panobinostat and Renal-Insufficiency

panobinostat has been researched along with Renal-Insufficiency* in 5 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for panobinostat and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
panobinostat (FARYDAK°). Multiple myeloma: too toxic!
    Prescrire international, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:176

    Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received several lines of therapy have no satisfactory treatment options. High-dose corticosteroid therapy or a combination of low-dose dexamethasone and pomaildomide may be proposed. Panobinostat is the first histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor to be authorised in the European Union for use in this indication. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated panobinostat in 768 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who were also receiving bortezomib + dexamethasone. Panobinostat did not prolong survival. The median time to myeloma progression, relapse, or death was prolonged by about 3 months with the panobinostat-containing combination, and by a median of about 8 months in the subgroup of patients who had received at least two lines of chemotherapy including bortezomib and an "immunomodulatory" drug. There was no statistically significant increase in survival, however. In this trial, adverse events led one in six patients to discontinue panobinostat and resulted in numerous hospital admissions. The proportion of patients who died from causes unrelated to myeloma was 6.8% in the panobinostat group versus 3.2% In the placebo group. The toxicity of panobinostat affects most vital functions, resulting in a risk of infections as well as haematological, gastrointestinal, cardiac, renal, hepatic and thyroid disorders. These adverse effects are often severe and sometimes fatal. Panobinostat is subject to pharmacokinetic interactions via cytochrome P450 enzymes and P-glycoproteln, and also to pharmacodynamic Interactions. Panobinostat was teratogenic in animal studies. In practice, even when several previous lines of treatment have failed, panobinostatis more toxic than useful In patients with myeloma. It should therefore not be used.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diarrhea; Drug Interactions; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Infections; Mortality; Multiple Myeloma; Myocardial Ischemia; Neutropenia; Panobinostat; Progression-Free Survival; Renal Insufficiency; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia

2016

Trials

2 trial(s) available for panobinostat and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
Overall survival of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with panobinostat or placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (the PANORAMA 1 trial): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:11

    Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly increased median progression-free survival compared with placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 PANORAMA 1 trial. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis for this trial.. PANORAMA 1 is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial of patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with one to three previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive panobinostat (20 mg orally) or placebo, with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m. Between Jan 21, 2010, and Feb 29, 2012, 768 patients were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to receive either panobinostat (n=387) or placebo (n=381), plus bortezomib and dexamethasone. At data cutoff (June 29, 2015), 415 patients had died. Median overall survival was 40·3 months (95% CI 35·0-44·8) in those who received panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus 35·8 months (29·0-40·6) in those who received placebo, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·78-1·14; p=0·54). Of patients who had received at least two previous regimens including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug, median overall survival was 25·5 months (95% CI 19·6-34·3) in 73 patients who received panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus 19·5 months (14·1-32·5) in 74 who received placebo (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·68-1·50).. The overall survival benefit with panobinostat over placebo with bortezomib and dexamethasone was modest. However, optimisation of the regimen could potentially prolong treatment duration and improve patients' outcomes, although further trials will be required to confirm this.. Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Asthenia; Blood Cell Count; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Creatinine; Dexamethasone; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatigue; Female; Geography; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Immunologic Factors; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Panobinostat; Patient Dropouts; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Quality of Life; Renal Insufficiency; Sex Factors; Steroids; Survival Analysis; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

2016
A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of renal function.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015, Volume: 75, Issue:1

    This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat and its metabolite BJB432 in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal to severely impaired renal function.. Patients with varying degrees of renal impairment, defined by their 24-h baseline urine creatinine clearance (as normal, mild, moderate or severe), received a single oral dose of 30 mg panobinostat. Serial plasma samples were collected pre-dose and up to 96-h post-dose. Serial urine samples were collected for 24-h post-dose. Following the serial PK sampling, patients received 30 mg oral panobinostat thrice weekly for as long as the patient had benefit. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using non-compartmental analysis.. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, and median age was 64 (range 40-81) years. Eleven patients had normal renal function; 10, 10, and 6 patients had mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Geometric means of AUC(0-∞) in the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups were 224.5, 144.3, 223.1, and 131.7 ng h/mL, respectively. Geometric mean ratio of BJB432 to parent drug plasma AUC(0-∞) was 0.64 in the normal group and increased to 0.81, 1.13, and 1.20 in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The fraction excreted as unchanged panobinostat was small (<2 %), with a large variability. The renal clearance of panobinostat and tolerability was similar across all four groups.. Systemic exposure to panobinostat did not increase with severity of renal impairment, and the drug was tolerated equally; thus, patients with renal impairment do not require starting dose adjustments.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biotransformation; Drug Monitoring; Drugs, Investigational; Half-Life; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Kidney; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasms; Panobinostat; Patient Dropouts; Renal Insufficiency; Severity of Illness Index

2015

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for panobinostat and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat in the presence of cancer, renal impairment, and hepatic impairment.
    Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition, 2021, Volume: 42, Issue:6

    Renal (RIP) and hepatic (HIP) impairments are prevalent conditions in cancer patients. They can cause changes in gastric emptying time, albumin levels, hematocrit, glomerular filtration rate, hepatic functional volume, blood flow rates, and metabolic activity that can modify drug pharmacokinetics. Performing clinical studies in such populations has ethical and practical issues. Using predictive physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in the evaluation of the PK of alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat exposures in the presence of cancer, RIP, and HIP can help in using optimal doses with lower toxicity in these populations. Verified PBPK models were customized under scrutiny to account for the pathophysiological changes induced in these diseases. The PBPK model-predicted plasma exposures in patients with different health conditions within average 2-fold error. The PBPK model predicted an area under the curve ratio (AUCR) of 1, and 1.8, for ruxolitinib and panobinostat, respectively, in the presence of severe RIP. On the other hand, the severe HIP was associated with AUCR of 1.4, 2.9, and 1.8 for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat, respectively, in agreement with the observed AUCR. Moreover, the PBPK model predicted that alectinib therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid levels are achieved in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, moderate HIP, and severe HIP at 1-, 1.5-, and 1.8-fold that of healthy subjects. The customized PBPK models showed promising ethical alternatives for simulating clinical studies in patients with cancer, RIP, and HIP. More work is needed to quantify other pathophysiological changes induced by simultaneous affliction by cancer and RIP or HIP.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Carbazoles; Fasting; Female; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Nitriles; Panobinostat; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Renal Insufficiency

2021
Three cases of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma under hemodialysis treated with panobinostat/bortezomib/dexamethasone (FVD).
    International journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 106, Issue:4

    Three patients under hemodialysis (HD) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were administered panobinostat/bortezomib/dexamethasone (FVD). Case 1: The patient was a 66-year-old male with BJP-κ. FVD was effective, but HD could not be discontinued. He developed Grade 3 adverse events (AEs), including nausea, dehydration, and fatigue, following the common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0. FVD was discontinued after the third course, while HD was continued. Case 2: The patient was a 65-year-old female with IgG-λ + BJP-λ. Amyloidosis was complicated. The first course of FVD was effective, but HD could not be discontinued. She developed G2 AEs, including nausea and fatigue. The cardiac amyloidosis worsened, and she died of heart and renal failure. Case 3: The patient was a 79-year-old male with BJP-κ. FVD was effective, and the HD could be discontinued on day 12 of treatment. No AEs were noted. However, he declined continuation of the FVD and died of MM relapse and renal failure. We analyzed the pharmacokinetics of panobinostat. There were no correlations between dose level and blood level of panobinostat or between blood level, efficacy, and incidence of AEs. We additionally measured the rate of elimination of the drug by HD.

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Female; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indoles; Male; Multiple Myeloma; Panobinostat; Recurrence; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency

2017