pf-06463922 and Brain-Neoplasms

To date, no direct comparisons have compared the effectiveness of all ALK inhibitors (ALKis) against ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ALKis in ALK-positive NSCLC.. The effectiveness of ALKis was evaluated by assessing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and PFS with baseline brain metastasis (BM). The serious adverse events (SAEs: Grade ≥ 3) and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were pooled to evaluate safety. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison between all ALKis by using a Bayesian model.. Twelve eligible trials including seven treatments were identified. All of the ALKis improved PFS and ORR relative to chemotherapy. Consistent with alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and ensartinib showed significant differences versus crizotinib and ceritinib. Lorlatinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with alectinib (0.64, 0.37 to 1.07), brigatinib (0.56, 0.3 to 1.05), and ensartinib (0.53, 0.28 to 1.02). No significant difference was found among them in OS except for alectinib versus crizotinib. Moreover, alectinib was significantly more effective than crizotinib (1.54, 1.02 to 2.5) in achieving the best ORR. Subgroup analyses based on BM indicated that PFS was dramatically lengthened by lorlatinib. Compared with other ALKis, alectinib notably reduced the rate of SAEs. There was no striking difference between discontinuation for AEs, except for ceritinib versus crizotinib. The ranking of validity showed that lorlatinib had the longest PFS (98.32%) and PFS with BM (85.84%) and the highest ORR (77.01%). The rank of probabilities showed that alectinib had the potentially best safety in terms of SAEs (97.85%), and ceritinib had less discontinuation (95.45%).. Alectinib was the first choice for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and even for those with BM, whereas lorlatinib was the second choice. Long-term follow-up and prospective studies are warranted to compare ALKis and to verify our conclusions directly.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Bayes Theorem; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

To conduct a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to determine the optimal clinical choice of first-line therapy for patients with ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (. Clinical trials in patients with histologically confirmed. Nine trials with 2,407 patients were included for analyses. Lorlatinib was better than brigatinib for progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.98). In subgroup analyses, lorlatinib exhibited the highest probability of best PFS ranking in patients with or without baseline brain metastases (38% and 80%, respectively); brigatinib had the highest probability of best PFS ranking among Asian patients (47%). Alectinib offered the highest survival advantage (57% probability), while lorlatinib was likely to be the best treatment for an objective response (41% probability). Alectinib displayed the highest probability of being ranked lowest for grade ≥3 adverse events (86%).. Lorlatinib was associated with the best PFS overall, and was suitable for patients with or without brain metastases. Brigatinib was associated with the best PFS in Asian patients.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Bayes Theorem; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Approximately 3-7% of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are driven by an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (. Herein, the authors review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety of lorlatinib and provide their future perspectives on this drug.. Lorlatinib is a potent

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been identified to exert a potent transforming activity through its rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and patients (pts) with ALK rearrangement can be treated more successfully with ALK inhibitors, such as crizotinib, alectinib, and ceritinib, than with chemotherapy. Despite the excellent efficacy of ALK inhibitors, resistance to these drugs is inevitably encountered in most ALK-rearranged pts. Cases of resistance are subtyped into three groups, i.e., systemic, oligo, and central nervous system (CNS) types, with the CNS being used to be considered a sanctuary. With regard to the management of CNS lesions in pts with ALK+ NSCLC, a growing body of evidence has gradually demonstrated the intracranial (IC) efficacy of ALK inhibitor (ALKi) in ALK+ NSCLC pts with brain metastases (BMs). Although the efficacy of crizotinib for the CNS lesions remains controversial, a recent retrospective investigation of ALK+ pts with BM enrolled in PROFILE 1005 and PROFILE 1007 demonstrated that crizotinib is associated with a high disease control rate for BM. However, BM comprises the most common site of progressive disease in pts with or without baseline BMs, which is a serious problem for crizotinib. Furthermore, alectinib can be used to achieve strong and long-lasting inhibitory effects on BM. In addition to alectinib, the IC efficacy of other next-generation ALK inhibitors, such as ceritinib, AP26113 and PF-06463922, has been demonstrated. In this article, we review the latest evidence regarding the BM and IC efficacy of ALK inhibitors in pts with ALK+ NSCLC.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

After a median follow-up of 18·3 months, the third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, lorlatinib, improved progression-free survival in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the phase 3 CROWN study. Here we report updated efficacy data, including intracranial activity, from an unplanned analysis after 3 years of follow-up.. CROWN is an ongoing, international, randomised, open-label phase 3 trial done in 104 centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older or aged 20 years and older (depending on local regulations) with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, had received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, had at least one extracranial measurable target lesion (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST], version 1.1), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral lorlatinib 100 mg daily or oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and by ethnicity. Since the primary endpoint of the study had been met at the planned interim analysis, no further formal analysis of progression-free survival was planned, per protocol. The current unplanned analysis was done to further characterise tumour-related endpoints with a longer follow-up and is presented descriptively. For the planned study, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were also assessed by the presence or absence of baseline brain metastases. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608.. Between May 11, 2017, and Feb 28, 2019, 425 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 296 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the lorlatinib (n=149) or crizotinib (n=147) group. At data cutoff for this unplanned analysis (Sept 20, 2021), median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 36·7 months (IQR 31·3-41·9) for lorlatinib and 29·3 months (10·8-35·0) for crizotinib. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached) for lorlatinib and was 9·3 months (7·6-11·1) for crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0·27 [95% CI 0·18-0·39]). 3-year progression-free survival was 64% (95% CI 55-71) in the lorlatinib group and 19% (12-27) in the crizotinib group. Progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, and duration of response were improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n=37 lorlatinib; n=39 crizotinib), the HR for time to intracranial progression for lorlatinib versus crizotinib was 0·10 (95% CI 0·04-0·27); in patients without baseline brain metastases (n=112 lorlatinib; n=108 crizotinib), the HR was 0·02 (95% CI 0·002-0·14). In patients without brain metastases, one (1%) in the lorlatinib group and 25 (23%) in the crizotinib group had intracranial progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 113 (76%) of 149 patients (most commonly due to altered lipid levels) with lorlatinib and in 81 (57%) of 142 patients with crizotinib. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11 (7%) patients in the lorlatinib group and 14 (10%) patients in the crizotinib group. There were no new safety signals.. These updated, long-term data from CROWN show the durable benefit of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and support the use of first-line lorlatinib in patients with and without baseline brain metastases.. Pfizer.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Brain metastases are especially common in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a cumulative incidence of over 50% and associated with a poor prognosis, high symptom burden, and decreased quality of life. Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has a high potency against resistance mutations seen with earlier generation ALK TKIs. In 2018, lorlatinib was granted accelerated approval in second- and third-line treatment for use in patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC on the basis of phase 1/2 study results. This initial approval was expanded for first-line treatment of patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC on the basis of the interim analysis of the phase 3 CROWN study showing longer progression-free survival, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, and objective response rate compared with crizotinib. This manuscript is a transcript of our podcast, in which we discuss the clinical significance of controlling the onset of brain metastases, considerations in selecting a first-line therapy option, efficacy and safety observed in patients with and without brain metastases, and rationales for using lorlatinib upfront versus reserving for a later line in therapy.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Lorlatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib and showed robust intracranial activity in patients with previously untreated advanced. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line lorlatinib (100 mg once daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day); no crossover between treatment arms was permitted. Tumor assessments, including CNS magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at screening and then at 8-week intervals. Regular assessments of patient-reported outcomes were conducted.. PFS by blinded independent central review was improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline (12-month PFS rates: 78%. First-line lorlatinib improved PFS outcomes and reduced CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with advanced

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Quality of life (QoL) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is negatively impacted by their disease and treatment side effects. We present detailed patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the phase 3 CROWN study, which compared lorlatinib with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.. PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire with Lung Cancer module. A longitudinal, random-intercept, random-slope, mixed-effect model assessed score changes from baseline up to (not including) end of treatment. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline at each cycle were calculated and presented up to cycle 18 (≥ 10-point change considered clinically meaningful).. In both lorlatinib (n = 148) and crizotinib (n = 140) arms, there were longitudinal improvements across multiple functioning and symptom scores during treatment compared with pre-treatment. Numerical improvements for most longitudinal functioning scores (physical, role, emotional, social) favored lorlatinib; cognitive functioning favored crizotinib. Numerical improvements favored lorlatinib for several symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea [clinically meaningful improvement], and cough); peripheral neuropathy favored crizotinib. Subgroup analyses showed PROs did not differ by presence/absence of baseline brain metastases.. Patients receiving first-line lorlatinib or crizotinib showed improvements and delayed deterioration in QoL, functioning, and several symptoms. Alongside the previously reported significantly longer progression-free survival and higher intracranial response rates for lorlatinib versus crizotinib, these data further support the use of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with/without baseline brain metastases and provide evidence of several QoL improvements with lorlatinib when used in the first-line setting.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Lorlatinib is a potent, third-generation ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.. We report the cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS progression with lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with ALK TKIs.. In an ongoing phase II study (NCT01970865), 198 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with ≥ 1 prior ALK TKI were enrolled into expansion cohorts (EXP) based on treatment history. Patients received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Patients were analyzed for progressive disease, categorized as CNS or non-CNS progression, by independent central review. Cumulative incidence probabilities were calculated adopting a competing risks approach.. Fifty-nine patients received crizotinib as their only prior ALK TKI (EXP2-3A); cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of CNS and non-CNS progression were both 22% at 12 months in patients with baseline CNS metastases (n = 37), and CIR of non-CNS progression at 12 months was higher versus that for CNS progression in patients without baseline CNS metastases [43% vs. 9% (n = 22)]. In patients who received ≥ 1 prior second-generation ALK TKI [EXP3B-5 (n = 139)], CIR of non-CNS progression at 12 months was higher versus that for CNS progression in patients both with and without baseline CNS metastases (35% vs. 23% (n = 94) and 55% vs. 12% (n = 45), respectively).. Lorlatinib showed substantial intracranial activity in patients with pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC, with or without baseline CNS metastases, whose disease progressed on crizotinib or second-generation ALK TKIs. CLINICALTRIALS.. NCT01970865.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Incidence; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets ALK and ROS1 with preclinical activity against most known resistance mutations in ALK and ROS1. We investigated the antitumour activity and safety of lorlatinib in advanced, ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).. In this open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial, we enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less (≤1 for phase 1 only) from 28 hospitals in 12 countries worldwide. Lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (escalating doses of 10 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily in phase 1 only) was given orally in continuous 21-day cycles until investigator-determined disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response, assessed by independent central review. Activity endpoints were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01970865.. Between Jan 22, 2014, and Oct 2, 2016, we assessed 364 patients, of whom 69 with ROS1-positive NSCLC were enrolled. 21 (30%) of 69 patients were TKI-naive, 40 (58%) had previously received crizotinib as their only TKI, and eight (12%) had previously received one non-crizotinib ROS1 TKI or two or more ROS1 TKIs. The estimated median duration of follow-up for response was 21·1 months (IQR 15·2-30·3). 13 (62%; 95% CI 38-82) of 21 TKI-naive patients and 14 (35%; 21-52) of 40 patients previously treated with crizotinib as their only TKI had an objective response. Intracranial responses were achieved in seven (64%; 95% CI 31-89) of 11 TKI-naive patients and 12 (50%; 29-71) of 24 previous crizotinib-only patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertriglyceridaemia (13 [19%] of 69 patients) and hypercholesterolaemia (ten [14%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in five (7%) of 69 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported.. Lorlatinib showed clinical activity in patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases and those previously treated with crizotinib. Because crizotinib-refractory patients have few treatment options, lorlatinib could represent an important next-line targeted agent.. Pfizer.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aminopyridines; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Pyrazoles; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Survival Rate; Young Adult

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation inhibitor of ALK and ROS1 tyrosine kinases with broad coverage of ALK mutations. In a phase 1 study, activity was seen in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, most of whom had CNS metastases and progression after ALK-directed therapy. We aimed to analyse the overall and intracranial antitumour activity of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.. In this phase 2 study, patients with histologically or cytologically ALK-positive or ROS1-positive, advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate end-organ function were eligible. Patients were enrolled into six different expansion cohorts (EXP1-6) on the basis of ALK and ROS1 status and previous therapy, and were given lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily continuously in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response by independent central review, assessed in pooled subgroups of ALK-positive patients. Analyses of activity and safety were based on the safety analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib) as assessed by independent central review. Patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline by independent central review were included in the intracranial activity analyses. In this report, we present lorlatinib activity data for the ALK-positive patients (EXP1-5 only), and safety data for all treated patients (EXP1-6). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865.. Between Sept 15, 2015, and Oct 3, 2016, 276 patients were enrolled: 30 who were ALK positive and treatment naive (EXP1); 59 who were ALK positive and received previous crizotinib without (n=27; EXP2) or with (n=32; EXP3A) previous chemotherapy; 28 who were ALK positive and received one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with or without chemotherapy (EXP3B); 112 who were ALK positive with two (n=66; EXP4) or three (n=46; EXP5) previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without chemotherapy; and 47 who were ROS1 positive with any previous treatment (EXP6). One patient in EXP4 died before receiving lorlatinib and was excluded from the safety analysis set. In treatment-naive patients (EXP1), an objective response was achieved in 27 (90·0%; 95% CI 73·5-97·9) of 30 patients. Three patients in EXP1 had measurable baseline CNS lesions per independent central review, and objective intracranial responses were observed in two (66·7%; 95% CI 9·4-99·2). In ALK-positive patients with at least one previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP2-5), objective responses were achieved in 93 (47·0%; 39·9-54·2) of 198 patients and objective intracranial response in those with measurable baseline CNS lesions in 51 (63·0%; 51·5-73·4) of 81 patients. Objective response was achieved in 41 (69·5%; 95% CI 56·1-80·8) of 59 patients who had only received previous crizotinib (EXP2-3A), nine (32·1%; 15·9-52·4) of 28 patients with one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP3B), and 43 (38·7%; 29·6-48·5) of 111 patients with two or more previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EXP4-5). Objective intracranial response was achieved in 20 (87·0%; 95% CI 66·4-97·2) of 23 patients with measurable baseline CNS lesions in EXP2-3A, five (55·6%; 21·2-86·3) of nine patients in EXP3B, and 26 (53·1%; 38·3-67·5) of 49 patients in EXP4-5. The most common treatment-related adverse events across all patients were hypercholesterolaemia (224 [81%] of 275 patients overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4) and hypertriglyceridaemia (166 [60%] overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (7%) of 275 patients and seven patients (3%) permanently discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported.. Consistent with its broad ALK mutational coverage and CNS penetration, lorlatinib showed substantial overall and intracranial activity both in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and in those who had progressed on crizotinib, second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or after up to three previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thus, lorlatinib could represent an effective treatment option for patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in first-line or subsequent therapy.. Pfizer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Time Factors; Tumor Burden

Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

The safety profile of lorlatinib includes neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Baseline factors associated with developing NAEs remain poorly characterized.. Records from patients who received lorlatinib through prospective studies at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH, n = 124) or the phase 1/2 B7461001 (NCT01970865; n = 248) study were reviewed to identify potential associations between comorbidities, baseline medications, and NAEs.. Most patients experienced a NAE (MGH: 60%, B7461001: 49%). Cognitive effects occurred in 40% and 29% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain metastases (p = 0.008), brain radiation (p = 0.033), psychiatric illness (p = 0.008), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), antiepileptics (p < 0.001), and stimulants (p = 0.026) were associated with developing cognitive effects in B7461001. Mood effects occurred in 36% and 23% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. In the MGH cohort, psychiatric illness (p = 0.02) and stimulants (p = 0.01) were associated with developing mood effects whereas brain surgery (p = 0.020), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), benzodiazepines (p = 0.002), and sedatives (p = 0.034) were associated with developing mood effects in B7461001. Psychotic effects were infrequent (MGH: 3%, B7461001: 9%) and were associated with brain surgery in the MGH cohort (p = 0.001) and age in B7461001 (p = 0.014). Speech effects were observed in 23% and 11% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain radiation (p = 0.012) and antiepileptics (p < 0.001) were associated with speech effects in B7461001. Dose reductions were implemented for 52% and 18% of patients with NAEs in MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively, with mitigating effect.. Neurocognitive effects from lorlatinib are common. Lorlatinib-related NAEs may be influenced by multiple factors, including brain metastases, brain radiation, psychiatric illness, and use of neurotropic medications.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

A 44-year-old woman with ALK-positive advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung was treated with crizotinib, and the lung lesions disappeared. The patient was treated with alectinib and chemotherapy, but brain metastases worsened; therefore, we performed an ALK resistance gene mutation test using plasma samples. Since no ALK resistance gene mutations were detected, we speculated that ALK inhibitors failed to achieve therapeutic effects due to poor transport to the central nervous system. Therefore, we switched to lorlatinib, and found a reduction in brain metastases. In ALK-positive advanced lung cancer, plasma-based resistance gene testing may be useful for treatment decisions.

Topics: Adult; Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lactams; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles

Most advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are accompanied by brain metastasis which is the major cause of increased mortality. The fusion rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene is an important feature of brain metastasis in lung cancer. The novel ALK inhibitors alectinib and lorlatinib are shown to be effective against NSCLC brain metastasis, while their underlying mechanism of action is unclear. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) proteins and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play important roles in brain metastasis by regulating the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To reveal the molecular function of alectinib and lorlatinib, we explored their effects on the cellular levels of EMT markers: VIM and FN1 and the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-9 and MMP-7. The mRNA and protein levels of VIM, FN1, MMP-9, and MMP-7 were elevated in H3122 cells. However, upon alectinib and lorlatinib treatment, the levels were significantly reduced. Similar results were obtained when these experiments were performed either in a dose-dependent or time-dependent manner. Furthermore, alectinib and lorlatinib also inhibited the cell viability and migration of H3122 cells. Interestingly, in comparison to individual drugs, the combination of alectinib and lorlatinib was found to be substantially more effective. Overall, these results suggest that alectinib and lorlatinib possibly function through the downregulation of MMPs and EMT in NSCLC metastasis.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Biomarkers, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Movement; Cell Survival; Down-Regulation; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Humans; Lactams; Lung Neoplasms; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Most inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) harbor ALK fusions but oncogene fusions involving ROS1, RET, NTRK, and PDGFR also occur. The recognition that most IMTs harbor receptor tyrosine kinase fusions has provided a rationale for the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to target these oncogenic drivers in advanced IMTs. Crizotinib has been effective in ALK and ROS1-positive IMTs but resistance eventually develops. Here we report the successful use of lorlatinib in a patient with heavily pretreated ROS1-positive IMT of the chest wall with acquired crizotinib-resistance and metastasis to the brain.

Topics: Adolescent; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Humans; Lactams; Male; Myofibroblasts; Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Pyrazoles; Thoracic Neoplasms

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Glioma; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pyrazoles; Remission Induction

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against most known resistance mutations. This is an ongoing phase 1/2, multinational study (NCT01970865) investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without intracranial (IC) metastases. Because patterns of ALK TKI use in Japan differ from other regions, we present a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Patients were enrolled into six expansion (EXP) cohorts based on ALK/ROS1 mutation status and treatment history. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the IC-ORR based on independent central review. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic evaluations. At data cutoff, 39 ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged Japanese patients were enrolled across the six expansion cohorts; all received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Thirty-one ALK-rearranged patients previously treated with ≥1 ALK TKI (EXP2 to EXP5) were evaluable for ORR and 15 were evaluable for IC-ORR. The ORR and the IC-ORR for Japanese patients in EXP2-5 were 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0-72.7) and 46.7% (95% CI: 21.3-73.4), respectively. Among patients who had received prior alectinib only (EXP3B), the ORR was 42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9-81.6). The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was hypercholesterolemia (79.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common grade 3/4 TRAE (25.6%). Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profiles among Japanese patients were similar to those in non-Japanese patients. Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses and IC responses among ALK-rearranged Japanese patients with NSCLC who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Pyrazoles

Several anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of EML4-ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer, with the newer generation agents brigatinib, alectinib and lorlatinib showing pronounced central nervous system activities. Intracranial efficacy is an important feature for these agents, as metastatic lesions frequently occur in the central nervous system in the ALK-positive setting. Here, we report on an updated case of a patient who received her diagnosis in 2005 and has had disease progression with new lesions on six occasions over the last 8 years. During the first two progressions, only local recurrence was observed. After that, the lungs stayed clear and the patient progressed exclusively in the brain and spinal cord. Initial treatments consisted of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In 2012, ALK-directed targeted therapy became available, and crizotinib was administered. The treatment was switched to brigatinib 3 years later because of spinal cord lesions. Brigatinib induced partial remission and was followed by lorlatinib and, later on, alectinib, when new metastases arose in the spinal cord and brain. Each of these drugs promoted complete remission of the recent lesions. In November 2018, imaging showed multiple cerebral metastases. As radiotherapy was not an option because of previous irradiation, and as chemotherapy cannot be expected to be active in the brain, the patient underwent brigatinib rechallenge, which led to partial remission. All of the central nervous system relapses were symptomatic, with symptoms resolved rapidly during treatment. This case of a patient with EML4-ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer shows that sequential treatment with next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including rechallenge, can induce profound remission even in heavily pretreated patients, especially if the central nervous system is the site of progression.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Organophosphorus Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Remission Induction; Spinal Cord Neoplasms

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Meningeal Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Spinal Cord Neoplasms; Sulfones; Treatment Outcome

Oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown significant benefit in the management of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients will experience disease progression after front-line ALK-TKIs such as crizotinib. Treatment with third generation ALK-TKI lorlatinib can have a significant clinical impact following disease progression, even in patients with a very poor performance status. Here, we review two clinical cases with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC who had pulmonary disease control with first-generation ALK inhibitor. However, disease progressed rapidly in the central nervous system with severe neurological symptoms. Treatment with lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK-TKI, led to a rapid radiological and clinical cerebral response in both patients. Lorlatinib can overcome ALK resistance to crizotinib, and the presented cases suggest a potential role for lorlatinib in patients with rapidly progressive cerebral and leptomeningeal metastases.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrazoles; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND ALK gene rearrangements as oncogenic drivers have been described in many cancers, including inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (IMS). The first-generation ALK inhibitor was limited in its ability to cross the blood-brain-barrier to treat brain metastasis. Drug-resistance invariably develops over time in ALK-rearranged tumors, which leads to disease progression. The newer generations of ALK inhibitors are designed to have higher potency in ALK inhibition and improved CNS penetration. CASE REPORT We report a rare case of pulmonary IMS with ALK-1 gene rearrangement and multiple brain metastases as initial presentation. After the primary lung tumor and the larger brain metastases were resected, control of residual CNS disease and subsequent progression and CNS spread was achieved with favorable clinical response by all three generations of ALK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS ALK inhibitors may be an effective therapy for this rare and unusual form of ALK-1-rearranged cancer, even in the presence of multifocal CNS metastases with leptomeningeal involvement.

Topics: Adolescent; Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Female; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Meningeal Neoplasms; Myofibroblasts; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sarcoma; Sulfones

Data from a phase I study indicate that the investigational ALK inhibitor lorlatinib is active in patients with ALK- or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer, including those with brain metastases. Objective responses were seen among patients with known ALK resistance mutations who had relapsed following treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Treatment Outcome

We report the preclinical evaluation of PF-06463922, a potent and brain-penetrant ALK/ROS1 inhibitor. Compared with other clinically available ALK inhibitors, PF-06463922 displayed superior potency against all known clinically acquired ALK mutations, including the highly resistant G1202R mutant. Furthermore, PF-06463922 treatment led to regression of EML4-ALK-driven brain metastases, leading to prolonged mouse survival, in a superior manner. Finally, PF-06463922 demonstrated high selectivity and safety margins in a variety of preclinical studies. These results suggest that PF-06463922 will be highly effective for the treatment of patients with ALK-driven lung cancers, including those who relapsed on clinically available ALK inhibitors because of secondary ALK kinase domain mutations and/or brain metastases.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Mice; Mutation; Neoplasms; NIH 3T3 Cells; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays