on-01910 and Pancreatic-Neoplasms

on-01910 has been researched along with Pancreatic-Neoplasms* in 4 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for on-01910 and Pancreatic-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:9

    Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na), a first-in-class Ras mimetic and small-molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling pathways including polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), has shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. In this study, rigosertib was assessed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.. Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus rigosertib 1800 mg/m(2) via 2-h continuous IV infusions given twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (RIG + GEM) versus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle (GEM).. A total of 160 patients were enrolled globally and randomly assigned to RIG + GEM (106 patients) or GEM (54). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (8% in the RIG + GEM group versus 6% in the GEM group), hyponatremia (17% versus 4%), and anemia (8% versus 4%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months for RIG + GEM versus 6.4 months for GEM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.81]. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for both groups (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.36). The partial response rate was 19% versus 13% for RIG + GEM versus GEM, respectively. Of 64 tumor samples sent for molecular analysis, 47 were adequate for multiplex genetic testing and 41 were positive for mutations. The majority of cases had KRAS gene mutations (40 cases). Other mutations detected included TP53 (13 cases) and PIK3CA (1 case). No correlation between mutational status and efficacy was detected.. The combination of RIG + GEM failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival or response compared with GEM in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rigosertib showed a similar safety profile to that seen in previous trials using the IV formulation.

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Cycle Proteins; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Gemcitabine; Glycine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Polo-Like Kinase 1; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Sulfones; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

2015
Phase I study of Rigosertib, an inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Polo-like kinase 1 pathways, combined with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors and pancreatic cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012, Apr-01, Volume: 18, Issue:7

    Rigosertib, a dual non-ATP inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathways (PI3K), and gemcitabine have synergistic antitumor activity when combined in preclinical studies. This phase I study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the combination of rigosertib and gemcitabine in patients with cancer.. Patients with solid tumors who failed standard therapy or were candidates for gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle and rigosertib on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, and 18. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted during an expansion cohort of patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).. Forty patients were treated, 19 in the dose-escalation phase and 21 in the expansion cohort. Dose levels evaluated were (gemcitabine/rigosertib mg/m(2)): 750/600 (n = 4), 750/1,200 (n = 3), 1,000/600 (n = 3), 1,000/1,200 (n = 3), and 1,000/1,800 (n = 6 + 21). One dose-limiting toxicity (death) occurred at the highest dose level (1,000/1,800) tested. Non-dose-limiting ≥grade II/III toxicities included neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and nausea. Grade III/IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue were seen in two, one, and two patients in the expansion cohort. Partial responses were observed in PDA, thymic cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma, including gemcitabine-pretreated PDA. The pharmacokinetic profile of rigosertib was not affected by gemcitabine.. The RPTD established in this study is rigosertib 1,800 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2). This regimen is well tolerated with a toxicity profile of the combination similar to the profile of gemcitabine alone. Antitumor efficacy was observed in patients who previously progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cohort Studies; Deoxycytidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatigue; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gemcitabine; Glycine; Humans; Lymphopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; Polo-Like Kinase 1; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Signal Transduction; Sulfones; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

2012

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for on-01910 and Pancreatic-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
A Small Molecule RAS-Mimetic Disrupts RAS Association with Effector Proteins to Block Signaling.
    Cell, 2016, Apr-21, Volume: 165, Issue:3

    Oncogenic activation of RAS genes via point mutations occurs in 20%-30% of human cancers. The development of effective RAS inhibitors has been challenging, necessitating new approaches to inhibit this oncogenic protein. Functional studies have shown that the switch region of RAS interacts with a large number of effector proteins containing a common RAS-binding domain (RBD). Because RBD-mediated interactions are essential for RAS signaling, blocking RBD association with small molecules constitutes an attractive therapeutic approach. Here, we present evidence that rigosertib, a styryl-benzyl sulfone, acts as a RAS-mimetic and interacts with the RBDs of RAF kinases, resulting in their inability to bind to RAS, disruption of RAF activation, and inhibition of the RAS-RAF-MEK pathway. We also find that ribosertib binds to the RBDs of Ral-GDS and PI3Ks. These results suggest that targeting of RBDs across multiple signaling pathways by rigosertib may represent an effective strategy for inactivation of RAS signaling.

    Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Crystallography, X-Ray; Dimerization; Glycine; Humans; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Mice; Mice, Nude; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phosphorylation; Polo-Like Kinase 1; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; ras Proteins; RNA-Binding Proteins; Sequence Alignment; Signal Transduction; Sulfones

2016
Evaluation of the novel mitotic modulator ON 01910.Na in pancreatic cancer and preclinical development of an ex vivo predictive assay.
    Oncogene, 2009, Jan-29, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    The pupose of this study was to evaluate the activity of ON 01910.Na, a mitotic inhibitor, in in vitro and in vivo models of pancreatic cancer and to discover biomarkers predictive of efficacy. Successive in vitro and in vivo models were used; these included cell line-derived and patient-derived tumors from our PancXenoBank, a live collection of freshly generated pancreatic cancer xenografts. ON 01910.Na showed equivalent activity to gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. The activity of the agent correlated with suppression of phospho-CDC25C and cyclin B1. These markers were optimized for a fine-needle aspirate ex vivo rapid assay. Cyclin B1 mRNA evaluation yielded the most optimal combination of accuracy and reproducibility. Next, nine patient-derived tumors from the PancXenoBank were profiled using the assay developed in cell lines and treated with ON01910.Na for 28 days. Two cases were cataloged as potential responders and seven as resistants. There was a correlation between the ex vivo assay and sensitivity to the tested agent, as the two cases prospectively identified as sensitive met prespecified criteria for response. Of the seven tumors of predictive resistant, only one was found to be sensitive to ON 01910.Na. In addition, there was a good correlation between cyclin B1 downregulation ex vivo and changes in cyclin B1 protein post-treatment. The novel mitotic inhibitor, ON 01910.Na, showed activity in preclinical model of pancreatic cancer. A rapid assay was rationally developed that not only identified cases sensitive to ON 01910.Na, but also anticipated the pharmacodynamic events occurring after in vivo exposure.

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; cdc25 Phosphatases; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclin B; Cyclin B1; Deoxycytidine; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gemcitabine; Glycine; Humans; Mice; Mice, Nude; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Sulfones; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

2009