olopatadine-hydrochloride has been researched along with Acute-Disease* in 6 studies
5 trial(s) available for olopatadine-hydrochloride and Acute-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparative evaluation of olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% treatment versus olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4% treatment in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
To evaluate the therapeutic effects of low-effective steroid fluorometholone 0.1% and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ketorolac 0.4% when concomitantly used with olopatadine 0.01% in relieving clinical signs and symptoms of acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study, 104 eyes of 52 patients with the diagnosis of SAC were conducted. The patients were assigned into two groups to receive either olopatadine and fluorometholone one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye or olopatadine and ketorolac one eye and placebo in the contralateral. The clinical signs (chemosis, mucus secretion, eyelid edema) and symptoms (itching, redness, tearing, burning) of the patients were evaluated by summing up the scores using a 3-point scale. Results were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test, p values less than 0.05 were defined as significant.. All parameters were improved less amount on the first day of the treatment in both groups, however, significant reduction in clinical signs and symptoms were seen on the 10th day compared with those receiving placebo. Fluorometholone was found superior to ketorolac in reducing redness, mucus secretion, chemosis and eyelid edema (p = 0.032 for redness, p = 0.028 for mucus secretion, p = 0.030 for chemosis, p = 0.042 for eyelid edema) and both drugs were similar in alleviating the symptoms itching, burning and tearing (p = 0.074 for itching, p = 0.064 for burning, p = 0.072 for tearing).. Fluorometholone was better than ketorolac in relieving redness, chemosis, mucus secretion and eyelid edema when concomitantly used with olopatadine, however, these two drugs were found equal in attenuating the symptoms itching, burning and tearing. Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Dibenzoxepins; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorometholone; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Ketorolac; Male; Middle Aged; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Ophthalmic Solutions; Placebos; Seasons; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2014 |
[The use of "Antigrippin-maximum" in the complex therapy of patients with acute respiratory diseases].
Topics: Acetaminophen; Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics; Antioxidants; Antiviral Agents; Ascorbic Acid; Calcium Gluconate; Combined Modality Therapy; Dibenzoxepins; Drug Combinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Rimantadine; Rutin; Treatment Outcome | 2006 |
Allergic conjunctivitis and contact lenses: experience with olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% therapy.
The efficacy of Patanol, a topically applied anti-allergic agent, was evaluated in a group of patients with allergic conjunctivitis due to contact lens wear (GROUP I) and a group comprised of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis patients, vernal conjunctivitis patients and atopic keratoconjunctivitis patients (GROUP II).. One drop of Patanol was administered to each eye twice daily. Signs and symptoms were assessed 7, 14, and 28 days after initiation of drug therapy.. Itching/burning, tearing, hyperemia and papillary reaction were reduced to scores of 0/1 (absent/mild) in 85%, 90%, 81% and 62%, respectively, of GROUP I patients at Day 28. The allergic conditions in GROUP II patients also improved with Patanol treatment. Itching/burning, tearing, hyperemia and papillary reactions were absent/mild in 60%, 76%, 96% and 90%, respectively, of these patients at Day 28.. Patanol treatment effectively and rapidly alleviated the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis due to contact lens wear as well as vernal conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis and the common seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Patanol allowed allergic patients to be more comfortable while permitting them to continue using contact lenses. Topics: Acute Disease; Chronic Disease; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic; Dibenzoxepins; Drug Evaluation; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Treatment Outcome | 2000 |
An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
To compare the clinical efficacy of Patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets, in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.. This was a randomized, double-masked, single center, contralateral controlled, antigen challenge model study. The concentration of allergen that elicited a positive response was determined at Visits 1 and 2 (itching > or = 2 and redness > or = 2 OU). At Visit 3, 29 subjects were randomized into two groups. Fifteen subjects received Claritin tablet and Patanol ophthalmic solution 0.1% in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. Fourteen subjects received placebo tablet and Patanol in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. One hour after drug administration, subjects were challenged with the antigen that elicited a positive response. At 3, 7, and 10 minutes, itching was subjectively evaluated. At Visit 4, the same procedure was followed as in Visit 3, but antigen challenge occurred 8 hours after drug instillation.. Results were analyzed by eye. Eyes treated with Patanol (concomitant with placebo tablet) had significantly lower ocular itching scores when compared to eyes treated with placebo (concomitant with Claritin) at 3, 7 and 10 minutes in the onset of action evaluation (p < 0.05). Eyes treated with Patanol (concomitant with placebo tablet) had significantly lower ocular itching scores at 7 minutes and there was a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.1) at 10 minutes in duration of action evaluation.. Patanol therapy was significantly more efficacious than Claritin in reducing ocular itching related to allergic conjunctivitis. Topics: Acute Disease; Allergens; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Dibenzoxepins; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Models, Biological; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Ophthalmic Solutions; Tablets; Time Factors | 2000 |
Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) with ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) in a clinical model of acute allergic conjunctivitis. Olopatadine is a dual acting H1 histamine receptor antagonist and a mast cell stabilizer, shown to be effective in treating allergic conjunctivitis. Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug approved in the United States for the relief of ocular itching associated with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.. The provocative antigen challenge model was used in this randomized, double-blind, single-center, crossover study. The allergen and concentration that consistently elicited a positive allergic reaction was used for challenge. After at least 14 days, subjects were randomized to receive either olopatadine in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye, or ketorolac in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. Twenty-seven minutes after drug instillation subjects were challenged with allergen. At 3, 10, and 20 minutes following allergen challenge, subjects graded ocular itching and were assessed for hyperemia in conjunctival, ciliary, and episcleral vessel beds. Approximately 14 days later, subjects received the alternate treatment in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye. They were again challenged with allergen and their responses were rated in the same manner.. Olopatadine significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced both ocular itching and hyperemia in all three vessel beds compared to placebo at all time points tested following allergen challenge. Ketorolac did not significantly reduce itching and showed a trend of increased hyperemia compared to placebo. Olopatadine was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than ketorolac in reducing hyperemia and ocular itching at all time points and was also significantly (p < 0.05) more comfortable than ketorolac as reported by subjects immediately following drug instillation.. The study demonstrated that olopatadine is effective and safe in preventing and treating ocular itching and hyperemia associated with acute allergic conjunctivitis and is more effective and more comfortable than ketorolac. Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Allergens; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzoxepins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Ketorolac; Male; Middle Aged; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Ophthalmic Solutions; Safety; Seasons; Treatment Outcome | 1999 |
1 other study(ies) available for olopatadine-hydrochloride and Acute-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Acute stress results in skin corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion, mast cell activation and vascular permeability, an effect mimicked by intradermal corticotropin-releasing hormone and inhibited by histamine-1 receptor antagonists.
Mast cells play an important role in allergic inflammation by releasing vasoactive molecules, proteases and cytokines. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and its structural analogue urocortin (Ucn) were shown to trigger skin mast cell activation and vascular permeability. We investigated the effect of acute stress on rat skin vascular permeability and CRH secretion, as well as the effect of intradermal CRH, and that of two histamine-1 receptor antagonists, azelastine and olopatadine, on vascular permeability.. Rats were stressed by restraint and vascular permeability was assessed by extravasation of (99)Tc-gluceptate, while mast cell activation was determined by skin rat mast cell protease-1 (RMCP-1) content. Skin CRH content was evaluated by ELISA. The effect of intradermal injection of CRH and Ucn, as well as that of two histamine-1 receptor antagonists, azelastine and olopatadine, was assessed by Evan's blue extravasation. Purified rat peritoneal mast cells (RPMCs) were also pretreated with azelastine (24 microM) or olopatadine (133 microM) for 5 min before challenge with compound 48/80 (0.5 microg/ml) for 30 min. Histamine secretion was measured fluorometrically. Intracellular Ca(2+) ions were evaluated in RPMCs loaded with calcium crimson and stimulated with compound 48/80.. Acute stress increased skin vascular permeability and CRH content, while it decreased RMCP-1. Intradermal injection of CRH or Ucn induced substantial Evan's blue extravasation that was inhibited by pretreatment with azelastine (24 microM) and olopatadine (133 microM). Both antihistamines also inhibited histamine release and intracellular increase of Ca(2+) ions from RPMCs stimulated by compound 48/80.. These results indicate that acute stress increases skin CRH that can trigger mast cell-dependent vascular permeability, effects inhibited by certain histamine-1 receptor antagonists, possibly acting to reduce intracellular Ca(2+) ion levels. Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Calcium; Capillary Permeability; Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Dibenzoxepins; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine Release; Injections, Intradermal; Male; Mast Cells; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Phthalazines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Restraint, Physical; Skin; Stress, Physiological | 2003 |