Page last updated: 2024-11-02

oxybutynin and Sleep Wake Disorders

oxybutynin has been researched along with Sleep Wake Disorders in 9 studies

oxybutynin: RN given refers to parent cpd
oxybutynin : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-oxybutynin and esoxybutynin. An antispasmodic used for the treatment of overactive bladder.

Sleep Wake Disorders: Abnormal sleep-wake schedule or pattern associated with the CIRCADIAN RHYTHM which affect the length, timing, and/or rigidity of the sleep-wake cycle relative to the day-night cycle.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Patients received stepwise pain treatment in which those who did not use analgesics were randomized to receive either paracetamol (3 g/day) or placebo tablets; those who already used pain treatment were allocated to buprenorphine transdermal system (max."5.27Effects of pain treatment on sleep in nursing home patients with dementia and depression: A multicenter placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. ( Bjorvatn, B; Blytt, KM; Flo, E; Husebo, B, 2018)
"Lidocaine patch treatment did not reduce combined resting and dynamic pain ratings compared with placebo in patients with severe, persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain."2.78Lidocaine patch (5%) in treatment of persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. ( Bischoff, JM; Kehlet, H; Petersen, M; Sommer, C; Uçeyler, N; Werner, MU, 2013)
"As for the safety of RTG, it is well tolerated and safe [WMD: 1."2.61The efficacy and safety of rotigotine transdermal patch for the treatment of sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. ( Ding, ZT; Fei, L; Zhou, D, 2019)
"Armodafinil is a wake-promoting agent against sleep deprivation related disorders."1.62Application of armodafinil-loaded microneedle patches against the negative influence induced by sleep deprivation. ( Du, L; Jin, Y; Li, Q; Ou, G; Wang, L; Yu, X; Zhang, S; Zhang, Y; Zhu, L; Zhu, S; Zhuang, X, 2021)
"Nocturnal enuresis is an innocent but distressing disorder occurring in many children."1.31[Monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: disease or complaint?]. ( Otto-Buczkowska, E; Szirer, G, 2000)

Research

Studies (9)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's2 (22.22)18.2507
2000's2 (22.22)29.6817
2010's4 (44.44)24.3611
2020's1 (11.11)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Marschall-Kehrel, D1
Valsecia, ME1
Malgor, LA1
Espíndola, JH1
Carauni, DH1
Yamao, Y1
Kawauchi, A1
Tanaka, Y1
Watanabe, H1
Kitamori, T1
Imada, N1
Shirakawa, S1
Otto-Buczkowska, E1
Szirer, G1
Zhu, L1
Zhang, S1
Yu, X1
Zhu, S1
Ou, G1
Li, Q1
Zhang, Y1
Wang, L1
Zhuang, X1
Du, L1
Jin, Y1
Blytt, KM1
Bjorvatn, B1
Husebo, B1
Flo, E1
Fei, L1
Zhou, D1
Ding, ZT1
Bischoff, JM1
Petersen, M1
Uçeyler, N1
Sommer, C1
Kehlet, H1
Werner, MU1
Simpson, DM1
Robinson-Papp, J1
Van, J1
Stoker, M1
Jacobs, H1
Snijder, RJ1
Schregardus, DS1
Long, SK1
Lambourg, B1
Katz, N1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Mechanisms of a Novel Intervention for Chronic Pain Tailored to People Living With HIV[NCT03692611]280 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-14Active, not recruiting
Capsaïcin patch8% in Adult Complex Regional Pain Syndromes: a Retrospective Analysis[NCT05523934]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-09-16Recruiting
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of QUTENZA® in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy[NCT01533428]Phase 3369 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12

Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Capsaicin 8%-27.96
Placebo-21.00

Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8

Percent change in the average daily pain score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 8, measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Capsaicin 8%-27.44
Placebo-20.85

"Change From Pre-application inPain Now Score"

"Change from pre-application inPain Now score was measured on a scale from 0-10 where 0 equates to No Pain and 10 to Pain as bad as you can imagine. Participants were asked to provide pain ratings relative only to the area of pain undergoing treatment." (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Pre-application and 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 minutes after patch removal [N=185; N=183]60 minutes after patch removal [N=185; N=182]
Capsaicin 8%-1.6-1.8
Placebo-2.0-2.2

Change From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12

Change from Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) questionnaire in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12. EQ-5D self-reported questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life by measuring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS) which records participants self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale with higher scores indicating higher Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 8 [ N=180;N=170]Week 12 [N=170; N=172]Week 2 [N=184; N=181]
Capsaicin 8%4.03.81.3
Placebo3.53.73.9

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, that contain 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance. (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 2 [N=183; N=180]Week 8 [N=178; N=171]Week 12 [N=169; N=169]
Capsaicin 8%-0.4-0.7-0.9
Placebo-0.5-0.6-0.9

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, it contains 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance. (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 2 [ N=184; N=181]Week 8 [N=180; N=171]Week 12 [N=169; N=171]
Capsaicin 8%-0.6-0.7-0.8
Placebo-0.6-0.4-0.6

Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Pain Medication Days 1 Through 5

Summarized number of participants who used Rescue Pain Medications for Pain (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Days 1 - 5

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
OverallAnalgesicsAnilidesNatural opium alkaloidsOther opioidsSalicylic acid and derivativesAntiinflammatory and antirheumatic productsPropionic acid derivativesOther gynecologicalsAntiinflammatory products vaginal administrationTopical products for joint and muscular painAntiinflammatory preparations, nonsteroids for topPreparations with salicylic acid derivatives
Capsaicin 8%35222014211515151516151
Placebo10994001111110

Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12

Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 12 (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much ImprovedMuch ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo ChangeMinimally WorseMuch WorseVery Much Worse
Capsaicin 8%23453950920
Placebo22294072810

Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2

Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 2 (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much ImprovedMuch ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo ChangeMinimally WorseMuch WorseVery Much Worse
Capsaicin 8%10497245331
Placebo9385868601

Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8

Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 8 (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much ImprovedMuch ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo ChangeMinimally WorseMuch WorseVery Much Worse
Capsaicin 8%20515847400
Placebo16364859841

Percent Change in Average Sleep Interference Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12

"Percent change in average sleep interference was measured by Question 9F of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI DN) and was used to assess pain and sleep interference index. Daily sleep interference rating scale consists of an 11-point numerical scale with which the patient describes how pain related to diabetes has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. On a scale 0 identifies pain does not interfere with sleep and 10 identifies pain completely interferes with sleep. Average sleep interference score is assessed from baseline to Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12." (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12

,
Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Week 2-8Week 2-12
Capsaicin 8%-33.12-33.99
Placebo-24.15-24.67

Percentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.

Percentage of participants achieving 30% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
30% Pain Reduction-Week 2 to 830% Pain Reduction-Week 2 to 12
Capsaicin 8%7476
Placebo6058

Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.

Percentage of participants achieving 50% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
50% Pain Reduction-Week 2 to 850% Pain Reduction-Week 2 to 12
Capsaicin 8%3941
Placebo3335

Safety Assessed Through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Vital Signs, and Laboratory Analyses From Baseline to Week 12

Number of patients assessed for Safety through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), vital signs, and laboratory analyses from baseline to week 12 (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAEsDeathsSerious TEAEsDrug-related serious TEAEsTEAEs permanent discontinuation of study drugDrug-related TEAEs to permanent discontinuationApplication site reactions
Capsaicin 8%87650200063
Placebo62230700015

Tolerability of Patch Application Assessed by Dermal Assessment on Day 1, 15 Minutes and 60 Minutes After Patch Removal.

Tolerability of patch application was assessed by dermal assessment (0 to 7 point severity score on Dermal Assessment Scale). Data reported is based on the number of participants in the combined category with a score ≥ 4 (Definite edema or higher), 15 and 60 minutes after patch removal. (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Day 1, 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
15 minutes after patch removal [N=185,N=180]60 minutes after patch removal [N=185,N=179]
Capsaicin 8%00
Placebo22

Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Based on Self-Assessment of Treatment (SAT II) Questionnaire at Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12

"Treatment satisfaction assessment based on Self-Assessment Treatment (SAT II) questionnaire and the question Over the past 7 days, how much has the study treatment improved your pain level?" (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 8 [N=177; N=170] [Not at all]Week 8 [N=177; N=170] [Slightly Better]Week 8 [N=177; N=170] [Moderately Better]Week 8 [N=177; N=170] [Quite a Bit Better]Week 8 [N=177; N=170] [Very Much Better]Week 12 [N=166; N=171] [Not at all]Week 12 [N=166; N=171] [Slightly Better]Week 12 [N=166; N=171] [Moderately Better]Week 12 [N=166; N=171] [Quite a Bit Better]Week 12 [N=166; N=171][Very Much Better]
Capsaicin 8%59353730166930232915
Placebo82332121139138121416

Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After Baseline

Weekly average of average daily pain score at Baseline and Weeks 2,4,8 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Capsaicin 8%6.645.144.834.784.73
Placebo6.385.145.025.015.08

Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score

Weekly Percent Change from baseline in average daily pain score from baseline to Week 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT01533428)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12
Capsaicin 8%-22.97-27.17-28.18-28.35-27.87-29.03-28.53-28.61-28.17-29.04-29.64
Placebo-19.00-20.51-21.11-21.17-21.66-21.02-21.46-21.78-20.73-21.75-20.76

Reviews

2 reviews available for oxybutynin and Sleep Wake Disorders

ArticleYear
Update on nocturia: the best of rest is sleep.
    Urology, 2004, Volume: 64, Issue:6 Suppl 1

    Topics: Behavior Therapy; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Female; Humans; Male; Mandelic Acids; Quality of Lif

2004
The efficacy and safety of rotigotine transdermal patch for the treatment of sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.
    Sleep medicine, 2019, Volume: 61

    Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Trial

2019

Trials

3 trials available for oxybutynin and Sleep Wake Disorders

ArticleYear
Effects of pain treatment on sleep in nursing home patients with dementia and depression: A multicenter placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.
    International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2018, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Aged; Analgesics; Buprenorphine; Dementia; Depressive Disorder; Double-Blind M

2018
Lidocaine patch (5%) in treatment of persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.
    Anesthesiology, 2013, Volume: 119, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Fe

2013
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017
Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    The journal of pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capsaicin; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hum

2017

Other Studies

4 other studies available for oxybutynin and Sleep Wake Disorders

ArticleYear
New adverse effect of oxybutynin: "night terror".
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 1998, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Cholinergic Antagonists; Female; Humans; Male; Mandelic Acids; Sleep

1998
Systematic treatment for nocturnal urinary frequency following a sleep-micturition chart.
    Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 1999, Volume: 53, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Benzilates; Cholinergic Antagonists; Circadian Rhythm; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives

1999
[Monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: disease or complaint?].
    Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960), 2000, Volume: 53, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Cholinergic Antagonists; Enuresis; Humans; Male; Mandelic Acids; Self Conce

2000
Application of armodafinil-loaded microneedle patches against the negative influence induced by sleep deprivation.
    European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 2021, Volume: 169

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Cognition; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Monitoring; Mice; Microte

2021