Page last updated: 2024-11-08

pilocarpine and Injuries, Radiation

pilocarpine has been researched along with Injuries, Radiation in 36 studies

Pilocarpine: A slowly hydrolyzed muscarinic agonist with no nicotinic effects. Pilocarpine is used as a miotic and in the treatment of glaucoma.
(+)-pilocarpine : The (+)-enantiomer of pilocarpine.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"A total number of 60 patients were randomized into the trial, but unfortunately only 39 patients were finally evaluated for xerostomia, 18 in the pilocarpine and 21 in the placebo group."9.10A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant pilocarpine with head and neck irradiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Haddad, P; Karimi, M, 2002)
"No difference was found according to dose/volume radiotherapy parameters suggesting that oral pilocarpine hydrochloride: (1) acts primarily by stimulating minor salivary glands: (2) can be of benefit to patients suffering of severe xerostomia regardless of radiotherapy dose/volume parameters: (3) all responders are identified at 12 weeks."9.09Post-radiation severe xerostomia relieved by pilocarpine: a prospective French cooperative study. ( Alfonsi, M; Ardiet, JM; Baillet, F; Bensadoun, RJ; Bolla, M; Bourdin, S; Calais, G; Coche-Dequéant, B; Coscas, Y; Desprez, P; Horiot, JC; Lapeyre, M; Lipinski, F; Maral, J; Maulard-Durdux, C; Montbarbon, X; Pene, F; Schraub, S; Urbajtel, M; Vinke, J; Wibault, M, 2000)
"Eighteen patients with xerostomia refractory to pilocarpine therapy after XRT for head and neck malignancy were offered acupuncture as palliation."9.09Acupuncture for pilocarpine-resistant xerostomia following radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. ( Inouye, WS; Johnstone, PA; May, BC; Niemtzow, RC; Peng, YP, 2001)
"Two hundred sixty-five patients with head and neck cancer who had previously participated in either a fixed-dose, dose-titration, or dose-ranging trial of oral pilocarpine hydrochloride tablets were enrolled in a 36-month multicenter maintenance study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of oral pilocarpine for the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia."9.08A multicenter maintenance study of oral pilocarpine tablets for radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Jacobs, CD; van der Pas, M, 1996)
"Pilocarpine has some efficacy in the treatment of xerostomia from radiation therapy, graft-versus-host disease and Sjögren's syndrome."8.84Systemic pilocarpine for treatment of xerostomia. ( Berk, L, 2008)
"This article examines the use of pilocarpine hydrochloride for radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer."8.80Pilocarpine for radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer. ( Hawthorne, M; Sullivan, K, 2000)
"To analyze the role of oral pilocarpine in the treatment of xerostomia of Sjogren's syndrome (SS)."8.80The use of oral pilocarpine in xerostomia and Sjögren's syndrome. ( Nusair, S; Rubinow, A, 1999)
"Patients with cancer of the head and neck who were 3 to 24 months from completing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT ± C) and who were experiencing xerostomia symptoms with basal whole saliva production ≥0."6.77Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Berk, L; Cardinale, F; James, JL; Lukaszczyk, B; Nguyen-Tân, PF; Sagar, S; Singh, AK; Wong, RK; Wyatt, G; Yeh, AM, 2012)
"To investigate the effect of concomitant administration of pilocarpine during radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on postradiotherapy xerostomia."5.13Protection of salivary function by concomitant pilocarpine during radiotherapy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. ( Burlage, FR; Coppes, RP; Kampinga, HH; Langendijk, JA; Roesink, JM; Stokman, MA; Terhaard, C; van Luijk, P; Vissink, A, 2008)
"The efficacy of pilocarpine given during radiotherapy for head-neck cancer to reduce xerostomia was assessed."5.11Double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study of pilocarpine to salvage salivary gland function during radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer. ( Black, M; Gornitsky, M; Hier, M; Katz, H; Shenouda, G; Sultanem, K; Velly, AM, 2004)
"A total number of 60 patients were randomized into the trial, but unfortunately only 39 patients were finally evaluated for xerostomia, 18 in the pilocarpine and 21 in the placebo group."5.10A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant pilocarpine with head and neck irradiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Haddad, P; Karimi, M, 2002)
"No difference was found according to dose/volume radiotherapy parameters suggesting that oral pilocarpine hydrochloride: (1) acts primarily by stimulating minor salivary glands: (2) can be of benefit to patients suffering of severe xerostomia regardless of radiotherapy dose/volume parameters: (3) all responders are identified at 12 weeks."5.09Post-radiation severe xerostomia relieved by pilocarpine: a prospective French cooperative study. ( Alfonsi, M; Ardiet, JM; Baillet, F; Bensadoun, RJ; Bolla, M; Bourdin, S; Calais, G; Coche-Dequéant, B; Coscas, Y; Desprez, P; Horiot, JC; Lapeyre, M; Lipinski, F; Maral, J; Maulard-Durdux, C; Montbarbon, X; Pene, F; Schraub, S; Urbajtel, M; Vinke, J; Wibault, M, 2000)
"Eighteen patients with xerostomia refractory to pilocarpine therapy after XRT for head and neck malignancy were offered acupuncture as palliation."5.09Acupuncture for pilocarpine-resistant xerostomia following radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. ( Inouye, WS; Johnstone, PA; May, BC; Niemtzow, RC; Peng, YP, 2001)
"Two hundred sixty-five patients with head and neck cancer who had previously participated in either a fixed-dose, dose-titration, or dose-ranging trial of oral pilocarpine hydrochloride tablets were enrolled in a 36-month multicenter maintenance study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of oral pilocarpine for the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia."5.08A multicenter maintenance study of oral pilocarpine tablets for radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Jacobs, CD; van der Pas, M, 1996)
"There is limited evidence to support the use of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia."4.91Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy. ( Davies, AN; Thompson, J, 2015)
"Pilocarpine has some efficacy in the treatment of xerostomia from radiation therapy, graft-versus-host disease and Sjögren's syndrome."4.84Systemic pilocarpine for treatment of xerostomia. ( Berk, L, 2008)
"This article examines the use of pilocarpine hydrochloride for radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer."4.80Pilocarpine for radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer. ( Hawthorne, M; Sullivan, K, 2000)
"To analyze the role of oral pilocarpine in the treatment of xerostomia of Sjogren's syndrome (SS)."4.80The use of oral pilocarpine in xerostomia and Sjögren's syndrome. ( Nusair, S; Rubinow, A, 1999)
"Patients with cancer of the head and neck who were 3 to 24 months from completing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT ± C) and who were experiencing xerostomia symptoms with basal whole saliva production ≥0."2.77Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia. ( Berk, L; Cardinale, F; James, JL; Lukaszczyk, B; Nguyen-Tân, PF; Sagar, S; Singh, AK; Wong, RK; Wyatt, G; Yeh, AM, 2012)
"Pilocarpine has been approved for post-radiation xerostomia, and the effect of its use during radiation therapy on salivary flow, xerostomia, mucositis, and quality of life (QOL) was assessed in a phase III study conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 97-09)."2.72Effect of pilocarpine during radiation therapy: results of RTOG 97-09, a phase III randomized study in head and neck cancer patients. ( Brachman, D; Foote, R; Hodson, DI; Lee, N; LeVeque, F; Meredith, R; Scarantino, C; Schulsinger, A; Swann, RS; White, R, 2006)
"Patients with head and neck cancers can develop salivary hypofunction after radiotherapy."2.70Salivary scintigraphy for assessing the protective effect of pilocarpine in head and neck irradiated tumours. ( Ferre, J; Fuster, D; Lomeña, F; Martin, F; Mateos, JJ; Navalpotro, B; Ortega, M; Pavia, J; Pons, F; Rovirosa, A; Setoain, X, 2001)
"Radiation induced xerostomia is a frequent consequence of radiotherapy (RT) for head-neck cancer (HNC) patients, when parotid glands are included in the radiation fields."2.43Preventing radiation induced xerostomia. ( Danielidis, V; Koukourakis, MI, 2005)
"Pilocarpine is a useful agent as a treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients."2.43Evaluation, prevention and management of radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. ( de Castro, G; Federico, MH, 2006)
"Head and neck cancer is becoming a more recognizable pathology to the general population and dentists."2.43Managing complications of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: Part I. Management of xerostomia. ( Chai, WL; Ngeow, WC; Rahman, RA; Ramli, R, 2006)
"Xerostomia is one of the most common side effects of head and neck radiation therapy."2.40Manifestations and treatment of xerostomia and associated oral effects secondary to head and neck radiation therapy. ( Garg, AK; Malo, M, 1997)

Research

Studies (36)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19902 (5.56)18.7374
1990's8 (22.22)18.2507
2000's21 (58.33)29.6817
2010's4 (11.11)24.3611
2020's1 (2.78)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Wang, XY1
Liu, KJ1
Zhang, FY1
Xiang, B1
Malallah, OS1
Garcia, CMA1
Proctor, GB1
Forbes, B1
Royall, PG1
López-López, J1
Jané Salas, E1
Chimenos Küstner, E1
Davies, AN2
Thompson, J1
Berk, L2
Wong, RK1
James, JL1
Sagar, S1
Wyatt, G1
Nguyen-Tân, PF1
Singh, AK1
Lukaszczyk, B1
Cardinale, F1
Yeh, AM1
Haddad, P1
Karimi, M1
Hawthorne, M1
Sullivan, K1
Taylor, SE2
DANYSZ, A1
PRONIEWSKI, H1
WISNIEWSKI, K1
ZACZEK, T1
POLOCKI, B1
SETAELAE, K1
LINDROOS, B1
KUIKKA, AO1
Gornitsky, M1
Shenouda, G1
Sultanem, K1
Katz, H1
Hier, M1
Black, M1
Velly, AM1
Aframian, DJ1
Palmon, A1
Nahlieli, O1
Ramos, FM1
Pontual, ML1
de Almeida, SM1
Bóscolo, FN1
Tabchoury, CP1
Novaes, PD1
Koukourakis, MI1
Danielidis, V1
de Castro, G1
Federico, MH1
Scarantino, C1
LeVeque, F1
Swann, RS1
White, R1
Schulsinger, A1
Hodson, DI1
Meredith, R1
Foote, R1
Brachman, D1
Lee, N1
Ngeow, WC1
Chai, WL1
Rahman, RA1
Ramli, R1
Shiboski, CH1
Hodgson, TA1
Ship, JA1
Schiødt, M1
Shorthose, K1
Burlage, FR1
Roesink, JM1
Kampinga, HH3
Coppes, RP3
Terhaard, C1
Langendijk, JA1
van Luijk, P1
Stokman, MA1
Vissink, A1
Jacobs, CD1
van der Pas, M1
Kumar, S1
Tyler, AB1
Phillips, S1
Burnet, NG1
Garg, AK1
Malo, M1
Tishler, M1
Miller, EG1
Nusair, S1
Rubinow, A1
Horiot, JC1
Lipinski, F1
Schraub, S1
Maulard-Durdux, C1
Bensadoun, RJ1
Ardiet, JM1
Bolla, M1
Coscas, Y1
Baillet, F1
Coche-Dequéant, B1
Urbajtel, M1
Montbarbon, X1
Bourdin, S1
Wibault, M1
Alfonsi, M1
Calais, G1
Desprez, P1
Pene, F1
Lapeyre, M1
Vinke, J1
Maral, J1
Johnstone, PA1
Peng, YP1
May, BC1
Inouye, WS1
Niemtzow, RC1
Mateos, JJ1
Setoain, X1
Ferre, J1
Rovirosa, A1
Navalpotro, B1
Martin, F1
Ortega, M1
Lomeña, F1
Fuster, D1
Pavia, J1
Pons, F1
Zeilstra, LJ1
Konings, AW1
O'Connell, AC1
Licht, R1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Effectiveness of C02 Microfractionated Laser in Conjunction With Topical Regenerative Therapy in the Management of Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy in Patients With a History of Breast Cancer. Randomized Experimental and Comparative Study.[NCT05585476]98 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pilocarpine in Patients With Xerostomia[NCT02982577]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
Finger-prick Autologous Blood (FAB) for Use in Dry Mouth[NCT03530735]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II/III Study Comparing Acupuncture-like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (ALTENS) Versus Pilocarpine in Treating Early Radiation-Induced Xerostomia[NCT00656513]Phase 2/Phase 3196 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Phase III Study to Test the Efficacy of the Prophylactic Use of Oral Pilocarpine to Reduce Hyposalivation and Mucositis Associated With Curative Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients[NCT00003139]Phase 3249 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Phase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment Response

This secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall radiation-induced xerostomia burden by looking at treatment response. Treatment response was determined by a reduction of at least 20% from baseline to 6 months in the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased xerostomia burden. This scale has high reproducibility and sensitivity. For the first and second stage analyses, 4 and 10 patients, respectively, must respond to treatment in order to proceed to the phase III component. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and 6 months from registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ALTENS: Phase II85.7

Phase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months

Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Baseline (randomization) and 9 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Pilocarpine: Phase III-0.27
ALTENS: Phase III-0.53

Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III

The UWHNSS includes ten categories-pain, disfigurement, activity, recreation/entertainment, employment, eating, saliva, taste, speech, mucus/phlegm. Patient scores on the UWHNSS range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating declining quality of life. Change in total score was calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up , thus a positive change score indicates a worsening while a negative change score indicates an improvement. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Baseline and 9 months from randomization.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Pilocarpine: Phase III-3.64
ALTENS: Phase III-7.27

Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)

Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 6, and 15 months from randomization

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
4 months6 months15 months
ALTENS: Phase III-0.47-0.4-0.6
Pilocarpine: Phase III-0.27-0.33-0.47

Change From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Stimulated (citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. Stimulation is elicited by asking patients to rinse 5 ml of 2% citric acid solution in the mouth for 15 seconds and then completely expectorating the citric acid. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

,
Interventionml/min (Median)
4 months6 months9 months15 months
ALTENS: Phase III0.20.400.600.20
Pilocarpine: Phase III0.030.20.990.3

Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Symptom burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning. The domain score is the average of all responses on a given domain and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased symptom burden. Change in symptom burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the symptom burden. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
4-month Physical Functioning4-month Pain/Discomfort4-month Personal/Psychological Functioning4-month Social Functioning6-month Physical Functioning6-month Pain/Discomfort6-month Personal/Psychological Functioning6-month Social Functioning9-month Physical Functioning9-month Pain/Discomfort9-month Personal/Psychological Functioning9-month Social Functioning15-month Physical Functioning15-month Pain/Discomfort15-month Personal/Psychological Functioning15-month Social Functioning
ALTENS: Phase III-0.5-0.375-0.5-0.33-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.33-0.5-0.5-0.75-0.33-0.75-0.5-0.75-0.33
Pilocarpine: Phase III-0.5-0.25-0.250-0.5-0.25-0.25-0.33-0.5-0.25-0.5-0.66-0.5-0.5-0.50

Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Basal whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment to 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

,
Interventionml/min (Median)
4 months6 months9 months15 months
ALTENS: Phase III00.020.040.192
Pilocarpine: Phase III000.0560.13

Phase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients)

Patients completing at least 19 out of 24 ALTENS therapy sessions were categorized as compliant. Fleming's two-stage was used, assuming a successful target compliance rate of 80%, statistical power of 0.87, and a type I error rate of 0.13. If fewer than 9 of the first 13 patients were compliant, then treatment delivery will be deemed not feasible. If there were between 9-12 compliant patients, the second stage analysis would be required to determine feasibility of treatment delivery. If all 13 patients are compliant, treatment delivery will immediately be deemed feasible. The second stage analysis required at least 31 compliant out of 39 overall patients for the treatment delivery to be deemed feasible. (NCT00656513)
Timeframe: Randomization to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
First StageSecond Stage (Overall)
ALTENS: Phase II1244

Reviews

16 reviews available for pilocarpine and Injuries, Radiation

ArticleYear
Buccal drug delivery technologies for patient-centred treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia (dry mouth).
    International journal of pharmaceutics, 2018, Apr-25, Volume: 541, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Drug Delivery Systems; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Mouth Mucosa; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpi

2018
[Prognosis and treatment of dry mouth. Systematic review].
    Medicina clinica, 2014, Feb-04, Volume: 142, Issue:3

    Topics: Cholinergic Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dental Caries; Disease Susceptibility; Double-Bli

2014
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Oct-05, Issue:10

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Contr

2015
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Oct-05, Issue:10

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Contr

2015
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Oct-05, Issue:10

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Contr

2015
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Oct-05, Issue:10

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Contr

2015
Systemic pilocarpine for treatment of xerostomia.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2008, Volume: 4, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Radiation I

2008
Pilocarpine for radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer.
    International journal of palliative nursing, 2000, Volume: 6, Issue:5

    Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Co

2000
Efficacy and economic evaluation of pilocarpine in treating radiation-induced xerostomia.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2003, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Antifungal Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Fluorides; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Muscarinic Ago

2003
Preventing radiation induced xerostomia.
    Cancer treatment reviews, 2005, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Quality of Life; Radia

2005
Evaluation, prevention and management of radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.
    Current opinion in oncology, 2006, Volume: 18, Issue:3

    Topics: Amifostine; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytoplasmic Granules; Free Radical S

2006
Managing complications of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: Part I. Management of xerostomia.
    Singapore dental journal, 2006, Volume: 28, Issue:1

    Topics: Chewing Gum; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Mouthwashes; Parasympatholytics; Pilocarpine; Radiatio

2006
Management of salivary hypofunction during and after radiotherapy.
    Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics, 2007, Volume: 103 Suppl

    Topics: Amifostine; Dental Caries; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Radiation-P

2007
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007, Jul-18, Issue:3

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Contr

2007
Manifestations and treatment of xerostomia and associated oral effects secondary to head and neck radiation therapy.
    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 1997, Volume: 128, Issue:8

    Topics: Cariostatic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dental Caries; Fluorides; Gels; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans

1997
[Pilocarpine--new use for an old drug].
    Harefuah, 1998, Volume: 135, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Radiotherapy; Xe

1998
Preemptive pharmacologic intervention in radiation-induced salivary dysfunction.
    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.), 1999, Volume: 221, Issue:1

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Amifostine; Animals; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease;

1999
The use of oral pilocarpine in xerostomia and Sjögren's syndrome.
    Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 1999, Volume: 28, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Radiation I

1999
Natural history and prevention of radiation injury.
    Advances in dental research, 2000, Volume: 14

    Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Free Radical Scavengers; Humans; Muscarinic Ag

2000

Trials

9 trials available for pilocarpine and Injuries, Radiation

ArticleYear
Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia.
    Cancer, 2012, Sep-01, Volume: 118, Issue:17

    Topics: Acupuncture; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle A

2012
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant pilocarpine with head and neck irradiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia.
    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2002, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; He

2002
Double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study of pilocarpine to salvage salivary gland function during radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.
    Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics, 2004, Volume: 98, Issue:1

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hum

2004
Effect of pilocarpine during radiation therapy: results of RTOG 97-09, a phase III randomized study in head and neck cancer patients.
    The journal of supportive oncology, 2006, Volume: 4, Issue:5

    Topics: Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine; Qualit

2006
Protection of salivary function by concomitant pilocarpine during radiotherapy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2008, Jan-01, Volume: 70, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Double-Blind Method; Female; Head and Neck Neopla

2008
A multicenter maintenance study of oral pilocarpine tablets for radiation-induced xerostomia.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 1996, Volume: 10, Issue:3 Suppl

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged;

1996
Post-radiation severe xerostomia relieved by pilocarpine: a prospective French cooperative study.
    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2000, Volume: 55, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male;

2000
Acupuncture for pilocarpine-resistant xerostomia following radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2001, Jun-01, Volume: 50, Issue:2

    Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Drug Resistance; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Miotics; Pilocarpine; Radiati

2001
Salivary scintigraphy for assessing the protective effect of pilocarpine in head and neck irradiated tumours.
    Nuclear medicine communications, 2001, Volume: 22, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Mi

2001

Other Studies

11 other studies available for pilocarpine and Injuries, Radiation

ArticleYear
Nicotinamide mitigates radiation injury in submandibular gland by protecting mitochondrial structure and functions.
    Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, 2022, Volume: 51, Issue:9

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; DNA Nucleotidylexotransferase; Humans; Mitochondria; NAD; Niacinami

2022
REACTIVITY TO VEGETATIVE DRUGS IN THE ACUTE RADIATION SICKNESS.
    Sbornik vedeckych praci Lekarske fakulty Karlovy university v Hradci Kralove, 1963, Volume: 6

    Topics: Acetylcholine; Atropine; Cats; Dogs; Epinephrine; Guinea Pigs; Iproniazid; Mice; Neostigmine; Nicoti

1963
[ON THE REMOVAL OF INCORPORATED STRONTIUM ISOTOPES IN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS. THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES FOR THE DECORPORATION TECHNIC WITH SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS].
    Strahlentherapie, 1964, Volume: 123

    Topics: Animals; Bone and Bones; Cats; Mice; Pharmacology; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Radiation Injuri

1964
[Future therapy strategies for salivary gland impairment].
    Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993), 2004, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Amifostine; Cranial Irradiation; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Pilocarpine;

2004
Evaluation of radioprotective effect of vitamin E in salivary dysfunction in irradiated rats.
    Archives of oral biology, 2006, Volume: 51, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Gamma Rays; Male; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Radiation-Protective Agents; Rats; Rats,

2006
New approaches to preventing xerostomia.
    The journal of supportive oncology, 2006, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Amifostine; Cytoprotection; Humans; Muscarinic Agonists; Neoplasms; Pilocarpine; Quinuclidines; Radi

2006
Oral pilocarpine for xerostomia.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 1994, Aug-19, Volume: 36, Issue:929

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Radiothe

1994
Severity of xerostomia reduced when Salagen tablets taken during radiation therapy.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 1996, Volume: 10, Issue:12

    Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Pilocarpine; Radiation Injuries; Sali

1996
Oral pilocarpine improves radiotherapy-induced dry eyes.
    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 1997, Volume: 9, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Eye; Eye Diseases; Hemangiosarcoma; Humans; Keratitis; Male; Parasympathomimetics; Pilocarpine

1997
Early to late sparing of radiation damage to the parotid gland by adrenergic and muscarinic receptor agonists.
    British journal of cancer, 2001, Sep-28, Volume: 85, Issue:7

    Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Animals; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Isoproterenol

2001
Salivary gland-sparing prophylactic pilocarpine treatment has no effect on tumor regrowth after irradiation.
    Radiation research, 2002, Volume: 157, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Division; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Humans; Mic

2002