panobinostat and Thrombocytopenia

panobinostat has been researched along with Thrombocytopenia* in 15 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for panobinostat and Thrombocytopenia

ArticleYear
panobinostat (FARYDAK°). Multiple myeloma: too toxic!
    Prescrire international, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:176

    Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received several lines of therapy have no satisfactory treatment options. High-dose corticosteroid therapy or a combination of low-dose dexamethasone and pomaildomide may be proposed. Panobinostat is the first histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor to be authorised in the European Union for use in this indication. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated panobinostat in 768 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who were also receiving bortezomib + dexamethasone. Panobinostat did not prolong survival. The median time to myeloma progression, relapse, or death was prolonged by about 3 months with the panobinostat-containing combination, and by a median of about 8 months in the subgroup of patients who had received at least two lines of chemotherapy including bortezomib and an "immunomodulatory" drug. There was no statistically significant increase in survival, however. In this trial, adverse events led one in six patients to discontinue panobinostat and resulted in numerous hospital admissions. The proportion of patients who died from causes unrelated to myeloma was 6.8% in the panobinostat group versus 3.2% In the placebo group. The toxicity of panobinostat affects most vital functions, resulting in a risk of infections as well as haematological, gastrointestinal, cardiac, renal, hepatic and thyroid disorders. These adverse effects are often severe and sometimes fatal. Panobinostat is subject to pharmacokinetic interactions via cytochrome P450 enzymes and P-glycoproteln, and also to pharmacodynamic Interactions. Panobinostat was teratogenic in animal studies. In practice, even when several previous lines of treatment have failed, panobinostatis more toxic than useful In patients with myeloma. It should therefore not be used.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diarrhea; Drug Interactions; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Infections; Mortality; Multiple Myeloma; Myocardial Ischemia; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Progression-Free Survival; Renal Insufficiency; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia

2016

Trials

10 trial(s) available for panobinostat and Thrombocytopenia

ArticleYear
Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed-and-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
    Acta haematologica, 2021, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in the PANORAMA-1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we present data from a phase II study (NCT02290431) of this combination in Japanese patients with relapsed or relapsed-and-refractory MM.. Patients received 3-week cycles of 20-mg oral panobinostat (weeks 1 and 2), 1.3-mg/m2 subcutaneous bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and 20-mg oral dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib administration) for a total of 8 cycles (24 weeks; treatment phase 1). Patients with treatment benefit had an option to enter the extension phase to receive 6-week (42-day) cycles of panobinostat (weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5) plus bortezomib (days 1, 8, 22, and 29) and dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib treatment) for 24 weeks. The primary objective was complete response (CR) + near CR (nCR) rate after treatment phase 1 as per the modified European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria.. Of the 31 patients, 4 (12.9%) completed the treatment and 27 (87.1%) discontinued; 17 (54.8%) entered the extension phase. In total, 24 patients (77.4%) entered the survival follow-up phase and followed until study closure when the last patient was treated for 1 year after treatment phase 1. The CR + nCR rate was 48.4% (90% CI: 33.6-63.2). The overall response rate (CR + nCR + partial response) was 80.6%. The median PFS, duration of response, time to response, and time to progression were 15.3, 22.7, 1.4, and 15.3 months, respectively. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with diarrhea (80.6%), decreased appetite (58.1%), and thrombocytopenia (54.8%) being the most frequent, regardless of relationship to the study treatment. Thrombocytopenia (48.4%), fatigue (25.8%), diarrhea (22.6%), neutrophil count decrease (22.6%), platelet count decrease (22.6%), and lymphocyte count decrease (22.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 AEs.. The study met the primary objective with 48.4% CR + nCR rate. The AEs associated with the combination treatment were safely managed using the existing AE management guidelines, including dose interruption/modification and/or supportive medical intervention. This treatment regimen is an effective option with a favorable benefit/risk profile for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Half-Life; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Staging; Panobinostat; Progression-Free Survival; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Thrombocytopenia

2021
Phase-I and randomized phase-II trial of panobinostat in combination with ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2018, Volume: 59, Issue:4

    This phase-I/phase-II study evaluated panobinostat in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (P-ICE) in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. During phase I, panobinostat was given daily on Monday/Wednesday/Friday starting one week prior to Cycle 1 (C1) of ICE and during two weeks of C1-2 of ICE (Schedule A). No DLT was observed at 30 mg. However, frequent (84%) grade-4 thrombocytopenia during second week prompted us to omit the second week of panobinostat 30 mg (Schedule B) for phase II, where this regimen was compared to ICE. In the randomized phase-II study, CR was seen in 9/11 (82%) and 8/12 (67%) for P-ICE and ICE, respectively (p = .64). Grade-4 neutropenia (55% vs. 8%) and thrombocytopenia (100% vs. 33%) were more common in P-ICE. In summary, combination therapy using panobinostat produced high CR rate at the cost of greater bone marrow toxicity. Investigation of panobinostat with less myelosuppressive agents is of interest.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Marrow; Carboplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Etoposide; Female; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Ifosfamide; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

2018
Single-agent panobinostat for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: clinical outcome and correlation with genomic data. A phase 2 study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2018, Volume: 59, Issue:12

    We investigated panobinostat 40 mg three times weekly in 35 adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Overall response rate and complete response were 17.1% and 11.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.4 and 7.6 months, respectively. Calculated 12, 24 and 36 months PFS were 26%, 11% and 11%, respectively. Four patients who achieved a sustained CR, continued receiving panobinostat for an overall period of 44, 48, 50, 62 months. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 (5 patients) and 4 (24 patients) represented the main toxic effect, causing dose reduction or treatment suspension in 19 patients. Genomic analysis was unable to identify any relationship between mutations and response; TP53 mutation appeared not to impact the clinical outcome. Overall, panobinostat has a modest activity in R/R DLBCL patients, however it can induce very long lasting responses in some cases. Thrombocytopenia frequently limits the use of this agent.

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Italy; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Mutation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Panobinostat; Progression-Free Survival; Prospective Studies; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

2018
An Expanded Treatment Protocol of Panobinostat Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Myeloma.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2018, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Panobinostat was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma who have received ≥ 2 regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug. The PANEX (panobinostat expansion) treatment protocol provided access to panobinostat and gathered additional safety data before commercial availability.. In treatment phase 1, patients received panobinostat 20 mg 3 times per week plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m. Thirty-nine patients with a median number of previous treatments of 4 (range, 1-12) were enrolled; most received subcutaneous bortezomib (87%). The overall response rate (partial response or better) was 56%. Grade 3/4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (47%), fatigue (31%), dehydration (26%), and diarrhea (18%). Among the patients who received subcutaneous bortezomib, relatively low rates of peripheral neuropathy (all grade, 15%) and notable grade 3/4 adverse events (thrombocytopenia, 47%; diarrhea, 12%) were observed.. Overall, data from the PANEX trial support regulatory approval of panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone and suggest the potential tolerability benefits of subcutaneous bortezomib in this regimen.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dehydration; Dexamethasone; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Panobinostat; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

2018
Overall survival of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with panobinostat or placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (the PANORAMA 1 trial): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:11

    Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly increased median progression-free survival compared with placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 PANORAMA 1 trial. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis for this trial.. PANORAMA 1 is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial of patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with one to three previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive panobinostat (20 mg orally) or placebo, with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m. Between Jan 21, 2010, and Feb 29, 2012, 768 patients were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to receive either panobinostat (n=387) or placebo (n=381), plus bortezomib and dexamethasone. At data cutoff (June 29, 2015), 415 patients had died. Median overall survival was 40·3 months (95% CI 35·0-44·8) in those who received panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus 35·8 months (29·0-40·6) in those who received placebo, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·78-1·14; p=0·54). Of patients who had received at least two previous regimens including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug, median overall survival was 25·5 months (95% CI 19·6-34·3) in 73 patients who received panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus 19·5 months (14·1-32·5) in 74 who received placebo (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·68-1·50).. The overall survival benefit with panobinostat over placebo with bortezomib and dexamethasone was modest. However, optimisation of the regimen could potentially prolong treatment duration and improve patients' outcomes, although further trials will be required to confirm this.. Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Asthenia; Blood Cell Count; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Creatinine; Dexamethasone; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatigue; Female; Geography; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Immunologic Factors; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Panobinostat; Patient Dropouts; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Quality of Life; Renal Insufficiency; Sex Factors; Steroids; Survival Analysis; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

2016
Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone as induction therapy in patients with multiple myeloma, candidates for autologous transplant.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2015, Volume: 56, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Diarrhea; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Induction Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Nausea; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Preoperative Period; Stem Cell Transplantation; Thrombocytopenia; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

2015
A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF).
    British journal of haematology, 2013, Volume: 161, Issue:1

    Panobinostat (LBH589), a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), was evaluated in a phase I study of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-essential thrombocythaemia/polycythaemia vera-related myelofibrosis (Post-ET/PV MF). Eighteen patients (PMF 56%; Post-PV MF 28%; Post-ET MF 17%) were treated in three cohorts at oral doses of (i) 20, (ii) 30, and (iii) 25 mg three times weekly consecutively. Reversible thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Five patients (two in Dose Cohort 1, one in Dose Cohort 2 and two in Dose Cohort 3) received six or more cycles and were evaluable for response assessment. After the sixth cycle, three of these five patients achieved clinical improvement (CI) with 100% reduction in palpable splenomegaly from baseline, and two patients experienced stable disease. Panobinostat therapy was also associated with improvement in the degree of anaemia in two of the five patients. Of the three patients who achieved CI after six cycles, one patient achieved a near complete remission after 15 cycles of treatment and another patient had resolution of marrow fibrosis after 16 cycles. We conclude that panobinostat is a well-tolerated, clinically active treatment for MF patients, regardless of JAK2 V617F status, and most effective when given at low doses over long periods of time.

    Topics: Aged; Bone Marrow; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Panobinostat; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Splenomegaly; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

2013
Phase I dose-escalating study of panobinostat (LBH589) administered intravenously to Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.
    Investigational new drugs, 2012, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Panobinostat (LBH589) is a potent pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor. As a result of promising preclinical data, Phase I and II clinical trials of intravenous and oral panobinostat have been conducted in patients with a wide variety of hematologic and solid tumors. This is the first report of a phase I study to evaluate intravenous panobinostat given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with solid tumors. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of panobinostat by evaluating the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included characterizing the pharmacokinetics and assessing antitumor activity. Fourteen patients were assigned to three dose levels (Cohort 1: 10 mg/m(2) [three patients], Cohort 2: 15 mg/m(2) [three patients], Cohort 3: 20 mg/m(2) [eight patients]), according to a standard "3 + 3" design. One patient who received 20 mg/m(2) had a DLT (grade 3 elevation of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase for >7 days). Thrombocytopenia was observed in all patients (grade 3 or 4 in 8), the severity of which was dependent on the dose and platelet count at baseline. The thrombocytopenia rapidly resolved within 8 days. Plasma panobinostat levels increased dose dependently, without clinically significant drug accumulation. Stable disease for ≥4 months was observed in six patients; however, there were no complete or partial responses. It is feasible to conclude that 20 mg/m(2) was the MTD and recommend as the starting dose for phase II clinical trials.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Japan; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Panobinostat; Thrombocytopenia

2012
Phase II trial of the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat as a single agent in advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2012, Volume: 53, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Lenalidomide; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Nausea; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Pyrazines; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Thalidomide; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

2012
Phase II study of melphalan, thalidomide and prednisone combined with oral panobinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2012, Volume: 53, Issue:9

    The combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) has demonstrated efficacy and acceptable toxicity in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Panobinostat is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi). In preclinical and clinical studies, panobinostat showed good anti-myeloma activity in combination with several agents. This phase II study evaluated the combination of a fixed dose of MPT with escalating doses of panobinostat (three times weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 9-day rest period) in relapsed/refractory MM. We used a two-stage design to determine whether the combination was safe and effective. At least a partial response was observed in 38.5% of patients. The maximum tolerated dose of panobinostat in combination with MPT could not be determined due to the high rate of dose-limiting toxicities experienced with panobinostat at doses of 10 and 15 mg. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (71%) and thrombocytopenia (35.5%). In conclusion, MPT in combination with panobinostat three times weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 9-day rest period is not well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Future studies should evaluate alternative dose schedules of panobinostat.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Prednisone; Recurrence; Thalidomide; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

2012

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for panobinostat and Thrombocytopenia

ArticleYear
Concomitant Use of Panobinostat and Reirradiation in Progressive DIPG: Report of 2 Cases.
    Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology, 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a devastating disease. Panobinostat has been shown to have therapeutic efficacy both in vitro and in DIPG orthotopic xenograft models; however, clinical data in patients with DIPG are lacking. We present 2 cases of DIPG, who were treated with panobinostat at 22 to 25 mg/m/dose, 3 times weekly for 2 weeks in 3-week cycles and concomitant reirradiation after disease progression. Two episodes of asymptomatic thrombocytopenia were observed in 1 patient. Hyperacetylation of histone H4 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evident following treatment. In our experience, panobinostat administered with reirradiation was well tolerated at a relatively higher dose than that used in adult studies.

    Topics: Acetylation; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glioma; Histones; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Panobinostat; Re-Irradiation; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

2017
Panobinostat (LBH589)-induced acetylation of tubulin impairs megakaryocyte maturation and platelet formation.
    Experimental hematology, 2012, Volume: 40, Issue:7

    Drug-induced thrombocytopenia often results from dysregulation of normal megakaryocytopoiesis. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms responsible for thrombocytopenia associated with the use of Panobinostat (LBH589), a histone deacetylase inhibitor with promising anti-cancer activities. The effects of LBH589 were tested on the cellular and molecular aspects of megakaryocytopoiesis by utilizing an ex vivo system in which mature megakaryocytes (MK) and platelets were generated from human primary CD34(+) cells. We demonstrated that LBH589 did not affect MK proliferation or lineage commitment but inhibited MK maturation and platelet formation. Although LBH589 treatment of primary MK resulted in hyperacetylation of histones, it did not interfere with the expression of genes that play important roles during megakaryocytopoiesis. Instead, we found that LBH589 induced post-translational modifications of tubulin, a nonhistone protein that is the major component of the microtubule cytoskeleton. We then demonstrated that LBH589 treatment induced hyperacetylation of tubulin and alteration of microtubule dynamics and organization required for proper MK maturation and platelet formation. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying LBH589-induced thrombocytopenia and provides a rationale for using tubulin as a target for selective histone deacetylase inhibitor therapies to treat thrombocytosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

    Topics: Acetylation; Blood Platelets; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Hematologic Neoplasms; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Megakaryocytes; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Panobinostat; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoiesis; Tubulin

2012
HDACI-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by its unexpected target.
    Experimental hematology, 2012, Volume: 40, Issue:9

    Topics: Acetylation; Blood Platelets; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Megakaryocytes; Panobinostat; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoiesis; Tubulin

2012
Rapid recovery from panobinostat (LBH589)-induced thrombocytopenia in mice involves a rebound effect of bone marrow megakaryocytes.
    Leukemia, 2011, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow Cells; Cell Count; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Kinetics; Megakaryocytes; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Panobinostat; Thrombocytopenia

2011