piperacillin--tazobactam-drug-combination and Peritonitis

Bacterial peritonitis, an infection of the ascitic fluid, can be classified etiologically as spontaneous or secondary bacterial peritonitis. The former is mainly caused by portal hypertension and its subsequent effects, whereas the latter is caused by the direct dissemination of bacteria into the peritoneal cavity. Previous reports have described some distinguishing features of these two entities. Here, we report the first known case of bacterial peritonitis with Aeromonas hydrophilia and Escherichia coli in a patient with malignant ascites associated with pancreatic carcinoma who exhibited features of both spontaneous and secondary peritonitis. Our report suggests that clinicians should also consider bacterial peritonitis in patients with malignant ascites who present with ostensibly cancer-related symptoms.

Topics: Aeromonas hydrophila; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ascites; Ascitic Fluid; Bacterial Infections; Drainage; Escherichia coli; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Peritonitis; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic disorder resulting from ovulation induction. Although the occurrence of this disorder is rare, it can be potentially life-threatening in its most severe forms. We herein present the case of a young nulliparous woman who presented with features of abdominal compartment syndrome and was subsequently diagnosed with severe OHSS. All physicians, in particular critical care doctors, must be aware of this rare, but potentially life-threatening iatrogenic disorder.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Treatment Outcome

Therapeutic failure is a frequent issue in the management of post-operative peritonitis.. A post hoc analysis of the prospective, multicentre DURAPOP trial analysed the risk factors for failures in post-operative peritonitis following adequate source control and empirical antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients.. Overall failures assessed post-operatively between Day 8 and Day 45 were defined as a composite of death and/or surgical and/or microbiological failures. Risk factors for failures were assessed using logistic regression analyses.. Among the 236 analysed patients, overall failures were reported in 141 (59.7%) patients, including 30 (12.7%) deaths, 81 (34.3%) surgical and 95 (40.2%) microbiological failures. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with overall failures were documented piperacillin/tazobactam therapy [adjusted OR (aOR) 2.10; 95% CI 1.17-3.75] and renal replacement therapy on the day of reoperation (aOR 2.96; 95% CI 1.05-8.34). The risk factors for death were age (aOR 1.08 per year; 95% CI 1.03-1.12), renal replacement therapy on reoperation (aOR 3.95; 95% CI 1.36-11.49) and diabetes (OR 6.95; 95% CI 1.34-36.03). The risk factors associated with surgical failure were documented piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (aOR 1.99; 95% CI 1.13-3.51), peritoneal cultures containing Klebsiella spp. (aOR 2.45; 95% CI 1.02-5.88) and pancreatic source of infection (aOR 2.91; 95% CI 1.21-7.01). No specific risk factors were identified for microbiological failure.. Our data suggest a predominant role of comorbidities, the severity of post-operative peritonitis and possibly of documented piperacillin/tazobactam treatment on the occurrence of therapeutic failures, regardless of their type.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors

A series of 459 hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections participated in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The present study was conducted to add a pharmacoeconomic analysis to the results.. A cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the hospital provider was carried out. Decision analysis was used to illustrate outcomes and to provide a basis on which to conduct a sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness ratios, representing the cost per expected successfully treated patient, were calculated to determine the most cost-effective alternative.. Among 244 economically evaluable patients, enrolled from 34 centers in the U.S. and Canada, 131 patients received ciprofloxacin-metronidazole (75% clinical success rate), and 113 received piperacillin-tazobactam (65% clinical success rate; p = 0.06). Switch to oral antibiotics was possible for 81 patients who received ciprofloxacin-metronidazole (85% clinical success rate) and 67 piperacillin-tazobactam patients (70% clinical success rate; p = 0.027). The mean hospital cost was US$10,662 +/- 7,793 for patients in the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole group and $10,009 +/- 7,023 for patients in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (p = 0.492). Significantly lower costs were documented for patients who could be switched to oral antibiotics than for those continued on intravenous antibiotic orders ($8,684 +/- 4,120 vs. $12,945 +/- 10,204, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients with appendicitis had lower mean hospital costs than those with other infections ($7,169 +/- 3,705 vs. $12,097 +/- 8,342, respectively; p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratios were $14,216:1 for patients in the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole group and $15,398:1 for patients in the piperacillin-tazobactam group.. The mean hospital costs associated with ciprofloxacin-metronidazole were similar to those of piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Lower costs were documented for patients able to be switched to oral antibiotics and for patients with appendicitis.

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendicitis; Ciprofloxacin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Humans; Male; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Treatment Outcome

Complicated intra-abdominal infections are a common problem in surgical practice. This study compared the effectiveness of ertapenem (1 g qd) and piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g q6h) in the treatment of these infections.. This was a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study conducted in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Of the 535 patients screened, 500 were stratified on the basis of disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score < or =10 or >10), then randomized (1:1) to 4-14 days of treatment with one of the regimens and six weeks of followup. Nearly all patients (N = 494) were treated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of microbiologically evaluable patients with a favorable clinical response (cure) at two weeks. Non-inferiority of ertapenem was based on a difference in response rate of <15 percentage points compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (lower bound of the 95% CI > -15).. Of the 494 treated patients, 231 were microbiologically evaluable, with 123 and 108 patients in the ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam groups, respectively. Statistically similar cure rates were observed in the ertapenem (82.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (81.7%) groups (difference 0.3 [95% CI: -9.6, 10.5]). The pathogens isolated most frequently were Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides thetaiotamicron, typical isolates associated with intra-abdominal infections. There were no statistical differences between the groups in serious drug-related clinical adverse events, drug-related clinical adverse experiences leading to study discontinuation, or mortality.. Ertapenem was non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in the cure of intra-abdominal infections caused by susceptible pathogens. Both study drugs generally were well tolerated.

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; APACHE; Bacterial Infections; Bacteroides; beta-Lactams; Double-Blind Method; Ertapenem; Escherichia coli; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Complicated intra-abdominal infections usually mandate prompt surgical intervention supplemented by appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that ertapenem was not inferior to piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of community-acquired intra-abdominal infections. A randomized open-label active-comparator clinical trial was conducted at 48 medical centers on four continents from December 2001 to February 2003. Adult patients with intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery were randomized to receive either ertapenem 1 g daily or piperacillin/tazobactam 13.5 g daily in 3-4 divided doses. The primary analysis of efficacy was the clinical response rate in clinically and microbiologically evaluable patients at the test-of-cure assessment 2 weeks after completion of therapy. All treated patients were included in the safety analysis. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment duration in both treatment groups were generally similar. The most commonly isolated pathogens at baseline were E coli (greater than 50% of cases in each group) and B fragilis ( approximately 9%). Favorable clinical response rates were 107/119 (90%) for ertapenem recipients and 107/114 (94%) for piperacillin/tazobactam recipients. The frequencies of drug-related adverse events, most commonly diarrhea and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase levels, were similar in both treatment groups. Six of 180 ertapenem recipients (3%) and two of 190 piperacillin/tazobactam recipients (1%) had serious drug-related adverse experiences. In this study, ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were comparably safe and effective treatments for adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Topics: Abdomen; Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bacteroides fragilis; Bacteroides Infections; beta-Lactams; Diarrhea; Ertapenem; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To examine the clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem, a novel beta-lactam agent with wide activity against common pathogens encountered in intraabdominal infection.. Ertapenem has a pharmacokinetic profile and antimicrobial spectrum that support the potential for use as a once-a-day agent for the treatment of common mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. METHODS This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam as therapy following adequate surgical management of complicated intraabdominal infections.. Six hundred thirty-three patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, with 396 meeting all criteria for the evaluable population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was most common (approximately 60% in microbiologically evaluable population). A prospective, expert panel review was conducted to assess the adequacy of surgical source control in patients who were failures as a component of evaluability. For the modified intent-to-treat groups, 245 of 311 patients treated with ertapenem (79.3%) were cured, as were 232 of 304 (76.2) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. One hundred seventy-six of 203 microbiologically evaluable patients treated with ertapenem (86.7%) were cured, as were 157 of the 193 (81.2%) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam.. In this study, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g once a day was equivalent to piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hours in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety and tolerability profile to piperacillin/tazobactam. A formal process for review of adequacy of source control was found to be of benefit. The results of this trial suggest that ertapenem may be a useful option that could eliminate the need for combination and/or multidosed antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ertapenem; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Hospitalization; Humans; Lactams; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Treatment Outcome

Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) was used in the treatment of 40 patients at the age of 22 to 64 years with intraabdominal infection (peritonitis, abscesses). P/T was administered as 30-minute intravenous infusions 4 or 3 times a day for 3 to 13 days. The recovery and improvement were stated in 80 and 10 per cent of the cases respectively. In 10 per cent of the patients the treatment failed because of surgical complications or insufficient surgical intervention or because of some other systemic diseases. The pathogens in the abdominal cavity were eradicated in 31 cases. In 5 cases the pathogen eradication was followed by superinfection. No relapses or pathogen persistence were recorded. Only in 1 case Edwardsiella tarda strains resistant to P/T were isolated from the abdominal cavity discharge and P/T resistant Aeromonas hydrophila strains from the urine by the 3rd or the 5th day of the treatment. The results are in favour of P/T as a drug of choice in the treatment of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Sepsis

Guidelines recommend empirical therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) with low risk of multidrug-resistant organisms. Whether coverage of beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, such as ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, provides clinical benefit in such situations is unknown.. In this observational study, we investigated the real-world effectiveness of empirical therapy with TZP monotherapy versus TZP plus linezolid (LZD) combination therapy in patients with SBP from two centers. Treatment failure, defined as the need to escalate antibiotic therapy due to in vitro resistance, lack of neutrophil decrease in ascitic fluid, or clinical decision, and 30-day survival were retrospectively assessed.. In the first cohort, 100 SBP episodes were empirically treated with TZP + LZD combination therapy (n = 50) or TZP monotherapy (n = 50). Treatment failure was recorded in 48% with TZP monotherapy compared with 16% with TZP + LZD combination therapy (p = 0.001), and this difference persisted after stratification for community-acquired versus hospital-acquired SBP. Although treatment failure after TZP therapy was associated with lower 30-day survival (56% vs. 82%; p = 0.04), 30-day survival with empirical TZP + LZD combination therapy was not different from empirical TZP monotherapy (Kaplan-Meier estimates 74% vs. 69%; p = 0.87). TZP concentrations in ascitic fluid were >32 mg/L in 94% samples after continuous administration. In a second cohort of 41 patients empirically treated with TZP, treatment failure was observed in 37%, which was also higher than in episodes treated with TZP + LZD in cohort 1 (p = 0.03).. In this retrospective analysis, empirical TZP + LZD combination therapy for SBP was associated with fewer treatment failures without impact on short-term survival.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Linezolid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is a frequently prescribed antibiotic in hospital settings. Reports suggest in vivo efficacy of TZP, despite in vitro resistance of isolates susceptible to cephalosporins. Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates hyperproducing TEM-1 β-lactamase possess this phenotype. This study investigated the influence of tazobactam (TAZ) concentration on piperacillin (PIP) inhibition of such isolates and compared the in vivo efficacy of TZP with cefotaxime (CTX) in an infection model.. The PIP MICs for E. coli isolates, either hyperproducing TEM-1 because of promoter substitutions (n = 4) or because of gene amplification (n = 2) or producing an inhibitor-resistant TEM-35 (IRT) (n = 1), were determined using increasing concentrations of TAZ in a checkerboard setup. Furthermore, the efficacy of TZP and CTX against the isolates was investigated in a mouse peritonitis model using antibiotic exposures mimicking human conditions. Isolates producing either OXA-48 or CTX-M-15 β-lactamases were included as controls.. Using TAZ concentrations ≤ 64 mg/L, one isolate hyperproducing TEM-1 had a PIP MIC of 8 at TAZ 16 mg/L and two additional isolates at TAZ 64 mg/L. In the mouse peritonitis infection model, reduction of bacterial load in the peritoneum was larger for TZP than CTX only for the CTX-M-15-producing isolate. Larger reductions in bacterial load were observed after CTX treatment than TZP treatment for seven of the eight remaining test isolates.. Piperacillin-tazobactam treatment of E. coli isolates hyperproducing TEM-1 was less effective than CTX treatment and may, for some isolates, be comparable with TZP treatment of isolates producing established resistance markers as IRT or OXA-48.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antigens, CD; beta-Lactamases; Cefotaxime; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neoplasm Proteins; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Tazobactam

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminoglycosides; Anastomotic Leak; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ascitic Fluid; Clavulanic Acids; Cohort Studies; Culture Techniques; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Peritonitis; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Wound Infection; Ticarcillin; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin

Acute appendicitis in children requires early surgery and short-course antibiotics active against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes. Although an aminoglycoside-containing three-drug regimen has been used successfully for decades, simpler regimens with similar efficacy are increasingly used. This study evaluated the impact of a switch from the combination of cefotaxime, metronidazole and gentamicin (regimen 1) to piperacillin/tazobactam (regimen 2) as first-line regimen for complicated acute appendicitis in children. In total, 171 children were enrolled [median (IQR) age, 10 (6-13) years], treated with regimen 1 (n = 80) or regimen 2 (n = 91) following surgery for complicated acute appendicitis. The two groups were comparable except for surgical approach (through laparoscopy in 46% vs. 88% for regimens 1 and 2, respectively; P < 0.001). Post-operative complications and duration of hospital stay were similar. Deviations from antibacterial treatment protocol decreased from 36% (29/80) to 14% (13/91) (P < 0.001), with a dramatic reduction in antibacterial treatment duration from median (IQR) of 15 (12-16) days to 5 (5-8) days (P < 0.001). Post-operative intra-abdominal abscess developed in 32 children (18.7%). Female sex (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.18-6.48; P = 0.02) and sepsis/septic shock on admission (OR = 4.72, 95% CI 1.12-19.97; P = 0.035) were independently associated with post-operative intra-abdominal abscess, but not antibacterial regimen. This study shows that simplification of first-line antibacterial regimen for complicated appendicitis in children was associated with reduced protocol deviation, reduced duration of antibiotics, and similar outcomes (post-operative complications and duration of hospital stay).

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendicitis; Cefotaxime; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gentamicins; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Metronidazole; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Retrospective Studies

We report a case of a rare complication of acute appendicitis with perforation through the abdominal wall. The case points out that an intraabdominal origin should be considered in patients presenting with rapidly spreading soft tissue infections of the trunk.. A 58-year-old European woman presented to our hospital with a 1-week history of severe abdominal pain accompanied by rapidly spreading erythema and emphysema of the lower abdomen. On admission, the patient was in septic shock with leukocytosis and elevation of C-reactive protein. Among other diagnoses, necrotizing fasciitis was suspected. Computed tomography showed a large soft tissue infection with air-fluid levels spreading through the lower abdominal wall. During the operation, we found a perforated appendicitis breaking through the fascia and causing a rapidly progressive soft tissue infection of the abdominal wall. Appendicitis was the origin of the soft tissue infection. The abdominal wall was only secondarily involved.. Even though perforated appendicitis as an etiology of a rapidly progressive soft tissue infection of the abdominal wall is very rare, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of abdominal wall cellulitis. The distinction between rapidly spreading subcutaneous infection with abscess formation and early onset of necrotizing fasciitis is often difficult and can be confirmed only by surgical intervention.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abdominal Wall; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Emphysema; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Reoperation; Soft Tissue Infections; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

To analyze the clinical characteristics of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) associated peritonitis in the tertiary hospitals and to discuss the preventive and therapeutic strategy.
 Methods: The clinical characteristics, pathogens, resistance and outcomes of 126 CAPD associated peritonitis in 104 patients from Jan, 2013 to June, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed.
 Results: Among the patients, the incidence rates of abdominal pain, fever, diarrhea and emesis were 104 (82.54%), 56 (44.44%), 49 (38.89%), and 31 (23.60%), respectively. Among them, 88 patients suffered peritonitis once, other 16 patients suffered multiple peritonitis or recurrent peritonitis for 38 times. Among the 38 times, the numbers for recurrent, repeated or catheter-associated peritonitis were 2, 2, or 3, respectively. Peritoneal fluids from 103 cases were cultured, and 64 cases were positive in bacteria, with a rate of 62.14%. A total of 70 strains of bacteria were separated, including 42 strains of gram-positive bacteria, 21 strains of gram-negative bacteria, and 7 strains of fungus. The most common gram-positive pathogens were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus, while Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common gram-negative bacteria. Candida albicans was the major fungal pathogens. Gram-positive cocci showed resistance to gentamycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, vancomycin and linezolid, with a rate at 20.00%, 36.11%, 5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. The gram-negative bacilli were resistent to cefoperazone/sulbactam, gentamycin, cephazolin, and ceftazidime, with a rate at 6.25%, 10.53%, 64.29%, and 15.38%, respectively. There were no imipenem, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant strains were found.
 Conclusion: The most common pathogen causing CAPD associated peritonitis is gram-positive bacteria. It is crucial to take the anti-infection therapy for CAPD associated peritonitis early. The positive rates for bacterial culture need to be enhanced through improvement of methods. At the same time, doctors could improve the outcome of CAPD associated peritonitis by adjusting the medication according to the drug sensitivity results.. 目的：探讨某三甲医院持续性非卧床腹膜透析(continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis，CAPD)相关性腹膜炎临床特点、致病菌分布及耐药性情况，为临床防治CAPD相关性腹膜炎总结经验。方法：回顾性调查该院2013年1月至2016年6月42个月中，104人126例次CAPD相关性腹膜炎患者的临床特点、致病菌分布、耐药性等情况。
结果：在126例次CAPD相关性腹膜炎中，患者出现腹痛104例次(82.54%)，发热56例次(44.44%)，腹泻49例次(38.89%)，呕吐31例次(23.60%)。126例次CAPD相关性腹膜炎中，发生一次腹膜炎的88人次，多次和反复发作的腹膜炎16人38例次，其中复发性腹膜炎2例，腹膜炎重现2例，导管相关性腹膜炎3例。在103例送检的腹水标本中，培养阳性64例次，阳性率达62.14%。共分离出致病菌70株，其中革兰阳性细菌42株，革兰阴性细菌21株，真菌7株。主要的革兰阳性菌包括表皮葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、溶血葡萄球菌；主要的革兰阴性菌包括大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌；真菌以白假丝酵母菌为主。革兰阳性菌对庆大霉素、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星、万古霉素、利奈唑胺的耐药率分别为20.00%，36.11%，5.00%，0%，0%；革兰阴性菌对头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、庆大霉素、头孢唑啉、头孢他啶的耐药率分别为6.25%，10.53%，64.29%，15.38%，对亚胺培南、阿米卡星、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的耐药率均为0%。结论：革兰阳性菌是CAPD相关性腹膜炎的主要致病菌，临床不仅应尽早开始经验性治疗，而且要考虑如何通过改善培养方法以提高阳性检出率；可以根据药敏结果调整用药，以促进患者CAPD相关性腹膜炎的治愈和腹膜功能的恢复。.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Candidiasis; Catheters; Diarrhea; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mycoses; Penicillanic Acid; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Staphylococcus haemolyticus; Vomiting

The aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with pre-transplant fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in liver transplant recipients.. Over a 3-year period (January 2009-December 2011), 317 patients who underwent liver transplantation were screened preoperatively for fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Risk factors for fecal carriage were investigated by univariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression.. Of the 317 patients screened, 50 (15.7%) harbored an ESBL-producing isolate. Previous infection with an ESBL-producing organism had developed during the last 6 months in 20% of fecal carriers versus in none of the non-carriers. Other variables associated with fecal carriage were a model for end-stage liver disease score ≥25, pre-transplant stay in the intensive care unit ≥48 h, hospital stay ≥10 days in the last 6 months, a history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), exposure to a β-lactam agent in the last month, and prophylaxis with norfloxacin. Independent predictors of fecal carriage in the multivariate logistic regression model were exposure to a β-lactam agent in the month preceding transplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 7.8, confidence interval [CI] = 4-15.5, P < 0.001), and a history of SBP (OR = 2.4, CI = 1.1-4.9, P = 0.02).. Previous infection with an ESBL-producing isolate, recent exposure to a β-lactam agent, and a history of SBP are risk factors for preoperative fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in liver transplant recipients. Patients at risk of fecal carriage should receive intraoperative prophylaxis and, when necessary, empiric postoperative antimicrobial treatment that includes coverage for these organisms.

Topics: Adult; Amikacin; beta-Lactamases; beta-Lactams; Cefoxitin; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; End Stage Liver Disease; Enterobacter cloacae; Enterobacteriaceae; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Feces; Female; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Liver Transplantation; Logistic Models; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Preoperative Period; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index

Initial antibiotics with planned interval appendectomy (interval AP) have been used to treat patients with complicated perforated appendicitis; however, little experience exists with this approach in children with suspected acute perforated appendicitis (SAPA). We sought to determine the outcome of initial antibiotics and interval AP in children with SAPA.. Over an 18-month period, 751 consecutive patients underwent appendectomy including 105 patients with SAPA who were treated with initial intravenous antibiotics and planned interval AP ≥ 8 weeks after presentation. All SAPA patients had symptoms for ≤ 96 hours. Primary outcome variables were rates of readmission, abscess formation, and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks.. Intraabdominal abscess rate was 27%. Appendectomy prior to planned interval AP was 11% and readmission occurred in 34%. All patients underwent eventual appendectomy with pathologic confirmation confirming the previous appendiceal inflammation. White blood cell (WBC) count >15,000, WBC >15,000 plus fecalith on imaging, and WBC >15,000 plus duration of symptoms >48 hours were all significantly associated with higher rates of readmission (p=0.01, p=0.04, p=0.02) and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks (p=0.003, p=0.05, p=0.03).. Treatment of SAPA with antibiotics and planned interval AP is successful in the majority of patients; however, complications such as abscess formation and/or readmission prior to planned interval AP occur in up to one-third of patients. Certain clinical variables are associated with increased treatment complications.

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Abdominal Pain; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Child; Critical Pathways; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Fever; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Patient Readmission; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Suction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Appendicitis is a frequent clinical condition in normal children that may be complicated by community-acquired secondary peritonitis (CASP). We evaluated the potential efficacy of different drugs for initial treatment of this condition, as recommended by recent Consensus Conference and Guidelines for paediatric patients. Susceptibility to ampicillin-sulbactam, ertapenem, gentamycin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin, and teicoplanin was evaluated according to EUCST 2012 recommendations in aerobic bacteria isolated from peritoneal fluid in CASP diagnosed from 2005 to 2011 at 'Istituto Giannina Gaslini', Genoa, Italy. A total of 114 strains were analysed: 83 E. coli, 15 P. aeruginosa, 6 Enterococci, and 10 other Gram-negatives. Resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam was detected in 37% of strains, while ertapenem showed a potential resistance of 13% (all P. aeruginosa strains). However, the combination of these drugs with gentamicin would have been increased the efficacy of the treatment to 99 and 100%, respectively. Resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was 3%, while no strain was resistant to meropenem. Our data suggest that monotherapy with ampicillin-sulbactam or ertapenem for community-acquired secondary peritonitis would present a non-negligible rate of failure, but the addition of gentamycin to these drugs could reset to zero this risk. On the contrary, monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem is highly effective.

Topics: Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; beta-Lactams; Child; Community-Acquired Infections; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ertapenem; Gentamicins; Hospitals, Pediatric; Humans; Italy; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Sulbactam; Thienamycins

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a common infection in cirrhosis, associated with a high mortality. Third-generation cephalosporins are recommended as first-line treatment. The aim was to evaluate the epidemiology of microbiological ascitic fluid findings and antimicrobial resistance in Denmark.. All patients with cirrhosis and a positive ascitic fluid culture, at three university hospitals in the Copenhagen area during a 7-year period, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with apparent secondary peritonitis were excluded from the study.. One hundred and forty cases with 187 microbiological isolates were identified. The findings were: Gram-positive cocci, n = 86 (45.9%); Enterobacteriaceae, n = 59 (31.7%), with Escherichia coli identified in 31 cases; anaerobes, n = 14 (7.5%); yeast, n = 12 (6.4%); and cutaneous flora, n = 15 (8.0%). One case of Listeria monocytogenes was identified (0.5%). Overall antibiotic coverage was 57% for cephalosporins, 73% for piperacillin-tazobactam, and 72% for meropenem. Mortality rates in patients with isolates susceptible or resistant to the initial antibiotic treatment at 30 days follow-up were 35% and 55%, respectively (p = 0.017, Log-rank test).. Almost half of the isolates were Gram-positive cocci, and as the overall antibiotic coverage with a cephalosporin was only 57%, and survival significantly dependent on whether the microbial etiology was susceptible to initial antibiotic treatment or not, a change of standard empiric antibiotic regime should be considered. Piperacillin-tazobactam could be a favorable choice.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ascitic Fluid; Cephalosporins; Denmark; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Cocci; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Mycoses; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins

A lethal peritonitis model was induced in mice with a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate producing the carbapenemase OXA-48. Administration of a single dose (up to 100 mg/kg) of the antibiotic piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem-cilastatin, ertapenem, or cefotaxime had little or no impact on lethality. Ceftazidime had the highest efficacy in vivo, which mirrored its in vitro activity; this was not the case for carbapenems. Therefore, ceftazidime may be recommended for the treatment of infections due to OXA-48 producers if they do not coproduce an extended-spectrum β-lactamase or a plasmid-mediated AmpC cephalosporinase.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamases; beta-Lactams; Cefotaxime; Ceftazidime; Cilastatin; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ertapenem; Imipenem; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Lethal Dose 50; Mice; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Plasmids; Survival Rate

Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Albendazole; Animals; Anthelmintics; Anti-HIV Agents; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Ascariasis; Ascaris lumbricoides; Bacteroides fragilis; Bacteroides Infections; Combined Modality Therapy; Emigrants and Immigrants; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic; Jejunum; Paraguay; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Young Adult

Meropenem is a carbapenem that has an excellent activity against many gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic, facultative, and anaerobic bacteria. The major objective of the present study was to assess the in vitro activity of meropenem compared to imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, against 1071 non-repetitive isolates collected from patients with bacteremia (55%), pneumonia (29%), peritonitis (12%) and wound infections (3%), in 15 French hospitals in 2006. The secondary aim of the study was to compare the results of routinely testings and those obtained by a referent laboratory.. Susceptibility testing and Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of meropenem, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were determined locally by Etest method. Susceptibility to meropenem was confirmed at a central laboratory by disc diffusion method and MICs determined by agar dilution method for meropenem, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam.. Cumulative susceptibility rates against Escherichia coli were, meropenem and imipenem: 100% and piperacillin/tazobactam: 90%. Against other Enterobacteriaceae, the rates were meropenem: 99%, imipenem: 98% and piperacillin/tazobactam: 90%. All Staphylococci, Streptococci and anaerobes were susceptible to the three antibiotics. Against non fermeters, meropenem was active on 84-94% of the strains, imipenem on 84-98% of the strains and piperacillin/tazobactam on 90-100% of the strains.. Compared to imipenem, meropenem displays lower MICs against Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Except for non fermenters, MICs90 of carbapenems were <4 mg/L. Piperacillin/tazobactam was less active against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter but not P. aeruginosa. Some discrepancies were noted between MICs determined by Etest accross centres and MICs determined by agar dilution method at the central laboratory. Discrepancies were more common for imipenem testing and more frequently related to a few centres. Overall MICs determined by Etest were in general higher (0.5 log to 1 log fold) than MICs by agar dilution.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; France; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Thienamycins; Wound Infection

In this report of the OPTAMA (Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment using the MYSTIC Antibiogram) program, we utilized Monte Carlo simulation to compare the probabilities of achieving bactericidal time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%T > MIC) exposures for imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h in the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.. The prevalence of pathogens causing secondary peritonitis was identified from the primary surgical and infectious diseases literature. Data for these pathogens with respect to MIC were obtained from the 2003 MYSTIC surveillance study and weighted by the prevalence of each pathogen. A sensitivity analysis varying the prevalence of P. aeruginosa was performed with two additional models to determine the robustness of the data. Pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from previously published studies in healthy volunteers were used to simulate the %T > MIC for 10,000 patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposure is reported.. Empiric utilization of imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h regimens achieved 99.6%-99.7% likelihood of bactericidal exposure. Piperacillin/ tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h produced bactericidal target attainments of 92.9% and 85.2%, respectively. Models simulating higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa reduced the likelihood of bactericidal exposure for piperacillin/tazobactam regimens significantly and had little effect on the carbapenems.. All of the beta-lactams used in the current analysis were predicted to achieve high target attainment consistently for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis. However, imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 1000 mg q8h and 500 mg q6h, and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h achieved the highest likelihood. These, in particular, would be effective choices for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Cilastatin; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Models, Biological; Monte Carlo Method; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Thienamycins

A total of 60 children with secondary peritonitis were enrolled in an open, non-comparative multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerance and efficacy of parenteral piperacillin/tazobactam (80/10 mg/kg every 8 hours) in young children. The most common diagnosis was perforated appendicitis (90%) and the three most common pathogens, obtained from the peritoneal cavity, were Escherichia coli (52 isolates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 isolates) and Bacteroides sp. (19 isolates). Patients were examined daily during therapy, 4-14 days and 4-6 weeks post-therapy. Of the 60 patients, 43 were evaluable. The majority of patients had polymicrobial infections (36 patients). All the aerobic isolates were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam while 19 were resistant to piperacillin alone. Four of 43 clinically evaluable patients were considered a clinical failure and 3 of 40 bacteriologically evaluable patients were considered to have an unfavorable microbiological response. There were 2 clinically adverse events considered related to the study drug and several possibly related, mild and transitory, abnormalities in eosinophil counts and liver function tests. Based on the safety and efficacy results from this study, the advantages of using a single agent for the treatment of mixed infections of the peritoneal cavity and its potential activity against resistant organisms, we believe that further comparative clinical trials in children with intra-abdominal infections are warranted.

Topics: Bacteria, Aerobic; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Penicillanic Acid; Peritonitis; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination