polidocanol has been researched along with Pancreatitis* in 3 studies
3 other study(ies) available for polidocanol and Pancreatitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
A prospective study on the safety and effectiveness of using lauromacrogol for ablation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with the aid of EUS.
With the development of imaging techniques, the detection rate of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) has increased. The surgical morbidity and mortality rates of PCNs are quite high. This study is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive treatment, EUS-guided PCN ablation with lauromacrogol.. From April 2015 to May 2016, 120 patients with PCNs were enrolled to undergo EUS. We prospectively studied 29 of the 120 patients who underwent EUS-guided ablation with lauromacrogol. The follow-up contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance image was conducted at 3 months and then 6 months after ablation. We determined the effectiveness of ablation by the changes in the volume of the cysts.. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, and 7 of them underwent a second ablation; therefore, there were 36 treatments. The mean tumor diameter was 28.6 ± 14.5 mm preoperation, whereas the diameter postoperation was 13.4 ± 10.5 mm. Mild pancreatitis occurred in 2 patients and moderate fever in 1; they occurred in the cysts located in the head/uncinate. Among the 29 treatments with complete follow-up of 9 months (range, 3-15), 11 had complete response and 9 had partial response. The resolution rate was 37.9% (11/29) with 36.4% (8/22) in the cysts of the head/uncinate and 42.9% (3/7) in the body/tail (P > .05).. EUS-guided PCN ablation with lauromacrogol is safe and efficient. Adverse event rates seem to be higher in the head/uncinate than in the body/tail, but their resolution rates are similar. Further studies involving larger populations and longer follow-ups are warranted. Topics: Ablation Techniques; Adult; Aged; Endosonography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Polidocanol; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Retreatment; Sclerosing Solutions; Tumor Burden | 2017 |
Gastrointestinal intramural hematoma, a complication of endoscopic injection methods for bleeding peptic ulcers: a case series.
In a prospective study, all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were documented between February 1984 and April 1992. A total of 227 patients were treated by local injection of epinephrine followed by laser application and injection of polidocanol or fibrin tissue adhesive. In five of these patients, intramural hematomas developing at the former bleeding site one to three days after endoscopic treatment were observed. The presenting symptoms were abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The diagnosis was established by endoscopy, abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, or laparotomy. In four of our five patients, the bleeding site and hematoma were located in the duodenum. All patients suffered from severe underlying diseases, and showed a clear disturbance of coagulation parameters. In three patients, acute pancreatitis occurred concurrently with the hematoma, probably due to obstruction of the papilla of Vater or compression of the pancreas caused by the hematoma. Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Duodenal Diseases; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Epinephrine; Female; Fibrin; Hematoma; Humans; Injections, Intralesional; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatitis; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Polidocanol; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Tissue Adhesives | 1994 |
Infected pancreatic necrosis possibly due to combined percutaneous aspiration, cystogastric pseudocyst drainage and injection of a sclerosant.
This paper reports on a patient who was treated by percutaneous aspiration, instillation of a sclerosant (polidocanol) and cystogastric drainage for a post-acute pancreatic pseudocyst. Five weeks after admission to hospital for the first episode of an acute necrotizing pancreatitis, the 60-year-old man underwent a percutaneous, ultrasound-guided puncture and aspiration of a voluminous pancreatic pseudocyst. Ten days later, recurrent fluid collection led to a second puncture, combined with the injection of polidocanol (15 ml; 1%) into the cyst cavity. Since this treatment failed, a percutaneous cystogastric drain ("double--pigtail") was inserted five days later. After developing acute abdominal pain and incipient sepsis, the patient was sent for surgical intervention twelve days after the second treatment with percutaneous aspiration and injection of polidocanol. During the operation an infected pancreatic pseudocyst with extensive contaminated necrosis of the pancreas and duodenal perforation was found. Necrectomy was performed, followed by continuous lavage of the omental bursa. Intensive care therapy was necessary for one week. Duodenal leakage persisted for nearly three weeks, the stopped spontaneously. The patient was discharged in quite a good state of health after 33 days of postoperative treatment. Although spontaneous development of infected pancreatic pseudocysts and pancreatic abscesses in necrotizing pancreatitis is known, a possible involvement of the drainage procedures, especially in combination with the injection of a sclerosant must be considered. Topics: Bacterial Infections; Drainage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Necrosis; Pancreas; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis; Polidocanol; Polyethylene Glycols; Sclerosing Solutions; Suction | 1991 |