ponesimod and Multiple-Sclerosis

To describe the safety, efficacy, and potential role in therapy of ponesimod, which was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a therapeutic option for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS).. A PubMed literature search using the following terms: ponesimod and MS (January 1, 2012-October 31, 2022). FDA product labeling was also reviewed for pertinent data sources.. All relevant English-language articles examining efficacy and/or safety of ponesimod were considered for inclusion.. Ponesimod is an orally administered second-generation sphingosine 1-phospate (S1-P) receptor modulator classified as a disease modifying treatment (DMT) for MS. Clinical studies have shown that ponesimod prevents relapse in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and has superior efficacy compared with teriflunomide. Nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, headache, high blood pressure, and liver dysfunction were some of the common adverse effects associated with ponesimod. Dyspnea, bradyarrhythmias, atrioventricular conduction delays, and macular edema were some of the rare but serious adverse effects associated with ponesimod.. Some advantages of ponesimod over other S1-P receptor modulators approved for RRMS include selectivity for the S1-P. Currently available data suggest that ponesimod is a useful addition to other high-efficacy DMTs available to treat patients with MS.

Topics: Humans; Immunologic Factors; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Sphingosine; Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors; Thiazoles

Ponesimod, a selective, rapidly reversible, and orally active, sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1P) modulator, is indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ponesimod was studied in 16 phase I, one phase II, and one phase III clinical studies. Ponesimod population PK was characterized by an open two-compartment disposition model with a terminal half-life of 33 h (accumulation factor of 2- to 2.6-fold), and fast and almost complete oral absorption (absolute oral bioavailability: 84%), reaching peak plasma and blood concentrations within 2-4 h. Ponesimod is highly metabolized, and the parent compound along with its two major (non-clinically active) metabolites are mainly excreted in the feces (recovery: 57.3-79.6%) and to a lesser extent in the urine (recovery: 10.3-18.4%). Additionally, the population PKPD model characterized the ponesimod effects on heart rate: a transient, dose-dependent decrease in heart rate in the first days of dosing, that is mitigated by administering the first doses of ponesimod treatment using a gradual up-titration schedule, before reaching the daily maintenance dose of 20 mg. This selected maintenance dose has been shown to be superior in reducing annualized relapse rate (ARR) when compared with teriflunomide in a pivotal phase III study. Furthermore, a dose-dependent reduction of peripheral lymphocyte counts that is sustained with continued daily oral dosing of ponesimod and is rapidly (4-7 days) reversible upon drug discontinuation has been characterized with an indirect response model.

Topics: Humans; Immunologic Factors; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors; Thiazoles

Ponesimod (ACT-128800) is a directly bioavailable, rapidly reversible sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator, highly selective for the subtype 1 (S1P₁ receptor). It acts by blocking the egress of lymphocytes from the lymphoid organs, thus limiting the entry of autoreactive cells into the central nervous system. Unlike fingolimod, ponesimod does not require monitoring of the first dose, thanks to a 14-day uptitration regimen, which markedly reduces the incidence of cardiodynamic effects related to the initiation of therapy. Results from the OPTIMUM phase III trial demonstrated the superiority of ponesimod over teriflunomide on disease activity markers, without unexpected safety concerns. Furthermore, the drug is eliminated within 1 week of discontinuation, allowing for the reversibility of its effects. Ponesimod was recently approved in both the U.S. and E.U. for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. This review summarizes the pharmacological characteristics of ponesimod and the main studies that led to its approval.

Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; Recurrence; Thiazoles

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signalling pathways have important and diverse functions. S1P receptors (S1PRs) have been proposed as a therapeutic target for various diseases due to their involvement in regulation of lymphocyte trafficking, brain and cardiac function, vascular permeability, and vascular and bronchial tone. S1PR modulators were first developed to prevent rejection by the immune system following renal transplantation, but the only currently approved indication is multiple sclerosis. The primary mechanism of action of S1PR modulators in multiple sclerosis is through binding S1PR subtype 1 on lymphocytes resulting in internalisation of the receptor and loss of responsiveness to the S1P gradient that drives lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. The reduction in circulating lymphocytes presumably limits inflammatory cell migration into the CNS. Four S1PR modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod) have regulatory approval for multiple sclerosis. Preclinical evidence and ongoing and completed clinical trials support development of S1PR modulators for other therapeutic indications.

Topics: Animals; Azetidines; Benzyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Humans; Immune System Diseases; Indans; Multiple Sclerosis; Nervous System Diseases; Oxadiazoles; Signal Transduction; Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulators; Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors; Thiazoles

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system in young adults. This disorder is a heterogeneous, multifactorial, immune-mediated disease that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. In most patients, reversible episodes of neurological dysfunction lasting several days or weeks characterize the initial stages of the disease (that is, clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS). Over time, irreversible clinical and cognitive deficits develop. A minority of patients have a progressive disease course from the onset. The pathological hallmark of MS is the formation of demyelinating lesions in the brain and spinal cord, which can be associated with neuro-axonal damage. Focal lesions are thought to be caused by the infiltration of immune cells, including T cells, B cells and myeloid cells, into the central nervous system parenchyma, with associated injury. MS is associated with a substantial burden on society owing to the high cost of the available treatments and poorer employment prospects and job retention for patients and their caregivers.

Topics: Azetidines; Benzyl Compounds; Demyelinating Diseases; Humans; Indans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Sclerosis; Oxadiazoles; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators possess a unique mechanism of action in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Subtype 1 of the S1PR is expressed on the surface of lymphocytes and is important in regulating egression from lymph nodes. The S1PR modulators indirectly antagonize the receptor's function leading to sequestration of lymphocytes in the lymph nodes. Fingolimod was the first S1PR modulator to receive regulatory approval for relapsing-remitting MS after 2 phase III trials demonstrated potent efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Fingolimod can cause undesirable effects as a result of its interaction with other S1PR subtypes, which are expressed in diverse tissues, including cardiac myocytes. As such, agents that more selectively target subtype 1 of the S1PR are of interest and are at various stages of development. These include ponesimod (ACT128800), siponimod (BAF312), ozanimod (RPC1063), ceralifimod (ONO-4641), GSK2018682, and MT-1303. Data from phase II trials and early results from phase III studies have been promising and will be presented in this review. Of special interest are results from the EXPAND study of siponimod, which suggest a potential role for S1PR modulators in secondary progressive MS.

Topics: Animals; Azetidines; Benzyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Indans; Indoles; Multiple Sclerosis; Naphthalenes; Oxadiazoles; Propanolamines; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Diroximel fumarate (DRF), ponesimod (PON), and teriflunomide (TERI) are oral disease-modifying therapies approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. No randomized trials have compared DRF versus PON or TERI.. The objectives of this analysis were to compare DRF versus PON and DRF versus TERI for clinical and radiological outcomes.. We used individual patient data from EVOLVE-MS-1, a 2-year, open-label, single-arm, phase III trial of DRF (n = 1057), and aggregated data from OPTIMUM, a 2-year, double-blind, phase III trial comparing PON (n = 567) and TERI (n = 566). To account for cross-trial differences, EVOLVE-MS-1 data were weighted to match OPTIMUM's average baseline characteristics using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison. We examined the outcomes of annualized relapse rate (ARR), 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), 24-week CDP, absence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions, and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions.. After weighting, we did not observe strong evidence of differences between DRF and PON for ARR [DRF versus PON incidence rate difference (IRD) -0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08, 0.04; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.92; 95% CI 0.61, 1.2], 12-week CDP [risk difference (RD) -2.5%; 95% CI -6.3, 1.2; risk ratio (RR) 0.76; 95% CI 0.38, 1.1], 24-week CDP (RD -2.7%; 95% CI -6.0, 0.63; RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.28, 1.0), and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions (RD -2.5%; 95% CI -13, 7.4; RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.70, 1.2). However, a higher proportion of DRF-treated patients were free of Gd+ T1 lesions than PON-treated patients (RD 11%; 95% CI 6.0, 16; RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.06, 1.2). Compared with TERI, DRF showed improved ARR (IRD -0.08; 95% CI -0.15, -0.01; IRR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50, 0.94), 12-week CDP (RD -4.2%; 95% CI -7.9, -0.48; RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.38, 0.90), 24-week CDP (RD -4.3%; 95% CI -7.7, -1.1; RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26, 0.81), and absence of Gd+ T1 lesions (RD 25%; 95% CI 19, 30; RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3, 1.5). However, DRF and TERI did not appear to differ significantly with respect to absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions when based on comparisons using the overall EVOLVE-MS-1 sample (RD 8.5%; 95% CI -0.93, 18; RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.94, 1.6), or in a sensitivity analysis restricted to newly enrolled EVOLVE-MS-1 patients (RD 2.7%; 95% CI -9.1, 14; RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.68, 1.5).. We did not observe differences between DRF and PON for ARR, CDP, and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, but there was a higher proportion of patients free of Gd+ T1 lesions among DRF-treated patients than PON-treated patients. DRF had improved efficacy versus TERI for all clinical and radiological outcomes, except for absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions.. EVOLVE-MS-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634307); OPTIMUM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02425644).

Topics: Dimethyl Fumarate; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Recurrence

To evaluate the dose-response relationship of 10, 20, and 40 mg ponesimod and long-term efficacy and safety of ponesimod 20 mg using an analysis of combined data from the phase 2 Core and Extension studies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).. In the Core study, 464 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1): placebo (n = 121), 10 mg (n = 108), 20 mg (n = 116), or 40 mg ponesimod (n = 119) once daily for 24 weeks. Patients who completed the Core study transitioned into the Extension study, which had treatment period 1 (TP1; up to 96 weeks) and TP2 and TP3 (up to 432 weeks). The 40 mg dose was discontinued due to low tolerability at the end of TP1, and the 10 mg dose was subsequently discontinued due to lower benefit-risk profile vs 20 mg at the end of TP2. All patients received 10 or 20 mg during TP2, followed by 20 mg in TP3. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), time to first confirmed relapse, MRI outcomes, and safety were evaluated.. A total of 435 patients received ≥1 dose of ponesimod (first randomized dose: 10 mg = 139, 20 mg = 145, and 40 mg = 151) at any time during the Core and/or the Extension study. As of March 31, 2019, 214 patients were still on ponesimod treatment. The median (range) of ponesimod exposure was 7.95 (0-9.36) years. Ponesimod 20 mg, from Core up to the end of TP3, was associated with sustained low clinical activity (ARR for confirmed relapses: 0.154; at week 432, Kaplan-Meier estimate for confirmed relapse was 43.9%, and 6-month CDA was 20.4%) and MRI disease activity, and over 64% of patients remained free of a confirmed relapse. Most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (30%), headache (24%), and upper respiratory tract infection (21%).. The effects on multiple sclerosis disease control were maintained with ponesimod 20 mg for approximately 8 years with no new safety concerns identified.. This study provides Class IV evidence that in individuals with RRMS, long-term treatment with ponesimod 20 mg was associated with a sustained low annualized confirmed relapse rate (0.154 at week 432), with 64% of patients remaining relapse-free.. EudraCT Number 2008-006786-92 (Core study) and EudraCT Number 2009-011470-15 (Extension study).

Topics: Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of ponesimod and teriflunomide for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) was compared in a randomized phase III trial. This study explores the exposure-response (E-R) relationships of efficacy end points (annualized relapse rate [ARR] and combined unique active lesions [CUALs]) of ponesimod observed in this trial. The E-R relationships were described using nonlinear mixed effects models for count data. The effect of baseline covariates (demography and prognostic factors) was also explored. Ponesimod 20 mg reduced ARR (primary end point) by 30.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8% to 46.4%) and the number of CUALs by 56% (95% CI: 46% to 64%) between baseline and week 108 compared to teriflunomide 14 mg. The E-R analyses indicated a significant relationship between ARR and CUAL. In turn, CUAL was significantly related to ponesimod systemic exposure. Based on these relationships, the predicted reduction of ARR was relatively flat in the range of ponesimod systemic exposure achieved with the 20 mg clinical dose: the expected ARR decrease ranged from 28% (95% CI: 11% to 42%) at the 5th percentile of ponesimod exposure to 34% (95% CI: 19% to 47%) at the 95th percentile. No significant baseline covariates affected the ponesimod effects and, consequently, dosage adjustments are not warranted by these analyses. Although significant relationships were found between ARR and CUAL and between ponesimod exposure and CUAL, these analyses were supportive of the use of a flat 20 mg maintenance dose for ponesimod in adult patients with MS.

Topics: Adult; Crotonates; Humans; Hydroxybutyrates; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Nitriles; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Toluidines; Treatment Outcome

Ponesimod is a sphingosphine-1-phosphate receptor modulator being developed for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. The effects of disease-modifying treatments on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in relapsing multiple sclerosis accurately predict effects on clinical relapses, therefore MRI lesion counts are generally accepted efficacy endpoints in phase II clinical studies of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatments. Here, we characterize the effect of ponesimod systemic exposure on the cumulative number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions and the annualized relapse rate in a phase IIb study.. This study assessed the cumulative number of new Gd+ lesions on T1-weighted MRI scans (primary endpoint) at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 and the annualized relapse rate (secondary endpoint). The effect of the demographic and prognostic covariates of sex, age, weight, T1 Gd+ lesions at baseline, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score at baseline were explored. Analyses were performed using NONMEM, Version 7.3.0 (ICON plc).. An increase in ponesimod exposure led to a statistically significant decrease in the cumulative T1 Gd+ lesions on MRI from week 12 to 24 of treatment. Increasing the ponesimod daily dose beyond 20 mg did not provide significant additional  benefits. Sex, age, T1 Gd+ lesions at baseline, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score at baseline were associated with a higher number of new cumulative T1 Gd+ from week 12 to 24 of treatment.. This analysis shows a relationship between ponesimod exposure and the cumulative number of new T1 Gd+ lesions. Sex, age, T1 Gd+ lesions at baseline, and Expanded Disability Status Score at baseline were not found to be importantly associated with the magnitude of ponesimod effect, and consequently, there is no indication from these analyses that dosage adjustments based on the explored covariates are warranted.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006265, registration date 1 November, 2009.

Topics: Humans; Infant; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to characterize the ponesimod effect on the heart rate (HR) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). A previous pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic model developed in healthy participants was updated using data from phase II and III trials conducted in patients with MS. Clinically relevant covariates were assessed. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the impact of the lack of adherence to ponesimod treatment and provide guidance in cases of treatment re-initiation. The maximal effect parameter of the PK/HR model was lower in patients with MS (23.5% decrease) compared with healthy volunteers (43.2%). The effect of patient covariates on PK/HR was similar to those identified in healthy participants and not clinically relevant in patients with MS. The population PK/HR model well characterized the effect of ponesimod on the time course of HR in patients with MS. After 2 weeks of treatment with 10 mg or higher doses, the model indicated full tolerance development. After repeated dosing at 20 mg, tolerance was maintained > 60% of the steady-state tolerance for up to 4 days after the last dose. Re-initiating with gradual uptitration is recommended if drug discontinuation lasts ≥ 4 days. This managed the negative chronotropic effects of ponesimod. No bradycardia events were observed within the first 2 weeks of treatment in patients with relapsing MS with a baseline HR > 55 bpm. This justifies the recommendation included in the human prescription drug labeling to monitor HR after the first ponesimod dose in these patients.

Topics: Heart Rate; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; Thiazoles

Ozanimod and ponesimod are sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Given that no head-to-head trials have assessed these two treatments, we performed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to compare efficacy and safety outcomes between ozanimod and ponesimod for MS.. A MAIC compared efficacy and safety of ozanimod and ponesimod at 2 years. Outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) and percentage change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) as well as rates of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (AEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and other safety outcomes. Individual patient-level data were obtained for ozanimod from the RADIANCE-B trial, while aggregate-level patient data were obtained for ponesimod from the OPTIMUM trial. The MAIC was not anchored owing to lack of a common comparator across the two trials. The following characteristics were matched between the trials' populations: age, sex, time since MS symptom onset, relapses in prior year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, disease-modifying therapies received in the prior 2 years, absence of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions, and percentage of patients from Eastern Europe.. After matching, key baseline characteristics were balanced between patients receiving ozanimod and ponesimod. Compared with ponesimod, ozanimod had a numerically lower ARR (rate ratio: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.57, 1.10]) and was associated with a significant reduction in BVL (% change difference: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.36]). Additionally, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of TEAEs (risk difference: -11.9% [95% CI: -16.8%, -7.0%]), AEs leading to discontinuation (-6.1% [95% CI: -8.9%, -3.4%]), and lymphocyte count <0.2 K/μL (-2.3% [95% CI: -4.2%, -0.5%]). There were no statistically significant differences in the other safety outcomes.. The MAIC results suggest that, compared with ponesimod, ozanimod is more effective in preserving brain volume, is comparable in terms of reducing relapse rates, and has a favorable safety profile.

Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Recurrence

Topics: Bronchoconstriction; Dyspnea; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Thiazoles

The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between ponesimod plasma concentrations and the temporal evolution of lymphocyte counts in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed using data from phase I, II, and III trials, and the impact of clinically relevant covariates on PK and PD parameters was assessed. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the maximal lymphocyte count reduction after ponesimod treatment, and the time required for total lymphocyte counts to return to normal values after treatment interruption.. The population PK/PD model well-characterized the PK of ponesimod and the time course of total lymphocyte counts in MS patients. Additionally, none of the evaluated covariates had a clinically relevant impact. This should be taken into consideration when assessing the risk of infection, administration of live-attenuated vaccines, and concomitant use of immunosuppressants.

Topics: Humans; Lymphocyte Count; Lymphocytes; Multiple Sclerosis; Thiazoles

Ponesimod (ACT-128800), a reversible, orally active, selective S1P1 receptor modulator, prevents the egress of lymphocytes from the lymph node into the systemic circulation. It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Modulation of circulating lymphocytes serves as biomarker of efficacy and safety, such that the quantitative characterization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship guides the clinical development of the compound. The availability of a variety of doses, dosing regimens, and treatment durations permitted estimation of the pharmacokinetics characterized by an absorption lag time followed by a sequential zero/first-order absorption and two compartments with first-order elimination. The PD are modeled as an indirect-effect model with rates of appearance and disappearance of lymphocytes in blood with a circadian rhythm and a drug effect on the rate of appearance. The model suggests a circadian variation of 9% and a maximum inhibition of 86% of total lymphocyte count with high doses at steady state. It was instrumental for the selection of doses for subsequent studies that confirmed the effect plateau in total lymphocyte count at approximately 0.5 × 10(9) counts/L.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Circadian Rhythm; Female; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Multiple Sclerosis; Population; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; Thiazoles; Young Adult