Page last updated: 2024-10-19

phytic acid and Disease Exacerbation

phytic acid has been researched along with Disease Exacerbation in 7 studies

Phytic Acid: Complexing agent for removal of traces of heavy metal ions. It acts also as a hypocalcemic agent.
myo-inositol hexakisphosphate : A myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in which each hydroxy group of myo-inositol is monophosphorylated.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Phytic acid (PA) has been demonstrated to have a potent anticarcinogenic activity against colorectal cancer (CRC)."7.88Phytic acid improves intestinal mucosal barrier damage and reduces serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in a 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colorectal cancer model. ( Chen, C; Cheng, L; Li, X; Liu, C; Song, Y; Yang, F, 2018)
"Phytic acid (PA) has been demonstrated to have a potent anticarcinogenic activity against colorectal cancer (CRC)."3.88Phytic acid improves intestinal mucosal barrier damage and reduces serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in a 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colorectal cancer model. ( Chen, C; Cheng, L; Li, X; Liu, C; Song, Y; Yang, F, 2018)
"Paclitaxel treatments caused increased NF-kappaB activation in the same cell lines."1.34Inositol hexaphosphate and paclitaxel: symbiotic treatment of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. ( Janus, SC; Ondrey, FG; Weurtz, B, 2007)

Research

Studies (7)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (14.29)29.6817
2010's4 (57.14)24.3611
2020's2 (28.57)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Raggi, P1
Bellasi, A1
Bushinsky, D1
Bover, J1
Rodriguez, M1
Ketteler, M2
Sinha, S1
Salcedo, C3
Gillotti, K1
Padgett, C1
Garg, R2
Gold, A2
Perelló, J3
Chertow, GM1
Perez, MM1
Ferrer, MD1
Lazo-Rodriguez, M1
Canals, AZ1
Banon-Maneus, E1
Campistol, JM1
Miller, S1
Liu, C1
Chen, C1
Yang, F1
Li, X1
Cheng, L1
Song, Y1
Schröterová, L1
Ježková, A1
Rudolf, E1
Caltová, K1
Králová, V1
Hanušová, V1
Joubert, P1
Raina, K1
Ravichandran, K1
Rajamanickam, S1
Huber, KM1
Serkova, NJ1
Agarwal, R1
Janus, SC1
Weurtz, B1
Ondrey, FG1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Effect of SNF472 on Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification on Top of Standard of Care in End-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) Patients on Hemodialysis (HD)[NCT02966028]Phase 2274 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score or the aortic valve from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.33
SNF 472 600 mg0.98
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups1.14
Matching Placebo2.86

Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the aortic valve was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.28
SNF 472 600 mg1.01
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups1.14
Matching Placebo1.98

Change in Log CAC Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and for the Combined Dose Groups vs the Placebo Group

Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.10
SNF 472 600 mg1.13
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups1.11
Matching Placebo1.20

Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo

"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.12
SNF 472 600 mg1.10
Matching Placebo1.20

Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. The primary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg & 600 mg Combined1.11
Matching Placebo1.20

Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in CAC Agatston Score in the thoracic aorta from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.30
SNF 472 600 mg1.28
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups1.29
Matching Placebo1.32

Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

"Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the thoracic aorta was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed.~A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome." (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
SNF472 300 mg1.25
SNF 472 600 mg1.21
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups1.23
Matching Placebo1.28

Mortality Rate (All-cause) for Each Dose Group and Placebo

The number of deaths were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SNF472 300 mg1
SNF 472 600 mg6
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups7
Matching Placebo5

Number of Participants With the Composite Safety Endpoint (Cardiovascular Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-fatal Stroke, Heart Failure or Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest.

The number of subjects meeting this composite safety endpoint were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.terms resulting in death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure for each dose group and placebo were summarized . (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SNF472 300 mg7
SNF 472 600 mg6
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups13
Matching Placebo10

Number of Subjects With <15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 were calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with <15% progression were counted. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SNF472 300 mg46
SNF 472 600 mg41
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups87
Matching Placebo37

Number of Subjects With >=15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score at Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo

Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 was calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with >=15% progression were counted for each treatment group, the combined treatments groups and placebo. (NCT02966028)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SNF472 300 mg31
SNF 472 600 mg24
SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups55
Matching Placebo40

Trials

1 trial available for phytic acid and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Slowing Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification With SNF472 in Patients on Hemodialysis: Results of a Randomized Phase 2b Study.
    Circulation, 2020, 03-03, Volume: 141, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aortic Valve; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Durapatite; E

2020

Other Studies

6 other studies available for phytic acid and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
A novel assay to measure calcification propensity: from laboratory to humans.
    Scientific reports, 2020, 10-16, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Aorta; Biomarkers; Calcinosis; Calciphylaxis; Calcium Phosphates; Clinical Laboratory Techn

2020
Phytic acid improves intestinal mucosal barrier damage and reduces serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in a 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colorectal cancer model.
    The British journal of nutrition, 2018, Volume: 120, Issue:2

    Topics: 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine; Animals; Body Weight; Cadherins; Claudin-1; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cyto

2018
Inositol hexaphosphate limits the migration and the invasiveness of colorectal carcinoma cells in vitro.
    International journal of oncology, 2018, Volume: 53, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Adhesion; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Colorectal

2018
Hypothesis: Phytate is an important unrecognised nutrient and potential intravenous drug for preventing vascular calcification.
    Medical hypotheses, 2016, Volume: 94

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Animals; Diet; Disease Progression; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kid

2016
Inositol hexaphosphate inhibits tumor growth, vascularity, and metabolism in TRAMP mice: a multiparametric magnetic resonance study.
    Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2013, Volume: 6, Issue:1

    Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Animals; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Body Weight; Cell Proliferatio

2013
Inositol hexaphosphate and paclitaxel: symbiotic treatment of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
    The Laryngoscope, 2007, Volume: 117, Issue:8

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Carcin

2007