pep005 and Pain

Background: Actinic keratosis (AK) can affect large skin areas. Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) gel (0.015% and 0.05%) is approved for topical treatment of AK in a single contiguous area of ~25 cm2.

Objective: The study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, and tolerability of IngMeb applied to AK on a contiguous area less than equal to 250 cm2.

Methods: Part 1 determined the MTD of IngMeb at 7 concentrations for 2 or 3 days. Part 2 assessed efficacy and tolerability at the MTD and one dose lower for 2 or 3 days vs vehicle.

Results: Four dosing regimens with an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio were identified: 0.018% and 0.027% once daily for 2 or 3 days. Complete clearance at 8 weeks was achieved by 21.3% to 39.1% of IngMeb-treated patients vs 0% to 3.2% treated with vehicle. Composite local skin response scores peaked on the day after the last application, rapidly declined, and were near baseline at 2 weeks. Adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate.

Limitations: The study evaluated a limited number of doses in a population of only white patients.

Conclusion: IngMeb gel was effective and well tolerated as field treatment of AK on the full face, full scalp, and up to 250 cm2 on the chest.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(5):438-444.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Diterpenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Face; Female; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pruritus; Scalp; Thorax; Treatment Outcome

Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR).. We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to assess efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction in patients with severe photodamage.. In this blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with multiple AK and field cancerization of the face or scalp were treated in 2 areas with IngMeb (0.015%) daily for 3 days. After finalized IngMeb treatment, 1 area was randomized to receive topical clobetasol propionate (0.05%) twice daily for 4 days. Assessments included LSR (0-24; days 1, 4, 8, 15, 57), pain (0-10) and pruritus (0-3; days 1-15), AK clearance (days 15, 57), and cosmetic outcome (0-3; day 57).. Clobetasol propionate application had no influence on LSR (P = .939), pain (P = .500), pruritus (P = .312), or AK cure rate (P = .991). Overall, IngMeb cleared 86% of all AK lesions, exerting a therapeutic effect on all AK severity grades; cure rates were 88%, 70%, and 60% for grade I, II, and III AK, respectively. Skin texture improved significantly in remedied areas (2.0 vs 1.0; P < .001); no hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, or scarring were observed.. These results do not provide safety and efficacy beyond 2 months of follow-up.. Application of clobetasol propionate does not alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR after 3 days of IngMeb treatment.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clobetasol; Denmark; Diterpenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Facial Dermatoses; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gels; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pruritus; Risk Assessment; Scalp Dermatoses; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the safety of two applications of PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) gel in superficial basal cell carcinoma. Efficacy was a secondary end-point.. Randomized, vehicle-controlled, phase IIa study conducted at eight private dermatology clinics in Australia. A total of 60 patients with histologically confirmed superficial basal cell carcinoma (lesion size, 4-15 mm) were randomized to treatment on days 1 and 2 (Arm A) or days 1 and 8 (Arm B) and, within each arm, to ingenol mebutate gel, 0.0025%, 0.01% or 0.05%, or vehicle gel. The main outcome measures were the incidence and severity of adverse events and local skin responses in Arms A and B; lesion clearance at day 85 was a secondary measure.. The incidence of adverse events was low. One patient treated with ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% in Arm A experienced severe flaking/scaling/dryness extending beyond the application site. Non-severe, potentially treatment-related events included erythema extending beyond the application site, application-site pain and headache in two patients each. Six patients in Arm A had one or more severe local skin responses. Efficacy appeared to be dose-related and there was a trend towards higher clinical and histological lesion clearance rates in Arm A compared with Arm B. Histological clearance occurred in five of eight patients (63%) randomized to ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% in Arm A.. Two applications of ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%, are safe and have efficacy in patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Diterpenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Gels; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Remission Induction; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Anogenital warts (AGW) can cause physical discomfort and decreased quality of life. Recent case reports suggest that ingenol mebutate gel might be an effective treatment of AGW.. To explore primarily the safety, and secondarily the efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% in patients with AGW.. This was an exploratory, open-label, 1-arm trial of ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% administered up to three times to patients with AGW. Safety was assessed by occurrence and severity of local skin reactions (LSRs) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was assessed by complete clearance and reduction in AGW count 14 days after last treatment, and recurrence 12 weeks after clearance.. Of 41 patients enrolled, 40 received treatment and 26 completed the trial. Patients had a median AGW count of 11.0 and AGW duration of 3.0 years at baseline. All patients experienced transient LSRs following treatment with a maximum composite LSR score of 7.5 (on a scale from 0 to 18). A total of 93% of patients reported treatment-related AEs, most frequently pain (85%) and procedural complications (35%) due to smearing of the gel. 78% of patients took mild analgesics for the pain, typically for 1-2 days following treatment. The majority of AEs were of moderate-to-severe intensity. Seventeen of 39 patients (43.6%) had complete clearance 14 days after last treatment, and AGW count was reduced by 90.9%. There was a tendency towards lower clearance rate in patients with longer duration of AGW. Eight of 14 patients (57.1%) had AGW recurrence 12 weeks after clearance.. Ingenol mebutate gel was associated with a high number of AEs and withdrawals due to painful local and adjacent skin reactions. Furthermore, it showed promising efficacy in reducing AGW despite a difficult-to-treat population. Optimization of the formulation is warranted to improve the safety profile of the treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Anus Diseases; Blister; Condylomata Acuminata; Diterpenes; Edema; Erythema; Female; Gels; Genital Diseases, Female; Genital Diseases, Male; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Skin Ulcer; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer in Caucasians today. Incidence rates in Europe have increased steadily since the 1960s and more than tripled over the last 50 years. Despite primary preventative efforts, incidences of non-melanoma skin cancer continue to rise and development of effective chemopreventative strategies is needed. In 2013, ingenol mebutate was approved in Denmark as a new topical drug for field-directed treatment for actinic keratoses. Ingenol mebutate has a dual mechanism of action, causing initial cell death, followed by an immune activation. The treatment induces an acute inflammation, manifesting as local skin responses, often accompanied by pain and pruritus. The severity of local skin responses for a given patient is unpredictable, and some individuals may develop insufferable inflammation. The overall aim of the thesis was to investigate if ingenol mebutate could be used as a chemopreventive agent to prevent development of non-melanoma skin cancer with minimal side effects. Specific aims included: Determine if ingenol mebutate can prevent progression of histological photodamage and squamous cell carcinoma (murine). Determine if ingenol mebutate can reverse clinical actinic damage in patients with multiple actinic keratoses and fieldcancerized skin (clinical). Determine if a topical glucocorticoid (clobetasol propionate) can reduce ingenol mebutate-induced local skin responses, pain, and pruritus without compromising the treatment efficacy (murine clinical). In two in vivo murine studies, ingenol mebutate's effect on photodamage and squamous cell carcinoma formation was investigated. Mice were irradiated with solar simulated ultraviolet radiation. During the first 20 weeks, 5 single applications with ingenol mebutate were given at four-week intervals with and without concurrent application of clobetasol propionate. Prophylactic treatments with ingenol mebutate prevented progression of histological photodamage of all investigated characteristics, including keratosis grade, epidermal hypertrophy, dysplasia, and dermal actinic damage. In addition, tumor formation was postponed by 3 weeks. In the clinical trial, patients with multiple actinic keratoses and field-cancerized skin were treated with ingenol mebutate, according to label, with and without sequential application of clobetasol propionate. Ingenol mebutate treatments were found to clear overall 86% of all actinic keratoses, exerting a therapeutic effe

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Denmark; Dermatologic Agents; Diterpenes; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; Mice; Pain; Pruritus; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Ultraviolet Rays