pazopanib and Ovarian-Neoplasms

Patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer often have poor prognoses, and their optimal treatment regimen remains unclear. Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable strategy for treating ovarian cancer, and the drug pazopanib is a potent, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, treatment with pazopanib in combination with chemotherapy remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and side effects of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials published up to September 2, 2022. The primary outcomes of eligible studies included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, 2-year PFS rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 2-year OS rate, and adverse events.. Outcomes from a total of 518 recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer patients from 5 studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Pooled results showed that pazopanib plus chemotherapy, when compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the ORR (pooled risk ratio=1.400; 95% CI, 1.062-1.846; P = 0.017) but not the disease control rate, 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, 1-year OS, or 2-year OS. Moreover, pazopanib increased the risk of neutropenia, hypertension, fatigue, and liver dysfunction.. Pazopanib plus chemotherapy improved patient ORR but did not improve survival; it also increased the occurrence of several adverse events. Further large-sample clinical trials are needed to verify these results to guide pazopanib use in patients with ovarian cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Specific blocking of interactions between ligands and receptors along the angiogenic pathways represents an effective approach for enhancing the efficacy as well as reducing adverse effects of chemotherapy. Over the past decade, there was a rapid progression in the application of this therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment. Anti-angiogenic therapy is the most promising targeted therapy for ovarian cancer. The addition of bevacizumab to conventional chemotherapy, either in the first-line setting or at disease relapse, may improve overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients, at least in a subset of patients with poor prognosis. In this article, we summarize published data on the major agents used for anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancers. We will review the molecular mechanisms, results of clinical trial of existing agents and describe the development of new agents. The limitations and side effects of angiogenesis inhibitor are also discussed.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Niacinamide; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Several 'lines of therapy' that utilize cytotoxic agents and are driven by platinum-free intervals are the current standard of care for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. For patients with platinum-resistant disease, single agent chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel) is the standard of care. For patients with platinum-sensitive disease, combination chemotherapy (carboplatin plus paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or gemcitabine) is the standard of care. In addition, antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab is an established option. Future directions could include 'lines of therapy' with biologic agents driven by specific biologic targets. Data from antiangiogenic agents (trebananib, pazopanib and cediranib), antifolate drugs (farletuzumab and vintafolide), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (olaparib and veliparib), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and immune editing agents (nivolumab) have been summarized in this review.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Deoxycytidine; Doxorubicin; Everolimus; Female; Folic Acid; Gemcitabine; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Nivolumab; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sirolimus; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vinca Alkaloids

The majority of women with ovarian cancer present with advanced disease, and ultimately relapse following primary surgery and platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Despite recent advances in the development of targeted agents in ovarian cancer, survival rates remain poor. The promising activity of bevacizumab, a VEGF receptor inhibitor, has stimulated research on the use of additional anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer. Pazopanib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targets VEGF receptor-1, -2 and -3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α and -β and c-kit; resulting in the inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor proliferation. Early phase studies have demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerability. To date, there has been one Phase III trial of pazopanib in ovarian cancer, demonstrating a progression-free survival benefit in women treated with maintenance pazopanib following primary surgery and systemic therapy. This article summarizes the preclinical and clinical data of pazopanib in ovarian cancer, highlighting future research options for this agent.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the USA. EOC is an exquisitely chemo-sensitive disease with response rates of over 75% in the upfront setting. Despite this, due to high rates of recurrence and development of chemo-resistance, the overall survival of EOC remains about 25%. Thus, there is a great need for new therapeutic approaches to render more durable responses. Based on preclinical and early phase clinical studies, key targeted pathways include targets that drive angiogenesis and chemo-resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases and non-receptor tyrosine kinases play important roles in these processes and several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in clinical development.. This review summarizes clinical rationale, mechanisms of action and clinical data for the TKIs under evaluation in the Phase III setting for EOC.. Despite reasonable preclinical activity, small molecule TKIs are unlikely to improve patient survival as single agent therapies in an unselected EOC population. Incorporation of tissue evaluation during ongoing clinical trials is required to identify molecularly defined groups that respond to single agents and direct rational combination strategies based on mechanisms of resistance to improve outcomes in EOC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzodioxoles; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Sulfonamides

Pazopanib has promising antiangiogenetic activity in solid cancers. The investigator-initiated phase I/II trial evaluated the combination of Topotecan with Pazopanib in platinum-resistant or intermediate-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).. Patients (≥ 18 years) with first or second recurrence were enrolled in this multicentre open-label trial. Phase I analysed Topotecan 4 mg/m. Between June 2012 and February 2017, 11 patients were enrolled in the phase I, and 50 patients in the phase II study. The MTD of Pazopanib was determined by 400 mg/daily. Haematological and liver toxicities determined the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and the most common grade 3-4 adverse events: leucopenia (25%), neutropenia (22%), thrombocytopenia (19%), accumulation of cholestatic (20%) and hepatocellular damage (15%), which often caused dose modifications, but no new life-threatening events. Overall response was 16% and clinical benefit rate 68%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.0-5.0). Due to early progression only 20% of the patients were able to start with maintenance treatment.. The combination of pazopanib and weekly topotecan is feasible, resulting in a manageable haematological and liver toxicity, but despite its encouraging response rate, was not associated with a significant survival benefit.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum; Topotecan

Treatment of patients with platinum resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an unmet need. We evaluated the role of oral metronomic therapy in this setting.. Between October 2017 and September 2019 seventy five patients with platinum resistant/refractory EOC were enrolled. Patients received oral etoposide (50 mg, day 1 to 14, cyclophosphamide 50 mg, day 1 to 28, every 4 weeks (Arm A, n = 38). Patients in Arm- B (n = 37) received Pazopanib (400 mg once daily) in addition to etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the EORTC questionnaire. Serum VEGF and PDGF were estimated at baseline, after 3rd and 6th cycle. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity and QoL.. Patients characteristics were well matched. Median PFS was higher in arm B, 5.1 months (95% CI 3.13 to10.33) compared to 3.4 months (95% CI 3.0 to 6.53) in arm A, p = 0.045. Median OS has 'not reached' in Arm B compared to 11.2 months (95% CI, 5.66 - not reached) in arm A, p = 0.032. Therapy was tolerated well; oral mucositis (p = 0.36) and fatigue (p = 0.08) being more in arm B. QoL assessment revealed modest improvement in 'symptom scales' in Arm B. Serum VEGF and PDGF levels decreased with therapy in both arms (Arm A-p < 0.0001, Arm B-p < 0.016).. Addition of pazopanib to etoposide and cyclophosphamide could be a novel oral combination for metronomic therapy for platinum resistant/refractory EOC.. CTRI/2017/10/010219.

Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Etoposide; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides

Angiogenesis is a driver of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. We assessed the effect of combination pazopanib and paclitaxel followed by maintenance pazopanib in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. Integrins α. We conducted an open-label, phase Ib study in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. Patients received 1 week of single-agent pazopanib (800 mg daily) followed by combination therapy with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m. Fourteen patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Complete and partial responses were seen in seven patients (54%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.63 months, and overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months. Baseline [. Combination therapy followed by maintenance pazopanib is effective and tolerable in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. [

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Peptides; Polyethylene Glycols; Positron-Emission Tomography; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Vascular co-option is a resistance mechanism to anti-angiogenic agents, but combinations of anti-vascular agents may overcome this resistance. We report a phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial to determine the safety and efficacy of pazopanib with fosbretabulin.. Eligible patients had recurrent, epithelial ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval (PFI) of 3 to 12 months. Patients were stratified according to PFI (>6 versus ≤6 months) and prior bevacizumab use.. It remains unclear whether pazopanib with with fosbretabulin is an efficacious regimen to treat epithelial ovarian cancer. Effective cardiac risk mitigation is needed to increase the tolerability and maximize patient safety in future trials.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cardiotoxicity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrimidines; Stilbenes; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate

The AGO-OVAR16 study was designed to test the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pazopanib maintenance after first-line chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).. Nine hundred and forty patients with histologically confirmed AOC, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-IV, were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800 mg pazopanib once daily or placebo for up to 24 months, unless there was disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint (investigator-assessed progression-free survival [PFS]) was met and previously reported. The results of final analyses of overall survival (OS) are reported here.. A third OS interim analysis showed futility and led to study closure and a final OS analysis after last patient last visit. At the time of the final OS analysis, 494 (89.7% of the planned 551) events had occurred. No difference was observed in OS between pazopanib and placebo. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.960 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.805-1.145), and the median OS from randomization was 59.1 months in pazopanib and 64.0 months in placebo arms. For the East Asian patients, similar to the first three interim OS analyses, a numerical negative trend was observed favoring placebo (HR, 1.332; 95% CI: 0.863-2.054). Exploratory analyses showed a trend for a longer time to first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death with pazopanib over placebo (HR, 0.829; 95% CI: 0.713-0.965), with a median estimate of 19.0 and 14.5 months, respectively. No new safety signals were observed.. Although pazopanib prolonged PFS, this was not associated with improvement in median OS.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00866697.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer deaths in the United States. Pazopanib is an oral, multitarget kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptors α and β; and proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (c-KIT).. To estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) of weekly paclitaxel and pazopanib compared with weekly paclitaxel and placebo in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives included frequency and severity of adverse events, proportion responding, and overall survival (OS) in each arm. Translational research objectives included exploring the association between possible biomarkers and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in vascular endothelial growth factor A, interleukin 8, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; and PFS, OS, and proportion responding.. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study was conducted at 26 participating institutions. Patients were enrolled between December 12, 2011, and April 22, 2013. Data were frozen on August 11, 2014. Participants were patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with 1 to 3 prior regimens and performance status of 0 to 2. One hundred six patients enrolled; 100 were evaluable for toxic effects.. All patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days and were randomized 1:1 to pazopanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo.. The primary end point was PFS. The study was designed to detect a 37.5% reduction in the hazard with 80% power (α = 10%).. A total of 106 women (median age [range], 61 [35-87] years; 88 [83%] white) were enrolled. Study arms were well balanced for age, performance status, measurable disease, and prior bevacizumab. Proportion responding was 14 of 44 (31.8%) vs 10 of 44 (22.7%) for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone. Median PFS was 7.5 vs 6.2 months for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone, respectively (HR, 0.84; 90% CI, 0.57-1.22; P = .20). Median OS was 20.7 vs 23.3 months for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone (HR, 1.04; 90% CI, 0.60-1.79; P = .90). Severe hypertension was more common on the pazopanib plus paclitaxel arm (relative risk, 12.0; 95% CI, 1.62-88.84). More patients discontinued treatment on the paclitaxel arm for disease progression (34 of 52 [65.4%] vs 17 of 54 [31.5%]), and more on the pazopanib plus paclitaxel arm for adverse events (20 of 54 [37%] vs 5 of 52 [9.6%]). No association was found between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (interleukin 8 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) and OS and proportion responding. Patients with VEGFA CC genotype may be more resistant to weekly paclitaxel than those with the AC or AA genotype, with 1 of 14 (7%), 3 of 15 (20%), and 4 of 8 (50%) responding, respectively.. The combination of pazopanib plus paclitaxel is not superior to paclitaxel in women with recurrent ovarian cancer.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01468909.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Placebos; Progression-Free Survival; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was a secondary end point in AGO-OVAR 16, which randomized 940 patients with EOC after first-line chemotherapy to maintenance pazopanib (PZ) or placebo (P). Additional post hoc analyses were carried out to investigate additional patient-centered end points.. HRQoL was measured with EORTC-QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28 and EQ-5D-3L. Pre-specified end points included mean differences in HRQoL between treatment arms. Exploratory analyses included quality-adjusted progression-free survival (QAPFS), impact of specific symptoms and progressive disease (PD) on HRQoL and time to second-line chemotherapy. The objective was to provide clinical perspective to the significant median PFS gain of 5.6 months with PZ.. There were statistically significant differences between PZ and P in QLQ-C30 global health status [5.5 points; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-10.4, P = 0.024] from baseline to 25 months, but not EQ-5D-3L (0.018 points; 95% CI - 0.033 to 0.069, P = 0.485). The impact of diarrhea was captured in QLQ-OV28 Abdominal/GI-Symptoms scale (8.1 points; 95% CI 3.6-12.5, P = 0.001). QAPFS was 386 days (95% CI 366-404 days) with PZ versus 359 days (95% CI 338-379 days) with placebo (P = 0.052). PD was associated with a decline in HRQoL (P < 0.0001). Median time to second-line chemotherapy was 19.7 months with PZ and 15.0 months with P [hazard ratio (HR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.86, P = 0.0001].. There were small to no significant mean score differences in global HRQoL and EQ5D-3L between PZ and placebo, respectively, despite the increased toxicity of PZ. Exploratory end points including QAPFS, impact of specific symptoms on HRQoL during treatment and at PD help place the PFS gain with PZ in context and interpret the results. Additional patient-centered end points should be considered in trials of maintenance therapy in EOC beyond mean differences in HRQoL scores alone, to support the benefit to patients of prolongation of PFS.. NCT00866697.

Topics: Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides; Time-to-Treatment

The recent phase 3 trial AGO-OVAR16 demonstrated that pazopanib maintenance improved median progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line treatment. However, this improvement was not seen in the subset of East Asian patients. The current analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of pazopanib maintenance in East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 and a separate East Asian study.. East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 (n = 209) and the East Asian study (N = 145) were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg/d or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point for each study was progression-free survival by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) based on investigator assessment. Clinical and genetics data were analyzed separately by study or pooled according to separate predetermined statistical plans.. Pazopanib maintenance had a detrimental effect on median progression-free survival versus placebo in East Asian patients from the combined studies (n = 354; 17.9 vs 21.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.114; 95% confidence interval, 0.818-1.518; P = 0.4928). Pazopanib maintenance showed a disadvantage in overall survival in East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 versus placebo (hazard ratio, 1.706; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-2.883; P = 0.0465); overall survival analysis was not performed in the East Asian study because of insufficient event numbers. Pazopanib-treated patients had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3 or higher hypertension (27%) and neutropenia (13%) versus placebo.. The treatment effect of maintenance pazopanib in East Asian patients seemed to differ from that in non-Asian patients. In study-specific and pooled analyses, none of the potential factors analyzed could satisfactorily explain the different efficacy results of pazopanib in East Asian patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1; Young Adult

The prognosis is poor for patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Evidence suggests that antiangiogenic treatment modalities could play a major role in EOC. A combined therapy consisting of the investigational oral antiangiogenic agent pazopanib and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide may offer a well-tolerable treatment option to patients with recurrent, previously treated EOC.. This study was designed as a multicenter phase I trial evaluating the optimal dose as well as activity and tolerability of pazopanib with metronomic cyclophosphamide in the treatment of patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, previously treated ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Here, 50mg cyclophosphamide were combined with 400 to 800mg pazopanib daily.. Sixteen patients were treated; mean age was 66years. At dose levels (DL) I and II, one instance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in one of 6 patients. At DL III, two of four patients showed a DLT, leading to a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 600mg pazopanib daily. Median number of administered cycles was 6 (2-13), with three patients being treated for at least 13months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.35months and 24.95months, respectively. 155 adverse events (AE) occurred, most frequently elevation of liver enzymes, leukopenia, diarrhea and fatigue. Altogether, five serious adverse events (SAE) developed in four patients.. Pazopanib 600mg daily p.o. and metronomic cyclophosphamide 50mg daily p.o. is a feasible regimen for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant EOC and showed promising activity in this previously treated patient population.. Clin.trial.gov registry no.: NCT01238770.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cyclophosphamide; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Leukopenia; Liver Function Tests; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum Compounds; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

AGO-OVAR 16 demonstrated that pazopanib maintenance therapy significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease had not progressed after first-line therapy. In a sub-study, we evaluated the effect of clinically important germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on PFS.. Of 940 AGO-OVAR 16 participants, 664 had BRCA1/2 exon sequencing data (pazopanib, n=335; placebo, n=329). A Cox model was used to test the association between genetic variants and PFS.. Ninety-seven of 664 patients (15%) carried clinically important BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1/2 carriers: pazopanib 14%, placebo 16%). Median PFS was longer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers than in BRCA1/2 non-carriers in the placebo arm (30.3 vs 14.1 months, hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.78; P=0.0031); a similar non-significant trend was noted with pazopanib (30.2 vs 17.7 months, hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.03; P=0.069). Among BRCA1/2 non-carriers, PFS was longer for pazopanib-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (17.7 vs 14.1 months, hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97; P=0.024). Among BRCA1/2 carriers, there was no significant PFS difference between treatments, although numbers were small (pazopanib, 46; placebo, 51), resulting in a wide CI (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI: 0.66-2.82).. Patients with clinically important BRCA1/2 mutations had better prognosis. BRCA1/2 mutation status might be added as strata in future trials in primary ovarian cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Disease-Free Survival; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Genome-Wide Association Study; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; White People; Young Adult

Analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (AEOC) trials may be confounded by the difficulty of radiologic evaluation of disease progression and the potential for discrepancy between investigator and blinded independent central assessments. PFS as assessed by local investigator (INV) was the primary endpoint of AGO-OVAR16, a randomized, double-blind trial of pazopanib maintenance therapy in AEOC. To confirm the robustness of the primary analysis, PFS was also evaluated by blinded independent central review (BICR).. Patients with histologically confirmed AEOC (N = 940) were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg/day or placebo for up to 24 months. Tumor response in the intent-to-treat population was evaluated by CT/MRI every 6 months and analyzed per RECIST 1.0.. Pazopanib prolonged PFS versus placebo by INV (median 17.9 vs 12.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.766, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.643-0.911; P = 0.0021). Results for PFS by BICR were similar (median 15.4 vs 11.8 months; HR = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.678-0.949; P = 0.0084). Progression events were recorded later by INV in 23% of pazopanib-treated patients and 17% of placebo-treated patients. The overall concordance between INV and BICR assessments was 84% and 86% in the pazopanib and placebo arms, respectively.. By INV and BICR assessments, maintenance therapy with pazopanib in AEOC provided a significantly longer PFS than placebo. The good overall concordance between INV and BICR assessments, as well as HR and P value consistency, supports the reliability of investigator-assessed PFS as the primary endpoint in AGO-OVAR16.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

To investigate the combination of liposomal doxorubicin/pazopanib in advanced relapsed/refractory ovarian cancer.. Twenty-two patients received liposomal doxorubicin/pazopanib. Initial doses (liposomal doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 monthly; pazopanib, 400 mg daily) were too toxic; three subsequent groups received lower doses/altered schedules.. The maximum tolerated doses (MTD) were liposomal doxorubicin, 30 mg/m2, and pazopanib, 400 mg daily. Severe toxicity included neutropenia (18%), rash/desquamation (14%), hypertension (9%), and hand-foot syndrome (9%). Five of the eight patients treated with MTD had grade 3 toxicity during the first two cycles. Dose reductions were frequently required.. Further development of the liposomal doxorubicin/pazopanib combination is not recommended.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Doxorubicin; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable treatment strategy for ovarian cancer. Pazopanib is an anti-angiogenic drug active in ovarian cancer. We assessed the effect of adding pazopanib to paclitaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer.. We did this open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 hospitals in Italy. We included patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer previously treated with a maximum of two lines of chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no residual peripheral neurotoxicity. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) with or without pazopanib 800 mg daily, and stratified by centre, number of previous lines of chemotherapy, and platinum-free interval status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01644825. This report is the final analysis; the trial is completed.. Between Dec 15, 2010, and Feb 8, 2013, we enrolled 74 patients: 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel and pazopanib and 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel only. One patient, in the paclitaxel only group, withdrew from the study and was excluded from analyses. Median follow-up was 16·1 months (IQR 12·5-20·8). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the pazopanib plus paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group (median 6·35 months [95% CI 5·36-11·02] vs 3·49 months [2·01-5·66]; hazard ratio 0·42 [95% CI 0·25-0·69]; p=0·0002). We recorded no unexpected toxic effects or deaths from toxic effects. Adverse events were more common in the pazopanib and paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (11 [30%] in the pazopanib group vs one [3%] in the paclitaxel group), fatigue (four [11%] vs two [6%]), leucopenia (four [11%] vs one [3%]), hypertension (three [8%] vs none [0%]), raised aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (three [8%] vs none), and anaemia (two [5%] vs five [14%]). One patient in the pazopanib group had ileal perforation.. Our findings suggest that a phase 3 study of the combination of weekly paclitaxel plus pazopanib for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer is warranted.. National Cancer Institute of Napoli and GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Italy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Platinum; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours.. Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored.. In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months.. Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Pazopanib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1/-2/-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α/-β, and c-Kit. Preclinical and clinical studies support VEGFR and PDGFR as targets for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. This study evaluated the role of pazopanib maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line chemotherapy.. Nine hundred forty patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, International Federation Gynecology Obstetrics (FIGO) stages II-IV, no evidence of progression after primary therapy consisting of surgery and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once per day or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 assessed by the investigators.. Maintenance pazopanib prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91; P = .0021; median, 17.9 v 12.3 months, respectively). Interim survival analysis based on events in 35.6% of the population did not show any significant difference. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of hypertension (30.8%), neutropenia (9.9%), liver-related toxicity (9.4%), diarrhea (8.2%), fatigue (2.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.9%) were significantly higher in the pazopanib arm. Treatment discontinuation related to adverse events was higher among patients treated with pazopanib (33.3%) compared with placebo (5.6%).. Pazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides

The prognosis of patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is poor. There is no standard treatment available. Emerging evidence suggests a major role for antiangiogenic treatment modalities in EOC, in particular in combination with the metronomic application of low dose chemotherapy. The novel, investigational oral antiangiogenic agent pazopanib targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-kit is currently being studied in different tumour types and is already used as first line therapy in recurrent renal cell carcinoma. A combined therapy consisting of pazopanib and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide may offer a well-tolerable treatment option to patients with recurrent, pretreated EOC.. This study is designed as a multicenter phase I/II trial evaluating the optimal dose for pazopanib (phase I) as well as activity and tolerability of a combination regimen consisting of pazopanib and metronomic cyclophosphamide in the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, pre-treated ovarian cancer (phase II). The patient population includes patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of EOC, cancer of the fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer which is platinumresistant or -refractory. Patients must have measurable disease according to RECIST criteria and must have failed available standard chemotherapy. Primary objectives are determination of the optimal doses for pazopanib (phase I) and the overall response rate according to RECIST criteria (phase II). Secondary objectives are time to progression, overall survival, safety and tolerability. The treatment duration is until disease progression or intolerability of study drug regimen (with a maximum of 13 cycles up to 52 weeks per subject).. The current phase I/II trial shall clarify the potential of the multitargeting antiangiogenic tyrosinkinaseinhibitor GW 786034 (pazopanib) in combination with oral cyclophosphamide as salvage treatment in patients with recurrent, pretreated ovarian cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

The progression-free and median survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer has not appreciably improved over the last decade. Novel targeted therapies, particularly antiangiogenic agents, may potentially improve clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. This phase II, open-label study evaluated oral pazopanib monotherapy in patients with low-volume recurrent ovarian cancer.. Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with complete CA-125 response to initial platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent elevation of CA-125 to ≥ 42 U/mL (> 2 × ULN) were treated with pazopanib 800 mg once daily until PD or unacceptable toxicity. This Green-Dahlberg study required 2 CA-125 responses in stage I (20 patients) to proceed to stage II (15 patients). The primary endpoint was CA-125 response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline, confirmed ≥ 21 days after initial evaluation).. Eleven of 36 patients (31%) had a CA-125 response to pazopanib, with median time to response of 29 days and median response duration of 113 days. Overall response rate was 18% in patients with measurable disease at baseline. The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug were grade 3 ALT (8%) and AST (8%) elevation. Only 1 grade 4 toxicity (peripheral edema) was reported.. Pazopanib monotherapy was relatively well tolerated, with toxicity similar to other small-molecule, oral angiogenesis inhibitors, and demonstrated promising single-agent activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Further studies evaluating the potential role of pazopanib in patients with ovarian cancer are ongoing.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; CA-125 Antigen; Disease-Free Survival; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate

Recurrent GLI1 gene fusions have been recently described in a subset of soft tissue tumors showing a distinct monotonous epithelioid morphology with a rich capillary network and frequent S100 protein expression. Three different fusion partners-ACTB, MALAT1, and PTCH1-have been reported with the PTCH1-GLI1 fusion from 2 patients only, both with head and neck tumors. Herein, we report for the first time a PTCH1-GLI1 fusion in a primary ovarian tumor from a female patient aged 54 years who presented with a 21-cm right ovarian mass and mesenteric metastasis. The tumor was diagnosed as "favor malignant melanoma" based on histologic examination and extensive immunohistochemistry studies. The patient received 4 cycles of pembrolizumab and 2 cycles of trabectedin but developed multiple metastases. A next-generation sequencing-based assay detected a PTCH1-GLI1 fusion, which led to a revised pathologic diagnosis and a change of the patient's management. The patient was switched to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pazopanib to target the sonic hedgehog pathway. Her disease was stable 49 months post TKI therapy. Our case report is the first to show that a tumor with GLI1 oncogenic activation was sensitive to a TKI. The morphologic and immunohistochemistry similarities of our patient's tumor to other recently described tumors harboring GLI1 fusions suggest that these tumors may all belong to the same entity of GLI1 fusion-positive neoplasms and may be treated similarly.

Topics: Female; Gene Fusion; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Zinc Finger Protein GLI1

Ovarian cancer is the second commonly seen cancer in the US, patients with ovarian cancer are commonly diagnosed in the advanced stage. Pazopanib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases and has been approved in treatment for carcinoma by FDA. N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) has been regarded as a cancer suppressor gene and presented an inhibition effect in cancer proliferation, invasion, and migration.. The NDRG2 overexpression and inhibition model was firstly constructed in SKOV-3 cells, the apoptotic cells were detected using flow cytometry. The expression of cellular metastasis genes was detected using the qPCR method. The angiogenesis factors was detected using the ELISA method. Expression of each target protein was detected using western blotting analysis.. NDRG2 overexpression and inhibition model were constructed in the SKOV-3 cell line, overexpression of NDRG2 enhanced the effect of pazopanib on inhibition of the expression of metastasis-related molecules and angiogenesis-related factors. The apoptosis process of cells was also enhanced after overexpression of NDRG2, and these effects were regulated by the activation of the ASK1/JNK1 signaling pathway.. NDRG2 might be a therapeutic target in treatment for ovarian cancer.

Topics: Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Women with recurrent, multiply-treated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have unfavorable prognosis with limited treatment options after failure of platinum-based regimens. We report here a retrospective analysis of women with recurrent, platinum-resistant EOC treated with an oral regimen of pazopanib and cyclophosphamide.. Women with recurrent platinum-resistant or -refractory EOC were treated with pazopanib (600 mg orally daily in 2 divided doses, 400 and 200 mg) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg orally daily for 21 days every 28 days) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.. Twenty patients (17 with platinum-resistant and 3 with platinum-refractory disease) were treated between April 2014 and April 2018. Patients had a median age of 52 years (range, 40-60 years) and median of 4 previous lines of chemotherapy (range, 2-8 previous lines), including 3 patients with progressive disease on bevacizumab. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 2-48 cycles) of pazopanib and cyclophosphamide, with best responses of partial response in 9 patients (45%, including 1 of 3 patients treated previously with bevacizumab), stable disease in 6 patients (30%), and disease progression in 5 patients (25%). The median progression-free survival time was 5.5 months, and median overall survival was 9.5 months. Common adverse events (grade 3 or 4) were fatigue (25%), diarrhea (15%), hand-foot syndrome (10%), mucositis (10%), transaminitis (5%), and hypertension (5%). Dose reduction as a result of toxicity was required in 14 patients (70%), and no patient stopped treatment as a result of toxicity.. Pazopanib plus oral cyclophosphamide is a well-tolerated regimen with clinically relevant benefit in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory EOC.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides

Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.. To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.. We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.. Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p = 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.. The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinosarcoma; Docetaxel; Doxorubicin; Female; Humans; Ifosfamide; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Neoplasms

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinosarcoma; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Uterine Neoplasms

Metabolism-mediated drug adverse effects (e.g., drug-drug interaction, bioactivation, etc.) strongly limit the utilization of clinical drugs. The present study aims to predict the metabolic capability of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 toward pazopanib which is an excellent drug exhibiting therapeutic role toward various cancers especially for ovarian cancer. Pazopanib can be well docked into the activity cavity of CYP3A4, and the interaction structure in pazopanib was methyl group located besides nitrogen in the five-membered ring. The distance between the hydrogen atom in methyl group and active center is 3.64 Å. The interaction amino acid is Glu374. Furthermore, both pazopanib and ketoconazole were docked into the activity cavity of CYP3A4 to compare their binding potential. The distance between ketoconazole and activity center (2.10 Å) is closer than the distance between pazopanib and activity center of CYP3A4, indicating the easy influence of CYP3A4 inhibitor toward the metabolism of pazopanib. All these data were helpful for the clinical application of pazopanib, and R&D of other tinib drug candidates as new anti-tumor drugs.

Topics: Amino Acids; Antineoplastic Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ketoconazole; Molecular Docking Simulation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Oxidation-Reduction; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Recent studies in patients with ovarian cancer suggest that tumor growth may be accelerated following cessation of antiangiogenesis therapy; however, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of therapy withdrawal to those of continuous treatment with various antiangiogenic agents. Cessation of therapy with pazopanib, bevacizumab, and the human and murine anti-VEGF antibody B20 was associated with substantial tumor growth in mouse models of ovarian cancer. Increased tumor growth was accompanied by tumor hypoxia, increased tumor angiogenesis, and vascular leakage. Moreover, we found hypoxia-induced ADP production and platelet infiltration into tumors after withdrawal of antiangiogenic therapy, and lowering platelet counts markedly inhibited tumor rebound after withdrawal of antiangiogenic therapy. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in platelets regulated their migration into the tumor microenvironment, and FAK-deficient platelets completely prevented the rebound tumor growth. Additionally, combined therapy with a FAK inhibitor and the antiangiogenic agents pazopanib and bevacizumab reduced tumor growth and inhibited negative effects following withdrawal of antiangiogenic therapy. In summary, these results suggest that FAK may be a unique target in situations in which antiangiogenic agents are withdrawn, and dual targeting of FAK and VEGF could have therapeutic implications for ovarian cancer management.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Animals; Antibodies, Neoplasm; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Blood Platelets; Cell Hypoxia; Cell Line, Tumor; Female; Focal Adhesion Kinase 1; Humans; Indazoles; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Neoplasm Proteins; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tumor Microenvironment; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

An alternative or follow-up adjunct to conventional maximum tolerated dose (MTD) chemotherapy now in advanced phase III clinical trial assessment is metronomic chemotherapy--the close regular administration of low doses of drug with no prolonged breaks. A number of preclinical studies have shown metronomic chemotherapy can cause long term survival of mice with advanced cancer, including metastatic disease, in the absence of overt toxicity, especially when combined with targeted antiangiogenic drugs. However, similar to MTD chemotherapy acquired resistance eventually develops, the basis of which is unknown. Using a preclinical model of advanced human ovarian (SKOV-3-13) cancer in SCID mice, we show that acquired resistance can develop after terminating prolonged (over 3 months) successful therapy utilizing daily oral metronomic topotecan plus pazopanib, an oral antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Two resistant sublines were isolated from a single mouse, one from a solid tumor (called KH092-7SD, referred to as 7SD) and another from ascites tumor cells (called KH092-7AS, referred to as 7AS). Using these sublines we show acquired resistance to the combination treatment is due to tumor cell alterations that confer relative refractoriness to topotecan. The resistant phenotype is heritable, associated with reduced cellular uptake of topotecan and could not be reversed by switching to MTD topotecan or to another topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, CPT-11, given either in a metronomic or MTD manner nor switching to another antiangiogenic drug, e.g. the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody, DC101, or another TKI, sunitinib. Thus, in this case cross resistance seems to exist between MTD and metronomic topotecan, the basis of which is unknown. However, gene expression profiling revealed several potential genes that are stably upregulated in the resistant lines, that previously have been implicated in resistance to various chemotherapy drugs, and which, therefore, may contribute to the drug resistant phenotype.

Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Indazoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Irinotecan; Mice, SCID; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was the first angiogenesis inhibitor approved for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in combination with intravenous fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Two major cohort studies--BRiTE and BEAT--reported a 2% incidence of bowel perforation, which remains a rare, but serious, complication of bevacizumab treatment. Late anastomotic complications, arising > 3 months after surgery, are emerging occurrences that may be associated with bowel perforation. We report here on such a case caused by pazopanib, a new antiangiogenic agent, and also include a review of the published cases in the literature (n = 23) and an analysis of their management. Proctectomy was the initial surgery in 17 patients (74%) with rectal cancer, and 13 of these patients had undergone adjuvant radiation prior to surgery. The majority (84%) of the complications occurred with antiangiogenic treatment after a mean number of four cycles. Patients' management was invariably associated with withdrawal of the antiangiogenic agent, together with conservative treatment in 14 patients (66%).

Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carcinoma; Colectomy; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Salpingectomy; Sulfonamides; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to investigate the antitumor and antiangiogenic effects utilizing a novel therapy regimen of metronomic topotecan and pazopanib, a multireceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In vitro (Western blot) and in vivo dose-finding experiments were done following pazopanib therapy in ovarian cancer models. Pazopanib and metronomic (daily) oral topotecan therapy was examined in an orthotopic model of ovarian cancer. Tumor weights, survival, and markers of the tumor microenvironment [angiogenesis (CD31 and pericyte coverage), proliferation (Ki-67), and apoptosis (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling)] were analyzed by immunostaining following therapy. Pazopanib therapy reduced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) activity in vitro and vivo in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with control mice, pazopanib reduced tumor weight by 28% to 82% (P < 0.01 in the SKOV3ip1 model) and metronomic topotecan reduced tumor weight by 40% to 59% in the HeyA8 (P = 0.13) and SKOV3ip1 (P = 0.07) models. Combination therapy had the greatest effect with 79% to 84% reduction (P < 0.01 for both models). In the SKOV3ip1 and A2780 models, mouse survival was significantly longer (P < 0.001 versus controls) with pazopanib and metronomic topotecan therapy. Pazopanib therapy reduced murine endothelial cell migration in vitro in a dose-dependent manner following VEGF stimulation and decreased tumor microvessel density and pericyte coverage when given in combination with metronomic topotecan. Tumor cell proliferation decreased in all treatment arms compared with controls (P < 0.01 for combination groups) and increased tumor cell apoptosis by 4-fold with combination therapy. Pazopanib therapy in combination with metronomic topotecan therapy showed significant antitumor and antiangiogenic properties in preclinical ovarian cancer models and warrants further investigation as a novel therapeutic regimen in clinical trials. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(4); 985-95. (c)2010 AACR.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Biological Therapy; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Mice; Models, Biological; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy has shown promising activity in many preclinical and some phase II clinical studies involving various tumor types. To evaluate further the potential therapeutic impact of metronomic chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, we developed a preclinical model of advanced human ovarian cancer and tested various low-dose metronomic chemotherapy regimens alone or in concurrent combination with an antiangiogenic drug, pazopanib. Clones of the SKOV-3 human ovarian carcinoma cell line expressing a secretable beta-subunit of human choriogonadotropic (beta-hCG) protein and firefly luciferase were generated and evaluated for growth after orthotopic (i.p.) injection into severe combined immunodeficient mice; a highly aggressive clone, SKOV-3-13, was selected for further study. Mice were treated beginning 10 to 14 days after injection of cells when evidence of carcinomatosis-like disease in the peritoneum was established as assessed by imaging analysis. Chemotherapy drugs tested for initial experiments included oral cyclophosphamide, injected irinotecan or paclitaxel alone or in doublet combinations with cyclophosphamide; the results indicated that metronomic cyclophosphamide had no antitumor activity whereas metronomic irinotecan had potent activity. We therefore tested an oral topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, oral topotecan, at optimal biological dose of 1 mg/kg/d. Metronomic oral topotecan showed excellent antitumor activity, the extent of which was significantly enhanced by concurrent pazopanib, which itself had only modest activity, with 100% survival values of the drug combination after six months of continuous therapy. In conclusion, oral topotecan may be an ideal agent to consider for clinical trial assessment of metronomic chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, especially when combined with an antiangiogenic drug targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, such as pazopanib. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(4); 996-1006. (c)2010 AACR.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclophosphamide; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelial Cells; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Irinotecan; Mice; Mice, SCID; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Bevacizumab; BRCA2 Protein; Carboplatin; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biomedical Research; CA-125 Antigen; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dasatinib; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Molecular Structure; Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Snake Venoms; Sulfonamides; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome