pci-32765 and Smith-Magenis-Syndrome

Two major advances were made in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): the addition of the antibody rituximab to chemotherapy two decades ago and the introduction of the targeted agents during the last few years. Four targeted drugs with different mechanisms of action were added to the armamentarium of CLL treatment: the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab, the two kinase inhibitors ibrutinib and idelalisib, which target the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and Phosphatidylinositiol-3-Kinase (PI3K) respectively in the B-cell receptor signalling pathway, as well as the Bcl2-antagonist venetoclax.Recently, the combination of venetoclax/obinutuzumab was approved for the first-line treatment of all CLL patients based on a phase-III trial in elderly unfit patients. This combination was shown to be clearly superior to chlorambucil/obinutuzumab and should become the preferred first-line treatment for the so called "slow-go" patients. Other options for these elderly, unfit patients are continuous ibrutinib or chlorambucil/obinutuzumab. Although data from phase-III studies are not yet available, venetoclax/obintuzumab may also be offered to younger, fit patients. Established therapeutic options for these so called "go go" patients are ibrutinib, fludarabin/cyclophosphamide/rituximab or bendemustine/rituximab (if > 65 years). Patients with the high-risk parameters deletion 17p or TP53mutation are known to poorly respond to chemo(immuno)therapy and should receive either ibrutinib or venetoclax/obinutuzumab.Thus, a choice has to be made between a continuous monotherapy with ibrutinib or a time-limited combination with either venetoclax/obinutuzumab (12 months) or chemoimmunotherapy (usually 6 months). In addition to disease-related factors (e. g. presence of deletion 17p/TP53 mutation, IgHV mutational status, prior therapies), comorbidities, co-medication and the specific side effects of the CLL therapies (myelosuppression, infections and secondary malignancies for chemoimmunotherapy; cardiac toxicity, bleeding and autoimmune disease for ibrutinib; tumour-lysis syndromes and infections for venetoclax) the patient's expectations need to be considered.. Die Aktualisierung der IWCLL-Kriterien ließ die Kriterien für die Diagnosestellung der CLL unberührt: In der Regel genügt weiterhin ein Blutausstrich und eine Immunphänotypisierung.. Auch die Kriterien für die Therapieeinleitung blieben unverändert: Nur Patienten mit symptomatischer, fortgeschrittener Erkrankung sollen behandelt werden. Die Untersuchung auf Vorliegen einer Deletion 17p und/oder TP53-Mutation als wichtigster ungünstiger Prognosefaktor und prädiktiver Faktor ist essenziell vor Einleitung jeder neuen Therapie. Die Bedeutung des Mutationsstatus der variablen Region des Immunglobulin-Schwerkettengens (IgHV) hat deutlich zugenommen.. Die Kombination des Bcl2-Antagonisten Venetoclax mit dem Antikörper Obinutuzumab wurde kürzlich für die Erstlinientherapie der CLL zugelassen. Aufgrund der klaren Überlegenheit gegenüber Chlorambucil/Obinutuzumab bei den unfitten, älteren Patienten sollte Venetoclax/Obinutuzumab von nun an die bevorzugte Behandlungsoption bei dieser Patientengruppe sein. Als Chemotherapie-freie und zeitlich limitierte Behandlung wird Venetoclax/Obinutuzumab auch bei den Hochrisikopatienten mit Deletion 17p/TP53-Mutation und bei den jüngeren, fitten Patienten künftig eine wichtige Option neben der Dauertherapie mit Ibrutinib darstellen. Bei Letzteren kann bei Vorliegen eines mutierten IgHV-Status auch eine Chemoimmuntherapie mit Rituximab, kombiniert mit Fliudarabin/Cyclophosphamid oder Bendamustin, erfolgen.. Auch in der Rezidiv-Situation werden vorzugsweise die zielgerichteten Substanzen eingesetzt unter Berücksichtigung der zyto- und molekulargenetischen Risikofaktoren der CLL, der Patientencharakteristiken, der Tiefe und Dauer des Ansprechens sowie Verträglichkeit der vorangegangenen Therapie(n).

Topics: Adenine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Comorbidity; Drug Approval; Humans; Immunotherapy; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Neoplasm Staging; Piperidines; Prognosis; Purines; Quinazolinones; Rituximab; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Sulfonamides

More effective therapies are emerging, with better toxicity profiles, and are being incorporated into modern treatment algorithms of chronic lymphocytic leukemia at various stages of the disease, including for patients harboring Del17p and/or aberrant TP53. Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, has demonstrated impressive response rates in the relapsed/refractory setting, including in the setting of Del17p and/or TP53 mutations. Venetoclax, an inhibitor of BCL-2 known to play an important role in regulating cell death, has been approved recently for treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with Del17p who have received at least one prior therapy. Unfortunately, a cure remains unattainable unless eligible patients are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. However, hematopoietic cell allografting is limited by the availability of suitable donors and significant morbidity and mortality. Recent clinical practice recommendations by the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation have relegated the role of transplantation to later stages of the disease. In patients with evidence of Richter syndrome, frontline consolidation allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the most desirable approach owing to the limited activity of ibrutinib or other novel therapies. Further therapeutic advances would require enrolling these patients in large clinical trials that evaluate novel therapies alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapies or even in the setting of posttransplant consolidation/maintenance.

Topics: Adenine; Allografts; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Sulfonamides; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

The emergence of targeted therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has permanently altered the therapeutic landscape. In both upfront and relapsed settings, safe and effective oral kinase inhibitors are available which rival the responses and durability seen with standard chemo immunotherapy regimens. In 2016, ibrutinib was granted Federal Drug Administration approval for first-line therapy in patients with CLL. While its role as initial therapy for older, unfit or deleted 17p CLL patients is less controversial, its role as first-line treatment for younger fit patients is less clear, begging the question, what is the optimal treatment for these patients, novel agents or standard CIT strategies? In this review, we aim to provide guidance for what we believe is the optimal management of young fit patients with CLL.

Topics: Adenine; Age Factors; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Humans; Immunotherapy; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Smith-Magenis Syndrome

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has changed dramatically in the last few years. The role of chemoimmunotherapy has declined significantly for patients with CLL. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab chemotherapy remains the standard frontline therapy for young fit patients with CLL, especially if

Topics: Adenine; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chlorambucil; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Rituximab; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Vidarabine

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the commonest leukemia in western countries. The disease typically occurs in elderly patients and has a highly variable clinical course. Leukemic transformation is initiated by specific genomic alterations that impair apoptosis of clonal B cells.. The diagnosis is established by blood counts, blood smears, and immunophenotyping of circulating B lymphocytes, which identify a clonal B-cell population carrying the CD5 antigen and B-cell markers.. Two prognostic staging systems exist, the Rai and Binet staging systems, which are established by physical examination and blood counts. Various biological and genetic markers also have prognostic value. Deletions of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del(17p)) and/or mutations of the TP53 gene predict resistance to available chemotherapies. A comprehensive prognostic score (CLL-IPI) using genetic, biological, and clinical variables has recently been developed allowing to classify CLL into very distinct risk groups.. Patients with active or symptomatic disease or with advanced Binet or Rai stages require therapy. For physically fit patients, chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab remains the current standard therapy. For unfit patients, currently available evidence supports two options for a first-line therapy: chlorambucil combined with an anti-CD20 antibody (obinutuzumab or rituximab or ofatumumab) or a continuous therapy with ibrutinib. At relapse, the initial treatment may be repeated, if the treatment-free interval exceeds 3 years. If the disease relapses earlier, therapy should be changed using alternative agents such as bendamustine (plus rituximab), alemtuzumab, lenalidomide, ofatumumab, ibrutinib, idelalisib, or venetoclax. Patients with a del(17p) or TP53 mutation can be treated with ibrutinib, venetoclax, or a combination of idelalisib and rituximab. An allogeneic SCT may be considered in relapsing patients with TP53 mutations or del(17p) or patients that are refractory to chemoimmunotherapy and the novel inhibitors.. The new agents (ibrutinib, idelalisib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab) hold the potential to significantly improve the outcome of CLL patients. However, their optimal use (in terms of combination, sequence, and duration) remains unknown. Therefore, CLL patients should be treated in clinical trials whenever possible.

Topics: Adenine; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Risk Assessment; Rituximab; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

With the recent approval of several effective and well-tolerated novel agents (NAs), including ibrutinib, idelalisib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab, patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have more therapeutic options than ever before. The availability of these agents is both an important advance for patients but also a challenge for practicing hematologist/oncologists to learn how best to sequence NAs, both with respect to chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and to other NAs. The sequencing of NAs in clinical practice should be guided both by an individual patient's prognostic markers, such as FISH and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (

Topics: Adenine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Quinazolinones; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Sulfonamides

Novel therapies targeting various kinases downstream of the B-cell receptor have emerged along with monoclonal antibodies and BCL-2 antagonists, and are changing the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, cure remains unattainable unless eligible patients are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has expanded considerably with availability of reduced intensity conditioning regimens which is capable offering durable remissions even in poor-risk disease. Encouraging data from ibrutinib and venetoclax in Del17p is challenging the notion of disease eradication as the ultimate therapeutic goal to a new concept of merely disease control. By favoring the non-transplant approach, patients should be aware that there are no established salvage therapies, yet, to rescue disease progression after ibrutinib. When disease eradication is the desirable approach, a reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant is the preferred choice at this time.

Topics: Adenine; Allografts; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Neoplasm; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Sulfonamides

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with deletion 17p [del(17p)] have poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy. Ibrutinib is indicated for the treatment of CLL/SLL, including del(17p) CLL/SLL, and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. This integrated analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes in 230 patients with relapsed/refractory del(17p) CLL/SLL from three ibrutinib studies. With a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-12), 18% and 79% of evaluable patients had del(11q) or unmutated IGHV, respectively. With a median follow-up of 28 months, overall response rate was 85% and estimated 30-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50-64] and 69% (95% CI 61-75), respectively. Patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase or no bulky disease had the most favourable survival outcomes. Sustained haematological improvements in haemoglobin, platelet count and absolute neutrophil count occurred in 61%, 67% and 70% of patients with baseline cytopenias, respectively. New onset severe cytopenias and infections decreased in frequency over time. Progression-free and overall survival with ibrutinib surpass those of other therapies for patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL. These results provide further evidence of the robust clinical activity of ibrutinib in difficult-to-treat CLL/SLL populations.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Recurrence; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Survival Rate

We performed a retrospective study comparing treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with the advent of ibrutinib to provide current real-world data.. Using a provincial population-based database, we analyzed CLL patients who received upfront treatment in British Columbia before ibrutinib availability (1984-2014), during ibrutinib access for: relapse only (2014-2015) and for upfront treatment of patients (with 17p deletion or unfit for chemotherapy) (2015-2016). Analysis included up to third-line treatment.. Of 1729 patients meeting inclusion criteria (median age, 66 years; 1466, period 1; 140, period 2; 123, period 3), FR was the most common first-line therapy (35.8 %, 54.3 % and 40.7 %, periods 1-3, respectively) and 18.7 % received ibrutinib upfront in period 3. The most common therapies in relapse were chemoimmunotherapy (36.1 % and 55.6 %, periods 1 and 2, second-line; 29.2 %, period 1, third-line) and ibrutinib (69.8 %, period 3, second-line; 46.4 % and 70.3 %, periods 2 and 3, third-line). OS improved for patients treated in periods 2-3 over period 1 (median OS not reached vs. 11.9 years, p < 0.001; no difference in OS for periods 2-3, p = 0.385).. Ibrutinib has replaced chemoimmunotherapy as the preferred therapy in relapse. Overall survival has improved over time with access to ibrutinib.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; British Columbia; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Cyclophosphamide; Disease Management; Doxorubicin; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm, Residual; Piperidines; Prednisone; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab; Smith-Magenis Syndrome; Survival Analysis; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Vidarabine; Vincristine

Ibrutinib is a novel oral therapy that has shown significant efficacy as initial treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It is a high-cost continuous therapy differing from other regimens that are given for much shorter courses. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib for first-line treatment of CLL in patients older than age 65 years without a 17p deletion. We developed a semi-Markov model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib vs a comparator therapy from a US Medicare perspective. No direct comparison between ibrutinib and the best available treatment alternative, obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (chemoimmunotherapy), exists. Therefore, we compared ibrutinib to a theoretical treatment alternative, which was modeled to confer the effectiveness of an inferior treatment (chlorambucil alone) and the costs and adverse events of chemoimmunotherapy, which would provide ibrutinib with the best chance of being cost-effective. Even so, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ibrutinib vs the modeled comparator was $189 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. To reach a willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of $150 000 per QALY, the monthly cost of ibrutinib would have to be at most $6800, $1700 less than the modeled cost of $8500 per month (a reduction of $20 400 per year). When the comparator efficacy is increased to more closely match that seen in trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy, ibrutinib costs more than $262 000 per QALY gained, and the monthly cost of ibrutinib would need to be lowered to less than $5000 per month to be cost-effective. Ibrutinib is not cost-effective as initial therapy at a WTP threshold of $150 000 per QALY gained.

Topics: Adenine; Aged; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Costs and Cost Analysis; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Smith-Magenis Syndrome

Topics: Adenine; Aged; Allopurinol; Antimetabolites; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Exanthema; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Smith-Magenis Syndrome