peptones and Escherichia-coli-Infections

The detection of Salmonella spp. in food samples is regulated by the ISO 6579:2002 standard, which requires that precise procedures are followed to ensure the reliability of the detection process. This standard requires buffered peptone water as a rich medium for the enrichment of bacteria. However, the effects of different brands of buffered peptone water on the identification of microorganisms by Raman spectroscopy are unknown. In this regard, our study evaluated the discrimination between two bacterial species, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, inoculated and analyzed with six of the most commonly used buffered peptone water brands. The results showed that bacterial cells behaved differently according to the brand used in terms of biomass production and the spectral fingerprint. The identification accuracy of the analyzed strains was between 85% and 100% depending on the given brand. Several batches of two brands were studied to evaluate the classification rates between the analyzed bacterial species. The chemical analysis performed on these brands showed that the nutrient content was slightly different and probably explained the observed effects. On the basis of these results, Raman spectroscopy operators are encouraged to select an adequate culture medium and continue its use throughout the identification process to guarantee optimal recognition of the microorganism of interest.

Topics: Bacterial Typing Techniques; Buffers; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Humans; Peptones; Salmonella enterica; Spectrum Analysis, Raman; Water

In an in vitro model using HEp-2 cells treated with purified plasmid-encoded toxin (Pet), we have identified morphological changes characterized by cell rounding and detachment after toxin internalization; these changes progress to cell death. However, these effects have not yet been shown to occur during the infection of epithelial cells by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC). Here, we show that the secretion of Pet by EAEC is regulated at the transcriptional level, since secretion was inhibited in eukaryotic cell culture medium, although Pet was efficiently secreted in the same medium supplemented with tryptone. Inefficient secretion of Pet by EAEC in DMEM prevented cell detachment, whereas efficient Pet secretion in DMEM/tryptone increased cell detachment in a HEp-2 cell adherence assay. Interestingly, Pet toxin was efficiently delivered to epithelial cells, since it was internalized into epithelial cells infected with EAEC at similar concentrations to those obtained by using 37 microg ml(-1) purified Pet protein. Additionally, Pet was not internalized when the epithelial cells were infected with a pet clone, HB101(pCEFN1), unlike the wild-type strain, which has a high adherence capability. There is a correlation between Pet secretion by EAEC, the internalization of Pet into epithelial cells, cell detachment and cell death in EAEC-infected cells. The ratio between live and dead cells decreased in cells treated with wild-type EAEC in comparison with cells treated with an isogenic mutant in the pet gene, whereas the effects were restored by complementing the mutant with the pet gene. All these data indicate that Pet is an important virulence factor in the pathogenesis of EAEC infection.

Topics: Bacterial Toxins; Cell Adhesion; Cell Death; Cell Line; Culture Media; Enterotoxins; Epithelial Cells; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Escherichia coli Proteins; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Peptones; RNA, Bacterial; Serine Endopeptidases; Transcriptional Activation; Up-Regulation; Virulence; Virulence Factors