palonosetron and Sleep-Initiation-and-Maintenance-Disorders

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of palonosetron (PAL) and dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1 only in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC). The primary endpoint was to evaluate the complete response (CR) rate in the delayed phase.. This study was a randomized phase 2. Regardless of assignment to either study arm, all patients received an intravenous prophylactic regimen of DEX (20 mg) within 15 min and then an intravenous dose of PAL (0.75 mg) as a bolus given 30 min before initiation of TC on day 1. Patients in the DEX 1-day group received no additional DEX on days 2 and 3. Patients in the DEX 3-day group received DEX (8 mg) orally on days 2 and 3.. Eighty-two patients had evaluable data on the primary outcome. The CR rates in the delayed phase between the two groups were not statistically significantly different (3-day group, 76.9 % [30/39]; 1-day group 69.8 % [30/43]; p = 0.4652). The frequency of constipation and insomnia which were antiemetic treatment-related adverse events was similar between two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.. Administration of a combination of PAL and DEX 1 day may prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the delayed phase for TC as well as administration of DEX 3 days. Further evaluation of the antiemetic regimen of combination of PAL and DEX 1 day for TC is warranted in future phase 3 trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Carboplatin; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Nausea; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Vomiting

Antipsychotics with dopamine (D2) receptor antagonism can be effective for emesis in cancer patients. Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) induced by typical antipsychotics can be exacerbated by other D2 receptor antagonists. We describe a case of persistent EPS induced by long-term, intermittent administration of low-dose olanzapine along with metoclopramide for emesis.. A 59-year-old pancreatic cancer patient underwent chemotherapy for 7 months. He was referred to the psychiatry department because of restlessness and insomnia. Although he did not have obvious depressive symptoms, he was anxious about the cancer treatment. For chemotherapy-induced nausea, he had been prescribed 5 mg of olanzapine intermittently for 7 months. He had last used the drug 9 days before presenting it to us. Additionally, he received metoclopramide and palonosetron as antiemetics. We considered akathisia and cancer-related anxiety/agitation as possible causes of restlessness and insomnia, and prescribed clonazepam. However, his symptoms worsened, resulting in hospitalization. We reconsidered his symptoms as cancer-related anxiety/agitation and prescribed quetiapine. Although it was effective, he had tremors and was assessed by a neurologist. Considering the clinical manifestations of rigidity, postural reflex disorder, and a mask-like face, we suspected drug-induced parkinsonism and replaced quetiapine with biperiden on the next day, leading to his discharge after 2 weeks. He did not have symptom recurrence even after discontinuation of biperiden.. Long-term, intermittent administration of low-dose antipsychotics with other antiemetics having D2 receptor antagonism can cause prolonged EPS. Especially in cancer patients, who often require polypharmacy, clinicians should consider exacerbated adverse effects due to drug interactions.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Biperiden; Clonazepam; Dopamine; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Palonosetron; Psychomotor Agitation; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Vomiting

This study aimed to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of a four-drug combination with those of a standard three-drug combination in Japanese patients with breast cancer treated with anthracycline. We retrospectively analyzed data from Japanese patients with breast cancer, who had received their first cycle of anthracycline and were treated with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone with or without olanzapine. This retrospective observational study was performed at Ehime University Hospital using the electronic medical records. Multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses were performed to compare the onset of complete response (CR) failure between the groups. One-hundred and thirty patients were included in this study and the four- and three-drug group had 22 and 108 patients, respectively. Similar to multivariable logistic regression analysis, propensity-adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that the four-drug group was markedly associated with a decreased odds of CR failure in the overall, acute, and delayed phases (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.73; OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.76; and OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.57, respectively). Additionally, treatment-related adverse events were well tolerated in both the groups. These findings suggest that the antiemetic efficacy of the four-drug combination is superior to that of the standard three-drug combination.

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Breast Neoplasms; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Nausea; Olanzapine; Palonosetron; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting