pasireotide and Digestive-System-Neoplasms

pasireotide has been researched along with Digestive-System-Neoplasms* in 3 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for pasireotide and Digestive-System-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Digestive neuroendocrine tumors (DNET): the era of targeted therapies.
    Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology, 2013, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies. Therapeutic options depend on location of the primitive tumor, its expandability, its hormonal symptoms and its differentiation. Though relatively rare, with an increasing incidence and a high prevalence digestive neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) are ranked just behind colorectal cancer as the most common digestive cancers in developed countries. Three main therapeutic axes have been individualized in the field of well-differentiated DNETs (corresponding to grades 1 and 2 of new WHO classification 2010), firstly, antitumor activity of somatostatin analogs, particularly in slowly progressive metastatic DNETs with limited hepatic invasion, secondly, targeting angiogenesis in these hypervascular tumors and thirdly targeting the mTOR pathway involved in DNETs carcinogenesis. As a consequence of two major randomized phase III trials in 2011, sunitinib and everolimus have been considered as new therapeutic options for well-differentiated, advanced and progressive pancreatic NETs. For everolimus, another phase III study, although non-significant with the chosen criteria, showed effectiveness notably against small intestine NETs. These targeted therapies are new therapeutic weapons in management of well-differentiated DNETs, but its exact role in care strategy, in comparison with other treatments (somatostatin analogs, chemo-embolization, chemotherapy...) deserves to be precise in the future.

    Topics: Algorithms; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bevacizumab; Clinical Trials as Topic; Digestive System Neoplasms; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Indoles; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Octreotide; Pyrroles; Sirolimus; Somatostatin; Sunitinib; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

2013

Trials

1 trial(s) available for pasireotide and Digestive-System-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Phase III study of pasireotide long-acting release in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid symptoms refractory to available somatostatin analogues.
    Drug design, development and therapy, 2015, Volume: 9

    In a randomized, double-blind, Phase III study, we compared pasireotide long-acting release (pasireotide LAR) with octreotide long-acting repeatable (octreotide LAR) in managing carcinoid symptoms refractory to first-generation somatostatin analogues. Adults with carcinoid tumors of the digestive tract were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pasireotide LAR (60 mg) or octreotide LAR (40 mg) every 28 days. Primary outcome was symptom control based on frequency of bowel movements and flushing episodes. Objective tumor response was a secondary outcome. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated in a post hoc analysis. Adverse events were recorded. At the time of a planned interim analysis, the data monitoring committee recommended halting the study because of a low predictive probability of showing superiority of pasireotide over octreotide for symptom control (n=43 pasireotide LAR, 20.9%; n=45 octreotide LAR, 26.7%; odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.97; P=0.53). Tumor control rate at month 6 was 62.7% with pasireotide and 46.2% with octreotide (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.89-4.32; P=0.09). Median (95% CI) PFS was 11.8 months (11.0 - not reached) with pasireotide versus 6.8 months (5.6 - not reached) with octreotide (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98; P=0.045). The most frequent drug-related adverse events (pasireotide vs octreotide) included hyperglycemia (28.3% vs 5.3%), fatigue (11.3% vs 3.5%), and nausea (9.4% vs 0%). We conclude that, among patients with carcinoid symptoms refractory to available somatostatin analogues, similar proportions of patients receiving pasireotide LAR or octreotide LAR achieved symptom control at month 6. Pasireotide LAR showed a trend toward higher tumor control rate at month 6, although it was statistically not significant, and was associated with a longer PFS than octreotide LAR.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoid Tumor; Delayed-Action Preparations; Digestive System Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Octreotide; Odds Ratio; Proportional Hazards Models; Somatostatin; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden

2015

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for pasireotide and Digestive-System-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Circulating Transcript Analysis (NETest) in GEP-NETs Treated With Somatostatin Analogs Defines Therapy.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2015, Volume: 100, Issue:11

    Early and precise delineation of therapeutic responses are key issues in neuroendocrine neoplasm/tumor management. Imaging is currently used but exhibits limitations in sensitivity and specificity. The utility of biomarkers is unclear. objective, setting, and design: This prospective cohort study (11 mo) sought to determine whether measurements of circulating neuroendocrine tumor transcripts (NETest) predict responses to somatostatin analogs (SSAs).. The test set consisted of 35 SSA-treated gastroenteropancreatic-NETs (RECISTevaluated). The prospective set consisted of 28 SSA-treated Grade 1-Grade 2 GEP-NETs.. Whole blood for transcript analysis (NETest) and plasma for Chromogranin A (CgA) (baseline), were collected every 4 weeks (prior to SSA injection). Morphologic (multidetector computed tomography/MRI) and functional imaging ((99m)Tc-[HYNIC, Tyr(3)]-Octreotide) was undertaken at entry and 6-month intervals until progression (RECIST 1.0).. Treatment response.. Test set: NETest (≥80%; scale, 0-100%) differentiated stable (SD) and progressive (PD) disease (P < .0001). Prospective set: 28 patients (26/28 SD) undergoing standard SSA. Grading: 12 G1, 16 G2. SSA Response: progression-free survival: 315 days: 14 (50%) SD, 14 (50%) PD. NETest: Twenty had elevated (≥80%) values; 14 developed PD; six, SD. CgA: Twelve of 28 exhibited elevated baseline values and/or subsequent >25% increase; eight developed PD; four, SD. NETest (P = .002) and grade (P = .054) were the only factors associated with treatment response. Multiple regression analysis established that the NETest could predict disease progression (P = .0002). NETest changes occurred significantly earlier (146 d prior to progression vs 56 d CgA; P < .0001; χ(2) = 19) and in more patients (100 vs 57%; P < .02).. NETest values (80-100%) were more accurate and occurred at a significantly earlier time point than CgA and predicted SSA treatment response.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biomarkers, Tumor; Chromogranin A; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Digestive System Neoplasms; Drug Monitoring; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Octreotide; Prospective Studies; Somatostatin; Survival Analysis; Tumor Burden

2015