oxyntomodulin and Hyperglycemia

Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Liraglutide; Male; Obesity; Peptides; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Patients with type 2 diabetes are characterised not only by compromised insulin secretion and action, but also by elevated plasma concentrations of the 29-amino acid peptide hormone glucagon, which generally is thought of as a pancreas-derived hormone (produced in and secreted from alpha cells in the islet of Langerhans). In patients with diabetes, circulating glucagon concentrations are elevated in the fasting state and fail to decrease appropriately or even increase in response to ingestion of nutrients. Glucagon is known to be a potent stimulator of hepatic glucose production, and, thus, the elevated glucagon concentrations in diabetes contribute decisively to the predominating trait of patients with diabetes namely hyperglycaemia. Interestingly, studies have shown that while oral intake of glucose results in inappropriately high plasma concentrations of glucagon in patients with diabetes, intravenous (iv) infusion of glucose does not. The mechanisms behind these differential glucagon responses to oral vs. iv glucose administration are currently unexplained. Three hypotheses were tested in the present thesis: 1) Could the inappropriate glucagon response to oral glucose ingestion in patients with diabetes be attributed to the release of glucagonotropic/glucagonostatic peptides secreted from the gut? 2) Could the inappropriate glucagon response to oral glucose ingestion in diabetes be a result of extrapancreatic glucagon secretion (possibly originating from the gut)? And 3) Does the differential glucagon responses between oral and iv glucose administration affect endogenous glucose production (EGP). The overall aim of this PhD thesis was, thus, to investigate the role of the gut in diabetic hyperglucagonaemia and hyperglycaemia. In Study I we examined the effect of the three gut-derived hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) on glucagon secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. We applied a 50 g-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and five isoglycaemic iv glucose infusions (IIGIs) with either saline, GIP, GLP-1, GLP-2 or a combination of the three hormones. We show that these gut-derived hormones affect glucagon secretion differently and that OGTT-induced secretion of these hormones may play a role in the inappropriate glucagon response to orally ingested glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes with especially GIP acting to increase glucagon secretion. In Study I

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucagon-Secreting Cells; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are injectable agents used for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. The interest for this pharmacological class is rising with the development of once weekly compounds and the demonstration of a potential reduction in cardiorenal outcomes. Areas covered: The paper describes the main pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of dulaglutide, a new once-weekly GLP-1 RA. Dulaglutide was extensively investigated in the phase-3 AWARD program, which demonstrated its safety and efficacy when compared to placebo or active glucose-lowering agents in patients treated with diet alone, metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy, oral dual therapies and basal insulin. In both Caucasian and Japanese patients, comparative trials showed better glucose control with dulaglutide, with a minimal risk of hypoglycemia and weight loss, but at the expense of an increased dropout rate due to side effects, mostly transient gastrointestinal disturbances. Dulaglutide proved its non-inferiority versus liraglutide and the safety and tolerance profile is similar to that of other GLP-1 RAs. Expert opinion: The once-weekly formulation and the combined positive effects on both glucose control and weight improves patient satisfaction despite nausea. Dulaglutide must prove its capacity to reduce cardiovascular and diabetic complications in the ongoing prospective REWIND trial.

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome

Chronic diseases have overtaken acute diseases, such as infections, as the major cause of premature mortality worldwide. Diabetes mellitus, a chronic degenerative metabolic disease, has reached epidemic proportions in the past 30 years, with worldwide prevalence approaching 400 million people.. The epidemic is largely secondary to an increasing sedentary lifestyle and highly prevalent overweight and obesity contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes. Clinical research efforts have developed and demonstrated effective strategies for prevention, and the annual incidence of diabetes in the United States may be decreasing for the first time in 3 decades. The long-term complications of diabetes cause severe morbidity and mortality. Here too the means of reducing the burden of microvascular and cardiovascular disease have been proved.. Improved glycemic control and better management of other identified risk factors for the complications of diabetes and more effective treatment of cardiovascular disease and microvascular complications have resulted in a more optimistic outlook for people with diabetes. This review focuses on recent advances in diagnosis and management and the remaining challenges in the prevention and treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Prediabetic State; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins; Thiazolidinediones

More than 26 million people in the United States have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Many treatment options exist, but achieving long-term glycemic control in patients with T2D remains challenging. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer a treatment option that improves glycemic control and reduces weight, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. They have emerged as attractive options for the treatment of T2D, and significant advances and developments continue to be published regarding these agents. To identify relevant literature on emerging issues related to GLP-1 RAs, a search of the MEDLINE database was performed. Studies published in English evaluating the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 RAs were analyzed. Because of their advantages and unique mechanism of action, GLP-1 RAs are currently being studied in new clinical areas, including in combination with basal insulin, as adjunctive therapy in type 1 diabetes, and for weight loss. In addition, there are several emerging agents in development. Lixisenatide is a once-daily GLP-1 RA that targets postprandial glucose and may be most useful when added to basal insulin as an alternative to rapid-acting insulin. Albiglutide and dulaglutide are once-weekly GLP-1 RAs that may offer more convenient dosing. The most common adverse effects of all GLP-1 RA agents are gastrointestinal (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), but the rates of occurrence vary among agents. Due to the differences in pharmacokinetics, efficacy, rates of adverse effects, and administration requirements within the GLP-1 RA class, each agent should be evaluated independently. The future of GLP-1 RAs offers broader treatment options for T2D as well as potential in other treatment areas.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Investigational; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Weight Loss

Incretin-based therapies, such as the injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and orally administered dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, have recently been introduced into clinical practice. At present, the GLP-1 receptor agonists need to be administered once or twice daily. Several once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists are in phase 3 development. This review examines the efficacy, safety and perspective for the future of the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists: exenatide once weekly, taspoglutide, albiglutide, LY2189265 and CJC-1134-PC, and compared them to the currently available agonists, exenatide BID and liraglutide QD. A greater reduction in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose was found with the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with exenatide BID, while the effect on postprandial hyperglycaemia was modest with the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist. The reduction in HbA1c was in most studies greater compared to oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin glargine. The reduction in weight did not differ between the short- and long-acting agonists. The gastrointestinal side effects were less with the once-weekly agonists compared with exenatide BID, except for taspoglutide. Antibodies seem to be most frequent with exenatide once weekly, while hypersensitivity has been described in few patients treated with taspoglutide. Injection site reactions differ among the long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists and are observed more frequently than with exenatide BID and liraglutide. In humans, no signal has been found indicating an association between the once-weekly agonists and C-cell cancer. The cardiovascular safety, durability of glucose control and effect on weight will emerge from several ongoing major long-term trials. The once-weekly GLP-1 receptor analogues are promising candidates for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, although their efficacy may not be superior to once-daily analogue liraglutide.

Topics: Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Liraglutide; Male; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Venoms

The current epidemics of excessive weight and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cause significant morbidity and mortality. T2DM frequently coexists with excess weight as well as hypertension and dyslipidemia, placing a significant percentage of the population at an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Maintaining effective glycemic control is linked with a diminished risk of developing microvascular complications, and recent studies have shown it may also reduce overall macro vascular complications. Reduction of associated risk factors, including those related to excessive weight, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia, are also necessary to meaningfully decrease cardiovascular risk. Agents that can improve glycemia with weight neutrality or weight loss could offer additional benefit to overweight patients with T2DM. Although the major pathophysiologic defects in T2DM are recognized to be beta-cell dysfunction and peripheral insulin resistance, derangements in the incretin system may contribute as well. Antidiabetes agents targeting this system include dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Both classes have been shown to significantly reduce hyperglycemia. GLP-1 receptor agonists also promote significant weight loss and have potentially beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk markers.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Protein Precursors

Topics: Animals; Brain; Feeding Behavior; Genes, fos; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperinsulinism; Neurons; Peptide Fragments; Protein Precursors; Rats; Rats, Zucker; Receptors, Glucagon; Venoms

We investigated whether dulaglutide (DU)-combined conventional insulin therapy is beneficial for glycemic control in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.. This study was a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Participants were randomized to either basal-plus (BP) therapy, where basal insulin and corrective doses of regular insulin were administered before meals, or BP + DU therapy, where BP therapy was combined with DU. Blood glucose (BG) levels before and after every meal were measured for 7 days after assignment to groups. Because we consider the ideal BG during hospitalization to be within 100-180 mg/dL, we defined this range as the hospitalized ideal glucose range (hIGR). We compared the percentage of BG measurements within the hIGR among all BG measurements (%hIGR), mean BG, glucose variability and insulin dose between the two groups.. Of 54 patients, 27 were assigned to the BP group and 27 to the BP + DU group. The %hIGR was significantly higher (44% vs 56%, P < 0.001), and the frequency of BG >240 mg/dL and BG <70 mg/dL was significantly lower in the BP + DU group than in the BP group (both P < 0.001). The mean BG (183 ± 29 vs 162 ± 30 mg/dL, P < 0.05), standard deviation (P < 0.01), coefficient of variation (P < 0.01) and total regular insulin dose (P < 0.05) in the BP + DU group were significantly lower than those in the BP group. No significant side-effects were observed in either group.. BP + DU therapy reduced the frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and resulted in a lower glucose variability.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Male; Pilot Projects; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

To assess the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide vs sitagliptin in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this phase IIIa randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicentre trial, Japanese adults with T2D treated with diet and exercise only or oral antidiabetic drug monotherapy (washed out during the run-in period) received once-weekly s.c. semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 100 mg. The primary endpoint was number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) after 30 weeks.. Overall, 308 participants were randomized and exposed to treatment, with similar baseline characteristics across the groups. In total, 2.9% of participants in both the semaglutide 0.5 mg and the sitagliptin group prematurely discontinued treatment, compared with 14.7% in the semaglutide 1.0 mg group. The majority of discontinuations in the semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg groups were attributable to adverse events (AEs). More TEAEs were reported in semaglutide- vs sitagliptin-treated participants (74.8%, 71.6% and 66.0% in the semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1.0 mg and sitagliptin groups, respectively). AEs were mainly mild to moderate. Gastrointestinal AEs, most frequently reported with semaglutide, diminished in frequency over time. The mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c [baseline 8.1%]) decreased by 1.9% and 2.2% with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, vs 0.7% with sitagliptin (estimated treatment difference [ETD] vs sitagliptin -1.13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.32; -0.94, and -1.44%, 95% CI -1.63; -1.24; both P < .0001). Body weight (baseline 69.3 kg) was reduced by 2.2 and 3.9 kg with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively (ETD -2.22 kg, 95% CI -3.02; -1.42 and -3.88 kg, 95% CI -4.70; -3.07; both P < .0001).. In Japanese people with T2D, more TEAEs were reported with semaglutide than with sitagliptin; however, the semaglutide safety profile was similar to that of other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight compared with sitagliptin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Constipation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Japan; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Severity of Illness Index; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Weight Loss

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes by subgroups of gender, duration of diabetes and baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the dulaglutide clinical development programme (AWARD-1 to -6 and -8 clinical trials).. Change in HbA1c was analysed by gender, duration of diabetes (<5, ≥5 years and <10, ≥10 years), and baseline HbA1c (<8.5%, ≥8.5%) in pooled and individual studies. Changes from baseline in weight, hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were evaluated for individual trials.. In the pooled analysis of patients treated with dulaglutide 1.5 mg at 6 months, the reductions in HbA1c from baseline were similar across gender (men: least squares [LS] mean -1.26% [95% confidence interval {CI} -1.36, -1.16]; women: LS mean -1.33% [95% CI -1.43, -1.24]) and among duration of diabetes subgroups (<5 years: LS mean -1.32% [95% CI -1.43, -1.22]; ≥5 and <10 years: LS mean -1.33% [95% CI -1.43, -1.22]; ≥10 years: -1.24% [95% CI -1.35, -1.14]). Patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% had greater HbA1c reductions than patients with baseline HbA1c <8.5%, (≥8.5%: LS mean -1.86% [95% CI -1.97, -1.75]; <8.5%: LS mean -1.02% [95% CI -1.12, -0.93]). Reductions in fasting blood glucose (FBG) were consistent with HbA1c changes. Similar results were observed with dulaglutide 0.75 mg. In general, body weight changes were similar among duration of diabetes and in baseline HbA1c subgroups, respectively; women had a numerically greater weight loss or less weight gain than men with both dulaglutide doses. There was no clinically meaningful difference in hypoglycaemia trends by gender or duration of diabetes. Hypoglycaemia incidence and rate were generally lower in patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% than in those with <8.5%, except for the AWARD-4 study (combination with mealtime insulin).. Across the AWARD studies, dulaglutide demonstrated significant improvements in glycaemic control irrespective of gender, duration of diabetes, or baseline HbA1c, with greater HbA1c and FBG reductions in patients with a higher baseline HbA1c. Dulaglutide was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sex Characteristics; Vomiting; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide as monotherapy or combined with an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) vs an additional OAD added to background therapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on diet/exercise or OAD monotherapy.. In this phase III, open-label trial, adults with T2D were randomized 2:2:1 to semaglutide 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg, or one additional OAD (a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, biguanide, sulphonylurea, glinide, α-glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) with a different mode of action from that of background therapy. The primary endpoint was number of adverse events (AEs) after 56 weeks.. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms (601 randomized). More AEs were reported in the semaglutide 0.5 mg (86.2%) and 1.0 mg (88.0%) groups than in the additional OAD group (71.7%). These were typically mild/moderate. Gastrointestinal AEs were most frequent with semaglutide, which diminished over time. The mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration (baseline 8.1%) was significantly reduced with semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg vs additional OAD (1.7% and 2.0% vs 0.7%, respectively; estimated treatment difference [ETD] vs additional OAD -1.08% and -1.37%, both P < .0001). Body weight (baseline 71.5 kg) was reduced by 1.4 kg and 3.2 kg with semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg, vs a 0.4-kg increase with additional OAD (ETD -1.84 kg and -3.59 kg; both P < .0001). For semaglutide-treated participants, >80% achieved an HbA1c concentration <7.0% (Japanese Diabetes Society target).. Semaglutide was well tolerated, with no new safety issues identified. Semaglutide treatment significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight vs additional OAD treatment in Japanese people with T2D.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Weight Loss

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists lower blood glucose in type 2 diabetes (T2D) partially through glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether beta-cell function (as measured by HOMA2-%B) at baseline affects the glycaemic response to dulaglutide. Dulaglutide-treated patients from AWARD-1, AWARD-3 and AWARD-6 clinical studies were categorised based on their homeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA2-%B) tertiles. Changes in glycaemic measures in response to treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide were evaluated in each HOMA2-%B tertile. Patients with low HOMA2-%B had higher baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial blood glucose, and longer duration of diabetes (P < .001, all) (mean low, middle and high tertiles with dulaglutide 1.5 mg: HOMAB-2%B, 31%, 58%, 109%; HbA1c, 8.7%, 7.7%, 7.3%, respectively). At 26 weeks, the low tertile experienced larger reductions in HbA1c compared to the high tertile with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (mean; -1.55% vs. -0.98% [-16.94 vs. -10.71 mmol/mol]). Differences between low and high tertiles disappeared when adjusted for baseline HbA1c (LSM; -1.00 vs. -1.18% [-10.93 vs. -12.90 mmol/mol]). Greater decreases in fasting blood glucose and greater increases in fasting C-peptide were observed in the low tertile. Similar increases in HOMA2-%B were observed in all tertiles. Dulaglutide demonstrated clinically relevant HbA1c reduction irrespective of estimated baseline beta-cell function.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; C-Peptide; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Resistance; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

To evaluate the effects of dulaglutide 1.5 mg on first- and second-phase insulin secretion in response to an intravenous (i.v.) glucose bolus challenge, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; primary objective) and in healthy subjects.. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study, subjects received a single subcutaneous injection of dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo on day 1 of each period. On day 3, subjects underwent a 6-hour insulin infusion, followed by an i.v. glucose bolus and a glucagon challenge during hyperglycaemia. Areas under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentrations for first- (AUC. In 20 subjects with T2DM, dulaglutide increased mean insulin AUC. In subjects with T2DM, a single dulaglutide 1.5-mg dose restored the first-phase insulin secretion in response to an i.v. glucose bolus, increased the second-phase insulin response and enhanced β-cell function.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome

To compare the addition of weekly dulaglutide vs the addition of placebo to titrated glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with sub-optimum glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration.. Patients (N = 300) from this phase III, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study were randomized to weekly subcutaneous injections of dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo with titrated daily glargine (mean ± standard deviation baseline dose: 39 ± 22 U), with or without metformin (≥1500 mg/d). The primary endpoint was superiority of dulaglutide/glargine to placebo/glargine with regard to change from baseline in HbA1c level at 28 weeks.. Least squares (LS) mean ± standard error (s.e.) HbA1c changes from baseline were -1.44 ± 0.09% (-15.74 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with dulaglutide/glargine and -0.67 ± 0.09% (-7.32 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with placebo/glargine at 28 weeks (LS mean difference [95% confidence interval] -0.77% [-0.97, -0.56]; P < .001). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide/glargine and increased with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -2.41 ± 0.39 kg; P < .001). Increases from baseline in mean glargine dose were significantly smaller with dulaglutide/glargine vs placebo/glargine (13 ± 2 U [0.1 ± 0.02 U/kg] vs 26 ± 2 U [0.3 ± 0.02 U/kg], respectively; P < .001; LS mean ± s.e. final dose: dulaglutide/glargine, 51 ± 2 U; placebo/glargine, 65 ± 2 U). The hypoglycaemia rate (≤3.9 mmol/L threshold) was 7.69 ± 15.15 and 8.56 ± 16.13 events/patient/year, respectively (P = .488). One episode of severe hypoglycaemia occurred in the dulaglutide/glargine group. Common gastrointestinal adverse events with dulaglutide were nausea (12.0%), diarrhoea (11.3%) and vomiting (6.0%).. Weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg added to basal insulin is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option for patients with T2D.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Aspart

We evaluated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures from the Assessment of Weekly AdministRation of LY2189265 (dulaglutide) in Diabetes (AWARD) clinical trial programme for dulaglutide (1.5 mg and 0.75 mg) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP), Impact of Weight on Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living (APPADL), Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite, EQ-5D, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised and Adult Low Blood Sugar Survey were administered and analysed for changes from baseline in one or more AWARD studies. Significant within-group changes from baseline to the primary time point were observed for several PRO measures across all studies. Compared with insulin glargine, significantly greater improvements in the IW-SP score were observed with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and with both dulaglutide doses in the APPADL score. Both dulaglutide doses resulted in significantly greater improvement in DTSQ scores (all subscales) compared with exenatide. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg also resulted in significantly greater improvement on the DTSQ hyperglycaemia subscale compared with metformin. Overall, these PRO results suggest that dulaglutide is beneficial in the treatment of T2D.

Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight; Quality of Life; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Self Report; Weight Loss; Weight Reduction Programs

The efficacy and tolerability of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were evaluated by subgroups defined by key demographic characteristics. This post hoc analysis included data from patients who received dulaglutide 0.75 mg for up to 26 weeks in three phase 3 trials (one open-label, randomized; one double-blind and open-label, randomized; one open-label, nonrandomized). Patients were classified into subgroups on the basis of sex (male, female), age (<65, ≥65 years), body weight (<70, ≥70 kg), body mass index (BMI; <25, ≥25 kg/m(2)), duration of diabetes (<7, ≥7 years), HbA1c (≤8.5, >8.5%), use of concomitant sulfonylurea (yes, no), and use of concomitant biguanide (yes, no). Efficacy measures analyzed were changes from baseline in HbA1c and body weight and percentages of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0%. Safety measures analyzed were incidence of hypoglycemia and nausea and change from baseline in seated pulse rate. A total of 855 patients were analyzed. Once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg improved blood glucose control as measured by HbA1c regardless of patient characteristics; patients with higher baseline HbA1c values had greater improvements compared to patients with lower baseline values. Weight loss was greater in patients with lower baseline HbA1c and in patients taking concomitant biguanides. Concomitant use of sulfonylureas had the greatest effect on the incidence of hypoglycemia. Treatment of T2D with once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg for 26 weeks was associated with significant improvement in glycemic control irrespective of age, sex, duration of diabetes, body weight, BMI, or concomitant medication.

Topics: Aged; Biguanides; Body Mass Index; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Overweight; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Loss

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on glimepiride monotherapy.. This phase III, randomized (4 : 1; dulaglutide:placebo), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week study compared the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with placebo in sulphonylurea-treated (≥half-maximal dose, stable ≥3 months) patients (N = 300) with T2D and inadequate glycaemic control [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5 and ≤9.5% (≥58 mmol/mol and ≤80 mmol/mol)]. Analysis was carried out according to intention-to-treat.. At baseline, the mean participant age was 58 years; mean HbA1c was 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) and mean weight was 85.5 kg. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to placebo at 24 weeks for HbA1c reduction from baseline with a between-group HbA1c difference of -1.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.6, -1.0] or -14 mmol/mol (95% CI -17, -11); p < 0.001. A greater proportion of participants in the dulaglutide group reached an HbA1c level of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) compared with placebo (55.3% vs 18.9%; p < 0.001). Dulaglutide significantly decreased fasting serum glucose from baseline compared with placebo (between-group difference -1.86 mmol/l (95% CI -2.58, -1.14) or -33.54 mg/dl (95% CI -46.55, -20.53); p < 0.001. Weight was decreased significantly from baseline in the dulaglutide group (p < 0.001); the between-group difference was not significant. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for dulaglutide 1.5 mg were gastrointestinal: nausea (10.5%), diarrhoea (8.4%) and eructation (5.9%). Total hypoglycaemia was higher with dulaglutide 1.5 mg vs placebo (2.37 and 0.07 events/participant/year, respectively; p = 0.025). No severe hypoglycaemia was reported.. Once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg had a favourable benefit/risk profile when added to glimepiride monotherapy.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Injections, Subcutaneous; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Therapeutic administration of peptides may result in anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation, hypersensitivity adverse events (AEs) and reduced efficacy. As a large peptide, the immunogenicity of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist dulaglutide is of considerable interest. The present study assessed the incidence of treatment-emergent dulaglutide ADAs, hypersensitivity AEs, injection site reactions (ISRs), and glycaemic control in ADA-positive patients in nine phase II and phase III trials (dulaglutide, N = 4006; exenatide, N = 276; non-GLP-1 comparators, N = 1141). Treatment-emergent dulaglutide ADAs were detected using a solid-phase extraction acid dissociation binding assay. Neutralizing ADAs were detected using a cell-based assay derived from human endothelial kidney cells (HEK293). A total of 64 dulaglutide-treated patients (1.6% of the population) tested ADA-positive versus eight (0.7%) from the non-GLP-1 comparator group. Of these 64 patients, 34 (0.9%) had dulaglutide-neutralizing ADAs, 36 (0.9%) had native-sequence GLP-1 (nsGLP-1) cross-reactive ADAs and four (0.1%) had nsGLP-1 neutralization ADAs. The incidence of hypersensitivity AEs and ISRs was similar in the dulaglutide versus placebo groups. No dulaglutide ADA-positive patient reported hypersensitivity AEs. Because of the low incidence of ADAs, it was not possible to establish their effect on glycaemic control.

Topics: Antibodies, Neutralizing; Cross Reactions; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Eruptions; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drugs, Investigational; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Risk; Severity of Illness Index; Solid Phase Extraction

Insulin is used to treat hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients but can cause hypoglycaemia, which is associated with poorer outcomes. In health glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a potent glucose-lowering peptide that does not cause hypoglycaemia. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of exogenous GIP infusion on blood glucose concentrations, glucose absorption, insulinaemia and gastric emptying in critically ill patients without known diabetes.. A total of 20 ventilated patients (Median age 61 (range: 22 to 79) years, APACHE II 21.5 (17 to 26), BMI 28 (21 to 40) kg/m(2)) without known diabetes were studied on two consecutive days in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, cross-over fashion. Intravenous GIP (4 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (0.9% saline) was infused between T = -60 to 300 minutes. At T0, 100 ml of liquid nutrient (2 kcal/ml) containing 3-O-Methylglucose (3-OMG), 100 mcg of Octanoic acid and 20 MBq Tc-99 m Calcium Phytate, was administered via a nasogastric tube. Blood glucose and serum 3-OMG (an index of glucose absorption) concentrations were measured. Gastric emptying, insulin and glucagon levels and plasma GIP concentrations were also measured.. While administration of GIP increased plasma GIP concentrations three- to four-fold (T = -60 23.9 (16.5 to 36.7) versus T = 0 84.2 (65.3 to 111.1); P <0.001) and plasma glucagon (iAUC300 4217 (1891 to 7715) versus 1232 (293 to 4545) pg/ml.300 minutes; P = 0.04), there were no effects on postprandial blood glucose (AUC300 2843 (2568 to 3338) versus 2819 (2550 to 3497) mmol/L.300 minutes; P = 0.86), gastric emptying (AUC300 15611 (10993 to 18062) versus 15660 (9694 to 22618) %.300 minutes; P = 0.61), glucose absorption (AUC300 50.6 (22.3 to 74.2) versus 64.3 (9.9 to 96.3) mmol/L.300 minutes; P = 0.62) or plasma insulin (AUC300 3945 (2280 to 6731) versus 3479 (2316 to 6081) mU/L.300 minutes; P = 0.76).. In contrast to its profound insulinotropic effect in health, the administration of GIP at pharmacological doses does not appear to affect glycaemia, gastric emptying, glucose absorption or insulinaemia in the critically ill patient.. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000488808. Registered 3 May 2012.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Critical Illness; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastric Emptying; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) and change version (DTSQc) were used to evaluate total treatment satisfaction and perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.. In the AWARD-1 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed in total DTSQs score for both dulaglutide doses (26 and 52 weeks) and exenatide (26 weeks). The improvement was significantly greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with placebo (26 weeks) and exenatide (26 and 52 weeks). The perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline. The improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses and exenatide compared with placebo at 26 weeks, and was also greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks. The exenatide group had an increase in perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia at 26 and 52 weeks. In the AWARD-3 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed for total DTSQs scores in all groups at 26 and 52 weeks. Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline, and this improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with metformin at 52 weeks.. Dulaglutide was associated with improvements in treatment satisfaction and a decrease in perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Peptides; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Venoms

AWARD-5 was an adaptive, seamless, double-blind study comparing dulaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, with placebo at 26 weeks and sitagliptin up to 104 weeks. The study also included a dose-finding portion whose results are presented here.. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on metformin were randomized 3 : 1 : 1 to seven dulaglutide doses, sitagliptin (100 mg), or placebo. A Bayesian algorithm was used for randomization and dose selection. Patients were adaptively randomized to dulaglutide doses using available data on the basis of a clinical utility index (CUI) of glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) versus sitagliptin at 52 weeks and weight, pulse rate (PR) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) versus placebo at 26 weeks. The algorithm randomly assigned patients until two doses were selected.. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was determined to be the optimal dose. Dulaglutide 0.75 mg met criteria for the second dose. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg showed the greatest Bayesian mean change from baseline (95% credible interval) in HbA1c versus sitagliptin at 52 weeks -0.63 (-0.98 to -0.20)%. Dulaglutide 2.0 mg showed the greatest placebo-adjusted mean change in weight [-1.99 (-2.88 to -1.20) kg] and in PR [0.78 (-2.10 to 3.80) bpm]. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg showed the greatest placebo-adjusted mean change in DBP [-0.62 (-3.40 to 2.30) mmHg].. The Bayesian algorithm allowed for an efficient exploration of a large number of doses and selected dulaglutide doses of 1.5 and 0.75 mg for further investigation in this trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Diet, Reducing; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Overweight; Receptors, Glucagon; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Young Adult

It was the aim of the study to examine whether the insulinotropic gut hormone GLP-1 is able to control or even normalise glycaemia in healthy subjects receiving intravenous glucose infusions and in severely ill patients hyperglycaemic during total parenteral nutrition.. Eight healthy subjects and nine patients were examined. The volunteers received, in six separate experiments in randomised order, intravenous glucose at doses of 0, 2 and 5mg kg(-1) min(-1), each with intravenous GLP-1 or placebo for 6 h. Patients were selected on the basis of hyperglycaemia (>150 mg/dl) during complete parenteral nutrition with glucose (3.2+/-1.4 mg kg(-1) min(-1)), amino acids (n=8; 0.9+/-0.2 mg kg(-1) min(-1)), with or without lipid emulsions. Four hours (8 a.m. to 12 a.m. on parenteral nutrition plus NaCl as placebo) were compared to 4 h (12 a.m. to 4 p.m.) with additional GLP-1 administered intravenously. The dose of GLP-1 was 1.2 pmol kg(-1) min(-1). Blood was drawn for the determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, GLP-1, glucagon, and free fatty acids.. Glycaemia was raised dose-dependently by glucose infusions in healthy volunteers (p<0.0001). GLP-1 ( approximately 100-150 pmol/l) stimulated insulin and reduced glucagon secretion and reduced glucose concentrations into the normoglycaemic fasting range (all p<0.05). In hyperglycaemic patients, glucose concentrations during the placebo period averaged 211+/-24 mg/dl. This level was reduced to 159+/-25 mg/dl with GLP-1 (p<0.0001), accompanied by a rise in insulin (p=0.0002) and C-peptide (p<0.0001), and by trend towards a reduction in glucagon (p=0.08) and free fatty acids (p=0.02). GLP-1 was well tolerated.. Hyperglycaemia during parenteral nutrition can be controlled by exogenous GLP-1, e.g. the natural peptide (available today), whereas the chronic therapy of Type 2 diabetes requires GLP-1 derivatives with longer duration of action.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatty Acids; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Parenteral Nutrition, Total; Peptide Fragments; Placebos

The effect of the insulinotropic incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), is preserved in typical middle-aged, obese, insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients, whereas a defective amplification of the so-called late-phase plasma insulin response (20-120 min) to glucose by the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is seen in these patients. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate plasma insulin and C-peptide responses to GLP-1 and GIP in five groups of diabetic patients with etiology and phenotype distinct from the obese type 2 diabetic patients. We studied (six in each group): 1) patients with diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis; 2) lean type 2 diabetic patients (body mass index < 25 kg/m(2)); 3) patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; 4) diabetic patients with mutations in the HNF-1alpha gene [maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)3]; and 5) newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. All participants underwent three hyperglycemic clamps (2 h, 15 mM) with continuous infusion of saline, 1 pmol GLP-1 (7-36)amide/kg body weight.min or 4 pmol GIP pmol/kg body weight.min. The early-phase (0-20 min) plasma insulin response tended to be enhanced by both GIP and GLP-1, compared with glucose alone, in all five groups. In contrast, the late-phase (20-120 min) plasma insulin response to GIP was attenuated, compared with the plasma insulin response to GLP-1, in all five groups. Significantly higher glucose infusion rates were required during the late phase of the GLP-1 stimulation, compared with the GIP stimulation. In conclusion, lack of GIP amplification of the late-phase plasma insulin response to glucose seems to be a consequence of diabetes mellitus, characterizing most, if not all, forms of diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; DNA-Binding Proteins; Female; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurotransmitter Agents; Nuclear Proteins; Pancreatitis; Peptide Fragments; Phenotype; Protein Precursors; Transcription Factors

Characterization of beta-cell function in humans is essential for identifying genetic defects involved in abnormal insulin secretion and the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.. We designed a novel test assessing plasma insulin and C-peptide in response to 3 different secretagogues. Seven lean, healthy volunteers twice underwent a 200 min hyperglycaemic clamp (10 mmol L-1) with administration of GLP-1 (1.5 pmol. kg-1. min-1) starting at 120 min and an arginine bolus at 180 min. We determined glucose-induced first and second-phase insulin secretion, GLP-1-stimulated insulin secretion, arginine-stimulated insulin response (increase above prestimulus, DeltaIarg) and the maximal, i. e. highest absolute, insulin concentration (Imax). Insulin sensitivity was assessed during second-phase hyperglycaemia. On a third occasion 6 subjects additionally received an arginine bolus at > 25 mM blood glucose, a test hitherto claimed to provoke maximal insulin secretion.. Insulin levels increased from 46 +/- 11 pM to 566 +/- 202 pM at 120 min, to 5104 +/- 1179 pM at 180 min and to maximally 8361 +/- 1368 pM after arginine (all P < 0.001). The within subject coefficients of variation of the different secretion parameters ranged from 10 +/- 3% to 16 +/- 6%. Except for second-phase which failed to correlate significantly with DeltaIarg (r = 0.52, P = 0.23) and Imax (r = 0.75, P = 0.053) all phases of insulin secretion correlated with one another. The insulin concentration after the arginine bolus at > 25 mM glucose (n = 6) was 2773 +/- 855 pM vs. 7562 +/- 1168 pM for Imax (P = 0.003).. This novel insulin secretion test elicits a distinct pattern of plasma insulin concentrations in response to the secretagogues glucose, GLP-1 and arginine and is highly reproducible and can be used for differential characterization of islet function.

Topics: Adult; Arginine; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Protein Precursors; Reproducibility of Results

Oral glucose induces a greater insulin response than i.v. glucose, a difference apparently due to the secretion of gut factors ("incretins"). Studies examining the mechanisms of this finding in human subjects are limited, however, because of differences in glucose profiles. To overcome this obstacle, we studied eight young nonobese subjects using the hyperglycemic clamp with and without superimposed ingestion of oral glucose. In both studies, glucose was acutely raised by 12.5 mg/dL above fasting values by the infusion of i.v. glucose and maintained at this level for 180 min. During the experimental study, but not the control, each subject ingested oral glucose (30 g) at 120 min, and the glucose infusion was adjusted to maintain the plasma glucose plateau. Plasma insulin responses were nearly identical during both studies until oral glucose was added. After oral glucose, both plasma insulin and C-peptide levels sharply increased by 45-55% above control values (p < 0.001), indicating a potentiation of insulin secretion rather than decreased hepatic extraction of insulin. Plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels increased significantly in response to oral glucose, whereas plasma levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-37) were not affected. The time course of the rise in plasma GIP and insulin was nearly identical. We conclude that the GIP response to a modest oral glucose load may play an important physiologic role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in healthy young subjects.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; C-Peptide; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Gastrointestinal Hormones; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Secretory Rate; Stimulation, Chemical

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (7-36 amide) is a physiological incretin hormone that is released after nutrient intake from the lower gut and stimulates insulin secretion at elevated plasma glucose concentrations. Previous work has shown that even in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients GLP-1 (7-36 amide) retains much of its insulinotropic action. However, it is not known whether the magnitude of this response is sufficient to normalize plasma glucose in Type 2 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control. Therefore, in 10 Type 2 diabetic patients with unsatisfactory metabolic control (HbA1c 11.6 +/- 1.7%) on diet and sulphonylurea therapy (in some patients supplemented by metformin or acarbose), 1.2 pmol x kg-1 x min-1 GLP-1 (7-36 amide) or placebo was infused intravenously in the fasting state (plasma glucose 13.1 +/- 0.6 mmol/l). In all patients, insulin (by 17.4 +/- 4.7 nmol x 1-1 x min; p = 0.0157) and C-peptide (by 228.0 +/- 39.1 nmol x 1-1 x min; p = 0.0019) increased significantly over basal levels, glucagon was reduced (by -1418 +/- 308 pmol x 1-1 x min) and plasma glucose reached normal fasting concentrations (4.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) within 4 h of GLP-1 (7-36 amide) administration, but not with placebo. When normal fasting plasma glucose concentrations were reached insulin returned towards basal levels and plasma glucose concentrations remained stable despite the ongoing infusion of GLP-1 (7-36 amide). Therefore, exogenous GLP-1 (7-36 amide) is an effective means of normalizing fasting plasma glucose concentrations in poorly-controlled Type 2 diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intravenous; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Time Factors

Symptoms associated with carbohydrate malabsorption limit the usefulness to diabetics of a powerful glycoside-hydrolase inhibitor (acarbose) which reduces postprandial glycaemia. Addition of a low dose (50 mg) of a acarbose together with 14.5 g guar gum to a breakfast test meal taken by 8 healthy volunteers reduced the mean peak rise in blood-glucose at 30 min by 70%. Areas under the insulin and gastrointestinal-polypeptide response curves were also greatly reduced. No evidence of carbohydrate malabsorption, as assessed by measurement of breath hydrogen, was found during any of the test periods. When acarbose was taken alone, 3 of the 8 subjects had troublesome symptoms and the 30 min rise in blood-glucose was reduced by only 28%. Thus, combination of these two agents effectively reduces the rate of carbohydrate absorption without increasing side-effects and may make combined acarbose and guar acceptable in the management of some diabetics.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cellulose; Cyclohexanols; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dietary Fiber; Eating; Galactans; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosidases; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Glycosides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Mannans; Oligosaccharides; Placebos; Polysaccharides; Trisaccharides

Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is characterized by elevated postprandial blood glucose, which commonly requires multiple insulin injections. We investigated whether a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dulaglutide (Dula), safely improved GC-induced hyperglycemia in inpatients, to reduce insulin injection frequency.. The data of hospitalized patients with GC-induced hyperglycemia treated with Dula (Dula group, n = 38) or without (non-Dula group, n = 38) were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline data were collected at the beginning of GC treatment. The primary outcome in this study was glycemic control, which was compared between the groups using the six-point blood glucose (before and 2 h after each meal) profiles at discharge. The daily injection frequency of injectable drugs at discharge were also compared between groups.. No specific trend of underlying diseases was observed between the non-Dula and Dula groups. The proportion of patients previously administered with GC pulse therapy was comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between groups, in the starting maintenance GC dose, GC dose at pretreatment of Dula and discharge, and cumulative GC dose during the observation. Six-point blood glucose levels at pretreatment and discharge were comparable between the two groups. However, daily injection frequency of injectable drugs and insulin dose were significantly lower in the Dula group than that in the non-Dula group. No differences were observed in the number of hypoglycemic events, the elevation of serum pancreatic enzyme levels, or gastrointestinal adverse events.. These findings suggest that Dula could provide glycemic control while reducing the insulin dose and injection frequency in inpatients with GC-induced hyperglycemia. The occurrence of adverse events such as gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycemia did not increase in the Dula-treated patients compared to those not treated, suggesting its safety.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucocorticoids; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Animals; Berberine; Colon; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Hyperglycemia; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes in an electronic medical record database to compare real-world, 6-month glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight outcomes for exenatide once weekly with those for dulaglutide and albiglutide. The study included 2465 patients: exenatide once weekly, n = 2133; dulaglutide, n = 201; and albiglutide, n = 131. The overall mean (standard deviation [s.d.]) age was 60 (11) years and 54% were men; neither differed among the comparison groups. The mean (s.d.) baseline HbA1c was similar in the exenatide once-weekly (8.3 [1.7]%) and dulaglutide groups (8.5 [1.5]%; P = .165), but higher in the albiglutide group (8.7 [1.7]%; P < .001). The overall mean (s.d.) HbA1c change was -0.5 (1.5)% (P < .001) and this did not differ among the comparison groups in either adjusted or unadjusted analyses. The mean (s.d.) weight change was -1.4 (4.7) kg for exenatide once weekly and -1.6 (3.7) kg for albiglutide (P = .579), but was greater for dulaglutide, at -2.7 (5.7) kg (P = .001). Outcomes were similar in subsets of insulin-naive patients with baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% or ≥9.0%. All agents significantly reduced HbA1c at 6 months, with no significant differences among agents or according to baseline HbA1c in insulin-naive subgroups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Weight Loss

Hyperglycemia is the major risk factor for microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the principal cause of death, and lowering HbA

Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Pioglitazone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

We report two patients with chronic hyperglycaemia secondary to type 2 diabetes who developed severe vomiting on d. The first patient was diagnosed with a mixed picture of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state (HHS) and the second, with DKA. They were on insulin therapy which was discontinued on commencing d because of inefficacy and weight gain. The HHS patient developed dehydration secondary to vomiting and had lactic acidosis but no other precipitant could be found in either case. It appears that the abrupt insulin discontinuation coupled with vomiting and dehydration led to the metabolic derangements. Subsequent C-peptide levels were found to be low in both patients. In view of the predisposition of patients with chronic hyperglycaemia to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) downregulation and the lag time to optimal efficacy of GLP-1R agonists, we propose that patients should have C-peptide levels measured to determine the risk of ketosis and whether insulin should be continued with dose adjustments when starting a GLP-1R agonist.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Male; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Dulaglutide is a new once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for the management of hyperglycemia in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. It stimulates dose-dependent insulin secretion and reduces glucagon secretion, both in a glucose-dependent manner. Efficacy on blood glucose control and safety were demonstrated in the large AWARD program in type 2 diabetic patients treated with diet, metformin, dual oral therapy or insulin lispro with or without metformin, confirming findings of pilot studies in Caucasian patients and data in Japanese patients. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly was superior to metformin, sitagliptin, insulin glargine and exenatide twice daily, and non-inferior to liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily regarding the reduction in glycated hemoglobin. A modest but significant weight loss was consistently observed. Most frequent adverse events were transient and generally mild gastrointestinal disturbances. Clinical outcomes of dulaglutide will not be known until the large prospective cardiovascular outcome trial REWIND is complete.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Diabetic osteopathy is a complication that leads to decreased bone mineral density, bone formation and having high risk of fractures that heals slowly. Diabetic osteopathy is a result of increase in osteoclastogenesis and decrease in osteoblastogenesis. Various factors viz., oxidative stress, increased inflammatory markers, PPAR-γ activation in osteoblast, activation of apoptotic pathway, increased glucose levels and inhibitory effect on parathyroid hormone etc. are mainly responsible for decreased bone mineral density. Berberine is an isoquinoline alkaloid widely used in Asian countries as a traditional medicine. Berberine is extensively reported to be an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and having potential to treat diabetic complications and glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. The osteoclastogenesis decreasing property of berberine can be hypothesized for inhibiting diabetic osteopathy. In addition, chronic treatment of berberine will be helpful for increasing the osteoblastic activity and expression of the modulators that affect osteoblastic differentiation. The apoptotic pathways stimulated due to increased inflammatory markers and nucleic acid damages could be reduced due to berberine. Another important consideration that berberine is having stimulatory effect on glucagon like peptide release and insulin sensitization that will be helpful for decreasing glucose levels and therefore, may exerts osteogenesis. Thiazolidinediones show bone loss due to activation of PPAR-γ in osteoblasts, whereas berberine stimulates PPAR-γ only in adipocytes and not in osteoblasts, and therefore the decreased bone loss due to use of thiazolidinediones may not be observed in berberine treatment conditions. Berberine decreases the advanced glycation end-products (AGE) formation in diabetic condition which will be ultimately helpful to decrease the stiffness of collagen fibers due to AGE-induced cross linking. Lastly, it is also reported that berberine has inhibitory effect on parathyroid hormone and enhances marker genes like osteocalcin, which are responsible for the osteoblastic activity. From these evidences, we hypothesized that berberine may have potential in the treatment of diabetic osteopathy.

Topics: Berberine; Calcitonin; Diabetes Complications; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Inflammation Mediators; Insulin Resistance; Models, Biological; Obesity; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Oxidative Stress; Parathyroid Hormone; PPAR gamma; Somatomedins

Glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide (tGLP-1) has attracted considerable potential as a possible therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes. However, tGLP-1 is rapidly inactivated in vivo by the exopeptidase dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV), thereby terminating its insulin releasing activity. The present study has examined the ability of a novel analogue, His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 to resist plasma degradation and enhance the insulin-releasing and antihyperglycemic activity of the peptide in 20-25-week-old obese diabetic ob/ob mice. Degradation of native tGLP-1 by incubation at 37 degrees C with obese mouse plasma was clearly evident after 3 h (35% intact). After 6 h, more than 87% of tGLP-1 was converted to GLP-1(9-36)amide and two further N-terminal fragments, GLP-1(7-28) and GLP-1(9-28). In contrast, His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 was completely resistant to N-terminal degradation. The formation of GLP-1(9-36)amide from native tGLP-1 was almost totally abolished by addition of diprotin A, a specific inhibitor of DPP IV. Effects of tGLP-1 and His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 were examined in overnight fasted obese mice following i.p. injection of either peptide (30 nmol/kg) together with glucose (18 mmol/kg) or in association with feeding. Plasma glucose was significantly lower and insulin response greater following administration of His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 as compared to glucose alone. Native tGLP-1 lacked antidiabetic effects under the conditions employed, and neither peptide influenced the glucose-lowering action of exogenous insulin (50 units/kg). Twice daily s.c. injection of ob/ob mice with His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 (10 nmol/kg) for 7 days reduced fasting hyperglycemia and greatly augmented the plasma insulin response to the peptides given in association with feeding. These data demonstrate that His(7)-glucitol tGLP-1 displays resistance to plasma DPP IV degradation and exhibits antihyperglycemic activity and substantially enhanced insulin-releasing action in a commonly used animal model of type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Eating; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Mice; Mice, Obese; Oligopeptides; Peptide Fragments; Protease Inhibitors; Protein Precursors; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Time Factors

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is known to stimulate insulin secretion and biosynthesis, but has also been shown to decrease insulin requirements in type 1 diabetic subjects suggesting insulin-independent effects. To assess whether GLP-1 exerts also direct effects on whole-body glucose metabolism, 6,6-D2-glucose kinetics were measured in 8 healthy volunteers receiving once GLP-1, once saline during hyperglycemic glucose clamping, while somatostatin with replacement amounts of insulin, glucagon and growth hormone was infused. Even though endogenous insulin secretion could not be blocked completely (increased plasma concentrations of C-peptide and proinsulin), somatostatin infusion resulted in stable insulin and glucagon plasma levels in both protocols (GLP-1 vs. placebo: NS). After 3 h of GLP-1 infusion, peripheral glucose disappearance significantly increased compared to placebo (p < 0.03) despite of somatostatin-induced suppression of insulin and glucagon secretion. Thus, GLP-1 infusion seems to have direct stimulatory effects on peripheral glucose metabolism in man.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Kinetics; Male; Peptide Fragments; Proinsulin; Somatostatin

Chronic hyperglycemia causes a near-total disappearance of glucose-induced insulin secretion. To determine if glucose potentiation of nonglucose secretagogues is impaired, insulin responses to 10(-9) M glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) (7-37) were measured at 2.8, 8.3, and 16.7 mM glucose with the in vitro perfused pancreas in rats 4-6 wk after 90% pancreatectomy (Px) and sham-operated controls. In the controls, insulin output to GLP-1 was > 100-fold greater at 16.7 mM glucose versus 2.8 mM glucose. In contrast, the increase was less than threefold in Px, reaching an insulin response at 16.7 mM glucose that was 10 +/- 2% of the controls, well below the predicted 35-40% fractional beta-cell mass in these rats. Px and control rats then underwent a 40-h fast followed by pancreas perfusion using a protocol of 20 min at 16.7 mM glucose followed by 15 min at 16.7 mM glucose/10(-9) M GLP-1. In control rats, fasting suppressed insulin release to high glucose (by 90%) and to GLP-1 (by 60%) without changing the pancreatic insulin content. In contrast, in Px the insulin response to GLP-1 tripled in association with a threefold increase of the insulin content, both now being twice normal when stratified for the fractional beta-cell mass. The mechanism of the increased pancreas insulin content was investigated by assessing islet glucose metabolism and proinsulin biosynthesis. In controls with fasting, both fell 30-50%. In Px, the degree of suppression with fasting was similar, but the attained levels both exceeded those of the controls because of higher baseline (nonfasted) values. In summary, chronic hyperglycemia is associated with a fasting-induced paradoxical increase in glucose-potentiated insulin secretion. In Px rats, the mechanism is an increase in the beta-cell insulin stores, which suggests a causative role for a lowered beta-cell insulin content in the impaired glucose-potentiation of insulin secretion.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Drug Synergism; Fasting; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucose; Hyperglycemia; In Vitro Techniques; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Organ Size; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Proinsulin; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; RNA, Messenger; Time Factors

The effect of insulin and glucose on fat-induced gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36 amide) (GLP-1 (7-36 amide)) was studied in five healthy subjects during continuous glucose infusion (Protocol 1) and during hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic blood glucose clamp (Protocol 2). In Protocol 1, 50 g fat was orally ingested and glucose was infused at a rate of 0.7 g/kg/h for 2 h continuously from the time of fat ingestion. Either glucose infusion alone or fat ingestion alone was carried out in the same subjects as the control. The release of GIP and GLP-1 (7-36 amide) was suppressed in the hyperglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state. In protocol 2, 50 g of fat was ingested and insulin was infused at a rate of 0.1 U/kg/h with an artificial pancreas system to obtain the normoglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state. The release of GIP was significantly suppressed in the normoglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state as well as in the hyperglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state. However, the release of GLP-1 (7-36 amide) was suppressed in the hyperglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state but not in the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic state. Thus, it is concluded that insulin inhibits fat-induced GIP, but not GLP-1 (7-36 amide), secretion and that glucose is likely to inhibit GLP-1 (7-36 amide) secretion.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Chromatography, Gel; Dietary Fats; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Injections, Intravenous; Insulin; Peptide Fragments; Peptides

Topics: Animals; Chromatography, Gel; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Hyperglycemia; Intestines; Mice; Mice, Obese; Obesity; Peptides