phytic acid has been researched along with Vascular Calcification in 8 studies
Phytic Acid: Complexing agent for removal of traces of heavy metal ions. It acts also as a hypocalcemic agent.
myo-inositol hexakisphosphate : A myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in which each hydroxy group of myo-inositol is monophosphorylated.
Vascular Calcification: Deposition of calcium into the blood vessel structures. Excessive calcification of the vessels are associated with ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUES formation particularly after MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (see MONCKEBERG MEDIAL CALCIFIC SCLEROSIS) and chronic kidney diseases which in turn increase VASCULAR STIFFNESS.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"It is a potential novel treatment for cardiovascular calcification in end-stage renal disease and calciphylaxis warranting further human studies." | 2.87 | First-time-in-human randomized clinical trial in healthy volunteers and haemodialysis patients with SNF472, a novel inhibitor of vascular calcification. ( Canals, AZ; Ferrer, MD; Joubert, PH; Perelló, J; Salcedo, C; Sinha, S, 2018) |
" Further prospective studies must be performed to elucidate the benefits of a phytate-rich diet and the associated risk of phosphorus bioavailability in these patients." | 1.43 | Protective Effect of Myo-Inositol Hexaphosphate (Phytate) on Abdominal Aortic Calcification in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. ( Berga, F; Bernabeu, MR; Buades, JM; Costa-Bauzá, A; García, S; Gelabert, MM; Gonzalez, J; Grases, F; Íñigo, MV; Molina, M; Sanchis, P, 2016) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (50.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 4 (50.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Raggi, P | 2 |
Bellasi, A | 1 |
Bushinsky, D | 1 |
Bover, J | 1 |
Rodriguez, M | 1 |
Ketteler, M | 2 |
Sinha, S | 3 |
Salcedo, C | 5 |
Gillotti, K | 1 |
Padgett, C | 1 |
Garg, R | 2 |
Gold, A | 2 |
Perelló, J | 5 |
Chertow, GM | 2 |
Hedayati, SS | 1 |
Ferrer, MD | 3 |
Del Mar Pérez, M | 1 |
Kaesler, N | 1 |
Brandenburg, VM | 1 |
Behets, GJ | 1 |
D'Haese, PC | 1 |
Isern, B | 1 |
Wolf, M | 1 |
Gómez, M | 1 |
Rodríguez, NY | 1 |
Buades, JM | 2 |
Pérez, MM | 1 |
Torregrosa, JV | 1 |
Martín, E | 1 |
Maduell, F | 1 |
Joubert, PH | 1 |
Canals, AZ | 1 |
Sanchis, P | 1 |
Berga, F | 1 |
Gelabert, MM | 1 |
Molina, M | 1 |
Íñigo, MV | 1 |
García, S | 1 |
Gonzalez, J | 1 |
Bernabeu, MR | 1 |
Costa-Bauzá, A | 1 |
Grases, F | 1 |
Joubert, P | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Effect of SNF472 on Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification on Top of Standard of Care in End-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) Patients on Hemodialysis (HD)[NCT02966028] | Phase 2 | 274 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-11-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score or the aortic valve from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.33 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 0.98 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 1.14 |
Matching Placebo | 2.86 |
"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the aortic valve was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.28 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 1.01 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 1.14 |
Matching Placebo | 1.98 |
Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.10 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 1.13 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 1.11 |
Matching Placebo | 1.20 |
"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.12 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 1.10 |
Matching Placebo | 1.20 |
"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. The primary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg & 600 mg Combined | 1.11 |
Matching Placebo | 1.20 |
Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in CAC Agatston Score in the thoracic aorta from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.30 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 1.28 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 1.29 |
Matching Placebo | 1.32 |
"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the thoracic aorta was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1.25 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 1.21 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 1.23 |
Matching Placebo | 1.28 |
The number of deaths were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 1 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 6 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 7 |
Matching Placebo | 5 |
The number of subjects meeting this composite safety endpoint were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.terms resulting in death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure for each dose group and placebo were summarized . (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 7 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 6 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 13 |
Matching Placebo | 10 |
Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 were calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with <15% progression were counted. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 46 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 41 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 87 |
Matching Placebo | 37 |
Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 was calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with >=15% progression were counted for each treatment group, the combined treatments groups and placebo. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SNF472 300 mg | 31 |
SNF 472 600 mg | 24 |
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups | 55 |
Matching Placebo | 40 |
1 review available for phytic acid and Vascular Calcification
Article | Year |
---|---|
SNF472: mechanism of action and results from clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Phytic Acid; Renal Dialysis; Vascular Calcification | 2021 |
2 trials available for phytic acid and Vascular Calcification
Article | Year |
---|---|
Slowing Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification With SNF472 in Patients on Hemodialysis: Results of a Randomized Phase 2b Study.
Topics: Aged; Aortic Valve; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Durapatite; E | 2020 |
First-time-in-human randomized clinical trial in healthy volunteers and haemodialysis patients with SNF472, a novel inhibitor of vascular calcification.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Calcium; Double-Blind Method; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male | 2018 |
5 other studies available for phytic acid and Vascular Calcification
Article | Year |
---|---|
A Novel Treatment for Vascular Calcification in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Are We There Yet?
Topics: Humans; Phytic Acid; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Vascular Calcification | 2020 |
Mechanism of action of SNF472, a novel calcification inhibitor to treat vascular calcification and calciphylaxis.
Topics: Animals; Calciphylaxis; Dogs; Humans; Phytic Acid; Rats; Renal Dialysis; Vascular Calcification | 2020 |
SNF472, a novel inhibitor of vascular calcification, could be administered during hemodialysis to attain potentially therapeutic phytate levels.
Topics: Calcium; Creatinine; Dialysis Solutions; Hemodiafiltration; Humans; Phytic Acid; Renal Dialysis; Vas | 2018 |
Protective Effect of Myo-Inositol Hexaphosphate (Phytate) on Abdominal Aortic Calcification in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
Topics: Aged; Aorta, Abdominal; Body Mass Index; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diet; Female; Humans; Male; Middle | 2016 |
Hypothesis: Phytate is an important unrecognised nutrient and potential intravenous drug for preventing vascular calcification.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Animals; Diet; Disease Progression; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kid | 2016 |