pazopanib and Neuroendocrine-Tumors

pazopanib has been researched along with Neuroendocrine-Tumors* in 7 studies

Reviews

3 review(s) available for pazopanib and Neuroendocrine-Tumors

ArticleYear
[Molecular targeted drugs for soft tissue sarcoma and neuroendocrine tumor].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2015, Volume: 73, Issue:8

    Both the soft tissue sarcomas and the neuroendocrine tumors are rare diseases. Therefore the recruiting of these patients was more difficult than other cancer species, and the development of the new therapy for these diseases did not readily advance. However, the identification of driver molecules for each sub-type enabled us to the development of the molecular targeted drugs. As for the GIST, several TKIs are used, but in late years it is found that susceptibility of TKIs varies according to difference in second mutation. In this chapter, the molecular target drug for the soft tissue sarcoma and the neuroendocrine tumor is reviewed.

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzamides; Denosumab; Drug Discovery; Everolimus; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Indazoles; Indoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperazines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sarcoma; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

2015
Current clinical trials of targeted agents for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.
    Pancreas, 2014, Volume: 43, Issue:8

    Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of tumors originating in various locations, including the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and pancreas. Clinical trial design and disease management of these tumors pose a significant challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentations and varying degrees of aggressiveness. The recent completion of several phase II and III trials demonstrates that rigorous investigation of novel agents can lead to practice-changing outcomes. Furthermore, the molecular and genetic understanding of NETs has dramatically improved during the last few years; as a result, investigators have shifted clinical trial design to focus on targeted therapies. Most of these trials have targeted the somatostatin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. This review will discuss the NET treatment landscape and trials of targeted agents currently offered.

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Cell Differentiation; Chemoradiotherapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drugs, Investigational; Everolimus; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Proteins; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Octreotide; Peptides, Cyclic; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Radioisotopes; Sirolimus; Somatostatin; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

2014
Current status and perspectives of targeted therapy in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.
    Oncology, 2012, Volume: 83, Issue:3

    Although neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a relatively rare malignancy, the reported incidence is increasing, and some of the current treatment options are limited in their efficacy. Standard first-line therapy for metastatic small bowel NET includes somatostatin analogs. Although these agents can provide symptom relief and can delay disease progression in many patients, ultimately, new treatments are required for patients with progressive disease. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in developing agents specifically targeted against some of the pathways known to be involved in cancer cell growth, survival and invasion. In 2011, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib were approved for the treatment of pancreatic NET. Clinical trials evaluating novel targeted agents are ongoing, both as single agents and in combination regimens. We review the current clinical status of these potential new treatments and highlight those with particular promise for the management of well-differentiated NET.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Differentiation; ErbB Receptors; Everolimus; Histone Deacetylases; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Indazoles; Indoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Niacinamide; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Somatostatin; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

2012

Trials

3 trial(s) available for pazopanib and Neuroendocrine-Tumors

ArticleYear
Pazopanib and depot octreotide in advanced, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours: a multicentre, single-group, phase 2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Treatment options for advanced, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) remain scarce. Pazopanib is an orally bioavailable, small molecule, multitargeted kinase inhibitor that inhibits VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3. We did a study of the efficacy of pazopanib with depot octreotide in patients with advanced NETs.. We did a parallel cohort study of patients with metastatic or locally advanced grade 1-2 carcinoid tumours or pancreatic NETs, by use of a single-group, two-stage design. Patients received pazopanib 800 mg orally once per day and octreotide at their preprotocol dosage. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response, as assessed by investigators, by intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00454363, and was completed in March, 2014.. Between April 12, 2007, and July 2, 2009, we enrolled 52 patients, including 32 individuals with pancreatic NETs and 20 individuals with carcinoid tumours. Seven (21·9%, 95% CI 11·0-38·8) of 32 patients with pancreatic NETs achieved an objective response. We detected no responses in the first stage of the cohort with carcinoid tumours, and we terminated accrual at 20 patients. Toxic effects included one patient with grade 4 hypertriglyceridaemia and one with grade 4 thrombosis, with the most common grade three events being aminotransferase increases and neutropenia, each of which happened in 3 patients. In all 52 patients, the most frequently observed toxic effects were fatigue (39 [75%]), nausea (33 [63%]), diarrhoea (33 [63%]), and hypertension (28 [54%]).. Treatment with pazopanib is associated with tumour response for patients with pancreatic NETs, but not for carcinoid tumours; a randomised controlled phase 3 study to assess pazopanib in advanced pancreatic NETs is warranted.. US National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

    Topics: Aged; Carcinoid Tumor; Cohort Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

2015
Pazopanib in pretreated advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a phase II, open-label trial of the Spanish Task Force Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (GETNE).
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:9

    The management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has recently changed. We assessed the activity of pazopanib after failure of other systemic treatments in advanced NETs.. This was a multicenter, open-label, phase II study evaluating pazopanib as a single agent in advanced NETs (PAZONET study). The clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months was the primary end point. Translational correlation of radiological response and progression-free survival (PFS) with circulating and tissue biomarkers was also evaluated.. A total of 44 patients were enrolled. Twenty-five patients (59.5%) were progression-free at 6 months (4 partial responses, 21 stable diseases) with a median PFS of 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-14.1]. The CBR varied according to prior therapy received, with 73%, 60% and 25% in patients treated with prior multitarget inhibitors, prior mTOR inhibitors and both agents, respectively. A nonsignificant increase in PFS was observed in patients presenting lower baseline circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts (9.1 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.22) and in those with decreased levels of soluble-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (sVEGFR-2) (12.6 versus 9.1 months; P = 0.067). A trend toward reduced survival was documented in patients with VEGFR3 rs307821 and rs307826 missense polymorphisms [hazard ratio (HR): 12.3; 95% CI 1.09-139.2; P = 0.042 and HR: 6.9; 95% CI 0.96-49.9; P = 0.055, respectively].. Pazopanib showed clinical activity in patients with advanced NETs regardless of previous treatments. Additionally, CTCs, soluble-s VEFGR-2 and VEGFR3 gene polymorphisms constitute potential biomarkers for selecting patients for pazopanib (NCT01280201).. NCT01280201.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3

2015
Phase II study of pazopanib monotherapy in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
    British journal of cancer, 2013, Sep-17, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Treatment options for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are still limited. We investigated the antitumour activity and safety profile of pazopanib--a multitarget drug with anti-angiogenic activity in patients with metastatic GEP NETs.. This was a nonrandomised, open-labeled, single-center phase II study. Pazopanib was orally administered at a dose of 800 mg daily continuously with a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was an objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. An independent review of objective response was planned. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT number 01099540. Correlative biomarker analyses were performed.. Between April 2010 and February 2012, a total of 37 patients were enrolled. Thirty-two percent of the enrolled patients had pancreatic primary and 22% of the patients had colorectal primary NETs. This phase II study demonstrated an objective response rate of 18.9% (7 of the 37, 95% CI 8.0-35.2) and a disease control rate (CR+confirmed PR+stable disease) of 75.7% (28 of the 37, 95% CI, 58.8-88.2) in metastatic GEP NETs. The independent review demonstrated a higher overall response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8-41.2%) with nine confirmed PRs.. Pazopanib showed a comparable efficacy to other targeted agents not only in pancreatic NETs but also in NETs originating from gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Intestinal Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

2013

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for pazopanib and Neuroendocrine-Tumors

ArticleYear
Identification of the BRAF V600E mutation in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Jan-26, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Genomic profiles of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are still insufficiently understood, and the genetic alterations associated with drug responses have not been studied. Here, we performed whole exome sequencing of 12 GEP-NETs from patients enrolled in a nonrandomized, open-labeled, single-center phase II study for pazopanib, and integrated our results with previously published results on pancreas (n = 12) and small intestine NETs (n = 50). The mean numbers of somatic mutations in each case varied widely from 20 to 4682. Among 12 GEP-NETs, eight showed mutations of more than one cancer-related gene, including TP53, CNBD1, RB1, APC, BCOR, BRAF, CTNNB1, EGFR, EP300, ERBB3, KDM6A, KRAS, MGA, MLL3, PTEN, RASA1, SMARCB1, SPEN, TBC1D12, and VHL. TP53 was recurrently mutated in three cases, whereas CNBD1 and RB1 mutations were identified in two cases. Three GEP-NET patients with TP53 mutations demonstrated a durable response and one small intestinal grade (G) 1 NET patient with BRAF V600E mutation showed progression after pazopanib treatment. We found BRAF V600E (G1 NET from rectum and two G3 NETs from colon) and BRAF G593S (G2 NET from pancreas) missense mutations (9.1%) in an independent cohort of 44 GEP-NETs from the rectum (n = 26), colon (n = 7), pancreas (n = 4), small intestine (n = 3), stomach (n = 3) and appendix (n = 1) by Sanger sequencing. All tumor specimens were obtained before chemotherapy. In conclusion, BRAF V600E mutation is likely to result in resistance to pazopanib but may be a potentianally actionable mutation in metastatic GEP-NETs patients.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cohort Studies; Exome; Female; Genome, Human; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Indazoles; Intestinal Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyrimidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Sulfonamides

2016