palonosetron has been researched along with Pain--Postoperative* in 7 studies
6 trial(s) available for palonosetron and Pain--Postoperative
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effects of palonosetron for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The preemptive multimodal pain protocols used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often cause emesis postoperatively. We investigated whether palonosetron prophylaxis reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk patients after TKA.. We randomized 120 female patients undergoing TKA to receive either palonosetron (0.075 mg, intravenous) or no antiemetic prophylaxis (0.9% saline, control group). All patients were given spinal anesthesia, a continuous femoral nerve block, and fentanyl-based intravenous patient controlled analgesia. Patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA were assigned to one group for the first knee and the other group for the second knee. The overall incidence of PONV, the incidences of both nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, complete response, requirement for rescue antiemetics, pain level, opioid consumption, and satisfaction scores were evaluated during three periods: 0-2, 2-24, and 24-48 h postoperatively. We also compared PONV and pain between the first and second TKA.. The incidence of PONV during the first 48 h was lower in the palonosetron group compared with the controls (22 vs. 41%, p = 0.028), especially 2-24 h after surgery, as was the nausea and vomiting respectively. The severity of nausea was lower in the palonosetron group (p = 0.010). The complete response rate (93 vs. 73%, p = 0.016) and satisfaction score (84 ± 12 vs. 79 ± 15, p = 0.032) were higher in the palonosetron group during 2-24 h after surgery. Patients who underwent a second operation complained of more severe pain, and consumed more opioids than those of the first operation. There was no difference in the incidence of PONV between the first and second operations.. Palonosetron prophylaxis reduced the incidence and severity of PONV in high-risk patients managed with multimodal pain protocol for 48 h, notably 2-24 h after TKA. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Antiemetics; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fentanyl; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines; Risk Factors | 2018 |
Comparison of Ramosetron and Palonosetron for Preventing Nausea and Vomiting after Spinal Surgery: Association With ABCB1 Polymorphisms.
Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms may influence 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist efficacy by altering their efflux transportation. We evaluated the influence of ABCB1 polymorphisms on the efficacy of ramosetron compared with palonosetron in managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients who received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after spinal surgery.. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 2 boluses (20 min before the end of surgery and 24 h after surgery) of either ramosetron 0.3 mg (n=150) or palonosetron 0.075 mg (n=146). The incidence and severity of PONV, fentanyl consumption, and pain intensity were serially assessed for postoperative 48 hours. ABCB1 3435C>T and 2677G>T/A polymorphisms were assessed.. The incidences of nausea were similar between the 2 groups in patients with the 3435TT (50% vs. 56%, ramosetron and palonosetron group, respectively, P>0.999) or 2677TT (50% vs. 56%, ramosetron and palonosetron group, respectively, P>0.999). Mild PONV were more frequent in the ramosetron group than in the palonosetron group among patients with 3435TT (91% vs. 33%, P=0.034) and 2677TT (92% vs. 20%, P=0.002) genotypes. The intensity of nausea experienced by ramosetron-group TT genotype patients (1 [1 to 2], 3435TT; 1 [1 to 2.5], 2677TT) was lower than that experienced by ramosetron-group non-TT genotype patients (3 [1 to 6], 3435 non-TT, P=0.030; 3 [1 to 6], 2677 non-TT, P=0.038) and palonosetron-group TT genotype patients (6 [2 to 7], 3435TT, P=0.010; 6 [4 to 7], 2677TT, P=0.002).. Compared with palonosetron, ramosetron may be superior for reducing PONV severity, especially in patients with ABCB1 3435TT or 2677TT genotype. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Antiemetics; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fentanyl; Genotype; Humans; Incidence; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Polymorphism, Genetic; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Spine; Young Adult | 2017 |
Implications of palonosetron in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with respect to its anti-shivering effect.
The elderly are vulnerable to hypothermia and have a higher risk of cardiovascular events induced by marked increases in oxygen consumption due to shivering. Five-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been previously reported to reduce post-anesthesia shivering.. In the present study, the authors investigated the effects of palonosetron, a new-generation 5-HT3 antagonist, on core hypothermia and the incidence of shivering after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.. Forty-eight patients (65-80 years) were randomly assigned to one of two groups and administered palonosetron 0.075 mg (palonosetron group, n = 24) or the same volume of normal saline (control group, n = 24) before anesthesia induction. Core body temperatures and hemodynamic variables were monitored during and after operation. Post-anesthetic shivering (PAS) and pain scores were obtained in a post-anesthetic care unit.. Intraoperative esophageal temperature changed significantly over time (P = 0.010), but significant intergroup difference in change was not observed (P = 0.706). Furthermore, shivering frequencies were similar in the two groups (P = 0.610). However, postoperative pain scores at 30 min after entering the post-anesthesia care unit were significantly lower in the palonosetron group (P = 0.002).. Regardless of the previously reported anti-shivering effect of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, pre-operative palonosetron 0.075 mg did not influence perioperative hypothermia or PAS in this study. This discrepancy might be due to the dose responsiveness of palonosetron to PAS and relatively low incidence of PAS in the elderly.. Pre-operative administration of palonosetron 0.075 mg did not influence perioperative hypothermia or post-anesthesia shivering in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, palonosetron might be beneficial for reducing early postoperative pain in elderly patients with opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Isoquinolines; Male; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Preoperative Care; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Shivering; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
Efficacy of palonosetron and ramosetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting related to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids after gynecological laparoscopic surgery (double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial).
The study was designed to assess the efficacy of palonosetron and ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) related to intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.. Patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups-C, P, R0.3 and RPCA. At the end of surgery, group C received an infusion of 50 ml normal saline, group P received palonosetron 75 μg mixed in 50 ml normal saline, and groups R0.3 and RPCA received ramosetron 0.3 mg mixed in 50 ml normal saline. A PCA pump containing fentanyl was connected for all groups; however, ramosetron 0.6 mg was mixed with the PCA regimen for the RPCA group. PONV and postoperative pain were assessed.. PONV incidence and scale, and Rhodes index in RPCA group between 24 and 72 h after discharge from the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) showed significantly lower values, compared with the other groups. PONV incidence and scale, and Rhodes index in P group and R0.3 group were lower than the corresponding values in C group at all times, without statistical significance.. A single dose of palonosetron 75 μg or ramosetron 0.3 mg was unable to prevent PONV related to IV PCA with opioids in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The combination of a single dose of ramosetron 0.3 mg, followed by ramosetron 0.6 mg mixed with PCA, significantly decreased PONV compared with a single dose of palonosetron 75 μg or ramosetron 0.3 mg. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fentanyl; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Isoquinolines; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines | 2015 |
Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postsurgical complications. Palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, is effective for PONV prevention. Herein, we compared palonosetron and aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) for PONV prevention in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery.. Ninety-three patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery under general anaesthesia were assigned to receive either a single intravenous injection of 0.075-mg palonosetron or 40-mg oral aprepitant in a double-blind randomised trial. The primary efficacy end points included complete response (visual analogue scale [VAS] nausea score <4 and no use of rescue therapy) 0-48 h after surgery. Nausea severity (0-10) and use of rescue therapy were monitored for 0-48 h. The secondary efficacy end points were the effect of aprepitant quantified using a 10-point VAS for pain, consumption of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and use of rescue analgesics.. Aprepitant was non-inferior to palonosetron in terms of complete response 0-48 hours after surgery (74% vs. 77%). At 0 and 2 h after administration, the nausea severity with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lesser than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron (P < 0.05). At 6 and 24 h after administration, fentanyl consumption with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lower than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron. Greater amounts of rescue analgesics were required in the aprepitant group.. Palonosetron and aprepitant were both effective for PONV prevention in the patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. The drugs can be used in combination for multimodal therapy because they bind to different receptors. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant on pain management in humans. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Isoquinolines; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Quinuclidines; Young Adult | 2014 |
Anti-emetic effect of ondansetron and palonosetron in thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Palonosetron is a new potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist. Although this drug is thought to be more effective in patients receiving opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), clinical data are lacking. This study compared the effects of i.v. ondansetron and palonosetron administered at the end of surgery in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk patients receiving i.v. PCA after thyroidectomy.. A total of 100 female non-smoking subjects were randomly assigned into a palonosetron group or an ondansetron group. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg bolus and 16 mg was added to the i.v. PCA mixture. In the palonosetron group, 0.075 mg was injected as a bolus only. Fentanyl-based PCA was provided for 24 h after operation. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, requirement for rescue anti-emetics, and adverse effects were evaluated during 0-2 and 2-24 h.. The incidence of PONV during the 24 h postoperative period was lower in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group (42% vs 62%, P=0.045). No differences were observed between the groups during the first 2 h. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting and nausea severity were significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group during 2-24 h. The only difference in the use of rescue anti-emetics was at 2-24 h (10% with palonosetron compared with 28% with ondansetron, P=0.02).. Palonosetron is more effective than ondansetron for high-risk patients receiving fentanyl-based PCA after thyroidectomy, especially 2-24 h after surgery. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Antiemetics; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Ondansetron; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Quinuclidines; Thyroidectomy; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2012 |
1 other study(ies) available for palonosetron and Pain--Postoperative
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of Ramosetron with Palonosetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Opioid-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Gynecological Laparoscopy.
We aimed to compare the effects of ramosetron and palonosetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients that received opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after gynecological laparoscopy. We reviewed the electronic medical records of 755 adults. Patients were classified into two groups, ramosetron (group R, Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Benzimidazoles; Electronic Health Records; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Isoquinolines; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Palonosetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Quinuclidines | 2017 |