piperidines and Intervertebral-Disc-Displacement

To compare hemodynamics, recovery profiles, early postoperative pain control and costs of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil and propofol and alfentanil.. Randomized, double-blind study.. University hospital.. 40 ASA physical status I and II adult patients scheduled for lumbar discectomy.. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil-propofol or alfentanil-propofol. Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) or alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) with propofol 2 mg kg(-1), and maintained with infusions of propofol 150 to 100 microg kg(-1)min(-1) and either remifentanil 0.1 microg kg(-1) min(-1) or alfentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1).. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), times to awakening, and tracheal extubation were recorded. In the postanesthesia care unit, pain level, frequency of analgesic demand, frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), partial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and respiratory rates were noted. Drug dosages and costs of each technique were determined.. The mean arterial pressure significantly decreased compared to baseline values 1 minute after induction (p < 0.05) in both groups, and it significantly decreased at 5, 15, and 30 minutes perioperatively in the remifentanil group compared to the alfentanil group (p < 0.05). Time of extubation, spontaneous eye opening, and response to verbal command were similar in both groups. Visual analog scale pain scores at 30 minutes and 60 minutes were significantly lower in the alfentanil group than remifentanil group (p < 0.05). At 15, 30, and 60 minutes after terminating the operation oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were significantly higher (p < 0.05) and analgesics were required sooner in the remifentanil group than the alfentanil group (p < 0.05). The frequency of PONV was similar in both groups. The remifentanil-propofol anesthesia was found to be slightly more expensive as compared to the alfentanil based TIVA (33.41 +/- 4.53 vs. 29.97 +/- 4.1 USD) (p < 0.05).. Both remifentanil and alfentanil provided a reasonably rapid and reliable recovery. The remifentanil-based TIVA was associated with high intraoperative cost and early postoperative pain, but it allowed a more rapid respiratory recovery.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alfentanil; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Oximetry; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Respiratory Function Tests; Time Factors

Recovery characteristics, haemodynamic profile, analgesic requirement and costs were evaluated and compared in patients undergoing elective lumbar discectomy with remifentanil-based anaesthesia using either desflurane or sevoflurane as the volatile anaesthetic agent. Sixty-two patients (ASA I/II status) were randomly assigned to receive either desflurane and remifentanil or sevoflurane and remifentanil (in oxygen/air) for anaesthesia. After induction with 0.5 microgram/kg/min remifentanil, 4 to 5 mg/kg thiopentone and 0.5 mg/kg atracurium, the patients received 0.25 microgram/kg/min remifentanil and 0.5 +/- 0.05 MAC of one of the volatile anaesthetic agents for further maintenance of anaesthesia. At the end of surgery, early emergence from anaesthesia was recorded by assessing the time to sufficient spontaneous respiration, eye opening and tracheal extubation. The total demand of piritramide in the postoperative period was determined using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA device). Quality of pain therapy was assessed via a verbal ranking scale (VRS). Side-effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting or shivering were recorded in the postanaesthetic care unit. In both groups, the haemodynamic profile was nearly identical. Mean arterial pressure (-18%) and heart rate (-23%) were significantly reduced throughout anaesthesia in both groups. All recovery parameters were significantly shorter in the desflurane group in comparison with the sevoflurane group (e.g. time to tracheal extubation: 8.5 +/- 3.0 min vs. 11.9 +/- 4.6 min). No significant differences between the groups were observed concerning the amount of piritramide required, side-effects such as nausea and vomiting or the total cost of anaesthesia. In conclusion, both anaesthetic techniques provide adequate haemodynamic stability and postoperative pain control in a surgical procedure with minimal trauma. Incidence and severity of side-effects such as nausea, vomiting or shivering did not differ between the groups and were acceptable under clinical conditions. Costs for desflurane were significantly higher than those for sevoflurane, but total costs were not different between the groups. Concerning recovery profile, desflurane/remifentanil seems to have small advantages over sevoflurane/remifentanil in patients undergoing lumbar vertebral disc resection.

Topics: Adult; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Arousal; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Desflurane; Diskectomy; Female; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Isoflurane; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Methyl Ethers; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Sevoflurane

Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dextromoramide; Female; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Laminectomy; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Piperidines; Postoperative Care; Respiration