povidone-iodine has been researched along with Conjunctivitis--Viral* in 18 studies
3 review(s) available for povidone-iodine and Conjunctivitis--Viral
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy of povidone-iodine-containing therapies for treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine | 2023 |
Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis.
Viruses cause about 80% of all cases of acute conjunctivitis. Human adenoviruses are believed to account for 65% to 90% of cases of viral conjunctivitis, or 20% to 75% of all causes of infectious keratoconjunctivitis worldwide. Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) is a highly contagious subset of adenoviral conjunctivitis that has been associated with large outbreaks at military installations and at medical facilities. It is accompanied by severe conjunctival inflammation, watery discharge, and light sensitivity, and can lead to chronic complications such as corneal and conjunctival scarring with discomfort and poor quality of vision. Due to a lack of consensus on the efficacy of any pharmacotherapy to alter the clinical course of EKC, no standard of care exists, therefore many clinicians offer only supportive care.. To assess the efficacy and safety of topical pharmacological therapies versus placebo, an active control, or no treatment for adults with EKC.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), with no restrictions on language or year of publication. The date of the last search was 27 April 2021.. We included randomized controlled trials in which antiseptic agents, virustatic agents, or topical immune-modulating therapy was compared with placebo, an active control, or no treatment.. We used standard Cochrane methodology.. We identified 10 studies conducted in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa with a total of 892 participants who were treated for 7 days to 6 months and followed for 7 days up to 1.5 years. Study characteristics and risk of bias In most studies participants were predominantly men (range: 44% to 90%), with an age range from 9 to 82 years. Three studies reported information on trial registration, but we found no published study protocol. The majority of trials had small sample sizes, ranging from 18 to 90 participants enrolled per study; the only exception was a trial that enrolled 350 participants. We judged most studies to be at high or unclear risk of bias across risk of bias domains. Findings We included 10 studies of 892 EKC participants and estimated combined intervention effects in analyses stratified by steroid-containing control treatment or artificial tears. Six trials contributed to the comparisons of topical interventions (povidone-iodine [PVP-I], trifluridine, ganciclovir, dexamethasone plus neomycin) with artificial tears (or saline). Very low certainty evidence from two trials comparing trifluridine or ganciclovir with artificial tears showed inconsistent effects on shortening the mean duration of cardinal symptoms or signs of EKC. Low certainty evidence based on two studies (409 participants) indicated that participants treated with PVP-I alone more often experienced resolution of symptoms (risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.24) and signs (RR 3.19, 95% CI 2.29 to 4.45) during the first week of treatment compared with those treated with artificial tears. Very low certainty evidence from two studies (77 participants) suggested that PVP-I or ganciclovir prevented the development of subepithelial infiltrates (SEI) when compared with artificial tears within 30 days of treatment (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.56). Four studies compared topical interventions (tacrolimus, cyclosporin A [CsA], trifluridine, PVP-I + dexamethasone) with topical steroids, and one trial compared fluorometholone (FML) plus polyvinyl alcohol iodine (PVA-I) with FML plus levofloxacin. Evidence from one trial showed that more eyes receiving PVP-I 1.0% plus dexamethasone 0.1% had symptoms resolved by day seven compared with those receiving dexamethasone alone (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.23 to 66.05; 52 eyes). In two trials, fewer eyes treated with PVP-I or PVA-I plus steroid developed SEI within 15 days of treatment compared with steroid alone or steroi. The evidence for the seven specified outcomes was of low or very low certainty due to imprecision and high risk of bias. The evidence that antiviral agents shorten the duration of symptoms or signs when compared with artificial tears was inconclusive. Low certainty evidence suggests that PVP-I alone resolves signs and symptoms by seven days relative to artificial tears. PVP-I or PVA-I, alone or with steroid, is associated with lower risks of SEI development than artificial tears or steroid (very low certainty evidence). The currently available evidence is insufficient to determine whether any of the evaluated interventions confers an advantage over steroids or artificial tears with respect to virus eradication or its spread to initially uninvolved fellow eyes. Future updates of this review should provide evidence of high-level certainty from trials with larger sample sizes, enrollment of participants with similar durations of signs and symptoms, and validated methods to assess short- and long-term outcomes. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Conjunctivitis; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Cyclosporine; Dexamethasone; Female; Fluorometholone; Ganciclovir; Humans; Keratoconjunctivitis; Levofloxacin; Lubricant Eye Drops; Male; Middle Aged; Povidone-Iodine; Tacrolimus; Trifluridine; Young Adult | 2022 |
Povidone-iodine liposomes--an overview.
In recent years, liposomes have been increasingly explored as novel drug delivery systems, and several liposome-based drug products have been approved in Europe, the USA and Japan. Depending on size, composition and surface characteristics, liposomes interact specifically with biological structures. Liposomal drug products provide a topical activity at the desired locus of action and are deemed more effective and less toxic than conventional drug formulations. The combination of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) and liposomes unites the exceptional microbicidal activity of the antiseptic substance with the excellent tolerability and lack of immunogenicity of liposomes; in addition, liposomes provide a moist molecular film for the wound environment. The multilamellar vesicles act as microreservoirs hence prolonging the release of the active ingredient. Although no commercial product for repeated application on the eye is currently available, PVP-I has been used in ophthalmology not only for pre- and postoperative antisepsis, but also for the treatment of bacterial and viral conjunctivitis and for prophylaxis against ophthalmia neonatorum. For these indications, liposomal formulations with 2.5 and 5.0% PVP-I were developed. These eye drops are isotonic with tear fluid at pH 6. First in vitro tests demonstrated an excellent antimicrobial efficacy, and a placebo-controlled clinical study on volunteers showed a very good local tolerability. A study on rabbits demonstrated positive results of the PVP-I liposome eye drops compared to placebo and the broadspectrum antibiotic Polyspectran in a standardized model of Staphylococcus aureus deep eye infection. The other aim is a well-tolerated liposomal PVP-I hydrogel for improved antiseptic wound treatment with moisturizer. It has been reported that liposomes are enriched at the wound bottom for direct action against infection and support of wound healing. An animal study on the efficacy and tolerability of different formulations of a hydrogel with PVP-I liposomes in deep dermal burn wounds has indicated an outstanding quality of wound healing with smooth granulation tissue, less inflammation, less wound contraction and no hyperkeratotic reactivity, especially with the 3% PVP-I liposome formulation. Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Burns; Clinical Trials as Topic; Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Approval; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Europe; Eye Infections, Bacterial; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Iodophors; Japan; Liposomes; Ophthalmia Neonatorum; Ophthalmic Solutions; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; Placebos; Povidone-Iodine; Rabbits; Skin; Staphylococcal Infections; United States; Wound Healing; Wound Infection | 1997 |
4 trial(s) available for povidone-iodine and Conjunctivitis--Viral
Article | Year |
---|---|
Success of Masking 5% Povidone-Iodine Treatment: The Reducing Adenoviral Patient Infected Days Study.
The effectiveness of masking is rarely evaluated or reported in single- or double-masked clinical trials. Knowledge of treatment assignment by participants and clinicians can bias the assessment of treatment efficacy.. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of masking in a double-masked trial of 5% povidone-iodine for the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis.. The Reducing Adenoviral Patient Infected Days study is a double-masked, randomized trial comparing a one-time, in-office administration of 5% povidone-iodine with artificial tears for the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis. Masking was assessed by asking participants and masked clinicians at designated time points if they believed the treatment administered was povidone-iodine or artificial tears, or if they were unsure. Adequacy of masking was quantified using a modified Bang Blinding Index.. Immediately after treatment, 34% of participants who received povidone-iodine and 69% of those who received artificial tears guessed incorrectly or were unsure of their treatment (modified Bang Indices of 0.31 and -0.38, respectively). On day 4, 38% of the povidone-iodine participants and 52% of the artificial tear participants guessed incorrectly or were unsure of their treatment (modified Bang Indices of 0.24 and -0.05, respectively), indicating adequate and ideal masking. On days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 21, masked clinicians guessed incorrectly or were unsure of treatment in 53%, 50%, 40%, 39%, and 42% among povidone-iodine participants compared with 44%, 35%, 38%, 35%, and 39% among artificial tears participants, respectively. The modified Bang Indices for clinician masking in the povidone-iodine group ranged from -0.05 to 0.25 and from 0.13 to 0.29 in the artificial tears group.. Masking of participants and clinicians was adequate. Successful masking increases confidence that subjective measurements are not biased. We recommend quantitative assessment and reporting the effectiveness of masking in ophthalmic clinical trials. Topics: Adenovirus Infections, Human; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Double-Blind Method; Eye Infections, Viral; Female; Humans; Lubricant Eye Drops; Male; Ophthalmic Solutions; Pilot Projects; Povidone-Iodine; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2021 |
Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial of Povidone-Iodine/Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Suspension for Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis.
To evaluate the efficacy/safety of an ophthalmic suspension of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) 0.6% and dexamethasone 0.1% in patients with acute adenoviral conjunctivitis.. Multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-masked trial.. Adults with a positive Rapid Pathogen Screening Adeno-Detector Plus test were randomized 1:1:1 to PVP-I 0.6%/dexamethasone 0.1%, PVP-I 0.6%, or vehicle, bilaterally 4 times daily for 5 days (days 1-5). Patients were evaluated on days 3, 6, and 12 (+1-day window). Efficacy measures included clinical resolution and adenoviral eradication.. Overall, 144 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (PVP-I/dexamethasone, n = 48; PVP-I, n = 50; vehicle, n = 46). The proportion of patients with clinical resolution (primary study eye with last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at the day 6 visit was higher with PVP-I/dexamethasone (31.3%) than with vehicle (10.9%; P = .0158) and PVP-I (18.0%; P = nonsignificant). The proportion with adenoviral eradication (primary study eye with LOCF) was higher with PVP-I/dexamethasone than with vehicle at the day 3 (35.4% vs 8.7%; P = .0019) and day 6 (79.2% vs 56.5%; P = .0186) visits and vs PVP-I (day 3 visit, 32.0%; day 6 visit, 62.0%; each P = nonsignificant). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 69.0% (vehicle), 62.7% (PVP-I), and 53.4% (PVP-I/dexamethasone) of patients in the safety dataset. Discontinuation owing to AEs occurred in 37 patients (vehicle, n = 16; PVP-I, n = 12; PVP-I/dexamethasone, n = 9).. PVP-I/dexamethasone appeared safe and well tolerated, and significantly improved clinical resolution and adenoviral eradication in patients with acute adenoviral conjunctivitis. Topics: Acute Disease; Adenovirus Infections, Human; Adenoviruses, Human; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ophthalmic Solutions; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome | 2018 |
A combination povidone-iodine 0.4%/dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis.
The objective of this pilot study was to determine the preliminary efficacy of a novel ophthalmic suspension containing povidone-iodine 0.4% and dexamethasone 0.1% in the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis.. A prospective, open-label, single-armed, phase II clinical trial in humans. Eligible patients with the clinical signs and symptoms of acute conjunctivitis who tested positive for adenoviral antigen by Rapid Pathogen Screening (RPS) Adeno Detector were enrolled in a single treatment arm consisting of a combination povidone-iodine 0.4%/dexamethasone 0.1% sterile ophthalmic suspension given four times daily for a minimum of 5 days. RPS Adeno Detector testing was performed at baseline and at each follow-up visit along with ocular fluid sampling by conjunctival swabs. Subsequent analysis performed on all swabs included both adenoviral titer by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and cell culture with confirmatory immunofluorescence (CC-IFA). The primary endpoint was clinical resolution of conjunctival injection and discharge. Secondary measures included reduction of qPCR titers and eradication of infectious virus as determined by CC-IFA.. A total of nine eyes of six patients with clinical signs and symptoms of acute viral conjunctivitis and a positive RPS Adeno Detector test result were enrolled in the study. In eight/nine eyes enrolled in the study, clinical resolution was observed by day 3 or day 4. In six/six eyes with detectable adenovirus by qPCR, significant reduction in viral titer was seen by day 3, day 4, or day 5. In five/six eyes with infectious virus confirmed by CC-IFA at enrollment, elimination of infectivity was achieved by day 4 or day 5. One patient was lost to followup.. An ophthalmic suspension containing povidone-iodine 0.4% and dexamethasone 0.1% may be a useful agent in the treatment of acute RPS Adeno Detector-positive conjunctivitis. A further placebo-controlled study with a larger number of patients is warranted. Topics: Acute Disease; Adenovirus Infections, Human; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Humans; Ophthalmic Solutions; Pilot Projects; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome | 2009 |
A controlled trial of povidone-iodine to treat infectious conjunctivitis in children.
To report the efficacy of povidone-iodine as a treatment for conjunctivitis in pediatric patients.. Double-masked, controlled, prospective clinical trial.. In an ophthalmology clinic in a general hospital in Manila, Philippines, 459 children (mean [SD] age 6.6 [6.6] years; range, 7 months-21 years) with acute conjunctivitis were studied. Infected eyes were cultured for bacteria and underwent immunofluorescent testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. Viral conjunctivitis was diagnosed if bacterial cultures were negative and diagnostic criteria were met. Subjects were alternated to receive povidone-iodine 1.25% or neomycin-polymyxin-B-gramicidin ophthalmic solution, one drop 4 times daily in the affected eye. Ocular inflammation was evaluated daily by the family or patient and weekly by an ophthalmologist. The main outcome measures were days until cured and proportion cured after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment.. Despite adequate statistical power (power >80% for a 1-day difference and P <.05), there was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding the number of days to cure or proportion cured at 1 or 2 weeks whether caused by bacteria or virus (P =.133-.824 for the four comparisons). After 1 week of treatment, povidone-iodine cured marginally more chlamydial infections than the antibiotic (P =.057). By 2 weeks, fewer chlamydial infections were cured than those of viral or bacterial etiology (P =.0001). The younger the patient, the faster their conjunctivitis resolved (R = 0.13, P =.013).. Povidone-iodine 1.25% ophthalmic solution was as effective as neomycin-polymyxin B-gramicidin for treating bacterial conjunctivitis, somewhat more effective against chlamydia, and as ineffective against viral conjunctivitis. Povidone-iodine ophthalmic solution should be strongly considered as treatment for bacterial and chlamydial conjunctivitis, especially in developing countries where topical antibiotics are often unavailable or costly. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bacteria; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctiva; Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gramicidin; Humans; Infant; Male; Neomycin; Ophthalmic Solutions; Polymyxin B; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Viruses | 2002 |
11 other study(ies) available for povidone-iodine and Conjunctivitis--Viral
Article | Year |
---|---|
Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of ophthalmologists about adenoviral conjunctivitis transmission and treatment : An online survey for Turkish ophthalmologists.
To determine the prevalence of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Turkish ophthalmologists, to provide an overview of the treatment and prophylaxis of adenoviral conjunctivitis, and to analyze the data in the context of evidence-based treatment recommendations.. An online questionnaire consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions about the characteristics of the respondents, the individual adenoviral conjunctivitis history of the ophthalmologists, their practice's approaches, and prescription preferences were emailed to Turkish ophthalmologists.. The survey was emailed to 500 ophthalmologists; 45% of them returned the questionnaire. According to the responses, the history of adenoviral conjunctivitis infections was positive in 46.7% (n: 120), recurrent attack prevalence was 16.2% in ophthalmologists. Lubricants (67.6%) are the most preferred first-line treatment options for adenoviral conjunctivitis, followed by povidone-iodine (59.6%), topical antibiotics (51.1%), topical antivirals (29.3%), topical corticosteroids (26.7%), and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (19.6%). A total of 98.2% preferred to dismiss infected patients. The preferred prophylaxis options were frequent hand washing/use of gloves (97.8%), disinfection of medical devices (95.1%), isolation of infected patients (79.1%), hand hygiene with gemicides (58.7%). The percentage of single-dose eye drop selection was 46.2.. The findings of this survey showed that most Turkish ophthalmologists generally follow international guidelines for the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis. The treatment algorithm is still controversial, so ophthalmologists should be aware of treatment guideline updates in line with evidence-based recommendations. Having sufficient knowledge of the basic characteristics of viruses is important to control the spread of the disease. Topics: Adenoviridae Infections; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antiviral Agents; Conjunctivitis; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Lubricants; Ophthalmic Solutions; Ophthalmologists; Povidone-Iodine; Surveys and Questionnaires | 2022 |
Comment on: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Povidone-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Suspension for Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis.
Topics: Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies | 2020 |
Reply to Comment on: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Povidone-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Suspension for Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis.
Topics: Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies | 2020 |
Iodine povidone. A new paradigm in the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis?
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Humans; Povidone-Iodine | 2019 |
Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial of Povidone-Iodine/Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Suspension for Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Humans; Povidone-Iodine | 2019 |
Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial of Povidone-Iodine/Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Humans; Povidone-Iodine | 2019 |
Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial of Povidone-Iodine/Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Suspension for Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Dexamethasone; Humans; Povidone-Iodine | 2019 |
The effects of povidone iodine (pH 4.2) on patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis.
To compare the efficacy of classical treatment and povidone-iodine treatment for adenoviral conjunctivitis.. This retrospective study was conducted at the Centre of Marmara Eye Health, Sakarya, Turkey, between January 2011 and February 2014, and comprised adult patients suffering from adenoviral conjunctivitis. The participants were randomly divided into two groups. Group I was given povidone-iodine solution while Group II was given the classical treatment and was taken as control. Povidone-iodine treatment was administered as three drops three times per day. The classical treatment comprised three drops of trifluorothymidine three times per day. Treatment were continued for two weeks. The patients who had not recovered in this time frame were defined as 'late recovering' patients. SPSS 23 was used for data analysis.. Of the 112 participants, there were 56(50%) in each group. In Group I, 54(96.4%) patients recovered in two weeks, while 2(3.6%) took more time. In Group II, 33(58.9%) patients recovered in two weeks while 23(41.1%) took more time (p<0.001). Overall, 92(82.1%) patients had familial transmission-contamination.. A new treatment protocol of povidone-iodine was used safely in patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Familial transmission was found very important to adenoviral conjunctivitis infection. Topics: Adenovirus Infections, Human; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antiviral Agents; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Trifluridine | 2016 |
Povidone iodine in the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis in infants.
Adenoviral conjunctivitis.. To examine the effects of conjunctival irrigation with povidone iodine in infants with adenoviral conjunctivitis.. An outbreak of adenovirus conjunctivitis occurred between September and December 2012 at the neonatal intensive care unit of our hospital. Forty-three infants with adenoviral conjunctivitis were examined in this study. Thirty-five eyes of 35 infants who had detailed ophthalmological examination and clinical scoring were included. The conjunctiva of 15 infants (Group 1) were irrigated with povidone iodine 2.5% solution and then treated with preservative-free artificial tears and preservative-free antibiotic drops. Twenty infants (Group 2) were treated only with the same drops with the same posology, without conjunctival irrigation with povidone iodine. Patients were examined two times a week until the complete recovery. Lid edema, conjunctival chemosis, fragility of conjunctival vasculature, pseudomembrane formation, and corneal involvement were scored clinically.. Twenty patients (57%) were female and 15 patients (43%) were male and mean age was 3.1 months (ranged from 1 to 4 months). No relation was found between gender and clinical scores. Statistically significant lower clinical scores were obtained from Group 1. The median recovery time was earlier in Group 1 (7 d) than Group 2 (12 d) (p = 0.001).. Conjunctival irrigation with 2.5% povidone iodine is effective in the treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis in infants. Topics: Adenoviridae Infections; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Female; Humans; Infant; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Male; Povidone-Iodine | 2015 |
Clinical and antiviral efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of dexamethasone povidone-iodine in a rabbit model of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis.
To determine the efficacy of a new formulation of topical dexamethasone 0.1%/povidone-iodine 0.4% (FST-100) in reducing clinical symptoms and infectious viral titers in a rabbit model of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis.. Rabbit corneas were inoculated bilaterally with 2×10(6) plaque-forming-units (PFU) of adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) after corneal scarification. Animals were randomized 1:1:1:1 (five rabbits per group) to FST-100, 0.5% cidofovir, tobramycin/dexamethasone (Tobradex; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) ophthalmic suspension, and balanced salt solution (BSS; Alcon Laboratories). Treatment began 12 hours after viral inoculation and continued for 7 consecutive days. The eyes were clinically scored daily for scleral inflammation (injection), ocular neovascularization, eyelid inflammation (redness), friability of vasculature, inflammatory discharge (pus), and epiphora (excessive tearing). Eye swabs were collected daily before treatment for the duration of the study. Virus was eluted from the swabs and PFU determined by titration on human A549 cells, according to standard procedures.. The FST-100 treatment resulted in significantly lower clinical scores (P<0.05) than did the other treatments. The 0.5% cidofovir exhibited the most ocular toxicity compared with FST-100, tobramycin/dexamethasone, and balanced salt solution treatments. FST-100 and 0.5% cidofovir significantly (P<0.05) reduced viral titers compared with tobramycin/dexamethasone or balanced salt solution.. FST-100 was the most efficacious in minimizing the clinical symptoms of adenovirus infection in rabbit eyes. FST-100 and 0.5% cidofovir were both equally effective in reducing viral titers and decreasing the duration of viral shedding. By providing symptomatic relief in addition to reducing infectious virus titers, FST-100 should be a valuable addition to treatment of epidemic adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. Topics: Adenoviridae; Adenoviridae Infections; Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cidofovir; Conjunctiva; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Cytosine; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ophthalmic Solutions; Organophosphonates; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Povidone-Iodine; Rabbits; Tobramycin; Treatment Outcome; Viral Plaque Assay | 2011 |
[Povidone-iodine for treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis: an in vitro study].
Adenoviral conjunctivitis causes high socioeconomic costs due to high contagiousness and therefore the need for extended quarantine. To date the only potentially active, topical antiviral agent is povidone-iodine (PVI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of diluted PVI on free adenovirus and adenoviral infected cells as well as to evaluate the cellular toxicity of PVI on non-infected cells.. PVI was diluted to a final concentration of 0.0008 %. Virucidal activity was measured IN VITRO using adenovirus 8 and A549 human epithelial cell cultures. Cytotoxicity effects on healthy cells after short- and long-term exposure to diluted PVI were measured in A549 cell cultures.. Exposure to PVI at a concentration of 1:10 (0.8 %) completely extinguishes infectivity of free adenovirus after an exposure time of 10 minutes. PVI is less effective against intracellular adenovirus resulting in a decreased infectivity and viral activity for approximately one day with a narrow spectrum between toxicity and virucidal activity. Healthy epithelial cells can be exposed to PVI for up to 6 hours without a cytotoxic effect.. PVI is highly effective against free adenovirus but less effective against intracellular adenoviral particles in already infected cell. Short- and long-term exposure of PVI causes little cytotoxicity for healthy cells. Therefore, administration of diluted PVI at a concentration of 1:10 is a potential option to reduce contagiousness in cases of adenoviral infections. Topics: Adenoviridae; Adenoviridae Infections; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cell Line; Cell Survival; Conjunctivitis, Viral; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Treatment Outcome | 2006 |