piperidines and Nausea

To develop and compare benefit-risk profiles for rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) of published clinical trials.. A fixed-effects Bayesian NMA of randomized controlled trials of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine were used to determine risk differences for efficacy and safety outcomes of the 3 treatments compared with pooled placebo. Risk differences were used to calculate number needed to treat (NNT) for pain relief and pain freedom at 2 and 2 to 24 hours and freedom from most bothersome symptoms at 2 hours; and number needed to harm (NNH) for dizziness and nausea, relative to placebo.. Results were based on 5 randomized controlled trials (NCT03461757, NCT02828020, NCT02867709, NCT02439320, and NCT02605174). NNT to achieve sustained pain relief at 2 to 24 hours was lowest for rimegepant 75 mg (5; 95% credible interval [Crl]: 4, 7) and ubrogepant 100 mg (5; 95% Crl: 4, 8) and highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (8; 95% Crl: 5, 16). Rimegepant had the lowest NNT to achieve sustained pain freedom at 2 to 24 hours and lasmiditan 50 mg had the highest (7; 95% Crl: 5, 12 vs. 26; 95% Crl: 13, 95). NNH for dizziness and nausea was highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (28; 95% Crl: 15, 62 and 99; 95% Crl: -2580, 2378, respectively). Lasmiditan 200 mg had the lowest NNH for dizziness and rimegepant 75 mg had the lowest NNH for nausea.. The benefit-risk profiles of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant may improve clinical decision-making.

Topics: Adult; Bayes Theorem; Benzamides; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Pyrroles; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Treatment Outcome

Migraine has been recognized as one of common diseases in the world whose current treatment options are not ideal. Lasmiditan, an oral 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched on lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine from inception of the databases to Feb 1, 2020. Pain free and pain relief, global impression (very much/much better), and no/mild disability at 2 h in efficacy; total treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), dizziness, nausea, fatigue, paraesthesia and somnolence in safety were extracted from the included studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3).. Four RCTs with a total of 4960 subjects met our inclusion criteria. The overall effect estimate showed that lasmiditan was significantly superior to placebo in terms of pain free (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.55-1.87), pain relief (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.33-1.47), global impression (very much/much better) (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.44-1.67), and no/mild disability (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.20) at 2 h. For the safety, significant number of patients experienced TEAEs with lasmiditan than with placebo (RR 2.77, 95% CI 2.53-3.03), most TEAEs were central nervous system (CNS)-related and included dizziness (RR 5.81, 95% CI 4.72-7.14), nausea (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.87-3.57), fatigue (RR 5.38, 95% CI 3.78-7.66), paraesthesia (RR 4.48, 95% CI 3.33-6.02), and somnolence (RR 2.82, 95% CI 2.18-3.66).. This meta-analysis suggests that lasmiditan is effective for the acute treatment of migraine with a higher incidence of CNS-related adverse reactions compared with placebo. Long-term, open-label, multi-dose trials are required to verify the current findings.

Topics: Benzamides; Dizziness; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1F; Receptors, Serotonin; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vertigo

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a mediator in B cell receptor signaling has been successfully exploited as a therapeutic target in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Ibrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that has shown excellent efficacy in treatment-naïve, heavily pre-treated, and high-risk CLL/SLL. With remarkable efficacy, good oral bioavailability, and modest adverse events profile, ibrutinib use is likely to continue to increase. As data with ibrutinib use in CLL matures, concerns regarding adverse events and drug resistance have emerged. New insights into mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance in CLL have uncovered potential therapeutic targets. Several promising novel agents are currently in early phases of development for overcoming ibrutinib resistance in CLL/SLL. We provide a comprehensive analysis of emerging adverse events profile of ibrutinib, summarize our current understanding of ibrutinib resistance in CLL, and review promising novel therapeutic tools to overcome this challenge.

Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Benzamides; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diarrhea; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Nausea; Piperidines; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrazines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services, and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter analgesics. Naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID); its efficacy in acute migraine has not been established by systematic reviews. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce the nausea and vomiting commonly associated with migraine headaches.. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of naproxen, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared with placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Oxford Pain Relief Database, together with two online databases (www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com and www.clinicaltrials.gov) and reference lists, for studies to 22 May 2013.. We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm, using naproxen alone or with an antiemetic to treat a migraine headache episode.. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate risk ratios and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared with placebo or a different active treatment.. We included six studies using naproxen 275 mg, 500 mg, or 825 mg to treat attacks of moderate or severe pain intensity. Overall, 1241 participants took naproxen (275 mg to 825 mg), 229 took sumatriptan 50 mg, 173 took naratriptan 2.5 mg, and 1092 took placebo. No studies combined naproxen with an antiemetic. Studies using naproxen 275 mg provided no useable data for analysis.Naproxen (500 mg and 825 mg) was better than placebo for pain-free response and headache relief. At two hours, the NNT for pain-free response was 11 (17% response with naproxen, 8% with placebo; risk ratio 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.6), moderate quality) and for headache relief was 6.0 (45% response with naproxen, 29% with placebo; risk ratio 1.6 (1.4 to 1.8), moderate quality). The NNT for sustained pain-free response during the 24 hours post dose was 19 (12% response with naproxen, 6.7% with placebo), and for sustained headache relief during the 24 hours post dose was 8.3 (30% response with naproxen, 18% with placebo). Analysing only the lower dose of 500 mg of naproxen did not significantly change the results. Adverse events, which were mostly mild or moderate in severity and rarely led to withdrawal, were more common with naproxen than with placebo when the 500 mg and 825 mg doses were considered together, but not when the 500 mg dose was analysed alone.There were insufficient data for analysis of naproxen compared with sumatriptan, and no data suitable for analysis of naproxen compared with naratriptan.. Naproxen is statistically superior to placebo in the treatment of acute migraine, but the NNT of 11 for pain-free response at two hours suggests that it is not a clinically useful treatment. Cochrane reviews examining other commonly used analgesics for acute migraine have reported better (lower) NNT results for the same outcome. Naproxen is not clinically useful as a stand-alone analgesic in acute migraine, as it is effective in fewer than 2 people in 10.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antiemetics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Naproxen; Nausea; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sumatriptan; Tryptamines; Vomiting

The addition of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonists to antiemetic regimens has substantially reduced chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). We sought to systematically review the overall impact of NK1R antagonists on CINV prevention.. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, and meeting proceedings for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated NK1R antagonists plus standard antiemetic therapy for CINV prevention. Complete response (CR) to therapy was defined as the absence of emesis and the absence of rescue therapy. The endpoints were defined as CR in the overall phase (during the first 120 hours of chemotherapy), CR in the acute phase (first 24 hours), and the delayed phase (24-120 hours) after chemotherapy, nausea, and toxicity. Subgroup analyses evaluated the type of NK1R antagonist used, the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy regimen, and prolonged use of 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor antagonists, a class of standard antiemetic agents. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were one-sided; statistical tests for effect estimates and publication bias were two-sided.. Seventeen trials (8740 patients) were included in this analysis. NK1R antagonists increased the CR rate in the overall phase from 54% to 72% (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.57, P < .001). CR and nausea were improved in all phases and subgroups. The expected side effects from NK1R antagonists did not statistically significantly differ from previous reports; however, this analysis suggests that the incidence of severe infection increased from 2% to 6% in the NK1R antagonist group (three RCTs with a total of 1480 patients; OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.69 to 5.67, P < .001).. NK1R antagonists increased CINV control in the acute, delayed, and overall phases. They are effective for both moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Their use might be associated with increased infection rates; however, additional appraisal of specific data from RCTs is needed.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Infections; Morpholines; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Odds Ratio; Piperazines; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Vomiting

The effective anti-migraine drugs triptans, all bind with high affinity to three serotonin (5-HT) subtypes, the 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F. 5-HT1B mRNA is densely localized within smooth muscle, and less in the endothelium of cerebral blood vessels. This vascular distribution of 5-HT1B receptor has been shown to mediate the vasoconstrictive properties of the triptans, responsible for potential cardiac adverse events. Activation of 5-HT1D subtype, although effective in animal models of migraine, was not enough efficient to attenuate migraine attacks in clinical trials. The 5-HT1F receptor is located both in vessels and within the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C), but with the difference that the 5-HT1F receptor lack vasoconstrictive properties, making it an attractive target for new anti-migraine drugs. Selective activation of 5-HT1F receptor potently inhibited markers associated with electrical stimulation of the TG. Thus 5-HT1F receptor represents an ideal target for anti-migraine drugs. So far two selective 5-HT1F agonists have been tested in human trials for migraine: LY334370 and lasmiditan. Both molecules were efficient in attenuating migraine attacks with efficacy in the same range as oral sumatriptan 100mg, the gold standard for triptans. The LY334370 project withdrew because of toxicity in animals, while lasmiditan is still testing. In this review we present all the available preclinical and clinical data on the 5-HT1F agonists as a potential new class of anti-migraine drugs lacking vascular activity and we discuss related issues on the vascular and neuronal aspects of migraine pathogenesis.

Topics: Animals; Benzamides; Carbazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Fatigue; Fluorobenzenes; Humans; Indoles; Migraine Disorders; Models, Neurological; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nausea; Paresthesia; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1F; Receptors, Serotonin; Serotonin; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Treatment Outcome; Vertigo

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life. The emetogenicity of the chemotherapeutic agents, repeated chemotherapy cycles, and patient risk factors significantly influence CINV. 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone have significantly improved the control of acute CINV, but delayed CINV remains a significant clinical problem. Two new agents, palonosetron and aprepitant, have been approved for the prevention of both acute and delayed CINV. Palonosetron is a second-generation 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist with a longer half-life and a higher binding affinity than first-generation 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. Aprepitant is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonists. Casopitant is another NK-1 receptor antagonist that is under review by the FDA after recent completion of Phase III clinical trials. The introduction of these new agents has generated revised antiemetic guidelines for the prevention of CINV. Future studies may consider the use of palonosetron, aprepitant and casopitant with other antiemetic agents (olanzapine, gabapentin, cannabinoids) in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well as in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Isoquinolines; Morpholines; Nausea; Palonosetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Vomiting

The effective treatment of emetic complications of cancer therapies has remained a challenging task for cancer patients and their cancer care providers. Despite striking advances in antiemetic interventions, the need for more personalized targeted treatments in those who fail to response to the currently available antiemetic agents are yet to be met. Casopitant, a potent selective inhibitor of neurokinin-1 receptors, is a product of the increasingly heightened interest in this particular subset of cancer patients. The current review examines the emerging data about the benefits and safety of casopitant for treatment of chemotherapy-induced acute and delayed emesis, as well as the postoperative nausea/vomiting. Although preclinical studies promoted the notion of a potential superiority of casopitant over the already approved aprepitant in enhancing food and fluid intake, the limited comparison in clinical settings have yet to affirm a demonstratable meaningful superiority. The prevailing view from the published prospective studies supports a single 100 or 150 mg dose schedule of casopitant, orally or intravenously, as an effective and safe prophylaxis for acute and delayed emesis. The relative inferior outcomes of "nausea" control, as compared to a more impressive "vomiting" prevention, are similarly shared by both casopitant and aprepitant. This repeated and disappointing observation has challenged the precision and accuracy of our current understandings about the exact fabric of the "emesis axis." The future efforts should be directed to identify more effective agents for managing nausea and anticipatory emesis equally in both genders.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Nausea; Neoplasms; Piperazines; Piperidines; Vomiting

Casopitant, an inhibitor of the neurokinin-1 receptor, and its mesylate salt, are being developed by GlaxoSmithKline plc for the potential treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), as well as for anxiety, depression and insomnia. Phase II trials are ongoing for anxiety, depression and insomnia, and further results are awaited from phase III trials of CINV and PONV. At the time of publication, it was expected that applications to the FDA for regulatory approval for CINV and PONV would be filed in 2008. Casopitant was previously being developed for the treatment of overactive bladder; however, in September 2007, this indication was no longer listed on the company's product pipeline.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Anxiety Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Contraindications; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Female; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Patents as Topic; Piperazines; Piperidines; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Structure-Activity Relationship; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; Vomiting

Rimonabant is a selective type 1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonist. It may assist with smoking cessation by restoring the balance of the endocannabinoid system, which can be disrupted by prolonged use of nicotine. Rimonabant also seeks to address many smokers' reluctance to persist with a quit attempt because of concerns about weight gain.. To determine whether selective CB1 receptor antagonists increase the numbers of people stopping smoking. To assess their effects on weight change in successful quitters and in those who try to quit but fail.. We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Review Group specialized register for trials, using the terms 'rimonabant' and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, using major MESH terms. We acquired electronic or paper copies of posters of preliminary trial results presented at the American Thoracic Society Meeting in 2005, and at the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco European Meeting 2006. We also attempted to contact the authors of ongoing studies of rimonabant, and Sanofi Aventis (manufacturers of rimonabant).. Types of studies: Randomized controlled trials.. Adult smokers. Types of interventions: Selective CB1 receptor antagonists, such as rimonabant. Types of outcome measures: The primary outcome is smoking status at a minimum of six months after the start of treatment. We preferred sustained cessation rates to point prevalence, and biochemically verified cessation to self-reported quitting. We regarded smokers who drop out or are lost to follow up as continuing smokers. We have noted any adverse effects of treatment. A secondary outcome is weight change associated with the cessation attempt.. Two authors checked the abstracts for relevance, and attempted to acquire full trial reports. One author extracted the data, and a second author checked them.. We found three trials which met our inclusion criteria, covering 1567 smokers (cessation: STRATUS-EU and STRATUS-US), and 1661 quitters (relapse prevention: STRATUS-WW). At one year, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for quitting with rimonabant 20 mg was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 2.30). No significant benefit was demonstrated for rimonabant at 5 mg dosage. Adverse events included nausea and upper respiratory tract infections. In the relapse prevention trial, smokers who had quit on the 20 mg regimen were 1(1/2) times more likely to remain abstinent on either active regimen than on placebo; the OR for the 20 mg maintenance group was 1.49 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.04, and for the 5 mg maintenance group 1.51 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.07). There appeared to be no significant benefit of maintenance treatment for the 5 mg quitters.Weight gain was reported to be significantly lower among the 20 mg quitters than in the 5 mg or placebo quitters. During treatment, overweight or obese smokers tended to lose weight, while normal weight smokers did not.. From the preliminary trial reports available, rimonabant 20 mg may increase the odds of quitting approximately 1 and one-half-fold. Adverse events include nausea and upper respiratory tract infections; the risk of serious adverse events is reported to be low. The evidence for rimonabant in maintaining abstinence is inconclusive. Rimonabant 20 mg may moderate weight gain in the long term.

Topics: Adult; Body Weight; Depression; Humans; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Secondary Prevention; Smoking Cessation; Smoking Prevention; Suicide

Rimonabant is a selective type 1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonist. It may assist with smoking cessation by restoring the balance of the endocannabinoid system, which can be disrupted by prolonged use of nicotine. Rimonabant also seeks to address many smokers' reluctance to persist with a quit attempt because of concerns about weight gain.. To determine whether selective CB1 receptor antagonists increase the numbers of people stopping smoking. To assess their effects on weight change in successful quitters and in those who try to quit but fail.. We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Review Group specialized register for trials, using the terms 'rimonabant' and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, using major MESH terms. We acquired electronic or paper copies of posters of preliminary trial results presented at the American Thoracic Society Meeting in 2005, and at the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco European Meeting 2006. We also attempted to contact the authors of ongoing studies of rimonabant, and Sanofi Aventis (manufacturers of rimonabant).. Types of studies: Randomized controlled trials.. Adult smokers. Types of interventions: Selective CB1 receptor antagonists, such as rimonabant. Types of outcome measures: The primary outcome is smoking status at a minimum of six months after the start of treatment. We preferred sustained cessation rates to point prevalence, and biochemically verified cessation to self-reported quitting. We regarded smokers who drop out or are lost to follow up as continuing smokers. We have noted any adverse effects of treatment.A secondary outcome is weight change associated with the cessation attempt.. Two authors checked the abstracts for relevance, and attempted to acquire full trial reports. One author extracted the data, and a second author checked them.. We found three trials which met our inclusion criteria, covering 1567 smokers (cessation: STRATUS-EU and STRATUS-US), and 1661 quitters (relapse prevention: STRATUS-WW). At one year, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for quitting with rimonabant 20 mg was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 2.30). No significant benefit was demonstrated for rimonabant at 5 mg dosage. Adverse events included nausea and upper respiratory tract infections. In the relapse prevention trial, smokers who had quit on the 20 mg regimen were 1(1/2) times more likely to remain abstinent on either active regimen than on placebo; the OR for the 20 mg maintenance group was 1.49 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.04, and for the 5 mg maintenance group 1.51 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.07). There appeared to be no significant benefit of maintenance treatment for the 5 mg quitters. Weight gain was reported to be significantly lower among the 20 mg quitters than in the 5 mg or placebo quitters. During treatment, overweight or obese smokers tended to lose weight, while normal weight smokers did not.. From the preliminary trial reports available, rimonabant 20 mg may increase the odds of quitting approximately 1(1/2)-fold. Adverse events include nausea and upper respiratory tract infections; the risk of serious adverse events is reported to be low. However, there is current concern (August 2007) over rates of depression and suicidal thoughts in people taking rimonabant for weight control. The evidence for rimonabant in maintaining abstinence is inconclusive. Rimonabant 20 mg may moderate weight gain in the long term.

Topics: Adult; Body Weight; Depression; Humans; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Secondary Prevention; Smoking; Smoking Cessation; Smoking Prevention; Suicide

Remifentanil is a synthetic opioid that was developed in the early 1990s and introduced into clinical use in 1996. It is a methyl ester and is metabolised by nonspecific tissue and plasma esterases. Consequently, it is a drug that undergoes rapid elimination and has a reported terminal elimination half-life of between 10 and 35 minutes. Because there is no drug accumulation, the context-sensitive half-time remains constant; thus the pharmacokinetics of the drug do not change regardless of the duration of infusion. The organ-independent elimination of remifentanil, coupled with the fact that its clearance is greater in infants and neonates compared with older age groups, make its pharmacokinetic profile different from any other opioid. In addition, its unique metabolism confers predictability in its clinical use. Like other opioid mu receptor agonists, remifentanil provides dose-dependent analgesia, while the adverse effects of this drug, e.g. respiratory depression, are also thought to be dose related. The incidence of nausea and vomiting appear similar to other opioids. Its rapid and consistent metabolism regardless of duration of infusion has made remifentanil an attractive analgesic/anaesthetic option for paediatric care providers.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Pressure; Child; Heart Rate; Humans; Nausea; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Respiratory Insufficiency; Seizures; Vomiting

Alzheimer's disease is common, incurable and disabling. It is expected to grow dramatically in prevalence over the next 50 years. At current, the standard of care for patients with mild and moderately severe Alzheimer's disease includes the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Donepezil (Aricept) is a highly selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with a pharmacokinetic profile allowing once-daily dosing. There is an extensive knowledge base derived from published clinical trials of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease, revealing consistent efficacy in cognition, global clinical ratings and daily function. Donepezil is also associated with additional meaningful outcomes such as reduced risk for, or delay to, nursing home placement. Despite a sense of limited efficacy of this drug class among prescribers, number needed-to-treat analyses suggest donepezil is highly effective at reducing the long-term adverse outcomes associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Anorexia; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Dementia; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indans; Nausea; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Sumatriptan is a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist of documented efficacy in relieving migraine and associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In the past decade, several studies reported an important delay of gastric emptying induced by sumatriptan in healthy humans. The impact of this gastric motor effect of sumatriptan in migraineurs is difficult to predict: a further delay in gastric emptying could be detrimental (i.e. increased nausea and epigastric symptoms) in patients already having delayed gastric emptying. However, in patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan is also reported to improve gastric accommodation to a meal and reduce perception of gastric distention, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Thus, reduced visceral perception could be a mechanism involved in reducing nausea during a migraine attack. Paradoxically, sumatriptan is reported both to relieve the nausea of a migraine attack and to have nausea as a side effect. Although careful analysis of the time of onset of nausea may offer a clue as to the origin of this symptom, available data do not support definite conclusions, all the more so because the gastric motor effect of second-generation triptans are still unexplored. Taken together, the available evidence warrants further studies to clarify the following issues: first, the mechanism responsible for the gastric motor effect of sumatriptan [receptor subtype(s) involved; central vs peripheral mechanism]; secondly, the effects on gastric motility/visceral sensitivity of second-generation triptans (which are 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists) and more recent selective 5-HT1D receptor agonists (proposed as investigational antimigraine agents with less potential to induce coronary vasoconstriction through 5-HT1B receptors); finally, the possible use of drugs improving gastric accommodation to a meal in the management of those dyspeptic patients with impaired fundic relaxation/altered visceral sensitivity.

Topics: Forecasting; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Indoles; Nausea; Piperidines; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Sumatriptan; Tryptamines; Vomiting

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of donepezil are reviewed. Donepezil is a synthetic noncovalent reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) for the treatment of mild to moderate dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease. In contrast to tacrine hydrochloride, the only comparable agent currently approved by FDA, donepezil exhibits a relatively high degree of selectivity for neuronal AChE as opposed to butyrylcholinesterase. It has a half-life of 60 hours in young adults and 104 hours in elderly patients. In clinical trials, donepezil has been associated with significant improvements in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale and Clinical Interview-Based Impression of Change scores. The most common adverse effects associated with donepezil are nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and vomiting, which are most likely to occur during dose initiation or adjustment. Hepatotoxicity, a dose-limiting adverse effect that sometimes requires discontinuation of tacrine, has not been reported with donepezil. Donepezil does not appear to interact with theophylline, cimetidine, warfarin, or digoxin. Ketoconazole and quinidine inhibit the metabolism of donepezil in vitro, but there is a lack of clinical data showing that these drugs decrease the clearance of donepezil. The initial recommended dosage is 5 mg daily before bedtime, with a dosage increase to 10 mg after four to six weeks according to the patient's response and tolerance. Donepezil appears to be preferable to tacrine as the initial agent for patients with mild to moderate dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Anorexia; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indans; Nausea; Piperidines

Paroxetine is a novel phenylpiperidine compound that acts as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). It is a more selective and potent SSRI than fluoxetine, sertraline, or fluvoxamine. Its pharmacokinetics are well suited to clinical use. Its half-life is approximately 24 hours, and it has no active metabolites. As with other SSRIs, there are few clinically significant drug interactions with paroxetine. Clinical studies consistently show that paroxetine alleviates moderate or severe depression and associated anxiety. It begins to act at least as rapidly as the tricyclic antidepressants. Animal data and limited human experience suggest relative safety in overdose and no evidence of teratogenicity. As with other SSRIs, the most common side effect of paroxetine is nausea, which is usually well tolerated. The nausea rarely leads to drug discontinuation or even dosage reduction. Little weight loss or weight gain occurs with paroxetine at doses used to treat depression, and the drug has no effect on the seizure threshold. Unlike other SSRIs, paroxetine has a relatively low incidence of anxiety and agitation. There is no evidence that paroxetine increases suicidal ideation. This supplement will contribute several important new papers to the literature on paroxetine.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Depressive Disorder; Humans; Nausea; Paroxetine; Piperidines; Serotonin Antagonists

Lasmiditan is the first 5-HT. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to lasmiditan 200 mg lasmiditan 100 mg, or a control group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), their severity, and incidence by treated attacks for frequently reported TEAEs (≥ 5%) were evaluated. The duration, onset, and relationship of efficacy with very common TEAEs (≥ 10%) was analyzed.. A total of 281 Chinese patients were included in this post hoc analysis. No deaths and no study drug-related treatment emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported. The incidence of at least one TEAE was higher in patients receiving lasmiditan 200 mg (73.9%) and 100 mg (66.3%) versus placebo (26.6%). TEAEs were generally mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of frequently reported TEAEs was generally highest during the first attack. Very common TEAEs with lasmiditan included dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, muscular weakness, fatigue, and nausea. The duration of dizziness was longest during the first attack. There were no cardio-cerebrovascular ischemic events and serotonin syndrome. The presence of very common TEAEs (except nausea), and severe dizziness, did not appear to have a negative influence on the efficacy.. In the Chinese population of the CENTURION study, most of the TEAEs were neurologic, of mild or moderate severity, and self-limiting. The distribution of frequently reported TEAEs at the first attack differed from the primary cohort, while the overall safety profile of lasmiditan in the Chinese population was generally consistent with the CENTURION primary cohort. No new safety concerns were observed in the Chinese population.. NCT03670810.. Although there is significant unmet medical need among patients with migraine, there has been no novel compound for treatment of migraine over past two decades in China. These unmet medical needs persist because the current available medications for the acute treatment of migraine are reported to have safety and tolerability issues. Lasmiditan is a new class of acute migraine medication (5-HT receptor agonist with high selectivity for the 5-HT

Topics: Benzamides; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Treatment Outcome

Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist that is being investigated for the preventive treatment of migraine.. In a phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with 4 to 14 migraine days per month in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a once-daily dose of oral atogepant (10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean number of migraine days per month across the 12 weeks. Secondary end points included headache days per month, a reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the 3-month average of migraine days per month, quality of life, and scores on the Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary (AIM-D).. A total of 2270 participants were screened, 910 were enrolled, and 873 were included in the efficacy analysis; 214 were assigned to the 10-mg atogepant group, 223 to the 30-mg atogepant group, 222 to the 60-mg atogepant group, and 214 to the placebo group. The mean number of migraine days per month at baseline ranged from 7.5 to 7.9 in the four groups. The changes from baseline across 12 weeks were -3.7 days with 10-mg atogepant, -3.9 days with 30-mg atogepant, -4.2 days with 60-mg atogepant, and -2.5 days with placebo. The mean differences from placebo in the change from baseline were -1.2 days with 10-mg atogepant (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8 to -0.6), -1.4 days with 30-mg atogepant (95% CI, -1.9 to -0.8), and -1.7 days with 60-mg atogepant (95% CI, -2.3 to -1.2) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Results for the secondary end points favored atogepant over placebo with the exceptions of the AIM-D Performance of Daily Activities score and the AIM-D Physical Impairment score for the 10-mg dose. The most common adverse events were constipation (6.9 to 7.7% across atogepant doses) and nausea (4.4 to 6.1% across atogepant doses). Serious adverse events included one case each of asthma and optic neuritis in the 10-mg atogepant group.. Oral atogepant once daily was effective in reducing the number of migraine days and headache days over a period of 12 weeks. Adverse events included constipation and nausea. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effect and safety of atogepant for migraine prevention. (Funded by Allergan; ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03777059.).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Pyrroles; Spiro Compounds; Young Adult

Tepotinib is an oral, potent, highly selective MET inhibitor. This first-in-man phase I trial investigated the MTD of tepotinib to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D).. Patients received tepotinib orally according to one of three dose escalation regimens (R) on a 21-day cycle: R1, 30-400 mg once daily for 14 days; R2, 30-315 mg once daily 3 times/week; or R3, 300-1,400 mg once daily. After two cycles, treatment could continue in patients with stable disease until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor effects.. One hundred and forty-nine patients received tepotinib (R1:. Tepotinib was well tolerated with clinical activity in MET-dysregulated tumors. The RP2D of tepotinib was established as 500 mg once daily.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Patient Safety; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Young Adult

Determine whether common migraine comorbidities affect the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a 5-HT. Across all the Comorbidity Groups, with the potential exception of fatigue, treatment-by-subgroup interaction analyses did not provide evidence of a lasmiditan-driven lasmiditan versus placebo differential treatment effect dependent on Yes versus No comorbidity subgroup for either efficacy or TEAE assessments.. The efficacy and safety of lasmiditan for treatment of individual migraine attacks appear to be independent of comorbid conditions.

Topics: Adult; Benzamides; Comorbidity; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Migraine without Aura; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Treatment Outcome; Vertigo

Niraparib, an inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has been associated with significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the presence or absence of. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival.. Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.. Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality of Life; Survival Analysis

Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor has been implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine. Rimegepant is an orally administered, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist that may be effective in acute migraine treatment.. In a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with at least a 1-year history of migraine and two to eight migraine attacks of moderate or severe intensity per month to receive rimegepant orally at a dose of 75 mg or matching placebo for the treatment of a single migraine attack. The primary end points were freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (other than pain) identified by the patient, both of which were assessed 2 hours after the dose of rimegepant or placebo was administered.. A total of 1186 patients were randomly assigned to receive rimegepant (594 patients) or placebo (592 patients); of these, 537 patients in the rimegepant group and 535 patients in the placebo group could be evaluated for efficacy. The overall mean age of the patients evaluated for efficacy was 40.6 years, and 88.7% were women. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage of patients who were pain-free 2 hours after receiving the dose was 19.6% in the rimegepant group and 12.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3 to 11.9; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were free from their most bothersome symptom 2 hours after the dose was 37.6% in the rimegepant group and 25.2% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 12.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.9 to 17.9; P<0.001). The most common adverse events were nausea and urinary tract infection.. Treatment of a migraine attack with the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant resulted in a higher percentage of patients who were free of pain and free from their most bothersome symptom than placebo. (Funded by Biohaven Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03237845.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Analgesics; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Placebos; Pyridines

Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibition following chemotherapy-elicited DNA damage overrides cell cycle arrest and induces mitotic catastrophe and cell death. GDC-0575 is a highly-selective oral small-molecule Chk1 inhibitor that results in tumor shrinkage and growth delay in xenograft models. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of GDC-0575 alone and in combination with gemcitabine. Antitumor activity and Chk1 pathway modulation were assessed.. In this phase I open-label study, in the dose escalation stage, patients were enrolled in a GDC-0575 monotherapy Arm (1) or GDC-0575 combination with gemcitabine Arm (2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Patients in arm 2 received either i.v. gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (arm 2a) or 500 mg/m2 (arm 2b), followed by GDC-0575 (45 or 80 mg, respectively, as RP2D). Stage II enrolled disease-specific cohorts.. Of 102 patients treated, 70% were female, the median age was 59 years (range 27-85), and 47% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0. The most common tumor type was breast (37%). The most frequent adverse events (all grades) related to GDC-0575 and/or gemcitabine were neutropenia (68%), anemia (48%), nausea (43%), fatigue (42%), and thrombocytopenia (35%). Maximum concentrations of GDC-0575 were achieved within 2 hours of dosing, and half-life was ∼23 hours. No pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was observed between GDC-0575 and gemcitabine. Among patients treated with GDC-0575 and gemcitabine, there were four confirmed partial responses, three occurring in patients with tumors harboring TP53 mutation. Pharmacodynamic data were consistent with GDC-0575 inhibition of gemcitabine-induced expression of pCDK1/2.. GDC-0575 can be safely administered as a monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine; however, overall tolerability with gemcitabine was modest. Hematological toxicities were frequent but manageable. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed but limited to a small number of patients with a variety of refractory solid tumors treated with GDC-0575 and gemcitabine.. NCT01564251.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Checkpoint Kinase 1; Deoxycytidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Fatigue; Female; Gemcitabine; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrroles; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

Sustained-release, high-dose (23 mg/d) donepezil has been approved for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease (AD). Based on a previous clinical trial, body weight of less than 55 kg is a risk factor for adverse events with donepezil 23 mg/d treatment in global population.. To clarify whether this finding is consistent across ethnic groups that vary in absolute body mass, we recruited Korean patients aged 45 to 90 years with moderate to severe AD who had been receiving standard donepezil immediate release 10 mg/d for at least 3 months. After screening, we analyzed a final cohort of 166 patients who received donepezil 23 mg/d for 24 weeks to compare the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between patients with high versus low body mass index (BMI) based on the World Health Organization overweight criteria for Asian populations (23 kg/m).. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 79.45% of patients in the lower BMI group and 58.06% of patients in the higher BMI group (odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-5.63; χ = 7.58, P = 0.006). In a multivariable survival analysis, the group with lower BMI showed a higher occurrence of TEAEs (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.68; P = 0.002).. In Korean patients with moderate to severe AD receiving high-dose donepezil over 24 weeks, TEAEs were significantly more common in those with lower BMI (not clinically overweight), especially nausea. This finding may inform clinical practice for Asian patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dizziness; Donepezil; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea

Ethnic diversity between different populations may affect treatment safety and efficacy.. A subanalysis to a global trial (study 326) was carried out to ascertain the safety and efficacy of donepezil 23 mg/day compared with donepezil 10 mg/day in Asian patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Changes in cognition and global functioning were measured by the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus), respectively, at week 24.. Cognitive improvement measured by SIB score was greater with donepezil 23 mg than with donepezil 10 mg (+1.36 vs -1.56]; difference, 2.92). There was no difference between the groups in global function measured by the CIBIC-Plus (3.94 and 3.95, respectively). Overall, 119 patients (82.1%) receiving donepezil 23 mg and 56 (71.8%) receiving donepezil 10 mg experienced ≥1 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In the donepezil 23 mg group, the incidence of TEAEs was higher among patients of lower weight (<55 kg) at baseline than in those of higher weight (64 of 75 patients [85.3%] vs 55 of 70 patients [78.5%]).. The benefits and risks associated with donepezil 23 mg in Asian patients are comparable to those of the global study population.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Asian People; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma relapse after initial therapy. Bendamustine plus rituximab is often used in the relapsed or refractory setting. We assessed the efficacy and safety of adding ibrutinib, an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), to bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.. The HELIOS trial was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in adult patients (≥18 years of age) who had active chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma with measurable lymph node disease (>1·5 cm) by CT scan, and had relapsed or refractory disease following one or more previous lines of systemic therapy consisting of at least two cycles of a chemotherapy-containing regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Patients with del(17p) were excluded because of known poor response to bendamustine plus rituximab. Patients who had received previous treatment with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors, refractory disease or relapse within 24 months with a previous bendamustine-containing regimen, or haemopoietic stem-cell transplant were also excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system to receive bendamustine plus rituximab given in cycles of 4 weeks' duration (bendamustine: 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 2-3 in cycle 1, and days 1-2 in cycles 2-6; rituximab: 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycle 1, and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycles 2-6 for a maximum of six cycles) with either ibrutinib (420 mg daily orally) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified according to whether they were refractory to purine analogues and by number of previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival. Crossover to ibrutinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with IRC-confirmed disease progression. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and is continuing for further long-term follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01611090.. Between Sept 19, 2012, and Jan 21, 2014, 578 eligible patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib or placebo in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (289 in each group). The primary endpoint was met at the preplanned interim analysis (March 10, 2015). At a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·7-20·7), progression-free survival was significantly improved in the ibrutinib group compared with the placebo group (not reached in the ibrutinib group (95% CI not evaluable) vs 13·3 months (11·3-13·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p<0·0001). IRC-assessed progression-free survival at 18 months was 79% (95% CI 73-83) in the ibrutinib group and 24% (18-31) in the placebo group (HR 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p<0·0001). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were neutropenia and nausea. 222 (77%) of 287 patients in the ibrutinib group and 212 (74%) of 287 patients in the placebo group reported grade 3-4 events; the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia (154 [54%] in the ibrutinib group vs 145 [51%] in the placebo group) and thrombocytopenia (43 [15%] in each group). A safety profile similar to that previously reported with ibrutinib and bendamustine plus rituximab individually was noted.. In patients eligible for bendamustine plus rituximab, the addition of ibrutinib to this regimen results in significant improvements in outcome with no new safety signals identified from the combination and a manageable safety profile.. Janssen Research & Development.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Atrial Fibrillation; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Retreatment; Rituximab; Thrombocytopenia

We aimed to compare fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine with respect to hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain control and achievement of sedation at the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). In this randomized double-blind study, 90 consecutive total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl (1.0 μg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.4 μg/kg/hr infusion (FK group, n = 30), or remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.08 μg/kg/min infusion (RK group, n = 30), or dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) over 10 minutes followed by a 0.5 μg/kg/hr infusion (DK group, n = 30) initiating at the end of main procedures of the operation to the time in the PACU. A single dose of intravenous ketorolac (30 mg) was given to all patients at the end of surgery. We respectively evaluated the pain VAS scores, the modified OAA/S scores, the BIS, the vital signs and the perioperative side effects to compare the efficacy of fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Compared with other groups, the modified OAA/S scores were significantly lower in DK group at 0, 5 and 10 minutes after arrival at the PACU (P < 0.05), whereas the pain VAS and BIS were not significantly different from other groups. The blood pressure and heart rate in the DK group were significantly lower than those of other groups at the PACU (P < 0.05). DK group, at sedative doses, had the better postoperative hemodynamic stability than RK group or FK group and demonstrated a similar effect of pain control as RK group and FK group with patient awareness during sedation in the PACU. (World Health Organization registry, KCT0001524).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Pressure; Dexmedetomidine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fentanyl; Heart Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypotension; Laparoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Young Adult

Breech presentation occurs in up to 3% of pregnancies at term and may be an indication for caesarean delivery. External cephalic version can be effective in repositioning the fetus in a cephalic presentation, but may be painful for the mother. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of remifentanil versus placebo for pain relief during external cephalic version.. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that included women at 36-41 weeks of gestation with non-cephalic presentations was performed. Women were randomized to receive either a remifentanil infusion at 0.1 μg/kg/min and demand boluses of 0.1 μg/kg, or saline placebo. The primary outcome was the numerical rating pain score (0-10) after external cephalic version.. Sixty women were recruited, 29 in the control group and 31 in the remifentanil group. There were significant differences in pain scores at the end of the procedure (control 6.5 ± 2.4 vs. remifentanil 4.7 ± 2.5, P = 0.005) but not 10 min later (P = 0.054). The overall success rate for external cephalic version was 49% with no significant differences between groups (remifentanil group 54.8% vs. control group 41.3%, P = 0.358). In the remifentanil group, there was one case of nausea and vomiting, one of drowsiness and three cases of fetal bradycardia. In the control group, there were three cases of nausea and vomiting, one of dizziness and nine cases of fetal bradycardia.. Intravenous remifentanil with bolus doses on demand during external cephalic version achieved a reduction in pain and increased maternal satisfaction. There were no additional adverse effects, and no difference in the success rate of external cephalic version or the incidence of fetal bradycardia.

Topics: Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Bradycardia; Breech Presentation; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fetal Diseases; Humans; Nausea; Pain; Pain Management; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Placebos; Pregnancy; Remifentanil; Treatment Outcome; Version, Fetal; Vomiting

The present study evaluated the efficacy of lafutidine, a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, for reducing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs for gastric cancer.. Patients with stage II (T1 cases excluded) or stage III gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy achieving R0 resection from 2011 to 2013 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either S-1 treatment or S-1 plus lafutidine treatment. Quality of life and gastrointestinal toxicity were evaluated before chemotherapy and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the beginning of treatment.. The incidence of diarrhea during chemotherapy was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (10% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.002). The grades of diarrhea and nausea during chemotherapy were also significantly lower compared to those before chemotherapy in patients receiving S-1 plus lafutidine than in those administered S-1 alone. The rate of patients requiring a dose reduction or interruption of S-1 was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (30% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.027).. Lafutidine might be useful not only for preventing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, but also for improving compliance with taking oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs. However, this indication needs to be confirmed in a larger, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Topics: Acetamides; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Tract; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

Surrogates may provide easy and quick access to information about pharmacological parameters of interest that can be directly measured only with difficulty. Surrogates have been proposed for opioid blood concentrations to replace invasive sampling, serving as a basis for target-controlled infusion systems to optimize analgesia. We aimed at identifying surrogates of remifentanil steady-state blood concentrations with relevance for its clinical, in particular, analgesic, effects. A "single ascending dose" study design assessed concentration-dependent effects of remifentanil in a double-blind randomized fashion in 16 healthy volunteers. Remifentanil was administered by means of computerized infusion aimed at steady-state effect-site concentrations of 0, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3, 3.6, 4.8, and 6 ng/ml (one concentration per subject, two subjects per concentration). Arterial remifentanil blood concentrations were measured during apparent steady state. Pharmacodynamic parameters were measured at baseline and during steady-state conditions. Potential surrogate parameters included the pupil diameter, the amplitude of pupil light reflex, and the performance in a visual tracking task. Clinical parameters were analgesia to experimental pain, nausea, tiredness, and visual acuity. Remifentanil blood concentrations were well predicted by its effects on the pupil light reflex amplitude, better than by its miotic effects. However, the best prediction for both remifentanil blood concentrations and analgesic effects was obtained using a combination of three surrogate parameters (pupil diameter, light reflex amplitude, and tracking performance). This combination of pharmacodynamic parameters provided even better predictions of analgesia than could be obtained using the measured opioid blood concentrations. Developing surrogates only for opioid blood concentrations is insufficient when opioid effects are the final goal. Combining pharmacodynamic surrogate parameters seems to provide a promising approach to obtain acceptable predictions of relevant clinical effects, with better results than obtained with measuring or estimating blood concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Pain; Photic Stimulation; Piperidines; Pupil; Reflex; Remifentanil; Sleep Stages; Visual Acuity; Young Adult

This trial aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil given by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or continuous infusion for labour analgesia. Patient controlled analgesia was administered using increasing stepwise boluses from 0.1 to 0.4 μg.kg(-1) (0.1 μg.kg(-1) increment, 2 min lockout, n = 30). Continuous infusion used rates from 0.05 to 0.2 μg.kg(-1) .min(-1) (0.05 μg.kg(-1) .min(-1) increment, n = 30). Dose increments were given on request. Women reported lowest pain scores (median (IQR [range]) of 3 (2-4 [2-5]) for PCA and 4 (3-5.25 [3-7]) for continuous infusion (p = 0.004) at 60 min after the beginning of analgesia. The mean (SD) remifentanil umbilical vein/maternal artery ratio in the PCA and infusion groups were 0.74 (0.45) vs 0.70 (0.52), respectively (p = 0.776). The mean (SD) umbilical artery/umbilical vein ratios were 0.31 (0.12) vs 0.26 (0.07), respectively (p = 0.088). Maternal and neonatal adverse reactions of remifentanil were similar between the two groups. The total remifentanil consumption (median (IQR [range]) during PCA administration was lower than continuous infusion, 1.34 (1.22-1.48 [0.89-1.69]) mg vs 1.49 (1.35-1.61 [1.12-1.70] mg; p = 0.011). The results suggest that remifentanil PCA provides better pain relief and similar placental transfer compared with continuous infusion.

Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Analysis of Variance; Blood Pressure; Bradycardia; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fetal Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Nausea; Pain Measurement; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Pruritus; Remifentanil; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The primary objective was to determine if a single dose of casopitant 90 mg added to ondansetron and dexamethasone would improve the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) over 0-120 h following initiation of oxaliplatin-based moderately emetic chemotherapy (MEC) compared to ondansetron and dexamethasone alone.. Patients with colorectal cancer received either casopitant or placebo intravenously (IV) added to ondansetron 8 mg bid oral on study days 1 to 3 and one dose of dexamethasone 8 mg IV given prior to starting the oxaliplatin on day 1. The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects achieving complete response (CR; no vomiting/retching or use of rescue medication) during 120 h after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1.. No difference in the rate of CR was noted in the casopitant group compared to the placebo group for the overall (placebo 85%, casopitant 86%, p = 0.7273), acute (placebo 96%, casopitant 97%), or delayed phases (placebo 85%, casopitant 86%). The average area under curve (0-∞) of casopitant after a single 90-mg IV dose was 8,390 ng h/mL. At 24 h after casopitant 90-mg IV dosing, the plasma casopitant concentration was 24% lower than the values noted in prior studies with 150 mg oral administration, and the plasma exposure of the major metabolite (GSK525060) was 18% lower.. Addition of single-dose casopitant 90 mg IV did not improve the control of CINV at any time during 120 h following initiation of oxaliplatin-based MEC. Excellent control of CINV was achieved in this study population with the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone alone.

Topics: Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ondansetron; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Piperazines; Piperidines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the effect of intravenously (IV) administered acetaminophen on postoperative pain in children and adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis or spondylolisthesis.. To evaluate effectiveness of IV-administered acetaminophen on postoperative analgesia, opioid consumption, and acetaminophen concentrations after major spine surgery in adolescents.. Scoliosis surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain, most commonly treated with IV-administered opioids. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as adjuvant to opioids, improve analgesia and reduce the need for opioids. However, by inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase enzymes peripherally, NSAIDs may inhibit bone healing. Acetaminophen, a centrally acting analgesic, does not have the adverse effects of NSAIDs and has improved analgesia in children after another orthopedic surgery.. In an institutional review board approved study, 36 American Society of Anesthesiology patient classification I to III patients of 10 to 18 years of age were analyzed. Acetaminophen 30 mg/kg, administered IV or 0.9% NaCl was administered at the end of scoliosis or spondylolisthesis surgery, and thereafter twice at 8-hour intervals. Timed blood samples for acetaminophen determination were taken between 0.25 and 20 hours after the first dose. All patients received standard propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Pain scores (visual analogue scale [VAS], 0-10), opioid consumption, and adverse effects were recorded.. In the surgical ward, 7 (39%) patients in the acetaminophen and 13 (72%) in the placebo group had a VAS pain score 6 or more (P < 0.05). There were fewer hours with VAS score 6 or more in the acetaminophen group compared with the placebo group (8.7% vs. 17.8% of the hours, P < 0.05). There was no difference in oxycodone consumption during the 24-hour follow-up between the 2 groups.. IV-administered acetaminophen 90 mg/kg/day, adjuvant to oxycodone, did improve analgesia, but did not diminish oxycodone consumption during 24 hours after major spine surgery in children and adolescents. All acetaminophen concentrations were in nontoxic levels.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Oxycodone; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Scoliosis; Spinal Diseases; Spondylolisthesis; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Rising life expectancies coupled with an increasing awareness of age-related cognitive decline have led to the unwarranted use of psychopharmaceuticals, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), by significant numbers of healthy older individuals. This trend has developed despite very limited data regarding the effectiveness of such drugs on non-clinical groups and recent work indicates that AChEIs can have negative cognitive effects in healthy populations. For the first time, we use a combination of EEG and simultaneous EEG/fMRI to examine the effects of a commonly prescribed AChEI (donepezil) on cognition in healthy older participants. The short- and long-term impact of donepezil was assessed using two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In both cases, we utilised cognitive (paired associates learning (CPAL)) and electrophysiological measures (resting EEG power) that have demonstrated high-sensitivity to age-related cognitive decline. Experiment 1 tested the effects of 5 mg/per day dosage on cognitive and EEG markers at 6-hour, 2-week and 4-week follow-ups. In experiment 2, the same markers were further scrutinised using simultaneous EEG/fMRI after a single 5 mg dose. Experiment 1 found significant negative effects of donepezil on CPAL and resting Alpha and Beta band power. Experiment 2 replicated these results and found additional drug-related increases in the Delta band. EEG/fMRI analyses revealed that these oscillatory differences were associated with activity differences in the left hippocampus (Delta), right frontal-parietal network (Alpha), and default-mode network (Beta). We demonstrate the utility of simple cognitive and EEG measures in evaluating drug responses after acute and chronic donepezil administration. The presentation of previously established markers of age-related cognitive decline indicates that AChEIs can impair cognitive function in healthy older individuals. To our knowledge this is the first study to identify the precise neuroanatomical origins of EEG drug markers using simultaneous EEG/fMRI. The results of this study may be useful for evaluating novel drugs for cognitive enhancement.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Female; Hippocampus; Humans; Indans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

Early recovery of patients following sedation/analgesia and anesthesia is important in ambulatory practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether modafinil, used for the treatment of narcolepsy, improves recovery following sedation/analgesia.. Patients scheduled for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Two groups received a combination of fentanyl/midazolam with either modafinil or placebo. The remaining groups received remifentanil/propofol with either modafinil or placebo. Modafinil 200 mg was administered to the treatment group patients 1 h before sedation/analgesia. Groups were compared using the digital symbol substitution test (DSST), trail making test (TMT), observer scale of sedation and analgesia (OAA/S) and Aldrete score. Verbal rating scale (VRS) scores for secondary outcome variables e.g. energy, tiredness and dizziness were also recorded before and after treatment.. Sixty-seven patients successfully completed the study. Groups received similar doses of sedation and analgesic drugs. No statistically significant difference was found for DSST between groups. No significant adverse effects occurred in relation to modafinil. No statistically significant difference between groups was identified for TMT, OAA/S and Aldrete scores. The mean VRS score for tiredness was lesser in the modafinil/fentanyl/midazolam group [1.3 (2.0)] compared with the placebo group [3.8 (2.5)], P=0.02. Such a difference was not found between the remifentanil/propofol groups [placebo 2.6 (2.2) vs. modafinil 3.1(2.7)], p>0.05. Dizziness was greater in the modafinil/remifentanil/propofol group 1.7 (2.0) vs. placebo 0.0 (0.5), p<0.05.. Modafinil reduces patient-reported tiredness after sedation/analgesia but does not improve recovery in terms of objective measures of patient psychomotor skills.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Appetite; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Deep Sedation; Dizziness; Fatigue; Fentanyl; Humans; Lithotripsy; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Nausea; Neuropsychological Tests; Pain; Piperidines; Placebos; Propofol; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychomotor Performance; Relaxation; Remifentanil; Sleep Stages; Young Adult

Depletion of cellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) by inhibition of its synthesis is a new pharmacological principle for cancer treatment currently in early phases of clinical development. We present new and previously published data on the safety and efficacy of these drugs based on early clinical trials.. A phase I clinical trial of CHS 828 in patients with advanced solid tumours was performed. Published clinical trials on NAD depleting drugs for cancer treatment were summarised for safety and efficacy.. Seven patients with previously treated solid tumours received oral administration of CHS 828 in the dose range 20-80 mg once weekly for 3 weeks in 4 weeks cycles. Toxicity was dominated by gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, subileus and gastric ulcer. One patient had thrombocytopenia grade 2. There were two cases each of grade 3-4 hyperuricemia and hypokalemia. Safety and efficacy of the NAD depleting drugs CHS 828 and FK866 have been reported from four phase I clinical trials, including a total of 97 patients with previously treated solid tumours. Outstanding toxicity reported was thrombocytopenia and various gastrointestinal symptoms. No objective tumour remission has been observed in the total of 104 patients treated in the above early trials.. Critical toxicity from NAD depleting cancer drugs to consider in future trials seems to be thrombocytopenia and various gastrointestinal symptoms. Efficacy of NAD depleting drugs when used alone is expected to be low.

Topics: Acrylamides; Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cyanides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatigue; Female; Guanidines; Humans; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Middle Aged; NAD; Nausea; Neoplasms; Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase; Piperidines; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

The control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is critical in preventing poor health outcomes and increasing patient quality of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the addition of casopitant to dual-combination therapy of dexamethasone and ondansetron on quality of life in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, add-on trial (N = 810), patients were randomized to intravenous (IV) ondansetron/dexamethasone alone (control) or in combination with either a single 150-mg oral dose of casopitant or 3-day IV/oral casopitant. Quality of life was assessed as impact of nausea and vomiting on daily life using the Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. Patients completed the FLIE questionnaire at baseline prior to receiving chemotherapy and after completion of the first cycle of HEC.. Patients in the single oral dose and 3-day IV/oral casopitant groups scored higher mean total FLIE scores (115.7 and 114.0, respectively; p ≤ 0.0332) than patients in the control group (107.5), indicating that casopitant patients experienced less impact from nausea and vomiting on daily life. The overall absolute difference in the proportion of patients reporting CINV with no impact on daily life between the single oral casopitant group and the control group was 13%; the difference between the 3-day IV/oral casopitant group and the control group was 14%.. The addition of casopitant to ondansetron and dexamethasone in patients receiving HEC was significantly more effective in reducing the impact of nausea and vomiting on all daily life activities as assessed by the FLIE compared with ondansetron/dexamethasone dual therapy.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vomiting; Young Adult

Following a 48-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in 821 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), safety and tolerability of donepezil (10 mg) were further evaluated in a 28-week extension study. Of 499 participants who completed the double-blind phase, 145 enrolled in the open-label study. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout. Overall, 57.4% of participants in the donepezil/donepezil group and 62.3% in the placebo/donepezil group experienced an AE, with the most frequent treatment-emergent AEs being diarrhea, muscle spasms, insomnia, and nausea. Most were mild to moderate in severity and were more common in the first several weeks after treatment initiation. More participants in the placebo/donepezil group (22.1%) discontinued donepezil due to an AE compared with the donepezil/donepezil group (10.3%). These findings support the safety of donepezil in patients with aMCI. When compared with other studies, however, the data suggest that patients with Alzheimer's tolerate donepezil better than patients with MCI.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amnesia; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition Disorders; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neuropsychological Tests; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Spasm; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug rechallenge (or reinitiation), following an event of drug-induced liver injury, is associated with 13% mortality in prospective series. Rechallenge generally results in much more rapid injury than the initial liver event. The neurokinin-1 antagonist casopitant or its placebo was administered cyclically with ondansetron and dexamethasone in two randomized chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting clinical trials in nearly 3000 subjects. Grade 3 ALT elevations were observed in up to 2% of subjects receiving casopitant or placebo treatment. Similar rates of positive rechallenge were observed in the casopitant 8/29 (28%) and placebo groups 2/8 (25%), with no Grade 4 ALT elevations, hypersensitivity or liver-related serious adverse events. Publishing available rechallenge data (positive and negative) will advance our clinical understanding. Rechallenge should only be considered when the potential drug benefit exceeds the risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Vomiting

Pharmacokinetic interactions between casopitant (a substrate and weak to moderate inhibitor of CYP3A), dexamethasone (a substrate and weak inducer of CYP3A), and ondansetron (a mixed CYP substrate) were evaluated in a two-part, three-period, single-sequence study in two groups of healthy subjects.. Part 1: subjects received oral casopitant (regimen A); oral dexamethasone and IV ondansetron (regimen B); and oral casopitant, a reduced dose of oral dexamethasone, and IV ondansetron (regimen C). Part 2: subjects received oral casopitant (regimen D); IV dexamethasone and oral ondansetron (regimen E); and oral casopitant, IV dexamethasone, and oral ondansetron (regimen F). Each regimen was separated by 14 days.. Casopitant AUC in regimen C was increased 28% on day 1 but decreased 34% on day 3 compared to casopitant alone in regimen A. When given with casopitant and ondansetron in regimen C, dexamethasone AUC was 17% lower on day 1, but similar on day 3, compared to regimen B (representing dose-normalized increases in exposure of 39% and 108%, respectively). Ondansetron exposure was equivalent in regimens B and C. Casopitant AUC in regimen F was similar to regimen D on days 1 and 3. Dexamethasone AUC increased 21% when given with oral casopitant and oral ondansetron (regimen F compared to regimen E). Ondansetron exposure was equivalent in regimens E and F.. When repeat-dose oral dexamethasone is to be coadministered with oral casopitant, a reduction in dexamethasone dose may be considered; however, no change in casopitant dose is required. Ondansetron exposure was not affected by coadministration with casopitant.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Vomiting; Young Adult

The objective of this study was to characterize the impact of casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist under investigation for the prevention of postoperative and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, on the pharmacokinetics of the commonly prescribed 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3 receptor antagonists, dolasetron or granisetron.. In a phase I, open-label, two-part, two-period, single-sequence study, two cohorts of healthy subjects received either oral dolasetron (100 mg once daily for 3 days) or oral granisetron (2 mg once daily for 3 days) alone (period 1) and combined with oral casopitant, 150 mg day 1, 50 mg days 2 and 3 (period 2). Pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron and granisetron were assessed on days 1 and 3 of each period. Log-transformed area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax were statistically analyzed by performing an analysis of variance. Eighteen subjects were enrolled in the dolasetron cohort; nine subjects were CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and nine subjects were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in the granisetron cohort.. The largest changes in hydrodolasetron exposure after coadministration with casopitant were seen in CYP2D6 EMs, with a 24% increase in hydrodolasetron AUC on day 1 and 30% increase in Cmax on days 1 and 3. All other changes in hydrodolasetron exposure were <20%, and granisetron exposure was not altered to any relevant extent (<11%).. None of the changes observed are considered clinically meaningful, and coadministration of casopitant with dolasetron or granisetron was well tolerated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quinolizines; Vomiting; Young Adult

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a clinical management problem after treatment with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). We therefore designed and carried out a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether a three-drug antiemetic regimen of ondansetron, dexamethasone, and the neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate was able to prevent acute and delayed CINV events in patients naive to chemotherapy with a malignant solid tumour who were scheduled to receive cisplatin-based HEC regimens.. The study was done between Nov 6, 2006, and Oct 9, 2007, in 77 participating centres in 22 countries. All 810 patients enrolled in the trial received dexamethasone and ondansetron. Patients were randomly assigned to also receive placebo (n=269), single oral dose of casopitant mesylate (150 mg oral, n=271), or 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate (90 mg intravenous on day 1 plus 50 mg oral on days 2 and 3, n=270). Randomisation was done using a central telephone system at the study level, because some centres were expected to recruit only a few patients during the study period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting, retching, or use of rescue medications) in the first 120 h after receiving HEC. Efficacy analysis was done on the modified intention-to-treat population (n=800), which included all patients who received placebo or study drug and HEC (n=265 control, n=266 single-dose oral casopitant mesylate, n=269 3-day intravenous and oral casopitant mesylate). Safety was reported in 802 patients who received either placebo or study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00431236.. Significantly more patients in each casopitant group achieved complete response in cycle 1 of HEC treatment than did those in the control group (175 [66%] patients in the control group, 228 [86%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group [p<0.0001 vs control], and 214 [80%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group (p=0.0004 vs control]). This improvement was sustained over multiple cycles of HEC. Adverse events occurred in 205 (77%) patients in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group and 203 (75%) patients in the 3-day intravenous and oral casopitant mesylate group compared with 194 (73%) of patients in the control group. The most common serious adverse events were neutropenia (n=5 [3%] in the control group, n=3 [1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=11 [4%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group), febrile neutropenia (n=1 [<1%] in the control group, n=4 [1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=6 [2%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group), and dehydration (n=4 [2%] in the control group, n=2 [<1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=1 [<1%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group).. A three-drug regimen including a single oral dose or 3-day intravenous plus oral regimen of casopitant mesylate plus dexamethasone and ondansetron significantly reduced CINV events in patients receiving HEC compared with a two-drug regimen of dexamethasone and ondansetron.. GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Infusion Pumps; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Structure; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Piperazines; Piperidines; Vomiting; Young Adult

Casopitant mesylate is a novel, oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist with demonstrated antiemetic efficacy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II trial to evaluate three casopitant doses as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin. The aim of the study was to detect a dose response.. A total of 493 patients with solid tumors receiving a first cycle of cisplatin > or =70 mg/m(2) were randomly assigned among six treatment arms. The primary analysis compared a control arm [ondansetron/dexamethasone (Ond/Dex)] with three investigational treatments (Ond/Dex plus oral casopitant 50, 100, or 150 mg administered daily for 3 days). Two exploratory arms were included: one evaluating a single oral casopitant dose of 150 mg added to standard Ond/Dex and another with 3-day oral aprepitant-based therapy (Ond/Dex plus aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2-3).. The complete response (CR) rate (defined as no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) was significantly increased in each casopitant arm relative to control over the 120-h evaluation period: 76% (50 mg), 86% (100 mg), 77% (150 mg), and 60% with control (P = 0.0036). The CR rate for the single oral dose regimen was similar to the CR rate reported for the 3-day regimens. No differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or significant nausea among groups in the primary analysis. The most common adverse events related to treatment included headache (n = 10) and hiccups (n = 14).. All doses of oral casopitant as a 3-day regimen (and likely as a 150-mg single oral dose) in combination with Ond/Dex provided significant improvement in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Vomiting

To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 different dosages of CP-690,550, a potent, orally active JAK inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate, etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab caused an inadequate or toxic response.. Patients (n = 264) were randomized equally to receive placebo, 5 mg of CP-690,550, 15 mg of CP-690,550, or 30 mg of CP-690,550 twice daily for 6 weeks, and were followed up for an additional 6 weeks after treatment. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at 6 weeks.. By week 6, the ACR20 response rates were 70.5%, 81.2%, and 76.8% in the 5 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg twice daily groups, respectively, compared with 29.2% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Improvements in disease activity in CP-690,550-treated patients compared with placebo were seen in all treatment groups as early as week 1. ACR50 and ACR70 response rates significantly improved in all treatment groups by week 4. The most common adverse events reported were headache and nausea. The infection rate in both the 15 mg twice daily group and the 30 mg twice daily group was 30.4% (versus 26.2% in the placebo group). No opportunistic infections or deaths occurred. Increases in mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and increases in mean serum creatinine level (0.04-0.06 mg/dl) were seen in all CP-690,550 treatment arms.. Our findings indicate that CP-690,550 is efficacious in the treatment of RA, resulting in rapid, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful reductions in the signs and symptoms of RA. Further studies of CP-690,550 in RA are warranted.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Headache; Humans; International Cooperation; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regimens containing casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).. Predominantly female patients (98%) diagnosed with breast cancer (96%) who were chemotherapy-naïve and scheduled to receive an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) -based regimen were enrolled onto this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 and oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3. Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm (placebo), a single oral dose casopitant arm (150 mg orally [PO] on day 1), a 3-day oral casopitant arm (150 mg PO on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3), or a 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm (90 mg IV on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting/retching or rescue medications) in the first 120 hours after the initiation of MEC.. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the single-dose oral casopitant arm, 3-day oral casopitant arm, and 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm achieved complete response (73%, 73%, and 74%, respectively) versus control (59%; P < .0001). The study did not demonstrate a reduced proportion of patients with nausea or significant nausea in those receiving casopitant. Adverse events were balanced among study arms.. All casopitant regimens studied were more effective than the control regimen. Casopitant was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Alopecia; Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Constipation; Cyclophosphamide; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Headache; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Neutropenia; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

This randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial evaluated the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate in combination with ondansetron/dexamethasone (ond/dex) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) related to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).. Chemotherapy-naive patients who were receiving MEC (N=723) were randomized to receive either oral placebo or casopitant at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg daily (on Days 1-3) plus ondansetron (on Days 1-3) and dexamethasone (Day 1). Two exploratory arms evaluated single-dose casopitant (150 mg) plus ond/dex and a 3-day casopitant regimen with once-daily ondansetron and dexamethasone. Primary endpoints were rates of complete response (CR) (no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) and significant nausea (SN) (>or=25 mm on a visual analog scale) over the first 120 hours after Cycle 1 of MEC. Secondary endpoints included acute and delayed CR and SN rates, rates of nausea, vomiting, and safety.. All casopitant doses that were tested significantly increased the proportion of patients with CR: The CR rates were 80.8% with casopitant 50 mg, 78.5% with casopitant 100 mg, and 84.2% with casopitant 150 mg compared with 69.4% in the control group (P=.0127); casopitant 150 mg was identified as the minimally effective dose. In exploratory analyses, single-dose casopitant demonstrated a 79.2% CR rate, and once-daily ondansetron plus casopitant produced an 83.5% CR rate. Vomiting rates in the first 5 days after MEC were reduced with casopitant-containing regimens (from 23% to 10%-16%). Rates of SN did not differ among treatment arms (range, 28%-29%). Casopitant appeared to be well tolerated with no notable differences in overall adverse event frequency.. Casopitant plus ond/dex was more effective than ond/dex alone for the prevention of CINV.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Vomiting

Rapidly acting narcotics enhance the degree of bradycardia due to the oculocardiac reflex (OCR) elicited by extraocular muscle (EOM) tension during strabismus surgery. We evaluated and compared the effects of remifentanil and sevoflurane on OCR during paediatric strabismus surgery.. One hundred and twenty children, 1-9 years old, undergoing elective strabismus surgery, were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane or remifentanil. No anticholinergic prophylaxis was administered. Anaesthesia was induced using ketamine 1.0 mg/kg or midazolam 0.15 mg/kg with 66% N(2)O in O(2). Laryngeal mask airways were placed with rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 2.0-3.0 vol% with 66% N(2)O in O(2) or remifentanil 0.75 mug/kg over 1 min and followed by the continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.5 mug/kg/min with 66% N(2)O in O(2). Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured and compared. OCR was defined as a reduction in HR of >20% induced by traction of an EOM.. During anaesthesia, HR and BP were maintained at a lower level in the remifentanil group than in the sevoflurane group (each, P<0.05). The mean percent change in HR (-23.3+/-17.0% vs. -11.2+/-13.0%; P<0.05) and the incidence of OCR (58.3% vs. 28.3%; P<0.05) following traction of an EOM were higher in the remifentanil group than in the sevoflurane group.. Remifentanil enhanced the degree of bradycardia due to OCR as compared with sevoflurane during paediatric strabismus surgery.

Topics: Anesthesia; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Infant; Male; Midazolam; Nausea; Piperidines; Reflex, Oculocardiac; Remifentanil; Strabismus; Vomiting

FK866 is a potent inhibitor or NAD synthesis. This first-in-human study was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics on a 96-h continuous infusion schedule.. Twenty four patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies refractory to standard therapies were treated with escalating doses of FK866 as a continuous, 96-h infusion given every 28 days. Serial plasma samples were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics of FK866. Further blood samples were collected for the measurement of plasma VEGF levels.. There were 12 women and 12 men with a median age of 61 (range 34-78) and a median KPS of 80%, received a 4-day of infusion of FK866 at dose levels of 0.018 mg/m2/h (n=3), 0.036 mg/m2/h (n=3), 0.072 mg/m2/h (n=3), 0.108 mg/m2/h (n=4), 0.126 mg/m2/h (n=6), and 0.144 mg/m2/h (n=5). Thrombocytopenia was the dose limiting toxicity, observed in two patients at the highest dose level and one patient at the recommended phase II dose of 0.126 mg/m2/h No other hematologic toxicities were noted other than mild lymphopenia and anemia. There was mild fatigue and grade 3 nausea; the latter was controlled with antiemetics and was not a DLT. Css (the mean of the 72 and 96 h plasma concentrations) increased in relation to the dose escalation. The study drug did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of VEGF. There were no objective responses, although four patients had stable disease (on treatment for 3 months or greater).. The recommended phase II dose is 0.126 mg/m2/h given as a continuous 96-h infusion every 28 days. The dose limiting toxicity of FK866 is thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetic data suggest an increase in the plasma Css in relation to the escalation of FK866.

Topics: Acrylamides; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatigue; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; NAD; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase; Piperidines; Thrombocytopenia; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vomiting

This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies.. This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed.. Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting >2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer.. Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Farnesyltranstransferase; Fatigue; Female; Gemcitabine; HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Halofuginone (tempostatin) is a synthetic derivative of a quinazolinone alkaloid showing anti-angiogenic, anti-metastatic and anti-proliferative effects in preclinical studies. The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to study the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of halofuginone when administered once or twice daily orally to patients with advanced solid tumours.. Patients were treated with escalating doses of halofuginone at doses ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 mg/day. For pharmacokinetic analysis plasma sampling was performed during the first and second course and assayed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection.. Twenty-four patients received a total of 106 courses. The 'acute' MTD was reached at 3.5 mg/day, with nausea, vomiting, and fatigue as DLT. The recommended dose for chronic administration was defined as 0.5mg/day with the requirement of 5HT3 antagonists to control nausea and vomiting considered as DLT. Several patients experienced bleeding complications on treatment with halofuginone in which a causal relationship could not be excluded. The PKs of halofuginone were linear over the dose range studied with a large interpatient variability.. In this study the DLT of halofuginone was nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The recommended dose for phase II studies of halofuginone is 0.5mg administered orally, once daily.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Fatigue; Humans; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Quinazolines; Quinazolinones; Vomiting

To determine the efficacy and safety of ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase with additional activity against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer and had received prior treatment with an anthracycline and taxane; measurable disease was required. Patients were enrolled sequentially into one of two dose cohorts, 100 or 300 mg orally once daily; 28 days defined one cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate; pharmacokinetics and serial pharmacodynamic studies were obtained.. Forty-six patients were enrolled between May 2002 and April 2003, and 44 were evaluable for response. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported toxicity and seemed dose related (grade >/=2: 4.5% and 37.5% in the 100 and 300 mg cohorts, respectively). Rash was reported by 26% of patients but was never worse than grade 2. Seven patients in the 300 mg cohort had asymptomatic grade 1 prolongation of the QTc interval. Hypertension requiring treatment was not reported. There were no objective responses; one patient in the 300 mg cohort had stable disease >/=24 weeks. All patients in the 300 mg cohort and 90% of patients in the 100 mg cohort achieved steady-state concentrations exceeding the IC(50) for VEGF inhibition in preclinical models.. ZD6474 monotherapy was generally well tolerated but had limited monotherapy activity in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Breast Neoplasms; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Quinazolines; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Remifentanil has been suggested as an ideal opioid for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour, but the safety profile has not been established. The aims of this preliminary prospective observational study were to investigate the maternal side-effects and early neonatal effects, and to assess the placental transfer of remifentanil PCA during labour.. Women with no known obstetric complications or contraindication to remifentanil were recruited (n=50). Remifentanil was administered at a bolus dose of 0.5 microg kg(-1) and a lockout period of 2 min. A visual analogue scale was used to assess pain, nausea and itching. Maternal observations were recorded hourly and fetal heart rate trace was assessed every 2 h. Umbilical cord gases, 1 and 5 min Apgar scores and neurological evaluation of the neonate were recorded. Maternal venous blood and umbilical artery and vein cord blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil concentration.. Fifty women enrolled in the study (24 multiparous, 26 primiparous). There was no evidence of cardiovascular instability or respiratory depression. Pain scores decreased significantly, but there was no significant change in nausea after initiating the PCA. A statistically significant increase in itching was found to be clinically mild and 22 women were slightly drowsy (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-58.7%) but alert to voice. Ten fetal heart rate traces demonstrated changes in the first 20 min, but did not require intervention (95% CI, 10-33.7%). The median 1 and 5 min Apgar scores were 9. The mean umbilical cord gases and neurological examination were within normal limits. Maternal vein and umbilical vein cord samples demonstrated placental transfer of remifentanil, and small amounts were detected in umbilical artery samples.. At the bolus dose used remifentanil PCA has an acceptable level of maternal side-effects and minimal effect on the neonate. Remifentanil crosses the placenta and appears to be either rapidly metabolized or redistributed in the neonate.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Apgar Score; Female; Fetal Heart; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Nausea; Piperidines; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Pruritus; Remifentanil

Flavopiridol, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, transcription inhibitor, and DNA-interacting agent, was combined with cisplatin or carboplatin to establish toxicities, evaluate pharmacokinetics, and examine its effects on patient cancers and levels of selected polypeptides in patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).. Therapy was given every 3 weeks. Stage I: cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2 with escalating flavopiridol. Stage II: flavopiridol was fixed at the stage I maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with escalation of cisplatin. Stage III: flavopiridol was fixed at the stage I MTD with escalation of carboplatin.. Thirty-nine patients were treated with 136 cycles of chemotherapy. Neutropenia was seen in only 11% of patients. Grade 3 flavopiridol/CDDP toxicities were nausea (30%), vomiting (19%), diarrhea (15%), dehydration (15%), and neutropenia (10%). Flavopiridol combined with carboplatin resulted in unexpectedly high toxicities and one treatment-related death. Stable disease (>3 months) was seen in 34% of treated patients, but there were no objective responses. The stage II MTD was 60 mg/m2 cisplatin and 100 mg/m2/24 hours flavopiridol. As given, CDDP did not alter flavopiridol pharmacokinetics. Flavopiridol induced increased p53 and pSTAT3 levels in patient PBMCs but had no effects on cyclin D1, phosphoRNA polymerase II, or Mcl-1.. Flavopiridol and cisplatin can be safely combined in the treatment of cancer patients. Unexpected toxicity in flavopiridol/carboplatin-treated patients attenuates enthusiasm for this alternative combination. Analysis of polypeptide levels in patient PBMCs suggests that flavopiridol may be affecting some, but not all, of its known in vitro molecular targets in vivo.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Carboplatin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Cohort Studies; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Flavonoids; Humans; Immunoblotting; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Posture has an effect on gastric emptying. In this study, we investigated whether posture influences the delay in gastric emptying induced by opioid analgesics. Ten healthy male subjects underwent 4 gastric emptying studies with the acetaminophen method. On two occasions the subjects were given a continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.2 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) while lying either on the right lateral side in a 20 degrees head-up position or on the left lateral side in a 20 degrees head-down position. On two other occasions no infusion was given, and the subjects were studied lying in the two positions. When remifentanil was given, there were no significant differences between the two postures in maximal acetaminophen concentration (right side, 34 micromol. L(-1); versus left side, 16 micromol. L(-1)), time taken to reach the maximal concentration (94 versus 109 min), or area under the serum acetaminophen concentration time curve from 0 to 60 min (962 versus 197 min. micromol. L(-1)). In the control situation, there were differences between the postures in maximal acetaminophen concentration (138 versus 94 micromol. L(-1); P < 0.0001) and area under the serum acetaminophen concentration time curves from 0 to 60 min (5092 versus 3793 min. micromol. L(-1); P < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in time taken to reach the maximal concentration (25 versus 47 min). Compared with the control situation, remifentanil delayed gastric emptying in both postures. We conclude that remifentanil delays gastric emptying and that this delay is not influenced by posture.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Area Under Curve; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gastric Emptying; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Posture; Pruritus; Remifentanil; Respiratory Mechanics; Vomiting

Stapedotomy for otosclerosis presents particular anaesthesiology demands as the surgeon has to assess functional results during the operation, work with some bleeding, be ensured the collaboration of the patient, and limit the occurrence of intra- and post-operative symptoms (dizziness, nausea, vomiting and pain). Remifentanyl, a micro-opioid selective agonist characterised by short latency and duration, has been used for about 2 years at the Otolaryngological Unit of the "Federico II" University of Naples for patients with otosclerosis undergoing stapedotomy. Aim of the study was, therefore, to assess: efficacy and tolerability of Remifentanyl in combination with a local anaesthetic in surgical procedures for otosclerosis; intra- and post-operative reduction in patient symptoms of dizziness, nausea, vomiting and pain; reduction of intra-operative bleeding; degree of patient collaboration and optimisation of anaesthesiological and vital parameters monitored during surgery. The study was carried out on 92 patients with otosclerosis, (17 M, 75 F), median age 41 years (range 25-56), undergoing stapedotomy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, which were homogeneous as far as concerns age, sex and pre-operative hearing: i. Group A (50 patients), received Remifentanyl infusion in combination with canal injection for local anaesthesia with Mepivacaine 2% and Adrenalin 1/100,000; ii. Group B (42 patients), received only local anaesthetic by infiltration of the external canal ear. Remifentanyl led to an improvement over the local anaesthetic technique previously used, with a clear decrease in intra- and post-operative neurovegetative symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, vomiting and pain, as well as reduced bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Dizziness; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Intraoperative Complications; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Otosclerosis; Pain; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Remifentanil; Stapes Surgery; Vomiting

At present, there is no proven pharmacologic treatment for cognitive or language impairments in Down syndrome (DS). Cholinergic deficits have been documented in DS and linked to cognitive deficits. This study is a 24-week open-label clinical trial of donepezil hydrochloride for the treatment of language deficits in adults with DS. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate systematically the effects of donepezil, a cholinesterase inhibitor, on specific language domains in DS. The main finding that emerged was an improvement in expressive language performance following donepezil therapy. Despite the multiple methodological limitations, the results raise important questions regarding the role of the cholinergic system in language function and the specific effect of cholinergic therapy in the treatment of language impairment in DS. The results support the need for large-scale controlled studies of the effects of donepezil treatment on language and on other cognitive domains in DS.

Topics: Adult; Appetite; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down Syndrome; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypotension; Indans; Language Disorders; Language Tests; Male; Muscle Cramp; Nausea; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome

To determine the response rate and toxicity of flavopiridol in patients with previously untreated or relapsed mantle-cell lymphoma.. Adult patients with previously untreated or in first or second relapse of previously responsive mantle-cell lymphoma were given flavopiridol 50 mg/m2/d by intravenous bolus for 3 consecutive days every 21 days with antidiarrheal prophylaxis. Flavopiridol was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or stable disease for four cycles. Disease was reassessed every two cycles.. From 33 registered patients, 30 were eligible after pathology review, 30 were assessable for toxicity, and 28 were assessable for response. A median of four cycles of treatment was administered; 90% of patients received at least 90% of planned dose-intensity. No complete responses were seen; three patients had a partial response (11%), 20 patients had stable disease (71%), and five patients had progressive disease (18%). The median duration of response was 3.3 months (range, 2.8 to 13.2 months). The most common toxicities were diarrhea (97%), fatigue (73%), nausea (47%), and vomiting (27%). At least one nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen in 14 patients (47%). Hematologic toxicity was modest.. Flavopiridol given as a daily bolus for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks has modest activity as a single agent for mantle-cell lymphoma. The number of stable and partial responses that was seen indicates that it is biologically active and may delay progression. Future studies in mantle-cell lymphoma should test this agent with other active agents and using different schedules.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Fatigue; Female; Flavonoids; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Opioids administered during surgery may be beneficial by preempting postoperative pain or detrimental by causing acute tolerance. We used a stable model of hyperalgesia in volunteers to test whether acute opioid exposure also results in such pain sensitization over a period of hours in humans. Ten healthy volunteers were studied. Areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were induced by topical capsaicin application plus intermittent heating. Computer-controlled IV remifentanil infusion was titrated to a targeted plasma concentration that reduced pain report to noxious heat by 70% and was maintained at this level for 60-100 min. Areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia were measured during and after remifentanil infusion. Remifentanil (targeted concentration of 3.1 +/- 1.2 ng/mL) reduced areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia by 33% +/- 31% and 65% +/- 28%, respectively, during infusion (P < 0.05). Areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia continuously enlarged 4 h after remifentanil was stopped, to 180% +/- 47% and 180% +/- 86%, respectively. This study demonstrates that acute opioid exposure enhances hypersensitivity for hours after exposure. If applicable to the surgical setting, this could increase the dose of opioid required for postoperative analgesia and enhance, rather than inhibit, postoperative pain.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Capsaicin; Female; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Male; Nausea; Oxyhemoglobins; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Remifentanil

Clinical observations suggest that patients with vascular dementia (VaD) may benefit from treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of donepezil for relieving symptoms of dementia in VaD.. Patients (n=603; mean age, 73.9 years; 55.2% men) with probable (70.5%) or possible (29.5%) VaD, according to criteria of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN), were randomized to 24 weeks of treatment with donepezil 5 mg/d (n=198), donepezil 10 mg/d (5 mg/d for first 28 days; n=206), or placebo (n=199). Analyses were based on the intent-to-treat population.. At week 24, both donepezil groups showed significant improvement in cognition versus placebo on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (mean change from baseline score effect size: donepezil 5 mg/d, -1.90; P=0.001; donepezil 10 mg/d, -2.33; P<0.001). Significant improvements in patients' global function were seen versus placebo at week 24 (observed cases), on the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus version only for patients on donepezil 5 mg/d (P=0.014), and on the Sum of the Boxes of the Clinical Dementia Rating only for patients on 10 mg/d (P=0.007). Donepezil-treated patients showed significant benefits in activities of daily living over placebo on the Alzheimer's Disease Functional Assessment and Change Scale (mean change from baseline score effect size at week 24: donepezil 5 mg/d, -1.31, P=0.02; donepezil 10 mg/d, -1.31, P=0.02). Donepezil was well tolerated. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were relatively low (placebo, 11.1%; donepezil 5 mg/d, 11.1%; donepezil 10 mg/d, 21.8%; P=0.005 versus placebo).. These data demonstrate that donepezil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for VaD and show it may have an important place in the management of this condition.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular System; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition; Dementia, Vascular; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Double-Blind Method; Female; Headache; Humans; Indans; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neuropsychological Tests; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

This study examined the intra-operative and postoperative characteristics of a remifentanil infusion alone, or intermittent fentanyl bolus admistration combined with a propofol infusion, for the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy. One of the key parameters investigated was the time to discharge. Fifty patients scheduled for extracorporeal shock wavelithotripsy (ESWL) were randomly allocated to receive either a continuous infusion of 0.2-0.4 micro g.kg-1.min-1 of remifentanil (Group 1) or a bolus of 3 micro g.kg-1 fentanyl followed by a continuous infusion of propofol at a rate of 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 with additional boluses of 0.05 mg fentanyl administered as required (Group 2). Both anaesthetic techniques were found to provide satisfactory analgesia and intra-operative conditions for ESWL. However, patients in the remifentanil Group 1 showed a higher incidence of nausea (52% vs. 0%, p < 0.01) and retching (36% vs. 0%, p < 0.01) 120 min following ESWL compared to Group 2. This resulted in prolonged discharge times (p < 0.01) in this group. We found that remifentanil used as the sole agent failed to demonstrate any advantage over the combination of fentanyl/propofol with regard to rapid recovery and discharge following anaesthesia for extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Fentanyl; Hemodynamics; Humans; Length of Stay; Lithotripsy; Middle Aged; Nausea; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil

The pharmacokinetic properties of remifentanil may allow a rapid analgesic action during painful procedures and short lasting postoperative respiratory depression.. We carried out a randomized, blind, study in 60 patients to compare remifentanil (continuous i.v. infusion starting at 0.025 micro g kg(-1) min(-1)) and sufentanil (i.v. doses of 0.15 micro g kg(-1)) during extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Pain was assessed using a numerical pain scale (0-100), and pain relief was defined as a score < or =30. Respiratory depression was defined as a ventilatory frequency less than10 breaths min(-1) on two occasions or a peripheral oxygen saturation < or =92%, or administration of naloxone.. The quality of analgesia was similar in both groups, during and after ESWL. During ESWL, there was no significant difference in respiratory depression in the remifentanil and sufentanil groups (53 vs 73%, NS). The percentage of satisfied patients (73 vs 83%, NS) and satisfied surgeons (97 vs 100%, NS) did not significantly differ between groups. After the procedure patients given remifentanil had less respiratory depression (20 vs 53%, P<0.05) and less nausea and vomiting (3 vs 20%, P<0.05).. A continuous i.v. infusion of remifentanil provided comparable analgesia and caused less respiratory depression and nausea and vomiting than i.v. boluses of sufentanil in patients undergoing extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lithotripsy; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Respiratory Insufficiency; Sufentanil; Vomiting

In man a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist has previously been shown to be ineffective in the prevention of motion-induced nausea. The antiemetic efficacy of NK1 receptor antagonists against chemotherapy-induced emesis is, however, enhanced when combined with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Hence the efficacy of the NK1 antagonist GR205171 in combination with the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron (Zofrantrade mark) was assessed in motion-induced nausea.. GR205171 25 mg i.v., with and without concomitant administration of ondansetron 8 mg i.v., and hyoscine hydrobromide 0. 6 mg orally (positive control) were compared with placebo in a model of motion-induced nausea. The study was performed to a four-period, randomized, balanced, double-blind, crossover design in 16 healthy subjects. The end-point was the exposure to the motion stimulus required to produce moderate nausea in the subjects.. The motion stimulus required to produce moderate nausea was significantly greater for the positive control than placebo (P < 0. 001). There was no significant difference between either GR205171 or GR205171 plus ondansetron and placebo (P = 0.648 and 0.342, respectively).. The enhancement of NK1 receptor antagonist antiemetic activity through combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is not replicated in motion-induced nausea.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motion Sickness; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperidines; Scopolamine; Serotonin Antagonists; Tetrazoles

Remifentanil is a new rapid-acting and ultra-short acting mu-opioid receptor agonist with few reports from use in children. Therefore, we compared a propofol-remifentanil-anaesthesia (TIVA) with a desflurane-N2O-anaesthesia (DN) with particular regard to the recovery of characteristics in children.. 50 children (4-11 yr) scheduled for ENT surgery were randomly assigned to receive TIVA (n = 25) or DN (N = 25). After standardised i.v. induction of anaesthesia in both groups with remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium, TIVA was maintained with infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Ventilation was with oxygen in air. DN was maintained with desflurane in 50% N20. The administration of volatile and intravenous anaesthetics was adjusted to maintain a surgical plane of anaesthesia. At the end of surgery all anaesthetics were terminated without tapering and early emergence and recovery were assessed. In addition, side effects were noted.. Both anaesthesia methods resulted in stable haemodynamics but significantly higher heart rate with desflurane. Recovery did not differ between the groups except for delayed spontaneous respiration after TIVA. Spontaneous ventilation occurred after 11 +/- 03.7 min versus 7.2 +/- 2.8 min (mean +/- SD, TIVA versus DN), extubation after 11 +/- 3.7 min versus 9.4 +/- 2.9 min, eye opening after 11 +/- 3.9 min versus 14 +/- 7.6 min and Aldrete score > or = 9 after 17 +/- 6.8 min versus 17 +/- 7.5 min. Postoperatively, there was a significant higher incidence of agitation in the DN group (80% vs. 44%) but a low incidence (< 10%) of nausea and vomiting in both groups.. In children, TIVA with remifentanil and propofol is a well-tolerated anaesthesia method, with a lower peroperative heart rate and less postoperative agitation compared with a desflurane-N2O based anaesthesia.

Topics: Adenoidectomy; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Child; Child, Preschool; Desflurane; Female; Heart Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Incidence; Intubation, Intratracheal; Isoflurane; Male; Middle Ear Ventilation; Nausea; Nitrous Oxide; Piperidines; Propofol; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Remifentanil; Respiration; Time Factors; Tonsillectomy; Vomiting; Wakefulness

Hyoscine (scopolamine), which is effective in the prophylaxis of motion sickness, shows similar binding affinities to all of the five known muscarinic receptor sub-types. The effectiveness of hyoscine was compared with zamifenacin (UK-76654), which binds selectively to the muscarinic M3 and m5 receptors.. Eighteen subjects received hyoscine hydrobromide 0.6 mg, zamifenacin 20 mg, or placebo (double-blind cross-over design). Sessions were 1 week apart and the drug (oral) was given 90 min prior to a motion sickness test. Motion sickness was elicited by cross-coupled stimulation on a turntable. The rotational velocity was incremented by 2 degrees s-1 every 30 s, and a sequence (seq) of eight head movements of 45 degrees was completed every 30 s. Motion tolerance was assessed as the number of sequences of head movement required to achieve moderate nausea. Pulse rate was recorded before and at 1 and 2 h after drug administration. Skin conductance activity in the frequency band 0.005-0.48 Hz, an index of sweat gland activity, was measured using Ag/AgCl electrodes on the palmar surfaces of fingers and across the forehead.. Both zamifenacin and hyoscine produced an increase in tolerance to the motion challenge (P < 0.01) with no significant difference between the two drugs (5.0 +/- 1.6 vs 5.7 +/- 1.6 seqs. respectively, mean +/- s.e.mean). Compared with placebo or zamifenacin, pulse rate fell following hyoscine administration (9 beats min-1, P < 0.01). Skin conductance was reduced following hyoscine compared with zamifenacin or placebo (P < 0.001).. These results suggest that compounds with selective M3 and/or m5 antagonism possess activity against motion sickness. Antagonism at these receptors may be the basis of the anti-motion sickness action of hyoscine.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Binding, Competitive; Cross-Over Studies; Dioxoles; Double-Blind Method; Electrodes; Galvanic Skin Response; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motion Sickness; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nausea; Piperidines; Psychomotor Performance; Receptors, Muscarinic; Rotation; Scopolamine; Sweat Glands

The well established bowel cleansing method using a polyethylene glycol-based solution (Fordtran) is limited by the necessity of large volume intake, which proves difficult for many patients. Therefore, a new method using small volumes (2 x 90 ml) of oral sodium phosphate is employed more and more frequently. Its only disadvantage is the occurrence of considerable nausea or occasional vomiting in about 25% of patients. To ascertain whether nausea could be reduced, 426 patients were given an antiemetic (ondansetron, metoclopramide, cisapride) or placebo on a randomized, double-blind basis, one hour before sodium phosphate intake.. sodium phosphate was well tolerated in 69.2% of the patients on placebo, 73.6% on cisapride, 76.5% on metoclopramide and 80.4% on ondansetron. Taking all four groups together, male patients exhibited much better tolerance (86.1%) than females (66.1%). Severe nausea and/or emesis was noted in 22.4% of patients on placebo, 21.7% on cisapride, 17% on metoclopramide and 14% on ondansetron. In over 90% of patients colon cleansing was rated as good to very good. This was largely independent of the severity of nausea. 129 patients who had undergone former polyethylene glycol-based lavage judged sodium phosphate to be more tolerable and easier to complete. Considering known contraindications (symptomatic congestive heart failure and/or renal failure), no serious adverse event was noted in any of the 426 patients investigated. In accordance with several recent studies, we consider sodium phosphate solution at present the procedure of choice for colon cleansing. Compared to Fordtran, patient acceptance is far better and cleansing quality superior. Routine antiemetic comedication for reducing possible nausea/vomiting is not worthwhile. On the other hand, this study confirms our former impression of enhanced colon cleansing after administration of an additional mild laxative before sodium phosphate, without interfering with patient acceptance.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Cathartics; Cisapride; Colonoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ondansetron; Phosphates; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Vomiting

Low doses of cisapride (5-10 mg twice daily) produced relatively rapid relief from nausea elicited by venlafaxine in six patients with treatment-refractory recurrent major depression. This further suggests that the nausea associated with serotonergic reuptake inhibition may be a result of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) agonist action. No adverse cardiac experiences were encountered in spite of the potential interaction of cisapride with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors at the cytochrome P4503A4 enzyme system.

Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cisapride; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Serotonin Antagonists; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Previous studies have shown that both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are effective in the treatment of panic disorders (PD). In this study, the SSRI fluvoxamine (Fluv) was compared with the MAO-A-I brofaromine (Brof). Thirty patients with the diagnosis of PD with or without agoraphobia were treated with either Fluv or Brof (150 mg daily) in a double-blind design. After 12 weeks of treatment, 93% of the Brof group and 87% of the Fluv group considered themselves much or very much improved. Taking a reduction in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score of 50% or more, 33% of the Fluv patients and 47% of the Brof patients were responders to treatment. After an increase in anxiety in the 1st week, which was more severe in Fluv-treated patients than for Brof, a clinically relevant decrease in anxiety symptoms and reduction in panic attacks and avoidance behavior was observed. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups. The most prominent side effects were middle-sleep disturbance (Brof), tiredness (Fluv), and nausea after taking the medication (Brof and Fluv). During a double-blind follow-up period of another 12 weeks, a further improvement was found in both treatment groups without significant differences between the two groups. The selective and reversible MAO-A-I brofaromine and the SSRI fluvoxamine are equally effective in the treatment of PD. Both compounds lead to a reduction in the number of panic attacks and a subsequent reduction in agoraphobic avoidance.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluvoxamine; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Nausea; Panic Disorder; Piperidines; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

We evaluated the use of an infusion of remifentanil to provide postoperative analgesia during recovery from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol. One hundred fifty-seven patients from seven medical centers underwent abdominal, spine, joint replacement, or thoracic surgery. Remifentanil was titrated in an effort to limit pain to 0 or 1 on a 0-3 scale. At the end of the 30-min titration period, 78% of infusion rates were in the range of 0.05 to < or = 0.15 microgram.kg-1.min-1, 5% were < 0.05 microgram.kg-1.min-1, and 17% were > 0.15 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Pain scores were 0 or 1 in 64% of patients. Nausea occurred in 35% and emesis in 8% of patients; the peak incidence of nausea followed discontinuation of the remifentanil infusion at the time of administering morphine. Respiratory adverse events (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry [Spo2] < 90% or respiratory rate < 12) affected 29% of patients. Apnea occurred in 11 patients (7.0%). There was a large variation in the incidence of respiratory depression between the centers, ranging from 0 to 75%. The explanation for the large variability in respiratory outcome was not evident.

Topics: Abdomen; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Apnea; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infusions, Intravenous; Joint Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Nausea; Oxygen; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Respiration; Spine; Thoracic Surgery; Vomiting

To assess the efficacy of cisapride therapy in relieving symptoms of functional dyspepsia.. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, 61 out of 74 patients were eligible to enter a 4-week double-blind treatment phase, consisting of treatment with cisapride (10 mg) or placebo tablets t.d.s. Gastric emptying was assessed scintigraphically at entry to the study. Patients were stratified before treatment into those with or without active chronic (Helicobacter pylori) gastritis. Patients were also classified retrospectively into those with 'reflux-like' dyspepsia (n = 29) and those with 'motility-like' dyspepsia (n = 32).. At the end of the active treatment phase, there was a similar significant (P < 0.001) reduction in total symptom score from baseline in both cisapride (8.9 +/- 0.5 to 5.8 +/- 0.6) and placebo (9.7 +/- 0.6 to 5.5 +/- 0.6) groups. Scores for heartburn and continual bloating were significantly reduced in the cisapride but not the placebo group; improvement was attributable to patients with normal, rather than delayed, rates of gastric emptying. For continual bloating, significant improvement also occurred in the cisapride subgroup without gastritis, but not in the subgroup with gastritis (mean symptom score reduction 0.48 +/- 0.18, P = 0.03). For global evaluation by the investigator and by the patient, the overall improvement rates were not statistically different between cisapride and placebo groups. In those with normal gastric emptying, however, there was a significant (P = 0.01) improvement in general well-being in the cisapride but not in the placebo group.. We were unable to show major differences in the short-term efficacy of cisapride and placebo in functional dyspepsia. There were indications, however, of beneficial effects of cisapride over placebo in those with 'reflux-like' dyspepsia, and in those without gastroparesis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Cisapride; Double-Blind Method; Dyspepsia; Eructation; Female; Gastric Emptying; Heartburn; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Time Factors

To compare the efficacy of the prokinetic drug cisapride and the antisecretory agent ranitidine in relieving symptoms of functional dyspepsia, as well as their effect on the recurrence of symptoms after the discontinuation of treatment.. A randomized double-blind parallel-group trial of cisapride 30 mg daily and ranitidine 300 mg daily given for 2, 4 or 8 weeks, followed by a 4-week drug-free follow-up of the patients with a good or excellent response. Rescue antacid tablets were allowed only if pain was unbearable.. A total of 203 patients (99 cisapride, 104 ranitidine) with symptoms of functional dyspepsia for more than 4 weeks, after the exclusion of organic disease by endoscopy and sonography or radiology.. Cisapride and ranitidine improved the symptoms of diffuse epigastric pain, postprandial epigastric fullness, epigastric distension, belching, heartburn, regurgitation, and nausea when compared with baseline. Pain at night and gastric discomfort also greatly improved. Cisapride produced a greater reduction in epigastric pain (P = 0.07) and epigastric distension (P = 0.03) scores than ranitidine. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing the concomitant reflux-like symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. At week 8, 87% of cisapride patients versus 61% of ranitidine patients had an excellent or good result. The deterioration of symptoms during the follow-up phase was limited in both groups. However, after the withdrawal of medication there was a greater reduction in scores in the cisapride group than in the ranitidine group for diffuse epigastric pain (P = 0.05), epigastric distension (P = 0.002), the cluster of six symptoms of epigastric discomfort (P = 0.05), and the cluster of all nine upper gastrointestinal symptoms (P = 0.06). Adverse events occurred in 15 cisapride patients and 18 ranitidine patients, and two of the ranitidine patients were withdrawn from treatment.. Although cisapride and ranitidine both improved the symptoms of functional dyspepsia, cisapride was superior to ranitidine, particularly on the combined evaluation of the response to treatment and the recurrence of symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Antacids; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Cisapride; Double-Blind Method; Dyspepsia; Eructation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Gastroscopy; Heartburn; Humans; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Ranitidine; Recurrence

Intravenous cisapride was shown to induce a phase-2-like pattern of human interdigestive jejunal motor activity containing an increased number of propagated contractions. This study investigated the effects of oral cisapride in 12 fasting healthy males. Jejunal pressures were recorded by a pneumohydraulic system and five catheter orifices positioned 10-30 cm aborad the ligament of Treitz. Single oral doses of 5 and 10 mg cisapride, administered 5 min after an activity front under random double-blind conditions, induced a phase-2-like jejunal motor pattern with a significantly higher number and amplitude of contractions and significantly more aborally propagated waves than placebo (P less than 0.001), while the number of subjects with activity fronts decreased with increasing dose. Five and 10 mg cisapride administered tid for three days affected psychomotor function, subjective feelings, and side-effect frequency, apart from increases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate, no more than placebo. It is concluded that in fasting man, oral cisapride induces a highly propagative phase-2-like jejunal motor pattern causing only minor side effects.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Pressure; Cisapride; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Gastrointestinal Motility; Heart Rate; Humans; Jejunum; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Psychomotor Performance; Random Allocation

A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial was carried out in 10 patients with narcolepsy to evaluate the effect of 600 mg femoxetine versus placebo. In comparison to placebo, femoxetine treatment resulted in a significant decrease in both the number and severity score of cataplectic attacks per day. There were also significantly fewer attacks of sleep paralysis, whilst the effects on nightmare and hypnogenic hallucinations were minor. The frequency of sleep attacks decreased slightly during femoxetine treatment, but the overall estimated sleep time during the day and excessive daytime sleepiness remained un-affected. An ambulatory sleep recording for 48 h one week after the start of the femoxetine and placebo period showed that femoxetine treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the total time spent in REM sleep. The side-effects of femoxetine were restricted to transient nausea in 2 patients. It is concluded that femoxetine or other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be a useful alternative for narcoleptic patients who experience troublesome side-effects with tricyclic antidepressants.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Nausea; Piperidines; Sleep Stages

Loperamide hydrochloride (4 mg t.d.s.) was compared with codeine phosphate (60 mg t.d.s.) in a double blind crossover study of patients with loose output from their ileostomies. Both drugs significantly decreased the daily output and water content of ileostomy fluid. Daily losses of sodium and potassium were less when the patients were treated with loperamide. Loperamide was also associated with less side effects. It is concluded that loperamide hydrochloride was more effective in the treatment of ileostomy diarrhoea than codeine phosphate. In this group of patients those with the highest outputs from their ileostomies benefited most from this treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Codeine; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Electrolytes; Female; Humans; Ileostomy; Loperamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Potassium; Sodium

The antiemetic effects of domperidone in patients undergoing post-surgical cytostatic treatment for stomach and colorectal carcinoma have been evaluated. The study has been performed on 3 groups of patients treated with domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo respectively. The antiemetic activity of domperidone proved to be better than that of metoclopramide. No side effects were observed in patients treated with domperidone.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Domperidone; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Postoperative Care; Vomiting

In a single-blind trial of therapy in 20 patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease, domperidone prevented nausea and vomiting induced by bromocriptine without diminishing beneficial central effects. Combination of the two drugs permitted rapid increase in bromocriptine dosage from 22.5 mg per day to 148 mg per day, with 71% mean clinical improvement over baseline score; continuing efficacy of the regimen was evident for a mean follow-up of 2 months.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Bromocriptine; Domperidone; Female; Humans; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Parkinson Disease; Piperidines; Vomiting

Forty patients with postprandial nausea and vomiting from a variety of underlying causes, were given either domperidone 20 mg t.d.s. or placebo in a double-blind study lasting two weeks. The tablets were taken before meals and no other anti-emetics were used. Nausea and vomiting were reduced in those patients given the active therapy, the results being recorded as excellent in 62% in the domperidone group and 18% of controls.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Dyspepsia; Female; Food; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

In a double-blind trial in 60 children suffering from gastroenteritis complicated by vomiting, it was found that suppositories of domperidone (30 mg) were more effective than either metoclopramide (10 mg) or placebo in reducing the severity of vomiting, nausea and other symptomatic parameters. No side effects were reported throughout the 24 hour period of the trial and the results suggest that domperidone suppositories may well prove to be the drug of choice in such cases of paediatric vomiting.

Topics: Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastroenteritis; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Nausea; Piperidines; Suppositories; Vomiting

Forty-seven infants and children suffering from chronic vomiting or regurgitation, participated in a two-week double-blind trial comparing 1% drops of domperidone, 1% metoclopramide drops or placebo. The dose was 0.3 mg/kg given t.d.s. before meals. Both active medicaments were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms and domperidone was also significantly superior to metoclopramide. It is concluded, in view of the good safety margin with domperidone, that this drug could become the treatment of choice in such cases.

Topics: Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Metoclopramide; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

In a series of open pilot studies, intravenous domperidone was given to three groups of post-operative patients, at doses ranging from 10 mg to 60 mg. As a result of these studies, it was decided that a regime of 20 mg initially, followed by maintenance doses of 10 mg at 6 hourly intervals was highly effective in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting. Consequently this regime was chosen to evaluate domperidone against placebo in a double-blind study involving 106 patients. The results showed that only three out of 53 patients (5.7%) on active treatment were having nausea and vomiting compared with 16 of 53 patients (30.2%) on placebo. It is concluded that this regime is effective in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting.

Topics: Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Vomiting

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Craniocerebral Trauma; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dysmenorrhea; Esophagoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Piperidines; Premedication; Radiotherapy; Renal Dialysis; Vomiting

One hundred and ninety-five female patients of child-bearing age were assessed for postoperative vomiting in a double-blind trial using domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo. Compared with placebo, both drugs were found to reduce vomiting in approximately half the patients who had undergone caesarean section. However, in the group of non-obstetric patients, no statistically significant difference as regards vomiting was shown.

Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Metoclopramide; Nausea; Piperidines; Placebos; Postoperative Period; Random Allocation; Vomiting

Topics: Adolescent; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

The effect of domperidone on vomiting due to cytostatic treatment was studied during a double-blind trial involving 41 patients. One group received the sequence domperidone-placebo and the other the reverse sequence during two consecutive courses of cytostatic therapy (chlormethine alone or in combination with other cytostatics). Domperidone 2 mg/ml or the placebo was injected IV 1 h before the start of the cytostatic treatment. A similar injection was given 4 h later. Presence, duration, and incidence of nausea and vomiting before, during, and after the peak period (period from the second up to and including the sixth hour after cytostatic injection) were measured. With respect to vomiting, domperidone was significantly superior to placebo concerning duration and effect before and after the peak period in both sequences. There was no difference during the peak period. With respect to nausea, domperidone was superior to placebo concerning duration and effect during the peak period in the placebo-domperidone sequence. No difference was observed in the reverse order. A significant superiority of domperidone was noted before the peak period.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Placebos; Time Factors; Vomiting

The effect of domperidone on postoperative nausea and vomiting was evaluated in two consecutive studies. Fifty-eight patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting were included in an open pilot study and 38 other patients in a double-blind trial. In the first study 4 mg of domperidone was found to be significantly superior to 2 mg, in controlling nausea and vomiting. In the double-blind trial, vomiting recurred significantly later in domperidone than in placebo-treated patients. Side-effects were not seen nor reported in either study.

Topics: Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Vomiting

Topics: Analgesics; Analysis of Variance; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Isonipecotic Acids; Morphine; Movement; Nausea; Nitriles; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Respiration; Time Factors; Vomiting

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Cholecystectomy; Female; Humans; Isonipecotic Acids; Male; Meperidine; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Nausea; Nitriles; Pain; Piperidines; Pulse; Respiration; Vomiting

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Imides; Menopause; Morpholines; Nausea; Piperidines; Remission, Spontaneous; Vomiting

Topics: Analgesics; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Isonipecotic Acids; Morphine; Nausea; Nitriles; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Vomiting

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

The MET inhibitor tepotinib demonstrated durable clinical activity in patients with advanced MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC. We report detailed analyses of adverse events of clinical interest (AECIs) in VISION, including edema, a class effect of MET inhibitors.. Incidence, management, and time to first onset/resolution were analyzed for all-cause AECIs, according to composite categories (edema, hypoalbuminemia, creatinine increase, and ALT/AST increase) or individual preferred terms (pleural effusion, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), for patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC in the phase II VISION trial.. Of 255 patients analyzed (median age: 72 years), edema, the most common AECI, was reported in 69.8% (grade 3, 9.4%; grade 4, 0%). Median time to first edema onset was 7.9 weeks (range: 0.1-58.3). Edema was manageable with supportive measures, dose reduction (18.8%), and/or treatment interruption (23.1%), and rarely prompted discontinuation (4.3%). Other AECIs were also manageable and predominantly mild/moderate: hypoalbuminemia, 23.9% (grade 3, 5.5%); pleural effusion, 13.3% (grade ≥ 3, 5.1%); creatinine increase, 25.9% (grade 3, 0.4%); nausea, 26.7% (grade 3, 0.8%), diarrhea, 26.3% (grade 3, 0.4%), vomiting 12.9% (grade 3, 1.2%), and ALT/AST increase, 12.2% (grade ≥ 3, 3.1%). GI AEs typically occurred early and resolved in the first weeks.. Tepotinib was well tolerated in the largest trial of a MET inhibitor in METex14 skipping NSCLC. The most frequent AEs were largely mild/moderate and manageable with supportive measures and/or dose reduction/interruption, and caused few withdrawals in this elderly population.

Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Creatinine; Diarrhea; Edema; Exons; Humans; Hypoalbuminemia; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Nausea; Piperidines; Pleural Effusion; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Vomiting

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of rimegepant for treatment of migraine.. A comprehensive PubMed and Cochrane search (1985 to May 2020) was performed utilizing the keywords. All English-language trials evaluating oral rimegepant were included for this review.. Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) is Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of migraine. According to data from 3 phase 3 randomized controlled trials, rimegepant has been shown to significantly improve freedom from pain at 2 hours after the dose and freedom from the most bothersome symptom 2 hours postdose. Additional outcomes improved include freedom from photophobia and phonophobia at 2 hours postdose and pain relief 2 hours after the dose. Adverse effects of rimegepant include nausea, urinary tract infection, and dizziness.. Orally disintegrating rimegepant provides a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of acute migraine. When patients experience inadequate relief from other therapies, have contraindications to triptans, or are unable to tolerate the adverse effects of triptans, rimegepant is a promising therapeutic option.. Rimegepant ODT is an efficacious migraine treatment option with a novel mechanism of action, convenient dosage form, and limited adverse effect profile.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Pain; Pain Management; Piperidines; Pyridines; Solubility; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

Here we investigate the involvement of the ventral pallidum (VP) in the anti-nausea effect of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibition with PF-3845, and examine the pharmacological mechanism of such an effect. We explored the potential of intra-VP PF-3845 to reduce the establishment of lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping (a model of acute nausea) in male Sprague-Dawley rats. As well, the role of the cannabinoid 1 (CB

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Basal Forebrain; Butyrates; Infusions, Intraventricular; Lithium Chloride; Male; Nausea; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

There are debates on representation and generalizability of previous randomized controlled trials about anti-dementia agents in the oldest old population. In this context, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-dementia agents in the very elderly patients with dementia.. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with dementia 1) who were 85 years or older, 2) got started anti-dementia agents, and 3) went through follow-up evaluation about one year thereafter. As a control, patients with dementia who were less than 85 years old with similar inclusion criteria were randomly selected during the same period. The adverse drug effects and discontinuation rates were investigated with self-reported complaint after starting or increasing anti-dementia drugs. For efficacy outcome, we also analyzed the change in neuropsychological results during follow-up period.. A total of 77 dementia patients who were at least 85 years were enrolled. As a control group, 78 patients with dementia who were younger than 85 was analyzed. The adverse drug effects were observed in 26 (33.3%) patients in the younger old and in 26 (33.8%) in the oldest old (. The use of anti-dementia agents in the oldest old dementia patients may be safe and effective as the younger old dementia patients.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Donepezil; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Medication Adherence; Nausea; Neuropsychological Tests; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies; Rivastigmine; Treatment Outcome

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins are used by cells in several DNA repair processes. PARP inhibition can result in preferential death of cancer cells when another mechanism for repairing DNA is defective. Two PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of recurrent, BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. More recently, these two and a third PARP inhibitor, niraparib, were approved by the FDA as maintenance therapy following platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. This has caused a paradigm shift in disease management and a challenge for clinicians, who must decide how best to use these agents in individualized treatment. The oral formulation is attractive to patients, but adverse effects such as nausea and fatigue can impact quality of life. As clinicians become comfortable selecting PARP inhibitors and managing associated toxicities, future steps will be to investigate how to safely administer them in combination with other therapies.

Topics: Anemia; Creatinine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Exanthema; Fatigue; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Leukopenia; Mutation; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Nasopharyngitis; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Thrombocytopenia; Transaminases; Vomiting

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibition elevates anandamide (AEA), which acts on cannabinoid (CB1 and CB2) receptors, as well as N-palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA), which act on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). Here, we determine the mechanism of action of FAAH inhibition on acute and anticipatory nausea (AN).. We compared the effectiveness and mechanism of action of two FAAH inhibitors, URB597 and PF-3845, to reduce acute nausea and AN in rodent models of conditioned gaping.. For assessment of acute nausea, rats were pretreated with vehicle (VEH), URB597 (0.3 and 10 mg/kg, experiment 1a) or PF-3845 (10 mg/kg, experiment 1b) 120 min prior to a saccharin-lithium chloride (LiCl) pairing. To assess the CB1 receptor or PPARα mediation of the effect of PF-3845 on acute nausea, rats were also pretreated with rimonabant or MK886, respectively. For assessment of AN, following four pairings of a novel context with LiCl, rats received a pretreatment of VEH, URB597 (0.3 mg/kg, experiment 2a), or PF-3845 (10, 20 mg/kg, experiment 2b) 120 min prior to placement in the AN context. To assess the CB1 receptor or PPARα mediation of the effect, rats were also pretreated with rimonabant or MK886, respectively.. PF-3845 (10 mg/kg, but not URB597 0.3 or 10 mg/kg) suppressed acute nausea via PPARα, but not CB1 receptors. URB597 (0.3 and 10 mg/kg) or PF-3845 (10 and 20 mg/kg) reduced AN via CB1 receptors, but not PPARα.. FAAH inhibition reduces acute nausea and AN through PPARα and CB1 receptor mediated effects, respectively.

Topics: Acute Disease; Amidohydrolases; Animals; Anticipation, Psychological; Benzamides; Carbamates; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; PPAR alpha; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

Opioids are indispensable for pain treatment but may cause serious nausea and vomiting. The mechanism leading to these complications is not clear. We investigated whether an opioid effect on the vestibular system resulting in corrupt head motion sensation is causative and, consequently, whether head-rest prevents nausea.. Thirty-six healthy men (26.6 ± 4.3 years) received an opioid remifentanil infusion (45 min, 0.15 μg/kg/min). Outcome measures were the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain determined by video-head-impulse-testing, and nausea. The first experiment (n = 10) assessed outcome measures at rest and after a series of five 1-Hz forward and backward head-trunk movements during one-time remifentanil administration. The second experiment (n = 10) determined outcome measures on two days in a controlled crossover design: (1) without movement and (2) with a series of five 1-Hz forward and backward head-trunk bends 30 min after remifentanil start. Nausea was psychophysically quantified (scale from 0 to 10). The third controlled crossover experiment (n = 16) assessed nausea (1) without movement and (2) with head movement; isolated head movements consisting of the three axes of rotation (pitch, roll, yaw) were imposed 20 times at a frequency of 1 Hz in a random, unpredictable order of each of the three axes. All movements were applied manually, passively with amplitudes of about ± 45 degrees.. The VOR gain decreased during remifentanil administration (p<0.001), averaging 0.92 ± 0.05 (mean ± standard deviation) before, 0.60 ± 0.12 with, and 0.91 ± 0.05 after infusion. The average half-life of VOR recovery was 5.3 ± 2.4 min. 32/36 subjects had no nausea at rest (nausea scale 0.00/0.00 median/interquartile range). Head-trunk and isolated head movement triggered nausea in 64% (p<0.01) with no difference between head-trunk and isolated head movements (nausea scale 4.00/7.25 and 1.00/4.5, respectively).. Remifentanil reversibly decreases VOR gain at a half-life reflecting the drug's pharmacokinetics. We suggest that the decrease in VOR gain leads to a perceptual mismatch of multisensory input with the applied head movement, which results in nausea, and that, consequently, vigorous head movements should be avoided to prevent opioid-induced nausea.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Head Movements; Humans; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular; Remifentanil

Enhancement of the endocannabinoid (EC) system may reduce anticipatory nausea (AN).. The experiments evaluated the potential of the dual fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)/monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor, JZL195, on its own and combined with anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) to reduce contextually elicited gaping, a measure of AN in rats.. Following four context lithium chloride (LiCl) pairings, rats were injected with vehicle (VEH) or JZL195 (10 mg kg(-1), intraperitoneally) 105 min before an injection of VEH, 2-AG (1.25 mg kg(-1)), or AEA (5.0 mg kg(-1)). Fifteen minutes later, all rats were placed in the LiCl-paired context for 5 min and in a different context for a 15-min locomotor test. Whole brains were extracted for EC analysis. The potential of the CB1 antagonist, SR141716, to reverse the suppression of AN by both JZL195 and AEA and of the CB2 antagonist, AM630, to reverse the suppression of AN by JZL195 was then evaluated.. JZL195 suppressed gaping and elevated AEA, palmitoylethanolamine, and oleoylethanolamide. As the suppression of gaping was reversed by SR141716, but not by AM630, the effect was CB1 mediated. The suppressive effect of JZL195 on gaping, as well as elevation of AEA and 2-AG, was amplified by pretreatment with either AEA or 2-AG. On its own, AEA, but not 2-AG, also suppressed gaping-an effect that was also prevented by CB1 antagonism.. JZL195 reduces AN primarily by acting as a FAAH inhibitor, but MAGL inhibition is also indicated.

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Anticipation, Psychological; Arachidonic Acids; Brain; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Carbamates; Endocannabinoids; Enzyme Inhibitors; Glycerides; Indoles; Lithium Chloride; Male; Monoacylglycerol Lipases; Motor Activity; Nausea; Oleic Acids; Piperazines; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Rimonabant

The cannabinoid 1 (CB1 ) receptor inverse agonists/antagonists, rimonabant (SR141716, SR) and AM251, produce nausea and potentiate toxin-induced nausea by inverse agonism (rather than antagonism) of the CB1 receptor. Here, we evaluated two phytocannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), for their ability to produce these behavioural effect characteristics of CB1 receptor inverse agonism in rats.. In experiment 1, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to produce conditioned gaping (measure of nausea-induced behaviour) in the same manner as SR and AM251. In experiment 2, we investigated the potential of THCV and CBDV to enhance conditioned gaping produced by a toxin in the same manner as CB1 receptor inverse agonists.. SR (10 and 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and AM251 (10 mg·kg(-1) ) produced conditioned gaping; however, THCV (10 or 20 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (10 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not. At a subthreshold dose for producing nausea, SR (2.5 mg·kg(-1) ) enhanced lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping, whereas Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (2.5 or 10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (2.5 or 200 mg·kg(-1) ) did not; in fact, THC (2.5 and 10 mg·kg(-1) ), THCV (10 mg·kg(-1) ) and CBDV (200 mg·kg(-1) ) suppressed LiCl-induced conditioned gaping, suggesting anti-nausea potential.. The pattern of findings indicates that neither THCV nor CBDV produced a behavioural profile characteristic of CB1 receptor inverse agonists. As well, these compounds may have therapeutic potential in reducing nausea.

Topics: Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoids; Disease Models, Animal; Dronabinol; Drug Partial Agonism; Lithium Chloride; Male; Nausea; Phytochemicals; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant

To understand how anandamide transport inhibition impacts the regulation of nausea and vomiting and the receptor level mechanism of action involved. In light of recent characterization of an anandamide transporter, fatty acid amide hydrolase-1-like anandamide transporter, to provide behavioural support for anandamide cellular reuptake as a facilitated transport process.. The systemic administration of the anandamide transport inhibitor ARN272 ([(4-(5-(4-hydroxy-phenyl)-3,4-diaza-bicyclo[4.4.0]deca-1(6),2,4,7,9-pentaen-2-ylamino)-phenyl)-phenylamino-methanone]) was used to evaluate the prevention of LiCl-induced nausea-induced behaviour (conditioned gaping) in rats, and LiCl-induced emesis in shrews (Suncus murinus). The mechanism of how prolonging anandamide availability acts to regulate nausea in rats was explored by the antagonism of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors with the systemic co-administration of SR141716.. The systemic administration of ARN272 produced a dose-dependent suppression of nausea-induced conditioned gaping in rats, and produced a dose-dependent reduction of vomiting in shrews. The systemic co-administration of SR141716 with ARN272 (at 3.0 mg·kg(-1)) in rats produced a complete reversal of ARN272-suppressed gaping at 1.0 mg·kg(-1). SR141716 alone did not differ from the vehicle solution.. These results suggest that anandamide transport inhibition by the compound ARN272 tonically activates CB1 receptors and as such produces a type of indirect agonism to regulate toxin-induced nausea and vomiting. The results also provide behavioural evidence in support of a facilitated transport mechanism used in the cellular reuptake of anandamide.

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Antiemetics; Arachidonic Acids; Behavior, Animal; Biological Transport; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endocannabinoids; Isoenzymes; Lithium Chloride; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Shrews; Vomiting

To evaluate the role of 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG) in the regulation of nausea and vomiting using animal models of vomiting and of nausea-like behaviour (conditioned gaping).. Vomiting was assessed in shrews (Suncus murinus), pretreated with JZL184, a selective monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor which elevates endogenous 2AG levels, 1 h before administering the emetogenic compound, LiCl. Regulation of nausea-like behaviour in rats by exogenous 2AG or its metabolite arachidonic acid (AA) was assessed, using the conditioned gaping model. The role of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors, CB(2) receptors and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition in suppression of vomiting or nausea-like behaviour was assessed.. JZL184 dose-dependently suppressed vomiting in shrews, an effect prevented by pretreatment with the CB(1) receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, AM251. In shrew brain tissue, JZL184 inhibited MAGL activity in vivo. In rats, 2AG suppressed LiCl-induced conditioned gaping but this effect was not prevented by AM251 or the CB(2) receptor antagonist, AM630. Instead, the COX inhibitor, indomethacin, prevented suppression of conditioned gaping by 2AG or AA. However, when rats were pretreated with a high dose of JZL184 (40 mg·kg(-1) ), suppression of gaping by 2AG was partially reversed by AM251. Suppression of conditioned gaping was not due to interference with learning because the same dose of 2AG did not modify the strength of conditioned freezing to a shock-paired tone.. Our results suggest that manipulations that elevate 2AG may have anti-emetic or anti-nausea potential.. This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.165.issue-8. To view Part I of Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue-7.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Behavior, Animal; Benzodioxoles; Brain; Endocannabinoids; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fear; Glycerides; Lithium Chloride; Male; Monoacylglycerol Lipases; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Shrews; Vomiting

Conditioned gaping reactions reflect nausea-induced behaviour in rats. Cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB(1) ) agonists interfere with the establishment of nausea-induced conditioned gaping; however, it is not known if their effects are mediated by an action at peripheral or central CB(1) receptors.. We utilized the conditioned gaping model of nausea to evaluate the effect of peripheral and central administration of the peripherally restricted CB(1) agonist, CB13, on the establishment of LiCl-induced gaping in rats. We further evaluated the ability of HU-210 administered to the gustatory insular cortex (GIC) or visceral insular cortex (VIC) to interfere with LiCl-induced conditioned gaping and determined if this effect was mediated by CB(1) receptors.. Central, but not peripheral, CB13 suppressed LiCl-induced conditioned gaping. Central administration of the potent CB(1) agonist, HU-210, delivered to the VIC, but not the GIC, suppressed the establishment of LiCl-induced gaping reactions, but not LiCl-induced suppression of hedonic reactions or conditioned taste avoidance. This pattern of results suggests that HU-210 delivered to the VIC prevented LiCl-induced nausea, but not learning per se. The suppression of LiCl-induced conditioned gaping by HU-210 was mediated by CB(1) receptors because it was prevented by co-administration of CB(1) antagonist/inverse agonist, AM-251, into the VIC. A high dose of AM-251 (20 µg) administered alone into the VIC did not produce conditioned gaping reactions.. The nausea-relieving effects of CB(1) agonists, but not the nausea-inducing effects of CB(1) inverse agonists, are mediated, at least in part, by their action at the VIC in rats.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Cerebral Cortex; Dronabinol; Lithium Chloride; Male; Naphthalenes; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists/inverse agonists, potentiate toxin-induced nausea and vomiting in animal models. Here, we sought to determine if this potentiated nausea was mediated by inverse agonism or neutral antagonism of the CB(1) receptor, and if the potentiated nausea would be produced by intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of an inverse agonist.. The conditioned gaping model of nausea in rats was used to compare the CB(1) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, AM251, and the CB(1) receptor neutral antagonists, AM6527 (centrally and peripherally active) and AM6545 (peripherally active), in potentiating conditioned gaping produced by lithium chloride (LiCl) solution. The effect of icv (lateral ventricle and 4th ventricle) administration of AM251 on LiCl-induced gaping in this model was also evaluated.. At a dose that did not produce conditioned gaping on its own, systemically administered AM251 (1.25 mg.kg(-1)) potentiated LiCl-induced conditioned gaping and reduced sucrose palatability; however, even doses as high as 8 mg.kg(-1) of AM6545 and AM6527 neither potentiated LiCl-induced conditioned gaping nor reduced sucrose palatability. Infusions of AM251 into the lateral ventricles (1.25, 12.5 and 125 microg) or the 4th ventricle (2.5, 12.5 and 125 microg) did not potentiate LiCl-induced conditioned gaping reactions, but all doses attenuated saccharin palatability during the subsequent test.. Inverse agonism, but not neutral antagonism, of CB(1) receptors potentiated toxin-induced nausea. This effect may be peripherally mediated or may be mediated centrally by action on CB(1) receptors, located distal to the cerebral ventricles.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Brain; Conditioning, Classical; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Feeding Behavior; Lithium Chloride; Male; Morpholines; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Saccharin

The objective was to investigate the frequency of adverse events (AE) as a cause for discontinuation of donepezil treatment for Alzheimer's dementia (DAT) in a geriatric memory unit.. Five-year retrospective study of 123 donepezil-treated patients diagnosed with DAT or mixed dementia in a geriatric memory unit. The material covers all patients treated with donepezil and surveyed for 12 months in the memory unit during the period from 14th March 2001 to 7th April 2006.. Among the 123 patients, 106 (86%) suffered from DAT and 17 (14%) suffered from mixed dementia. A total of 100 (81%) were female while 23 (19%) were male. The median age was 84 years. In all, 26 (21%) patients discontinued treatment due to AE. The most frequent AE were nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and loss of appetite.. In 21% of the cases treatment was discontinued within 12 months due to AE. The most frequent AEs were nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and loss of appetite. For the most part discontinuation took place within the initial three months. However, some treatments were not discontinued until after six months; consequently, treatment should be supervised and patients should have easy access to a memory unit in the case of AE.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Appetite; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Nausea; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies; Vomiting

Drugs that interfere with cannabinoid CB1 transmission suppress various food-motivated behaviors, and it has been suggested that such drugs could be useful as appetite suppressants. Biochemical studies indicate that most of these drugs assessed thus far have been CB1 inverse agonists, and although they have been shown to suppress food intake, they also appear to induce nausea and malaise. The present studies were undertaken to characterize the behavioral effects of AM4113, which is a CB1 neutral antagonist, and to examine whether this drug can reduce food-reinforced behaviors and feeding on diets with varying macronutrient compositions. Biochemical data demonstrated that AM4113 binds to CB1 receptors, but does not show inverse agonist properties (ie no effects on cyclic-AMP production). In tests of spontaneous locomotion and analgesia, AM4113 reversed the effects of the CB1 agonist AM411. AM4113 suppressed food-reinforced operant responding with rats responding on fixed ratio (FR) 1 and 5 schedules of reinforcement in a dose-dependent manner, and also suppressed feeding on high-fat, high-carbohydrate, and lab chow diets. However, in the same dose range that suppressed feeding, AM4113 did not induce conditioned gaping, which is a sign of nausea and food-related malaise in rats. These results suggest that AM4113 may decrease appetite by blocking endogenous cannabinoid tone, and that this drug may be less associated with nausea than CB1 inverse agonists.

Topics: Adamantane; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Conditioning, Operant; Cyclic AMP; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dronabinol; Drug Interactions; Eating; Male; Motor Activity; Nausea; Piperidines; Protein Binding; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Reinforcement, Psychology

We examined the therapeutic potential of a proprietary Croton palanostigma extract (Zangrado(R)) in the management of emesis and itch.. Emesis was induced in ferrets with morphine-6-glucuronide (0.05 mg/kg sc) in the presence of Zangrado (3 mg/kg, ip) and the cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist, AM 251 (5 mg/kg, ip). Topical Zangrado (1%) was assessed for anti-pruretic actions in the 5-HT-induced scratching model in rats and evaluated in capsaicin-induced gastric hyperemia as measured by laser doppler flow. In the ApcMinmouse model of precancerous adenomatosis polyposis, mice received Zangrado (100 mug/ml in drinking water) from the age of 6 - 16 weeks for effects on polyp number. In RAW 264.7 cells Zangrado was examined for effects on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitrite production.. Zangrado was a highly effective anti-emetic, reducing morphine-induced vomiting and retching by 77%. These benefits were not associated with sedation or hypothermia and were not reversed by cannabinoid receptor antagonism. Itch responses were blocked in both the morphine and 5-HT models. Zangrado did not exacerbate the ApcMincondition rather health was improved. Capsaicin-induced hyperemia was blocked by Zangrado, which also attenuated the production of nitric oxide by activated macrophages.. Zangrado is an effective anti-emetic and anti-itch therapy that is devoid of common side-effects, cannabinoid-independent and broadly suppresses sensory afferent nerve activation. This complementary medicine represents a promising new approach to the management of nausea, itch and irritable bowel syndrome.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Antipruritics; Cell Line; Croton; Ferrets; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Piperidines; Plant Extracts; Proanthocyanidins; Pruritus; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Vomiting

The endogenous cannabinoid system plays a vital role in the control of nausea and emesis. Because of the rapid breakdown and hydrolysis of endocannabinoids, such as anandamide, the therapeutic effects may be enhanced by prolonging their duration of action.. The present experiment evaluated the potential of various doses of URB597, a fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor, alone and in combination with systemic administration of anandamide to modulate the establishment of lithium-induced conditioned taste reactivity responses in rats.. In experiment 1, on the conditioning day, rats first received an injection of 0.3 mg/kg URB597, 0.15 mg/kg URB597, or vehicle and then received a second injection of anandamide (5 mg/kg) or vehicle, before a 3-min exposure of 0.1% saccharin by intraoral infusion. Immediately after the saccharin exposure, the rats were injected with lithium chloride. On each of three test days, rats received a 3-min intraoral infusion of saccharin solution, and the taste reactivity responses were videotaped and monitored. In experiment 2, the effects of pretreatment with the CB(1) antagonist, AM-251, on URB597 and anandamide-induced suppressed aversion was evaluated.. Administration of URB597 alone and in combination with anandamide reduced active rejection reactions elicited by a LiCl-paired saccharin solution; both effects were reversed by pretreatment with AM-251, suggesting that they were CB(1) receptor mediated.. The results suggest that prolonging the action of anandamide by pretreatment with the FAAH inhibitor, URB597, suppresses lithium-induced nausea in the rat.

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Association Learning; Avoidance Learning; Benzamides; Carbamates; Conditioning, Classical; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endocannabinoids; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Lithium Chloride; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Vomiting

This study aimed to dissect the mechanisms involved in malaise induced by the anti-cancer drug cisplatin by attempting to uncouple its effects on locomotor activity, arguably at least partly indicative of fatigue, from those effects indicative of emesis (pica, gastric stasis, reduced food intake) using pharmacological agents in the rat. Over 2 days cisplatin (6 mg/kg i.p.) reduced food intake, stimulated kaolin consumption, increased the wet weight of gastric contents and reduced locomotor activity. In animals treated with cisplatin: the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (1 mg/kg s.c. bd.) had no effect on either activity or weight of gastric contents but did increase food intake on day 1 (P<0.05) and the total over both days (27.6+/-1.8 vs. 19.9+/-2.3g, P<0.05), reducing kaolin consumption on day 2 (P<0.01) but not the total over both days; the NK1 receptor antagonist GR205171 (1 mg/kg s.c. bd.) was without effect on activity, but reduced the wet weight of gastric contents (P<0.05), increased food intake on day 2 (P<0.01) and total consumption over both days (28.1+/-1.7 g vs. 19.9+/-2.3 g; P<0.05) and reduced kaolin consumption on day 2 (P<0.05) but not over both days; dexamethasone (2 mg/kg s.c. bd.) blocked the cisplatin-induced reduction in activity on days 1 and 2 (P<0.01), reduced the wet weight of gastric contents by 43% (P<0.01), reduced kaolin consumption on both days (P<0.01) and arguably decreased the reduction in food intake caused by cisplatin. This study has revealed novel insights into the different spectra of activities of 5-HT3 and NK1 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone, which have implications for therapeutic strategies to alleviate the emetic, anorectic, dyspeptic and activity-reducing effects of anti-cancer chemotherapy.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Eating; Gastric Emptying; Male; Motor Activity; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Pica; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Serotonin Antagonists; Tetrazoles

A growing body of evidence suggests that cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists have potential therapeutic utility as appetite suppressants. However, the specific mechanisms underlying the reduction in food intake produced by these drugs are not well understood.. Considering the known antiemetic and motor-suppressive effects of CB1 agonists, the present studies were conducted to determine if the reductions in food intake induced by the CB1 antagonist AM 251 could result from nausea or impairments in intake-related motor control, rather than solely from appetite suppression.. Three experiments were conducted to examine the effects of AM 251 (2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 mg/kg or vehicle) on detailed parameters of food intake, on the development of conditioned taste avoidance, and on taste reactivity.. In the first experiment, acute administration of AM 251 dose-dependently decreased food intake; nevertheless, feeding rate (grams consumed per time spent eating) and food handling were unaffected, which suggests that food intake was not reduced because of severe motor impairments. In the second experiment, AM 251 dose-dependently reduced intake of a flavor with which it had previously been associated, indicating that conditioned taste avoidance had developed. Lastly, AM 251 was found to induce conditioned rejection reactions in a dose-dependent manner.. The CB1 antagonist AM 251 may reduce food intake in part by inducing nausea or malaise, but not because of incoordination or motor slowing related to feeding.

Topics: Animals; Appetite Depressants; Avoidance Learning; Conditioning, Psychological; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eating; Feeding Behavior; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Taste

Marijuana has been reported to suppress nausea produced by chemotherapy treatment in human cancer patients. Although there is abundant evidence that cannabinoid agonists attenuate vomiting in emetic species, there has been little experimental evidence of their anti-nausea potential. Considerable evidence suggests that conditioned rejection reactions in rats reflect nausea. The present experiments evaluated the potential of low doses of the cannabinoid agonists, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), and HU-210 (0.001 mg/kg and 0.01 mg/kg, i.p.), and the CB(1) antagonist SR-141716A in modulating the establishment and the expression of lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions in rats.. To evaluate the effect of cannabinoids on conditioned rejection reactions, a rat model of nausea.. In experiments 1 and 2, respectively, rats were injected with cannabinoid agonists, THC (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and HU-210 (0.001, 0.005 or 0.01 mg/kg), 30 min prior to exposure to 0.1% saccharin solution by intraoral infusion. Immediately following saccharin exposure, they were injected with 20 ml/kg 0.15 M lithium chloride or saline. On each of two test trials, the rats were injected with the cannabinoid or vehicle 30 min prior to exposure to saccharin. In experiment 3, rats were injected with the CB(1) antagonist, SR-141716A (2.5 mg/kg) or a combination of SR-141716A and HU-210 (0.01 mg/kg) 30 min prior to an infusion of saccharin followed by injection of lithium or saline. They were given a single drug-free test trial. Experiment 4 replicated and extended the findings of experiment 3.. delta-9-THC and HU-210 interfered with the establishment and the expression of lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions. The suppressive effect of HU-210 on rejection reactions was reversed by pretreatment with SR-141716A. Administration of SR-141716A prior to conditioning potentiated lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions.. These results indicate that the establishment and the expression of lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions are suppressed by pretreatment with cannabinoid agents. These effects appear to be mediated by their action on the CB(1) receptor, because they are reversed by pretreatment with SR-141716A. Finally, our results suggest that endogenous cannabinoids play a role in modulation of nausea, because the antagonist potentiated lithium-induced nausea.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Avoidance Learning; Behavior, Animal; Cannabinoids; Conditioning, Psychological; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dronabinol; Lithium; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rimonabant

The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the effect of lerisetron (1-phenyl-methyl-2-piperazinyl-1H-benzimidazole hydrochloride, CAS 143257-98-1, F-0930-RS2), a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on ipecacuanha-induced nausea and vomiting. The ipecacuanha model of emesis has been used to test the anti-emetic activity of several different 5-HT3 antagonists and the anti-emetic doses that were effective in the ipecacuanha model have been found to correlate well with the clinically effective doses. Study 1 investigated oral doses of lerisetron from 4 mg to 40 mg. Study 2 evaluated the duration of effect of a single dose of 20 mg oral lerisetron. Study 3 evaluated intravenous doses of 18 mg and 12 mg lerisetron. In Study 1, the 40 mg dose of oral lerisetron inhibited emesis in all test subjects. The percentage of subjects who experienced an emetic episode increased as the dose of lerisetron decreased. At the lowest dose level tested five of six subjects had an emetic episode compared with four out of five in the placebo group. In Study 2, 20 mg oral lerisetron was effective up to 12 h after administration. When ipecacuanha was administered at 18 h post-dose three of seven subjects had an emetic episode and at 24 h post-dose the incidence of emesis was similar to the placebo treatment groups in the previous study. Study 3 demonstrated the effectiveness of intravenous doses of lerisetron. The 18 mg intravenous dose reduced the number of patients experiencing emetic episodes by 75% compared with placebo, doses below 12 mg i.v. were not evaluated because of the reduced efficacy of the compound at this dose level. In conclusion, lerisetron has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ipecacuanha-induced nausea and vomiting at intravenous doses of 18 mg and at oral doses of 20 mg for up to 12 hours.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Emetics; Granisetron; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Ipecac; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3; Serotonin Antagonists; Time Factors; Vomiting

Topics: Aged; Analgesics; Colonoscopy; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pain; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Diarrhea; Donepezil; Humans; Indans; Nausea; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Vomiting

To compare the effects of oral rizatriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on the relief and emergence of nausea during a migraine attack.. Data from five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan 10 mg was directly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (N = 772), 50 mg (N = 1168), 25 mg (N = 1180), naratriptan 2.5 mg (N = 406), or zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (N = 571) for the acute treatment of a migraine attack were retrospectively analyzed. Migraine was diagnosed according to International Headache Society criteria. Presence or absence of nausea was recorded at baseline and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 hours after dosing. The end points analyzed were relief of nausea in those who had it at baseline and emergence of nausea in those who were free of it at baseline. Treatments were compared using odds ratios estimated from logistic regression models at 2 hours, and averaged odds ratios for the first 2 hours posttreatment.. Approximately 60% of patients in each treatment group had nausea at baseline. In those patients with nausea at baseline, significantly more patients treated with rizatriptan 10 mg were free of nausea at 2 hours compared with sumatriptan 100 mg (66% versus 58%, P =.043), sumatriptan 50 mg (68% versus 57%, P =.010), sumatriptan 25 mg (68% versus 59%, P =.017), and naratriptan 2.5 mg (59% versus 45%, P =.014). Averaging over the four posttreatment time points in the first 2 hours, significantly more patients treated with rizatriptan 10 mg were free of nausea compared with sumatriptan 100 mg (P =.004), sumatriptan 50 mg (P =.001), and naratriptan 2.5 mg (P =.015). No significant differences in nausea relief were seen between rizatriptan 10 mg and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, either at 2 hours (65% versus 61%, P =.210) or over the first 2 hours (P =.781). Rates of treatment-emergent nausea at 2 hours ranged from 11% to 18% with placebo, from 5% to 13% with rizatriptan 10 mg, and from 10% to 20% with other comparator triptans.. Oral rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan and naratriptan at eliminating nausea within 2 hours in patients who had it at baseline. Rates of emergent nausea in patients who were free of it at baseline were low, and no consistent differences were observed between active treatments.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indoles; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Oxazolidinones; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Sumatriptan; Triazoles; Tryptamines; Vasoconstrictor Agents

Donepezil is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor indicated for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. It is reported to have a relatively favourable side-effect profile. We report here on a pharmacovigilance study carried out post-marketing in England. An observational cohort study using the technique of Prescription-Event Monitoring was carried out. Some 1762 patients (mean age 72.9 years; 42% male) were followed up for 6 months minimum. The commonest adverse events were nausea, diarrhoea, malaise, dizziness and insomnia. Aggression, agitation and abnormal dreams were uncommonly associated with the drug. There were no cardiac rhythm disturbances or liver disorders causally associated. The commonest adverse drug reactions are already reported in the product information. Given the relatively small size of this cohort, the signals of abnormal dreams and psychiatric disturbance as possible adverse drug reactions need further investigation in carefully planned studies.

Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cohort Studies; Donepezil; Drug Prescriptions; England; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indans; Male; Nausea; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Vomiting

The effects of GR205171, a selective tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist, were investigated on both the acute and delayed phases of cisplatin-induced nausea-like behaviour and vomiting in the conscious piglet. Animals receiving cisplatin (5.5 mg kg(-1), i.v.) were observed for 60 h. Fifteen min prior to cisplatin infusion (T0(-15 min)), eight piglets acting as controls received an intravenous injection of saline solution (1 ml kg(-1)), whereas experimental animals received a single i.v. administration of GR205171 (1 ml kg(-1)) at a dose of 0.01 (n=8), 0.03 (n=8), 0.1 (n = 8), 0.3 (n = 16) or 1.0 (n = 13) mg kg(-1). In eight additional piglets, GR205171 (1 mg kg(-1)) was administered 15 min before the onset of the delayed phase (T16(-15 min)). A further five piglets received GR205171 (1 mg kg(-1)) every 6 h throughout the experiment. The latencies of the first emetic episode (EE) and nausea-like behavioural episode (NE) increased in all experimental groups treated at T0(-15 min), and the total number of both EE and NE during the 60 h was reduced in a dose-dependent manner. In piglets treated at T0(-15 min) with GR205171 1 mg kg(-1), eight out of 13 (62%) did not vomit throughout the experiment. Animals treated with GR205171 (1 mg kg(-1)) at T16(-15 min) exhibited an acute response to cisplatin but did not vomit during the delayed phase. The greatest inhibition of both nausea-like behaviour and vomiting was observed in piglets receiving multiple injections of GR205171. These results demonstrate the long-lasting anti-emetic effects of GR205171, and confirm the key role of substance P within the emetic reflex.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Piperidines; Swine; Tetrazoles; Vomiting

The effects of a NK1 antagonist, GR205171, and a 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansetron, in a novel model of post-anaesthesia-induced emesis in Suncus murinus is described. GR205171 (1 and 3 mg k(-1) s.c) and ondansetron (3 mg kg(-1) s.c.) each significantly inhibited emesis. This model may be useful for studying drugs to treat post-operative nausea and vomiting in man.

Topics: Anesthesia; Animals; Halothane; Humans; Male; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Piperidines; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3; Serotonin Antagonists; Shrews; Tetrazoles; Vomiting

Topics: 1-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Cisapride; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Nausea; Phobic Disorders; Piperidines; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Sertraline

Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cisapride; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Nausea; Piperidines; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

A low dose of cisapride (5 mg b.i.d.) produced rapid relief from nausea elicited by the initiation of treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in eight patients. This effect of cisapride is presumably related to its serotonin3 antagonistic property.

Topics: Adult; Cisapride; Depressive Disorder; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists

The results of a well-controlled multicenter shortterm safety and efficacy study, supported by results from several long-term studies, indicate that therapeutic doses of flecainide are well tolerated by most patients. The most frequently reported extracardiac adverse experiences were dizziness (30%) and visual disturbances (28%), often occurring in tandem. Headache, nausea, dyspnea and chest pain occurred at incidences of 6 to 9%; other adverse experiences occurred at incidences of greater than or equal to 5%. Because of study design, it is likely that these figures are overestimates; they include all reports, whether or not they were caused by flecainide. Extracardiac adverse experiences were given as reasons contributing to discontinuation of therapy in 10% of patients in the short-term and 6% of patients in the long-term studies. In most cases the inability to tolerate flecainide became evident early in therapy. No new adverse experiences indicative of any chronic toxic effect of flecainide were reported during the long-term studies. Side effects tended to be intermittent and to decrease over time.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Dizziness; Dyspnea; Flecainide; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Piperidines; Vision Disorders

Topics: Adolescent; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Nausea; Piperidines; Vomiting

The findings of a study into the anti-emetic properties of domperidone are reported. When the drug was given prophylactically with either morphine or pethidine the study revealed that any anti-emetic property of domperidone was of short duration and that it would not be suitable as a prophylaxis against opiate-induced emesis. Domperidone is not being introduced into clinical practice in the United Kingdom on the basis of current study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, General; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Postoperative Period; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Vomiting

The incidence of nausea in relation to pain was recorded in 104 patients after abdominal operations. Ten per cent of the patients had episodes of nausea not related to pain. One hundred and fourteen episodes of concomitant pain and nausea were recorded in 61 patients (58.6 per cent). The intravenous injection of morphine or ketobemidone relieved nausea as well as pain in 80 per cent of the episodes. Relief of pain with persistence of nausea was uncommon and if pain relief was inadequate nausea was unabated. Nausea was provoked by 3.4 per cent of the morphine injections, but all patients tolerated similar doses of morphine on other occasions without nausea. Nausea often accompanies pain in the early postoperative period and can be relieved concomitant with the pain by the intravenous use of opiates in adequate doses in a high proportion of cases.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Male; Meperidine; Middle Aged; Morphine; Nausea; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Furosemide; Guanethidine; Heart Rate; Humans; Hydralazine; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Hypertrichosis; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Methyldopa; Middle Aged; Minoxidil; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Antiemetics; Carbonates; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dinitrophenols; Humans; Nausea; Parkinson Disease; Piperidines; Vomiting

Topics: Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Autistic Disorder; Autonomic Nervous System; Catatonia; Female; Hallucinations; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Liver Function Tests; Male; Mental Disorders; Nausea; Neurotic Disorders; Paranoid Disorders; Personality Disorders; Phenothiazines; Piperidines; Schizophrenia; Sleep Wake Disorders; Stimulation, Chemical; Sweating; Tremor; Vascular Diseases; Vomiting