piperidines and Myalgia

To evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety/tolerability of the nonbenzodiazepine antispasmodic pridinol (PRI) in patients with muscle-related pain.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) according to PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane recommendations. Data sources included Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Registry, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, and product manufacturer archives from inception to 31 January 2022. Eligibility criteria for study selection were randomized, placebo-controlled trials with PRI in adults (≥18 years) with muscle-related pain. Data extraction, synthesis, and analysis carried out by two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Categorial global response rates (number of patients) based on clinical judgement of study physicians (as primary efficacy endpoint), and response on pain at rest, pain at movement, stiffness, tenderness, and movement restriction (as secondary efficacy endpoints), as well as the number of patients with drug-related adverse events (DRAEs) were meta-analytically evaluated using the Review Manager Software version 5.4.1.. The results from this meta-analysis as based on two placebo-controlled studies in adult patients with mild to moderate acute muscle pain demonstrate that a 3-week monotherapy with PRI showed a comparable safety profile, but significantly better analgesic effects and improvements of related impairments such as stiffness, tenderness, and movement restrictions compared with placebo - irrespective of its mode of administration.. Muscle pain is one of the most common pain problems worldwide.In the majority of cases, muscle pain is temporary, transient, and benign in nature. However, people affected may still experience severe pain and significant pain-related disabilities in daily life activities that may require temporary drug treatment – also in order to be able to undertake the non-drug treatment measures necessary to prevent recurrence.Current treatment recommendations for muscle pain are largely ´non-specific´ and limited to symptomatic pain-relieving measures (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatories), while muscle relaxants – such as pridinol (PRI), which has been reapproved in Germany in 2017 and first time approved in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Poland in 2020 – are currently not recommended (primarily due to insufficient efficacy data from controlled clinical trials) but nevertheless frequently prescribed.Due to our systematic literature research of double-blind randomized and placebo-controlled trials, a 3-week monotherapy with PRI

Topics: Acute Pain; Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myalgia; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Ibrutinib is indicated in Europe for the treatment of several B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). However, despite the high efficacy and favourable toxicity profile of ibrutinib, recent data suggest that it is not always administered optimally in clinical practice, with an increased tendency for dose reduction and a higher frequency of discontinuation. An expert panel of European haematologists was convened to identify practical issues pertinent to physicians involved in the therapeutic management of ibrutinib-treated CLL patients and here we outline the findings. Practical management recommendations are given for treating patients with ibrutinib and clinical considerations for the management of adverse events (AEs) that can be associated with ibrutinib treatment are addressed. This article highlights that patients should be monitored for treatment emergent adverse events, most of which are mild, transient and generally occur early in therapy and that, even with more challenging AEs, patients can often be maintained on therapy with minimal disruption through careful management. The necessity to use the correct ibrutinib dose, along with increased awareness, vigilance, mitigation and management of AEs, are all recommended to maximise outcomes for CLL patients treated with ibrutinib.

Topics: Adenine; Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; Arthralgia; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diarrhea; Drug Eruptions; Drug Interactions; Exanthema; Fatigue; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Infections; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Lymphocytosis; Medication Adherence; Myalgia; Piperidines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Arthralgia; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Musculoskeletal Pain; Myalgia; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines

Alectinib--a highly selective, CNS-active, ALK inhibitor-showed promising clinical activity in crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-resistant patients with ALK-rearranged (ALK-positive) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on previous crizotinib.. We did a phase 2 study at 27 centres in the USA and Canada. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with stage IIIB-IV, ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed after crizotinib. Patients were treated with oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily until progression, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by an independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Response endpoints were assessed in the response-evaluable population (ie, patients with measurable disease at baseline who received at least one dose of study drug), and efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all enrolled patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01871805. The study is ongoing and patients are still receiving treatment.. Between Sept 4, 2013, and Aug 4, 2014, 87 patients were enrolled into the study (intention-to-treat population). At the time of the primary analysis (median follow-up 4·8 months [IQR 3·3-7·1]), 33 of 69 patients with measurable disease at baseline had a confirmed partial response; thus, the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by the independent review committee was 48% (95% CI 36-60). Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2, most commonly constipation (31 [36%]), fatigue (29 [33%]), myalgia 21 [24%]), and peripheral oedema 20 [23%]). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were changes in laboratory values, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase (seven [8%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (five [6%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (four [5%]). Two patients died: one had a haemorrhage (judged related to study treatment), and one had disease progression and a history of stroke (judged unrelated to treatment).. Alectinib showed clinical activity and was well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. Therefore, alectinib could be a suitable treatment for patients with ALK-positive disease who have progressed on crizotinib.. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Constipation; Creatine Kinase; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Edema; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Myalgia; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Retreatment

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has transformed the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), leading to unprecedented improvements in progression-free and overall survival for all patients, including those with poor prognostic features. The side effect profile of ibrutinib is unique compared with chemoimmunotherapy and includes atrial fibrillation, increased bleeding risk, and arthralgias/myalgias. Although common, arthralgias/myalgias and their management are poorly described.. We identified 214 patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib (as a single agent or in combination) from 2011 to 2018 at the University of Pennsylvania.. In this cohort, 36% (76/214) of patients developed arthralgias/myalgias during follow-up with a median onset of 34.5 months. Most (79%) events were grade 1 or 2. Risk factors for developing arthralgias/myalgias included younger age at start of ibrutinib, female gender, and ibrutinib use as first treatment. Twenty-eight percent of patients with grade 1 or 2 toxicity continued ibrutinib and had resolution of symptoms. Dose holds were frequently used to manage this toxicity, and this strategy was more successful than dose reduction. Sixty-two percent of patients with grade 3 toxicity ultimately discontinued ibrutinib. Supportive care measures such as discontinuing statins or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, or corticosteroids were not used frequently enough in this cohort to evaluate their efficacy.. Additional studies to determine the mechanism of ibrutinib-related arthralgias/myalgias are needed to develop optimal management strategies.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Incidence; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Myalgia; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Cannabinoid (CB) receptors have emerged as an attractive therapeutic target for pain management in recent years and the interest in the use of cannabinoids is gradually increasing, particularly in patients where conventional treatments fail. Muscle pain is a major clinical problem and new pharmacological approaches are being studied. Recently, we have demonstrated that cannabinoid synthetic agonists are useful to reduce muscular pain in two animal models, where the local administration is effective. Now, we want to know if tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a cannabinoid natural derivative with therapeutic use in humans, is also effective in reducing acute muscle pain. The antinociceptive effect of THC by systemic (i.p.) and local (i.m.) administration was tested in two animal models of acute muscle pain, rat masseter and gastrocnemius, induced by hypertonic saline (HS) injection. The drugs used were the non-selective agonist THC and two selective cannabinoid antagonists, AM251 (CB1) and AM630 (CB2). THC, i.p. and i.m. administered, reduced the nociceptive behaviours induced by HS in both muscular pain models. The antinociceptive effect induced by the systemic administration of THC was mediated by CB1 receptors in the masseter muscle whereas in gastrocnemius both CB1 and CB2 receptors participated. When THC was administered locally, only CB2 receptors were involved in the antinociceptive effect in both muscles. This study suggests that THC could be a future pharmacological option in the treatment of muscle pain. The local administration of THC could be an interesting option to treat this type of pain avoiding the central adverse effects.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Dronabinol; Indoles; Injections, Intramuscular; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Male; Masseter Muscle; Muscle, Skeletal; Myalgia; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Cannabinoid