perampanel and Intellectual-Disability

People with severe motor and intellectual disabilities syndrome (SMIDS) have multiple comorbidities and high mortality rates. This study examined whether there is a difference in the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) between patients with drug-resistant epilepsy with or without SMIDS. The study identified 65 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent PER treatment as adjunctive therapy. The 50 % responder rate was 22 % (14/65) overall and 11 % (5/44) in patients with SMIDS versus 43 % (9/21) in patients without SMIDS (p <0.01). Although the overall 50 % responder rate was similar to those of previous reports, PER was less efficacious in the patients with SMIDS; nevertheless, PER was tolerated in the patients with SMIDS.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Japan; Nitriles; Pyridones; Treatment Outcome

Epilepsy prevalence is over 20% for those with ID. It is difficult to diagnose and treat and more likely to be treatment resistant. The evidence informing prescribing is sparse, particularly for new drugs such as perampanel (PMP).. This study seeks to strengthen the research evidence regarding PMP for people with ID by pooling information from two isolated and separately conducted studies: the UK-based Epilepsy Database Register (Ep-ID) and the data from the Kempenhaeghe clinic in the Netherlands.. A single data set of comparable data was created and analysed under agreement and supervision of a UK statistician.. Seizure reduction within twelve months was evident in 62% of Dutch and 47% of UK patients. Retention rates were higher for those in the UK (P = .01) and for patients with moderate to profound ID, whilst side effects were more prominent in the Dutch cohort.. Comparable rates of seizure reduction are in line with estimates for non-ID patients, adding to the evidence suggesting that PMP has a similar impact on those with ID. Taking a European perspective and sharing data across centres can help strengthen the evidence for prescribing antiepileptic drugs in the ID population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Nitriles; Pyridones; Registries; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Young Adult

Antiepileptic drug side effects are frequent, 42% of them corresponding to cosmetic changes. The most frequent effects are weight gain, gingival hyperplasia, and hair loss. Hair changes in texture or colour are rarely reported in the literature. We present a case of hair curling after the introduction of perampanel. A 13-year-old girl with genetically confirmed Pitt-Hopkins syndrome with uncontrolled seizures, while on treatment with levetiracetam and valproic acid, was started on perampanel, reaching seizure control. After a few weeks of the introduction of the new antiepileptic drug, she developed hair curling. Hair curling is a rare cosmetic side effect, reported mainly in patients under valproic acid treatment. Perampanel is a recently introduced pharmaceutical molecule with no prior reports of hair changes as a side effect. There is no clear explanation for this side effect, but it should be discussed with patients taking valproate whenever perampanel is added to the treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Facies; Female; Hair; Humans; Hyperventilation; Intellectual Disability; Nitriles; Pyridones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid

Body weight (BW) gain may be induced by perampanel (PER) administration, similar to the well-known adverse effects of valproic acid and gabapentin. Intellectual disability (ID) and serum PER concentration may be risk factors of BW gain.. This study investigated how ID and serum PER concentration are associated with PER-induced BW gain.. Subjects were 76 patients with epilepsy (41 men, aged 16-70 years). All patients were divided by intelligence quotient (IQ) into no ID (IQ ≥ 70, n = 24), mild to moderate ID (70 > IQ ≥35, n = 31), and severe to profound ID (IQ < 35, n = 21) groups. BW was measured before and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after initiation of PER treatment, and serum PER concentration at 12 months.. BW gains in the mild to moderate ID group at 4, 6, and 12 months were significantly (p <  0.05) higher than in the no ID and in the severe to profound ID groups. At 12 months, BW gain was associated with serum PER concentrations in the no ID (p =  0.034) and the mild to moderate ID (p =  0.001) groups but not in the severe to profound ID group. Multiple linear regression analysis found BW gain at 12 months was positively correlated with the mild to moderate ID group (β = 0.373, p =  0.002) and serum PER concentration (β = 0.241, p =  0.047).. The mild to moderate ID group gained more BW than the no ID group, suggesting that PER-induced food intake was greater due to weaker behavioral control in the mild to moderate ID group. The present study suggests a linear correlation between serum PER concentration and BW change.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Regression Analysis; Time Factors; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To explore the retention rates and the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) by using monthly real life data for a period of 12 months.. Longitudinal outcomes of (PER) usage were assessed using actuarial statistics in an observational nonrandomised multicentre study of 181 people with epilepsy (PWE) refractory to first and second line drugs. Graded seizure outcomes, toxicity and the dose of PER were recorded for each month.. PWE were followed for a mean of 15.1 months. The total cumulative probability for retention on PER at 12 months was 61.7% and for ≥50% improvement was 38.2%. Most improvements in seizure control occurred soon after initiation of PER, 17% by one month, 32% by six months and 38% by twelve months, and mostly at low doses 53% on 2 mg and 90% up to 6 mg. Improvements, when they occurred, were sustained. The most common side effects were neuropsychiatric, occurring in 28%. The emergence of side effects did not appear to be dose related. Although people with intellectual disability (ID) were more likely to remain on PER they did not show improved seizure control and also reported more side effects. Patients treated with VNS and PER had a worse outcome.. Overall around a third of people showed a useful, response to PER therapy. The response to PER is noted usually early in the treatment and for the majority of the patients for doses up to 8 mg.

Topics: Actuarial Analysis; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

There is a shortfall of suitably powered studies to provide evidence for safe prescribing of AEDs to people with Intellectual Disability (ID). We report clinically useful information on differences in response to Perampanel (PER) adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy between ID sub-groups and general population from the UK Ep-ID Research Register.. Pooled retrospective case notes data of consented people with epilepsy (PWE) prescribed PER from 6 UK centres was classified as per WHO guidance into groups of moderate -profound ID, mild ID and General population. Demographics, concomitant AEDs, starting and maximum dosage, exposure length, adverse effects, dropout rates, seizure type and frequency were collected. Group differences were reported as odds ratios estimated from univariable logistic regression models.. Of the 144 PWE (General population 71, Mild ID 48, Moderate to profound ID 48) examined the association between withdrawal and ID type was marginally statistically significant (p=0.07). Moderate to profound ID PWE were less likely to come off PER compared to mild ID (OR=0.19, CI=0.04-0.92, p=0.04). Differences in mental health side effects by groups was marginally statistically significant (p=0.06). Over 50% seizure improvement was seen in 11% of General population, 24% mild ID and 26% Moderate to profound ID.. PER seems safe in PWE with ID. It is better tolerated by PWE with Moderate to profound ID than PWE with higher functioning. Caution is advised when history of mental health problems is present. The standardised approach of the Ep-ID register UK used confirms that responses to AEDs by different ID groups vary between themselves and General population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of this cross-sectional retrospective study was to assess the tolerability and efficacy of perampanel in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who also suffered from intellectual disability (ID).. We used an industry-independent, non-interventional retrospective evaluation based on standardized, daily seizure records. Twenty-seven patients with ID and drug-resistant epilepsy were started on perampanel between September 2012 and November 2015 after a 3-month observation period without perampanel treatment. Perampanel was given at a maximum dosage of 4-12 mg daily. Evaluation was carried out after 6, 12 and 24 months, including calculation of the retention rate. Mean seizure frequency was compared between the 3-month baseline period and subsequent 3-month treatment periods. The Clinical Global Impression scale was applied to assess qualitative changes in seizure severity, and the Aggressive Behaviour Scale (ABS) gave further insights into challenging behaviour.. Perampanel was efficacious and well tolerated in five of 25 patients. In 18 patients, perampanel treatment was stopped, mainly because of adverse events (n=6), lack of efficacy (n=3) or both (n=9). Behavioural changes were documented in 15 of 27 patients, with aggressive behaviour being the commonest effect; we observed ataxia (n=6) and sedation (n=8) in further patients. The ABS showed worsening of aggressive behaviour in six patients.. Perampanel was well tolerated and efficacious in one-fifth of our patients. We observed challenging behaviour, ataxia and sedation in a relevant number of patients with ID under perampanel treatment. Further studies are warranted to explore the tolerability of perampanel in patients with ID.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Behavior; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Initial registration studies of perampanel (PMP), an AMPA receptor antagonist, have now been followed up by 'clinical' studies that confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with refractory epilepsy. Publications on the use of PMP among patients with intellectual disability (ID) are still limited. This study extends our knowledge with respect to the relevance of PMP for patients with both ID and epilepsy, and furthermore specifies the behavioral side effects of PMP in this specific population.. Retrospective evaluation of medical records at 3, 6 and 12months of follow-up after the initial start of PMP.. 62 patients were included. 21 patients (33.9%) were female. All patients had complete data of 6months follow-up and we were able to review 42 patients with a 1-year follow-up. Level of ID varied from borderline to profound, and mild ID was most common (43.5%). The mean maximum daily dosage of PMP was 5.6mg (range 1-12mg). Retention rates for PMP were 87.1% and 67.7% after three and six months. A trend indicated a longer mean retention time in patients with a more severe ID (borderline-mild-moderate ID: 205days, severe-profound ID: 275days). Seizure reduction was achieved in 53.2%. 36 patients (58.1%) experienced adverse effects, 80.6% of those within 3months. 45.2% of the patients experienced somatic adverse effects. Most common were fatigue & sleep problems, motor problems & unsteadiness, and gastrointestinal problems. Behavioral adverse effects were present in 40.3%. Most common were aggression, agitated behavior, disruptive behavior, and mood symptoms. Reasons for discontinuation of PMP were lack of efficacy in 14.8%, intolerable adverse effects in 44.4%, and a combination of both in 40.7%. Altogether, 24.2% (15/62) of the patients achieved seizure reduction without experiencing adverse effects, though none reached seizure freedom.. The use of PMP might lead to an effective seizure reduction without adverse effects in a minority of patients with both epilepsy and ID. Pre-existing behavioral problems or polypharmacy do not predict the occurrence of additional behavioral adverse effects, implying that these patients need not be excluded from the introduction of PMP when clinically indicated. Patients should, ideally, be monitored at a multidisciplinary clinic.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Receptors, AMPA; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult