omapatrilat and Chronic-Disease

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Chronic Disease; Endpoint Determination; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Survival Rate; Thiazepines

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is not an effective antianginal therapy. Experimental data suggest that broader vasopeptidase inhibition may decrease the magnitude of demand-induced myocardial ischemia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel study evaluated omapatrilat, an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. The primary objective was to compare maximum duration of exercise at peak plasma concentrations. Exercise treadmill studies were performed in 348 patients who had chronic angina at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy with 80 mg/day omapatrilat or placebo. Safety data were collected and reported for all patients. Treadmill exercise duration at peak was significantly prolonged in the omapatrilat group compared with the placebo group (76.6 +/- 84.2 vs 28.7 +/- 82.2 seconds difference from baseline, p <0.001). Similar statistically significant increases were seen in time to onset of level III/IV angina and time to onset of >/=0.1-mV ST-segment depression (p <0.001). The significant improvements in exercise duration and measurements of myocardial ischemia were not sustained 20 to 28 hours after dosing. Omapatrilat was generally well tolerated in this predominantly normotensive population. The incidence of serious adverse events was 5.2% in the 2 groups. Thus, omapatrilat, an investigational vasopeptidase inhibitor, is effective in prolonging exercise duration and parameters of demand-induced myocardial ischemia in patients who have chronic angina at peak concentrations. The data confirm the proof of principle that broader vasopeptidase inhibition beyond angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is required to alleviate symptoms of chronic angina.

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin III; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Pyridines; Thiazepines

Combined inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) may produce greater benefits in heart failure than ACE inhibition alone.. We randomly assigned 5770 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure to double-blind treatment with either the ACE inhibitor enalapril (10 mg BID, n=2884) or to the ACE-NEP inhibitor omapatrilat (40 mg once daily, n=2886) for a mean of 14.5 months. The primary end point-the combined risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure requiring intravenous treatment--was used prospectively to test both a superiority and noninferiority hypothesis (based on the effect of enalapril in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction [SOLVD] Treatment Trial). A primary end point was achieved in 973 patients in the enalapril group and in 914 patients in the omapatrilat group (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.03, P=0.187)--a result that fulfilled prespecified criteria for noninferiority but not for superiority. The omapatrilat group also had a 9% lower risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization (P=0.024) and a 6% lower risk of death (P=0.339). Post hoc analysis of the primary end point with the definition used in the SOLVD Treatment Trial (which included all hospitalizations for heart failure) showed an 11% lower risk in patients treated with omapatrilat (nominal P=0.012).. Omapatrilat reduces the risk of death and hospitalization in chronic heart failure but was not more effective than ACE inhibition alone in reducing the risk of a primary clinical event. Between-group differences in favor of omapatrilat observed in secondary and post hoc analyses warrant further study.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Endpoint Determination; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Thiazepines

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exert their effects by modulating the neurohumoral milieu. Vasopeptidase inhibitors (VPI) are ACE and neutral endopeptidase inhibitors and may increase natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and perhaps endothelin-1 in patients with congestive heart failure. Patients (n = 107) with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class II to III, with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, and on ACE inhibitor therapy were randomized to either the VPI omapatrilat 40 mg/day or the ACE inhibitor lisinopril 20 mg/day. Trough levels of neurohormones (24 hours after dosing) were assessed at baseline, and at 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up. C-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (C-ANP) levels decreased with lisinopril (p = 0.035), but not with omapatrilat. In contrast, N-terminal ANP levels did not change, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels tended to decrease similarly in both groups. Endothelin-1 levels increased in both groups, the increase reaching statistical significance with omapatrilat (p = 0.008). Levels of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 tended to decrease, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 increased in both groups, with statistical significance only for interleukin-10 with omapatrilat therapy. Neither agent changed catecholamines or angiotensin II. Thus, even at trough levels, omapatrilat potentiates C-ANP more than lisinopril. Potentially important effects of omapatrilat on endothelin-1 and anti-inflammatory cytokines were identified, providing potential explanations for differences in clinical outcome.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biomarkers; Chronic Disease; Cytokines; Double-Blind Method; Endothelin-1; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Neurotransmitter Agents; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Stroke Volume; Thiazepines; Treatment Outcome

The mechanisms of action of omapatrilat, an agent that inhibits both neutral endopeptidase 24.11 and angiotensin-converting enzyme, on arterial function in patients with heart failure have not been previously reported. Forty-eight patients in New York Heart Association functional class II to III, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, and in sinus rhythm were randomized to a dose-ranging (2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg) study of omapatrilat for 12 weeks. Measurements were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks. Decreases in systolic (25.0 +/- 4.5 vs 2.8 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and mean arterial (13.9 +/- 3.0 vs 0.3 +/- 3.3 mm Hg, p < 0.05) pressure were seen after 12 weeks of therapy with higher doses. Ventricular-arterial coupling was improved with a dose-related decrease in augmentation index (-13.8 +/- 1.7% vs +6.1 +/- 2.1%, p < 0.01). There was no change in resting forearm blood flow between groups; however, maximum forearm vasodilator response during reactive hyperemia increased in the high-dose groups compared with the control group (+266 +/- 43% vs - 14 +/- 92%, p < 0.05). Omapatrilat induced an increase in postdose plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels (30 +/- 11 vs -2 +/- 7 pmol/L, p < 0.01) in high-dose groups consistent with endopeptidase 24.11 inhibition. Omapatrilat shows beneficial changes in ventricular-vascular coupling and arterial function in heart failure.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Blood Pressure; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke Volume; Thiazepines; Vasodilation; Ventricular Function, Left

The renoprotective efficacy of the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA) was compared with that of enalapril (ENA) in male Munich-Wistar rats subjected to 5/6 nephrectomy. ENA and OMA administered beginning on day 2 after surgery were equally effective in normalizing systolic BP (SBP) and preventing glomerulosclerosis (GS) for 12 wk. Micropuncture studies of rats performed using a similar treatment protocol demonstrated greater reduction of glomerular capillary hydraulic pressure with OMA than with ENA, at similar mean arterial pressures. To investigate whether these glomerular hemodynamic differences might be associated with differences in chronic renoprotective efficacy, additional rats were included in a protocol in which treatment was delayed until 4 wk after surgery (after the onset of hypertension and proteinuria) and continued for a longer period. Both treatments normalized SBP, but OMA resulted in more sustained reduction of proteinuria than did ENA. At week 20, OMA- and ENA-treated rats exhibited less GS than did untreated (control) rats at week 12, but only the difference in control versus OMA values was statistically significant [GS scores: control (12 wk), 36 +/- 4%; ENA (20 wk), 22 +/- 6%; OMA (20 wk), 14 +/- 2%]. The remaining ENA-treated rats were euthanized at 32 wk because of rapidly increasing proteinuria, whereas the remaining OMA-treated rats demonstrated a substantially slower increase in proteinuria until euthanasia at 50 wk. At this extremely late time point, OMA-treated rats exhibited GS scores similar to those of ENA-treated rats at 32 wk and control rats at 12 wk [GS scores: ENA (32 wk), 34 +/- 5%; OMA (50 wk), 38 +/- 8%]. It is concluded that, in this model, OMA affords greater long-term renoprotection than ENA when doses are adjusted to yield equivalent control of SBP.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Chronic Disease; Disease Progression; Hemodynamics; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Neprilysin; Protease Inhibitors; Punctures; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Renal Circulation; Thiazepines; Time Factors