piperidines and Arthritis--Rheumatoid

To investigate whether treatment effects of pharmaceutical compounds compared with placebo controls are systematically different to the effects of the same compounds compared with active treatment controls in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials.. We systematically identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in RA, and matched active treatment arms with comparable regimens, populations, background therapy, and outcome reporting, by the nature of their control group (active comparator or placebo). Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL were used to identify RCTs investigating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapies until December 2021. Using mixed-model logistic regression we estimated OddsRatios (OR) for achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70% response at weeks 12 and 24. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Tool.. We screened 8328 studies and included 40 for analysis after detailed review of 590 manuscripts; unique compounds had significantly higher responses in active comparator trials compared with their effects observed in placebo controlled trials, with ORs of 1.67 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.91; p<0.001) for ACR20, 1.50 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.75; p<0.001) for ACR50 and 1.65 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.10; p<0.001) for ACR70 (week 12); corresponding ORs for ACR 20, 50, and 70 (week 24) were 1.93 (95% CI 1.50 to 2.48; p<0.001), 1.75 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.33; p<0.001) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.34; p<0.001), respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results.. Placebo controlled trials lead to smaller effect sizes of active compounds in RCTs compared with the same compound in head-to-head trials. This difference may be explained by potential nocebo effects in placebo-controlled settings and needs to be considered when interpreting head-to-head and placebo-controlled trials, by patients, investigators, sponsors and regulatory agencies.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the real-world data on the use of tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Spain. Sixteen retrospective studies carried out in Spain between 2019 and 2021 have been analyzed, considering patients' characteristics, and treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety. In those studies, approximately 511 patients received tofacitinib during the study period. They were predominantly women (mean age: 48-61 years). The percentage of patients receiving tofacitinib as monotherapy ranged between 20.0% and 67.9%. Only five studies reported the combined use of corticosteroids (42.0-84.5% of patients), with a mean dose varying from 1.8 to 7.2 mg. A wide range of patients (36.0-85.7%) had failed a previous biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was the lack of efficacy, and the most common adverse event described was herpes zoster infection. Real-world studies complement clinical trials by adding efficacy and safety data in real-world settings to the benefit/risk profile of the drug. The profile of RA patients receiving tofacitinib in Spain has similarities with other real-world studies conducted in other countries.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome

The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate responses to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in RA patients with inadequate responses to bDMARDs.. Four RCTs comprising 1399 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib achieved significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) responses versus placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo. The ranking in SUCRA based on the ACR50 response rate indicated that baricitinib 4 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, and placebo. Tofacitinib 5 mg showed a significantly higher ACR70 response rate than filgotinib 100 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg. Tofacitinib 5 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and placebo showed a significantly lower serious adverse event rate than upadacitinib 15 mg.. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were effective treatment options for RA patients with an inadequate response to bDMARDs but with different efficacy and safety profiles.. ZIEL: Bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) und inadäquater Reaktion auf biologische krankheitsmodizifierende Antirheumatika (bDMARD) wurde die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib ermittelt.. Eine Bayes-Netzwerk-Metaanalyse wurde durchgeführt, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf bDMARD zu untersuchen.. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 1399 Patienten erfüllt. Unter Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib zeigte sich eine signifikant höhere ACR20-Ansprechrate (gemäß American College of Rheumatology) als unter Placebo. Wie die Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, basierend auf der Oberfläche unter der kumulativen Rangfolgenkurve (SUCRA, „surface under the cumulative ranking curve“), ergab, stellte Upadacitinib 15 mg mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit die beste Behandlung zur Erzielung der ACR20-Ansprechrate dar, es folgten Filgotinib 200 mg, Baricitinib 4 mg, Filgotinib 100 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg und Placebo. Die auf der ACR50-Ansprechrate basierende SUCRA-Rangfolge zeigte, dass für Baricitinib 4 mg die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit bestand, die ACR50-Ansprechrate zu erzielen, es folgten Filgotinib 200 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg, Filgotinib 100 mg und Placebo. Tofacitinib 5 mg wies eine signifikant höhere ACR70-Ansprechrate auf als Filgotinib 100 mg und Upadacitinib 15 mg. Für Tofacitinib 5 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und Placebo zeigte sich eine signifikant niedrigere Rate schwerer unerwünschter Ereignisse als für Upadacitinib 15 mg.. Für RA-Patienten mit inadäquater Reaktion auf bDMARD erwiesen sich Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib als wirksame Therapieoptionen, jedoch mit unterschiedlichen Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsprofilen.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

The use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors is a new approach in the therapy of inflammatory diseases with immune base. Tofacitinib is one of these inhibitors targeting JAK1 and JAK3, and its efficacy has been demonstrated in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). It is a small synthetic molecule administered orally, with a fast bioavailability and elimination rate, predictable pharmacokinetics and lack of immunogenicity, which are convenient characteristics for both efficacy and safety. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics of tofacitinib and its safety profile.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Interactions; Herpes Zoster; Herpes Zoster Vaccine; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Venous Thromboembolism

An assessment of the relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to those of methotrexate (MTX) was performed in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) so as to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and MTX in DMARD-naïve RA patients. Four RCTs comprising 2185 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate, followed by baricitinib 4 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib treatments achieved significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 responses compared to MTX. Tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. The safety analysis based on serious adverse events, adverse events (AEs), and withdrawals due to AEs revealed no statistically significant differences between the respective intervention groups. In conclusion, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were effective treatment options for DMARD-naïve RA patients, suggesting a difference in efficacy and safety among the different JAK inhibitors.. Die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib wurde im Vergleich zu Methotrexat (MTX) bei DMARD-naiven („disease-modifying antirheumatic drug“) Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) untersucht. Die Autoren führten eine Netzwerk-Metaanalyse nach Bayes durch, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib und MTX bei DMARD-naiven RA-Patienten zu ermitteln. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 2185 Patienten erfüllt. Die Ranking-Wahrscheinlichkeit auf Grundlage der Fläche unter der kumulativen Ranking-Kurve („surface under the cumulative ranking curve“, SUCRA) zeigte, dass unter Upadacitinib 15 mg die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit zur Erzielung der Responserate gemäß American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) bestand, dann folgten Baricitinib 4 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und MTX. Die Behandlung mit Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib führten zu signifikant höheren ACR50- und ACR70-Therapieantworten als MTX. Tofacitinib 5 mg wies die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit für die Erzielung der ACR50- und ACR70-Responseraten auf, es folgten Upadacitinib 15 mg, Baricitinib 4 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und MTX. Die Sicherheitsanalyse basierte auf den Parametern schwere unerwünschte Ereignisse, unerwünschte Ereignisse („adverse events“, AE) und Therapieabbruch aufgrund von AE, aber es waren keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den jeweiligen Interventionsgruppen festzustellen. Als Fazit ist festzuhalten, dass Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib wirksame Therapieoptionen bei DMARD-naiven RA-Patienten waren, dabei ergaben sich Hinweise auf Unterschiede zwischen der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit zwischen den verschiedenen JAK-Inhibitoren.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. We evaluated radiographic progression in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA for up to 3 years in two pooled long-term extension (LTE) studies (ORAL Sequel; A3921041) (primary analysis), and for up to 5 years using data integrated from one phase (P)2 (A3921068), two P3 (ORAL Start; ORAL Scan) and two LTE studies (exploratory analysis).. In LTE studies, patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or 10 mg BID as monotherapy or with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Radiographic outcomes up to 3 years: least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (ΔmTSS), erosion score (ΔES) and joint space narrowing (ΔJSN) score; proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (ΔmTSS ≤0.5); proportion of patients with no new erosions (ΔES ≤0.5). ΔmTSS was evaluated for up to 5 years in an exploratory analysis.. For all tofacitinib-treated patients with radiographic data available at LTE month 36 (n = 414), LSM ΔmTSS was 1.14, LSM ΔES was 0.66, LSM ΔJSN was 0.74, and 74.3% and 86.2% of patients showed no radiographic progression and no new erosions, respectively. Similar values were observed regardless of tofacitinib dose, or whether patients received tofacitinib as monotherapy or with csDMARDs. In an exploratory analysis of integrated P2/P3/LTE studies, LSM ΔmTSS was 3.34 at month 60 (n = 269).. Limited progression of structural damage was observed in tofacitinib-treated patients up to 5 years, with similar results for tofacitinib used as monotherapy or combination therapy up to 3 years.. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov): NCT01164579; NCT01039688; NCT00847613; NCT00413699; NCT00661661.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Radiography; Young Adult

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety.. Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration.. The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale.. The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.

Topics: Adamantane; Advisory Committees; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cytokines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Rheumatology; Spondylarthropathies; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

JAK inhibitor therapies are effective treatment options for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but their use has been limited by venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk warnings from licensing authorities. We undertook this study to evaluate the VTE risk of JAK inhibitors in patients with IMIDs.. Systematic searches of Medline and Embase databases from inception to September 30, 2020 were conducted. Phase II and phase III double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitors at licensed doses were included in our analyses. RCTs with no placebo arm, long-term extension studies, post hoc analyses, and pooled analyses were excluded. Three researchers independently extracted data on exposure to JAK inhibitors or placebo and VTE events (e.g., pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) and assessed study quality.. A total of 42 studies were included, from an initial search that yielded 619. There were 6,542 JAK inhibitor patient exposure years (PEYs) compared to 1,578 placebo PEYs. There were 15 VTE events in the JAK inhibitor group and 4 in the placebo group. The pooled incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of VTE, PE, and DVT in patients receiving JAK inhibitors were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.36-1.29), 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.70), and 0.59 (95% CI 0.31-1.15), respectively.. This meta-analysis of RCT data defines the VTE risk with JAK inhibitors as a class in IMID patients. The pooled IRRs do not provide evidence that support the current warnings of VTE risk for JAK inhibitors. These findings will aid continued development of clinical guidelines for the use of JAK inhibitors in IMIDs.

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pulmonary Embolism; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Spondylarthropathies; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Triazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis, and has been previously investigated for psoriasis (PsO). This meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was performed to identify genetic factors associated with increased risk/faster onset of herpes zoster (HZ) in subjects with RA or PsO receiving tofacitinib treatment, and to determine potential mechanisms that could be attributed to the varying rates of HZ across ethnicities.. In an ethnicity/indication-specific, trans-ethnic, trans-population meta-analysis of GWAS in subjects with RA or PsO from phase II, phase III, and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib, 8 million genetic variants were evaluated for their potential association with time to an HZ event and incidence of an HZ event (case versus control) with tofacitinib treatment, using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression analyses, respectively.. In total, 5,246 subjects were included (3,168 with RA and 2,078 with PsO). After adjustment for age, baseline absolute lymphocyte count, genetically defined ethnicity, and concomitant methotrexate use (in RA subjects only), 4 loci were significantly associated with faster onset of HZ in European subjects (P < 5 × 10. Genetic analysis of tofacitinib-treated subjects with RA or PsO identified multiple loci associated with increased HZ risk. Prevalent variants near the immune-relevant genes CD83 and IL17RB in European and East Asian populations, respectively, may contribute to risk of HZ in tofacitinib-treated subjects.

Topics: Antigens, CD; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asian People; CD83 Antigen; Genome-Wide Association Study; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Logistic Models; Membrane Glycoproteins; Piperidines; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Proportional Hazards Models; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Interleukin-17; White People

To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with tofacitinib compared with TNFis in patients with RA.. RA patients initiating tofacitinib or a TNFi without use of any biologic or tofacitinib any time prior were identified from IBM 'MarketScan' (2012-18), Medicare (parts A, B and D, 2012-17) or 'Optum' Clinformatics (2012-19) and followed until treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, insurance disenrollment or administrative censoring. The primary outcome, VTE, was identified using inpatient claims for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. A Cox proportional hazards model provided hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs after accounting for confounding through propensity score fine-stratification weighting. HRs were pooled across databases with inverse variance meta-analytic method.. A total of 42 201, 25 078 and 20 374 RA patients were identified from MarketScan, Medicare and Optum, respectively, of whom 7.1, 7.1 and 9.7% were tofacitinib initiators. The crude incidence rates per 100 person-years (95% CI) were 0.42 (0.20-0.77) and 0.35 (0.29-0.42) in MarketScan, 1.18 (0.68-1.92) and 0.83 (0.71-0.97) in Medicare, and 0.19 (0.04-0.57) and 0.34 (0.26-0.44) in Optum for tofacitinib and TNFis, respectively. Propensity score-weighted HRs showed no significant differences in the risk of VTE between tofacitinib and TNFis in any database with a pooled HR (95% CI) of 1.13 (0.77-1.65).. Overall, VTE occurred infrequently (<1 per 100) in a total of 87 653 RA patients initiating tofacitinib or a TNFi. We observed no evidence for an increased risk of VTE for tofacitinib vs TNFis in RA patients.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Venous Thromboembolism

Non-Helicobacter pylori species (NHPS) are newly emerging bacteria that naturally inhabit birds and mammals apart from humans and rarely cause diseases in humans. In recent years, a rise in the number of cases associated with NHPS infections in humans has been observed. Among them, infections with Helicobacter (H.) canis are sporadic and challenging to recognise clinically. To date, ten cases of H. canis infections in mainly immunocompromised humans have been reported in the literature. Transmission pathway is most likely zoonotic via the faecal-oral route during close contacts with dogs and cats or may result from a contaminated sheep milk intake. No clear guidelines for successful antibiotic regimen are known. Important additional risk factor for infection might be biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other conditions. Herein we present the first case of H. canis bacteraemia in a RA patient treated with novel JAKi tofacitinib.. A 65-year-old female patient with RA and rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia treated with tofacitinib, methotrexate, and methylprednisolone came to a planned visit in our outpatient rheumatology clinic. She presented with a history of back pain that significantly worsened 2 days before visit. She had numbness and tingling sensation in both legs and muscle weakness. Neurological examination was within a normal range. The patient was afebrile, had no chills, and was haemodynamically stable. She was in close contact with her pet dogs. Laboratory examination showed increased markers of inflammation. She was found to have H. canis bacteraemia with underlying multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Identification of H. canis was performed by MALDI-TOF MS and 16 S rRNA gene sequence analysis of isolate from subcultured positive aerobic blood culture bottles. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed low minimum inhibitory concentrations to amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and gentamicin. She was treated with combined antibiotic regimen (ceftriaxone, doxycycline) for 14 days, which resulted in total remission of the infection.. Clinicians should recognise H. canis infection risk in patients with recent pet exposure and predisposing factors such as immunodeficiency disorders or diseases that demand immunosuppressive drug therapy. A minimum of two weeks of antibiotic therapy is suggested.

Topics: Aged; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bacteremia; Cat Diseases; Cats; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Female; Helicobacter; Humans; Methotrexate; Methylprednisolone; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Sheep; Treatment Outcome

The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and mavrilimumab were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and mavrilimumab combined with DMARDs in patients with an inadequate response to DMARDs.. In total, 8 RCTs with 2,965 patients met inclusion criteria. 21 pairwise comparisons were performed, including 12 direct comparisons of 7 interventions. In patients with active RA and an inadequate DMARD response, mavrilimumab 150 mg+methotrexate (MTX) and mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX were the most effective treatments. Compared with placebo+MTX, all tofacitinib and mavrilimumab doses, except mavrilimumab 50 mg+MTX, achieved significant ACR20 responses. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that mavrilimumab 150 mg+MTX had the highest probability for best treatment outcome in terms of the ACR20 response rate, followed by mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX, tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX, mavrilimumab 30 mg+MTX, mavrilimumab 50 mg+MTX, and placebo+MTX. No significant differences were noted in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) after tofacitinib+MTX, mavrilimumab+MTX, or placebo+MTX.. In patients with RA showing inadequate DMARD response, mavrilimumab 150 mg+MTX and mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX and tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX, were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of SAEs.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

One-third of patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not achieve remission or low disease activity, or they have side effects from cDMARD and bDMARD. They will need a new treatment option such as the small molecule JAK inhibitors. In this systematic review, we evaluate the efficacy and safety data of the current jakinibs: tofacitinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib in patients in whom treatment with conventional or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD and/or bDMARD) failed.. We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of jakinibs for RA treatment using the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov databases with the terms: "rheumatoid arthritis" OR "arthritis rheumatoid" OR "RA" AND "inhibitor" OR "jak inhibitor" AND "clinical trial" OR "treatment" OR "therapy".. All jakinibs achieved good results in ACR 20, 50, 70 and with CRP-DAS28 for LDA and remission, upadacitinib showed better results compared to the others. In ESR-DAS28 for remission, tofacitinib achieved the best result. Regarding the safety of all jakinibs, peficitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib did not register deaths in their studies unlike tofacitinib that presented 11 deaths. Despite all benefits of jakinibs, the use in patients with severe liver and kidney disease should be avoided.. Jakinibs in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate can be considered a viable alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA. Even after failures with combination of cDMARDS and bDMARDS, jakinibs demonstrated efficacy.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Kidney Diseases; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

An enhanced understanding of the importance of Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling in multiple disease states has led to an increasing applicability of therapeutic intervention with JAK inhibitors. These agents have revolutionised treatments for a heterogeneous group of disorders, such as myeloproliferative neoplasms, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple immune-driven dermatological diseases, exemplifying rapid bench-to-bedside translation. In this Therapeutics paper, we summarise the currently available data concerning the successes and safety of an array of JAK inhibitors and hypothesise on how these fields could develop.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

We compared the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing inadequate response to conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with RA exhibiting inadequate cs- or bDMARD response.. Nine RCTs consisting of 5466 patients met the inclusion criteria. We obtained 15 pairwise comparisons, including 11 direct comparisons from 6 interventions. Tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX and filgotinib 200 mg + MTX were among the most effective treatments for active RA showing an inadequate cs- or bDMARD response, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, and adalimumab + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX and filgotinib 200 mg + MTX showed the highest probability of being the best treatment options in terms of ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.898, 0.782), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.602), filgotinib 100 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.359), adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA = 0.358), and placebo + MTX (SUCRA = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib + MTX, filgotinib + MTX, adalimumab + MTX, or placebo + MTX.. In patients with RA exhibiting an inadequate response to cs- or bDMARDs, tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX and filgotinib 200 mg + MTX were the most efficacious interventions and risks of serious adverse events did not differ between tofacitinib and filgotinib groups.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKs) are being developed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. Tofacitinib is effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but there are safety concerns. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety profile of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, or ankylosing spondylitis.. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through July 1, 2019. We performed a manual review of conference databases from 2012 through 2018. The primary outcome was incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. We also estimated incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, other malignancies, major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We performed a meta-analysis, which included controlled studies, to assess the relative risk of these events.. We identified 973 studies; of these, 82 were included in the final analysis, comprising 66,159 patients with immune-mediated diseases who were exposed to a JAK inhibitor. Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials. The incidence rate of AEs was 42.65 per 100 person-years and of serious AEs was 9.88 per 100 person-years. Incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events were 2.81 per 100 person-years, 2.67 per 100 person-years, 0.89 per 100 person-years, and 0.48 per 100 person-years, respectively. Mortality was not increased in patients treated with JAK inhibitors compared with patients given placebo or active comparator (relative risk 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.28). The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in risk of herpes zoster infection among patients who received JAK inhibitors (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.37).. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection among patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with JAK inhibitors. All other AEs were not increased among patients treated with JAK inhibitors.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Herpes Zoster; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Incidence; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Placebos; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Chronic inflammation, such as that present in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), leads to aberrations in bone remodeling, which is mediated by several signaling pathways, including the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway. In this light, pro-inflammatory cytokines are now clearly implicated in these processes as they can perturb normal bone remodeling through their action on osteoclasts and osteoblasts at both intra- and extra-articular skeletal sites. As a selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3, tofacitinib has the potential to play a role in the management of rheumatic diseases such as RA and PsA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tofacitinib can inhibit disturbed osteoclastogenesis in RA, which suggests that targeting the JAK-STAT pathway may help limit bone erosion. Evidence from clinical trials with tofacitinib in RA and PsA is encouraging, as tofacitinib treatment has been shown to decrease articular bone erosion. In this review, the authors summarize current knowledge on the relationship between the immune system and the skeleton before examining the involvement of JAK-STAT signaling in bone homeostasis as well as the available preclinical and clinical evidence on the benefits of tofacitinib on prevention of bone involvement in RA and PsA.Key Points• Chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) leads to disturbances in bone remodeling• Bone remodeling is mediated by several signaling pathways, including the JAK-STAT pathway• Tofacitinib, a selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3, is active in RA and PsA and may help limit systemic bone loss through inhibiting disturbed osteoclastogenesis• Clinical trials show that tofacitinib reduces articular bone erosion.

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone and Bones; Bone Remodeling; Humans; Immune System; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitors currently approved for RA.. A targeted literature review was conducted for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of three approved JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) as monotherapy or combination therapy among patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR). Using Bayesian NMA, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses and clinical remission (defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6) were evaluated separately at 12 and 24 weeks.. Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the NMA. All JAK inhibitors demonstrated significantly better efficacy than csDMARD. Among combination therapies, upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest 12-week ACR50 responses (median [95% credible interval]: 43.4% [33.4%, 54.5%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (38.7% [28.6%, 49.8%]), baricitinib 2 mg (37.1% [25.0%, 50.6%]), and baricitinib 4 mg (36.7%, [27.2%, 47.0%]). Similar results were observed for ACR20/70 and at week 24. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD was also found to have the highest clinical remission rates at week 12 (29.8% [16.9%, 47.0%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (24.3%, [12.7%, 40.2%]), baricitinib 4 mg (22.8%, [11.8%, 37.5%]), and baricitinib 2 mg (20.1%, [8.6%, 37.4%]). Similar results were seen at week 24. Among monotherapies, upadacitinib had a higher ACR50 response (38.5% [25.3%, 53.2%]) than tofacitinib (30.4% [18.3%, 45.5%]). The differences in efficacy measures were not statistically significant between the JAK inhibitors.. The NMA found that upadacitinib 15 mg once daily had numerically higher efficacy in terms of ACR response and clinical remission among approved JAK combination therapies and monotherapies for csDMARD-IR patients with RA.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides

To compare improvement in pain and physical function for patients treated with baricitinib, adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapy from randomised, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled trials in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)/biologic (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).. Data were from Phase III trials on patients receiving monotherapy baricitinib, tocilizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or MTX. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm) and physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). An MAIC based on treatment-arm matching, an MAIC with study-level matching and Bucher's method without matching compared change in outcomes between therapies. Matching variables included age, gender, baseline disease activity and baseline value of outcome measure.. With all methods, greater improvements were observed in pain and HAQ-DI at 6 months for baricitinib compared with adalimumab and tocilizumab (. Results suggest greater pain reduction and improved physical function for baricitinib monotherapy compared with tocilizumab and adalimumab monotherapy. No statistically significant differences in pain reduction and improved physical function were observed between baricitinib and tofacitinib with the MAIC analyses.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disability Evaluation; Humans; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and peficitinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and peficitinib in combination with DMARDs in patients with an inadequate response to DMARDs.. Nine RCTs, including 3836 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen pairwise comparisons were performed, including six direct comparisons of seven interventions. Tofacitinib 10 mg+methotrexate (MTX) and peficitinib 150 mg+MTX were among the most effective treatments for patients with active RA with an inadequate DMARD response. The efficacy of tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX, peficitinib 150 mg+MTX or tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX tended to be higher than that of adalimumab+MTX. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX had the greatest probability of being the best treatment to achieve the American College of Rheumatology 20 response rate, followed by peficitinib 150 mg+MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX, adalimumab+MTX, peficitinib 100 mg+MTX, and placebo+MTX. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib+MTX, peficitinib+MTX, adalimumab+MTX, or placebo+MTX.. In patients with RA with an inadequate response to DMARDs, tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX and peficitinib 150 mg+MTX were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Topics: Adamantane; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Several clinical trials have attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but their relative efficacy and safety as monotherapy remain unclear due to the lack of data from head-to-head comparison trials. The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy relative to placebo in patients with RA.. Five RCTs comprising 1547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate. Peficitinib 150 mg monotherapy showed the highest ACR20 response rate (odds ratio, 17.24.39; 95% credible interval, 6.57-51.80). The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that peficitinib 150 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by peficitinib 100 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, baricitinib 4 mg and placebo. However, the number of patients who experienced serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the JAK inhibitors, except for tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo.. All five JAK inhibitors-tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib-were efficacious monotherapy interventions for active RA, and differences were noted in their efficacy and safety in monotherapy.

Topics: Adamantane; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of different dosing regimens of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, novel selective oral Janus activated kinase inhibitors, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) baricitinib (2 and 4 mg daily), and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg daily) in RA were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 11, 2019. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled mean differences and relative risks (RRs). American College of Rheumatology 20%, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, adverse events, risk for infection, venous thromboembolic events, and malignancy were calculated.. Twenty trials with an overall low risk of bias involving 8982 patients were identified. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib improved RA control as determined by American College of Rheumatology 20% (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.20) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (mean differences, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.28) compared with placebo. Adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30); upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.27); and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24). The risk for infection was highest with tofacitinib, 10 mg, twice daily (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.72 to 4.41), followed by upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60) and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.45). Data for venous thromboembolic events were not available for tofacitinib or baricitinib, but there was no increase in risk with upadacitinib (15 mg daily: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.34 to 15.92).. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib significantly improve RA control. Head-to-head Janus activated kinase inhibitor clinical trials are needed to further inform decision making.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically over the last two decades since the development of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Moreover, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors became available in 2013. JAK inhibitors are low-molecular-weight compounds, which exert anti-rheumatic effects by suppressing the action of JAK, an intracellular tyrosine kinase. Of note, biologics bind to extracellular proteins and block their activity. The availability of JAK inhibitors that are as effective as bDMARDs, despite the completely different route of administration and mode of action, has enabled the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis to enter a new stage. JAK inhibitors are useful in a variety of cases, including patients who inadequately responded to treatment with methotrexate and/or bDMARDs. Oral administration is convenient for patients. Nevertheless, the drugs should be carefully prescribed as they are metabolized in the liver and kidneys. Attention should also be paid to adverse events, such as infections including herpes zoster. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of JAK inhibitors and use these agents judiciously.

Topics: Adamantane; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Benzofurans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neutropenia; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Venous Thromboembolism

With recent advancements in the understanding of vitiligo pathogenesis, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a promising new treatment modality, but their effects remain incompletely elucidated. Tofacitinib, an oral JAK 1/3 inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has previously been shown to induce significant re-pigmentation in vitiligo. However, as with other novel targeted therapies, cutaneous adverse effects have been observed. We report a 36-year-old woman with a history of rheumatoid arthritis, refractory to multiple pharmacotherapies, who was initiated on tofacitinib and subsequently developed progressive depigmented patches consistent with new-onset vitiligo. Although definitive causation cannot be established in this case without additional studies, it is important to note that many targeted therapies have the potential to induce paradoxical effects, that is, the occurrence or exacerbation of pathologic conditions that have been shown to respond to these medications. Paradoxical findings with other targeted therapies include the occurrence of melanoma during treatment with BRAF inhibitors, keratoacanthomas with PD-1 inhibitors, vitiligo and psoriasis with TNF-alpha inhibitors, and hidradenitis suppurativa with various biologic agents. Although JAK inhibitors hold therapeutic promise in the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders, further research is warranted to more fully comprehend their effects.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Keratoacanthoma; Melanoma; Piperidines; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vitiligo

To assess the risk of developing cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics or tofacitinib therapy.. Systematical search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library plus a hand search of conference proceedings were performed. Observational studies that reported cancer incidence in patients with RA treated with biologics or tofacitinib with active comparator of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or TNFi were eligible for inclusion. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with fix-effects or random-effects model.. Of 2,819 identified articles, a total of 10 studies involving over 40,587 patients with more than 87,622 patient-years of exposure to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics and 2,221 patients with more than 4,506 patient-years of exposure to tofacitinib were included. Pooled analysis showed there was no increased risk of developing cancer in general or specific cancer types in RA patients receiving treatment with rituximab (pooled RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.03), tocilizumab (pooled RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06), or tofacitinib, compared with those receiving csDMARDs or TNFi. But abatacept was associated with a slightly increased overall cancer risk (pooled RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24) and non-melanoma skin cancer (pooled RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.45), relative to csDMARDs or TNFi in RA patients.. Among RA patients, a small statistically significant increase in developing cancer was observed for abatacept exposure, while no increased cancer risk for rituximab, tocilizumab or tofacitinib, in comparison with csDMARDs or TNFi.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Neoplasms; Observational Studies as Topic; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis have a heavy financial burden. The cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib to the current treatment sequence for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis who have inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs-IR) in China remains unknown.. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib into the current treatment sequence in China for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis who have csDMARDs-IR.. A Markov model was constructed from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system to compare treatment sequences with and without first-line tofacitinib for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with csDMARDs-IR. The treatment sequence without tofacitinib included adalimumab, etanercept, recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor-Fc fusion protein, infliximab, and tocilizumab. Costs were derived from publicly available sources. Clinical trials, network meta-analysis, and real-world data were used to generate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), transition probabilities, and the incidence of adverse events. Mortality probabilities were estimated from rheumatoid arthritis-based, Chinese all-cause mortality data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the model. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of adding tofacitinib as second- and third-line treatment options was evaluated in our analyses. Costs and effects were discounted at 5% per anum.. Compared to the current treatment sequence, adding tofacitinib as first-line treatment led to a cost-saving of $US880.11 (2018 values) and incremental QALYs of 1.34. Sensitivity analyses showed the results to be robust. Adding tofacitinib at second-line therapy was also a cost-saving option with a cost saving of $US653.65 and incremental QALYs of 1.34, while the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adding tofacitinib at third-line therapy was $US5588.14 per QALY gained.. Using the WHO-recommended ICER acceptability threshold of ≤ 1-time per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP), our analysis suggests that the introduction of tofacitinib into the current treatment sequence for moderate-to-severe RA patients with csDMARDs-IR in China was a cost saving option as first- and second-line treatment, and cost-effective as a third-line treatment option. Of note, use of tofacitinib as first- and second-line treatment post-csDMARDs-IR appeared to be cost saving.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Treatment Outcome

To summarize patients' preferences for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. We conducted a systematic review to identify English-language studies of adult patients with RA that measured patients' preferences for DMARD or health states and treatment outcomes relevant to DMARD decisions. Study quality was assessed using a published quality assessment tool. Data on the importance of treatment attributes and associations with patient characteristics were summarized across studies.. From 7951 abstracts, we included 36 studies from a variety of countries. Most studies were in patients with established RA and were rated as medium- (n = 19) or high-quality (n = 12). The methods to elicit preferences varied, with the most common being discrete choice experiment (DCE; n = 13). Despite the heterogeneity of attributes in DCE studies, treatment benefits (disease improvement) were usually more important than both non-serious (6 of 8 studies) and serious adverse events (5 of 8), and route of administration (7 of 9). Among the non-DCE studies, some found that patients placed high importance on treatment benefits, while others (in patients with established RA) found that patients were quite risk averse. Subcutaneous therapy was often but not always preferred over intravenous therapy. Patient preferences were variable and commonly associated with the sociodemographic characteristics.. Overall, the results showed that many patients place a high value on treatment benefits over other treatment attributes, including serious or minor side effects, cost, or route of administration. The variability in patient preferences highlights the need to individualize treatment choices in RA.

Topics: Adalimumab; Administration, Intravenous; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Patient Preference; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Janus kinases inhibitors (JAKI) are new orally administrable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), representing a treatment alternative equally effective as biological DMARD that is also classified equivalent in the guidelines. JAKI reversibly inhibit intracellular signal transduction from the cytokine receptor to the nucleus. Tofacitinib and baricitinib, two JAKI already approved for RA treatment, are taken once or twice a day, respectively, and two more are expected to receive approval next year. Tofacitinib is also approved for PsA. Generally, JAKI are initially used in combination with methotrexate (MTX) but are equally effective as monotherapeutic treatment if MTX is contraindicated. In terms of therapy safety, JAKI and bDMARD are generally comparable with one exception: JAKI are associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster infection. JAKI treatment requires laboratory blood tests, especially blood count, transaminases and creatinine. Due to hepatic metabolization, tofacitinib is associated with certain drug interactions. Altogether JAKI enhance treatment possibilities for diseases such as RA and PsA combining the same effectiveness and safety as bDMARD with the option of oral administration.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom in patients with RA. Since 2007, fatigue has been included as one of the core outcome measures in RA. Clinical trials of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) have included fatigue as a secondary endpoint. A Cochrane review in 2016 concluded that the bDMARDs have a moderate effect on improving fatigue in RA. More recent clinical trials of the new biologic agent sarilumab and the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib showed similar benefits. It remains unclear whether the effect of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs on fatigue is mediated by direct effects or through a reduction in inflammation. As fatigue was a secondary endpoint, many analyses did not adjust for potential confounding factors, including pain, mood and anaemia, which is a significant limitation.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Fatigue; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a comprehensive review of phase 3 studies of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) (approved dose in many countries) in patients with moderate to severe RA and inadequate response to prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.. A search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 5 studies: ORAL Solo (NCT00814307), ORAL Sync (NCT00856544), ORAL Standard (included adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks; NCT00853385), ORAL Scan (NCT00847613), and ORAL Step (NCT00960440). Efficacy and safety data for tofacitinib 5 mg BID, placebo, and adalimumab were analyzed.. Across the 5 studies, 1216 patients received tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 681 received placebo, and 204 received adalimumab. At month 3, tofacitinib demonstrated significantly higher 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) response rates, greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and a higher proportion of Disease Activity Score-defined remission than placebo. Frequencies of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar for tofacitinib and placebo at month 3; serious infection events were more frequent for tofacitinib. In ORAL Standard, although not powered for formal comparisons, tofacitinib and adalimumab had numerically similar efficacy and AEs; serious AEs and serious infection events were more frequent with tofacitinib.. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID reduced RA signs and symptoms and improved physical function versus placebo in patients with inadequate response to prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID had a consistent, manageable safety profile across studies, with no new safety signals identified.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in combination with DMARDs in RA patients with an inadequate DMARD or biologic response.. Twelve RCTs including 5883 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 15 pairwise comparisons including 10 direct comparisons of 6 interventions. Tofacitinib 10 mg + methotrexate (MTX) and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX were among the most effective treatments for active RA with an inadequate DMARD or biologic response, followed by baricitinib 2 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, and adalimumab + MTX. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment to achieve the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.865), followed by baricitinib 4 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.774), baricitinib 2 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.552), tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.512), adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA = 0.297), and placebo + MTX (SUCRA <0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib + MTX, baricitinib + MTX, adalimumab + MTX, or placebo + MTX.. In RA patients with an inadequate response to DMARDs or biologics, tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Cytokines are key drivers of inflammation in RA, and anti-cytokine therapy has improved the outcome of RA. Janus Kinases (JAK) are intracellular tyrosine kinases linked to intracellular domains of many cytokine receptors. There are four JAK isoforms: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2. Different cytokine receptor families utilize specific JAK isoforms for signal transduction. Phosphorylation of JAK when cytokine binds to its cognate receptor leads to phosphorylation of other intracellular molecules that eventually leads to gene transcription. Oral JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have been developed as anti-cytokine therapy in RA. Two JAKi, tofacitinib and baricitinib, have been approved recently for the treatment of RA, and many JAKi are currently in development. JAKi inhibit JAK isoforms with different selectivity. This review discusses the efficacy and safety of JAKi in RA, in particular the potential clinical significance of JAKi selectivity.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Inflammation; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

The current paradigm in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to treat patients in the early stage of the disease (ERA). Previous meta-analysis-based mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs), aimed to identify the most effective drugs in ERA, are biased by the wide "window" of early definition, ranging from 6 months to 2 years. The aim of this study was to estimate through a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis which biologics or small molecules are more likely to achieve a 1-year good clinical response in ERA patients with disease duration < 1 year. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic agents and small molecules in combination with MTX to treat patients affected with ERA lasting < 1 year were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov between 1990 and September 2017. The outcome of interest was the achievement of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 and ACR 70 response at 1 year. WinBUGS 1.4 software (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK) was used to perform the analyses, using a fixed effect model. Fourteen studies were included in the analysis. Tofacitinib (64.83%) followed by Etanercept (23.26%) were the drugs with the highest probability of achieving ACR50 response. Rituximab showed the highest probability of inducing ACR70 response (52.81%) followed by Etanercept (26.85%). This is the first MTC involving only RCTs on ERA patients with disease duration < 1 year. Tofacitinib and rituximab were the drugs ranked first in inducing 1-year ACR50 and ACR70 response, respectively.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Biological Factors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Etanercept; Humans; Infliximab; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome

There is currently interest in the risk of infections during treatment with new targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), specifically the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib. Tofacitinib has been studied extensively in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to be effective and generally safe. East Asian countries have a high background rate of tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the risk of recurrence or reactivation of infections such as TB, HBV and herpes zoster during DMARD therapy is of particular interest in the region. This paper reviews available data on the risk of TB, HBV and herpes zoster infections, including recurrence/reactivation of infections, during treatment with tofacitinib, with a focus on east Asia.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asia, Eastern; Drug Therapy, Combination; Herpes Zoster; Herpesvirus 3, Human; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Piperidines; Prevalence; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recurrence; Risk; Tuberculosis; Virus Activation

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized primarily by inflammation and pain in the joints. Tofacitinib is an oral drug recently approved for RA treatment; it inhibits Janus protein kinases (JAK) that reduces RA symptoms when conventional DMARDs do not trigger a response. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of biological DMARDs in monotherapy or combined with methotrexate in RA patients and compare the treatments.. We reviewed the literature for articles published up to June 2017, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the biological DMARDs indicated for RA in patients with inadequate responses to conventional DMARDs and naïve to biological DMARDs, in similar populations, considering ACR50 as the efficacy variable. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each drug combination, and these parameters were transformed into differences in responses to assess the effectiveness of the alternative medicines. Equivalence therapeutic alternatives (ETA) were ensured to assess the possibility of considering these medications with equivalent efficacy. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using Bayesian approaches and the fixed-effects model.. Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that met the pre-established criteria were identified. The 95% CI of biological DMARDs was higher than that of placebo without methotrexate, except for certolizumab, golimumab-m, anakinra-m and adalimumab monotherapy. These DMARDs performed significantly better than the placebo, except for etanercept, certolizumab, tofacitinib and golimumab. Certolizumab-m was better than anakinra-m and adalimumab, and tocilizumab alone or combined with methotrexate was superior to adalimumab. Etanercept-m yielded a higher difference in responses compared with the other biological DMARDs, which presented more homogeneous responses, except for adalimumab and anakinra-m, which yielded worse results. None of the biological DMARDs displayed ETA to etanercept-m; however, they displayed ETA with certolizumab-m, except for adalimumab and anakinra-m.. All biological DMARDs used in combination with methotrexate, except for etanercept, anakinra, certolizumab and tocilizumab without methotrexate, were displayed ETA on using ACR50 at week 24 in patients naïve to biological DMARDs. Etanercept displayed a greater difference in responses, although the high uncertainty of the comparative results prevented the confirmation of the increased efficacy of this drug.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Janus kinase inhibition is promising in the treatment of RA, with already two oral drugs marketed. New compounds are under investigation that are more selective for Janus kinase 1 or Janus kinase 3. Phase II results for filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib and decernotinib are reviewed showing almost consistently a fast dose-dependent clinical improvement similar to already approved drugs tofacitinib and baricitinib. I will reflect on the most frequently reported dose-dependent adverse events and laboratory changes. Some are similar for all drugs of this class, some are more specific for a certain drug, but all may influence future treatment effectiveness in daily practice. This implies the need for a critical evaluation of phase III trials, and eventually trials specifically powered for conclusions on the safety profile and registries once these drugs become marketed. These innovative drugs also need head-to-head trials versus biologics or in-class as well as specific strategy studies to determine their optimal future use.

Topics: Adamantane; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Valine

Tofacitinib and baricitinib are the first orally available, small-molecule inhibitors of Janus kinase (JAK) enzymes to be approved for the treatment of RA. Tofacitinib is a selective JAK1, 3 inhibitor with less activity against JAK2 and TYK2 and baricitinib is a selective, oral JAK1, 2 inhibitor with moderate activity against TYK2 and significantly less activity against JAK3. Both drugs have undergone extensive phase III clinical trials in RA and demonstrated rapid improvements in disease activity, function and patient-reported outcomes as well as disease modification. Tofacitinib 5 mg bd, was approved by the Federal Drug Administration in 2012 for the treatment of RA in patients who are intolerant or unresponsive to MTX. An extended release formulation for the treatment of RA was approved by Federal Drug Administration in 2016. In 2017 the European Medicines Agency approved tofacitinib 5 mg bd in combination with MTX and baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg once daily for the treatment of moderate to severe active RA in adult patients who are intolerant or unresponsive to one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the risk of serious infection (SI) and herpes zoster (HZ) in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving JAK inhibitors.. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 mg bid), baricitinib (4 mg od) and upadacitinib (15 mg od). Patient-exposure years were calculated. A per-protocol analysis was applied, incorporating follow-up time from patients randomized to placebo who cross into the treatment arm. Pooled incidence rates per 100 person-years of SI and HZ were calculated. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of drug vs placebo were compared using a meta-synthesis approach.. Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis; 11 tofacitinib (5888 patients), six baricitinib (3520 patients) and four upadacitinib studies (1736 patients). For SI, the incidence rates were 1.97 (95% CI: 1.41, 2.68), 3.16 (95% CI: 2.07, 4.63) and 3.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 7.04), respectively. The IRRs comparing treatment arm to placebo were statistically non-significant: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.60, 2.45), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.46, 1.38) and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.24, 5.43), respectively. For HZ, the incidence rates were 2.51 (95% CI: 1.87, 3.30), 3.16 (95% CI: 2.07, 4.63) and 2.41 (95% CI: 0.66, 6.18), respectively. The IRR of HZ comparing baricitinib with placebo was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.26, 6.50). Non-significant IRRs were seen with tofacitinib and upadacitinib: 1.38 (95% CI: 0.66, 2.88) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.19, 3.22), respectively. Indicator opportunistic infections excluding HZ were too rare to provide meaningful incidence rates.. The absolute SI rates were low. However across the JAK inhibitors, the incidence of HZ is higher than expected for the population (3.23 per 100 patient-years). While the risk was numerically greatest with baricitinib, indirect comparisons between the drugs did not demonstrate any significant difference in risk.. Prospero 2017 CRD4201707879.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Herpes Zoster; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Incidence; Infections; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Tofacitinib inhibits the Janus kinases, tyrosine kinases that are activated by cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Areas covered: Clinical trials have revealed an anti-rheumatic effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX). Post-hoc analysis of those clinical trials and real-world experiences will be reviewed to explore efficacy and safety. Expert commentary: The efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy has garnered much attention and has been initiated in large number of patients. However, combination therapy with MTX is necessary in order to achieve the maximum effect. Combination therapy can be transferred to monotherapy by tapering and/or discontinuing MTX. The discontinuation of tofacitinib should be avoided and tapering should be investigated. There has been no new safety signal although venous thrombotic events (VTEs) have been raised and would require long-term follow-up. Increased events of Herpes zoster were observed and the use of a subunit vaccination is expected to become an effective tool for prevention. Post-hoc analysis of the clinical trials and real-world experience is revealing further usefulness of tofacitinib not only in rheumatoid arthritis but also other diseases. Additional experience and data from the real world are required to help improve the use of tofacitinib..

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Proliferation; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

In Germany, baricitinib and tofacitinib have been approved for the treatment of at least moderately active rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in 2017, and tofacitinib also for psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Both baricitinib and tofacitinib can be taken orally and reversibly inhibit Janus kinases (JAK) and therefore the signaling of a large number of cytokines via the JAK/STAT pathway. JAK inhibitors have been shown to be at least as efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis as adalimumab and tofacitinib was also efficacious in psoriatic arthritis. Since they inhibit many cytokines, it is likely that in the future they will be applied for the treatment of further chronic inflammatory disorder such as connective tissue diseases and vasculitis. The adverse events of JAK inhibitors are comparable to those observed with biologicals, only herpes zoster is slightly more common. In the placebo-controlled trials, venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were more common in the baricitinib treated patients. The VTE rate does not appear to be elevated in baricitinib treated patients compared to RA cohorts however.In conclusion, JAK inhibitors are a powerful new treatment of RA and likely many other rheumatic diseases and fulfill an unmet need since they may be taken orally.. JAK-Inhibitoren wirken intrazellulär und hemmen im Gegensatz zu den Biologika viele Zytokine.. JAK-Inhibitoren werden oral eingenommen. Angesichts der Halbwertzeit von einigen Stunden sind sie gut steuerbar.. Die JAK-Inhibitoren Baricitinib und Tofacitinib sind zugelassen für die Therapie der mittelschweren bis schweren aktiven RA bei erwachsenen Patienten nach erfolgloser Therapie mit DMARDs. Tofacitinib ist auch bei Colitis ulcerosa und in der Kombination mit MTX auch bei der Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) zugelassen.. In der Kombination mit Methotrexat (MTX) ist Tofacitinib bei der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA) so gut wirksam wie Adalimumab mit MTX, Baricitinib war in der Kombination mit MTX sogar bei einigen Endpunkten besser als Adalimumab mit MTX. Die JAK-Inhibitoren sind auch in der Monotherapie wirksam.. Das Nebenwirkungsprofil der JAK-Inhibitoren unterscheidet sich nicht wesentlich von dem von TNF- oder IL6-Rezeptor-Inhibitoren. Nur das Auftreten eines Herpes zoster ist während der JAK-Inhibition etwas häufiger.. JAK-Inhibitoren hemmen zahlreiche Zytokine, die auch bei verschiedenen anderen chronischen Krankheiten eine Rolle spielen. Daher ist mit Zulassungen für weitere Indikationen zu rechnen, z. B. Kollagenosen.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Germany; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in RA patients with an inadequate cs- or b-DMARD response.. Nine RCTs including 5794 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 15 pairwise comparisons including 10 direct comparisons of 6 interventions. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 30 mg + MTX were among the most effective treatments for active RA with an inadequate cs- or b-DMARD response, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, and adalimumab + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 30 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of the American College of Rheumatology 20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.820, 0.762), followed by tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.623), tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.424), adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA = 0.371), and placebo + MTX (SUCRA = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib + MTX, upadacitinib + MTX, adalimumab + MTX, or placebo + MTX.. In RA patients with an inadequate response to cs- or b-DMARDs, upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 30 mg + MTX were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with significant risks of serious adverse events.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib, a pan Janus kinase inhibitor, has been investigated as monotherapy in patients naive to methotrexate and in methotrexate incomplete responders and in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in antirheumatic drug incomplete responders and TNF inhibitor failures in the Phase II and III programs. The clinical trial program demonstrated efficacy and a reasonable safety profile in these disease populations that has led to the approval of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily orally in many countries. The pharmacology, chemistry, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety in the Phase II and III clinical trials, safety in the long-term extension studies and postmarketing safety reports are the focus of this review.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Two different Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-baricitinib and tofacitinib-are effective and licensed in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There have been recent concerns about potential thromboembolic risks with these drugs. Concerns about baricitinib focus on clinical trial findings. Using all publically available data, we estimate thromboembolic risks are approximately five events per 1000 patient years with 4 mg baricitinib daily. Concerns about tofacitinib have been raised by analyses of the Federal Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERs). These show some evidence of increased risks of pulmonary thrombosis, though not pulmonary embolism or venous thrombosis. Observational studies suggest in the general population and non-RA controls there are one to four thromboembolic events per 1000 patient years. In RA, thromboembolic risks increase to three to seven per 1000 patient years. The impact of biologics and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on disease risk appears minimal, and the number of thromboembolic events is between four and eight per 1000 patient years. In the short term, full details of thromboembolic events in trials of JAK inhibitors need to be published. As the numbers of thromboembolic events will be small and patients enrolled in trials are not representative of all RA patients who may receive JAK inhibitors, this information is unlikely to provide definitive answers. Consequently, in the longer term, large observational studies are needed to accurately quantify thromboembolic risks attributable to JAK inhibitors and other drugs used to treat RA, and differentiate these from risks attributable to RA itself and its comorbidities.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Technology Assessment, Biomedical

A new class of oral synthetic drugs has been developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of blocking the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) system. Tofacitinib and baricitinib have been approved for the treatment RA patients who inadequately respond to methotrexate or anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the data concerning the drugs' basic mechanisms and clinical trial results in order to inform clinicians about the serious and non-serious adverse events associated with JAK inhibitors. Areas covered: The mechanisms, adverse events, and clinical trial data associated with the use of JAK inhibitors in RA patients were reviewed by searching the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for papers published between 1999 and April 2018 using combinations of words or terms. Articles not written in English were excluded. Expert commentary: Management of the adverse events of JAK inhibitors is challenging because of the lack of robust treatment data used and the heterogeneity of the events themselves. Treatment decisions are often made clinically on the basis of age and the burden of comorbidities, and require the multidisciplinary collaboration of rheumatologists and other specialists.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Tofacitinib is an oral immunosuppressant approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is currently undergoing investigation (Phase III trials) for treating chronic plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib inhibits Janus kinases (JAKs), which are essential for the signaling of multiple inflammatory pathways and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of RA and psoriasis. The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of RA and psoriasis have been demonstrated in Phase III trials. Across all studies, the efficacy of tofacitinib in alleviating symptoms of RA and psoriasis were superior to placebo. Moreover, treatment was generally well-tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events, for both RA and psoriasis, being nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. As such, tofacitinib proves to be an effective therapeutic option for RA and a promising new therapy for psoriasis.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) informing the 2016 update of the recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. An SLR for the period between 2013 and 2016 was undertaken to assess the efficacy of glucocorticoids (GCs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) (tofacitinib and baricitinib) in randomised clinical trials.. For GCs, four studies were included in the SLR. Patients without poor prognostic factors experienced benefit when GCs were added to methotrexate (MTX). Lower doses of GCs were similar to higher doses. For csDMARDs, two new studies comparing MTX monotherapy with combination csDMARD were included in the SLR. In the tREACH trial at the end of 12 months no difference between the groups in disease activity, functional ability and radiographic progression was seen, using principles of tight control (treat-to-target). In the CareRA trial, combination therapy with csDMARDs was not superior to MTX monotherapy and monotherapy was better tolerated.For tsDMARDs, tofacitinib and baricitinib were shown to be more effective than placebo (MTX) in different patient populations.. Addition of GCs to csDMARD therapy may be beneficial but the benefits should be balanced against the risk of toxicity. Under tight control conditions MTX monotherapy is not less effective than combination csDMARDs, but better tolerated. Tofacitinib and baricitinib are efficacious in patients with RA, including those with refractory disease.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (biologics) are highly effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however there are few head-to-head biologic comparison studies. We performed a systematic review, a standard meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis (NMA) to update the 2009 Cochrane Overview. This review is focused on the adults with RA who are naive to methotrexate (MTX) that is, receiving their first disease-modifying agent.. To compare the benefits and harms of biologics (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab) and small molecule tofacitinib versus comparator (methotrexate (MTX)/other DMARDs) in people with RA who are naive to methotrexate.. In June 2015 we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase; and trials registers. We used standard Cochrane methods. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for traditional meta-analyses and 95% credible intervals (CrI) using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons approach for network meta-analysis (NMA). We converted OR to risk ratios (RR) for ease of interpretation. We also present results in absolute measures as risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial or harmful outcome (NNTB/H).. Nineteen RCTs with 6485 participants met inclusion criteria (including five studies from the original 2009 review), and data were available for four TNF biologics (adalimumab (six studies; 1851 participants), etanercept (three studies; 678 participants), golimumab (one study; 637 participants) and infliximab (seven studies; 1363 participants)) and two non-TNF biologics (abatacept (one study; 509 participants) and rituximab (one study; 748 participants)).Less than 50% of the studies were judged to be at low risk of bias for allocation sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, 21% were at low risk for selective reporting, 53% had low risk of bias for attrition and 89% had low risk of bias for major baseline imbalance. Three trials used biologic monotherapy, that is, without MTX. There were no trials with placebo-only comparators and no trials of tofacitinib. Trial duration ranged from 6 to 24 months. Half of the trials contained participants with early RA (less than two years' duration) and the other half included participants with established RA (2 to 10 years). Biologic + MTX versus active comparator (MTX (17 trials (6344 participants)/MTX + methylprednisolone 2 trials (141 participants))In traditional meta-analyses, there was moderate-quality evidence downgraded for inconsistency that biologics with MTX were associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit versus comparator as demonstrated by ACR50 (American College of Rheumatology scale) and RA remission rates. For ACR50, biologics with MTX showed a risk ratio (RR) of 1.40 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.49), absolute difference of 16% (95% CI 13% to 20%) and NNTB = 7 (95% CI 6 to 8). For RA remission rates, biologics with MTX showed a RR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.98), absolute difference of 15% (95% CI 11% to 19%) and NNTB = 5 (95% CI 6 to 7). Biologics with MTX were also associated with a statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, benefit in physical function (moderate-quality evidence downgraded for inconsistency), with an improvement of HAQ scores of -0.10 (95% CI -0.16 to -0.04 on a 0 to 3 scale), absolute difference -3.3% (95% CI -5.3% to -1.3%) and NNTB = 4 (95% CI 2 to 15).We did not observe evidence of differences between biologics with MTX compared to MTX for radiographic progression (low-quality evidence, downgraded for imprecision and inconsistency) or serious adverse events (moderate-quality evidence, downgraded for imprecision). Based on low-qual. In MTX-naive RA participants, there was moderate-quality evidence that, compared with MTX alone, biologics with MTX was associated with absolute and relative clinically meaningful benefits in three of the efficacy outcomes (ACR50, HAQ scores, and RA remission rates). A benefit regarding less radiographic progression with biologics with MTX was not evident (low-quality evidence). We found moderate- to low-quality evidence that biologic therapy with MTX was not associated with any higher risk of serious adverse events compared with MTX, but results were inconclusive for withdrawals due to adverse events and cancer to 24 months.TNF biologic monotherapy did not differ statistically significantly or clinically meaningfully from MTX for any of the outcomes (moderate-quality evidence), and no data were available for non-TNF biologic monotherapy.We conclude that biologic with MTX use in MTX-naive populations is beneficial and that there is little/inconclusive evidence of harms. More data are needed for tofacitinib, radiographic progression and harms in this patient population to fully assess comparative efficacy and safety.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Biological Products; Etanercept; Humans; Infliximab; Methotrexate; Methylprednisolone; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rituximab

This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).. A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences.. The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence.. This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Juvenile; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Elective Surgical Procedures; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Perioperative Care; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Diseases; Rheumatology; Spondylarthritis; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Surgeons; United States

The goal of this study was to compile all available evidence regarding the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) inhibitors, non-TNF biologics, and tofacitinib for TNF-experienced patients who have rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and rheumatology conference abstracts was performed to identify observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting American College of Rheumatology response rates (ACR 20/50/70) for adult patients with RA who switched from at least 1 TNF to another TNF or a non-TNF therapy. A direct random effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate ACR 20/50/70 response rates for TNF and non-TNF therapies. Separate analyses were conducted among 3-, 6-, and 12-month observational studies and for 6-month RCTs.. A total of 18 observational studies and 6 RCTs were selected. Among 3-month observational studies, the percentages of ACR20/50/70 responders switching to another TNF were similar to those switching to a non-TNF biologic (ACR20, 54.5% vs 58.6%; ACR50, 33.3% vs 33.3%; and ACR70, 13.0% vs 14.6%, respectively). Among 6-month observational studies, the percentages of TNF ACR20/50/70 responders were higher than those of non-TNF responders (ACR20, 67.7% vs 50.4%; ACR50, 50.4% vs 26.6%; and ACR70, 24.9% vs 11.6%). Among 6-month RCTs, the percentages of non-TNF biologic ACR20/50/70 responders were similar to those in the 6-month non-TNF observational studies (ACR20, 50.7% vs 50.4%; ACR50, 27.5% vs 26.6%; and ACR70, 11.9% vs 11.6%). For 12-month observational studies, TNF biologic ACR20/50/70 percentages were higher than those of non-TNF therapies (ACR20, 72.2% vs 57.0%; ACR50, 42.1% vs 28.9%; and ACR70, 22.9% vs 10.0%).. For TNF-experienced patients with RA, subsequent TNF therapy and non-TNF biologic therapy have comparable efficacy.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Tofacitinib is a pan JAK inhibitor with specificity for JAK3 over JAK1 over JAK2, which is approved in many countries for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including the United States and the European Union, either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-arthritis drugs (csDMARDs). Phase 2, 3 and 4 clinical trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib given either as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs. Areas covered: This review reports the safety, clinical, functional, and radiographic efficacy, of tofacitinib used as monotherapy in the treatment of adult patients with RA reported in the prospective, double-blind, controlled randomized trials reported to date. One critical clinical question is whether tofacitinib monotherapy has similar efficacy as tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate (MTX); this question has recently been addressed. A literature search on tofacitinib monotherapy was carried out using the PubMed database up to July 2017. Expert opinion: Although tofacitinib plus MTX is statistically more clinically effective, tofacitinib monotherapy is effective in many patients with RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and destruction of the joints.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease. The introduction of a new class of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, which work by inhibiting the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, has led to new possibilities for achieving remission of RA. Tofacitinib and baricitinib are both JAK/STAT inhibitors, which have shown efficacy in line with anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment. The side effects seem manageable, and up to now only increased risk of herpes zoster has raised consideration. JAK/STAT inhibitors create new possibilities for reaching low disease activity or remission for patients with RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz

Topics: Adalimumab; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinases; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The use of biologics such as anti-tumor necrosis factor and oral Janus kinase inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The risk of malignancies such as lymphomas, lung cancer, and nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) is greater in patients with RA compared with the general population. The incidence of all malignancy (excluding NMSC) was similar in tofacitinib users compared with the general population. The rates of overall and site-specific malignancies in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib are similar to what is expected in the RA population and not different from disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinases; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Skin Neoplasms

To determine possible differences in serious adverse effects among the 10 currently approved biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/ts-DMARDs) for RA.. Systematic review in bibliographic databases, trial registries and websites of regulatory agencies identified randomized trials of approved b/ts-DMARDs for RA. Network meta-analyses using mixed-effects Poisson regression models were conducted to calculate rate ratios for serious adverse events (SAEs) and deaths between each of the 10 drugs and control (i.e. no b/ts-DMARD treatment), based on subjects experiencing an event in relation to person-years. Confidence in the estimates was assessed by applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE).. A total of 117 trials (47 615 patients) were included. SAEs were more common with certolizumab compared with abatacept (rate ratio = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.14), adalimumab (1.36, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.81), etanercept (1.60, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.17), golimumab (1.45, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.08), rituximab (1.63, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.30), tofacitinib (1.44, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.02) and control (1.45, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.87); and tocilizumab compared with abatacept (1.30, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.65), etanercept (1.31, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.67) and rituximab (1.34, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.78). No other comparisons were statistically significant. Accounting for study duration confirmed our findings for up to 6 months' treatment but not for longer-term treatment (6-24 months). No differences in mortality between b/ts-DMARDs and control were found. Based on the GRADE approach, confidence in the estimates was low due to lack of head-to-head comparison trials and imprecision in indirect estimates.. Despite low confidence in the estimates, our analysis found potential differences in rates of SAEs. Our data suggest caution should be taken when deciding among available drugs.. PROSPERO CRD42014014842.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Etanercept; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Poisson Distribution; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Regression Analysis; Risk; Rituximab

Current available treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have some limitations and new options are needed. Several new molecules are being tested for the treatment of IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Among them, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors seem to have the lead, since tofacitinib has received regulatory approval in 2012 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and also it has shown a favorable risk-benefit ratio in phase 3 studies for ulcerative colitis, both in anti-TNF naïve and anti-TNF experienced patients. Other compounds with JAK inhibitory activity are also being tested with promising results. Areas covered: This review discusses the molecular aspects of the JAK-STAT pathway, which gives rationale for the use of JAK inhibitors in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, especially in IBD. Different compounds with JAK inhibitory activity are presented, and relevant efficacy and safety data in IBD and other conditions are discussed. Expert commentary: It would not be surprising that in a foreseeable future many new orally administrated drugs will be available. This enhanced armamentarium will probably pose new dilemmas, in terms of drug positioning, escalation and de-escalation strategies, and combination therapy.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Assessment; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs: referred to as biologics) are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however there are few head-to-head comparison studies. Our systematic review, standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) updates the 2009 Cochrane overview, 'Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA)' and adds new data. This review is focused on biologic or tofacitinib therapy in people with RA who had previously been treated unsuccessfully with biologics.. To compare the benefits and harms of biologics (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab) and small molecule tofacitinib versus comparator (placebo or methotrexate (MTX)/other DMARDs) in people with RA, previously unsuccessfully treated with biologics.. On 22 June 2015 we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase; and trials registries (WHO trials register, Clinicaltrials.gov). We carried out article selection, data extraction, and risk of bias and GRADE assessments in duplicate. We calculated direct estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using standard meta-analysis. We used a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC) approach for NMA estimates with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We converted odds ratios (OR) to risk ratios (RR) for ease of understanding. We have also presented results in absolute measures as risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB). Outcomes measured included four benefits (ACR50, function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, remission defined as DAS < 1.6 or DAS28 < 2.6, slowing of radiographic progression) and three harms (withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancer).. This update includes nine new RCTs for a total of 12 RCTs that included 3364 participants. The comparator was placebo only in three RCTs (548 participants), MTX or other traditional DMARD in six RCTs (2468 participants), and another biologic in three RCTs (348 participants). Data were available for four tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-biologics: (certolizumab pegol (1 study; 37 participants), etanercept (3 studies; 348 participants), golimumab (1 study; 461 participants), infliximab (1 study; 27 participants)), three non-TNF biologics (abatacept (3 studies; 632 participants), rituximab (2 studies; 1019 participants), and tocilizumab (2 studies; 589 participants)); there was only one study for tofacitinib (399 participants). The majority of the trials (10/12) lasted less than 12 months.We judged 33% of the studies at low risk of bias for allocation sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, 25% had low risk of bias for attrition, 92% were at unclear risk for selective reporting; and 92% had low risk of bias for major baseline imbalance. We downgraded the quality of the evidence for most outcomes to moderate or low due to study limitations, heterogeneity, or rarity of direct comparator trials. Biologic monotherapy versus placeboCompared to placebo, biologics were associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in RA as demonstrated by higher ACR50 and RA remission rates. RR was 4.10 for ACR50 (95% CI 1.97 to 8.55; moderate-quality evidence); absolute benefit RD 14% (95% CI 6% to 21%); and NNTB = 8 (95% CI 4 to 23). RR for RA remission was 13.51 (95% CI 1.85 to 98.45, one study available; moderate-quality evidence); absolute benefit RD 9% (95% CI 5% to 13%); and NNTB = 11 (95% CI 3 to 136). Results for withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events did not show any statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences. There were no studies available for analysis for function measured by HAQ, radiographic progression, or cancer outcomes. There were not enough data for any of the outcomes to look at subgroups. Biologic + MTX versus active comparator (MTX/other traditional DMARDs)Compared to MTX/other traditional DMARDs, biologic + MTX was associated with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in ACR50, function measured by HAQ, and RA remission rates in direct comparisons. RR for ACR50 was 4.07 (95% CI 2.76 to 5.99; high-quality evidence); absolute benefit RD 16% (10%. Biologic (with or without MTX) or tofacitinib (with MTX) use was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefits (ACR50, HAQ, remission) compared to placebo or an active comparator (MTX/other traditional DMARDs) among people with RA previously unsuccessfully treated with biologics.No studies examined radiographic progression. Results were not clinically meaningful or statistically significant for withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events, and were inconclusive for cancer.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Biological Products; Disease Progression; Humans; Methotrexate; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Failure

To summarize and compare the risks of malignancies accompanying biologic DMARDs (b-DMARDs) and tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and long-term extension studies (LTEs).. Articles in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science dated from 2000 to February 2015. Selection criteria were as follows: (1) focus on RCTs or LTEs in RA; (2) treatment with b-DMARDs or tofacitinib; (3) data on malignancies; and (4) a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks. Data included publication details, study design, risk of bias, number and types of malignancies, and patient characteristics and treatments.. Of 113 articles and one updated report that were meta-analyzed, overall malignancies in RCTs showed odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of 1.01 (0.72, 1.42) for all TNF antagonists, 1.12 (0.33, 3.81) for abatacept, 0.54 (0.20, 1.50) for rituximab, 0.70 (0.20, 2.41) for tocilizumab, and 2.39 (0.50, 11.5) for tofacitinib. Network meta-analysis of overall malignancies showed odds ratio (95% predictive intervals) of 1.68 (0.48-5.92) for infliximab, 0.79 (0.44-1.40) for etanercept, 0.93 (0.43-2.03) for adalimumab, 0.87 (0.28-2.75) for certolizumab, 0.87 (0.39-1.95) for golimumab, 1.04 (0.32-3.32) for abatacept, 0.58 (0.21-1.56) for rituximab, 0.60 (0.16-2.28) for tocilizumab, and 1.15 (0.24-5.47) for tofacitinib. Marginal numerical differences in the incidence rate of solid and hematological malignancies and non-melanoma skin cancers appeared in LTEs.. In RCTs, treatment of RA with b-DMARDs or tofacitinib does not increase the risk for malignancies. Generalizability of the differences in the rate of specific malignancies encountered in LTEs requires continuous pharmacovigilance of real-world patients.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a novel respiratory illness firstly reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012. It is caused by a new corona virus, called MERS corona virus (MERS-CoV). Most people who have MERS-CoV infection developed severe acute respiratory illness.. This work is done to determine the clinical characteristics and the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients with confirmed MERS-CoV infection.. This study included 32 laboratory confirmed MERS corona virus infected patients who were admitted into ICU. It included 20 (62.50%) males and 12 (37.50%) females. The mean age was 43.99 ± 13.03 years. Diagnosis was done by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for corona virus on throat swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Clinical characteristics, co-morbidities and outcome were reported for all subjects.. Most MERS corona patients present with fever, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, runny nose and sputum. The presence of abdominal symptoms may indicate bad prognosis. Prolonged duration of symptoms before patients' hospitalization, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, bilateral radiological pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxemic respiratory failure were found to be strong predictors of mortality in such patients. Also, old age, current smoking, smoking severity, presence of associated co-morbidities like obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart diseases, COPD, malignancy, renal failure, renal transplantation and liver cirrhosis are associated with a poor outcome of ICU admitted MERS corona virus infected patients.. Plasma HO-1, ferritin, p21, and NQO1 were all elevated at baseline in CKD participants. Plasma HO-1 and urine NQO1 levels each inversely correlated with eGFR (. SnPP can be safely administered and, after its injection, the resulting changes in plasma HO-1, NQO1, ferritin, and p21 concentrations can provide information as to antioxidant gene responsiveness/reserves in subjects with and without kidney disease.. A Study with RBT-1, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease, NCT0363002 and NCT03893799.. HFNC did not significantly modify work of breathing in healthy subjects. However, a significant reduction in the minute volume was achieved, capillary [Formula: see text] remaining constant, which suggests a reduction in dead-space ventilation with flows > 20 L/min. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02495675).. 3 组患者手术时间、术中显性失血量及术后 1 周血红蛋白下降量比较差异均无统计学意义（. 对于肥胖和超重的膝关节单间室骨关节炎患者，采用 UKA 术后可获满意短中期疗效，远期疗效尚需进一步随访观察。.. Decreased muscle strength was identified at both time points in patients with hEDS/HSD. The evolution of most muscle strength parameters over time did not significantly differ between groups. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of different types of muscle training strategies in hEDS/HSD patients.. These findings support previous adverse findings of e-cigarette exposure on neurodevelopment in a mouse model and provide substantial evidence of persistent adverse behavioral and neuroimmunological consequences to adult offspring following maternal e-cigarette exposure during pregnancy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6067.. This RCT directly compares a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with a standard CROSS regimen in terms of overall survival for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The results of this RCT will provide an answer for the controversy regarding the survival benefits between the two treatment strategies.. NCT04138212, date of registration: October 24, 2019.. Results of current investigation indicated that milk type and post fermentation cooling patterns had a pronounced effect on antioxidant characteristics, fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and textural characteristics of yoghurt. Buffalo milk based yoghurt had more fat, protein, higher antioxidant capacity and vitamin content. Antioxidant and sensory characteristics of T. If milk is exposed to excessive amounts of light, Vitamins B. The two concentration of ZnO nanoparticles in the ambient air produced two different outcomes. The lower concentration resulted in significant increases in Zn content of the liver while the higher concentration significantly increased Zn in the lungs (p < 0.05). Additionally, at the lower concentration, Zn content was found to be lower in brain tissue (p < 0.05). Using TEM/EDX we detected ZnO nanoparticles inside the cells in the lungs, kidney and liver. Inhaling ZnO NP at the higher concentration increased the levels of mRNA of the following genes in the lungs: Mt2 (2.56 fold), Slc30a1 (1.52 fold) and Slc30a5 (2.34 fold). At the lower ZnO nanoparticle concentration, only Slc30a7 mRNA levels in the lungs were up (1.74 fold). Thus the two air concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles produced distinct effects on the expression of the Zn-homeostasis related genes.. Until adverse health effects of ZnO nanoparticles deposited in organs such as lungs are further investigated and/or ruled out, the exposure to ZnO nanoparticles in aerosols should be avoided or minimised.

Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adipogenesis; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Aeromonas hydrophila; Aerosols; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Agriculture; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Airway Remodeling; Alanine Transaminase; Albuminuria; Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Algorithms; AlkB Homolog 2, Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase; Alzheimer Disease; Amino Acid Sequence; Ammonia; Ammonium Compounds; Anaerobiosis; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antifungal Agents; Antigens, Bacterial; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antitubercular Agents; Antiviral Agents; Apolipoproteins E; Apoptosis; Arabidopsis; Arabidopsis Proteins; Arsenic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atherosclerosis; ATP-Dependent Proteases; Attitude of Health Personnel; Australia; Austria; Autophagy; Axitinib; Bacteria; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins; Bacterial Proteins; Bacterial Toxins; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Bariatric Surgery; Base Composition; Bayes Theorem; Benzoxazoles; Benzylamines; beta Catenin; Betacoronavirus; Betula; Binding Sites; Biological Availability; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Birth Weight; Blindness; Blood Chemical Analysis; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Blood-Brain Barrier; Blotting, Western; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Resorption; Borates; Brain; Brain Infarction; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Neoplasms; Breakfast; Breast Milk Expression; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchi; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Buffaloes; Cadherins; Calcification, Physiologic; Calcium Compounds; Calcium, Dietary; Cannula; Caprolactam; Carbon; Carbon Dioxide; Carboplatin; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Ductal; Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carps; Carrageenan; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Catalytic Domain; Cattle; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Adhesion; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Death; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Nucleus; Cell Phone Use; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Cells, Cultured; Cellulose; Chemical Phenomena; Chemoradiotherapy; Child; Child Development; Child, Preschool; China; Chitosan; Chlorocebus aethiops; Cholecalciferol; Chromatography, Liquid; Circadian Clocks; Circadian Rhythm; Circular Dichroism; Cisplatin; Citric Acid; Clinical Competence; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Coculture Techniques; Cohort Studies; Cold Temperature; Colitis; Collagen Type I; Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain; Collagen Type XI; Color; Connective Tissue Diseases; Copper; Coronary Angiography; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Counselors; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Creatine Kinase; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Cryosurgery; Crystallography, X-Ray; Cues; Cultural Competency; Cultural Diversity; Curriculum; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cycloparaffins; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytoprotection; Databases, Factual; Denitrification; Deoxycytidine; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Diatoms; Diet; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Exposure; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diketopiperazines; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA Glycosylases; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Bacterial; DNA, Viral; Docetaxel; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Liberation; Drug Repositioning; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Edible Grain; Education, Graduate; Education, Medical, Graduate; Education, Pharmacy; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Electron Transport Complex III; Electron Transport Complex IV; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Emergency Service, Hospital; Empathy; Emulsions; Endothelial Cells; Endurance Training; Energy Intake; Enterovirus A, Human; Environment; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Assays; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Epoxide Hydrolases; Epoxy Compounds; Erythrocyte Count; Erythrocytes; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Escherichia coli Proteins; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Esophagectomy; Estrogens; Etanercept; Ethiopia; Ethnicity; Ethylenes; Exanthema; Exercise; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Extracellular Matrix; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Eye Infections, Fungal; False Negative Reactions; Fatty Acids; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Feces; Female; Femur Neck; Fermentation; Ferritins; Fetal Development; Fibroblast Growth Factor-23; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Fibroblasts; Fibroins; Fish Proteins; Flavanones; Flavonoids; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Studies; Food Handling; Food Supply; Food, Formulated; Forced Expiratory Volume; Forests; Fractures, Bone; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Fusobacteria; G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Gamma Rays; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Gefitinib; Gels; Gemcitabine; Gene Amplification; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Gene-Environment Interaction; Genotype; Germany; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon; Glucocorticoids; Glycemic Control; Glycerol; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Glycolipids; Glycolysis; Goblet Cells; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Graphite; Greenhouse Effect; Guanidines; Haemophilus influenzae; HCT116 Cells; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Needs and Demand; Health Status Disparities; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Heart Transplantation; Heart-Assist Devices; HEK293 Cells; Heme; Heme Oxygenase-1; Hemolysis; Hemorrhage; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatocytes; Hexoses; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histidine; Histone Deacetylase 2; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Homebound Persons; Homeodomain Proteins; Homosexuality, Male; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Hydrogen; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypoxia; Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Imatinib Mesylate; Immunotherapy; Implementation Science; Incidence; INDEL Mutation; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Industrial Waste; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Infliximab; Infusions, Intravenous; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Injections; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-8; Internship and Residency; Intestines; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Ion Transport; Iridaceae; Iridoid Glucosides; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation; Isodon; Isoflurane; Isotopes; Italy; Joint Instability; Ketamine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Neoplasms; Kinetics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Knee Joint; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors; Lactate Dehydrogenase 5; Laparoscopy; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lasers, Solid-State; Laurates; Lead; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Light; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipopolysaccharides; Liposomes; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Locomotion; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Lubricants; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Lysosomes; Macrophages; Male; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Kinase 4; Mass Screening; Maternal Health; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma, Experimental; Memantine; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Proteins; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Metal Nanoparticles; Metalloendopeptidases; Metalloporphyrins; Methadone; Methane; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mexico; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Mice, Transgenic; Microarray Analysis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbiota; Micronutrients; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Confocal; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Milk; Milk, Human; Minority Groups; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Membranes; Mitochondrial Proteins; Models, Animal; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Molecular Epidemiology; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Multimodal Imaging; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscular Diseases; Mutation; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Myocardial Stunning; Myristates; NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone); Nanocomposites; Nanogels; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Naphthalenes; Nasal Cavity; National Health Programs; Necrosis; Needs Assessment; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neonicotinoids; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Netherlands; Neuroblastoma; Neuroprotective Agents; Neutrophils; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Nicotiana; Nicotine; Nitrates; Nitrification; Nitrites; Nitro Compounds; Nitrogen; Nitrogen Dioxide; North Carolina; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Nuclear Proteins; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Nucleosomes; Nutrients; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Oceans and Seas; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Oncogenes; Oocytes; Open Reading Frames; Osteoclasts; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Outpatients; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Overweight; Oxazines; Oxidants; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxidoreductases; Oxygen; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Oxygenators, Membrane; Ozone; Paclitaxel; Paenibacillus; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pandemics; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Particulate Matter; Pasteurization; Patient Preference; Patient Satisfaction; Pediatric Obesity; Permeability; Peroxiredoxins; Peroxynitrous Acid; Pharmaceutical Services; Pharmacists; Pharmacy; Phaseolus; Phenotype; Phoeniceae; Phosphates; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phospholipid Transfer Proteins; Phospholipids; Phosphorus; Phosphorylation; Photoperiod; Photosynthesis; Phylogeny; Physical Endurance; Physicians; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plant Proteins; Plant Roots; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Viral; Point-of-Care Testing; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymers; Polysorbates; Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postprandial Period; Poverty; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prediabetic State; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Pressure; Prevalence; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Primary Health Care; Professional Role; Professionalism; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Prolactin; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Proof of Concept Study; Proportional Hazards Models; Propylene Glycol; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Protein Binding; Protein Biosynthesis; Protein Isoforms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Phosphatase 2; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Protein Transport; Proteoglycans; Proteome; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Proton Pumps; Protons; Protoporphyrins; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Pulmonary Veins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Qualitative Research; Quinoxalines; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H3; Receptors, Immunologic; Receptors, Transferrin; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Reference Values; Referral and Consultation; Regional Blood Flow; Registries; Regulon; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Reperfusion Injury; Repressor Proteins; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Resistance Training; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Insufficiency; Resuscitation; Retinal Dehydrogenase; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Rhinitis, Allergic; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Rivers; RNA Interference; RNA-Seq; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; RNA, Small Interfering; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Rural Population; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salivary Ducts; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; San Francisco; SARS-CoV-2; Satiation; Satiety Response; Schools; Schools, Pharmacy; Seasons; Seawater; Selection, Genetic; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Serine-Threonine Kinase 3; Sewage; Sheep; Sheep, Domestic; Shock, Hemorrhagic; Signal Transduction; Silver; Silymarin; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Sirolimus; Sirtuin 1; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Social Class; Social Participation; Social Support; Soil; Soil Microbiology; Solutions; Somatomedins; Soot; Specimen Handling; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spinal Fractures; Spirometry; Staphylococcus aureus; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Streptomyces coelicolor; Stress, Psychological; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Medical; Students, Pharmacy; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Sulfur Dioxide; Surface Properties; Surface-Active Agents; Surveys and Questionnaires; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Survivin; Sweden; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Sympathetic Nervous System; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Talaromyces; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; tau Proteins; Telemedicine; Telomerase; Telomere; Telomere Homeostasis; Temperature; Terminally Ill; Th1 Cells; Thiamethoxam; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thioredoxin Reductase 1; Thrombosis; Thulium; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic; Thyroid Neoplasms; Time Factors; Titanium; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Transcription Factor AP-1; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation; Transcriptome; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Transistors, Electronic; Translational Research, Biomedical; Transplantation Tolerance; Transplantation, Homologous; Transportation; Treatment Outcome; Tretinoin; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Tubulin Modulators; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Twins; Ultrasonic Therapy; Ultrasonography; Ultraviolet Rays; United States; Up-Regulation; Uranium; Urethra; Urinary Bladder; Urodynamics; Uromodulin; Uveitis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Ventricular Function, Left; Vero Cells; Vesicular Transport Proteins; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Visual Acuity; Vital Capacity; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin K 2; Vitamins; Volatilization; Voriconazole; Waiting Lists; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Whole Genome Sequencing; Wine; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries; WW Domains; X-linked Nuclear Protein; X-Ray Diffraction; Xanthines; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; YAP-Signaling Proteins; Yogurt; Young Adult; Zebrafish; Zebrafish Proteins; Ziziphus

JAK-3, a member of the Janus kinase family, is a protein tyrosine kinase, which plays an important role in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Previous studies showed that regulation of JAK-3’s activity plays a crucial role in the treatment of diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Many reports have been published with a focus on selective JAK-3 inhibitors, some of which showed excellent JAK-3 selectivity and inhibitory activities. Among the JAK-3 inhibitors reported, tofacitinib has satisfactory therapeutic benefits in the clinical trials, and has been approved for treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, some JAK-3 inhibitors exhibited moderate to severe side effects, which need to be controlled by drug improvement. In order to pave the way for improvement of current JAK-3 inhibitors and development of new JAK-3 inhibitors, we provide an outline of the structure of JAK-3 and strategies in development of its inhibitors.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To further assess the potential role of Janus kinase inhibition in the development of malignancies, we performed an integrated analysis of data from the tofacitinib RA clinical development programme.. Malignancy data (up to 10 April 2013) were pooled from six phase II, six Phase III and two long-term extension (LTE) studies involving tofacitinib. In the phase II and III studies, patients with moderate-to-severe RA were randomised to various tofacitinib doses as monotherapy or with background non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), mainly methotrexate. The LTE studies (tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily) enrolled patients from qualifying prior phase I, II and III index studies.. Of 5671 tofacitinib-treated patients, 107 developed malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (n=24) followed by breast cancer (n=19), lymphoma (n=10) and gastric cancer (n=6). The rate of malignancies by 6-month intervals of tofacitinib exposure indicates rates remained stable over time. Standardised incidence ratios (comparison with Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) for all malignancies (excluding NMSC) and selected malignancies (lung, breast, lymphoma, NMSC) were within the expected range of patients with moderate-to-severe RA.. The overall rates and types of malignancies observed in the tofacitinib clinical programme remained stable over time with increasing tofacitinib exposure.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult

To evaluate the risk of opportunistic infections (OIs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib.. Phase II, III and long-term extension clinical trial data (April 2013 data-cut) from the tofacitinib RA programme were reviewed. OIs defined a priori included mycobacterial and fungal infections, multidermatomal herpes zoster and other viral infections associated with immunosuppression. For OIs, we calculated crude incidence rates (IRs; per 100 patient-years (95% CI)); for tuberculosis (TB) specifically, we calculated rates stratified by patient enrolment region according to background TB IR (per 100 patient-years): low (≤0.01), medium (>0.01 to ≤0.05) and high (>0.05).. We identified 60 OIs among 5671 subjects; all occurred among tofacitinib-treated patients. TB (crude IR 0.21, 95% CI of (0.14 to 0.30)) was the most common OI (n=26); median time between drug start and diagnosis was 64 weeks (range 15-161 weeks). Twenty-one cases (81%) occurred in countries with high background TB IR, and the rate varied with regional background TB IR: low 0.02 (0.003 to 0.15), medium 0.08 (0.03 to 0.21) and high 0.75 (0.49 to 1.15). In Phase III studies, 263 patients diagnosed with latent TB infection were treated with isoniazid and tofacitinib concurrently; none developed TB. For OIs other than TB, 34 events were reported (crude IR 0.25 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.36)).. Within the global tofacitinib RA development programme, TB was the most common OI reported but was rare in regions of low and medium TB incidence. Patients who screen positive for latent TB can be treated with isoniazid during tofacitinib therapy.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Janus Kinase 3; Opportunistic Infections; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Assessment; Tuberculosis

This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of biologics and tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with RA that inadequately responds to TNF inhibitors.. Four RCTs including 1796 patients met the inclusion criteria. The tocilizumab 8 mg group showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than the abatacept and tofacitinib groups. Ranking probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tocilizumab 8 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.9863), followed by rituximab (SUCRA = 0.6623), abatacept (SUCRA = 0.5428), tocilizumab 4 mg (SUCRA = 0.4956), tofacitinib 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.4715), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.3415) and placebo (SUCRA = 0). In contrast, the safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly among the treatment options.. Tocilizumab 8 mg was the second-line non-TNF biologic with the highest performance regarding an early good response based on ACR20 response rate and acceptable safety profile, followed by rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with RA and an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapy, and none of these treatments were associated with a significant risk of withdrawal due to adverse events.

Topics: Abatacept; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Biological Products; Drug Substitution; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rituximab; Treatment Failure; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality are increased in patients with active, untreated rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite lower levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reported in individuals with active RA compared with those without RA. Alterations in non-traditional lipid assessments, such as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function and HDL-associated proteins, have been described in patients with active RA, including elevated HDL-associated serum amyloid A and decreased paraoxonase-1 activity. We review changes in both traditional lipoprotein concentrations and non-traditional lipoprotein assessments in multiple studies of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including non-biologic and biologic DMARDs and tofacitinib. In addition, data from a recently published clinical trial with tofacitinib that describe a potential mechanism for suppression of cholesterol levels in active RA patients are reviewed. Finally, CV event data from various studies of DMARDs are presented, and the current management of RA patients with regard to the CV risk is reviewed.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Lipids; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatology

Cytokines orchestrate immune and inflammatory responses involved in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). Protein kinases are essential for signal transduction in eukaryotic cells. Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of protein tyrosine kinases that play a pivotal role in cytokine receptor signaling. Indeed, a major subgroup of cytokines use Type I and II cytokine receptors which signal via the activation of JAKs. Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor that has been studied in autoimmune pathologies, including UC and rheumatoid arthritis with good overall efficacy and acceptable safety profile. This literature review was performed with the goal of summarizing the knowledge on JAK inhibitors in UC treatment.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoimmunity; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cytokines; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

The Tec family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases comprises five members. The cellular expression and function of these kinases has implicated them as potential drug targets for the treatment of both malignant and autoimmune diseases. Most attention has focused on inhibitors of BTK kinase with ibrutinib already approved for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Multiple BTK inhibitors are being developed for both oncology and autoimmune disease indications.. BTK inhibitors being evaluated in rheumatoid arthritis are considered. Both inhibitors which have progressed to early clinical development, and those demonstrating activity in rodent models of arthritis are reviewed. These include both reversible and irreversible inhibitors of the kinase, most of which target the cysteine-481 residue of BTK. The selectivity of these inhibitors for Tec family kinases is considered.. Developing inhibitors of any kinase to treat of rheumatoid arthritis has proved problematic with regard to both efficacy and selectivity. It is anticipated that the more selective BTK inhibitors may prove more useful in treating arthritis, with the use of reversible inhibitors possibly offering a better strategy. Chronic dosing may exacerbate the emergence of drug resistance, with resistant mutations already observed in ibrutinib-treated patients.

Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Design; Drug Resistance; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines

This is an update of the 2009 Cochrane overview and network meta-analysis (NMA) of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. To assess the benefits and harms of nine biologics (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab) and small molecule tofacitinib, versus comparator (MTX, DMARD, placebo (PL), or a combination) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed to respond to methotrexate (MTX) or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), i.e., MTX/DMARD incomplete responders (MTX/DMARD-IR).. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (via The Cochrane Library Issue 6, June 2015), MEDLINE (via OVID 1946 to June 2015), and EMBASE (via OVID 1947 to June 2015). Data extraction, risk of bias and GRADE assessments were done in duplicate. We calculated both direct estimates using standard meta-analysis and used Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons approach for NMA estimates to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). We converted OR to risk ratios (RR) which are reported in the abstract for the ease of interpretation.. This update included 73 new RCTs for a total of 90 RCTs; 79 RCTs with 32,874 participants provided usable data. Few trials were at high risk of bias for blinding of assessors/participants (13% to 21%), selective reporting (4%) or major baseline imbalance (8%); a large number had unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation (68%) or allocation concealment (74%).Based on direct evidence of moderate quality (downgraded for inconsistency), biologic+MTX/DMARD was associated with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in ACR50 versus comparator (RR 2.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36 to 3.10); absolute benefit 24% more patients (95% CI 19% to 29%), number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 5 (4 to 6). NMA estimates for ACR50 in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologic+MTX/DMARD (RR 3.23 (95% credible interval (Crl) 2.75 to 3.79), non-TNF biologic+MTX/DMARD (RR 2.99; 95% Crl 2.36 to 3.74), and anakinra + MTX/DMARD (RR 2.37 (95% Crl 1.00 to 4.70) were similar to the direct estimates.Based on direct evidence of moderate quality (downgraded for inconsistency), biologic+MTX/DMARD was associated with a clinically and statistically important improvement in function measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (0 to 3 scale, higher = worse function) with a mean difference (MD) based on direct evidence of -0.25 (95% CI -0.28 to -0.22); absolute benefit of -8.3% (95% CI -9.3% to -7.3%), NNTB = 3 (95% CI 2 to 4). NMA estimates for TNF biologic+MTX/DMARD (absolute benefit, -10.3% (95% Crl -14% to -6.7%) and non-TNF biologic+MTX/DMARD (absolute benefit, -7.3% (95% Crl -13.6% to -0.67%) were similar to respective direct estimates.Based on direct evidence of moderate quality (downgraded for inconsistency), biologic+MTX/DMARD was associated with clinically and statistically significantly greater proportion of participants achieving remission in RA (defined by disease activity score DAS < 1.6 or DAS28 < 2.6) versus comparator (RR 2.81 (95% CI, 2.23 to 3.53); absolute benefit 18% more patients (95% CI 12% to 25%), NNTB = 6 (4 to 9)). NMA estimates for TNF biologic+MTX/DMARD (absolute improvement 17% (95% Crl 11% to 23%)) and non-TNF biologic+MTX/DMARD (absolute improvement 19% (95% Crl 12% to 28%) were similar to respective direct estimates.Based on direct evidence of moderate quality (downgraded for inconsistency), radiographic progression (scale 0 to 448) was statistically significantly reduced in those on biologi. Based primarily on RCTs of 6 months' to 12 months' duration, there is moderate quality evidence that the use of biologic+MTX/DMARD in people with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed to respond to MTX or other DMARDs results in clinically important improvement in function and higher ACR50 and remission rates, and increased risk of serious adverse events than the comparator (MTX/DMARD/PL; high quality evidence). Radiographic progression is slowed but its clinical relevance is uncertain. Results were inconclusive for whether biologics + MTX/DMARDs are associated with an increased risk of cancer or withdrawals due to adverse events.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Etanercept; Humans; Infliximab; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rituximab

The biologics have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are still patients that are difficult to control and a cure is still not achievable. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor is an orally available, new-in-class, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug with similar efficacy to biologics. JAK is activated by multiple cytokines involved in the pathology of RA, and affects non-immune and immune cells, mainly the lymphocytes. Besides its anti-rheumatic effect, the recent focus has been on adverse events. As with other biologics, serious infections have been observed especially with patients with lymphopenia, consistent with the mechanism of action. The major difference in adverse events from other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is the prominent increase in the occurrence of herpes zoster; it is increased worldwide, especially in Asia. There are other concerns such as malignancies and hyperlipidemia that may cause cardiovascular events that deserve further attention. The first JAK inhibitor for RA is demonstrating great benefit along with some risk, providing insights into the post-biologic era.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved considerably following the advent of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these drugs require special storage and transportation. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are oral synthetic DMARDs that inhibit the non-receptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase. Recently, many JAK inhibitors are being developed as new therapies for patients with RA.. In this article, we mainly review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors currently under investigation. Tofacitinib has already been approved in 43 countries except in the EU. Results of three JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, decernotinib, and peficitinib) in phase III are consistent with that of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib and baricitinib were partially effective in patients who had an inadequate response to biological DMARDs. Expert commentary: JAK kinase inhibitors provide a new therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis. Meanwhile, further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and the most appropriate patients suitable for such therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Valine

In 2014, guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, was announced from Japan College of Rheumatology. This guideline was made by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method with a concept of "treat to target" led for European and American recommendation of rheumatoid arthritis. It assesses not only evidences but also the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences of the patient, and resource use. It is constructed by evidence summary of 88 clinical questions and 37 recommendations about medication, orthopaedic surgery and rehabilitation.

Topics: Abatacept; Algorithms; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Japan; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The combined use of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) such as methotrexate and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) has revolutionized treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Remission is now realistic targets, achieved by a large proportion of RA patients. However, bDMARDs are limited to intravenous or subcutaneous uses and orally available small but strong products have been developed. Oral administration of tofacitinib targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) is significantly effective than placebo in active RA patients with sDMARD-naïve, inadequately responsive to sDMARDs or TNF-inhibitors. The efficacy was rapid and as strong as adalimumab, a TNF-inhibitor. The common adverse events were related to infection, hematologic and hepatic disorders and association of tofacitinib with carcinogenicity and infections remains debated.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Discovery; Humans; Janus Kinases; Lymphocytes; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However certain amount of the patients cannot achieve goal of therapy. Recently, compounds targeting the intracellular kinase, Janus kinase (JAK) have demonstrated therapeutic effects resembling biologics. Tofacitinib is the only JAK inhibitor approved for RA and during the clinical trial, increased events of herpes zoster (HZ) was observed. Incidence rate was twice as much as patients treated with conventional anti-rheumatic drug and was especially increased in Japan that was four times as much. The risk factors were age and glucocorticoid that is identical to that of common RA patients and there was nothing specific for tofacitinib. Mechanism of increased incidence of HZ and the difference in ethnicity remains unknown. Analysis of clinical trials have identified that HZ do not correlate with further adverse events. Therefore, it is extremely important to accumulate clinical data with considerable amount of patients with long term follow up including the post marketing surveillance in Japan to reveal the significance of increased HZ in RA patients.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Follow-Up Studies; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinases; Japan; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, the safety and efficacy data from five Phase 2 studies of tofacitinib in patients with RA are summarized. Tofacitinib 1-30 mg twice daily was investigated, as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate, in patients with RA. Tofacitinib 20 mg once daily was investigated in one study. Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily were selected for investigation in Phase 3 studies; therefore, the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily in Phase 2 studies are the focus of this review. Tofacitinib ≥ 5 mg twice daily was efficacious in a dose-dependent manner, with statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in the signs and symptoms of RA and patient-reported outcomes. The safety profile was consistent across studies. The efficacy and safety profile of tofacitinib in Phase 2 studies supported its further investigation and the selection of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily and tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for evaluation in Phase 3 studies.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation and joint destruction. Considerable advance in the treatment of RA has been made following the advent of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these biologics require intravenous or subcutaneous injection and some patients fail to respond to biological DMARDs or lose their primary response. Various cytokines and cell surface molecules bind to receptors on the cell surface, resulting in the activation of various cell signaling pathways, including phosphorylation of kinase proteins. Among these kinases, the non-receptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase (JAK) plays a pivotal role in the pathological processes of RA. Several JAK inhibitors have been developed as new therapies for patients with RA. These are oral synthetic DMARDs that inhibit JAK1, 2, and 3. One JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, has already been approved in many countries. Results of phase III clinical trials using a JAK1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, have shown feasible efficacy and tolerable safety. Both drugs are effective in patients who showed inadequate response to biological DMARDs as well as synthetic DMARDs. In addition, clinical phase III trials using filgotinib and ABT-494, specific JAK1 inhibitors, are currently underway. JAK inhibitors are novel therapies for RA, but further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and selection of the most appropriate patients for such therapy.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

We performed a systematic review, a standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA), which updates the 2009 Cochrane Overview, 'Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA)'. This review is focused on biologic monotherapy in people with RA in whom treatment with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including methotrexate (MTX) had failed (MTX/other DMARD-experienced).. To assess the benefits and harms of biologic monotherapy (includes anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) or non-TNF (abatacept, anakinra, rituximab, tocilizumab)) or tofacitinib monotherapy (oral small molecule) versus comparator (placebo or MTX/other DMARDs) in adults with RA who were MTX/other DMARD-experienced.. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 6, June), MEDLINE (via OVID 1946 to June 2015), and Embase (via OVID 1947 to June 2015). Article selection, data extraction and risk of bias and GRADE assessments were done in duplicate. We calculated direct estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using standard meta-analysis. We used a Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) approach for NMA estimates with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We converted odds ratios (OR) to risk ratios (RR) for ease of understanding. We calculated absolute measures as risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB).. This update includes 40 new RCTs for a total of 46 RCTs, of which 41 studies with 14,049 participants provided data. The comparator was placebo in 16 RCTs (4,532 patients), MTX or other DMARD in 13 RCTs (5,602 patients), and another biologic in 12 RCTs (3,915 patients). Monotherapy versus placeboBased on moderate-quality direct evidence, biologic monotherapy (without concurrent MTX/other DMARDs) was associated with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR50) and physical function, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) versus placebo. RR was 4.68 for ACR50 (95% CI, 2.93 to 7.48); absolute benefit RD 23% (95% CI, 18% to 29%); and NNTB = 5 (95% CI, 3 to 8). The mean difference (MD) was -0.32 for HAQ (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.23; a negative sign represents greater HAQ improvement); absolute benefit of -10.7% (95% CI, -14% to -7.7%); and NNTB = 4 (95% CI, 3 to 5). Direct and NMA estimates for TNF biologic, non-TNF biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy showed similar results for ACR50 , downgraded to moderate-quality evidence. Direct and NMA estimates for TNF biologic, anakinra or tofacitinib monotherapy showed a similar results for HAQ versus placebo with mostly moderate quality evidence.Based on moderate-quality direct evidence, biologic monotherapy was associated with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant greater proportion of disease remission versus placebo with RR 1.12 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.22); absolute benefit 10% (95% CI, 3% to 17%; NNTB = 10 (95% CI, 8 to 21)).Based on low-quality direct evidence, results for biologic monotherapy for withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events were inconclusive, with wide confidence intervals encompassing the null effect and evidence of an important increase. The direct estimate for TNF monotherapy for withdrawals due to adverse events showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant result with RR 2.02 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.78), absolute benefit RD 3% (95% CI,1% to 4%), based on moderate-quality evidence. The NMA estimates for TNF biologic, non-TNF biologic, anakinra, or tofacitinib monotherapy for withdrawals due to adverse events and for serious adverse events were all inconclusive and downgraded to low-quality evidence. Monotherapy versus active comparator (MTX/other DMARDs)Based on direct evidence of moderate quality, biologic monotherapy (without concurrent MTX/other DMARDs) was associated wi. Based mostly on RCTs of six to 12-month duration in people with RA who had previously experienced and failed treatment with MTX/other DMARDs, biologic monotherapy improved ACR50, function and RA remission rates compared to placebo or MTX/other DMARDs.Radiographic progression was reduced versus active comparator, although the clinical significance was unclear.Results were inconclusive for whether biologic monotherapy was associated with an increased risk of withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events or cancer, versus placebo (no data on cancer) or MTX/other DMARDs.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Disease Progression; Etanercept; Humans; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rituximab; Treatment Failure

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This analysis compared the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with RA and a prior inadequate response (IR) to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).. A systematic literature review identified 5 randomized placebo-controlled trials that evaluated tofacitinib or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) against placebo in patient populations with RA with a prior IR to TNFi. The definition of TNFi-IR varied across studies, and included patients with an IR or who had failed treatment with TNFi for any reason. A network meta-analysis was conducted comparing study data with regard to American College of Rheumatology response rates and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index improvement at weeks 12 and 24, rates of treatment withdrawal due to all causes; adverse events (AEs) and lack of efficacy; and rates of AEs, serious AEs, and serious infections.. The 5 trials included a total of 2136 patients. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily combined with methotrexate was found to have relative risk estimates of American College of Rheumatology responses and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score comparable with abatacept, golimumab, rituximab, and tocilizumab combined with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Withdrawal rates from trials due to all causes and AEs were comparable between treatments, and tofacitinib had a lower rate of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. Rates of AEs and HAQ-DI were comparable between tofacitinib, other active treatments, and placebo. No serious infections were reported with tofacitinib during the placebo-controlled period (up to week 12) in this study population; rates of serious infection with other active treatments were generally low and similar to placebo.. During a 24-week period, tofacitinib had efficacy and rates of AEs comparable with currently available bDMARDs in the treatment of patients with RA who had a prior IR to TNFi. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: ORAL Step, NCT00960440; ATTAIN, NCT00124982; GO-AFTER, NCT00299546; RADIATE, NCT00106522; REFLEX, NCT00462345.

Topics: Abatacept; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rituximab; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

To analyze lipid changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) treated with biologic agents or tofacitinib in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).. A systematic literature search was performed, using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge databases. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to assess changes in the percentage of patients with abnormal lipid values or in the mean percentage of increase in the cholesterol and triglycerides levels.. Twenty-five of 4,527 identified articles met the inclusion criteria. Compared with RA patients treated with placebo, those treated with tocilizumab were more likely to have hypercholesterolemia (odds ratio [OR] 4.64; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.71, 7.95 [P < 0.001]), increased levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.14, 4.44 [P = 0.020]), and increased levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (OR 4.80; 95% CI 3.27, 7.05 [P < 0.001]); this was not observed in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (OR 1.54; 95% CI 0.90, 2.66 [P = 0.119]) or tofacitinib (OR 3.4; 95% CI 0.62, 18.55 [P = 0.158]). Among patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, the mean percentage of increases in the HDL cholesterol level (weighted mean difference [WMD] 13.00 mg/dl; 95% CI 12.08, 13.93 [P < 0.001]) and the LDL cholesterol level (WMD 11.20 mg/dl; 95% CI 10.08, 12.32 [P < 0.001]) were higher than those in the comparator groups. Among patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, the mean percentage of increases in the HDL cholesterol level (WMD 15.21 mg/dl; 95% CI 13.28, 17.14 [P < 0.001]) and the LDL cholesterol level (WMD 15.42 mg/dl; 95% CI 11.77, 19.06 [P < 0.001]) were also higher than those in the comparator groups. No data were available for RA treated with other biologic agents or for SpA.. In patients with RA treated with tocilizumab or tofacitinib but not with TNF antagonists, moderate changes in lipids are observed. Whether these changes pertain to the control of inflammation or to the mechanism of action of the biologic agents or tofacitinib remains undetermined.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spondylarthritis; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily, or in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in patients with active RA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA were included in this network meta-analysis. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Ten RCTs including 4867 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 21 pairwise comparisons including 11 direct comparisons of seven interventions. The ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX group than in the placebo and MTX groups (OR 7.56, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 3.07-21.16; OR 3.67, 95 % CrI 2.60-5.71, respectively). Ranking probabilities based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.9254), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.7156), adalimumab 40 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.6097), tofacitinib 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.5984), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.4749), MTX (SUCRA = 0.1674), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0086). In contrast, the safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly among the seven interventions. Tofacitinib, at dosages 5 and 10 mg twice daily, in combination with MTX, was the most efficacious intervention for active RA and was not associated with a significant risk for withdrawals due to adverse events.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation and joint destruction. However, the combined use of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) such as methotrexate and a biological DMARD targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has revolutionized treatment of RA. Clinical remission is a realistic target to treat and the maintenance of remission has produced significant improvements in structural and function outcomes. However, biological DMARDs are limited to intravenous or subcutaneous uses and orally available small but strong products have been developed. The multiple cytokines and cell surface molecules bind to receptors, resulting in the activation of various signalling, including phosphorylation of kinase proteins. Among multiple kinases, Janus kinase (JAK) plays pivotal roles in the pathological processes of RA. Tofacitinib, a small product targeting JAK, inhibits phosphorylation of JAK1 and JAK3, subsequent Stat1 and expression of Stat1-inducible genes, which contribute to efficient propagation of its anti-inflammatory effects for the treatment of RA. The primary targets of tofacitinib are dendritic cells, CD4(+) T cells such as Th1 and Th17 and activated B cells which leads to multi-cytokine targeting. Six global phase 3 studies revealed that oral administration of 5 or 10 mg tofacitinib was significantly effective than placebo with or without methotrexate in active RA patients with methotrexate-naïve, inadequately responsive to methotrexate or TNF-inhibitors. Therapeutic efficacy of tofacitinib was observed in a short term after administration and was as strong as adalimumab, a TNF-inhibitor. The most commonly observed adverse events were related to infection, hematologic, hepatic and renal disorders and association of tofacitinib with carcinogenicity and infections remains debated. Further investigation on post-marketing survey would help us understand the positioning of this drug.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Inflammation; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; STAT1 Transcription Factor; Translational Research, Biomedical; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

This article presents a brief review and summarizes current therapies for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depression, and rheumatoid arthritis. One new pharmaceutical agent is highlighted for each of the topics.

Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Depressive Disorder; Fluticasone; Humans; Nursing Process; Piperazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfides; United States; Vortioxetine

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib modulates the signaling of cytokines that are integral to lymphocyte activation, proliferation, and function. Thus, tofacitinib therapy may result in suppression of multiple elements of the immune response. Serious infections have been reported in tofacitinib RA trials. However, limited head-to-head comparator data were available within the tofacitinib RA development program to directly compare rates of serious infections with tofacitinib relative to biologic agents, and specifically adalimumab (employed as an active control agent in two randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib).. A systematic literature search of data from interventional randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies with biologics in RA was carried out. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus was followed for reporting results of the review and meta-analysis. Incidence rates (unique patients with events/100 patient-years) for each therapy were estimated based on data from randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies using a random-effects model. Relative and absolute risk comparisons versus placebo used Mantel-Haenszel methods.. The search produced 657 hits. In total, 66 randomized controlled trials and 22 long-term extension studies met the selection criteria. Estimated incidence rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were 3.04 (2.49, 3.72), 3.72 (2.99, 4.62), 5.45 (4.26, 6.96), and 4.90 (4.41, 5.44), respectively. Incidence rates (95% CIs) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) in phase 3 trials were 3.02 (2.25, 4.05) and 3.00 (2.24, 4.02), respectively. Corresponding incidence rates in long-term extension studies were 2.50 (2.05, 3.04) and 3.19 (2.74, 3.72). The risk ratios (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 2.21 (0.60, 8.14) and 2.02 (0.56, 7.28), respectively. Risk differences (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 0.38% (-0.24%, 0.99%) and 0.40% (-0.22%, 1.02%), respectively.. In interventional studies, the risk of serious infections with tofacitinib is comparable to published rates for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severely active RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Communicable Diseases; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Recent advance in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been derived by biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting cytokines. A Jak inhibitor tofacitinib, the first drug of targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD), a novel category of DMARD, shows similar efficacy profile, but different safety concerns, compared to bDMARDs. It is, therefore, essential to understand the mode of action of tofacitinib in the context of safety and efficacy. We here document the possible mechanism of tofacitinib in patiens with RA, shedding light upon a characteristic adverse event, herpes zoster.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocyte Subsets

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has markedly advanced by the advent of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, they require special storage and transportation and remission is observed in ∼ 30%. Tofacitinib inhibits the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase (JAK), which is activated immediately after cytokines bind to their receptor within the cytoplasmic membrane.. Tofacitinib is an orally available tablet and treatment efficacy is similar to biologic DMARDs. Pharmacokinetics, and drug-drug interaction is covered in this article. In addition, efficacy and adverse events from the Phase II and Phase III are overviewed. Additionally, the authors have described the novel mechanism of action (MOA) of tofacitinib in relevance to efficacy and adverse events. Because of its MOA, greater caution is necessary for selecting appropriate patients for treatment initiation and further treatment continuation following clinical trials.. Tofacitinib is a new class of DMARDs orally available with a new mechanism of action and with strong clinical efficacy similar to biologic DMARDs. Multiple cytokines and signaling pathways are partially inhibited at clinical doses that are in contrast to biological DMARDs. Further investigation is necessary to come to a conclusion on risk-benefit ratio and selection of patients.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of patients with acute rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Randomized controlled trials were searched in MEDLINE (1966-2013), Embase (1947-2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1948-2013), WHO International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (2004-2013), Clinical Trial.gov (1999-2013), and China Biology Medicine disc (1978-2013). The review included 10 studies involving 4,929 patients. A pooled analysis of six studies showed that tofacitinib had a superior effect over placebo (both with background therapy) at weeks 12 and 24. Also, the pooled results of three studies showed that tofacitinib monotherapy had a significantly greater effect over placebo. Compared to adalimumab, tofacitinib was found to be more efficacious as well. For safety, tofacitinib monotherapy had less serious adverse events (sAE) than placebo but not other adverse effects (oAE). In the comparison of tofacitinib and placebo both with background therapy, no difference in sAE and oAE were found. However, the quality of the evidence was quite low when evaluated using GRADE. Tofacitinib alone, or together with non-biologic DMARDs, was associated with more favorable remission in the signs and symptoms of RA than adalimumab or placebo. Also, tofacitinib monotherapy was safer than placebo with regards to reported sAE, but not oAE. However, the quality of evidence is exceedingly low; long-term, large-scale, and high-quality post-marketing research is suggested to further verify the conclusion.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

To update a previous systematic review assessing the efficacy of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Two systematic reviews of the literature using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library were performed from 2009 until January 2013 to assess the efficacy of csDMARDs (as monotherapy or combination therapy) in adults with RA, and the efficacy of glucocorticoids in early RA. A third systematic review was performed until March 2013 to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib by meta-analysis.. For glucocorticoids, of 222 hits, five publications relating to four new trials were analysed for efficacy, confirming that initial treatment of RA with low-dose prednisone plus methotrexate (MTX) results in better clinical and structural outcomes at 1 and 2 years than treatment with MTX alone. For csDMARDs, of 498 studies, only two new studies were randomised controlled trials comparing MTX monotherapy with MTX in combination with another csDMARD without differences in glucocorticoid usage. Using tight control principles, clinical outcomes were no better with immediate triple therapy than with 'step-up' therapy. For tofacitinib, the pooled analysis of 10 trials showed that tofacitinib was more efficacious on signs and symptoms, disability and appeared to be more efficacious on structural damage than control treatment with placebo (OR (95% CI)--American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response: 2.44 (1.97 to 3.02)) or treatment with MTX (ACR20 response: 2.38 (1.66 to 3.43)).. Addition of low-dose glucocorticoids to csDMARD therapy produces benefits in early RA. Under tight control conditions, combination therapy with csDMARDs is no better than MTX monotherapy. Tofacitinib is a new DMARD with proven efficacy.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be the source of significant pain and functional limitation. The past 20 years have seen a transition in treatment goals away from mere pain management toward disease modification through the suppression of autoimmunity. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, such as methotrexate and biologic agents, impair disease progression and joint destruction. However, despite these achievements, a substantial subset of RA patients does not respond to or cannot tolerate current treatments for RA. Scientific insight into the cellular pathways of inflammation has revealed new therapeutic targets for the treatment of autoimmune diseases like RA. Attention has focused on pathways mediated by Janus kinase (JAK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). This review article summarizes the evidence supporting the use of various kinase inhibitors, including the newly approved JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, in the treatment of RA.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Design; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Kinases; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease characterized by inflammation of the synovial membrane and progressive destruction of the articular cartilage and bone. Advances in the knowledge of disease pathogenesis allowed the identification of novel therapeutic targets such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 or the system JAK/STAT phosphorylation. At present there are 5 TNF antagonists approved for RA. Tocilizumab blocks the pathway of IL-6 and is the only biological with proven efficacy in monotherapy. Rituximab modulates B cell response in RA. Abatacept provided new data on T cell involvement in the pathogenesis of RA. Tofacitinib is the first kinase inhibitor approved for this disease. Biologic drugs have proven efficacy, almost always in combination with methotrexate, and even halt radiographic progression. Monitoring infection is the main precaution in handling these patients.

Topics: Abatacept; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

To describe the longterm safety and efficacy profile of tofacitinib in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Data were pooled from 2 open-label studies (NCT00413699, NCT00661661) involving patients who had participated in qualifying phase I, II, or III index studies of tofacitinib. Safety data included over 60 months of observation; efficacy data are reported up to Month 48. Treatment was initiated with tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AE) and laboratory safety data. Secondary endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates, and Disease Activity Score (28 joints) (DAS28)-4[erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)] and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessments.. Overall, 4102 patients were treated for 5963 patient-years; mean (maximum) treatment duration was 531 (1844) days; 20.8% of patients discontinued treatment over 60 months. The most common AE were nasopharyngitis (12.7%) and upper respiratory tract infection (10.5%). Serious AE were reported in 15.4% of patients with an exposure-estimated incidence rate of 11.1 events/100 patient-years. Serious infections were reported in 4.5% of patients with an exposure-estimated incidence rate of 3.1 events/100 patient-years (95% CI: 2.66-3.55). Mean values for laboratory variables were stable over time and consistent with phase II and III studies. Persistent efficacy was demonstrated through Month 48, as measured by ACR response rate (ACR20/50/70) DAS28-4-ESR, and HAQ-DI. Safety and efficacy were similar for patients receiving tofacitinib as monotherapy or with background nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.. Tofacitinib demonstrated consistent safety and persistent efficacy over 48 months in patients with RA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib is the first Janus kinase inhibitor which was approved for the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis in the USA. Several phase III studies proved the efficacy of Tofacitinib as monotherapy or in combination with established medication. This article discusses the therapeutic potential of this new pharmacological approach and the current data on efficacy and safety of Tofacitinib therapy with special emphasis on a prospective approval in the EU.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Europe; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To determine the rate of infection and all-cause mortality across tofacitinib phase II, phase III, and long-term extension (LTE) studies in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Pooled data from studies of tofacitinib in patients with RA were analyzed. In these studies, tofacitinib was administered as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The cutoff date for inclusion of data was April 19, 2012.. Across phase II, phase III, and LTE studies, 4,789 patients received tofacitinib (8,460 patient-years of exposure). The overall rate of serious infection was 3.09 events per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.73-3.49), and rates were stable over time. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that age, corticosteroid dose, diabetes, and tofacitinib dose were independently linked to the risk of serious infection. Lymphocyte counts of <0.5 × 10(3) /mm(3) were rare but were associated with an increased risk of treated and/or serious infection. Overall, all-cause mortality rates were 0.30 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0.20-0.44).. The overall risk of infection (including serious infection) and mortality rates in RA patients treated with tofacitinib appear to be similar to those observed in RA patients treated with biologic agents. The rates of serious infection were stable over time.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Infections; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prevalence; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The goal of this study was to review and summarize the efficacy and safety of use of tofacitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify English-language articles published through May 2013 within PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library reporting results from Phase II and Phase III tofacitinib randomized clinical trials. Tofacitinib must have been used as monotherapy or in combination therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of RA. Study outcomes had to include at least 1 of the following: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% response rates; tender/swollen joint count; health assessment questionnaire of disability; radiographic outcomes; and drug persistence.. Eight studies (4 Phase II and 4 Phase III trials) were included in the review. Patients with active RA and who were nonresponders to a biologic agent or the nonbiologic DMARD methotrexate were included in these studies. The results of the Phase II trials show that tofacitinib at doses ≥3 mg BID was efficacious among the nonresponders. The results of the Phase III trials, comparing tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg with placebo, show that tofacitinib led to a significant improvement in ACR20 response (P < 0.0001), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (P < 0.0001) scores, and ACR50 response (P < 0.0001) after 3 months. The efficacy of tofacitinib was numerically similar to adalimumab. The most common adverse events were infections, infestations, increases in LDL-C and HDL-C levels, and a decrease in neutrophil counts.. Tofacitinib is an efficacious drug for the management of moderate to severe RA among patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Long-term studies can help in understanding the risk/benefit profile of tofacitinib.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases as well as manual searches.. Five RCTs, including three phase-II and two phase-III trials involving 1,590 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The three phase-II RCTs included 452 patients with RA (144 patients randomized to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 156 patients randomized to 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, and 152 patients randomized to placebo) who were included in this meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups than in the control group (relative risk [RR], 2.445; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229 to 4.861; p = 0.011; and RR, 2.597; 95% CI, 1.514 to 4.455; p = 0.001, respectively). The safety outcomes did not differ between the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups and placebo groups with the exception of infection in the tofacitinib 10-mg group (RR, 2.133; 95% CI, 1.268 to 3.590; p = 0.004). The results of two phase-III trials (1,123 patients) confirmed the findings in the phase-II studies.. Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 and 10 mg twice daily was found to be effective in patients with active RA that inadequately responded to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and showed a manageable safety profile.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinases; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

The constitutional isomers and tautomers of oxadiazolones, as well as their mono- and disulfur analogues, were calculated at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ level. Four groups of 30 molecules each were considered: oxadiazolone, oxadiazolthione, thiadiazolone, and thiadiazolthione isomers. The compounds were categorized into six groups according to permutations of three heteroatoms in the five-membered ring. Additionally, each of the constitutional isomer was considered to have five tautomers conserving stable five-membered ring: two NH tautomers, two rotameric OH (or SH) forms and one CH. La trombocitosis es un hallazgo casual frecuente en pediatría. En niños, predominan las formas secundarias, siendo las infecciones su causa más prevalente. Se distinguen 4 grados de trombocitosis en función del número de plaquetas; en la forma extrema, se supera el 1.000.000/mm. Endoscopic thrombin injection was similar to glue injection in achieving successful hemostasis of AGVH. However, a higher incidence of complications may be associated with glue injection.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Allyl Compounds; Amylopectin; Amylose; Anaerobiosis; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anura; Arginase; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atmosphere; B-Lymphocytes; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Bioelectric Energy Sources; Biofilms; Biofuels; Biomarkers; Biopolymers; Bioreactors; Brain; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Breast Neoplasms; Calibration; Carbon Tetrachloride; Caspase 3; Catalysis; Catechin; Cations; Cattle; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Body; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Plasticity; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chemistry Techniques, Synthetic; China; Chitosan; Chloride Channels; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromosome Mapping; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cohort Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colloids; Coloring Agents; Congresses as Topic; Correlation of Data; Crystallization; Cyanoacrylates; Cyclohexane Monoterpenes; Cyprinidae; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1; Death, Sudden; Dent Disease; Dietary Supplements; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease Resistance; Disulfides; Drug Monitoring; Drug Stability; Ecotoxicology; Electricity; Electrodes; Endocytosis; Environmental Exposure; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Esters; Fagopyrum; Female; Ferrosoferric Oxide; Flame Retardants; Flavobacteriaceae; Flow Cytometry; Follow-Up Studies; Formoterol Fumarate; Fusarium; Garlic; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gene Expression; Genes, Plant; Genetic Markers; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein; Gliosis; Global Health; Glutathione Transferase; Glycine max; Gum Arabic; Hemostasis, Endoscopic; Hepatocytes; Hippocampus; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Illinois; Immunoglobulin G; Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Interleukin-4; Iowa; Iron; Ki-67 Antigen; Kidney; Kinetics; Kynurenine; Lakes; Levofloxacin; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipids; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental; Magnetic Fields; Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles; Male; Manure; Maze Learning; Memory, Short-Term; Metal Nanoparticles; Metals, Heavy; Methane; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Michigan; Microalgae; Microbial Consortia; Mitochondria; Models, Animal; Models, Chemical; Models, Neurological; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Mutation; Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells; NADPH Oxidase 2; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurites; Neurons; Neuroprotective Agents; NF-kappa B; NIH 3T3 Cells; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Nitrogen; Ohio; Ointments; Ontario; Organelle Biogenesis; Organophosphates; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oxidative Stress; Palladium; Particle Size; Pectins; Phenotype; Phytotherapy; Piperidines; Placenta; Plant Diseases; Plant Extracts; Polymers; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polyphenols; Powders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Structure, Secondary; Proteins; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Rats, Wistar; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon; Receptors, Chemokine; Receptors, Formyl Peptide; Receptors, Lipoxin; Recovery of Function; Recurrence; Reference Standards; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory Function Tests; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sewage; Signal Transduction; Sodium Glutamate; Soil; Solanum tuberosum; Solubility; Solutions; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spermatozoa; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfamethoxazole; Tea; Temperature; Thermodynamics; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; United States; Viscosity; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Water Purification; White Matter; Wisconsin; X-Ray Diffraction; Zea mays

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic painful and debilitating autoimmune disease. Although the outcome for patients with RA has improved markedly in the past decades, driven largely by the advent of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and updated management strategies, adequate disease control cannot be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients. Since RA is a syndrome with different biological subsets, DMARDs, with a novel mechanism of action, may represent a valuable addition to the current armamentarium. Tofacitinib is a novel synthetic DMARD that selectively inhibits Janus kinases (JAKs), particularly JAK1 and JAK3.. This review describes the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib. Furthermore, the article summarizes and comments the drug's efficacy and safety profile in RA patients. The authors furthermore assess data derived from the FDA's RA development program.. Tofacitinib is an oral synthetic DMARD displaying linear pharmacokinetics. Metabolism, primarily mediated by CYP3A4, accounts for 70% of the total clearance of the drug; the remaining 30% are renally excreted. Tofacitinib monotherapy, or in combination with traditional DMARDs, has demonstrated its efficacy while having an acceptable safety profile in RA patients who have responded inadequately to current DMARDs, including TNF antagonists. In view of its undetermined benefit to risk ratio, in the real-world population, tofacitinib should, for now, only be prescribed to selected patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The advent of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) therapy has changed the way of treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, primary and secondary failure are relatively frequent with all anti-TNF agents, which are available only as parenteral agents. Tofacitinib is an oral janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that inhibits JAK family kinase members, in particular JAK1 and JAK3, achieving a broad limitation of inflammation by interfering with several cytokine receptors. It first proved its efficacy as an immunosuppressive regimen after renal transplantation, and was recently approved by the FDA for rheumatoid arthritis. First data in IBD are promising, especially in ulcerative colitis. Ongoing clinical trials in both UC and Crohn's disease (CD) are needed to further explore its efficacy in CD and to better assess its safety profile.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz(®)) is the first approved drug in a new class of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. JAKs have a pivotal role in triggering cytokine-induced signal transduction pathways that influence normal and pathological cellular processes of haematopoiesis and immune cell function, including pathogenic mechanisms involved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Selective inhibition of JAKs by tofacitinib potentially modulates inflammatory processes and provides a novel approach for the treatment of RA. Oral tofacitinib is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with active RA who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate and/or other DMARDs. In several large well designed trials, tofacitinib, in combination with methotrexate or other nonbiological DMARDs or as monotherapy, was an effective and generally well tolerated DMARD for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active RA who had had an inadequate response to previous DMARDs, including tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Direct head-to-head trials and/or further clinical experience (including long-term safety data), along with robust pharmacoeconomic studies, are required to more definitively position tofacitinib relative to other currently available DMARDs. In the meantime, tofacitinib (alone or in combination with nonbiological DMARDs) is an emerging option for the treatment of DMARD-experienced adult patients with moderately to severely active RA who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of methotrexate or other DMARDs.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of tofacitinib, a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor, recently approved for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in patients who have failed previous treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and other databases till 3 May 2013. All included studies were analyzed with the use of the Review Manager 5.1.0. software according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement protocol. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tofacitinib with placebo were identified. Two of them additionally provided the comparison with adalimumab. However, only eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall results of the meta-analysis showed that tofacitinib provided a statistically significant improvement according to the response criteria (ACR20/50/70) after 12 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo (p < 0.00001). Moreover, it was demonstrated that tofacitinib was significantly superior to adalimumab in achieving the ACR50 response criteria at week 12 (p = 0.003). For the safety analysis, there were no statistically significant differences between tofacitinib-, adalimumab-, and placebo-treated patients in respect to the risk of serious adverse events or treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions (p > 0.05). The findings of this systematic review with meta-analysis indicate that tofacitinib monotherapy or with background methotrexate provides early statistically significant and clinically important improvement in rheumatoid arthritis symptoms and has an acceptable safety profile comparable to that of placebo. The results of the present meta-analysis show that the frequency of serious adverse events was not increased after tofacitinib treatment. In addition, tofacitinib might provide an effective treatment option compared to intravenous or subcutaneous biological DMARDs, as suggested by the result of the comparison made regarding tofacitinib vs. adalimumab ACR50 response rate.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Inflammation; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The management of rheumatoid arthritis has seen a dramatic improvement with the introduction of a range of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in recent years. Nonetheless, a proportion of patients remain resistant or intolerant to multiple conventional and biological DMARDs, so innovative strategies are needed to offer patients new therapeutic options. Tofacitinib is the first of a new class of orally active DMARDs, with immunomodulating effects through inhibition of intracellular Janus kinase (JAK) pathways. It has been recently licensed for treatment of adults with moderate to severe RA in the US, Japan, and Russia. In this review the authors evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in RA, focusing predominantly on the phase 3 study data.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Biologics targeting inflammatory cytokine has become a standardized tool for remission induction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is handled under restricted conditions and their cost of acquisition is high. Small molecule drugs targeting Janus kinase (JAK), a molecule involved in intracellular signaling pathway has shown similar treatment effect as biologics. Moreover, inhibitory effect on bone destruction has been demonstrated and has been approved in 2012 as a new disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug in USA. However, since the inhibition of JAK results in inhibition of multiple cytokine signaling pathways, the clinical studies have also shown adverse events differing from biologics.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

Tofacitinib is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) which was recently approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There are several randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that have investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A systematic review with a meta-analysis of RCTs was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in treating patients with RA.. Electronic and clinical trials register databases were searched for published RCTs of tofacitinib between 2009 and 2013. Outcomes of interest include 20% and 50% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology Scale (ACR20 and ACR50) response rates, rates of infection, the number of immunological/haematological adverse events (AEs), deranged laboratory results (hepatic, renal, haematological tests and lipoprotein level) and the incidence of drug withdrawal.. Eight RCTs (n = 3,791) were reviewed. Significantly greater ACR20 response rates were observed in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg bid (twice daily) versus placebo at week 12, with risk ratios (RR) of 2.20 (95% CI 1.58, 3.07) and 2.38 (95% CI 1.81, 3.14) respectively. The effect was maintained at week 24 for 5 mg bid (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.55, 2.44) and 10 mg bid (RR 2.20; 95% CI 1.76, 2.75). The ACR50 response rate was also significantly higher for patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg bid (RR 2.91; 95% CI 2.03, 4.16) and 10 mg bid (RR 3.32; 95% CI 2.33, 4.72) compared to placebo at week 12. Patients in the tofacitinib group had significantly lower mean neutrophil counts, higher serum creatinine, higher percentage change of LDL/HDL and a higher risk of ALT/AST > 1 ULN (upper limit of normal) versus placebo. There were no significant differences in AEs and withdrawal due to AEs compared to placebo.. Tofacitinib is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with MTX-resistant RA up to a period of 24 weeks. However, haematological, liver function tests and lipoproteins should be monitored. Long-term efficacy and pharmacovigilance studies are recommended.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to at least one of the nonbiologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. Electronic based literature search was conducted in the databases of HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative), MEDLINE and Cochrane library. The studies included in the meta-analysis were double-blind randomized clinical trials that were conducted in treatment-refractory or intolerant patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The odds ratios (OR), standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined by using the random effects model. Heterogeneity among the included studies was evaluated by I² statistics.. The odds of tofacitinib treated patients who met the criteria for an at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20) was more than 4 times higher than placebo treated patients (overall OR = 4.15; 95% CI, 3.23 to 5.32). Even though the discontinuation rate due to adverse events was not different from placebo groups, tofacitinib was associated with infections (overall SMD = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.428 to 2.676), reduction in neutrophil counts (overall SMD = -0.34, 95% CI = -0.450 to -0.223) and elevated levels of LDL cholesterol and liver enzymes.. Tofacitinib was effective in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to at least one DMARDs. However, treatment with tofacitinib was associated with infections and laboratory abnormalities.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Failure

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety, dosage administration, and adverse effects of tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment.. Primary sources of information were obtained from clinical studies, which were identified through PubMed (1966 to June 2013) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to March 2013) using terms: tofacitinib, tasocitinib, CP-690550, and CP-690,550. Information was used from tofacitinib package insert, guidelines, and published abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism.. Data search was limited to include publications in English language and from human subjects.. Tofacitinib is the first oral Janus kinase inhibitor indicated for treatment of moderate to severe RA. Tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Tofacitinib was efficacious in RA patients, indicated by achievements of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 criteria. Similar improvements were observed in patients who met remission criteria based on the Disease Activity Scores 28 criteria and quality of life as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Tofacitinib was associated with infections and malignancies; and elevations in serum creatinine and lipids were observed. Drug interactions with inducers and inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 3A4 and 2C9 isoenzymes were reported.. Tofacitinib is an oral treatment option for RA patients who have inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate. Postmarket surveillance will provide further insight to tofacitinib's role in RA therapy, especially in patients who may require different types of combination therapy with DMARDS.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a representative autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and destructive inflammatory synovitis. The multiple cytokines play pivotal roles in RA pathogenesis by inducing intracellular signaling, and members of the Janus kinase (JAK) family are essential for such signal transduction. An orally available JAK3 inhibitor, tofacitinib, has been applied for RA, with satisfactory effects and acceptable safety in multiple clinical examinations. From phase 2 dose-finding studies, tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice a day appear suitable for further evaluation. Subsequently, multiple phase 3 studies were carried out, and tofacitinib with or without methotrexate (MTX) is efficacious and has a manageable safety profile in active RA patients who are MTX naïve or show inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD)-IR, or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor-IR. The common adverse events were infections, such as nasopharyngitis; increases in cholesterol, transaminase, and creatinine; and decreases in neutrophil counts. Although the mode of action of tofacitinib remains unclear, we clarified that the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib could be mediated through suppression of interleukin (IL)-17 and interferon (IFN)-γ production and proliferation of CD4(+) T cells in the inflamed synovium. Taken together, an orally available kinase inhibitor tofacitinib targeting JAK-mediated signals would be expected to be a new option for RA treatment.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Developments in our knowledge of the aetiology and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis continued apace in 2012, and several important new advances were reported in the therapy of this disease. Culminating in the approval of a new therapy in the USA, the year offered new insights for clinicians and fresh hope for patients.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Management; Enzyme Inhibitors; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; HLA Antigens; Humans; Piperidines; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Advances in the treatment of RA in the past decade have been achieved mainly by using combinations of different conventional and biologic DMARDs. However, until now no final victory has been achieved over this organ damaging and potentially life-threatening systemic autoimmune disease. Few patients, notably those with established disease, stay in remission permanently, even using advanced treatment concepts. Thus novel approaches, especially for patients resistant to biologics, are urgently needed. Pro-inflammatory signalling pathways beyond the level of cytokines and receptors have been intensively elaborated and provide such potential targets. This review focuses on the development of new small molecule inhibitors of Janus kinases in clinical trials in RA.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aminopyridines; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Forecasting; Germany; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Morpholines; Oxazines; Piperidines; Prognosis; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a representative autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and destructive inflammatory synovitis that causes severe disability and mortality. Since joint destruction occurs from the early disease, its diagnosis and treatment have to be done timely. 2010 RA classification criteria redefine the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease. Thus, a new concept of 'treat-to-target' is emerging in treatments of RA, whereby patients are treated according to prespecified goals, such as remission. Accordingly, the combinational use of methotrexate and biologics targeting TNF and IL-6 has revolutionized the treatment of RA, producing significant improvements in clinical and structural outcomes, and has produced upcoming endpoint for the treatment as the clinical and structural remission.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Denosumab; Etanercept; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Infliximab; Interleukin-6; Methotrexate; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RANK Ligand; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; Reference Standards; Remission Induction; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Since the introduction of biologic therapies into the treatment paradigm of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there has been hope that oral small molecule immune modulators would be developed that would have a risk : benefit profile at least similar to biologic therapies, be more convenient for the patient and, hopefully, be less expensive. This article reviews the progress made in the development of these compounds over the past year.. Additional information has become available in the past year on five oral compounds including kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib, fostamatinib, VX-509), an S1P lyase inhibitor (LX 3305) and a chemokine receptor-1 antagonist (CCX354-C). Efficacy has been shown in phase III with tofacitinib and in phase II with fostamatinib and VX-509; safety was the primary endpoint of the trials of CCX354-C and LX3305. Regarding side effects, liver test elevation and neutropenia occurred with tofacitinib, VX-509 and fostamatinib; lipid elevation with tofacitinib and VX-509; creatinine elevation and anemia with tofacitinib, and hypertension and diarrhea with fostamatinib.. Compounds that inhibit tyrosine kinase pathways involved in cellular signalling have been shown to be effective in the treatment of RA with a reasonable risk : benefit ratio. It is too early to tell about inhibitors of other pathways.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Morpholines; Oxazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 1% of the worldwide population. It primarily targets the synovial membrane of joints, leading to a synovial proliferation, joint cartilage lesion and erosions in the adjacent bone tissue. The disease is usually progressive and if the inflammatory process is not adequately suppressed, joint deformity takes place, leading to a significant functional disability and work incapacity. Over the last decade, biological therapy was established as a major step towards disease control in those patients who experienced failure after treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Despite the growing number of biological agents with different immunological targets, a significant number of patients do not receive appropriate disease control, or have the use of these agents limited because of adverse events. As such, the search for new molecules with a higher efficacy and better safety profile is ongoing. This article focuses on a new drug, tofacitinib, which is a synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug for treatment of RA. Preclinical studies in arthritis and transplantation animal models are reviewed as a background for the possible use of tofacitinib treatment in humans. Four Phase II (one A and three B dose-ranging) trials lasting from 6 to 24 weeks in RA patients showed significant American College of Rheumatology 20 improvements as early as week 2 and sustained at week 24 in two studies. Tofacitinib Phase III studies in RA are included in a clinical program called 'ORAL Trials'. Long-term follow-up from ongoing studies will contribute to a more accurate tofacitinib efficacy and safety profile. Trials in other illness such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, renal transplant rejection prevention, inflammatory bowel diseases and dry eye are underway.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Janus Kinases; Nitriles; Piperidines; Primary Myelofibrosis; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

Kinase inhibitors have now been shown to work in various types of patients and have potential to be additional weapons in our armamentarium in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. This review will go over the currently available data and discuss potential uses for these new agents.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Morpholines; Oxazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

Three major advances over the last decade have impacted the way we treat rheumatoid arthritis; early and aggressive treatment, use of disease activity measures leading to treat to target, and availability of biologic agents. No oral biologic agents are available at this time but promising data is emerging for two drugs, tofacitinib and fostamatinib, inhibitors of JAK and Syk kinases, respectively. This paper will review some of the relevant published data for these agents and discuss where they may be placed in our treatment options for RA.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Janus Kinases; Morpholines; Oxazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Syk Kinase; Treatment Outcome

CP-690,550 is an orally active and selective inhibitor of the janus kinase (JAK) molecules. The molecular pathways through which the JAK moieties function are described along with the clinical mechanisms associated with their inhibition. Animal models of JAK inhibition are reviewed as a background for the possible inhibition of JAK in humans. The pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550 in humans is described, and the Phase IIA and IIB trials are reviewed in some detail. These trials were dose-ranging and showed a general dose response with relatively robust American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) responses. A proof-of-concept 6-week trial in which CP-690,550 was given as monotherapy was associated with highly efficacious responses at the mid and higher twice-daily dose ranges employed. A subsequent 24 week dose-ranging trial in which CP-690,550 was administered in combination with methotrexate showed ACR20 responses, which were also statistically significant versus placebo interventions. CP-690,550 treatment was associated with side effects, which included headache and nausea. Infections were more common versus placebo as were elevations in transaminase enzymes when administered in combination with methotrexate, and increases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Decreases in haemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC) counts were also observed along with small increases in serum creatinine. Occasional significant decreases of haemoglobin (>2 g dl(-1)) were observed, although decreases of WBC to less than 1000 per mm(3) were not seen. Plans for long-term follow-up of the described trials are described along with the features of five presently ongoing Phase III trials of the CP-690,550 janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. Future directions include completion and publication of these trials along with study of JAK inhibition for other indications.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Health Status; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis is likely to implicate anti-citrullinated protein/ peptide antibody(ACPA) and an immunodistortion including abnormal T cell subpopulation. Based on above and other recent findings, new biological agents targeted to inflammatory cytokines such as tocilizumab, activated T cells (abatacept) or B cells (ocrelizumab), as well as new small molecule drugs such as JAK3 inhibitor, are sure to further facilitate remission without impaired activity of daily life in patients with RA. The contribution of Japanese physician-scientists to the progress in rheumatology has been significant as described in this review, and it must be increasingly greater in the near future.

Topics: Abatacept; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoantibodies; Cytokines; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Janus Kinase 3; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

Recent advance of targeted therapies including monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins has allowed effective strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. And now, TNF inhibitors are broadly used for rheumatoid arthritis and prevent the disease progression. Meanwhile, B cell targeted therapies and anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody treatment are not only used for second line biological agents for rheumatoid arthritis, but also expected for the treatments of various autoimmune diseases. Recent year, some of novel small molecules, which inhibit the signal transduction of various surface receptors of immune cells, are in clinical trials. These drugs will be a breakthrough for the treatment of some autoimmune disorders.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; B-Lymphocytes; Connective Tissue Diseases; Etanercept; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Infliximab; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Interleukin-6; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Pfizer Inc is developing the novel JAK3 inhibitor CP-690550 for the potential prevention of transplant rejection and treatment of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis. The benefits of currently available immunosuppressive drugs are countered by numerous side effects, caused mainly by the ubiquitous distribution of the target molecules of these treatments. CP-690550 is expected to overcome these limitations by selectively targeting JAK3, which is expressed generally only in immune cells and is only bound by gamma-chain-bearing cytokine receptors involved in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. CP-690550 exhibited potent immunosuppressive activity in preclinical models of RA and organ transplant rejection. Phase I and II clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CP-690550 in preventing transplant rejection and alleviating the symptoms of RA and psoriasis. At the time of publication, CP-690550 was in phase II/III trials in patients with RA, phase II trials in patients with psoriasis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, and transplant recipients, and a phase I/II trial for dry eye disease (xerophthalmia). Thus, the preclinical and clinical data strongly support the use of CP-690550 to produce sufficient immunosuppression to prevent organ transplant rejection and to treat autoimmune diseases; CP-690550 could herald the beginning of a new generation of safe and effective immunosuppressive therapies.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Chemokines belong to a large family of chemoattractant molecules involved in the directed migration of immune cells. They achieve their cellular effects by direct interaction with cell surface receptors. The chemokine receptor CCR1 appears to be involved in a variety of proinflammatory and autoimmune diseases and this makes it a very attractive therapeutic target. This review discusses the identification, chemistry, biology and therapeutic potential of BX 471 a potent CCR1 antagonist that is currently in the clinic for a variety of indications.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Psoriasis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic systemic autoimmune disease, is characterized by synovitis and progressive damage to the bone and cartilage of the joints, leading to disability and reduced quality of life. This study was a randomized clinical trial comparing the outcomes between withdrawal and dose reduction of tofacitinib in patients with RA who achieved sustained disease control.. The study was designed as a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients who were taking tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) and had achieved sustained RA remission or low disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints [DAS28] ≤3.2) for at least 3 months were enrolled at six centers in Shanghai, China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three treatment groups: continuation of tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily); reduction in tofacitinib dose (5 mg daily); and withdrawal of tofacitinib. Efficacy and safety were assessed up to 6 months.. Overall, 122 eligible patients were enrolled, with 41 in the continuation group, 42 in the dose-reduction group, and 39 in the withdrawal group. After 6 months, the percentage of patients with a DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of <3.2 was significantly lower in the withdrawal group than that in the reduction and continuation groups (20.5%, 64.3%, and 95.1%, respectively; P  < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The average flare-free time was 5.8 months for the continuation group, 4.7 months for the dose reduction group, and 2.4 months for the withdrawal group.. Withdrawal of tofacitinib in patients with RA with stable disease control resulted in a rapid and significant loss of efficacy, while standard or reduced doses of tofacitinib maintained a favorable state.. Chictr.org, ChiCTR2000039799.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; China; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

To investigate sustained remission following the discontinuation of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.. Patients who had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) with or without biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were randomly divided into two groups at baseline, and tofacitinib treatment in combination with MTX was administered to both groups. Either MTX or tofacitinib was then withdrawn if patients achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission at week 52. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who sustained clinical remission at week 104.. A total of 113 patients participated in this study. Among them, a total of 48 patients achieved remission at week 52. After discontinuation of tofacitinib, only 29.2% (7/24) of patients remained remission, while 50.0% (10/20) of patients, which was numerically higher but not statistically significant, sustained remission after MTX discontinuation. A greater proportion of bio-naïve patients achieved remission at week 52 and sustained low disease activity with tofacitinib discontinuation at week 104. Additionally, the patients who were able to discontinue tofacitinib without flares had lower rheumatoid factor (p=0.04) and lower anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (p=0.051) before discontinuation of tofacitinib. No severe adverse events were recorded after discontinuation of tofacitinib or MTX. In patients who relapsed after tofacitinib discontinuation, 71.4% achieved remission with resumption of tofacitinib.. This study implies that a blanket cessation of tofacitinib may not be suitable for all patients, given that 58% of the participants experienced relapse. However, the withdrawal of tofacitinib is unlikely to result in the acquisition of treatment-resistance.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines

There is a need for observational studies to supplement evidence from clinical trials, and the target trial emulation (TTE) framework can help avoid biases that can be introduced when treatments are compared crudely using observational data by applying design principles for randomized clinical trials. Adalimumab (ADA) and tofacitinib (TOF) were shown to be equivalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a randomized clinical trial, but to our knowledge, these drugs have not been compared head-to-head using routinely collected clinical data and the TTE framework.. To emulate a randomized clinical trial comparing ADA vs TOF in patients with RA who were new users of a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD).. This comparative effectiveness study emulating a randomized clinical trial of ADA vs TOF included Australian adults aged 18 years or older with RA in the Optimising Patient Outcomes in Australian Rheumatology (OPAL) data set. Patients were included if they initiated ADA or TOF between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2021; were new b/tsDMARD users; and had at least 1 component of the disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) recorded at baseline or during follow-up.. Treatment with either ADA (40 mg every 14 days) or TOF (10 mg daily).. The main outcome was the estimated average treatment effect, defined as the difference in mean DAS28-CRP among patients receiving TOF compared with those receiving ADA at 3 and 9 months after initiating treatment. Missing DAS28-CRP data were multiply imputed. Stable balancing weights were used to account for nonrandomized treatment assignment.. A total of 842 patients were identified, including 569 treated with ADA (387 [68.0%] female; median age, 56 years [IQR, 47-66 years]) and 273 treated with TOF (201 [73.6%] female; median age, 59 years [IQR, 51-68 years]). After applying stable balancing weights, mean DAS28-CRP in the ADA group was 5.3 (95% CI, 5.2-5.4) at baseline, 2.6 (95% CI, 2.5-2.7) at 3 months, and 2.3 (95% CI, 2.2-2.4) at 9 months; in the TOF group, it was 5.3 (95% CI, 5.2-5.4) at baseline, 2.4 (95% CI, 2.2-2.5) at 3 months, and 2.3 (95% CI, 2.1-2.4) at 9 months. The estimated average treatment effect was -0.2 (95% CI, -0.4 to -0.03; P = .02) at 3 months and -0.03 (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.1; P = .60) at 9 months.. In this study, there was a modest but statistically significant reduction in DAS28-CRP at 3 months for patients receiving TOF compared with those receiving ADA and no difference between treatment groups at 9 months. Three months of treatment with either drug led to clinically relevant average reductions in mean DAS28-CRP, consistent with remission.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Australia; C-Reactive Protein; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines

Recent results from 'ORAL Surveillance' trial have raised concerns regarding the cardiovascular safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We further examined this safety concern in the real-world setting.. We created two cohorts of patients with RA initiating treatment with tofacitinib or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFI) using deidentified data from Optum Clinformatics (2012-2020), IBM MarketScan (2012-2018) and Medicare (parts A, B and D, 2012-2017) claims databases: (1) A 'real-world evidence (RWE) cohort' consisting of routine care patients and (2) A 'randomised controlled trial (RCT)-duplicate cohort' mimicking inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ORAL surveillance trial to calibrate results against the trial findings. Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine stratification weighting were used to estimate HR and 95% CIs for composite outcome of myocardial infarction and stroke and accounting for 76 potential confounders. Database-specific effect estimates were pooled using fixed effects models with inverse-variance weighting.. In the RWE cohort, 102 263 patients were identified of whom 12 852 (12.6%) initiated tofacitinib. The pooled weighted HR (95% CI) comparing tofacitinib with TNFI was 1.01 (0.83 to 1.23) in RWE cohort and 1.24 (0.90 to 1.69) in RCT-duplicate cohort which aligned closely with ORAL-surveillance results (HR: 1.33, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.94).. We did not find evidence for an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes with tofacitinib in patients with RA treated in the real-world setting; however, tofacitinib was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes, although statistically non-significant, in patients with RA with cardiovascular risk factors.. NCT04772248.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Increases in lipid levels and cancers with tofacitinib prompted a trial of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib as compared with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor.. We conducted a randomized, open-label, noninferiority, postauthorization, safety end-point trial involving patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment who were 50 years of age or older and had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive tofacitinib at a dose of 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily or a TNF inhibitor. The coprimary end points were adjudicated MACE and cancers, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. The noninferiority of tofacitinib would be shown if the upper boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio was less than 1.8 for the combined tofacitinib doses as compared with a TNF inhibitor.. A total of 1455 patients received tofacitinib at a dose of 5 mg twice daily, 1456 received tofacitinib at a dose of 10 mg twice daily, and 1451 received a TNF inhibitor. During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, the incidences of MACE and cancer were higher with the combined tofacitinib doses (3.4% [98 patients] and 4.2% [122 patients], respectively) than with a TNF inhibitor (2.5% [37 patients] and 2.9% [42 patients]). The hazard ratios were 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.94) for MACE and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.09) for cancers; the noninferiority of tofacitinib was not shown. The incidences of adjudicated opportunistic infections (including herpes zoster and tuberculosis), all herpes zoster (nonserious and serious), and adjudicated nonmelanoma skin cancer were higher with tofacitinib than with a TNF inhibitor. Efficacy was similar in all three groups, with improvements from month 2 that were sustained through trial completion.. In this trial comparing the combined tofacitinib doses with a TNF inhibitor in a cardiovascular risk-enriched population, risks of MACE and cancers were higher with tofacitinib and did not meet noninferiority criteria. Several adverse events were more common with tofacitinib. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Surveillance ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02092467.).

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

To evaluate the effect of tofacitinib (TOF) on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. This post hoc analysis pooled data from RA phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing TOF 5 or 10 mg BID, adalimumab (ADA), or placebo, with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and a phase IIIb/IV RCT assessing TOF 5 mg BID monotherapy, TOF 5 mg BID with methotrexate (MTX), or ADA with MTX. Outcomes included proportions of patients achieving ACR20/50/70 responses and ≥ 20/50/70% improvement rates in ACR components at week 2 and months 1, 3, and 6; and mean percent improvement in ACR components and Clinical or Simplified Disease Activity Index (CDAI or SDAI) low disease activity or remission rates, at month 3, for ACR20/50/70 responders.. Across treatment groups, ≥ 20/50/70% improvement rates were numerically higher for most physician- vs patient-reported measures. In phase III RCTs, at earlier timepoints, ≥ 50/70% improvements in patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, and physician global assessment were similar. Among ACR20 responders receiving TOF, mean percent improvements for tender and swollen joint counts were > 70% at month 3. CDAI/SDAI remission was achieved at month 3 by 27.8-45.0% of ACR70 responders receiving TOF.. Among ACR20 responders treated with TOF, physician-reported components particularly exceeded 20% response improvement. At month 3, disease state generally did not corroborate ACR70 response criteria. Divergences between physician- and patient-reported measures highlight the importance of identifying appropriate patient-reported outcome targets to manage RA symptoms in clinical practice. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00847613/NCT00856544/NCT00853385/NCT02187055).

Topics: Adalimumab; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatology; Treatment Outcome; United States

Fatigue, a common symptom of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is detrimental to health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated the impact of tofacitinib on fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL and explored associations between fatigue, related patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and disease activity in RA patients.. This post hoc analysis pooled data from three Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib (ORAL Scan; ORAL Standard; ORAL Sync) in RA patients. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, placebo, or adalimumab (active control; ORAL Standard only, not powered for superiority) with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Assessed through Month (M)12 were changes from baseline in disease activity, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale (MOS-SS), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) composite/domain scores, and proportions of patients reporting improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or ≥ population normative values. Pearson correlations examined associations among PROs at M6. Treatment comparisons were exploratory, with p < 0.05 considered nominally significant.. Generally, active treatment led to significant improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total, and MOS-SS and SF-36 composite/domain scores vs placebo, observed by M1 and maintained through M6 (last placebo-controlled time point). Through M6, more patients achieved improvements from baseline ≥ MCID and achieved scores ≥ population normative values in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores with tofacitinib vs placebo. Through M12, some nominally significant improvements with tofacitinib vs adalimumab were observed. With active treatment at M6, FACIT-F scores were moderately (0.40-0.59) to highly (≥ 0.60) correlated with SF-36 composite/domain scores (particularly vitality), moderately correlated with most MOS-SS domain scores, and highly correlated with MOS-SS Sleep Problems Index I scores. Disease activity correlations were moderate with FACIT-F scores and low (0.20-0.39) to moderate with SF-36 general health domain/composite scores.. Tofacitinib and adalimumab generally conferred significant, clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL (including vitality) vs placebo through M6, with improvements maintained to M12. M6 correlations between FACIT-F, PROs of sleep, HRQoL, and disease activity underscore the interrelatedness of multiple PROs and disease activity in RA.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009).

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Fatigue; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Sleep; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post hoc analysis assessed whether baseline body mass index (BMI) impacts tofacitinib efficacy in patients with RA.. Of 3880 patients included, 1690 (43.6%), 1173 (30.2%) and 1017 (26.2%) had baseline BMI <25, 25 to <30 and ≥30 kg/m. Baseline BMI did not consistently affect tofacitinib response suggesting that tofacitinib is an effective oral treatment option for adults with moderate to severe RA regardless of baseline BMI, including patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m. NCT00814307, NCT01039688; NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00856544; NCT00853385.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Body Mass Index; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Results of the ORAL Surveillance safety trial have indicated that there is an increased risk for the development of malignancies with tofacitinib therapy when compared to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This study was undertaken to further examine this safety concern in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-world setting.. Using US insurance claims data from Optum Clinformatics (2012-2020), IBM MarketScan Research Databases (2012-2018), and Medicare (parts A, B, and D, 2012-2017), we created 2 cohorts of RA patients who had initiated treatment with tofacitinib or TNFi. The first cohort, designated the real-world evidence (RWE) cohort, included RA patients from routine care. For the second cohort, designated the randomized controlled trial (RCT)-duplicate cohort, we emulated the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were applied in the ORAL Surveillance trial of tofacitinib, which allowed us to assess the comparability of our results with the results of that trial. Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine-stratification weighting were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the risk of any malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). Database-specific estimates were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models with inverse-variance weighting.. The RWE cohort consisted of 83,295 patients, including 10,504 patients (12.6%) who received treatment with tofacitinib. The pooled weighted HR for the primary outcome of any malignancy associated with tofacitinib treatment compared to any malignancy associated with TNFi therapy was 1.01 (95% CI 0.83, 1.22) in the RWE cohort and 1.17 (95% CI 0.85, 1.62) in the RCT-duplicate cohort (compared to the ORAL Surveillance trial HR of 1.48 [95% CI 1.04, 2.09]).. We did not find evidence of an increased risk of malignancy development with tofacitinib therapy, in comparison with TNFi therapy, in RA patients treated in a real-world setting. However, our results cannot rule out the possibility of an increase in risk that may accrue with a longer duration of treatment with tofacitinib.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

To characterise infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ORAL Surveillance.. In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA aged≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times per day or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first events/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for infections, overall and by age (50-<65 years; ≥65 years). Probabilities of infections were obtained (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Cox modelling identified infection risk factors.. IRs/HRs for all infections, serious infection events (SIEs) and non-serious infections (NSIs) were higher with tofacitinib (10>5 mg two times per day) versus TNFi. For SIEs, HR (95% CI) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively, were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.50) and 1.48 (1.17 to 1.87). Increased IRs/HRs for all infections and SIEs with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi were more pronounced in patients aged≥65 vs 50-<65 years. SIE probability increased from month 18 and before month 6 with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively. NSI probability increased before month 6 with both tofacitinib doses versus TNFi. Across treatments, the most predictive risk factors for SIEs were increasing age, baseline opioid use, history of chronic lung disease and time-dependent oral corticosteroid use, and, for NSIs, female sex, history of chronic lung disease/infections, past smoking and time-dependent Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein.. Infections were higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Findings may inform future treatment decisions.. NCT02092467.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; C-Reactive Protein; Female; Humans; Lung Diseases; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To better understand tofacitinib treatment responses, we used group-based trajectory modeling to investigate distinct disease activity trajectories and associated baseline variables in patients with active RA.. This post hoc analysis used data from a phase III study of methotrexate-naive patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. Changes in the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to month 24 were used in group-based trajectory modeling to identify distinct disease activity trajectories. Patient and disease characteristics, changes in radiographic progression and patient-reported outcomes, and safety up to month 24 were compared among trajectory groups.. From 346 methotrexate-naive patients, 5 disease trajectory groups, defined by DAS28-ESR scores, were identified, which progressed from high disease activity (HDA) to remission (group 1, n = 28), to low disease activity (LDA) rapidly (group 2, n = 107), to moderate disease activity (group 3, n = 98), to LDA gradually (group 4, n = 46), or remained in HDA (group 5, n = 67), at month 24. At baseline, groups 1 and 2 generally had lower disease activity and more favorable patient-reported outcomes, compared with other groups. Improvements in radiographic progression and patient-reported outcomes over 24 months were generally consistent with DAS28-ESR-predicted disease activity trajectories. Adverse event rates were generally comparable across groups.. Distinct phenotypic subgroups identified heterogeneity in patients with RA normally analyzed as a single population. Trajectory modeling may enable separation of clinically meaningful subsets of patients with RA, and may help optimize treatment outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Creatine kinase (CK) levels and CK-related adverse events (AEs) in tofacitinib-treated patients with UC were evaluated.. Data were analyzed for three UC cohorts: Induction (phase 2 and 3 induction studies); Maintenance (phase 3 maintenance study); Overall [patients who received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (b.d.) in phase 2, phase 3, or open-label, long-term extension studies; data at November 2017]. Clinical trial data for tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis are presented for contextualization.. Week 8 mean change from baseline CK with tofacitinib 10 mg b.d. induction therapy was 91.1 U/L (95% CI, 48.1-134.1) versus 19.2 U/L (8.5-29.9) with placebo. Among patients completing induction with 10 mg b.d. and re-randomized to 52 weeks of maintenance therapy, mean increases from induction baseline to the end of maintenance were 35.9 (8.1-63.7), 90.3 (51.9-128.7), and 115.6 U/L (91.6-139.7), with placebo, 5 and 10 mg b.d., respectively. The incidence rate (unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) for AEs of CK elevation in the tofacitinib-treated UC Overall cohort was 6.6 versus 2.2, 6.5, and 3.7 for tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis, respectively. No serious AEs of CK elevation or AEs of myopathy occurred in UC studies.. In patients with UC, CK elevations with tofacitinib appeared reversible and not associated with clinically significant AEs. UC findings were consistent with tofacitinib use in other inflammatory diseases.. NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951; NCT01458574; NCT01470612; NCT01262118; NCT01484561; NCT00147498; NCT00413660; NCT00550446; NCT00603512; NCT00687193; NCT01059864; NCT01164579; NCT00976599; NCT01359150; NCT02147587; NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01039688; NCT02187055; NCT00413699; NCT00661661; NCT01710046; NCT00678210; NCT01276639; NCT01309737; NCT01241591; NCT01186744; NCT01163253; NCT01877668; NCT01882439; NCT01976364.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Creatine Kinase; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Risk Factors

To report the efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) of tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the open-label phase of Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Shift.. ORAL Shift was a global, 48-week, phase 3b/4 withdrawal study in patients with moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Patients received open-label tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate; those who achieved low disease activity (LDA; Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)≤10) at week 24 were randomised to receive blinded tofacitinib 11 mg once daily plus placebo (ie, blinded methotrexate withdrawal) or continue with blinded tofacitinib 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate for another 24 weeks. Efficacy, PROs and safety from the open-label phase are reported descriptively.. Following screening, 694 patients were enrolled and received tofacitinib plus methotrexate in the open-label phase. At week 24, 527 (84.5%) patients achieved CDAI-defined LDA. Improvements from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 were generally observed for all efficacy outcomes (including measures of disease activity, and response, LDA and remission rates) and PROs. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were reported by 362 (52.2%), 20 (2.9%) and 41 (5.9%) patients, respectively. No deaths were reported.. Tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate conferred improvements in disease activity measures, functional outcomes and PROs, with most (84.5%) patients achieving CDAI-defined LDA after 24 weeks of open-label treatment; the safety profile was generally consistent with the historic safety profile of tofacitinib.Funded by Pfizer Inc; NCT02831855.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor being developed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This study characterizes the relationships between upadacitinib exposure and interleukin (IL)-6-induced signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation (pSTAT3) and IL-7-induced STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) in the ex vivo setting as measures for JAK1 and JAK1/JAK3 inhibition, respectively, with comparison to tofacitinib. Drug plasma concentrations and ex vivo IL-6-induced pSTAT3 and IL-7-induced pSTAT5 in blood from subjects evaluated in 2 phase 1 studies who received immediate-release 1 mg to 48 mg upadacitinib, 5 mg twice daily (BID) tofacitinib, or placebo were determined. Exposure-response models were developed, and the effects of different upadacitinib doses on ex vivo biomarker responses were simulated and compared to tofacitinib. Upadacitinib (and tofacitinib) reversibly inhibited IL-6-induced pSTAT3 and IL-7-induced pSTAT5 in a concentration-dependent manner. Model-estimated values of 50% of the maximum effect were 60.7 nM for upadacitinib and 119 nM for tofacitinib for IL-6-induced pSTAT3 inhibition, and 125 nM for upadacitinib and 79.1 nM for tofacitinib for IL-7-induced pSTAT5 inhibition. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID is estimated to have a similar magnitude of effect on IL-6-induced pSTAT3 to ∼3 mg BID of upadacitinib (immediate-release formulation), whereas a 4-fold higher dose of upadacitinib (∼12 mg BID), is estimated to show a similar magnitude of inhibition on IL-7-induced pSTAT5 as tofacitinb 5 mg BID. This study confirms that in humans, upadacitinib has greater selectivity for JAK1 vs JAK3 relative to the rheumatoid arthritis approved dose of tofacitinib, and results from these analyses informed the selection of upadacitinib IR doses evaluated in phase 2.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; STAT3 Transcription Factor; STAT5 Transcription Factor; Young Adult

To determine if a validated Level A in-vitro in-vivo correlation (IVIVC) could be achieved with the extrudable core system (ECS) osmotic tablet platform. Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.. Fast-, medium-, and slow-release modified-release formulations of 11 mg tofacitinib ECS tablets, and one formulation of 22 mg tofacitinib ECS tablet, were manufactured. In vitro dissolution of the tofacitinib ECS tablets was performed using USP Apparatus 2 (paddles) and in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) data were obtained from a Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers. A 5 mg immediate-release formulation tablet was included to support deconvolution of the tofacitinib ECS PK tablet data to obtain the in vivo absorption profiles. A linear, piecewise correlation and a simple linear correlation were used to build and validate two IVIVC models.. The prediction errors (PEs) for the linear, piecewise correlation met the Food and Drug Administration's criteria for establishing a Level A IVIVC, with a maximum absolute individual internal PE of 4.6%, a maximum absolute average internal PE of 3.9%, and a maximum absolute external PE of 8.4% obtained.. This study demonstrates that the tofacitinib ECS osmotic tablet platform can achieve a Level A IVIVC, similar to other osmotic delivery systems.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Availability; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Liberation; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Osmosis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Random Allocation; Solubility; Tablets; Technology

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of temporary discontinuation and reinitiation of tofacitinib on disease control in patients with RA in the vaccine sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study ORAL Sequel (NCT00413699).. The sub-study of ORAL Sequel was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label study. Patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for ≥ 3 months in ORAL Sequel were randomized to receive continuous (tofacitinib monotherapy/with methotrexate) or interrupted (tofacitinib withdrawn for 2 weeks post-randomization then reinitiated as monotherapy/with methotrexate) treatment. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 response rates, change from baseline (∆) in C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Global Assessment of arthritis (PtGA), Pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and Physician Global Assessment of arthritis (PGA). Safety was assessed throughout.. The sub-study included 99 patients each in the continuous and interrupted treatment groups. ACR20/50 response rates, ∆CRP, ∆HAQ-DI (day 15), ∆DAS28-4 (ESR), ∆CDAI, ∆PtGA, ∆Pain (VAS), and ∆PGA were significantly worse in interrupted vs continuous patients during dose interruption, but were generally similar to pre-interruption/continuous treatment levels 28 days post-reinitiation. A numerically higher proportion of interrupted patients reported adverse events (49.5%) vs continuous patients (35.4%).. Tofacitinib efficacy can be re-established after temporary withdrawal and reinitiation. The safety profile of patients who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib in the sub-study was consistent with previous tofacitinib LTE studies over 9 years.. NCT00413699 Key Points • In this sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study, ORAL Sequel, the efficacy of tofacitinib was re-established after temporary withdrawal (2 weeks) and reinitation of treatment in patients with RA. • Patients with RA who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib had similar safety events to those reported in previous LTE studies. • The results of this sub-study were consistent with a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two LTE studies, ORAL Sequel and A3921041, which assessed the efficacy of tofacitinib following a treatment discontinuation period of 14-30 days.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Sedimentation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

To describe the efficacy of tofacitinib in reducing pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled trials.. Data were collected from patients in seven tofacitinib studies: six phase III (four RA, two PsA) and one phase II study (AS), and grouped into five analysis populations based on rheumatic disease diagnosis and category of prior inadequate response (IR) to treatment: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-IR (RA and PsA), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors-IR (RA and PsA), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-IR (AS). Only patients who received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo were included. Pain assessments included: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Short-Form Health Survey 36v2 Question (Q)7 and Bodily Pain domain, Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Q9 and Q14, EuroQol Five Dimensions Pain/Discomfort dimension and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Q2 and Q3. Data were reported to month 6 (placebo to month 3) in the RA and PsA populations, and week 12 (tofacitinib and placebo) in the AS population.. Overall, 3330 patients were included in this analysis. In the RA and PsA populations, pain improvements in tofacitinib-treated patients compared with placebo were observed at the earliest time point assessed and at month 3 (maintained to month 6). In the AS population, pain improvements compared with placebo were observed at week 12.. Tofacitinib was associated with rapid and sustained improvements across multiple pain measures in patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Placebos; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).. This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson's Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients.. Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients.. This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients' perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care.. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009).

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Fatigue; Humans; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report the largest integrated safety analysis of tofacitinib, as of March 2017, using data from phase I, II, III, IIIb/IV and long-term extension studies in adult patients with RA.. Data were pooled for patients with RA who received ≥1 tofacitinib dose. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events/100 patient-years [PY]; 95% CIs) of first-time occurrences were obtained for adverse events (AEs) of interest.. 7061 patients received tofacitinib (total exposure: 22 875 PY; median [range] exposure: 3.1 [0 to 9.6] years). IRs (95% CI) for serious AEs, serious infections, herpes zoster (all), opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis [TB]) and TB were 9.0 (8.6 to 9.4), 2.5 (2.3 to 2.7), 3.6 (3.4 to 3.9), 0.4 (0.3 to 0.5) and 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2), respectively. IRs (95% CI) for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC and lymphomas were 0.8 (0.7 to 0.9), 0.6 (0.5 to 0.7) and 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1), respectively. IRs (95% CI) for gastrointestinal perforations, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, arterial thromboembolism and major adverse cardiovascular events were 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2), 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2), 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2), 0.3 (0.2 to 0.3), 0.4 (0.3 to 0.5) and 0.4 (0.3 to 0.5), respectively. IR (95% CI) for mortality was 0.3 (0.2 to 0.3). IRs generally remained consistent across 6-month intervals to >78 months.. This represents the largest clinical dataset for a JAK inhibitor in RA to date. IRs remained consistent with previous reports from the tofacitinib RA clinical development programme, and stable over time.. NCT01262118; NCT01484561; NCT00147498; NCT00413660; NCT00550446; NCT00603512; NCT00687193; NCT01164579; NCT00976599; NCT01059864; NCT01359150; NCT02147587; NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01039688; NCT02187055; NCT00413699; NCT00661661.For summary of phase I, phase II, phase III, phase IIIb/IV and LTE studies included in the integrated safety analysis, see online supplemental table 1.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To explore herpes zoster (HZ) rates and live zoster vaccine (LZV) safety in a subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received LZV before tofacitinib ± methotrexate (MTX), or adalimumab (ADA) plus MTX in the ORAL Strategy.. ORAL Strategy was a 1-year, phase IIIb/IV, randomized, triple-dummy, active-comparator-controlled study. MTX-inadequate responder patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 5 mg BID plus MTX, or ADA 40 mg every other week plus MTX (1:1:1 randomization). Eligible patients age ≥50 years could opt to receive LZV 28 days before initiating study treatment. HZ incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years) were calculated. Opportunistic HZ infections (multidermatomal/disseminated), serious HZ events, and LZV-related adverse events were monitored.. In ORAL Strategy, 216 of 1,146 patients (18.8%) received LZV. Overall, 18 patients (1.6%) developed HZ (vaccinated: n = 3; nonvaccinated: n = 15). HZ IRs were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-2.9), 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-4.6), and 1.7 (95% CI 0.6-3.7) for tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus MTX, and ADA plus MTX, respectively, and were generally similar between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients. Three multidermatomal, 1 disseminated, and 2 serious HZ events occurred. No vaccinated patients had zoster-like lesions within 42 days of vaccination; 1 patient had vaccination-site erythema.. LZV was well tolerated, and HZ IRs were generally similar between treatment groups and vaccinated versus nonvaccinated patients. However, ORAL Strategy was not powered for comparisons between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients because <20% of all patients were vaccinated. Furthermore, LZV has been shown to be effective only in ~50% of individuals.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Herpes Zoster; Herpes Zoster Vaccine; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The objective of this study was to evaluate early changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical disease activity measures as predictors of later structural progression in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. This was a post hoc analysis of data pooled across treatments from a three-arm (tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate [MTX], or MTX monotherapy) trial of MTX-naïve patients with early, active RA. Synovitis, osteitis and erosions were assessed with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) and RAMRIQ (automated quantitative RA MRI assessment system; automated RAMRIS) at months 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12. Radiographs were assessed at months 0, 6 and 12, and clinical endpoints were assessed at all timepoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored the predictive value of early changes in RAMRIS/RAMRIQ parameters and disease activity measures, with respect to subsequent radiographic progression.. Data from 109 patients with a mean RA duration of 0.7 years were included. In univariate analyses, changes in RAMRIS erosions at months 1 and 3 significantly predicted radiographic progression at month 12 (both p <  0.01); changes in RAMRIQ synovitis and osteitis at months 1 and 3 were significant predictors of RAMRIS erosions and radiographic progression at month 12 (all p <  0.01). In subsequent multivariate analyses, RAMRIS erosion change at month 1 (p <  0.05) and RAMRIQ osteitis changes at months 1 and 3 (both p <  0.01) were significant independent predictors of radiographic progression at month 12. Univariate analyses demonstrated that changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) at months 1 and 3 were not predictive of month 12 radiographic progression.. MRI changes seen as early as 1 month after RA treatment initiation have the potential to better predict long-term radiographic progression than changes in disease activity measures.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01164579 .

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Predictive Value of Tests; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To provide the first direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following treatment with tofacitinib monotherapy versus tofacitinib or adalimumab (ADA) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR).. ORAL Strategy (NCT02187055), a phase IIIB/IV, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial, assessed non-inferiority between tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day monotherapy, tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day+MTX and ADA 40 mg every other week+MTX. PROs assessed included the following: Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (PtGA), Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) summary and domain scores.. Substantial improvements from baseline were reported across all PROs in all treatment arms, which, in the majority, met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences. Compared with tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib+MTX combination treatment conferred significantly greater improvements in PtGA, Pain and SF-36 physical component summary scores at month 6. Statistically or numerically greater improvements were often, but not uniformly, reported for combination treatments compared with tofacitinib monotherapy at other time points.. Treatment with tofacitinib+MTX, ADA+MTX and tofacitinib monotherapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in PROs in MTX-IR patients with RA. These were comparatively greater with combination treatments versus tofacitinib monotherapy, although differences between treatment arms were small, limiting our ability to confer clinical meaning.. NCT02187055.

Topics: Adalimumab; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Optimal targeted treatment in rheumatoid arthritis requires early identification of failure to respond. This post hoc analysis explored the relationship between early disease activity changes and the achievement of low disease activity (LDA) and remission targets with tofacitinib.. Data were from 2 randomized, double-blind, phase III studies. In the ORAL Start trial, methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or MTX, for 24 months. In the placebo-controlled ORAL Standard trial, MTX inadequate responder patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks, with MTX, for 12 months. Probabilities of achieving LDA (using a Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score ≤10 or the 4-component Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] ≤3.2) at months 6 and 12 were calculated, given failure to achieve threshold improvement from baseline (change in CDAI ≥6 or DAS28-ESR ≥1.2) at month 1 or 3.. In ORAL Start, 7.2% and 5.4% of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily, respectively, failed to show improvement in the CDAI ≥6 at month 3; of those who failed, 3.8% and 28.6%, respectively, achieved month 6 CDAI-defined LDA. In ORAL Standard, 18.8% and 17.5% of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily, respectively, failed to improve CDAI ≥6 at month 3; of those who failed, 0% and 2.9%, respectively, achieved month 6 CDAI-defined LDA. Findings were similar when considering improvements at month 1 or DAS28-ESR thresholds.. In patients with an inadequate response to MTX, lack of response to tofacitinib after 1 or 3 months predicted a low probability of achieving LDA at month 6. Lack of an early response may be considered when deciding whether to continue treatment with tofacitinib.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Probability; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for treatment of RA. We compared tofacitinib modified-release (MR) 11 mg once daily (QD) with tofacitinib immediate-release (IR) 5 mg twice daily (BID) in Japanese patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX.. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week study. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD (n = 104) or IR 5 mg BID (n = 105), with stable MTX. Compliance was based on returned pill counts. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of MR 11 mg QD to IR 5 mg BID. Non-inferiority was declared if the upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in change from baseline in DAS28-4(CRP) at week 12 was <0.6.. At week 12, with tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD and IR 5 mg BID, respectively, the change from baseline in least squares mean DAS28-4(CRP) was -2.43 and -2.85; the mean difference was 0.43 (95% CI 0.17, 0.69). Non-inferiority of MR 11 mg QD to IR 5 mg BID was not met. Improvement of DAS28-4(CRP) ⩾1.2 was observed in 89 and 85% of patients, respectively, corresponding to a clinically important, significant change in both groups. The frequency of adverse events (52.9 and 51.4%, respectively) and serious adverse events (4.8 and 3.8%, respectively) was generally similar between treatments. No deaths were reported.. Non-inferiority of MR 11 mg QD to IR 5 mg BID was not met in this study. However, clinically meaningful improvements in RA were observed with both tofacitinib formulations in Japanese patients. The safety profile was similar with both formulations.. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02281552.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The phase III, 24-month, placebo-controlled Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis (ORAL) Scan trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy, including inhibition of structural progression, and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Month 24 data from the completed study are reported here.. Patients were randomized 4:4:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, switched to tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, with stable background MTX. Patients receiving placebo switched to tofacitinib at month 3 (nonresponders) or month 6 (remaining patients). Clinical efficacy, structural progression, and treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set with observed data or nonresponder imputation with no advancement penalty for clinical efficacy, and imputation by linear extrapolation for structural progression.. Overall, 797 patients were treated; 539 (67.6%) completed 24 months of treatment. Responses according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70; the proportion of patients in whom remission or low disease activity was achieved according to the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Clinical Disease Activity Index, or Simplified Disease Activity Index; Boolean remission; and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index scores were maintained from month 12 to 24 and were similar between tofacitinib dosages. Limited structural damage was observed at months 12 and 24. Safety events were similar in type and frequency for both tofacitinib dosages, and were consistent with those previously reported.. Our findings indicate that clinical and radiographic treatment effects are sustained in months 12-24 in patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily plus MTX. The safety profile is consistent with that of other tofacitinib studies.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study, we assessed the molecular mechanism of action of the selective histamine-4-receptor antagonist toreforant.. Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate were randomized (3:1) to toreforant 30 mg/day (weeks 0-52) or placebo (weeks 0-12) followed by toreforant 30 mg/day (weeks 12-52).. Primary biomarker analyses comprised 39 different proteins/mRNA transcripts measured in synovial biopsy (n = 39) and/or time-matched serum (n = 15) samples collected at baseline and week 6. Clinical response was assessed using C-reactive protein-based 28-joint disease activity scores. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.. Among 21 randomized, treated patients (toreforant-16, placebo-5), 18 (toreforant-13, placebo-5) completed the 12-week double-blind period (none completed open-label treatment) prior to the early study termination. Biomarker profiling indicated potential modest effects of toreforant on gene expression of histamine-1-receptor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-8 in synovium. Potential trends between biomarkers and clinical response were observed with synovial monocyte chemoattractant protein-4 and phosphorylated extracellular-signal-regulated kinases and serum matrix metalloproteinase-3. Minimal synovial gene expression of interleukins-17A and 17F was detected.. While clear biomarker signals associated with toreforant pharmacology in RA patients were not identified, modest associations between biomarkers and clinical response were noted. Synovial expression of interleukins-17A/17F was minimal. Limited sample size warrants cautious interpretation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Interleukin-17; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Histamine H4; Synovial Membrane; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined response to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times a day in patients with seropositive vs seronegative RA.. Data were pooled from five Phase III studies of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD)- or biological DMARD-inadequate responders (ORAL Step [NCT00960440]; ORAL Scan [NCT00847613]; ORAL Solo [NCT00814307]; ORAL Sync [NCT00856544]; ORAL Standard [NCT00853385]). 'Serotype' subgroups were: anticyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) positive (anti-CCP+/RF+); anti-CCP+/RF negative (-); anti-CCP-/RF+; anti-CCP-/RF-. At month 3, ACR20/50/70 response rates, Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4[ESR])-defined remission (DAS28-4[ESR]<2.6) and low disease activity (LDA; DAS28-4[ESR]≤3.2), changes from baseline (CFB) in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were evaluated. Safety endpoints were compared.. Baseline demographics/characteristics were similar across subgroups. Tofacitinib significantly improved ACR20/50/70 response rates, DAS28-4(ESR) LDA rates and CFB in HAQ-DI and FACIT-F vs placebo across subgroups. More anti-CCP+/RF+ than anti-CCP-/RF- patients had ACR20/50/70 responses (ACR20/50: both tofacitinib doses; ACR70: 10 mg two times a day). SF-36 physical functioning improved in anti-CCP+/RF+, anti-CCP+/RF- and anti-CCP-/RF+ patients (both tofacitinib doses) and anti-CCP-/RF- patients (10 mg two times a day) vs placebo. More anti-CCP+/RF+ and anti-CCP+/RF- than anti-CCP-/RF- patients achieved DAS28-4(ESR) remission and LDA with tofacitinib 10 mg two times a day. Frequency of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across subgroups.. Generally, tofacitinib efficacy (ACR20/50/70 responses) and safety were similar across subgroups. DAS28-4(ESR) remission rates and SF-36 physical functioning appeared lower in anti-CCP- patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biomarkers; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatoid Factor; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Final data are presented for the ORAL Sequel long-term extension (LTE) study evaluating the safety and efficacy of tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily (BID) for up to 9.5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Eligible patients had previously completed a phase 1, 2, or 3 qualifying index study of tofacitinib and received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg BID. Stable background therapy, including csDMARDs, was continued; adjustments to tofacitinib or background therapy were permitted at investigators' discretion. Assignment to dose groups (5 mg or 10 mg BID) was based on patients' average total daily dose. The primary objective was to determine the long-term safety and tolerability of tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg BID; the key secondary objective was to evaluate the long-term persistence of efficacy.. Between February 5, 2007, and November 30, 2016, 4481 patients were enrolled. Total tofacitinib exposure was 16,291 patient-years. Safety data are reported up to month 114 for all tofacitinib; efficacy data are reported up to month 96 for tofacitinib 5 mg BID and month 72 for 10 mg BID (with low patient numbers limiting interpretation beyond these time points). Overall, 52% of patients discontinued (24% due to adverse events [AEs] and 4% due to insufficient clinical response); the safety profile remained consistent with that observed in prior phase 1, 2, 3, or LTE studies. The incidence rate (IR; number of patients with events per 100 patient-years) for AEs leading to discontinuation was 6.8. For all-cause AEs of special interest, IRs were 3.4 for herpes zoster, 2.4 for serious infections, 0.8 for malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, 0.4 for major adverse cardiovascular events, and 0.3 for all-cause mortality. Clinically meaningful improvements in the signs and symptoms of RA and physical functioning, which were observed in the index studies, were maintained.. Tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg BID demonstrated a consistent safety profile (as monotherapy or combination therapy) and sustained efficacy in this open-label LTE study of patients with RA. Safety data are reported up to 9.5 years, and efficacy data up to 8 years, based on adequate patient numbers to support conclusions.. NCT00413699 , funded by Pfizer Inc (date of trial registration: December 20, 2006).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib has been investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in phase III studies in which concomitant glucocorticoids (GC) were allowed. We analyzed the effect of GC use on efficacy outcomes in patients with RA receiving tofacitinib and/or methotrexate (MTX) or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) in these studies.. Our posthoc analysis included data from 6 phase III studies (NCT01039688; NCT00814307; NCT00847613; NCT00853385; NCT00856544; NCT00960440). MTX-naive patients or patients with inadequate response to csDMARD or biological DMARD received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily alone or with csDMARD, with or without concomitant GC. Patients receiving GC (≤ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) before enrollment maintained a stable dose throughout. Endpoints included the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates, rates of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-defined low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10) and remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8), and changes from baseline in CDAI, 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), pain visual analog scale (VAS), and modified total Sharp score.. Of 3200 tofacitinib-treated patients, 1258 (39.3%) received tofacitinib monotherapy and 1942 (60.7%) received tofacitinib plus csDMARD; 1767 (55.2%) received concomitant GC. ACR20/50/70 response rates, rates of CDAI LDA and remission, and improvements in CDAI, DAS28-4-ESR, HAQ-DI, and pain VAS with tofacitinib were generally similar with or without GC in monotherapy and combination therapy studies. GC use did not appear to affect radiographic progression in tofacitinib-treated MTX-naive patients. MTX plus GC appeared to inhibit radiographic progression to a numerically greater degree than MTX alone.. Concomitant use of GC with tofacitinib did not appear to affect clinical or radiographic efficacy. MTX plus GC showed a trend to inhibit radiographic progression to a greater degree than MTX alone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disability Evaluation; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucocorticoids; Health Surveys; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Objective This study was designed to directly compare the outcomes of tofacitinib therapy for methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) between biologic-naïve patients and patients who had experienced an inadequate response to biological agents. Methods We prospectively enrolled and followed 113 patients who had a high or moderate clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (36 biologic-naïve patients and 77 biologic-experienced patients). Patients received 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily. Effectiveness and adverse events were examined at month 6 of treatment. Results At month 6, 65 patients (57.5%) reached CDAI50, which is defined as achieving ≥50% improvement. The number of previous biological agents was twice as high in CDAI50 non-responders as in responders (2.2 versus 1.1, p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the type of previous agents or the reason for discontinuation. According to a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the previous use of biological agents [odds ratio (OR) 4.48, p=0.002] and the concurrent use of prednisolone (OR 2.40, p=0.047) were associated with a failure to achieve a CDAI 50 response. Biologic-naïve patients were more likely to achieve CDAI50 than biologic-experienced patients (80.6% versus 46.8%, p=0.001). Mean CDAI values were higher in biologic-experienced patients (11.4 versus 4.8, p=0.001), and remission rates were higher in biologic-naïve patients (41.7% versus 11.7%, p=0.001). Biologic-naïve patients more rapidly achieved remission. Rates of discontinuation resulting from adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Although tofacitinib can provide an effective treatment option for intractable RA patients, its impact on outcomes is lower in patients with previous biologic failure.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assess the effect of tofacitinib + conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on patient-reported outcomes in Chinese patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs.. This analysis of data from the Phase 3 study ORAL Sync included Chinese patients randomized 4 : 4 : 1 : 1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, placebo→tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, or placebo→tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, with csDMARDs. Placebo non-responders switched to tofacitinib at 3 months; the remaining placebo patients switched at 6 months. Least squares mean changes from baseline were reported for Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient assessment of arthritis pain (Pain), patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), physician global assessment of disease activity (PGA), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.. Overall, 216 patients were included (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, n = 86; tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, n = 86; placebo→tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, n = 22; placebo→tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, n = 22). At month 3, tofacitinib elicited significant improvements in HAQ-DI, Pain, PtGA, PGA and SF-36 Physical Component Summary scores. Improvements were generally maintained through 12 months.. Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily + csDMARDs resulted in improvements in health-related quality of life, physical function and Pain through 12 months in Chinese patients with RA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; China; Disability Evaluation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Status; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Recovery of Function; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study evaluated the short-term effects of tofacitinib treatment on peripheral blood leukocyte phenotype and function, and the reversibility of any such effects following treatment withdrawal in healthy volunteers. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive subjects received oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and were followed for 4 weeks after drug withdrawal. There were slight increases in total lymphocyte and total T-cell counts during tofacitinib treatment, and B-cell counts increased by up to 26%. There were no significant changes in granulocyte or monocyte counts, or granulocyte function. Naïve and central memory T-cell counts increased during treatment, while all subsets of activated T cells were decreased by up to 69%. T-cell subsets other than effector memory cluster of differentiation (CD)4+, activated naïve CD4+ and effector CD8+ T-cell counts and B-cell counts, normalized 4 weeks after withdrawal. Following ex vivo activation, measures of CMV-specific T-cell responses, and antigen non-specific T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity and interferon (IFN)-γ production, decreased slightly. These T-cell functional changes were most pronounced at Day 15, partially normalized while still on tofacitinib and returned to baseline after drug withdrawal. Total natural killer (NK)-cell counts decreased by 33%, returning towards baseline after drug withdrawal. NK-cell function decreased during tofacitinib treatment, but without a consistent time course across measured parameters. However, markers of NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production were decreased up to 42% 1 month after drug withdrawal. CMV DNA was not detectable in whole blood, and there were no cases of herpes zoster reactivation. No new safety concerns arose. In conclusion, the effect of short-term tofacitinib treatment on leukocyte composition and function in healthy CMV+ volunteers is modest and largely reversible 4 weeks after withdrawal.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Leukocytes; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Phenotype; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocytes

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We evaluated the relationship between disease activity, according to Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) after 6-month treatment with tofacitinib, and long-term outcomes at 24 months. This was a post hoc analysis of two 24-month, phase 3, randomized controlled trials in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve (ORAL Start [NCT01039688]) or MTX-inadequate responder patients (ORAL Scan [NCT00847613]) receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) as monotherapy or with background MTX. RAPID3 scores were calculated at baseline, month (M)6, and M24, and defined as remission (≤ 3), low (LDA; > 3-≤ 6), moderate (MDA; > 6-≤ 12), or high disease activity (HDA; > 12). Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, and radiographic non-progression (modified Total Sharp Scores ≤ 0) at M24 were evaluated by M6 RAPID3 response. Among patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID, respectively, 42.2 and 51.5% (ORAL Start) and 29.8 and 39.0% (ORAL Scan) achieved RAPID3 remission/LDA at M6. Most patients maintained/improved RAPID3 responses at M24. A higher proportion of patients in RAPID3 remission/LDA versus MDA/HDA at M6 achieved CDAI remission, reported normative HAQ-DI scores (< 0.5), and achieved both normative HAQ-DI scores and radiographic non-progression at M24. Patients achieving RAPID3 remission/LDA after 6-month treatment with tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID have improved long-term outcomes versus patients with MDA/HDA. These findings support the use of RAPID3 to monitor longer-term disease activity in conjunction with physician-assessed measures.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

The physiopathology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is mediated by proinflammatory cytokines, some of which are regulated by the JAK/STAT pathway. Tofacitinib is a JAK inhibitor, but its role in the regulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) is unknown. There is also no information regarding the role of miRNAs in the clinical relapse/remission of RA. The present project aims to identify a signature profile of miRNA expression in a subgroup of RA patients who had to discontinue tofacitinib treatment (because of the ending of a 5-year open-label clinical trial) and to describe the expression of miRNAs during RA remission or flare-up. The relative expression of 61 miRNAs was determined in serum samples with the Firefly™ BioWorks assay. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Student's t-test and heatmap analysis was performed with Firefly™ Analysis Workbench software and in the software GraphPad® Prism v5.0. Target prediction and Gene Ontology analysis were carried out using bioinformatic tools. We found a distinctive signature of miRNA expression associated with relapse, featuring upregulated expression of hsa‑miR‑432‑5p (p < 0.05). We also found upregulation of hsa‑miR‑194‑5p (p < 0.05) in samples of patients with RA flare-up. Gene Ontology analysis of the target genes for hsa‑miR‑432‑5p was performed to identify relevant pathways associated with relapse; the implications of these pathways in the physiopathology of RA are discussed. Tofacitinib treatment does not have a direct effect on the expression of measured miRNAs. The changes in hsa‑miR‑432‑5p and hsa‑miR‑194‑5p are associated with the regulation of proinflammatory pathways and RA flare-up.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recurrence

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Brazilian patients from Phase 2 (P2) and Phase 3 (P3) global studies of up to 24 months' duration were evaluated.. Data were pooled from Brazilian patients with RA and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs enrolled in P2/P3 tofacitinib studies who received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo, as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate. Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 24 months.. Patients (226) from Brazil were treated in tofacitinib global P2/P3 studies. At Month 3, there were improvements in American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores with both tofacitinib doses. Improvements from baseline in pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were reported. Efficacy improvements were sustained up to Month 24. The most frequent class of adverse events was infections and infestations. No cases of tuberculosis or other opportunistic infections were reported.. In a Brazilian subpopulation of patients with RA, tofacitinib reduced disease signs and symptoms and improved physical function up to Month 24, with a safety profile consistent with findings from global studies.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Sedimentation; Brazil; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

This post-hoc, pooled analysis of Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib examined the safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) when used as monotherapy versus combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Pooled data from six double-blind, randomized controlled Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID in patients with RA were analyzed for safety and stratified by administration as monotherapy (ORAL Solo: NCT00814307 and ORAL Start: NCT01039688) or in combination with csDMARDs (ORAL Sync: NCT00856544, ORAL Standard: NCT00853385, ORAL Scan: NCT00847613, and ORAL Step: NCT00960440), and by glucocorticoid use at baseline. Safety assessments included incidence rates (IRs) for serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events, and herpes zoster (HZ), and were evaluated throughout the duration of the Phase 3 studies.. In total, 3881 patients were included in the safety analysis (monotherapy studies: n = 1380; combination therapy studies: n = 2501). IRs for selected AEs of interest were generally numerically lower in patients who received tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID as monotherapy than as combination therapy (SAEs: IR [range] 6.21-6.72 versus IR 10.17-13.46; discontinuations due to AEs: IR 5.53-6.18 versus IR 10.80-11.01; serious infections: IR 1.57-1.66 versus IR 3.39-3.56; HZ: IR 1.95-2.93 versus IR 4.37-4.99, respectively), irrespective of tofacitinib dose or glucocorticoid use. There were too few patients and events within the placebo group to fully evaluate effect between combination therapy and monotherapy.. Safety profiles were generally similar between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy; however, selected safety events of interest, including HZ and serious infections, showed lower IRs with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals for tofacitinib all monotherapy versus combination therapy. Tofacitinib monotherapy may, therefore, have fewer safety events compared with combination therapy, and have a favorable risk-benefit profile in patients with active RA who are intolerant to csDMARDs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 and long-term extension (LTE) studies.. ORAL Sync was a 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at 3 or 6 months. All patients remained on ≥1 background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. ORAL Sequel is an open-label LTE study (data-cut: March 2015; data collection and analyses were ongoing, and study database was not locked at the time of analysis; study was closed in 2017). Efficacy outcomes: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]). Patient- and physician-reported outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis, and pain (visual analog scale). Safety was assessed throughout.. ORAL Sync included 218 patients; 192 were subsequently enrolled into ORAL Sequel. In ORAL Sync, more patients achieved ACR20 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 67.4%; 10 mg BID, 70.6%; placebo, 34.1%) and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 7.1%; 10 mg BID, 13.1%; placebo, 2.3%) with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. Mean changes from baseline in HAQ-DI were greater with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. In ORAL Sequel, efficacy was consistent to Month 48. Incidence rates for adverse events of special interest in tofacitinib-treated patients were similar to the global population.. Tofacitinib significantly reduced signs/symptoms and improved physical function and quality of life in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severely active RA up to Month 48. The safety profile was consistent with the global population.. NCT00856544 and NCT00413699.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asian People; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

RA causes high disability levels and reduces health-related quality of life, triggering increased costs and risk of unemployment. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. These post hoc analyses of phase 3 data aimed to assess monthly medical expenditure (MME) and risk of job loss for tofacitinib treatment vs placebo.. Data analysed were from two randomized phase 3 studies of RA patients (n = 1115) with inadequate response to MTX or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, adalimumab (one study only) or placebo, in combination with MTX. Short Form 36 version 2 Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were translated into predicted MME via an algorithm and concurrent inability to work and job loss risks at 6, 12 and 24 months, using Medical Outcomes Study data.. MME reduction by month 3 was $100 greater for tofacitinib- than placebo-treated TNFi inadequate responders (P < 0.001); >20 and 6% reductions from baseline, respectively. By month 3 of tofacitinib treatment, the odds of inability to work decreased ⩾16%, and risk of future job loss decreased ∼20% (P < 0.001 vs placebo). MME reduction by month 3 was $70 greater for tofacitinib- than placebo-treated MTX inadequate responders (P < 0.001); ⩾23 and 13% reductions from baseline, respectively. By month 3 of tofacitinib treatment, the odds of inability to work decreased ⩾31% and risk of future job loss decreased ⩾25% (P < 0.001 vs placebo).. Tofacitinib treatment had a positive impact on estimated medical expenditure and risk of job loss for RA patients with inadequate response to MTX or TNFi.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost of Illness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Return to Work; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis triaL (ORAL) Strategy aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with a previous inadequate response to methotrexate.. ORAL Strategy was a 1 year, double-blind, phase 3b/4, head-to-head, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged 18 years or older with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) monotherapy, oral tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) plus methotrexate, or subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every other week) plus methotrexate at 194 centres in 25 countries. Eligible patients received live zoster vaccine at investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who attained an American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% (ACR50) at month 6 in the full analysis set (patients who were randomly assigned to a group and received at least one dose of the study treatment). Non-inferiority between groups was shown if the lower bound of the 98·34% CI of the difference between comparators was larger than -13·0%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187055.. 1146 patients received treatment (384 had tofacitinib monotherapy; 376 had tofacitinib and methotrexate; and 386 had adalimumab and methotrexate). At 6 months, ACR50 response was attained in 147 (38%) of 384 patients with tofacitinib monotherapy, 173 (46%) of 376 patients with tofacitinib and methotrexate, and 169 (44%) of 386 patients with adalimumab and methotrexate. Non-inferiority was declared for tofacitinib and methotrexate versus adalimumab and methotrexate (difference 2% [98·34% CI -6 to 11]) but not for tofacitinib monotherapy versus either adalimumab and methotrexate (-6 [-14 to 3]) or tofacitinib and methotrexate (-8 [-16 to 1]). In total, 23 (6%) of 384 patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, 26 (7%) of 376 patients receiving tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and 36 (9%) of 386 patients receiving adalimumab plus methotrexate discontinued due to adverse events. Two (1%) of the 384 patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy died. No new or unexpected safety issues were reported for either treatment in this study for up to 1 year.. Tofacitinib and methotrexate combination therapy was non-inferior to adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate in this trial. Tofacitinib monotherapy was not shown to be non-inferior to either combination.. Pfizer Inc.

Topics: Adalimumab; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of herpes zoster, and vaccination is recommended for patients ages 50 years and older, prior to starting treatment with biologic agents or tofacitinib. Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA. We evaluated its effect on the immune response and safety of live zoster vaccine (LZV).. In this phase II, 14-week, placebo-controlled trial, patients ages 50 years and older who had active RA and were receiving background methotrexate were given LZV and randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo 2-3 weeks postvaccination. We measured humoral responses (varicella zoster virus [VZV]-specific IgG level as determined by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and cell-mediated responses (VZV-specific T cell enumeration, as determined by enzyme-linked immunospot assay) at baseline and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 14 weeks postvaccination. End points included the geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in VZV-specific IgG levels (primary end point) and T cells (number of spot-forming cells/10. One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive tofacitinib (n = 55) or placebo (n = 57). Six weeks postvaccination, the GMFR in VZV-specific IgG levels was 2.11 in the tofacitinib group and 1.74 in the placebo group, and the VZV-specific T cell GMFR was similar in the tofacitinib group and the placebo group (1.50 and 1.29, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients in the tofacitinib group (5.5%) and 0 patients (0.0%) in the placebo group. One patient, who lacked preexisting VZV immunity, developed cutaneous vaccine dissemination 2 days after starting tofacitinib (16 days postvaccination). This resolved after tofacitinib was discontinued and the patient received antiviral treatment.. Patients who began treatment with tofacitinib 2-3 weeks after receiving LZV had VZV-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to LZV similar to those in placebo-treated patients. Vaccination appeared to be safe in all of the patients except 1 patient who lacked preexisting VZV immunity.

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Viral; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay; Female; Herpes Zoster; Herpes Zoster Vaccine; Herpesvirus 3, Human; Humans; Immunogenicity, Vaccine; Immunoglobulin G; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocytes

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib or placebo in combination with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).. In a 12-month, phase III randomized controlled trial (ORAL Sync), patients (n = 795) with active RA and previous inadequate response to therapy with ≥1 conventional or biologic DMARD were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, placebo advanced to 5 mg BID, or placebo to 10 mg BID, in combination with stable background DMARD therapy. PROs included patient global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), patient assessment of arthritis pain (Pain), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index [HAQ DI]), health-related quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey [SF-36]), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F]), and sleep (Medical Outcomes Study Sleep [MOS Sleep]).. At month 3, statistically significant improvements from baseline versus placebo were reported in PtGA, Pain, HAQ DI, all 8 SF-36 domains, FACIT-F, and MOS Sleep with tofacitinib 10 mg BID, and in PtGA, Pain, HAQ DI, 7 SF-36 domains, FACIT-F, and MOS Sleep with tofacitinib 5 mg BID. Improvements were sustained to month 12. Significantly more tofacitinib-treated patients reported improvements of greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important differences at month 3 versus placebo in all PROs, except the SF-36 role-emotional domain (significant for tofacitinib 10 mg BID).. Patients with active RA treated with tofacitinib combined with background conventional DMARD therapy reported sustained, significant, and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recovery of Function; Remission Induction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post hoc analysis investigated the effect of methotrexate (MTX) dose on the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with RA. ORAL Scan (NCT00847613) was a 2-year, randomized, Phase 3 trial evaluating tofacitinib in MTX-inadequate responder (IR) patients with RA. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo, with low (≤12.5 mg/week), moderate (>12.5 to <17.5 mg/week), or high (≥17.5 mg/week) stable background MTX. Efficacy endpoints (at months 3 and 6) included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates, and mean change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-4(erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and modified Total Sharp score. 797 patients were treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID (N = 321), tofacitinib 10 mg BID (N = 316), or placebo (N = 160); 242, 333, and 222 patients received low, moderate, and high MTX doses, respectively. At months 3 and 6, ACR20/50/70 response rates were greater for both tofacitinib doses vs placebo across all MTX doses. At month 3, mean changes from baseline in CDAI and HAQ-DI were significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses vs placebo, irrespective of MTX category; improvements were maintained at month 6. Both tofacitinib doses demonstrated improvements in DAS28-4(ESR), and less structural progression vs placebo, across MTX doses at month 6. Tofacitinib plus MTX showed greater clinical and radiographic efficacy than placebo in MTX-IR patients with RA, regardless of MTX dose.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Sedimentation; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Regression Analysis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a novel respiratory illness firstly reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012. It is caused by a new corona virus, called MERS corona virus (MERS-CoV). Most people who have MERS-CoV infection developed severe acute respiratory illness.. This work is done to determine the clinical characteristics and the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients with confirmed MERS-CoV infection.. This study included 32 laboratory confirmed MERS corona virus infected patients who were admitted into ICU. It included 20 (62.50%) males and 12 (37.50%) females. The mean age was 43.99 ± 13.03 years. Diagnosis was done by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for corona virus on throat swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Clinical characteristics, co-morbidities and outcome were reported for all subjects.. Most MERS corona patients present with fever, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, runny nose and sputum. The presence of abdominal symptoms may indicate bad prognosis. Prolonged duration of symptoms before patients' hospitalization, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, bilateral radiological pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxemic respiratory failure were found to be strong predictors of mortality in such patients. Also, old age, current smoking, smoking severity, presence of associated co-morbidities like obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart diseases, COPD, malignancy, renal failure, renal transplantation and liver cirrhosis are associated with a poor outcome of ICU admitted MERS corona virus infected patients.. Plasma HO-1, ferritin, p21, and NQO1 were all elevated at baseline in CKD participants. Plasma HO-1 and urine NQO1 levels each inversely correlated with eGFR (. SnPP can be safely administered and, after its injection, the resulting changes in plasma HO-1, NQO1, ferritin, and p21 concentrations can provide information as to antioxidant gene responsiveness/reserves in subjects with and without kidney disease.. A Study with RBT-1, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease, NCT0363002 and NCT03893799.. HFNC did not significantly modify work of breathing in healthy subjects. However, a significant reduction in the minute volume was achieved, capillary [Formula: see text] remaining constant, which suggests a reduction in dead-space ventilation with flows > 20 L/min. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02495675).. 3 组患者手术时间、术中显性失血量及术后 1 周血红蛋白下降量比较差异均无统计学意义（. 对于肥胖和超重的膝关节单间室骨关节炎患者，采用 UKA 术后可获满意短中期疗效，远期疗效尚需进一步随访观察。.. Decreased muscle strength was identified at both time points in patients with hEDS/HSD. The evolution of most muscle strength parameters over time did not significantly differ between groups. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of different types of muscle training strategies in hEDS/HSD patients.. These findings support previous adverse findings of e-cigarette exposure on neurodevelopment in a mouse model and provide substantial evidence of persistent adverse behavioral and neuroimmunological consequences to adult offspring following maternal e-cigarette exposure during pregnancy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6067.. This RCT directly compares a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with a standard CROSS regimen in terms of overall survival for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The results of this RCT will provide an answer for the controversy regarding the survival benefits between the two treatment strategies.. NCT04138212, date of registration: October 24, 2019.. Results of current investigation indicated that milk type and post fermentation cooling patterns had a pronounced effect on antioxidant characteristics, fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and textural characteristics of yoghurt. Buffalo milk based yoghurt had more fat, protein, higher antioxidant capacity and vitamin content. Antioxidant and sensory characteristics of T. If milk is exposed to excessive amounts of light, Vitamins B. The two concentration of ZnO nanoparticles in the ambient air produced two different outcomes. The lower concentration resulted in significant increases in Zn content of the liver while the higher concentration significantly increased Zn in the lungs (p < 0.05). Additionally, at the lower concentration, Zn content was found to be lower in brain tissue (p < 0.05). Using TEM/EDX we detected ZnO nanoparticles inside the cells in the lungs, kidney and liver. Inhaling ZnO NP at the higher concentration increased the levels of mRNA of the following genes in the lungs: Mt2 (2.56 fold), Slc30a1 (1.52 fold) and Slc30a5 (2.34 fold). At the lower ZnO nanoparticle concentration, only Slc30a7 mRNA levels in the lungs were up (1.74 fold). Thus the two air concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles produced distinct effects on the expression of the Zn-homeostasis related genes.. Until adverse health effects of ZnO nanoparticles deposited in organs such as lungs are further investigated and/or ruled out, the exposure to ZnO nanoparticles in aerosols should be avoided or minimised.

Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adipogenesis; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Aeromonas hydrophila; Aerosols; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Agriculture; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Airway Remodeling; Alanine Transaminase; Albuminuria; Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Algorithms; AlkB Homolog 2, Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase; Alzheimer Disease; Amino Acid Sequence; Ammonia; Ammonium Compounds; Anaerobiosis; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antifungal Agents; Antigens, Bacterial; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antitubercular Agents; Antiviral Agents; Apolipoproteins E; Apoptosis; Arabidopsis; Arabidopsis Proteins; Arsenic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atherosclerosis; ATP-Dependent Proteases; Attitude of Health Personnel; Australia; Austria; Autophagy; Axitinib; Bacteria; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins; Bacterial Proteins; Bacterial Toxins; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Bariatric Surgery; Base Composition; Bayes Theorem; Benzoxazoles; Benzylamines; beta Catenin; Betacoronavirus; Betula; Binding Sites; Biological Availability; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Birth Weight; Blindness; Blood Chemical Analysis; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Blood-Brain Barrier; Blotting, Western; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Resorption; Borates; Brain; Brain Infarction; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Neoplasms; Breakfast; Breast Milk Expression; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchi; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Buffaloes; Cadherins; Calcification, Physiologic; Calcium Compounds; Calcium, Dietary; Cannula; Caprolactam; Carbon; Carbon Dioxide; Carboplatin; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Ductal; Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carps; Carrageenan; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Catalytic Domain; Cattle; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Adhesion; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Death; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Nucleus; Cell Phone Use; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Cells, Cultured; Cellulose; Chemical Phenomena; Chemoradiotherapy; Child; Child Development; Child, Preschool; China; Chitosan; Chlorocebus aethiops; Cholecalciferol; Chromatography, Liquid; Circadian Clocks; Circadian Rhythm; Circular Dichroism; Cisplatin; Citric Acid; Clinical Competence; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Coculture Techniques; Cohort Studies; Cold Temperature; Colitis; Collagen Type I; Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain; Collagen Type XI; Color; Connective Tissue Diseases; Copper; Coronary Angiography; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Counselors; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Creatine Kinase; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Cryosurgery; Crystallography, X-Ray; Cues; Cultural Competency; Cultural Diversity; Curriculum; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cycloparaffins; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytoprotection; Databases, Factual; Denitrification; Deoxycytidine; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Diatoms; Diet; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Exposure; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diketopiperazines; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA Glycosylases; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Bacterial; DNA, Viral; Docetaxel; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Liberation; Drug Repositioning; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Edible Grain; Education, Graduate; Education, Medical, Graduate; Education, Pharmacy; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Electron Transport Complex III; Electron Transport Complex IV; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Emergency Service, Hospital; Empathy; Emulsions; Endothelial Cells; Endurance Training; Energy Intake; Enterovirus A, Human; Environment; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Assays; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Epoxide Hydrolases; Epoxy Compounds; Erythrocyte Count; Erythrocytes; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Escherichia coli Proteins; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Esophagectomy; Estrogens; Etanercept; Ethiopia; Ethnicity; Ethylenes; Exanthema; Exercise; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Extracellular Matrix; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Eye Infections, Fungal; False Negative Reactions; Fatty Acids; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Feces; Female; Femur Neck; Fermentation; Ferritins; Fetal Development; Fibroblast Growth Factor-23; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Fibroblasts; Fibroins; Fish Proteins; Flavanones; Flavonoids; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Studies; Food Handling; Food Supply; Food, Formulated; Forced Expiratory Volume; Forests; Fractures, Bone; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Fusobacteria; G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Gamma Rays; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Gefitinib; Gels; Gemcitabine; Gene Amplification; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Gene-Environment Interaction; Genotype; Germany; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon; Glucocorticoids; Glycemic Control; Glycerol; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Glycolipids; Glycolysis; Goblet Cells; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Graphite; Greenhouse Effect; Guanidines; Haemophilus influenzae; HCT116 Cells; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Needs and Demand; Health Status Disparities; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Heart Transplantation; Heart-Assist Devices; HEK293 Cells; Heme; Heme Oxygenase-1; Hemolysis; Hemorrhage; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatocytes; Hexoses; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histidine; Histone Deacetylase 2; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Homebound Persons; Homeodomain Proteins; Homosexuality, Male; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Hydrogen; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypoxia; Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Imatinib Mesylate; Immunotherapy; Implementation Science; Incidence; INDEL Mutation; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Industrial Waste; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Infliximab; Infusions, Intravenous; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Injections; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-8; Internship and Residency; Intestines; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Ion Transport; Iridaceae; Iridoid Glucosides; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation; Isodon; Isoflurane; Isotopes; Italy; Joint Instability; Ketamine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Neoplasms; Kinetics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Knee Joint; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors; Lactate Dehydrogenase 5; Laparoscopy; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lasers, Solid-State; Laurates; Lead; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Light; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipopolysaccharides; Liposomes; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Locomotion; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Lubricants; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Lysosomes; Macrophages; Male; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Kinase 4; Mass Screening; Maternal Health; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma, Experimental; Memantine; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Proteins; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Metal Nanoparticles; Metalloendopeptidases; Metalloporphyrins; Methadone; Methane; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mexico; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Mice, Transgenic; Microarray Analysis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbiota; Micronutrients; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Confocal; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Milk; Milk, Human; Minority Groups; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Membranes; Mitochondrial Proteins; Models, Animal; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Molecular Epidemiology; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Multimodal Imaging; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscular Diseases; Mutation; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Myocardial Stunning; Myristates; NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone); Nanocomposites; Nanogels; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Naphthalenes; Nasal Cavity; National Health Programs; Necrosis; Needs Assessment; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neonicotinoids; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Netherlands; Neuroblastoma; Neuroprotective Agents; Neutrophils; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Nicotiana; Nicotine; Nitrates; Nitrification; Nitrites; Nitro Compounds; Nitrogen; Nitrogen Dioxide; North Carolina; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Nuclear Proteins; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Nucleosomes; Nutrients; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Oceans and Seas; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Oncogenes; Oocytes; Open Reading Frames; Osteoclasts; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Outpatients; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Overweight; Oxazines; Oxidants; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxidoreductases; Oxygen; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Oxygenators, Membrane; Ozone; Paclitaxel; Paenibacillus; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pandemics; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Particulate Matter; Pasteurization; Patient Preference; Patient Satisfaction; Pediatric Obesity; Permeability; Peroxiredoxins; Peroxynitrous Acid; Pharmaceutical Services; Pharmacists; Pharmacy; Phaseolus; Phenotype; Phoeniceae; Phosphates; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phospholipid Transfer Proteins; Phospholipids; Phosphorus; Phosphorylation; Photoperiod; Photosynthesis; Phylogeny; Physical Endurance; Physicians; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plant Proteins; Plant Roots; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Viral; Point-of-Care Testing; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymers; Polysorbates; Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postprandial Period; Poverty; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prediabetic State; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Pressure; Prevalence; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Primary Health Care; Professional Role; Professionalism; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Prolactin; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Proof of Concept Study; Proportional Hazards Models; Propylene Glycol; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Protein Binding; Protein Biosynthesis; Protein Isoforms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Phosphatase 2; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Protein Transport; Proteoglycans; Proteome; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Proton Pumps; Protons; Protoporphyrins; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Pulmonary Veins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Qualitative Research; Quinoxalines; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H3; Receptors, Immunologic; Receptors, Transferrin; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Reference Values; Referral and Consultation; Regional Blood Flow; Registries; Regulon; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Reperfusion Injury; Repressor Proteins; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Resistance Training; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Insufficiency; Resuscitation; Retinal Dehydrogenase; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Rhinitis, Allergic; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Rivers; RNA Interference; RNA-Seq; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; RNA, Small Interfering; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Rural Population; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salivary Ducts; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; San Francisco; SARS-CoV-2; Satiation; Satiety Response; Schools; Schools, Pharmacy; Seasons; Seawater; Selection, Genetic; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Serine-Threonine Kinase 3; Sewage; Sheep; Sheep, Domestic; Shock, Hemorrhagic; Signal Transduction; Silver; Silymarin; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Sirolimus; Sirtuin 1; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Social Class; Social Participation; Social Support; Soil; Soil Microbiology; Solutions; Somatomedins; Soot; Specimen Handling; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spinal Fractures; Spirometry; Staphylococcus aureus; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Streptomyces coelicolor; Stress, Psychological; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Medical; Students, Pharmacy; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Sulfur Dioxide; Surface Properties; Surface-Active Agents; Surveys and Questionnaires; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Survivin; Sweden; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Sympathetic Nervous System; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Talaromyces; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; tau Proteins; Telemedicine; Telomerase; Telomere; Telomere Homeostasis; Temperature; Terminally Ill; Th1 Cells; Thiamethoxam; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thioredoxin Reductase 1; Thrombosis; Thulium; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic; Thyroid Neoplasms; Time Factors; Titanium; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Transcription Factor AP-1; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation; Transcriptome; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Transistors, Electronic; Translational Research, Biomedical; Transplantation Tolerance; Transplantation, Homologous; Transportation; Treatment Outcome; Tretinoin; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Tubulin Modulators; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Twins; Ultrasonic Therapy; Ultrasonography; Ultraviolet Rays; United States; Up-Regulation; Uranium; Urethra; Urinary Bladder; Urodynamics; Uromodulin; Uveitis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Ventricular Function, Left; Vero Cells; Vesicular Transport Proteins; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Visual Acuity; Vital Capacity; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin K 2; Vitamins; Volatilization; Voriconazole; Waiting Lists; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Whole Genome Sequencing; Wine; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries; WW Domains; X-linked Nuclear Protein; X-Ray Diffraction; Xanthines; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; YAP-Signaling Proteins; Yogurt; Young Adult; Zebrafish; Zebrafish Proteins; Ziziphus

To evaluate tofacitinib's effect upon pneumococcal and influenza vaccine immunogenicity.. We conducted two studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV-23) and the 2011-2012 trivalent influenza vaccine. In study A, tofacitinib-naive patients were randomised to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or placebo, stratified by background methotrexate and vaccinated 4 weeks later. In study B, patients already receiving tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (with or without methotrexate) were randomised into two groups: those continuing ('continuous') or interrupting ('withdrawn') tofacitinib for 2 weeks, and then vaccinated 1 week after randomisation. In both studies, titres were measured 35 days after vaccination. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a satisfactory response to pneumococcus (twofold or more titre increase against six or more of 12 pneumococcal serotypes) and influenza (fourfold or more titre increase against two or more of three influenza antigens).. In study A (N=200), fewer tofacitinib patients (45.1%) developed satisfactory pneumococcal responses versus placebo (68.4%), and pneumococcal titres were lower with tofacitinib (particularly with methotrexate). Similar proportions of tofacitinib-treated and placebo-treated patients developed satisfactory influenza responses (56.9% and 62.2%, respectively), although fewer tofacitinib patients (76.5%) developed protective influenza titres (≥1:40 in two or more of three antigens) versus placebo (91.8%). In study B (N=183), similar proportions of continuous and withdrawn patients had satisfactory responses to PPSV-23 (75.0% and 84.6%, respectively) and influenza (66.3% and 63.7%, respectively).. Among patients starting tofacitinib, diminished responsiveness to PPSV-23, but not influenza, was observed, particularly in those taking concomitant methotrexate. Among existing tofacitinib users, temporary drug discontinuation had limited effect upon influenza or PPSV-23 vaccine responses.. NCT01359150, NCT00413699.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Young Adult

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and in patients with an IR to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR).. Data were taken from phase II and phase III studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other csDMARDs. Efficacy endpoints and incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were assessed.. 2812 bDMARD-naive and 705 bDMARD-IR patients were analysed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups within subpopulations. Across subpopulations, improvements in efficacy parameters at month 3 were generally significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Clinical response was numerically greater with bDMARD-naive versus bDMARD-IR patients (overlapping 95% CIs). Rates of safety events of special interest were generally similar between tofacitinib doses and subpopulations; however, patients receiving glucocorticoids had more serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events and herpes zoster. Numerically greater clinical responses and incidence rates of AEs of special interest were generally reported for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (overlapping 95% CIs).. Tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in both bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-IR patients with RA. Clinical response to tofacitinib was generally numerically greater in bDMARD-naive than bDMARD-IR patients. The safety profile appeared similar between subpopulations.. (NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385).

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Here, tofacitinib safety and efficacy data from a long-term extension study in Japanese patients are presented.. Study A3921041 was a multi-centre, open-label, long-term extension study that included Japanese patients who had participated in a prior Phase 2 or Phase 3 study of tofacitinib as monotherapy or with background methotrexate. Patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Dose adjustment of tofacitinib during treatment period, and concomitant usage of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs including methotrexate after week 12 were permitted. Primary endpoints were adverse events, laboratory parameters and vital signs. Secondary efficacy endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 response rates, Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-4(erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR))<2.6 response rate (DAS-defined remission) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score. Safety and efficacy data were assessed throughout the study.. A total of 486 patients were recruited and treated (1439.9 patient-years of exposure). 308 patients completed the study. Median (range) duration of treatment in this extension study was 1185 (5-2016) days. 476 patients (97.9 %) experienced adverse events; the majority of which (97.8 %) were of mild or moderate severity. The two most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (n = 293, 60.3 %) and herpes zoster (n = 94, 19.3 %). For all tofacitinib-treated patients, the incidence rate (patients with events per 100 patient-years) was 10.7 for serious adverse events, 3.3 for serious infections, 7.4 for herpes zoster (serious and non-serious) and 1.2 for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). Mean changes from baseline (start of the index study) in laboratory parameters were consistent with those seen in previously reported studies of tofacitinib. ACR20/50/70 response rates, DAS-defined remission rates and HAQ-DI scores were sustained through to study completion.. Tofacitinib (with or without background methotrexate) demonstrated a stable safety profile and sustained efficacy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. The risk of herpes zoster appears to be higher in Japanese patients treated with tofacitinib than in the global population.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00661661 . Registered 7 February 2008.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Japan; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate effects of tofacitinib or adalimumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate to severe RA and inadequate responses to MTX.. In this 12-month, phase 3, randomized controlled trial (ORAL Standard), patients (n = 717) receiving background MTX were randomized to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks or placebo. PROs included HAQ-Disability Index, Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain, health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 [SF-36]), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) and sleep (Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep).. At month 3, tofacitinib 10 mg BID treatment resulted in significant changes from baseline vs placebo across all PROs, sustained to month 12, with the highest number of patients reporting improvements ⩾minimum clinically important differences vs placebo (P < 0.05). Changes from baseline at month 3 with tofacitinib 5 mg BID and adalimumab were similar and statistically significant vs placebo across most PROs, excluding SF-36 Mental Component Score and Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health domains, with significantly more patients reporting improvements ⩾minimum clinically important differences. Numbers Needed to Treat were lowest for tofacitinib 10 mg BID and similar between tofacitinib 5 mg BID and adalimumab.. Patients with moderate to severe RA and inadequate responses to MTX reported improvements across a broad range of PROs with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID and adalimumab that were significantly superior to placebo.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To explore the effects of tofacitinib-an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-with or without methotrexate (MTX), on MRI endpoints in MTX-naive adult patients with early active RA and synovitis in an index wrist or hand.. In this exploratory, phase 2, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily + MTX, tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily + placebo (tofacitinib monotherapy), or MTX + placebo (MTX monotherapy), for 1 year. MRI endpoints (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI score (RAMRIS), quantitative RAMRIS (RAMRIQ) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI) were assessed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Treatment differences with p<0.05 (vs MTX monotherapy) were considered significant.. In total, 109 patients were randomised and treated. Treatment differences in RAMRIS bone marrow oedema (BME) at month 6 were -1.55 (90% CI -2.52 to -0.58) for tofacitinib + MTX and -1.74 (-2.72 to -0.76) for tofacitinib monotherapy (both p<0.01 vs MTX monotherapy). Numerical improvements in RAMRIS synovitis at month 3 were -0.63 (-1.58 to 0.31) for tofacitinib + MTX and -0.52 (-1.46 to 0.41) for tofacitinib monotherapy (both p>0.05 vs MTX monotherapy). Treatment differences in RAMRIQ synovitis were statistically significant at month 3, consistent with DCE MRI findings. Less deterioration of RAMRIS and RAMRIQ erosive damage was seen at months 6 and 12 in both tofacitinib groups versus MTX monotherapy.. These results provide consistent evidence using three different MRI technologies that tofacitinib treatment leads to early reduction of inflammation and inhibits progression of structural damage.. NCT01164579.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Density; Bone Marrow; Bone Marrow Diseases; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Female; Hand; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Synovitis; Treatment Outcome; Wrist Joint

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of open-label tofacitinib following blinded treatment with adalimumab or tofacitinib for moderate to severe RA.. Analyses included patients treated with adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) with background methotrexate (MTX) in a 12-month randomized study (NCT00853385), who subsequently received tofacitinib 10 mg BID (with/without background MTX) in an open-label extension (NCT00413699). Patients with treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) and serious or recurrent infections in the index study were excluded from the extension study. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of safety-related events were assessed in 3-month and 12-month periods in the year before and in the year after switching. Efficacy was assessed 3 months before, at the time of, and 3 months after switching.. There were 233 (107 adalimumab to tofacitinib 10 mg BID, 126 blinded to open-label tofacitinib 10 mg BID) patients included in these analyses. Patients in both treatment sequences had similar incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) of discontinuation due to AEs, serious AEs, and serious infections in the year before and in the year after switching. Incidence rates of AEs were increased in the first 3 months after switching compared with the last 3 months before switching in both treatment groups. Switching from either blinded adalimumab or tofacitinib to open-label tofacitinib resulted in numerically higher incidence of responders for signs and symptoms of disease and improved physical function.. Treatment can be directly switched from adalimumab to tofacitinib. A similar safety and efficacy profile was seen when patients received open-label tofacitinib after receiving either blinded adalimumab or tofacitinib.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00853385 , registered 27 February 2009; NCT00413699 , registered 18 December 2006.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tofacitinib, an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in a 6-month, phase III, randomized controlled trial.. Patients ages ≥18 years with active RA with an inadequate response to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and receiving stable background methotrexate were randomized 2:2:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily at month 3. PROs measured at month 3 included patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI), Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2; acute), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and MOS Sleep Scale.. Patients received tofacitinib 5 mg (n = 133) or 10 mg (n = 134) or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 mg (n = 66) or 10 mg (n = 66). HAQ DI (reported previously), PtGA (P < 0.0001), and SF-36v2 physical and mental component summary (P < 0.05) scores were improved for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Furthermore, improvements greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference were more frequently reported by tofacitinib-treated patients versus placebo for PtGA (P < 0.05), pain (P < 0.0001), HAQ DI (P < 0.05), SF-36v2 physical and mental component summary scores (P < 0.05), and FACIT-F (P < 0.001 for 5 mg twice daily). No statistical differences were observed in the MOS Sleep Scale.. Tofacitinib treatment resulted in significant, clinically meaningful improvements in multiple PROs versus placebo over 3 months of treatment in patients with active RA and a previous inadequate response to TNFi.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Self Report; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The pathways affected by tofacitinib and the effects on gene expression in situ are unknown. Therefore, tofacitinib effects on synovial pathobiology were investigated.. A randomised, double-blind, phase II serial synovial biopsy study (A3921073; NCT00976599) in patients with RA with an inadequate methotrexate response. Patients on background methotrexate received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or placebo for 28 days. Synovial biopsies were performed on Days -7 and 28 and analysed by immunoassay or quantitative PCR. Clinical response was determined by disease activity score and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response on Day 28 in A3921073, and at Month 3 in a long-term extension study (A3921024; NCT00413699).. Tofacitinib exposure led to EULAR moderate to good responses (11/14 patients), while placebo was ineffective (1/14 patients) on Day 28. Tofacitinib treatment significantly reduced synovial mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-3 (p<0.05) and chemokines CCL2, CXCL10 and CXCL13 (p<0.05). No overall changes were observed in synovial inflammation score or the presence of T cells, B cells or macrophages. Changes in synovial phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT3 strongly correlated with 4-month clinical responses (p<0.002). Tofacitinib significantly decreased plasma CXCL10 (p<0.005) at Day 28 compared with placebo.. Tofacitinib reduces metalloproteinase and interferon-regulated gene expression in rheumatoid synovium, and clinical improvement correlates with reductions in STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation. JAK1-mediated interferon and interleukin-6 signalling likely play a key role in the synovial response.. NCT00976599.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chemokines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 1; Matrix Metalloproteinase 3; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Synovial Membrane; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Systemic inflammation is proposed to play a fundamental role in the altered lipid metabolism associated with RA; however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We undertook this study to compare cholesterol and lipoprotein kinetics in patients with active RA with those in matched healthy volunteers.. This was a phase I open-label mechanism-of-action study. Cholesterol and lipoprotein kinetics were assessed with (13) C-cholesterol and (13) C-leucine infusions. RA patients were reevaluated after receiving oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 6 weeks.. Levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) as well as HDL cholesterol particle number were lower in RA patients (n = 36) than in healthy volunteers (n = 33). In contrast, the cholesterol ester fractional catabolic rate was higher in RA patients, but no differences were observed in cholesterol ester transfer protein, cholesterol ester production rate, HDL-associated Apo A-I fractional catabolic rate, or LDL-associated Apo B fractional catabolic rate. Following tofacitinib treatment in RA patients, the cholesterol ester fractional catabolic rate decreased and cholesterol levels increased. The decrease in cholesterol ester fractional catabolic rate correlated significantly with the increase in HDL cholesterol. Additionally, HDL cholesterol particle number increased and markers of HDL cholesterol function improved.. This is the first study to assess cholesterol and lipoprotein kinetics in patients with active RA and matched healthy volunteers. The data suggest that low cholesterol levels in patients with active RA may be driven by increases in cholesterol ester catabolism. Tofacitinib treatment reduced cholesterol ester catabolism, thereby increasing cholesterol levels toward those in healthy volunteers, and markers of antiatherogenic HDL function improved.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biomarkers; Cholesterol; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Hungary; Lipoproteins; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Young Adult

To evaluate oral tofacitinib versus placebo for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, 12-week, phase 2 study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00687193), 317 patients received tofacitinib: 1, 3, 5, 10, or 15 mg as monotherapy or placebo twice daily (BID).. response rate by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ≥ 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 12.. ACR20 response rates: 37.7% (20/53), 67.9% (36/53), 73.1% (38/52), 84.9% (45/53), and 90.7% (49/54) with tofacitinib: 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 mg BID, respectively, versus 15.4% (8/52) with placebo (p < 0.01; all doses). Dose-dependent ACR20 responses with tofacitinib versus placebo occurred from week 2 onward (p < 0.05). Changes from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate improved with tofacitinib versus placebo from week 4 (p < 0.01; all doses). Six tofacitinib patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs). Most common treatment-emergent AEs: nasopharyngitis (10% vs 12%) and hyperlipidemia (5% vs 0%). Serum creatinine, hemoglobin, and total-, low-, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels increased with tofacitinib.. Tofacitinib produced dose-dependent ACR20 responses and reduced disease activity. The safety profile was consistent with that reported from global monotherapy trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). During the clinical development programme, increases in mean serum creatinine (SCr) of approximately 0.07 mg/dL and 0.08 mg/dL were observed which plateaued early. This study assessed changes in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) with tofacitinib relative to placebo in patients with active RA.. This was a randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study (NCT01484561). Patients were aged ≥18 years with active RA. Patients were randomised 2:1 to oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) in Period 1 then placebo BID in Period 2 (tofacitinib → placebo); or oral placebo BID in both Periods (placebo → placebo). Change in mGFR was evaluated by iohexol serum clearance at four time points (run-in, pre-dose in Period 1, Period 1 end, and Period 2 end). The primary endpoint was the change in mGFR from baseline to Period 1 end. Secondary endpoints included: change in mGFR at other time points; change in estimated GFR (eGFR; Cockcroft-Gault equation) and SCr; efficacy; and safety.. 148 patients were randomised to tofacitinib → placebo (N = 97) or placebo → placebo (N = 51). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. A reduction of 8% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 14%) from baseline in adjusted geometric mean mGFR was observed during tofacitinib treatment in Period 1 vs placebo. During Period 2, mean mGFR returned towards baseline during placebo treatment, and there was no difference between the two treatment groups at the end of the study--ratio (tofacitinib → placebo/placebo → placebo) of adjusted geometric mean fold change of mGFR was 1.04 (90% CI: 0.97, 1.11). Post-hoc analyses, focussed on mGFR variability in placebo → placebo patients, were consistent with this conclusion. At study end, similar results were observed for eGFR and SCr. Clinical efficacy and safety were consistent with prior studies.. Increases in mean SCr and decreases in eGFR in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA may occur in parallel with decreases in mean mGFR; mGFR returned towards baseline after tofacitinib discontinuation, with no significant difference vs placebo, even after post-hoc analyses. Safety monitoring will continue in ongoing and future clinical studies and routine pharmacovigilance.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01484561. Registered 30 November 2011.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Creatinine; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Young Adult

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.. In this 6-month, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 611 patients with inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD-IR) were randomized 4:4:1:1 to receive: tofacitinib 5 mg BID or tofacitinib 10 mg BID for the duration of the study, or placebo for 3 months followed by tofacitinib 5 mg BID or tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included: Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA); Patient Assessment of Pain (Pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS) Short Form-36 (SF-36); Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F); and MOS Sleep Scale. Time-to-event data (PtGA and Pain) were collected using an interactive voice response system daily diary (baseline through day 14).. At month 3, tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID demonstrated statistically significant improvements versus placebo in PtGA (both p < 0.0001), Pain (both p < 0.0001), HAQ-DI (both p < 0.0001), SF-36 Physical (p < 0.0001) and Mental (p < 0.05 [5 mg BID] and p < 0.0001 [10 mg BID]), Component Summary scores and all domain scores (p < 0.05-p < 0.0001) and FACIT-F (both p < 0.0001). Statistically significant changes from baseline in MOS Sleep Scale were reported for 10 mg BID (p < 0.05). Benefits of tofacitinib treatment were rapid in onset and significant improvements were reported at week 2 for PtGA, Pain and HAQ-DI, and differentiation from baseline was seen as early as 3 days after treatment initiation for interactive voice response system (IVRS) PtGA and IVRS Pain. The numbers needed to treat for patients to report changes greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference in PtGA, Pain, HAQ-DI, SF-36 Physical Component Summary score and FACIT-F ranged between 4.0-6.1 (5 mg BID) and 3.2-5.0 (10 mg BID).. Tofacitinib monotherapy in DMARD-IR patients resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in multiple PROs versus placebo at month 3, with sustained improvements over 6 months.. Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT00814307 , registered 22 December 2008.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Self Report; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus placebo in modifying lipids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving the oral Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib.. A randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre phase 2 study, open-label for tofacitinib and blinded for atorvastatin. Patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks; at week 6, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral atorvastatin 10 mg once daily or placebo for 6 weeks. Main outcome measures were lipid moieties, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates, disease activity score in 28 joint counts and safety.. 111 patients meeting ACR 1987 RA criteria with active disease were enrolled. Tofacitinib-induced elevation of mean total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein A-1 concentrations were sustained in placebo recipients to week 12; atorvastatin added at week 6 significantly reduced tofacitinib-associated increases in total and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B to below week 0 levels. Co-administration of atorvastatin resulted in a significant reduction of LDL-cholesterol versus placebo (primary endpoint; p<0.0001); from week 6 to week 12 the least squares mean reduction was 35.3% with atorvastatin, versus 5.8% increase with placebo. ACR responses were observed with tofacitinib; numerically greater rates were seen with atorvastatin versus placebo. Adverse events were consistent with phase 3 studies.. Tofacitinib-associated elevated total and LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were rapidly and significantly reduced by atorvastatin. Further investigation is required to explore the significance of reductions in RA disease activity in patients receiving tofacitinib and atorvastatin. (Pfizer protocol A3921109).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Atorvastatin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heptanoic Acids; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Placebos; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effects of tofacitinib on T lymphocytes in RA patients with a special focus on efficacy and infectious adverse events (iAEs).. Forty-four RA patients participated in 12-month phase II/III randomized clinical trials and an open-label extension trial. Peripheral lymphocyte subsets and in vitro CD4(+) T lymphocyte proliferation were measured in 23 patients of 44 at baseline and at the end of the 12-month trial.. Forty-four patients [35 females, age 54.3 years, disease duration 84.3 months, simplified disease activity index (SDAI) 36.5, CRP 24.9 mg/l, ESR 53 mm/h, MMP-3 284 pg/ml, RF 172.6 IU/ml, neutrophil count 4842 per μl, lymphocyte count 1410 per μl] were treated with tofacitinib. At the end of the study, the SDAI improved to 6.2, but the peripheral lymphocyte count and absolute numbers of CD4(+) and CD8(+) subpopulations did not change during this period. However, CD4(+) T lymphocyte proliferation was suppressed, which correlated with the improvement in SDAI, but not with iAEs (n = 19) during the 12-month treatment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a CD8(+) T lymphocyte count ≤ 211 per μl at baseline as a significant predictor of clinically significant iAEs.. The efficacy of tofacitinib is mediated through the suppression of CD4(+) T lymphocyte proliferation without affecting the absolute number of these cells in the periphery. A low CD8(+) T cell count at baseline correlated with the development of iAEs during the treatment of RA patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Count; Cell Proliferation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib is currently being investigated as a disease-modifying agent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the in-vivo effects of tofacitinib treatment for 4 weeks on elevated circulating acute-phase serum amyloid (SAA) levels in 14 Japanese patients with RA. SAA levels fell from 110·5 ± 118·5 μg/ml (mean ± standard deviation) at treatment initiation to 15·3 ± 13·3 μg/ml after 4 weeks treatment with tofacitinib. The reduction in SAA levels was greater in patients receiving tofacitinib plus methotrexate compared with those receiving tofacitinib monotherapy. Tofacitinib was also associated with reduced serum interleukin (IL)-6, but had no effect on serum levels of soluble IL-6 receptor. Patients were divided into groups with adequate (normalization) and inadequate SAA responses (without normalization). Serum IL-6 levels were reduced more in the group with adequate SAA response compared with those with inadequate SAA response. These results suggest that tofacitinib down-regulates the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-6, accompanied by reduced serum SAA levels in patients with active RA. The ability to regulate elevated serum IL-6 and SAA levels may explain the anti-inflammatory activity of tofacitinib.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; C-Reactive Protein; Double-Blind Method; Down-Regulation; Female; Humans; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Placebos; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Interleukin-6; Serum Amyloid A Protein

Methotrexate is the most frequently used first-line antirheumatic drug. We report the findings of a phase 3 study of monotherapy with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as compared with methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate.. We randomly assigned 958 patients to receive 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or methotrexate at a dose that was incrementally increased to 20 mg per week over 8 weeks; 956 patients received a study drug. The coprimary end points at month 6 were the mean change from baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (which ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) and the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response (≥70% reduction in the number of both tender and swollen joints and ≥70% improvement in three of five other criteria: the patient's assessment of pain, level of disability, C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, global assessment of disease by the patient, and global assessment of disease by the physician).. Mean changes in the modified total Sharp score from baseline to month 6 were significantly smaller in the tofacitinib groups than in the methotrexate group, but changes were modest in all three groups (0.2 points in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and <0.1 point in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 0.8 points in the methotrexate group [P<0.001 for both comparisons]). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib, 25.5% in the 5-mg group and 37.7% in the 10-mg group had an ACR 70 response at month 6, as compared with 12.0% of patients in the methotrexate group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Herpes zoster developed in 31 of 770 patients who received tofacitinib (4.0%) and in 2 of 186 patients who received methotrexate (1.1%). Confirmed cases of cancer (including three cases of lymphoma) developed in 5 patients who received tofacitinib and in 1 patient who received methotrexate. Tofacitinib was associated with increases in creatinine levels and in low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.. In patients who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate, tofacitinib monotherapy was superior to methotrexate in reducing signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage. The benefits of tofacitinib need to be considered in the context of the risks of adverse events. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Start ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01039688.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cholesterol; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Small increases in mean serum creatinine (SCr) were observed in studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients during tofacitinib treatment. These SCr changes were investigated and potential mechanisms explored.. SCr values and renal adverse event data were pooled from five Phase 3 and two long-term extension (LTE) studies. Dose-response relationships and association with inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP)) were explored using Phase 2 data and confirmed with Phase 3 data.. In Phase 3, least squares mean SCr differences from placebo at Month 3 were 0.02 and 0.04 mg/dl for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) (P <0.05), respectively. During Months 0 to 3, confirmed SCr ≥33% increases over baseline were reported in 17 (1.4%; 5 mg BID) and 23 (1.9%; 10 mg BID) patients. Generally, elevations plateaued and remained within normal limits throughout Phase 3 and LTE studies. Exposure-response modeling demonstrated small, reversible effects of tofacitinib on mean SCr, and significant (P <0.05) effects of CRP on model parameters. Phase 3 data confirmed that patients with higher baseline CRP or greater CRP decreases following tofacitinib treatment had the largest increases in SCr. Across Phase 3 and LTE studies, 22 tofacitinib-treated patients had clinical acute renal failure (ARF), predominantly in the setting of concurrent serious illness.. Tofacitinib treatment was associated with small, reversible mean increases in SCr that plateaued early. The mechanism behind these SCr changes remains unknown, but may involve effects of tofacitinib on inflammation. ARF occurred infrequently, was associated with concurrent serious illness, and was unrelated to prior SCr increases.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; C-Reactive Protein; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The constitutional isomers and tautomers of oxadiazolones, as well as their mono- and disulfur analogues, were calculated at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ level. Four groups of 30 molecules each were considered: oxadiazolone, oxadiazolthione, thiadiazolone, and thiadiazolthione isomers. The compounds were categorized into six groups according to permutations of three heteroatoms in the five-membered ring. Additionally, each of the constitutional isomer was considered to have five tautomers conserving stable five-membered ring: two NH tautomers, two rotameric OH (or SH) forms and one CH. La trombocitosis es un hallazgo casual frecuente en pediatría. En niños, predominan las formas secundarias, siendo las infecciones su causa más prevalente. Se distinguen 4 grados de trombocitosis en función del número de plaquetas; en la forma extrema, se supera el 1.000.000/mm. Endoscopic thrombin injection was similar to glue injection in achieving successful hemostasis of AGVH. However, a higher incidence of complications may be associated with glue injection.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Allyl Compounds; Amylopectin; Amylose; Anaerobiosis; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anura; Arginase; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atmosphere; B-Lymphocytes; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Bioelectric Energy Sources; Biofilms; Biofuels; Biomarkers; Biopolymers; Bioreactors; Brain; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Breast Neoplasms; Calibration; Carbon Tetrachloride; Caspase 3; Catalysis; Catechin; Cations; Cattle; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Body; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Plasticity; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chemistry Techniques, Synthetic; China; Chitosan; Chloride Channels; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromosome Mapping; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cohort Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colloids; Coloring Agents; Congresses as Topic; Correlation of Data; Crystallization; Cyanoacrylates; Cyclohexane Monoterpenes; Cyprinidae; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1; Death, Sudden; Dent Disease; Dietary Supplements; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease Resistance; Disulfides; Drug Monitoring; Drug Stability; Ecotoxicology; Electricity; Electrodes; Endocytosis; Environmental Exposure; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Esters; Fagopyrum; Female; Ferrosoferric Oxide; Flame Retardants; Flavobacteriaceae; Flow Cytometry; Follow-Up Studies; Formoterol Fumarate; Fusarium; Garlic; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gene Expression; Genes, Plant; Genetic Markers; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein; Gliosis; Global Health; Glutathione Transferase; Glycine max; Gum Arabic; Hemostasis, Endoscopic; Hepatocytes; Hippocampus; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Illinois; Immunoglobulin G; Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Interleukin-4; Iowa; Iron; Ki-67 Antigen; Kidney; Kinetics; Kynurenine; Lakes; Levofloxacin; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipids; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental; Magnetic Fields; Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles; Male; Manure; Maze Learning; Memory, Short-Term; Metal Nanoparticles; Metals, Heavy; Methane; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Michigan; Microalgae; Microbial Consortia; Mitochondria; Models, Animal; Models, Chemical; Models, Neurological; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Mutation; Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells; NADPH Oxidase 2; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurites; Neurons; Neuroprotective Agents; NF-kappa B; NIH 3T3 Cells; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Nitrogen; Ohio; Ointments; Ontario; Organelle Biogenesis; Organophosphates; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oxidative Stress; Palladium; Particle Size; Pectins; Phenotype; Phytotherapy; Piperidines; Placenta; Plant Diseases; Plant Extracts; Polymers; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polyphenols; Powders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Structure, Secondary; Proteins; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Rats, Wistar; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon; Receptors, Chemokine; Receptors, Formyl Peptide; Receptors, Lipoxin; Recovery of Function; Recurrence; Reference Standards; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory Function Tests; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sewage; Signal Transduction; Sodium Glutamate; Soil; Solanum tuberosum; Solubility; Solutions; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spermatozoa; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfamethoxazole; Tea; Temperature; Thermodynamics; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; United States; Viscosity; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Water Purification; White Matter; Wisconsin; X-Ray Diffraction; Zea mays

Tofacitinib, a novel Janus kinase inhibitor, may prevent structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this cohort study, we compared radiographic progression of hand joints between 21 RA patients who took tofacitinb for 18 months in a phase IIb and its extension study and 42 patients who took conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), using simple erosion narrowing score. For tofacitinib group, changes before and after the treatment were also compared. The changes of erosion and sum scores were significantly less in tofacitinib than DMARDs group (for erosion, -0.60 ± 1.83 vs 0.51 ± 1.77, P = 0.038; for sum, -0.50 ± 1.72 vs 1.57 ± 4.13, P = 0.012). Joint space narrowing score (JSN) was also less in tofacitinib group (0.095 ± 0.58 vs 1.06 ± 2.60, P = 0.055). In tofacitinib group, yearly rates of both erosion and JSN were significantly decreased after administration of tofacitinib (For erosion, 0.62 ± 0.93 to -0.14 ± 0.48, P = 0.009; for JSN, 0.47 ± 0.64 to 0.03 ± 0.40, P = 0.032), as was change of sum score (1.09 ± 1.27 to -0.10 ± 0.63, P < 0.001). In conclusion, tofacitinib may prevent structural damage caused by RA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Radiography; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not achieve adequate and safe responses with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Tofacitinib is a novel, oral, Janus kinase inhibitor that treats RA.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic DMARDs.. 1-year, double-blind, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00856544).. 114 centers in 19 countries.. 792 patients with active RA despite nonbiologic DMARD therapy.. Patients were randomly assigned 4:4:1:1 to oral tofacitinib, 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo advanced to tofacitinib, 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily.. Primary end points were 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria; Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) of less than 2.6; DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission, change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, and safety assessments.. Mean treatment differences for ACR20 response rates (month 6) for the 5-mg and 10-mg tofacitinib groups compared with the combined placebo groups were 21.2% (95% CI, 12.2% to 30.3%; P < 0.001) and 25.8% (CI, 16.8% to 34.8%; P < 0.001), respectively. The HAQ-DI scores (month 3) and DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6 response rates (month 6) were also superior in the tofacitinib groups versus placebo. The incidence rates of serious adverse events for patients receiving 5-mg tofacitinib, 10-mg tofacitinib, or placebo were 6.9, 7.3, or 10.9 events per 100 patient-years of exposure, respectively. In the tofacitinib groups, 2 cases of tuberculosis, 2 cases of other opportunistic infections, 3 cardiovascular events, and 4 deaths occurred. Neutrophil counts decreased, hemoglobin and low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased, and serum creatinine levels had small increases in the tofacitinib groups.. Placebo groups were smaller and of shorter duration. Patients received primarily methotrexate. The ability to assess drug combinations other than tofacitinib plus methotrexate was limited.. Tofacitinib improved disease control in patients with active RA despite treatment with nonbiologic DMARDs, primarily methotrexate.. Pfizer.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous chronic disease, and no therapeutic agent has been identified which is universally and persistently effective in all patients. We investigated the effectiveness of tofacitinib (CP-690,550), a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as a targeted immunomodulator and disease-modifying therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.. We did a 6-month, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study at 82 centres in 13 countries, including North America, Europe, and Latin America. 399 patients aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1:1 ratio with an automated internet or telephone system to receive twice a day treatment with: tofacitinib 5 mg (n=133); tofacitinib 10 mg (n=134); or placebo (n=132), all with methotrexate. At month 3, patients given placebo advanced to either tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (n=66) or 10 mg twice a day (n=66). Primary endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response rate, mean change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and rates of disease activity score (DAS)28-4(ESR) less than 2·6 (referred to as DAS28<2·6), all at month 3. The full analysis set for the primary analysis included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline assessment. This trial is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00960440.. At month 3, ACR20 response rates were 41·7% (55 of 132 [95% CI vs placebo 6·06-28·41]; p=0·0024) for tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day and 48·1% (64 of 133; [12·45-34·92]; p<0·0001) for tofacitinib 10 mg twice a day versus 24·4% (32 of 131) for placebo. Improvements from baseline in HAQ-DI were -0·43 ([-0·36 to -0·15]; p<0·0001) for 5 mg twice a day and -0·46 ([-0·38 to -0·17]; p<0·0001) for 10 mg twice a day tofacitinib versus -0·18 for placebo; DAS28<2·6 rates were 6·7% (eight of 119; [0-10·10]; p=0·0496) for 5 mg twice a day tofacitinib and 8·8% (11 of 125 [1·66-12·60]; p=0·0105) for 10 mg twice a day tofacitinib versus 1·7% (two of 120) for placebo. Safety was consistent with phase 2 and 3 studies. The most common adverse events in months 0-3 were diarrhoea (13 of 267; 4·9%), nasopharyngitis (11 of 267; 4·1%), headache (11 of 267; 4·1%), and urinary tract infection (eight of 267; 3·0%) across tofacitinib groups, and nausea (nine of 132; 6·8%) in the placebo group.. In this treatment-refractory population, tofacitinib with methotrexate had rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and physical function over 6 months with manageable safety. Tofacitinib could provide an effective treatment option in patients with an inadequate response to TNFi.. Pfizer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The purpose of this 24-month phase III study was to examine structural preservation with tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Data from a planned 12-month interim analysis are reported.. In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, patients receiving background MTX were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily, placebo to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, and placebo to tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily. At month 3, nonresponder placebo-treated patients were advanced in a blinded manner to receive tofacitinib as indicated above; remaining placebo-treated patients were advanced at 6 months. Four primary efficacy end points were all analyzed in a step-down procedure.. At month 6, response rates according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were higher than those for placebo (51.5% and 61.8%, respectively, versus 25.3%; both P < 0.0001). At month 6, least squares mean (LSM) changes in total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 0.12 and 0.06, respectively, versus 0.47 for placebo (P = 0.0792 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively). At month 3, LSM changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were -0.40 (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and -0.54 (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus -0.15 for placebo. At month 6, rates of remission (defined as a value <2.6 for the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 7.2% (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and 16.0% (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus 1.6% for placebo. The safety profile was consistent with findings in previous studies.. Data from this 12-month interim analysis demonstrate that tofacitinib inhibits progression of structural damage and improves disease activity in patients with RA who are receiving MTX.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Motor Activity; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Radiography; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 5 doses of oral tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy with placebo for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.. In this 24-week, double-blind, phase IIb study, patients with RA (n = 384) were randomized to receive placebo, tofacitinib at 1, 3, 5, 10, or 15 mg administered orally twice a day, or adalimumab at 40 mg injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks (total of 6 injections) followed by oral tofacitinib at 5 mg twice a day for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the responder rate according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 12.. Treatment with tofacitinib at a dose of ≥3 mg twice a day resulted in a rapid response with significant efficacy when compared to placebo, as indicated by the primary end point (ACR20 response at week 12), achieved in 39.2% (3 mg; P ≤ 0.05), 59.2% (5 mg; P < 0.0001), 70.5% (10 mg; P < 0.0001), and 71.9% (15 mg; P < 0.0001) in the tofacitinib group and 35.9% of patients in the adalimumab group (P = 0.105), compared with 22.0% of patients receiving placebo. Improvements were sustained at week 24, according to the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates as well as classifications of remission according to the 3-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) using C-reactive protein and the 4-variable DAS28 using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in patients across all tofacitinib treatment arms (n = 272) were urinary tract infection (7.7%), diarrhea (4.8%), headache (4.8%), and bronchitis (4.8%).. Tofacitinib monotherapy at ≥3 mg twice a day was efficacious in the treatment of patients with active RA over 24 weeks and demonstrated a manageable safety profile.

Topics: Adalimumab; Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Drug Tolerance; Female; Health Status; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Janus Kinase 3; Joints; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recovery of Function

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 6 dosages of oral tofacitinib (CP-690,550) with placebo for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients receiving a stable background regimen of methotrexate (MTX) who have an inadequate response to MTX monotherapy.. In this 24-week, double-blind, phase IIb study, patients with active RA (n = 507) were randomized to receive placebo or tofacitinib (20 mg/day, 1 mg twice daily, 3 mg twice daily, 5 mg twice daily, 10 mg twice daily, or 15 mg twice daily). All patients continued to receive a stable dosage of MTX. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12.. At week 12, ACR20 response rates for patients receiving all tofacitinib dosages ≥3 mg twice daily (52.9% for 3 mg twice daily, 50.7% for 5 mg twice daily, 58.1% for 10 mg twice daily, 56.0% for 15 mg twice daily, and 53.8% for 20 mg/day) were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater than those for placebo (33.3%). Improvements were sustained at week 24 for the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses, scores for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, the 3-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP), and a 3-variable DAS28-CRP of <2.6. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >10% of patients in any tofacitinib group were diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache; 21 patients (4.1%) experienced serious adverse events. Sporadic increases in transaminase levels, increases in cholesterol and serum creatinine levels, and decreases in neutrophil and hemoglobin levels were observed.. In patients with active RA in whom the response to MTX has been inadequate, the addition of tofacitinib at a dosage ≥3 mg twice daily showed sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile over 24 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Multiple cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The appropriate intracellular signalling pathways must be activated via cytokine receptors on the cell surface, and the tyrosine kinases transduce the first 'outside to in' signals to be phosphorylated after receptor binding to its ligand. Among them, members of the Janus kinase (JAK) family are essential for the signalling pathways of various cytokines and are implicated in the pathogenesis of RA. The in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo effects of a JAK inhibitor CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) for the treatment of RA are reported. In vitro experiments indicated that the effects of tofacitinib were mediated through suppression of interleukin 17 (IL-17) and interferon γ production and proliferation of CD4 T cells, presumably Th1 and Th17. A treatment study was conducted in the severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-HuRAg mice, an RA animal model using SCID mice implanted with synovium and cartilage from patients. Tofacitinib reduced serum levels of human IL-6 and IL-8 in the mice and also reduced synovial inflammation and invasion into the implanted cartilage. A phase 2 double-blind study using tofacitinib was carried out in Japanese patients with active RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). A total of 140 patients were randomised to tofacitinib 1, 3, 5, 10 mg or placebo twice daily and the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12, a primary end point, was significant for all tofacitinib treatment groups. Thus, an orally available tofacitinib in combination with MTX was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. Tofacitinib at 5 and 10 mg twice a day appears suitable for further evaluation to optimise the treatment of RA.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Isoenzymes; Janus Kinase 3; Mice; Mice, SCID; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated as a targeted immunomodulator and disease-modifying therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.. In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 6-month study, 611 patients were randomly assigned, in a 4:4:1:1 ratio, to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, placebo for 3 months followed by 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, or placebo for 3 months followed by 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily. The primary end points, assessed at month 3, were the percentage of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20), the change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores (which range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater disability), and the percentage of patients with a Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) of less than 2.6 (with scores ranging from 0 to 9.4 and higher scores indicating more disease activity).. At month 3, a higher percentage of patients in the tofacitinib groups than in the placebo groups met the criteria for an ACR 20 response (59.8% in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and 65.7% in the 10-mg tofacitinib group vs. 26.7% in the combined placebo groups, P<0.001 for both comparisons). The reductions from baseline in HAQ-DI scores were greater in the 5-mg and 10-mg tofacitinib groups than in the placebo groups (-0.50 and -0.57 points, respectively, vs. -0.19 points; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a DAS28-4(ESR) of less than 2.6 was not significantly higher with tofacitinib than with placebo (5.6% and 8.7% in the 5-mg and 10-mg tofacitinib groups, respectively, and 4.4% with placebo; P=0.62 and P=0.10 for the two comparisons). Serious infections developed in six patients who were receiving tofacitinib. Common adverse events were headache and upper respiratory tract infection. Tofacitinib treatment was associated with elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and reductions in neutrophil counts.. In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, tofacitinib monotherapy was associated with reductions in signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and improvement in physical function. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Solo ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00814307.).

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disability Evaluation; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Least-Squares Analysis; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.. In this 12-month, phase 3 trial, 717 patients who were receiving stable doses of methotrexate were randomly assigned to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 40 mg of adalimumab once every 2 weeks, or placebo. At month 3, patients in the placebo group who did not have a 20% reduction from baseline in the number of swollen and tender joints were switched in a blinded fashion to either 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily; at month 6, all patients still receiving placebo were switched to tofacitinib in a blinded fashion. The three primary outcome measures were a 20% improvement at month 6 in the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20); the change from baseline to month 3 in the score on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater disability); and the percentage of patients at month 6 who had a Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) of less than 2.6 (with scores ranging from 0 to 9.4 and higher scores indicating greater disease activity).. At month 6, ACR 20 response rates were higher among patients receiving 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib (51.5% and 52.6%, respectively) and among those receiving adalimumab (47.2%) than among those receiving placebo (28.3%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). There were also greater reductions in the HAQ-DI score at month 3 and higher percentages of patients with a DAS28-4(ESR) below 2.6 at month 6 in the active-treatment groups than in the placebo group. Adverse events occurred more frequently with tofacitinib than with placebo, and pulmonary tuberculosis developed in two patients in the 10-mg tofacitinib group. Tofacitinib was associated with an increase in both low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with reductions in neutrophil counts.. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate, tofacitinib was significantly superior to placebo and was numerically similar to adalimumab in efficacy. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Standard ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00853385.).

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cholesterol; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Least-Squares Analysis; Leukocyte Count; Lipoproteins; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To determine the efficacy of CP-690,550 in improving pain, function and health status in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate or a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor.. Patients were randomised equally to placebo, CP-690,550 5, 15 or 30 mg twice daily for 6 weeks, with 6 weeks' follow-up. The patient's assessment of arthritis pain (pain), patient's assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were recorded.. At week 6, significantly more patients in the CP-690,550 5, 15 and 30 mg twice-daily groups experienced a 50% improvement in pain compared with placebo (44%, 66%, 78% and 14%, respectively), clinically meaningful reductions in HAQ-DI (> or =0.3 units) (57%, 75%, 76% and 36%, respectively) and clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 domains and physical and mental components.. CP-690,550 was efficacious in improving the pain, function and health status of patients with RA, from week 1 to week 6.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recovery of Function; Treatment Outcome

CP-690,550, a selective inhibitor of the Janus kinase family, is being developed as an oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A semi-mechanistic model was developed to characterize the time course of drug-induced absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reduction in a phase 2a study. Data from 264 RA patients receiving 6-week treatment (placebo, 5, 15, 30 mg bid) followed by a 6-week off-treatment period were analyzed. The model included a progenitor cell pool, a maturation chain comprising transit compartments, a circulation pool, and a feedback mechanism. The model was adequately described by system parameters (BASE(h), ktr(h), gamma, and k(circ)), disease effect parameters (DIS), and drug effect parameters (k(off) and k(D)). The disease manifested as an increase in baseline ANC and reduced maturation time due to increased demand from the inflammation site. The drug restored the perturbed system parameters to their normal values via an indirect mechanism. ANC reduction due to a direct myelosuppressive drug effect was not supported. The final model successfully described the dose- and time-dependent changes in ANC and predicted the incidence of neutropenia at different doses reasonably well.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Neutropenia; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors

To investigate the effects of methotrexate (MTX) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CP-690,550, a novel Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor in development as a therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to determine the effects of multiple doses of CP-690,550 on the PK of MTX, and to evaluate the short-term safety and tolerability of co-administration of CP-690,550 and MTX.. This was a fixed-dose drug-drug interaction study. Twelve patients diagnosed with RA for at least 6 months were enrolled in a Phase I, open-label study of the PK of multiple doses of CP-690,550 (30 mg b.i.d.) and single doses of MTX (15-25 mg per week).. All patients completed the study and were evaluated for PK and safety. CP-690,550 exposure was not affected by co-administration with MTX; AUC(12) ratio (CP-690,550 + MTX/CP-690,550) was 103.06% [90% confidence interval (CI) 99.00, 107.29]. MTX exposure decreased by 10%; AUC(12) ratio (CP-690,550 + MTX/MTX) was 89.53% (90% CI 77.38, 103.57), which was not considered clinically significant. Co-administration of CP-690,550 and MTX was safe and well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events or withdrawals from the study and there was no trend in the incidence or severity of adverse events across treatments.. Co-administration of CP-690,550 and MTX was safe and well tolerated. There was no clinically significant effect on the PK profile of either drug. Therefore, dose adjustments should not be required when co-administering CP-690,550 and MTX.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), a chemokine receptor expressed on T cells and macrophages, and its ligands are found in inflamed synovial tissue (ST) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The rationale for testing CCR5 blockade in patients with RA was supported by the effects of a CCR5 antagonist in collagen-induced arthritis in rhesus monkeys. The effects of CCR5 blockade in patients with active RA were explored.. In this phase Ib randomised, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with an oral CCR5 inhibitor (SCH351125) in patients with active RA was evaluated. Clinical efficacy was assessed using European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria. ST biopsies were taken before and after 28 days of treatment, and analysed for CCR5+ cells. In a subset of patients, MRIs of an inflamed joint were obtained before and after treatment.. In all, 32 patients were included; 20 received SCH351125 and 12 placebo. Three patients who received SCH351125 did not complete the study due to adverse events; none of these were serious. No improvement was observed in the active treatment group compared to placebo. Results were consistent for clinical evaluation, ST analysis and MRI.. This proof of concept study does not support the use of CCR5 blockade as a therapeutic strategy in patients with active RA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Cyclic N-Oxides; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Oximes; Piperidines; Pyridines; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Since current treatment options for patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain inadequate, especially for those unresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), new and improved medication is needed. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of masitinib (AB1010), a potent and selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c-KIT, in the monotherapy treatment of DMARD-refractory RA.. This was a multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label, randomised, dose-ranging, phase 2a trial. Masitinib was administered orally to 43 patients who had inadequate response to DMARDs, at initial randomised dosing levels of 3 and 6 mg/kg per day over a 12-week period. Dose adjustment was permitted based upon tolerability and response criteria. Efficacy was assessed via American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score using 28 joint counts (DAS28), index of improvement in RA (ACRn) and C-reactive protein (CRP) improvement, relative to baseline at week 12.. Improvement was observed in all efficacy endpoints, including ACR20/50/70 scores of 54%, 26% and 8%, respectively, and a reduction in CRP level by greater than 50% for approximately half the population. This improvement was sustainable throughout an extension phase (> 84 weeks) and was also independent of initial DMARD resistance (anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha and/or methotrexate). A relatively high patient withdrawal rate (37%) required the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) data imputation. Incidence of adverse events was high (95%), although the majority were of mild or moderate severity with a considerable decline in frequency observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Two nonfatal serious adverse events were reported. Dose-response analyses tentatively indicate that an initial dosing level of 6.0 mg/kg per day administered orally in two daily intakes is the most appropriate, based upon potency and tolerability trends.. Treatment with masitinib improved DMARD-refractory active RA. Following an initial high incidence of mostly mild to moderate side effects during the first 12 weeks of treatment, masitinib appears to be generally well tolerated. This, together with evidence of a sustainable efficacy response, suggests that masitinib is suitable for long-term treatment regimens. Since this was the first study of masitinib in a nononcologic pathology, the relatively high patient withdrawal rate observed can be partly attributed to a highly cautious response to adverse events. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant further placebo-controlled investigation.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00831922.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzamides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 different dosages of CP-690,550, a potent, orally active JAK inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate, etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab caused an inadequate or toxic response.. Patients (n = 264) were randomized equally to receive placebo, 5 mg of CP-690,550, 15 mg of CP-690,550, or 30 mg of CP-690,550 twice daily for 6 weeks, and were followed up for an additional 6 weeks after treatment. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at 6 weeks.. By week 6, the ACR20 response rates were 70.5%, 81.2%, and 76.8% in the 5 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg twice daily groups, respectively, compared with 29.2% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Improvements in disease activity in CP-690,550-treated patients compared with placebo were seen in all treatment groups as early as week 1. ACR50 and ACR70 response rates significantly improved in all treatment groups by week 4. The most common adverse events reported were headache and nausea. The infection rate in both the 15 mg twice daily group and the 30 mg twice daily group was 30.4% (versus 26.2% in the placebo group). No opportunistic infections or deaths occurred. Increases in mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and increases in mean serum creatinine level (0.04-0.06 mg/dl) were seen in all CP-690,550 treatment arms.. Our findings indicate that CP-690,550 is efficacious in the treatment of RA, resulting in rapid, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful reductions in the signs and symptoms of RA. Further studies of CP-690,550 in RA are warranted.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Headache; Humans; International Cooperation; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib (TF) is a selective oral jakanib approved by the USFDA for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To overcome the adverse effects of orally administered TF, topical delivery can be a suitable choice. The therapeutic efficacy of TF can be improved through the high affinity of natural ligands (hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate) to CD44 receptors on the macrophages or other immune cells in the dermal region. Thus, the present research work was inspired by the possibility to develop and evaluate the potential of hyaluronic acid-coated proglycosomes (HA-TF-PG) as the carrier for site-specific dermal delivery. The normal-PG (N-TF-PG) and HA-TF-PG showed particle sizes of <250 nm. The HA-TF-PG demonstrated 3.15-fold higher retention of TF in the viable dermis layers than the conventional formulation. The in vivo pharmacodynamic study, cytokines, and radiographic study on Complete Freud's Adjuvant-induced arthritic rat model revealed that HA-TF-PG exhibited a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in inflammation in arthritic rat's paw compared to the conventional TF. The developed HA-TF-PG treated groups showed significantly lowered CD44 levels compared to FD-gel and N-TF-PG i.e. 2.28 and 1.32-fold respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, The HA-TF-PG can be developed as an effective carrier for the site-specific dermal drug delivery system of TF to treat RA.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Delivery Systems; Hyaluronic Acid; Piperidines; Rats

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Pharmacovigilance; Piperidines

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Long-term oral tofacitinib (TOF) administration has been linked to serious side effects majorly immunological suppression. The aim of this work was to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of TOF by chondroitin sulphate (CS) coated proglycosomes through the anchoring of high-affinity CS to CD44 receptors on immune cells in the inflammatory region. The CS was coated onto the TOF-loaded proglycosomes (CS-TOF-PG) formulations and they were evaluated for in vitro drug release, ex vivo (permeation, dermatokinetics) studies. In vivo efficacy studies were carried out in Freund's complete adjuvant (CFA) induced arthritis model. The optimized CS-TOF-PG showed particle sizes of 181.13 ± 7.21 nm with an entrapment efficiency of 78.85 ± 3.65 %. Ex-vivo studies of CS-TOF-PG gel exhibited 1.5-fold high flux and 1.4-fold dermal retention compared to FD-gel. The efficacy study revealed that CS-TOF-PG showed a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in inflammation in arthritic rat paws compared to the TOF oral and FD gel. The current study ensured that the CS-TOF-PG topical gel system would provide a safe and effective formulation for localization and site-specific delivery of TOF at the RA site and overcome the adverse effects associated with the TOF.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chondroitin Sulfates; Piperidines; Rats

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Humans; Piperidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To determine the rate of unintentional monotherapy (UM; switching to monotherapy from combination therapy of patients' own volition) in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tofacitinib and to evaluate tofacitinib survival rate.. This national, multicenter study included patients' data from the TURKBIO Registry. Demographics, clinical characteristics, disease duration and activity, comorbidities, and treatments were analyzed.. Data of 231 rheumatoid arthritis patients (84.8% female, median age, 56 years) were included; 153 were initially prescribed combination therapy and continued to their therapies; 31 were initially prescribed combination therapy but switched to monotherapy on their own volition (UM); 21 were initially prescribed monotherapy and switched to combination therapy; 26 were initially prescribed monotherapy and continued to their therapies. The rate of comorbidities at the time of data retrieval was higher in the UM group than in the combination group (83.3% vs. 60.3%, p = 0.031). Presence of comorbidities was a significant factor affecting switching to monotherapy ( p = 0.039; odds ratio, 3.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-10.18). The combination and UM groups did not differ regarding remission rate assessed by Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (60.5% and 70%, respectively; p = 0.328). Drug survival rates of the UM and combination groups did not differ. The median drug survival duration of tofacitinib was 27+ months with 1- and 4-year drug survival rates of 89.6% and 60.2%, respectively, in the UM group.. Although 13.4% of the study population started monotherapy unintentionally, drug survival and remission rates of the UM and combination groups were not different. Comorbidity was a factor affecting transition from combination therapy to monotherapy.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; C-Reactive Protein; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Survival Rate

Tofacitinib has only been available in China for 2 years to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our purpose was to compare real-world effectiveness of tofacitinib with that of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in Chinese patients with RA. The records of patients with RA treated at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between July 2017 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those treated with tofacitinib, biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA), and swollen joint and tender joint count were compared among the groups up to 12 months of treatment. A total of 150 patients were included: 63 were treated with tofacitinib, 48 with bDMARDs, and 39 with csDMARDs. Tofacitinib was first-line treatment in 26.98% of patients, second-line treatment in 49.21%, and third-line treatment in 26.98%. Patients in the tofacitinib group had significantly higher disease duration (6.11 ± 6.97 years) than those in the other groups. All disease indices in the three groups decreased with time, indicating improvement of symptoms, with no differences among the groups at 12 months. Tofacitinib appeared to improve symptoms more rapidly than other treatments; however, differences in disease indices were not significant. This real-world study suggests that tofacitinib is rapidly effective and that the effects are sustained after 12 months in Chinese patients with RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; China; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

A 67-year-old woman with transverse myelitis and seizure disorder secondary to suspected central nervous system (CNS) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis had two episodes of severe nephrotic syndrome 15 years apart. She underwent a renal biopsy in both episodes, showing tip lesion variant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The patient responded both times to prednisone treatment, achieving a complete remission within 2 months in the first episode and remission 4 months in the second episode. A year after her second episode, the patient had a third episode of severe nephrotic syndrome. She achieved an equally rapid complete remission in 3 months without steroid treatment, as she was concomitantly treated with the Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib for a flare of rheumatoid arthritis. This case report suggests that JAK inhibitors may have therapeutic use in FSGS, which is supported by experimental data in the medical literature.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

We assess the impact of switching versus staying on the same tofacitinib dose on efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. ORAL Sequel was an open-label, long-term extension study of patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID for up to 9.5 years. Tofacitinib doses could be switched during the study at investigator discretion. In this post hoc analysis, data from ORAL Sequel were stratified into four groups: 5 → 10 mg BID (Dose-up); 5 mg BID (Stay-on 5); 10 → 5 mg BID (Dose-down); and 10 mg BID (Stay-on 10). Efficacy assessments over 12 months included: change from baseline in 4-component Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28), and DAS28 minimum clinically important difference, remission, and low disease activity (LDA) rates. Safety was assessed for the study duration.. Generally, DAS28 improvements and minimum clinically important difference rates were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in Dose-up versus Stay-on 5 up to month 12. DAS28 remission rates were significantly greater in Dose-up versus Stay-on 5 at month 12. Change from baseline in DAS28 was similar in Dose-down and Stay-on 10. No significant differences in DAS28 LDA rates were observed between groups. Safety data were similar overall across the four groups.. In patients with RA receiving open-label tofacitinib, this analysis found that some benefited from increasing dose from 5 to 10 mg BID and did not find that reducing dose from 10 to 5 mg BID affected efficacy or that dose switching in either direction affected safety.. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00413699. Registered December 20, 2006. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00413699 Key Points • This post hoc analysis of data from the long-term extension study, ORAL Sequel, assessed the impact of dose switching between tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID), at the investigator's discretion, on efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). • Dosing up from tofacitinib 5 to 10 mg BID was associated with improved efficacy up to 12 months versus staying on 5 mg BID, and dosing down from 10 to 5 mg BID was not generally associated with a significant loss of efficacy. • Safety outcomes were generally consistent across dose groups and did not change markedly after switching dose in either direction. • These findings can help to inform physicians on what may be expected in terms of efficacy and safety when adjusting tofacitinib dose according to clinical need. The recommended tofacitinib dosage for the treatment of RA in most jurisdictions is 5 mg BID.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

This multi-center, retrospective study aimed to clarify the factors affecting drug retention of the Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) including baricitinib (BAR) and tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with RA. Patients were as follows; females, 80.6%; age, 60.5 years; DAS28-ESR, 4.3; treated with either BAR (n = 166) or TOF (n = 185); bDMARDs- or JAKi-switched cases (76.6%). The reasons for drug discontinuation were classified into four major categories. The drug retention was evaluated at 24 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling adjusted by confounders. Discontinuation rates for the corresponding reasons were as follows; ineffectiveness (22.3%), toxic adverse events (13.3%), non-toxic reasons (7.2%) and remission (0.0%). Prior history of anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody (aIL-6R) ineffectiveness significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to ineffectiveness (p = 0.020). Aging (≥ 75 years) (p = 0.028), usage of PSL ≥ 5 mg/day (p = 0.017) and female sex (p = 0.041) significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to toxic adverse events. Factors not associated with treatment discontinuation were: number of prior bDMARDs or JAKi, concomitant MTX usage, difference of JAKi, and prior use of TNF inhibitor, CTLA4-Ig or other JAKi.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a major concern in RA. These patients have been included in clinical trials and in the post-marketing setting of RA patients using tofacitinib. We aimed to assess the real-life efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with RA-ILD.. RA patients with ILD diagnosis based on the HRCT images of the lungs from eight different centres recruited to study. As a control group, RA patients without ILD under tofacitinib were included. Demographic data, patients' characteristics, available pulmonary function tests regarding RA and RA-ILD at the visit in which tofacitinib was initiated and for the last follow-up visit under tofacitinib were recorded. Reasons for tofacitinib discontinuation were also recorded. Drug retention rates were compared by log-rank test. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.. A total of 47(42.6% male) RA patients with RA-ILD and a control group of 387 (17.8% male) patients without RA-ILD were included in analysis. After the median of 12 (9-19) months follow-up, mean FEV1%; 82.1 vs. 82.8 (pre/post-treatment, respectively, p=0.08), mean FVC%; 79.8 vs. 82.8 (pre/post-treatment, respectively, p=0.014) were stable and worsening was observed in 2/18 (11.1%) patients. Retention rates were similar (p=0.21, log-rank). In RA-ILD group, most common cause of drug discontinuation was infections (6.3 vs. 2.4 per 100 patient-years).. Treatment strategy of RA-ILD patients is still based on small observational studies. A high rate of discontinuation due to infections was observed in RA-ILD patients under tofacitinib; however, RA-ILD patients were older than RA patients without ILD.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

To describe the use of baricitinib and tofacitinib by Swedish RA patients and to compare their effectiveness with that of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs).. RA patients who initiated baricitinib (n = 1420), tofacitinib (n = 316), abatacept (n = 1050), IL-6 inhibitors (IL-6is; n = 849), rituximab (n = 1101) or TNF inhibitors (TNFis; n = 6036) between January 2017 and November 2019 were followed for a minimum of 1 year using data from several linked Swedish national registers. Proportions reaching a good EULAR 28-joint DAS (DAS28) response, HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) improvement >0.2 units and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission were compared at 1 year, imputing discontinued treatments as 'non-response'. Additionally, we compared drug retention and changes in DAS28, HAQ-DI and CDAI from baseline to 3 months after treatment initiation.. On average, baricitinib, and particularly tofacitinib, were initiated as later lines of therapy and more frequently as monotherapy compared with rituximab and TNFi. Adjusted 1 year response proportions were consistently lower on TNFi compared with baricitinib, with differences of -4.3 percentage points (95% CI -8.7, 0.1) for good EULAR response, -9.9 (-14.4 to -5.4) for HAQ-DI improvement and -6.0 (-9.8 to -2.2) for CDAI remission. Comparisons with non-TNFi bDMARDs also favoured baricitinib, but not consistently. Treatment responses for tofacitinib were only marginally lower than those for baricitinib and generally similar to those of bDMARDs, with precision limited by low power. Comparisons of drug retention and changes in disease activity from baseline to 3 months supported the 1 year findings.. Baricitinib and tofacitinib showed at least equivalent effectiveness compared with bDMARDs after exploring several different effectiveness measures.

Topics: Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Cohort Studies; Humans; Interleukin-6; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rituximab; Sulfonamides; Sweden; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Tofacitinib (TOF) is an oral, small-molecule drug used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and is one of several alternative treatments to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We evaluated physician- and patient-reported effectiveness of TNFi compared to TOF, using real-world data from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI).. Patients enrolled in the OBRI initiating TOF or TNFi between 2014 and 2019 were included. Patients were required to have physician- and patient-reported effectiveness outcome data, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and RA Disease Activity Index (RADAI), available at treatment initiation and 6 (± 2) months later. To deal with confounding by indication, we estimated propensity scores (PS) for covariates.. Four hundred nineteen patients were included. Of those, 226 initiated a TNFi and 193 TOF, and had a mean (SD) disease duration of 8.0 (8.7) and 12.6 (9.6) years, respectively. In addition, the TNFi group was less likely to have prior biologic use (21.7%) compared to the TOF group (67.9%). The proportion of patients in CDAI low disease activity (LDA)/remission (REM) at 6 months was 36.7% and 33.2% in the TNFi and TOF groups, respectively. The generalized linear mixed models adjusting for PS quantile showed that there was no significant difference in CDAI LDA/REM (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.43) and RADAI coefficient (OR 0.48, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.14) between the 2 groups (ref: TOF).. In patients with RA, physician- and patient-reported effectiveness are similar in the TNFi and TOF groups 6 months after treatment.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Physicians; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Registries; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

A man in his 70s with rheumatoid arthritis presented with seizures and coma and was transferred to our emergency department. Two months prior to admission, he started to take tofacitinib 10 mg/day. On admission, we noted a rash with a blister on the forehead, and herpes zoster was diagnosed. Cerebrospinal fluid examination suggested meningitis. An MRI of the brain showed no abnormality. Based on these findings, he was suspected with herpes zoster meningitis. We discontinued tofacitinib and treated the patient with intravenous acyclovir for 2 weeks. He regained complete consciousness, but right forehead skin lesion, severe vision loss in the right eye and right facial nerve paralysis remained as sequelae. Six weeks after admission, we restarted tofacitinib with oral valaciclovir as antiviral prophylaxis. Two years after admission, we administered Shingrix, an adjuvant recombinant vaccine for herpes zoster, and discontinued oral valaciclovir.

Topics: Acyclovir; Antiviral Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

To evaluate work productivity of adult Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) in RA questionnaire at 0- and 6-month follow-up.. This non-interventional study was performed in Colombia and Peru. Evaluated the effects of tofacitinib and bDMARDs in patients with RA after failure of conventional DMARDs. The WPAI-RA questionnaire was administered at baseline and at the 6-month (±1 month) follow-up. The results are expressed as least squares means (LSMs), and standard errors (SEs).. One hundred patients treated with tofacitinib and 70 patients treated with bDMARDs were recruited. Twenty-eight percent of patients from the tofacitinib group and 40.0% from the bDMARDs group were working for pay at baseline. At month 6, the changes in absenteeism, presenteeism, and work impairment due to health were -18.3% (SE 7.7), -34.8% (SE 5.9), and -11.0% (SE 16.5), respectively, in the tofacitinib group and -19.4% (SE 8.0), -34.8% (SE 6.2), and -15.9% (SE 15.0), for the bDMARD group.. For patients who reported working, there were improvements in presenteeism, absenteeism, and work impairment due to health in both groups.. NCT03073109.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Efficiency; Humans; Latin America; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; Work Performance

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

We aimed to explore the effect of tofacitinib on erectile dysfunction (ED), as well as disease activity and health related quality of life in male patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Forty eight male RA patients with ED were included. Demographic and clinical data at baseline and 6 month of treatment were recorded from patients' medical records. Disease activity was evaluated with the disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28), quality of life with Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and ED with International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). The patients were aged 45.58 [Formula: see text] 2.14 years with a disease duration of 79.33 [Formula: see text] 25.31 months. According to the IIEF-5, 17 (35.4%) patients had severe ED, 10 (20.8%) patients moderate ED, 10 (20.8%) patients mild to moderate ED and 11 (22.9%) patients mild ED. For the entire patient group, baseline median IIEF-5 score was significantly increased from 9.35 (5.30-19.40) to 9.90 (5.20-24.90), baseline median DAS28 was significantly decreased from 5.65 (4.80-6.70) to 5.00 (2.40-6.40), HAQ-DI from 1.70 (1.10-2.40) to 1.15 (0.40-2.20) at 6th month of treatment (all p value < 0.001). Also, quantitative change in IIEF-5 was significantly correlated with changes in DAS28 (r: - 0.735, p < 0.001) and HAQ-DI (r: - 0.700, p < 0.001). Tofacitinib monotherapy may improve ED severity and as well as disease activity and health related quality of life in male patients with RA complaining of ED.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease, which has been reported closely associated with the dysfunction of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. This study aims to explore the potential therapeutic effect of Tofacitinib, a putative JAK/STAT inhibitor, in RA. Tofacitinib suppressed proliferation and accelerated apoptosis of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts (RA-FLS) as confirmed by CCK-8, EdU and Western blot assays. Tofacitinib significantly inhibited expression of pro-inflammatory factors including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), vascular endothelial growth factor A, matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 3, interleukin-6 and interferon gamma in RA-FLS cells. mechanistically, tofacitinib decreased signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), which transcriptionally activates miR-425-5p, and thus increased insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF1) expression, a target of miR-425-5p in RA-FLS. Overexpression of STAT6 restored the expression of pro-inflammatory factors and proliferation inhibited by Tofacitinib in RA-FLS. Overall, Tofacitinib exerted inhibitory effect on proliferation and inflammation of RA-FLS through modulating STAT6/miR-425-5p/IGF1 signal axis. These findings shed light on the novel strategies for improving RA.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Fibroblasts; Humans; Inflammation; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Interferon-gamma; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinases; Matrix Metalloproteinase 1; MicroRNAs; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Sincalide; STAT6 Transcription Factor; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

To support the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tofacitinib, we designed the TuTOR (tailoring tofacitinib oral therapy in rheumatoid arthritis) mobile app. The impact of the app on medical adherence was evaluated using a crossover design alternating a paper-diary and the TuTOR App. Twenty patients with RA (mean age at inclusion, 59 ± 13 years) were included in the study. A statistically significant decrease in DAS28 was observed since the first month of therapy (mean DAS28 at baseline, 3.9 ± 1 vs. 1° month 3.1 ± 1,

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Mobile Applications; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Generic tofacitinib has been available in India for more than a year and is widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy. There is scarce real-world data on its effectiveness and safety from India, especially given infection endemicity. We retrospectively analysed records (demographic and clinical information, haematology and biochemistry, adverse events) of patients prescribed generic tofacitinib from a single centre in Mumbai, India. Disease activity was calculated using the disease activity score-28 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and other tools, and we used paired T-tests for significant response. We defined clinical tofacitinib failure as a composite outcome, including clinician's decision to change to an alternative disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or flare after self-withdrawal. We performed logistic regression and survival analysis for determinants of clinical failure. We reviewed records of 102 patients (92 female; median age: 53 years) with mean RA duration of 146 months. Thirteen had prior treatment with innovator tofacitinib. There was significant improvement in disease activity parameters at a mean duration of 186 days. No serious adverse events were reported; 4 patients had tuberculosis and 19 patients had mild COVID-19 while on treatment. Clinical failure was seen in 25 patients, and mean time to failure on survival analysis was 357 days. No baseline characteristic predicted clinical failure. Generic tofacitinib showed good effectiveness and a tolerable adverse effect profile, despite tuberculosis endemicity and COVID-19. Setting up registries would be valuable in gaining more data on generic tofacitinib. Key Points • There is scarce data from India regarding the use of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis, despite widespread use. • In this retrospective analysis of 102 patients at a single centre, we found tofacitinib monotherapy was efficacious and tolerable. • Tuberculosis was detected in four and nineteen patients had mild covid.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; COVID-19; Female; Humans; India; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Shaoyao-Gancao-Fuzi decoction (SGFD), a well-known traditional Chinese medicine formula, was originally described in "Treatise on Febrile Diseases" and has been extensively used to dispel wind, eliminate dampness and treat paralysis. It is widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinic. However, the effect of SGFD on the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450s) and the herb-drug interactions are rarely studied.. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SGFD on the activity of CYP450s and evaluate the potential herb-drug interactions between SGFD and tofacitinib, commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.. The cocktail approach was employed to assess the effect of SGFD on the activity of CYP1A2, 3A4, 2A6, 2E1, and 2C9. The pharmacokinetic profile of oral administration of tofacitinib in rats after two weeks of treatment with SGFD was investigated. RT-qPCR and molecular docking were performed to unveil the underlying mechanism of the herb-drug interaction.. SGFD had no effect on the activities of CYP2E1 and 2C9, had a weak effect on CYP2A6, and had activatory effect on CYP1A2. However, it had a dramatically inhibitory effect on the activity of CYP3A4. Simultaneously, the values of C. The system exposure of tofacitinib was increased by SGFD. SGFD could affect the activity and gene expression of the key metabolic enzyme CYP3A. These findings give a clear understanding to predict herb-drug interaction of SGFD for safe clinical use in future.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Diterpenes; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Glycyrrhiza; Herb-Drug Interactions; Molecular Docking Simulation; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Rats

Using data from real-world practice, this analysis compared outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating treatment with an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib, in combination with persistent, discontinued, or interrupted treatment with oral methotrexate (MTX).. This retrospective claims analysis (MarketScan® databases) included data from US patients with RA and at least one prescription claim for tofacitinib, dated between January 1, 2013, and April 30, 2017. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months before and after treatment initiation, and initiated tofacitinib in combination with oral MTX, with at least two prescription claims for each. Patients were grouped according to treatment pattern (MTX-Persistent, MTX-Discontinued, or MTX-Interrupted). Tofacitinib treatment persistence, adherence, and effectiveness, as well as all-cause and RA-related health care costs, were assessed.. A total of 671 patients were eligible for inclusion; 504 (75.1%) were MTX-Persistent; 131 (19.5%), MTX-Discontinued; and 36 (5.4%), MTX-Interrupted. Rates of tofacitinib treatment persistence, adherence, and effectiveness at 12 months were similar between the MTX-Persistent and MTX-Discontinued cohorts. The percentage of patients switched from tofacitinib to another advanced disease-modifying antirheumatic drug within 12 months of tofacitinib initiation was greater in the MTX-Persistent cohort compared with that in the MTX-Discontinued cohort. RA-related health care costs at 12 months post-initiation were significantly greater in the MTX-Persistent cohort compared with those in the MTX-Discontinued cohort.. The findings from this analysis of real-world data indicate that patients who initiate tofacitinib in combination with oral MTX may discontinue MTX and still experience outcomes similar to those in patients who persist with MTX, with lesser RA-related health care costs. These results support those from a previous clinical study on methotrexate withdrawal in patients with RA (NCT02831855).

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Studies as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This study examined long-term outcomes of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Ninety-seven RA patients who desired drug discontinuation after sustained remission or low disease activity for at least 48 weeks due to stable treatment with biological drugs or tofacitinib were enrolled into this study. All patients were prospectively followed until disease flare or the end of the study. Discontinued drugs (previous drugs) were reintroduced to treat flares.. Following bDMARD/tofacitinib discontinuation (mean follow-up, 2.1 years; standard deviation, 2.0), disease flare occurred at a crude incidence rate of 0.36 per person-year. The median time to flare was 1.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.6), and the cumulative flare probability was estimated to be 45% at 1 year, 64% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years. No or little radiological progression was shown in 87.1% of patients who maintained remission for 3 years. A Fine‒Gray competing risk regression analysis showed that predictive factors for a flare were longer RA duration at the start of bDMARD/tofacitinib treatment, previous failure of treatment with bDMARDs, and a shorter period of remission or low disease activity before drug discontinuation. Type of discontinued drug was not identified as a predictive factor after adjusting for other predictor variables. Restarting previous treatment regimens led to rapidly regaining disease control in 89% of flare patients within 1 month.. Discontinuation of bDMARD/tofacitinib may be a feasible strategy in RA patients, especially patients with early treated and longer-controlled RA. Flares are manageable in most RA patients and radiological progression is rare for at least 3 years in patients with sustained remission after bDMARD/tofacitinib discontinuation.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Symptom Flare Up; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic results of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy with different biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and the first Janus-activated kinase (JAK) inhibitor in real-life clinical settings. This is a prospective, observational, longitudinal study at the largest rheumatology clinic in Bulgaria conducted during the period 2012-2020. One hundred seventy-four patients were followed up for a period of one year. Patients naïve to biological therapy were consecutively assigned on the available at the time bDMARDs (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, golimumab, cetrolizumab, tocilizumab) or tofacitinib. We evaluated the disease activity score (DAS28-CRP), Health assessment questionnaires (HAQ) and short form 36 (SF-36) were applied at the initiation of biological therapy, after 6, and 12 months of follow-up. We analyze the changes in the two major subgroups of SF36-physical (MCS) and mental health (PCS). The age and gender distribution were similar between the groups on bDMARDs and tsDMARD. All observed indicators for disease control and QoL improve after the initiation of the biological or JAK inhibitor therapy. We also analyze the effect of therapies on DAS28-CRP, HAQ, SF-36 (PCS, MCS). Dispersion analysis for the effect of therapy measured through DAS28 between 1st and 3rd measurement shows a statically significant difference in between the average effect of therapies (p = 0.005). According to the average change in DAS28 between the first and third measurement the most effective is the golimumab (Median difference = 2.745), followed by rituximab (median = 2.305) and etanercept (median = 2.070). According to the average change in HAQ between first and third the most effective is tofacitinib (median 0.563), followed rituximab and infliximab (median 0.500 for both). Less effective in term of HAQ changes between the first and third measurement appears to be etanercept (median difference 0.250). All differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Regarding the changes in the QoL measured with SF-36 MCS and PCS there is no statistically significant differences in the average effect of different therapeutic agents. Tofacitinib is non-inferior in comparison to bDMARDs and improve both-disease activity and QoL in patients with RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Etanercept; Humans; Infliximab; Longitudinal Studies; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome

Systemic inflammation is the main factor underlying secondary osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), such as tofacitinib (Tofa), can control systemic inflammation and may have beneficial effects on bone in various models. This might be due to direct effects on the bone microenvironment and not exclusively based on their anti-inflammatory function. Bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) are abundant in the bone microenvironment. The effect of JAKi on BMAds is unknown, but evidence suggests that there is competition between human bone marrow-derived stromal cell (hBMSC) differentiation routes towards BMAds and osteoblasts (Ob) in osteoporosis.. The aims of the study are to determine whether Tofa influences BMAds and Ob derived from hBMSCs and to investigate the potential effects of Tofa on bone marrow adiposity in RA patients.. To determine the effect of Tofa on cellular commitment, hBMSCs were differentiated to BMAds or OBs for 3 days together with Tofa at 200, 400, or 800 nM and TNFα. This study was also conducted using differentiated BMAds. The impact of Tofa was determined by gene and protein expression analysis and cell density monitoring. In parallel, in a pilot study of 9 RA patients treated with Tofa 5 mg twice a day (NCT04175886), the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was measured using MRI at the lumbar spine at baseline and at 6 months.. In non-inflammatory conditions, the gene expression of Runx2 and Dlx5 decreased in Ob treated with Tofa (p <0.05). The gene expression of PPARγ2, C/EBPα, and Perilipin 1 were increased compared to controls (p <0.05) in BMAds treated with Tofa. Under inflammatory conditions, Tofa did not change the expression profiles of Ob compared to TNFα controls. In contrast, Tofa limited the negative effect of TNFα on BMAd differentiation (p <0.05). An increase in the density of differentiated BMAds treated with Tofa under TNFα was noted (p <0.001). These findings were consolidated by an increase in PDFF at 6 months of treatment with Tofa in RA patients (46.3 ± 7.0% versus 53.2 ± 9.2% p <0.01).. Together, these results suggest a stimulatory effect of Tofa on BMAd commitment and differentiation, which does not support a positive effect of Tofa on bone.

Topics: Adipocytes; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Marrow; Clinical Studies as Topic; Humans; Inflammation; Osteoporosis; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Tofacitinib is a relatively new oral drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The ORAL surveillance study shows in a direct comparison that more patients with RA develop a 'major adverse cardiovascular event' (MACE) or malignancy during treatment with tofacitinib than during treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. The reliability of the study, the generalisability and interpretation of the results, as well as their implication for daily practice are discussed here.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Reproducibility of Results; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease without effective treatment. Tofacitinib (TOF) is a JAK inhibitor that can be used for RA therapy, but it still faces the problems of nonspecific distribution and relatively low therapeutic effect. Herein, ICAM-1-modified TOF-loaded P(AN-co-AAm)-PEG micelles (AI-TM) were developed, which can result in an enhanced RA therapy when combining with microwave hyperthermia (MH). It was found that AI-TM could rapidly release the encapsulated TOF under a thermal condition of >43 °C, which was due to the fact that the polymeric micelles has an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) of 43 °C. AI-TM could specifically distribute into the inflamed joints of RA mice, which is associated with the high affinity between anti-ICAM-1 and overexpressed ICAM-1 receptors. Moreover, the combination of AI-TM and MH could result in a remarkably enhanced anti-rheumatic activity, which was related to the RA-targeted ability of AI-TM, the rapid TOF release under MH, and the combined effect between TOF and MH treatment. Our study definitely provides a novel strategy for effective treatment of RA.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Hyperthermia, Induced; Mice; Micelles; Microwaves; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

We describe a case of a 57-year-old white woman treated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tofacitinib 10mg daily (started one year ago) and prednisolone 5mg daily. She presented to the emergency department with a tight squeezing chest pain and shortness of breath for 7h and the clinical evaluation revealed regional systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle, mimicking a myocardial infarction, in the absence of angiographic evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease or acute plaque rupture. All changes were transient and resolved completely within 4 days. The diagnosis of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TKM) was established. This is, as far as we know, the first report of a case of TKM in a RA patient taking tofacitinib. Although the association has not been previously described and the precise cause cannot be identified in this patient, the association with tofacitinib should be considered given the etiopathogenic rationale and the absence of any other identifiable cause.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prednisolone; Pyrimidines; Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

To evaluate the adherence to treatment with Tofacitinib in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using two versions of the self-questionnaire Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology, CQR19 and CQR5, to determine the variables associated with adherence to Tofacitinib and to compare the performance of both questionnaires.. A cross-sectional study was carried out. We included patients ≥18 years old, with RA (ACR/EULAR criteria 2010) under treatment with Tofacitinib. Sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, treatment and data on patient evaluation. All the patients completed self-questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5.. Descriptive statistics. t-Test or Mann Whitney to compare the continuous variables, Chi. We included 52 patients, 82.7% women, with a median (m) age of 57.7 years, disease duration m 16 years, 63.5% had comorbidities. Of the patients, 86.5% were treated with Tofacitinib (5 mg BID) and 48% received Tofacitinib as monotherapy. The median time of Tofacitinib treatment was 13 months, 42.3% suspended treatment, and only one patient permanently stopped treatment due to lack of provision. Median CQR19 was 89.5% and 84.6% had an adherence ≥ 80%. The variables significantly associated with adherence ≥ 80% were the presence of comorbidities (p = .014) and older age (p = .033). Considering the CQR5, a similar percentage of patients (82.7%) were adherents to treatment, however, the concordance with CQR19 was low. In the multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable independently associated with good adherence to treatment.. Treatment adherence to Tofacitinib was very good for both presentations. Older age was associated with higher adherence. The agreement between the questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5 was low.

Topics: Adolescent; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

This study aimed to describe the real-world effectiveness and treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).. This was a post hoc analysis of a retrospective, non-interventional study that extracted data for patients treated with tofacitinib or bDMARDs from the Australian OPAL dataset between March 2015 and September 2018. Monotherapy tofacitinib and bDMARDs and combination therapy tofactinib and bDMARDs were propensity score matched and treatment effectiveness and persistence of the groups were evaluated.. In the bDMARD and tofacitinib monotherapy and combination therapy matched populations there were 1300 bDMARD initiators (n = 564 monotherapy) and 650 tofacitinib initiators (n = 282 monotherapy). In the bDMARD and tofacitinib monotherapy matched groups, 62.9% and 66.7% were in DAS-28 CRP disease remission after 18 months of treatment, respectively. In the combination therapy bDMARD and tofacitinib groups, 50% and 58.9% were in DAS-28 CRP disease remission after 18 months, respectively. The median treatment persistence was similar between the monotherapy bDMARD and tofacitinib treatment groups (36.7 months (95% CI 27.4 to "not reached') and 34.2 months (95%CI 30.3 to "not reached") respectively) as well as the combination therapy bDMARD and tofacitinib groups (32.2 months (95% CI 25.7 to 34.4) and 32.7 months (95%CI 28.7 to "not reached", respectively).. Patients receiving combination therapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs had higher disease activity scores at index than patients receiving monotherapy. Monotherapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs, and combination therapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs demonstrated similar treatment effectiveness and persistence, respectively. Key Points • This study provides real-world evidence regarding effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with monotherapy or combination therapy tofacitinib. • The study suggests that monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib is an effective intervention in RA with persistence and effectiveness comparable to bDMARDs.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Australia; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept and clarify the impact of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) on responses to these treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. After adjustments by propensity score matching, 70 out of 161 patients receiving tofacitinib and 70 out of 131 receiving abatacept were extracted. The clinical effectiveness of both drugs over 24 weeks and the impact of the copy numbers of SE on effectiveness outcomes were investigated.. The percentage of patients in remission in the 28-joint count disease activity score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) did not significantly differ between patients receiving tofacitinib and abatacept at week 24 (32% vs 37%, p = 0.359). The mean change at week 4 in DAS28-ESR from baseline was significantly greater in patients receiving tofacitinib than in those receiving abatacept (- 1.516 vs - 0.827, p = 0.0003). The percentage of patients in remission at week 4 was 30% with tofacitinib and 15% with abatacept (p = 0.016). When patients were stratified by the copy numbers of SE alleles, differences in these numbers did not affect DAS28-ESR scores of patients receiving tofacitinib. However, among patients receiving abatacept, DAS28-ESR scores were significantly lower in patients carrying 2 copies of SE alleles than in those carrying 0 copies at each time point throughout the 24-week period. Furthermore, the percentage of patients in remission with DAS28-ESR at week 24 was not affected by the copy numbers of SE alleles in patients receiving tofacitinib (p = 0.947), whereas it significantly increased as the copy numbers became higher in patients receiving abatacept (p = 0.00309). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed a correlation between the presence of SE and DAS28-ESR remission in patients receiving abatacept (OR = 25.881, 95% CI = 3.140-213.351, p = 0.0025), but not in those receiving tofacitinib (OR = 1.473, 95% CI = 0.291-7.446, p = 0.639).. Although the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept was similar at week 24, tofacitinib was superior to abatacept for changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR and the achievement of remission at week 4. SE positivity was associated with the achievement of DAS28-ESR remission by week 24 in patients receiving abatacept, but not in those receiving tofacitinib.

Topics: Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Epitopes; HLA-DRB1 Chains; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to investigate hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving tofacitinib.. This was a retrospective study performed in a regional teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. During January 2017 and December 2020, patients with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of RA using tofacitinib for at least 3 months were enrolled. Serum HBV DNA levels and serum alanine aminotransferase were followed up around every 3 to 6 months to assess HBV reactivation.. A total of 98 patients with RA were enrolled, and eight were hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) (8.1%), 64 were HBsAg-negative (HBsAg-)/hepatitis B core antibody positive (HBcAb+) (65.3%). In the HBsAg+ patients, two patients received antiviral prophylaxis, and none of them had HBV reactivation or hepatitis flare-up. The HBV reactivation rate was 33.3% (2/6) in the HBsAg+ RA patient without antiviral prophylaxis. Among the HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients, the HBV reactivation rate was 3.1% (2/64). The incidence rate of HBV reactivation was 153.8 per 1000 person-years for overall HBsAg+ patients and 250 per 1000 person-years after excluding patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis. The incidence rate was 11.2 per 1000 person-years for HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients with RA receiving tofacitinib.. Tofacitinib could induce HBV reactivation in both HBsAg+ and HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients. HBsAg+ patients receiving tofacitinib have a high incidence rate of HBV reactivation, which could be prevented by antiviral prophylaxis. Although the risk of reactivation is low in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients, closely monitoring HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase should be suggested.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Antiviral Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Activation

To investigate the acute phase response to surgical stress in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.. A retrospective matched pair analysis of 34 patients treated with tofacitinib and 34 patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was performed. Patients were matched for age, sex, and type of surgery; body temperature, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count were compared between the tofacitinib and csDMARDs groups within 2 weeks after orthopedic surgery. Postoperative complications within 90 days were also assessed.. No surgical site infection or delayed wound healing was observed in the tofacitinib group; whereas, one case of superficial infection was noted in the csDMARDs group. A similar postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level was observed in both the groups. Postoperatively, the tofacitinib group showed an increase in WBC and neutrophils counts and a decrease in lymphocyte count, unlike the csDMARDs group. In contrast to two patients (2.6%) in the csDMARDs group, seven patients (20.6%) in the tofacitinib group had lymphocyte counts below 500 cells/μL within 2 weeks postoperatively.. Tofacitinib did not suppress postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level. Because of the postoperative decrease in lymphocyte count in patients treated with tofacitinib, the timing for resuming tofacitinib treatment after surgery should be carefully considered. Key Points • This study is the first to report the complications and systemic inflammatory responses after orthopedic surgery in patients treated with tofacitinib in comparison with matched pairs treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) • While tofacitinib does not suppress postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level, the postoperative decrease in lymphocyte count in patients treated with tofacitinib is significant compared with patients treated with csDMARDs • Attention should be paid to a reduced lymphocyte count when to resume tofacitinib after surgery.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Orthopedic Procedures; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Current knowledge on the actions of tofacitinib on cytokine signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on. Sixteen patients with active RA, despite treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily for three months. Levels of constitutive and cytokine-induced phosphorylated STATs in peripheral blood monocytes, T cells and B cells were measured by flow cytometry at baseline and three-month visits. mRNA expression of JAKs, STATs and suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) were measured from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by quantitative PCR. Association of baseline signaling profile with treatment response was also investigated.. Tofacitinib, in csDMARDs background, decreased median disease activity score (DAS28) from 4.4 to 2.6 (p < 0.001). Tofacitinib treatment significantly decreased cytokine-induced phosphorylation of all JAK-STAT pathways studied. However, the magnitude of the inhibitory effect depended on the cytokine and cell type studied, varying from 10% to 73% inhibition following 3-month treatment with tofacitinib. In general, strongest inhibition by tofacitinib was observed with STAT phosphorylations induced by cytokines signaling through the common-γ-chain cytokine receptor in T cells, while lowest inhibition was demonstrated for IL-10 -induced STAT3 phosphorylation in monocytes. Constitutive STAT1, STAT3, STAT4 and STAT5 phosphorylation in monocytes and/or T cells was also downregulated by tofacitinib. Tofacitinib treatment downregulated the expression of several JAK-STAT pathway components in PBMCs, SOCSs showing the strongest downregulation. Baseline STAT phosphorylation levels in T cells and monocytes and SOCS3 expression in PBMCs correlated with treatment response.. Tofacitinib suppresses multiple JAK-STAT pathways in cytokine and cell population specific manner in RA patients

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Protein; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the economic benefit of upadacitinib combination therapy versus tofacitinib combination therapy and upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy from improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Data were analyzed from two trials of upadacitinib (SELECT-NEXT and SELECT-MONOTHERAPY) and one trial of tofacitinib (ORAL-Standard) that collected HRQOL measurements using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey in patients with RA. Direct medical costs per patient per month (PPPM) for patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and methotrexate were derived from observed SF-36 Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores in the SELECT trials using a regression algorithm. Direct medical costs PPPM for patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily were obtained from a published analysis of SF-36 PCS and MCS scores observed in the ORAL-Standard trial. Short-term (12-14 weeks) and long-term (48 weeks) estimates of direct medical costs PPPM were compared between upadacitinib and tofacitinib and between upadacitinib and methotrexate.. Over 12 weeks, direct medical costs PPPM were $252 lower (95% CI $72, $446) for upadacitinib-treated patients versus tofacitinib-treated patients. Medical costs PPPM at weeks 24 and 48 and cumulative costs over the entire 48-week period (difference $1759; 95% CI $1162, $2449) were significantly lower for upadacitinib than for tofacitinib. Over 14 weeks, direct medical costs PPPM were $399 lower (95% CI $158, $620) for patients treated with upadacitinib monotherapy compared with those treated with methotrexate alone. Direct medical costs at week 48 and cumulative costs over the entire 48-week period (difference $2044; 95% CI $1221, $2846) were significantly lower for upadacitinib monotherapy compared with methotrexate alone.. In the short and long term, upadacitinib combination therapy versus tofacitinib combination therapy and upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy were associated with significantly lower direct medical costs for patients with RA.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02675426, NCT02706951, and NCT00853385.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Inflammation; Piperidines; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus a non-TNFi (biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs)) as the first-line treatment following conventional synthetic DMARDs, as well as potential modifiers of response, observed in US clinical practice.. Data were from a large US healthcare registry (Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry). The analysis included patients (aged ≥18 years) with a documented diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a valid baseline Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of >2.8 and no prior bDMARD or tsDMARD use. Outcomes were captured at 1-year postinitiation of a TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, golimumab or infliximab) or a non-TNFi (abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab, anakinra or tofacitinib) and included CDAI, 28-Joint Modified Disease Activity Score, patient-reported outcomes (including the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, EuroQol-5 Dimension score, sleep, anxiety, morning stiffness and fatigue) and rates of anaemia. Groups were propensity score-matched at baseline to account for potential confounding.. There were no statistically significant differences observed between the TNFi and non-TNFi treatment groups for outcomes assessed, except the incidence rate ratio for anaemia, which slightly favoured the TNFi group (19.04 per 100 person-years) versus the non-TNFi group (24.01 per 100 person-years, p=0.03). No potential effect modifiers were found to be statistically significant.. The findings of no significant differences in outcomes between first-line TNF versus first-line non-TNF groups support RA guidelines, which recommend individualised care based on clinical judgement and consideration of patient preferences.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Infliximab; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Propensity Score; Pyrimidines; Registries; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint and systemic involvement. Tofacitinib is a JAK- inhibitor that is an effective agent in the treatment of active RA. Varicella zoster virus(VZV) reactivation is among the most important adverse effects of tofacitinib. Ramsay-Hunt syndrome(RHS) is a rare clinical condition that develops as a result of VZV reactivation and progresses with hearing loss, dizziness, and facial nerve paralysis.. To present a case of Ramsay-Hunt syndrome due to varicella zoster reactivation in a RA patient using tofacitinib.. A 63-year-old female RA patient under tofacitinib treatment was admitted to the rheumatology outpatient clinic due to widespread skin rashes on her face and ear, and hearing loss. On inspection widespread erythematous, vesicular rashes on the left side of the face, lips, around the eye and in the ear, and mild facial paralysis on the left side were detected. On laboratory investigations, acute phase reactants were increased. Serological study for specific antibodies against varicella zoster virus showed higher titers. Dermatology and ear nose throat specialist consultations were performed, and varicella zoster lesions on the left inner ear, face, and mild facial paresis were considered. According to clinical and laboratory findings, the patient was diagnosed with RHS triggered by tofacitinib. Tofacitinib and methotrexate were discontinued, and intravenous acyclovir was started. On the control examination, the patient's skin lesions and facial nerve paralysis regressed.. Herein, we reported the fırst case of tofacitinib-induced RHS in a patient with RA. This may be another side effect of biologic treatment. New studies are needed on this subject.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Herpes Zoster Oticus; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an extra-articular manifestation of RA. We investigated incidence rates of ILD in patients with RA, receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, and identified potential risk factors for ILD.. This post hoc analysis comprised a pooled analysis of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo from 2 phase (P)1, 10 P2, 6 P3, 1 P3b/4, and 2 long-term extension studies. Interstitial lung disease events were adjudicated as "probable" (supportive clinical evidence) or "possible" (no supportive clinical evidence) compatible adverse events. Incidence rates (patients with events per 100 patient-years) were calculated for ILD events.. Of 7061 patients (patient-years of exposure = 23,393.7), 42 (0.6%) had an ILD event; median time to ILD event was 1144 days. Incidence rates for ILD with both tofacitinib doses were 0.18 per 100 patient-years. Incidence rates generally remained stable over time. There were 17 of 42 serious adverse events (40.5%) of ILD; for all ILD events (serious and nonserious), 35 of 42 events (83.3%) were mild to moderate in severity. A multivariable Cox regression analysis identified age 65 years or older (hazard ratio 2.43 [95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.21]), current smokers (2.89 [1.33-6.26]), and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate score (1.30 [1.04-1.61]) as significant risk factors for ILD events.. Across P1/2/3/4/long-term extension studies, incidence rates for ILD events were 0.18 following tofacitinib treatment, and ILD events were associated with known risk factors for ILD in RA.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Incidence; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at elevated risk of cardiovascular disease vs the general population, despite a lower prevalence of traditional risk factors, including hyperlipidemia. Mechanistic studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis suggest that tofacitinib restores serum lipids to preinflammation levels by reversing inflammation-induced cholesterol metabolism changes. We reviewed data on lipid levels and cardiovascular events, alongside recommendations for managing lipid levels during tofacitinib treatment in patients with UC, based on up-to-date expert guidelines.. Data were identified from a phase 3/open-label, long-term extension (OLE) tofacitinib UC clinical program (cutoff May 27, 2019). Literature was identified from PubMed (search terms "lipid," "cholesterol," "lipoprotein," "cardiovascular," "inflammation," "atherosclerosis," "tofacitinib," "rheumatoid arthritis," "psoriasis," "inflammatory bowel disease," "ulcerative colitis," "hyperlipidemia," and "guidelines") and author knowledge. Data were available from 4 phase 3 clinical trials of 1124 patients with moderately to severely active UC who received ≥1 dose of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily in induction (two identical trials), maintenance, and OLE studies (treatment duration ≤6.8 years; 2576.4 patient-years of drug exposure).. In the OLE study, tofacitinib treatment was not associated with major changes from baseline in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with lipid levels and ratios generally remaining stable over time. The major adverse cardiovascular events incidence rate was 0.26/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.54).. Lipid levels and ratios remained generally unchanged from baseline in the OLE study after tofacitinib treatment, and major adverse cardiovascular events were infrequent. Long-term studies are ongoing.. NCT01465763, NCT01458951, NCT01458574, NCT01470612.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Inflammation; Lipids; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Myelitis; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Varicella Zoster Virus Infection

To assess the real-life efficacy, retention rate, and safety data of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.. We analyzed all patients registered in the HURBİO database who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib. Patients who received at least one dose were included in retention analysis; patients with at least 1 control visit were included in efficacy and safety analysis. Factors predicting good response at the last follow-up visit were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and predictors of drug retention were determined by Cox proportional hazard model. Adverse events, reasons for switching, and discontinuation were also determined.. Two hundred and forty-seven (210, 85.0% female) patients were included in the study. The median duration of tofacitinib treatment was 10.2 (20.2) [med, (IQR)] months. Two hundred and four (82.6%) patients were included in safety and efficacy analysis; 45.6% of patients were in low-disease activity (LDA) state (DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2). Predictors of LDA were being biologic-naïve [aOR 2.53 (1.31–4.88); 95% CI] and RF negativity [aOR 2.14 (1.12–4.07); 95% CI]. At 1 year, the overall tofacitinib retention rate was 63.9% with no relevant predicting factor. Response and retention rates of tofacitinib were similar in patients with and without concomitant csDMARDs. Treatment failure was the most common cause of discontinuation. The most common infectious and laboratory adverse events were herpes zoster infection (3.9 per 100 patient-years) and elevation in ALT (x3UNL: 9.7 per 100 patient-years), respectively.. Tofacitinib is effective as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs. It is a well-tolerated treatment option in Turkish RA patients.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Duration of Therapy; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Patient Acuity; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Failure; Turkey

The objective of this study is to describe the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or tofacitinib.. This is a descriptive study from a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with RA who were treated with bDMARDs or tofacitinib after failure of conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) or first bDMARD. Patients who were receiving pharmacological treatment between 01 January 2014 and 30 June 2018 were included. The analysis is through the revision of claim database and electronical medical records. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The costs of healthcare resources were estimated from the billing expense of healthcare service provider.. We evaluated 588 RA patients on treatment with bDMARDs (n = 505) or tofacitinib (n = 83), most of them were in combination with cDMARDs (85.4%). The 88.1% were females and mean age was 57.3 ± 12.5 years. The median evolution of RA since diagnosis was 9 years (IQR:4-17.2). The mean duration of use during follow-up of the bDMARDs or tofacitinib was similar, with a mean of 9.8 ± 1.9 months. It was identified that 394 (67.0%) discontinued therapy. The average annual direct cost of care per patient was USD 8997 ± 2172, where 97.2% was due to drug costs. The average annual cost of treatment per patient with bDMARDs was USD 8604 and tofacitinib was USD 6377.. In the face of a first failure of cDMARD, bDMARDs are frequently added. A high frequency of patients do not persist treatment during the first year of follow-up. The pharmacological treatment is the most representative cause of healthcare costs. Key Points • Rheumatoid arthritis is a disease with a high burden of comorbidities, complications, and worse health-related quality of life and is associated with elevated healthcare costs. • The biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib medications are indicated for those with significant progression of the disease and when there is a need for alternatives to achieve low levels of activity and remission. • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib represent a significant economic burden to the health system, especially in the costs derived from pharmacological treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies

To compare medication persistence of tofacitinib with persistence of injectable biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. We performed a retrospective new-user cohort study of patients with RA in the IBM MarketScan Research Databases. New users of tofacitinib or bDMARD were identified between November 2012 and December 2016. Persistence, in number of years, was the time between treatment initiation and the earliest occurrence of discontinuation or switching from the medication prescribed at cohort entry. Persistence of tofacitinib was compared with bDMARD persistence using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for high-dimensional propensity scores. Similar methods were used for an analysis of post first-line therapy in patients who switched to tofacitinib from a bDMARD.. New tofacitinib users (n = 1031) were 56 years of age, on average, and 82% were women. New bDMARD users (n = 17,803) were 53 years of age, on average, and 78% were women. New tofacitinib users had shorter medication persistence (median 0.81 yrs) compared to bDMARD patients (1.02 yrs). After adjustment, the HR for discontinuation of tofacitinib compared with bDMARD was 1.14 (95% CI 1.05-1.25). Patients who switched to tofacitinib from a bDMARD had longer persistence than patients who switched to a bDMARD (adjusted HR for discontinuation 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97).. Further research is warranted to understand the reasons for discontinuation of tofacitinib despite its ease of administration and to understand the observed differences between switchers and new users.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To provide additional clinical evidence in regulatory submissions for a modified-release (MR) once-daily (QD) tofacitinib formulation, we compared real-world adherence and effectiveness between patients initiating the MR QD formulation and patients initiating an immediate-release (IR) twice-daily (BID) formulation.. Two noninterventional cohort studies were conducted. First, adherence and two effectiveness proxies were compared between patients with RA who newly initiated tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD or IR 5 mg BID in the IBM. In each study, approximately two-thirds of patients initiated the MR formulation. In the claims database study, improved adherence and at least comparable effectiveness were observed with tofacitinib MR vs IR over 12 months, particularly in patients without prior advanced therapy. In the registry study, the noninferiority of tofacitinib MR vs IR was demonstrated for both CDAI outcomes at ~6 months; this finding was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.. These results demonstrate the value of real-world evidence from complementary data sources in understanding the impact of medication adherence with a QD formulation in clinical practice. These analyses were suitable for regulatory consideration as an important component of evidence for the comparability of tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD vs IR 5 mg BID in patients with RA.. Claims database study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04018001, retrospectively registered July 12, 2019. Corrona US RA Registry study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04267380, retrospectively registered February 12, 2020.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Medicare; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; United States

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of Tofacitinib (TFC) in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not responded well to methotrexate from the Iranian payer's perspective.. An individual microsimulation Markov model was developed to compare TFC with etanercept (ETN) and Adalimumab (ADA) over a life-time horizon. Treatment efficacy was estimated based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response improvement criteria in 6 months. Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores were mapped onto utility values to calculate outcomes in terms of QALYs. Direct medical costs were taken from national databases. Uncertainty in model parameters was evaluated by sensitivity analyses.. This study demonstrated that TFC was cost-effective in both scenarios. Although TFC was associated with lower QALYs than ETN (6.664 versus 6.876), it was also associated with lower costs over a life-time horizon ($42,565.04 versus $58,696.29). Additionally, TFC was found to be the dominant strategy with a lower cost ($50,299.91 versus $51,550.29) and higher QALYs gained (6.900 versus 6.687) compared to ADA.. TFC was found to be cost-effective in patients with severe RA who do not respond well to methotrexate compared to ADA, ETN in Iran.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Iran; Male; Markov Chains; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adalimumab; Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infections; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Registries; Risk Factors; United States

Although tofacitinib has shown highly significant efficacy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are still a considerable number of patients that are non-responders owing to its limited effectiveness and various adverse effects. Thus, alternative options with better efficacy and lower toxicity are desired. Here, M-134, a recently developed HDAC6 inhibitor, was examined for its therapeutic potential when combined with tofacitinib in a rat model of RA.. The single or combined administration of M-134 and tofacitinib was examined in complete Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) or collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rodent models. To evaluate the therapeutic and adverse effects, the following factors were observed: macroscopic or microscopic scoring of all four paws; the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IP-10 in the joints and that of various cytokines and chemokines in the plasma; the weight of the thymus and the liver; and changes in hematological enzymes.. Combination treatment showed strong synergistic effects as measured by the clinical score and histological changes, without adverse effects such as weight loss in the thymus and increased liver enzymes (ALT and AST). Additionally, it also reduced ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IP-10 expression in the joints, and M-134 increased the efficacy of tofacitinib by regulating various cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-17, and TNF-α, in the serum of AIA rats. Differences in the cytokine expression for each drug were found in the CIA model.. M-134 and tofacitinib combination therapy is a potential option for the treatment of RA through the regulation of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Freund's Adjuvant; Histone Deacetylase 6; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Sporadic cases of rheumatoid nodules (RNs) in the lung during treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been reported, but no treatment has been established. Here, we report a case of symptomatic lung RNs refractory to abatacept (ABT) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) that improved with tofacitinib (TOF) treatment. A 75-year-old Japanese woman with a 10-year history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presented with a cough and haemoptysis during treatment with etanercept (ETN). Radiographic examinations revealed multiple nodules that were diagnosed as lung RNs

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Lung Diseases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Rheumatoid Nodule; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

To evaluate real-world efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib and baricitinib in a large, single-centre cohort of RA patients across the treatment pathway, including those refractory to multiple biologic drugs.. All RA patients, treated with tofacitinib (from time of compassionate access scheme) or baricitinib since approval in 2017 had DAS28-CRP scores and components recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months (with retrospective data for compassionate access scheme). Efficacy was evaluated in the total cohort, each treatment group, and subgroups of number of prior biologic classes failed.. One hundred and fifteen patients were treated with a JAKi (tofacitinib 54, baricitinib 69, 8 both); 76.4% female; mean (s.d.) age 57.3 (14.3) years. On average patients had received three previous bDMARDs; 11 (9.6%) were bDMARD naïve. Combined group baseline DAS28-CRP (s.d.) 5.62(1.14) improved by 1.49(1.44) and 1.67(1.61) at 3 and 6 months, respectively, comparable in individual JAKi groups; with 24% in at least low disease activity at 3 months. The biggest improvement was observed in the biologic-naïve group (mean DAS28-CRP improved from 5.16-2.14 after 6 months); while those with prior exposure to minimum three bDMARD classes had DAS28-CRP improvement of >1.2. Five out of 8 patients treated with both JAKi sequentially responded. Twelve patients previously unresponsive to IL-6 blockade responded to JAKi. No unexpected safety events were recorded. Two cases of venous thromboembolism were observed.. JAK inhibition is effective in a real-world population of RA patients, including in a subset of patients refractory to multiple previous bDMARDs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that is employed in the treatment of several diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to prevent joint damage and reduce disease activity. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is a disorder that is linked to some drugs and is characterised by regression of clinical signs and symptoms after discontinuation of the drug. A 56-year-old woman who was diagnosed with RA for 20 years was admitted to the rheumatology department. Tofacitinib tablet 10 mg/d was added to the patient's medical treatment. Three months after this medical treatment, the patient was diagnosed with drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous (DISCLE) with erythematous skin lesions and autoantibody positivity. The skin rash, with increased autoantibodies, improved 6 months after discontinuation of tofacitinib. To the best of our knowledge, tofacitinib-induced lupus erythematous has not been previously reported. In this case, DILE developed after tofacitinib treatment in a patient who was followed up with RA.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; Janus Kinases; Methotrexate; Models, Statistical; Piperidines; Prednisolone; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Rituximab; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides; Virus Diseases

The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to clarify the retention rates of sarilumab (SAR), baricitinib (BAR), and tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Patients treated with either SAR (n = 62), BAR (n = 166), or TOF (n = 185) (females, 80.9%; age, 61.0 years; disease duration, 11.1 years; rheumatoid factor positivity, 84.4%; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 4.3; concomitant prednisolone dose, 5.3 mg/day [47.0%] and methotrexate dose, 8.8 mg/week [58.4%]; biologics- or Janus kinase inhibitors-switched cases 78.4%) were included. The reasons for drug discontinuation were classified into 4 major categories (lack of effectiveness, toxic adverse events, non-toxic reasons, and remission) by each attending physician. The drug retention rate was estimated at 18 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted for potential confounders by Cox proportional hazards modeling.. The discontinuation rates of SAR, BAR, and TOF for the corresponding reasons were as follows, respectively: lack of effectiveness (15.7%, 15.6%, and 21.5%; P = 0.84), toxic adverse events (15.8%, 12.1%, and 12.3%; P = 0.35), non-toxic reasons (10.9%, 7.7%, and 6.8%; P = 0.35), and remission (0.0%, 2.8%, and 0.0%; P = 1.0). The overall retention rates excluding non-toxic reasons and remission were as follows: 68.8% for SAR, 72.5% for BAR, and 66.7% for TOF (P = 0.54).. After adjustment by potent confounders, SAR, BAR, and TOF showed similar discontinuation rates due to lack of effectiveness and toxic adverse events. Key Points • This is the first retrospective multicenter study that aimed to clarify the retention rates and reasons for discontinuation of SAR, BAR, and TOF in patients with RA.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer treatment; however, immune-related adverse events do occur, with up to 7% developing inflammatory arthritis. Common rheumatoid arthritis therapies such as methotrexate, prednisolone and biologics have been used to treat this arthritis in small, uncontrolled case series with varying success. In this case of personalised medicine, we report the first use of tofacitinib, a small molecular inhibitor of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, to treat checkpoint inhibitor-related inflammatory arthritis. This resulted in a rapid clinical response and complete, sustained remission of the arthritis with associated marked reduction in synovial molecular and cellular immune response.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Precision Medicine; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assessed the effects of tofacitinib on bone density and bone markers in association with clinical and laboratory parameters in RA. Tofacitinib stabilized bone density and resulted in a positive balance of bone turnover.. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors emerged as new therapeutic options in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We have little information on how it affects areal and volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of 1-year tofacitinib therapy on bone metabolism in RA.. Thirty RA patients with active disease were treated with either 5 mg bid or 10 mg bid tofacitinib for 12 months. We determined DAS28, CRP, IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) levels, as well as serum levels of sclerostin, osteocalcin (OC), P1NP, DKK-1, OPG, RANKL, and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3. Areal and volumetric BMD were assessed by DXA and peripheral quantitative CT (QCT), respectively.. Twenty-six patients (13 on each arm) completed the study. Tofacitinib was clinically effective by suppressing DAS28, CRP, and HAQ. This was accompanied by the attenuation of further bone loss. Tofacitinib therapy significantly increased OC, OPG, and vitamin D3, while decreased CTX levels (p < 0.05). Age and multiple bone markers (OC, CTX, P1NP, RANKL) inversely correlated with L2-4 and femoral neck BMD by DXA. CRP, DAS28, and RANKL inversely determined volumetric BMD by QCT. Age, CRP, anti-CCP, and DKK-1 influenced the effects of tofacitinib therapy on BMD changes.. One-year tofacitinib treatment stabilized BMD in RA patients and resulted in a positive balance of bone turnover as indicated by bone biomarkers. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of JAK inhibitors on inflammatory bone loss.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Density; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) are efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with variable reported rates of adverse events, potentially related to differential JAK family member selectivity. Filgotinib was compared with baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib to elucidate the pharmacological basis underlying its clinical efficacy and safety.. In vitro JAKinib inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription phosphorylation (pSTAT) was measured by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood from healthy donors and patients with RA following cytokine stimulation of distinct JAK/STAT pathways. The average daily pSTAT and time above 50% inhibition were calculated at clinical plasma drug exposures in immune cells. The translation of these measures was evaluated in ex vivo-stimulated assays in phase 1 healthy volunteers.. JAKinib potencies depended on cytokine stimulus, pSTAT readout and cell type. JAK1-dependent pathways (interferon (IFN)α/pSTAT5, interleukin (IL)-6/pSTAT1) were among the most potently inhibited by all JAKinibs in healthy and RA blood, with filgotinib exhibiting the greatest selectivity for JAK1 pathways. Filgotinib (200 mg once daily) had calculated average daily target inhibition for IFNα/pSTAT5 and IL-6/pSTAT1 that was equivalent to tofacitinib (5 mg two times per day), upadacitinib (15 mg once daily) and baricitinib (4 mg once daily), with the least average daily inhibition for the JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways including IL-2, IL-15, IL-4 (JAK1/JAK3), IFNγ (JAK1/JAK2), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, IL-12, IL-23 (JAK2/tyrosine kinase 2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (JAK2/JAK2). Ex vivo pharmacodynamic data from phase 1 healthy volunteers clinically confirmed JAK1 selectivity of filgotinib.. Filgotinib inhibited JAK1-mediated signalling similarly to other JAKinibs, but with less inhibition of JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways, providing a mechanistic rationale for its apparently differentiated efficacy:safety profile.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Organising pneumonia (OP) complicated by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a rare type of interstitial lung disease, is sometimes refractory and resistant to immunosuppressive therapy. We report for the first time two cases of refractory OP with RA for which tofacitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase, was highly effective. Two women, aged 84 and 65 years, developed refractory OP during treatment for RA with biologics, certolizumab pegol, and etanercept. A moderate amount of prednisolone was effective in both cases; however, recurrences were observed with reduced glucocorticoid dosage. When tofacitinib was administered, OP and RA were well controlled. Thus, the glucocorticoid dosage was successfully tapered low enough until no side effects were observed. Tofacitinib therapy may be a treatment option for refractory OP.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

The differences of efficacy between each Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have not been clarified in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. Here, we compared the efficacy between tofacitinib (TOFA) and baricitinib (BARI) in clinical practice.. The efficacy of TOFA (n=156) in patients with RA was compared with BARI (n=138). Selection bias was reduced to a minimum using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) trajectory for patients who started TOFA or BARI was analysed using growth mixture modelling (GMM).. No significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between the TOFA and BARI groups in after adjustment by propensity score-based IPTW. The BARI group had a significantly higher rate of CDAI remission at week 24 after the introduction of JAK inhibitors than the TOFA group. The treatment-resistant group defined by GMM, comprising patients who did not achieve low disease activity at week 24, was more likely to include those who had received many biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) before the introduction of JAK inhibitors and those who received TOFA. Among patients with RA who received TOFA, those who had received ≥4 bDMARDs before the introduction of TOFA were more likely to be classified into the treatment-resistant group.. BARI showed a similar safety profile and better clinical outcome when compared with TOFA after reduction to a minimum of selection bias. However, these were observed in a small population. Accordingly, further investigation is required in an accurately powered head-to-head trial.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Propensity Score; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who failed conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.. An individual patient simulation model was used to estimate the lifetime cost and effectiveness. The comparator sequence commenced with etanercept, followed by rituximab-tocilizumab- non-biologic therapy. The intervention sequences were assumed to add tofacitinib to different positions in the comparator sequence. Quality-of-life estimates were generated by mapping Health Assessment Questionnaire scores to utility with the algorithm derived from a Chinese population. Scenario analyses, univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty.. Compared with the comparator sequence, patients receiving tofacitinib as the first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment gained additional 0.49, 0.59, 0.44 and 0.53 QALYs, respectively, and the use of tofacitinib as the first- and second-line treatment was less costly, whereas the use of tofacitinib as the third- and fourth-line treatment cost an additional $234,998 and $381,116, respectively. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $333.73 and $9669.34/QALY, respectively.. Tofacitinib is estimated to be dominant in both the first- and second-line settings and to be highly cost-effective in both the third- and fourth-line settings.

Topics: Algorithms; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Tofacitinib tablet is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, tofacitinib (Tfc) faces extensive first-pass metabolism following oral administration.. To develop transdermal systems of Tfc and evaluate their efficacies against RA using Freund's Complete Adjuvant immunized arthritis rat model.. These systems were prepared by solvent casting method and evaluated for texture, needle strength, skin penetrability,. Transdermal patch (TS) showed smooth texture, good mechanical strength, slow-release, and slow permeation through the skin. Microneedle array (MNS) showed good needle strength, with required skin penetrability. MNS and TS showed 95% and 24% drug release, and 82% and 12% drug permeation, respectively in 4 h. The developed systems were found to be stable for 90 days at very stressful conditions, that is, 40 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 5% RH. MNS and TS both reduced arthritic scores (at. TS and MNS were found to be stable and effective for the treatment of arthritis and hence considered a good alternative for the treatment of RA with better clinical pertinence.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Delivery Systems; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Transdermal Patch

Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule targeting the intracellular Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathways approved for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the effects of tofacitinib on the response of RA lymphocytes to B and T cell collagen epitopes in their native and post-translationally modified forms. In particular, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with RA and healthy subjects were cultured with type II collagen peptides (T261-273, B359-369, carT261-273, citB359-369) or with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)/ionomycin/CD40L in the presence or absence of 100 nM tofacitinib for 20 h and analyzed by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS). Cultures without brefeldin A were used for cytokine supernatant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Tofacitinib down-regulated inflammatory cytokines by stimulated B [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α] and T [interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-17 or TNF-α] cells in the short term, while a significant reduction of IL-17 and IL-6 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) supernatant was also observed. IL-10 was significantly reduced in collagen-stimulated B cells from patients with RA and increased in controls, thus mirroring an altered response to collagen self-epitopes in RA. Tofacitinib partially prevented the IL-10 down-modulation in RA B cells stimulated with collagen epitopes. In conclusion, the use of tofacitinib exerts a rapid regulatory effect on B cells from patients with RA following stimulation with collagen epitopes while not reducing inflammatory cytokine production by lymphocytes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Collagen Type II; Cytokines; Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte; Female; Humans; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinases; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Lymphocytes; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

In this study we aimed to identify the predictors of drug survival for biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting. Data from RA patients receiving bDMARDs and tsDMARDs between 2007 and 2019 were extracted from the Taiwan Rheumatology Association Clinical Electronic Registry (TRACER). Patients were categorized into tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, non-TNF-α inhibitors, and tofacitinib groups. The primary outcome was 3-year drug retention and the causes of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs discontinuation were recorded. Baseline demographic data before the initiation of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs treatment were analyzed to identify the predictors of 3-year drug survival. A total of 1,270 RA patients were recruited (TNF-α inhibitors: 584; non-TNF-α inhibitors: 535; tofacitinib: 151). The independent protective factors for 3-year drug survival were positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.85, p = 0.013) and biologics-naïve RA (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94, p = 0.024). In contrast, positive anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.32-3.79, p = 0.003) and pre-existing latent tuberculosis (HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.06-4.09, p<0.001) were associated with drug discontinuation. RA patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors exhibited better drug retention, especially in the biologics-naïve subgroup (p = 0.037). TNF-α inhibitors were associated with lower cumulative incidence of discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events (both p<0.001). Baseline RF and ACPA positivity in abatacept-treated patients were associated with a better 3-year drug survival. However, negative ACPA levels predicted superior drug survival of TNF-α inhibitors and tofacitinib. In conclusion, bio-naïve status predicted better drug survival in TNF-α inhibitors-treated RA patients. RF and ACPA positivity predicted better abatacept drug survival. In contrast, ACPA negativity was associated with superior TNF-α inhibitors and tofacitinib survival.

Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Registries; Taiwan; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

To compare effectiveness between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve patients or previous bDMARD-failure patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate (MTX).. We used two ongoing real-world registries of patients with RA who had first started tofacitinib or tocilizumab between August 2013 and February 2019 at our institutions. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based improvements at 12 months were used for comparisons between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments, separately for bDMARD-naïve and previous bDMARD-failure patients.. A total of 464 patients with RA with high or moderate CDAI were enrolled (247 with tofacitinib and 217 with tocilizumab). After adjustments for treatment-selection bias by propensity score matching, we showed that tofacitinib was more likely to induce and maintain ≥85% improvement in CDAI (CDAI85), CDAI70 and remission at 12 months compared with tocilizumab in bDMARD-naïve patients. After adjusting for concurrent use of MTX and prednisolone, the ORs of tofacitinib versus tocilizumab were 3.88 (95% CI 1.87 to 8.03) for CDAI85, 2.89 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.84) for CDAI70 and 3.31 (95% CI 1.69 to 6.48) for remission. These effects were not observed in bDMARD-failure patients. In tofacitinib treatment for bDMARD-failure patients, the number of previously failed bDMARD classes was not associated with CDAI-based improvements. The rate of overall adverse events was similar between both treatments. Similar ORs were obtained from patients adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Compared with tocilizumab, tofacitinib can induce greater improvements during the first 12-month treatment in bDMARD-naïve patients, but this difference was not observed in previous bDMARD-failure patients.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

To analyse adverse events (AEs) of special interest across tofacitinib clinical programmes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ulcerative colitis (UC) and psoriasis (PsO), and to determine whether the incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) of these events are consistent across diseases.. The analysis included data from patients exposed to ≥1 dose of tofacitinib in phase 1, 2, 3 or 3b/4 clinical trials and long-term extension (LTE) studies (38 trials) in RA (23 trials), PsA (3 trials), UC (5 trials) and PsO (7 trials). All studies were completed by or before July 2019, except for one ongoing UC LTE study (data cut-off May 2019). IRs were obtained for AEs of special interest.. 13 567 patients were included in the analysis (RA: n=7964; PsA: n=783; UC: n=1157; PsO: n=3663), representing 37 066 patient-years of exposure. Maximum duration of exposure was 10.5 years (RA). AEs within the 'infections and infestations' System Organ Class were the most common in all diseases. Among AEs of special interest, IRs were highest for herpes zoster (non-serious and serious; 3.6, 1.8, 3.5 and 2.4 for RA, PsA, UC and PsO, respectively) and serious infections (2.5, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.3 for RA, PsA, UC and PsO, respectively). Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mortality ratios (weighted for country) were ≤0.2 across cohorts.. The tofacitinib safety profile in this analysis was generally consistent across diseases and with longer term follow-up compared with previous analyses.

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome

The molecular mechanism of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike protein was characterized to identify novel therapies. The impact of tofacitinib, IL-6R Ab, or TNFi therapy was determined on Spike protein or LPS/IFN-γ-induced signaling, inflammation, and metabolic reprogramming in MΦs and/or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS). ACE2 frequency was markedly expanded in MΦs compared to T cells and RA FLS. Tofacitinib suppresses Spike protein potentiated STAT1 signaling, whereas this function was unchanged by TNFi. Tofacitinib impairs IL-6/IFN/LPS-induced STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in RA MΦs and FLS. Interestingly, tofacitinib had a broader inhibitory effect on the monokines, glycolytic regulators, or oxidative metabolites compared to IL-6R Ab and TNFi in Spike-protein-activated MΦs. In contrast, all three therapies disrupted IFN-α and IFN-β secretion in response to Spike protein; nonetheless, the IFN-γ was only curtailed by tofacitinib or IL-6R Ab. While tofacitinib counteracted MΦ metabolic rewiring instigated by Spike protein, it was inconsequential on the glycolysis expansion mediated via HK2 and/or LDHA in the activated RA MΦ and FLS. Nevertheless, the potentiated inflammatory response and the diminished oxidative phosphorylation modulated by Spike protein and/or LPS/IFN-γ stimulation in MΦs or RA FLS were reversed by tofacitinib. In conclusion, tofacitinib suppresses MΦ inflammation and immunometabolism triggered by Spike protein and may provide a promising strategy for COVID-19 patients.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interleukin-6; Macrophages; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Interleukin-6; SARS-CoV-2; Signal Transduction; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Main objective: Describe the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib and tofacitinib in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in our hospital.. Analyse whether there are  differences between the two drugs in routine clinical practice.. Two-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with  rheumatoid arthritis treated in our hospital with baricitinib and tofacitinib  for at least 6 months. Databases: Electronic medical record and outpatient medication dispensing software. Variables collected:  Demographic variables, poor prognosis factors, previous treatment,  duration of treatment, concomitant treatment, DAS28, number of swollen  and painful joints, pain visual analogy scale, treatment discontinuation,  and adverse reactions. Effectiveness evaluation: Decreases in the DAS28  scale, the number of swollen and painful joints, and the pain Visual  Analogy Scale at 6 months and 12 months after starting treatment. Safety evaluation: Detection of adverse reactions.. Student t- test.. A total of 44 patients were evaluated. Of these, 20 (70%  women) received treatment with baricitinib and 24 (95.8% women)  received tofacitinib. Baricitinib reduced the DAS28 by 2.3 and 1.7 at 6  months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the scale by 2 and 1.9 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced the  number of swollen and painful joints by 7 at both 6 months and 12  months, and tofacitinib reduced the number of swollen and painful joints  by 4 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced  the Visual Analogy Scale score by 7.8 and 6.8 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the score by 5 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Corticosteroid treatment was needed in 40% of patients treated with baricitinib and 62.5% of patients treated with  rofacitinib. Treatment was discontinued due to loss of effectiveness in 10% of patients receiving baricitinib and 25% of patients treated with  tofacitinib. Adverse reactions were experienced by 10% of patients treated with baricitinib and 12.5% of patients treated with tofacitinib. Adverse  reactions led to treatment discontinuation in only 1 patient in each group.  No statistically significant differences were observed between the two  drugs.. The results show that baricitinib and tofacitinib were  effective and safe in relation to all the variables analysed. Moreover, both drugs were similar in terms of effectiveness and safety for the  treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice.. Objetivo: Objetivo principal: describir la efectividad y seguridad de baricitinib y tofacitinib en pacientes diagnosticados de artritis  reumatoide en nuestro centro. Objetivo secundario: analizar si existen  diferencias entre ambos fármacos en práctica clínica real.Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de 2 años de duración que  incluyó pacientes diagnosticados de artritis reumatoide en tratamiento con  baricitinib o tofacitinib en nuestro centro durante al menos 6 meses. Bases de datos: historia clínica electrónica, aplicativo informático de dispensación a pacientes externos. Variables recogidas: demográficas, factores de mal  pronóstico, tratamiento previo, duración de tratamiento, tratamiento  concomitante, escala DAS28, número de articulaciones inflamadas y  dolorosas, escala visual analógica del dolor, suspensión del tratamiento y  reacciones adversas. Evaluación de la efectividad: disminución en la escala DAS28, articulaciones inflamadas y dolorosas y escala visual analógica del  dolor a los 6 y 12 meses de iniciado el tratamiento. Evaluación de la  seguridad: detección de reacciones adversas.Análisis estadístico: prueba t-student.Resultados: Se evaluaron 44 pacientes, 20 (70% mujeres) recibieron tratamiento con baricitinib, 24 (95,8% mujeres) con tofacitinib.  Baricitinib redujo la puntuación en la escala DAS28 en 2,3 y 1,7 a los 6 y  12 meses. Tofacitinib en 2 y 1,9 respectivamente. Baricitinib redujo el  número de articulaciones inflamadas y dolorosas en 7 a los 6 y 12 meses,  tofacitinib en 4 las inflamadas y 6 las dolorosas. Baricitinib redujo la  puntuación en la escala visual analógica del dolor en 7,8 y 6,8; tofacitinib  en 5 y 6 a los 6 y 12 meses. El 40% de los pacientes con baricitinib y el 62,5% con tofacitinib precisaron tratamiento con corticoides. El 10% de los pacientes con baricitinib y el 25% de los pacientes con tofacitinib suspendieron el tratamiento por ineficacia. El 10% de los pacientes de baricitinib y el 12,5% de tofacitinib experimentaron reacciones adversas. Sólo un paciente de cada grupo suspendió el tratamiento por reacciones adversas. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos fármacos.Conclusiones: Según nuestros resultados, baricitinib y tofacitinib han demostrado ser efectivos y seguros en todas las variables analizadas. Además, ambos fármacos resultaron similares en efectividad y  seguridad en la práctica clínica habitual del tratamiento de la artritis  reumatoide.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with RA in a real-world setting.. A total of 242 patients with RA who were treated with tofacitinib (n = 161) or baricitinib (n = 81) were enrolled. We evaluated efficacy and safety between tofacitinib and baricitinib using multivariable analyses to avoid confounding. Their clinical disease activity and AEs were evaluated for 24 weeks.. The mean (SD) DAS28-ESR change from baseline to 24 weeks was 1.57 (1.55) (tofacitinib) and 1.46 (1.36) (baricitinib). There was no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.28). The efficacy was not significantly changed in the patients without concomitant MTX use in both groups, but the concomitant MTX use showed better clinical efficacy in the cases of baricitinib treatment. In both groups, the most common AE was herpes zoster infection, and the AE rates were similar between the two groups. However, the predictive factors contributing to clinical response as revealed by a multivariable logistic analysis differed. The concomitant oral steroid use was independently associated with the achievement of DAS-low disease activity in the tofacitinib group, whereas in the baricitinib group, the number of biological and/or targeted synthetic DMARDs previously used was associated.. Our findings indicate that tofacitinib and baricitinib had comparable continuing efficacies and safety profiles. However, there is a possibility that the influence of clinical characteristics on the treatment response differs. The comparison provides useful information to the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in real-world settings.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

To describe characteristics, treatment patterns and persistence in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in Canadian clinical practice between 1 June 2014 and 31 May 2017.. Data were obtained from the tofacitinib eXel support programme. Baseline demographics and medication history were collected via patient report/special authorization forms; reasons for discontinuation were captured by patient report. Treatment persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with data censored at last follow-up. Cox regression was applied to analyse baseline characteristics associated with treatment discontinuation.. The number of patients with RA enrolled from 2014 to 2017 was 4276; tofacitinib utilization increased during that period, as did the proportion of biologic (b) DMARD-naïve patients prescribed tofacitinib. Of patients who initiated tofacitinib, 1226/3678 (33.3%) discontinued, mostly from lack of efficacy (35.7%) and adverse events (26.9%). Persistence was 62.7% and 49.6% after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. Prior bDMARD experience predicted increased tofacitinib discontinuation (vs bDMARD-naïve, P < 0.001). Increased retention was associated with older age (56-65 years and >65 years vs ⩽45 years; P < 0.05), and time since diagnosis of 15 to <20 years (vs <5 years; P < 0.01). In bDMARD-naïve, post-1 bDMARD, post-2 bDMARD and post-⩾3 bDMARD patients, median survival was >730, 613, 667 and 592 days, respectively.. Since 2014, tofacitinib use in Canadian patients with RA increased, especially among bDMARD-naïve/post-1 bDMARD patients. Median drug survival was ∼2 years. Likelihood of persistence increased for bDMARD-naïve (vs bDMARD-experienced) patients and those aged ⩾56 (vs ⩽45) years.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Canada; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this analysis was to characterize the relationship between tofacitinib dose and efficacy, as measured by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates, and to compare this between Japanese and Western patients with RA. Efficacy data were pooled from 2 double-blind, dose-ranging phase 2 studies of tofacitinib monotherapy 1-15 mg twice daily in patients with RA with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). NCT00550446 was carried out in mostly Western patients and NCT00687193 in Japanese patients. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates in week 12 were analyzed using maximum drug effect (E

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asian People; Black People; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; White People; Young Adult

Tofacitinib is a new small-molecule inhibitor of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. We herein report a case of IgA vasculitis apparently caused by tofacitinib. A 67-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis developed IgA vasculitis after taking tofacitinib for 6 months. She presented with proteinuria and purpura of the lower extremities. Biopsy specimens from her skin and kidney were compatible with IgA vasculitis. Following termination of tofacitinib, the patient completely recovered from the IgA vasculitis. Drug-induced IgA vasculitis has been previously described for anti-tumor necrosis factor-(TNF)α therapies, but this is the first report of this adverse effect with anti-JAK therapy.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin A; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vasculitis

The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to adalimumab were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and adalimumab in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.. Four RCTs comprising 5451 patients met the inclusion criteria. Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that baricitinib 4 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, and placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX showed significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 response rates than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. For herpes zoster infection, the ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that placebo + MTX was likely to be the safest treatment, followed by filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. No statistically significant differences were found between the intervention groups in terms of safety.. In RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed the highest ACR response rates, suggesting a difference in efficacy among the different JAK inhibitors.. ZIEL DER ARBEIT: Bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) und inadäquatem Ansprechen auf Methotrexat (Mtx) wurde die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib im Vergleich zu Adalimumab untersucht.. Die Autoren führten eine Bayes-Netzwerk-Metaanalyse durch, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib und Adalimumab bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf MTX zu untersuchen.. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 5451 Patienten erfüllt. Unter Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX und Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX zeigte sich eine signifikant höhere ACR20-Ansprechrate (gemäß American College of Rheumatology) als unter Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Wie die Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, basierend auf der Oberfläche unter der kumulativen Rangfolgenkurve (SUCRA, „surface under the cumulative ranking curve“), ergab, stellte Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit die beste Behandlung zur Erzielung der ACR20-Ansprechrate dar, es folgten Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, Tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX und Placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX und Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX wiesen signifikant höhere ACR50- und ACR70-Ansprechraten auf als Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. In Bezug auf eine Herpes-zoster-Infektion ergab die auf SUCRA basierende Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, dass Placebo + MTX am ehesten die sicherste Therapie darstellte, dem folgten Filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, Tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX und Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. Es wurden keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den Interventionsgruppen hinsichtlich der Sicherheit festgestellt.. Bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf MTX ergaben Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX und Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX die höchsten ACR-Ansprechraten, was ein Hinweis auf einen Unterschied in der Wirksamkeit der verschiedenen JAK-Inhibitoren sein könnte.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

The aim of this study was to describe the real-world evidence for effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns among patients in the community with rheumatoid arthritis treated with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib.. This was a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study that extracted data for new users of tofacitinib or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) from the Australian Optimizing Patient outcomes in Australian RheumatoLogy (OPAL) dataset between March 2015 and September 2018. Patients were propensity score matched at a 1:2 tofacitinib to bDMARD ratio based on age, sex, and selected baseline treatment combinations. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated using disease status measures. Treatment persistence was calculated and the percentage of patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy at treatment initiation was evaluated.. Data from 2810 patients were extracted and 1950 patients were included in the matched population (1300 bDMARD initiators and 650 tofacitinib initiators). Patients were predominantly aged 55 to 74 years (57.8%) and female (81.2%). After 18 months of treatment, 52.4% and 57.8% of patients had achieved disease activity score (DAS) remission in the bDMARD and tofacitinib groups, respectively. The median treatment persistence for tofacitinib was similar to that for bDMARDs: 34.2 months (95% CI 32.2 to not reached) and 33.8 months (95% CI 28.8 to 40.4), respectively. In the overall population, more patients were prescribed tofacitinib as monotherapy (43.4%) compared with bDMARD monotherapy (33.4%).. Tofacitinib demonstrated treatment effectiveness and persistence similar to bDMARDs. Overall, there was a trend for more use of tofacitinib as monotherapy than bDMARDs. Key Points • This study provides real-world evidence regarding effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the community being treated with tofacitinib. • The study suggests that tofacitinib is an effective and enduring intervention in RA with tofacitinib persistence and effectiveness comparable to bDMARDs.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Australia; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Herpes Zoster Vaccine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vaccines, Live, Unattenuated

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cardiovascular Diseases; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines

Signaling pathways that sense amino acid abundance are integral to tissue homeostasis and cellular defense. Our laboratory has previously shown that halofuginone (HF) inhibits the prolyl-tRNA synthetase catalytic activity of glutamyl-prolyl-tRNA synthetase (EPRS), thereby activating the amino acid response (AAR). We now show that HF treatment selectively inhibits inflammatory responses in diverse cell types and that these therapeutic benefits occur in cells that lack GCN2, the signature effector of the AAR. Depletion of arginine, histidine, or lysine from cultured fibroblast-like synoviocytes recapitulates key aspects of HF treatment, without utilizing GCN2 or mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 pathway signaling. Like HF, the threonyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor borrelidin suppresses the induction of tissue remodeling and inflammatory mediators in cytokine-stimulated fibroblast-like synoviocytes without GCN2, but both aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) inhibitors are sensitive to the removal of GCN1. GCN1, an upstream component of the AAR pathway, binds to ribosomes and is required for GCN2 activation. These observations indicate that aaRS inhibitors, like HF, can modulate inflammatory response without the AAR/GCN2 signaling cassette, and that GCN1 has a role that is distinct from its activation of GCN2. We propose that GCN1 participates in a previously unrecognized amino acid sensor pathway that branches from the canonical AAR.

Topics: Amino Acids; Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Line; Fibroblasts; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; Humans; Lung; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Quinazolinones; RNA-Binding Proteins; RNA-Seq; Signal Transduction; Synovial Membrane; Synoviocytes; Trans-Activators

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Betacoronavirus; Colitis, Ulcerative; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Cytokines; Dermatitis, Atopic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Immunomodulation; Janus Kinases; Nitriles; Pandemics; Piperidines; Pneumonia, Viral; Primary Myelofibrosis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; SARS-CoV-2; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides

Low drug concentrations at interest sites and unwanted systemic side effects are major obstacles to effective therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). With the aim of improving the efficacy of tofacitinib citrate (TOF), a liposomal system was developed for targeted delivery to inflamed joints, and this approach was validated in a RA rat model. TOF was effectively loaded into the liposomes (entrapment efficiency: 86.5±1.9%; drug loading: 2.3±0.05%) by a pH gradient method, and these molecules featured sustained drug release behaviour over 48 h.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Foot; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; Humans; Joints; Lipid Peroxidation; Liposomes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Synovial Membrane; Tissue Distribution

To assess the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib-containing treatment sequences versus sequences containing only standard biological therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after the failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR population) and in patients previously treated with methotrexate (MTX) who show an inadequate response to second-line therapy with any tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi-IR population).. A patient-level microsimulation model estimated, from the perspective of the Spanish Public NHS, lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for treatment sequences starting with tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) followed by biological therapies versus sequences of biological treatments only. Concomitant treatment with MTX was considered. Model's parameters comprised demographic and clinical inputs (initial Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score and clinical response to short- and long-term treatment). Efficacy was measured by means of HAQ score changes using mixed treatment comparisons and data from long-term extension (LTE) trials. Serious adverse events (SAEs) data were derived from the literature. Total cost estimation (€, 2018) included drug acquisition, parenteral administration, disease progression and SAE management.. In the csDMARD-IR population, sequences starting with tofacitinib proved dominant options (more QALYs and lower costs) versus the corresponding sequences without tofacitinib. In the TNFi-IR population, first-line treatment with tofacitinib+MTX followed by scAbatacept+MTX➔rituximab+MTX➔certolizumab+MTX proved dominant versus scTocilizumab+MTX➔scAbatacept+MTX➔rituximab+MTX➔certolizumab+MTX; and tofacitinib+MTX➔scTocilizumab+MTX➔scAbatacept+MTX➔rituximab+MTX versus scTocilizumab+MTX➔scAbatacept+MTX➔rituximab+MTX➔certolizumab+MTX was less effective but remained a cost-saving option.. Inclusion of tofacitinib seems a dominant strategy in moderate-to-severe RA patients after csDMARDs failure. Tofacitinib, as initial third-line therapy, proved a cost-saving strategy (€- 337,489/QALY foregone) in moderate-to-severe TNFi-IR RA patients. Key points • Therapeutical approach in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) consisted in sequences of several therapies during patient lifetime. • Treatment sequences initiating with tofacitinib followed by biological drugs provided higher health effects in csDMARDs-IR population, compared with sequences containing only biological drugs. • In both csDMARD-IR and TNFi-IR RA populations, initiating treatment with tofacitinib was associated to lower treatment costs for the Spanish National Health System.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Spain; Treatment Outcome

Phospholipase D1 (PLD1) plays a crucial role in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and systemic autoimmune disease. However, the role of PLD1 in the pathogenesis of RA remains unknown. Here, we first investigated the role and effects of PLD1 in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and found that genetic and pharmacological inhibition of PLD1 in DBA1/J mice with CIA reduced the incidence of CIA, decreased the clinical score, and abrogated disease symptoms including infiltration of leukocytes, synovial inflammation, bone erosion, and cartilage destruction. Moreover, ablation and inhibition of PLD1 suppressed the production of type II collagen-specific IgG2a autoantibody and proinflammatory cytokines, accompanied by an increase in the regulatory T (Treg) cell population and a decrease in the Th17 cell population in CIA mice. The PLD1 inhibitor also promoted differentiation of Treg cells and suppressed differentiation of Th17 cells in vitro. Furthermore, the PLD1 inhibitor attenuated pathologic bone destruction in CIA mice by suppressing osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Thus, our findings indicate that the targeting of PLD1 can ameliorate CIA by modulating the imbalance of Treg and Th17 cells and suppressing osteoclastogenesis, which might be a novel strategy to treat autoimmune diseases, such as RA.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzimidazoles; Cell Differentiation; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Knee Joint; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred DBA; Mice, Knockout; Osteogenesis; Phospholipase D; Piperidines; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Th17 Cells; X-Ray Microtomography

Multiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.. To compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.. This observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.. 4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.. Tofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.

Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Switzerland; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Rifampin is known to influence the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib owing to drug interactions. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of tofacitinib on co-administration with rifampin in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.. Biologic-naïve RA patients treated with tofacitinib were selected, and electronic medical reports were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before starting tofacitinib, and patients with positive results were treated to prevent progression to active tuberculosis. To evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib with or without rifampin, the discontinuation rates of tofacitinib were examined during the first 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to construct cumulative discontinuation curves, and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test.. Among 81 patients who starting tofacitinib, 21 were LTBI-positive and 18 were administered rifampin concomitantly with tofacitinib. Additionally, 14 of the 81 patients (17.3%) discontinued tofacitinib during the follow-up, and 7 patients discontinued tofacitinib because of uncontrolled RA activity. The discontinuation rates of tofacitinib within the first 6 months were significantly higher in patients treated with rifampin for LTBI than in those not treated with rifampin (lack of efficacy: 24.7% vs. 5.1%, P<0.01; all causes: 38.9% vs. 11.2%, P<0.01).. Discontinuation rates were higher in RA patients who started tofacitinib during chemoprophylaxis involving rifampin than in those who did not receive rifampin. Physicians should be aware that the efficacy of tofacitinib could be decreased by chemoprophylactic regimens for tuberculosis.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Latent Tuberculosis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Rifampin; Treatment Outcome

To create a mobile application able to help patients follow medical treatments properly.. We designed and developed a custom Android/iOS App to remind patients of the pharmaceutical drugs to be taken, of the visits and exams to attend, and to detect their compliance with their personal therapeutic plan. In this paper we describe the App development, UX/UI design, Gamification. TuTOR is an Android and iOS application designed to remind patients of the drugs to be taken, giving them all the information related to their therapeutic plans in a simple and non-invasive way. Thanks to a dedicated back-office, specially designed to meet specific medical information needs, the App can also help physicians detect their patients' compliance with their treatments and modify prescriptions in real time. The App also ensures a state-of-the-art approach to data security and privacy protection. The main feature of TuTOR is the smart therapy assistant, which features dedicated alarms to remind users of taking their prescription drugs. Thanks to the automatic synchronization with a local database, the alert system works even without connection to the Internet. Particular attention was paid during the App's design process: we looked to create an intuitive interface to ensure absolute ease of use, with state-of-the-art visual design aimed at maximizing user experience. Other relevant features include the App's ability to givevisual evidence of the most important drugs to be taken and its note-taking feature, which gives patients the possibility to note down indications on why a specific drug was skipped. The App also keeps track of upcoming medical exams, laboratory tests, and visits on a devoted calendar. It also helps patients by listing therapy contacts, such as physicians' phone numbers, and indicates all medical references by showing, for example, locations of relevant clinics and pharmacies on a map. Thanks to specific visual progress indicators and an innovative gamification approach, the App encourages users to faithfully follow therapy guidelines. With TuTOR, assessing the therapy's state of completion is quick and easy.Thanksto the privacy-by-design approach used, all data managed by the system is compliant with the European Privacy Regulation and it is not available to third parties.. A mobile App for medication adherence might increase objectively and subjectively measured adherence.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Computer Security; Female; Humans; Medication Adherence; Mobile Applications; Piperidines; Pregnancy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Young Adult

Lymphocyte proliferation is a major factor determining the magnitude of the immune response. Both dexamethasone (DEX) and tofacitinib (TOF) exert marked immunosuppressive effects and are mainstay drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was aimed to explore the single and combined anti-proliferative action of DEX and TOF on lymphocytes and their sex differences.. The single-drug effects and dual-drug interactions of TOF and DEX were assessed on the in vitro concanavalin A-stimulated proliferation of lymphocytes isolated from male and female rat and human peripheral blood.. TOF has a promising steroid-sparing potential with the beneficial effects of the combination therapy more likely in males than females.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Concanavalin A; Dexamethasone; Drug Antagonism; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Lymphocytes; Male; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Pyrimidines; Rats; Sex Factors; Species Specificity

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We characterized tofacitinib efficacy/safety in Indian vs rest of the world (ROW; excluding India) RA patients.. Efficacy data were pooled for disease-modified antirheumatic drug (DMARD) inadequate responders from Phase (P)3 studies. For Indian patients, ORAL Solo and ORAL Scan; ROW (excluding India), these studies plus ORAL Step, ORAL Sync, and ORAL Standard. Safety data also included ORAL Start (P3; methotrexate-naïve) and ORAL Sequel (long-term extension [LTE] study; data cut-off March 2017) for Indian patients, and these studies plus A3921041 (LTE study; Japanese study) for ROW. Efficacy outcomes at months 3/6: American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission/low disease activity; change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events/100 patient-years) for adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were assessed throughout. Descriptive data underwent no formal comparison.. One-hundred-and-ninety-seven Indian and 3879 ROW patients were included. Compared with ROW patients, Indian patients were younger, had lower body mass index, shorter RA duration, and higher baseline disease activity; most Indian patients were non-smokers and all were biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve. Month 3 ACR20 rates with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily/10 mg twice daily/placebo were 67.4%/82.1%/40.9% (India) and 59.0%/66.1%/28.2% (ROW), and month 6 rates were 76.2%/92.1%/88.9% (India) and 69.0%/74.2%/66.5% (ROW). Month 3/6 improvements in other outcomes were generally numerically greater with tofacitinib vs placebo, and similar in both populations. Compared with ROW, Indian patients had numerically fewer AEs/serious AEs, and similar IRs for discontinuations due to AEs and AESIs, except that tuberculosis (TB) IR was higher in Indian (IR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.49, 2.49) vs ROW patients (IR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.11, 0.25).. Tofacitinib efficacy/safety were similar in both populations, except TB IR, which was higher in Indian patients but in line with those in bDMARD-treated RA patients from high-risk countries (IR = 0.00-2.56; TB IR >0.05 [World Health Organization]). Limitations included the small Indian population and baseline differences between populations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; India; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib are new treatments for rheumatic diseases. Recent concerns regarding the risk of thrombosis have led to warnings by competent authorities. We therefore aimed to examine the thromboembolic safety signal for tofacitinib and baricitinib.. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) for tofacitinib and baricitinib were retrieved from the World Health Organization global database VigiBase in April 2019. Primary outcomes were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thrombosis (PT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Patient demographics were summarized and then stratified by outcome. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) worldwide, and stratified by either Europe or the US.. In both the tofacitinib (n = 40,017) and baricitinib (n = 2138) ICSRs, patients with reported DVT or PT/PE were older and had higher reporting of prothrombotic medications or antithrombotic treatments, suggesting a pre-existing thromboembolic risk/event. In Europe, tofacitinib was associated with increased reporting for DVT (ROR 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.56) and PT/PE (ROR 2.38. 95% CI 1.45-3.89). For baricitinib, a threefold increased reporting odds was observed for DVT (ROR 3.47, 95% CI 2.18-5.52) and PT/PE (ROR 3.44, 95% CI 2.43-4.88) in Europe. In the US, tofacitinib was only associated with an elevated ROR of PT (ROR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45-2.90) and no baricitinib ICSRs were reported.. This study supports the current recommendation for cautious use of tofacitinib in patients with high thromboembolic risk. Moreover, with a similar patient profile and elevated reporting for baricitinib, a potential class effect of JAK inhibitors cannot be ruled out.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Pharmacovigilance; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism; World Health Organization

Innate immune cells play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) via release of cytokines. Small-molecule inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKi) are clinically efficacious in patients with RA. However, the isoform-specific action of each JAKi is difficult to assess, since JAKs form heterodimeric complexes with cytokine receptors. We assessed the effects of several JAKi on GM-CSF-primed human innate immune cells.. Treatment with JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) prevented GM-CSF-induced JAK2/STAT5 phosphorylation at higher concentrations (400 nM) in THP-1 cells. Whereas compared with baricitinib or upadacitinib, the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib on the GM-CSF-induced JAK2/STAT5 phosphorylation were weak at lower concentrations (≤ 100 nM). All JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced IL-1β production by human neutrophils. However, the inhibitory effects of baricitinib on IL-1β production were larger compared to those of tofacitinib or upadacitinib at lower concentrations (≤ 100 nM). Similarly, all JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced caspase-1(p20) production by human neutrophils.. We conclude that incubation with JAKi prevents GM-CSF-mediated JAK2/STAT5 activation in human innate immune cells. Although baricitinib and upadacitinib almost completely blocked GM-CSF-mediated JAK2/STAT5 signaling, the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib were weaker at lower concentrations suggesting that variation exists among these JAKi in the inhibition of JAK2 signaling pathways.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Line; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT5 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides; THP-1 Cells

This multi-center, retrospective study aimed to clarify retention rates and reasons for discontinuation of 7 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib (TOF), one of the janus kinase inhibitors, in bDMARDs-naïve and bDMARDs-switched patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. This study assessed 3897 patients and 4415 treatment courses with bDMARDs and TOF from 2001 to 2019 (2737 bDMARDs-naïve courses and 1678 bDMARDs-switched courses [59.5% of switched courses were their second agent], female 82.3%, baseline age 57.4 years, disease duration 8.5 years; rheumatoid factor positivity 78.4%; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate 4.3; concomitant prednisolone [PSL] dose 6.1 mg/day [usage 42.4%], and methotrexate [MTX] dose 8.5 mg/week [usage 60.9%]). Treatment courses included abatacept (ABT; n = 663), adalimumab (ADA; n = 536), certolizumab pegol (CZP; n = 226), etanercept (ETN; n = 856), golimumab (GLM; n = 458), infliximab (IFX; n = 724), tocilizumab (TCZ; n = 851), and TOF (n = 101/only bDMARDs-switched cases). Drug discontinuation reasons (categorized into lack of effectiveness, toxic adverse events, non-toxic reasons, or remission) and rates were estimated at 36 months using Gray's test and statistically evaluated after adjusted by potential clinical confounders (age, sex, disease duration, concomitant PSL and MTX usage, starting date, and number of switched bDMARDs) using the Fine-Gray model.. Cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation for each reason was as follows: lack of effectiveness in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 13.7% [ABT] to 26.9% [CZP]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 18.9% [TCZ] to 46.1% [CZP]; P < 0.001 between agents); toxic adverse events in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 4.6% [ABT] to 11.2% [ETN]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 5.0% [ETN] to 15.7% [TOF]; P = 0.004 between agents); and remission in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 2.9% [ETN] to 10.0% [IFX]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 1.1% [CZP] to 3.3% [GLM]; P = 0.9 between agents).. Remarkable differences were observed in drug retention of 7 bDMARDs and TOF between bDMARDs-naïve and bDMARDs-switched cases.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLS) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of RA. RA-FLS display passive pro-inflammatory responses and self-directed aggressive responses, such as pro-inflammatory mediator production, reduced apoptosis and formation of a thickened synovial lining. Evidence suggests a role for Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and transcriptional activator (STAT) signaling in the passive response but the aggressive behavior of RA-FLS is poorly understood. The pharmacologic effects of the novel JAK inhibitor, peficitinib, on cytokine-induced intracellular signaling and self-directed aggressive behavior of RA-FLS (e.g., increased expression of apoptosis-resistant genes and sodium nitroprusside-induced apoptosis) were investigated and compared with approved JAK inhibitors. RA-FLS assembly to form a lining-like structure and pro-inflammatory mediator production was investigated in three-dimensional (3D)-micromass culture. Peficitinib inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in RA-FLS following induction by interferon (IFN)-α2b, IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-6, oncostatin M, and leukemia inhibitory factor in a concentration-related manner, and was comparable to approved JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib and baricitinib. Peficitinib and tofacitinib suppressed autocrine phosphorylation of STAT3 and expression of apoptosis-resistant genes, and promoted cell death. In 3D-micromass culture, peficitinib reduced multi-layered RA-FLS cells to a thin monolayer, an effect less pronounced with tofacitinib. Both compounds attenuated production of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, matrix metalloproteinases, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor superfamily-11. This study confirmed the pathogenic role of uncontrolled JAK-STAT signaling in the aggressive and passive responses of RA-FLS that are critical for RA progression. The novel JAK inhibitor peficitinib suppressed the pro-inflammatory behavior of RA-FLS, accelerated cell death and abrogated thickening of the synovium.

Topics: Adamantane; Apoptosis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Niacinamide; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides; Synoviocytes

Monocyte-derived Dendritic cells (Mo-DC) are a distinct DC subset, involved in inflammation and infection, they originate from monocytes upon stimulation in the circulation and their activation and function may vary in autoimmune diseases. In this study we investigate the differences in Mo-DC differentiation and function in patients with Rheumatoid (RA) compared to Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A significant increase in the Mo-DC differentiation marker CD209, paralleled by a corresponding decrease in the monocytic marker CD14, was demonstrated in RA compared to PsA, as early as 1 day post Mo-DC differentiation. RA monocytes

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Differentiation; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Janus Kinases; Monocytes; NADPH Oxidases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors

Many biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are currently available as treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but a subset of RA patients shows inadequate responses to any of these DMARDs. This phenomenon, which we call super-resistance, is becoming a serious concern. In this study, I present two cases of super-resistant RA in which patients failed to respond to treatment with bDMARDs of any class as well as to tsDMARD therapy with tofacitinib. In these cases, leukocytapheresis (LCAP), a treatment that removes overabundant leukocytes from the body, rapidly induced low disease activity and made patients subsequently responsive to previously ineffective DMARDs. My experience with the present cases suggests that LCAP is worth considering as an alternative therapeutic option for the management of RA patients with super-resistance to DMARD therapies.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Leukapheresis; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease in which synovial fibroblasts (SF) play a key role. Baricitinib and Tofacitinib both act intracellularly, blocking the ATP-binding side of JAK proteins and thereby the downstream signalling pathway via STAT-3. Therefore, we investigated the role of organic cation transporters (OCTs) in Baricitinib and Tofacitinib cellular transport.. OCT expression was analysed in SF isolated from RA and osteoarthritis (OA) patients, as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The interaction of Baricitinib and Tofacitinib with OCTs was investigated using quenching experiments. The intracellular accumulation of both drugs was quantified using LC/MS. Target inhibition for both drugs was tested using Western blot for phosphorylated JAK1 and STAT3 upon stimulation with IL-6.. MATE-1 expression increased in OASF compared to RASF. The other OCTs were not differentially expressed. The transport of Baricitinib was not OCT dependent. Tofacitinib; however, was exported from RASF in a MATE-1 dependent way. Tofacitinib and Baricitinib showed comparable inhibition of downstream signalling pathways.. We observed different cellular uptake strategies for Baricitinib and Tofacitinib. Tofacitinib was exported out of healthy cells due to the increased expression of MATE1. This might make Tofacitinib the favourable drug.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Fibroblasts; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Organic Cation Transport Proteins; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Incidence; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

In clinical trials of tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Japanese and Korean patients had higher incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) than subjects from elsewhere; however, post-market data from Asia are lacking. Hence, we investigated the incidence of HZ and its risk factors in Taiwanese RA patients receiving tofacitinib. At a medical center in Taichung, Taiwan, we enrolled patients with active RA treated with tofacitinib between January 4, 2015 and December 9, 2017, following unsuccessful methotrexate therapy and no tofacitinib exposure RA patients as a control group. Demographic characteristics, interferon-gamma levels, and lymphocyte counts were compared. Among 125 tofacitinib-treated RA patients, 7 developed HZ, an incidence rate of 3.6/100 person-years. Patients with HZ had shorter disease duration than those without, but higher frequency of prior HZ. Baseline interferon-gamma levels and HLA-DR activated T cell counts were positively correlated and significantly lower in patients with HZ than without. Strikingly, 5/7 HZ cases occurred within 4 months of starting tofacitinib therapy. Incidence of HZ in tofacitinib-treated Taiwanese RA patients is lower than rates in Japan or Korea, and commensurate with the global average. HZ may occur soon after commencing tofacitinib therapy. The role of interferon-gamma and activated T cells in tofacitinib-related HZ deserves further investigation.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Case-Control Studies; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Incidence; Interferon-gamma; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocytes; Taiwan

Thrombocytepenia, anasarca, fever, renal insufficiency, and organomegaly (TAFRO) syndrome is a novel disease entity characterized by a constellation of symptoms (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal insufficiency, and organomegaly). Here, we describe the development of TAFRO syndrome-like features during the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.. In this report, a 74-year-old woman treated with a JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib) for rheumatoid arthritis was admitted because of fever and thrombocytopenia.. On laboratory examination, marked thrombocytopenia and elevated creatinine and C-reactive protein levels were present. A computed tomography scan revealed lymphadenopathy, hepato-splenomegaly, and anasarca. A left axillary lymph node biopsy revealed Castleman's disease-like features. These clinical features satisfied the proposed diagnostic criteria for TAFRO syndrome. Since autoimmune disorders should be excluded when diagnosing TAFRO syndrome, it is not strictly correct to diagnose her as TAFRO syndrome. Therefore, we diagnosed her as rheumatoid arthritis complicated by TAFRO syndrome-like features.. The patient was treated with high-dose glucocorticoid, tacrolimus, eltrombopag, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab.. Her condition was refractory to the above-mentioned treatment, and she eventually died because of multi-organ failure 6 months after the first admission.. TAFRO syndrome-like features can develop during treatment with a JAK inhibitor for rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with autoimmune diseases complicated by TAFRO syndrome-like features can follow a fatal clinical course, and thus, an intensive combined treatment is warranted for such patients, especially in cases refractory to glucocorticoid.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Castleman Disease; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Multiple Organ Failure; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Thrombocytopenia

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Lymphadenitis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

This study was designed to compare outcomes of dose reduction, withdrawal, and continuation of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine effectiveness of rescue with an original treatment regimen for disease flare.. We prospectively enrolled 100 patients who had high or moderate disease activity and treated them with tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily for 1 year. All patients achieving remission or low disease activity (LDA) were assigned to a withdrawal, dose-reduction, or continuation group, then followed until disease flare or end of the study. For flare cases, the original treatment regimen was reintroduced.. During the first year, 68 patients achieved remission or LDA (median sustained time 49.0 weeks). Subsequently, disease flare occurred at the following crude incidence rates per person-year (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.73 (0.43-1.22) after withdrawal, 0.44 (0.25-0.77) after dose reduction, and 0.04 (0.01-0.27) during continuation. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median flare-free time (95% CI) were 7.0 months (2.8-11.2) for withdrawal and 21.0 months (4.1-37.9) for dose reduction. In the Cox regression analysis, adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) were 18.11 (2.38-138) for withdrawal and 9.13 (1.19-70.4) for dose reduction compared with continuation. Restart of the original treatment regimen led to rapid remission in flare cases (93% for withdrawal and 100% for dose reduction).. After achievement of remission or LDA, the dose-reduction strategy seems preferable to immediate withdrawal of tofacitinib. Restart of the original regimen can reinduce RA control in flare cases.Key Points• During the 1-year tofacitinib therapy, two-thirds of RA patients with high or moderate disease activity achieved rapid and sustained remission or low disease activity.• During subsequent years, the incidence rate and adjusted hazard ratio for disease flare were significantly higher following tofacitinib immediate withdrawal than following dose reduction.• Half of the patients were estimated to remain flare-free for 21 months after dose reduction and for 7 months after withdrawal of tofacitinib.• Restart of the original treatment regimen rapidly restored disease control in almost all flare cases.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Symptom Flare Up

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pruritus; Pyrimidines; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To assess the capability of in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) using. Twenty-four mice with collagen-induced arthritis in the following groups were assessed: Group 1, where the changes in PET measures for the extremity joints were evaluated at the peak and trough plasma drug levels after administration of a single dose of tofacitinib (4 hours apart); Group 2, where joint PET measures were assessed before treatment and after 6 days of administration of a daily dose of tofacitinib; and group 3 (controls), where joint PET measures were derived from the same mice, 6 days apart.. At about peak plasma levels of the drug after a single tofacitinib administration, there was a reduction in PET measures compared to pretreatment values, suggesting decreased inflammatory activity. These measures were equivalent to those obtained after 6 days of daily dosing by tofacitinib. However, PET measures at trough plasma levels of the drug from tofacitinib administration were significantly higher than those at peak plasma drug levels and equivalent to pretreatment measures. There were insignificant changes in PET measures for the control animals.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Administration Schedule; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Joints; Male; Mice, Inbred DBA; Piperidines; Positron-Emission Tomography; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Radiopharmaceuticals; Whole Body Imaging

Tofacitinib is a novel therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to measure various serum cytokines levels and to explore potential markers predictive of therapeutic efficacy of tofacitinib for RA patients.. Thirty-two patients with RA were given tofacitinib (5 mg bid). Serum cytokines levels of Th1 (IFN-. Disease activity was significantly decreased as early as week 4 after tofacitinib treatment. Serum IL-35 levels were significantly increased and serum levels of TNF-. After treatment with tofacitinib, RA patients may benefit from monitoring of disease activity as early as week 4. IL-35 also might be a predictive indicator of the disease activity and drug efficacy. Meanwhile, tofacitinib might be CS-sparing in RA.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Female; Humans; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-6; Interleukins; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic synovitis and bone destruction at the joints, causing pain and motor disturbance. Despite the better control of inflammation and joint deformity afforded by modern disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, many patients with RA remain dissatisfied with their treatment, primarily because of sensory-emotional distress. Pre-clinical tests that can evaluate not only the symptoms of arthritis but also the associated pain as sensory-emotional experience are urgently needed.. Here, we introduce two types of novel methods for evaluation of voluntary behavior in a commonly used model of RA (collagen-induced arthritis; CIA) in male mice. First, spontaneous motor activity was assessed with a running wheel placed in home cages and the number of rotations was continuously recorded in a 12:12-h light environment. Second, temperature preference was assessed by measuring the time spent in either of the floor plates with augmenting (25 to 49 °C) or fixed temperature (25 °C). We also evaluated the effects of tofacitinib on CIA-associated changes in voluntary wheel running and temperature preference.. We detected a significant decrease in voluntary wheel running, a significant shift in the distribution of movement in the dark phase, and a significant increase in the time spent in warmer environments than the room temperature in the mice with CIA. These alterations in voluntary behavior have never been described with conventional methods. We also revealed tofacitinib-resistant significant changes in the voluntary behavior and choice of temperature despite significant mitigation of the symptoms of arthritis.. We described for the first time significant alterations of the voluntary behavior of the mice with CIA during the clinical periods, indicating that the overall physical/motivational states and its circadian variation, as well as the specific preference to a certain environmental temperature, are modified in the mice with CIA, as observed in human patients. Some of these did not parallel with the conventional arthritis scores, particularly during the pharmacotherapy suggesting that mice with CIA show not only the peripheral symptoms but also the central consequences. The use of these approaches would also help clarify the biological mechanisms underlying physician-patient discordance in the assessment of RA.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Humans; Joints; Male; Mice, Inbred DBA; Motor Activity; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Synovitis; Temperature

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as an effective class of therapies for various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors function intracellularly by modulating the catalytic activity of JAKs and disrupting the receptor-mediated signaling of multiple cytokines and growth factors, including those with pro-inflammatory activity. Understanding the inhibition profiles of different JAK inhibitors, based on the associated cytokine receptors and downstream inflammatory pathways affected, is important to identify the potential mechanisms for observed differences in efficacy and safety. This study applied an integrated modeling approach, using in vitro whole blood cytokine inhibition potencies and plasma pharmacokinetics, to determine JAK-dependent cytokine receptor inhibition profiles, in the context of doses estimated to provide a similar clinical response in RA clinical trials. The calculated profiles of cytokine receptor inhibition for the JAK inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib and its metabolite, were generally similar when clinically efficacious doses for RA were considered. Only minor numerical differences in percentage cytokine receptor inhibition were observed, suggesting limited differentiation of these inhibitors based on JAK pharmacology, with each showing a differential selectivity for JAK1 heterodimer inhibition. Nevertheless, only robust clinical testing involving head-to-head studies will ultimately determine whether there are clinically meaningful differences between these JAK inhibitors. Furthermore, ongoing and future research into inhibitors with alternative JAK selectivity remains of clinical importance. Thus, all JAK inhibitors should be characterized via thorough preclinical, metabolic and pharmacological evaluation, adequate long-term clinical data, and when available, real-world experience.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Line; Cytokines; Enzyme Assays; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Cytokine; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Confounding by disease severity is an issue in pharmacoepidemiology studies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), due to channeling of sicker patients to certain therapies. To address the issue of limited clinical data for confounder adjustment, a patient-level prediction model to differentiate between patients prescribed and not prescribed advanced therapies was developed as a surrogate for disease severity, using all available data from a US claims database.. Data from adult RA patients were used to build regularized logistic regression models to predict current and future disease severity using a biologic or tofacitinib prescription claim as a surrogate for moderate-to-severe disease. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver (AUC) operating characteristic curve, tested and trained in Optum Clinformatics® Extended DataMart (Optum) and additionally validated in three external IBM MarketScan® databases. The model was further validated in the Optum database across a range of patient cohorts.. In the Optum database (n = 68,608), the AUC for discriminating RA patients with a prescription claim for a biologic or tofacitinib versus those without in the 90 days following index diagnosis was 0.80. Model AUCs were 0.77 in IBM CCAE (n = 75,579) and IBM MDCD (n = 7,537) and 0.75 in IBM MDCR (n = 36,090). There was little change in the prediction model assessing discrimination 730 days following index diagnosis (prediction model AUC in Optum was 0.79).. A prediction model demonstrated good discrimination across multiple claims databases to identify RA patients with a prescription claim for advanced therapies during different time-at-risk periods as proxy for current and future moderate-to-severe disease. This work provides a robust model-derived risk score that can be used as a potential covariate and proxy measure to adjust for confounding by severity in multivariable models in the RA population. An R package to develop the prediction model and risk score are available in an open source platform for researchers.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index

Increased incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) has been observed with JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib. However, whether concomitant methotrexate (MTX) and/or glucocorticoids confer additional (additive or multiplicative) risk is unclear. We evaluated HZ risk in tofacitinib users with and without MTX and glucocorticoids.. Within MarketScan and Medicare data (2011-2016), we identified all patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis initiating treatment with tofacitinib (index date); demographics and baseline covariates were evaluated in the year prior to the index date. HZ was ascertained using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision codes with antiviral drug use (±7 days). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate hazard ratios (HRs) for HZ in tofacitinib users with and without current concomitant MTX and glucocorticoids, controlling for baseline covariates.. We studied 8,030 new tofacitinib users (83.3% women). The mean ± SD age was 60.3 ± 12.6 years. HZ incidence in tofacitinib users was numerically lowest in the absence of glucocorticoids (3.4 per 100 patient-years with MTX; 3.7 per 100 patient-years without MTX). An approximately 2-fold increased incidence of HZ was observed for tofacitinib users receiving either glucocorticoids alone (6.0 per 100 patient-years) or both MTX plus glucocorticoids (6.5 per 100 patient-years). The adjusted HR for HZ in tofacitinib users was unchanged (HR 0.99 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.64-1.54]) when given only with MTX, but was increased (HR 1.96 [95% CI 1.33-2.88]) for tofacitinib plus glucocorticoids. Older age and female sex were also risk factors, while prior vaccination was associated with a strong trend for lower risk.. In tofacitinib users, HZ occurred at a rate of approximately 4% per year and was further doubled with glucocorticoid exposure. Concomitant MTX did not confer additional risk. Zoster vaccination may decrease risk.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucocorticoids; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Medicare; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; United States

Iatrogenic lymphoproliferative disorders have been described in patients receiving immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory agents outside the transplantation setting. Novel biological agents such as TNF-α blockers and JAK-inhibitors have also proven to be effective in many disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease), psoriasis, and others. A significant dilemma exists in those lymphoproliferative disorders associated with immunosuppressants and rheumatologic conditions, that relies on whether the association of the process is with the medication or the underlying autoimmune condition. In the current case report, we describe an extraordinary case of Epstein-Barr virus-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma, in association with rheumatoid arthritis and the use of JAK-inhibitors. Comprehensive molecular testing (fluorescence in situ hybridization, OncoScan microarray, pyrosequencing) was done comparing sequential biopsies in this patient from skin and lung, which revealed a driving mutation in the BRAF V600E gene, a crucial finding, given the potential use of targeted therapy in this pathway.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic; Male; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

14-3-3η protein is a proinflammatory mediator that may represent a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assessed the correlation between changes in serum 14-3-3η levels and changes in clinical disease activity measures in RA patients treated with Tofacitinib (TOF). Paired serum samples from 35 patients with RA were obtained at baseline and 5 months after the initiation of treatment with TOF. The levels of 14-3-3η were measured by JOINT stat 14-3-3η ELISA test kits (Augurex Life Sciences Corp.). The cut-off was defined as 0.19 ng/ml. 14-3-3η positivity was found in 57% of the patients at baseline and in 37% of the patients after 5 months of treatment. Mean ± SD baseline 14-3-3η levels [4.92 ± 8.86 ng/ml] were significantly higher (p < 0.005) than 14-3-3η levels following treatment [1.97 ± 4.59 ng/ml]. A statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) of CDAI, SDAI, DAS4ESR and DAS4CRP was achieved after 5 month of treatment. Decrease in 14-3-3η protein levels was highly correlated with improvement in DAS4ESR (r = 0.50, p < 0.01), DAS4CRP (r = 0.46, p < 0.01) and ESR (r = 0.36, p = 0.03) and moderately correlated with improvement in CDAI (r = 0.32, p = 0.065) and SDAI (r = 0.33, p = 0.051). The correlation between decrease in 14-3-3η levels and improvement in DAS4ESR remained significant in a partial correlation analysis controlling for ESR (r = 0.39, p = 0.02). This study demonstrates that in RA patients who were treated with TOF, decrease in 14-3-3η levels is correlated with improvement in clinical disease activity parameters. The 14-3-3η protein may serve as an objective biomarker for monitoring of TOF therapy response.

Topics: 14-3-3 Proteins; Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biomarkers; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Altered lymphocyte cell counts and a potential association with increased infection rates have been reported in RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate the short-, mid-, and long-term effects of tofacitinib on lymphocytes and infection rates in patients with RA.. In this post hoc analysis, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were obtained from phase III studies (12-24 months; n = 717-958) and phase I/II/III/long-term extension studies of tofacitinib (≤117 months) (All RA population; n = 7,061); lymphocyte subset counts (LSCs) were from phase II studies (1.5-6 months' exposure; n = 236-486), an ORAL Sequel vaccine substudy (~22 months; n = 198), and an ORAL Sequel lymphocyte substudy (~50 months; n = 55-1,035) of tofacitinib. The reversibility of ALC/LSC changes was evaluated. The relationship of ALC and LSC to infections was analyzed in the All RA population. The value of monitoring ALC alone was assessed by examining correlations between ALCs and LSCs.. Tofacitinib treatment resulted in an initial increase in ALC versus pretreatment baseline, which gradually declined to steady state by ~48 months. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts decreased over long-term treatment, and ALC and LSC changes were reversible upon treatment cessation. Patients with ALCs of <500 cells/mm. Our findings indicate that monitoring of ALC alone appears to be adequate to assess infection risk in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; B-Lymphocytes; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Humans; Incidence; Infections; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Killer Cells, Natural; Lymphocyte Count; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; T-Lymphocytes; Time Factors

To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tofacitinib versus those receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.. RA patients who were initiating treatment with tofacitinib or a TNF inhibitor and had not previously received any biologic agent or tofacitinib were identified from the Truven MarketScan database (2012-2016) or Medicare claims (parts A, B, and D) database (2012-2015). Patients were followed up until treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, insurance disenrollment, or administrative censoring. The outcome of VTE was identified using inpatient claims for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined using a Cox proportional hazards model after accounting for confounding through propensity score-based fine-stratification weighting. HRs were pooled across databases using the inverse variance meta-analytic method.. A total of 34,074 RA patients (mean age 50 years; 5.6% tofacitinib initiators) and 17,086 RA patients (mean age 71 years; 5.8% tofacitinib initiators) were identified from the Truven and Medicare databases, respectively. The crude incidence rates of VTE per 100 person-years were 0.60 (95% CI 0.26-1.19) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.27-0.41) in Truven and 1.12 (95% CI 0.45-2.31) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.76-1.11) in Medicare for patients receiving tofacitinib and patients receiving TNF inhibitors, respectively. Propensity score-adjusted HRs showed no significant differences in the risk of VTE between tofacitinib-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated patients in either database, with a pooled HR of 1.33 (95% CI 0.78-2.24).. Occurrence of VTE in a total of 50,865 RA patients initiating treatment with tofacitinib or a TNF inhibitor was infrequent (<1 per 100 person-years). We observed a numerically higher, but statistically nonsignificant, risk of VTE in RA patients receiving tofacitinib versus those receiving TNF inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Abatacept; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Virus Replication

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Fibroma; Humans; Middle Aged; Neurofibromatosis 1; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Skin Neoplasms

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is a member of the Tec family of kinases and is essential for B cell receptor (BCR) mediated signaling. BTK also plays a critical role in the downstream signaling pathways for the Fcγ receptor in monocytes, the Fcε receptor in granulocytes, and the RANK receptor in osteoclasts. As a result, pharmacological inhibition of BTK is anticipated to provide an effective strategy for the clinical treatment of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. This article will outline the evolution of our strategy to identify a covalent, irreversible inhibitor of BTK that has the intrinsic potency, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic properties necessary to provide a rapid rate of inactivation systemically following a very low dose. With excellent in vivo efficacy and a very desirable tolerability profile, 5a (branebrutinib, BMS-986195) has advanced into clinical studies.

Topics: Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Discovery; Humans; Indoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Macaca fascicularis; Mice; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

We report tofacitinib efficacy and safety in Asia-Pacific patients who participated in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical development program.. This post-hoc analysis included pooled data from patients with RA in the Asia-Pacific region treated with tofacitinib with/without conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Phase (P)1, 2, 3, and long-term extension (LTE) studies (one LTE ongoing; January 2016 data-cut). Efficacy was assessed over 24 months in patients who received tofacitinib 5 (N = 397) or 10 (N = 382) mg twice daily or placebo (N = 243) in three P2 and five P3 studies. Endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission rates, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (∆HAQ-DI). Safety data pooled over 92 months from one P1, four P2, six P3, and two LTE studies for all tofacitinib doses (N = 1464) included incidence rates (IRs) (patients with events/100 patient-years) for adverse events (AEs) of special interest.. At month 3, patients receiving tofacitinib 5/10 mg twice daily improved vs placebo in ACR20 (69.2%/77.9% vs 27.5%), ACR50 (36.9%/44.4% vs 9.5%), and ACR70 (15.1%/22.4% vs 2.7%) responses, remission rates for DAS28-4(ESR) (8.5%/18.5% vs 2.6%) and CDAI (6.1%/12.3% vs 0.5%), and ∆HAQ-DI (-0.5/-0.6 vs -0.1); improvements were sustained through 24 months. IRs (95% CI) were 9.4 (8.5, 10.3) for serious AEs, 9.1 (8.3, 10.1) for discontinuations due to AEs, 3.7 (3.2, 4.3) for serious infections, 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) for herpes zoster, and 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer).. In Asia-Pacific patients, tofacitinib improved signs/symptoms over 24 months. Safety over 92 months was generally consistent with global tofacitinib studies; however, infection IRs were higher in Asia-Pacific patients.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Opportunistic Infections; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recovery of Function; Remission Induction; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adamantane; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Proliferation; Chemokine CCL2; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Synovial Membrane

Assess the cost-effectiveness (US healthcare payer perspective) of sarilumab subcutaneous (SC) 200 mg + methotrexate versus conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or targeted DMARD + methotrexate for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults with inadequate response to methotrexate.. Microsimulation based on patient profiles from MOBILITY (NCT01061736) was conducted via a 6-month decision tree and lifetime Markov model with 6-monthly cycles. Treatment response at 6 months was informed by a network meta-analysis and based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response. Responders: patients with ACR20 response who continued with therapy; non-responders: ACR20 non-responders who transitioned to the subsequent treatment. Utilities and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated via mapping 6-month ACR20/50/70 response to relative change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score (short term) and based on published algorithms (long term). Direct costs considered drugs (wholesale acquisition costs), administration and routine care.. Lifetime QALYs and costs for treatment sequences on the efficiency frontier were 3.43 and $115,019 for active csDMARD, 5.79 and $430,918 for sarilumab, and 5.94 and $524,832 for etanercept (all others dominated). Sarilumab was cost-effective versus tocilizumab and csDMARD (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $84,079/QALY and $134,286/QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested comparable costs and slightly improved health benefits for sarilumab versus tocilizumab, irrespective of threshold.. In patients with moderate-to-severe RA, sarilumab 200 mg SC every 2 weeks + methotrexate can be considered a cost-effective treatment option, with lower costs and greater health benefits than alternative treatment sequences (+ methotrexate) beginning with adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab and tofacitinib and below commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds against tocilizumab + methotrexate or csDMARD active treatment.. Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Certolizumab Pegol; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Young Adult

The increase in cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with the general population is due to the combined effect of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, systemic inflammation, and side effects of antirheumatic drugs. Tofacitinib (TOFA) is an oral reversible inhibitor of janus kinases for the treatment of RA with proven efficacy and good tolerability, but its effects on body weight and metabolic profile need to be clarified. We investigated the effects of TOFA on body mass index (BMI) and visceral adiposity index (VAI) in RA patients. Thirty-one consecutive patients with active RA and starting new treatment with TOFA were included in a prospective 1 year follow-up observational study of cardiovascular effects of TOFA treatment. Weight, height, waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, lipid profile, fasting glucose and VAI were measured at baseline and 12 months of treatment. Median weight gain was 3 kg (4.2%) after 1 year of TOFA. 23 (74%) patients suffered from a weight gain, and 6 (26%) out of them from a weight increment of 10% or more. Patients with lower BMI (p = 0.024) and higher baseline DAS28 [ESR] (p = 0.017) have the risk of an increase in BMI > 5% during TOFA treatment in a multivariate analysis. A decrease in VAI after 12 months was recorded. Weight increment and improvement of VAI are frequent on TOFA treatment. BMI dynamics associated with higher disease activity at baseline and lower baseline BMI.

Topics: Adiposity; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Body Mass Index; Female; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Abdominal; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Waist Circumference

RA is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by lymphocyte infiltration and release of inflammatory cytokines. Previous studies have shown that treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, increased the incidence rate of herpes zoster compared with conventional DMARDs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of tofacitinib on the varicella-zoster-virus (VZV)-specific T cell immune response.. The effect of tofacitinib on the VZV-specific T cell immune response was determined by evaluating the IFNγ production, the proliferative capacity, the VZV-induced differentiation into effector and memory T cells, the expression of activation marker CD69 and helper T cell type 1 (Th1)-characteristic chemokine receptors, such as CXCR3 and CCR5, as well as cytotoxic activity (perforin and granzyme B expression) of CD4+ T cells of patients with RA compared with healthy donors upon stimulation with VZV antigen in vitro.. Tofacitinib significantly reduced the IFNγ production, proliferation, activation, and CXCR3 expression of VZV-specific CD4+ T cells in a dose-dependent manner in short- and long-term lymphocyte culture. No effect on the distribution of naive, effectors or memory, or on the expression of perforin or granzyme B by VZV-specific CD4+ T cells was observed.. This study showed that tofacitinib significantly modulated the Th1 response to VZV. The poor VZV-specific cellular immune response in patients with RA may be considered in recommendations regarding appropriate vaccination strategies for enhancing the VZV-specific Th1 response.

Topics: Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Herpesvirus 3, Human; Humans; Immunity, Cellular; Interferon-gamma; Lectins, C-Type; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, CCR5; Receptors, CXCR3; Th1 Cells

As the first approved oral kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib is effective and well-tolerated, but more expensive than conventional treatments for uncontrolled rheumatoid arthritis. Public formulary listing typically exerts a positive impact on the uptake of new drugs. We aimed to assess the budgetary impact of introducing tofacitinib into the Hospital Authority Drug Formulary as a fully subsidised drug in Hong Kong.. We applied a population-based budget impact model to trace the number of eligible patients receiving biologics or tofacitinib treatment, then estimated the 5-year healthcare expenditure on rheumatoid arthritis treatments, with or without tofacitinib (2017-2021). We used linear regression to estimate the number of target patients and compound annual growth rate to estimate market share. Competing treatments included abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, and tofacitinib. Retail price was used for drug costs, valued in Hong Kong dollars (HK$) in 2017 and discounted at 4% per year.. The annual treatment cost of tofacitinib was HK$74 214 per patient, and the costs of biologics ranged from HK$64 350 to HK$115 700. Without tofacitinib, the annual government health expenditures for rheumatoid arthritis treatment were estimated to increase from HK$147.9 million (2017) to HK$190.6 million (2021). The introduction of tofacitinib to the formulary would reduce healthcare expenditures by 17.3% to 20.3% per year, with cumulative savings of HK$192.8 million; this change was estimated to provide consistent savings (HK$66.4 million to HK$196.8 million) in all tested scenarios.. Introduction of tofacitinib to the formulary will provide 5-year savings, given the current drug price and patient volume.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Health Care Costs; Hong Kong; Hospitals, Public; Humans; Linear Models; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Fingers; Humans; Male; Mycoses; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by persistent synovial inflammation. The major drivers of synovial inflammation are cytokines and chemokines. Among these molecules, TNF activates fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs), which leads to the production of inflammatory mediators. Here, we show that TNF regulates the expression of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) in human FLSs as well as in a TNF transgenic arthritis mouse model. Transcriptomic analyses of IRF1-deficient, TNF-stimulated FLSs define the interferon (IFN) pathway as a major target of IRF1. IRF1 expression is associated with the expression of IFNβ, which leads to the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Blocking the JAK-STAT pathway with the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKinib) baricitinib or tofacitinib reduces the expression of IFN-regulated genes (IRGs) in TNF-activated FLSs. Therefore, we conclude that TNF induces a distinct inflammatory cascade, in which IRGs are key elements, in FLSs. The IFN-signature might be a promising biomarker for the efficient and personalized use of new treatment strategies for RA, such as JAKinibs.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biomarkers; Female; Gene Expression; Humans; Inflammation; Interferon Regulatory Factor-1; Interferons; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Synovial Membrane; Synoviocytes; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Tofacitinib (TOF), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, which was approved in 2012, has been recommended for the treatment of clinically active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Dexamethasone (DEX), a potent corticosteroid, is also used in RA therapy but with limited usefulness due to dose- and time-dependent adverse effects. This pilot study examines the single and combined effects of DEX and TOF in order to explore the steroid-sparing potential of TOF. Collagen-induced arthritic (CIA) rats were subcutaneously (SC) dosed with vehicle, 1.5 mg/kg TOF, 5 mg/kg TOF, 0.225 mg/kg DEX, or a combination of 1.5 mg/kg TOF and 0.225 mg/kg DEX. Paw sizes were measured as an index of disease and drug efficacy and dynamically depicted using a logistic function for natural paw growth, a turnover model for disease progression, an indirect response model for inhibitory effects of TOF and DEX and a non-competitive interaction model for the combined effect of DEX and TOF. TOF alone exerted only a slight inhibitory effect on RA paw edema compared to DEX, which reduced edema by 40%. In combination, TOF and DEX had additive effects with an interaction factor of 0.76. Using model simulations, a single SC dose of TOF does not have a visible steroid-sparing potential, although BID oral dosing has such potential. The current study suggests an additive effect of TOF and DEX and simulations indicate that further exploration of TOF and DEX administration timing may produce desirable drug efficacy with lower DEX doses.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dexamethasone; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Male; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew

The in vitro pharmacology of baricitinib, upadacitinib, and tofacitinib was evaluated to understand differences among these JAK inhibitors (JAKis) at the cellular level.. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were incubated with different JAKis, levels of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription (pSTAT) were measured following cytokine stimulation, and half maximum inhibitory concentration (IC. Different JAKis modulated distinct cytokine pathways to varying degrees, and no agent potently or continuously inhibited an individual cytokine signaling pathway throughout the dosing interval. Notably, baricitinib inhibited JAK1/3 signaling to a lesser extent than upadacitinib and tofacitinib, while upadacitinib, baricitinib, and tofacitinib inhibited the signaling of JAK2/2-dependent cytokines, including GM-CSF and IL-3, as well as the signaling of the JAK2/TYK2-dependent cytokine G-CSF.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biomarkers; Cytokines; Flow Cytometry; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

Patients' adherence to and persistence on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can vary, depending on type and distribution of disease and treatment modality. We aim to identify differences in adherence and persistence with treatments with different administration routes (intravenous vs oral) in IBD.. A retrospective cohort analysis of a claims database of adult patients diagnosed with IBD or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who began treatment with vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or infliximab from January 2015 through December 2015. Adherence evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and cumulative days with gaps at least 20% beyond expected interval (CG20) using multivariable generalized linear equation models. Persistence assessed as time to treatment discontinuation over 12 months of follow-up using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models; proportion of persistent patients determined via multivariable logistic regression. Indirect comparisons across disease states adjusted using infliximab data.. After indirect adjustment by disease, mean PDC difference was significantly higher (difference of 4.7%; P = 0.0376) and mean CG20 was lower (difference of 15 days; P = 0.0646) but not statistically significant in vedolizumab/IBD than tofacitinib/RA.. We describe a novel adjustment method for interdisease treatment differences using infliximab treatment patterns to bridge differences between IBD and RA. After adjustment, adherence was higher with infusions than oral medications, which may affect outcomes. Indirect comparisons between vedolizumab and tofacitinib are not generalizable and should be confirmed in tofacitinib-treated IBD patients.. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Infliximab; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Medication Adherence; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; United States

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was undertaken to evaluate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with RA receiving tofacitinib.. Data were pooled from patients with moderately to severely active RA receiving ≥1 tofacitinib dose in 6 phase III and 2 long-term extension studies over 7 years. MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death) were independently adjudicated. Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations between baseline variables and time to first MACE. Following 24 weeks of tofacitinib, changes in variables and time to future MACE were evaluated after adjusment for age, baseline values, and time-varying tofacitinib dose. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.. Fifty-two MACE occurred in 4,076 patients over 12,873 patient-years of exposure (incidence rate 0.4 patients with events per 100 patient-years). In univariable analyses of baseline variables, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and glucocorticoid and statin use were associated with MACE risk; disease activity and inflammation measures were not. In subsequent multivariable analyses, baseline age, hypertension, and the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio remained significantly associated with risk of MACE. After 24 weeks of treatment, an increase in HDL cholesterol and a decrease in the total to HDL cholesterol were associated with decreased MACE risk; changes in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and disease activity measures were not. Increased erythrocyte sedimentation rates trended with increased future MACE risk.. In this post hoc analysis, after 24 weeks of tofacitinib treatment, increased HDL cholesterol, but not increased LDL cholesterol or total cholesterol, appeared to be associated with lower future MACE risk. Further data are needed to test the cardiovascular safety of tofacitinib.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Sedimentation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Marrow Cells; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Interferon-gamma; Janus Kinase 3; Killer Cells, Natural; Mice; Mice, Mutant Strains; Mutation; Phenotype; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Virus Activation

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We characterized lymphoma events in the tofacitinib RA clinical development program.. Lymphoma events (up to March 2015) were identified from 19 tofacitinib studies (2 phase I, 9 phase II, 6 phase III, and 2 long-term extension) of patients with moderate to severe RA. Patients in these studies received tofacitinib dosed at 1-30 mg twice daily or 20 mg once daily, as monotherapy or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Lymphoma incidence rates (IRs; number of patients with events/100 patient-years) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated. A descriptive case-matched control analysis (1:4) was performed to identify potential risk factors for lymphoma.. A total of 6,194 patients received tofacitinib (19,406 patient-years of exposure, 3.4 years median treatment duration). Nineteen lymphomas occurred (IR 0.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.06-0.15]), with no increase observed with time of exposure. The age- and sex-adjusted SIR of lymphoma was 2.62 (95% CI 1.58-4.09) (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] program database). The clinical characteristics of the 19 lymphomas were typical for the RA population. Three lymphomas were positive for Epstein-Barr virus, 8 were negative, 2 were equivocal, and 6 were untested. Numerically, more lymphoma cases had a history of Sjögren's syndrome and were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and rheumatoid factor at baseline versus matched controls. The mean corticosteroid dose was higher for lymphoma cases versus controls.. In the tofacitinib RA clinical development program, lymphoma rates were stable over time and there were minimal differences in the baseline characteristics of patients with and without lymphoma.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

To describe disease activity and disability during the first year of follow-up, from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who discontinue tofacitinib after they end participation in a clinical trial. From 2008 to 2016, 36 patients were enrolled in the "Long term follow-up study with tofacitinib (and methotrexate) for RA treatment". At the end of the study, tofacitinib was discontinued and patients were proposed to enter an observational study; 35 agree and had scheduled evaluations at baseline, at 15 and 30 days of follow-up, at month 2 and 3, and thereafter every 3 months. Disease activity was evaluated as per DAS28-ESR and disability as per HAQ. During follow-up, treatment was treat-to-target oriented, only conventional DMARDs were indicated. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric test were used. The study was approved by IRB. Patients were primarily females (N = 34), had median (Q25-75) age of 52 years (45-58), and had received tofacitinib for a median of 7.9 years (6.3-8.3). The proportion of patients with remission and low disease activity decreased from day 30 of follow-up and recovered after 270 days, meanwhile patients with high disease activity increased from 0% at baseline to 6.3% at 1 year. At study entry, 20 patients had remission/low disease activity; during follow-up, 85% deteriorated after (median) 30 days; among them, 23.5% recovered their baseline status after a median of 172.5 days. The HAQ showed a similar behavior, but 66.7% recovered. A substantial proportion of RA patients deteriorated outcomes early after tofacitinib cessation; some patients recovered baseline status with traditional DMARDS.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disability Evaluation; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethics, Research; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Research Design; Research Subjects; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vulnerable Populations

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Remodeling; Double-Blind Method; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Adverse events are anticipated during a clinical development program. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We describe here the process undertaken by Pfizer to investigate a safety signal for pancreatic cancer with tofacitinib. Potential cases of pancreatic cancer across indications from Pfizer's clinical trials and safety databases were identified and underwent in-depth case review and external expert consultation. The magnitude of the signal was quantified. The feasibility of formal signal evaluation via a hypothesis-testing study was explored. As of July 2016, 14 cases of potential pancreatic cancer were identified: eight cases in clinical development trials (psoriasis n = 6; RA n = 1; psoriatic arthritis n = 1), four cases in a postmarketing study in RA patients in Japan, and two spontaneous reports. Incidence rates (95% confidence intervals) per 100 patient-years ranged from 0 (0, 0.02) to 0.14 in RA, 0.05 (0.01, 0.15) to 0.07 (0.02, 0.16) in psoriasis, and 0.25 (0.01, 1.37) in psoriatic arthritis. The majority of patients had established risk factors for pancreatic cancer. The pharmaceutical industry's rapid and transparent response to safety signals is essential for ensuring patient safety and enabling physicians and patients to adequately assess a drug's risk:benefit. Safety signals emerging through pharmacovigilance may be true or false indicators of a causative association with drug exposure. In this example, it was determined that tofacitinib exposure was unlikely to be related to induction and promotion of pancreatic cancer; however, a relationship with pancreatic cancer promotion could not be excluded.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pharmacovigilance; Piperidines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib is a targeted inhibitor of janus kinase (JAK), currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We present a patient on treatment withtofacitinib who had an episode of classic dermatomal herpes zoster followed months later by atypical chronic cutaneous ulcers also caused by herpes zoster.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chronic Disease; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Skin; Skin Ulcer

Tofacitinib is the first oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and non-TNF biologics in patients with RA previously treated with methotrexate.. We used MarketScan® databases (2011-2014) to study methotrexate-exposed patients with RA who were newly prescribed tofacitinib, DMARDs other than methotrexate, and biologics. The date of first prescription was defined as the cohort entry. The therapy was considered effective if all of the following criteria from a claims-based algorithm were achieved at the first year of follow-up: high adherence, no biologic or tofacitinib switch or addition, no DMARD switch or addition, no increase in dose or frequency of index drug, no more than one glucocorticoid joint injection, and no new/increased oral glucocorticoid dose. The safety outcome was serious infections requiring hospitalization. Non-TNF biologics comprised the reference group.. We included 21,832 patients with RA, including 0.8% treated with tofacitinib, 24.7% treated with other DMARDs, 61.2% who had started therapy with TNFi, and 13.3% treated with non-TNF biologics. The rates of therapy effectiveness were 15.4% for tofacitinib, 11.1% for DMARDs, 18.6% for TNFi, and 19.8% for non-TNF biologics. In adjusted analyses, tofacitinib and non-TNF biologics appeared to have similar effectiveness rates, whereas DMARD initiators were less effective than non-TNF biologics. We could not clearly establish if tofacitinib was associated with a higher rate of serious infections.. In patients with RA previously treated with methotrexate, our comparisons of tofacitinib with non-TNF biologics, though not definitive, did not demonstrate differences with respect to hospitalized infections or effectiveness.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Infections; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Tofacitinib, a small molecule JAK inhibitor, has been widely used to reduce inflammation and inhibit progression of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. STAT3, a downstream signaling molecule of JAK, plays a key role in the activation of signaling in response to inflammatory cytokines. Thus, targeting STAT3 may be an inspiring strategy for treating osteoclast-related diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, we first investigated the effects of Stattic, a STAT3 inhibitor, on receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Stattic inhibited osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in RANKL-induced RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Stattic also suppressed RANKL-induced upregulation of osteoclast-related genes tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, matrix metalloproteinase 9, cathepsin K, RANK, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6, and osteoclast-associated receptor in RAW264.7 cells. Moreover, Stattic exhibited an inhibitory effect on cell proliferation and cell cycle progression at higher dosages. At the molecular level, Stattic inhibited RANKL-induced activation of STAT3 and NF-κB pathways, without significantly affecting MAPK signaling. In addition, Stattic inhibited RANKL-induced expression of osteoclast-related transcription factors c-Fos and NFATc1. Importantly, Stattic also prevented bone loss caused by ovariectomy. Together, our data confirm that Stattic restricts osteoclastogenesis and bone loss by disturbing RANKL-induced STAT3 and NF-κB signaling. Thus, Stattic represents a novel type of osteoclast inhibitor that could be useful for conditions such as osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bone Resorption; Cyclic S-Oxides; Gene Expression Regulation; Genes, fos; Humans; Janus Kinases; Macrophages; Mice; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Osteogenesis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RANK Ligand; RAW 264.7 Cells; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chickenpox; Female; Herpesvirus 3, Human; Humans; Piperidines; Pneumonia, Viral; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

This study estimated the extent and predictors of primary nonadherence (i.e., prescriptions made by physicians but not initiated by patients) to methotrexate and to biologics or tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who were newly prescribed these medications.. Using administrative claims linked with electronic health records (EHRs) from multiple healthcare provider organizations in the USA, RA patients who received a new prescription for methotrexate or biologics/tofacitinib were identified from EHRs. Claims data were used to ascertain filling or administration status. A logistic regression model for predicting primary nonadherence was developed and tested in training and test samples. Predictors were selected based on clinical judgment and LASSO logistic regression.. A total of 36.8% of patients newly prescribed methotrexate failed to initiate methotrexate within 2 months; 40.6% of patients newly prescribed biologics/tofacitinib failed to initiate within 3 months. Factors associated with methotrexate primary nonadherence included age, race, region, body mass index, count of active drug ingredients, and certain previously diagnosed and treated conditions at baseline. Factors associated with biologics/tofacitinib primary nonadherence included age, insurance, and certain previously treated conditions at baseline. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the logistic regression model estimated in the training sample and applied to the independent test sample was 0.86 and 0.78 for predicting primary nonadherence to methotrexate and to biologics/tofacitinib, respectively.. This study confirmed that failure to initiate new prescriptions for methotrexate and biologics/tofacitinib was common in RA patients. It is feasible to predict patients at high risk of primary nonadherence to methotrexate and to biologics/tofacitinib and to target such patients for early interventions to promote adherence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Physicians; Piperidines; Prescriptions; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors

To examine the effects of tofacitinib on metabolic activity, mitochondrial function, and proinflammatory mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Ex vivo RA synovial explants and primary RA synovial fibroblasts (RASFs) were cultured with 1 μM tofacitinib. RASF bioenergetics were assessed using an XF24 analyzer, and key metabolic genes were assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Mitochondrial function was assessed using specific cell fluorescent probes and by mitochondrial gene arrays. Mitochondrial mutagenesis was quantified using a mitochondrial random mutation capture assay, and lipid peroxidation was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The effect of tofacitinib on spontaneous release of proinflammatory mediators from RA whole tissue synovial explants was quantified by ELISAs/MSD multiplex assays, and metabolic markers were quantified by RT-PCR. Finally, RASF invasion, matrix degradation, and synovial outgrowths were assessed by transwell invasion/Matrigel outgrowth assays and ELISA.. Tofacitinib significantly decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial mass, and reactive oxygen species production by RASFs and differentially regulated key mitochondrial genes. Tofacitinib significantly increased oxidative phosphorylation, ATP production, and the maximal respiratory capacity and the respiratory reserve in RASFs, an effect paralleled by a decrease in glycolysis and the genes for the key glycolytic enzymes hexokinase 2 (HK2), glycogen synthase kinase 3α (GSK-3α), lactate dehydrogenase A, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α. Tofacitinib inhibited the effect of oncostatin M (OSM) on interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 and reversed the effects of OSM on RASF cellular metabolism. Using RA whole tissue synovial explants, we found that tofacitinib inhibited the key metabolic genes for glucose transporter 1, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3, 3'-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1, HK2, and GSK-3α, the proinflammatory mediators IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and TIE-2, and RASF outgrowth from synovial explants, RASF invasion, and matrix metalloproteinase 1 activity.. This study demonstrates that JAK/STAT signaling mediates the complex interplay between inflammation and cellular metabolism in RA pathogenesis.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Energy Metabolism; Fibroblasts; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Janus Kinases; Mitochondria; Oncostatin M; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Synovial Membrane

Clinical trials have shown combinations of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologicals plus methotrexate (MTX) are more effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis than biological monotherapies, based, in part, on the assumption that MTX reduces the immunogenicity of biologicals. However, co-treatment with the anti-interleukin-6 receptor-alpha antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) and MTX does not demonstrate the same level of incremental benefit over TCZ monotherapy. Using the human primary cell based BioMAP phenotypic profiling platform, we investigated the impact of TCZ, adalimumab (ADA), and the small molecule drug tofacitinib (TOF), alone and in combination with MTX, on translational biomarkers that could indicate unique pharmacodynamic interactions outside those of reduced immunogenicity.. TCZ, ADA, and TOF, alone and in combination with MTX, were profiled in BioMAP systems at concentrations close to clinical exposure levels: TCZ, 200 μg/ml; TOF1, 1.1 μM; TOF2, 0.12 µM; MTX, 10 μM. Changes in biomarkers were evaluated by statistical methods to determine whether combinations differed from the individual agents.. Although the BioMAP activity profile for TCZ + MTX was not significantly different from that for TCZ alone, profiles for ADA + MTX and TOF1 + MTX or TOF2 + MTX had a greater number of statistically significant different activities (P < 0.01) than did agents profiled individually.. These data support the comparable efficacy of TCZ as monotherapy and as combination therapy and suggest that TOF, like ADA, may be more beneficial in combination with MTX. Taking an orthogonal approach to directly compare monotherapy and combination therapies indicates that MTX contributes to the efficacy of some, but not all, RA therapies and can be affected by factors additional to reduced immunogenicity.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Inflammation; Methotrexate; Phenotype; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Interleukin-6; Signal Transduction

Treatment cycling with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), is common among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and can result in reduced clinical efficacy and increased economic burden. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA.. To evaluate and compare the economic effect of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) treatment directly after methotrexate (MTX) in the MTX-inadequate responder population, or after MTX and 1 TNFi (adalimumab [ADA] or etanercept [ETN]) or 2 TNFi (ADA and ETN) in TNF-inadequate responder patients with RA, from a U.S. payer perspective.. A decision-tree economic model was used to evaluate costs over 2 years. Treatment response was modeled as American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response. ACR response rates at 6-month intervals were derived from U.S. prescribing information for monotherapy and combination therapy. Safety event rates were sourced from a meta-analysis. It was assumed that 75% of patients switched therapy after an adverse event or lack of response. Cost inputs included drugs, monitoring and administration (including physician visits), health care utilization, and treatment for adverse events. The population comprised all organization members (i.e., RA and non-RA members); RA patients receiving TNFi were estimated using epidemiologic data. Results were based on an organization size of 1 million. Economic endpoints were total 2-year costs, costs per member per month (PMPM), and costs per ACR20/50 responder.. 1,321 patients were included for analysis. Based on ACR20 switch criteria and either 100% or 50% monotherapy rates for all treatments, total 2-year costs and costs PMPM were lower for patients receiving tofacitinib as second-line therapy after MTX and as third-line therapy after MTX and 1 TNFi; costs were highest for patients who cycled through 2 TNFi. Similar trends were observed for switch criteria based on ACR50 response and addition of 20% rebates for ADA and ETN and 0% for tofacitinib, although differences were mitigated slightly.. A treatment strategy with tofacitinib as either second- or third-line therapy after MTX may be a lower cost treatment option, compared with fourth-line introduction of tofacitinib after cycling through 2 TNFi following MTX.. All aspects of this study were funded by Pfizer. Claxton was an employee of York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, at the time of this study. Taylor is an employee of York Health Economics Consortium, The University of York, which received funding from Pfizer to conduct this study. Soonasra, Bourret, and Gerber are employees of Pfizer and hold stock/stock options in Pfizer. A previous iteration of the data reported in this manuscript (before adjustment for recent drug price increases) was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 28th Annual Meeting and Expo; April 19-22, 2016; held in San Francisco, CA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Clinical Decision-Making; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Decision Trees; Drug Costs; Drug Substitution; Humans; Methotrexate; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Remission Induction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; United States

While highly efficacious in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, Tofacitinib (Tofa, CP-690 550), has dose-dependent toxicities that limit its clinical application. In this study, we have examined whether a prodrug design that targets arthritic joints would enhance Tofa's therapeutic efficacy, which may provide an opportunity for future development of safer Tofa dosing regimens. A prodrug of Tofa (P-Tofa) was synthesized by conjugating the drug to the N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer via an acid cleavable carbamate linker. The therapeutic efficacy of a single dose of P-Tofa was compared to the dose-equivalent daily oral administration of Tofa in an adjuvant-induced arthritis (AA) rat model. Saline treated AA rats and age-matched healthy rats were used as controls. Observational analyses support the superior and sustained efficacy of a single dose P-Tofa treatment compared to the dose-equivalent daily Tofa administration in ameliorating joint inflammation. Micro-CT and histological analyses demonstrated that the P-Tofa treatment provided a structural preservation of the joints better than that of the dose-equivalent Tofa. Optical imaging, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses attribute P-Tofa's superior therapeutic efficacy to its passive targeting to arthritic joints and inflammatory cell-mediated sequestration. In vitro cell culture studies reveal that the P-Tofa treatment produced sustained the inhibition of JAK/STAT6 signaling in IL-4-treated murine bone marrow macrophages, consistent with a gradual subcellular release of Tofa. Collectively, a HPMA-based nanoscale prodrug of P-Tofa has the potential to enhance the therapeutic efficacy and widen the therapeutic window of Tofa therapy in RA.

Topics: Acrylamides; Administration, Oral; Animals; Ankle Joint; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Macrophages; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Prodrugs; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew; Signal Transduction; STAT6 Transcription Factor; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; X-Ray Microtomography

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting an estimated 1.5 million patients in the US. The condition is associated with a substantial health and economic burden. An economic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib (a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor) versus biologic therapies commonly prescribed in the US for the treatment of RA.. A cost-utility model was developed whereby sequences of treatments were evaluated. Response to treatment was modeled by HAQ change, and informed by a network meta-analysis. Mortality, resource use and quality of life were captured in the model using published regression analyses based on HAQ score. Treatment discontinuation was linked to response to treatment and to adverse events. Patients were modeled as having had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR), or to a first biologic therapy (TNFi-IR).. The tofacitinib strategy was associated with cost savings compared with alternative treatment sequences across all modeled scenarios (i.e. in both the MTX-IR and TNFi-IR scenarios), with lifetime cost savings per patient ranging from $65,205 to $93,959 (2015 costs). Cost savings arose due to improved functioning and the resulting savings in healthcare expenditure, and lower drug and administration costs. The tofacitinib strategies all resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with additional QALYs per patient ranging from 0.01 to 0.22.. Tofacitinib as a second-line therapy following methotrexate failure and as a third-line therapy following a biologic failure produces lower costs and improved quality of life compared with the current pathway of care.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; United States

Pain accompanies rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory conditions and is difficult to manage. Although opioids provide potent analgesia, chronic opioid use can cause tolerance and addiction. Recent studies have demonstrated functional interactions between chemokine and opioid receptor signaling pathways. Reported heterodimerization of chemokine and opioid receptors led our group to develop bivalent compounds that bind both types of receptors, with the goal of targeting opioids to sites of inflammation. MCC22 is a novel bivalent compound containing a CCR5 antagonist and mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist pharmacophores linked through a 22-atom spacer. We evaluated the efficacy of MCC22 in the K/B.g7 T-cell receptor transgenic mouse model of spontaneous inflammatory arthritis.. MCC22 or morphine was administered intraperitoneally at varying doses to arthritic K/B.g7 mice or nonarthritic control mice. Mechanical pain hypersensitivity was measured each day before and after drug administration, using the electronic von Frey test. The potency of MCC22 relative to that of morphine was calculated. Functional readouts of pain included grip strength and nesting behavior. A separate dosing regimen was used to determine whether the drugs induced pharmacologic tolerance.. MCC22 provided ~ 3000-fold more potent analgesia than morphine in this model. Daily treatment with MCC22 also led to a cumulative analgesic effect, reducing the daily baseline pain level. MCC22 produced no observable analgesic effect in nonarthritic control mice. Importantly, repeated administration of MCC22 did not induce pharmacologic tolerance, whereas a similar regimen of morphine did. Both grip strength and nesting behaviors improved among arthritic mice treated with MCC22. Ankle thickness and arthritis scores were not affected by MCC22. The analgesic effect of MCC22 was abolished in K/B.g7 mice genetically lacking CCR5, demonstrating the receptor specificity of the antagonist pharmacophore.. MCC22 is a novel bivalent ligand that targets CCR5 and MOR. Our findings demonstrate that MCC22 provides highly potent analgesia and improved functional outcomes in a model of inflammatory arthritis, without inducing typical opioid tolerance. These findings suggest that MCC22 or similar compounds could be used to treat the pain associated with inflammatory arthritis and related conditions, while minimizing the risks typically associated with chronic opioid use.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Tolerance; Isoquinolines; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Pain; Piperidines; Receptors, CCR5; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases. Th17 has been shown to play am important role in the pathogenesis of RA. Accumulating data suggest the involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in Th17 differentiation in autoimmune diseases. In the current study, we found that NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in CD4 T cells from RA patients. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome was correlated with disease activities and IL-17A concentration in RA sera. Knockdown of NLRP3 suppressed Th17 differentiation. In addition, caspase-1 or IL-1 receptor inhibitor inhibits Th17 differentiation significantly. Further, ROS production is increased in CD4 T cells from RA patients. The inhibition of ROS production decreased NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β production in CD4 T cells, leading to the suppression of Th17 differentiation. These findings suggest a pathogenic role of NLRP3 inflammasome in RA by promoting Th17 cell differentiation. NLRP3 inflammasome could be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of RA.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antioxidants; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Caspase 1; Caspase Inhibitors; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Female; Humans; Inflammasomes; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Interleukin-1beta; Lymphopoiesis; Male; Middle Aged; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Reactive Oxygen Species; Receptors, Interleukin-1; Th17 Cells

Tofacitinib is the first Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor to treat moderately to severely active RA. In this study, we investigated whether the effect of tofacitinib have any effects on body composition in mice and female patients with RA. Female C57BL/6 mice fed with a high-fat diet were treated with 30 mg/kg/day tofacitinib or vehicle for 70 days. Following treatment, trunk muscle, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fats were measured using X-ray computed tomography CT scan. Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity were assessed. In female RA patients treated with biological disease modified anti-rheumatic-drugs (biological DMARDs) or tofacitinib (n=4 per group), we also evaluated the body composition after 3 months from the start of treatment initiation using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Treatment with tofacitinib did not affect the body weight, and body composition in C57BL/6 mice. It also did not affect glucose, and insulin tolerance in mice. In patients with RA, treatment with biological DMARDs did not affect the body composition whereas the muscle mass was unchanged after receiving tofacitinib and the fat mass was significantly increased. J. Med. Invest. 65:166-170, August, 2018.

Topics: Adiposity; Adult; Aged; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Body Composition; Diet, High-Fat; Female; Glucose; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Lipolysis; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Weight Gain

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The objective of this document is to provide a comprehensive update of the recommendations of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology on drug treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on a systematic literature review and on the opinion of a panel of rheumatologists. Four general principles and eleven recommendations were approved. General principles: RA treatment should (1) preferably consist of a multidisciplinary approach coordinated by a rheumatologist, (2) include counseling on lifestyle habits, strict control of comorbidities, and updates of the vaccination record, (3) be based on decisions shared by the patient and the physician after clarification about the disease and the available therapeutic options; (4) the goal is sustained clinical remission or, when this is not feasible, low disease activity. Recommendations: (1) the first line of treatment should be a csDMARD, started as soon as the diagnosis of RA is established; (2) methotrexate (MTX) is the first-choice csDMARD; (3) the combination of two or more csDMARDs, including MTX, may be used as the first line of treatment; (4) after failure of first-line therapy with MTX, the therapeutic strategies include combining MTX with another csDMARD (leflunomide), with two csDMARDs (hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine), or switching MTX for another csDMARD (leflunomide or sulfasalazine) alone; (5) after failure of two schemes with csDMARDs, a bDMARD may be preferably used or, alternatively a tsDMARD, preferably combined, in both cases, with a csDMARD; (6) the different bDMARDs in combination with MTX have similar efficacy, and therefore, the therapeutic choice should take into account the peculiarities of each drug in terms of safety and cost; (7) the combination of a bDMARD and MTX is preferred over the use of a bDMARD alone; (8) in case of failure of an initial treatment scheme with a bDMARD, a scheme with another bDMARD can be used; in cases of failure with a TNFi, a second bDMARD of the same class or with another mechanism of action is effective and safe; (9) tofacitinib can be used to treat RA after failure of bDMARD; (10) corticosteroids, preferably at low doses for the shortest possible time, should be considered during periods of disease activity, and the risk-benefit ratio should also be considered; (11) reducing or spacing out bDMARD doses is possible in patients in sustained remission.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Brazil; Decision Making; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Leflunomide; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatology; Societies, Medical; Sulfasalazine

Neutrophils play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) via the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), proteases and cytokines. Orally active Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi), e.g. baricitinib and tofacitinib, have high clinical efficacy in RA but are linked with neutropenia and increased infections. Our aim was to determine the effect of JAK inhibition with baricitinib and tofacitinib on healthy control and RA neutrophil lifespan and function. RA (n = 7) and healthy control (n = 7) neutrophils were treated with baricitinib or tofacitinib for 30 min, prior to incubation in the absence or presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or interferon (IFN)-γ. JAKi prevented GM-CSF- and IFN-γ-induced apoptosis delay in RA and healthy control neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner. Baricitinib decreased the rate of chemotaxis towards interleukin (IL)-8, but not f-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) in RA neutrophils. While healthy control neutrophils incubated with GM-CSF became primed to produce ROS in response to stimulation with fMLP and phorbol-12-myristate-12-acetate (PMA), RA neutrophils produced increased levels of ROS without the need for priming. JAKi prevented ROS release from primed healthy control neutrophils in response to fMLP, but had no effect on ROS production by RA neutrophils. Baricitinib reversed GM-CSF priming of ROS production in response to fMLP in healthy control, but not RA, neutrophils. We conclude that incubation with JAKi prevents chemotaxis of RA neutrophils towards IL-8, but does not prevent the production of ROS or increase the level of apoptosis. This may be due to the in-vivo exposure of RA neutrophils to priming agents other than those that activate JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Case-Control Studies; Cell Movement; Cells, Cultured; Female; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Interleukin-8; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Reactive Oxygen Species; Respiratory Burst; Sulfonamides; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate; United Kingdom

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is an opportunistic ocular infection most commonly observed in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We present a rare case of CMV retinitis that developed in a non-HIV patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Over the preceding 5 months, a family doctor had been treating the 78-year-old male patient with a combination therapy of methotrexate (MTX) and tofacitinib (TOF). CMV retinitis occurred when the patient's CD4+ T cells were low (196 cells/μl), and preceded the onset of Pneumocystis pneumonia. MTX and TOF were stopped after the diagnosis of CMV retinitis. While intravenous and intravitreal ganciclovir administration significantly improved the CMV retinitis, uveitis developed 3 months later during the maintenance therapy with oral valganciclovir, concomitantly with the recovery of the CD4+ T cell counts. As we believed this uveitis was caused by the immune reconstitution mechanism, we treated the patient with a retrobulbar injection of corticosteroids. During the 6 months following the cessation of MTX and TOF, there was no flare-up of the RA. Cases of CMV retinitis and immune recovery uveitis in RA patients have been rarely reported in the literature. In the current case, the intensive immunosuppressive therapy in this elderly patient might have been the cause of this unusual opportunistic complication of RA.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytomegalovirus Retinitis; Ganciclovir; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Intravitreal Injections; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Uveitis

To determine whether tofacitinib can be discontinued in patients with RA who achieve low disease activity (LDA).. RA patients with LDA after tofacitinib treatment in a phase III and long-term extension study were enrolled in this multicentre, non-randomized, open, prospective, observational study. The decision of discontinuation or continuation of tofacitinib was determined based on patient-physician decision making with informed consent. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained tofacitinib-free at post-treatment week 52. Clinical outcome was compared between those who continued and those who discontinued tofacitinib. The last observation carried forward method was used for patients who could not discontinue tofacitinib before week 52.. Of 64 patients, 54 discontinued and 10 continued tofacitinib therapy. At post-treatment week 52, 20 of the 54 patients (37%) of the discontinuation group remained tofacitinib-free without disease flare. Disease activity at post-treatment week 52 was higher in the discontinuation group than the continuation group. Among the discontinuation group, the RF titre at baseline was significantly lower in patients who remained tofacitinib-free than those who did not (40 vs 113 U/ml). In fact, a higher proportion of patients with lower RF remained tofacitinib-free at week 52 compared with those with higher RF at baseline. In patients who could not achieve tofacitinib-free status, re-initiation of tofacitinib or other biologics improved disease activity.. It is possible to discontinue tofacitinib without flare in about a third of patients with RA. A low RF predicts maintenance of LDA after discontinuation of tofacitinib.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by pronounced inflammation and leukocyte infiltration in affected joints. Tofacitinib is new agent, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) signaling pathways mediated by JAK1 and JAK3 and inhibits the key transcription factors STAT1 and STAT3. We investigated the action mechanisms of tofacitinib in rats with adjuvant-induced-arthritis (AIA). AIA-rats were treated orally with tofacitinib or with methotrexate. Arthritis severity and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were evaluated, splenic cells were examined by flow cytometry and cytokines were analyzed by real-time PCR. Tofacitinib markedly reduced the clinical status of treated rats in comparison to control group. Reduced joints inflammation and down-regulated serum CRP levels reflected the clinical manifestations of the treated rats. Tofacitinib down-regulated significantly the frequency of CD4

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; C-Reactive Protein; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Foot; Foot Joints; Forelimb; Hindlimb; Interferon-gamma; Interleukin-1beta; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger; Spleen

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting.. Seventy consecutive patients, for whom tofacitinib was initiated between November 2013 and May 2016, were enrolled. All patients fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA. All patients received 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily and were followed for 24 weeks. Clinical disease activity indicated by disease activity score (DAS)28-ESR, the simplified disease activity index, and the clinical disease activity index as well as adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which baseline variables influenced the efficacy of tofacitinib at 24 weeks.. Fifty-eight patients (82.9%) continued tofacitinib at 24 weeks. Clinical disease activity rapidly and significantly decreased, and this efficacy continued throughout the 24 weeks: i.e., DAS28-ESR decreased from 5.04 ± 1.33 at baseline to 3.83 ± 1.11 at 4 weeks and 3.53 ± 1.17 at 24 weeks (P<0.0001, vs. baseline). 15 AEs including 5 herpes zoster infection occurred during tofacitinib treatment. The efficacy of tofacitinib was not changed in patients without concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) or patients whose treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ) failed. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that the number of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) previously used was independently associated with achievement of DAS-low disease activity.. Our present study suggests that tofacitinib is effective in real-world settings even without concomitant MTX use or after switching from TCZ. Our results also suggest that its efficacy diminishes if started after use of multiple bDMARDs.

Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).. A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences.. The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence.. This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Juvenile; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Biological Products; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Orthopedics; Perioperative Care; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Diseases; Rheumatology; Societies, Medical; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; United States

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrroles

Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased cardiovascular mortality, paradoxically associated with reduced circulating lipid levels. The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib ameliorates systemic and joint inflammation in RA with a concomitant increase in serum lipids. We analysed the effect of tofacitinib on the lipid profile of hyperlipidaemic rabbits with chronic arthritis (CA) and on the changes in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) during chronic inflammation.. CA was induced in previously immunized rabbits, fed a high-fat diet, by administering four intra-articular injections of ovalbumin. A group of rabbits received tofacitinib (10 mg·kg. Tofacitinib decreased systemic and synovial inflammation and increased circulating lipid levels. Although it did not modify synovial macrophage density, it reduced the lipid content within synovial macrophages. In foam macrophages in culture, IFNγ further stimulated intracellular lipid accumulation, while the JAK/STAT inhibition provoked by tofacitinib induced lipid release by increasing the levels of cellular liver X receptor α and ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA1) synthesis.. Active inflammation could be associated with lipid accumulation within macrophages of CA rabbits. JAK inhibition induced lipid release through RCT activation, providing a plausible explanation for the effect of tofacitinib on the lipid profile of RA patients.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cholesterol; Diet, High-Fat; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Inflammation; Lipids; Macrophages; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rabbits; Structure-Activity Relationship

Topics: Adalimumab; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Tofacitinib (CP-690550), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through blocking the signaling pathways of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, recent evidence suggests that long-term tofacitinib treatment is associated with increased risk of infection (e.g. tuberculosis) in patients. In the present study, we illustrate that tofacitinib administration significantly reduced the survival rate of mice given lethal or sub-lethal dose challenge with Candida albicans. This was related to the ability of tofacitinib to reverse TNFα- and IFNγ-enhanced candidacidal activity of murine polymorph nuclear cells (PMNs) and also to suppress chemokine CXCL5 expression and PMN infiltration in the infected tissues of mice. More importantly, tofacitinib significantly antagonized the ability of TNFα, IFNγ and GM-CSF to boost human PMNs in phagocytosis and direct killing of C. albicans in vitro. It also down-regulated reactive oxygen production and neutrophil extracellular trap formation by human PMNs stimulated with yeast-derived β-glucans in the presence of TNFα, IFNγ or GM-CSF. Our data emphasizes a significantly increased risk for opportunistic fungal infection associated long-term tofacitinib treatment in humans, likely through antagonizing the PMN-boosting effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Candida albicans; Candidiasis; Disease Susceptibility; Female; Humans; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Neutrophil Activation; Neutrophils; Phagocytosis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Fear; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Vaccination

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ), and the risk appears to be increased in patients treated with tofacitinib. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether concomitant treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or glucocorticoids (GCs) contributes to the increased risk of HZ in RA patients treated with tofacitinib.. HZ cases were identified from the databases of 2 phase I, 9 phase II, 6 phase III, and 2 long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in RA patients. Crude incidence rates (IRs) of all HZ events (serious and nonserious) per 100 patient-years (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) were calculated for unique patients. Within phase III studies, we described HZ rates according to concomitant csDMARD treatment and baseline GC use. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate HZ risk factors across studies.. Across all studies (6,192 patients; 16,839 patient-years), HZ was reported in 636 tofacitinib-treated patients (IR 4.0, 95% CI 3.7-4.4). In most cases (93%), HZ was classified as nonserious, and the majority of patients (94%) had involvement of only 1 dermatome. HZ IRs varied across regions, from 2.4 (95% CI 2.0-2.9) in Eastern Europe to 8.0 (95% CI 6.6-9.6) in Japan and 8.4 (95% CI 6.4-10.9) in Korea. Within phase III studies, HZ IRs varied according to tofacitinib dose, background csDMARD treatment, and baseline use of GCs. The IRs were numerically lowest for monotherapy with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily without GCs (IR 0.56 [95% CI 0.07-2.01]) and highest for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily with csDMARDs and GCs (IR 5.44 [95% CI 3.72-7.68]). Age, GC use, tofacitinib dose, and enrollment within Asia were independent risk factors for HZ.. Patients receiving treatment with tofacitinib and GCs appear to have a greater risk of developing HZ compared with patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy without GCs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chloroquine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Databases, Factual; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Incidence; Isoxazoles; Leflunomide; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Vaccination

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Molecular Docking Simulation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. This study aimed to analyze the effects of Tofacitinib treatment, a Janus kinase inhibitor, on atherosclerosis in patients with RA. Patients with an active RA (28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 3.2) despite methotrexate (MTX) treatment 12 mg/week were included in this open-label prospective study and started on Tofacitinib (10 mg/day, 5 mg twice/day). Japanese guideline does not allow high dose of MTX. All patients used a stable dosage of MTX, steroids, and statins or lipid-lowering drugs. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) at the baseline and 54 weeks after Tofa treatment. Clinical data were collected at regular visits. Forty-six patients completed this study. CIMT did not significantly change from baseline to 54 weeks (1.09 ± 0.69 and 1.08 ± 0.78 mm, p = 0.82). In 12 patients who had atherosclerosis at baseline (carotid intima-media thickness > 1.10 mm), there was a significant decrease in CIMT (0.05± 0.026 mm; p < 0.05). However, the decrease in CIMT was of limited clinical significance. Tofacitinib increased fasting total cholesterol levels from baseline to 54 weeks (216 ± 25.3 and 234 ± 28.8 mg/dL, p < 0.01). Tofacitinib affects atherosclerosis in patients with active RA The CIMT in RA patients was stable. Tofacitinib decreased the CIMT of patients who had increased CIMT at baseline. Tofacitinib reduced RA disease activity and limited vascular damage despite up-regulating cholesterol in patients with an active RA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Atherosclerosis; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ultrasonography; Up-Regulation

After a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fails tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, clinical guidelines support either cycling to another TNFi or switching to a different mechanism of action (MOA), but payers often require TNFi cycling before they reimburse switching MOA. This study examined treatment persistence, cost, and cost per persistent patient among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers.. This study of Commercial and Medicare Advantage claims data from the Optum Research Database included patients with RA and at least one claim for a TNFi (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab) between January 2012 and September 2015 who changed to another TNFi or a different MOA therapy (abatacept, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib) within 1 year. The index date was the date of the change in therapy. Treatment persistence was defined as no subsequent switch or 60-day gap in therapy for 1 year post-index. RA-related costs included plan-paid and patient-paid amounts for inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. Medication costs included index and post-index costs of TNFi and different MOA therapies.. There were 581 (38.3%) MOA switchers and 935 (61.7%) TNFi cyclers. The treatment persistence rate was significantly higher for MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers (47.7% versus 40.2%, P = 0.004). Mean 1-year healthcare costs were significantly lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers for total RA-related costs ($37,804 versus $42,116; P < 0.001) and medication costs ($29,001 versus $34,917; P < 0.001). When costs were divided by treatment persistence, costs per persistent patient were lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers: $25,436 lower total RA-related cost and $25,999 lower medication costs.. MOA switching is associated with higher treatment persistence and lower healthcare costs than TNFi cycling. Reimbursement policies that require patients to cycle TNFi before switching MOA may result in suboptimal outcomes for both patients and payers.. Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Databases, Factual; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Infliximab; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Approval; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; United Kingdom

Transient receptor potential canonical 5 (TRPC5) is functionally expressed on a range of cells including fibroblast-like synoviocytes, which play an important role in arthritis. A role for TRPC5 in inflammation has not been previously shown in vivo. We investigated the contribution of TRPC5 in arthritis.. Male wild-type and TRPC5 knockout (KO) mice were used in a complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced unilateral arthritis model, assessed over 14 days. Arthritis was determined by measurement of knee joint diameter, hindlimb weightbearing asymmetry and pain behaviour. Separate studies involved chronic pharmacological antagonism of TRPC5 channels. Synovium from human postmortem control and inflammatory arthritis samples were investigated for TRPC5 gene expression.. At baseline, no differences were observed. CFA-induced arthritis resulted in increased synovitis in TRPC5 KO mice assessed by histology. Additionally, TRPC5 KO mice demonstrated reduced ispilateral weightbearing and nociceptive thresholds (thermal and mechanical) following CFA-induced arthritis. This was associated with increased mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators in the ipsilateral synovium and increased concentration of cytokines in synovial lavage fluid. Chronic treatment with ML204, a TRPC5 antagonist, augmented weightbearing asymmetry, secondary hyperalgesia and cytokine concentrations in the synovial lavage fluid. Synovia from human inflammatory arthritis demonstrated a reduction in TRPC5 mRNA expression.. Genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade of TRPC5 results in an enhancement in joint inflammation and hyperalgesia. Our results suggest that activation of TRPC5 may be associated with an endogenous anti-inflammatory/analgesic pathway in inflammatory joint conditions.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Behavior, Animal; Edema; Female; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Mice, Knockout; Middle Aged; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Osteoarthritis; Piperidines; RNA, Messenger; Synovial Membrane; Synovitis; TRPC Cation Channels

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To characterise the relative safety profile of tofacitinib to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), the accrued patient-years (pt-yrs) of exposure needed in an RA clinical trial programme to detect a potential increase in risk of specific adverse events (AEs) was determined. This case study/framework was constructed on the pt-yrs' accrual within pooled phase (P)1, P2 and P3, as well as long-term extension, studies of tofacitinib in RA (March 2015 data-cut) and published AE incidence rates for bDMARDs. Sample size calculations were based on a Poisson distribution to estimate pt-yrs' exposure required for 90 % probability that the lower bound of the 95 % confidence interval for tofacitinib/bDMARD would be >1, assuming that tofacitinib rates were 1.2×/1.5×/2.0× greater than comparator rates. AE rates for bDMARDs were derived from sources intended to optimise similarity with the tofacitinib database in terms of baseline characteristics, study duration and follow-up. Based on the tofacitinib exposure accrued (19,406 pt-yrs), data were sufficient (90 % probability) to detect potential differences over external bDMARD comparator rates in serious infections (≥1.2×), malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and lymphoma (each ≥1.5×), as well as opportunistic infections and gastrointestinal perforations (≥2×), should they exist. This risk characterisation approach can support the comparative safety of new RA medications. To date, tofacitinib safety appears similar to approved published data from bDMARDs with respect to serious infections, malignancies (excluding NMSC), NMSC, MACE, lymphoma, opportunistic infections and gastrointestinal perforations.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Neoplasms; Opportunistic Infections; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Assessment

B-cells are pivotal to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, is effective and safe in its treatment. Tofacitinib interferes with signal transduction via cytokine receptors using the common γ-chain. Despite extensive data on T-lymphocytes, the impact of tofacitinib on B-lymphocytes is poorly understood. In this study we assessed the effect of tofacitinib on B-lymphocyte differentiation and function. Tofacitinib treatment strongly impaired in vitro plasmablast development, immunoglobulin secretion and induction of B-cell fate determining transcription factors, Blimp-1, Xbp-1, and IRF-4, in naïve B-cells. Interestingly, class switch and activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AICDA) induction was only slightly reduced in activated naïve B-cells. The effect of tofacitinib on plasmablast formation, immunoglobulin secretion and proliferation was less profound, when peripheral blood B-cells, including not only naïve but also memory B-cells, were stimulated. In line with these in vitro results, the relative distribution of B-cell populations remained stable in tofacitinib treated patients. Nevertheless, a temporary increase in absolute B-cell numbers was observed 6-8 weeks after start of treatment. In addition, B-cells isolated from tofacitinib treated patients responded rapidly to in vitro activation. We demonstrate that tofacitinib has a direct impact on human naïve B-lymphocytes, independently from its effect on T-lymphocytes, by impairing their development into plasmablasts and immunoglobulin secretion. The major effect of tofacitinib on naïve B-lymphocyte development points to the potential inability of tofacitinib-treated patients to respond to novel antigens, and suggests planning vaccination strategies prior to tofacitinib treatment.

Topics: Antibody Formation; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; B-Lymphocytes; Cells, Cultured; Cytidine Deaminase; Humans; Immunoglobulin Class Switching; Immunomodulation; Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocyte Count; Piperidines; Plasma Cells; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction

Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor that is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In previous clinical trials of tofacitinib, a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-based analysis was used to assess outcomes. In this study, remission rates according to various remission criteria were evaluated across 5 phase III randomized controlled studies.. In all 5 studies, tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 5 mg twice daily or 10 mg twice daily, either as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. One of the studies included adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks. In addition to the 4-variable DAS28 using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]), a primary efficacy variable used in the phase III studies, disease activity was assessed post hoc by the 4-variable DAS28 using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-4[CRP]), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Boolean-based assessment.. A total of 3,306 patients were analyzed (1,213 of these patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, 1,212 received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, 679 received placebo, and 202 received adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks). Remission rates varied according to the criteria used, with higher rates in the active-treatment groups for the DAS28-4(CRP) than for other scores. At month 3, remission rates with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily were 18-22% using the DAS28-4(CRP), 5-10% using the DAS28-4(ESR), 4-7% using the SDAI, 5-6% using the CDAI, and 2-7% using the Boolean-based method. In contrast, the remission rates with placebo varied from 0% to 7%, with small differences between the DAS28-4(ESR) and the DAS28-4(CRP).. Although tofacitinib at dosages of 5 mg twice daily and 10 mg twice daily was effective compared with placebo in achieving disease remission, regardless of the disease activity measure, remission rates were substantially higher when the DAS28-4(CRP) was used. The presence or absence and type of acute-phase reactants in remission criteria were significant contributors to remission rates across treatment groups. This finding has important consequences for trial design and clinical practice.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) display an aggressive phenotype that is a critical factor in cartilage destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Increased FLS migration and proliferation are essential to the pathology of RA. Halofuginone has been found to inhibit cell migration and proliferation in cancer cells. However, whether halofuginone has a role in the treatment of RA FLSs is unclear. In this study, we found that halofuginone reduced migration, invasion, cell proliferation and MMPs expression in RA FLSs. In addition, we demonstrated that halofuginone inhibited reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton during cell migration. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms, we evaluated the effect of halofuginone on the MAPK and AKT pathways. Our results indicated that halofuginone inhibited the activity of MAPK and AKT. Taken together, these results suggest that halofuginone may protect against joint destruction in RA by regulating synoviocyte migration, invasion and cell proliferation by inhibiting MAPK and AKT activation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases; Female; Fibroblasts; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Piperidines; Quinazolinones; Signal Transduction; Synoviocytes; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. The aim of this analysis was to characterize changes in haematological parameters following tofacitinib treatment, and to compare changes in haemoglobin with markers of disease activity, fatigue and vitality.. Changes in neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts and haemoglobin levels were analysed in patients with RA from six phase 3 randomized controlled trials (n = 4271) of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg bd, placebo or active comparators of up to 24 months' duration, and two long-term extension (LTE) studies (n = 4858) of tofacitinib of up to 84 months' duration. Disease activity markers included CRP and ESR. Fatigue and vitality were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and Short Form Health Survey-36 vitality domain scores.. In phase 3 studies, mean neutrophil and lymphocyte counts decreased and mean haemoglobin levels increased in all tofacitinib treatment groups. Haemoglobin levels and neutrophil counts stabilized in the LTE studies, while lymphocyte count decreases stabilized at approximately month 48. Increased haemoglobin was associated with decreased ESR and CRP levels. Clinically meaningful reductions in haemoglobin levels (⩾3 g/dl from baseline or haemoglobin ⩽7 g/dl) occurred in <1.0% of patients in all treatment groups. FACIT-F and Short Form Health Survey-36 vitality scores were weakly correlated with haemoglobin levels.. Small changes in haematological parameters were seen with tofacitinib treatment, which stabilized over time in the LTE studies. Changes in haemoglobin levels, although associated with changes in ESR and CRP, were not associated with fatigue or vitality.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Sedimentation; C-Reactive Protein; Cell Count; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Fatigue; Female; Hemoglobins; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Cytokines; Fibroblasts; Humans; Lactones; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Resorcinols; Synovial Membrane

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report an integrated safety summary of tofacitinib from two phase I, nine phase II, six phase III and two long-term extension studies in adult patients with active RA.. Data were pooled for all tofacitinib-treated patients (data cut-off: 31 March 2015). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with event/100 patient-years) and 95% CIs are reported for adverse events (AEs) of interest.. 6194 patients received tofacitinib for a total 19 406 patient-years' exposure; median exposure was 3.4 patient-years. IR (95% CI) for serious AEs was 9.4 (9.0 to 9.9); IR for serious infections was 2.7 (2.5 to 3.0). IR for (all) herpes zoster was 3.9 (3.6 to 4.2); IR for disseminated or multidermatomal herpes zoster was 0.3 (0.2 to 0.4). IR for opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) was 0.3 (0.2 to 0.4) and was 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) for tuberculosis. IR for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) was 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0); NMSC IR was 0.6 (0.5 to 0.7). IR for gastrointestinal perforations was 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2). Analysis of IR for serious infections, herpes zoster and malignancies by 6-month intervals did not reveal any notable increase in IR with longer-duration tofacitinib exposure.. This analysis of tofacitinib exposure up to 8.5 years allowed estimation of safety events with improved precision versus previous tofacitinib reports. AEs were generally stable over time; no new safety signals were observed compared with previous tofacitinib reports.. NCT01262118, NCT01484561, NCT00147498, NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT01164579, NCT00976599, NCT01059864, NCT01359150, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT01039688, NCT00413699, NCT00661661; Results.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Incidence; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Opportunistic Infections; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Time Factors; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease characterized by joint destruction. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. This post hoc analysis assessed the safety of tofacitinib in Latin American (LA) patients with RA versus the Rest of World (RoW) population.. Data were pooled from 14 clinical studies of tofacitinib: six Phase 2, six Phase 3 and two long-term extension studies. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events/100 patient-years of treatment exposure) were calculated for safety events of special interest combined across tofacitinib doses. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for IRs were calculated using the maximum likelihood method. Descriptive comparisons were made between LA and RoW (excluding LA) populations.. This analysis included data from 984 LA patients and 4687 RoW patients. IRs for safety events of special interest were generally similar between LA and RoW populations, with overlapping 95% CIs. IRs for discontinuation due to adverse events, serious infections, tuberculosis, all herpes zoster (HZ), serious HZ, malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and major adverse cardiovascular events were numerically lower for LA versus RoW patients; IR for mortality was numerically higher. No lymphoma was reported in the LA population versus eight cases in the RoW population. Exposure (extent and length) was lower in the LA population (2148.33 patient-years [mean = 2.18 years]) versus RoW (10515.68 patient-years [mean = 2.24 years]).. This analysis of pooled data from clinical studies of tofacitinib in patients with RA demonstrates that tofacitinib has a consistent safety profile across LA and RoW patient populations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Incidence; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Latin America; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Social media may complement traditional data sources to answer comparative effectiveness/safety questions after medication licensure.. The Treato platform was used to analyze all publicly available social media data including Facebook, blogs, and discussion boards for posts mentioning inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid, psoriatic). Safety events were self-reported by patients and mapped to medical ontologies, resolving synonyms. Disease and symptom-related treatment indications were manually redacted. The units of analysis were unique terms in posts. Pre-specified conditions (e.g. herpes zoster (HZ)) were selected based upon safety signals from clinical trials and reported as pairwise odds ratios (ORs); drugs were compared with Fisher's exact test. Empirically identified events were analyzed using disproportionality analysis and reported as relative reporting ratios (RRRs). The accuracy of a natural language processing (NLP) classifier to identify cases of shingles associated with arthritis medications was assessed.. As of October 2015, there were 785,656 arthritis-related posts. Posts were predominantly US posts (75%) from patient authors (87%) under 40 years of age (61%). For HZ posts (n = 1815), ORs were significantly increased with tofacitinib versus other rheumatoid arthritis therapies. ORs for mentions of perforated bowel (n = 13) were higher with tocilizumab versus other therapies. RRRs associated with tofacitinib were highest in conditions related to baldness and hair regrowth, infections and cancer. The NLP classifier had a positive predictive value of 91% to identify HZ. There was a threefold increase in posts following television direct-to-consumer advertisement (p = 0.04); posts expressing medication safety concerns were significantly more frequent than favorable posts.. Social media is a challenging yet promising data source that may complement traditional approaches for comparative effectiveness research for new medications.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Direct-to-Consumer Advertising; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Natural Language Processing; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Social Media

To determine the cost-effectiveness of treatment sequences of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or Janus kinase/STAT pathway inhibitors (collectively referred to as bDMARDs) vs conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) from the US societal perspective for treatment of patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate responses to cDMARDs.. An individual patient simulation model was developed that assesses the impact of treatments on disease based on clinical trial data and real-world evidence. Treatment strategies included sequences starting with etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, or abatacept. Each of these treatment strategies was compared with cDMARDs. Incremental cost, incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each treatment sequence relative to cDMARDs. The cost-effectiveness of each strategy was determined using a US willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY.. For the base-case scenario, bDMARD treatment sequences were associated with greater treatment benefit (i.e. more QALYs), lower lost productivity costs, and greater treatment-related costs than cDMARDs. The expected ICERs for bDMARD sequences ranged from ∼$126,000 to $140,000 per QALY gained, which is below the US-specific WTP. Alternative scenarios examining the effects of homogeneous patients, dose increases, increased costs of hospitalization for severely physically impaired patients, and a lower baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index score resulted in similar ICERs.. bDMARD treatment sequences are cost-effective from a US societal perspective.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Age Factors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Etanercept; Humans; Infliximab; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; United States

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib can be administered as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This study describes RA patients' characteristics, treatment patterns, and costs for those initiating tofacitinib treatment as monotherapy or combination therapy, using US claims data from clinical practice.. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged ≥18 years with RA (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 714.xx) and with ≥1 tofacitinib claim in the Truven Marketscan (TM) or the Optum Clinformatics (OC) database. Index was defined as the first tofacitinib fill date (November 2012-June 2014). Patients were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months before and after index. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and medication possession ratio (MPR). Persistence was evaluated using a 1.5× days' supply gap or switch. All-cause and RA-related costs in the 12-month pre- and post-index periods were evaluated. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were conducted on data on treatment patterns and costs stratified by monotherapy status.. A total of 337 (TM) and 118 (OC) tofacitinib patients met the selection criteria; 52.2% (TM) and 50.8% (OC) received monotherapy and 83.7% (TM) and 76.3% (OC) had pre-index biologic DMARD experience. Twelve-month mean PDC values were 0.56 (TM) and 0.53 (OC), and 12-month mean MPR was 0.84 (TM) and 0.80 (OC), with persistence of 140.0 (TM) and 124.6 (OC) days. Between 12-month pre- and post-index periods, mean (SD) 12-month RA-related medical costs decreased by $5784 ($31,832) in TM and $6103 ($25,897) in OC (both, P < 0.05), whereas total costs increased by $3996 ($30,397) in TM (P < 0.05) and $1390 ($26,603) in OC. There were no significant differences in adherence, persistence, or all-cause/RA-related costs between monotherapy and combination therapy in unadjusted/adjusted analyses.. This analysis adds to the existing tofacitinib knowledge base and will enable informed clinical and policy decision making based on valuable datasets independent of randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Databases, Factual; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate the risks of herpes zoster (HZ) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection associated with tofacitinib compared with biologic agents among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Using health plan data from 2010 to 2014, patients with RA initiating tofacitinib or biologics with no history of HZ or HSV were identified, as were incident cases of HZ or HSV. Crude incidence rates were calculated by drug exposure. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the adjusted association between tofacitinib and HZ, and a composite outcome of HZ or HSV.. A total of 2526 patients initiating tofacitinib were compared with initiations of other biologics: anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) (n=42 850), abatacept (n=12 305), rituximab (n=5078) and tocilizumab (n=6967). Patients receiving tofacitinib were somewhat younger (mean age 55 years) versus those on other biologics, and somewhat less likely to use concomitant methotrexate (MTX) (39% vs 43%-56%, depending on drug). Crude incidence of HZ associated with tofacitinib was 3.87/100 patient-years (py). After multivariable adjustment, HZ risk was significantly elevated, HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.40 to 2.88) compared with abatacept. Rates and adjusted HRs for all other RA biologics were comparable with each other and abatacept. Older age, female sex, prednisone >7.5 mg/day, prior outpatient infection and greater number of hospitalisations were also associated with increased HZ risk. Incidence rates for the combined outcome were greatest for tofacitinib (7.61/100 py) and also significantly elevated after adjustment (HR=1.40, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81).. The rate of zoster associated with tofacitinib was approximately double that observed in patients using biologics.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Female; Herpes Simplex; Herpes Zoster; Herpesviridae Infections; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Sex Factors

To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) perforation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tofacitinib, tocilizumab, or other biologic agents.. Using health plan data from 2006 through 2014, RA patients without prior GI perforation were identified. Those in whom treatment with tofacitinib or a biologic agent was being initiated were followed up for incident GI perforation with hospitalization. Crude incidence rates were calculated by exposure. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between GI perforation and exposures. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.. A cohort of 167,113 RA patients was analyzed. Among them, 4,755 began treatment with tofacitinib, 11,705 with tocilizumab, 115,047 with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), 31,214 with abatacept, and 4,392 with rituximab. Compared to TNFi recipients, abatacept recipients were older, tofacitinib and rituximab recipients were younger, and tocilizumab recipients were similar in age. Patients beginning treatment with a non-TNFi agent were more likely to have previously received biologic agents than patients beginning treatment with a TNFi. The incidence of GI perforation per 1,000 patient-years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.55 (tocilizumab), 1.07 (abatacept), 0.73 (rituximab), and 0.83 (TNFi). Most perforations occurred in the lower GI tract: the incidence of lower GI tract perforation per 1,000 patient-years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.26 (tocilizumab), 0.76 (abatacept), 0.48 (rituximab), and 0.46 (TNFi). Lower GI tract perforation risk was significantly elevated with tocilizumab treatment, and numerically elevated with tofacitinib treatment, versus treatment with TNFi. Adjusted HRs were 2.51 (95% CI 1.31-4.80) for tocilizumab and 1.94 (95% CI 0.49-7.65) for tofacitinib. Older age (HR 1.16 per 5 years [95% CI 1.10-1.22]), diverticulitis/other GI conditions (HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.62-6.50]), and prednisone use at >7.5 mg/day (HR 2.29 [95% CI 1.39-3.78]) were associated with lower GI tract perforation. The incidence of upper GI tract perforation was similar among all drug exposures.. The risk of lower GI tract perforation associated with tocilizumab treatment, and possibly tofacitinib treatment, is elevated compared to that associated with TNF blockade.

Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Databases, Factual; Diverticulitis; Esophageal Perforation; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Incidence; Intestinal Perforation; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Peptic Ulcer; Piperidines; Prednisone; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Rituximab; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; United States

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and is being investigated for the treatment of psoriasis. Both conditions can present in women of child-bearing potential, but pregnancy was an exclusion and discontinuation criterion in tofacitinib randomized controlled trials (RCTs) because of the unknown effects of tofacitinib on mother and child. Tofacitinib is a small molecule that has the potential to cross the placenta.. The objective was to report outcomes of pregnancy cases identified through April 2014 from tofacitinib RA/psoriasis RCTs, RA post-approval non-interventional studies, and spontaneous adverse-event reporting.. Pregnancy outcomes were categorized as follows: healthy newborn, medical termination, fetal death, congenital malformation, spontaneous abortion, or pending/lost to follow-up.. Out of 9815 patients, 1821 female patients of child-bearing age were enrolled in the RA/psoriasis RCTs; 47 women became pregnant, including 33 who received tofacitinib monotherapy, 13 who received combination therapy with methotrexate (RA patients only), and one patient whose therapy was still blinded. No fetal deaths were reported. One congenital pulmonary valve stenosis (monotherapy, n = 1), seven spontaneous abortions (monotherapy, n = 4; combination therapy, n = 3), and eight medical terminations (monotherapy, n = 4; combination therapy, n = 3; blinded therapy, n = 1) were identified. Remaining cases reported healthy newborns (n = 25) or were pending/lost to follow-up (n = 6). Forty-four cases of paternal exposure to tofacitinib were reported (monotherapy, n = 43; combination therapy, n = 1), including five spontaneous abortions (monotherapy, n = 4; combination therapy, n = 1), 23 healthy newborns, and 16 pending/lost to follow-up.. The pregnancy outcomes reported in this small number of RA/psoriasis patients appear similar to those observed in the general population and in patients treated with biologic therapies for inflammatory diseases. However, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, and pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving tofacitinib will continue to be monitored.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The implications of treatment with tofacitinib on cardiovascular (CV) risk in RA are unknown. Therefore, CV adverse events (AEs), and blood pressure and lipid level changes, in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA were evaluated.. Data were pooled from six Phase (P)3 studies (24 months) and two open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies (60 months) of tofacitinib in patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs. Tofacitinib was administered alone or with non-biologic DMARDs. CV events, including major adverse CV events (MACE: CV death and non-fatal CV events) and congestive heart failure (CHF), were assessed by a blinded adjudication committee.. Overall, 4271 patients from P3 studies and 4827 enrolled from P2/P3 studies into LTE studies were evaluated, representing 3942 and 8699 patient-years of exposure to tofacitinib, respectively. Blood pressure remained stable over time across studies. The number of investigator-reported hypertension-related AEs in tofacitinib-treated patients was low in P3 studies (Months 0-3: 2.8%; Months 3-6: 1.4%; >6 months: 2.8%). Across studies, lipid level increases were generally observed within 1-3 months of treatment and stabilized thereafter. Patients with events (incidence rate [IR]/100 patient-years) for MACE and CHF, respectively, were: 23 (0.58) and 9 (0.23) in P3 studies, and 32 (0.37) and 8 (0.09) in LTE studies; IRs were comparable with placebo (P3) and did not increase over time (LTE).. Tofacitinib was associated with a low incidence of CV events in a large Phase 3 program, including LTE studies. Further long-term studies are underway.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Incidence; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Triglycerides

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib is approved in the United States for use in adults with moderately to severely active RA and an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate.. To (a) evaluate, using an economic model, the treatment costs of an RA strategy including tofacitinib, compared with adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab and tocilizumab biologic RA treatment strategies, which are commonly prescribed in the United States, and (b) assess the economic impact of monotherapy and combination therapy in patients who had an inadequate response to methotrexate therapy (MTX-IR analysis) and to combination therapy in patients who had an inadequate response to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-IR analysis).. A transparent, Excel-based economic model with a decision-tree approach was developed to evaluate costs over a 1- and 2-year time horizon. The model compared tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) either as monotherapy or in combination with MTX with similarly labeled biologic therapies. Response to treatment was modeled as American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response. ACR20 represented clinical response and determined whether patients continued therapy. ACR response rates at 6-month intervals were sourced from prescribing information and safety event rates from a published meta-analysis. Following an adverse event or a lack of response to treatment, it was assumed that 75% of patients switched to the next line of treatment (first to abatacept and then to rituximab). The perspective was that of a U.S. payer. Costs were reported in 2015 U.S. dollars and included drug wholesale acquisition costs, monitoring, drug administration, and treatment for minor and serious adverse events. The patient population eligible for treatment was based on the total number of members (i.e., RA and non-RA) in a payer organization; members with RA treated with biologic therapies were estimated using epidemiological data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of varying key parameters, including treatment-switching probability, product rebate, major rates of adverse drug reaction, and ACR20 rates, on the model outcomes.. Tofacitinib combination therapy after MTX failure was associated with the lowest cost per member per month (PMPM) over a 2-year time frame at $5.53, compared with $6.49 for adalimumab, $6.43 for etanercept, $5.95 for certolizumab, and $5.89 for tocilizumab. Similar savings were observed when all biologics were administered as monotherapy. Tofacitinib combination therapy was also associated with the lower PMPM cost compared with adalimumab combination therapy in the TNF-IR analysis. Tofacitinib was also among the lowest cost per ACR20 responder in each analysis. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that tofacitinib would potentially be cost saving even in the least optimistic scenarios.. This analysis suggests that tofacitinib 5 mg BID following MTX failure is a lower cost per patient treatment option when used either as monotherapy or combination therapy, compared with adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab and tocilizumab biologic regimens. Tofacitinib + MTX in TNF-IR patients was also predicted to be a lower-cost treatment option compared with adalimumab+MTX and was associated with the lowest cost per ACR 20/50/70 responder.. This study was funded by Pfizer, which determined the research topic and paid York Health Economics Consortium to develop the analysis and conduct the research. York Health Economics Consortium has received consultancy fees from Pfizer. Gerber, Wallenstein, Mendelsohn, Bourret, Singh, and Moynagh are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. Editorial support was funded by Pfizer and was provided by Claxton, Jenks, and Taylor, who are employees of York Health Economics Consortium. Study concept and design were contributed primarily by Taylor, Jenks, Gerber, and Singh, along with the other authors. Gerber, Moynagh, and Singh collected the data, assisted by Bouret and Mendelsohn; data interpretation was performed by Claxton, Gerber, Bouret, and Mendelsohn. The manuscript was written primarily by Claxton, with assistance from the other authors, and revised by Claxton, Gerber, Bouret, and Mendelsohn, with assistance from the other authors.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; United States

The present study was designed to investigate the potential therapeutic effect of trikatu, an herbal compound and its underlying molecular mechanism in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA). Our results indicate that trikatu (1000 mg/kg/b.wt. oral) administration suppressed the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1) and downregulated the mRNA expression levels of inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, MCP-1, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)) and transcription factors (nuclear factor kappa B 65 (NFкB-p65) and activator protein-1 (AP-1)) in cultured AIA-fibroblast like synoviocytes and synovial tissue of AIA rats. Consistently, the protein expression of NFкB-p65, IL-17, TNF-α, COX-2, and RANKL was also dramatically reduced in cultured AIA-fibroblast like synoviocytes and synovial tissue of AIA rats by trikatu treatment. In addition, trikatu suppressed the expression and phosphorylation of NFкB-p65 similar to the Bay 11-7082 (NFкB inhibitor) in cultured AIA-fibroblast like synoviocytes. Furthermore, trikatu alleviated the histopathology of joint of arthritic rats. Overall, these data highlights that trikatu could be a promising alternative modality for the possible treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory diseases.

Topics: Alkenes; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blotting, Western; Cells, Cultured; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cytokines; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Fibroblasts; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Male; NF-kappa B; Phytotherapy; Piperidines; Rats, Wistar; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; Synovial Membrane; Synoviocytes

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

Pfizer's Xeljanz (tofacitinib citrate) was the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor to reach the market for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following its U.S. approval in November 2012, and it has since gained approval in more than 45 countries as a second-line therapy for RA after failure of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This emerging category has heralded an attractive new class of oral treatment options in RA, with a notable opportunity in patients who stop responding to DMARDs, but they are facing a challenging market. Despite RA affecting approximately 23.7 million people worldwide, Xeljanz faces a market dominated by the anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologicals, which have robust long-term safety and efficacy. The availability of biosimilars of these market leaders is also intensifying competition, and a high price and uncertainty over long-term safety is currently tempering the market for the JAK inhibitors.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Real-world data comparing tofacitinib with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are limited.. To compare characteristics, treatment patterns, and costs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving tofacitinib versus the most common bDMARDs (adalimumab [ADA], etanercept [ETN], and abatacept [ABA]) following a single bDMARD in a U.S. administrative claims database.. This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged ≥ 18 years with an RA diagnosis (ICD-9-CM codes 714.0x-714.4x; 714.81) and 1 previous bDMARD filling ≥ 1 tofacitinib or bDMARD claim in the Truven MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims databases (November 1, 2012-October 31, 2014). Monotherapy was defined as absence of conventional synthetic DMARDs within 90 days post-index. Persistence was evaluated using a 60-day gap. Adherence was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC). RA-related total, pharmacy, and medical costs were evaluated in the 12-month pre- and post-index periods. Treatment patterns and costs were adjusted using linear models including a common set of clinically relevant variables of interest (e.g., previous RA treatments), which were assessed separately using t-tests and chi-squared tests.. Overall, 392 patients initiated tofacitinib; 178 patients initiated ADA; 118 patients initiated ETN; and 191 patients initiated ABA. Tofacitinib patients were older versus ADA patients (P = 0.0153) and had a lower proportion of Medicare supplemental patients versus ABA patients (P = 0.0095). Twelve-month pre-index bDMARD use was greater in tofacitinib patients (77.6%) versus bDMARD cohorts (47.6%-59.6%). Tofacitinib patients had greater 12-month pre-index RA-related total costs versus bDMARD cohorts (all P < 0.0001) and greatest index use of monotherapy (P = 0.0080 vs. ABA). A similar (all P > 0.10) proportion of patients were persistent with tofacitinib (42.6%) versus ADA (37.6%), ETN (42.4%), and ABA (43.5%). Mean PDC was 0.55 for tofacitinib versus 0.57 (ADA), 0.59 (ETN), and 0.44 (ABA; P = 0.0003). Adjusted analyses generated similar findings to the unadjusted treatment patterns. Tofacitinib had lower adjusted 12-month post-index mean RA-related total costs ($23,568) versus ADA ($29,278; P < 0.0001), ETN ($26,885; P = 0.0248), and ABA ($30,477; P < 0.0001).. In this study, tofacitinib was more commonly used as monotherapy and yielded at least comparable persistence and adherence with lower adjusted mean RA-related total costs versus ADA, ETN, and ABA. Further analysis is warranted given the greater 12-month pre-index bDMARD use and RA-related costs for tofacitinib versus bDMARDs.. This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Harnett, Gerber, Gruben, Koenig, and Chen are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. Some data reported in this manuscript have been previously presented at the Academy of Managed Care Nexus 2015; Orlando, Florida; October 26-29, 2015, and was submitted in abstract form to the European League Against Rheumatism Congress; London, United Kingdom; June 8-11, 2016. All authors were involved in the conception and design of this study. Harnett and Gruben were involved in data collection and analysis. All authors interpreted the data, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; United States

2014 saw the emergence of a novel rheumatoid arthritis therapy to rival methotrexate, as well as advances in our understanding of mouse T.cell biology and of the cross-talk between the nervous system and the immune system. How will these advances affect the future of rheumatoid arthritis research and therapy?

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Inflammation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

Enhancers regulate spatiotemporal gene expression and impart cell-specific transcriptional outputs that drive cell identity. Super-enhancers (SEs), also known as stretch-enhancers, are a subset of enhancers especially important for genes associated with cell identity and genetic risk of disease. CD4(+) T cells are critical for host defence and autoimmunity. Here we analysed maps of mouse T-cell SEs as a non-biased means of identifying key regulatory nodes involved in cell specification. We found that cytokines and cytokine receptors were the dominant class of genes exhibiting SE architecture in T cells. Nonetheless, the locus encoding Bach2, a key negative regulator of effector differentiation, emerged as the most prominent T-cell SE, revealing a network in which SE-associated genes critical for T-cell biology are repressed by BACH2. Disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms for immune-mediated disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, were highly enriched for T-cell SEs versus typical enhancers or SEs in other cell lineages. Intriguingly, treatment of T cells with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib disproportionately altered the expression of rheumatoid arthritis risk genes with SE structures. Together, these results indicate that genes with SE architecture in T cells encompass a variety of cytokines and cytokine receptors but are controlled by a 'guardian' transcription factor, itself endowed with an SE. Thus, enumeration of SEs allows the unbiased determination of key regulatory nodes in T cells, which are preferentially modulated by pharmacological intervention.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors; Cell Differentiation; Cell Lineage; Enhancer Elements, Genetic; Gene Expression Regulation; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Janus Kinase 3; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; p300-CBP Transcription Factors; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RNA, Untranslated; T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer; Transcription, Genetic

To investigate whether a narrow spectrum kinase inhibitor RV1088, which simultaneously targets specific MAPKs, Src and spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), is more effective at inhibiting inflammatory signalling in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) than single kinase inhibitors (SKIs).. elisas were used to determine the efficacy of RV1088, clinically relevant SKIs and the pharmaceutical Humira on pro-inflammatory cytokine production by activated RA synovial fibroblasts, primary human monocytes and macrophages, as well as spontaneous cytokine synthesis by synovial membrane cells from RA patients. In human macrophages, RNAi knockdown of individual kinases was used to reveal the effect of inhibition of kinase expression on cytokine synthesis.. RV1088 reduced TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 production in all individual activated cell types with low, nM, IC50 s. SKIs, and combinations of SKIs, were significantly less effective than RV1088. RNAi of specific kinases in macrophages also caused only modest inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine production. RV1088 was also significantly more effective at inhibiting IL-6 and IL-8 production by monocytes and RA synovial fibroblasts compared with Humira. Finally, RV1088 was the only inhibitor that was effective in reducing TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 synthesis in RA synovial membrane cells with low nM IC50 s.. This study demonstrates potent anti-inflammatory effect of RV1088, highlighting that distinct signalling pathways drive TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 production in the different cell types found in RA joints. As such, targeting numerous signalling pathways simultaneously using RV1088 could offer a more powerful method of reducing inflammation in RA than targeting individual kinases.

Topics: Acetamides; Adalimumab; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Dasatinib; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Interleukin-6; Interleukin-8; Macrophages; Monocytes; Naphthalenes; Oxazines; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RNA, Small Interfering; Signal Transduction; Synovial Membrane; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Urea

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, to the treatment of Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.. In this cost-utility analysis model, patients transitioned through treatment sequences based on Korean guidelines for RA patients with inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Lifetime health-related quality of life and costs were evaluated. Characteristics of the model cohort were based on those reported by the Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis phase 3 triaL (ORAL) Standard randomized Controlled trial of tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo. Efficacy was assessed using American College of Rheumatology response rates, converted to the changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, based on tofacitinib clinical trials data. Published clinical trial data on discontinuation rates of the indicated drugs were incorporated in the model. The HAQ-DI scores were mapped onto utility values to calculate outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); HAQ-DI-to-utility (EuroQoL 5D) mapping was based on data from 5 tofacitinib clinical trials. Costs were analyzed from a societal perspective, with values expressed in 2013 Korean won (KRW). Cost-effectiveness is presented in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model.. First-line tofacitinib used before the standard of care (base-case analysis) increased both treatment costs and QALYs gained versus the standard-of-care treatment sequence, resulting in an ICER of KRW 13,228,910 per QALY. Tofacitinib also increased costs and QALYs gained when incorporated as a second-, third-, or fourth-line therapy. The inclusion of first-line tofacitinib increased the duration of active immunomodulatory therapy from 9.4 to 13.2 years. Tofacitinib-associated increases in costs were attributable to the increased lifetime drug costs. In sensitivity analyses, variations in input parameters and assumptions yielded ICERs in the range of KRW 6,995,719 per QALY to KRW 37,450,109 per QALY.. From a societal perspective, the inclusion of tofacitinib as a treatment strategy for moderate to severe RA is cost-effective; this conclusion was considered robust based on multiple sensitivity analyses. The study was limited by the lack of clinical data on follow-up therapy after tofacitinib administration and a lack of long-term data on discontinuation of drug use.

Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Republic of Korea; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires

Despite the broad spectrum of antirheumatic drugs, RA is still not well controlled in up to 30-50 % of patients. Inhibition of JAK kinases by means of the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib has demonstrated to be effective even in difficult-to-treat patients. Here, we discuss whether the efficacy of JAK inhibition can be improved by simultaneously inhibiting SYK kinase, since both kinases mediate complementary and non-redundant pathways in RA.. Efficacy of dual JAK + SYK inhibition with selective small molecule inhibitors was evaluated in chronic G6PI-induced arthritis, a non-self-remitting and destructive arthritis model in mice. Clinical and histopathological scores, as well as cytokine and anti-G6PI antibody production were assessed in both preventive and curative protocols. Potential immunotoxicity was also evaluated in G6PI-induced arthritis and in a 28-day TDAR model, by analysing the effects of JAK + SYK inhibition on hematological parameters, lymphoid organs, leukocyte subsets and cell function.. Simultaneous JAK + SYK inhibition completely prevented mice from developing arthritis. This therapeutic strategy was also very effective in ameliorating already established arthritis. Dual kinase inhibition immediately resulted in greatly decreased clinical and histopathological scores and led to disease remission in over 70 % of the animals. In contrast, single JAK inhibition and anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) were able to stop disease progression but not to revert it. Dual kinase inhibition decreased Treg and NK cell counts to the same extent as single JAK inhibition but overall cytotoxicity remained intact. Interestingly, treatment discontinuation rapidly reversed such immune cell reduction without compromising clinical efficacy, suggesting long-lasting curative effects. Dual kinase inhibition reduced the Th1/Th17 cytokine cascade and the differentiation and function of joint cells, in particular osteoclasts and fibroblast-like synoviocytes.. Concurrent JAK + SYK inhibition resulted in higher efficacy than single kinase inhibition and TNF blockade in a chronic and severe arthritis model. Thus, blockade of multiple immune signals with dual JAK + SYK inhibition represents a reasonable therapeutic strategy for RA, in particular in patients with inadequate responses to current treatments. Our data supports the multiplicity of events underlying this heterogeneous and complex disease.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cyclohexylamines; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Flow Cytometry; Immunophenotyping; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Janus Kinases; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred DBA; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Syk Kinase

In the present study, trikatu, an herbal compound was evaluated for its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties with reference to cell mediated immune responses (delayed type hypersensitivity reaction), humoral immune response (haemagglutination titer and plaque forming assay), macrophage phagocytic index, circulating immune complex and inflammatory mediators in rats. For comparison purposes, indomethacin was used as a reference drug for anti-inflammatory studies. The results obtained in our study showed a significant decrease in cell mediated immune responses, humoral immune responses (haemagglutination titre and plaque forming assay) and macrophage phagocytic index in trikatu treated rats (1000 mg/kg/b.wt.) compared to control animals implying its immunosuppressive property. In addition, significant anti-inflammatory effects were observed in trikatu treated adjuvant induced arthritic rats by a reduction in the levels of circulating immune complexes and inflammatory mediators (TNF-alpha and Interleukin-1beta). Thus, in conclusion, our data suggest that trikatu could be considered as a potential anti-inflammatory agent for treating autoimmune inflammatory disorders like rheumatoid arthritis with immunosuppressive property.

Topics: Alkenes; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Female; Hemolytic Plaque Technique; Herbal Medicine; Hypersensitivity, Delayed; Immunity, Cellular; Immunity, Humoral; Immunomodulation; Indomethacin; Inflammation Mediators; Interleukin-1beta; Macrophages; Phagocytosis; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

In the last 15 years, the therapeutical options for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases in rheumatology have increased a lot. Nevertheless, some patients do not respond or respond partially to the current therapies--including to the biologics therapy. Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) is now on the Swiss market. It inhibits the JAK pathway. Tofacitinib--as monotherapy or with methotrexate--improves the control of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In a comparative study, tofacitinib was as effective as adalimumab. Further, tofacitinib reduced structural damages in RA and is considered as an alternative, in case of non-response, to anti-TNF and probably to other biologics therapy. The side effects are upper respiratory tract and opportunist infections and tuberculosis. Blood count, lipids, kidney function, liver tests, CK and blood pressure have to be monitored.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chronic Disease; Drug Approval; Humans; Inflammation; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Diseases; Switzerland

To describe current trends in the numbers of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related surgeries.. The number of operations was determined for patients with RA in a large observational cohort [Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA)] enrolled from 2001 to 2012.. The total number of operations peaked in 2002 and gradually decreased thereafter, but began to increase again in 2008. The number of total knee replacements has decreased since 2003, while the number of wrist and foot arthroplasties and the number of artificial finger prosthesis surgeries have increased gradually.. Our results suggest that the number of orthopedic surgeries may change in response to changes in the drug therapy for RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chromones; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Japan; Joints; Male; Orthopedic Procedures; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides; Tacrolimus

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk for herpes zoster (HZ) (i.e., shingles). The aim of this study was to determine whether treatment with tofacitinib increases the risk of HZ in patients with RA.. HZ cases were identified as those reported by trial investigators from the databases of the phase II, phase III, and long-term extension (LTE) clinical trials in the Tofacitinib RA Development Program. Crude incidence rates (IRs) of HZ per 100 patient-years (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) were calculated by exposure group. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate potential risk factors for HZ (e.g., age, prednisone use).. Among 4,789 participants, 239 were identified as having tofacitinib-associated HZ during the phase II, phase III, and LTE trials, of whom 208 (87%) were female and whose median age was 57 years (range 21-75 years). One HZ case (0.4%) was multidermatomal; none of the cases involved visceral dissemination or death. Twenty-four patients with HZ (10%) permanently discontinued treatment with tofacitinib, and 16 (7%) were either hospitalized or received intravenous antiviral drugs. The crude HZ IR across the development program was 4.4 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 3.8-4.9), but the IR was substantially higher within Asia (7.7 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 6.4-9.3). Older age was associated with HZ (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.6), and IRs for HZ were similar between patients receiving 5 mg tofacitinib twice daily (4.4 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 3.2-6.0) and those receiving 10 mg twice daily (4.2 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 3.1-5.8). In the phase III trials among placebo recipients, the incidence of HZ was 1.5 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0.5-4.6).. In the Tofacitinib RA Development Program, increased rates of HZ were observed in patients treated with tofacitinib compared with those receiving placebo, particularly among patients within Asia. Complicated HZ among tofacitinib-treated patients was rare.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Databases, Factual; Female; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

High-affinity, functionally potent, urea-based antagonists of CCR1 have been discovered. Modulation of PXR transactivation has revealed the selective and orally bioavailable CCR1 antagonist BMS-817399 (29), which entered clinical trials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Discovery; Hep G2 Cells; Humans; Male; Microsomes, Liver; Models, Molecular; Piperidines; Pregnane X Receptor; Protein Conformation; Receptors, CCR1; Receptors, Steroid; Species Specificity; Urea; Valine

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been developed as anti-inflammatory agents and have demonstrated clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated if JAK-3-selective inhibition alone could disrupt cytokine signalling in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. In-vitro studies were performed using synovial fibroblasts isolated from patients with RA. Levels of activated JAK and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis. Target-gene expression levels were measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or real-time PCR. The JAK inhibitors CP-690,550 and INCB028050 both suppressed activation of JAK-1/-2/-3 and downstream STAT-1/-3/-5, as well as the expression levels of target proinflammatory genes (MCP-I, SAA1/2) in oncostatin-M (OSM)-stimulated rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. In contrast, the JAK-3-selective inhibitor, PF-956980, suppressed STAT-1/-5 activation but did not affect STAT-3 activation in OSM-stimulated rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. In addition, PF-956980 significantly suppressed MCP-1 gene expression, but did not block SAA1/2 gene expression in OSM-stimulated rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. These data suggest that JAK-3-selective inhibition alone is insufficient to control STAT-3-dependent signalling in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts, and inhibition of JAKs, including JAK-1/-2, is needed to control the proinflammatory cascade in RA.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Fibroblasts; Humans; Janus Kinases; Oncostatin M; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Synovial Fluid; Synovial Membrane

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Janus Kinases; Male; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Drug Costs; Drug Industry; Humans; Janus Kinases; National Institutes of Health (U.S.); Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; United States

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Therapeutic Equivalency; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the novel Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690,550 in fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. RA FLSs were isolated from tissue obtained by arthroplasty, cultured and serum-starved 48 h prior to stimulation. Messenger RNA and protein levels were determined by quantitative PCR and ELISA or multiplex bead assay, respectively. Phosphorylation of STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) proteins was determined by western blot.. Interleukin-6-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT3 was inhibited by CP-690,550 with IC(50) values of 23 and 77 nM, respectively. Unexpectedly, although tumour necrosis factor (TNF) did not induce immediate phosphorylation of either STAT, CP-690,550 inhibited TNF-induced expression of several chemokines (IP-10, RANTES and MCP1) at the messenger RNA and protein levels. Chemokine expression was inhibited by cycloheximide, implying a need for de novo protein synthesis, and cycloheximide abolished the effect of CP-690,550 (tofacitinib). TNF induced early interferon (IFN) β expression and STAT1 phosphorylation beginning at 3 h, which was blocked by CP-690,550. The dependence of TNF-induced chemokine expression on type I IFN was confirmed in FLSs from mice lacking type I IFN receptors (IFNARs) and in RA FLSs using an IFNAR blocking antibody.. The Janus kinase/STAT pathway in FLS is indirectly activated by TNF through autocrine expression of type I IFN, resulting in IFNAR engagement and production of T cell chemokines. These findings illuminate a novel role of CP-690,550 in the treatment of RA: the reduction of chemokine synthesis by FLS, thereby limiting recruitment of T cells and other infiltrating leucocytes.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autocrine Communication; Cells, Cultured; Chemokines; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interferon Type I; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase 3; Mice; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Synovial Membrane; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has dramatically developed with the use of biologics targeting inflammatory cytokines. However, expense and parenteral use can cause issues in the initiation and continuation of the treatment. Therefore a new orally available anti-rheumatic drug has been long-awaited. Recently, small-molecule compounds targeting Janus kinase (JAK) has shown clinical efficacy similar to biologics in clinical trials for active RA. Among the JAK-inhibitors, new drug application for tofacitinib is concurrently under review in western and asian countries and is highly expected to become a new anti-rheumatic drug in the near future. In order to evaluate the mode of action, we utilized peripheral blood and synovium from RA patients. Proliferation and cytokine production of CD4+ T cell was prominently reduced and subsequently inhibited cartilage destruction by the synovium. Our result is in line with the inhibitory effect of tofacitinib on joint destruction in RA patients those who were treated with tofacitinib. Therefore, further clinical efficacy is expected in the in the long-term treatment with tofacitinib.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Janus Kinases; Mice; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes severe disability through chronic and destructive inflammation of the synovial joints. Currently available therapeutic options, including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents, often fail to adequately prevent disease progression. Tofacitinib (CP-690550) is an inhibitor of the Janus kinase family; tyrosine kinase receptors expressed in lymphoid cells that are involved in the signaling of cytokines important for the production and function of various immune cells implicated in RA pathogenesis. Tofacitinib has been evaluated in phase II, phase III and long-term extension studies, as both monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate and other DMARDs, and demonstrates statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the signs and symptoms of RA, patient health, physical functioning and quality of life, while having a manageable safety profile. It is currently under evaluation for approval for the treatment of adults with RA by several regulatory agencies around the world.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index

JAK inhibitors have been developed as antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive agents and are currently undergoing testing in clinical trials. The JAK inhibitors CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) and INCB018424 (ruxolitinib) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the mechanisms that mediate the beneficial actions of these compounds are not known. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of both JAK inhibitors on inflammatory and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) responses in human macrophages.. In vitro studies were performed using peripheral blood macrophages derived from healthy donors and treated with TNF and using synovial fluid macrophages derived from patients with RA. Levels of activated STAT proteins and other transcription factors were detected by Western blotting, and gene expression was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The in vivo effects of JAK inhibitors were evaluated in the K/BxN serum-transfer model of arthritis.. JAK inhibitors suppressed the activation and expression of STAT-1 and downstream inflammatory target genes in TNF-stimulated and RA synovial macrophages. In addition, JAK inhibitors decreased nuclear localization of NF-κB subunits in TNF-stimulated and RA synovial macrophages. CP-690,550 significantly decreased the expression of interleukin-6 in synovial macrophages. JAK inhibitors augmented nuclear levels of NF-ATc1 and cJun, followed by increased formation of osteoclast-like cells. CP-690,550 strongly suppressed K/BxN serum-transfer arthritis, which is dependent on macrophages, but not lymphocytes.. Our findings demonstrate that JAK inhibitors suppress macrophage activation and attenuate TNF responses and further suggest that suppression of cytokine/chemokine production and innate immunity contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of JAK inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Disease Models, Animal; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinases; Macrophages; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Nitriles; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; STAT1 Transcription Factor; Synovial Membrane; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

A 70-year-old woman underwent emergent clipping surgery for subarachnoid hemorrhage under general anesthesia. Her laboratory data showed thrombocytopenia (4.0 x 10(4) microl(-1)). She had taken prednisolone (3 mg x day(-1)) and methotrexate (MTX) (10 mg x week(-1)) for rheumatoid arthritis for the last 10 years. Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil as well as propofol, maintained with remifentanil and sevoflurane in oxygen. The operation was performed uneventfully without platelet transfusion. Since the cause of thrombocytopenia was suspected to be MTX, we started rescue therapy by calcium folinate postoperatively. Platelet count was normalized two days later (11.6 x 10(4) microl(-1)). One month after the operation, she was discharged uneventfully.

Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, General; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Emergencies; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Intracranial Aneurysm; Leucovorin; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Platelet Transfusion; Postoperative Care; Propofol; Remifentanil; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Approval; Humans; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Continuous bounded outcome data are unlikely to meet the usual assumptions for mixed-effects models of normally distributed and independent subject-specific and residual random effects. Additionally, overly complicated model structures might be necessary to account adequately for non-drug (time-dependent) and drug treatment effects. A transformation strategy with a likelihood component for censoring is developed to promote the simplicity of model structures and to improve the plausibility of assumptions on the random effects. The approach is motivated by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) data from a study in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis and is evaluated using a simulation study.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Computer Simulation; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Janus Kinase 3; Models, Statistical; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokines exert their effects through activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling cascade. The JAK/STAT pathways play an important role in rheumatoid arthritis, since JAK inhibitors have exhibited dramatic effects on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical trials. In this study, we investigated the molecular effects of a small molecule JAK inhibitor, CP690,550 on the JAK/STAT signaling pathways and examined the role of JAK kinases in rheumatoid synovitis.. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) were isolated from RA patients and stimulated with recombinant oncostatin M (OSM). The cellular supernatants were analyzed using cytokine protein chips. IL-6 mRNA and protein expression were analyzed by real-time PCR method and ELISA, respectively. Protein phosphorylation of rheumatoid synoviocytes was assessed by Western blot using phospho-specific antibodies.. OSM was found to be a potent inducer of IL-6 in FLS. OSM stimulation elicited rapid phosphorylation of STATs suggesting activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in FLS. CP690,550 pretreatment completely abrogated the OSM-induced production of IL-6, as well as OSM-induced JAK/STAT, and activation of mitogen-activated kinases (MAPKs) in FLS.. These findings suggest that IL-6-type cytokines contribute to rheumatoid synovitis through activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in rheumatoid synoviocytes. Inhibition of these pro-inflammatory signaling pathways by CP690,550 could be important in the treatment of RA.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzimidazoles; Cells, Cultured; Culture Media, Conditioned; Drug Interactions; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase 3; Oncostatin M; p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Piperidines; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; STAT5 Transcription Factor; Synovial Membrane

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Industry; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Cytokine; Signal Transduction

A Bayesian nonlinear longitudinal Emax model for a binary endpoint was used to characterize the dose-response relationship for a new treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The model includes prespecified parametric functions for the dependence of response on dose level and time. It was selected based on pharmacometric input about likely dose and time trends. The longitudinal model was useful for combining data collected at different doses and times from two different studies. The example illustrates the utility of more substantive parametric models to guide selection of doses outside the initial dosing range when designing an additional phase 2 study and for extrapolating shorter-term phase 2 dose response to longer-term phase 3 studies, as is often required for dosing decisions in drug development for chronic diseases. Comparison of the estimated dose response from the longitudinal model with a corresponding logistic regression model applied at a single time point also demonstrated improved precision. Specification of an informative prior distribution based on numerous sources of prior information is described. This was the most difficult step in the analysis and one that has limited the use of Bayesian methods in similar applications. Model fit was evaluated and the potential impact of some model deficiencies on the dosing decision was assessed. Analyses of the combined studies identified doses likely to achieve a targeted effect in larger and longer confirmatory trials.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bayes Theorem; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Nonlinear Dynamics; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model.. Monocytes from healthy donors (HD; n = 8) or from RA patients (for CCR2 and CCR5 antibody n = 8; for CCR1 blockade n = 13) were isolated from peripheral blood and pre-incubated with different concentrations of either anti-CCR1, anti-CCR2, or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies (or medium or isotype controls). In addition, a small molecule CCR1 antagonist (BX471) was tested. Chemotaxis was induced by CCL2/MCP-1 (CCR2 ligand), CCL5/RANTES (CCR1 and CCR5 ligand), or by a mix of 5 RA synovial fluids (SFs), and cellular responses compared to chemotaxis in the presence of medium alone. Anti-CCR2 antibody treatment blocked CCL2/MCP-1-induced chemotaxis of both HD and RA monocytes compared to isotype control. Similarly, anti-CCR5 antibody treatment blocked CCL5/RANTES-induced chemotaxis of RA monocytes. While neither CCR2 nor CCR5 blocking antibodies were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis, even when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, both anti-CCR1 antibodies and the CCR1 antagonist were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis.. The RA synovial compartment contains several ligands for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 as well as other chemokines and receptors involved in monocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation. The results suggest that CCR2 and CCR5 are not critical for the migration of monocytes towards the synovial compartment in RA. In contrast, blockade of CCR1 may be effective. Conceivably, CCR1 blockade failed in clinical trials, not because CCR1 is not a good target, but because very high levels of receptor occupancy at all times may be needed to inhibit monocyte migration in vivo.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Case-Control Studies; Chemokine CCL2; Chemokine CCL5; Chemotaxis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monocytes; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Receptors, CCR; Receptors, CCR1; Receptors, CCR2; Receptors, CCR5; Synovial Fluid

The aim was to determine the effect of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk)-selective inhibitor PCI-32765, currently in Phase I/II studies in lymphoma trials, in arthritis and immune-complex (IC) based animal models and describe the underlying cellular mechanisms.. PCI-32765 was administered in a series of murine IC disease models including collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA), reversed passive anaphylactic reaction (RPA), and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA). Clinical and pathologic features characteristic of each model were examined following treatment. PCI-32765 was then examined in assays using immune cells relevant to the pathogenesis of arthritis, and where Btk is thought to play a functional role. These included proliferation and calcium mobilization in B cells, cytokine and chemokine production in monocytes/macrophages, degranulation of mast cells and its subsequent cytokine/chemokine production.. PCI-32765 dose-dependently and potently reversed arthritic inflammation in a therapeutic CIA model with an ED(50) of 2.6 mg/kg/day. PCI-32765 also prevented clinical arthritis in CAIA models. In both models, infiltration of monocytes and macrophages into the synovium was completely inhibited and importantly, the bone and cartilage integrity of the joints were preserved. PCI-32765 reduced inflammation in the Arthus and PCA assays. In vitro, PCI-32765 inhibited BCR-activated primary B cell proliferation (IC(50) = 8 nM). Following FcγR stimulation, PCI-32765 inhibited TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 production in primary monocytes (IC(50) = 2.6, 0.5, 3.9 nM, respectively). Following FcεRI stimulation of cultured human mast cells, PCI-32765 inhibited release of histamine, PGD(2), TNF-α, IL-8 and MCP-1.. PCI-32765 is efficacious in CIA, and in IC models that do not depend upon autoantibody production from B cells. Thus PCI-32765 targets not only B lymphocytes but also monocytes, macrophages and mast cells, which are important Btk-expressing effector cells in arthritis.

Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; B-Lymphocytes; Cell Proliferation; Female; Humans; Immune Complex Diseases; Macrophages; Mast Cells; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Monocytes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines

Inhibition of intracellular signal transduction is considered to be a therapeutic target for chronic inflammation. The new Janus kinase (JAK)3 inhibitor CP690,550 has shown efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the influence of JAK/STAT inhibition using CP690,550 on the induction of acute-phase serum amyloid A (SAA), which is triggered by interleukin 6 (IL-6) stimulation in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLS).. IL-6-stimulated gene expression of the acute-phase serum amyloid A genes (A-SAA; encoded by SAA1+SAA2) and SAA4 was analyzed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The intracellular signaling pathway mediating the effects of CP690,550 on IL-6-stimulated JAK/STAT activation was assessed by measuring the phosphorylation levels using Western blots.. IL-6 trans-signaling induced A-SAA messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in RA-FLS. By contrast IL-6 stimulation did not affect SAA4 mRNA expression, which is expressed constitutively in RA-FLS. IL-6 stimulation elicited rapid phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3, which was blunted by CP690,550. CP690,550 abrogated IL-6-mediated A-SAA mRNA expression in RA-FLS. Similarly, CP690,550 inhibited IL-6-mediated A-SAA mRNA expression in human hepatocytes.. Our data indicated that CP690,550 blocked IL-6-induced JAK2/STAT3 activation, as well as the induction of A-SAA. Inhibition of IL-6-mediated proinflammatory signaling pathways by CP690,550 may represent a new antiinflammatory therapeutic strategy for RA and AA amyloidosis.

Topics: Acute-Phase Reaction; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RNA, Messenger; Serum Amyloid A Protein; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Synovial Membrane

Despite tremendous advances in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there remains interest in oral agents that may offer benefits that are similar to, or better than, those of biologic therapies. In their paper, Chang and colleagues demonstrate the effectiveness of a Bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor in two models of RA. Btk inhibition impacts several pathways affecting both B-cell and macrophage activation, making it a promising target in RA. However, other kinase inhibitors have failed to transition from animal models to human therapy, so it remains to be seen whether a Btk inhibitor will have a role in the RA treatment armamentarium.

Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines

The new JAK3 inhibitor, CP690,550, has shown efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The present study was undertaken to assess the effects of CP690,550 on cytokine production and cellular signaling in human CD4(+) T cells.. CD4(+) T cells produced IL-2, IL-4, IL-17, IL-22 and IFN-γ in following stimulation with a CD3 antibody. At the optimal concentration, CP690,550 almost completely inhibited the production of IL-4, IL-17, IL-22 and IFN-γ from these activated CD4(+) T cells, but only had marginal effects on IL-2 production. Moreover CP690,550 inhibited anti-CD3-induced phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, and STAT6, but not the TCR-associated phosphorylation of ZAP-70.. Therefore, CP690,550-mediated modification of the JAK/STAT pathway may be a new immunosuppressive strategy in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; CD3 Complex; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Janus Kinase 3; Lymphocyte Activation; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that causes irreversible joint damage and significant disability. However, the fundamental mechanisms underlying how inflammation and joint destruction in RA develop and are sustained chronically remain largely unknown. Here, we show that signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is the key mediator of both chronic inflammation and joint destruction in RA. We found that inflammatory cytokines highly expressed in RA patients, such as IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-6, activated STAT3 either directly or indirectly and in turn induced expression of IL-6 family cytokines, further activating STAT3 in murine osteoblastic and fibroblastic cells. STAT3 activation also induced expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), a cytokine essential for osteoclastogenesis, and STAT3 deficiency or pharmacological inhibition promoted significant reduction in expression of both IL-6 family cytokines and RANKL in vitro. STAT3 inhibition was also effective in treating an RA model, collagen-induced arthritis, in vivo through significant reduction in expression of IL-6 family cytokines and RANKL, inhibiting both inflammation and joint destruction. Leukemia inhibitory factor expression and STAT3 activation by IL-1β were mainly promoted by IL-6 but still induced in IL-6-deficient cells. Thus, our data provide new insight into RA pathogenesis and provide evidence that inflammatory cytokines trigger a cytokine amplification loop via IL-6-STAT3 that promotes sustained inflammation and joint destruction.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chronic Disease; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fibroblasts; Gene Expression; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin-1beta; Interleukin-6; Joints; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred DBA; Osteoclasts; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; RANK Ligand; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aminopyridines; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Design; Humans; Morpholines; Oxazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

A dose-escalating phase II trial studied masitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in 43 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Masitinib induced American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses in 54%, 26% and 8% of patients, respectively. A placebo group was not included. Thirty-seven per cent of the patients withdrew before the 12-week end-point was reached, primarily because of adverse events. These findings are the first on the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibition in a sizeable population. Future work should focus on delineating the tyrosine kinase that is most important in maintaining rheumatoid activity and address potential long-term toxicities such as gonadal insufficiency, teratogenicity and cardiotoxicity.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzamides; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Humans; Piperidines; Pyridines; Thiazoles

To investigate the effect of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition on the production of inflammatory mediators and proliferation in tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-stimulated fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Cultured FLS from patients with RA were treated with two PARP inhibitors, 3,4-dihydro-5-[4-1(1-piperidinyl)buthoxy]-1(2H)-isoquinolinona (DPQ) or 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimida (ANI) before TNF stimulation. PARP-1 expression was also suppressed in RA FLS by small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection. Expression and secretion of inflammatory mediators were analysed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Proliferation of RA FLS was also determined. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity was analysed by western blot assay and activator protein (AP)-1 and nuclear factor (NF)kappaB binding by electrophoretic mobility shift assay.. We show, for the first time, that PARP inhibition either with specific inhibitors or by siRNA transfection significantly reduced TNF-induced cytokine and chemokine expression in FLS from patients with RA. PARP inhibitors also decreased TNF-induced RA FLS proliferation. PARP inhibition reduced TNF-induced JNK phosphorylation and AP-1 and NF kappaB binding activities were partially impaired by treatment with PARP inhibitors or by PARP-1 knockdown.. PARP inhibition reduces the production of inflammatory mediators and the proliferation of RA FLS (in response to TNF), suggesting that PARP inhibitors could have therapeutic benefits in RA.

Topics: 1-Naphthylamine; Apoptosis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blotting, Western; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Depression, Chemical; Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interleukin-6; Interleukin-8; Isoquinolines; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Naphthalimides; NF-kappa B; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Quinolones; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering; Synovial Membrane; Transcription Factor AP-1; Tumor Necrosis Factors

Intraarticular gene transfer of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors to suppress synovial cell cycling has shown efficacy in treating animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. Endogenous CDK inhibitors also modulate immune function via a CDK-independent pathway. Accordingly, systemic administration of small molecules that inhibit CDK may or may not ameliorate arthritis. To address this issue, alvocidib (flavopiridol), known to be tolerated clinically for treating cancers, and a newly synthesized CDK4/6-selective inhibitor were tested for antiarthritic effects. In vitro, they inhibited proliferation of human and mouse synovial fibroblasts without inducing apoptosis. In vivo, treatment of collagen-induced arthritis mice with alvocidib suppressed synovial hyperplasia and joint destruction, whereas serum concentrations of anti-collagen type II (CII) Abs and proliferative responses to CII were maintained. Treatment was effective even when therapeutically administered. Treated mice developed arthritis after termination of treatment. Thus, immune responses to CII were unimpaired. The same treatment ameliorated arthritis induced by K/BxN serum transfer to lymphocyte-deficient mice. Similarly, the CDK4/6-selective inhibitor suppressed collagen-induced arthritis. Both small-molecule CDK inhibitors were effective in treating animal models of rheumatoid arthritis not by suppressing lymphocyte function. Thus, the two small-molecule CDK inhibitors ameliorated arthritis models in a distinctive way, compared with other immunosuppressive drugs.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoantibodies; Cell Proliferation; Collagen Type II; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Disease Models, Animal; Fibroblasts; Flavonoids; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Synovial Membrane; Treatment Outcome

CP-690550 is a small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 (JAK3), a critical enzyme in the signaling pathway of multiple cytokines (interleukin (IL)-2, -7, -15 and -21) that are important in various T cell functions including development, activation and homeostasis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CP-690550 in murine collagen-induced (CIA) and rat adjuvant-induced (AA) models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. CIA and AA were induced using standard protocols and animals received the JAK3 inhibitor via osmotic mini-pump infusion at doses ranging from 1.5-15 mg/kg/day following disease induction. Arthritis was assessed by clinical scores in the CIA models and paw swelling monitored using a plethysmometer in the AA model until study conclusion, at which time animals were killed and evaluated histologically.. CP-690550 dose-dependently decreased endpoints of disease in both RA models with greater than 90% reduction observed at the highest administered dose. An approximate ED50 of approximately 1.5 mg/kg/day was determined for the compound based upon disease endpoints in both RA models examined and corresponds to CP-690550 serum levels of 5.8 ng/ml in mice (day 28) and 24 ng/ml in rats (day 24). The compound also reduced inflammatory cell influx and joint damage as measured histologically. Animals receiving a CP-690550 dose of 15 mg/k/d showed no histological evidence of disease.. The efficacy observed with CP-690550 in CIA and AA suggests JAK3 inhibition may represent a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of RA.

Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cartilage, Articular; Collagen; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Inhibitors; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase 3; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred DBA; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew

Cannabis-based medicines have a number of therapeutic indications, including anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. The endocannabinoid receptor system, including the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and receptor 2 (CB2) and the endocannabinoids, are implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that cannabis-based drugs have therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the key elements of the endocannabinoid signalling system, which produces immunosuppression and analgesia, are expressed in the synovia of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or RA.. Thirty-two OA and 13 RA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. Clinical staging was conducted from x-rays scored according to Kellgren-Lawrence and Larsen scales, and synovitis of synovial biopsies was graded. Endocannabinoid levels were quantified in synovial fluid by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The expression of CB1 and CB2 protein and RNA in synovial biopsies was investigated. Functional activity of these receptors was determined with mitogen-activated protein kinase assays. To assess the impact of OA and RA on this receptor system, levels of endocannabinoids in the synovial fluid of patients and non-inflamed healthy volunteers were compared. The activity of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the predominant catabolic endocannabinoid enzyme, was measured in synovium.. CB1 and CB2 protein and RNA were present in the synovia of OA and RA patients. Cannabinoid receptor stimulation of fibroblast-like cells from OA and RA patients produced a time-dependent phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1 and ERK-2 which was significantly blocked by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A. The endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) were identified in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients. However, neither AEA nor 2-AG was detected in synovial fluid from normal volunteers. FAAH was active in the synovia of OA and RA patients and was sensitive to inhibition by URB597 (3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate).. Our data predict that the cannabinoid receptor system present in the synovium may be an important therapeutic target for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with OA and RA.

Topics: Aged; Amidohydrolases; Arachidonic Acids; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blotting, Western; Cells, Cultured; Chromatography, Liquid; Cytokines; Endocannabinoids; Female; Fibroblasts; Glycerides; Humans; Knee Joint; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3; Osteoarthritis; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Rimonabant; RNA, Messenger; Synovial Fluid; Synovial Membrane

Topics: Acetates; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chondroitin Sulfates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles

Topics: Aniline Compounds; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds; Dicarboxylic Acids; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Japan; Myopia; Pharmacology, Clinical; Piperidines; Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate; Societies, Medical

The CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha) and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) have been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Since their effects are mediated through the CCR1 chemokine receptor, we set up a small molecule CCR1 antagonist program to search for inhibitors. Through high capacity screening we discovered a number of 4-hydroxypiperidine compounds with CCR1 antagonist activity and report their synthesis and in vitro pharmacology here. Scatchard analysis of the competition binding data revealed that the compounds had Ki values ranging from 40 to 4000 nM. The pharmacological profile of the most potent member of this series, compound 1 (2-2-diphenyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)piperidin-lyl)valeronitri te), was further evaluated. Compound 1 showed concentration-dependent inhibition of MIP-1alpha-induced extracellular acidification and Ca2+ mobilization demonstrating functional antagonism. When given alone, the compound did not elicit any responses, indicating the absence of intrinsic agonist activity. Compound 1 inhibited MIP-1alpha- and RANTES-induced migration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a dose-responsive manner. Selectivity testing against a panel of seven transmembrane domain receptors indicated that compound 1 is inactive on a number of receptors at concentrations up to 10 microM. This is the first description of CCR1 receptor antagonists that may be useful in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases involving MIP-1alpha, RANTES, and CCR1.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cell Line; Chemokine CCL3; Chemokine CCL4; Chemokine CCL5; Chemotaxis, Leukocyte; Humans; Hydroxylation; Kinetics; Ligands; Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins; Multiple Sclerosis; Piperidines; Receptors, CCR1; Receptors, Chemokine

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cisapride; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Middle Aged; Octreotide; Piperidines

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzydamine; Dibucaine; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hyaluronoglucosaminidase; Piperidines; Placebos; Polymyalgia Rheumatica

The anti-inflammatory activity of flazalone, a unique chemical drug, is described. In acute irritant anti-inflammatory tests, flazalone exhibited a wide spectrum of activity. The compound was active in affecting the course of paw swelling in adjuvant arthritis when given daily either at the outset of the polyarthritis or after induction. The most unusual aspect of this compound is its ability to inhibit graft rejection in goldfish and rabbits. The pattern of anti-inflammatory activity does not allow one to classify this drug in the usual groups.

Topics: Adrenal Glands; Adrenalectomy; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthus Reaction; Edema; Erythema; Goldfish; Graft Rejection; Graft vs Host Reaction; Guinea Pigs; Hypersensitivity, Delayed; Male; Mice; Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis; Piperidines; Rabbits; Rats; Skin Transplantation; Transplantation, Autologous; Transplantation, Homologous