olopatadine-hydrochloride and Hemolysis

Olopatadine, an effective topical ocular human conjunctival mast cell stabilizer/antihistaminic antiallergic drug, was evaluated and compared to selected classical antihistamines for their interaction with model and natural membranes to ascertain potential functional consequences of such interactions.. The model membranes examined consisted of the argon-buffer interface and monomolecular films of 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (SOPC) at the argon-buffer interface. Interactions with the model membranes were detected as changes in surface tension, i.e., surface pressure. Functional consequences of these interactions were assessed with natural membranes by 6-carboxyfluorescein leakage, hemoglobin release, lactate dehydrogenase release, and histamine release from appropriate cell types.. Measurements at the argon-buffer interface revealed intrinsic surface activity for all agents that ranged from highly surface-active to weakly surface-active in the order of: desloratadine > clemastine > azelastine congruent with ketotifen > diphenhydramine> pyrilamine > emedastine > epinastine > or = olopatadine. This order of amphipathic behavior was confirmed for most of the compounds by estimates of their dissociation constants (K(d,L)) determined from interactions with SOPC monolayers adjusted to a surface pressure approximating that of natural membranes. Epinastine was the only antihistamine that showed a disproportionately greater increase in surface activity toward SOPC in monolayer when compared to other antihistamines. Dissociation constants could not be established for olopatadine because of its low affinity for both the argon-buffer interface and the SOPC monolayer. Functional consequences of these interactions were assessed with natural membranes by 6-carboxyfluorescein leakage (erythrocyte ghosts), hemoglobin release (erythrocytes), lactate dehydrogenase release (conjunctival mast cells, corneal epithelial cells), and histamine release (conjunctival mast cells). Aside from olopatadine and emedastine, all antihistamines promoted a concentration-dependent leakage of hemoglobin from intact erythrocytes. The concentration of drug required to cause half-maximal hemoglobin release (H(50)) from erythrocytes correlated linearly (r = 0.98) with the SOPC dissociation constants (K( d,L)) estimated for the different antihistaminic agents interacting with SOPC monolayers. A similarly high correlation (r = 0.85) emerged from a plot with a slope approaching unity that related drug concentrations required for half-maximal hemoglobin leakage from erythrocytes to threshold doses of drug that caused histamine release from human conjunctival mast cells. Olopatadine was the only agent that did not promote membrane perturbation as monitored by either hemoglobin release from intact erythrocytes, LDH release from human conjunctival mast cells, or 6-carboxyfluorescein release from erythrocyte ghosts. Assessment of the lytic potential of marketed concentrations of ketotifen (0.025%), azelastine (0.05%), and epinastine (0.05%) revealed significant membrane perturbation of human conjunctival mast cells and, importantly, human corneal epithelial cells as indexed by LDH release. This was in contrast to marketed concentrations of olopatadine (0.1%) which maintained normal. Combined, these results support the notion that the disruption of natural cell membranes by surface-active antihistamines occurs not through a receptor-mediated process, but is the consequence of a direct interaction of these agents with the cell membrane. This is corroborated by surface pressure-concentration isotherms for adsorption of five different antihistaminic agents to SOPC monolayers where 50% lysis occurred at a surface pressure of 42.9 +/- 1.1 mN/m. Olopatadine appears to be unique among the agents tested by demonstrating low intrinsic surface activity, thus limiting its interaction with natural membranes. At concentrations of about half-maximal compound solubility (, 5.0 mM or a 0.19% drug solution), olopatadine generated SOPC monolayer surface pressures (i.e., 39.82 +/- 0.10 mN/m) that were below those that promoted membrane perturbation and onset of hemoglobin leakage. Olopatadine's restricted interaction with membrane phospholipids limits the degree of membrane perturbation and release of intracellular constituents, including histamine, LDH, and hemoglobin, which is believed to contribute to olopatadine's topical ocular comfort and patient acceptance.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cattle; Cell Membrane Permeability; Conjunctiva; Dibenzoxepins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epithelium, Corneal; Erythrocyte Membrane; Erythrocytes; Fluoresceins; Hemoglobins; Hemolysis; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine Release; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Mast Cells; Membranes, Artificial; Olopatadine Hydrochloride

Olopatadine is a human conjunctival mast cell stabilizer with antihistaminic activity. Ketotifen is an older molecule that possesses antihistaminic activity and is reported to have additional pharmacological properties. The interactions of these two compounds with model membranes (i.e., monolayers of 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerophosphocholine at the argon-buffer interface), and natural (i.e., erythrocyte) membranes were compared in an effort to understand the differences in their biological activities. Drug-lipid interaction with monolayers was determined by monitoring the surface pressure as a function of the drug concentration in the aqueous phase supporting the monolayer. Drug interaction with erythrocyte membranes was determined by monitoring changes in the permeability of the membranes to hemoglobin and 6-carboxyfluorescein as a function of drug concentration in the medium. Olopatadine and ketotifen are both intrinsically surface active and both interact with phospholipid monolayers. However, in both the presence and absence of lipid monolayers, the changes in surface pressure induced by olopatadine are lower than those caused by ketotifen. The effects of these two drugs on cell membranes were dramatically different. Exposure of bovine erythrocytes to increasing concentrations of ketotifen (1-10 mM) resulted in complete hemolysis of the cells, whereas olopatadine (1-10 mM) caused only minimal hemolysis (< 8%). Consistent results were obtained in experiments measuring the leakage of 6-carboxyfluorescein from erythrocyte ghosts as a more sensitive marker of membrane perturbation. Olopatadine treatment (0.1-10 mM) minimally perturbed the cell membrane while ketotifen (1-10 mM) caused a concentration dependent release of the fluorescent marker. These data demonstrate fundamental differences between the two drugs in their effects on cell membranes. Moreover, the differences are consistent with the surface activities of the two compounds measured in monolayers and with reported differences in their pharmacological activities. These findings offer an explanation for the biphasic non-specific cytotoxic effect of ketotifen on histamine release from mast cells and may account for the nonlytic mast cell stabilizing activity of olopatadine.

Topics: Animals; Cattle; Cell Membrane Permeability; Dibenzoxepins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Erythrocyte Membrane; Fluoresceins; Hemolysis; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Ketotifen; Membranes, Artificial; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Permeability; Phosphatidylcholines