oxymorphone and Neoplasms

Opioids are recommended for control of moderate-to-severe, chronic, malignant, and nonmalignant pain. A controlled-release formulation of the opioid oxymorphone has recently been launched. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of oxymorphone as an analgesic in chronic pain. A systematic search for published studies of oral oxymorphone in the management of chronic pain was conducted. The studies were evaluated for their internal validity according to standard criteria. They were also evaluated for their external validity and research ethic aspects. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effect of oxymorphone compared with placebo. Nine studies were evaluated; three were excluded because of low quality. Six controlled studies (duration 2-12 weeks) included a total of 1489 subjects suffering from chronic low back pain, chronic pain from osteoarthritis, and chronic cancer pain. Three of the studies were of high quality and three of medium quality. External validity was assessed to be high, medium, and low (in one, three, and two studies, respectively). The meta-analysis suggests that daily doses of 40-100mg are superior to placebo; however, the estimate (reduction of pain intensity compared with placebo) of the treatment effect is imprecise (95% confidence interval -17.08, -8.69). Limited evidence suggests that oxymorphone is effective for pain control in patients with cancer. No significant differences between oxymorphone and oxycodone at equipotent doses were found. In conclusion, oxymorphone is superior to placebo. There is no evidence that the efficacy of oxymorphone differs from other opioids.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Disease; Humans; Low Back Pain; Neoplasms; Osteoarthritis; Oxymorphone; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Pain among the elderly is pervasive, under-treated and can be properly managed by judiciously using analgesics in the armamentarium. For severe pain, opioids generally provide the most effective pain relief, but concerns about safety and tolerability have limited, often unnecessarily, their utilization in the geriatric population.. It is common for geriatric patients to be taking more than one medicine. Oxymorphone might be particularly well suited for use in geriatric patients, in that its metabolism is mainly through non-CYPP450 pathways, thereby posing less risk of interaction with the many drugs that are metabolized by the CYPP450 system. However, oxymorphone is not as familiar to clinicians as morphine or some other opioids. We review here the clinical studies on oxymorphone to outline the key considerations for use of oxymorphone in the geriatric population.. Nine available clinical trials of oxymorphone alone or comparing oxymorphone with placebo or other active agents were analyzed with respect to the safety and tolerability findings. These studies included geriatric patients but were not designed to evaluate oxymorphone exclusively in this population.. Based on the results from nine published clinical studies, oxymorphone is an effective opioid analgesic with a safety profile at least comparable to other opioid drugs. At low starting doses and individual titration, oxymorphone should be considered for appropriate geriatric patients, particularly in whom there is concern about interaction with drugs that are metabolized by CYPP450 enzymes.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthralgia; Biotransformation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Constipation; Drug Interactions; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Liver; Narcotics; Nausea; Neoplasms; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxymorphone; Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Polypharmacy; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Sleep Stages; Vomiting

Oxymorphone (oxymorphone hydrochloride) (14-hydroxy-dihydromorphinone), a semisynthetic mu-opioid agonist, was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1959. Oxymorphone is considered a more potent opioid than its parent compound, morphine. Recently, an immediate-release and long-acting oral formulation of this drug was developed that makes oxymorphone a new option in treating moderate to severe pain. This article reviews the pharmacodynamics, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy for this new option in treating moderate to severe pain.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Humans; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain

In vertebrates, the glucuronidation of small lipophilic agents is catalyzed by the endoplasmic reticulum UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). This metabolic pathway leads to the formation of water-soluble metabolites originating from normal dietary processes, cellular catabolism, or exposure to drugs and xenobiotics. This classic detoxification process, which led to the discovery nearly 50 years ago of the cosubstrate UDP-glucuronic acid (19), is now known to be carried out by 15 human UGTs. Characterization of the individual gene products using cDNA expression experiments has led to the identification of over 350 individual compounds that serve as substrates for this superfamily of proteins. This data, coupled with the introduction of sophisticated RNA detection techniques designed to elucidate patterns of gene expression of the UGT superfamily in human liver and extrahepatic tissues of the gastrointestinal tract, has aided in understanding the contribution of glucuronidation toward epithelial first-pass metabolism. In addition, characterization of the UGT1A locus and genetic studies directed at understanding the role of bilirubin glucuronidation and the biochemical basis of the clinical symptoms found in unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia have uncovered the structural gene polymorphisms associated with Crigler-Najjar's and Gilbert's syndrome. The role of the UGTs in metabolism and different disease states in humans is the topic of this review.

Topics: Autoimmunity; Chromosome Mapping; Glucuronides; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Neoplasms; Steroids; Terminology as Topic

Oxycodone is a µ-opioid receptor agonist widely used in the treatment of cancer pain. The predominant metabolic pathway of oxycodone is CYP3A4-mediated N-demethylation to noroxycodone, while a minor proportion undergoes 3-O-demethylation to oxymorphone by CYP2D6. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the mild CYP3A4 inhibitor aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered controlled-release (CR) oxycodone.. This study design was an open-label, single-sequence with two phases in cancer patients with pain who continued to be administered orally with multiple doses of CR oxycodone every 8 or 12 hours. Plasma concentration of oxycodone and its metabolites were measured up to 8 hours after administration as follows: on day 1, CR oxycodone was administered alone; on day 2, CR oxycodone was administered with aprepitant (125 mg, at the same time of oxycodone dosing in the morning). The steady-state trough concentrations (Css) were measured from day 1 to day 3.. Aprepitant increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-8) of oxycodone by 25% (p<0.001) and of oxymorphone by 34% (p<0.001), as well as decreased the AUC0-8 of noroxycodone by 14% (p<0.001). Moreover, aprepitant increased Css of oxycodone by 57% (p = 0.001) and of oxymorphone by 36% (p<0.001) and decreased Css of noroxycodone by 24% (p = 0.02) at day 3 compared to day 1.. The clinical use of aprepitant in patients receiving multiple doses of CR oxycodone for cancer pain significantly altered plasma concentration levels, but would not appear to need modification of the CR oxycodone dose.. UMIN.ac.jp UMIN000003580.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Aprepitant; Area Under Curve; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pain

This study evaluated the plasma concentrations of oxycodone and its demethylates and opioid-induced adverse effects based on cachexia stage in cancer patients receiving oxycodone. Seventy patients receiving oxycodone for cancer pain were enrolled. Cachexia was evaluated using the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). Predose plasma concentrations of oxycodone, oxymorphone, and noroxycodone were determined at the titration dose. Opioid-induced adverse effects were monitored for 2 weeks after the titration. Plasma concentrations of oxycodone and oxymorphone but not noroxycodone in patients with a GPS of 2 were significantly higher than that with a GPS of 0. The metabolic ratios of noroxycodone but not oxymorphone to oxycodone in patients with a GPS of 1 and 2 were significantly lower than in those with a GPS of 0. A higher GPS was associated with a higher incidence of somnolence, while the GPS did not affect the incidence of vomiting. Plasma concentrations of oxycodone and oxymorphone were not associated with the incidence of adverse effects. In conclusion, cancer cachexia raised the plasma exposures of oxycodone and oxymorphone through the reduction of CYP3A but not CYP2D6. Although the cachexia elevated the incidence of somnolence, alterations in their pharmacokinetics were not associated with the incidence.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cachexia; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pain

Oxycodone is widely used for the treatment of cancer pain, but little is known of its pharmacokinetics in cancer pain patients. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between ordinary patient characteristics and serum concentrations of oxycodone and the ratios noroxycodone or oxymorphone/oxycodone in cancer patients.. Four hundred and thirty-nine patients using oral oxycodone for cancer pain were included. The patients' characteristics (sex, age, body mass index [BMI], Karnofsky performance status, "time since starting opioids", "oxycodone total daily dose", "time from last oxycodone dose", use of CYP3A4 inducer/inhibitor, "use of systemic steroids", "number of medications taken in the last 24 h", glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albumin serum concentrations) influence on oxycodone serum concentrations or metabolite/oxycodone ratios were explored by multiple regression analyses.. Sex, CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors, total daily dose, and "time from last oxycodone dose" predicted oxycodone concentrations. CYP3A4 inducers, total daily dose, and "number of medications taken in the last 24 h" predicted the oxymorphone/oxycodone ratio. Total daily dose, "time from last dose to blood sample", albumin, sex, CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors, steroids, BMI and GFR predicted the noroxycodone/oxycodone ratio.. Women had lower oxycodone serum concentrations than men. CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors should be used with caution as these are predicted to have a significant impact on oxycodone pharmacokinetics. Other characteristics explained only minor parts of the variability of the outcomes.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pain; Sex Factors

The aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma dispositions of oxycodone and its demethylates and dose escalation based on genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6, CYP3A5, ABCB1, and OPRM1 in cancer patients receiving oxycodone. Sixty-two Japanese cancer patients receiving oxycodone extended-release tablets were enrolled. Predose plasma concentrations (C(12)) of oxycodone, noroxycodone, and oxymorphone were determined at the titrated dose. Daily oxycodone escalation rate was evaluated as the opioid escalation index (OEI). Genetic variants did not significantly alter oxycodone C(12). Oxymorphone C(12) and its ratio to oxycodone C(12) were significantly higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers than in intermediate metabolizers but did not affect dose escalation. In contrast, noroxycodone C(12) and its ratio to oxycodone C(12) were significantly higher in the CYP3A5*1 carrier group than in the *3/*3 group. The OEI was significantly higher in the CYP3A5*3/*3 group than in the *1 carrier group. No significant difference was observed in the OEI in the other genetic variants. Noroxycodone C(12) was higher in the dose escalation group as compared to the nonescalation group and significantly affected the incidence of dose escalation. In conclusion, CYP3A5*3 altered the plasma disposition of noroxycodone, which was inversely affecting the dose escalation in cancer patients receiving oxycodone.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Polymorphism, Genetic; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Inadequate analgesia and/or unmanageable adverse events frequently result in the need to rotate patients with cancer pain to a different opioid. The availability of a novel oral extended-release (ER) formulation of oxymorphone provides clinicians with another treatment option. In this study, we assessed the analgesic effectiveness and safety of the new oral ER formulation of oxymorphone following treatment with controlled-release (CR) morphine sulfate or oxycodone.. Adults with moderate to severe cancer pain were stabilized for > or =3 days on morphine CR or oxycodone CR, and then treated for 7 days at their stabilized dose. Drug selection was based upon patients' previous use or investigator preference. Patients were then crossed over for 7 days of treatment at an estimated equianalgesic dosage of oxymorphone ER. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and adverse events were recorded.. A total of 86 patients entered open-label treatment. Of 34 patients assigned to morphine CR and 52 assigned to oxycodone CR, 21 (61.8%) and 42 (80.8%) completed stabilization and began treatment with oxymorphone ER, respectively; 59 of 63 (93.7%) completed treatment with oxymorphone. There were no significant differences in daily pain intensity scores between oxymorphone ER and comparators (paired t -test). Rescue medication use, expressed as the percent of the daily dose of scheduled opioid, was greater during morphine CR treatment than after crossover to oxymorphone ER (25.2% vs 13.3%; P <0.05, Wilcoxon's test). The tolerability/safety profiles (e.g., nausea, drowsiness, somnolence) were similar for all opioids.. Cancer patients stabilized on morphine CR or oxycodone CR were safely and rapidly converted to a lower milligram dose of oxymorphone ER that provided adequate pain relief with comparable tolerability. These results justify additional trials with oxymorphone ER.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Middle Aged; Morphine; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of oxymorphone extended release (ER) and oxycodone controlled release (CR) in patients with moderate to severe cancer pain.. This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 2-period crossover study included adult outpatients (>or= 18 years of age) with moderate or severe cancer pain who were first titrated for 3-10 days with open-label oxymorphone or oxycodone to achieve a stable dose that provided and other efficacy parameters were comparable for adequate analgesia with tolerable adverse events and no requirement for more than 2 doses of rescue medication per day. The subsequent double-blind treatment phase was a 7- to 10-day period of oxycodone CR or oxymorphone ER treatment followed by crossing over to the alternate medication for another 7-10 days. During the treatment phase, up to 2 doses per day of morphine sulfate 15-mg tablets were allowed as rescue.. Assessments included the Brief Pain Inventory, global evaluations, Karnofsky performance status, and clinical laboratory evaluations (serum chemistry profile, complete blood count, urinalysis). Efficacy variables were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with treatment, sequence, and period as fixed effects and subject as a random effect.. Forty-seven patients entered the titration/stabilization phase, 44 received at least 1 dose of study drug, 42 completed the first double-blind phase, and 40 completed the second double-blind phase. Mean pain intensity scores the 2 groups. The mean daily dosage of oxycodone CR (91.9 mg) was twice that of oxymorphone ER (45.9 mg), an equianalgesic dose ratio of 2:1. Rescue medication use was low in both groups (approximately 1 tablet of morphine sulfate 15 mg/day). No significant differences in opioid adverse events were observed between the groups.. Adult patients with cancer who were taking oxycodone CR were readily converted to oxymorphone ER and required half the milligram dose to stabilize their pain. Within 72 h, most patients achieved a stable dose that provided adequate relief with similar opioid adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pain; United States

Thirty patients with cancer pain completed a double-blind crossover study comparing controlled-release (CR) and immediate-release (IR) oxycodone. In open-label titration (2 to 21 days), these patients were stabilized on IR oxycodone qid. They were then randomized to double-blind treatment with CR oxycodone q12h or IR oxycodone qid for 3 to 7 days followed by crossover at the same daily dose. Mean (+/- SD) pain intensity (0 = none to 10 = severe) decreased from a baseline of 6.0 +/- 2.2 to 2.7 +/- 1.1 after titration with IR oxycodone dosed qid. Pain intensity remained stable throughout double-blind treatment: 2.7 +/- 1.9 with CR oxycodone and 2.8 +/- 1.9 with IR oxycodone. Acceptability of therapy and pain scores correlated with plasma oxycodone concentrations for each interval and were similar for both medications (IR and CR oxycodone). Adverse events were similar for both formulations. Following repeat dosing under double-blind conditions, oral CR oxycodone administered q12h provided analgesia comparable to IR oxycodone given qid.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Biological Availability; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pain; Pain Measurement; Therapeutic Equivalency; Vomiting

The relative analgesic potency of oral and intramuscular oxymorphone was evaluated in a double-blind crossover comparison of graded single doses in patients with chronic pain due to cancer. When both duration and intensity of analgesia are considered (total effect), oral oxymorphone was 1/6 as potent as the intramuscular form. In terms of peak effect, however, oral oxymorphone was only 1/14 as potent. These values are almost identical to those obtained in a previous study comparing oral with intramuscular morphine. The analgesic effect of oral oxymorphone rose to a peak later and had a longer duration than the effect of intramuscular oxymorphone. Intramuscular oxymorphone and morphine were also compared in a similar patient group. Intramuscular oxymorphone proved to be 8.7 times as potent as morphine in terms of total analgesic effect and 13 times as potent in terms of peak effect. In roughly equinalgesic doses, the occurrence of side effects was qualitatively and quantitatively similar for oral and intramuscular oxymorphone and for intramuscular oxymorphone and morphine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Analgesics; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Hydromorphone; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain; Placebos; Time Factors

Cancer immunotherapy has significantly contributed to the treatment of various types of cancers mainly by targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Among them, V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) has been explored as a promising therapeutic target. Besides, histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) has been demonstrated to be efficacious target for several cancers. The current theoretical work was performed to explore the virtual repurposing of the FDA-approved drugs as inhibitors against these two (VISTA and HDAC6) cancers therapeutic targets. The crystal structure of the two proteins were downloaded from PDB and subjected to virtual screening by DrugRep webserver while using FDA-approved drugs library as ligands database. Our study revealed that Oxymorphone and Bexarotene are the top-ranked inhibitors of VISTA and HDAC6, respectively. The docking score of Bexarotene was predicted as - 10 kcal/mol while the docking score of Oxymorphone was predicted as - 6.2 kcal/mol. Furthermore, a total of 100 ns MD simulation revealed that the two drugs Oxymorphone and Bexarotene formed stable complexes with VISTA and HDAC6 drug targets. As compared to the standard drug the two drugs Oxymorphone and Bexarotene revealed great stability during the whole 100 ns MD simulation. The binding free energy calculation further supported the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) result which stated that as compared to the ref/HDAC6 (- 18.0253 ± 2.6218) the binding free energy score of the Bexarotene/HDAC6 was good (- 51.9698 ± 3.1572 kcal/mol). The binding free energy score of Oxymorphone/VISTA and Ref/VISTA were calculated as - 36.8323 ± 3.4565, and - 21.5611 ± 4.8581 respectively. In conclusion, the two drugs deserve further consideration as cancer treatment option.

Topics: Bexarotene; Blood Group Antigens; Early Detection of Cancer; Histone Deacetylase 6; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone

Cancer patients often require feeding or venting gastrostomy-tubes (G-tubes) for enteral nutrition or symptom palliation. The administration of most extended-release (ER) opioids via the G-tube or orally followed by clamping of the venting G-tube is contraindicated. Oxymorphone immediate release (IR) may be useful because of its longer half-life compared to other IR opioids. We examined the use of oxymorphone IR administered every 8 hours in patients with G-tubes.. This was a retrospective chart review of 40 consecutive cancer patients with G-tubes who underwent opioid rotation (OR) to oxymorphone. Demographics, symptoms, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and oxymorphone dose were collected. Successful OR was defined as a 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score and continued use of oxymorphone at follow-up in outpatient setting, or discharge in inpatient setting. Opioid rotation ration (ORR) between MEDD and oxymorphone in patients with successful OR was calculated as MEDD before the OR divided by total oxymorphone dose/day at follow-up or discharge.. The median age was 56 years, 57.5% were white, 68% male, 47.5% (n=19) had head and neck cancer, 90% had advanced disease, 67.5% (n=27) were inpatient, and 15% (n=6) had venting G-tubes. 25/40 (62.5%) patients had successful OR to oxymorphone. The median ORR from MEDD to oxymorphone was 3.5 (IQR, 3.1-4). There were no independent predictors for successful OR, and ORR did not significantly differ among various groups.. Oxymorphone IR can be used successfully in cancer patients with G-tubes using an ORR of 3.5 to calculate dose from MEDD.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Gastrostomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain; Retrospective Studies

Opioids are recommended by the World Health Organization for moderate to severe cancer pain. Oxycodone is one of the most commonly used opioids and is metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 enzymes. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the relationship between oxycodone pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and the CYP2D6 genotypes "poor metaboliser" (PM), "extensive metaboliser" (EM) and "ultra-rapid metaboliser" (URM) in a cohort of patients with cancer pain.. The patients were genotyped for the most common CYP2D6 variants and serum concentrations of oxycodone and metabolites were determined. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used to assess the symptoms of tiredness and nausea. Cognitive function was assessed by the Mini Mental State (MMS) examination. Associations were examined by analyses of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA), or ordinal logistic regressions with and without covariates.. The sample consisted of 27 PM, 413 EM (including heterozygotes) and 10 URM. PM had lower oxymorphone and noroxymorphone serum concentrations and oxymorphone to oxycodone ratios than EM and URM. No differences between PM, EM and URM in pain intensity, nausea, tiredness or cognitive function was found.. CYP2D6 genotypes caused expected differences in pharmacokinetics, but they had no pharmacodynamic consequence. CYP2D6 genotypes did not influence pain control, the adverse symptoms nausea and sedation or the risk for cognitive failure in this study of patients treated with oxycodone for cancer pain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Biotransformation; Chronic Pain; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors; Drug Monitoring; Europe; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Polymorphism, Genetic; Severity of Illness Index

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Humans; Low Back Pain; Neoplasms; Opioid-Related Disorders; Osteoarthritis; Oxymorphone; Pain; Pain, Postoperative

To assess the safety, efficacy, and use of continuous iv infusion (CI) of opioids for cancer pain, we reviewed the clinical experience of 36 patients who received 46 CIs. CI was always preceded by a period of repetitive dosing of opioids. Morphine was used in 36 CIs, methadone in four, hydromorphone in four, oxymorphone in one, and levorphanol in one. Mean doses during CI were the morphine equivalent of 17 mg/hour (range, 0.7-100) at the start, 69 mg/hour (range, 4-480) at the maximum, and 52 mg/hour (range, 1-480) at termination. Pain relief was acceptable during 28 CIs, unacceptable during 17, and unknown during one. There were few toxic effects other than sedation. Twenty-five patients died, 12 resumed im or oral opioids, six continued CI with a different opioid (yielding analgesia in two), and outcome was undetermined in three. This review suggests that (a) CI is safe, (b) analgesia may require rapid escalation of infusion rates, (c) patient response varies and lack of acceptable analgesia may occur in up to one-third, (d) ineffective CI with one drug may be followed by success with another, (e) CI should be preceded by a period of repetitive iv boluses with the same drug, and (f) guidelines can be developed which incorporate pharmacokinetic principles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Hydromorphone; Infant; Infusions, Parenteral; Levorphanol; Methadone; Middle Aged; Morphine; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain, Intractable; Palliative Care; Retrospective Studies