pitolisant and Narcolepsy

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cataplexy; Child; Drug Inverse Agonism; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Pyrazoles

Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder characterized by a pentad of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, and disturbed nocturnal sleep. Treatment of narcolepsy remains challenging and current therapy is strictly symptomatically based.. The present manuscript is based on an extensive Internet and PubMed search from 1990 to 2020. It is focused on the clinical and pharmacological properties of pitolisant in the treatment of narcolepsy.. Currently there is no cure for narcolepsy. Although efforts have been made, current treatments do not always allow to obtain an optimal control of symptoms. Pitolisant is an antagonist/inverse agonist of the histamine H3 autoreceptor. Its mechanism of action is novel and distinctive compared to the other available therapies for narcolepsy. Clinical trials suggest that pitolisant administered at a dose of ≤36 mg/day is an effective treatment option for narcolepsy, reducing EDS and cataplexy. Pitolisant is available as oral tablets and offers a convenient once-daily regimen. Pitolisant is generally well tolerated and showed minimal abuse potential in animals and humans. Long-term studies comparing the effectiveness and tolerability of pitolisant with active drugs (e.g. modafinil, sodium oxybate) are needed.

Topics: Animals; Cataplexy; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Sleep; Sodium Oxybate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine Agonists; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Hypothalamus; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H3

Excessive daytime sleepiness is considered as the prominent symptom in narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Pitolisant is a novel selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist approved for improving excessive daytime sleepiness. The meta-analysis is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of pitolisant versus placebo for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from earliest date to November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were mean changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), mean sleep latency, European quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D), and risk ratio of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). We pooled 678 patients from four RCTs and found pitolisant significantly decreased ESS by mean difference (MD) of - 2.86 points (95% CI: -3.75 to -1.96), increased mean sleep latency by MD of 3.14 min (95% CI: 2.18-4.11), and increased EQ-5D by MD of 3.32 points (95% CI: 0.26-6.39) compared with placebo. The risk ratio of TEAE was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08-1.74). Insomnia was the only TEAE significantly associated with pitolisant treatment. In conclusion, pitolisant showed great efficacy and controllable security versus placebo for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA. Compared with narcolepsy, patients with OSA were deemed to benefit more from pitolisant especially in terms of improving mobility and quality of life of patients without continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Topics: Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Placebo Effect; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Narcolepsy is a rare, chronic, and disabling central nervous system hypersomnia; two forms can be recognized: narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). Its etiology is still largely unknown, but studies have reported a strong association between NT1 and HLA, as well as a pathogenic association with the deficiency of cerebrospinal hypocretin-1. Thus, the most reliable pathogenic hypothesis is an autoimmune process destroying hypothalamic hypocretin-producing cells. A definitive cure for narcolepsy is not available to date, and although the research in the field is highly promising, up to now, current treatments have aimed to reduce the symptoms by means of different pharmacological approaches. Moreover, overall narcolepsy symptoms management can also benefit from non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) and psychosocial interventions to improve the patients' quality of life in both adult and pediatric-affected individuals as well as the well-being of their families. In this review, we summarize the available therapeutic options for narcolepsy, including the pharmacological, behavioral, and psychosocial interventions.

Topics: Behavior Therapy; Carbamates; Counseling; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Phenylalanine; Piperidines; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents

Topics: Animals; Cataplexy; Drug Inverse Agonism; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H3

Topics: Animals; Cataplexy; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

Narcolepsy is the most common cause of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) following obstructive sleep apnea. Its treatment aims to reduce EDS and cataplexy, improve nighttime sleep disturbance, sleep paralysis and sleep-related hallucinations. Pitolisant (a histamine H3 receptor antagonist) and solriamfetol (a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) have recently been approved effective for narcolepsy in the United States and the European Union. Pitolisant has proved to be effective for both EDS and cataplexy. Besides being effective on EDS, solriamfetol seems to have advantages in abuse potential and withdrawal syndrome. As potential treatments for EDS and cataplexy associated with narcolepsy, several new drugs are being developed and tested. These new drugs include new hydroxybutyrate preparations (controlled release sodium hydroxybutyrate FT218, low sodium hydroxybutyrate JZP-258), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (AXS-12), and modafinil combined with astroglial junction protein inhibitor (THN102). This paper reviews the recently approved drugs and potential treatments for narcolepsy.

Topics: Carbamates; Cataplexy; Drug Development; Humans; Narcolepsy; Phenylalanine; Piperidines

Narcolepsy is a rare sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and rapid eye movement sleep dysregulation, manifesting as cataplexy and sleep paralysis, as well as hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations. Disease onset may occur at any age, although adolescents and young adults are mainly affected. Currently, the diagnosis delay ranges from 8 to 10 years and drug therapy may only attenuate symptoms. Pitolisant is a first-in-class new drug currently authorized by the European Medicines Agency to treat narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults and with an expanded evaluation for the treatment of neurologic diseases such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of pitolisant, highlighting its effectiveness and safety in patients with narcolepsy. We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We report on the efficacy and safety data of pitolisant in narcoleptic patients regarding cataplexy episodes and subjective and objective daytime sleepiness. The development program of pitolisant was characterized by eight Phase II/III studies. One proof-of-concept study followed by two pivotal studies, three randomized controlled trials, and two open studies were evaluated. Our review confirmed the effectiveness of pitolisant in treating major clinically relevant narcolepsy symptoms, including cataplexy, as compared to placebo. In addition, pitolisant revealed a safe profile when compared with placebo and active comparators. Headache, insomnia, and nausea were the prominent side effects. Further long-term randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of pitolisant with active comparators (ie, modafinil and sodium oxybate) may clarify its real place in therapy and its possible use as a first-line agent on the basis of its safety and tolerability.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Design; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the safety and efficacy of medical treatments for narcolepsy were analyzed using network meta-analysis.. The RCTs in narcolepsy were searched. Network meta-analysis compared efficacy and safety of multiple treatments, multi-arm studies, and multi-criteria treatment decisions, based on a random model that assumed heterogeneity between studies, with corrections for multi-arm studies.. Fourteen RCTs, three drug treatments, and six doses were identified: sodium oxybate (6 and 9 g/d), modafinil (between 200 and 400 mg/d), and pitolisant (up to 20 and up to 40 mg/d). Significant heterogeneity (>50%) between studies was found in 12/14 studies for almost all endpoints, but between-design consistency was present. For ESS and MWT, sodium oxybate 9 g/d, modafinil, and pitolisant up to 40 mg/d had similar efficacy. Pitolisant 40 mg/d and sodium oxybate 9 g/d in two nightly doses had similar efficacy in reducing cataplexy. A good safety profile characterized by a TEAE incidence risk ratio (IRR) <1.5 was found for all the compared treatments, except for sodium oxybate 9 g/d. Although no significant difference was found, Pitolisant 40 mg was shown with the best P scores for the benefit/risk (BR) ratio.. Modafinil (200-400 mg/d), sodium oxybate 9 g/d, and pitolisant up to 40 mg/d had similar efficacy in reducing excessive day time sleepiness. Only sodium oxybate 9 g/d and pitolisant up to 40 mg/d were shown with a comparable beneficial effect on cataplexy. Overall, Pitolisant was found with the best P score on the BR ratio.. PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017054686. Efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk comparison of alternative treatments in narcolepsy: a network multiple comparisons of treatment meta-analysis. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017054686.

Topics: Adult; Cataplexy; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Piperidines; Risk Assessment; Sleepiness; Sodium Oxybate

Narcolepsy is an orphan neurological disease and presents with sleep-wake, motoric, neuropsychiatric and metabolic symptoms. Narcolepsy with cataplexy is most commonly caused by an immune-mediated process including genetic and environmental factors, resulting in the selective loss of hypocretin-producing neurons. Narcolepsy has a major impact on workableness and quality of life. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the temporal available treatment options for narcolepsy (type 1 and 2) in adults, including authorization status by regulatory agencies. First- and second-line options are discussed as well as combination therapies. In addition, treatment options for frequent coexisting co-morbidities and different phenotypes of narcolepsy are presented. Finally, this review considers potential future management strategies. Non-pharmacological approaches are important in the management of narcolepsy but will not be covered in this review. Expert opinion: Concise evaluation of symptoms and type of narcolepsy, coexisting co-morbidities and patients´ distinct needs is mandatory in order to identify a suitable, individual pharmacological treatment. First-line options include Modafinil/Armodafinil (for excessive daytime sleepiness, EDS), Sodium Oxybate (for EDS and/with cataplexy), Pitolisant (for EDS and cataplexy) and Venlafaxine (for cataplexy (off-label) and co-morbid depression). New symptomatic and causal treatment most probably will be completed by hypocretin-replacement and immune-modifying strategies.

Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cataplexy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Neuropeptides; Off-Label Use; Orexins; Piperidines; Quality of Life; Sleep; Sodium Oxybate; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents

Since March 2016, a new treatment option for adult patients with narcolepsy – with or without cataplexy – has been granted marketing authorization in Europe. Pitolisant (Wakix®) is an inverse agonst at the histamine-3 (H3) receptor. In clinical studies, tests for measurement of wakefulness and attention, pitolisant showed significantly better results in comparison with placebo and similar results in comparison with modafinil. Pitolisant is well tolerated. Postmarketing analyses have to collect data about the long-term safety of pitolisant when used in a real-life setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Arousal; Attention; Contraindications; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Pitolisant (Wakix™) is an inverse agonist of the histamine H3 receptor that is being developed by Bioproject. Oral pitolisant is approved in the EU for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults. Pitolisant has received a Temporary Authorization of Use in France for this indication in case of treatment failure, intolerance or contraindication to currently available treatment. Pitolisant has orphan drug designation in the EU and the USA. In the pivotal HARMONY I trial, pitolisant significantly decreased excessive daytime sleepiness versus placebo in adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy (primary endpoint). Pitolisant also significantly decreased cataplexy rate versus placebo in these patients. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of pitolisant leading to this first approval for narcolepsy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adrenergic Neurons; Adult; Animals; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Mice; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H3

Narcolepsy is a life-long disorder characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, often arising in childhood or adolescence. Pitolisant, a selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, has been approved in Europe and USA for adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy, with a favourable safety profile. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.. For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multisite study, we recruited patients aged 6-17 years with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in 11 sleep centres in five countries (Italy, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Finland). Participants were required to have a Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale score of 15 or greater and to have not received psychostimulants for at least 14 days before enrolment; participants who needed anticataplectics (including sodium oxybate) were required to have been on a stable dose for at least 1 month. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pitolisant or placebo in a 2:1 ratio at the end of screening. Randomisation was stratified by study centre and treatment was allocated using an interactive web response system. After a 4-week screening period including a 2-week baseline period, patients entered in a 4-week individual up-titration scheme from 5 mg a day to a maximum of 40 mg a day of pitolisant or placebo; treatment was administered at a stable dose for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week placebo period. For the primary analysis, we assessed pitolisant versus placebo using change in the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) total score from baseline to the end of double-blind period in the full analysis set, defined as all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of treatment and who had at least one baseline UNS value. A decrease in the UNS total score reflects a reduction in both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. All adverse events were assessed in the safety population, defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study medication. An open-label follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02611687.. Between June 6, 2016, and April 3, 2021, we screened 115 participants and 110 were randomly assigned (mean age 12·9 [SD 3·0] years, 61 [55%] male, and 90 [82%] with cataplexy; 72 assigned to pitolisant and 38 to placebo); 107 (70 receiving pitolisant and 37 receiving placebo) completed the double-blind period. The mean adjusted difference in UNS total score from baseline to the end of the double-blind period was -6·3 (SE 1·1) in the pitolisant group and -2·6 (1·4) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference -3·7; 95% CI -6·4 to -1·0, p=0·007). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (31%) of 72 patients in the pitolisant group and 13 (34%) of 38 patients in the placebo group. The most frequently reported adverse events (affecting ≥5% of patients) in either group were headache (14 [19%] in the pitolisant group and three [8%] in the placebo group) and insomnia (five [7%] in the pitolisant group and one [3%] in the placebo group).. Pitolisant treatment resulted in an improvement in narcolepsy symptoms in children, although the UNS was not validated for use in children with narcolepsy when our study began. The safety profile was similar to that reported in adults but further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety.. Bioprojet.

Topics: Adolescent; Cataplexy; Child; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Drug Inverse Agonism; Female; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Treatment Outcome

Pitolisant, a selective histamine 3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, is indicated for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy. The efficacy and safety of pitolisant have been demonstrated in randomized placebo-controlled trials. When evaluating the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials, the clinical impact of a treatment can be assessed using effect size metrics that include Cohen's d (the standardized mean difference of an effect) and number needed to treat (NNT; number of patients that need to be treated to achieve a specific outcome for one person).. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of pitolisant for the reduction in excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy.. This post hoc analysis incorporated data from two 7-week or 8-week randomized placebo-controlled trials (HARMONY 1, HARMONY CTP). Study medication was individually titrated, with a maximum possible pitolisant dose of 35.6 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and weekly rate of cataplexy (HARMONY CTP only). Cohen's d was derived from the least-squares mean difference between treatment groups (pitolisant vs placebo), and NNTs were calculated from response rates. Treatment response was defined for excessive daytime sleepiness in two ways: (a) reduction in ESS score ≥ 3 or final ESS score ≤ 10 and (b) final ESS score ≤ 10. Treatment response was defined for cataplexy as a ≥ 25%, ≥ 50%, or ≥ 75% reduction in weekly rate of cataplexy.. The analysis population included 61 patients in HARMONY 1 (pitolisant, n = 31; placebo, n = 30) and 105 patients in HARMONY CTP (pitolisant, n = 54; placebo, n = 51). For pitolisant vs placebo, Cohen's d effect size values were 0.61 (HARMONY 1) and 0.86 (HARMONY CTP) based on changes in ESS scores, and 0.86 (HARMONY CTP) based on changes in weekly rate of cataplexy. NNTs for pitolisant were 3-5 for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness and 3-4 for the treatment of cataplexy.. The results of this analysis demonstrate the robust efficacy of pitolisant for the reduction in both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. These large effect sizes and low NNTs provide further evidence supporting the strength of the clinical response to pitolisant in the treatment of adults with narcolepsy.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01067222 (February 2010), NCT01800045 (February 2013).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cataplexy; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Pitolisant is approved in the USA and Europe for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy.. Analyses evaluated the time to onset of clinical response during treatment with pitolisant.. Data were obtained from two randomized, double-blind, 7-week or 8-week, placebo-controlled studies (HARMONY 1, HARMONY CTP). Study medication was individually titrated to a maximum dose of pitolisant 35.6 mg/day and then remained stable. Efficacy assessments included the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and weekly rate of cataplexy (calculated from patient diaries). Onset of clinical response was defined as the first timepoint at which there was statistical separation between pitolisant and placebo.. The analysis included 61 patients in HARMONY 1 (pitolisant, n = 31; placebo, n = 30) and 105 patients in HARMONY CTP (pitolisant, n = 54; placebo, n = 51). Onset of clinical response began at week 2 (HARMONY 1) or week 3 (HARMONY CTP) for the mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and week 2 (HARMONY CTP) or week 5 (HARMONY 1) for the mean change in weekly rate of cataplexy, with further improvements observed in pitolisant-treated patients through the end of treatment. The percentage of treatment responders was significantly greater with pitolisant vs placebo beginning at week 3 for excessive daytime sleepiness (defined as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score reduction ≥ 3) and week 2 for cataplexy (defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in weekly rate of cataplexy [HARMONY CTP]).. Onset of clinical response for excessive daytime sleepiness and/or cataplexy was generally observed within the first 2-3 weeks of pitolisant treatment in patients with narcolepsy. CLINICALTRIALS.. NCT01067222 (February 2010), NCT01800045 (February 2013).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cataplexy; Circadian Rhythm; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate the human abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy.. Nondependent, recreational stimulant users able to distinguish phentermine HCl 60 mg from placebo in a drug discrimination test were randomized in a four-period, double-blind, crossover design to receive single doses of pitolisant 35.6 mg (therapeutic dose), pitolisant 213.6 mg (supratherapeutic dose), phentermine HCl 60 mg, and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum effect (Emax) on the 100-point Drug Liking ("at this moment") visual analog scale.. In 38 study completers (73.7% male; 65.8% white; mean age, 33.3 years), mean Drug Liking Emax was significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant 35.6 mg (mean difference, 21.4; p < 0.0001) and pitolisant 213.6 mg (mean difference, 19.7; p < 0.0001). Drug Liking Emax was similar for pitolisant (both doses) and placebo. Similarly, for key secondary measures of Overall Drug Liking and willingness to Take Drug Again, mean Emax scores were significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant (both doses) and similar for pitolisant (both doses) versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events was 82.1% after phentermine HCl 60 mg, 72.5% after pitolisant 213.6 mg, 47.5% after pitolisant 35.6 mg, and 48.8% after placebo administration.. In this study, pitolisant demonstrated significantly lower potential for abuse compared with phentermine and an overall profile similar to placebo; this suggests a low risk of abuse for pitolisant.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03152123. Determination of the abuse potential of pitolisant in healthy, nondependent recreational stimulant users. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03152123.

Topics: Adult; Cataplexy; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

This multicenter, open-label, single-dose study of pitolisant 17.8 mg enrolled patients aged 6 through 17 years with a diagnosis of narcolepsy. Blood samples were collected at prespecified time points for analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum serum concentration (C. Of the 25 enrolled patients, 24 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Pitolisant C. After single-dose administration, the exposure parameters of pitolisant were significantly greater in the younger compared with older pediatric patients with narcolepsy. Pitolisant doses up to 17.8 mg/d (in children with body weight <40 kg) or 35.6 mg/d are appropriate for further evaluation in pediatric patients.. EudraCT Number: 2013-001505-93.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

Histaminergic neurons are crucial to maintain wakefulness, but their role in cataplexy is unknown. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, for treatment of cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy.. For this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial we recruited patients with narcolepsy from 16 sleep centres in nine countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Macedonia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine). Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with narcolepsy with cataplexy according to version two of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders criteria, experienced at least three cataplexies per week, and had excessive daytime sleepiness (defined as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥12). We used a computer-generated sequence via an interactive web response system to randomly assign patients to receive either pitolisant or placebo once per day (1:1 ratio). Randomisation was done in blocks of four. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Treatment lasted for 7 weeks: 3 weeks of flexible dosing decided by investigators according to efficacy and tolerance (5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg oral pitolisant), followed by 4 weeks of stable dosing (5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg). The primary endpoint was the change in the average number of cataplexy attacks per week as recorded in patient diaries (weekly cataplexy rate [WCR]) between the 2 weeks of baseline and the 4 weeks of stable dosing period. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01800045.. The trial was done between April 19, 2013, and Jan 28, 2015. We screened 117 patients, 106 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment (54 to pitolisant and 52 to placebo) and, after dropout, 54 patients from the pitolisant group and 51 from the placebo group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The WCR during the stable dosing period compared with baseline was decreased by 75% (WCR. Pitolisant was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing cataplexy. If confirmed in long-term studies, pitolisant might constitute a useful first-line therapy for cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy, for whom there are currently few therapeutic options.. Bioprojet, France.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cataplexy; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To validate the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) as a treatment effect measure in narcolepsy, and to compare the SART with the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).. Validation of treatment effect measurements within a randomized controlled trial (RCT).. Ninety-five patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.. The RCT comprised a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial comparing the effects of 8-w treatments with pitolisant (BF2.649), modafinil, or placebo (NCT01067222). MWT, ESS, and SART were administered at baseline and after an 8-w treatment period. The severity of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy was also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-C).. The SART, MWT, and ESS all had good reliability, obtained for the SART and MWT using two to three sessions in 1 day. The ability to distinguish responders from nonresponders, classified using the CGI-C score, was high for all measures, with a high performance for the SART (r = 0.61) and the ESS (r = 0.54).. The Sustained Attention to Response Task is a valid and easy-to-administer measure to assess treatment effects in narcolepsy, enhanced by combining it with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

Topics: Adult; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cataplexy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Reproducibility of Results; Sleep Stages; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness

Narcolepsy is characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy. Histamine neurons are crucial to maintain wakefulness. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pitolisant (previously called BF2.649), a selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist that activates these neurons, in patients with narcolepsy.. For this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group controlled trial, we recruited patients with narcolepsy from 32 sleep disorder centres in five European countries. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had not taken psychostimulants for at least 14 days, and had EDS (defined as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score of at least 14). Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated patients to receive pitolisant, modafinil, or placebo (1:1:1). Treatment lasted 8 weeks: 3 weeks of flexible dosing according to investigator's judgment (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg a day of pitolisant; 100 mg, 200 mg or 400 mg a day of modafinil) followed by 5 weeks of stable dosing. Patients took four tablets a day in a double-dummy design to ensure masking. For the primary analysis, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, we assessed the superiority of pitolisant versus placebo, and the non-inferiority of pitolisant versus modafinil. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01067222.. Between May 26, 2009, and June 30, 2010, we screened 110 patients, 95 of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 30 to placebo, 32 to pitolisant, and 33 to modafinil. Over the 8-week treatment period, mean ESS score reductions were -3·4 (SD 4·2) in the placebo group, -5·8 (6·2) in the pitolisant group, and -6·9 (6·2) in the modafinil group. Our primary analysis of between-group differences in mean ESS score at endpoint (adjusted for baseline) showed pitolisant to be superior to placebo (difference -3·0, 95% CI -5·6 to -0·4; p=0·024), but not non-inferior to modafinil (difference 0·12, 95% CI -2·5 to 2·7; p=0·250). We recorded 22 adverse events with pitolisant, 26 with modafinil, and ten with placebo. Six severe adverse events were treatment-related: one with pitolisant (abdominal discomfort) and five with modafinil (abdominal pain, abnormal behaviour, amphetamine-like withdrawal symptoms, lymphoadenopathy, and inner ear disorders).. Pitolisant at doses up to 40 mg was efficacious on EDS compared with placebo and well tolerated compared with modafinil. If these findings are substantiated in further studies, pitolisant could offer a new treatment option for patients with narcolepsy.. Bioprojet, France.

Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Placebos; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents; Young Adult

Narcolepsy is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, direct onsets of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep from wakefulness (DREMs) and deficiency of orexins, neuropeptides that promote wakefulness largely via activation of histamine (HA) pathways. The hypothesis that the orexin defect can be circumvented by enhancing HA release was explored in narcoleptic mice and patients using tiprolisant, an inverse H(3)-receptor agonist. In narcoleptic orexin(-/-) mice, tiprolisant enhanced HA and noradrenaline neuronal activity, promoted wakefulness and decreased abnormal DREMs, all effects being amplified by co-administration of modafinil, a currently-prescribed wake-promoting drug. In a pilot single-blind trial on 22 patients receiving a placebo followed by tiprolisant, both for 1 week, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was reduced from a baseline value of 17.6 by 1.0 with the placebo (p>0.05) and 5.9 with tiprolisant (p<0.001). Excessive daytime sleep, unaffected under placebo, was nearly suppressed on the last days of tiprolisant dosing. H(3)-receptor inverse agonists could constitute a novel effective treatment of EDS, particularly when associated with modafinil.

Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Neuropeptides; Orexins; Piperidines; Polysomnography; Prospective Studies; Reaction Time; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Sleep Stages; Wakefulness

Pitolisant is a histamine 3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist effective and safe for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in narcolepsy. We report a 19-year-old woman affected by narcolepsy type 1 who presented panic attacks and dissociative symptoms induced by pitolisant. The patient medical history was unremarkable except that for familiarity for anxiety disorder and chronic insomnia. Moreover, a detailed psychometric evaluation revealed a profile of low resilience, a severe grade of depression, an anxiety trait and a propension to dissociative symptoms. Our report suggests that caution should be used in patients with predisposing factors to psychiatric disorders, especially during the first period of treatment with pitolisant. In consideration of the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in narcolepsy, it seems worth to carefully investigate psychiatric background of narcoleptic patients.

Topics: Adult; Cataplexy; Drug Inverse Agonism; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Narcolepsy; Panic Disorder; Young Adult

First symptoms of narcolepsy mostly present during childhood. Pharmacological management options in children are limited, also due to approval status. Pitolisant is an inverse histamine 3 receptor agonist and has been approved for the treatment of adult narcolepsy with or without cataplexy by EMA and FDA. Clinical experience indicates for a beneficial use also in children and adolescents. Our goal was to evaluate the effects and tolerability of pitolisant in narcolepsy children/adolescents in a real-world setting.. This multicentre retrospective observational study included 55 patients with narcolepsy from three international narcolepsy centers (Germany, France and Italy) who were treated with pitolisant. Patients were eligible if they were at least 6 years old and diagnosed with narcolepsy type 1 or 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics, questionnaires, sleep medicine and laboratory data were collected.. 55 children/adolescents (25 girls, 45.45%, 30 boys, 54.55%) aged 6-18 years, with narcolepsy (type 1 = 92.7%, type 2 = 7.3%), were treated with pitolisant. The mean pitolisant dose was 34.1 mg/d. Treatment was effective for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy: the pediatric Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score decreased from 19 to 13.5 (p < 0.001) and the weekly cataplexy frequency improved from 7.9 at baseline to 5.2 (p < 0.001). Treatment with pitolisant was well tolerated. Side effects were mild and mostly short-term. Insomnia was reported most frequently (5.5%).. First real-world results suggest that pitolisant treatment is effective in improving EDS and cataplexy in children with narcolepsy, and also is well tolerated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amines; Cataplexy; Child; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies

Modafinil is a common treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy. The long-term use of modafinil can lead to tolerance with the loss of efficacy and the continuous increase of its dose. Pharmacological strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays in patients with tolerance to modafinil.. Narcolepsy patients on monotherapy with modafinil who developed symptoms of tolerance were eligible. The following alternating therapy regimen was established: Monday to Friday patients continued on modafinil whereas Saturday and Sunday they switched to pitolisant to "bridge" the EDS symptoms. Patients were assessed at baseline and after three months with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS). Health-related quality of life (HrQol) was evaluated by EuroQol5D. Adverse events were documented in the patients' diaries.. 41 patients aged 30.9 ± 5.6 years were included. After three months of the alternating therapy regimen, the symptoms of tolerance decreased and the modafinil dose could be reduced by 41% (p < 0.01) resulting in better safety. The EDS improved on ESS (baseline: 18.2 ± 4.2, follow-up: 12.6 ± 4.0, p < 0.0001) and UNS (baseline: 25.8 ± 7.9, follow-up: 18.9 ± 5.9, p < 0.0001). The HrQol increased significantly.. Patients with tolerance to modafinil could benefit from pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays. This alternating pharmacological strategy proved to be safe and helped to reduce EDS and to decrease the modafinil dose. Further randomized controlled studies are required to evaluate the different strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil.. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT05321355.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Quality of Life

Narcolepsy is a chronic and rare hypersomnia of central origin characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and a complex array of symptoms as well as by several medical comorbidities. With growing pharmacological options, polytherapy may increase the possibility of a patient-centered management of narcolepsy symptoms. The aims of our study are to describe a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were candidates for pitolisant treatment and to compare patients' subgroups based on current drug prescription (drug-naïve patients in whom pitolisant was the first-choice treatment, switching to pitolisant from other monotherapy treatments, and adding on in polytherapy).. We conducted a cross-sectional survey based on Italian data from the inclusion visits of the Post Authorization Safety Study of pitolisant, a 5-year observational, multicenter, international study.. One hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (76.4% with narcolepsy type 1 and 23.6% with narcolepsy type 2). Most patients (63.4%) presented at least one comorbidity, mainly cardiovascular and psychiatric. Pitolisant was prescribed as an add-on treatment in 120/191 patients (62.8%), as switch from other therapies in 42/191 (22.0%), and as a first-line treatment in 29/191 (15.2%). Drug-naive patients presented more severe sleepiness, lower functional status, and a higher incidence of depressive symptoms.. Our study presents the picture of a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were prescribed with pitolisant, suggesting that polytherapy is highly frequent to tailor a patient-centered approach.

Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

Type 1 narcolepsy is a disabling disease that requires continuous treatment, which is not always effective. Pitolisant is a new drug with a different mechanism of action that offers a new treatment option. The objective of the study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of pitolisant in patients with type 1 narcolepsy that did not respond to or tolerate previous standard treatments.. Real-life multicentre descriptive observational study that included patients diagnosed with type 1 narcolepsy who did not respond to or tolerate previous treatments and started treatment with pitolisant. The study evaluated three different moments: the start of treatment, the stabilization of treatment with pitolisant and the three months after.. In 32 patients included (mean age, 44 years; 37.5% women) the mean of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was reduced from 17.1 to 13.5; 47.8% of the patients improved from their cataplexy; 65% of the patients improved their clinical global impression at the physician's and at the patient's discretion and the mean number of medications consumed was reduced from 2.0 to 1.4. The most frequent adverse effect was insomnia in 43.8% of patients. Of the 32 patients, 23 continued with the treatment during the 3-month follow-up period.. In patients with type I narcolepsy who do not respond to or do not tolerate the available treatments, pitolisant can improve their clinical situation and reduce their medication consumption. Studies with a higher level of evidence are needed to confirm these results.. Estudio WAKE de vida real en pacientes con narcolepsia con cataplejía tratados con pitolisant no respondedores a tratamientos previos.. Introducción. La narcolepsia de tipo 1 es una enfermedad incapacitante que requiere tratamiento continuo, que no siempre es eficaz. El pitolisant es un nuevo fármaco con un mecanismo de acción diferente que ofrece una nueva opción de tratamiento. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la efectividad y la seguridad del pitolisant en pacientes con narcolepsia de tipo 1 que no hubieran respondido o tolerado previamente los tratamientos habituales. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional descriptivo multicéntrico de vida real que incluyó a pacientes diagnosticados de narcolepsia de tipo 1 no respondedores a tratamientos previos que iniciaron tratamiento con pitolisant. El estudio evaluó tres momentos: el inicio del tratamiento, la estabilización del tratamiento con pitolisant y los tres meses posteriores. Resultados. En 32 pacientes incluidos (media de edad, 44 años; 37,5% de mujeres), la media de la escala de somnolencia de Epworth se redujo de 17,1 a 13,5; un 47,8% de los pacientes mejoró subjetivamente de su cataplejía; un 65% de los pacientes mejoró su impresión clínica global a criterio médico y a criterio del paciente; y se redujo la media de medicamentos consumidos de 2,0 a 1,4. El efecto adverso más frecuente fue el insomnio, en un 43,8% de los pacientes. De los 32 pacientes, 23 mantuvieron el tratamiento durante los tres meses de seguimiento. Conclusiones. En pacientes con narcolepsia de tipo 1 que no responden a o no toleran los tratamientos disponibles, el pitolisant puede mejorar su situación clínica y reducir su consumo de medicamentos. Son necesarios estudios de mayor nivel de evidencia para confirmar estos resultados.

Topics: Adult; Cataplexy; Female; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Data were pooled from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 7- or 8-week studies of pitolisant (titrated to a potential maximum dose of 35.6 mg/day) in adults with narcolepsy. Analyses included three independent patient subgroups: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) baseline score ≥16, Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) sleep latency ≤8 min, and ≥15 cataplexy attacks per week.. The analysis populations included 118 patients for ESS (pitolisant, n = 60; placebo, n = 58), 105 for MWT (pitolisant, n = 59; placebo, n = 46), and 31 for cataplexy (pitolisant, n = 20; placebo, n = 11). On the ESS, least-squares mean change from baseline was significantly greater for pitolisant (-6.1) compared with placebo (-2.3; P < 0.001). Significantly more pitolisant-treated patients were classified as treatment responders: ESS score reduction ≥3, 69.0% in the pitolisant group versus 35.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.001); final ESS score ≤10, 36.2% versus 10.5%, respectively (P = 0.005). On the MWT, mean sleep latency increased from 3.5 min to 10.4 min with pitolisant and from 3.4 min to 6.8 min with placebo (P = 0.017). Least-squares mean change in the weekly rate of cataplexy was significantly greater for pitolisant (-14.5; baseline, 23.9; final, 9.4) compared with placebo (-0.1; baseline, 23.1; final, 23.0; P = 0.004). Headache was the most common adverse event with pitolisant.. Pitolisant, at once-daily doses up to 35.6 mg, was efficacious for reducing excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in patients with severe narcolepsy symptom burden.

Topics: Adult; Cataplexy; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness

Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake-promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine-like properties within in vivo preclinical models.

Topics: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Carbamates; Corpus Striatum; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Inverse Agonism; Feeding Behavior; Histamine Antagonists; Locomotion; Mice; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Neostriatum; Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Nucleus Accumbens; Phenylalanine; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H3; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents

The cost-effectiveness of available pharmacological treatments for narcolepsy is largely unknown. Available pharmacological treatments are associated with tolerability, abuse, and adherence issues. Pitolisant is the first inverse agonist of the histamine H3 receptor to be prescribed for the treatment of narcolepsy with and without cataplexy. Studies suggest that pitolisant is both as effective as previously introduced drugs and is associated with fewer adverse effects. The objective in this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of pitolisant as monotherapy, and pitolisant as an adjunctive treatment to modafinil, compared with standard treatment.. Calculations were performed using a Markov model with a 50-year time horizon. Healthcare utilization and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each treatment alternative were calculated assuming no treatment effect on survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for treatment effectiveness and healthcare cost parameters.. The cost per additional quality-adjusted life year was estimated at SEK 356 337 (10 SEK ≈ 1 Euro) for pitolisant monotherapy, and at SEK 491 128 for pitolisant as an adjunctive treatment, as compared to standard treatment. The cost-effectiveness measure was demonstrated to be particularly sensitive to the assumptions made concerning indirect effects on total healthcare utilization and the pitolisant treatment cost.. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were below the unofficial willingness-to-pay threshold at SEK 500 000. The estimated costs per additional QALY obtained here are likely to overestimate the true cost-effectiveness ratio since significant potential indirect effects-pertaining both to labor-market and household-related productivity-of treatment are not taken into account.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Utilization; Histamine Agents; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Narcolepsy; Parkinson Disease; Piperidines

To asses the long-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant, an histamine H3-receptor antagonist, on narcolepsy.. This open-label, single-arm, pragmatic study, recruited adult patients with narcolepsy and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥12. After a titration period, patients were treated for up to 1 year with oral pitolisant once-a-day at up to 40 mg. Concomitant stimulants and anti-cataplectic agents were allowed. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included ESS, cataplexy, and other diary parameters.. Patients (n = 102, 75 with cataplexy) received pitolisant, for the first time in 73 of them. Sixty-eight patients (51 with cataplexy) completed the 12-month treatment. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (11.8% of patients), insomnia (8.8%), weight gain (7.8%), anxiety (6.9%), depressive symptoms (4.9%), and nausea (4.9%). Seven patients had a serious adverse effect, unrelated to pitolisant except for a possibly related miscarriage. One-third of patients stopped pitolisant, mostly (19.6%) for insufficient benefit. ESS score decreased by 4.6 ± 0.6. Two-thirds of patients completing the treatment were responders (ESS ≤ 10 or ESS decrease ≥ 3), and one third had normalized ESS (≤10). Complete and partial cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and sleep attacks were reduced by 76%, 65%, 54%, 63%, and 27%, respectively. Pitolisant as monotherapy (43% of patients) was better tolerated and more efficacious on ESS than on add-on, but efficacy was maintained in this last case.. Long-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant on daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, and sleep paralysis is confirmed.

Topics: Adult; Anxiety; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Female; Headache; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome

On 31 March 2016, the European Commission issued a decision for a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union (EU) for pitolisant (Wakix) for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults. Pitolisant is an antagonist/inverse agonist of the human histamine H3 receptor. The dose should be selected using an up-titration scheme depending on individual patient response and tolerance and should not exceed 36 mg/day. The main evidence of efficacy of pitolisant was based on two Phase III clinical trials. The improvement on excessive daytime sleepiness was shown against placebo in the Harmony I study (-3.33 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) [-5.83; -0.83]; p = 0.024) and in Harmony CTP (-3.41 points; 95% CI [-4.95; -1.87]; p < 0.0001). The daily cataplexy rate in Harmony I improved against placebo with a rate ratio (rR) of 0.38 whilst in the Harmony CTP the ratio of improvement on weekly cataplexy rate against placebo was 0.512. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were headache, insomnia and nausea. This article summarizes the scientific review leading to approval of pitolisant in the EU. The assessment report and product information are available on the European Medicines Agency website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Animals; Attention; Cataplexy; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cognition; Drug Inverse Agonism; Humans; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H3; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents; Young Adult

Topics: Cataplexy; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

▼Pitolisant (Wakix-Bioprojet Pharma) is a new treatment for adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy. It was licensed for use in the EU in March last year and has orphan drug status.

Topics: Adult; Contraindications; Disease Management; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Humans; Narcolepsy; Piperidines

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Piperidines; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents