ospemifene and Hot-Flashes

Topics: Animals; Cimicifuga; Dehydroepiandrosterone; Estrogens; Female; Flax; Hot Flashes; Humans; Menopause; Progestins; Tamoxifen

The results of large clinical trials have led physicians and patients to question the safety of hormone therapy for menopause. In the past, physicians prescribed hormone therapy to improve overall health and prevent cardiac disease, as well as for symptoms of menopause. Combined estrogen/progestogen therapy, but not estrogen alone, increases the risk of breast cancer when used for more than three to five years. Therefore, in women with a uterus, it is recommended that physicians prescribe combination therapy only to treat menopausal symptoms such as vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) and vaginal atrophy, using the smallest effective dosage for the shortest possible duration. Although estrogen is the most effective treatment for hot flashes, nonhormonal alternatives such as low-dose paroxetine, venlafaxine, and gabapentin are effective alternatives. Women with a uterus who are using estrogen should also take a progestogen to reduce the risk of endometrial cancer. Women who cannot tolerate adverse effects of progestogens may benefit from a combined formulation of estrogen and the selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene. There is no highquality, consistent evidence that yoga, paced respiration, acupuncture, exercise, stress reduction, relaxation therapy, and alternative therapies such as black cohosh, botanical products, omega-3 fatty acid supplements, and dietary Chinese herbs benefit patients more than placebo. One systematic review suggests modest improvement in hot flashes and vaginal dryness with soy products, and small studies suggest that clinical hypnosis significantly reduces hot flashes. Patients with genitourinary syndrome of menopause may benefit from vaginal estrogen, nonhormonal vaginal moisturizers, or ospemifene (the only nonhormonal treatment approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for dyspareunia due to menopausal atrophy). The decision to use hormone therapy depends on clinical presentation, a thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits, and an informed discussion with the patient.

Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Administration, Intravaginal; Amines; Antidepressive Agents; Atrophy; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dietary Supplements; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspareunia; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Estrogens; Exercise Therapy; Female; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Hot Flashes; Humans; Hypnosis; Indoles; Menopause; Paroxetine; Progestins; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Tamoxifen; Vagina; Vaginal Diseases; Vasomotor System; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are synthetic non-steroidal agents which have varying estrogen agonist and antagonist activities in different tissues, most likely due to the receptor conformation changes associated with that SERM's binding and the subsequent effect on transcription. Clinical trials aim to differentiate amongst SERMs on selected target tissues for use in postmenopausal women including effects on breast, bone, cardiovascular venous thrombosis risk, endometrium, vagina, vasomotor symptoms, and brain. This paper describes differences in clinical effects on selected target tissues of SERMs that are approved, discontinued or in development. FDA approved SERMs include tamoxifen and toremifene used for prevention and treatment of breast cancer, raloxifene approved for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of invasive breast cancer, and ospemifene approved for treatment of dyspareunia from menopausal vaginal atrophy. The FDA approved first tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) a pairing of conjugated equine estrogens with the SERM, bazedoxifene. This pairing reduces the risk of endometrial hyperplasia that can occur with the estrogenic component of the TSEC without the need for a progestogen in women with a uterus. It also allows for the estrogenic benefits on relief of hot flashes and prevention of bone loss without stimulating the breast or the endometrium. In clinical practice, the tissue-selective actions of SERMs, alone or paired with estrogens, allow for individualization in meeting the treatment needs of postmenopausal women by providing targeted tissue effects. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Menopause'.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dyspareunia; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP); Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Indoles; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Postmenopause; Pyrrolidines; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Receptors, Estrogen; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Tamoxifen; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Toremifene

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ospemifene for the treatment of moderate to severe vaginal dryness in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA).. This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind phase 3 study randomized postmenopausal women (aged 40-80 years) with VVA and moderate to severe vaginal dryness as their most bothersome symptom to daily oral ospemifene 60 mg or placebo. Coprimary efficacy endpoints included changes from baseline to week 12 in percentages of vaginal parabasal and superficial cells, vaginal pH, and vaginal dryness severity with ospemifene versus placebo; other secondary endpoints were evaluated (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and endometrial biopsies.. Women (n = 631; ospemifene [n = 316], placebo [n = 315]) had a mean age of 59.8 years, a mean body mass index of 27.2 kg/m, and most were white. Ospemifene significantly improved (P < 0.0001) the percentages of parabasal and superficial cells, vaginal pH, and severity of vaginal dryness severity compared with placebo at week 12; significant between-group differences were noted by week 4. Secondary endpoints of dyspareunia (P < 0.001), maturation value (P < 0.0001), and the Female Sexual Function Index (P < 0.05) also significantly improved with ospemifene versus placebo at week 12. Significantly more women responded (31.5% vs 6.0%; P < 0.0001) or were satisfied (49.2% vs 33.8%; P = 0.0007) with ospemifene versus placebo at week 12. No unexpected TEAEs, treatment-related serious TEAEs, thrombotic events, or endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma were observed.. Ospemifene was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vaginal dryness in postmenopausal women with VVA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrophy; Double-Blind Method; Dyspareunia; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Postmenopause; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Severity of Illness Index; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; Vagina; Vaginal Diseases; Vulva

To evaluate the safety of daily oral ospemifene 60 mg, estrogen agonist/antagonist, used to treat moderate-to-severe dyspareunia due to postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy, which is part of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.. Post hoc analysis of safety data (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) pooled from six phase 2 and 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter placebo-controlled studies, evaluating the effects of ospemifene 60 mg on the breast, cardiovascular system, and bone in postmenopausal women.. At least one TEAE was reported by 67.6% (840/1242) and 54.1% (518/958) of women taking ospemifene 60 mg and placebo, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate and occurred within 4 to 12 weeks. The most commonly reported TEAEs with ospemifene were hot flush (8.5% vs. 3.3% for placebo) and urinary tract infection (6.5% vs. 4.8%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs was 7.6% with ospemifene and 3.8% with placebo. Most women discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs): hot flushes, muscle spasms, headache, and vaginal discharge. Serious AEs occurred infrequently (ospemifene, 2.6%; placebo, 1.8%); most were not considered related to treatment. Breast cancer and other breast-related TEAE incidences were comparable between ospemifene (2.5%) and placebo (2.2%), and cardiovascular TEAE incidence, including deep vein thrombosis, was low with ospemifene (0.3%) and placebo (0.1%).. No unexpected safety signals were reported, and discontinuation due to TEAEs was low, with use of ospemifene 60 mg versus placebo in six phase 2 and 3 trials, suggesting a lack of detrimental effects on the breast, bone, and cardiovascular health of postmenopausal women when ospemifene is used to effectively treat moderate-to-severe postmenopausal dyspareunia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atrophy; Bone and Bones; Breast; Cardiovascular System; Double-Blind Method; Dyspareunia; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Placebos; Postmenopause; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; Vagina; Vulva

The study aimed to assess the effects of ospemifene on vulvar vestibule in postmenopausal women with vulvar pain and dyspareunia. Fifty-five postmenopausal women used oral ospemifene 60 mg/d for 60 d. Symptoms of dryness, burning, and dyspareunia were evaluated on a 10 cm visual analog scale. Visual examination of the vulvar vestibule was also conducted. Patients also underwent current perception threshold (CPT) testing obtained from the vulvar vestibule. Fifty-five patients (94.6%) completed the treatment. Hot flashes were the most frequent adverse effects, but this led to a discontinuation of therapy in three patients (5.4%). After therapy, there was a statistically significant decrease from the baseline in the mean scores for dryness, burning, and dyspareunia and reduction of vestibular trophic score (baseline value of 11.2-4.2 after the therapy, p ≤ 002) and cotton swab test scores (2.81 compared with 1.25, p = .001). There was a difference in CPT values for all nerve fibers and more consistent for C fibers (-38% of sensitivity). These results confirm the efficacy of ospemifene on postmenopausal vestibular symptoms and signs; moreover, the drug was effective in normalizing vestibular innervation sensitivity.

Topics: Administration, Buccal; Dyspareunia; Electric Stimulation; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Pain Perception; Pilot Projects; Postmenopause; Syndrome; Tamoxifen; Vulva; Vulvar Vestibulitis; Vulvodynia

To examine the effect of ospemifene 60 mg/d on vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women using clinical safety and efficacy data from five phase 2 and 3 studies.. The incidence of hot flush treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was compiled from five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies; baseline parameters associated with hot flush incidence were also identified. Ospemifene's effects on the frequency and severity of hot flushes were evaluated in a previously unpublished, 6-week, placebo-controlled study.. Analysis of pooled hot flush TEAE data for 2,166 women showed an incidence of hot flush of 8.5% for ospemifene and 3.2% for placebo (P < 0.0001). Hot flushes were most frequent during the first 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment and decreased in frequency thereafter. Logistic regression analysis revealed that hormone therapy within 6 months before study start (P = 0.0234), longer study treatment duration (P = 0.0234), and more hot flush days per month at baseline (P = 0.0313) were associated with more hot flushes. Ospemifene 60 mg/d did not worsen the frequency and severity of existing hot flushes in a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial of 198 postmenopausal women who were experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes.. In randomized trials, hot flush TEAEs were more frequent with ospemifene 60 mg/d than with placebo, particularly among women with prior history of hormone therapy use. The majority of hot flushes, however, waned after 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment. Ospemifene did not worsen existing hot flushes in women experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Postmenopause; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; Vasomotor System

To compare ospemifene and raloxifene regarding their effects on hormones, lipids, genital tract, and tolerability in postmenopausal women.. A randomized, double-blind study in which 118 healthy postmenopausal women received 30 (n = 29), 60 (n = 30), or 90 mg (n = 30) of ospemifene or 60 mg (n = 29) of raloxifene for 3 months.. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between study groups. In comparison with raloxifene, follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased significantly more in the 90-mg ospemifene group and sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased more in all ospemifene groups. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased more in raloxifene than in ospemifene groups, although the difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol between 90-mg ospemifene and raloxifene was not significant. Endometrial thickness did not change in any study group and endometrial biopsies showed atrophy in the majority of subjects at 3 months. All ospemifene groups demonstrated a clear estrogenic effect on the vaginal epithelium, as seen in Pap smears. This was in sharp contrast to the raloxifene group, which had no effect on the vaginal epithelium. Kupperman index decreased in all study groups during treatment. The adverse events were mild, mainly single cases, and no clustering of events was observed. There were no clinically significant abnormal findings in laboratory safety parameters.. Ospemifene, at the dose of 90 mg/day, was more estrogenic than raloxifene, as shown by changes in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Neither agent stimulated endometrium, but in contrast to raloxifene, ospemifene had a clear estrogenic effect in the vagina. Further studies with ospemifene are needed in subjects with vaginal atrophy.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Hot Flashes; Humans; Lipids; Middle Aged; Postmenopause; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; Uterus; Vagina

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are drugs that exhibit both estrogen agonistic and antagonistic effects that are tissue-specific. Ospemifene (FC-1271a) is a novel SERM compound, which has been shown in animal models to have estrogen-like effects on bone and the cardiovascular system, while having antiestrogen-like effects in uterus and breast. In this study, we investigated the effects of ospemifene on the uterine endometrium, vaginal maturation index and hormonal status in healthy postmenopausal women.. The study was conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I study, where 40 healthy postmenopausal women volunteers were randomized to receive daily oral doses of ospemifene either 25, 50, 100 or 200 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Vaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy were performed and vaginal maturation index determined at baseline and at 12 weeks' visit. Serum concentrations of estradiol, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG), parathyroid hormone and prolactin were determined from samples taken at baseline, at 4 days and at 4, 12, and 16 weeks' visits. Climacteric symptoms were assessed using 12 visual analogue scales (VAS) at baseline and at the end of the study.. No clinically significant changes were seen in endometrial thickness at any dose level. Ospemifene exerted a very weak estrogenic effect on endometrial histology. On the other hand, it induced a clear estrogenic effect on vaginal epithelium. Among the endocrine parameters only FSH and SHBG showed significant dose dependent changes; FSH decreased and SHBG increased during the treatment. In general, ospemifene was well tolerated. The 25 and 50 mg doses tended to reduce climacteric symptoms, but no statistically significant differences were observed between different doses of ospemifene and placebo. The highest dose level (200 mg) induced more subjective adverse reactions, especially hot flushes, than lower doses.. Our study suggests that a safe and well tolerated dose of ospemifene for potential clinical use may be between 25 and 100 mg. Further studies are needed to substantiate the results of this Phase I pilot study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Endometrium; Estradiol; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Hormones; Hot Flashes; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Parathyroid Hormone; Postmenopause; Prolactin; Reference Values; Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin; Tamoxifen; Ultrasonography; Vagina

Two new products recently approved for the treatment of menopausal symptoms contain estrogen receptor agonists/antagonists, which have varying effects on bone, breast, endometrial, and vaginal tissues. Ospemifene improves symptoms of dyspareunia associated with vulvovaginal atrophy. Bazedoxifene combined with conjugated estrogens improves vasomotor symptoms and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Clinicians must consider the increased risk for venous and arterial thromboembolic disease posed by these drugs. Clinical trials are ongoing to fully evaluate the drugs' efficacy and safety compared with traditional estrogen-based regimens.

Topics: Atrophy; Bone Density; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Postmenopause; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Tamoxifen; Vaginal Diseases; Vulvar Diseases