piperidines has been researched along with Sinusitis* in 13 studies
1 review(s) available for piperidines and Sinusitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
The present article summarizes anesthetic techniques used during functional endoscopic sinus surgery to decrease bleeding and aid in creating a clear surgical field. The applicable physiology behind these anesthetic techniques is reviewed with emphasis on the effect on bleeding and the surgical field. Deliberate hypotension, reverse Trendelenburg positioning, regional anesthesia, and cerebral monitoring are discussed.. There are mixed data as to whether traditional inhalation anesthesia or total intravenous anesthesia is superior with respect to better surgical fields and decreased blood loss. A review of the literature tends to favor total intravenous anesthesia. Cerebral oximetry and transcranial Doppler ultrasound are emerging techniques to monitor cerebral perfusion during deliberate hypotension.. Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil is the current favored technique for producing deliberate hypotension during endoscopic sinus surgery due to its hemodynamic stability and smooth rapid emergence. Topics: Airway Management; Anesthesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Endoscopy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Paranasal Sinus Diseases; Patient Positioning; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Treatment Outcome | 2017 |
6 trial(s) available for piperidines and Sinusitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effect of desmopressin administration on intraoperative blood loss and quality of the surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, clinical trial.
Bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a challenge for the quality of the surgical field for surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of desmopressin premedication on blood loss and the quality of the surgical field in endoscopic sinus surgery.. A total of 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis. They were randomly allocated to receive either desmopressin 0.3 μg/kg or saline before the operation. Management of anesthesia was achieved with propofol and remifentanil infusions, with moderate, controlled hypotension. Blood loss and quality of the surgical field were assessed after surgery. Effects of desmopressin on anesthetic requirements and hemodynamic variables were analyzed.. Blood loss was significantly less in the desmopressin group (mean ± SD, 42 ± 8.7 ml) than in the control group (70 ± 9.2 ml, P < 0.001). Surgeons were more satisfied with the surgical field in the desmopressin group than in the control group (median score, 4 [3-5] vs. 7 [6-9], P < 0.001). Requirements for remifentanil and esmolol were lower in the desmopressin group than in the control group.. Premedication with desmopressin 0.3 μg/kg can effectively reduce bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery. Topics: Adult; Blood Loss, Surgical; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Endoscopy; Female; Hemostatics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Remifentanil; Single-Blind Method; Sinusitis; Young Adult | 2015 |
Pilot study comparing total intravenous anesthesia to inhalational anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery: novel approach of blood flow quantification.
We compared anesthesia with sevoflurane-remifentanil hydrochloride (SR) to total intravenous anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil hydrochloride (PR) in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis in terms of sinonasal mucosal blood flow, the surgical field visualization score, and blood loss.. We performed a double-blinded prospective study at a tertiary care center in 23 adults scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. The patients were randomized to receive SR or PR. The sinonasal mucosal blood flow was measured by optical rhinometry. The surgical field visualization score was based on the Boezaart scale.. The groups had similar clinical characteristics. During the 60- to 90-minute and 90- to 120-minute operative time windows, the blood flow was significantly greater in the PR group than in the SR group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). The amounts of blood loss in the PR and SR groups were 152.9 +/- 161.3 mL and 355.9 +/- 393.4 mL, respectively (p = 0.12). The median ratios of the surgical field visualization score to the number of sinuses operated on in the PR and SR groups were 2.1 and 1.8, respectively (p = 0.52).. The intraoperative blood flow, as determined by optical rhinometry, was significantly greater with anesthesia with PR than with anesthesia with SR, 1 hour into the procedure; however, this difference did not translate into differences in the amounts of operative blood loss or in the surgical field visualization scores. Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Loss, Surgical; Double-Blind Method; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Methyl Ethers; Middle Aged; Paranasal Sinuses; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Remifentanil; Rhinitis; Sevoflurane; Sinusitis | 2012 |
Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery.
Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often affected by intra-nasal bleeding, which can be influenced by various anaesthetics and preoperative conditions. This study compared the surgical condition and the amount of intra-nasal bleeding between patients given sevoflurane/remifentanil (SR) and propofol/remifentanil (PR) anaesthesia.. ASA I or II patients undergoing ESS were randomly assigned to group SR (n=20) or group PR (n=20). The extent of the preoperative surgical lesion was classified as high (> 12) and low Lund-Mackay (LM) (< or = 12) scores according to the computed tomography findings. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was calculated from the patients' haemoglobin (Hb) and the amount of blood in the suction canister. The surgeons rated the visibility of the surgical field on a numeric rating scale (NRS).. In the high-LM score patients, the median (1st/3rd quartiles) blood loss for the SR and PR groups was 135 (121/222) and 19 (8/71) ml h(-1), respectively (P<0.01), and the mean (SD) of NRS was 5.8 (2.3) and 2.3 (1.0), respectively (P<0.05). However, in patients with low-LM score, both blood loss and NRS scores were not different between groups SR and PR.. In the high-LM score patients, PR anaesthesia results in less blood loss and a better surgical conditions for ESS than SR anaesthesia. Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Loss, Surgical; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Methyl Ethers; Middle Aged; Paranasal Sinuses; Piperidines; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Remifentanil; Severity of Illness Index; Sevoflurane; Sinusitis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed | 2008 |
Hypotensive anaesthesia with remifentanil combined with desflurane or isoflurane in tympanoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomised, controlled trial.
To compare the effect of remifentanil combined with desflurane or isoflurane on the quality of the operative field and surgical conditions, blood loss, and recovery during tympanoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery.. Randomised, double-blinded clinical study.. Sixty-four patients were scheduled for elective tympanoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: desflurane or isoflurane. After anaesthesia induction, all patients received a continuous remifentanil infusion of 0.2-0.5 microg/kg/min until a mean arterial pressure of 65-75 mmHg was achieved. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded throughout anaesthesia. Blood loss was measured at the end of surgery. Achievement of a bloodless operative field was rated on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Following completion of surgery, the time to extubation and to achievement of an Aldrete score of nine or more was recorded.. Sixty-three patients were evaluated. The total dose of remifentanil and the total blood loss were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Time to extubation and to an Aldrete score of nine or more for the desflurane group was significantly less than for the isoflurane group (p 0.05).. Although desflurane and isoflurane both enabled good surgical conditions (in terms of quality of operative field) and convenient induction of hypotension for tympanoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery, the recovery characteristics of desflurane were better than those of isoflurane. Therefore, desflurane may be preferable to isoflurane in such circumstances. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Combined; Blood Loss, Surgical; Desflurane; Double-Blind Method; Endoscopy; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypotension; Isoflurane; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Polyps; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Sinusitis; Treatment Outcome; Tympanoplasty | 2008 |
Effect of a balanced anaesthetic technique using desflurane and remifentanil on surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery.
Controlled hypotension is used to improve surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Several drug combinations are suitable to provide deep and predictable level of anaesthesia combined with an exact control of intraoperative blood pressure. However, only little is known about the relative importance of the level of hypnosis on the one hand and analgesia on the other hand.. Prospective, randomized, patient and observer-blinded study.. All 100 consecutive patients received a balanced anaesthesia technique using desflurane and remifentanil. Anaesthesia was desflurane-accentuated with remifentanil-supplementation (DARS-group: 1 MAC desflurane; remifentanil: 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or remifentanil-accentuated with desflurane-supplementation (RADS-group: desflurane: 0.5 MAC; remifentanil: 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Administration of anaesthetics performed to maintain a sufficient level of anaesthesia and to keep mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg (8-9.3 hPa). The attending ENT-surgeons were unaware of the type of anaesthesia and rated general surgical conditions and the dryness of the operating site on a visual analogue scale (0-10 cm) and on a verbal rating scale immediately after surgery.. Blood pressure and heart rate was not different between the two groups. Dryness of the operating site was rated significantly better (p < 0.0001) in the DARS-group (median; 25th/75th-percentile: 2.0; 1.5-3.5 vs. RADS-group: 2.6; 2.0-4.0) but the overall rating of the surgical conditions did not differ between the groups (DARS-group: 2.0; 1.0-2.4 vs. RADS-group: 2.2; 1.5-3.2). Immediate postoperative recovery times were increased in the RADS-group, but there was no difference with respect to fit-for-discharge criteria one hour after surgery.. Balanced anaesthesia using high dose of desflurane offers small but statistically significant advantages with respect to dryness of the operating site compared to an opioid-accentuated anaesthesia technique. However, since the opioid-accentuated anaesthetic group had a faster immediate recovery both techniques are equally effective for microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Topics: Adult; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Pressure; Desflurane; Electroencephalography; Endoscopy; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypotension, Controlled; Intraoperative Care; Isoflurane; Male; Microsurgery; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Remifentanil; Single-Blind Method; Sinusitis | 2007 |
Intravenous anesthesia provides optimal surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery.
Controlled hypotension is used to improve surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. New short-acting anesthetics such as propofol and remifentanil allow exact control of intraoperative blood pressure and thus might be valuable tools to improve intraoperative conditions for the otorhinolaryngological surgeon. Intravenous anesthesia was compared with traditional balanced anesthesia by subjective assessment of surgical conditions made by two experienced otorhinolaryngological surgeons.. Prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded study.. Ninety consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous anesthesia with propofol 5 to 8 mg.kg-1.h-1 and remifentanil 10 to 30 microg.kg-1.h-1 or with isoflurane (0.4-1.0 vol%) and repetitive doses of 0.5 to 1 mg alfentanil. An injectable vasodilator was used in both groups to keep mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70 mm Hg (8-9.3 hecto-pascal). The attending otorhinolaryngological surgeon was unaware of the type of anesthesia administered. Immediately after the operation the surgeons rated surgical conditions (bleeding from the surgical field) on a visual analogue scale (0-10 cm) and on a verbal rating scale.. Blood pressure was not different between the two groups, but heart rate was lower in the intravenous anesthesia group (mean heart rate in the intravenous anesthesia group, 62 beats per min [95% confidence interval, 52-72]; mean heart rate in the balanced anesthesia group, 75 beats per min [95% confidence interval, 67-83]). Surgical conditions were rated to be significantly better (P <.0001) during anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil (median rating: 2.8; 25th/75th percentile: 2.0/3.4) compared with isoflurane-alfentanil (median rating: 4.9; 25th/75th percentile: 3.6/7.6).. Intravenous anesthesia using propofol-remifentanil provides better surgical conditions compared with a traditional balanced anesthesia technique using isoflurane-alfentanil. It is hypothesized that lower cardiac output caused by decreased heart rate during deep general anesthesia is responsible for this result. Topics: Adult; Alfentanil; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Endoscopy; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Isoflurane; Male; Microsurgery; Paranasal Sinuses; Piperidines; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Remifentanil; Sinusitis | 2003 |
6 other study(ies) available for piperidines and Sinusitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Therapeutic Effects of Intranasal Tofacitinib on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in Mice.
The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway play a key role in immune modulation, especially in the polarization of T helper cells. JAK inhibitors reduce inflammation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of STAT. We investigated whether a JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, can reduce inflammation in a mouse model of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).. An eosinophilic CRSwNP model was induced using 4-week-old BALB/c mice. The therapeutic effects of topical tofacitinib were compared with the effects of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC). Polyp formation and eosinophilic infiltration were assessed by histology. Levels of phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT), eosinophil cationic protein, and eotaxin were measured by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression levels of GATA-3 was measured using quantitative PCR. The production of cytokines in sinonasal tissues, including interleukin IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, and interferon-γ, were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).. Topical tofacitinib administration significantly reduced the number of polyp-like lesions and the degree of eosinophilic infiltration, with an efficacy comparable with that of systemic TAC administration. Similarly, the levels of pSTAT6, eosinophil cationic protein, and eotaxin decreased with tofacitinib treatment. Tofacitinib decreased the gene expression level of GATA-3. Lastly, tofacitinib significantly decreased IL-4 and IL-5 production to a similar extent as that by systemic or topical TAC administration. Tofacitinib, but not TAC, significantly increased the production of interferon-γ.. Topical tofacitinib administration may be an effective treatment for eosinophilic CRSwNP by inhibiting phosphorylation of STATs.. N/A. Laryngoscope, 131:E1400-E1407, 2021. Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Administration, Intranasal; Animals; Chronic Disease; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Eosinophilia; Eosinophils; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Mice; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Polyps; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Rhinitis; Signal Transduction; Sinusitis; STAT Transcription Factors; Triamcinolone Acetonide | 2021 |
Management of hypogammaglobulinemia and recurrent infections in a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient receiving ibrutinib.
Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinemia; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Recurrence; Sinusitis | 2018 |
Invasive Fungal Sinusitis due to Mucor Species in a Patient on Ibrutinib.
Topics: Adenine; Humans; Invasive Fungal Infections; Mucor; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; Sinusitis | 2018 |
Unusual cause of sinusitis and cough.
Topics: Adenine; Biopsy; Cough; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Radiography, Thoracic; Salvage Therapy; Sinusitis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome | 2018 |
Anesthetic management of a patient with narcolepsy.
We report the anesthetic management of a narcoleptic patient performed using sevoflurane-remifentanil with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. A 22-year-old man, who was diagnosed with narcolepsy at the age of 17, requested endoscopic sinus surgery, under general anesthesia, for chronic allergic rhinitis. On the morning of the day of operation, he took his daily dose of modafinil, used to control narcolepsy. Anesthesia was induced by 5% sevoflurane and maintained with sevoflurane and continuous infusion of remifentanil and 60% oxygen in conjunction with BIS monitoring. BIS values were between 47 and 58. Duration of surgery was 150 min. After surgery, the patient emerged from anesthesia within 10 min and was extubated. His recovery was uneventful. We found the use of BIS monitoring for titrating sevoflurane concentration in a narcoleptic patient is useful for preventing not only oversedation but also intraoperative awareness caused by the preoperative medication. Topics: Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Consciousness Monitors; Endoscopy; Flurbiprofen; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Methyl Ethers; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Sevoflurane; Sinusitis; Young Adult | 2011 |
Using remifentanil and sufentanil in functional endoscopic sinus surgery to improve surgical conditions.
The purpose of the study was to compare three types of general anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with controlled hypotension measuring the quality of visibility of the surgical field and the blood loss during the operation. Seventy-one patients underwent endoscopic ethmoidectomy bilaterally for nasal polyposis and/or chronic sinusitis. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of anesthesia they had: group A (sufentanil/sevoflurane), group B (remifentanil/propofol), and group C (fentanyl/isoflurane). The mean estimated blood loss for group A was 117.83 ml, for group B it was 100.5 ml and for group C it was 198.89 ml. The average quality of visibility of the surgical field was 1.57 for group A, 1.3 for group B and 2.79 for group C. The quantity of blood loss (p < 0.01) and the visibility of the surgical field (p < 0.001) demonstrated a difference among the three groups. Remifentanil and sufentanil during functional ESS enable controlled hypotension and a general improvement in surgical conditions. Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Adult; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Chronic Disease; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Nasal Polyps; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Retrospective Studies; Sinusitis; Sufentanil; Tampons, Surgical | 2005 |