palonosetron and Ovarian-Neoplasms

palonosetron has been researched along with Ovarian-Neoplasms* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for palonosetron and Ovarian-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Effects of Palonosetron on Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Multiple-Day Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.
    Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin, 2021, Volume: 44, Issue:4

    Patients who undergo multiple-day chemotherapy sessions experience hard-to-treat nausea and vomiting. Currently, there is no effective standard treatment for this condition. This study compared the preventive effect of first-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT

    Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Bleomycin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Etoposide; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Ovarian Neoplasms; Palonosetron; Platinum Compounds; Retrospective Studies; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Testicular Neoplasms; Vomiting

2021
Comparison of healthcare resource use between patients receiving ondansetron or palonosetron as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2011, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    To analyze the differences between ondansetron and palonosetron in healthcare resource use (i.e., inpatient/ outpatient encounters) among patients receiving intraperitoneal cisplatin.. A medical record review was performed. Intraperitoneal cisplatin administrations for gynecological cancers from January through June 2006 and from October 2007 through June 2008 were divided into two groups based on the serotonin-receptor antagonist used. The occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)-related hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient encounters occurring within 7 days after cisplatin administration was compared. CINV-related resource use was defined as events associated with dehydration, hypovolemia, nausea/vomiting, hypokalemia, constipation, shortness of breath, or syncope/collapse.. Ondansetron or palonosetron was used in 39 and 89 cisplatin administrations, respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with mean age of 59 years and ovarian cancer being the most common cancer. Length of stay was approximately 2 days. Palonosetron was always administered as a single-day therapy while one- or multi-day ondansetron therapy was administered in 27% and 73% of cycles, respectively. A trend towards more CINV-related hospitalizations with ondansetron versus palonosetron was observed (5.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.09) with no significant difference in other CINV-related encounters.. Palonosetron was associated with a trend to a lower risk of CINV-related hospital readmission than ondansetron in patients receiving intraperitoneal cisplatin for gynecological cancers, although not statistically significant. The duration of ondansetron therapy might be suboptimal with 27% of patients receiving only 1 day of therapy during hospital stay. These findings need to be confirmed in future studies.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Boston; Cisplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Emergency Service, Hospital; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Health Resources; Humans; Isoquinolines; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ondansetron; Ovarian Neoplasms; Palonosetron; Patient Readmission; Premedication; Quinuclidines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Serotonin Antagonists; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

2011