palonosetron and Genital-Neoplasms--Female

To explore efficacy of short-course olanzapine with or without low-dose dexamethasone for prevention of delayed emesis in gynecologic cancer patients receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel.. This was a prospective study in 81 chemo-naive patients receiving 0.25 mg intravenous palonosetron, 16 mg dexamethasone, and 10 mg oral olanzapine before chemotherapy. On days 2 and 3, patients randomly received 10 mg olanzapine (arm A; n=27), 10 mg olanzapine plus 4 mg dexamethasone (arm B; n=27), or 8 mg dexamethasone (reference arm C; n=27). The primary endpoint was total control (TC; no vomiting, no rescue antiemetics, and no nausea) on days 2-5, using a diary. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with no emesis impact on daily life using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire, and patient's satisfaction with antiemetic coverage.. Fifty-two percent of patients in arm A (. In this exploratory study with a small sample size, we did not find any clue about better control of delayed emesis with either olanzapine regimen in gynecologic cancer patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and receiving the same prophylaxis for acute emesis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carboplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Italy; Middle Aged; Nausea; Olanzapine; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vomiting

Palonosetron is effective for the management of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). While emetogenic carboplatin-based chemotherapy is widely used to treat gynecologic cancers, few studies have evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness of palonosetron in this setting.. A multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of palonosetron in controlling CINV in patients with gynecologic cancer. Chemotherapy-naïve patients received intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg/body) and dexamethasone before the infusion of carboplatin-based chemotherapy on day 1. Dexamethasone was administered (orally or intravenously) on days 2-3. The incidence and severity of CINV were evaluated using the patient-completed Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool and treatment diaries. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing complete control (CC) of vomiting, with "no rescue antiemetic medication" and "no clinically significant nausea" or "only mild nausea" in the delayed phase (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR: "no vomiting" and "no rescue antiemetic medication") in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and overall (0-120 hours) phases, and CC in the acute and overall phases.. Efficacy was assessable in 77 of 80 patients recruited. In the acute and delayed phases, the CR rates the primary endpoint, were 71.4% and 59.7% and the CC rates, the secondary endpoint, were 97.4% and 96.1%, respectively.. While palonosetron effectively controls acute CINV, additional antiemetic management is warranted in the delayed phase after carboplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients (Trial registry at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012806).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Palonosetron; Severity of Illness Index; Vomiting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most frequently encountered side effects of cancer treatment. Severe CINV can lead patients to refuse chemotherapy, which ultimately affects cancer outcomes. The development of fairly new antiemetic agents, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists, palonosetron and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and aprepitant has reduced the risk and incidence of CINV. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of aprepitant plus palonosetron against palonosetron for CINV in patients receiving moderately emetic cancer chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin combination [TC] therapy).. Between November 2010 and March 2014, 78 patients with gynecological cancer treated with TC therapy were randomized into two groups: an aprepitant group (administered aprepitant, dexamethasone and palonosetron) and a control group (administered dexamethasone and palonosetron). The primary study endpoint was complete response, defined as the complete absence of emetic events in the delayed phase.. The complete response rate in the delayed phase differed significantly between the two groups, with 82% in the aprepitant group and 97% in the control group (P = 0.025).. The combination of aprepitant and palonosetron appears to be of greater efficacy than palonosetron alone for the prevention of delayed-phase CINV induced by TC therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Carboplatin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Vomiting

Olanzapine is effective in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). In patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), its efficacy was reported as rescue therapy for breakthrough emesis refractory to triplet therapy (palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone). However, its preventive effects with triplet therapy for CINV are unknown. This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of preventive use of olanzapine with triplet therapy for CINV of HEC.. This study is a prospective multicenter study conducted by Kansai Clinical Oncology Group. Forty chemo-naïve gynecological cancer patients receiving HEC with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m(2)) were enrolled. Oral olanzapine (5 mg) was administered with triplet therapy a day prior to cisplatin administration and on days 1-5. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting and no rescue) rate for the overall phase (0-120 h post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were complete response rate for acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) and delayed phase (24-120 h post-chemotherapy) and complete control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no significant nausea) rate and total control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no nausea) rate for each phase. These endpoints were evaluated during the first cycle of chemotherapy.. Complete response rates for acute, delayed, and overall phases were 97.5, 95.0, and 92.5 %, respectively. Complete control rates were 92.5, 87.5, and 82.5 %, respectively. Total control rates were 87.5, 67.5, and 67.5 %, respectively. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events.. Preventive use of olanzapine combined with triplet therapy gives better results than those from previously reported studies of triplet therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Benzodiazepines; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Olanzapine; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Vomiting

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of palonosetron (PAL) and dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1 only in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC). The primary endpoint was to evaluate the complete response (CR) rate in the delayed phase.. This study was a randomized phase 2. Regardless of assignment to either study arm, all patients received an intravenous prophylactic regimen of DEX (20 mg) within 15 min and then an intravenous dose of PAL (0.75 mg) as a bolus given 30 min before initiation of TC on day 1. Patients in the DEX 1-day group received no additional DEX on days 2 and 3. Patients in the DEX 3-day group received DEX (8 mg) orally on days 2 and 3.. Eighty-two patients had evaluable data on the primary outcome. The CR rates in the delayed phase between the two groups were not statistically significantly different (3-day group, 76.9 % [30/39]; 1-day group 69.8 % [30/43]; p = 0.4652). The frequency of constipation and insomnia which were antiemetic treatment-related adverse events was similar between two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.. Administration of a combination of PAL and DEX 1 day may prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in the delayed phase for TC as well as administration of DEX 3 days. Further evaluation of the antiemetic regimen of combination of PAL and DEX 1 day for TC is warranted in future phase 3 trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Carboplatin; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Nausea; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Vomiting

There is no research regarding the appropriate antiemetic agents for female patients, especially those receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). We evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of a combination of 5-HT₃ receptor with/without aprepitant in patients with gynecological cancer treated with the TC (paclitaxel and carboplatin) regimen of MEC.. We enrolled 38 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer and scheduled to receive the TC regimen. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, either palonosetron in the first cycle followed by granisetron in the second cycle or vice versa. In the third cycle, all patients received a combination of the 5-HT₃ receptor and dexamethasone with/without aprepitant.. When three drugs were administered, palonosetron consistently produced an equivalent complete response (CR) rate to granisetron in the acute phase (89.5% vs. 86.8%, p=0.87) and delayed phase (60.5% vs. 65.8%, p=0.79). With regard to the change in dietary intake, palonosetron exhibited similar efficacy to granisetron in the acute phase (92.1% vs. 89.4%, p=0.19) and delayed phase (65.7% vs. 68.4%, p=0.14). However, in the delayed phase, the addition of aprepitant therapy with a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist and dexamethasone produced a higher CR rate than a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (93.3% vs. 47.8%, p<0.001) and allowed the patients to maintain a higher level of dietary intake (93.3% vs. 56.5%, p<0.001).. The addition of aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy of a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone in gynecological cancer patients treated with the TC regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Carboplatin; Cross-Over Studies; Diet; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Granisetron; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Vomiting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can affect a patient's quality of life, leading to poor compliance with further treatments. Previous studies have provided minimal data about carboplatin-based regimens. Female sex is a known risk factor for CINV. The purpose of this study was to evaluate palonosetron plus single-dose dexamethasone (DEX) for preventing CINV caused by carboplatin plus paclitaxel combination therapy (TC regimen) in patients with gynecologic cancers.. Patients were recruited for this phase-II, multicenter, randomized trial from 12 hospitals in Hokkaido, Japan. Eligible patients were women with uterine cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancer scheduled to receive conventional TC regimen or dose-dense TC regimen; 116 patients were randomly assigned to receive palonosetron in combination with 1-day DEX or 3-day DEX.. During the overall period, complete response (CR) was observed in 67.9% (95% confidence interval, 53.7-80.1) of patients in the 3-day DEX arm, and 60.7% (95% confidence interval, 46.8-73.5) of patients in the 1-day DEX arm; CR was significantly lower in the 1-day DEX arm if motion sickness was already present (P = 0.0370). In the severe hyperemesis gravidarum cohort, CR in the 1-day DEX arm tended to be lower than in the 3-day DEX arm.. Combination therapy of palonosetron and 1-day DEX was effective for subjects undergoing a TC regimen for gynecologic cancers. However, the possibility of reduced efficacy of 1-day only DEX therapy in women undergoing a TC regimen could not be refuted and requires further investigation.

Topics: Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Carboplatin; Dexamethasone; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Nausea; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Serotonin Antagonists; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is crucial for maintaining the quality of life of cancer patients. Female patients have been underrepresented in previous clinical studies of aprepitant or palonosetron. We performed a prospective multicenter study to investigate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy comprising these two agents and dexamethasone in female cancer patients receiving chemotherapy that included cisplatin (≥ 50 mg/m(2)).. Aprepitant was administered at a dose of 125 mg before chemotherapy on day 1 and at 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Palonosetron (0.75 mg) was given before chemotherapy on day 1. Dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 9.9 mg before chemotherapy on day 1 and at 6.6 mg on days 2-4. The primary endpoint was the the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) throughout the overall period (0-120 h post-chemotherapy).. Ninety-six women (median age 55 years) were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 54.2 %. CR was obtained during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) and the delayed phase (24-120 h post-chemotherapy) in 87.5 and 56.3 % of the patients, respectively. The most common adverse reactions were constipation and fatigue (reported by three patients each).. Exhibition of a favorable overall CR rate over existing two-drug combinations suggests that the triple therapy regimen used in the present study is effective and tolerable in patients with gynecological malignancies receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Female patients may have a higher risk of developing CINV.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neoplasms; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Vomiting

Patients with gynecological cancers are at high risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). NEPA (300-mg netupitant, 0.50-mg palonosetron) is the first oral fixed-combination antiemetic. Pivotal trials demonstrated the superiority of oral NEPA over intravenous palonosetron in preventing CINV after highly emetogenic (anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based [AC] and cisplatin-based [non-AC]) CT. This post hoc subset analysis considered patients with gynecological cancer receiving cisplatin- or carboplatin-based CT from 1 pivotal trial and from 1 multicycle safety trial to evaluate the efficacy of oral NEPA in preventing CINV.. Single-dose NEPA was given before CT in combination with dexamethasone. The efficacy end points for the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (25-120 hours), and overall (0-120 hours) CINV phases after CT included complete response (CR; no emesis, no rescue medication) and no significant nausea (<25 mm on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale). Safety was also assessed.. For cisplatin-induced CINV, NEPA achieved high CR rates (acute phase: >90%; delayed, overall phases: ≥85%). For carboplatin-induced CINV, NEPA was also highly effective, with high acute, delayed, and overall CR rates (cycle 1: >75%; cycles 2-4: >95%). No significant nausea rates were more than 90% and more than 80% in the acute and delayed phases, respectively, for patients receiving cisplatin or carboplatin. NEPA was well tolerated.. Results suggest that oral NEPA is effective and safe in preventing CINV in patients with gynecological cancers treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based CT. Single fixed-combination NEPA is a convenient option for CINV prevention in high-risk CINV patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Palonosetron; Pyridines; Vomiting

There is no positive evidence for the efficacy of antiemetic triplet therapy with aprepitant (APR), palonosetron (PALO), and dexamethasone (DEX) for moderate emetogenic chemotherapy, especially for gynecologic malignancies. Thus, the present study evaluated the efficacy of this triplet therapy in patients receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for gynecologic malignancy.. Seventy patients with gynecologic cancer receiving CP were enrolled into a prospective single-arm study with APR (125 mg on day 1, 80 mg on days 2-3), PALO (0.75 mg), and DEX (20 mg) before initiating chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was delayed complete response (CR) rate, i.e., no vomiting and no rescue, at 24-120 h after chemotherapy administration.. Seventy patients were enrolled. The delayed CR rate was 97.1% (68/70). No serious adverse events were observed. Younger patient age (≤50 years) tended to be associated with a poor delayed CR rate.. This study demonstrated a notable efficacy of antiemetic triplet therapy with APR, PALO, and DEX in female patients receiving CP. Further evaluation with a larger phase III trial is warranted.

Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Carboplatin; Dexamethasone; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Morpholines; Nausea; Paclitaxel; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines; Vomiting; Young Adult