pazopanib and Neutropenia

Sunitinib and pazopanib are extensively used as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We performed this meta-analysis to assess the anti-tumor effectiveness, toxicity, and total costs of the two drugs among patients with mRCC/advanced RCC (aRCC).. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched to obtain eligible articles. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse effects (AEs), and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs.. We included 14 medium- to high-quality studies. Both drugs were valid for mRCC/aRCC, with equivalent PFS (hazard ratio (HR) =1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.15, P = 0.13), OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.07, P = 0.29), objective response rate (ORR, risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% CI: 0.93-1.13, p = 0.58), and disease control rate (DCR, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.22, P = 0.54). Sunitinib had more dosage reductions and higher PPPM (weighted mean difference = - 1.50 thousand US dollars, 95% CI: - 2.27 to - 0.72, P = 0.0002). Furthermore, more incidences of severe fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were recorded for sunitinib, but pazopanib had more liver toxicity. In subgroup analysis, studies from the US reported longer OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, P = 0.004) and higher ORR (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.51, P = 0.03).. Pazopanib provides equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower PPPM as compared with sunitinib for mRCC/aRCC. Great care should be given to pazopanib-treated patients with abnormal liver function. Nevertheless, more large-scale, high-quality studies are required.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Fatigue; Health Care Costs; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

As precision medicine has become a focus in oncology in recent years, many targeted and biologic agents are being used along with or in place of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. As these drugs have been developed and some have received FDA approval, we have gained substantial data about the adverse event profiles. However, the management and approach to the toxicities incurred and subsequent complications are often not well understood, especially for physicians who have a varied clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the frequency and types of adverse events and appropriate management steps when prescribing modern targeted therapies for gynecologic cancers in the classes of anti-angiogenic agents, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and immunotherapy drugs.

Topics: Anemia; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Autoimmune Diseases; Bevacizumab; Diarrhea; Epistaxis; Fatigue; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Headache; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Intestinal Perforation; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nausea; Neutropenia; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Precision Medicine; Proteinuria; Pyrimidines; Risk Assessment; Sulfonamides; Vomiting; Water-Electrolyte Imbalance

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) often does not respond well to chemotherapy and develops against a background of NF1. The purpose of our study was to examine the efficacy of pazopanib against MPNST. Our study was designed as a physician-initiated phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced MPNST. Patients were registered from 11 large hospitals. The primary endpoint was set to clarify the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the CBR based on modified Choi evaluation at week 12 were set as secondary endpoints along with treatment-related safety. The study enrolled 12 patients. Median age was 49 years. Seven had Grade 2 and five Grade 3 according to the FNCLCC evaluation. Median follow-up period was 10.6 months. CBR at 12 weeks was both 50.0% (RECIST and Choi). The median PFS was 5.4 months for both RECIST and Choi, and the median OS was 10.6 months. Of special interest, the median PFS was 2.9 months for patients with FNCLCC Grade 2 and 10.2 months for Grade 3 (both RECIST and Choi). Grade 4 adverse events of neutropenia and lipase elevation were noted in one patient each. The results of this pazopanib therapy were generally better than those of any of the other single molecular targeted therapies reported previously. Although accumulation of more cases remains necessary, we conclude pazopanib treatment for MPNST to be a safe and promising treatment after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neurofibrosarcoma; Neutropenia; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

Doxorubicin is a standard of care in patients with advanced, inoperable soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We tested whether pazopanib has efficacy comparable to that of doxorubicin in elderly patients with STS and offers superior tolerability for hematologic toxicity.. Patients age 60 years or older without previous systemic treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic STS who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function were included. Treatment consisted of pazopanib 800 mg once per day or doxorubicin 75 mg/m. Pazopanib and doxorubicin were given to 81 and 39 patients, respectively. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-88 years). PFS was noninferior (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.53) and the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia favored pazopanib. Objective response rates for pazopanib and doxorubicin were 12.3% and 15.4%, respectively. Overall survival did not differ significantly between arms (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.72;. Pazopanib was noninferior to doxorubicin, rendering pazopanib a putative therapeutic option in the first-line treatment of STS in patients age 60 years or older. The distinct adverse event profile may be used to counsel patients and tailor therapy to individual needs.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Sarcoma; Sulfonamides

Topics: Acetylation; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Benzofurans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epigenesis, Genetic; Fatigue; Female; Gene Expression; Histone Deacetylase 2; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Histones; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Young Adult

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor predominantly acting on tumor endothelium, and ixabepilone is a semisynthetic analog of epothilone B that promotes microtubule stabilization inducing tumor and tumor endothelial cell apoptosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal tolerated dose (OTD) of the combination of pazopanib and ixabepilone for the treatment of metastatic previously treated solid tumors.. Dose escalation started at 32 mg/m of ixabepilone and increased to 40 mg/m. Pazopanib was administered initially at 400 mg and escalated at 200 mg increments up to 800 mg. Pharmacokinetic analysis assessed effect of ixabepilone on pazopanib metabolism. Correlative studies evaluated changes in angiogenic cytokines.. Thirty-one patients (20 male and 11 female; median age, 58 y) with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (fatigue and neutropenia) at dose level 2 (ixabepilone 40 mg/m and pazopanib 400 mg), and therefore the ixabepilone dose was decreased (32 mg/m) before escalating pazopanib to levels 3 and 4. One patient had a dose-limiting toxicity (thrombocytopenia) at dose level 4 (ixabepilone 32 mg/m and pazopanib 800 mg). Dose level 3 was determined to be the OTD (pazopanib 600 mg and ixabepilone 32 mg/m). The most common toxicities were cytopenias. A significant decrease in the level of sE-selectin was associated with improvement in progression free survival.. The OTD for combination of pazopanib and ixabepilone was established. There was no impact of ixabepilone on pazopanib pharmacokinetics. The relationship between sE-selectin and progression free survival warrants further investigation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cytokines; Disease-Free Survival; E-Selectin; Epothilones; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Pyrimidines; Retreatment; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia

Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to be clinically active in the treatment of various cancer types. This study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), safety, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in adult patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).. This was a Phase I, 3 + 3 design, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT0050943; VEG108925) conducted in sequential cohorts to determine the MTR of pazopanib and irinotecan administered with cetuximab. Twenty-five patients received treatment in three dosing cohorts and were evaluated for safety and tolerability of the combination and pharmacokinetics of individual drugs.. The MTR was determined to be 400 mg pazopanib per day orally in combination with 150 mg/m(2) irinotecan biweekly and 250 mg/m(2) cetuximab weekly by infusion. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic results suggested that the overall systemic exposure to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, was affected by pazopanib to a greater extent than was the systemic exposure to irinotecan itself.. This study provided evidence for the manageable safety profile and feasibility of using the novel triplet combination of pazopanib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in patients with refractory mCRC. Further large-scale Phase II studies are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Irinotecan; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Recurrence; Sulfonamides; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The role of pazopanib in the second-line setting of refractory metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium has not been defined clearly. The aim of this phase I/II trial was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining pazopanib and vinflunine in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium after failure of first-line platinum-containing therapy. From May 2011 to December 2011, five patients were enrolled in this trial. Pazopanib was the investigated compound; four levels were planned (200, 400, 600, and 800 mg/day). Vinflunine was dosed at 280 mg/m for the first dose and 320 mg/m every 3 weeks thereafter. After the definition of a tolerated dose for the combined therapy, a subsequent phase II study was planned. At the starting level, pazopanib 200 mg/day, dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two of five patients. One patient experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia, which led to treatment discontinuation. A second patient showed grade 3 hepatobiliary disorder with an increase in γ-glutamyltransferase. The study was interrupted at dose level 1 for safety reasons. The initially planned phase II study was therefore not carried out. This phase I study showed that combined therapy of daily pazopanib (200 mg) and vinflunine (280/320 mg/m) every 3 weeks is poorly tolerated in patients with refractory advanced urothelial cancer.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Palliative Care; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Urologic Neoplasms; Vinblastine

The patient(woman, approximately 46 years old)began pazopanib (PAZ) treatment (800 mg/day)f ollowing the recurrence of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. Prior to treatment, the patient's platelet count was 18.6×10(4)/µl and her neutrophil count was 1.61×10(3)/µl . The platelet count decreased to 9.2×10(4)/µl on day 7 and to 5.4×10(4)/µl on day 21 after commencement of treatment. The neutrophil count was 0.97×10(3)/µl on day 28 and 0.68×10(3)/µl on day 35 after commencement of treatment. Thus, PAZ treatment was stopped on day 35. The blood sampling results on day 42 after commencement of treatment showed that the platelet count was 13.0×10(4)/µl and that the neutrophil count had recovered to 1.28×10(3)/µl . At that time, PAZ treatment was resumed at a reduced dose of 600 mg/day. By day 84 after commencement of treatment, the platelet count had increased from 12.7 to 13.8×10(4)/µl and the neutrophil count had increased from 1.02 to 1.34×10(3)/µl ; treatment was subsequently continued. The main adverse effects that have been reported for PAZ are hypertension and frequent liver dysfunction; these reports also indicate that the incidence of severe cytopenia(thrombocytopenia, neutropenia)is quite low. However, our patient exhibited cytopenia after commencement of PAZ treatment and her blood cell counts recovered once treatment was ceased, independent of other possible medications. Our findings suggest that cytopenia should be considered as an adverse effect of PAZ.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inducing Agents; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Leiomyosarcoma; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Pyrimidines; Recurrence; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia