piperidines and Varicocele

piperidines has been researched along with Varicocele* in 4 studies

Trials

3 trial(s) available for piperidines and Varicocele

ArticleYear
The preoperative use of gabapentin, dexamethasone, and their combination in varicocele surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 2007, Volume: 105, Issue:4

    We investigated the effects of gabapentin and dexamethasone given together or separately 1 h before the start of surgery on laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, intraoperative hemodynamics, opioid consumption, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing varicocele operations.. Patients were randomly divided into four double-blind groups: group C (control, n = 20) received placebo, group G (gabapentin, n = 20) received 800 mg gabapentin, group D (dexamethasone, n = 20) received 8 mg dexamethasone, group GD (gabapentin plus dexamethasone) received both 800 mg gabapentin and 8 mg dexamethasone IV 1 h before the start of surgery. Standard induction and maintenance of anesthesia were accomplished and continued by propofol and remifentanil infusion. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were recorded before induction and after intubation. Intraoperative total remifentanil consumption was recorded. Hemodynamic variables and visual analog scale were recorded for 24 h. Side effects were noted.. Hemodynamics at 1, 3, 5, and 10 min after tracheal intubation, total remifentanil consumption during surgery, postoperative visual analog scale scores at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were found to be significantly lower in group GD than in group G and group D (P < 0.05 for both), and substantially lower when compared with group C (P < 0.001). All values in group C were also higher than in groups G and D (P < 0.05).. Gabapentin and dexamethasone administered together an hour before varicocele surgery results in less laryngeal and tracheal intubation response, improves postoperative analgesia, and prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting better than individual administration of each drug.

    Topics: Adult; Amines; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Pressure; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Glucocorticoids; Heart Rate; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Male; Oxygen; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Preoperative Care; Remifentanil; Varicocele

2007
Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol.
    European journal of anaesthesiology, 2003, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    In some situations, the use of muscle relaxants (neuromuscular blocking drugs) are undesirable or contraindicated. We compared intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in premedicated patients receiving either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1).. In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 healthy patients were assigned to one of four groups (n = 20). After intravenous atropine, alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) were injected over 90 s followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of lung ventilation, jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff.. Seven patients who received remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and one patient who received remifentanil 3 microg kg(-1) could not be intubated at the first attempts. Excellent intubating conditions (jaw relaxed, vocal cords open and no movement in response to tracheal intubation and cuff inflation) were observed in those who received either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) (45% of patients) or remifentanil in doses of 2 microg kg(-1) (20%), 3 microg kg(-1) (75%) or 4 microg kg(-1) (95%). Overall, intubating conditions were significantly better (P < 0.05), and the number of patients showing excellent conditions were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients who received remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) compared with those who received alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1). No patient needed treatment for hypotension or bradycardia.. Remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) administered in sequence intravenously provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation in all patients without the use of muscle relaxants.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alfentanil; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Varicocele

2003
General anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for outpatient urological surgery.
    European journal of anaesthesiology, 2003, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    A variety of drugs and techniques have been introduced into ambulatory anaesthesia. The technique as well as the drugs used may hasten or delay home discharge. We compared recovery profiles and side-effects of spinal anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia.. Forty unpremedicated ASA I-II patients (18-65 yr) undergoing varicocele repair were randomly divided into two groups. Spinal anaesthesia (26-G atraumatic needle) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 5 mg and fentanyl 25 microg were given to patients in Group Spinal (n = 20). Patients in Group TIVA (n = 20) received total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil given by continuous infusion; a laryngeal mask was used to secure the airway. The duration of surgery, time to home readiness and side-effects were recorded.. The two groups were comparable with respect to patients' characteristics and duration of surgery. The times to achieve ambulation were similar between groups (Spinal = 78.4 +/- 40.9 min, TIVA = 75.9 +/- 13.8 min). Urinary voiding was a requirement for discharge after spinal anaesthesia and the time for home readiness was longer in Group Spinal (158.0 +/- 40.2 versus 94.9 +/- 18.8 min) (P < 0.05). Two patients reported pruritus and one reported postdural puncture headache in Group Spinal, whereas two patients reported nausea in Group TIVA. Patients in Group TIVA had a greater need for analgesia postoperation (P < 0.05).. In healthy unpremedicated men undergoing minor urological operations, total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol provided as safe and effective anaesthesia as spinal block with the advantage of earlier home readiness.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Fentanyl; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male; Varicocele

2003

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for piperidines and Varicocele

ArticleYear
Remifentanil versus alfentanil in total intravenous anaesthesia for day case surgery.
    European journal of anaesthesiology, 2003, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    We assessed the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and recovery profiles of total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and alfentanil for outpatient surgery.. Patients in Group 1 (n = 20) received alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) followed by 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously; patients in Group 2 (n = 20) received remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously. Both groups then received propofol 2 mg kg(-1) followed by 9 mg kg(-1) h(-1) intravenously. Five minutes after skin incision, infusion rates were decreased, and at the end of surgery, all infusions were discontinued. Early recovery was assessed by the Aldrete score, whereas intermediate recovery was assessed with the postanaesthetic discharge scoring system (PADS).. Perioperative arterial pressure was similar in both groups; heart rate was lower in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The times to spontaneous and adequate respiration, response to verbal commands, extubation and times for Aldrete score > or = 9 were shorter in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Pain scores were higher in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Overall times for postanaesthetic discharge scores > or = 9 were similar.. Early recovery of patients after day surgery is significantly shorter after total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil compared with that with alfentanil but postoperative pain management must be planned ahead.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alfentanil; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Varicocele

2003