Page last updated: 2024-11-01

ondansetron and Hematologic Neoplasms

ondansetron has been researched along with Hematologic Neoplasms in 8 studies

Ondansetron: A competitive serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist. It is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, including cisplatin, and has reported anxiolytic and neuroleptic properties.

Hematologic Neoplasms: Neoplasms located in the blood and blood-forming tissue (the bone marrow and lymphatic tissue). The commonest forms are the various types of LEUKEMIA, of LYMPHOMA, and of the progressive, life-threatening forms of the MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Interestingly, none of the patients aged under 7 years, receiving divided dosing ondansetron, presented nausea symptoms compared with those receiving single daily dosing (p-value ."9.41Single daily dosing versus divided dosing intravenous ondansetron to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among children: A comparative randomized double-blind controlled trial. ( Lertvivatpong, N; Monsereenusorn, C; Photia, A; Rujkijyanont, P; Ruktrirong, J; Traivaree, C, 2021)
"Evidence supports olanzapine for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (CINV) for highly emetogenic chemotherapy; however, most studies focus on solid malignancies and single-day regimens."9.27Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig ( Andrick, B; Clemmons, AB; DeRemer, D; Gandhi, A; Orr, J; Sportes, C, 2018)
"Patients were assessed for nausea and vomiting on their infusion day using the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool (MAT) at arrival, pre-ASCT infusion, pre-ondansetron administration, prior to the first bag, and after each bag of stem cells."9.17Prevention of dimethylsulfoxide-related nausea and vomiting by prophylactic administration of ondansetron for patients receiving autologous cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells. ( Eisenberg, S; Gooley, T; Holmberg, L; Linenberger, M; Wickline, M, 2013)
"The objective of this double blind parallel-group multicentre study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination ondansetron + methylprednisolone + lorazepam (O + M + L) in the prevention of emesis induced by chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide or adriamycin ."9.09[Improvement in the control of chemotherapy induced emesis with ondansetron, methylprednisolone and lorazepam combination in patients treated by a moderate emetic treatment and uncontrolled by a previous antiemetic combination]. ( Bonneterre, J; Harousseau, JL; Hedouin, M; Ouvry, J; Zittoun, R, 2000)
"Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy."6.80Phase II, open label, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron alone versus the combination of ondansetron and aprepitant for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving regimens containing high-dose cytara ( Badar, T; Borthakur, G; Cortes, J; Ferrajoli, A; Garcia-Manero, G; Kadia, T; Kantarjian, H; Mattiuzzi, G; O'Brien, S; Poku, R; Wierda, W, 2015)
" Interestingly, none of the patients aged under 7 years, receiving divided dosing ondansetron, presented nausea symptoms compared with those receiving single daily dosing (p-value ."5.41Single daily dosing versus divided dosing intravenous ondansetron to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among children: A comparative randomized double-blind controlled trial. ( Lertvivatpong, N; Monsereenusorn, C; Photia, A; Rujkijyanont, P; Ruktrirong, J; Traivaree, C, 2021)
"Evidence supports olanzapine for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (CINV) for highly emetogenic chemotherapy; however, most studies focus on solid malignancies and single-day regimens."5.27Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig ( Andrick, B; Clemmons, AB; DeRemer, D; Gandhi, A; Orr, J; Sportes, C, 2018)
"Patients were assessed for nausea and vomiting on their infusion day using the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool (MAT) at arrival, pre-ASCT infusion, pre-ondansetron administration, prior to the first bag, and after each bag of stem cells."5.17Prevention of dimethylsulfoxide-related nausea and vomiting by prophylactic administration of ondansetron for patients receiving autologous cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells. ( Eisenberg, S; Gooley, T; Holmberg, L; Linenberger, M; Wickline, M, 2013)
"The objective of this double blind parallel-group multicentre study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination ondansetron + methylprednisolone + lorazepam (O + M + L) in the prevention of emesis induced by chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide or adriamycin ."5.09[Improvement in the control of chemotherapy induced emesis with ondansetron, methylprednisolone and lorazepam combination in patients treated by a moderate emetic treatment and uncontrolled by a previous antiemetic combination]. ( Bonneterre, J; Harousseau, JL; Hedouin, M; Ouvry, J; Zittoun, R, 2000)
"Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy."2.80Phase II, open label, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron alone versus the combination of ondansetron and aprepitant for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving regimens containing high-dose cytara ( Badar, T; Borthakur, G; Cortes, J; Ferrajoli, A; Garcia-Manero, G; Kadia, T; Kantarjian, H; Mattiuzzi, G; O'Brien, S; Poku, R; Wierda, W, 2015)
" We evaluated the possibility of a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction between the antiemetic agents and high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and BCNU (CPA/cDDP/BCNU)."2.69Modification of the pharmacokinetics of high-dose cyclophosphamide and cisplatin by antiemetics. ( Bearman, SI; Cagnoni, PJ; Day, TC; Jones, RB; Matthes, S; Shpall, EJ, 1999)

Research

Studies (8)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (12.50)18.2507
2000's1 (12.50)29.6817
2010's4 (50.00)24.3611
2020's2 (25.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
França de Moraes, GH1
Lima, LC1
Couceiro, TCM1
Lins, MM1
Cumino, DO1
Simões, LABM1
Mello, MJG1
Ruktrirong, J1
Traivaree, C1
Monsereenusorn, C1
Photia, A1
Lertvivatpong, N1
Rujkijyanont, P1
Clemmons, AB1
Orr, J1
Andrick, B1
Gandhi, A1
Sportes, C1
DeRemer, D1
Eisenberg, S1
Wickline, M1
Linenberger, M1
Gooley, T1
Holmberg, L1
Badar, T1
Cortes, J1
Borthakur, G1
O'Brien, S1
Wierda, W1
Garcia-Manero, G1
Ferrajoli, A1
Kadia, T1
Poku, R1
Kantarjian, H1
Mattiuzzi, G1
Stiff, PJ1
Fox-Geiman, MP1
Kiley, K1
Rychlik, K1
Parthasarathy, M1
Fletcher-Gonzalez, D1
Porter, N1
Go, A1
Smith, SE1
Rodriguez, TE1
Cagnoni, PJ1
Matthes, S1
Day, TC1
Bearman, SI1
Shpall, EJ1
Jones, RB1
Harousseau, JL1
Zittoun, R1
Bonneterre, J1
Hedouin, M1
Ouvry, J1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Addition of Olanzapine to Standard CINV Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant[NCT04535141]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-18Completed
Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of FOND (Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone) Versus FOND+O (FOND Plus Olanzapine) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Hematology Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy Re[NCT02635984]Phase 3108 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Randomized Phase 3 Study of Aprepitant Versus Placebo in Chinese Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy[NCT02161991]Phase 3244 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-01Completed
Aprepitant- and Olanzapine- Containing Regimens for Prevention of Acute and Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Associated With High Dose Melphalan and BEAM in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Patients[NCT02939287]Phase 3429 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-23Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Total Number of Rescue Medications Needed -Delayed

"The total number of rescue medications needed for breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting were calculated, starting from the second day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing through the fifth day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.~The rescue medication is defined as documented administration of an anti-emetic agent other than those that are scheduled for CINV prophylaxis." (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 days after end of the chemotherapy ( Days 2-12).

Interventionnumber of rescue medication (Mean)
Usual Care0.47
Olanzapine1.17

Total Number of Rescue Medications Needed Acute

"The total number of rescue medications needed acute was calculated, starting from the first dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing for one day after the last dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy.~The rescue medication is defined as documented administration of an anti-emetic agent other than those that are scheduled for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis." (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: End of day 1 following last chemotherapy administration. (Up to day 2)

Interventionnumber of rescue medication (Mean)
Usual Care0.08
Olanzapin0.10

Frequency of Nausea in the Acute Phase

"Starting with the first dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing for one day after the last dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy.~Nausea was assessed using subjects' responses to the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) nausea questions. Scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Almost constantly.~To meet this endpoint the score reported for the Pro-CTCAE question for nausea frequency cannot exceed rarely in the first 24 hours following receipt of chemotherapy." (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: End of day 1 following last chemotherapy administration (Up to day 2)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Met endpointDid not meet endpoint
Olanzapine441
Usual Care433

Frequency of Somnolence

The frequency of somnolence was determined as the number of patients who experienced somnolence based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAE v5). The number of subjects has somnolence during the study period was counted. (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 2-12

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
subjects have somnolencesubjects do not have somnolence
Olanzapine142
Usual Care046

Number of Emesis Episodes in Delayed Phase

The number of emesis episodes in acute phase was defined as the number of subjects with no emesis, 1 emesis, and 2 or more emesis. (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 days after end of the chemotherapy ( Days 2-12).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No emesis episodes1 emesis episode2 or more emesis episodes
Olanzapine3663
Usual Care3295

Number of Subjects Achieved Emesis Endpoint in Acute Phase.

: The number of subjects who did not experience emesis, starting from the first dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing for one day after the last dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy. Met endpoint = 0 emesis. (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: End of day 1 following last chemotherapy administration. (Up to day 2)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Met endpointDid not meet endpoint
Olanzapine450
Usual Care451

Number of Subjects Achieved Nausea Endpoint in the Delayed Phase.

"Nausea was assessed using subjects' responses to the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) nausea questions, starting the second day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing through the fifth day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.~Scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Almost constantly.~The number of subjects who experienced never or rarely nausea were considered as met the endpoint while those who experienced occasionally, frequently or almost constantly were considered as not met the endpoint." (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 days after end of the chemotherapy (Days 2-12).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Met endpointDid not meet endpoint
Olanzapine2718
Usual Care1927

Number of Subjects Achieving Minimal Nausea

"To determine the number of subjects achieving minimal nausea was defined as the frequency of participants responded to the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) nausea question In the last 24 hours, how often did you have nausea? as rarely or less Starting with the first dose of chemotherapy and continuing for one day after the last dose of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy.~PRO-CTCAE of nausea scale includes categories: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Almost constantly To meet this endpoint the score reported for the Pro-CTCAE question for nausea frequency cannot exceed rarely and the score reported for the Pro-CTCAE question for nausea severity cannot exceed mild" (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 2-12

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Olanzapine2520
Usual Care1531

Safety Endpoint: Qtc Prolongation

Prolongation of corrected QTc interval graded as defined in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Corrected QTc was calculated using Fredericia's Formula. Corrected QT interval (QTc) = QT interval / (60/Heart rate)^0.33. (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 days after end of the chemotherapy (Days 2- 12).

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5None
Baseline Olanzapine4000041
Baseline Usual Care3000043
Olanzapine Post-chemo Day 13000042
Olanzapine- End of Study3010041
Usual Care End of Study3010042
Usual Care Post-chemo Day 12000044

Severity of Nausea in Delayed Phase

"The severity of nausea in the delayed phase was defined as the response of the subject to the PRO- CTCAE nausea question.~Starting the second day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy and continuing through the fifth day after the completion of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (PRO-CTCAE) Scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Almost constantly~o meet the endpoint, the subject could not have answered a score as higher than mild in the period of time starting 24 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing until the 5th day following receipt of chemotherapy ." (NCT04535141)
Timeframe: Day 2-12

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Met endpointDid not meet endpoint
Olanzapine3124
Usual Care2323

Overall Percentage of Patients Who Had a Complete Response

Overall percentage of patients who had a complete response (CR) defined as no emesis and minimal nausea (< 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) during the overall assessment period (starting day 1 of chemotherapy and continuing for 5 days after discontinuation of chemotherapy) for the first cycle of chemotherapy. (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo13
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine28

Percent of Participants With no Significant Nausea in Acute Phase

Reported as acute [chemotherapy days]. All assessment with all VAS < 25 mm on days of chemotherapy (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo33
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine39

Percent of Participants With no Significant Nausea in Delayed Phase

Reported for delayed [5 days after chemotherapy administration] All assessment with all VAS < 25 mm (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo16
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine34

Percent of Patients Achieving Complete Protection in Overall Assessment Phase

(CP = no emesis, no breakthrough antiemetic use, no significant nausea). To be reported as overall phases [chemotherapy days plus 5 days after] (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo6
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine13

Percent of Patients With Complete Response in Acute Phase

Complete response (no emesis and no more than minimal nausea, defined as < 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) in acute phase (days of chemotherapy) (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo31
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine39

Percent of Patients With Complete Response in Delayed Phase

Complete response (no emesis and no more than minimal nausea, defined as < 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) in delayed phase (5 days after chemotherapy) (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo15
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine31

Percent of Patients With no Nausea in Overall Assessment Period

No nausea (all VAS <5 mm) in overall assessment period (days of chemotherapy plus five days after) (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo6
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine18

Percent of Patients With no Significant Nausea in Overall Assessment Period

Reported for overall phases [chemotherapy days plus 5 days after] where all VAS < 25 mm (NCT02635984)
Timeframe: Until study completion; estimated 1.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triplet Therapy Plus Placebo14
Triplet Therapy Plus Olanzapine30

Trials

7 trials available for ondansetron and Hematologic Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Single daily dosing versus divided dosing intravenous ondansetron to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among children: A comparative randomized double-blind controlled trial.
    Pediatric blood & cancer, 2021, Volume: 68, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chil

2021
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Fe

2018
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Fe

2018
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Fe

2018
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Fosaprepitant, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone (FOND) Versus FOND Plus Olanzapine (FOND-O) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Hig
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Fe

2018
Prevention of dimethylsulfoxide-related nausea and vomiting by prophylactic administration of ondansetron for patients receiving autologous cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells.
    Oncology nursing forum, 2013, May-01, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiemetics; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Cohort Studies; Cryoprotective Agents; Dimethyl Sulfoxid

2013
Phase II, open label, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron alone versus the combination of ondansetron and aprepitant for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving regimens containing high-dose cytara
    BioMed research international, 2015, Volume: 2015

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cytarabine; Dose-Response R

2015
Prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with stem cell transplant: results of a prospective, randomized trial of aprepitant used with highly emetogenic preparative regimens.
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Dexamethasone; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic St

2013
Prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with stem cell transplant: results of a prospective, randomized trial of aprepitant used with highly emetogenic preparative regimens.
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Dexamethasone; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic St

2013
Prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with stem cell transplant: results of a prospective, randomized trial of aprepitant used with highly emetogenic preparative regimens.
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Dexamethasone; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic St

2013
Prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with stem cell transplant: results of a prospective, randomized trial of aprepitant used with highly emetogenic preparative regimens.
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Dexamethasone; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic St

2013
Modification of the pharmacokinetics of high-dose cyclophosphamide and cisplatin by antiemetics.
    Bone marrow transplantation, 1999, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Carmustine; Cisplatin;

1999
[Improvement in the control of chemotherapy induced emesis with ondansetron, methylprednisolone and lorazepam combination in patients treated by a moderate emetic treatment and uncontrolled by a previous antiemetic combination].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2000, Volume: 87, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Breast Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemato

2000

Other Studies

1 other study available for ondansetron and Hematologic Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Vomiting after intrathecal chemotherapy under anesthesia in pediatric patients with hematologic cancers: A cohort study.
    Paediatric anaesthesia, 2024, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthesia; Antiemetics; Child; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms;

2024