olanzapine and Schizophrenia

Are antipsychotic dose equivalents between acute mania and schizophrenia the same?. Six databases were systematically searched (from inception to 17 September 2022) to identify blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that used a flexible-dose oral antipsychotic drug for patients with acute mania. The mean and SD of the effective dose and the pre-post changes in manic symptoms were extracted. A network meta-analysis (NMA) under a frequentist framework was performed to examine the comparative efficacy between the antipsychotics. A classic mean dose method (sample size weighted) was used to calculate each antipsychotic dose equivalent to 1 mg/day olanzapine for acute mania. The antipsychotic dose equivalents of acute mania were compared with published data for schizophrenia.. We included 42 RCTs which enrolled 11 396 participants with acute mania. The NMA showed that risperidone was superior to olanzapine (reported standardised mean difference: -022, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.02), while brexpiprazole was inferior to olanzapine (standardised mean difference: 0.36, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.64). The dose equivalents to olanzapine (with SD) were 0.68 (0.23) for haloperidol, 0.32 (0.07) for risperidone, 0.60 (0.11) for paliperidone, 8.00 (1.41) for ziprasidone, 41.46 (5.98) for quetiapine, 1.65 (0.32) for aripiprazole, 1.23 (0.20) for asenapine, 0.53 (0.14) for cariprazine and 0.22 (0.03) for brexpiprazole. Compared with the olanzapine dose equivalents for schizophrenia, those of acute mania were higher for quetiapine (p<0.001, 28.5%) and aripiprazole (p<0.001, 17.0%), but lower for haloperidol (p<0.001, -8.1%) and risperidone (p<0.001, -15.8%).. Antipsychotic drugs have been considered first-line treatment for acute mania, warranting specific dose equivalence for scientific and clinical purposes.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Bipolar Disorder; Haloperidol; Humans; Mania; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a major psychiatric disorder with unknown aetiology. Recent evidence suggests a potential role for cytokines in its pathophysiology and that antipsychotic medication may alter this. While the aetiology of schizophrenia remains only partly understood, an altered immune function representing an important avenue of further discovery. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we focus on the specific effects of second generation antipsychotics risperidone and clozapine on inflammatory cytokines.. A defined systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed to identify relevant studies published between Jan 1900 and May 2022. After screening of 2969 papers, 43 studies (27 single-arm and 8 dual-arm) were included that consisted of a total of 1421 patients with schizophrenia in the systematic review. From these, twenty studies (4 dual-arm; 678 patients) had data available on which a meta-analysis could be carried out.. Our meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines post-risperidone treatment in the absence of a similar association with clozapine. Subgroup analyses (First episode v chronic) demonstrated that duration of illness influenced the extent of cytokine alteration; risperidone treatment produced significant cytokine changes (lowered IL-6 and TNF-α) in chronic patients but not in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients.. Varying treatment effects on cytokines can be observed by the use of different antipsychotic drugs. The cytokine alterations post-treatment are influenced by the specific antipsychotic drugs and patient status. This may explain disease progression in certain patient groups and influence therapeutic choices in the future.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cytokines; Humans; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Psychosis is a state of mind that makes it difficult to determine what is real and what is not. Psychosis can have serious negative effects. Like many psychiatric phenomena, psychosis has a variety of causes, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychotic depression. Antipsychotic medications, psychotherapy, and social support are the most common treatments. Antipsychotic drugs reduce the symptoms of psychosis by changing brain chemistry. Based on the mechanism of action, antipsychotics have two groups, typical and atypical. Most people who take antipsychotics experience side effects. People taking typical antipsychotics tend to have higher rates of extrapyramidal side effects, but some atypical drugs, especially olanzapine, are associated with the risk of significant weight gain, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, which, in turn, increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and premature death. Physical exercise, diet regimen, psychoeducation, monotherapy, or switching to an alternative antipsychotic are strategies to correct metabolic aberrates in atypical antipsychotic users. In light of several successful studies on the use of medicinal plants to control metabolic syndrome, this article briefly reviews the studies on some herbal medications for the management of metabolic disorders associated with atypical antipsychotics and discusses probable mechanisms. Therefore, we searched the Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases for works published before July, 2022, on the effect of herbal medications on antipsychotic-related metabolic abnormalities in animals or humans. We recommend that some herbal medicines may be efficient for regulating the metabolic changes related to atypical antipsychotics due to their multipotential action, and more efforts should be made to make herbal drug treatments more effective. We hope this review will be a reference for research on developing herbal therapeutics for metabolic alterations in antipsychotic customers.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia are susceptible to olanzapine-associated weight gain and cardiometabolic dysregulation. This meta-analysis characterized weight and metabolic effects observed during olanzapine treatment in randomized clinical trials in this vulnerable patient population.. PubMed, EMBASE, and Dialog were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting weight or cardiometabolic outcomes associated with olanzapine treatment in first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted using R v4.0.5.. Of 1203 records identified, 26 RCTs informed the analyses. The meta-analytic mean (95% CI) weight gain was 7.53 (6.42-8.63) kg in studies (n = 19) that reported weight gain with olanzapine treatment. Stratified by duration, the mean (95% CI) weight gain was significantly higher in studies >13 weeks in duration than in those lasting ≤13 weeks: 11.35 (10.05-12.65) vs 5.51 (4.73-6.28) kg, respectively. Despite between-study variability, increases from baseline in most glycemic and lipid parameters were generally small in studies of both ≤13 and >13 weeks. There were no correlations, however, between weight gain and metabolic parameter changes when stratified by study duration.. In RCTs enrolling patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia, olanzapine was consistently associated with weight gain that was greater in studies lasting >13 weeks compared with those of ≤13 weeks. Metabolic changes observed across studies suggest that RCTs may underestimate metabolic sequelae vs real-world treatment observations. Patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia are vulnerable to olanzapine-associated weight gain; strategies minimizing olanzapine-associated weight gain should be carefully considered.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Schizophrenia, a serious psychiatric disorder, is among the top 10 global causes of disability and affects nearly 1% of the world population. Antipsychotics constitute the best treatment for patients with schizophrenia, however, this treatment class carries a high risk of metabolic syndrome, including lipid abnormalities. Indeed, the risk of metabolic syndrome would be increased in the population with schizophrenia compared to the general population. The objective is to summarize the prevalence, the mechanisms, and the potential treatments of antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome. This is a narrative review of the literature. We searched the electronic database Medline, accessed through PubMed, to find studies that investigated the prevalence and treatments of metabolic syndrome in the adult population using antipsychotics. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients treated with antipsychotics ranges from 37% to 63%. Antipsychotic iatrogenic effects include weight gain/increased waist circumference, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Clozapine and olanzapine are reported to precipitate the onset of metabolic syndrome features. In patients with metabolic syndrome, an antipsychotic with less metabolic side effects such as lurasidone, lumateperone, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole should be prioritized. Unlike medications, aerobic exercise and dietetic counseling were found to be efficient as the nonpharmacologic treatment of antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome. Few pharmacological treatments were proven effective against weight gain in this patient population. The risk of metabolic syndrome induced by antipsychotics should be early recognized and closely monitored. Primary and secondary prevention of metabolic syndrome or onset of its feature might help reduce the risk of death for patients using antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Hypertension; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

There are significant differences between men and women in the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic drugs. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of what is currently known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antipsychotics in women with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and translate these insights into considerations for clinical practice. Slower drug absorption, metabolism and excretion in women all lead to higher plasma levels, which increase the risk for side-effects. Moreover, women reach higher dopamine receptor occupancy compared to men at similar serum levels, since oestrogens increase dopamine sensitivity. As current treatment guidelines are based on studies predominantly conducted in men, women are likely to be overmedicated by default. The risk of overmedicating generally increases when sex hormone levels are high (e.g. during ovulation and gestation), whereas higher doses may be required during low-hormonal phases (e.g. during menstruation and menopause). For premenopausal women, with the exceptions of quetiapine and lurasidone, doses of antipsychotics should be lower with largest adjustments required for olanzapine. Clinicians should be wary of side-effects that are particularly harmful in women, such as hyperprolactinaemia which can cause oestrogen deficiency and metabolic symptoms that may cause cardiovascular diseases. Given the protective effects of oestrogens on the course of SSD, oestrogen replacement therapy should be considered for postmenopausal patients, who are more vulnerable to side-effects and yet require higher dosages of most antipsychotics to reach similar efficacy. In conclusion, there is a need for tailored, female-specific prescription guidelines, which take into account adjustments required across different phases of life.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Female; Humans; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

To describe the approval of olanzapine/samidorphan, compare the clinical trial data, and summarize key findings, with a focus on impact to clinical practice.. A literature search of PubMed was performed (March 2006 to November 2021) using the following search terms:. Relevant English-language studies conducted in humans were considered. Primary use of Phase III clinical drug approval trials preferred; supplementary trial analysis evaluated to provide context.. This review details the pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, associated dosing and indications, and adverse effects for the drug combination olanzapine/samidorphan. Better understanding of novel drug mechanisms will help to expand on the potential role and place for use in clinical practice.. When treating complex patients with schizophrenia, the olanzapine/samidorphan combination has limited effect on medication-induced weight gain often associated with antipsychotic olanzapine monotherapy. Additional studies are needed to further define the role of olanzapine/samidorphan in bipolar I disorder and clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Although olanzapine remains one of the most efficacious antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia, there are significant tolerability concerns related to its weight and metabolic profile. Olanzapine-samidorphan combination tablets (OLZ/SAM), branded as Lybalvi, is a newly FDA approved formulation aimed at attenuating antipsychotic induced weight gain via modulation of the endogenous opioid system with samidorphan, while retaining the robust antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine.. We reviewed the published literature of OLZ/SAM for the management of schizophrenia using the US National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov resource. Topics covered in this narrative review include the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and tolerability of OLZ/SAM.. OLZ/SAM is an effective and well-tolerated pharmacologic option in mitigating olanzapine induced weight gain while retaining olanzapine's efficacy. OLZ/SAM cumulatively tends to attenuate weight gain rather than promote weight loss. Effect on metabolic laboratory variables appears limited. Additional research will be needed to determine its effectiveness compared to alternative strategies to attenuate antipsychotic induced weight gain.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Tablets; Weight Gain

Although numerous studies reported some changes of cortical silent period (CSP), an indicator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) function in central nervous system, in schizophrenia patients, it has been unknown how the disease stage and antipsychotic medication affect CSP values.. The present study conducted a systematic review of previous literature comparing CSP between schizophrenia patients and healthy subjects, and then performed meta-analysis on the effects of (1) the disease stage and (2) antipsychotics on CSP.. (1) In the comparison of the disease stage comprising a total of 17 reports, there was no significant difference in CSP between patients under drug-naïve first-episode psychoses and healthy controls, or between patients with antipsychotic medication and healthy controls. (2) In the comparison of the antipsychotic class, patients treated with clozapine were longer in CSP compared to healthy controls. Patients treated with olanzapine/quetiapine or with other type of antipsychotics were not different from healthy controls. Regarding other type of antipsychotics, the iteration analysis after leaving out one literature showed that patients were shorter in CSP than healthy controls.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Neural Inhibition; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, GABA; Schizophrenia

Clozapine is the gold standard of treatment for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, approximately 60% of those patients do not respond to clozapine; moreover, clinical outcomes after clozapine discontinuation are unclear so far. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to clarify the outcomes after clozapine discontinuation.. A systematic literature search was conducted, using MEDLINE and Embase with the following keywords: (clozapine AND (cessation* OR cease* OR withdraw* OR discontinu* OR halt* OR stop* OR switch*) AND (schizophreni* OR schizoaffective)).. A total of 28 clinical studies from 27 articles were identified and included in this systematic review. Three randomized controlled trials reported worsening of psychiatric symptoms. In 10 single-arm studies, the results of worsening and improving psychiatric symptoms were inconsistent. In one large retrospective cohort study, clozapine rechallenge, olanzapine, and antipsychotic polypharmacy had lower rehospitalization rates compared to no medication after clozapine discontinuation. In the other 14 retrospective studies, the vast majority showed worsening of clinical status after clozapine discontinuation. Among five studies on clinical outcomes after clozapine rechallenge, four reported improvements in clinical status in more than half of patients who rechallenged clozapine. The remaining study reported that the clozapine discontinuation-rechallenge group had a worse remission assessment score than the clozapine discontinuation-no rechallenge group.. Clinical outcomes generally worsen after clozapine discontinuation. Clozapine rechallenge and olanzapine may be considered following clozapine discontinuation. The outcomes after clozapine discontinuation in clozapine non-responders remain inconclusive; therefore, well-designed studies are warranted.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic with established efficacy in several psychiatric disease states, but its use is limited because of weight gain and metabolic side effects. Samidorphan is a novel opioid antagonist that binds to mu-opioid, kappa-opioid, and delta-opioid receptors and is hypothesized to reduce cravings for high-calorie foods thus attenuating antipsychotic-induced weight gain. The combination product olanzapine/samidorphan was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in June 2021 for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder; this article reviews the pharmacological properties of oral olanzapine/samidorphan and its clinical efficacy and tolerability with a focus on mitigation of olanzapine-induced weight gain in these patient populations. In clinical trials, the combination of olanzapine/samidorphan was associated with significantly less weight gain and smaller increases in waist circumference as compared with olanzapine monotherapy. Olanzapine/samidorphan demonstrated similar efficacy as olanzapine monotherapy and was well tolerated. Weight gain and metabolic side effects associated with olanzapine monotherapy can result in tolerability issues and potentially medication nonadherence. Olanzapine/samidorphan is an effective treatment for schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder with less weight gain than olanzapine monotherapy.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) - onset before age 18 - is linked with great disease burden and disability. Decision-making for EOS pharmacological treatment may be challenging due to conflicting information from evidence and guidelines and unidentified care needs may remain unmet.We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and umbrella reviews of EOS pharmacological treatment published in PubMed over the past 10 years and selected five clinical guidelines from Europe, North-America and Australia. Based on predefined outcomes, we critically compared the evidence supporting EOS-approved drugs in Europe and/or North-America with guidelines recommendations. We also evaluated the coverage of these outcomes to identify unmet needs.One systematic review, nine meta-analyses and two umbrella reviews (k=203 trials, N=81,289 participants, including duplicated samples across selected articles) were retrieved. Evidence supported the efficacy of aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, lurasidone, molindone, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and paliperidone in EOS, all of which obtained approval for EOS either in Europe and/or in North-America. Cognition, functioning and quality of life, suicidal behaviour and mortality and services utilisation and cost-effectiveness were poorly covered/uncovered.Among the antipsychotics approved for EOS, aripiprazole, lurasidone, molindone, risperidone, paliperidone and quetiapine emerged as efficacious and comparably safe options. Olanzapine is known for a high risk of weight gain and haloperidol for extrapyramidal side-effects. Treatment-resistant patients should be offered clozapine. Future long-term trials looking at cognition, functioning, quality of life, suicidal behaviour, mortality, services utilisation and cost-effectiveness are warranted. Closer multi-agency collaboration may bridge the gap between evidence, guidelines and approved drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Humans; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Molindone; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Systematic Reviews as Topic

BACKGROUND Myocarditis is cardiac muscle inflammation caused by infectious or noninfectious agents. Rarely, clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug used to treat resistant schizophrenia, has been reported to cause myocarditis, as we report in this case. CASE REPORT A 29-year-old man, who was known to have schizophrenia and was on olanzapine therapy, presented in our Emergency Department with active psychosis, and was subsequently admitted to the psychiatric ward for refractory schizophrenia. He was started on clozapine, which was cross-titrated with olanzapine. On day 20 of being treated with clozapine, he developed a high-grade fever and chest pain. EKG demonstrated new-onset prolonged QT corrected for heart rate (QTc), premature ventricular contractions, ST-T wave changes with an increased ventricular rate, and ventricular bigeminy with elevated troponin and inflammatory markers. Echocardiography showed a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Coronary angiography showed normal coronary arteries, low cardiac output, and cardiac index consistent with cardiogenic shock was also observed. Other pertinent laboratory results included negative respiratory viral panel, including COVID-19 PCR, negative blood cultures, and negative stool screen for ova and parasite. Clozapine was discontinued and the patient received management for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. He improved clinically with return of EKG to normal sinus rhythm and improved left ventricular ejection fraction on repeat echocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS Acute myocarditis can occur due to a myriad of causes, both infectious and noninfectious; thus, determining the lesser-known causes, such as drug-related etiology, is essential to provide appropriate treatment for patients.

Topics: Adult; Clozapine; COVID-19; Humans; Male; Myocarditis; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder associated with substantial morbidity and mortality affecting 0.25-1.6% of adults in the USA. Antipsychotic treatment is the standard of care for schizophrenia, but real-world treatment patterns and associated costs have not been systematically reviewed.. We conducted a systematic review to summarize treatment patterns and associated costs related to oral antipsychotic treatment of patients with schizophrenia in the USA.. We searched Medline (via PubMed) and Embase to identify relevant observational studies published from January 1, 2008, to June 1, 2018; costs were converted to 2018 US dollars.. Observational, real-world studies reporting on patterns of treatment and/or associated costs for adult patients with schizophrenia treated with oral antipsychotics in the USA were included.. Eighty-one studies were identified. Frequently prescribed oral second-generation antipsychotics were olanzapine (up to 50.9%), risperidone (up to 40.0%), and quetiapine (up to 30.7%). Suboptimal adherence was common across studies. Antipsychotic switching occurred in about half of patients, while antipsychotic combination therapy occurred in nearly 30%; all were associated with increased medication-related costs. Mean annual direct medical costs differed by treatment, with reported costs of $17,115 to $26,138 for patients treated with olanzapine, $18,395 for risperidone, and $17,656 to $28,101 for quetiapine.. This systematic review is limited by the variations in definitions of schizophrenia-related clinical terms used between studies and by the inclusion of studies focused on only the US health care system.. In the treatment of schizophrenia, suboptimal adherence, antipsychotic switching, and antipsychotic augmentation were all associated with high costs of care in comparison to patients who were adherent and did not require antipsychotic switching or augmentation. These findings illustrate the need for the development of new treatments that address efficacy and adherence challenges of currently available therapies.. Schizophrenia is a debilitating mental disorder that affects up to 1.6% of adults in the USA. Antipsychotic medications reduce symptoms of the disease, but many patients with schizophrenia are not fully adherent or choose to discontinue treatment entirely, increasing their risk of hospitalization. In others, efforts to achieve better symptom control or to avoid intolerable side effects may result in switching antipsychotic medications or adding additional medications, leading to higher medical treatment costs. The magnitude of these cost increases is unclear. This study sought to assess medical costs associated with antipsychotic treatment adherence, switching, and adding additional antipsychotics. We reviewed 81 studies published from January 2008 through June 2018 examining treatment adherence in patients with schizophrenia. We calculated rates of adherence, switching, and adding antipsychotics, as well as associated medical costs. Overall adherence to antipsychotic treatment was less than 50%, with up to 50% of patients switching medications and up to 29% adding an additional antipsychotic medication to their current treatment. Patients who were not treatment adherent incurred annual medical costs of $10,316 compared with $5723 in patients who were adherent. The costs of immediate or delayed switching of antipsychotic medications ranged from $21,922 to $28,232, while costs of adding an additional antipsychotic ranged from $24,045 to $29,344. These data suggest that suboptimal medication adherence, along with high rates of patient discontinuation and medication switching, lead to higher treatment costs in the management of patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Financial Stress; Humans; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; United States

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lurasidone compared with olanzapine and risperidone in the first-line treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.. A Markov model with 6-week cycle was constructed to reflect the disease progression of schizophrenia patients in the acute and maintenance phase. Probabilities of treatment discontinuation and adverse events in the acute phase were derived from the 6-week lurasidone clinical trial and a published network meta-analysis; long-term risks of relapse and discontinuation were estimated based on the 12-month lurasidone clinical trial and other treatment comparison studies. Cost inputs were derived from published literature and Chinese official documents, supplemented by expert opinions when necessary. Utility values were taken from published literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed over 15 years with a discount rate of 5% per year.. Over a 15-year time horizon, lurasidone yielded an improvement of 0.197 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥12,093 (US$1,753) vs. olanzapine and an improvement of 0.116 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥6,781 (US$983) vs. risperidone. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated robust base-case results since all analyses yielded net monetary benefits >0 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that lurasidone had 99.7, 99.9, and 100% probability of being cost-effective vs. olanzapine and risperidone at the conventional decision thresholds of 1, 2, and 3 times the Chinese per capita gross domestic product [namely CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY, CN¥1,44,894.00 (US$20,999.13)/QALY, and CN¥2,17,341.00 (US$31,498.70)/QALY in 2020], respectively.. Treatment with lurasidone was predicted to improve health outcomes and be a dominant strategy for patients with schizophrenia, compared with olanzapine and risperidone, in China.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe brain disorder characterized by an intriguing clinical panel that has begun to gain interest due to its particular phenotype. Having considered the role of gut microflora in psychiatry, the latest discoveries might offer further insight into the underlying mechanisms. Thus, we aimed to offer an updated overview of the therapeutic potential of microorganism-derived supplements alongside dedicated protocols that target the re-establishment of the host's eubiosis. Based on combinations of specific keywords, we performed searches in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) for the established interval (2018-2022) and identified twenty two eligible cases, restricted only to human patients' experiences. Up until the writing of this manuscript, it has been revealed that the administration of specific lactic acid bacteria strains (

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Olanzapine; Prebiotics; Probiotics; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic medications are used in a wide range of mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions in children and adolescents. Their efficacy and tolerability with long-term use have not been clearly established. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents. All relevant double-blind randomized control trials (RCTs), on any antipsychotic used for 12 weeks or longer in any mental health/neurodevelopmental condition in this age group, were included. We evaluated several efficacy and tolerability measures. Meta-analysis was performed for adverse events. Seven RCTs were identified (n = 939, age = 5-17 years), four on aripiprazole and three on risperidone. All studies reported symptomatic/functional improvements or more time before discontinuation with antipsychotics compared to placebo. Weight gain was identified as a significant side effect with antipsychotics. Serum prolactin was reduced with aripiprazole and increased with risperidone, and abdominal pain/discomfort, respiratory tract infections, were more common with Aripiprazole compared to placebo. Musculoskeletal pain may be more common with aripiprazole compared to placebo. Use of antipsychotics for 12 weeks or longer may be associated with symptomatic/functional improvements, but may be associated with additional side effects compared to short-term treatment. Further research in this population is needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Mental Health; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been considered as gold standard for establishing the efficacy and safety of investigational new drugs; nonetheless, the generalizability of their findings has been questioned. To address this issue, an increasing number of naturalistic studies and real-world database analyses have been conducted. The question of how much information from these two approaches is congruent or discrepant with each other is of great importance for the clinical practice. To answer this question, we focused on data from the antipsychotic (AP) treatment of schizophrenia. Our aim was two-fold: to conduct a meta-analysis of real-world studies (RWS), and to compare the results of RWS meta-analysis with previously published meta-analyses of RCTs. The principal measure of effectiveness was all-cause treatment discontinuation for both RWS and RCTs (when not available, then drop out for RCTs). We included publications for 8 selected APs (oral formulations of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and long-acting injectable (LAI) risperidone). We identified 11 RWS and 7 RCT meta-analyses for inclusion. Our results indicated that the RWS yielded statistically conclusive and consistent findings across individual investigations. For the overwhelming majority of the comparisons where both RWS and RCT meta-analyses were available, there was good congruency between the RWS and the RCT results. Our results support that RCTs, despite their limitations, provide evidence which is generalizable to real-world settings. This is an important finding for both regulators and clinicians. RWS can provide guidance for situations where no evidence is available from double-blind clinical trials.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Over the last ten years, the treatment of psychosis has seen a near explosion of creative development in both novel agents and new delivery modalities. The current review summarizes these developments over the past decade (2011-2020). We performed a systematic review utilizing PubMed and PsychInfo with the aim of identifying all the RCT and related analyses in adults with psychosis (schizophrenia and mania).. We identified 11 significant developments: the introduction of new antipsychotics cariprazine, brexpiprazole, lumateperone, and pimavanserin; introduction of new delivery methods: subcutaneous long-acting risperidone, aripiprazole lauroxil, transdermal asenapine, and inhaled loxapine; and the introduction of new approaches such as olanzapine/samidorphan for olanzapine-associated weight gain, examination of the TAAR1 agonist SEP 363,856 as a test of concept, and the combination of Xanomeline/Trospium, an M

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

This study aimed to compare the treatment effects of different antipsychotics for methamphetamine psychosis (MAP).. Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for short-term, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the inception to June 15, 2020. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were aggregated using random-effects pairwise comparisons and frequentist network meta-analyses (NMAs). Primary outcomes of interest were the main psychotic symptoms and dropout rates. We also rated the quality of NMA estimates.. This NMA included six RCTs of 395 patients with MAP. Six studied antipsychotics were aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone extended-release, quetiapine, and risperidone. Risperidone is the most frequently studied antipsychotic, being investigated in four trials. Low quality of evidence was available to determine the efficacy of those antipsychotics for main psychotic symptoms. Aripiprazole was significantly inferior to olanzapine (SMD = 1.36, 95 % CI = 0.46-2.26), quetiapine (SMD = 1.13, 95 % CI = 0.28-1.98), haloperidol (SMD = 0.87, 95 % CI = 0.14-1.60), and paliperidone extended-release (SMD = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.06-1.14). Olanzapine and quetiapine were superior to risperidone (SMD = -1.09, 95 % CI = -1.89 to -0.28 and SMD = -0.86, 95 % CI = -1.61 to -0.11, respectively). The dropout rates were not significantly different among the studied antipsychotics.. This analysis suggests that olanzapine or quetiapine may be a preferred antipsychotic for MAP, although the evidence for this was rated low-quality due to the high risk of bias or indirectness/intransitivity.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Methamphetamine; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects over 20 million people worldwide. Common symptoms include distortions in thinking, perception, emotions, language, and self awareness. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the development of schizophrenia, however, there are no unifying features between the proposed hypotheses. Schizophrenic patients have perturbed levels of glucose in their cerebrospinal fluid, indicating a disturbance in glucose metabolism. We have explored the possibility that disturbances in glucose metabolism can be a general mechanism for predisposition and manifestation of the disease. We discuss glucose metabolism as a network of signaling pathways. Glucose and glucose metabolites can have diverse actions as signaling molecules, such as regulation of transcription factors, hormone and cytokine secretion and activation of neuronal cells, such as microglia. The presented model challenges well-established concepts in enzyme kinetics and glucose metabolism. We have developed a 'two-cell' model of glucose metabolism, which can explain the effects of electroconvulsive therapy and the beneficial and side effects of olanzapine treatment. Arrangement of glycolytic enzymes into metabolic signaling complexes within the 'two hit' hypothesis, allows schizophrenia to be formulated in two steps. The 'first hit' is the dysregulation of the glucose signaling pathway. This dysregulation of glucose metabolism primes the central nervous system for a pathological response to a 'second hit' via the astrocytic glycogenolysis signaling pathway.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Cytokines; Glucose; Humans; Microglia; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

This study compared relapse prevention and acceptability of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in the maintenance treatment of adults with nonaffective psychoses.. The authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and online registers for randomized controlled trials published until June 2020. Relative risks and standardized mean differences were pooled using random-effects pairwise and network meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were relapse rate and all-cause discontinuation ("acceptability"). The quality of included studies was rated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the certainty of pooled estimates was measured with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).. Of 86 eligible trials, 78 (N=11,505) were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding relapse prevention, most of the 12 LAIs included outperformed placebo. The largest point estimates and best rankings of LAIs compared with placebo were found for paliperidone (3-month formulation) and aripiprazole. Moderate to high GRADE certainty for superior relapse prevention compared with placebo was also found for (in descending ranking order) risperidone, pipothiazine, olanzapine, and paliperidone (1-month formulation). In head-to-head comparisons of LAIs, only haloperidol was inferior to aripiprazole, fluphenazine, and paliperidone. For acceptability, most LAIs outperformed placebo, with moderate to high GRADE certainty for (in descending ranking order) zuclopenthixol, aripiprazole, paliperidone (3-month formulation), olanzapine, flupenthixol, fluphenazine, and paliperidone (1-month formulation). In head-to-head comparisons, only LAI aripiprazole had superior acceptability to other LAIs (bromperidol, fluphenazine, paliperidone [1-month formulation], pipothiazine, and risperidone).. LAI formulations of paliperidone (3-month formulation), aripiprazole, olanzapine, and paliperidone (1-month formulation) showed the highest effect sizes and certainty of evidence for both relapse prevention and acceptability. Results from this network meta-analysis should inform frontline clinicians and guidelines.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clopenthixol; Delayed-Action Preparations; Flupenthixol; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Phenothiazines; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention

Psychomotor agitation is a common condition in patients with psychotic disorders. One treatment possibility is intramuscular (IM) second-generation antipsychotics. Yet their efficacy in this formulation and for this aim is unclear. This network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of short-acting IM second-generation antipsychotic drugs, haloperidol and placebo in patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders that present acute agitation.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, PubMed, BIOSIS, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP up to November 2018 and PubMed until March 2020. Study selection and outcome extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted to compare the different IM second-generation antipsychotics among themselves and with IM haloperidol and placebo. The primary outcome was the number of responders at 2 h after the first injection. Responders at 24 h were also analysed.. 10 studies with 1964 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Ziprasidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole and haloperidol were more efficacious than placebo in calming patients at 2 h after administration. Furthermore, olanzapine was superior to aripiprazole. The results at 24 h confirmed the superiority of aripiprazole, olanzapine and haloperidol over placebo, while for ziprasidone no data were available.. All second-generation antipsychotics available as intramuscular medications were effective in reducing agitation in people with schizophrenia. Olanzapine was somewhat more efficacious than aripiprazole.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Cardiometabolic Risk Factors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The use of ketamine for depression has increased rapidly in the past decades. Ketamine is often prescribed as an add-on to other drugs used in psychiatric patients, but clear information on drug-drug interactions is lacking. With this review, we aim to provide an overview of the pharmacodynamic interactions between ketamine and mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase-inhibitors, antipsychotics, and psychostimulants.. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched.. Twenty-four studies were included. For lithium, no significant interactions with ketamine were reported. Two out of 5 studies on lamotrigine indicated that the effects of ketamine were attenuated. Benzodiazepines were repeatedly shown to reduce the duration of ketamine's antidepressant effect. For the monoamine oxidase-inhibitor tranylcypromine, case reports showed no relevant changes in vital signs during concurrent S-ketamine use. One paper indicated an interaction between ketamine and haloperidol, 2 other studies did not. Four papers investigated risperidone, including 3 neuroimaging studies showing an attenuating effect of risperidone on ketamine-induced brain perfusion changes. Clozapine significantly blunted ketamine-induced positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia but not in healthy participants. One paper reported no effect of olanzapine on ketamine's acute psychotomimetic effects.. Current literature shows that benzodiazepines and probably lamotrigine reduce ketamine's treatment outcome, which should be taken into account when considering ketamine treatment. There is evidence for an interaction between ketamine and clozapine, haloperidol, and risperidone. Due to small sample sizes, different subject groups and various outcome parameters, the evidence is of low quality. More studies are needed to provide insight into pharmacodynamic interactions with ketamine.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Depression; Drug Interactions; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Ketamine; Lithium; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotropic Drugs; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Drug Combinations; Humans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians. The authors sought to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.. A search of multiple electronic databases (through November 2018) was conducted for all placebo-controlled dose-finding studies for 20 second-generation antipsychotic drugs and haloperidol (oral and long-acting injectable, LAI) in people with acute schizophrenia symptoms. Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model. The outcome measure was total score reduction from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The authors identified 95% effective doses, explored whether higher or lower doses than the currently licensed ones might be more appropriate, and derived dose equivalencies from the 95% effective doses.. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The 95% effective doses and the doses equivalent to 1 mg of oral risperidone, respectively, were as follows: amisulpride for patients with positive symptoms, 537 mg/day and 85.8 mg; aripiprazole, 11.5 mg/day and 1.8 mg; aripiprazole LAI (lauroxil), 463 mg every 4 weeks and 264 mg; asenapine, 15.0 mg/day and 2.4 mg; brexpiprazole, 3.36 mg/day and 0.54 mg; haloperidol, 6.3 mg/day and 1.01 mg; iloperidone, 20.13 mg/day and 3.2 mg; lurasidone, 147 mg/day and 23.5 mg; olanzapine, 15.2 mg/day and 2.4 mg; olanzapine LAI, 277 mg every 2 weeks and 3.2 mg; paliperidone, 13.4 mg/day and 2.1 mg; paliperidone LAI, 120 mg every 4 weeks and 1.53 mg; quetiapine, 482 mg/day and 77 mg; risperidone, 6.3 mg/day and 1 mg; risperidone LAI, 36.6 mg every 2 weeks and 0.42 mg; sertindole, 22.5 mg/day and 3.6 mg; and ziprasidone, 186 mg/day and 30 mg. For amisulpride and olanzapine, specific data for patients with predominant negative symptoms were available. The authors have made available on their web site a spreadsheet with this method and other updated methods that can be used to estimate dose equivalencies in practice.. In chronic schizophrenia patients with acute exacerbations, doses higher than the identified 95% effective doses may on average not provide more efficacy. For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Isoxazoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder with variable therapeutic responses, the etiology and pathophysiology of which require further elucidation.. To review which pharmacological options are effective and safe and for which treatment goals in schizophrenia.. Narrative review of the pharmacological therapy of adults diagnosed with schizophrenia.. Despite heterogeneous therapeutic responses, to date only dopamine antagonists or partial agonists are approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. The efficacy of antipsychotic agents differs only gradually, with the exception of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, whereas undesired adverse effects are more variable. Those antipsychotic agents that show gradual efficacy advantages in meta-analyses of acute and maintenance treatment (clozapine, amisulpride, olanzapine, risperidone) are also those where at least one undesired adverse effect is most severely expressed. Antipsychotic adverse effects occur in subgroups of patients and are generally tolerable or treatable, whereas the "side effect" of untreated schizophrenia affects almost all patients, including relapses, psychosocial deterioration, secondary treatment resistance and increased mortality. Therefore, in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of schizophrenia, a lifelong continuous therapy is currently most likely indicated, ideally with antipsychotic agents for which adherence is directly measurable and improved. In the case of treatment resistant clozapine is the agent of choice, followed by electroconvulsive therapy, which also has the best evidence as augmentation treatment in cases of clozapine resistance.. New therapeutic agents with improved efficacy and tolerability as well as effectiveness for negative symptoms and cognitive disturbance are needed.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Dexmedetomidine; Drug Development; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of second generation (SG) long-acting antipsychotics (LAIAs) versus first generation (FG) LAIAs in schizophrenia. We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO until May 2019. Inclusion criteria for randomized trials included: (1) patients ≥18 years with schizophrenia, (2) efficacy evaluated through the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), (3) safety assessment through clinimetry, laboratory analysis, somatometry or adverse events, and (4) treatment duration ≥12 weeks. Data was synthesized using mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes using a random-effect model. Of 1872 citations, 17 trials were included, and direct comparisons of SG vs FG-LAIAs were observed in 3 (n = 459). SG and FG-LAIAs had similar effects on PANSS scores (MD -1.35; 95% CI -8.33-5.64), tardive dyskinesia (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.47-2.07), all-cause discontinuation (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.75-1.36), discontinuation due to inadequate efficacy (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.81-1.59) or adverse events (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.55-2.11). SG-LAIAs reduced the risk of using antiparkinsonian drugs (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.54-0.76) but significantly increased serum prolactin, weight and BMI. For long-term management, depot preparations of paliperidone, haloperidol, risperidone and fluphenazine were equally effective at symptom control and adherence, with significant differences in their safety profiles. These results however are considerably limited due to the small number of included studies and are therefore preliminary, not generalizable. More clinical trials are required to obtain a broader perspective of SG-LAIAs compared to FG-LAIAs.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with schizophrenia. However, the clinical features of olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia remain hitherto unclear because of inconsistencies in the literature. This meta-analysis thus investigated the effects of olanzapine treatment on lipid profiles among patients with schizophrenia. Studies of the effects of olanzapine on lipids were obtained through the PubMed, Web of science, The Cochrane Library and Embase databases (up to January 1, 2020). Twenty-one studies and 1790 schizophrenia patients who received olanzapine therapy were included in our analysis. An olanzapine-induced increase was observed in plasma triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with schizophrenia (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the time points analyzed included the following: baseline, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and ≥ 24 weeks (data of ≥ 24 weeks were integrated). The significant elevation of TG, TC, and LDL-C was observed in patients with schizophrenia already by 4 weeks of olanzapine therapy (all P < 0.05), with no obvious changes observed in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (P > 0.05). In conclusion, olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia, characterized by increased TG, TC, and LDL-C levels, was observed in patients with schizophrenia already by 4 weeks of olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Amisulpride is an antipsychotic available in Europe since 1990s, in Poland since 2000. Subsequent years brought to Polish market more second-generation compounds such as ziprasidone and aripiprazole. In 2018, the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System issued positive recommendation for lurasidone in schizophrenia (Recommendation 30/2018) facilitating its entry to the market. Thanks to new molecules, therapeutic possibilities of medicines consequently rise, however, higher number of available substances of different properties brings also more dilemmas which one to pick. Since new publications of comparative drug trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews are issued regularly, the authors present herein publications issued within last ten years focusing on amisulpride as opposed to other neuroleptics used in Poland. Although in many aspects it is equivalent to other atypical antipsychotics, it still has some advantages. Amisulpride seems to have better outcome than classic and atypical neuroleptics when it comes to depressive symptoms and predominant negative symptoms. It might also be superior to haloperidol in inducing symptomatic remission in first episode schizophrenia. Except for prolactin increase its side effects profile is favorable - it rarely leads to extrapyramidal symptoms (which are dose-dependent) and sedation. Therefore many patients accept treatment with amisulpride for its measurable clinical gains, such as improvement of positive symptoms and higher quality of life, compared to typical neuroleptics. Pharmacokinetics of amisulpride also encourage its wider use, especially when there is either a need for combined psychopharmacotherapy or comorbidity with general medical condition rises a need for somatic parallel treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Neurosecretory Systems; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Because women are often perceived as having better outcomes than men in psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia - women are less often in hospital, have a lower suicide rate, are less often involved with the law, enjoy better relationships with family and friends - the question arises as to whether or not this apparent advantage is attributable to a gender difference in antipsychotic response.. The aim of this paper is to critically review the quantitative and qualitative literature on gender difference in antipsychotic response sourced mainly from medical databases of the last ten years.. There are theoretical reasons why women's effective doses of antipsychotics might need to be lower than guidelines recommend for men, especially as regards olanzapine and clozapine, but, because there are so many variables that impinge on antipsychotic response, it is difficult to provide definitive guidance. What is evident is that some antipsychotic side effects, weight gain for instance, are more worrisome for women than for men. It is also evident that, after menopause, women need an increase in their antipsychotic dose; other reproductive stages in women's lives require special prescribing considerations as well.. There is a science, and an art, to prescribing antipsychotics, which needs to take gender into account. This article is part of the issue entitled 'Special Issue on Antipsychotics'.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors

This systematic review aimed to determine whether olanzapine is more likely than other second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) to induce insulin resistance in patients with schizophrenia in China.. We reviewed all randomized controlled trials on insulin resistance and metabolic abnormalities caused by SGAs in the PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang databases. Retrieved articles were published on or before December 2018. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect size of the treatment on the insulin resistance index (IRI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and fasting insulin (FINS).. Forty studies (3725 participants in total) were included. All studies contained data suitable for comparing aripiprazole vs. olanzapine, ziprasidone vs. olanzapine, and risperidone vs. olanzapine. Patients treated with olanzapine had higher IRI, FBG, and FINS levels than did patients treated with aripiprazole, ziprasidone, or risperidone, with significant differences (aripiprazole vs. olanzapine: FBG: standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] - 0.82, - 0.61; FINS: SMD = - 0.8, 95%CI - 1.00, - 0.61; IRI: SMD = - 0.80, 95%CI - 0.99, - 0.61; ziprasidone vs. olanzapine: FBG: SMD = - 1.19, 95%CI - 1.30, - 1.08; FINS: SMD = - 0.66, 95%CI - 0.85, - 0.47; IRI: SMD = - 0.71, 95%CI - 0.88, - 0.55; risperidone vs. olanzapine: FBG: SMD = - 0.17, 95%CI - 0.34, - 0.00).. Existing data suggest that olanzapine is associated with a significantly greater risk of IRI, FBG, and FINS, while other agents are associated with relatively lower risks. Thus, olanzapine is more likely to induce insulin resistance than are other SGAs in schizophrenic patients in China.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; China; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Children and adolescents are a special group in the context of psychopharmacotherapy. Given the limited choice of registered antipsychotics permitted in childhood, caution should be exercised in the choice of medication. This literature review reviews the current evidence base for pharmacotherapy of acute psychotic episode and schizophrenia in children and adolescents. The results of major systematic reviews and meta-analyses are compared. Meta-analyses of pharmacotherapy studies of the first psychotic episode are considered separately. Antipsychotics of the first and second generation are comparable in effectiveness for children and adolescents with acute psychotic episode. Olanzapine demonstrates higher efficacy in reducing negative symptoms. Ziprasidone and asenapine are less effective in treating schizophrenia in children and adolescents than other antipsychotics. Compared to adults, children and adolescents are at higher risk of metabolic impairments when taking antipsychotics.. Дети и подростки - особый контингент в контексте применения психофармакотерапии. Учитывая ограниченный выбор зарегистрированных антипсихотиков, разрешенных к применению в детском возрасте, следует осторожно подходить к выбору препарата. В настоящем обзоре литературы рассмотрена современная доказательная база по фармакотерапии острого психотического эпизода и шизофрении у детей и подростков. Сопоставлены результаты крупных систематических обзоров и метаанализов. Отдельно были рассмотрены метаанализы исследований фармакотерапии первого психотического эпизода. Антипсихотики первой и второй генерации сопоставимы по эффективности у детей и подростков с острым психотическим эпизодом. Оланзапин демонстрирует более высокую эффективность по редукции негативной симптоматики. Зипрасидон и азенапин по сравнению с другими антипсихотиками менее эффективны при лечении шизофрении у детей и подростков. У детей и подростков отмечается бо`льшая склонность к метаболическим нарушениям при приеме антипсихотиков по сравнению со взрослыми.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

Hypothermia is unpredictable and life-threatening adverse effect of atypical antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment, which has been little described. The aim of this article is to increase the awareness that hypothermia induced by APD drugs is more common than the current published case reports may suggest, and risk factors increase its development. Moreover, valuable guidelines regarding how to detect the early stages of hypothermia in clinical practice are included. A literature search for reports on APD-induced hypothermia in PubMed, Academic Search Complete, Medline Complete and eHealthMe databases was conducted. The literature search apart from eHealthMe database resulted in 524 articles, which included 34 case reports. Hypothermia was mostly induced by olanzapine (14) and risperidone (10). However, the data from Food and Drug Administration reports revealed several dozen more cases of APD-induced hypothermia (591case reports) compared with the published case reports (e.g. olanzapine-262 and risperidone-161). Hypothermia, mostly mild (61% of cases), has developed mainly in men (71%) having schizophrenia, a few hours after commencement of treatment or in the presence of risk factors. Owing to the increased risk of hypothermia development during APD treatment, doctors should routinely measure body temperature of patients, especially during the first days of the therapy. Early diagnosis of hypothermia and appropriate treatment may prevent death.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Hypothermia; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Time Factors; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Schizophrenia is a debilitating condition with three main symptom domains: positive, negative, and cognitive. Approximately one-third of persons with schizophrenia will fail to respond to treatment. Growing evidence suggests that treatment-resistant (refractory) schizophrenia (TRS) may be a distinct condition from treatment-respondent schizophrenia. There is limited evidence on effective treatments for TRS, and a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for TRS has hampered research. Areas covered: A literature search was conducted using Pubmed.gov and the EMBASE literature database. The authors discuss the pragmatic definitions of TRS and review treatments consisting of antipsychotic monotherapy and augmentation strategies. Expert opinion: Currently available first-line antipsychotic medications are generally effective at treating the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, leaving residual negative and cognitive symptoms. Before diagnosing TRS, rule out any pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic failures. Most evidence supports clozapine as having the most efficacy for TRS. If clozapine is used, it should be optimized, and serum levels should be at least 350-420 ng/ml. If clozapine is unable to be tolerated, some evidence suggests olanzapine at dosages up to 40mg/day can be useful. Augmentation strategies have weak evidence. Tailoring treatment to the specific domain is the preferred approach, and the use of a structured assessment/outcome measure is encouraged.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

There are many psychotropic drugs available for treatment of schizophrenia. The clinician's choice of the most effective first-line antipsychotic treatment for patients with schizophrenia should balance considerations of differential efficacy of antipsychotics against the relative risk of different side effects.. We reviewed recent studies using meta-analytic techniques and additional studies of new antipsychotics which quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of side effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotics and studies of the efficacy on add-on secondary medications. We present an integrated summary of these results to guide a clinician's decision-making.. Recent meta-analyses have suggested that antipsychotics are not equivalent in efficacy. Clozapine (effect size [SMD] 0.88 vs. placebo), amisulpride (effect size 0.6 vs placebo), olanzapine (effect size 0.59 vs. placebo), and risperidone (effect size 0.56 vs placebo) show small but statistically significant differences compared to a number of other antipsychotics on measures of overall efficacy (effect sizes 0.33-0.50). However, increasing placebo response remains a concern in interpreting these data. Amisulpride (effect size 0.47 vs placebo) and cariprazine (effect size in one trial compared to risperidone 0.29) have the strongest evidence indicating greater efficacy for treating primary negative symptoms relative to other antipsychotics. In terms of side effects, clozapine and olanzapine have among the highest weight gain potential and sertindole and amisulpride have more effects on QTc prolongation than other commonly used antipsychotics. Prolactin elevation is highest with paliperidone, risperidone, and amisulpride. Adjunctive treatment with an antidepressant drug may improve response in patients with schizophrenia who also have severe depressive or negative symptoms. For multi-episode patients with an inadequate response to an adequate dose and duration of the initial antipsychotic choice, switching to another antipsychotic, with a different receptor profile, may improve response, although evidence is very limited. In first-episode patients, a recent study on switching to another antipsychotic, with a different receptor profile after 4 weeks demonstrated no beneficial effects. There is little evidence to support using doses above the therapeutic range other than in exceptional circumstances.. Our review of recent studies using meta-analytic techniques has provided evidence that all antipsychotics are not equal in the severity of different side effects and in some measures of clinical efficacy. Comparative analysis and rankings from network meta-analyses can provide guidance to clinicians in choosing the most appropriate antipsychotic for first-line treatment, if used in conjunction with available information of the patient's history of previous clinical response or higher risks for specific side effects.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Depression; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is associated with an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. Patients receiving antipsychotic medications, including olanzapine, are at further risk. Ghrelin is an appetite-stimulating peptide hormone, although whether blood levels are altered by antipsychotic treatment, remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing blood ghrelin levels in patients with schizophrenia before and after treatment with olanzapine.. Two authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception until February 2018 for studies measuring blood ghrelin levels among patients with schizophrenia before and after olanzapine therapy. Random effects meta-analysis calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and meta-regression analyses were performed.. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, there were 111 patients with schizophrenia (mean age 40, 85% male, baseline BMI 22, and endpoint BMI 23). Olanzapine treatment (mean [standard deviation] duration = 12.3 [7.6] weeks) was associated with a significant decrease in blood ghrelin levels with a medium effect size (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.08, p = 0.018). Age, sex, baseline BMI, geography, olanzapine dose and duration, year of publication, study quality, inpatient status, and antipsychotic washout did not moderate this association.. Our results suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, olanzapine therapy is associated with decreased blood ghrelin levels, a paradoxical phenomenon known to occur in obesity. Future studies should investigate the contribution of dietary factors (e.g., caloric intake) and physical activity to this association, as well as the effects of other antipsychotics on ghrelin levels.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Ghrelin; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is widely used in the treatment of schizophrenia and has shown some degree of efficacy on negative and cognitive symptoms. We aimed to review the effects of olanzapine treatment on brain regions that are directly involved in cognitive and emotional processing.. We used the PubMed database to perform a bibliographic search on functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that investigated the effects of olanzapine treatment on neural activity in patients with schizophrenia during cognitive and emotional tasks.. Despite the high variability of tasks and analysis methods employed, the weight of the evidence was consistent with the hypothesis that olanzapine treatment is associated with a normalization of brain activity in schizophrenia. Distinctive functional changes were found in frontal cortex and cingulate cortex activity during both cognitive and emotional tasks. During emotional processing, olanzapine treatment seems to specifically regulate the activity of the striatum and limbic system.. The results of the reviewed studies suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, olanzapine treatment might lead to a more physiological brain activity coupled with regulation of dopamine release. Future studies should further corroborate these hypotheses using larger samples and homogeneous experimental tasks.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Brain; Cognition; Emotions; Functional Neuroimaging; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Modeling dose-response relationships of drugs is essential to understanding their safety effects on patients under realistic circumstances. While intention-to-treat analyses of clinical trials provide the effect of assignment to a particular drug and dose, they do not capture observed exposure after factoring in nonadherence and dropout. We develop a Bayesian method to flexibly model the dose-response relationships of binary outcomes with continuous treatment, permitting multiple evidence sources, treatment effect heterogeneity, and nonlinear dose-response curves. In an application, we examine the risk of excessive weight gain for patients with schizophrenia treated with the second-generation antipsychotics paliperidone, risperidone, or olanzapine in 14 clinical trials. We define exposure as total cumulative dose (daily dose × duration) and convert to units equivalent to 100 mg of olanzapine (OLZ doses). Averaging over the sample population of 5891 subjects, the median dose ranged from 0 (placebo randomized participants) to 6.4 OLZ doses (paliperidone randomized participants). We found paliperidone to be least likely to cause excessive weight gain across a range of doses. Compared with 0 OLZ doses, at 5.0 OLZ doses, olanzapine subjects had a 15.6% (95% credible interval: 6.7, 27.1) excess risk of weight gain; corresponding estimates for paliperidone and risperidone were 3.2% (1.5, 5.2) and 14.9% (0.0, 38.7), respectively. Moreover, compared with nonblack participants, black participants had a 6.8% (1.0, 12.4) greater risk of excessive weight gain at 10.0 OLZ doses of paliperidone. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that paliperidone is safer in terms of weight gain risk than risperidone or olanzapine for all participants at low to moderate cumulative OLZ doses.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Up to 75% of people with serious mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have co-occurring substance use disorders (dual diagnosis). Dual diagnosis can have an adverse effect on treatment and prognosis of SMI.. To evaluate the effects of risperidone compared to treatment with other antipsychotics (first-generation and other second-generation antipsychotics) used in people with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance misuse.. On 6 January 2016 and 9 October 2017, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (including trial registers).. We selected randomised trials of risperidone versus any other antipsychotic in people with SMI and substance abuse (dual diagnosis). We included trials meeting our inclusion criteria and reporting useable data. We excluded trials that either did not meet our inclusion criteria or met our inclusion criteria but did not report any useable data.. We independently inspected citations and selected studies. For included studies, we independently extracted data and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes we calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the quality of evidence, creating a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.. We identified eight randomised trials containing a total of 1073 participants with SMI and co-occurring substance misuse. Seven of these contributed useable data to the review. There was heterogeneity in trial design and measurement. Risperidone was compared to clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Few trials compared risperidone with first-generation agents. Few trials examined participants with a dual diagnosis from the outset and most trials only contained separate analyses of subgroups with a dual diagnosis or were secondary data analyses of subgroups of people with a dual diagnosis from existing larger trials.For risperidone versus clozapine we found no clear differences between these two antipsychotics in the reduction of positive psychotic symptoms (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), n = 36, mean difference (MD) 0.90, 95% CI -2.21 to 4.01, very low quality evidence), or reduction in cannabis use (1 RCT, n = 14, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.35, very low quality evidence), improvement in subjective well-being (1 RCT, n = 36, MD -6.00, 95% CI -14.82 to 2.82, very low quality evidence), numbers discontinuing medication (1 RCT, n = 36, RR 4.05, 95% CI 0.21 to 78.76, very low quality evidence), extrapyramidal side-effects (2 RCTs, n = 50, RR 2.71, 95% CI 0.30 to 24.08; I² = 0%, very low quality evidence), or leaving the study early (2 RCTs, n = 45, RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.51; I² = 34%, very low quality evidence). Clozapine was associated with lower levels of craving for cannabis (1 RCT, n = 28, MD 7.00, 95% CI 2.37 to 11.63, very low quality evidence).For risperidone versus olanzapine we found no clear differences in the reduction of positive psychotic symptoms (1 RCT, n = 37, MD -1.50, 95% CI -3.82 to 0.82, very low quality evidence), reduction in cannabis use (1 RCT, n = 41, MD 0.40, 95% CI -4.72 to 5.52, very low quality evidence), craving for cannabis (1 RCT, n = 41, MD 5.00, 95% CI -4.86 to 14.86, very low quality evidence), parkinsonism (1 RCT, n = 16, MD -0.08, 95% CI -1.21 to 1.05, very low quality evidence), or leaving the study early (2 RCT, n = 77, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35; I² = 0%, very low quality evidence).For risperidone versus perphenazine, we found no clear differences in the number of participants leaving the study early (1 RCT, n = 281, RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.20, low-quality evidence).For risperidone versus quetiapine, we found no clear differences in the number of participants leaving th. There is not sufficient good-quality evidence available to determine the effects of risperidone compared with other antipsychotics in people with a dual diagnosis. Few trials compared risperidone with first-generation agents, leading to limited applicability to settings where access to second-generation agents is limited, such as in low- and middle-income countries. Moreover, heterogeneity in trial design and measurement of outcomes precluded the use of many trials in our analyses. Future trials in this area need to be sufficiently powered but also need to conform to consistent methods in study population selection, use of measurement scales, definition of outcomes, and measures to counter risk of bias. Investigators should adhere to CONSORT guidelines in the reporting of results.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry); Humans; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders; Thiazoles

Amisulpride was introduced into China in 2010 as a second-generation atypical antipsychotic, while olanzapine has been on the market since 1999 as one of the leading treatments for schizophrenia in China. Since more Chinese patients are gaining access to amisulpride, the study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and costs between amisulpride and olanzapine for schizophrenia treatment in China.. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to July 2018. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was utilized to assess the quality of included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and olanzapine, followed by a cost-minimization analysis using local drug and medical costs reported in China.. Twenty RCTs with 2000 patients were included in the systematic review. There were no significant differences between amisulpride and olanzapine on efficacy measures based on scores from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity or Improvement. For safety outcomes, amisulpride was associated with lower fasting blood glucose and less abnormal liver functions as well as significantly lower risks of weight gain, constipation, and somnolence; olanzapine was associated with significantly lower risks of insomnia and lactation/amenorrhea/sexual hormone disorder. No significant differences were found in risks of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), tremor, akathisia, abnormal corrected QT interval. Cost-minimization analysis showed that amisulpride was likely to be a cost-saving alternative in China, with potential savings of 1358 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per patient for a three-month schizophrenia treatment compared with olanzapine.. As the first meta-analysis and cost-minimization analysis comparing the efficacy, safety and cost of amisulpride and olanzapine within a Chinese setting, the study suggests that amisulpride may be an effective, well-tolerated, and cost-saving antipsychotic drug alternative in China.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Switching between different antipsychotic therapies is a frequent occurrence in the management of patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. This paper provides a review of the principles of antipsychotic switching and discusses pharmacological principles underlying adverse events that occur while switching olanzapine to another antipsychotic medication. It offers suggestions for management of switch-associated adverse events in clinical settings.. Few publications explore olanzapine switch-related adverse events, the underlying pharmacological principles and appropriate switching strategies to minimise the risk of adverse events. There is still a need for further studies to verify existing knowledge and assist in the development of 'gold standard' guidelines that outline appropriate switching strategies and duration of the switching process to reduce and avoid adverse events.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Substitution; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

The aim of the study was to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate, an atypical long-acting antipsychotic drug. Paliperidone is a 9-hydroxy metabolite of risperidone with a slightly different receptor profile and significantly different pharmacokinetic profile. After the short review of its pharmacological properties, the efficacy of the drug in comparison to placebo or to an active comparator was described. The studies revealed the effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of psychotic symptoms, mainly schizophrenia. The drug proved to be efficacious in both acute psychotic symptoms treatment and long-term treatment. Its efficacy in patients with schizophrenia was similar and sometimes even better than the efficacy of other long-acting drugs, such as risperidone or olanzapine. In the pharmacoeconomic studies, paliperidone proved to be cost-effective in comparison to risperidone or olanzapine. The review of the literature also underlined that paliperidone palmitate is well tolerated, compared with placebo. Frequency and severity of side-effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperprolactinemia and weight gain, was similar or less than those found in treatment with other atypical antipsychotics, including long-acting ones.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are associated with metabolic disturbances. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a rare, but potentially fatal sign of acute glucose metabolism dysregulation linked to the use of SGAs. The aims of this article are to present patients with a history of psychotic disorders and of severe metabolic diabetic ketoacidosis, possibly associated with the use of antipsychotics, and to review the current literature on the topic of antipsychotic-induced DKA.. PubMed/Medline and EBSCO databases were searched using the keywords: diabetic ketoacidosis, antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, second generation antipsychotics, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, paliperidone, amisulpride and haloperidol. Case reports, case series and reviews of case series were included in the review.. The majority of patients who developed DKA following treatment with antipsychotics were treated with olanzapine and clozapine in monotherapy or in combination with other antipsychotics. DKA mostly occurred in the first six months of antipsychotic treatment. Other risk factors included insulin resistance prior to antipsychotic treatment, male gender and middle age.. Clinicians should consider the risk of DKA when starting treatment with SGAs. Preventive measures for patients with psychotic disorders using antipsychotics should include regular assessment of risk factors and screening for diabetes before and after administering antipsychotics, especially in the first months of treatment. Whenever possible, polypharmacy should be avoided.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clozapine; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

The choice of antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy remains controversial, mainly due to a lack of exposure and outcome data. Randomized clinical trials are practically impossible due to ethical reasons. Our reports describe three cases of closely monitored female patients with schizophrenia who were treated with olanzapine during pregnancy. The novelty of reports is that all patients were previously treated with olanzapine long acting injectable (LAI) for an average period of 3.8 years. During the LAI treatment period they were in remission and then refused to continue with LAI mainly due to treatment modality (injectable administration).. The patients were relatively young, diagnosed with schizophrenia and were previously successfully treated with long acting injectable. The women were pregnant for the first time. In two cases, the patients had become pregnant during remission and they continued treatment with oral olanzapine. In the third case, olanzapine treatment was initiated during admission for a relapse.. There are no controlled studies for the use of olanzapine therapy in pregnant women. More studies are needed to determine the effects of antipsychotics, including olanzapine, on pregnant women and the developing fetus. Schizophrenia relapse during pregnancy may expose the mother and the fetus to high risk if olanzapine is stopped. It is important to assess the risks and benefits of treating pregnant or breastfeeding women with antipsychotics, and weigh these against possible risks of anomalies and developmental problems to the fetus or child.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Olanzapine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotics have serious metabolic side effects on blood glucose. However, the comparative influence of these drugs on blood glucose levels has not been comprehensively evaluated. We conducted a network meta-analysis to create a hierarchy of the side effects of 12 antipsychotic drugs on changes in blood glucose levels.. A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases (last search June 2016) was conducted to identify studies that reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing changes in blood glucose levels between patients receiving one of 12 antipsychotic drugs or a placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia or related disorders. The studies we searched were limited to those published in English. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The primary outcome of interest was changes in fasting glucose levels.. We included 47 studies with 114 relevant arms. Of the antipsychotic drugs, only olanzapine was associated with significantly increased glucose levels compared to a placebo (mean difference (MD) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.14 to 7.76). Moreover, olanzapine was associated with a significantly greater change in the glucose levels than ziprasidone (MD = 5.51, 95% CI = 1.62 to 9.39), lurasidone (MD = 5.58, 95% CI = 0.53 to 10.64) or risperidone (MD = 3.05, 95% CI = 0.87 to 5.22). Ziprasidone and lurasidone were associated with minimal glucose changes compared to the other antipsychotics.. Olanzapine was associated with a significantly greater change in blood glucose levels than ziprasidone, lurasidone, risperidone or placebo treatment. The application of a hierarchy of glucose metabolism-related side effects may help clinicians tailor the choice of antipsychotic drug to meet the needs of individual patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Humans; Insulin; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Non-adherence to long-term treatment is a major issue for patients with schizophrenia and is associated with an increased risk of relapse. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics can offer a useful option to improve adherence. Due to the type of sustained-release mechanism, olanzapine pamoate (OLAI) can differ in safety as compared with oral olanzapine. Recent safety data concerning olanzapine pamoate required an update of previous systematic reviews.. Safety data were found in US and EU clinical trial registries, and a literature search was undertaken using the databases PubMed and EMBASE to find all relevant published studies. Where appropriate, the number needed to harm and 95% confidence interval for categorical safety outcomes were calculated.. The safety profile of OLAI was similar to the well-known safety profile of oral olanzapine, except for the risk of occurrence of post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS). Olanzapine pamoate can be a choice for schizophrenic patients with a history of response to and acceptable tolerance of oral olanzapine, who have easy access to mental healthcare settings with emergency services for the treatment of PDSS. Long-term, prospective studies assessing the efficacy and safety of OLAI and head-to-head comparisons with other LAI and oral antipsychotics are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Injections; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

In treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine is considered the standard treatment. However, clozapine use has restrictions owing to its many adverse effects. Moreover, an increasing number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of other antipsychotics have been published.. To integrate all the randomized evidence from the available antipsychotics used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia by performing a network meta-analysis.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Trial Registry, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched up to June 30, 2014.. At least 2 independent reviewers selected published and unpublished single- and double-blind RCTs in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (any study-defined criterion) that compared any antipsychotic (at any dose and in any form of administration) with another antipsychotic or placebo.. At least 2 independent reviewers extracted all data into standard forms and assessed the quality of all included trials with the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects model in a Bayesian setting.. The primary outcome was efficacy as measured by overall change in symptoms of schizophrenia. Secondary outcomes included change in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, categorical response to treatment, dropouts for any reason and for inefficacy of treatment, and important adverse events.. Forty blinded RCTs with 5172 unique participants (71.5% men; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [3.7] years) were included in the analysis. Few significant differences were found in all outcomes. In the primary outcome (reported as standardized mean difference; 95% credible interval), olanzapine was more effective than quetiapine (-0.29; -0.56 to -0.02), haloperidol (-0. 29; -0.44 to -0.13), and sertindole (-0.46; -0.80 to -0.06); clozapine was more effective than haloperidol (-0.22; -0.38 to -0.07) and sertindole (-0.40; -0.74 to -0.04); and risperidone was more effective than sertindole (-0.32; -0.63 to -0.01). A pattern of superiority for olanzapine, clozapine, and risperidone was seen in other efficacy outcomes, but results were not consistent and effect sizes were usually small. In addition, relatively few RCTs were available for antipsychotics other than clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone. The most surprising finding was that clozapine was not significantly better than most other drugs.. Insufficient evidence exists on which antipsychotic is more efficacious for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and blinded RCTs-in contrast to unblinded, randomized effectiveness studies-provide little evidence of the superiority of clozapine compared with other second-generation antipsychotics. Future clozapine studies with high doses and patients with extremely treatment-refractory schizophrenia might be most promising to change the current evidence.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

Chlorpromazine is an aliphatic phenothiazine, which is one of the widely-used typical antipsychotic drugs. Chlorpromazine is reliable for its efficacy and one of the most tested first generation antipsychotic drugs. It has been used as a 'gold standard' to compare the efficacy of older and newer antipsychotic drugs. Expensive new generation drugs are heavily marketed worldwide as a better treatment for schizophrenia, but this may not be the case and an unnecessary drain on very limited resources.. To compare the effects of chlorpromazine with atypical or second generation antipsychotic drugs, for the treatment of people with schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register up to 23 September 2013.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared chlorpromazine with any other atypical antipsychotic drugs for treating people with schizophrenia. Adults (as defined in each trial) diagnosed with schizophrenia, including schizophreniform, schizoaffective and delusional disorders were included in this review.. At least two review authors independently screened the articles identified in the literature search against the inclusion criteria and extracted data from included trials. For homogeneous dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous data, we determined the mean difference (MD) values and 95% CIs. We assessed the risk of bias in included studies and rated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. This review includes 71 studies comparing chlorpromazine to olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine. None of the included trials reported any data on economic costs. 1. Chlorpromazine versus olanzapineIn the short term, there appeared to be a significantly greater clinical response (as defined in each study) in people receiving olanzapine (3 RCTs, N = 204; RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.99, low quality evidence). There was no difference between drugs for relapse (1 RCT, N = 70; RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.86, very low quality evidence), nor in average endpoint score using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) for mental state (4 RCTs, N = 245; MD 3.21, 95% CI -0.62 to 7.05,very low quality evidence). There were significantly more extrapyramidal symptoms experienced amongst people receiving chlorpromazine (2 RCTs, N = 298; RR 34.47, 95% CI 4.79 to 248.30,very low quality evidence). Quality of life ratings using the general quality of life interview (GQOLI) - physical health subscale were more favourable with people receiving olanzapine (1 RCT, N = 61; MD -10.10, 95% CI -13.93 to -6.27, very low quality evidence). There was no difference between groups for people leaving the studies early (3 RCTs, N = 139; RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.40, very low quality evidence). 2. Chlorpromazine versus risperidoneIn the short term, there appeared to be no difference in clinical response (as defined in each study) between chlorpromazine or risperidone (7 RCTs, N = 475; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.34, low quality of evidence), nor in average endpoint score using the BPRS for mental state 4 RCTs, N = 247; MD 0.90, 95% CI -3.49 to 5.28, very low quality evidence), or any observed extrapyramidal adverse effects (3 RCTs, N = 235; RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.40,very low quality evidence). Quality of life ratings using the QOL scale were significantly more favourable with people receiving risperidone (1 RCT, N = 100; MD -14.2, 95% CI -20.50 to -7.90, very low quality evidence). There was no difference between groups for people leaving the studies early (one RCT, N = 41; RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11, very low quality evidence). 3. Chlorpromazine versus quetiapineIn the short term, there appeared to be no difference in clinical response (as defined in each study) between chlorpromazine or quetiapine (28 RCTs, N = 3241; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06, moderate quality evidence) nor in average endpoint score using the BPRS for mental state (6 RCTs, N = 548; MD -0.18, 95% CI -1.23 to 0.88, very lo. Most included trials included inpatients from hospitals in China. Therefore the results of this Cochrane review are more applicable to the Chinese population. Mostincluded trials were short term studies, therefore we cannot comment on the medium and long term use of chlorpromazine compared to atypical antipsychotics. Low qualityy evidence suggests chlorpromazine causes more extrapyramidal adverse effects. However, all studiesused varying dose ranges, and higher doses would be expected to be associated with more adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Humans; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia are eight times more likely than healthy individuals to become infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (hiv). Although in vitro studies provide some data on the interaction between antipsychotics and retroviral agents, there is a lack of in vitro data on this subject. We describe the case of a 35-year-old patient who suffered from schizophrenia, polydrug abuse and an hiv infection and who also had treatment-resistant psychosis. An interaction between the antiretroviral drug ritonavir and the antipsychotic olanzapine turned out to be the cause of the treatment resistance. As far as we know, this is the first report of such a clinically relevant interaction. We present a review of the current literature on this type of interaction.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Ritonavir; Schizophrenia

Risperidone is the first new generation antipsychotic drug made available in a long-acting injection formulation.. To examine the effects of depot risperidone for treatment of schizophrenia or related psychoses in comparison with placebo, no treatment or other antipsychotic medication.To critically appraise and summarise current evidence on the resource use, cost and cost-effectiveness of risperidone (depot) for schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (December 2002, 2012, and October 28, 2015). We also checked the references of all included studies, and contacted industry and authors of included studies.. Randomised clinical trials comparing depot risperidone with other treatments for people with schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD). We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created 'Summary of findings' tables using GRADE.. Twelve studies, with a total of 5723 participants were randomised to the following comparison treatments: Risperidone depot versus placebo Outcomes of relapse and improvement in mental state were neither measured or reported. In terms of other primary outcomes, more people receiving placebo left the study early by 12 weeks (1 RCT, n=400, RR 0.74 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88, very low quality evidence), experienced severe adverse events in short term (1 RCT, n=400, RR 0.59 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93, very low quality evidence). There was however, no difference in levels of weight gain between groups (1 RCT, n=400, RR 2.11 95% CI 0.48 to 9.18, very low quality evidence). Risperidone depot versus general oral antipsychotics The outcome of improvement in mental state was not presented due to high levels of attrition, nor were levels of severe adverse events explicitly reported. Most primary outcomes of interest showed no difference between treatment groups. However, more people receiving depot risperidone experienced nervous system disorders (long-term:1 RCT, n=369, RR 1.34 95% CI 1.13 to 1.58, very-low quality evidence). Risperidone depot versus oral risperidoneData for relapse and severe adverse events were not reported. All outcomes of interest were rated as moderate quality evidence. Main results showed no differences between treatment groups with equivocal data for change in mental state, numbers leaving the study early, any extrapyramidal symptoms, weight increase and prolactin-related adverse events. Risperidone depot versus oral quetiapine Relapse rates and improvement in mental state were not reported. Fewer people receiving risperidone depot left the study early (long-term: 1 RCT, n=666, RR 0.84 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95, moderate quality evidence). Experience of serious adverse events was similar between groups (low quality evidence), but more people receiving depot risperidone experienced EPS (1 RCT, n=666, RR 1.83 95% CI 1.07 to 3.15, low quality evidence), had greater weight gain (1 RCT, n=666, RR 1.25 95% CI 0.25 to 2.25, low quality evidence) and more prolactin-related adverse events (1 RCT, n=666, RR 3.07 95% CI 1.13 to 8.36, very low quality evidence). Risperidone depot versus oral aripiprazoleRelapse rates, mental state using PANSS, leaving the study early, serious adverse events and weight increase were similar between groups. However more people receiving depot risperidone experienced prolactin-related adverse events compared to those receiving oral aripiprazo. Depot risperidone may be more acceptable than placebo injection but it is hard to know if it is any more effective in controlling the symptoms of schizophrenia. The active drug, especially higher doses, may be associated with more movement disorders than placebo. People already stabilised on oral risperidone may continue to maintain benefit if treated with depot risperidone and avoid the need to take tablets, at least in the short term. In people who are happy to take oral medication the depot risperidone is approximately equal to oral risperidone. It is possible that the depot formulation, however, can bring a second-generation antipsychotic to people who do not reliably adhere to treatment. People with schizophrenia who have difficulty adhering to treatment, however, are unlikely to volunteer for a clinical trial. Such people may gain benefit from the depot risperidone with no increased risk of extrapyramidal side effects.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The aim of this study was to build an eligible population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for olanzapine in Chinese psychotic patients based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data, with assistance of meta-analysis, to facilitate individualized therapy.. Population PK analysis for olanzapine was performed using NONMEM software (version 7.3.0). TDM data were collected from Guangzhou Brain Hospital (China). Because of the limitations of TDM data, model-based meta-analysis was performed to construct a structural model to assist the modeling of TDM data as prior estimates. After analyzing related covariates, a simulation was performed to predict concentrations for different types of patients under common dose regimens.. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was developed for olanzapine oral tablets, based on 23 articles with 390 data points. The model was then applied to the TDM data. Gender and smoking habits were found to be significant covariates that influence the clearance of olanzapine. To achieve a blood concentration of 20 ng/mL (the lower boundary of the recommended therapeutic range), simulation results indicated that the dose regimen of olanzapine should be 5 mg BID (twice a day), ≥ 5 mg QD (every day) plus 10 mg QN (every night), or >10 mg BID for female nonsmokers, male nonsmokers and male smokers, respectively.. The population PK model, built using meta-analysis, could facilitate the modeling of TDM data collected from Chinese psychotic patients. The factors that significantly influence olanzapine disposition were determined and the final model could be used for individualized treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Smoking; Young Adult

Asenapine (Saphris(®), Sycrest(®)) is an atypical antipsychotic that is administered sublingually twice daily and is approved for schizophrenia in the USA, Japan and other countries, but not in the EU. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability profile of asenapine in the treatment of adults with schizophrenia. Clinical trials with asenapine have demonstrated efficacy in terms of both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, although findings have not always been consistent. Across three short-term (6-week) studies in acute schizophrenia (including one in Asian patients), asenapine was generally superior to placebo and had broadly similar efficacy to active controls in improving total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. A meta-analysis of four short-term trials with asenapine (that also included a negative study and a failed trial) also showed significant benefit with asenapine over placebo. In longer-term trials and extensions (up to ≈3 years' duration), asenapine was effective relative to placebo in preventing relapse in schizophrenia, but was less effective than olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (according to intent-to-treat LOCF analysis). However, in two trials in patients with persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia, asenapine and olanzapine were similarly effective in reducing negative symptoms at week 26, with asenapine providing better results than olanzapine at week 52 in one of the extensions. The most frequently reported adverse events with asenapine are somnolence, akathisia and oral hypoesthesia. Although potentially associated with more extrapyramidal symptoms, asenapine appears to have less weight gain and metabolic effects than some other antipsychotic agents, such as olanzapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Fluphenazine is a typical antipsychotic drug from the phenothiazine group of antipsychotics. It has been commonly used in the treatment of schizophrenia, however, with the advent of atypical antipsychotic medications, use has declined over the years.. To measure the outcomes (both beneficial and harmful) of the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of oral fluphenazine versus atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Studies (25 April 2013). For the economic search, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Health Economic Database (CSzGHED) on 31 January 2014 SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fluphenazine (oral) with any other oral atypical antipsychotics.. Review authors worked independently to inspect citations and assess the quality of the studies and to extract data. For homogeneous dichotomous data we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and calculated the mean differences (MDs) for continuous data. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to rate the quality of the evidence.. Four studies randomising a total of 202 people with schizophrenia are included. Oral fluphenazine was compared with oral amisulpride, risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine.Comparing oral fluphenazine with amisulpride, there was no difference between groups for mental state using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (1 RCT, n = 57, MD 5.10 95% CI -2.35 to 12.55, very low-quality evidence), nor was there any difference in numbers leaving the study early for any reason (2 RCTs, n = 98, RR 1.19 95% CI 0.63 to 2.28, very low-quality evidence). More people required concomitant anticholinergic medication in the fluphenazine group compared to amisulpride (1 RCT, n = 36, RR 7.82 95% CI 1.07 to 57.26, very low-quality evidence). No data were reported for important outcomes including relapse, changes in life skills, quality of life or cost-effectiveness.Comparing oral fluphenazine with risperidone, data showed no difference between groups for 'clinically important response' (1 RCT, n = 26, RR 0.67 95% CI 0.13 to 3.35, very low-quality evidence) nor leaving the study early due to inefficacy (1 RCT, n = 25, RR 1.08 95% CI 0.08 to 15.46, very low-quality evidence). No data were reported data for relapse; change in life skills; quality of life; extrapyramidal adverse effects; or cost-effectiveness.Once again there was no difference when oral fluphenazine was compared with quetiapine for clinically important response (1 RCT, n = 25, RR 0.62 95% CI 0.12 to 3.07, very low-quality evidence), nor leaving the study early for any reason (1 RCT, n = 25, RR 0.46 95% CI 0.05 to 4.46, very low-quality evidence). No data were reported for relapse; clinically important change in life skills; quality of life; extrapyramidal adverse effects; or cost-effectiveness.Compared to olanzapine, fluphenazine showed no superiority for clinically important response (1 RCT, n = 60, RR 1.33 95% CI 0.86 to 2.07, very low-quality evidence), in incidence of akathisia (1 RCT, n = 60, RR 3.00 95% CI 0.90 to 10.01, very low-quality evidence) or in people leaving the study early (1 RCT, n = 60, RR 3.00 95% CI 0.33 to 27.23, very low-quality evidence). No data were reported for relapse; change in life skills; quality of life; or cost-effectiveness.. Measures of clinical response and mental state do not highlight differences between fluphenazine and amisulpride, risperidone, quetiapine or olanzapine. Largely measures of adverse effects are also unconvincing for substantive differences between fluphenazine and the newer drugs. All included trials carry a substantial risk of bias regarding reporting of adverse effects and this bias would have favoured the newer drugs. The four small short included studies do not provide much clear information about the relative merits or disadvantages of oral fluphenazine compared with newer atypical antipsychotics.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Fluphenazine; Humans; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Treatment Outcome

Psychotic disorders can lead some people to become agitated. Characterised by restlessness, excitability and irritability, this can result in verbal and physically aggressive behaviour - and both can be prolonged. Aggression within the psychiatric setting imposes a significant challenge to clinicians and risk to service users; it is a frequent cause for admission to inpatient facilities. If people continue to be aggressive it can lengthen hospitalisation. Haloperidol is used to treat people with long-term aggression.. To examine whether haloperidol alone, administered orally, intramuscularly or intravenously, is an effective treatment for long-term/persistent aggression in psychosis.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (July 2011 and April 2015).. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) or double blind trials (implying randomisation) with useable data comparing haloperidol with another drug or placebo for people with psychosis and long-term/persistent aggression.. One review author (AK) extracted data. For dichotomous data, one review author (AK) calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a fixed-effect model. One review author (AK) assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.. We have no good-quality evidence of the absolute effectiveness of haloperidol for people with long-term aggression. One study randomising 110 chronically aggressive people to three different antipsychotic drugs met the inclusion criteria. When haloperidol was compared with olanzapine or clozapine, skewed data (n=83) at high risk of bias suggested some advantage in terms of scale scores of unclear clinical meaning for olanzapine/clozapine for 'total aggression'. Data were available for only one other outcome, leaving the study early. When compared with other antipsychotic drugs, people allocated to haloperidol were no more likely to leave the study (1 RCT, n=110, RR 1.37, CI 0.84 to 2.24, low-quality evidence). Although there were some data for the outcomes listed above, there were no data on most of the binary outcomes and none on service outcomes (use of hospital/police), satisfaction with treatment, acceptance of treatment, quality of life or economics.. Only one study could be included and most data were heavily skewed, almost impossible to interpret and oflow quality. There were also some limitations in the study design with unclear description of allocation concealment and high risk of bias for selective reporting, so no firm conclusions can be made. This review shows how trials in this group of people are possible - albeit difficult. Further relevant trials are needed to evaluate use of haloperidol in treatment of long-term/persistent aggression in people living with psychosis.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Haloperidol; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic drugs constitute the mainstay in the treatment of schizophrenia, and their efficacy is well established in hundreds of randomized clinical trials. However, it is not known whether they are effective or how effective they are across the wide range of baseline symptom severity.. To examine the influence of baseline severity of schizophrenia on the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs.. Meta-analysis of participant-level data from 3 pivotal randomized trials of acute schizophrenia (n = 611) and 3 pivotal trials in patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia (n = 475).. Olanzapine or risperidone vs placebo, and amisulpride vs placebo.. Change scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; score range, 30-210) and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS; score range, 0-125) up to 6 weeks after baseline. The relationship between baseline and change scores for the drug and placebo groups was examined with 8 competing mixed-effects models for repeated measures.. The best-fitting models showed that, for both types of patients, the interactions between baseline symptom severity and treatment were statistically significant (P < .01). The greater the baseline severity was, the greater the magnitude of the differences was between active treatment and placebo. In acute treatment, the mean differences in PANSS change scores were 9.5 points for patients who were mildly ill at baseline (baseline PANSS score of 58), 13.7 for moderately ill patients (baseline PANSS score of 75), 18.8 for markedly ill patients (baseline PANSS score of 95), and 24.0 for severely ill patients (baseline PANSS score of 116). In treatment of predominantly negative symptoms, the mean differences in SANS change scores were 1.7 for those who were moderately ill (baseline SANS score of 55), 5.7 for markedly ill patients (baseline SANS score of 70), and 9.7 for severely ill patients (baseline SANS score of 85).. We can expect benefits of antipsychotic drugs for the full spectrum of patients likely to be treated for acute schizophrenia and for highly symptomatic patients with predominantly negative symptoms. Toward the mildest end of the spectrum, clinicians need to be aware that patients benefit less in terms of symptom improvement but may experience full adverse effects of antipsychotics. Clinicians also need to be aware that in addition to the treatment of active symptoms, which was the focus of this study, antipsychotics have another important action, namely to prevent relapses among patients in remission.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sulpiride; Treatment Outcome

To review available data on first-trimester exposure to olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and aripiprazole and risk of congenital malformations. We performed a systematic literature search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines identifying studies containing original data on first-trimester exposure and pregnancy outcome with respect to congenital malformations. Cumulated data for olanzapine were 1090 first-trimester-exposed pregnancies with 38 malformations resulting in a malformation rate of 3.5%. The corresponding numbers for quetiapine, risperidone and aripiprazole were 443/16 (3.6%), 432/22 (5.1%) and 100/5 (5.0%), respectively. Relative risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals were 1.0 (0.7-1.4) (olanzapine), 1.0 (0.6-1.7) (quetiapine), 1.5 (0.9-2.2) (risperidone) and 1.4 (0.5-3.1) (aripiprazole). First-trimester exposure to olanzapine is not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformation. Data for quetiapine and risperidone do not suggest a substantially increased risk, while the risk estimate for aripiprazole remains imprecise owing to a low amount of data.

Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Olanzapine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

This study was conducted to review systematically adjunctive treatments for weight reduction in patients with schizophrenia and compare efficacies of clinical trials through meta-analysis, so as to provide effective clinical guideline regarding weight control for patients taking atypical antipsychotics.. Candidate clinical trials were identified through searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and PsycINFO. Fourteen randomized clinical trials were included for systematic review and meta-analysis from 132 potential trials. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 was used for meta-analysis.. Difference in means and significances from meta-analyses regarding weight control by adjunctive treatments showed that topiramate, aripiprazole, or sibutramine was more effective than metformin or reboxetine. Psychiatric evaluations did not show statistically significant changes between treatment groups and placebo groups except topiramate adjunctive treatments. Adverse effects regarding adjunctive therapies were tolerable and showed statistically no significances compared to control groups.. Though having several reports related to exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms, topiramate and aripiprazole are more efficacious than other medications in regard to weight reduction and less burden of critical adverse effects as well as being beneficial for clinical improvement.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Most of the 13 542 trials contained in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register just tested the general efficacy of pharmacological or psychosocial interventions. Studies on the subsequent treatment steps, which are essential to guide clinicians, are largely missing. This knowledge gap leaves important questions unanswered. For example, when a first antipsychotic failed, is switching to another drug effective? And when should we use clozapine? The aim of this article is to review the efficacy of switching antipsychotics in case of nonresponse. We also present the European Commission sponsored "Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe" (OPTiMiSE) trial which aims to provide a treatment algorithm for patients with a first episode of schizophrenia.. We searched Pubmed (October 29, 2014) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined switching the drug in nonresponders to another antipsychotic. We described important methodological choices of the OPTiMiSE trial.. We found 10 RCTs on switching antipsychotic drugs. No trial was conclusive and none was concerned with first-episode schizophrenia. In OPTiMiSE, 500 first episode patients are treated with amisulpride for 4 weeks, followed by a 6-week double-blind RCT comparing continuation of amisulpride with switching to olanzapine and ultimately a 12-week clozapine treatment in nonremitters. A subsequent 1-year RCT validates psychosocial interventions to enhance adherence.. Current literature fails to provide basic guidance for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. The OPTiMiSE trial is expected to provide a basis for clinical guidelines to treat patients with a first episode of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Management; Europe; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

The use of antipsychotic therapy has been proven to have an association with the incidence of diabetes mellitus. The use of atypical antipsychotics is shown to have a higher association, in contrast with typical antipsychotics. Olanzapine and Clozapine appear to have the highest rates of diabetes mellitus incidence, due to their tendency to affect glucose metabolism compared with other antipsychotic drugs. In this research the main goal is to understand which antipsychotic drugs are the most diabetogenic and to show the mechanisms involved in the glucose metabolism dysregulations with special focus on Olanzapine considering it is a very commonly prescribed and used drug especially among patients with schizophrenia.. Our study is a literature based research. For our research we reviewed 41 Pubmed published articles from 2005 to 2015.. According to most of the literature, from all the antipsychotics, Clozapine followed by Olanzapine appear to be the atypical neuroleptics that most relate to metabolic syndrome and Diabetes. The basis for this metabolic dysregulations appears to be multifactorial in origin and a result of the drugs, environment and genes interaction.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Risk Assessment; Schizophrenia

The purpose of this study was to assess whether early symptom improvement predicts later treatment outcome in patients with schizophrenia.. Data were pooled from intent-to-treat (ITT) populations of three six-week randomized controlled studies with fixed doses of asenapine (ASE; n=470), olanzapine (OLA; n=95), risperidone (RIS; n=56), haloperidol (HAL; n=112), or placebo (PLA; n=275). Early improvement was defined as a 20% reduction of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 2, compared to baseline (primary criterion). Treatment outcome at week 6 was defined as response (PANSS: ≥50% score reduction) or remission (PANSS item score ≤3 on selected items at week 6). Odds ratios (ORs) and predictive performance statistics were calculated.. Statistically significant associations between early improvement (at week 2) and treatment outcome (at week 6) were observed for all treatment groups except OLA; as evidenced by increased ORs for response. Analysis of associations between early improvement and remission, as defined by Andreasen et al. (2005), revealed a statistically significant relationship for ASE and PLA-treated patients only. Predictive performance statistics revealed higher negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity rates, and comparably lower positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity rates across treatment groups for both response and remission.. It is suggested that absence of improvement within two weeks of treatment may predict the unlikely success of subsequent pharmacological intervention.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Haloperidol; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome

To describe weight changes and metabolic effects of asenapine compared with placebo and olanzapine in adults.. Post hoc analyses were performed using data from 17 asenapine trials (13 schizophrenia and 4 bipolar mania trials) with placebo (5-10 mg twice daily; n = 1,748; 1-6 weeks) and/or olanzapine (5-20 mg, once daily; n = 3,430; 3-100 weeks). Data were pooled based on treatment into placebo-controlled and olanzapine-controlled trials. For trials with placebo and olanzapine treatment groups, the asenapine population was included in both pools. Changes from baseline for weight, body mass index, and fasting lipid and glucose levels were determined. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to define metabolic adverse events.. Mean (standard error [SE]) weight change was greater with asenapine than with placebo (1.2 [0.2] vs 0.14 [0.2] kg; P < .0001) and similar in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Mean changes differed for asenapine versus placebo in triglycerides (1.8 [6.3] vs -12.2 [5.9] mg/dL; P < .01) and fasting glucose (1.9 [1.7] vs -1.6 [1.5] mg/dL; P < .05). In the olanzapine-controlled trials, weight change was significantly lower with asenapine than with olanzapine (0.9 [0.1] vs 3.1 [0.2] kg; P < .0001). Changes associated with asenapine were lower than those with olanzapine in fasting glucose (2.0 vs 3.3 mg/dL), total cholesterol (-0.4 [1.1] vs 6.2 [1.2] mg/dL; P < .0001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.3 [1.1] vs 3.1 [1.2] mg/dL; P < .01), and triglycerides (-0.9 [5.4] vs 24.3 [5.8] mg/dL; P < .0001).. Asenapine was associated with greater weight gain and glucose changes than placebo and not associated with a meaningful change in triglycerides or cholesterol levels. Asenapine was not significantly different from olanzapine in change in glucose levels and lower than olanzapine with respect to triglycerides, weight gain, and increased cholesterol.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Female; Hematologic Tests; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Weight Gain

Complex modeling techniques such as discrete-event simulation and simpler Markov or decision-tree models have been used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic diseases such as schizophrenia. A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, EconLit, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified schizophrenia modeling studies presenting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The relationship between modeling technique used and reported outcomes was examined. Fifty-four studies reporting results of 69 pairs of drug comparisons were identified. Of the paired-drug comparisons, 27 were conducted in at least two studies; in 14 of the 27, the results agreed (i.e., drug A cost-effective compared with drug B) despite differences in modeling techniques. Thirteen of the 27 paired-drug comparisons had contradictory study results even when the same modeling technique was used. Different modeling techniques did not appear to explain different findings about cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Models, Economic; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

To clarify the effects of smoking on the disposition of two commonly used antipsychotics, olanzapine and clozapine, and to create standards to adjust the doses of these drugs in clinical practice based on the smoking status.. A meta-analysis was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for relevant prospective and retrospective studies.. We included the studies that investigated the effects of smoking on the concentration to dose (C/D) ratio of olanzapine or clozapine.. The weighted mean difference was calculated using a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, along with 95% CI.. Seven association studies, comprising 1094 patients (652 smokers and 442 non-smokers) with schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorders, were included in the meta-analysis of olanzapine. The C/D ratio was significantly lower in smokers than in non-smokers (p<0.00001), and the mean difference was -0.75 (ng/mL)/(mg/day) (95% CI -0.89 to -0.61). Therefore, it was estimated that if 10 and 20 mg/day of olanzapine would be administered to smokers, about 7 and 14 mg/day, respectively, should be administered to non-smokers in order to obtain the equivalent olanzapine concentration. Four association studies of clozapine were included in the meta-analysis of clozapine, comprising 196 patients (120 smokers and 76 non-smokers) with schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorders. The C/D ratio was significantly lower in smokers than in non-smokers (p<0.00001), and the mean difference was -1.11 (ng/mL)/(mg/day) (95% CI -1.53 to -0.70). Therefore, it was estimated that if 200 and 400 mg/day of clozapine would be administered to smokers, about 100 and 200 mg/day, respectively, should be administered to non-smokers.. We suggest that the doses of olanzapine and clozapine should be reduced by 30% and 50%, respectively, in non-smokers compared with smokers in order to obtain an equivalent olanzapine or clozapine concentration.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Smoking

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disease, which is treated by antipsychotic drugs. These drugs are mostly D2 and 5-HT2A antagonists and have extrapyramidal side effects depending on the D2 antagonistic effect. Recently admitted antipsychotic drugs also have systemic side effects. Clozapine, which has the strongest antipsychotic effect, can cause neutropenia. A problem in the treatment of schizophrenia is poor patient compliance leading to the recurrence of psychotic symptoms.. A search was carried out in Medline using the following terms: antipsychotic drugs, antipsychotic effect, risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazol, asenapine, questiapine, cariprazine, lurasidone, arrythmia, diabetes mellitus, weight gain, epileptic activity, extrapyramidal symptoms, sexual activity, clinical trials and tolerability.. Most clinical trials describe a good antipsychotic effect of the currently used antipsychotic drugs. The efficacy and safety of the antipsychotic drugs also depend on the form of schizophrenia, for example, the chronic recurrent form of schizophrenia. Clozapine and olanzapine have the safest therapeutic effect, while the side effect of neutropenia must be controlled by 3 weekly blood controls. If schizophrenia has remitted and if patients show a good compliance, the adverse effects can be controlled. The pharmacological treatment should be combined with social therapies and psychoeducation in order to reach a good therapeutic outcome.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists

To conduct meta-analyses of all published association studies on the HTR2C -759C/T (rs3813829) polymorphism and olanzapine-induced weight gain in schizophrenia patients and on the HTR2C -759C/T, -697G/C (rs518147) and rs1414334:C> G polymorphisms and olanzapine/clozapine/risperidone-induced metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients.. Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed and Web of Science databases. Meta-analyses were performed using Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.2) to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).. Our meta-analyses revealed both a significant positive association between the rs1414334 C allele and olanzapine/clozapine/risperidone-induced metabolic syndrome and a marginally significant positive association between the -697C allele and the induced metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients, but no significant association between the -759C/T polymorphism and the induced metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients. Our analysis further revealed a pronounced trend toward a significant negative association between the -759T allele and high olanzapine-induced weight gain and a trend toward a significant positive association between the -759C allele and high olanzapine-induced weight gain in Caucasian schizophrenia patients.. Our results support that HTR2C polymorphisms play a role in antipsychotic-induced metabolic disturbance. More association studies are needed to further elucidate association of different HTR2C polymorphisms and antipsychotic-induced metabolic disturbance.

Topics: Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2C; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Schizophrenia is a mental illness causing disordered beliefs, ideas and sensations. Many people with schizophrenia smoke cannabis, and it is unclear why a large proportion do so and if the effects are harmful or beneficial. It is also unclear what the best method is to allow people with schizophrenia to alter their cannabis intake.. To assess the effects of specific psychological treatments for cannabis reduction in people with schizophrenia.To assess the effects of antipsychotics for cannabis reduction in people with schizophrenia.To assess the effects of cannabinoids (cannabis related chemical compounds derived from cannabis or manufactured) for symptom reduction in people with schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register, 12 August 2013, which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED and PsycINFO.We searched all references of articles selected for inclusion for further relevant trials. We contacted the first author of included studies for unpublished trials or data.. We included all randomised controlled trials involving cannabinoids and schizophrenia/schizophrenia-like illnesses, which assessed:1) treatments to reduce cannabis use in people with schizophrenia;2) the effects of cannabinoids on people with schizophrenia.. We independently inspected citations, selected papers and then re-inspected the studies if there were discrepancies, and extracted data. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RR) and for continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. We excluded data if loss to follow-up was greater than 50%. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.. We identified eight randomised trials, involving 530 participants, which met our selection criteria.For the cannabis reduction studies no one treatment showed superiority for reduction in cannabis use. Overall, data were poorly reported for many outcomes of interest. Our main outcomes of interest were medium-term data for cannabis use, global state, mental state, global functioning, adverse events, leaving the study early and satisfaction with treatment. 1. Reduction in cannabis use: adjunct psychological therapies (specifically about cannabis and psychosis) versus treatment as usualResults from one small study showed people receiving adjunct psychological therapies specifically about cannabis and psychosis were no more likely to reduce their intake than those receiving treatment as usual (n = 54, 1 RCT, MD -0.10, 95% CI -2.44 to 2.24, moderate quality evidence). Results for other main outcomes at medium term were also equivocal. No difference in mental state measured on the PANSS positive were observed between groups (n = 62, 1 RCT, MD -0.30 95% CI -2.55 to 1.95, moderate quality evidence). Nor for the outcome of general functioning measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF (n = 49, 1 RCT, MD 0.90 95% CI -1.15 to 2.95, moderate quality evidence). No data were reported for the other main outcomes of interest 2. Reduction in cannabis use: adjunct psychological therapy (specifically about cannabis and psychosis) versus adjunct non-specific psychoeducation One study compared specific psychological therapy aimed at cannabis reduction with general psychological therapy. At three-month follow-up, the use of cannabis in the previous four weeks was similar between treatment groups (n = 47, 1 RCT, RR 1.04 95% CI 0.62 to 1.74, moderate quality evidence). Again, at a medium-term follow-up, the average mental state scores from the Brief Pscychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded were similar between groups (n = 47, 1 RCT, MD 3.60 95% CI - 5.61 to 12.81, moderate quality evidence). No data were reported for the other main outcomes of interest: global state, general functioning, adverse events, leaving the study early and satisfaction with treatment. 3. Reduction in cannabis use: antipsychotic versus antipsychotic In a small trial comparing effectiveness of olanzapine versus risperidone for cannabis reduction, there was no difference between groups at medium-term follow-up (n = 16, 1 RCT, RR 1.80 95% CI 0.52 to 6.22, moderate quality evidence). The numb. Results are limited and inconclusive due to the small number and size of randomised controlled trials available and quality of data reporting within these trials. More research is needed to a) explore the effects of adjunct psychological therapy that is specifically about cannabis and psychosis as currently there is no evidence for any novel intervention being better than standard treatment,for those that use cannabis and have schizophrenia b) decide the most effective drug treatment in treating those that use cannabis and have schizophrenia, and c) assess the effectiveness of cannabidiol in treating schizophrenia. Currently evidence is insufficient to show cannabidiol has an antipsychotic effect.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cannabinoids; Humans; Marijuana Abuse; Medical Marijuana; Olanzapine; Psychotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

In most western industrialised countries, second generation (atypical) antipsychotics are recommended as first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. In this review we specifically examine how the efficacy and tolerability of one such agent - aripiprazole - differs from that of other comparable second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of aripiprazole compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (November 2011), inspected references of all identified studies for further trials, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing aripiprazole (oral) with oral and parenteral forms of amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. Where possible, we calculated illustrative comparative risks for primary outcomes. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD), again based on a random-effects model. We assessed risk of bias for each included study.. We included 12 trials involving 6389 patients. Aripiprazole was compared to olanzapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. All trials were sponsored by an interested drug manufacturer. The overall number of participants leaving studies early was 30% to 40%, limiting validity (no differences between groups).When compared with olanzapine no differences were apparent for global state (no clinically important change: n = 703, 1 RCT, RR short-term 1.00 95% CI 0.81 to 1.22; n = 317, 1 RCT, RR medium-term 1.08 95% CI 0.95 to 1.22) but mental state tended to favour olanzapine (n = 1360, 3 RCTs, MD total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 4.68 95% CI 2.21 to 7.16). There was no significant difference in extrapyramidal symptoms (n = 529, 2 RCTs, RR 0.99 95% CI 0.62 to 1.59) but fewer in the aripiprazole group had increased cholesterol levels (n = 223, 1 RCT, RR 0.32 95% CI 0.19 to 0.54) or weight gain of 7% or more of total body weight (n = 1095, 3 RCTs, RR 0.39 95% CI 0.28 to 0.54).When compared with risperidone, aripiprazole showed no advantage in terms of global state (n = 384, 2 RCTs, RR no important improvement 1.14 95% CI 0.81 to 1.60) or mental state (n = 372, 2 RCTs, MD total PANSS 1.50 95% CI -2.96 to 5.96).One study compared aripiprazole with ziprasidone (n = 247) and both the groups reported similar change in the global state (n = 247, 1 RCT, MD average change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score -0.03 95% CI -0.28 to 0.22) and mental state (n = 247, 1 RCT, MD change PANSS -3.00 95% CI -7.29 to 1.29).When compared with any one of several new generation antipsychotic drugs the aripiprazole group showed improvement in global state in energy (n = 523, 1 RCT, RR 0.69 95% CI 0.56 to 0.84), mood (n = 523, 1 RCT, RR 0.77 95% CI 0.65 to 0.92), negative symptoms (n = 523, 1 RCT, RR 0.82 95% CI 0.68 to 0.99), somnolence (n = 523, 1 RCT, RR 0.80 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93) and weight gain (n = 523, 1 RCT, RR 0.84 95% CI 0.76 to 0.94). Significantly more people given aripiprazole reported symptoms of nausea (n = 2881, 3 RCTs, RR 3.13 95% CI 2.12 to 4.61) but weight gain (7% or more of total body weight) was less common in people allocated aripiprazole (n = 330, 1 RCT, RR 0.35 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64). Aripiprazole may have value in aggression but data are limited. This will be the focus of another review.. Information on all comparisons are of limited quality, are incomplete and problematic to apply clinically. Aripiprazole is an antipsychotic drug with a variant but not absent adverse effect profile. Long-term data are sparse and there is considerable scope for another update of this review as new data emerges from the many Chinese studies as well as from ongoing larger, independent pragmatic trials.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Schizophrenia, a mental disorder, is a debilitating condition which typically strikes young people in their early 20's. Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia however a balancing act is necessary to provide the correct dose to each patient. It is suggested that a large number of patients discontinue antipsychotic pharmacotherapy because the treatments provided do not always reduce the positive symptoms of the disease, while many have adverse effects on the patients. This implies that neither the incorrect drug nor the optimal dosage for that patient is achieved.. The current review investigates variability in response to olanzapine with a specific focus on the common intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence both olanzapine and CYP1A2 activity. Furthermore, the authors discuss the utilization of phenotyping and genotyping of CYP1A2 and their potential utility in clinical practice for olanzapine dosing regimens. The authors also consider the potential of pharmacometrics compared to pharmacogenomics as a tool to personalize medicine.. Careful consideration must be given to the impact of a genetic variant on the disposition of a drug prior to implementing genetic 'tests' to determine response. CYP1A2 phenotypic assessment can yield important information regarding the disposition of olanzapine; however, it relies on the accuracy of the metric and the minimal impact of other metabolic pathways. The application of pharmacometrics provides an effective method to establish covariates that significantly influence olanzapine disposition which can incorporate phenotype and/or genotype.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Genotype; Humans; Olanzapine; Pharmacogenetics; Phenotype; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is one of the SGAs (second-generation antipsychotics) which have been used for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Japan. Olanzapine has various affinities for multiple receptors, including dopamine D2 receptor, serotonin 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, 5-HT6 receptors, and adrenaline alpha1, histamine H1, muscarine M1-M5 receptors as well. Therefore, olanzapine is known as MARTA(multi-acting receptor targeted antipsychotics). Numerous studies have been conducted to compare the effectiveness of olanzapine between SGAs and FGAs (first-generation antipsychotics). According to the head-to-head meta-analysis and large-scale studies like CATIE and EUFEST, olanzapine seems to have not only higher efficacy but also less discontinuation comparing to other anti-psychotics.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is the most dangerous life-threatening complication of antipsychotic medication. It's development is connected with the blockade of dopaminergic transmission (D2 receptors) in the nigrostriatal system of the brain. Fever is one of the main symptoms of this syndrome and it's elevation is due to the activation of the immune system. Numerous studies report that treatment with clozapine (doses 37.5-600 mg) or olanzapine (doses 10-25 mg) or the use of these drugs in polytherapy cause pyrexia between 37.8-40.6 °C. Additionally, levels of proinflammatory interleukins such as IL-6, IL-1,TNF-α were increased. The aim of this article is to describe how olanzapine and clozapine influence fever development in NMS, in relation to the dose of the drug taken by schizophrenic patients including changes in immunological system.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fever; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Interleukins; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

When treating schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, clinicians often encounter the problems of non-adherence, which is almost the most common drawback of achieving remission and a better quality of life. The uncertain oral drug taking habits may lead to relapses and rehospitalizations. Using second generation long acting injectables we have more possibilities to avoid these problems. This review attempts to present and describe the pharmacological background of the modern long acting injectables including patient cases where olanzapine pamoate long acting injectable provided remission and better quality of life for the patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Olanzapine was the second first-line atypical antipsychotic medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult schizophrenia and later approved for adolescent schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Initial studies performed on adults demonstrated efficacy compared to placebo and a first-generation antipsychotic medication. Initial assessments in adolescents with schizophrenia demonstrated significant symptom reduction without movement disorder, but with weight gain. Later studies reported efficacy for bipolar disorder in teenagers, but with weight gain. The assessment of olanzapine safety in teenagers has shown substantial weight gain and metabolic measures. Because of equivalent efficacy to other atypical antipsychotic medications and the metabolic side-effects, olanzapine is often recommended as a second-use medication.. Studies of olanzapine use in adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder demonstrate significant reduction in symptoms while causing no movement disorder side-effects. There has been reduction in use of olanzapine with adolescents as newer atypical antipsychotics have emerged associated with less weight gain.. Studies of olanzapine have demonstrated effectiveness in adolescents with a psychotic illness. Metabolic side-effects are a strong concern of the field and have led to the recommendation of using the medication in a secondary fashion.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine pamoate is one of three second-generation antipsychotics available as depot medication. While non-adherence is a major problem in the treatment of schizophrenia, olanzapine pamoate can improve adherence, though its use is limited by its safety profile.. The review covers data on efficacy with a focus on tolerability and safety of olanzapine pamoate using the known databases including PubMed, Psychinfo and Embase using keywords. Relevant websites were also reviewed.. Olanzapine is an efficacious antipsychotic that can be used in its oral and depot formula (olanzapine pamoate) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. It has demonstrated superiority over conventional and some other atypical antipsychotics, with both formulas having comparable low rates of motor side effects. The side effects on body weight and glucose homeostasis are also similar in both formulas and limit its use. The only clear difference regarding side effects is 'the risk that 0.07% of injections in preclinical trials have led to a post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome event which requires a risk management plan'. Especially in outpatients this could cause inconveniences that should be overcome by offering, for example, psychological therapies or psychoeducation to effectively use the time when patients have to remain in the healthcare facilities.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Risk Management; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia often presents in adolescence, but current treatment guidelines are based largely on studies of adults with psychosis. Over the past decade, the number of studies on treatment of adolescent-onset psychosis has increased. The current systematic review collates and critiques evidence obtained on the use of various atypical antipsychotic medications for adolescents with psychosis.. To investigate the effects of atypical antipsychotic medications in adolescents with psychosis. We reviewed in separate analyses various comparisons of atypical antipsychotic medications with placebo or a typical antipsychotic medication or another atypical antipsychotic medication or the same atypical antipsychotic medication but at a lower dose.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (October 2011), which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We inspected references of all identified studies and contacted study authors and relevant pharmaceutical companies to ask for more information.. We included all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared atypical antipsychotic medication with placebo or another pharmacological intervention or with psychosocial interventions, standard psychiatric treatment or no intervention in children and young people aged 13 to 18 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, acute and transient psychoses or unspecified psychosis. We included studies published in English and in other languages that were available in standardised databases.. Review authors AK and SSD selected the studies, rated the quality of the studies and performed data extraction. For dichotomous data, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed-effect model. When possible, for binary data presented in the 'Summary of findings' table, we calculated illustrative comparative risks. We summated continuous data using the mean difference (MD). Risk of bias was assessed for included studies.. We included 13 RCTs, with a total of 1112 participants. We found no data on service utilisation, economic outcomes, behaviour or cognitive response. Trials were classified into the following groups. 1. Atypical antipsychotics versus placebo: Only two studies compared one atypical antipsychotic medication with placebo. In one study, the number of non-responders treated with olanzapine was not different from the number treated with placebo (1 RCT, n = 107, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.10); however, significantly more (57% vs 32%) people left the study early (1 RCT, n = 107, RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87) from the placebo group compared with the olanzapine group. With regard to adverse effects, young people treated with aripiprazole had significantly lower serum cholesterol compared with those given placebo (1 RCT, n = 302, RR 3.77, 95% CI 1.88 to 7.58). 2. Atypical antipsychotics versus typical antipsychotics: When the findings of all five trials comparing atypical antipsychotic medications with a typical antipsychotic medication were collated, no difference in the mean end point Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score was noted between the two arms (5 RCTs, n = 236, MD -1.08, 95% CI -3.08 to 0.93). With regard to adverse effects, the mean end point serum prolactin concentration was much higher than the reference range for treatment with risperidone, olanzapine and molindone in one of the studies. However, fewer adolescents who were receiving atypical antipsychotic medications left the study because of adverse effects (3 RCTs, n = 187, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.15) or for any reason (3 RCTs, n = 187, RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.97).3. One atypical antipsychotic versus another atypical antipsychotic: The mean end point BPRS score was not significantly different for people who received risperidone compared with those who received olanzapine; however, the above data were highly skewed. Overall no difference was noted in the number of people leaving the studies early because of any adverse effects between each study arm in the three studies comparing olanzapine and risperidone (3 RCTs, n = 130, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.44 to 3.04). Specific adverse events were not reported uniformly across the six different studies included in this section of the review; therefore it was difficult to do a head-to-head comparison of adverse events for different atypical antipsychotic medications.4. Lower-dose atypical antipsychotic versus standard/higher-dose atypical antipsychotic: Thre. No convincing evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic medications are superior to typical medications for the treatment of adolescents with psychosis. However, atypical antipsychotic medications may be more acceptable to young people because fewer symptomatic adverse effects are seen in the short term. Little evidence is available to support the superiority of one atypical antipsychotic medication over another, but side effect profiles are different for different medications. Treatment with olanzapine, risperidone and clozapine is often associated with weight gain. Aripiprazole is not associated with increased prolactin or with dyslipidaemia. Adolescents may respond better to standard-dose as opposed to lower-dose risperidone, but for aripiprazole and ziprasidone, lower doses may be equally effective. Future trials should ensure uniform ways of reporting.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Molindone; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

In many countries, second-generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first-line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. It is not clear how the effects of the various second-generation antipsychotic drugs differ.. To evaluate the effects of quetiapine compared with other second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (May 2010), inspected references of all identified studies, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral quetiapine with other oral forms of atypical antipsychotic medication in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MDs), again based on a random-effects model.. Efficacy data tended to favour the control drugs over quetiapine (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score vs olanzapine: 11 RCTs, n = 1486, mean quetiapine endpoint score 3.67 higher, CI 1.95 to 5.39, low quality; vs risperidone: 13 RCTs, n = 2155, mean quetiapine endpoint score 1.74 higher, CI 0.19 to 3.29, moderate quality; vs paliperidone: 1 RCT, n = 319, mean quetiapine endpoint score 6.30 higher, CI 2.77 to 9.83, moderate quality), but the clinical meaning of these data is unclear. No clear mental state differences were noted when quetiapine was compared with clozapine, aripiprazole or ziprasidone. Compared with olanzapine, quetiapine produced slightly fewer movement disorders (7 RCTs, n = 1127, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.51, CI 0.32 to 0.81, moderate quality) and less weight gain (8 RCTs, n = 1667, RR 0.68, CI 0.51 to 0.92, moderate quality) and glucose elevation, but increased QTc prolongation (3 RCTs, n = 643, MD 4.81, CI 0.34 to 9.28). Compared with risperidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer movement disorders (8 RCTs, n = 2163, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.5, CI 0.36 to 0.69, moderate quality), less prolactin increase (7 RCTs, n = 1733, MD -35.25, CI -43.59 to -26.91) and some related adverse effects but greater cholesterol increase (6 RCTs, n = 1473, MD 8.57, CI 4.85 to 12.29). On the basis of limited data, compared with paliperidone, quetiapine induced fewer parkinsonian side effects (1 RCT, n = 319, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.64, CI 0.45 to 0.91, moderate quality) and less prolactin increase (1 RCT, n = 319, MD -49.30, CI -57.80 to -40.80) and weight gain (1 RCT, n = 319, RR weight gain of 7% or more of total body weight 2.52, CI 0.5 to 12.78, moderate quality). Compared with ziprasidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects (1 RCT, n = 522, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.43, CI 0.2 to 0.93, moderate quality) and less prolactin increase. On the other hand, quetiapine was more sedating and led to greater weight gain (2 RCTs, n = 754, RR 2.22, CI 1.35 to 3.63, moderate quality) and cholesterol increase when compared with ziprasidone.. Available evidence from trials suggests that most people who start quetiapine stop taking it within a few weeks (around 60%). Comparisons with amisulpride, sertindole and zotepine do not exist. Although efficacy data favour olanzapine and risperidone compared with quetiapine, the clinical meaning of these data remains unclear. Quetiapine may produce fewer parkinsonian effects than paliperidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone and olanzapine. Quetiapine appears to have a similar weight gain profile to risperidone, as well as clozapine and aripiprazole (although data are very limited for the latter two comparators). Quetiapine may produce greater weight gain than ziprasidone and less weight gain than olanzapine and paliperidone. Most data that have been reported within existing comparisons are of very limited value because of assumptions and biases within them. Much scope is available for further research into the effects of this widely used drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The purpose of this project was to provide evidence-based guidance concerning when and how it is appropriate to undertake elective changes in antipsychotic medications in order to reduce adverse effects, with a focus on those adverse effects associated with increased long-term health risks. This project extends the results of the National Institute of Mental Health-funded 2009 Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) psychopharmacologic treatment recommendations. The authors reviewed the literature on switching antipsychotics, focusing on randomized controlled trials published since the 2009 Schizophrenia PORT. The studies reviewed support a recommendation that an elective switch from higher to lower metabolic risk antipsychotics can produce weight and lipid benefits without significant risk of clinical deterioration. Evidence also suggests that certain antipsychotic switches may improve other adverse effects, including extrapyramidal symptoms and prolactin elevation. In deciding to make an elective change of antipsychotic medication, it is important to conduct a careful risk/benefit assessment with the patient. Before initiating a switch, patients should be educated about what to expect during the process. Studies also support gradual discontinuation of the current medication in order to minimize problems early in the switching process.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Drug Substitution; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Lipids; Olanzapine; Patient Outcome Assessment; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

This comprehensive review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of olanzapine and other antipsychotics in schizophrenia treatment, defining effectiveness as time to all-cause medication discontinuation (primary) and as all-cause treatment discontinuation rates. This study examined randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational non-interventional studies.. Schizophrenia studies that compared olanzapine with individual first- (FGAs) and/or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) were included in the meta-analyses. Hazard ratios (HR), risk ratios (RR), and their associated 95% confidence intervals were extracted for RCTs and observational studies. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of sources of funding, dose of olanzapine, and allocation concealment method on final results.. There were 60 RCTs (N=33,360) and 27 observational studies (N=202,591) included. On time to all-cause medication discontinuation, olanzapine was significantly better than aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and perphenazine for RCTs and better than amisulpride, risperidone, haloperidol, and perphenazine for observational studies. There were no significant differences between olanzapine and clozapine in RCTs or observational studies. All-cause discontinuation rates in RCTs were significantly lower for olanzapine compared to all comparators except amisulpride and clozapine. In observational studies, olanzapine was less effective than clozapine. Industry-sponsored studies favored olanzapine when compared to haloperidol and perphenazine; higher dose of olanzapine favored quetiapine and perphenazine when compared to olanzapine; method of allocation concealment did not generally affect the results.. Using a global measure of medication effectiveness (time to all-cause medication discontinuation), olanzapine appears to be more effective - in both RCTs and observational studies - than most SGAs and FGAs, except for clozapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Support as Topic; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Withholding Treatment

Clozapine is considered the gold standard for the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS); however, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of olanzapine showed efficacy similar to clozapine in patients with TRS.. A systematic review was conducted comparing clozapine with olanzapine in patients with TRS. Meta-analyses were performed for single outcome measures. Response to treatment was measured by the percentage of responders, or mean change or endpoint values of psychotic symptoms scales. Effect sizes were shown as relative risks (RR), or standardized mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals.. Seven RCT were included, comprising 648 patients. Five meta-analyses were performed. Olanzapine and clozapine had similar effects on dropout rates (RR = 0.93, CI95% = 0.77-1.12), PANSS total endpoints (SMD = 0.21, CI95% = -0.04-0.46), and PANSS total mean changes (SMD = 0.08, CI95% = -0.01-0.027). Clozapine was superior to olanzapine for PANSS positive (SMD = 0.51, CI95% = 0.17-0.86) and negative (SMD = 0.50, CI95% = 0.16-0.85) subscales. There was a trend toward high doses of olanzapine producing higher effect sizes for this drug.. The results of this study suggest that clozapine is significantly more efficacious than olanzapine in improving positive and negative symptoms in TRS patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Clozapine is superior to other antipsychotic drugs for treatment of refractory schizophrenia. However, its use has been limited by its potentially serious adverse effects. There is little guidance on the management of patients who discontinue clozapine for reasons such as lack of response, intolerance, or noncompliance. The literature was searched for studies on the efficacy of antipsychotics that replaced clozapine in such patients. The search revealed 15 papers, which were evaluated in this article. Olanzapine was the most tested alternative to clozapine with most of the studies reporting positive outcome, especially in patients with less severe illness and those who stop clozapine for reasons other than poor response. Other antipsychotics were not adequately tested in this manner. We concluded that in patients who discontinue clozapine, considering a trial of olanzapine would be worthwhile.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Drug Substitution; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe and recurrent brain disorder that requires continuous, long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication to minimize relapse and provide clinical benefit to patients. For patients with schizophrenia, non-adherence to medication is a major risk factor for relapse and re-hospitalization. Long-acting injectable formulations of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs-LAIs) provide constant medication delivery and the potential for improved adherence. Currently, three drugs are available for the treatment of schizophrenia, risperidone longacting injectable, olanzapine pamoate and paliperidone palmitate. Several studies have also demonstrated efficacy and safety of such drugs in patients with acute schizophrenia. In the present paper the literature on LAI atypical antipsychotics will be reviewed and practical advice will be given concerning the use of these drugs in the clinical practice.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Injections; Isoxazoles; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Palmitates; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Hypothermia as an adverse reaction of antipsychotic drug use represents a potentially life-threatening complication. However, the mechanisms by which antipsychotic drugs alter thermoregulatory processes in the human body are far from being fully understood. Here we present a case series of 5 patients developing severe hypothermia after administration of olanzapine and benperidol. Controlled by a network of neural structures, body temperature is physiologically regulated in far more narrow boundaries than are other vital functions, and its homeostasis is critical for survival. The preoptic region in the ventral hypothalamus is assumed to act as a coordinating center that is endowed with thermosensory units that constantly compare actual body temperature with target values and initiate regulatory and compensatory mechanisms in case of mismatch. Hypothermia risk seems to increase in the first days after initiation of antipsychotic drug therapy or increases in the daily dose. Schizophrenic patients bear a higher risk than nonschizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic drugs (such as patients with dementia or depression). Antipsychotic drugs with strong 5-HT2 antagonism seem to be more frequently associated with hypothermia. These cases demonstrate the clinical relevance of hypothermia as an adverse reaction to antipsychotic treatment and the importance of careful monitoring of body temperature.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benperidol; Benzodiazepines; Body Temperature Regulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists; Severity of Illness Index

This paper discusses the evidence base for interventions addressing non-adherence to prescribed antipsychotics. A case study approach is used, and the extent to which adherence improvement interventions might be used in collaboration with a specific patient is considered. The principles and application of harm-reduction philosophy in mental health are presented in a planned non-adherence harm-reduction intervention. This intervention aims to acknowledge the patient's ability to choose and learn from experience and to reduce the potential harm of antipsychotic withdrawal. The intervention evaluation method is outlined.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Harm Reduction; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is usually considered an illness of young adulthood. However, onset after the age of 40 years is reported in 23% of patients hospitalised with schizophrenia. At least 0.1% of the world's elderly population have a diagnosis of late-onset schizophrenia which seems to differ from earlier onset schizophrenia on a variety of counts including response to antipsychotic drugs.. To assess the effects of antipsychotic drugs for elderly people with late-onset schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (January 2010) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials. We contacted relevant authors of trials for additional information.. All relevant randomised controlled trials that compared antipsychotic drugs with other treatments for elderly people (at least 80% older than 65 years) with a recent (within five years) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizophrenia like illnesses.. For the 2010 search, two new review authors (AE, AG) inspected all citations to ensure reliable selection. We assessed methodological quality of trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. AE and AG also independently extracted data. For homogenous dichotomous data, we planned to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).. There were no included studies in the original version of this review (2002 search). The 2010 search for the current update produced 211 references, among which we identified 88 studies. Only one study met the inclusion criteria and was of acceptable quality. This was an eight-week randomised trial of risperidone and olanzapine in 44 inpatients with late-onset schizophrenia. All participants completed the eight-week trial, indicating that both drugs were well tolerated. Unfortunately, this study provided little usable data. We excluded a total of 81 studies, 77 studies because they either studied interventions other than antipsychotic medication or because they involved elderly people with chronic - not late-onset - schizophrenia. We excluded a further four trials of antipsychotics in late-onset schizophrenia because of flawed design. Five studies are still awaiting classification, and one is on-going.. There is no trial-based evidence upon which to base guidelines for the treatment of late-onset schizophrenia. There is a need for good quality-controlled clinical trials into the effects of antipsychotics for this group. Such trials are possible. Until they are undertaken, people with late-onset schizophrenia will be treated by doctors using clinical judgement and habit to guide prescribing.

Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia have a shorter life expectancy and their risk of dying from a cardiovascular disease is higher than the general population. Both facts have been attributed to the raised presence of metabolic syndrome. There is a big amount of scientific publications that deals with the relationship between schizophrenia, antipsychotic treatment, and the development of metabolic syndrome. There is also information about recommendations and clinical guides to achieve an adequate prevention, screening, and treatment of the disease. The aim of this review is to update the current information about this issue and to understand related etiologic factors, differences between antipsychotic drugs, and the current recommendations for patient's care.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypothalamus; Incidence; Life Expectancy; Lipid Metabolism; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity, Abdominal; Olanzapine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

For over 40 years, antipsychotic drugs have been used as long-term maintenance treatment to control symptoms and reduce relapse rates in patients with schizophrenia. 'First-generation' oral agents such as haloperidol and chlorpromazine are associated with high levels of unwanted neurological effects and poor rates of patient adherence.1,2 Long-acting ('depot') injections of antipsychotics were developed to try to improve adherence. 'Second-generation' antipsychotic agents (also known as atypical antipsychotics) were introduced into clinical practice over 16 years ago. Although these agents have a lower propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects, they are associated with a range of other unwanted effects (e.g. weight gain and its sequelae).1,3,4 Initially, second-generation agents were only available as orally administered medicines. Three long-acting injectable formulations of second-generation antipsychotics are now available in the UK: olanzapine embonate injection (ZypAdhera), paliperidone injection (Xeplion) and risperidone injection (Risperdal Consta). In this article we review the evidence for these agents and discuss the practical implications of their use.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Costs; Humans; Injections; Isoxazoles; Monitoring, Physiologic; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrimidines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is prescribed for a number of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar mania, and unipolar and bipolar depression. Olanzapine treatment is associated with tolerability issues such as metabolic adverse effects (e.g. weight gain, increase in blood glucose, triglycerides and total cholesterol levels), extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS] (e.g. parkinsonism, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia) and sedative adverse effects. Metabolic issues lead to some long-term consequences, which include cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and these complications cause high rates of mortality and morbidity among patients with severe mental illnesses. The expanded indications of olanzapine in psychiatry suggest a need to investigate whether there is a difference in the incidence and severity of adverse effects related to category diagnosis. Are the adverse effects expressed differently according to phenotype? Unfortunately, there are no reported studies that investigated these differences in adverse effects associated with olanzapine treatment in psychiatric patients with different phenotypes.. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to separately examine olanzapine-induced cardiometabolic adverse effects and EPS in patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders.. A search of computerized literature databases PsycINFO (1967-2010), PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE (1980-2010) and the clinicaltrials.gov website for randomized clinical trials was conducted. A manual search of reference lists of published review articles was carried out to gather further data.. Randomized controlled trials were included in our study if (i) they assessed olanzapine adverse effects (metabolic or extrapyramidal) in adult patients with schizophrenia or affective disorders; and (ii) they administered oral olanzapine as monotherapy during study.. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts for choosing articles and one reviewer extracted relevant data on the basis of predetermined exclusion and inclusion criteria. It should be mentioned that for the affective disorders group we could only find articles related to bipolar disorder.. Thirty-three studies (4831 patients) that address olanzapine monotherapy treatment of adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes were metabolic adverse effects (changes in weight, blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels). The secondary outcomes of our study were assessing the incidence of some EPS (parkinsonism, akathisia and use of antiparkinson medication). The tolerability outcomes were calculated separately for the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder groups and were combined in a meta-analysis. Tolerability outcomes show that olanzapine contributes to weight gain and elevates blood triglycerides, glucose and total cholesterol levels in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients. However, olanzapine treatment produced significantly more weight gain in schizophrenia patients than in bipolar disorder patients. In addition, increases in blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were higher in the schizophrenia group compared with the bipolar disorder group, even though these differences were not statistically significant. Based on our results, the incidence of parkinsonism was significantly higher in the schizophrenia group than in the bipolar disorder group. Subgroup analysis and logistic regression were used to assess the influence of treatment duration, dose, industry sponsorship, age and sex ratio on tolerability outcome.. Our results suggest that schizophrenia patients may be more vulnerable to olanzapine-induced weight gain. The findings may be explained by considering the fact that in addition to genetic disposition for metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients, they have an especially high incidence of lifestyle risk factors for CVD, such as poor diet, lack of exercise, stress and smoking. It might be that an antipsychotic induces severity of adverse effect according to the phenotype.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome

In randomized controlled trials of antipsychotics, various cutoffs have been used to define response on continuous outcome measures.. To find a summary effect measure that remains constant across different definitions of response.. We conducted secondary analyses of individual patient data from 10 randomized controlled trials of second-generation antipsychotics for schizophrenia (n=4278) by applying a meta-analytic approach to produce odds ratios (OR), risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different definitions of response, using cutoffs of 10% through 90% reduction on the symptom severity rating scales. Constancy of these indices was examined through visual inspection, by way of I-squared statistics to quantify heterogeneity, and by way of coefficients of variation. If any of these indices were found to remain reasonably constant, we next examined the concordance between the number needed to treat (NNT) predicted from them and the observed NNT.. OR and RR remained reasonably constant across various definitions of response, especially for those using thresholds of 10% through 70% reduction. The NNTs predicted from OR and RR agreed well with the observed NNTs, with ANOVA intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98) and 0.86 (0.72 to 0.93), respectively.. The relative measures of treatment effectiveness remain reasonably constant across different scale-derived definitions of response and, in conjunction with varying control event rates, can give accurate estimates of NNTs for individuals with schizophrenia.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome

In many countries of the industrialised world second-generation ("atypical") antipsychotics (SGAs) have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether and if so how much the effects of the various SGAs differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone differs from that of other SGAs.. To evaluate the effects of risperidone compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.2. Reference searching We inspected the references of all identified studies for more trials.3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information.4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised, blinded trials comparing oral risperidone with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD), again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 45 blinded RCTs with 7760 participants. The number of RCTs available for each comparison varied: four studies compared risperidone with amisulpride, two with aripiprazole, 11 with clozapine, 23 with olanzapine, eleven with quetiapine, two with sertindole, three with ziprasidone and none with zotepine. Attrition from these studies was high (46.9%), leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Furthermore, 60% were industry sponsored, which can be a source of bias.There were few significant differences in overall acceptability of treatment as measured by leaving the studies early. Risperidone was slightly less acceptable than olanzapine, and slightly more acceptable than ziprasidone in this regard.Risperidone improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) slightly less than olanzapine (15 RCTs, n = 2390, MD 1.94 CI 0.58 to 3.31), but slightly more than quetiapine (9 RCTs, n = 1953, MD -3.09 CI -5.16 to -1.01) and ziprasidone (3 RCTs, n = 1016, MD -3.91 CI -7.55 to -0.27). The comparisons with the other SGA drugs were equivocal. Risperidone was also less efficacious than olanzapine and clozapine in terms of leaving the studies early due to inefficacy, but more efficacious than ziprasidone in the same outcome.Risperidone produced somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects than a number of other SGAs (use of antiparkinson medication versus clozapine 6 RCTs, n = 304, RR 2.57 CI 1.47 to 4.48, NNH 6 CI 33 to 3; versus olanzapine 13 RCTs, n = 2599, RR 1.28 CI 1.06 to 1.55, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100; versus quetiapine 6 RCTs, n = 1715, RR 1.98 CI 1.16 to 3.39, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100; versus ziprasidone 2 RCTs, n = 822, RR 1.42 CI 1.03 to 1.96, NNH not estimable; parkinsonism versus sertindole 1 RCT, n = 321, RR 4.11 CI 1.44 to 11.73, NNH 14 CI 100 to 8). Risperidone also increased prolactin levels clearly more than all comparators, except for amisulpride and sertindole for which no data were available.Other adverse events were less consistently reported, but risperidone may well produce more weight gain and/or associated metabolic problems than amisulpride (weight gain: 3 RCTs, n = 585, MD 0.99 CI 0.37 to 1.61), aripiprazole (cholesterol increase: 1 RCT, n = 83, MD 22.30 CI 4.91 to 39.69) and ziprasidone (cholesterol increase 2 RCTs, n = 767, MD 8.58 CI 1.11 to 16.04) but less than clozapine (weight gain 3 RCTs n = 373, MD -3.30 CI -5.65 to -0.95), olanzapine (weight gain 13 RCTs, n = 2116, MD -2.61 CI -3.74 to -1.48), quetiapine (ch. Risperidone seems to produce somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects and clearly more prolactin increase than most other SGAs. It may also differ from other compounds in efficacy and in the occurrence of other adverse effects such as weight gain, metabolic problems, cardiac effects, sedation and seizures. Nevertheless, the large proportion of participants leaving studies early and incomplete reporting of outcomes makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further large trials, especially comparing risperidone with those other new drugs for which only a few RCTs are available, are needed.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Nonadherence is still a major problem in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia. Long-acting injectable or depot atypical antipsychotics are associated with better maintenance. Olanzapine pamoate, available since 2010, is the second depot atypical antipsychotic.. This review covers data on the efficacy and tolerability/safety of olanzapine pamoate, the long-acting formulation of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. Administered as a pamoate salt, it has an elimination half-life of 30 days, allowing a 2- or 4-week injection interval. Antipsychotic efficacy was documented in an 8-week trial in 404 acutely ill schizophrenia patients with maintenance therapy in a 24-week trial in 1065 chronic patients. The side-effect profile is comparable to that of oral olanzapine. The most relevant adverse event is the post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome, occurring at a rate of 0.07% of injections or 1.4% of patients. It requires administration by qualified personnel in settings where a post-injection observation period for 3 h by medical personnel is available.. Olanzapine pamoate is an efficacious formulation, particularly for patients with a history of good response to oral olanzapine and doubtful adherence. Psychiatrists should reconsider their negative attitudes toward long-acting or depot antipsychotics and should offer this administration to the majority of patients, not only to a negatively selected population.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia

To compare, from the perspective of third-party payers in the United States health care system, the cost-effectiveness of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI, depot) with alternative antipsychotic agents including risperidone-LAI, paliperidone-LAI, haloperidol-LAI, and oral olanzapine, in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia who have been non-adherent or partially adherent with oral antipsychotics.. A 1-year micro-simulation economic decision model was developed to simulate the dynamics of usual care of patients with schizophrenia who continue, discontinue, switch, or restart their medication. The model uses a range of clinical and cost parameters including adherence levels, relapse with and without hospitalization, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), treatment discontinuation rates by reason, treatment-emergent adverse events, suicide, health care resource utilization, and direct health care costs. Published medical literature and a clinical expert panel were used to develop baseline model assumptions.. Key model outputs include annual total direct cost (US$) per treatment and incremental cost-effectiveness values per additional QALY gained.. Model results found that the olanzapine-LAI treatment strategy was more effective (greater QALYs) and less costly than risperidone-LAI, paliperidone-LAI, and haloperidol-LAI. In addition, olanzapine-LAI was both more effective and more costly, with an estimated incremental cost/QALY of $26,824 compared to oral olanzapine. The base-case and multiple sensitivity analyses found olanzapine-LAI to remain within acceptable cost-effective ranges (<$50,000) in terms of incremental cost/QALY gained.. This micro-simulation model finds the olanzapine-LAI treatment strategy to result in better effectiveness and to be a cost-effective alternative compared to oral olanzapine and the LAI formulations of risperidone, paliperidone, and haloperidol in the treatment of non-adherent and partially adherent patients with schizophrenia in the United States. A key limitation is the assumption how LAI therapies compare to oral counterparts due to sparse head-to-head data. Further research is needed to verify baseline assumptions.

Topics: Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Humans; Injections; Medication Adherence; Models, Economic; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; United States

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is useful in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder, but its use is associated with troublesome weight gain and metabolic syndrome. A variety of pharmacological agents has been studied in the efforts to reverse weight gain induced by olanzapine, but current evidence is insufficient to support any particular pharmacological approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of metformin for the treatment of olanzapine-induced weight gain. Systematic review of the literature revealed 12 studies that had assessed metformin for antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Of these, four studies (n= 105) met the review inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis was performed to see the effect size of the treatment on body weight, waist circumference and body-mass index (BMI). Weighted mean difference (WMD) for body weight was 5.02 (95% CI 3.93, 6.10) kg lower with metformin as compared with placebo at 12 weeks. For waist circumference, the test for heterogeneity was significant (P= 0.00002, I(2) = 85.1%). Therefore, a random effects model was used to calculate WMD, which was 1.42 (95% CI 0.29, 3.13) cm lower with metformin as compared with placebo at 12 weeks. For BMI, WMD was 1.82 (95% CI 1.44, 2.19) kg m(-2) lower with metformin as compared with placebo at 12 weeks. Existing data suggest that short term modest weight loss is possible with metformin in patients with olanzapine-induced weight gain.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Olanzapine; Overweight; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Antipsychotic therapy forms the cornerstone of treatment for people with severe mental illness. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics are associated with a significantly lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms than the typical, first-generation agents; however, changes in metabolic variables -- including impaired glucose metabolism, diabetes mellitus, weight gain and dyslipidaemia -- have been reported during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Understanding any potential link between antipsychotic treatment and the incidence of these events is complicated by the increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes occurring in the general population and the increased risk of diabetes and changes in metabolic variables in people with schizophrenia. While relative risk estimates are inconsistent, the association between atypical antipsychotics and increases in glucose level appears to fall on a continuum, with olanzapine appearing to have a greater association than some other atypical antipsychotics. The PubMed database was used to search for publications that included any information on measures of changes in weight, body mass index (BMI) and/or metabolic variables in randomized studies of olanzapine published between 1992 and 2010. In long-term (≥48 weeks) studies of olanzapine, the mean weight gain was 5.6 kg (last observation carried forward; median exposure 573 days). The proportions of patients who gained at least 7%, 15% or 25% of their baseline weight with long-term exposure were 64%, 32% and 12%, respectively. Some studies have suggested that weight gain early during the course of olanzapine treatment may predict clinically significant weight gain following long-term exposure to the drug. Changes in metabolic variables, such as elevated indices of glucose metabolism and triglyceride level, have also been observed during treatment with olanzapine. Consensus guidelines emphasize the importance of appropriate baseline screening and ongoing monitoring of weight gain and metabolic variables for people receiving all antipsychotic treatments. Long-term weight management programmes have been shown to reduce weight gain in some patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dyslipidemias; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Humans; Incidence; Olanzapine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Olanzapine, a second-generation antipsychotic, is a first-line agent in the treatment of schizophrenia. The objective of this review was to determine whether olanzapine warrants clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring in patients with schizophrenia, using a previously published decision-making algorithm. Although olanzapine is an appropriate therapy for patients with schizophrenia and is readily measurable in biological fluids, significant interindividual variation exists in its pharmacokinetics. While the duration of therapy is expected to be long term, the correlation of olanzapine concentrations with efficacy and toxicity has not been well defined in the literature. There are multiple tools readily available for the assessment of efficacy in schizophrenia, and clinical signs and symptoms can be used to monitor both for efficacy and for adverse effects. Therefore, routine monitoring of olanzapine concentrations does not appear warranted in the general schizophrenic population. However, patients in whom a change in olanzapine pharmacokinetics is expected--such as during addition or removal of an enzyme-inducing or -inhibiting drug, or during initiation or cessation of smoking--may benefit from clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring, as would patients in whom non-compliance is suspected. Patients who fail to respond to maximum recommended doses and those who experience adverse effects from therapeutic doses may also benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring, as they may have inherent variations in hepatic enzyme activity. However, in the population at large who suffer from schizophrenia, monitoring of olanzapine concentrations is not expected to offer additional benefit beyond appropriate clinical monitoring alone.

Topics: Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

Our aim in this article is 2-fold: first, to examine the mid-term to long-term data on efficacy, from controlled and naturalistic and other studies, in order to determine if they are consistent with the quantitative meta-analyses of mostly short-term, randomized controlled trials Our second (and most important) aim is to use these and other data to provide guidance about the potential relationship of these differences among antipsychotics to the individual patient's own experience with antipsychotic drugs in the process of shared decision-making with the patients and their significant others.. A search of PubMed, Embase, and PsychINFO was conducted for articles published in English between January 1, 1999, and April 2011, using the search terms double-blind AND randomized AND olanzapine AND (ziprasidone OR risperidone OR quetiapine OR haloperidol OR fluphenazine OR perphenazine OR aripiprazole).. Studies with a duration 3 months or longer, including patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, reporting survival analysis for all-cause discontinuation and relapse or dropout due to poor efficacy were selected.. We extracted the number of patients relapsed due to poor efficacy and hazard rates for relapses.. Overall, the efficacy patterns of both controlled effectiveness and observational long-term studies closely parallel the efficacy observed in the short-term, controlled studies. The results of Phase 1 Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness are very similar to, but not identical with, the controlled short-term efficacy studies, the European First-Episode Schizophrenia Trial, and naturalistic studies. The mid-term and long-term data suggest that olanzapine is more effective than risperidone and that both of these are better than the other first- and second-generation antipsychotics except for clozapine, which is the most efficacious of all. Further large differences emerged regarding the specific mid-term and long-term safety profiles of individual antipsychotics.. Despite intraclass differences and the complexities of antipsychotic choice, the second-generation antipsychotics are important contributions not only to the acute phase but, more importantly, to the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Participation; Psychotherapy; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ("atypical") antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of olanzapine compared to other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. 2. Reference searching We inspected the reference of all identified studies for more trials. 3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information. 4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised trials that used at least single-blind (rater-blind) design, comparing oral olanzapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random effects model.. The review currently includes 50 studies and 9476 participants which provided data for six comparisons (olanzapine compared to amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone). The overall attrition from the included studies was considerable (49.2%) leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Olanzapine improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) more than aripiprazole (2 RCTs, n = 794, WMD -4.96 CI -8.06 to -1.85), quetiapine (10 RCTs, n = 1449, WMD -3.66 CI -5.39 to -1.93), risperidone (15 RCTs, n = 2390, WMD -1.94 CI -3.31 to -0.58) and ziprasidone (4 RCTs, n = 1291, WMD -8.32 CI -10.99 to -5.64), but not more than amisulpride or clozapine. This somewhat better efficacy was confirmed by fewer participants in the olanzapine groups leaving the studies early due to inefficacy of treatment compared to quetiapine (8 RCTs, n = 1563, RR 0.56 CI 0.44 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 6 to 50), risperidone (14 RCTs, n = 2744, RR 0.78 CI 0.62 to 0.98, NNT 50 CI 17 to 100) and ziprasidone (5 RCTs, n = 1937, RR 0.64 CI 0.51 to 0.79, NNT 17, CI 11 to 33).Fewer participants in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (2 RCTs, n = 876, RR 0.56 CI 0.41 to 0.77, NNT 11 CI 7 to 25) and ziprasidone (2 RCTs, n = 766, RR 0.65 CI 0.45 to 0.93, NNT 17 CI 9 to 100) treatment groups, but not in the clozapine group (1 RCT, n = 980, RR 1.28 CI 1.02 to 1.61, NNH not estimable), had to be re-hospitalised in the trials.Except for clozapine, all comparators induced less weight gain than olanzapine (olanzapine compared to amisulpride: 3 RCTs, n = 671, WMD 2.11 kg CI 1.29 kg to 2.94 kg; aripiprazole: 1 RCT, n = 90, WMD 5.60 kg CI 2.15 kg to 9.05 kg; quetiapine: 7 RCTs, n = 1173, WMD 2.68 kg CI 1.10 kg to 4.26 kg; risperidone: 13 RCTs, n = 2116, WMD 2.61 kg CI 1.48 kg to 3.74 kg; ziprasidone: 5 RCTs, n = 1659, WMD 3.82 kg CI 2.96 kg to 4.69 kg). Associated problems such as glucose and cholesterol increase were usually also more frequent in the olanzapine group. Other differences in adverse effects were less well documented. Nevertheless, olanzapine may be associated with slightly more extrapyramidal side effects than quetiapine (use of antiparkinson medication (6 RCTs, n = 1090, RR 2.05 CI 1.26 to 3.32, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100), but less than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication 13 RCTs, n = 2599, RR 0.78 CI 0.65 to 0.95, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100) and ziprasidone (use of antiparkinson medication 4 RCTs, n = 1732, RR 0.70 CI 0.50 to 0.97, NNH not estimabl. Olanzapine may be a somewhat more efficacious drug than some other second generation antipsychotic drugs. This small superiority in efficacy needs to be weighed against a larger weight gain and associated metabolic problems than most other second generation antipsychotic drugs, except clozapine. These conclusions are tentative due to the large number of people leaving the studies early which possibly limits the validity of the findings. Further large, well-designed trials are necessary to establish the relative effects of different second generation antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this article is to assess the clinical characteristics of akathisia in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder receiving aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, or placebo. We conducted post hoc analyses of pooled safety data from trials in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar I disorder. Outcome measures included the incidence of akathisia, time to onset, duration, severity, and discontinuation due to akathisia, concomitant use of benzodiazepines and/or anticholinergics, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) scores, and the correlation between antipsychotic efficacy and akathisia. The results for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were as follows: akathisia in 9% of aripiprazole- and 6% of placebo-treated patients; 12.5% of aripiprazole- versus 24% of haloperidol-treated patients; 11% of aripiprazole- versus 6% of olanzapine-treated patients. Bipolar I disorder: akathisia in 18% of aripiprazole- and 5% of placebo-treated patients. The clinical characteristics of akathisia were similar between each data set, regardless of disease. Akathisia was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Discontinuation due to akathisia was low in both the schizophrenia trials (aripiprazole 0.3%; placebo 0%; aripiprazole 0.9%; haloperidol 2.3%; aripiprazole 1.2%; olanzapine 0.2%) and the bipolar trials (aripiprazole 2.3%; placebo 0%). Treatment-emergent akathisia was not associated with a poorer clinical response. In conclusion, akathisia with aripiprazole occurred early in treatment, was mild-to-moderate in severity, led to few study discontinuations, and did not compromise therapeutic efficacy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The time course of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores in adult schizophrenia patients was modeled, and the effectiveness of paliperidone extended-release tablets (paliperidone ER) and olanzapine was quantified. Data from 3 randomized, double-blind phase III studies were used. Patients received paliperidone ER (3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 mg), olanzapine 10 mg, or matched placebo once daily for 6 consecutive weeks. An indirect response model implemented using a nonlinear mixed effects approach described the time course of the PANSS. Deterioration rate was modeled as a function of baseline PANSS score, placebo, and drug effects, and the dropout effect. An exponential decrease of the placebo response was also implemented. Paliperidone ER and olanzapine treatment were characterized by a long-lasting drug effect (13%), with a larger but short-lasting placebo effect (40%) and a notable dropout rate. The covariate exploration failed to identify any clinically relevant factors. The nonparametric bootstrap analysis confirmed the acceptable precision of parameter estimates. The visual predictive check supported the model's adequacy to reproduce observed PANSS time courses. The population model describes the time course of PANSS scores in schizophrenia patients and is appropriate for use in clinical trial simulation activities.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Isoxazoles; Models, Psychological; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Principal Component Analysis; Psychometrics; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation (atypical) antipsychotics have become first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examine how the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of amisulpride compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.. We included randomised, at least single-blind, trials comparing oral amisulpride with oral forms of aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For continuous data we calculated weighted mean differences (MD), for dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate.. The review currently includes ten short to medium term trials with 1549 participants on three comparisons: amisulpride versus olanzapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. The overall attrition rate was considerable (34.7%) with no significant difference between groups. Amisulpride was similarly effective as olanzapine and risperidone and more effective than ziprasidone (leaving the study early due to inefficacy: n=123, 1 RCT, RR 0.21 CI 0.05 to 0.94, NNT 8 CI 5 to 50). Amisulpride induced less weight gain than risperidone (n=585, 3 RCTs, MD -0.99 CI -1.61 to -0.37) or olanzapine (n=671, 3 RCTs, MD -2.11 CI -2.94 to -1.29). Olanzapine was also associated with a higher increase of glucose (n=406, 2 RCTs, MD -7.30 CI -7.62 to -6.99). There was no difference in terms of cardiac effects and extra pyramidal symptoms (EPS) compared with olanzapine (akathisia: n= 587, 2 RCTs, RR 0.66 CI 0.36 to 1.21), compared with risperidone (akathisia: n=586, 3 RCTs, RR 0.80 CI 0.58 to 1.11) and compared with ziprasidone (akathisia: n=123, 1 RCT, RR 0.63, CI 0.11 to 3.67).. There is little randomised evidence comparing amisulpride with other second generation antipsychotic drugs. We could only find trials comparing amisulpride with olanzapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. We found amisulpride may be somewhat more effective than ziprasidone, and more tolerable in terms of weight gain and other associated problems than olanzapine and risperidone. These data, however, are based on only ten short to medium term studies and therefore too limited to allow for firm conclusions.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. It is not clear how the effects of the various second generation antipsychotic drugs differ.. To evaluate the effects of quetiapine compared with other second generation antipsychotic drugs for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007), inspected references of all identified studies, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised control trials comparing oral quetiapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 21 randomised control trials (RCTs) with 4101 participants. These trials provided data on four comparisons - quetiapine versus clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or ziprasidone.A major limitation to all findings is the high number of participants leaving studies prematurely (57.6%) and the substantial risk of biases in studies. Efficacy data favoured olanzapine and risperidone compared with quetiapine (PANSS total score versus olanzapine:10 RCTs, n=1449, WMD 3.66 CI 1.93 to 5.39; versus risperidone: 9 RCTs, n=1953, WMD 3.09 CI 1.01 to 5.16), but clinical meaning is unclear. There were no clear mental state differences when quetiapine was compared with clozapine or ziprasidone.Compared with olanzapine, quetiapine produced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1090, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.49 CI 0.3 to 0.79, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100) and less weight gain (7 RCTs, n=1173, WMD -2.81 CI -4.38 to -1.24) and glucose elevation, but more QTc prolongation (3 RCTs, n=643, WMD 4.81 CI 0.34 to 9.28). Compared with risperidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1715, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.5 CI 0.3 to 0.86, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100), less prolactin increase (6 RCTs, n=1731, WMD -35.28 CI -44.36 to -26.19) and some related adverse effects, but more cholesterol increase (5 RCTs, n=1433, WMD 8.61 CI 4.66 to 12.56). Compared with ziprasidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects (1 RCT, n=522, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.43 CI 0.2 to 0.93, NNH not estimable) and prolactin increase. On the other hand quetiapine was more sedating and led to more weight gain (2 RCTs, n=754, RR 2.22 CI 1.35 to 3.63, NNH 13 CI 8 to 33) and cholesterol increase than ziprasidone.. Best available evidence from trials suggests that most people who start quetiapine stop taking it within a few weeks. Comparisons with amisulpride, aripiprazole, sertindole and zotepine do not exist. Most data that has been reported within existing comparisons are of very limited value because of assumptions and biases within them. There is much scope for further research into the effects of this widely used drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ("atypical") antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of olanzapine compared to other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.2. Reference searching We inspected the reference of all identified studies for more trials.3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information.4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised trials that used at least single-blind (rater-blind) design, comparing oral olanzapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random effects model.. The review currently includes 50 studies and 9476 participants which provided data for six comparisons (olanzapine compared to amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone). The overall attrition from the included studies was considerable (49.2%) leaving the interpretation of results problematic.Olanzapine improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) more than aripiprazole (2 RCTs, n=794, WMD -4.96 CI -8.06 to -1.85), quetiapine (10 RCTs, n=1449, WMD -3.66 CI -5.39 to -1.93), risperidone (15 RCTs, n=2390, WMD -1.94 CI -3.31 to -0.58) and ziprasidone (4 RCTs, n=1291, WMD -8.32 CI -10.99 to -5.64), but not more than amisulpride or clozapine. This somewhat better efficacy was confirmed by fewer participants in the olanzapine groups leaving the studies early due to inefficacy of treatment compared to quetiapine (8 RCTs, n=1563, RR 0.56 CI 0.44 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 6 to 50), risperidone (14 RCTs, n=2744, RR 0.78 CI 0.62 to 0.98, NNT 50 CI 17 to 100) and ziprasidone (5 RCTs, n=1937, RR 0.64 CI 0.51 to 0.79, NNT 17, CI 11 to 33).Fewer participants in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=876, RR 0.56 CI 0.41 to 0.77, NNT 11 CI 7 to 25) and ziprasidone (2 RCTs, n=766, RR 0.65 CI 0.45 to 0.93, NNT 17 CI 9 to 100) treatment groups, but not in the clozapine group (1 RCT, n=980, RR 1.28 CI 1.02 to 1.61, NNH not estimable), had to be re-hospitalised in the trials.Except for clozapine, all comparators induced less weight gain than olanzapine (olanzapine compared to amisulpride: 3 RCTs, n=671, WMD 2.11kg CI 1.29kg to 2.94kg; aripiprazole: 1 RCT, n=90, WMD 5.60kg CI 2.15kg to 9.05kg; quetiapine: 7 RCTs, n=1173, WMD 2.68kg CI 1.10kg to 4.26kg; risperidone: 13 RCTs, n=2116, WMD 2.61kg CI 1.48kg to 3.74kg; ziprasidone: 5 RCTs, n=1659, WMD 3.82kg CI 2.96kg to 4.69kg). Associated problems such as glucose and cholesterol increase were usually also more frequent in the olanzapine group.Other differences in adverse effects were less well documented. Nevertheless, olanzapine may be associated with slightly more extrapyramidal side effects than quetiapine (use of antiparkinson medication (6 RCTs, n=1090, RR 2.05 CI 1.26 to 3.32, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100), but less than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication 13 RCTs, n=2599, RR 0.78 CI 0.65 to 0.95, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100) and ziprasidone (use of antiparkinson medication 4 RCTs, n=1732, RR 0.70 CI 0.50 to 0.97, NNH not estimable). It may also increase prolactin somewhat more than. Olanzapine may be a somewhat more efficacious drug than some other second generation antipsychotic drugs. This small superiority in efficacy needs to be weighed against a larger weight gain and associated metabolic problems than most other second generation antipsychotic drugs, except clozapine. These conclusions are tentative due to the large number of people leaving the studies early which possibly limits the validity of the findings. Further large, well-designed trials are necessary to establish the relative effects of different second generation antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that, in addition to its use in adults, is now indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adolescents aged 13-17 years. In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 6-week trial in adolescents aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia, the least squares mean reduction from baseline to 6 weeks in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) total score (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo. In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 3-week trial in adolescents, aged 13-17 years, with manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, the mean reduction from baseline to 3 weeks in the Adolescent Structured Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo. In extensions of each of the pivotal placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia and bipolar mania, open-label treatment with olanzapine for up to 26 weeks produced significant reductions from baseline to endpoint in BPRS-C and YMRS total scores, respectively. Oral olanzapine was generally well tolerated in adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar mania. Sedation and weight gain were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled trials. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported by 10% of olanzapine recipients compared with 6% of placebo recipients. Olanzapine-treated adolescents were likely to experience greater increases in bodyweight, sedation, blood lipids, serum prolactin and liver transaminase levels than olanzapine-treated adults. Therefore, careful consideration of risk-benefit is recommended before using olanzapine in adolescents.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To comprehensively review the 2 recent and large antipsychotic effectiveness trials for treatment of schizophrenia: the United Kingdom's Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS), and the National Institute of Mental Health-initiated Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia trial.. We present a review of the rationale, methodology, and findings to date from the CUtLASS and CATIE schizophrenia trials, including all primary and secondary outcomes.. The primary findings from both trials, CUtLASS and CATIE, suggest that first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are equally effective in the treatment of schizophrenia. The exception is in treatment-resistant populations where clozapine exhibits superiority, compared with other SGAs. In the CATIE trial, there is a suggestion that olanzapine is superior in effectiveness, compared with other nonclozapine SGAs, although this seems to be mediated by past history of olanzapine use, and carries with it increased weight gain and metabolic adverse events. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, there is no evidence that SGAs are superior to FGAs, with findings suggesting the possibility that FGAs may be superior.. Past efficacy trials have strongly supported the position that SGAs are superior to FGAs in the treatment of schizophrenia and in side effect profile. Two large independent effectiveness trials, CUtLASS and CATIE, have offered a strong challenge to these claims. Both suggest that SGAs, except clozapine in the treatment-resistant population, offer little, if any, clinical benefits, and, moreover, harbour their own significant side effects.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; United States

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic was first introduced in 1996 as an oral formulation and is used in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Recent developments have included parenteral formulations to improve compliance in the treatment of schizophrenia and to treat agitation in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar mania. Olanzapine pamoate long acting injection (depot) is a novel formulation of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine, which is licensed for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. When administered as the pamoate salt, olanzapine has an elimination half-life of approximately 30 days, allowing it to be given at 2- or 4-weekly intervals. An 8-week, randomized, double-blind study in 404 patients acutely ill with schizophrenia demonstrated significant antipsychotic efficacy (versus placebo). A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in 1,065 schizophrenia patients stabilized with oral olanzapine demonstrated the depot formulation could delay exacerbation of positive symptoms or hospitalization. Apart from local injection reactions and a postinjection delirium/sedation syndrome, no new adverse events additional to those seen with oral olanzapine have been notedto date. The pivotal clinical trials of olanzapine rapid-acting intramuscular injection are reviewed in addition to post-hoc analyses, controlled and naturalistic studies since its launch.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

An advance in the treatment of schizophrenia is the development of long-acting intramuscular formulations of antipsychotics, such as olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI). During clinical trials, a post-injection syndrome characterized by signs of delirium and/or excessive sedation was identified in a small percentage of patients following injection with olanzapine LAI.. Safety data from all completed and ongoing trials of olanzapine LAI were reviewed for possible cases of this post-injection syndrome. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterize incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome. Regression analyses were conducted to assess possible risk factors.. Based on approximately 45,000 olanzapine LAI injections given to 2054 patients in clinical trials through 14 October 2008, post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome occurred in approximately 0.07% of injections or 1.4% of patients (30 cases in 29 patients). Symptomatology was consistent with olanzapine overdose (e.g., sedation, confusion, slurred speech, altered gait, or unconsciousness). However, no clinically significant decreases in vital signs were observed. Symptom onset ranged from immediate to 3 to 5 hours post injection, with a median onset time of 25 minutes post injection. All patients recovered within 1.5 to 72 hours, and the majority continued to receive further olanzapine LAI injections following the event. No clear risk factors were identified.. Post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome can be readily identified based on symptom presentation, progression, and temporal relationship to the injection, and is consistent with olanzapine overdose following probable accidental intravascular injection of a portion of the olanzapine LAI dose. Although there is no specific antidote for olanzapine overdose, patients can be treated symptomatically as needed. Special precautions include use of proper injection technique and a post-injection observation period.. ClinicalTrials.gov ID; URL: http://http//www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00094640, NCT00088478, NCT00088491, NCT00088465, and NCT00320489.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Delayed-Action Preparations; Delirium; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Overdose; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Intramuscular; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Sleep; Syndrome; Treatment Outcome

Although atypical antipsychotics have beneficial efficacy and tolerance, non-adherence and partial adherence remain in patients treated for schizophrenia. Long-acting injectable or depot atypical antipsychotics offer better medication adherence and tolerability advantages. Currently, two drugs are available for the treatment of schizophrenia, risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) and olanzapine pamoate (OP).. Short- and long-term safety and tolerability data on RLAI and OP from January 2006 through September 2009 were reviewed by performing Medline and PubMed searches, reviewing abstracts and poster presentations, and viewing available material from the FDA and European Medicines Agency.. RLAI and OP show good short- and long-term safety when treating patients with schizophrenia, with uncommon discontinuation due to adverse effects. RLAI and OP data show rare problems with injection site reactions and patients exposed to injectable treatments prefer to continue injections. Infrequent but serious post-injection delirium sedation syndrome occurred after 1% of OP injections. Weight gain was generally higher among patients treated with OP versus RLAI.. Healthcare providers, patients and family members should be made aware of the safety and benefits of long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotics in order to diminish the unnecessary restrictions of these therapies for patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperprolactinemia; Injections; Medication Adherence; Movement Disorders; Olanzapine; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are serious and have not been compared head to head in a meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the metabolic side effects of the following SGAs head-to-head: amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone, zotepine.. We searched the register of the Cochrane schizophrenia group (last search May 2007), supplemented by MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search January 2009) for randomized, blinded studies comparing the above mentioned SGA in the treatment of schizophrenia or related disorders. At least three reviewers extracted the data independently. The primary outcome was weight change. We also assessed changes of cholesterol and glucose. The results were combined in a meta-analysis.. We included 48 studies with 105 relevant arms. Olanzapine produced more weight gain than all other second-generation antipsychotics except for clozapine where no difference was found. Clozapine produced more weight gain than risperidone, risperidone more than amisulpride, and sertindole more than risperidone. Olanzapine produced more cholesterol increase than aripiprazole, risperidone and ziprasidone. (No differences with amisulpride, clozapine and quetiapine were found). Quetiapine produced more cholesterol increase than risperidone and ziprasidone. Olanzapine produced more increase in glucose than amisulpride, aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone; no difference was found with clozapine.. Some SGAs lead to substantially more metabolic side effects than other SGAs. When choosing an SGA for an individual patient these side effects with their potential cause of secondary diseases must be weighed against efficacy and characteristics of the individual patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

To examine potential differences in efficacy and safety of treatment with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia of white and black descent.. A post-hoc, pooled analysis of 6 randomized, double-blind trials in the treatment of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder compared white (N = 605) and black (N = 375) patients treated with olanzapine (5 to 20 mg/day) for 24 to 28 weeks. Efficacy measurements included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; and positive, negative, and general psychopathology scores; and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scores at 6 months. Safety measures included differences in the frequencies of adverse events along with measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight, glucose, and lipid changes over time.. 51% of black patients and 45% of white patients experienced early study discontinuation (P = .133). Of those who discontinued, significantly more white patients experienced psychiatric worsening (P = .002) while significantly more black patients discontinued for reasons other than efficacy or tolerability (P = .014). Discontinuation for intolerability was not different between groups (P = .320). For the estimated change in PANSS total score over 6 months, there was no significant difference in efficacy between white and black patients (P = .928), nor on the estimated PANSS positive (P = .435), negative (P = .756) or general psychopathology (P = .165) scores. Overall, there was no significant difference in the change in CGI-S score between groups from baseline to endpoint (P = .979). Weight change was not significantly different in white and black patients over 6 months (P = .127). However, mean weight change was significantly greater in black versus white patients at Weeks 12 and 20 only (P = .028 and P = .026, respectively). Additionally, a significantly greater percentage of black patients experienced clinically significant weight gain (≥ 7%) at anytime compared to white patients (36.1% vs. 30.4%, P = .021). Changes across metabolic parameters (combined fasting and random lipids and glucose) were also not significantly different between groups, with the exception of a greater categorical change in total cholesterol from borderline to high among white subjects and a categorical change from normal to low in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol among white males.. The findings did not demonstrate overall substantive differences in efficacy or safety between white and black patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or related disorders treated with olanzapine. However, a significantly greater percentage of black patients (36.1%) experienced clinically significant weight gain compared to white patients (30.4%).

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Black or African American; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; White People

The aim was to perform a meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of antipsychotic drugs in adolescents aged between 13 and 17 suffering from schizophrenia.. Enclosed studies - were multicentric, randomized, double-blind clinical trials; - included only adolescents (aged 13-17) with DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia; - used standardized scales to assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of antipsychotics.. All treatments resulted in significant improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (p < 0.001), in PANSS positive subscale score (p < 0.001) and in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness score (p < 0.001) at the endpoint. Patients with a considerable weight gain were significantly higher in the olanzapine-treated group. Data about extrapyramidal side-effects were not available for olanzapine. Risperidone group was associated with a significantly major incidence of akathisia, tremor and dystonic events than controls. High dose of aripiprazole was associated with a significant major incidence of tremor and Parkinsonism (p < 0.01) than controls.. Results demonstrated that antipsychotic treatment with risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole in adolescents affected by schizophrenia led to significant improvements in symptomatology. A pharmacological treatment for adolescents suffering from schizophrenia must fulfil several prerequisites, to grant the most favourable outcomes, avoiding acute and long term side-effects. Treatment with a 10 mg daily dose of aripiprazole was associated with the lowest incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and showed no significant weight gain. If a treatment with antipsychotic drugs associated with significant weight gain as olanzapine or risperidone is needed, compensative measures should be soon considered.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic demonstrated to be superior in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia which causes fewer movement disorders. Clozapine, however, entails a significant risk of serious blood disorders such as agranulocytosis which could be potentially fatal. Currently there are a number of newer antipsychotics which have been developed with the purpose to find both a better tolerability profile and a superior effectiveness.. To compare the clinical effects of clozapine with other atypical antipsychotics (such as amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone and zotepine) in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (June 2007) and reference lists of all included randomised controlled trials. We also manually searched appropriate journals and conference proceedings relating to clozapine combination strategies and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies.. All relevant randomised, at least single-blind trials, comparing clozapine with other atypical antipsychotics, any dose and oral formulations, for people with schizophrenia or related disorders.. We selected trials and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 27 blinded randomised controlled trials, which involved 3099 participants. Twelve randomised control trials compared clozapine with olanzapine, five with quetiapine, nine with risperidone, one with ziprasidone and two with zotepine. Attrition from these studies was high (overall 30.1%), leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Clozapine had a higher attrition rate due to adverse effects than olanzapine (9 RCTs, n=1674, RR 1.60 CI 1.07 to 2.40, NNT 25 CI 15 to 73) and risperidone (6 RCTs, n=627, RR 1.88 CI 1.11 to 3.21, NNT 16 CI 9 to 59). Fewer participants in the clozapine groups left the trials early due to inefficacy than risperidone (6 RCTs, n=627, RR 0.40 CI 0.23 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 7 to 21), suggesting a certain higher efficacy of clozapine.Clozapine was more efficacious than zotepine in improving the participants general mental state (BPRS total score: 1 RCT, n=59, MD -6.00 CI -9.83 to -2.17), but not consistently more than olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. There was no significant difference between clozapine and olanzapine or risperidone in terms of positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia. According to two studies from China quetiapine was more efficacious for negative symptoms than clozapine (2 RCTs, n=142, MD 2.23 CI 0.99 to 3.48).Clozapine produced somewhat fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication: 6 RCTs, n=304, RR 0.39 CI 0.22 to 0.68, NNT 7 CI 5 to 18) and zotepine (n=59, RR 0.05 CI 0.00 to 0.86, NNT 3 CI 2 to 5). More participants in the clozapine group showed decreased white blood cells than those taking olanzapine, more hypersalivation and sedation than those on olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine and more seizures than people on olanzapine and risperidone. Also clozapine produced an important weight gain not seen with risperidone.Other differences in adverse effects were less documented and should be replicated, for example, clozapine did not alter prolactin levels whereas olanzapine, risperidone and zotepine did; compared with quetiapine, clozapine produced a higher incidence of electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations; and compared with quetiapine and risperidone clozapine produced a higher increase of triglyceride levels. Other findings that should be replicated were: clozapine improved social functioning less than risperidone and fewer participants in the clozapine group had to be hospitalised to avoid suicide attempts compared. Clozapine may be a little more efficacious than zotepine and risperidone but further trials are required to confirm this finding. Clozapine differs more clearly in adverse effects from other second generation antipsychotics and the side-effect profile could be key in the selection of treatment depending on the clinical situation and a patient's preferences. Data on other important outcomes such as cognitive functioning, quality of life, death or service use are currently largely missing, making further large and well-designed trials necessary. It is also important to take into account that the large number of people leaving the studies early limits the validity and interpretation of our findings.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Olanzapine pamoate (olanzapine long-acting injection [OLAI]; Zypadhera®; Zyprexa® Relprevv™) is the intramuscular depot formulation of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. In two pivotal, double-blind clinical trials of 8 or 24 weeks' duration, the efficacy of recommended dosages of OLAI injected every 2 or 4 weeks (without oral supplementation) was greater than that of placebo in improving symptoms in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia, and generally similar to that of continuing oral olanzapine in preventing psychotic exacerbations in patients with schizophrenia whose symptoms had previously been stabilized on oral olanzapine. The effectiveness of OLAI in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia was also demonstrated in an (ongoing) open-label extension study in which the all-cause discontinuation rate was 34.3% after 18 months. OLAI is generally well tolerated. It has an adverse event profile similar to that of oral olanzapine, with the exception of adverse events related to the intramuscular route of administration; these include a manageable post-injection syndrome, which occurred in <0.1% of injections in clinical trials. The possibility of a post-injection syndrome event requires a risk management plan (RMP) to be adopted that includes observation by appropriately qualified personnel in a healthcare facility for at least 3 hours post-injection. With its potential to improve adherence to medication, and thereby treatment outcomes, OLAI is a useful addition to the pharmacological options available for the maintenance therapy of schizophrenia. Given its benefit/risk profile, OLAI appears most suited for patients who, despite responding well to oral olanzapine, have difficulties remaining adherent to this form of medication, provided they can comply with the conditions of the RMP.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Injections; Lipids; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Decision Making; Female; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Polypharmacy; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain

Weight gain is common for people with schizophrenia and this has serious implications for a patient's health and well being. Switching strategies have been recommended as a management option.. To determine the effects of antipsychotic medication switching as a strategy for reducing or preventing weight gain and metabolic problems in people with schizophrenia.. We searched key databases and the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trials register (January 2005 and June 2007), reference sections within relevant papers and contacted the first author of each relevant study and other experts to collect further information.. All clinical randomised controlled trials comparing switching of antipsychotic medication as an intervention for antipsychotic induced weight gain and metabolic problems with continuation of medication and/or other weight loss treatments (pharmacological and non pharmacological) in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses.. Studies were reliably selected, quality assessed and data extracted. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measures were weight loss, metabolic syndrome, relapse and general mental state.. We included four studies for the review with a total of 636 participants. All except one study had a duration of 26 weeks or less. There was a mean weight loss of 1.94 kg (2 RCT, n = 287, CI -3.9 to 0.08) when switched to aripiprazole or quetiapine from olanzapine. BMI also decreased when switched to quetiapine (1 RCT, n = 129, MD -0.52 CI -1.26 to 0.22) and aripiprazole (1 RCT, n = 173, RR 0.28 CI 0.13 to 0.57) from olanzapine.Fasting blood glucose showed a significant decrease when switched to aripiprazole or quetiapine from olanzapine. (2 RCT, MD -2.53 n = 280 CI -2.94 to -2.11). One RCT also showed a favourable lipid profile when switched to aripiprazole but these measures were reported as percentage changes, rather than means with standard deviation.People are less likely to leave the study early if they remain on olanzapine compared to switching to quetiapine or aripiprazole.There was no significant difference in outcomes of mental state, global state, and adverse events between groups which switched medications and those that remained on previous medication. Three different switching strategies were compared and no strategy was found to be superior to the others for outcomes of weight gain, mental state and global state.. Evidence from this review suggests that switching antipsychotic medication to one with lesser potential for causing weight gain or metabolic problems could be an effective way to manage these side effects, but the data were weak due to the limited number of trials in this area and small sample sizes. Poor reporting of data also hindered using some trials and outcomes. There was no difference in mental state, global state and other treatment related adverse events between switching to another medication and continuing on the previous one. When the three switching strategies were compared none of them had an advantage over the others in their effects on the primary outcomes considered in this review. Better designed trials with adequate power would provide more convincing evidence for using medication switching as an intervention strategy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Substitution; Fasting; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Olanzapine pamoate, a long-acting depot preparation of olanzapine, is being evaluated by regulatory agencies for the treatment of schizophrenia. Clinical trial information was accessed by on-line query of http://www.pubmed.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.fda.gov, along with an examination of poster presentations at scientific meetings held in 2008. Two double-blind randomised clinical trials of olanzapine pamoate were conducted and demonstrate efficacy for both the acute treatment of schizophrenia and for the maintenance of antipsychotic response. Long-term open-label studies provide additional information on safety. The overall tolerability profile for olanzapine pamoate is similar to that for the oral formulation; however, with the depot there is a risk of a postinjection delirium sedation syndrome which resembles an overdose of oral olanzapine and which occurs in 0.07% of injections, requiring patients to be observed for 3 h after injection. At present, there are no studies available that directly compare olanzapine pamoate with other antipsychotics other than oral olanzapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Injections; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in serious and disabling neuropsychiatric disorders.. The authors report a case of a 51-year old male, admitted to the psychiatric ward for acute psychosis and suicidal ideation, probably associated with TBI. After a temporal head trauma he initiated auditory/verbal hallucinations and subsequently developed paranoid delusions. The electroencephalography showed slow bilateral temporal activity and the neuropsychological testing showed several impairments. The patient improved with olanzapine at a dosage of 20 mg daily.. This case shows the difficulty of differential diagnosis between schizophrenia and psychotic disorder due to traumatic brain injury.. The authors conducted a revision of literature about the diagnosis, epidemiology, clinical aspects, laboratory and structural investigations and the treatment of this condition. Based on this revision work, the authors sketch some recommendations about the work-up that should be done when faced with this diagnostic hypothesis.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain Injuries; Diagnosis, Differential; Electroencephalography; Hallucinations; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Paranoid Disorders; Portugal; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health to compare the effectiveness of drugs for schizophrenia. The focus here is not on its conclusions but on the knotty issues of design and methods, in order to support appropriate clinical interpretation of the conclusions, and on using the CATIE experience to indicate directions for improvement of future clinical trials. While many of the CATIE design and implementation decisions are excellent and serve as models for future research, other decisions resulted in a study with a large study group but inadequate power. Multiple treatment interventions, unbalanced randomization within and across clinical sites, and multiple secondary outcomes are among the issues that require even more serious consideration in future large multisite clinical trials. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify whether the intent of a study is to establish superiority of some treatments or to establish equivalence, for the appropriate designs and analyses differ in these situations. If the study is designed, as was CATIE, to demonstrate some treatments' superiority, statistically nonsignificant results should not be misinterpreted as evidence of "equivalence." For establishing either superiority or equivalence, future treatment comparisons might better be designed with fewer sites, more subjects per site, fewer treatments, and fewer outcomes, in order to have the power for definitively establishing superiority or equivalence at a lower cost.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Perphenazine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Schizophrenia; United States

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation (atypical) antipsychotics have become first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examine how the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of aripiprazole compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (March 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.. We included all randomised trials comparing oral aripiprazole with oral forms of amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (MD) again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes four trials with 1404 participants on two out of eight possible comparisons - aripiprazole versus olanzapine and aripiprazole versus risperidone. The overall number of participants leaving the studies early was considerable (38.5%), limiting the validity of the findings, but with no significant differences between groups. Aripiprazole was less efficacious than olanzapine in terms of the general mental state (PANSS total score: n=794, 2 RCTs, MD 4.96 CI 1.85 to 8.06), but it was associated with fewer side-effects such as cholesterol increase, weight gain, sedation and prolactin associated side-effects. Compared with risperidone there was no difference in efficacy (PANSS total score: n=372, 2 RCTs, MD 1.50 CI -2.96 to 5.96). Dystonia, QTc abnormalities, prolactin and cholesterol increase were less frequent in the aripiprazole group, while tremor was more frequent in the aripiprazole group compared with those allocated risperidone.. Aripiprazole may be somewhat less effective than olanzapine, but more tolerable in terms of metabolic effects and sedation. There is no evidence for a difference in efficacy compared to risperidone, but for better tolerability in terms of dystonias, cholesterol prolactin increase and QTc prolongation. Randomised evidence comparing aripiprazole with other second generation antipsychotic drugs is currently not available.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various new generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of ziprasidone compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Specialised Register (April 2007) and references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised, at least single-blind, controlled trials comparing oral ziprasidone with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (MD) for dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate.. The review currently includes nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 3361 participants. The overall rate of premature study discontinuation was very high (59.1%). Data for the comparisons of ziprasidone with amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone were available. Ziprasidone was a less acceptable treatment than olanzapine (leaving the studies early for any reason: 5 RCTs, n=1937, RR 1.26 CI 1.18 to 1.35, NNH 7 CI 5 to 10) and risperidone (3 RCTs, n=1029, RR 1.11 CI 1.02 to 1.20, NNH 14 CI 8 to 50), but not than the other second generation antipsychotic drugs. Ziprasidone was less efficacious than amisulpride (leaving the study early due to inefficacy: 1 RCT, n=123, RR 4.72 CI 1.06 to 20.98, NNH 8 CI 5 to 50) olanzapine (PANSS total score: 4 RCTs, n=1291, MD 8.32 CI 5.64 to 10.99) and risperidone (PANSS total score: 3 RCTs, n=1016, MD 3.91 CI 0.27 to 7.55). Based on limited data there were no significant differences in tolerability between ziprasidone and amisulpride or clozapine. Ziprasidone produced less weight gain than olanzapine (5 RCTs, n=1659, MD -3.82 CI -4.69 to -2.96), quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=754, RR 0.45 CI 0.28 to 0.74) or risperidone (3 RCTs, n=1063, RR 0.49 CI 0.33 to 0.74). It was associated with less cholesterol increase than olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone. Conversely ziprasidone produced slightly more extrapyramidal side-effects than olanzapine (4 RCTs, n=1732, RR 1.43 CI 1.03 to 1.99, NNH not estimable) and more prolactin increase than quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=754, MD 4.77 CI 1.37 to 8.16), but less movement disorders (2 RCTs, n=822, RR 0.70 CI 0.51 to 0.97, NNT not estimable) and less prolactin increase (2 RCTs, n=767, MD -21.97 CI -27.34 to -16.60) than risperidone.. Ziprasidone may be a slightly less efficacious antipsychotic drug than amisulpride, olanzapine and risperidone. Its main advantage is the low propensity to induce weight gain and associated adverse effects. However, the high overall rate of participants leaving the studies early limits the validity of any findings.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Early-onset psychotic illnesses in children and adolescents are not as rare as is commonly believed. These disorders, which include schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, and major depression with psychotic features, often have a chronic and severe course and poor long-term outcome. Many patients with early-onset schizophrenia have greater functional impairments than most patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that patients with early-onset schizophrenia experience substantial gray matter loss during adolescence, which is not observed in studies of patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. The chronic course, severe functional impairments, and poor prognosis of early-onset psychosis create a great need to identify effective and safe treatments for youth with psychosis. Although atypical anti-psychotics have been considered superior to traditional antipsychotics, there has been little controlled information to inform clinical decisions until recently. Over the past 5 years, several studies have been initiated to address these questions. The results of the studies completed to date are reviewed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Brain Diseases; Child; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Failure

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Olanzapine; Receptors, Adrenergic; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention; Weight Gain

Medication nonadherence, especially in psychiatric disorders, has been associated with treatment failure and other negative outcomes. Orally disintegrating formulations have been developed as an alternative to improve medication adherence. This report reviews the properties, efficacy, and safety profile of olanzapine as an orally disintegrating tablet, and explores their association with medication compliance compared with standard oral formulation. Medical literature, published on orally disintegrating formulation of olanzapine identified using Pubmed and EMBASE, was used. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug. Studies evaluating the biostability, biodisposability, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of orally disintegrating olanzapine as treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders were reviewed. Measurement tools included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S), Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and Nursing Assessment of Medication Acceptance (NAMA). Orally disintegrating olanzapine, an effective atypical antipsychotic with an acceptable safety profile, can facilitate the burden of treatment on patients and caregivers due to its ease of administration. This is especially important in diseases such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, which can be chronic and require long-term treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biological Availability; Bipolar Disorder; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Compliance; Schizophrenia; Solubility; Tablets

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG:HDL-C) are predictors of cardiovascular risk. This post-hoc analysis assessed changes in these parameters during treatment with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine or aripiprazole using pooled data from three randomized, long-term clinical studies in patients with schizophrenia.. Data were pooled from one open-label and two double-blind (26- or 52-week) studies in patients randomized to olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) or aripiprazole (15-30 mg/day). Change from baseline in non-HDL-C levels between groups was analyzed in the Observed Case (OC) dataset at each time point and Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) dataset at endpoint using analysis of covariance, with treatment as main effect and baseline non-HDL-C as covariate. Differences between groups in median changes from baseline in TG:HDL-C were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis tests.. This analysis included 546 patients (olanzapine, n=274; aripiprazole, n=272). Mean changes from baseline in non-HDL-C levels were significantly different (p<0.0001) with olanzapine versus aripiprazole at Weeks 26 (+13.0 versus -7.5 mg/dL) and 52 (+12.2 versus -8.1 mg/dL). Baseline TG:HDL-C was high in the olanzapine (3.73) and aripiprazole (3.79) groups. Differences in median changes from baseline in TG:HDL-C were significant with olanzapine versus aripiprazole at Weeks 26 (+0.22 versus -0.54; p<0.0001) and 52 (+0.24 versus -0.62; p=0.004).. Long-term aripiprazole treatment is associated with improvements in lipid profiles of schizophrenia patients versus no improvement or worsening during olanzapine treatment. Consideration of cardiovascular risk is needed when prescribing antipsychotics, as is close monitoring for metabolic changes during treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Lipoproteins; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

This study compared the sensitivity and tolerability of antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.. English-language literature from January 1966 to December 2006 cited in MEDLINE was searched for the terms antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotic, generic and brand names of antipsychotics, safety, tolerability, discontinuation due to adverse events, somnolence, and bipolar mania, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, manic-depressive illness, or schizophrenia, randomized, double blind, and controlled clinical trial.. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monotherapy studies of anti-psychotics in both bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were prioritized.. Absolute risk increase (ARI) or reduction (ARR) and the numbers needed to treat to harm (NNTH) or benefit (NNTB) for the discontinuation due to adverse events and somnolence relative to placebo were estimated.. Ten acute trials in mania, 3 in bipolar depression, and 8 in schizophrenia were identified, along with 2 maintenance studies in bipolar disorder and 2 in schizophrenia. In schizophrenia, ziprasidone caused significantly more discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with an NNTH of 19, while aripiprazole caused significantly fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with an NNTB of 12. In mania, there was no statistically significant difference in discontinuation due to adverse events between antipsychotics and placebo. However, in bipolar depression, both quetiapine and olanzapine caused more discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with NNTHs of 7 and 24, respectively. All atypical antipsychotics caused a significantly greater incidence of somnolence than placebo in mania and depression, with NNTHs from 5 to 8 for mania and 2 to 6 for depression. In schizophrenia, only olanzapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole (NNTHs from 5 to 14) caused a significantly higher incidence of somnolence. There was no significant difference between schizophrenia and mania in the discontinuation due to adverse events or somnolence of all studied antipsychotics. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events and somnolence caused by quetiapine in bipolar depression than that in schizophrenia or mania.. Patients with bipolar disorder appear more sensitive to antipsychotics, and depressed patients are less tolerant to somnolence than those with either mania or schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sleep Stages; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Several papers and communications have reported possible weight reduction or less weight gain when patients start or switch to orally disintegrating olanzapine, as contrasted with standard oral olanzapine tablets. In this paper, the current literature is reviewed and hypothesized mechanisms of action are discussed. The data are still preliminary and mechanisms of action are not well understood. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate change in weight during treatment with orally disintegrating olanzapine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Schizophrenia; Solubility; Tablets; Weight Gain

Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Topics: Acute Disease; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Irritable Mood; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Language; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Verbal Behavior

Treatment continuation, as measured by time to all-cause treatment discontinuation, is a broad measure of overall treatment effectiveness. This integrated analysis compared the likelihood of discontinuation from olanzapine treatment versus other antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia.. Clinical trials of all sponsors were included if they met the following criteria: double-blind, randomized, comparative; duration of 12 weeks or longer; no mandatory discontinuation before 12 weeks; and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; 20 patients or more per treatment. Weighted mean hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from discontinuation time. Meta-analyses were performed for the following comparators that had at least 2 studies: haloperidol (5 studies), risperidone (5 studies), ziprasidone (2 studies), clozapine (3 studies), and perphenazine (2 studies) (13 studies in total; 3 included more than 1 comparator). Only 1 eligible published study was found for fluphenazine, amisulpride, and quetiapine; therefore, meta-analyses could not be performed for these comparators.. Significantly (P < 0.05) greater likelihood of discontinuation relative to olanzapine treatment (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was observed for haloperidol (1.4 [1.2-1.7]), risperidone (1.3 [1.1-1.6]), ziprasidone (1.6 [1.4-2.0]), and quetiapine (1.4 [1.1-1.9]), but not clozapine (1.2 [0.9-1.6]), fluphenazine (1.8 [0.8-4.3]), perphenazine (1.3 [0.7-2.1]), or amisulpride (1.1 [0.8-1.6]).. These data suggest that patients with schizophrenia and related disorders may continue olanzapine treatment longer than haloperidol, risperidone, ziprasidone, or quetiapine treatment.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Dyslipidemias; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Mental Disorders; Obesity; Olanzapine; Phenothiazines; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Agitation can present as an emergency in the course of numerous psychiatric conditions including intoxication, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and delirium. This article reviews relevant literature regarding the definition, etiology, measurement, and management of episodic agitation and pays particular attention to intramuscular treatments. The impact of changes in methodology between the era of first- and second-generation antipsychotics, the implications of those changes for external validity of studies of second-generation studies, and the recent evolution of expert consensus are discussed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Emergencies; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychomotor Agitation; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The decision to stay with a treatment or switch to a different one depends on the balance between overall effectiveness, efficacy, and tolerability. One of the challenges with antipsychotic medication treatment of serious mental illness is the risk of weight gain, which can be considerable for some patients. This article reviews the issue of weight gain associated with antipsychotics and places it within the context of metabolic issues in general. The concept of "number needed to treat" is introduced to interpret the results of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness for schizophrenia, particularly to examine the balance between overall effectiveness, efficacy, and tolerability of the different antipsychotic treatments tested. Predictors of weight gain for olanzapine are reviewed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, as is a monitoring plan applicable for all patients receiving antipsychotic therapy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Most of the data evaluating the potential relationship between diabetes, schizophrenia, and anti-psychotics currently derive from retrospective analysis. Relevant confounders of such data include screening and selection bias. Prospective data collected from randomized controlled trials may reduce such biases. As no single trial has glucose comparisons as a primary endpoint, we undertook a systematic review of available data.. Embase, HealthStar, MEDLINE, Pre-MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases were searched online for relevant articles. Abstracts from major congresses held between January 2000 and April 2006 were included. Search terms included all currently available antipsychotics: olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and zotepine.. Prospective clinical trials involving schizophrenia patients with no stated previous glucose abnormalities randomly assigned to cohorts receiving active or placebo comparator antipsychotic medications were included with no restrictions on study length. 16 studies were from peer-reviewed publications, 4 were from posters at major congresses, and 2 were available only on Internet-based sites.. Glucose parameters reported included fasting and random glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin. Data reported included mean changes and categorical reports of abnormal levels.. Data were available in 6329 patients from 22 trials. The most common comparator agents were aripiprazole and olanzapine in 4 studies including 1432 patients. 14 studies reported fasting and 9 studies reported nonfasting data. 15 studies were a minimum of 5 months, with 8 studies of at least 1 year's duration. No consistent significant glucose differences were found between any comparator antipsychotics or placebo in any trial.. In contrast to some of the retrospective data, an analysis of prospective data from randomized clinical trials showed no consistent significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent glucose abnormalities in patients treated with antipsychotics. The reduction in both screening and selection biases may be relevant. Although one third of the studies had at least 1 year's duration, the data are not sufficient to reach conclusions regarding patients receiving longer-term treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Psychopharmacology; Receptor, Muscarinic M1; Retinoic Acid 4-Hydroxylase; Schizophrenia

To compare the efficacy and safety of the intramuscular formulations of ziprasidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole in treating agitation.. The pivotal registration trials were accessed by querying on-line literature and clinical trial databases. Pharmacovigilance data and posters were requested from the manufacturers. No date or language constraints were applied.. Nine double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials were identified.. Number needed to treat (NNT) for response to treatment for agitation and number needed to harm (NNH) for extrapyramidal effects were calculated from the study reports. Additional safety outcomes subject to NNH analysis were obtained from product labeling.. Using the a priori definitions of response at 2 hours after the first injection, NNT for response versus placebo (or placebo equivalent) in treating agitation for the pooled data at the recommended dose of ziprasidone 10-20 mg was 3 (95% CI = 2 to 4), for olanzapine 10 mg was 3 (95% CI = 2 to 3), and for aripiprazole 9.75 mg was 5 (95% CI = 4 to 8). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring during the pivotal trials revealed statistically significant NNH versus placebo (or placebo equivalent) for aripiprazole for headache (NNH = 20, 95% CI = 11 to 170) and nausea (NNH = 17, 95% CI = 11 to 38), for ziprasidone in the treatment of headache (NNH = 15, 95% CI = 8 to 703), and for olanzapine in treatment-emergent hypotension (NNH = 50, 95% CI = 30 to 154). Olanzapine and aripiprazole had a more favorable extrapyramidal side effect profile compared to haloperidol. (There was no haloperidol treatment arm in the ziprasidone studies.). Although the lowest NNT, and hence strongest therapeutic effect, was seen for the studies of ziprasidone and olanzapine as opposed to aripiprazole, head-to-head controlled studies directly comparing these 3 agents are needed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychomotor Agitation; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

This meta-analytic review examines the efficacy of antipsychotic medications in ameliorating schizophrenia-related long-term memory (LTM) impairments. Twenty-three studies were reviewed that compared schizophrenia spectrum patients treated (a) with atypical versus typical antipsychotic medications, or (b) with various atypical treatments. In 17 atypical versus typical trials aggregating 939 participants, superior overall (verbal and nonverbal) LTM was detected in patients assigned to atypical trials. However, this difference was small (effect size estimate (ES) 0.17; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.31) and specific to certain atypical treatments. Relative to typical antipsychotic trials, LTM superiority was marginally significant for risperidone trials (ES 0.20; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.44) and significant for olanzapine trials (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.49). In contrast, clozapine trials did not produce a LTM advantage over typical trials (ES -0.06; 95% CI -0.35 to 0.23). Due to the lack of available studies, the effect of quetiapine was indeterminate. Direct comparison between atypical trials revealed a similar effect pattern. A marginally significant superiority in overall LTM was detected for risperidone and olanzapine compared to clozapine (ES 0.28; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.59), which reached significance for verbal LTM (ES 0.36; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.67). Finally, the beneficial impact of antipsychotic medications emerged as a function of differences in the anticholinergic properties of the treatment arms being compared.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Memory Disorders; Olanzapine; Retention, Psychology; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

We obtain the posterior predictive distribution of transition probabilities between symptom severity states over time for patients with schizophrenia by (i) employing a Bayesian meta-analysis of published clinical trials and observational studies to estimate the posterior distribution of parameters that guide changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores over time and under the influence of various drugs and (ii) by propagating the variability from the posterior distributions of the parameters through a micro-simulation model that is formulated based on schizophrenia progression. Results show detailed differences among haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine in controlling various levels of severities of positive, negative and joint symptoms over time. For example, risperidone seems best in controlling severe positive symptoms while olanzapine is the worst in that during the first quarter of drug treatment; however, olanzapine seems to be best in controlling severe negative symptoms across all four quarters of treatment while haloperidol is the worst in this regard. These details may further serve to better estimate quality of life of patients and aid in resource utilization decisions in treating schizophrenic patients. In addition, consistent estimation of uncertainty in the time-profile parameters also has important implications for the practice of cost-effectiveness analysis and for future resource allocation policies in schizophrenia treatment.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzodiazepines; Computer Simulation; Decision Making; Haloperidol; Humans; Markov Chains; Models, Psychological; Monte Carlo Method; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Treatment-refractory early-onset schizophrenia is a rare but severe form of the disorder associated with poor premorbid function and long-term disability. The currently available evidence suggests that clozapine remains the most efficacious treatment for the amelioration of both positive and negative symptoms of the disorder and problematic aggressive behaviors. Clozapine use in children and adolescents, however, is limited by its association with hematologic adverse events and an increased frequency of seizure activity. Further studies are needed to examine the usefulness of antipsychotic combinations and of augmentation therapies to antipsychotic medications in order to treat persistent residual psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents who have schizophrenia and who have not responded to several sequential trials of antipsychotic monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clozapine; Drug Resistance; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Previous research on pharmacotherapy with conventional antipsychotics has suggested that patients with affective disorders have higher rates of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than patients with schizophrenia. It is not known whether this differential vulnerability holds true for treatment with atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine. The present analysis retrospectively examined olanzapine clinical trial data for incidence of treatment-emergent EPS in patients with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.. Study participants were 4417 patients meeting DSM-III or DSM-IV criteria for either schizophrenia or bipolar mania participating in olanzapine clinical trials through July 31, 2001. Data were pooled across haloperidol-controlled trials and separately across placebo-controlled trials. Measures of EPS included rates of treatment-emergent EPS adverse event by type (i.e., dystonic, parkinsonian, or residual), Simpson-Angus Scale score mean change, rates of treatment-emergent parkinsonism, and rates of anticholinergic use.. Consistent with prior research, haloperidol-treated patients with bipolar disorder appeared to be more vulnerable to the development of EPS than those with schizophrenia. However, olanzapine-treated patients with bipolar disorder were no more likely to develop EPS than those with schizophrenia.. Results support previous research regarding conventional antipsychotics and suggest that olanzapine therapy does not increase the risk of EPS for patients with bipolar disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Cholinergic Antagonists; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Incidence; Male; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

In many parts of the world, second-generation antipsychotics have largely replaced typical antipsychotics as the treatment of choice for schizophrenia. Consequently, trials comparing two drugs of this class--so-called head-to-head studies--are gaining in relevance. The authors reviewed results of head-to-head studies of second-generation antipsychotics funded by pharmaceutical companies to determine if a relationship existed between the sponsor of the trial and the drug favored in the study's overall outcome.. The authors identified head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics through a MEDLINE search for the period from 1966 to September 2003 and identified additional head-to-head studies from selected conference proceedings for the period from 1999 to February 2004. The abstracts of all studies fully or partly funded by pharmaceutical companies were modified to mask the names and doses of the drugs used in the trial, and two physicians blinded to the study sponsor reviewed the abstracts and independently rated which drug was favored by the overall outcome measures. Two authors who were not blinded to the study sponsor reviewed the entire report of each study for sources of bias that could have affected the results in favor of the sponsor's drug.. Of the 42 reports identified by the authors, 33 were sponsored by a pharmaceutical company. In 90.0% of the studies, the reported overall outcome was in favor of the sponsor's drug. This pattern resulted in contradictory conclusions across studies when the findings of studies of the same drugs but with different sponsors were compared. Potential sources of bias occurred in the areas of doses and dose escalation, study entry criteria and study populations, statistics and methods, and reporting of results and wording of findings.. Some sources of bias may limit the validity of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics. Because most of the sources of bias identified in this review were subtle rather than compelling, the clinical usefulness of future trials may benefit from minor modifications to help avoid bias. The authors make a number of concrete suggestions for ways in which potential sources of bias can be addressed by study initiators, peer reviewers of studies under consideration for publication, and readers of published studies.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bias; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Industry; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Publication Bias; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Research Support as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Obesity is highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia and is associated with detrimental health consequences. Although excessive consumption of fast food and pharmacotherapy with such second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs) as clozapine and olanzapine has been implicated in the schizophrenia/obesity comorbidity, the pathophysiology of this link remains unclear. Here, we propose a mechanism based on brain reward function, a relevant etiologic factor in both schizophrenia and overeating. A comprehensive literature search on neurobiology of schizophrenia and of eating behavior was performed. The collected articles were critically reviewed and relevant data were extracted and summarized within four key areas: (1) energy homeostasis, (2) food reward and hedonics, (3) reward function in schizophrenia, and (4) metabolic effects of the SGAs. A mesolimbic hyperdopaminergic state may render motivational/incentive reward system insensitive to low salience/palatability food. This, together with poor cognitive control from hypofunctional prefrontal cortex and enhanced hedonic impact of food, owing to exaggerated opioidergic drive (clinically manifested as pain insensitivity), may underlie unhealthy eating habits in patients with schizophrenia. Treatment with SGAs purportedly improves dopamine-mediated reward aspects, but at the cost of increased appetite and worsened or at least not improved opiodergic capacity. These effects can further deteriorate eating patterns. Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications of these insights need further validation via prospective clinical trials and neuroimaging studies.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Eating; Energy Metabolism; Humans; Neurobiology; Olanzapine; Reward; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic medication is a mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia. Risperidone and olanzapine are popular choices among the new generation drugs.. To determine the clinical effects, safety and cost effectiveness of risperidone compared with olanzapine for treating schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (Sept 2005) which is based on regular searches of, amongst others, BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. References of all identified studies were inspected for further trials. We also contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies for additional information.. We included all clinical randomised trials comparing risperidone with olanzapine for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/H) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).. We found no difference for the outcome of unchanged or worse in the short term (n=548, 2 RCTs, RR 1.00 CI 0.88 to 1.15). One study favoured olanzapine for the outcome of relapse/rehospitalisation by 12 months (n=279, 1 RCT, RR 2.16 CI 1.31 to 3.54, NNH 7 CI 3 to 25). Most mental state data showed the two drugs to be as effective as each other (n=552, 2 RCTs, RR 'no <20% decrease PANSS by eight weeks' 1.01 CI 0.87 to 1.16). Both drugs commonly cause adverse events: 75% given either drug experience an adverse event; 20% anticholinergic symptoms; both groups experienced insomnia although it was more frequent with risperidone (n=1588, 5 RCTs, RR 1.41 CI 1.15 to 1.72, NNH 15 CI 9 to 41); about 30% experienced sleepiness (n=1713, 6 RCTs, RR 0.92 CI 0.79 to 1.07). People given either drug often experienced some extrapyramidal symptoms (n=893, 3 RCTs, RR 1.18 CI 0.75 to 1.88); 25% of people using risperidone required medication to alleviate these symptoms (n=419, 2 RCTs, RR 1.76 CI 1.25 to 2.48, NNH 8 CI 4 to 25). People allocated to risperidone were less likely to gain weight compared with those given olanzapine and the weight gain was often considerable and of quick onset (n=984, 2 RCTs, RR gain more than 7% of their baseline weight in short term 0.47 CI 0.36 to 0.61, NNH 7 CI 6 to 10). Risperidone participants were less likely to leave the study due to metabolic side effects and weight gain compared with olanzapine (n=667, 1RCT, RR 0.19 CI 0.08 to 0.45). Patients on risperidone were more likely to experience abnormal ejaculation (n=370, 2 RCTs, RR 4.36 CI 1.38 to 13.76, NNH 20 CI 6 to 176). Both drugs are associated with high attrition rates; in the long term consistent findings show that 66% of those allocated risperidone left the study early compared with 56% given olanzapine (n=1440, 5 RCTs, RR 1.17 CI 1.08 to 1.27, NNH 11 CI 7 to 23).. We know very little of the effects of these drugs regarding service outcomes, general functioning and behaviours, engagement with services and treatment satisfaction from evaluative studies. There was generally a high rate of attrition in the trials and there appears to be little to differentiate between risperidone and olanzapine except on issues of adverse effects. Both drugs are associated with a reduction in psychotic symptoms but both commonly cause unpleasant adverse effects.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic, approved for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Despite the publicity regarding reported adverse events with the novel antipsychotics, such as weight gain and Type II diabetes mellitus, olanzapine remains a useful and important medicine. It is a selective monoaminergic antagonist with high-affinity binding to a number of receptors thought to be implicated in some psychotic and mood symptoms. The complex pharmacology of olanzapine has lead to studies exploring its use in treating substance abuse, aggression/violence, borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and as a neuroprotective agent in schizophrenia. As the pharmacology of olanzapine and other novel antipsychotics becomes better understood, future effective treatment strategies are likely to match an individual's genetic makeup and receptor profiles to the most compatible agent.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Up to 40 % of patients with schizophrenic psychosis suffer from symptoms that are resistant to monotherapy with antipsychotic drugs. As a consequence, combined approaches are often used, especially based on clozapine and olanzapine. This review aims to provide a critical overview on olanzapine-augmentations.. A systematic database search including generic and trade names of antipsychotic substances as well as general items such as "augmentation" and "combination" was performed in Medline and BIOSIS (OVID) until May 2005.. Amongst a number of 16 reports dealing with 9 different antipsychotic augmentation strategies (85 patients) only sulpiride was tested in a randomized manner. A significant part of the treatments achieved favourable results. In contrast, augmentations of olanzapine with antidepressants or mood stabilizers were evaluated in well-designed clinical trials (9 strategies, 10 publications, 837 patients). Improvements of positive and/or negative symptoms as well as depressed mood were reported.. The empirical basis to combine olanzapine with antipsychotic substances has to be improved in order to evaluate benefits and risks. Augmentations with mood stabilizers were successful, for example on hostility, showing that randomized and placebo-controlled trials are feasible.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The etiopathogenesis, risk factors and indications for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with schizophrenia are presented. Accelerated decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) is mostly attributed to antypsychotics (drug-induced hyperprolactinemia and decrease in levels of estrogen and testosterone), insufficient calcium intake, low physical activity and limited exposure to sunshine, alcohol and tobacco intake, polidypsia. Clinical symptoms of osteoporosis (eg. vertebral fractures) develop very slowly and in patients with schizophrenia are very rarely diagnosed. Many of risk factors (especially adequate choice of pharamcotherapy and monitoring of BMD) might be prevented in order to decrease the prevalence of osteoporosis in population of patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bone Density; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Osteoporosis; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic treatment discontinuation can be used to measure overall treatment effectiveness. Our goal was to investigate differential treatment discontinuation comparing olanzapine with other atypical antipsychotics. A post hoc pooled analysis of 4 randomized, double-blind, 24- to 28-week schizophrenia clinical trials included 822 olanzapine-treated and 805 risperidone-, quetiapine-, or ziprasidone-treated patients. A checklist was used to record the reason for discontinuation. Treatment differences were assessed between olanzapine and the other 3 antipsychotics combined. Poor response/symptom worsening was the primary reason for discontinuation, regardless of medication. The rate of discontinuation due to poor response/symptom worsening significantly varied by treatment (olanzapine, 14.23%, vs. other atypical antipsychotics, 24.60%; P < 0.0001). The rate of discontinuation due to intolerability of medication did not significantly vary by treatment (olanzapine, 5.60%, vs. other atypical antipsychotics, 7.45%; P = 0.13). Consequent to the differential rates of discontinuation due to poor response/symptom worsening, the olanzapine-treated patients experienced a significantly greater likelihood of overall treatment completion (53.9% vs. 39.3%; P < 0.001) and a significantly longer duration of treatment (19.1 vs. 16.1 weeks; P < 0.0001) than other atypical-treated patients. The predominant reason for the significantly lower discontinuation rate of treatment for patients taking olanzapine compared with that of patients taking other atypical antipsychotics was the significantly higher dropout rates in other atypical antipsychotics because of poor response/symptom worsening.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation antipsychotics make up one of the fastest growing segments of the rapidly growing pharmaceutical sector. Given limited health care resources, assessment of the value for the cost of second-generation antipsychotics relative to first-generation antipsychotics is critical for resource-allocation decisions.. With a MEDLINE search, the authors identified eight studies (based on six randomized clinical trials) that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics relative to first-generation antipsychotics in individuals with schizophrenia disorders. The authors reviewed appropriate methods of measurement, analysis, and design of cost-effectiveness studies in randomized clinical trials and evaluated the validity of economic results derived from the studies in light of appropriate methods.. The eight randomized clinical trial-based cost-effectiveness studies of antipsychotic medications faced a variety of threats to validity related to 1) measurement of costs, 2) measurement of effectiveness, 3) analysis of costs, 4) measurement of sampling uncertainty, 5) analysis of incomplete cost data, 6) minimizing loss to follow-up, and 7) threats to external validity.. Economic claims made by the authors of a number of trial-based economic evaluations have generally been favorable to second-generation antipsychotics. However, the methodological issues the authors of the current study identified suggest that there is no clear evidence that atypical antipsychotics generate cost savings or are cost-effective in general use among all schizophrenia patients. Psychiatrists, researchers, and administrators should consider the methodological issues highlighted in interpreting study results. These issues should be addressed in future trial designs.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Costs and Cost Analysis; Drug Costs; Health Care Costs; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Resource Allocation; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Thirty years ago, psychiatrists had only a few choices of old neuroleptics available to them, currently defined as conventional or typical antipsychotics, as a result schizophrenics had to suffer the severe extra pyramidal side effects. Nowadays, new treatments are more ambitious, aiming not only to improve psychotic symptoms, but also quality of life and social reinsertion. Our objective is to briefly but critically review the advances in the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in the past 30 years. We conclude that conventional antipsychotics still have a place when just the cost of treatment, a key factor in poor regions, is considered. The atypical antipsychotic drugs are a class of agents that have become the most widely used to treat a variety of psychoses because of their superiority with regard to extra pyramidal symptoms. We can envisage different therapeutic strategies in the future, each uniquely targeting a different dimension of schizophrenia, be it positive, negative, cognitive or affective symptoms.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Agitation is common in patients with acute schizophrenia or bipolar mania, and when severe can result in aggressive or violent behaviour. Pharmacotherapy for acute psychotic agitation includes the use of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine drugs, either alone or in combination. Although oral treatment is preferred, options in the pharmacotherapy of acute agitation include the parenteral administration of antipsychotics in order to facilitate onset of drug action and quickly alleviate symptoms. Until recently only conventional antipsychotic and benzodiazepine drugs were available as intramuscular injections. Olanzapine has been one of the first atypical antipsychotics available for intramuscular administration. Four randomized placebo and comparator controlled , double-blind clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of olanzapine in reducing acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar mania and Alzheimer and vascular dementia. Evidence from these clinical trials has shown that IM olanzapine associated with faster onset of action and more favorable profile of adverse events, than monotherapy with IM haloperidol. Current clinical experience and one naturalistic study with intramuscular olanzapine suggest that it is efficacious and can be safely used in "real world" patients with severe agitation. Intramuscular olanzapine have shown ease of transition to same agent oral therapy once the acute agitation has diminished. The orally disintegrating tablet formulation of olanzapine was effective rapidly reducing psychopathology, while improving medication compliance, attitudes and behaviours. This new formulation of olanzapine may offer an alternative strategy in the treatment of acutely ill, noncompliant schizophrenic patients. Evidence suggests that the new formulations of olanzapine should be among the first-line choices in the treatment of agitation in acute psychosis.. olanzapine, intramuscular, orally disintegrating tablet, agitation, psychosis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Dementia; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Drug Tolerance; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Time Factors

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia and a major impediment to social and vocational rehabilitation. A number of studies have claimed cognitive benefits from treatment with various atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs). The currently available evidence supporting cognitive improvement with atypical APDs was evaluated in two meta-analyses. Studies that (1) prospectively examined cognitive change to the atypical APDs clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, (2) included a commonly used neuropsychological test, and (3) provided data from which relevant effect sizes could be calculated, were included. Forty-one studies met these criteria. Neuropsychological test data from each study were combined into a Global Cognitive Index and nine cognitive domain scores. Two meta-analyses were carried out. The first included 14 controlled, random assignment trials that assigned subjects to an atypical APD and a typical APD control arm. The second analysis included all prospective investigations of atypical treatment and the within-group change score divided by its standard deviation served as an estimate of effect size (ES). The first analysis revealed that atypicals are superior to typicals at improving overall cognitive function (ES=0.24). Specific improvements were observed in the learning and processing speed domains. The second analysis extended the improvements to a broader range of cognitive domains (ES range=0.17-0.46) and identified significant differences between treatments in attention and verbal fluency. Moderator variables such as study blind and random assignment influence results of cognitive change to atypical APDs. Atypical antipsychotics produce a mild remediation of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, and specific atypicals have differential effects within certain cognitive domains.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; MEDLINE; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic reported to be effective without producing disabling extrapyramidal adverse effects associated with older, typical antipsychotic drugs.. To determine the clinical effects and safety of olanzapine compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophreniform psychoses.. We updated the first search [Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), PsycLIT (1974-1999) and The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 2000)] in October 2004 using the Cochrane Schizophrenia's Group's register of trials. We also searched references of all included studies for further trials, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors.. We included all randomised clinical trials comparing olanzapine with placebo or any antipsychotic treatment for people with schizophrenia or schizophreniform psychoses.. We independently extracted data and, for homogeneous dichotomous data, calculated the random effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the number needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data we calculated weighted mean differences.. Fifty five trials are included (total n>10000 people with schizophrenia). Attrition from olanzapine versus placebo studies was >50% by six weeks, leaving interpretation of results problematic. Olanzapine appeared superior to placebo at six weeks for the outcome of 'no important clinical response' (any dose, 2 RCTs n=418, RR 0.88 CI 0.8 to 0.1, NNT 8 CI 5 to 27). Although dizziness and dry mouth were reported more frequently in the olanzapine-treated group, this did not reach statistical significance. The olanzapine group gained more weight. When compared with typical antipsychotic drugs, data from several small trials are incomplete. With high attrition in both groups (14 RCTs, n=3344, 38% attrition by six weeks, RR 0.81 CI 0.65 to 1.02) the assumptions included in all data are considerable. For the short term outcome of 'no important clinical response', olanzapine seems as effective as typical antipsychotics (4 RCTs, n=2778, RR 0.90 CI 0.76 to 1.06). People allocated olanzapine experienced fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than those given typical antipsychotics. Weight change data for the short term are not statistically significant but results between three to 12 months suggest a clinically important average gain of four kilograms for people given olanzapine (4 RCTs, n=186, WMD 4.62, CI 0.6 to 8.64). Twenty three percent of people in trials of olanzapine and other atypical drugs left by eight weeks; 48% by three to12 months (11 RCTs, n=1847, RR 0.91 CI 0.82 to 1.00). There is little to choose between the atypicals, although olanzapine may cause fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than other drugs in this category. Olanzapine produces more weight gain than other atypicals with some differences reaching conventional levels of statistical significance (1 RCT, n=980, RR gain at 2 years 1.73 CI 1.49 to 2.00, NNH 5 CI 4 to 7). There are very few data for people with first episode illness (1 RCT, duration 6 weeks, n=42). For people with treatment-resistant illness there were no clear differences between olanzapine and clozapine (4 RCTs, n=457).. The large proportion of participants leaving studies early in these trials makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on olanzapine's clinical effects. For people with schizophrenia it may offer antipsychotic efficacy with fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than typical drugs, but more weight gain. There is a need for further large, long-term randomised trials with more comprehensive data.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic medication is a mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia and risperidone and olanzapine are the most popular treatment choice of the new generation drugs.. To determine the clinical effects, safety and cost effectiveness of risperidone compared with olanzapine for treating schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 2004) which is based on regular searches of, amongst others, BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. References of all identified studies were inspected for further trials. We also contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies for additional information.. We included all clinical randomised trials comparing risperidone with olanzapine for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/H) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).. We found no difference for the outcome of unchanged or worse in the short term (n=548, 2 RCTs, RR 1.00 CI 0.88 to 1.15). One study, sponsored by the manufactures of olanzapine, favoured this drug for the outcome of relapse/rehospitalisation by 12 months (n=279, RR 2.16 CI 1.31 to 3.54, NNT 7 CI 4 to 25). Most mental state data showed the two drugs to as effective as each other (n=552, 2 RCTs, RR 'no <20% decrease PANSS by eight weeks' 1.01 CI 0.87 to 1.16). At least two thirds of people given risperidone or olanzapine experienced an adverse event (n=300, 2 RCTs, RR 1.16 CI 0.70 to 1.94). About 20% had anticholinergic symptoms (n=719, 3 RCTs, RR 1.12 CI 0.77 to 1.63) and 20% of both groups experienced insomnia (n=594, 3 RCTs, RR 1.33 CI 0.95 to 1.85) and approximately 33% sleepiness (n=719, 4 RCTs, 0.99 CI 0.79 to 1.23). One third of people given either drug experienced some extrapyramidal symptoms (n=893, 3 RCTs, RR 1.18 CI 0.75 to 1.88) but 25% of people using risperidone require medication to alleviate extrapyramidal adverse effects (n=419, 2 RCTs, RR 1.76 CI 1.25 to 2.48, NNH 8 CI 4 to 25). People allocated to risperidone were less likely to gain weight compared with those given olanzapine and the weight gain resulting from olanzapine can be considerable and of rapid onset (n=377, 1 RCT, RR gain more than 7% of their baseline weight 0.40 CI 0.23 to 0.70, NNT 8 CI 6 to 17). Risperidone may cause more sexual dysfunction than olanzapine (n=370, 2 RCTs, RR abnormal ejaculation 4.36 CI 1.38 to 13.76, NNH 20 CI 6 to 176; n=31, 1 RCT, RR impotence 2.43 CI 0.24 to 24.07). Within trials both drugs are associated with equal attrition (n=1217, 7 RCTs, RR leaving the study early 1.17 CI 0.92 to 1.49).. Data regarding quality of life and economic outcomes are difficult to interpret, and for both these highly marketed new drugs we know very little from evaluative studies regarding service outcomes, general functioning and behaviour, engagement with services and treatment satisfaction. There is little to differentiate between risperidone and olanzapine except on the issue of adverse effects and both these drugs have unpleasant adverse effects. Risperidone is particularly associated with movement disorders and sexual dysfunction. Olanzapine can cause considerable rapid weight gain.This review highlights the need for large, independent, well designed, conducted and reported pragmatic randomised studies.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have historical, clinical, and epidemiological links. The clinical use of atypical neuroleptics (ie, dual serotonin-dopamine antagonists) to treat both conditions sheds a new light on them. We report the first two cases of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) induced by quetiapine in schizophrenia patients. A case of successful augmentation by quetiapine in refractory OCD is also presented. A review of the literature on OCS induced by atypical neuroleptics follows. This paradoxically induced OCD symptomology in schizophrenia patients administered atypical neuroleptics is discussed from new pathophysiological and clinical perspectives. The discussion emphasizes the prognostic implications of OCS in schizophrenia and available therapies for this comorbidity.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Male; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics, including olanzapine, have been associated with clinically significant weight gain in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if weight gain was associated with increasing plasma concentrations during olanzapine treatment in subjects with schizophrenia. This study included 39 acutely ill subjects with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder (DSM-III-R or DSM-IV). Assessments included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and weight measurements. Olanzapine was titrated to a dose of 5 to 20 mg/d for 2 to 6 weeks. A 24-hour plasma concentration was obtained after 6 weeks of treatment. Analysis using a receiver operator characteristic curve identified a threshold dose-weighted plasma concentration of 20.6 ng/mL being associated with an increased likelihood of clinically significant weight gain (> or =7% baseline weight) during olanzapine treatment. The associations remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, baseline body mass index, baseline symptom severity, and symptom improvement (OR = 10.1; 95% CI, 1.3-75.0; P = 0.024). Similar analysis determined that a threshold olanzapine dose of 13.3 mg/d was associated with > or =7% weight gain. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the results did not remain significant. The association of weight gain with plasma concentrations during treatment with olanzapine may support the utilization of plasma drug concentration as a marker for antipsychotic-induced weight gain in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Confidence Intervals; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Risperidone and olanzapine are novel antipsychotic medications that compete as first-line agents in treating patients with schizophrenia. The objective of this paper is to review the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and cost of risperidone versus olanzapine. We reviewed both randomised and peer-reviewed non-randomised head-to-head (olanzapine versus risperidone) studies in populations with schizophrenia. The studies were selected through a MEDLINE search. Risperidone and olanzapine provide control of positive, negative and global symptoms of schizophrenia. Each drug has a distinct adverse effect profile. Five randomised trials comparing risperidone with olanzapine suggested grossly similar efficacy in the first 2 months of treatment, with some results indicating advantages for olanzapine over the longer term. Only two of the trials included measures of service utilisation. One had 28-week follow-up, and the other followed patients for 12 months but had small sample sizes. Both experimental and naturalistic studies indicated that the acquisition cost of olanzapine is about 50% greater than for risperidone at dose levels commonly used for the treatment of schizophrenia. The only experiment with 12-month total treatment cost data found essentially equivalent costs for patients assigned to olanzapine or risperidone, showing that there are circumstances where total cost is similar in spite of the higher drug acquisition cost of olanzapine. Most retrospective studies also reported comparable total cost. Few studies gave enough information to evaluate cost effectiveness. The clear difference in acquisition cost of these two medications was rarely reflected in overall treatment cost in the studies we reviewed. Overall, our review of the literature highlights that there is inadequate evidence to distinguish the relative total cost of care associated with risperidone versus olanzapine, although accumulating evidence suggests the difference is small. This population-based conclusion does not indicate which medication is more costly or more cost effective for a particular patient; this depends on each patient's response to each medication.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Costs and Cost Analysis; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

It is difficult to determine the relative efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia, based on the available literature. The purpose of this article is to review and compare the efficacy of two atypical antipsychotics: olanzapine and ziprasidone.This review focused on randomised trials in which these two antipsychotics were compared with placebo, conventional antipsychotics and each other. Common efficacy measures were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. When sufficient data were available, the mean treatment effect (with 95% confidence intervals) was computed and presented. Olanzapine was consistently found to be significantly superior to placebo and comparable with, or superior to, haloperidol for the treatment of overall, positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms. Ziprasidone appears to have significantly greater efficacy than placebo for overall and negative symptoms, but it remains uncertain whether ziprasidone is comparable in efficacy with conventional antipsychotics such as haloperidol. Two unpublished clinical trials have directly compared olanzapine and ziprasidone. One of these trials found no significant efficacy differences between the two drugs, whereas the results of the other study favoured olanzapine. Compared with ziprasidone, olanzapine has a larger body of evidence supporting its efficacy, and a greater proportion of findings for olanzapine have been published, allowing for greater scrutiny of results. Both drugs appear to be superior to placebo for the treatment of overall and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but olanzapine generally compares more favourably with conventional antipsychotics. Firm conclusions regarding the comparison between olanzapine and ziprasidone require additional published trials on ziprasidone, particularly in direct comparison with olanzapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The purpose of this review is to critically review the current literature on olanzapine with an emphasis on emergent themes and key findings in the use of this agent for the treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia. New information continues to emerge on the impact of olanzapine on schizophrenia and on aspects of the course of mood disorders. There are also continued efforts to understand, predict and manage the side-effect risk with olanzapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Up to 40% of patients with schizophrenic psychoses have symptoms that are resistant to monotherapy with antipsychotic drugs. In consequence, combinations of drugs are often used, especially based on the antipsychotic agents clozapine and olanzapine because of their broad receptor-interaction profile. The aim of this review was to provide a critical overview of the published results of olanzapine augmentation.. A systematic database search was performed of MEDLINE and BIOSIS (Ovid), looking for publications on augmented therapeutic approaches involving olanzapine. The search terms used were "augmentation," "combination," "schizophrenia," "olanzapine," and the names of other antipsychotic drugs and non-antipsychotic agents, including brand names, spanning publications from 1966 until the end of December 2004.. Of 14 reports dealing with 8 different antipsychotic augmentation strategies (83 patients), only 1 trial, of sulpiride-olanzapine therapy, was performed in a randomized manner. Based on clinical observation, a significant number of the treatments led to favourable results. In contrast to adjuvant therapy with antipsychotic drugs, augmentation of olanzapine with glycine, antidepressants or mood stabilizers was evaluated in well-designed clinical trials (8 publications, 989 patients), with distinct improvements of positive and/or negative symptoms reported.. The combination of olanzapine with antidopaminergic atypical antipsychotic agents seems to follow a neurobiological rationale. The augmentation trials with non-antipsychotic agents, for example, mood stabilizers, were successful and showed that randomized and placebo-controlled trials are feasible. Therefore, systematic evaluations of antipsychotic agents as adjuvant therapy are possible as well as necessary to determine the benefits and risks of any new treatment strategy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

Tardive dyskinesia (TD), the principal adverse effect of long-term conventional antipsychotic treatment, can be debilitating and, in many cases, persistent. We sought to explore the incidence and management of TD in the era of atypical antipsychotics because it remains an important iatrogenic adverse effect.. We conducted a review of TD incidence and management literature from January 1, 1965, to January 31, 2004, using the terms tardive dyskinesia, management, therapy, neuroleptics, antipsychotics, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of relevant references. We considered articles that contributed to the current understanding of both the incidence of TD with atypical antipsychotics and management strategies for TD.. The incidence of TD is significantly lower with atypical, compared with typical, antipsychotics, but cases of de novo TD have been identified. Evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic therapy ameliorates long-standing TD. This paper outlines management strategies for TD in patients with schizophrenia.. The literature supports the recommendation that atypical antipsychotics should be the first antipsychotics used in patients who have experienced TD as a result of treatment with conventional antipsychotic agents. The other management strategies discussed may prove useful in certain patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Incidence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Stopping antipsychotic treatment can interrupt improvement and exacerbate the illness. The reasons for discontinuing treatment during controlled clinical trials were analyzed to explore this phenomenon.. A post-hoc, pooled analysis was made of 4 randomized, double-blind clinical trials, 24-28 weeks in duration, involving 1627 patients with schizophrenia or a related disorder. Analyses combined all the atypical antipsychotic treatment groups in the studies.. The majority of patients (53%) stopped their treatment at an early stage. Poor psychiatric response along with worsening symptoms was the most frequently given reason for discontinuing the course (36%), which was substantially more common than discontinuation due to poor tolerability of the medication (12%). This phenomenon was corroborated by less improvement in patients who discontinued treatment compared with those who completed, based on the PANSS total scores. Discontinuation due to poor response was, apparently, more predominantly linked to patient perception than to physicians' conclusions alone (80% vs. 20%). Discontinuation due to patient perception of poor response appeared to occur particularly early in the course of treatment. Patients who discontinued due to poor toleration of the medication responded in a more comparable manner with completers.. Discontinuing treatment may lead to exacerbation of symptoms, undermining therapeutic progress. In these studies, poor response to treatment and worsening of underlying psychiatric symptoms, and to a lesser extent, intolerability to medication were the primary contributors to treatment being discontinued. Our findings suggest that adherence may be enhanced by effective symptom control, as objectively measured and as subjectively perceived. Such strategies may improve patients' willingness to undertake long-term therapy and increase the likelihood of a better prognosis.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Failure; Treatment Refusal

To review the literature on the healthcare costs associated with olanzapine and risperidone in treating schizophrenia.. Published English-language pharmacoeconomic studies on olanzapine and risperidone obtained through a MEDLINE search (1990-May 2003) were selected. Additional studies were identified from a manual search of the references of retrieved articles. data extraction: Based on the identified studies, data were extracted on various treatment costs associated with the use of antipsychotic drugs, concomitant drugs from other classes, inpatient care, outpatient care, and emergency care. Emphasis was placed on studies directly comparing olanzapine and risperidone.. Both olanzapine and risperidone were generally associated with a trend of decrease in total medical costs compared with typical antipsychotics. When directly comparing the drugs, some studies found significant cost savings in favor of olanzapine and some suggested risperidone to save total costs. Still others showed no significant difference in total costs between the 2 drug regimens.. While both olanzapine and risperidone appear to be more cost saving than typical antipsychotics, the literature offers no conclusive evidence to determine the comparative advantage of one versus another in terms of total cost outcomes. Major factors that contribute to the inconclusive findings may include across-study variations in populations, design, outcome measures, dosage, severity of illness, inclusion criteria, and statistical methodologies.

Topics: Benzodiazepines; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Humans; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; United States

During the last few years, several case reports and studies have been published on the potential diabetes mellitus (DM)-inducing effect of some atypical antipsychotics, especially clozapine and olanzapine. The purpose of our study was to evaluate diabetogenic effects of atypical antipsychotics in the literature. In order to give a full-scale overview, both peer-reviewed publications and oral and poster presentations on this subject were screened. We found 27 case reports of new-onset DM for clozapine, 39 for olanzapine, 4 for risperidone, and 3 for quetiapine. Related to the year of introduction of these drugs on the market and the number of treatment days of each drug during the last 6 years in 13 western countries, Brazil, and Japan, the cases show an over-representation of cases related to olanzapine and clozapine. In the majority of cases, risk factors (DM family history, obesity, Negroid ethnicity) were present. Eighty-four percent of the cases arose in patients < 50 years, in contrast to the general population (most cases, > 50 years). Comparative epidemiological studies point in the same direction, with two studies showing no differences between the atypical drugs. Antipsychotic agents are used often for treatment of schizophrenia, a condition that appears to be associated with DM also in untreated subjects. Some antipsychotics appear to induce new-onset diabetes mellitus. In view of the health risks of DM and the predisposition in patients with schizophrenia, it is advised to be cautious with prescription of antipsychotics that are associated with new-onset DM. Especially in predisposed patients (family history of DM, obese, Negroid ethnicity), reticence in this respect is required. Moreover, careful monitoring of weight, BMI, and glucose levels is advised both before these antipsychotics are prescribed and during treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The development of new "atypical" antipsychotic agents, which are safer than classical neuroleptics and also active against the negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits caused by the illness, has produced a significant advancement in the treatment of schizophrenia. The atypical (or "second generation") antipsychotics have several therapeutical properties in common, however they can significantly differ with regard to clinical potency and side effects. The main features regarding pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological interactions of the most important atypical antipsychotics, namely clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, are treated herein. Several analytical methods available for the therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs are also presented, as well as the novel formulations, which can notably improve the therapy of schizophrenia. Other very recent atypical agents, such as ziprasidone, aripiprazole, iloperidone, sertindole and zotepine will also be briefly described.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Molecular Structure; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Undoubtedly, the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia has changed dramatically over the last 10 years. Large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have ushered the availability of each new antipsychotic. However, there has been an information lag because of the relative paucity of long term, comparative studies among second-generation antipsychotics. While we await such evidence, naturalistic studies have helped to provide useful information on the pattern of use, patient response, and tolerability of these new agents in clinical practice. This review provides an account of representative studies for each second generation antipsychotic, which illustrate the contributions of naturalistic studies to our understanding of the evolving pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Polypharmacy; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The first compounds showing efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was chlorpromazine, an anti-histaminic compound casually observed to possess antipsychotic effects. The discovery of the real mechanism of action of antipsychotic substances dates back to the 1960s, when researchers found that these compounds act as dopamine receptor antagonists. Unfortunately, this type of drugs cannot block the D2 receptors only in the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway (which mediates their therapeutic effects), because of their non-selective D2 receptor blockage in both the mesolimbic and striatal regions, and the consequent appearance of side effects related to striatal interaction in the same dosage range as is needed for the therapeutical effects. Clozapine, discovered in the early 1970s, seemed to represent the solution to contrast these side effects, as it possesses antipsychotic activity without inducing extrapyramidal disorders in humans or catalepsy in rats; for this reason, it was defined as an "atypical" antipsychotic drug. Later, other beneficial properties, such as improvement of negative symptoms and of cognitive dysfunction and efficacy in neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia, were included in the definition of "atypical". In recent years, the appearance of new atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone) has opened new ways to therapy. The aim of this paper is to review literature about newer antipsychotics, focusing on their advantages in terms of efficacy and side effect profiles when compared to classical and older atypical antipsychotics, and to evaluate the efficacy of the different new antipsychotics when compared to one another.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Second generation antipsychotics have become the standard of modern pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Amisulprid, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindol, ziprasidone are the second generation antipsychotics registered in Hungary. They are more efficacious and their side effects are less stigmatizing than those of the first generation of antipsychotic drugs. Their use is limited by the availability of different formulations, by the lack of experience of some physicians, however the main limitation is the economic barrier.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

We sought to develop and validate an excitement subscale from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to allow the investigation of mania-like excitement symptoms in clinical trials of patients with schizophrenia using the PANSS and to provide clinicians with a short assessment tool for these states.. Baseline PANSS data from six double-blind, randomized registration trials of olanzapine, three in schizophrenia and three in acute bipolar mania, were used in these post-hoc analyses. Schizophrenia study data were pooled and randomly split in half. Exploratory principal component factor analysis was performed on half of the data. Factors were extracted based on minimum eigenvalue criteria (eigenvalue> or =1); loadings were determined using an equamax rotation. Confirmatory principal component factor analysis was performed on the other half of the data, retaining the original number of factors. Principal component factor analysis was also done for the pooled bipolar studies. Change in the new mania-like factor scores was then correlated with Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) scores in each bipolar study.. Exploratory principal components analysis on the pooled schizophrenia data extracted five factors: negative, positive, excitement, cognitive, and depressive factors. The mania-like excitement factor was represented by four items (uncooperativeness, poor impulse control, excitement, and hostility), with only moderate loadings by tension and suspiciousness/persecution. Results were similar in the confirmatory analysis and the pooled bipolar studies. Change from baseline to endpoint for the mania-like factor correlated reasonably well (0.64-0.78) with change in Y-MRS scores in the bipolar studies. At baseline, bipolar patients scored higher than patients with schizophrenia on three of four PANSS mania-like factor items: poor impulse control, excitement, and hostility; the converse was true for most other PANSS items.. Factor analyses of the PANSS consistently uncovered an excitement factor including uncooperativeness, poor impulse control, excitement, and hostility items. This factor may be useful in examining manic symptoms in studies where the addition of a scale specific to mania would be burdensome and where symptoms of excitement are part of the clinical presentation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Principal Component Analysis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Atypical antipsychotics offer superior safety and similar efficacy compared with conventional agents in adults with psychotic disorders. Consequently, atypical antipsychotics have been increasingly used in children and adolescents. Because most information now available on pediatric use comes from case reports and small open-label studies rather than large controlled trials, treatment in pediatric patients is often guided by experience with adults or based on limited evidence in youths. Although the literature contains reports on the use of each agent in this class in children, risperidone has been the focus of the greatest number of reports. However, the atypical antipsychotics are not interchangeable; each has a unique pharmacologic profile and may differ considerably in terms of adverse effects. Evidence on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents is summarized in this review.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Tic Disorders

The use of atypical antipsychotic agents is associated with the induction of both an indolent progression to insulin-resistant diabetes and an idiosyncratic beta-cell toxicity presenting as diabetic ketoacidosis, both of which are usually reversible or improved subsequent to cessation of treatment. The underlying mechanisms are unclear at present. Nonetheless, in light of the now numerous reports on the adverse metabolic effects of these drugs, the Consensus Development Conference which met in November 2003 recommends that metabolic risks be considered when starting atypical antipsychotic drugs. Their operative checklist includes baseline screening of candidates for antipsychotic treatment, which includes personal/family history of diabetes, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose and fasting lipid profile, and then follow-up of these parameters. Furthermore, the health professionals, patients, family and caregivers should be aware of the signs and symptoms of diabetes, especially when acute decompensation occurs which is commensurate with diabetic ketoacidosis. We wish, through this short report, to raise the awareness of physicians treating psychiatric patients to the possibility of new-onset diabetes during therapy with atypical antipsychotic drugs and to emphasize the necessity for increased vigilance and close metabolic follow-up of these patients. Moreover, the choice of the best antipsychotic treatment for each patient should take into consideration the diabetogenic effect of the different treatment options as well the other side effects.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Female; Glucose; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Recently, increasing attention has been drawn to the potential diabetogenic effect of novel antipsychotics. Until now, large prospective studies examining the relationship between atypical antipsychotics and impaired glucose metabolism have been lacking. However, the case reports and retrospective studies that we review here suggest an increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics compared to schizophrenic patients treated with conventional antipsychotics or those without treatment. Although most atypical antipsychotic agents might have a diabetogenic potential, the risk of developing DM might be higher in patients treated with either clozapine or olanzapine than with risperidone, whereas data on quetiapine and ziprasidone is presently limited and needs further attention. Possible mechanisms include the induction of peripheral insulin resistance and the direct influence on pancreatic beta-cell function by 5-HT1A/2A/2C receptor antagonism, by inhibitory effects via alpha 2-adrenergic receptors or by toxic effects. On the other hand, atypical antipsychotics might not be an independent risk factor for the development of DM, but hasten the onset of DM in patients bearing other risk factors. It is suggested that schizophrenic patients should be monitored for the occurrence of glucose metabolism abnormalities before starting atypical antipsychotics, and at a 3-month interval at least during therapy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Glucose; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Islets of Langerhans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pancreas; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Tardive dyskinesia is a chronic drug-induced movement disorder that tends to be persistent in older adults who are treated with antipsychotics. Tardive dyskinesia can affect older patients both physically and psychologically, leading to frequent falls, difficulty eating, and depression. While atypical antipsychotics may cause tardive dyskinesia, the percentage is usually significantly lower than with conventional antipsychotics. Using atypical antipsychotics, particularly at lower doses, may aid in preventing symptoms of tardive dyskinesia in older adults.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists

Atypical antipsychotics are widely used in clinical practice for several psychiatric disorders. Between 1994 and 1999, 26 cases of manic and hypomanic syndromes were reported with olanzapine and risperidone and were described in a previous review article.. An updated MEDLINE search (1999-2003) using the terms atypical antipsychotics, amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, flupenthixol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone, zotepine, hypomania, and mania showed that 34 new cases of induced hypomanic or manic syndromes have been published, not only with olanzapine (N = 5) and risperidone (N = 6), but also with quetiapine (N = 5) and ziprasidone (N = 11) treatment. Six cases have been reported with flupenthixol and 1 with amisulpride, two antipsychotics considered as "partial" atypicals.. A critical analysis of these case reports revealed that the effects on mood were insufficiently documented in some of the reports but that for 20 of them, evidence is highly suggestive of a causative role of atypical antipsychotics in the induction of manic/hypomanic symptomatology.. This updated review continues and extends the results of the initial review and suggests that atypical antipsychotics have some intriguing effects on mood. Such effects have never been reported with conventional antipsychotics. The mechanisms involved in this phenomenon of mood switch remain to be elucidated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder, Major; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The effect of funding source on the outcome of randomized controlled trials has been investigated in several medical disciplines; however, psychiatry has been largely excluded from such analyses. In this article, randomized controlled trials of second generation antipsychotics in schizophrenia are reviewed and analyzed with respect to funding source (industry vs. non-industry funding).. A literature search was conducted for randomized, double-blind trials in which at least one of the tested treatments was a second generation antipsychotic. In each study, design quality and study outcome were assessed quantitatively according to rating scales. Mean quality and outcome scores were compared in the industry-funded studies and non-industry-funded studies. An analysis of the primary author's affiliation with industry was similarly performed.. Results of industry-funded studies significantly favored second generation over first generation antipsychotics when compared to non-industry-funded studies. Non-industry-funded studies showed a trend toward higher quality than industry-funded studies; however, the difference between the two was not significant. Also, within the industry-funded studies, outcomes of trials involving first authors employed by industry sponsors demonstrated a trend toward second generation over first generation antipsychotics to a greater degree than did trials involving first authors employed outside the industry (p=0.05).. While the retrospective design of the study limits the strength of the findings, the data suggest that industry bias may occur in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. There appears to be several sources by which bias may enter clinical research, including trial design, control of data analysis and multiplicity/redundancy of trials.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Industry; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Support as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Dyslipidemia is an increasing problem in most industrialized societies and is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Imbalances in individual lipid components, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and serum triglycerides, have each been shown to contribute to this increased risk. Certain psychiatric patient populations, such as those afflicted with schizophrenia, are of particular concern. Psychiatric patients with schizophrenia are naturally at increased risk for dyslipidemia and obesity, in part due to poor diet and sedentary lifestyle, but these conditions can be exacerbated by some antipsychotic medications. Clozapine and olanzapine, for example, appear to be associated with hyperlipidemia, which may be associated with changes in body weight. Other, newer antipsychotic agents may exhibit less liability for weight gain and the development of dyslipidemia. This review is intended to briefly highlight the association between dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, the changes in serum lipids associated with some antipsychotic agents, and how these changes in serum lipids affect the monitoring of schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, VLDL; Clozapine; Coronary Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Obesity; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides; Weight Gain

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Perazine; Pimozide; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is reported to be effective without producing the disabling extrapyramidal side effects associated with the older, typical antipsychotic drugs.. To determine the clinical effects and safety of olanzapine as compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophreniform psychoses.. The reviewers undertook electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), PsycLIT (1974-1999) and The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 2000). References of all identified studies were searched for further trials, and the reviewers contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials.. All randomised clinical trials comparing olanzapine to placebo or any antipsychotic treatment for those with schizophrenia or schizophreniform psychoses.. Data were independently extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the random effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data the reviewers calculated weighted mean differences.. Twenty one trials are included. Attrition from olanzapine versus placebo studies was so great (olanzapine - 61%, placebo - 73% by six weeks, RR 0.85 CI 0.7-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-40) that interpretation of results is problematic. Olanzapine appeared superior to placebo at six weeks for the outcome of 'no important clinical response' (RR 0.88 CI 0.8-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-27) and global mental state scores. Although dizziness and dry mouth were reported more frequently in the olanzapine-treated group, this did not reach statistical significance. Tthe olanzapine group gained more weight. When compared to typical antipsychotic drugs, data from several small trials are incomplete; but, for the short term outcome of 'no important clinical response', olanzapine seem as effective as typical antipsychotics (n=2778, RR 0.9 CI 0.76-1.06). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) data tended to be equivocal but Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) rating of total score and negative and positive symptom sub-scores favoured olanzapine. With high attrition in both groups (olanzapine - 36%, typical drug - 49% by 6 weeks, n=2738, RR 0.85 CI 0.66-1.1; olanzapine - 83%, typical drug - 90% by 1 year, n=2738, RR 0.9 CI 0.86-1.02), the assumptions included in all continuous data are considerable. Participants allocated olanzapine experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects than people given haloperidol. Weight change data for the short term are not conclusive (n=2455, WMD 0.8kg CI -0.6-2.2) but the three to 12 month results suggest an average gain of four kilograms (n=233, WMD 4 CI 0.3-7.8). It is difficult to distinguish between olanzapine and other atypical drugs, although it may cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects than risperidone (n=339, RR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9, NNH 8 CI 4-29). Olanzapine did cause more weight gain than its comparators but current data are not statistically significant (3-12 months, n=535, WMD 2.2kg CI -0.6-5). One study (n=180) found no clear differences between olanzapine and clozapine for people with treatment-resistant illness.. The large proportions of participants leaving the studies early, in the large multi-centre trials makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on clinical effects. For people with schizophrenia olanzapine may offer antipsychotic efficacy with fewer extrapyramidal side effects than typical drugs but more weight gain. Large, long-term randomised trials with participants, interventions and primary outcomes that are familiar to those wishing to help those with schizophrenia are long overdue.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

To evaluate the evidence that novel antipsychotic medications offer a cost advantage compared to traditional antipsychotic medications.. Literature for this review was identified through a computerized search of Medline, Healthstar and Psyc-INFO databases inclusive from January 1989 to January 2002. Articles included in the review were required to include cost evaluation and to be published in peer-reviewed journals.. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. All five studies that used experimental designs found that second-generation antipsychotic medications were associated with a cost advantage or were cost-neutral, and, in some cases, improved quality of life. Of the ten studies using a pre-post design, four found an increase in total costs, six reported a decrease in total costs, and four reported increased effectiveness with use of a second-generation antipsychotic. All seven of the simulation studies reported a cost advantage for novel antipsychotics for specific patient populations under certain conditions.. The majority of studies found that novel antipsychotics are at least cost-neutral and may offer cost advantages compared to traditional agents. Some studies also reported greater improvement in effectiveness and quality of life when novel antipsychotics were compared to traditional antipsychotic medications. However, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions given the small sample sizes and limited study designs available in this literature.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; United States

In schizophrenia, comparing treatment dropouts between olanzapine and risperidone can be useful to better understand their relative effectiveness.. To analyze the differences in the rates of dropout from clinical trials and response between these 2 antipsychotics.. Literature search was based on MEDLINE (1966-May 2002). Analysis 1 included 4 randomized studies (838 patients), analysis 2 included 2 randomized studies (n = 716), and analysis 3 assessed 5 clinical studies for olanzapine (n = 928) and 3 for risperidone (n = 290). Odds ratios were estimated by the fixed-effect model.. The risk of treatment discontinuation (analysis 1) was significantly greater for risperidone than for olanzapine (42% vs. 33%, respectively). The response rates were identical for the 2 drugs (analysis 2). A slightly better pattern of maintenance of response was found for olanzapine (analysis 3).. The pattern of dropout and maintenance of remission seems to be better controlled for olanzapine than for risperidone.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Patient Dropouts; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Although life prevalence of substance use disorders among patients with schizophrenia is close to 50%, few studies have been carried out to date to identify an integrated pharmacological treatment for this comorbidity. So far, the most promising results, that we report here, have been obtained with clozapine. To a lesser extent, quetiapine and olanzapine, both clozapine analogues, have also shown promising results. Further to these observations, the present paper critically reviews the advantages associated with clozapine, quetiapine and olanzapine, and their relevance to the treatment of addiction among schizophrenic patients. Six characteristics seem to distinguish clozapine, quetiapine and olanzapine from the first-generation antipsychotics: (1) acting preferentially on the reward system, these second-generation antipsychotics (mainly clozapine and quetiapine) induce almost no extrapyramidal symptoms; (2) quickly dissociating from D(2), theses drugs (mainly clozapine and quetiapine) seem not to induce dysphoria, unlike conventional antipsychotics like haloperidol;(3) these drugs (mainly clozapine) seem more effective in the treatment of negative symptoms than conventional antipsychotics; (4) because of a diversified activity on several serotoninergic and noradrenergic receptors, these drugs positively alter mood, which does not seem to be the case with conventional antipsychotics, except for flupenthixol; (5) these drugs have a positive impact on cognition, which is not the case with the first-generation antipsychotics; (6) unlike conventional antipsychotics, these drugs seem to have a moderate affinity for 5-HT(3), the receptor on which ondansetron, an anti-craving medication, acts.

Topics: Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition; Comorbidity; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacological treatment remains the mainstay of the management of schizophrenia. Older, "typical" antipsychotics carry a significant burden of side effects, notably extrapyramidal and neurocognitive side effects. Newer, "atypical" agents carry a lower risk of extrapyramidal side effects. They appear to have added benefit for treating negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, and hence can enhance the quality of life of some patients. The choice of particular agents for individual patients requires a balancing of efficacy and side effects. Medication is only one element of what should be an individualised comprehensive treatment plan for people with schizophrenia.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is the rarest and the most serious of the neuroleptic induced movement disorders. Although potent neuroleptics are more frequently associated with NMS, atypical antipsychotic drugs may also be a cause of NMS. Three databases were searched using the terms 'olanzapine' and 'neuroleptic' 'malignant syndrome'. Case reports were selected and reviewed from among all articles that fulfilled the search criteria. Twenty six cases were reviewed. Twenty cases fulfilled the criteria published by Sachdev et al. Olanzapine was the most probable cause of NMS in 16 cases. The absence of rigidity was described in only two of 16 highly probable olanzapine induced NMS cases, which is not as often as it is reported in clozapine associated NMS (36%). It was found that prior NMS is an important risk factor in NMS.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Several clinical and research applications require an estimation of therapeutic dose equivalence across antipsychotic medications. Since the advent of the newer atypical antipsychotics, new dose equivalent estimations have been needed.. The reported minimum effective dose was identified for each newer atypical antipsychotic medication and for haloperidol across all available fixed-dose placebo-controlled studies. Reported minimum effective dose equivalence ratios to haloperidol were then converted to chlorpromazine equivalents using the "2 mg of haloperidol equals 100 mg of chlorpromazine" convention.. To identify the fixed-dose studies, the following sources were searched until June 2002: MEDLINE, the bibliographies of identified reports, published meta-analyses and reviews, Cochrane reviews, Freedom of Information Act material available from the Food and Drug Administration, and abstracts from several scientific meetings from 1997 to 2002.. Doses equivalent to 100 mg/day of chlorpromazine were 2 mg/day for risperidone, 5 mg/day for olanzapine, 75 mg/day for quetiapine, 60 mg/day for ziprasidone, and 7.5 mg/day for aripiprazole.. These equivalency estimates may be useful for clinical and research purposes. The source of the dose equivalency estimation is evidence-based and consistent across medication.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Humans; Indoles; Isoindoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles

The frequency and severity of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) were evaluated in patients with DSM-III or DSM-IV schizophrenia in the acute phase (- 8 weeks) of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials from the integrated olanzapine clinical trial database.. This retrospective analysis included 23 clinical trials and 4611 patients from November 11, 1991, through July 31, 2001. Incidences of dystonic, parkinsonian, and akathisia events were compared using treatment-emergent adverse-event data. Categorical analyses of Simpson-Angus Scale and Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) scores, use of anticholinergic medications, and baseline-to-endpoint changes in Simpson-Angus Scale and BAS scores were compared.. A significantly smaller percentage of olanzapine-treated patients experienced dystonic events than did haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.047). A significantly greater percentage of haloperidol-treated patients experienced parkinsonian (p <.001) and akathisia (p <.001) events than did olanzapine-treated patients. Categorical analysis of Simpson-Angus Scale scores showed significantly more haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.004) developed parkinsonism than did olanzapine-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly greater reductions in Simpson-Angus Scale scores than did haloperidol- (p <.001), risperidone- (p <.001), or clozapine-treated (p =.032) patients. Categorical analysis of BAS scores showed significantly more haloperidol-treated patients experienced treatment-emergent akathisia versus olanzapine-treated patients (p <.001). Significantly greater reductions in BAS scores were experienced during olanzapine treatment versus placebo (p =.007), haloperidol (p <.001), and risperidone (p =.004) treatments. A significantly smaller percentage of olanzapine-treated patients received anticholinergic medications compared with that of haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.018). Compared with that in olanzapine-treated patients, the duration of anticholinergic cotreatment was significantly longer among haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.040) and significantly shorter among clozapine-treated patients (p =.021).. This analysis of available data from olanzapine clinical trials lends additional support to olanzapine's favorable EPS profile.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The new generation antipsychotics are associated with a lower risk of adverse effects compared with drugs such as haloperidol. Many treatment guidelines recommend the use of new generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs for people with a first episode of schizophrenia.. To examine the effects of the new generation antipsychotics for people with a first episode of schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. The reviewers searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (March 2002) and the included and excluded studies tables of relevant Cochrane reviews, references of all relevant studies, contacted industry and authors of relevant studies to identify further trials.. Randomised clinical trials comparing new generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sulpiride, ziprasidone, zotepine) with conventional antipsychotics for people with a first episode of schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by three reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. We independently extracted data but excluded them if loss to follow up was greater than 50%. For homogeneous dichotomous data, we calculated the relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT), on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, reviewers calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).. We include two short-term studies (total n=266), one of which was a report of a sub-group of a larger study. One compared risperidone with an average of 6 mg/day haloperidol and the other olanzapine with an average of 11 mg/day haloperidol. Compared with olanzapine, significantly more people receiving haloperidol left the study early (n=83, 1 RCT, RR 0.43 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNH 3 CI 2 to 8). This was not so for the risperidone versus haloperidol comparison (n=183, 1 RCT, RR=0.7 CI 0.4 to 1.1). In terms of global effects, studies reported no differences between risperidone and haloperidol (n=183, RR not much improved 1.0 CI 0.6 to 1.5), and olanzapine and the same control (n=83, RR needing at least one dose of benzodiazepine 0.8 CI 0.5 to 1.1). More people allocated to olanzapine had clinically significant improvement in mental state compared with those given haloperidol (n=83, RR no 'clinically significant improvement' 0.45 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNH 3 CI 2 to 6). In the risperidone study, however, no such difference was apparent (n=183, RR 'no clinically significant improvement in mental state' 0.85 CI 0.6 to 1.2). Significantly more people given haloperidol (4-16mg) experienced at least one adverse event when compared with risperidone (4-16mg) (n=183, RR 0.9 CI 0.8 to 0.98, NNH 8 CI 4 to 50). Use of anticholinergic medication for extrapyramidal adverse events was less prevalent for people allocated either olanzapine (n=83, RR 0.3 CI 0.2 to 0.7, NNH 4 CI 2 to 14) or risperidone (n=183, RR 0.7 CI 0.5 to 0.9, NNH 4 CI 3 to 9) compared with those given haloperidol. There are no data at all on outcomes such as compliance, cost, social and cognitive functioning, relapse, rehospitalisation, or quality of life. There are no medium to long-term data. Eight ongoing studies may provide more information.. The results of this review are inconclusive. Whether the use of new generation antipsychotics really makes the treatment less off putting and enhances long-term compliance is unclear. Pragmatic, well-designed and reported long-term trials would be useful to answer this question.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Glucose; Haloperidol; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Mental Disorders; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Weight Gain

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Clozapine; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dibenzothiepins; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Perazine; Pimozide; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

For young people experiencing a first-episode of schizophrenia, the first and most important matter to be attended to, once the diagnosis of schizophrenia has been made and patients have entered the care system, is to establish a treatment alliance. The next step is to conceive an individually tailored treatment programme (non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological). The use of antipsychotic drugs needs to be carefully discussed with both patients and families, as medication tends to have a poor public perception. Maintaining treatment is vitally important in terms of relapse prevention, but people who suffer a first-episode tend to terminate treatment early. Patients often discontinue their medication because of side-effects, although a number of other factors can also exert a negative influence on the continuous intake of medication. Among others, these include insufficient information provided to patients and significant others as well as lack of insight and problems in the doctor-patient-relationship. The published data indicate that the outcome of treatment is better for younger patients in a first-episode of schizophrenia than it is for patients who are more chronically ill. However, young patients are much more sensitive to compliance problems than older patients. The main challenge in this phase of the illness is therefore to convince patients that maintenance treatment is necessary in order to assure the best possible outcome.

Topics: Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Patient Education as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The safety and efficacy of i.m. ziprasidone and olanzapine for treating acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia are described, along with factors to consider when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these agents. Agitation is defined as excessive motor and verbal activity. Acute agitation has traditionally been treated with the combination of haloperidol 5 mg and lorazepam 2 mg i.m. Controlled trials have shown, however, that combination therapy of haloperidol or droperidol plus lorazepam i.m. is better than single-drug treatment at one hour but not earlier. Phase II and III clinical trials showed that both i.m. ziprasidone mesylate 10 mg and 20 mg and olanzapine 2.5 mg-10 mg controlled agitation faster in patients with schizophrenia than p.o. ziprasidone 2 mg and placebo. In addition, i.m. olanzapine 10 mg controlled agitation faster in patients with schizophrenia faster than haloperidol in 15 minutes. Olanzapine i.m. was also superior to placebo in patients with dementia and in patients with bipolar disorder with and without psychotic symptoms, suggesting that agitation may be a syndrome that is similar across a multitude of disease states. Dystonic reactions occurred in 2.6% of patients taking ziprasidone, compared with 9.2% of patients taking haloperidol. No patients receiving olanzapine experienced a dystonic reaction. Ziprasidone has been associated with prolonged QTc Intervals. Pharmaco-economic evaluations should include costs associated with repeat i.m. injections for agitated patients, increased time in the emergency room, case of switching from i.m. to oral therapy, adverse effects, and relapse, as well as medication costs. I.m. olanzapine and ziprasidone show promise for treating acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia, especially because of their safer adverse effect profile and faster onset of effectiveness compared with haloperidol.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Continuity of Patient Care; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon but serious idiosyncratic reaction associated with antipsychotic medication. The purpose of this study was to reveal and analyze the clinical characteristics of the reported cases of NMS in patients given the novel antipsychotic olanzapine. A MEDLINE search related to olanzapine-induced NMS cases reported in the international literature was conducted. All cases were critically reviewed and examined against three different sets of NMS diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV, Addonizio, Levenson). The authors identified 17 cases of possible NMS associated with olanzapine. Ten of the reported NMS cases were definitely NMS meeting all three sets of criteria and three cases were probable NMS meeting two sets of criteria. Most of the patients exhibited a full-blown NMS. There were four definite NMS cases associated with olanzapine monotherapy. Three of them had concurrent serious physical illnesses and one had a previous NMS episode. Olanzapine can cause NMS, mainly in susceptible or predisposed patients.

Topics: Benzodiazepines; Humans; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia

The treatment of aggressive symptoms in schizophrenic patients is a relevant clinical problem. We systematically review the efficacy of the different atypical neuroleptics on acute or persistent aggressive symptoms also regarding methodological problems. Currently typical neuroleptics are still first choice in treating acute aggressive symptoms, while risperidone and olanzapine could be alternatives. In persistent aggression clozapin shows the best specific results. Typical depot neuroleptics should be considered in cases when medication compliance is a problem.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Hostility; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Innovation in atypical antipsychotic agents continues with new preparations of available drugs as well as novel agents. In this article, we provide an update on these novel products by reviewing information from a computerised literature search, recent abstracts and discussions with industry representatives. A generic formulation of clozapine is now available. It may be less well absorbed and/or less effective than Clozaril, although evidence is conflicting. A fatty acid amide derivative of clozapine is in early development. A liquid formulation of risperidone is currently available, which may be a useful treatment for psychotic agitation as well as a preferable alternative to tablets for some patients. A depot formulation is in development for the long-term management of psychosis. An orally disintegrating tablet formulation of olanzepine is a useful alternative to standard tablets. A short-acting injectable formulation of the drug is in development for psychotic agitation. Sachets and slow-release formulations of quetiapine are in development. Ziprasidone, a recently launched agent, is available in tablet form for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, psychotic depression and mania. A short-acting injectable formulation is in development for psychotic agitation. Aripiprazole (tablets) and iloperidone (tablets and depot injection) are two antipsychotics in development for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (available information regarding iloperidone is very limited). These new formulations and agents should broaden options for the treatment of psychosis.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dosage Forms; Humans; Isoxazoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Cholinergic Agonists; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine Antagonists; Enzyme Inhibitors; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Humans; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptors, AMPA; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Receptors, Neurotensin; Receptors, Serotonin; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

"Atypical" antipsychotics represent a new generation of antipsychotics with a significantly lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), as well as little or no effect on prolactin elevation. These advantages constitute a major improvement in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. The exact mechanisms that make these drugs atypical is not clear. However, a preferential action on serotonin 5-HT2 or D4 receptors, or a more rapid dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor, may account for atypicality. Although the atypical antipsychotics have overcome EPS, other side effects such as weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance/lipid abnormalities have come to the fore. Thus, the challenges are far from over. The current atypicals are much more effective against the psychosis of schizophrenia than against the other, more enduring aspects of this disorder, e.g. negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. At present, the atypicals use a "pharmacological shotgun" strategy to treat aspects of the disease in all patients. A more sophisticated and perhaps effective approach to schizophrenia may lie in independently targeting the pathophysiological mechanisms of each clinical dimension (i.e. positive, negative, cognitive, and affective) with more selective drugs that can be combined and individually titrated to the needs of each patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Monitoring; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine, a thienobenzodiazepine derivative, is a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic agent which has proven efficacy against the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Compared with conventional antipsychotics, it has greater affinity for serotonin 5-HT2A than for dopamine D2 receptors. In large, well controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses, olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day was significantly superior to haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/day in overall improvements in psychopathology rating scales and in the treatment of depressive and negative symptoms, and was comparable in effects on positive psychotic symptoms. The 1-year risk of relapse (rehospitalisation) was significantly lower with olanzapine than with haloperidol treatment. In the first double-blind comparative study (28-week) of olanzapine and risperidone, olanzapine 10 to 20 mg/day proved to be significantly more effective than risperidone 4 to 12 mg/day in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms but not on overall psychopathology symptoms. In contrast, preliminary results from an 8-week controlled study suggested risperidone 2 to 6 mg/day was superior to olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day against positive and anxiety/depressive symptoms (p < 0.05), although consistent with the first study, both agents demonstrated similar efficacy on measures of overall psychopathology. Improvements in general cognitive function seen with olanzapine treatment in a 1-year controlled study of patients with early-phase schizophrenia, were significantly greater than changes seen with either risperidone or haloperidol. However, preliminary results from an 8-week trial showed comparable cognitive enhancing effects of olanzapine and risperidone treatment in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Several studies indicate that olanzapine has benefits against symptoms of aggression and agitation, while other studies strongly support the effectiveness of olanzapine in the treatment of depressive symptomatology. Olanzapine is associated with significantly fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than haloperidol and risperidone. In addition, olanzapine is not associated with a risk of agranulocytosis as seen with clozapine or clinically significant hyperprolactinaemia as seen with risperidone or prolongation of the QT interval. The most common adverse effects reported with olanzapine are bodyweight gain, somnolence, dizziness, anticholinergic effects (constipation and dry mouth) and. Olanzapine demonstrated superior antipsychotic efficacy compared with haloperidol in the treatment of acute phase schizophrenia, and in the treatment of some patients with first-episode or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The reduced risk of adverse events and therapeutic superiority compared with haloperidol and risperidone in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms support the choice of olanzapine as a first-line option in the management of schizophrenia in the acute phase and for the maintenance of treatment response.

Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition Disorders; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Depression; Drug Interactions; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Although atypical antipsychotics are becoming the treatment of choice for schizophrenia, what makes an antipsychotic "atypical" is not clear. This article provides a new hypothesis about the mechanism of action of atypical antipsychotics.. Published data regarding the molecular, animal model, neuroimaging, and clinical aspects of typical and atypical antipsychotics were reviewed to develop this hypothesis. Particular attention was paid to data regarding the role of the serotonin 5-HT(2) and dopamine D(4) receptors in atypicality.. Neuroimaging data show that optimal dopamine D(2) occupancy is sufficient to produce the atypical antipsychotic effect. Freedom from motor side effects results from low D(2) occupancy, not from high 5-HT(2) occupancy. If D(2) occupancy is excessive, atypicality is lost even in the presence of high 5-HT(2) occupancy. Animal data show that a rapid dissociation from the D(2) receptor at a molecular level produces the atypical antipsychotic effect. In vitro data show that the single most powerful predictor of atypicality for the current generation of atypical antipsychotics is fast dissociation from the D(2) receptor, not its high affinity at 5-HT(2), D(4), or another receptor.. The authors propose that fast dissociation from the D(2) receptor makes an antipsychotic more accommodating of physiological dopamine transmission, permitting an antipsychotic effect without motor side effects, prolactin elevation, or secondary negative symptoms. In contrast to the multireceptor hypotheses, the authors predict that the atypical antipsychotic effect can be produced by appropriate modulation of the D(2) receptor alone; the blockade of other receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Terminology as Topic; Tomography, Emission-Computed

Alterations of electrocardiogram results and cases of sudden cardiac death have been reported since the beginning of neuroleptic treatment. In particular, a temporal association exists between some antipsychotics and prolongation of the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc), an event that may increase the risk for developing a potentially fatal ventricular tachycardia arrhythmia known as torsades de pointes if it significantly exceeds normal intraindividual and interindividual variation. Although the incidence of serious adverse cardiac events in response to antipsychotic medications is relatively low, any possibility for the occurrence of cardiotoxicity warrants continued study. The present article reviews important differences among antipsychotic drugs in the potential for, and occurrence of, serious adverse cardiac outcomes and suggests that olanzapine, as therapeutically administered to patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses, does not contribute significantly to a QTc prolongation that could result in potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Benzodiazepines; Death, Sudden; Female; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Torsades de Pointes

Schizophrenic patients who have been prescribed atypical antipsychotics have a potential risk of gaining weight. The implications of weight gain for clinical care may differ depending on whether a patient is underweight or overweight at baseline. The exact mechanism for weight gain is not known, but several factors have been identified that can help predict which patients are at risk for gaining weight. These factors include better clinical outcome, increased appetite, and low baseline body mass index. In patients treated with olanzapine for up to 3 years, weight gain trended toward a plateau at approximately 36 weeks. Weight gain interventions, including behavioral modifications, show promise in controlling or reducing weight in patients treated with antipsychotics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Health Behavior; Humans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

This study aimed to determine the effect of olanzapine and other antipsychotic drugs on cognitive functions after 6months of treatment. Baseline, 3month and 6month psychopathological and cognitive evaluations were made. Thirty-eight partially responsive outpatients with DSM-IV chronic schizophrenia diagnosis were included in the study. On the indication of their attending psychiatrists, 21 patients initiated treatment with olanzapine, and 17 remained on their previous treatment with other antipsychotic drugs. Cognitive assessments were blind to medication and psychopathological status. The olanzapine group presented a significantly greater improvement in negative symptomatology and verbal memory than the comparison group in repeated-measures of MANOVAs between baseline, 3month and 6month assessments. These differences remained statistically significant after covarying out gender, treatment with other atypical antipsychotics, biperidene doses and changes in positive and negative symptoms. In order to match previous differences between groups, cognitive baseline scores for each test were introduced as covariates, resulting in a significant improvement for the olanzapine group in negative symptomatology and the interference task of the Stroop test.We then re-analyzed the data, dividing the comparison group into two groups: risperidone-treated patients (n=9) and patients receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=8). Post-hoc analyses between groups were carried out with baseline cognitive assessment as covariate. The olanzapine group improved significantly more than the risperidone group in negative symptomatology and in the interference task of Stroop test. The improvement in the number of categories of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was higher in risperidone patients than in those receiving olanzapine or conventional antipsychotic treatment. Conventional antipsychotic drugs did not present a significant improvement over atypical antipsychotic drugs in any cognitive function. In summary, in patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotic agents were associated with slight differential improvements over time in attentional, verbal memory and executive functions compared with conventional neuroleptic drugs. No differential improvements were found in social functioning, verbal fluency, non-verbal domains of memory or visuo-motor abilities.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method

With the availability of the so-called novel antipsychotic agents, extrapyramidal symptoms are becoming decreasingly problematic for patients with schizophrenia, and simultaneously, a new symptom is emerging as a preeminent concern. This side effect is weight gain and its metabolic concomitants. This article reviews what is currently known about antipsychotic-induced weight gain, describes the magnitude of the problem, briefly touches on mechanisms of action, and addresses the correlation of interindividual variations in magnitude of weight gain. In addition, we address questions about the effects of weight gain on compliance and whether or not there is a correlation between weight gain and therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we address medical consequences of weight gain and review the literature supporting various treatment options for antipsychotic-induced weight gain. As will be seen, this is an area of research in its infancy, and much work remains to be done.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

In general, antipsychotic agents have diverse actions on a wide range of neurotransmitter systems. Data strongly suggest that a number of these systems may play a role in the regulation of body weight. In addition to having very distinct pharmacologic profiles, individual agents possess discrete weight gain liabilities. This article briefly reviews the evidence for the involvement of specific neurotransmitter systems in the control of body weight and describes the relevant pharmacologic characteristics of individual antipsychotic agents. By comparing the pharmacologic profiles of specific antipsychotic agents with their respective weight gain liabilities, this article attempts to gain an insight into the specific receptors underlying a drug's propensity to induce weight gain. However, there is still much to be learned concerning weight control mechanisms, and the role of many of the receptors at which antipsychotic agents are active remains unclear. In spite of this, an overview of current knowledge in the field may facilitate prediction of a potential novel antipsychotic agent's weight gain liability.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Eating; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Receptors, Neurotransmitter; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Meta-analysis is a useful method to assess the efficacy of newer antipsychotic drugs compared with older drugs or placebo. However, few trials directly compare novel drugs to each other.. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the method of indirect meta-analysis by applying it to data on olanzapine versus haloperidol and risperidone versus haloperidol to enable a comparison between olanzapine and risperidone.. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of risperidone, olanzapine, and/or haloperidol were identified through literature searches (1983 to 1999) of the MEDLINE, Current Contents, and HealthSTAR databases and reviewed. Data for the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative subscale, the percentage of patients using anticholinergic drugs, and the percentage of patients dropping out due to lack of efficacy, side effects, or any cause were extracted and combined using the indirect method. These findings were compared with those from a direct comparative study of olanzapine and risperidone.. The literature search yielded 8 RCTs comparing risperidone to haloperidol and 3 comparing olanzapine to haloperidol. Only 1 trial directly comparing olanzapine and risperidone was found. In this trial, the change in BPRS total and PANSS negative subscale scores tended to be higher with olanzapine by 1.80 and 1.10, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. Indirect meta-analysis yielded similar results. Changes in both BPRS total scores and PANSS negative subscale scores tended to be higher with olanzapine by 0.37 and 0.54, respectively, and again, the differences were not statistically significant. In the indirect meta-analysis, the rate of anticholinergic drug use was 19.5% greater among patients treated with risperidone than among patients treated with olanzapine (P < 0.05). In the direct comparative RCT, the rate was 13.1% higher among patients treated with risperidone (P < 0.05). The dropout rates were similar for patients treated with risperidone and those treated with olanzapine in both analyses.. An indirect meta-analysis of studies comparing olanzapine with haloperidol and risperidone with haloperidol yielded conclusions similar to those found in a direct comparative RCT of olanzapine and risperidone.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This paper reviews the clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety of the new atypical antipsychotic, ziprasidone. All published citations regarding ziprasidone were retrieved and reviewed using a MEDLINE search (completed for citations to early 2001). In addition, abstracts from recent scientific meetings presenting data not yet published were reviewed. Like other new antipsychotic medications, ziprasidone fits the profile of an atypical agent, exerting efficacy in positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, as well as affective symptoms, with a low risk of neurological and neuroendocrinological side effects. Unlike newer agents, it does not appear to be associated with weight gain in most patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Interactions; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Tourette Syndrome

The available literature suggests that patients with schizophrenia are at risk for diabetes mellitus and taking antipsychotic medication further increases the chance of developing non-insulin-dependent hyperglycemia. Case reports, chart reviews, and some results from clinical drug trials implicate a relationship between glucose levels and treatment with clozapine or olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia, although a few cases of hyperglycemia have also been reported in patients taking risperidone and quetiapine. These studies indicate that hyperglycemia is not dose dependent, is reversible on cessation of treatment with clozapine or olanzapine, and reappears on reintroduction of these therapies. The postulated underlying mechanisms involved in this process in patients with schizophrenia include (1) a decreased sensitivity to insulin that is independent of atypical medication, (2) an increased insulin resistance related to atypical medications, (3) the effects of atypical medications on serotonin receptors, and (4) overuse of insulin due to weight gain. These mechanisms are discussed in detail, and recommendations for the administration of atypical antipsychotics are offered. Overweight, ethnicity, family or personal history of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, and weight gain during the course of treatment have all been identified as risk factors in the development of hyperglycemia in patients with schizophrenia. However, it is difficult to statistically assess the true incidence of diabetes within each type of antipsychotic medication group with the exclusive dependence on available case studies and without proper epidemiologic research.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; United States

Prescribing an antipsychotic for a patient with schizophrenia requires a risk-benefit analysis. Weight gain has become an issue recently as a result of reports that 2 of the atypical antipsychotic agents, clozapine and olanzapine, are associated with a higher risk than other drugs of causing excessive weight gain. Some degree of weight gain may occur with any atypical antipsychotic agent, particularly early in treatment. A more important consideration is the long-term effects of the atypical antipsychotic on body weight, since many of the patients in this population require chronic therapy. This is important because weight gain is an adverse effect that is associated with noncompliance and medical problems. In this article, I review recent reports about the weight effects of different atypical antipsychotic drugs. To provide accurate understanding of the effects of atypical antipsychotic agents, data analyses should include both short-term and long-term findings, the relationship of changes in body weight to pretreatment body mass index (BMI), relationship to dose, both intent-to-treat and complete analyses, and presentation of both mean and median changes in weight. It is also important to know whether the studies have been done in an inpatient or outpatient setting, since patients who are institutionalized may be less likely to exhibit increases in body weight. Such complete information and multidimensional analysis would minimize obfuscation about the true nature of a drug's impact on body weight.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hospitalization; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

"Atypical" antipsychotics are associated with a much lower propensity for extrapyramidal side effects and, with some exceptions, a lack of sustained prolactin elevation. The authors propose that a low-affinity and fast dissociation (in molecular terms) from the dopamine D(2) receptor, along with administration of the drug in doses that lead to appropriate levels of dopamine D(2) receptor blockade, are the most important requirements for atypicality. Actions at other receptors (5-HT(2), D(4), etc.) may not be necessary to achieve atypicality, and while action at these receptors may have benefits on symptoms such as mood and cognition, this is as yet to be conclusively proven. Why clozapine is effective in refractory patients is still elusive and efforts to make antipsychotics that are devoid of effects on the dopamine D(2) receptors so far have been unsuccessful. In light of this, the authors provide a heuristic model linking pathophysiology and therapeutics and suggest that the ideal treatment for schizophrenia is unlikely to be single-drug with multireceptor blockade (a sort of one-size-fits-all polypharmacy) but will require several specific and targeted treatment strategies that are titrated to match the variable expression of different dimensions of schizophrenia in each patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Models, Neurological; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Cytoskeletal Proteins; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine; Dopamine Antagonists; Humans; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

The number of elderly persons with psychosis will increase with the increasing geriatric population. Olanzapine is one of the newer atypical antipsychotics with efficacy for positive and negative symptoms and safer side effect profile compared to conventional antipsychotics. The manuscript describes the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability studies, adverse effects and dosing considerations in the elderly. Further studies are needed to fully assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in the elderly. Current research supports a role for olanzapine in treating elderly patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Four new antipsychotic medications--clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine--have been introduced in the United States during the past decade. These new medications now account for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions. The author reviews specific issues related to the use of traditional antipsychotic medications and then highlights the emerging clinical research data regarding the new medications, which have all been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of schizophrenia. Clinical research data indicate that they are also more useful for a broader array of symptoms associated with schizophrenia than traditional compounds. Furthermore, movement disorder side effects are substantially decreased--a property that leads to higher acceptability. Surprisingly, there has been little relationship between the pivotal trials designed for FDA approval and current dosing strategies in broader clinical settings. These dosing issues are described. New uses, including treatment of mood disorders and conduct disorder, are also discussed. These medicines offer substantial hope for improved treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Agranulocytosis; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prolactin; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Depressive symptoms and syndromal depression commonly occur in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is also associated with aggression directed at self and others. For this article, the available literature regarding the efficacy of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone in the treatment of depression, hostility, and suicidality in patients with schizophrenia was reviewed. These studies suggest that atypical antipsychotics may exert therapeutic effects on depression and hostility as well as psychosis and that clozapine and olanzapine may reduce suicidality in patients with schizophrenia. These therapeutic actions appear to represent additional advantages of atypical antipsychotics compared with standard agents.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Hostility; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Given the problematic nature of tardive dyskinesia in persons taking conventional antipsychotics, evaluation of newer atypical antipsychotic agents should include a systematic assessment of tardive dyskinesia liability. Results of a prospective double-blind, randomized study of schizophrenic patients who participated in 3 preclinical olanzapine studies and were treated with 5 to 20 mg/day of olanzapine (N = 1192) or haloperidol (N = 522) recently indicated a significantly lower risk of development of tardive dyskinesia with olanzapine treatment than haloperidol treatment. This article discusses the known effects of atypical antipsychotic medications on tardive dyskinesia movements (both withdrawal and persistent) and the incidence rate of tardive dyskinesia among schizophrenic patients undergoing long-term treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Haloperidol; Humans; Incidence; Molindone; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Survival Analysis

The enthusiasm produced by the introduction of antipsychotic medication in the 1950s gave way to a certain frustration in the 1970s and 1980s. Despite the development of a large number of new drugs, little progress was made in treatment because these new agents were, in essence, therapeutically equivalent. This lack of progress was perhaps also related to an emphasis on tardive dyskinesia in the 1970s, i.e., the preoccupation with a negative effect of treatment. The reverse is taking place today. Clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics are associated in people's minds with fewer or absent extrapyramidal symptoms and less tardive dyskinesia than the older typical agents. As a result, a certain amount of complacency exists. Tardive dyskinesia not only may be painful and disfiguring, but it also predicts poor outcome in patients with schizophrenia. Although many treatments have been tried, none have proven completely efficacious. The best treatment for tardive dyskinesia and dystonia is prevention, which is a function of medication choice. Pharmacologic interventions for tardive dyskinesia include clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics. If typical antipsychotics must be used, they should be started at the lowest possible levels. Studies of risperidone suggest that it, too, should be used at very low doses to minimize the risk of tardive dyskinesia. It is also possible that schizophrenic patients taking atypical antipsychotics may experience fewer spontaneous dyskinesias, although further study is warranted.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Decision Trees; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Dystonia; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Probability; Reserpine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Tetrabenazine; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin E

Atypical neuroleptic drugs have enriched our treatment programs, especially in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. Reviewed here is the use of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents with a schizophrenic disorder. The receptor binding profile and pharmacological properties, indications, side effects, clinical application, and trials of atypical neuroleptic drugs are compared to the classical neuroleptic drug haloperidol in the treatment of adolescent schizophrenia. Special attention is paid to the most common atypical neuroleptics clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone since most studies are carried out with these compounds, most often with clozapine. More clinically controlled trials have to be conducted since only one has been performed to date. The place of atypical neuroleptic drugs is discussed and further studies are necessary in order to differentiate, and eventually broaden the spectrum of the indications tested thus far.

Topics: Adolescent Psychiatry; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child Psychiatry; Clozapine; Germany; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is reported to be effective without producing the disabling extrapyramidal side effects associated with the older, typical antipsychotic drugs.. To determine the clinical effects and safety of olanzapine as compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophreniform psychoses.. The reviewers undertook electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (September 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), and PsycLIT (1974-1999). References of all identified studies were searched for further trials, and the reviewers contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials.. All randomised clinical trials comparing olanzapine to placebo or any antipsychotic treatment for those with schizophrenia or schizophreniform psychoses.. Data were independently extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the random effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data the reviewers calculated weighted mean differences.. Twenty trials are included. Attrition from olanzapine versus placebo studies was so great (olanzapine - 61%, placebo - 73% by six weeks, RR 0.85 CI 0. 7-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-40) that interpretation of results is problematic. Olanzapine appeared superior to placebo at six weeks for the outcome of 'no important clinical response' (RR 0.88 CI 0.8-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-27), but trial data regarding negative symptoms are equivocal for this comparison. Dizziness and dry mouth were more common in the olanzapine-treated group, and, although not statistically significant, the olanzapine group gained more weight. Data from several small trials are incomplete; but, for the short term outcome of 'no important clinical response', olanzapine seem as effective as typical antipsychotics (n=2778, RR 0.9 CI 0.76-1.06). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) data tended to be equivocal but Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) rating of total score and negative and positive symptom sub-scores favoured olanzapine. With high attrition in both groups (olanzapine - 36%, typical drug - 49% by 6 weeks, n=2738, RR 0.85 CI 0.66-1.1; olanzapine - 83%, typical drug - 90% by 1 year, n=2738, RR 0.9 CI 0. 86-1.02), the assumptions included in all continuous data are considerable. Participants allocated olanzapine experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects than people given haloperidol. Weight change data for the short term are not conclusive (n=2455, WMD 0.8kg CI -0.6-2.2) but the three to 12 month results suggest an average gain of four kilograms (n=233, WMD 4 CI 0.3-7.8). It is difficult to distinguish between olanzapine and other atypical drugs, although it may cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects than risperidone (n=339, RR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9, NNH 8 CI 4-29). Olanzapine did cause more weight gain than its comparators but current data are not statistically significant (3-12 months, n=535, WMD 2.2kg CI -0.6-5). One study (n=180) found no clear differences between olanzapine and clozapine for people with treatment-resistant illness.. For people with schizophrenia olanzapine may offer antipsychotic efficacy with fewer extrapyramidal side effects than typical drugs but more weight gain. The large proportions of participants leaving the studies early, in the large multi-centre trials makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on clinical effects. Large, long-term randomised trials with participants, interventions and primary outcomes that are familiar to those wishing to help those with schizophrenia are long overdue.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

The overall effectiveness of traditional antipsychotics has been hindered by their extrapyramidal side effects, which contribute to noncompliance and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. The side effects associated with traditional antipsychotic treatment are generally minimal in patients who take risperidone, a combined 5-HT2/D2 antagonist, but the literature is sparse on adverse events among the newer atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone is associated with relatively few motor side effects compared with the traditional antipsychotics, and weight gain is less likely with risperidone than with either clozapine or olanzapine. While increased prolactin levels have been reported in patients taking risperidone, little correlation has been found between prolactin levels and adverse events. As antipsychotic treatment options expand to include the new agents, it is important for clinicians to anticipate side effects and to query patients about specific adverse events.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Incidence; Movement Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain

Olanzapine, a serotonin-dopamine receptor antagonist, is one of the novel atypical antipsychotics that is effective against the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia with significantly fewer treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms and less akathisia associated with traditional antipsychotics. Compared with traditional agents, olanzapine shows only a few adverse events such as dry mouth, sedation, and increase in appetite. Compared with risperidone, olanzapine causes greater increases in weight gain and body mass index but less hyperprolactinemia. Transient, non-dose-dependent, asymptomatic elevations in liver enzymes have also been noted in olanzapine-treated patients. Because of the comparative efficacy and improved side effect profiles of the atypical antipsychotics, consideration should be given to using the newer agents as preferred treatment for schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Topics: Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The results of controlled studies of the efficacy of the new atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms show that these antipsychotics have a more pronounced effect on negative symptoms in acute schizophrenic patients than the classical neuroleptics. Supplementary complex statistical analyses substantiate that the increased efficacy of the atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms can only partially be explained by indirect effects of better extrapyramidal tolerability, better effects on productive psychotic symptoms, etc. Instead, it is due largely to the stronger direct effect of these atypical neuroleptics. Clinical studies to evaluate their efficacy in chronic schizophrenic patients with stable, predominantly negative symptoms are still mostly lacking. First results support the presumption that atypical neuroleptics have a direct effect. Parallel to the evaluation of the new atypical neuroleptics, important progress has been made in the methodology of clinical studies in this area.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Neurotransmitter Agents; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Risperidone is one of a number of 'atypical antipsychotics' which are currently being marketed for the treatment of those with schizophrenia, largely on the basis of claims of improved tolerability and effectiveness compared to much cheaper conventional antipsychotics. The efficacy of risperidone has already been compared to conventional drugs, but it remains unclear how risperidone compares with other atypical antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine.. To determine the effects of risperidone compared with other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.. Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2000), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (January 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), LILACS (1982-1999), PSYNDEX (1977-1999) and PsycLIT (1974-1999) were undertaken. In addition, pharmaceutical databases on the Dialog Corporation Datastar and Dialog services were searched. References of all identified studies were searched for further trials. Pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials were contacted.. All randomised controlled clinical trials that compared risperidone to other atypical antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses were included by independent assessment.. Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were independently extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, standardised and weighted mean differences were calculated (SMD, WMD). All data were inspected for heterogeneity.. Nine studies were obtained, comparing risperidone with clozapine (five studies - largely amongst treatment resistant patients); olanzapine (three studies); and amisulpiride (one study). The research was beset by problems of high attrition rates and short term follow up. Clozapine does seem equally acceptable to risperidone in the short term (leaving the study early, n=466, RR 1. 00 CI 0.73-1.37). For most other outcomes wide confidence intervals were obtained, which meant that it was impossible to judge whether the two compounds were equally effective, or whether one was in fact superior to the other. Olanzapine and risperidone seem broadly similar according to numbers of patients responding to treatment (40% reduction in PANSS scores: n=339, RR 1.14, CI 0.99-1.32). Olanzapine caused fewer people to leave the study early (n=404, RR 1. 31 CI 1.06-1.60; NNT 8 CI 4-32) and fewer extrapyramidal side effects (n=339, RR 1.67 CI 1.14-2.46; NNH 8 CI 5-33), although comparative doses of risperidone were higher than those recommended in practice. In one single study (n=228) amisulpiride seemed broadly similar to risperidone in most respects. There were no useful data presented relating to service use and costs. Very few data relating to quality of life were presented.. The equivalence of clozapine and risperidone for treatment resistant schizophrenia cannot yet be assumed and there seems to be little to chose between risperidone and both olanzapine and amisulpiride. The research is limited in many respects, and longer term studies measuring clinically important outcomes, including service use and quality of life are needed to judge the comparative value of the various atypical drugs.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

In recent years several new antipsychotics have come to market in the Netherlands (i.e. risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine). These compounds are called atypical for their lack of the extrapyramidal side effects typical of older antipsychotics. Clozapine, which was developed earlier, is also an atypical antipsychotic drug. The new antipsychotics have proven to be more effective than the old ones in reducing the negative symptoms and in improving the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. Moreover, they indeed induce less extrapyramidal side effects than the older antipsychotics. Head-to-head comparisons of the atypical antipsychotics are sparse. Studies comparing low-dose regimens of the typical antipsychotics with the atypical drugs as well as relapse prevention studies are needed before it can be decided whether the atypical drugs can replace the older compounds.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Netherlands; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychopharmacology; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Agents

Risperidone and olanzapine are atypical antipsychotics that are now widely used in clinical practice.. A MEDLINE search (1966-1999) showed that, following the introduction of these agents in recent years, 26 cases of induced hypomanic and manic syndromes have been reported during standard olanzapine (N = 10) or risperidone (N = 16) treatment.. A critical analysis of these case reports reveals that the effects on mood were sometimes insufficiently documented and that in about half of them (N = 16) evidence is highly suggestive of a causative role of risperidone or olanzapine in the induction of (hypo)manic symptomatology.. Despite limitations, the available literature confirms intriguing effects of these 2 antipsychotics on mood. The risk factors as well as the mechanisms of action underlying these effects remain to be clarified.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

There is relatively little comparative information on elevations in plasma prolactin level (PRL) with conventional versus novel antipsychotic agents.. This paper examines the comparative effects on PRL of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol based on data from 3 multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. Magnitude of response, dose dependency, time course, effects of sex and age, and response to switching from haloperidol to olanzapine are assessed.. The effects of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on PRL were assessed in patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses participating in 3 double-blind clinical trials: (1) a 6-week acute trial comparing olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 1,336) and haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 660), with a 1-year, open-label olanzapine extension for responders; (2) a 54-week study comparing olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 21), risperidone 4 to 10 mg/d (n = 21), and haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 23) in early illness; and (3) a 28-week study comparing olanzapine 10 to 20 mg/d (n = 172) and risperidone 4 to 12 mg/d (n = 167).. PRL elevations were significantly greater with risperidone than with either olanzapine or haloperidol in study 2. and significantly greater than with olanzapine in study 3 (all, P < 0.001). PRL elevations were significantly greater with haloperidol than with olanzapine in study 1 (P < 0.001 ). A dose-response relationship was not consistently confirmed with any of the drug treatments. Risperidone-associated PRL elevations peaked relatively early in treatment. In haloperidol- and risperidone-treated patients, the mean change in PRL was greater in women than in men. PRL decreased significantly when treatment was switched from haloperidol to olanzapine.. This side-by-side analysis of 3 independent studies suggests that with the 3 antipsychotic drugs studied, PRL is elevated moderately by olanzapine (mean change, 1-4 ng/mL), intermediately by haloperidol (mean change, approximately 17 ng/mL), and strongly by risperidone (mean change, 45-80 ng/mL). No consistent dose-response relationship was observed, and the time course and sex-dependency of the response differed between the 3 agents. Patients with haloperidol-induced hyperprolactinemia may benefit from a switch to olanzapine. Long-term studies examining the health consequences of chronic hyperprolactinemia during antipsychotic treatment are needed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prolactin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

To develop an evidence base for recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia.. Systematic overview and meta-regression analyses of randomised controlled trials, as a basis for formal development of guidelines.. 12 649 patients in 52 randomised trials comparing atypical antipsychotics (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole) with conventional antipsychotics (usually haloperidol or chlorpromazine) or alternative atypical antipsychotics.. Overall symptom scores. Rate of drop out (as a proxy for tolerability) and of side effects, notably extrapyramidal side effects.. For both symptom reduction and drop out, there was substantial heterogeneity between the results of trials, including those evaluating the same atypical antipsychotic and comparator drugs. Meta-regression suggested that dose of conventional antipsychotic explained the heterogeneity. When the dose was

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Costs; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

Atypical neuroleptics have enriched our treatment programmes, especially in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. This article reviews the use of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents with schizophrenic disorder. It considers the receptor binding profile and pharmacological properties, indications, side effects, clinical applications and trials of atypical neuroleptics in comparison to the classical neuroleptic haloperidol in adolescent schizophrenia. Special emphasis is placed on the most common atypical neuroleptics clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone since most studies are carried out with these compounds, especially with clozapine. More clinically controlled trials have to be conducted since only one was performed so far. The place of the atypical neuroleptics is discussed and further studies are necessary in order to differentiate the indications tested so far and to find out if the spectrum of indications can be broadened.

Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Psychiatry; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Binding Sites; Brain; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tomography, Emission-Computed

The introduction of conventional antipsychotics revolutionized the management of psychotic disorders in the 1950s. The use of these agents has been marked by several shortcomings, including their association with severe motor disturbances and their limited efficacy in treating the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Patients noncompliance has largely been the result of subjectively distressing extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPMS). It was therefore necessary to develop antipsychotic drugs with selective pharmacological profiles, e.g. limbic selectivity. A defining characteristic of atypical neuroleptics is a higher ratio of serotonin receptor blockade to D2 receptor blockade. Their primary advantage is their superior side-effect profile. The implications of EPMS reduction touch several domains of pathology in schizophrenia such as short- and long-term movement disorders, noncompliance, relapse rate, negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Novel antipsychotics may represent the second pharmacological revolution in the treatment of psychotic disorders. There is, however, still a need for a critical evaluation of the risk-benefit-ratio of differing atypical agents.

Topics: Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Olanzapine is a serotonin-dopamine receptor antagonist primarily used in the treatment of psychotic illnesses. It has been shown in numerous large trials to be as equally effective as haloperidol in the acute treatment and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. However, olanzapine was shown to be more effective than haloperidol in the treatment of negative symptoms and to cause significantly fewer extrapyramidal symptoms. Furthermore, early reports suggest that olanzapine produces less tardive dyskinesia than haloperidol, though longer follow-up data are needed. Current studies have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of olanzapine in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. One comparison trial of olanzapine versus risperidone has indicated similar efficacy. Clinical trials in acute mania have found olanzapine to be more effective than placebo. However, there is no role for olanzapine monotherapy in bipolar disorder given current studies. Although olanzapine has shown a low rate of extrapyramidal symptoms, it is not without adverse effects. Clinically significant weight gain has been noted with olanzapine in each of the large clinical trials. The degree of weight gain is similar to clozapine and probably greater than that observed with risperidone. The long-term medical consequence of atypical antipsychotic-induced weight gain is not known at this time. While generally considered first-line drugs from an efficacy and adverse effect standpoint, pharmacoeconomic studies are needed to justify the large acquisition cost of olanzapine compared to typical agents.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Elderly patients with schizophrenia and dementia patients with agitation are frequently candidates for antipsychotic treatment. Conventional neuroleptics have relatively little effect on negative symptoms and may cause considerable side effects, especially in elderly patients. The authors have found a 29% cumulative annual incidence of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in middle-aged and elderly outpatients treated with relatively low doses of conventional neuroleptics Newer antipsychotics are less likely to cause extrapyramidal symptoms and may be associated with a lower risk of TD. They are generally effective for both positive and negative symptoms and may also improve some aspects of cognition, but these drugs have their own side effects. Dosing requirements for elderly patients tend to be much lower than those for younger adults.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dementia; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The objective of this meta-analysis is to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of the new antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole and quetiapine in schizophrenia compared to placebo and conventional antipsychotics. The main results are: (1) All of the 4 new drugs are more effective than placebo, but the magnitude of the effect is only moderate [mean effect size, r, of all antipsychotics vs. placebo = 0.25, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.22-0.28, n = 2477]. (2) According to the studies published to date, sertindole and quetiapine are as effective as haloperidol, and risperidone and olanzapine are slightly more effective than haloperidol in the treatment of global schizophrenic symptomatology. (3) With respect to negative symptoms, all new antipsychotics are more effective than placebo. However, contrary to widespread opinion, so is the 'conventional' antipsychotic haloperidol. Risperidone and olanzapine are slightly superior, sertindole is as effective and--according to the only study fully published to date--quetiapine is even slightly less effective than haloperidol in this regard. (4) All new antipsychotics are associated with less frequent use of antiparkinson medication than haloperidol, with risperidone appearing to have a slightly less favourable EPS-profile than the other new antipsychotics. The methodological limitations of this review, the generalizability of the results and expectations from future research are discussed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The syndrome of schizophrenia often includes negative symptoms and severe cognitive deficits that are resistant to change with conventional pharmacotherapy. The efficacy of clozapine in the reduction of the negative syndrome has prompted a series of studies implicating circumscribed cognitive improvements. Restrictions on the use of clozapine have encouraged the development and introduction of novel compounds with a clinical efficacy profile similar to clozapine that are hoped also to have beneficial cognitive effects. The present review summarizes studies of the cognitive efficacy of novel antipsychotic medications, particularly in regard to issues in experiment design and study implementation that might facilitate additional research. Although preliminary support exists for relatively circumscribed improvement of cognitive status with the use of clozapine and risperidone--and more general improvement with the use of olanzapine--specific inferences relating cognitive change to particular treatments will remain speculative until more sophisticated investigations are completed. The present review emphasises the most relevant design limitations in past studies to provide practical suggestions for the implementation of subsequent investigations Previous results have established the possibility of a medication-based change in cognitive status in schizophrenia Future research will determine the validity of these changes, the cerebral mechanism involved, and their significance to improved prognosis.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index

Typical antipsychotic agents produce central nervous system effects, especially extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Nearly every patient who receives neuroleptic therapy has one or more identifiable risk factors for TD, among the most significant of which are older age, female gender, presence of EPS, diabetes mellitus, affective disorders, and certain parameters of neuroleptic exposure (i.e. dose and duration of therapy). The typical course of TD is a gradual onset after several years of drug therapy, followed by slow improvement or remission, but a large number of patients have persistent TD with irreversible symptoms. In the management of TD, the patient's mental status is of primary concern. Currently, no uniformly safe and effective therapies for TD exist, though a variety of therapeutic agents, including some of the atypical neuroleptics, have been reported to treat TD successfully in some patients. Because TD liability is so much lower with novel antipsychotic therapy, all patients who have TD or are at risk for TD, as well as EPS, should be considered candidates for switching to these new drugs.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors

Strategies for preventing relapse during the maintenance or stable phase of schizophrenia are discussed for both conventional and newer antipsychotics. For conventional agents, strategies focus on finding dosages that minimize antipsychotic drug side effects and provide adequate protection against psychotic relapse. Although few studies are available to compare older and newer antipsychotics for preventing relapse, there are reasons for proposing that newer drugs will be shown to be superior. Because of their milder side effects, clinicians can choose drug dosages that provide maximum protection against relapse. Further, since patients on the newer drugs are likely to experience fewer discomforting side effects, they may be more likely to take their medications as directed. Other potential advantages of the newer drugs over the older drugs include the likelihood that they are more effective against negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention

The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia requires focus on both clinical and quality of life effects and impact on the cost of medical resources. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies help clinicians and health care decision makers identify treatments that provide the most benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs has been evaluated using noncontrolled, mirrorimage (i.e. retrospective/prospective) cohort study designs; clinical decision analysis models; and randomized clinical trials. The current pharmacoeconomic evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective therapy for neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenia and that although olanzapine and risperidone therapy may be cost neutral, they improve outcome in patients treated for schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The main objective in the treatment of schizophrenia should be to optimize individual patient functioning and quality of life. Little is known about the possible relationship of concurrent mood symptoms and quality of life. We hypothesized that the quality of life for people with schizophrenia would be inversely related to the severity of concurrent mood disruption.. We conducted a post hoc analysis of an international, multicenter, double-blind, 28-week study of 339 patients who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder and were randomized to treatment with either olanzapine or risperidone. Quality of life data were collected at baseline, 8, 16, 24, and 28 weeks or at early discontinuation; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) data were collected at each visit (weekly to week 8 and monthly thereafter). Correlations were calculated between changes in quality of life (quality of life scale [QLS] total and subscales) and PANSS mood score. Regression models were used to determine the proportion of variability in the QLS total and subscores accounted for by changes in PANSS positive, PANSS negative, and PANSS mood scores. Finally, path analysis was performed to determine the mechanisms used by the PANSS mood scores to affect the QLS total and subscores.. Olanzapine demonstrated a significantly greater therapeutic effect on the PANSS mood item than risperidone did. However, mood improvements with either therapy demonstrated correlations of PANSS mood on the QLS total and subscores which were statistically significant, with the strongest correlation against the interpersonal relations (QLS-IPR) subscore. The path analysis results indicate that the PANSS mood item's most significant path in affecting the QLS total and QLS-IPR is direct.. Changes in the quality of life of schizophrenic patients is inversely related to changes in the concurrent mood disruption. Early therapeutic interventions directed at a broader constellation of schizophrenic symptomatology, including mood, may be helpful in improving an individual patient's quality of life. The possible relative advantages of introducing novel antipsychotic agents earlier in the course of illness for restoration of individual quality of life merit further investigation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome

Soon after the introduction of antipsychotic drugs into clinical practice, these agents were observed to be capable of producing not only acute extrapyramidal ("parkinsonian") side effects, but also later occurring abnormal involuntary movements that came to be called tardive dyskinesia. Since antipsychotic drugs are used in a variety of conditions that include psychotic features, studies have attempted to determine whether specific diagnostic subgroups may experience different degrees of vulnerability to drug-induced movement disorders. This issue is important not only to inform clinical practice, but also to provide clues to pathophysiology. A number of studies suggest that patients with affective disorders are at greater risk for developing tardive dyskinesia (controlling, to the extent possible, for other relevant variables such as age, sex, length of treatment). Encouraging preliminary data with new antipsychotic drugs such as olanzapine suggest that the risk of tardive dyskinesia associated with long-term antipsychotic drug use may be substantially reduced. This would go a long way toward improving the benefit-to-risk ratio of antipsychotic drug treatment, particularly in patients with affective disorders.

Topics: Adult; Affective Disorders, Psychotic; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Carbamazepine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Cognitive impairment is a central feature of schizophrenia and has been correlated with negative symptoms and impaired social functioning. There is a growing body of data suggesting that the so-called atypical antipsychotic drugs (e.g. clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine) are better at enhancing cognitive function than traditional neuroleptics. Preclinical studies of information processing using a pre-pulse inhibition model show that the mechanism of action of both olanzapine and clozapine for cognitive enhancement may involve glutamatergic/N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonism. Using positron emission tomography, we have described the metabolic and neurochemical correlates of cognitive impairment induced by glutamatergic/NMDA antagonism. A better understanding of the underlying causes of cognitive impairment may contribute to elucidating the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and the development of more efficacious treatments for this disorder.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Glutamic Acid; Haloperidol; Humans; N-Methylaspartate; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The primary aim of the long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia is to prevent relapse, which is costly both in psychological and economic terms. Although with conventional antipsychotic drugs relapse may occur despite compliance with maintenance regimens, the rate of relapse is reduced in compliant patients. However, this benefit is achieved at the cost of side-effects and the risk of developing tardive dyskinesia, even among patients who have taken these drugs for only a year or two. To provide the therapeutic benefits of maintenance medication without its drawbacks, intermittent dosing and long-term therapy with reduced doses of conventional medications have been explored. The atypical antipsychotic agent, olanzapine, has been shown to be effective maintenance medication and has an improved safety profile.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Long-Term Care; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Recurrence; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent displaying a unique and pleotrophic pharmacology, which distinguishes it from other existing treatments. Clinical investigations employing olanzapine have demonstrated a number of potential therapeutic advantages in reference not only to placebo but also to contemporary drug standards in the management of psychosis. This paper reviews data on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of olanzapine, its benefits for quality of life, and economic aspects to assist clinicians in determining where they can usefully employ it.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder; Drug Resistance; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prolactin; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine possesses a broad pharmacological profile, interacting with a range of different neurotransmitter receptors. Although its affinity for muscarinic receptors is relatively greater than for dopamine receptors, on schedule-controlled behaviour olanzapine displays a profile resembling a dopamine antagonist. Likewise, in a test of cognitive function, olanzapine does not produce anticholinergic-like deficits. In drug discrimination assays, olanzapine substitutes for clozapine in clozapine-trained animals and clozapine generalises to olanzapine in olanzapine-trained animals. Olanzapine also reverses the behavioural deficits produced by inhibiting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor glutamatergic transmission. This profile suggests that olanzapine will be effective against both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia while producing minimal extrapyramidal side-effects.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Clozapine; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Humans; Maze Learning; Motor Activity; Muscarinic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Pharmaceutical Vehicles; Phencyclidine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Scopolamine; Social Isolation

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has a broad receptor binding profile, which may account for its pharmacological effects in schizophrenia. In vitro receptor binding studies showed a high affinity for dopamine D2, D3, and D4 receptors; all 5-HT2 receptor subtypes and the 5-HT6 receptor; muscarinic receptors, especially the M1 subtype: and alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. In vivo studies showed that olanzapine had potent activity at D2 and 5-HT2A receptors, but much less activity at D1 and muscarinic receptors, and that it inhibited dopaminergic neurons in the A10 but not the A9 tract, suggesting that this agent will not cause extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS). Microdialysis studies showed that olanzapine increased the extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine, but not 5-HT, in the prefrontal cortex, and increased extracellular dopamine levels in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens, areas of the brain associated with schizophrenia. Studies of gene expression showed that olanzapine 10 mg/kg also increased Fos expression in the prefrontal cortex, the dorsolateral striatum, and the nucleus accumbens. These findings are consistent with the effectiveness of olanzapine on both negative and positive symptoms and suggest that, with careful dosing, olanzapine should not cause EPS.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Gene Expression; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Muscarinic; Receptors, Serotonin; Schizophrenia

The recent introduction of the atypical antipsychotics into the treatment arena for psychoses and related disorders comes with justifiable excitement. These newer antipsychotics offer several clinical benefits over the conventional antipsychotics, which have been the mainstays of care thus far. The primary advantage of these atypical agents is their superior side effect profiles, particularly with regard to extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). The implications from a reduction in EPS touch on virtually every aspect of pathology in schizophrenic illness, including short- and long-term movement disorders, negative symptoms, noncompliance, cognitive dysfunction, and dysphoria. It should be emphasized that while atypical antipsychotics share many clinical attributes, there are also substantial differences among them. This review will examine the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and side effect profiles of the atypical antipsychotics and attempt to relate the attributes observed in clinical practice and clinical trials to their basic pharmacologic profiles. There is a fair, but not perfect, correspondence between the pharmacologic profiles of the different atypical antipsychotics and their respective clinical attributes. After a comparative overview of their receptor-binding profiles, a brief pharmacokinetic summary will be provided. Finally, the clinical profiles of these agents will be summarized with regard to both their efficacy and adverse effects.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Limbic System; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Receptors, Neurotransmitter; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The advent of a number of new antipsychotics has been paralleled by efforts to better delineate their mechanisms of action and, in doing so, further our understanding of schizophrenia and its pathophysiology. Technological advances, such as positron emission tomography (PET), have proven to be powerful tools in this process, allowing us to evaluate in vivo models based primarily on in vitro evidence. Combined serotonin-2/dopamine-2 (5-HT2/D2) antagonism represents one such model, and we now have PET evidence available that can be extrapolated to our understanding and clinical use of both conventional and novel antipsychotics.

Topics: Amoxapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Haloperidol; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Loxapine; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Tomography, Emission-Computed

Three atypical antipsychotics are currently considered to be first-line therapies for schizophrenia, namely risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine. Deciding which one of these agents to choose for any given patient can be a daunting task because head-to-head comparisons of these 3 agents are just beginning, and most published trials are comparisons with typical antipsychotics, not with another atypical antipsychotic. Furthermore, results from clinical trials often do not match findings from clinical practice. Thus, guidelines for selection and use of the atypical antipsychotics are evolving from controlled studies as well as from clinical judgment based on the practical use of these agents once they have entered clinical practice. The atypical properties of first-line atypical antipsychotics as well as clozapine are reviewed here, with clinical pearls and dosing tips for each based upon a consensus of information from both clinical trials and clinical practice. The conventional antipsychotic loxapine is also reviewed and proposed as a potentially valuable agent to augment atypical antipsychotics when patients do not experience an acceptable treatment response from monotherapy with an atypical antipsychotic. By integrating information from clinical trials and clinical practice, the prescriber can be in a better position to choose which atypical antipsychotic to select for any given patient.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Terminology as Topic

The management of agitation and aggression in psychiatric inpatients is a significant clinical dilemma. Establishing a clear diagnosis and distinguishing whether aggression is an acute manifestation or a long-standing or repetitive problem are fundamental antecedents of medication treatment. For acute aggression, either benzodiazepines or antipsychotic medications (typical and atypical) are recommended choices. Currently, on the basis of efficacy, ease of use, and availability in multiple (tablet, liquid, intramuscular) preparations, typical antipsychotics such as loxapine should be considered as first choice for acute aggression (in psychosis). On the other hand, atypical antipsychotics, particularly clozapine, should be considered when aggression in psychosis persists and/or is repetitive. Typical antipsychotics are indicated for persistent aggression in psychosis when medication noncompliance is the obstacle to effective treatment.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Loxapine; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Clinical studies with clozapine have clearly demonstrated its superior efficacy over that of conventional antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. In comparative trials with these drugs, considerably more patients respond to treatment with clozapine than to conventional antipsychotic medication. Recently, new antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, and zotepine, have been introduced, but extensive data on their effects in treatment-resistant patients are not yet available. Published studies have drawn criticism in terms of inappropriate titration schedules, nonequivalent dosing between treatment groups, short treatment duration, and inadequate sample sizes. Further research will be needed to determine whether novel antipsychotics may substitute for clozapine in the future or whether clozapine will retain its unique role in the management of patients suffering from difficult-to-treat schizophrenic disorders.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Knowing the clinical differences of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone would be of benefit for choosing an atypical antipsychotic drug. In order to compare their efficacy and acceptability, we conducted a meta-analysis of published, randomized, placebo-controlled trials by comparing the response and dropout rates of an atypical antipsychotic drug group and those of a placebo group. After a comprehensive search of study reports, the response and dropout rates of patients treated with an atypical antipsychotic drug and those treated with placebo were extracted on the intention-to-treat basis. The effect size with 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) of pooled data comparing the response and dropout rates of an atypical antipsychotic drug group and those of a placebo group were calculated by using the Peto method. The response-rate effect sizes (95% CIs) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were 1.75 (1.06 to 2.89), 1.71 (1.20 to 2.42), and 3.28 (1.98 to 5.44), respectively. The dropout-rate effect sizes (95% CIs) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88), 0.65 (0.46 to 0.91), and 0.39 (0.24 to 0.62), respectively. In conclusion, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone are more effective and more acceptable than placebo in treating schizophrenic patients. However, they are not different from each other in the respect of efficacy and acceptability. The cost of these agents should play an important role in choosing an atypical antipsychotic drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chi-Square Distribution; Confidence Intervals; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Odds Ratio; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The introduction of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and sertindole for the treatment of schizophrenia has coincided with an increased awareness of the potential of drug-drug interactions, particularly involving the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The current literature describing the pharmacokinetics of the metabolism of these agents, including their potential to influence the metabolism of other medications, is reviewed. Clozapine appears to be metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, with additional contributions by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. In addition, clozapine may inhibit the activity of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and induce CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A. Risperidone is metabolized by CYP2D6, and possibly CYP3A4. In vitro data indicate that olanzapine is metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. Quetiapine is metabolised by CYP3A4 and sertindole by CYP2D6. There is, however, a general paucity of in vivo data regarding the metabolism of the atypical antipsychotics, indicating a need for further research in this area.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine (2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-b][1,5] benzodiazepine) is a novel antipsychotic agent of the theinobenzodiazepine class developed by Eli Lilly & Co. It has a pleotrophic pharmacology and affects the dopaminergic, serotonergic, muscarinic and adrenergic systems. The therapeutic advantage of recent antipsychotics (so-called atypical antipsychotics) has been attributed to additional serotonergic effects. Clinical studies and trials suggest that olanzapine is comparable or superior to haloperidol and may be superior to risperidone in terms of efficacy and side-effect profiles. The starting dose of olanzapine is a single dose of 10 mg. The drug reaches peak plasma levels in 5-8 h, and has a half-life of about 35 h, depending on metabolism. The recommended maximum dose is 20 mg daily, but higher doses have been employed. Abnormalities of the QTc interval on ECG are unlikely to occur and so there is no need for a baseline ECG as with sertindole, which has recently been withdrawn. The most common side-effects are somnolence and weight gain. About 40% of patients in clinical trials gain weight--especially if they are on a high starting dose and if they were underweight pre-treatment. Reported evidence to date suggests that olanzapine is relatively less likely to produce sexual dysfunction. In general, weight gain and sexual dysfunction are of great concern to people taking antipsychotics and the side-effect profile of any antipsychotic may affect compliance. Olanzapine's general efficacy and side-effect profile suggest that, unforeseen post-marketing complications notwithstanding, olanzapine deserves a major place in the first-line management of psychotic disorders.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

The treatment of schizophrenic patients who fail adequate trials of typical neuroleptics is a major challenge. For these patients, the availability of atypical antipsychotics is a useful therapeutic advance. Olanzapine shows a superior and broader spectrum of efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia, particularly its negative symptoms, with a substantially more favorable safety profile than conventional antipsychotic agents (e.g., haloperidol). However, little information on the clinical effects of olanzapine is available in Japan. This article provides information on the efficacy of olanzapine for various symptoms of schizophrenic patients and drug safety. Olanzapine is significantly superior to haloperidol in positive, negative, and depressive symptoms of patients, and for tardive dyskinesia and extrapyramidal symptoms. Significantly greater improvement in avolition-apathy is achieved with olanzapine as compared to risperidone. These advantages are related to high affinity at the 5-HT2 binding site, no association with an alteration in dopamine A9 firing rates, and lower D2 striatal receptor blockade of olanzapine. Treatment with 10 mg/day olanzapine is more appropriate for positive symptoms, and 12.5-17.5 mg/day olanzapine is more effective for negative symptoms. Patients will need help adapting to a new level of functioning after a successful switch to olanzapine, and overcoming the disappointment that eventually occurs when the limitations of olanzapine become apparent.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Binding Sites; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Secondary Prevention; Serotonin

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent which is at least as effective as the conventional agent haloperidol and the atypical agent risperidone. Olanzapine may be superior to haloperidol in some respects, including treatment of negative symptoms. A major advantage of olanzapine over haloperidol is its lower risk of extrapyramidal symptoms. Olanzapine improves quality of life and other aspects of functioning to a greater extent than haloperidol, and improves quality of life to at least the same extent as risperidone. However, olanzapine has a high acquisition cost compared with conventional antipsychotics. Despite this, most pharmacoeconomic analyses indicate that treatment with olanzapine does not significantly increase, and may even decrease, the overall direct treatment costs of schizophrenia, compared with haloperidol. Total direct medical costs calculated from prospective resource utilisation data were lower with olanzapine than with haloperidol by $US388 (1995 values) per patient over 6 weeks and by $US55 per patient per month during 46 weeks extended treatment. In a mixed effects linear model of the same data, total costs over 1 year were $US10,301 (1996 values) per patient lower with olanzapine than haloperidol, and olanzapine was associated with 18.3 more symptom-free days per patient. Compared with risperidone, mean total direct medical costs over 28 weeks were $US493 (1995 values) per patient lower with olanzapine. In a Markov model of 5 years' treatment, olanzapine was associated with more time in a disability-free state than haloperidol at a total cost per patient that was lower by $US1539 (1995 values), 816 Pounds (1995/1996 values), 977 Dutch guilders (NLG; 1995 values) and 2296 Deutschmarks in US, UK, Dutch and German analyses, respectively. In a similar Spanish analysis, the overall total cost was higher with olanzapine, giving an incremental cost effectiveness for olanzapine of 32,516 pesetas (1995 values) per month of disability-free time gained. When risperidone was a comparator, the total cost per patient was $US1875 and NLG202 lower with olanzapine in US and Dutch analyses, respectively.. The high acquisition cost of olanzapine is offset by reductions in other treatment costs in patients with schizophrenia. Compared with haloperidol, the drug improved patient outcome and quality of life, while overall direct treatment costs were generally not increased, or even decreased. Olanzapine has also been reported to decrease overall treatment costs compared with risperidone, but confirmation is required. Olanzapine is a cost-effective alternative to conventional agents for the treatment of moderately to severely ill patients with longstanding schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Costs and Cost Analysis; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia

The pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia remains a critical component in the short- and long-term management of this disease. Considerable progress has been made in delineating different domains of this illness, ranging from positive and negative symptoms to cognitive dysfunction and psychosocial vulnerabilities. Increasingly, treatments are being studied in relation to a variety of different outcome measures with functional ability and quality of life achieving appropriate emphasis. The introduction of a new generation of antipsychotic drugs has helped to raise optimism and expectations. Overall, second-generation drugs do provide clear advantages in terms of reducing adverse effects (particularly drug-induced Parkinsonism, anesthesia, and, hopefully, tardive dyskinesia). Advantages in alleviating refractory symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, and suicidal behavior are found in some reports; however, much remains to be done methodologically in establishing the relative merits of specific drugs in the multiple domains of interest.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

As antipsychotic treatment evolves toward a broader range of efficacy and more benign side effect profiles, our criteria for treatment-refractory schizophrenia may become more subtle. Unidimensional concepts of treatment resistance may be replaced by multiaxial descriptions of the target symptoms, side effects, and compliance issues that limit the ultimate goals of enhanced psychosocial function and quality of life. Augmentation strategies, increasing insight into dose response relationships, and atypical agents may benefit patients who failed to respond to or tolerate previous therapies. The advantages of newer agents in treatment-resistant schizophrenia may arise in part from their preferential targeting of newer agents in treatment-resistant schizophrenia may arise in part from their preferential targeting of mesolimbic compared with motor and tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic pathways.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Terminology as Topic; Treatment Failure

Antipsychotic medications are the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia. The recent advent of atypical antipsychotics has provided new clinical options and set higher expectations for the treatment of schizophrenia. It is not yet clear how each different drug will fit within the therapeutic armamentarium and this lack is most evident with considering patients with treatment refractory schizophrenia. On the other hand, the expectation of superior efficacy, more benign side effect profile and potential to impact the longitudinal course of schizophrenia provide a rationale for the use of novel antipsychotics as a first-line treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Behavioral Symptoms; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Resistance; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Neurobehavioral Manifestations; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychopharmacology; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

Inevitably, the greater availability of more costly antipsychotic medications has resulted in attempts to regulate the use of these agents. Early objections over the cost of treatment with clozapine or risperidone have in part been mollified by preliminary statistics on the cost effectiveness of these agents. However, this issue is complex and requires careful consideration of pharmacoeconomic principles in the development and clinical distribution of novel antipsychotics. Future cost-effectiveness studies need to consider a balance of public and private perspectives. These studies should be conducted in several settings, preferably also within the context of broader, multimodal treatment intervention strategies.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, dosage and administration, and cost of olanzapine are reviewed. Olanzapine is a serotonin-dopamine-receptor antagonist indicated for use in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. The affinity of olanzapine for neuroreceptors is similar to that of clozapine. The drug is well absorbed from the GI tract; food has no effect. Olanzapine is more effective than placebo and equal to haloperidol in reducing psychotic symptoms on two rating scales. However, unlike typical dopamine-receptor antagonists used for antipsychotic therapy, olanzapine is more effective in reducing the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The most frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with olanzapine are somnolence, agitation, insomnia, and headache. Constipation and dry mouth occur as dose-dependent ADRs. Unlike clozapine, olanzapine does not cause agranulocytosis. No cases of tardive dyskinesia or neuroleptic malignant syndrome have been reported. Olanzapine has been associated with slight increases in hepatic transaminases. More study is needed to determine whether olanzapine interacts significantly with other drugs. The recommended starting dosage is 5-10 mg orally once daily. Efficacy beyond six weeks has not been evaluated; patients treated for longer than six weeks should be periodically reassessed. Olanzapine costs about 10 times more than typical antipsychotics because a generic version is not available; however, olanzapine costs less than clozapine therapy and may cost less than haloperidol in terms of total health care costs. Olanzapine offers an effective alternative for treating schizophrenia and has a favorable adverse-effect profile.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopamine Antagonists; Humans; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

To review the existing literature on the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotics for adolescent psychosis. The review focuses in particular on literature regarding adverse effects that are thought to have an increased incidence in young patients and on the possible neurobiological bases for such differential sensitivity.. Pertinent studies were sought using Medline searches, supplemented by selected bibliographies, and reviewed.. There is a relative paucity of research in this area; in particular, well-controlled trails are lacking. The existing literature suggests fairly good efficacy of both typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of psychotic disorders in children and adolescents. However, the incidence of certain side effects, particularly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). is found to be higher in younger patients compared with adults. Positron emission tomography (PET) receptor studies in adults have demonstrated that the incidence of EPS is related to dose-dependent dopamine type-2 (D2) receptor occupancy and that there is a significant relationship between the number of these receptors and age.. Improved tolerability is leading to the increasing us of atypical antipsychotics for adolescent patients, though these new drugs to have specific adverse effects of their own. There is a need for more controlled studies of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents. In particular, dose-finding studies are needed to determine the optimal dose range to produce the greatest improvement with the least side effects for each of these drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Psychiatry; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Fibers; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Corpus Striatum; Disease Susceptibility; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tomography, Emission-Computed

Adverse effects of antipsychotics often lead to noncompliance. Thus, clinicians should address patients' concerns about adverse effects and attempt to choose medications that will improve their patients' quality of life as well as overall health. The side effect profiles of the atypical antipsychotics are more advantageous than those of the conventional neuroleptics. Conventional agents are associated with unwanted central nervous system effects, including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), tardive dyskinesia, sedation, and possible impairment of some cognitive measures, as well as cardiac effects, orthostatic hypotension, hepatic changes, anticholinergic side effects, sexual dysfunction, and weight gain. The newer atypical agents have a lower risk of EPS, but are associated in varying degrees with sedation, cardiovascular effects, anticholinergic effects, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, hepatic effects, lowered seizure threshold (primarily clozapine), and agranulocytosis (clozapine only). Since the incidence and severity of specific adverse effects differ among the various atypicals, the clinician should carefully consider which side effects are most likely to lead to the individual's dissatisfaction and noncompliance before choosing an antipsychotic for a particular patient.

Topics: Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Central Nervous System Diseases; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Health Status; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Cholinergic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological; Sleep Wake Disorders; Treatment Refusal; Weight Gain

The advent of the atypical antipsychotics marked a new era in the history of the treatment of psychotic disorders. To evaluate the published literature about the available atypical antipsychotics--clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine--and select the most appropriate treatment for specific patients, physicians need to understand the outcome measures used in clinical studies, the pharmacologic differences that explain varying side effect profiles, and pharmacoeconomic assessments that are used in the decision-making process. While the atypical antipsychotics have established efficacy in the overall treatment of schizophrenia, they may differ in their effects on factors such as cognitive function, overall quality of life, adverse events, and hospitalization status. Each of these factors should be considered when weighing treatment options for an individual patient.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Approval; Health Care Costs; Health Status; Hospitalization; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

The incidence of acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)--akathisia, dystonia, and parkinsonism--associated with traditional antipsychotics varies, but most researchers agree that neuroleptic-induced EPS occur in 50% to 75% of patients who take conventional antipsychotics. Atypical antipsychotics were developed to widen the therapeutic index and to reduce EPS. Although the mechanisms are unclear, the risk of EPS is less with the novel antipsychotics than with conventional drugs, and agents that produce low levels of acute EPS are likely to produce less tardive dyskinesia. Nevertheless, clinicians should exercise caution when comparing data from investigations of the novel antipsychotics and, until long-term data become available, should administer the new drugs at doses below the EPS-producing level.

Topics: Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Dystonia; Humans; Olanzapine; Parkinson Disease, Secondary; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

Depression in schizophrenia may be partially responsible for the increased suicide rate in schizophrenic patients, which is more than 20 times higher than that found in the general population. Affective disorders in patients with schizophrenia are associated with a poor outcome, an increased risk of relapse, and a high rate of suicide. There is evidence that atypical antipsychotics may contribute to a reduction in suicidality, and although the new drugs are marketed for the treatment of schizophrenia, their novel psychopharmacologic effects suggest the possibility of other therapeutic applications. Recent studies of the efficacy of the novel antipsychotics found that these agents may produce an antidepressant effect in schizophrenia and may be used as either an adjunctive medication or an alternative to mood stabilizers in patients with affective disorders.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder; Humans; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide; Suicide Prevention

Atypical antipsychotics have become the treatment of choice for patients experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia. In addition, they are often prescribed for conditions such as bipolar disorder and dementia. While clinical trials have not yet established the efficacy of the atypical antipsychotics for these uses, a number of reports offer preliminary evidence that the atypical antipsychotics may be beneficial for affective disorders, substance abuse disorder, senile dementia, and pathologic aggression. Atypical agents may be particularly effective and tolerable in elderly patients who are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of conventional antipsychotic medication. Lower dosages are more necessary for the elderly than for younger adults. Current evidence suggests that clozapine is the most effective atypical antipsychotic for neuroleptic-resistant patients. Risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine may also be effective in a subset of these patients.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Decision Trees; Dementia; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

A substantial portion of schizophrenic patients demonstrate suboptimal response to conventional antipsychotics. These agents are primarily effective in the treatment of psychotic symptoms; their efficacy in other domains of psychopathology such as negative symptoms, chronic aggressive behavior, and cognitive deficits, is limited or non-existent. In this group of refractory patients, the novel atypical antipsychotic clozapine has demonstrated robust efficacy, with response rates approaching 60% after twelve weeks of treatment. Efficacy of clozapine extends to symptom domains other than psychosis, including negative symptoms, mood stabilization, aggressive behavior and compulsive water drinking. Several novel agents, each of which shares some, but not all, of the preclinical and clinical characteristics that make clozapine so unique, have been introduced in the last 4 years. These agents demonstrate a broader spectrum of efficacy and an improved side effect profile in non-refractory patients. Initial data on their efficacy in refractory patients suggests that olanzapine does not achieve overall superior efficacy in this patient population compared to conventional agents although there is some evidence of relatively greater efficacy in negative symptoms and aggressivity. Several studies suggest that the efficacy of risperidone is superior to that of conventional agents in refractory patients. Preliminary conclusions are not possible for quetiapine because of a paucity of data in the literature. The literature supports a risperidone trial prior to a clozapine trial in a treatment algorithm for refractory patients because of its more favorable risk/benefit profile.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

When a patient with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia is admitted into the hospital, the target symptoms include pathologic excitement/agitation and exacerbated psychotic symptoms. The goal of hospitalization becomes attenuation of these symptoms to a level compatible with safe discharge. The mainstay of stabilization is antipsychotic treatment. A risk/benefit analysis of the conventional versus the newer antipsychotics favors the use of the newer agents as first-line drugs. These newer antipsychotic agents represent the first significant advance in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia in the past four decades. They are at least as effective as conventional agents and are clearly superior from a safety perspective. Because of short inpatient stays, the challenge for clinicians is to provide an adequate treatment period without aggressively escalating the dose.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Hospitalization; Humans; Length of Stay; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The early recognition and management of a first episode of schizophrenic illness is a difficult task, with identification complicated by a broad differential diagnosis, lack of definitive data on the prognostic implications of premorbid/prodromal symptoms, and, until recently, treatment limited to pharmacologic agents with severe adverse effects. The first psychotic episode in patients with schizophrenia is the most responsive to treatment in terms of both rate and degree. However, first-episode patients are also more likely to develop motor side effects, even at lower medication doses, than multiepisode patients. Considerable evidence supports the assertion that early treatment can improve outcome and possibly prevent the development of full-blown illness in high-risk individuals. There is evidence that atypical antipsychotic medications are effective in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia and are well tolerated. The improved tolerability associated with the newer antipsychotic medications, including a lower risk for motor side effects and possible lower risk for development of tardive dyskinesia, has swung the risk-benefit balance in favor of early and aggressive treatment. By intervening early and providing long-term maintenance treatment, the course of schizophrenic illness may be altered in the coming years with overall decreased deterioration and chronicity and overall improved functioning resulting in lower societal costs.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnosis, Differential; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Episode of Care; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Placebo-controlled maintenance studies of conventional antipsychotic agents demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of schizophrenic relapse in neuroleptic-treated patients. Neuroleptic discontinuation even in patients who remained in remission for as long as 5 years results in a relapse rate comparable to that seen for patients initially assigned to placebo. Yet, patients maintained on conventional neuroleptics are exposed to the risk of tardive dyskinesia (approximately 5% per year for patients with up to 10 years of neuroleptic exposure). Attempts have been made to reduce neuroleptic exposure. A lower maintenance dose was associated with higher relapse rates, as was intermittent, targeted therapy. Psychoeducational treatment studies reaffirmed that the major influence on the rate of rehospitalization was the dose of conventional maintenance medication. Although data are scarce for maintenance treatment with atypical antipsychotic drugs, findings suggest that atypical agents are at least as efficacious and may be better tolerated. Olanzapine has demonstrated efficacy in maintenance treatment as well as a reduced risk of tardive dyskinesia compared with haloperidol.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Caregivers; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic and debilitating disorder whose effective pharmacological management is often less than optimal. For several decades, pharmaceutical treatment for this disorder consisted of conventional neuroleptics such as haloperidol and chlorpromazine. However, the limitations of these drugs have driven the development of newer antipsychotics that are designed to be more efficacious and more tolerable than conventional agents. Newer agents available for consideration as first-line treatment options now include risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole and, more recently, quetiapine. Proper dosing has emerged as a vital factor in the effective use of these newer drugs. This report examines data derived from clinical trials and market research with risperidone and olanzapine to help clinicians determine the appropriate dose for efficacy and to appraise the adverse events associated with that efficacious dose. Current information suggests that, for most patients with schizophrenia, the optimal dose with respect to efficacy and tolerability of risperidone is < or = 6 mg/day. The optimal dose of olanzapine is less clear and may be 15 mg/day or higher. With the advent of these newer antipsychotics, clinicians now have more treatment options for the management of patients with psychotic disorders. Knowledge gained through clinical experience is needed to augment clinical trial results and to help define the most effective use of each of these agents.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

This article reviews the published clinical experience with atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents.. A computerized literature search was conducted (MEDLINE, 1974-1998) to retrieve all reports on the use of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents. A hand search was performed as well. All relevant clinical data were collated by type of drug.. We found 5 blind placebo-controlled clinical trials (105 patients), 24 open-label clinical trials (387 patients), and 33 case series (115 patients) describing the use of the atypical neuroleptics clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, sulpiride, tiapride, amisulpride, remoxipride, and clothiapine in children and adolescents. Some of these agents, especially clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine, were found to be efficacious in the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and pervasive developmental disorders. The role of atypical neuroleptics as augmenters of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder is unclear. Risperidone appears to possess anti-tic properties in patients with Tourette's disorder.. The most convincing evidence of the efficacy of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents concerns clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Data on other atypical neuroleptics in other disorders are still sparse, and further research is needed. Some of the atypical neuroleptics may become the first-line treatment for childhood schizophrenia and pervasive developmental disorders.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Remoxipride; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This article will briefly familiarize the reader with the positive and negative signs and with the symptoms of Schizophrenia. After describing these signs and symptoms, the atypical anti-psychotic medications of Risperidone, Olanzapine and Clozapine will be reviewed as to their pharmacodynamics, dosages, and side effects in treating of these sign and symptoms. Within the scope of practice for advance practice nurses, the care being rendered and the implementation of those atypical drugs will be described. Thanks to their educational and clinical background, the advanced practice nurses find themselves in a unique set of circumstances to positively contribute in the treatment and maintenance of Schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Nurse Clinicians; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Nursing; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Olanzapine is a thienobenzodiazepine derivative which displays efficacy in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. It has structural and pharmacological properties resembling those of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and an improved tolerability profile compared with the classical antipsychotic haloperidol. In several large, well controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses, olanzapine generally 5 to 20 mg/day was at least as effective as haloperidol (5 to 20mg) and more so than placebo, as assessed by overall rating scales for psychoses. Olanzapine improved negative symptoms to a greater extent than haloperidol in 2 of 3 comparative trials, including the largest trial. Efficacy of olanzapine has a rapid onset (within 1 to 2 weeks). Its clinical benefits appear to be maintained for treatment periods of up to 1 year, as shown by analysis of the extension phase of several trials demonstrating decreased probability of hospitalisation over this period compared with haloperidol. Preliminary data suggest the drug may also improve quality of life. Olanzapine was associated with significantly fewer adverse movement disorders (e.g. akathisia, dystonia, hypertonia, extrapyramidal symptoms) than haloperidol. There have been no reports of agranulocytosis (as occurs with clozapine) or any other haemotoxicity attributed to olanzapine, and the drug has shown minimal effect on prolactin levels. Transient increases in levels of hepatic transaminases seem to be clinically important. The only events recorded more frequently during olanzapine than during haloperidol therapy were weight gain, dry mouth and increased appetite. Although the antipsychotic activity of olanzapine has been well demonstrated. Its efficacy in refractory schizophrenia and its place relative to other atypical antipsychotics remain to be determined. Nevertheless, if the long term tolerability profile of olanzapine is confirmed, the drug should provide a valuable therapeutic alternative in the management of schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

To present aspects of preclinical and clinical pharmacology of new antipsychotic drugs and to emphasize those preclinical drug characteristics which might predict desirable clinical actions.. Review of the relevant literature and publicly presented data.. Traditional neuroleptics have considerable effectiveness in treating positive symptoms of psychosis but can cause serious motor side effects. Clozapine produces no motor side effects and delivers a unique antipsychotic action. Risperidone also produces low motor side effects, but only at relatively low doses. Olanzapine and sertindole are newly introduced. Both have potent antipsychotic actions, with greatly reduced motor side effects. Both drugs also have possible advantages in negative symptoms.. These data support the conclusion that several new antipsychotics are becoming available for general use which are safe and effective in the treatment of psychosis and have several advantages over traditional neuroleptics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is a new "atypical" antipsychotic agent that belongs chemically to the thienobenzodiazepine class. Its relatively greater binding affinity for 5-HT2 compared to D2 receptors makes it similar to the atypical agent clozapine, a serotonin/dopamine antagonist. Four double-blind pivotal studies, which compare olanzapine to placebo and/or haloperidol, are presented. The results suggest that olanzapine is as effective as haloperidol for positive symptoms and more effective than haloperidol for the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Clinical safety data for treatment of acute schizophrenia with olanzapine, a new atypical antipsychotic agent, are summarized. The primary clinical trial safety database included 2500 patients treated with olanzapine, 810 with haloperidol, and 236 with placebo. The overall discontinuation rate from olanzapine treatment was low. Significant adverse events included somnolence, weight gain, and asymptomatic treatment-emergent transaminase elevation. Minimal parkinsonism and akathisia with rare dystonia were noted. No hematotoxicity was noted. The incidence of seizures and sexual dysfunction was rare.

Topics: Acute Disease; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Dystonia; Haloperidol; Heart Rate; Humans; Liver; Olanzapine; Parkinson Disease, Secondary; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sleep; Transaminases; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

As the new generation of atypical antipsychotics becomes available, the limitations of the older typical agents become apparent. The new medications, which have benefits other than the alleviation of positive symptoms of schizophrenia, may also be beneficial for psychotic disorders that have responded poorly to conventional neuroleptics. This article will describe the potential use of the atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine, for affective mood disturbances in schizophrenia, psychotic depression and mania, first-break schizophrenia, comorbid schizophrenia and substance abuse disorders, dementia in the elderly and those with late-onset schizophrenia, and behavioral problems in patients with mental retardation or developmental delays.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Comorbidity; Dementia; Depressive Disorder; Developmental Disabilities; Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry); Humans; Intellectual Disability; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders

Olanzapine is a new antipsychotic agent with serotonin/dopamine antagonism action. Efficacy in treating overall psychopathology in acute schizophrenia as measured by the BPRS0-6 total score was demonstrated at 10 mg/day versus placebo; at doses in a 5-20 mg/day range, olanzapine was comparable or superior to haloperidol. Superior efficacy for negative and depressive symptoms was shown in comparison to haloperidol. Olanzapine has a favorable acute and tardive extrapyramidal symptom profile relative to haloperidol and caused substantially less elevation of serum prolactin. Dose-related weight gain and asymptomatic mild transaminase elevations occurred in olanzapine-treated patients.

Topics: Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Medications comprise a minor portion of the costs of schizophrenia, but may have a major impact on the likelihood of successful outcome of care. Novel antipsychotic medications which demonstrate superior symptom control, an improved safety profile, and benefits to quality-of-life may also reduce patients' need for medical services and the associated costs of these treatments. This report first considers key experimental design elements involved in integrating pharmacoeconomic and clinical objectives in studies of new drug therapies for schizophrenia. We briefly discuss the choice of therapies for comparison, randomization and blinding, sample size and composition, data collection, selection of the time frame for economic evaluation, and the importance of an intent-to-treat perspective. Second, as an example we present the design and selected results from a new economic clinical trial of the novel antipsychotic olanzapine. This trial utilized a randomized, double-blind design to compare the use of medical services and the cost of treatment for 817 schizophrenic patients from the United States treated with olanzapine or haloperidol. In comprehensive health care cost comparisons that incorporated the expenditures for study medications, the total cost of health care for olanzapine-treated patients was reduced by an average of $431 per month in comparison with haloperidol-treated patients during the initial 6 weeks of treatment. Among treatment responders receiving double-blind therapy for a maximum of 1 year, the total cost of care among olanzapine responders was reduced by an average of $345 per month in comparison with haloperidol responders. The results of this economic evaluation suggest that olanzapine's superior treatment profile may lead to reductions in the overall costs of medical care for patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Data Collection; Double-Blind Method; Drug Costs; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Haloperidol; Health Care Costs; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Pirenzepine; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy data, and adverse effects of olanzapine as a treatment for schizophrenia and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of this atypical antipsychotic agent compared with currently marketed agents.. A MEDLINE computer literature search was conducted to retrieve all English-language studies and review articles involving olanzapine published as of October 1, 1996. The manufacturer of the drug, Eli Lilly and Company, provided the clinical investigator's brochure and abstracts of unpublished Phase III clinical trials.. Animal studies evaluating the pharmacology of olanzapine were evaluated, as were all open-label and double-blind studies involving the evaluation of olanzapine for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.. All available clinical studies were reviewed and the interpretation of data for each study was influenced by the size of the study sample, the nature of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data analysis techniques used.. Olanzapine is a thienobenzodiazepine analog with an in vitro receptor affinity profile similar to that of clozapine. Olanzapine exhibits linear kinetics over the dosage range studied and is extensively metabolized in humans. Clinical evaluations to date have shown olanzapine to be at least as efficacious as typical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of the acute phase of schizophrenia. The drug was well tolerated, with significantly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than haloperidol. Current data suggest that olanzapine may be more effective than haloperidol for the treatment of negative symptoms; moreover, preliminary data suggest that fewer relapses occur over the course of treatment in patients treated with olanzapine compared with those taking haloperidol.. The exact place of olanzapine in the therapy of psychotic patients remains unclear, as more data are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this agent, its impact on negative symptoms, and its potential use in patients resistant to the standard agents. Despite limitations in the current database, olanzapine is a promising treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Aged; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

The unprecedented level of activity in the development of new antipsychotic medications can be traced to the 1989 approval of clozapine by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of refractory schizophrenia. This has encouraged the development of other new agents that share some of clozapine's receptor binding characteristics. A wide range of clinical trial designs are being used during the development of new antipsychotic medications. This article describes both basic designs and more innovative ones: flexible-dose designs that include placebo and conventional neuroleptic agents as controls; fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of experimental medication; and fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of the experimental and comparator medication. The strengths and weaknesses of each are identified. The need for long-term maintenance studies of newer agents is emphasized because psychotic disorders in general, and schizophrenia in particular, are chronic relapsing illnesses. The current status of four newer antipsychotic medications is considered: clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and sertindole. The importance of direct comparison among the newer antipsychotic medications in both short- and long-term trials is highlighted.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

With the arrival of atypical antipsychotic drugs, questions have arisen as to their efficacy, compared with classical antipsychotics, and their impact on the clinical and psychosocial behavior of schizophrenic patients. This paper reviews the development of antipsychotic drugs from the prototype chlorpromazine in the 1950s to the atypical antipsychotics--clozapine, risperidone, olanzapinein--in the 1990s. Particular attention is given to the medications' effect on positive and negative symptoms and on patients' quality of life. Experience to date with the atypical antipsychotic drugs is that they are as effective as traditional treatments, with a possibly greater action in treating negative symptoms and with a lower extrapyramidal side effects profile. For comprehensive treatment of schizophrenia, the author advocates a polydimensional approach encompassing psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions (particularly with family members), and vocational training.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Behavioral Symptoms; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Family Health; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Social Adjustment

New neuroleptic drugs are being developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Clozapine and risperidone are available for general use. Sertindole and olanzapine are nearing release. Seroquel and ziprazidone are in the final stages of study. This generation of drugs will provide advantages in the area of lower motor side effects and probably in improved negative symptom treatment.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Care Team; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Cognitive impairment is a relatively frequent aspect of schizophrenia. Deficits are most prominent in tasks involving attention, memory, and executive function. Although some research suggests that deterioration is progressive, these deficits appear to be relatively stable over time. Imaging and biochemical studies show that schizophrenia is characterized by a number of morphological, hemodynamic, and neurochemical abnormalities within systems integrating the cortex, temporal lobes, and various limbic structures. Neurochemical assays suggest that the neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate play a significant role in the disease-associated decrement. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia impedes psychosocial performance and eventual reintegration into society and is therefore an especially relevant target in the development of new therapeutic modalities. Atypical agents, such as clozapine and olanzapine, hold special promise in this area.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Dopamine; Glutamic Acid; Humans; Limbic System; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin

Long-term outcomes for patients with schizophrenia have been disappointing. The article discusses how the typical antipsychotics (clozapine and risperidone) as well as several agents that should be available in the near future (olanzapine, sertindole, quetiapine, and ziprasidone) might improve outcome and then focuses on antipsychotic relapse rates and the newly released antipsychotic olanzapine. Considerable evidence shows that relapse rates for compliant patients maintained on atypical antipsychotics are substantially lower than rates for those maintained on conventional antipsychotics. Also, the decreased extrapyramidal symptom liability of the newer medications will make it easier to prescribe more effective doses of antipsychotic that can maximize relapse prevention without simultaneously interfering with the patient's quality of life or motor functioning. The authors describe clinical observations of olanzapine based on their 3 years of clinical experience using this agent in a phase 3 clinical trial. They suggest that as atypical antipsychotics like olanzapine are more widely used, some problems associated with the long-term use of conventional antipsychotics will diminish, but other issues and concerns will be more common. In particular: (1) Despite their better side effect profiles, atypical antipsychotics will not solve the noncompliance problem. A significant proportion of patients with schizophrenia will still need depot therapy. (2) There will be problems arising from "awakenings" phenomena where patients will become more in touch with their losses and painful inner feelings. It seems likely that the need for rehabilitation services will be increased as more patients improve to the point where they will be amenable to psychiatric rehabilitation.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Although neuroleptic drugs have become the mainstay of treating acute and chronic psychosis, they are substantially limited by troublesome side effects. The traditional neuroleptic drugs have a wide array of central nervous system and peripheral system side effects that often lead to problems in management or patient noncompliance. Of particular difficulty are the extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. However, other side effects of seizures, sedation, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and cardiovascular, hematologic, endocrinological, and weight gain problems remain as clinical management challenges posed by existing antipsychotic drug therapy. Considerable progress has been made in improving the motor side effect profile with the advent of clozapine and risperidone. However, each of these drugs has its own dose-limiting side effect profile. Two new drugs, olanzapine and sertindole, are now added to the pharmacopeia for treating psychosis. They further improve the benefit/ risk ratio because they have even fewer EPS and other side effects. Overall, these new antipsychotic agents greatly improve the treatment of psychosis by reducing drug-induced morbidity and improving the quality of life for patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Seizures; Sleep; Weight Gain

Advances in the neurosciences, concerns about cost containment, and a growing consumer advocacy movement are creating new hopes and challenges for the development of more effective and cost-effective treatments for persons with psychotic disorders. Using the development of new antipsychotic agents for the treatment of schizophrenia as a prototype, this article examines the assessment of outcomes of treatments for these patients. Psychotic disorders exert a broad range of negative effects on patients' lives. This requires a broad view of outcomes to assess the relative effectiveness of alternative pharmacotherapies. The outcomes of interest cover the clinical, rehabilitative, humanitarian, and public welfare domains. Most of our knowledge about the efficacy of antipsychotic agents focuses on improvements in and prevention of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, better antipsychotic medications must show advantages above and beyond symptom suppression. We need to know not only whether alternative medications offer advantages in these other dimensions of outcome, but also how they interact with psychosocial treatments to enhance outcomes, how effective they are with patients in usual practices settings, and how cost-effective they are relative to other treatments. A research agenda for evaluating these impacts must include longer term outcome studies that evaluate the wider range of outcomes of interest to practitioners, patients, families, and payers.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Costs; Health Care Reform; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Serotonin-dopamine antagonists (SDAs) offer the possibility of improved treatment of schizophrenia compared with conventional neuroleptics and have superior safety profiles. Clinical trial data have so far been published for only three SDAs to date, namely, risperidone, sertindole, and olanzapine. Of these, extensive data are available only for risperidone, showing that at doses of 4 to 16 mg/day, it is superior to haloperidol at 10 to 20 mg/day. Furthermore, risperidone, 6 and 16 mg/day, significantly improved negative/symptoms, whereas 20 mg/day of haloperidol was ineffective. Risperidone also appears to cause fewer extrapyrimidal symptoms (EPS) than haloperidol, 10 or 20 mg/day. Similar advantages of risperidone over perphenazine have also been found. A clinical trial of sertindole showed that, at 20 mg/day, it was equivalent to haloperidol, 16 mg/day, and caused fewer EPS. Olanzapine, a chemical derivative of clozapine, has also been shown to be superior to haloperidol (10 to 20 mg/day) at doses of 7.5 to 17.5 mg/day. In addition, at doses of 12.5 to 17.5 mg/day, olanzapine was found to have a significantly superior effect on negative symptoms over haloperidol, 10 to 20 mg/day. Doses of up to 17.5 mg/day of olanzapine also caused fewer EPS than haloperidol, 10 to 20 mg/day. There was no evidence of any leukopenia in patients treated with olanzapine in this small study (N = 335). The low EPS liability of these SDAs, combined with their efficacy, suggests that SDAs should become the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopamine Antagonists; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Isoxazoles; Olanzapine; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

Total white blood cell count (TWBCc), an index of chronic and low-grade inflammation, is associated with clinical symptoms and metabolic alterations in patients with schizophrenia. The effect of antipsychotics on TWBCc, predictive values of TWBCc for drug response, and role of metabolic alterations require further study.. Patients with schizophrenia were randomized to monotherapy with risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, perphenazine or haloperidol in a 6-week pharmacological trial. We repeatedly measured clinical symptoms, TWBCc, and metabolic measures (body mass index, blood pressure, waist circumference, fasting blood lipids and glucose). We used mixed-effect linear regression models to test whether TWBCc can predict drug response. Mediation analysis to investigate metabolic alteration effects on drug response.. At baseline, TWBCc was higher among patients previously medicated. After treatment with risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, perphenazine, and haloperidol, TWBCc decreased significantly (. TWBCc is affected by certain antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia, with decreases observed following short-term, but increases following long-term treatment. TWBCc is predictive of drug response, with lower TWBCc predicting better responses to antipsychotics. It also mediates the effects of certain metabolic measures on improvement of negative symptoms. This indicates that the metabolic state may affect clinical manifestations through inflammation.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Glucose; Haloperidol; Humans; Inflammation; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Since the early clinical efficacy of antipsychotics has not yet been well perceived, this study sought to decide whether the efficacy of antipsychotics at week 2 can predict subsequent responses at week 6 and identify how such predictive capacities vary among different antipsychotics and psychotic symptoms.. A total of 3010 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and received a 6-week treatment with one antipsychotic drug randomly chosen from five atypical antipsychotics (risperidone 2-6 mg/d, olanzapine 5-20 mg/d, quetiapine 400-750 mg/d, aripiprazole 10-30 mg/d, and ziprasidone 80-160 mg/d) and two typical antipsychotics (perphenazine 20-60 mg/d and haloperidol 6-20 mg/d). Early efficacy was defined as the reduction rate using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 2. With cut-offs at 50% reduction, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and random forests were adopted.. The reduction rate of PANSS total score and improvement of psychotic symptoms at week 2 enabled subsequent responses to 7 antipsychotics to be predicted, in which improvements in delusions, lack of judgment and insight, unusual thought content, and suspiciousness/ persecution were endowed with the greatest weight.. It is robust enough to clinically predict treatment responses to antipsychotics at week 6 using the reduction rate of PANSS total score and symptom relief at week 2. Psychiatric clinicians had better determine whether to switch the treatment plan by the first 2 weeks.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Clozapine and olanzapine are some of the most effective antipsychotics, but both are associated with weight gain and relevant metabolic disturbances, including pre-diabetes and diabetes. Non-pharmacological/behavioural interventions have had limited effects counteracting these adverse effects. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. We will investigate the long-term effects of add-on treatment with semaglutide once a week versus placebo once a week on the metabolic status in pre-diabetic (glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 35-47 mmol/mol (5.4%-6.4%) and diabetic (HbA1c 48-57 mmol/mol (6.5%-7.4%)) patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder who initiated clozapine or olanzapine treatment within the last 60 months.. This is a 26-week, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Altogether, 104 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, aged 18-65 years, with pre-diabetes or diabetes will be randomised to injections of 1.0 mg semaglutide once a week or placebo for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint is change from baseline in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints include changes in body weight, hip and waist circumference and plasma levels of insulin, glucagon, glucose, and C-peptide, insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, hepatic function, fibrosis-4 score, lipid profile, incretin hormones, bone markers, body composition, bone density, proteomic analyses and oxidative stress markers. Together with alcohol, tobacco and drug use, potential effects on the reward value of a sweet-fat stimulus, psychopathology, level of activity and quality of life will also be assessed.. This study is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency and the regional scientific ethics committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (committee C, #H-20019008) and will be carried out in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Helsinki Declaration. The results will be disseminated through peer-review publications and conference presentations.. NCT04892199.

Topics: Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Olanzapine; Prediabetic State; Proteomics; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia

To analyze the relationship between olanzapine blood concentration and clinical efficacy in schizophrenia patients, which has been expected to provide a scientific reference basis for improving the treatment effect of olanzapine in schizophrenia patients. Four hundred eighty-six psychiatric inpatients were randomly selected from October 31, 2019, to October 31, 2020, and all enrolled patients were given olanzapine treatment, and the treatment effect of schizophrenia patients was assessed according to the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale subtraction rate, and divided into treatment effective and ineffective groups at 1, 2, and 3 weeks of treatment, respectively. The olanzapine blood concentration in the body was monitored at 1, 2, and 3 weeks of treatment, and the relationship between olanzapine blood concentration and treatment effect at different time points was analyzed. Patients in the ineffective group had lower olanzapine blood concentrations than the effective group in treatment 1, 2, and 3 weeks and lower Positive and Negative Symptom Scale score reduction rates than the effective group (P < .05); the differences in other baseline information between the groups were not statistically significant (P > .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that olanzapine blood concentration at different times of treatment was related to the treatment effect (odds ratio > 1, P < .05); the results of the bivariate Spearman linear correlation test showed that olanzapine blood concentration at different times of treatment was positively related to the treatment effect of schizophrenia patients (R > 0, P < .05). In schizophrenia patients treated with olanzapine, the higher the olanzapine blood concentration in patients, the better the clinical treatment effect. Accordingly, the clinical can develop individualized medication regimens based on the results of blood concentration testing in the body under the premise of ensuring safety, aiming to ensure maximum efficacy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Antipsychotic treatment may improve clinical insight. However, previous studies have reported inconclusive findings on whether antipsychotics improve insight over and above the reduction in symptoms of psychosis. These studies assessed homogeneous samples in terms of stage of illness. Randomised studies investigating a mixed population of first- and multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders might clarify this disagreement.. Our data were derived from a pragmatic, rater-blinded, semi-randomised trial that compared the effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine. A sample of 144 patients with first- or multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders underwent eight assessments during a 1-year follow-up. Clinical insight was assessed by item General 12 from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We analysed latent growth curve models to test if the medications had a direct effect on insight that was over and above the reduction in total psychosis symptoms. Furthermore, we investigated whether there were differences between the study drugs in terms of insight.. Based on allocation analysis, all three drugs were associated with a reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the initial phase (weeks 0-6). Amisulpride and olanzapine were associated with improved insight over and above what was related to the reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the long-term phase (weeks 6-52). However, these differential effects were lost when only including the participants that chose the first drug in the randomisation sequence. We found no differential effect on insight among those who were antipsychotic-naïve and those who were previously medicated with antipsychotics.. Our results suggest that antipsychotic treatment improves insight, but whether the effect on insight surpasses the effect of reduced total psychosis symptoms is more uncertain.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01446328, 05.10.2011.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

It remains a challenge to predict the long-term response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia who do not respond at an early stage. This study aimed to investigate the optimal predictive cut-off value for early non-response that would better predict later non-response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia.. This multicenter, 8-week, open-label, randomized trial was conducted at 19 psychiatric centers throughout China. All enrolled participants were assigned to olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, or aripiprazole monotherapy for 8 weeks. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) was evaluated at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 8. The main outcome was the prediction of nonresponse. Nonresponse is defined as a < 20% reduction in the total scores of PANSS from baseline to endpoint. Severity ratings of mild, moderate, and severe illness corresponded to baseline PANSS total scores of 58, 75, and 95, respectively.. At week 2, a reduction of < 5% in the PANSS total score showed the highest total accuracy in the severe and mild schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 75.0% and 80.8%, respectively), and patients who were treated with the risperidone and amisulpride groups (total accuracy, 82.4%, and 78.2%, respectively). A 10% decrease exhibited the best overall accuracy in the moderate schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 84.0%), olanzapine (total accuracy, 79.2%), and aripiprazole group (total accuracy, 77.4%). At week 4, the best predictive cut-off value was < 20%, regardless of the antipsychotic or severity of illness (total accuracy ranging from 89.8 to 92.1%).. Symptom reduction at week 2 has acceptable discrimination in predicting later non-response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia, and a more accurate predictive cut-off value should be determined according to the medication regimen and baseline illness severity. The response to treatment during the next 2 weeks after week 2 could be further assessed to determine whether there is a need to change antipsychotic medication during the first four weeks.. This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03451734).

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Humans; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Quick symptomatic remission after the onset of psychotic symptoms is critical in schizophrenia treatment, determining the subsequent disease course and recovery. In this context, only every second patient with acute schizophrenia achieves symptomatic remission within three months of initiating antipsychotic treatment. The potential indication extension of clozapine-the most effective antipsychotic-to be introduced at an earlier stage (before treatment-resistance) is supported by several lines of evidence, but respective clinical trials are lacking.. Two hundred-twenty patients with acute non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia will be randomized in this double-blind, 8-week parallel-group multicentric trial to either clozapine or olanzapine. The primary endpoint is the number of patients in symptomatic remission at the end of week 8 according to international consensus criteria ('Andreasen criteria'). Secondary endpoints and other assessments comprise a comprehensive safety assessment (i. e., myocarditis screening), changes in psychopathology, global functioning, cognition, affective symptoms and quality of life, and patients' and relatives' views on treatment.. This multicentre trial aims to examine whether clozapine is more effective than a highly effective second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), olanzapine, in acute schizophrenia patients who do not meet the criteria for treatment-naïve or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Increasing the likelihood to achieve symptomatic remission in acute schizophrenia can improve the overall outcome, reduce disease-associated burden and potentially prevent mid- and long-term disease chronicity.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The CATIE schizophrenia trial was a very influential randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Patients were followed for up to 18 months under treatment with a randomly assigned antipsychotic. The primary endpoint, time to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, is influenced by individual patient characteristics, external factors as well as effects of drug treatment. New insight is obtained by applying an innovative survival analysis based on constrained confidence partitioning (SA-C

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Combining antipsychotics is common in schizophrenia treatment, despite evidence-based guidelines generally not recommending such practice. Otherwise, evidence remains inconclusive, especially regarding specific combinations. The trial aimed to test whether a combination of amisulpride plus olanzapine is more effective than either intervention as a monotherapy.. A multicentre, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial was done at 16 psychiatric in-patient centres throughout Germany. Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18-65 years with non-first episode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and with a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of at least 70 and at least two items of the positive symptoms subscale rated at least 4. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 16 weeks of treatment with either amisulpride plus olanzapine, amisulpride plus placebo, or olanzapine plus placebo (1:1:1), and block randomisation was stratified by study site. To keep patients and investigators masked throughout the duration of the trial, amisulpride, olanzapine, and placebo were administered as identical capsules. Flexibly dosed monotherapy of oral amisulpride (amisulpride plus placebo, 200-800 mg per day) or olanzapine (olanzapine plus placebo, 5-20 mg per day) was compared with a combination of amisulpride plus olanzapine. The primary outcome was symptom reduction measured by the PANSS total score after 8 weeks, in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients randomly assigned to an intervention and receiving at least one study drug dose). As determined a priori, group differences were examined by t tests (Bonferroni-Holm-adjustment) followed by pre-planned Bayesian analyses as well as imputation methods based on mixed models to account for missing values and post-hoc ANCOVA adjusting for PANSS baseline scores. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01609153; the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00003603; and the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT-No. 2011-002463-20.. Between June 15, 2012, and Dec 15, 2018, 13 692 patients were assessed for eligibility. 13 364 patients were excluded (including for not meeting inclusion criteria, declining to participate, or inappropriate reasons for changing pharmacological treatment), and 328 were then randomly assigned to an intervention group. 112 patients were randomly assigned to receive amisulpride plus olanzapine, 109 were randomly assigned to receive amisulpride plus placebo, and 107 were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine plus placebo. 321 patients were analysed for the primary outcome in the modified intention-to-treat population after exclusion of screening failures and patients who did not receive the intervention (110 for amisulpride plus olanzapine, 109 for amisulpride plus placebo, and 102 for olanzapine plus placebo). Among the 321 patients who were randomly assigned to intervention groups and analysed for the primary outcome, 229 (71%) were male, 92 (29%) were female; the mean age was 40·2 years (SD 11·7); and 296 (92%) were White and 25 (8%) were classified as other ethnicity. PANSS total score improved significantly more at 8 weeks in the amisulpride plus olanzapine group (-29·6 [SD 14·5]) than in the olanzapine plus placebo group (-24·1 [13·4], p=0·049, Cohen's d=0·396). A significant difference was not observed in reduction of PANSS total score between the amisulpride and olanzapine group compared with the amisulpride and placebo group (-25·2 [SD 15·9], p=0·095, Cohen's d=0·29). After 8 weeks and 16 weeks, sexual dysfunction, weight, and waist circumference increase were significantly higher for patients receiving amisulpride plus olanzapine than for those receiving amisulpride plus placebo, with no differences in serious adverse events. Two patients died during study participation; one randomly assigned to the amisulpride plus olanzapine group, and one assigned to the olanzapine plus placebo group (both assessed with no relation to treatment).. The advantages of amisulpride plus olanzapine have to be weighed against a higher propensity for side-effects. The use of this specific combination therapy could be an alternative to monotherapy in certain clinical situations, but side-effects should be considered.. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Bayes Theorem; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain is associated with alterations to the composition of the gut microbiota. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of probiotics plus dietary fiber on antipsychotic-induced weight gain.. Two sequential, randomized clinical trials were conducted. In Study 1, 90 drug-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia patients were randomized to receive either olanzapine plus probiotics or olanzapine monotherapy for 12 weeks. In Study 2, 60 drug-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia patients were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine plus probiotics and dietary fiber or olanzapine monotherapy for 12 weeks.. In Study 1, no significant differences in weight gain were observed between the two groups. The insulin resistance index (IRI) was lower in the olanzapine plus probiotics group compared with the olanzapine monotherapy group at week 12 (estimated mean difference, -0.65, [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.10 to -0.20]; p = .005). In Study 2, weight gain was lower in the probiotics plus dietary fiber group than in the olanzapine monotherapy group at week 12 (estimated mean difference -3.45 kg, [95% CI, -5.91 to -1.00]; p = .007). At week 12, IRI increased significantly in the olanzapine monotherapy group (mean, 1.74; standard deviation (SD) = 1.11, p < .001), but not in the olanzapine plus probiotics and dietary fiber group (mean 0.47, SD = 2.16, p = .35) with an estimated mean difference of -0.95 between the two groups [95% CI, -1.77 to -0.14]; p = .022).. These results provide support for the efficacy and safety of probiotics plus dietary fiber in attenuating antipsychotic-induced weight gain in drug-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Dietary Fiber; Humans; Olanzapine; Probiotics; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Antipsychotic medications are generally effective in ameliorating psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Identifying predictors associated with poor treatment response is important for a personalized treatment approach. Childhood trauma (CT) may have a general and differential effect on the effectiveness of different types of antipsychotics in SSDs. The Bergen-Stavanger-Trondheim-Innsbruck (BeSt InTro) study is a pragmatic, researcher-initiated, semi-randomized trial. The present study aimed to investigate symptom change (the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks of antipsychotic treatment (amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine) by group (CT/no CT). Participants (n = 98) with diagnoses within the schizophrenia spectrum (F20-29 in the International Classification of Diseases - 10th Revision) were randomized to receive amisulpride, aripiprazole or olanzapine, and for this study categorized into groups of none and low CT, and moderate to severe CT according to thresholds defined by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short-Form manual. CT in SSDs predicted an overall slower treatment response and less antipsychotic effectiveness after 26 weeks of treatment, which was statistically nonsignificant at 52 weeks. Secondary analyses showed a differential effect of CT related to type of antipsychotic medication: patients with SSDs and CT who received olanzapine showed less antipsychotic effectiveness throughout 52 weeks of treatment. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were convergent. Our findings indicate that in patients with SSD and CT, delayed response to antipsychotics could be expected, and a longer evaluation period before considering change of medication may be recommended.

Topics: Adverse Childhood Experiences; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Meta-analyses have shown that the majority of patients with schizophrenia who have not improved after 2 weeks of treatment with an antipsychotic drug are unlikely to fully respond later. We hypothesized that switching to another antipsychotic with a different receptor binding profile is an effective strategy in such a situation.. In total, 327 inpatients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized to double-blind treatment with either olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) or amisulpride (200-800 mg/day). Those patients who had not reached at least 25% Positive-and-Negative-Syndrome-Scale (PANSS) total score reduction from baseline after 2 weeks (the "non-improvers") were rerandomized double-blind to either staying on the same compound ("stayers") or to switching to the other antipsychotic ("switchers") for another 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in the number of patients in symptomatic remission between the combined "switchers" and the "stayers" after 8 weeks of treatment, analyzed by logistic regression.. A total of 142 nonimprovers were rerandomized at week two. 25 (45.5 %) of the 'stayers' compared to 41 (68.3 %) of the "switchers" reached remission at endpoint (p = .006). Differences in secondary efficacy outcomes were not significant, except for the PANSS negative subscore and the Clinical-Global-Impression-Scale. "Switchers" and "stayers" did not differ in safety outcomes.. Switching "non-improvers" from amisulpride to olanzapine or vice-versa increased remission rates and was safe. The superiority in the primary outcome was, however, not paralleled by significant differences in most secondary efficacy outcomes and the effect was only apparent at the last visit making replications of longer duration necessary.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Treatment resistance constitutes the highest burden of disease within schizophrenia. We hypothesized that the synergistic activity of Lu AF35700 at dopamine D. This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial (NCT02717195) followed by a one year open-label safety extension (NCT02892422). Following prospective confirmation of treatment resistance, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 10 weeks double-blind treatment with Lu AF35700 10 mg or 20 mg, or active comparator (risperidone or olanzapine).. 1628 patients were screened for TRS, of which 1092 entered the prospective confirmation period. Of these, 697 were randomized (Lu AF35700 10 mg n = 235, 20 mg n = 232, comparator n = 230) and 395 discontinued before randomization, including 264 (24 %) who responded to treatment. 586 patients completed the double-blind phase, of which 524 entered the open-label extension and 318 completed 1-year of open-label treatment. At the end of the double-blind phase, the mean ± SE change in positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) total score was -10.1 ± 0.96 for Lu AF35700 10 mg, -8.22 ± 0.98 for Lu AF35700 20 mg, and - 9.90 ± 0.97 for the comparator group. Treatment differences [95 % CI] versus comparator treatment were non-significant (-0.12 [-2.37; 2.13] and 1.67 [-0.59; 3.94], respectively). The most common adverse events with Lu AF35700 were increased weight and headache. Prolactin values decreased by ≥50 % in both sexes treated with Lu AF35700.. Despite evidence of antipsychotic efficacy, treatment with Lu AF35700 failed to differentiate from conventional antipsychotic treatment for patients with TRS.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Dopamine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant; Treatment Outcome

Treatment with antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), and increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers are present in patients with T2D. We previously demonstrated that the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide significantly reduced glucometabolic disturbances and body weight in prediabetic, overweight/obese schizophrenia-spectrum disorder patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. This study aims to assess the involvement of cytokines in the therapeutic effects of liraglutide.. Serum concentrations of 10 cytokines (interferon-γ [IFN-γ], tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin 1β [IL-1β], IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-13) from fasting prediabetic and normal glucose-tolerant (NGT) patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders were measured using multiplexed immunoassays. Prediabetic patients were randomized to 16 weeks of treatment with liraglutide or placebo, and cytokines were measured again at the end of the treatment.. IFN-γ (1.98 vs 1.17 pg/ml, P = .001), IL-4 (0.02 vs 0.01 pg/ml, P < .001), and IL-6 (0.73 vs 0.46 pg/ml, P < .001) were significantly higher in prediabetic (n = 77) vs NGT patients (n = 31). No significant changes in cytokine levels following treatment with liraglutide (n = 37) vs placebo (n = 40) were found.. Prediabetic vs NGT patients with schizophrenia treated with clozapine or olanzapine had increased serum levels of several proinflammatory cytokines, further substantiating the link between inflammation and T2D. Treatment with liraglutide did not affect the investigated cytokines. Further testing of these findings in larger numbers of individuals is needed.

Topics: Biomarkers; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Interleukin-4; Interleukin-6; Liraglutide; Olanzapine; Prediabetic State; Schizophrenia

Previous studies have revealed the abnormalities in homotopic connectivity in schizophrenia. However, the relationship of these deficits to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia remains unclear. This study explored the effects of antipsychotic therapy on brain homotopic connectivity and whether the homotopic connectivity of these regions might predict individual treatment response in schizophrenic patients.. A total of 21 schizophrenic patients and 20 healthy controls were scanned by the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The patients received olanzapine treatment and were scanned at two time points. Voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC) and pattern classification techniques were applied to analyze the imaging data.. Schizophrenic patients presented significantly decreased VMHC in the temporal and inferior frontal gyri, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), and motor and low-level sensory processing regions (including the fusiform gyrus and cerebellum lobule VI) relative to healthy controls. The VMHC in the superior/middle MPFC was significantly increased in the patients after eight weeks of treatment. Support vector regression (SVR) analyses revealed that VMHC in the superior/middle MPFC at baseline can predict the symptomatic improvement of the positive and negative syndrome scale after eight weeks of treatment.. This study demonstrated that olanzapine treatment may normalize decreased homotopic connectivity in the superior/middle MPFC in schizophrenic patients. The VMHC in the superior/middle MPFC may predict individual response for antipsychotic therapy. The findings of this study conduce to the comprehension of the therapy effects of antipsychotic medications on homotopic connectivity in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Nerve Net; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Prefrontal Cortex; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of metacognitive training (MCT) in schizophrenia. However, the underlying mechanisms related to therapeutic effect of MCT remain unknown. The present study explored the treatment effects of MCT on brain regional neural activity using regional homogeneity (ReHo) and whether these regions' activities could predict individual treatment response in schizophrenia. Forty-one patients with schizophrenia and 20 healthy controls were scanned using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were randomly divided into drug therapy (DT) and drug plus psychotherapy (DPP) groups. The DT group received only olanzapine treatment, whereas the DPP group received olanzapine and MCT for 8 weeks. The results revealed that ReHo in the right precuneus, left superior medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), right parahippocampal gyrus and left rectus was significantly increased in the DPP group after 8 weeks of treatment. Patients in the DT group showed significantly increased ReHo in the left ventral MPFC/anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), left superior MPFC/middle frontal gyrus (MFG), left precuneus, right rectus and left MFG, and significantly decreased ReHo in the bilateral cerebellum VIII and left inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) after treatment. Support vector regression analyses showed that high ReHo levels at baseline in the right precuneus and left superior MPFC could predict symptomatic improvement of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) after 8 weeks of DPP treatment. Moreover, high ReHo levels at baseline and alterations of ReHo in the left ventral MPFC/ACC could predict symptomatic improvement of PANSS after 8 weeks of DT treatment. This study suggests that MCT is associated with the modulation of ReHo in schizophrenia. ReHo in the right precuneus and left superior MPFC may predict individual therapeutic response for MCT in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Brain; Brain Mapping; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Combination olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM), in development for schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, is intended to provide the efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. OLZ/SAM safety, tolerability, and efficacy from a 52-week open-label extension study in patients with schizophrenia are reported.. Patients previously completing the 4-week, double-blind ENLIGHTEN-1 study switched from OLZ/SAM, olanzapine, or placebo to OLZ/SAM. Assessments included adverse events (AEs), weight, vital signs, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores. Baseline was prior to first dose of OLZ/SAM in the extension study.. In total, 281 patients enrolled, 277 received ≥1 OLZ/SAM dose, and 183 (66.1%) completed 52 weeks. Reasons for discontinuation included patient withdrawal (15.5%), loss to follow-up (6.9%), AEs (5.8%), and lack of efficacy (1.8%). AEs were reported in 136 (49.1%) patients; increased weight (13%) and somnolence (8%) were most common. Ten serious AEs were reported in eight patients (2.9%); none were considered treatment related. There were no deaths. Mean (SD) baseline weight was 79.1 (17.8) kg. Mean weight change from baseline to week 52 was 1.86 kg (2.79% increase). PANSS total and CGI-S scores continued to decline over 52 weeks (mean [95% CI] changes from baseline to week 52: -16.2 [-18.5, -14.0] and -0.9 [-1.0, -0.8], respectively).. OLZ/SAM was generally well tolerated in this extension study; most patients completed the 52-week treatment period with sustained improvement in schizophrenia symptoms. Mean increases in weight stabilized by week 6 with limited subsequent change through end of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Molindone; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; United States

Schizophrenia is associated with a lowered bone mineral density. The antidiabetic and body weight lowering glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide has shown to mitigate overweight and impaired glucose tolerance associated with olanzapine and clozapine. As liraglutide has been proposed to affect bone metabolism, we evaluated the effect of liraglutide on bone turnover markers (BTM) in patients with prediabetes and schizophrenia treated with olanzapine or clozapine. Patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated with the antipsychotic compounds clozapine and/or olanzapine, having prediabetes and a BMI above 27 kg/m

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Biomarkers; Body Weight; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Clozapine; Collagen Type I; Fasting; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Overweight; Prediabetic State; Schizophrenia

Treatment of violence in schizophrenia remains a challenging problem, especially in patients with conduct disorder. Previous clinical studies did not select patients on the basis of violence and did not focus on conduct disorder. This study is a head-to-head comparison of clozapine, olanzapine, and haloperidol in the treatment of violent schizophrenia patients with and without conduct disorder.. Physically assaultive schizophrenia patients (N=99) were randomly assigned to receive clozapine, olanzapine, or haloperidol in a 12-week double-blind trial. They were characterized on the basis of the presence or absence of conduct disorder before age 15. Assaults were recorded; their frequency and severity were scored on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale. Psychiatric symptoms were evaluated through the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.. Patients with a history of conduct disorder had more frequent and severe assaults than those without conduct disorder during the 12-week trial. Clozapine was superior to haloperidol and olanzapine in reducing assaults; olanzapine was superior to haloperidol. Clozapine's greater antiaggressive efficacy over haloperidol was substantially more pronounced in patients with conduct disorder than in patients without conduct disorder. In patients with conduct disorder, clozapine was four times more likely than haloperidol to result in lower violence; in patients without conduct disorder, it was three times more likely to do so. Olanzapine's superiority over haloperidol was also more pronounced in patients with conduct disorder.. This study is the first to examine the effect of clozapine in violent schizophrenia patients with conduct disorder. When conduct disorder is present, clozapine is the optimal treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Conduct Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Violence

A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) is in development for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder and is intended to provide the efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. This 52-week open-label extension (NCT02873208; ENLIGHTEN-2-EXT) assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of OLZ/SAM in patients with schizophrenia.. Patients completing the 24-week randomized, double-blind, phase 3 ENLIGHTEN-2 study (NCT02694328) comparing weight change from baseline to week 24 with OLZ/SAM versus olanzapine were eligible to enroll in the 52-week ENLIGHTEN-2-EXT study. Assessments included adverse events (AEs; each visit), weight/waist circumference (every other week for the first 8 weeks, then every 4 weeks thereafter), metabolic laboratory parameters (weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores (weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores (weeks 2 and 4, then every 4 weeks thereafter through week 48, and at week 52). Analyses were based on observed results using descriptive statistics. Baseline was relative to the first OLZ/SAM dose in the extension study.. In total, 265 patients were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of OLZ/SAM; 167 (63.0%) completed the 52-week extension study. Common AEs (≥5%) were weight decreased (n = 23; 8.7%), extra dose administered (n = 21; 7.9%), headache (n = 18; 6.8%), and weight increased (n = 16; 6.0%). At week 52, the mean (SD) change from baseline for weight and waist circumference was -0.03 (6.17) kg and - 0.35 (6.12) cm, respectively. Changes in fasting lipid and glycemic parameters were generally small and remained stable over 52 weeks. During the extension, PANSS total scores remained stable, and at week 52, 81.3% of patients had CGI-S scores of 3 or less, reflecting mild illness severity.. OLZ/SAM was generally well tolerated over 52 weeks. Weight, waist circumference, metabolic laboratory parameters, and schizophrenia symptoms remained stable throughout the study.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This report presents the rationale and design of a multi-center clinical trial that examines the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic combination treatment in acutely ill schizophrenia patients compared to antipsychotic monotherapy. Antipsychotic combination treatment is common in clinical practice worldwide, despite clinical guidelines generally not recommending such practice due to lacking evidence for its efficacy and safety. Olanzapine has a related chemical structure and comparable receptor-binding profile as clozapine, which demonstrated superior efficacy in combination studies, but has a more unfavorable side-effect profile compared to olanzapine. Amisulpride and olanzapine have shown promising therapeutic efficacy in meta-analyses in monotherapy for people with schizophrenia. Combining amisulpride and olanzapine, complementary receptor-binding properties may enhance efficacy and possibly reduce (or at least not augment) side effects due to the different receptor profiles and metabolization pathways. Accordingly, we hypothesize that patients treated with amisulpride plus olanzapine show greater improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score after 8 weeks versus either monotherapy. A randomized, double-blind controlled trial is performed at 16 German centers comparing flexibly dosed monotherapy of oral amisulpride (400-800 mg/day), and olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) and amisulpride-olanzapine co-treatment. Sample size was calculated to be n = 101 per treatment arm, assuming an effect size of 0.500 and a two-sided alpha = 0.025 and beta = 0.90. Recruitment for this trial started in June 2012. Until December 2018, 328 patients have been randomized. Trial conduct has been extended to reach the projected sample size. Publication of the study results is expected in 2019 informing an evidence-based recommendation regarding specific antipsychotic combination treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Olanzapine, a second-generation atypical antipsychotic drug, is widely used for schizophrenia and moderate to severe mania associated with bipolar disorders. This open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover, comparative pharmacokinetic study assessed the bioequivalence of 5 mg of olanzapine administered in tablet (R) or disintegrating tablet (T) formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions. Numbers of enrolled subjects were 30 and 24 for fasting and fed treatments, respectively. Blood samples were drawn and collected predose as well as up to 144 hours postdose. The plasma concentration of olanzapine was quantitated by a robust, rapid, and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The R was bioequivalent to T formulation under either fasting or fed conditions. The 90%CI for ratios of the geometric means observed maximum plasma concentration, area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to last time point, and area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were all within the allowed limit (80.0% to 125.0%). The pharmacokinetic profiles of T and R formulations were similar under fasting and fed conditions. Both formulations were well tolerated, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events under fasting and fed conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Body Mass Index; Chromatography, Liquid; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Compounding; Fasting; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Mania; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Safety; Schizophrenia; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Therapeutic Equivalency

Schizophrenia patients show executive function (EF) impairments in voluntary orienting as measured by eye-movements. We tested 14 inpatients to investigate the effects of the antipsychotic olanzapine on EF, as measured by antisaccade eye-movement performance.. Patients were tested at baseline (before olanzapine), 3-5 days post-medication, and 12-14 days post-medication. Patients were also assessed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to measure the severity of schizophrenia-related symptoms, and administered the Stroop task, a test of EF. Nine matched controls were also tested on the antisaccade and Stroop.. Both groups showed improvement on Stroop and antisaccade; however, the schizophrenia group improved significantly more on antisaccade, indicating an additional benefit of olanzapine on EF performance. Patients with poorer baseline antisaccade performance (High-Deficit) showed significantly greater improvement on the antisaccade task than patients with better baseline performance (Low-Deficit), suggesting that baseline EF impairment predicts the magnitude of cognitive improvement with olanzapine. These subgroups showed significant and equivalent improvement on PANSS scores, indicating that improvement on the antisaccade task with olanzapine was not a result of differences in magnitude of clinical improvement.. This preliminary study provides evidence that olanzapine may be most advantageous for patients with greater baseline EF deficits.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognitive Dysfunction; Executive Function; Eye Movements; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Stroop Test; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Different effectiveness profiles among antipsychotics may be a key point to optimize treatment in patients suffering a first episode of psychosis to impact on long-term outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first episode of psychosis at 3-year follow-up.. From February 2001 to January 2011, 2 phases of a prospective, randomized, open-label study were undertaken. A total of 376 first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n = 55), risperidone (n = 63), haloperidol (n = 56), aripiprazole (n = 78), ziprasidone (n = 62), or quetiapine (n = 62) and followed up for 3 years. The primary effectiveness measure was all cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy.. The overall dropout rate at 3 years reached 20.75%. Treatment discontinuation rates were significantly different among treatment groups (olanzapine = 69.09, risperidone = 71.43, aripiprazole = 73.08%, ziprasidone = 79.03%, haloperidol = 89.28%, and quetiapine = 95.53%) (χ2 = 79.86; P = .000). Statistically significant differences in terms of lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability were observed among treatment groups along the 3-year follow-up, determining significant differences in time to all-cause discontinuation (log-rank = 92.240; P = .000). Significant differences between treatments were found in the categories of sleepiness/sedation, increased sleep duration, akinesia, weight gain, ejaculatory dysfunction, extrapyramidal-symptoms, and amenorrhea.. Olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole presented advantages for the first-line treatment of first episode of psychosis in terms of effectiveness. Identifying different discontinuation patterns may contribute to optimize treatment selection after first episode of psychosis.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02526030 https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02526030.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Young Adult

OLZ/SAM is a combination of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, and samidorphan, an opioid antagonist, and is in development for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. OLZ/SAM is under development with the intent to provide the established antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. This thorough QT study assessed the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of OLZ/SAM on cardiac repolarization in patients with schizophrenia.. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive (moxifloxacin)-controlled, parallel-group study, 100 patients aged 18 to 60 years with stable schizophrenia were randomized 3:2 to the active arm and control arm. Subjects in the active arm received a therapeutic dose of 10/10 mg (10 mg olanzapine/10 mg samidorphan) on days 2-4, 20/20 mg on days 5-8, and a supratherapeutic dose of 30/30 mg (1.5 times and 3 times the maximum recommended daily dose of olanzapine and samidorphan, respectively) on days 9-13, and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on days 1 and 14. Subjects in the control arm received a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on days 1 and 14 in a nested crossover fashion, along with OLZ/SAM-matched placebo on days 2-13. Serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) and simultaneous plasma drug concentrations were determined pre- and post-dose. The effects of OLZ/SAM on heart rate and ECG parameters (QT interval with Fridericia's correction [QTcF], PR and QRS interval, and T-wave morphology) were evaluated, and the primary endpoint was change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF). The relationship between drug concentration and ΔQTcF (C-QTc) was evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model. Safety monitoring included adverse events reporting and clinical laboratory assessments.. This thorough QT study in patients with stable schizophrenia demonstrated that OLZ/SAM, in doses and plasma concentrations up to supratherapeutic levels, does not have a clinically relevant effect on ECG parameters, including QT/QTc prolongation.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

To assess the antipsychotic efficacy and safety of a combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM).. This 4-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled study was conducted from December 2015 to June 2017 in adults with schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria who were experiencing an acute exacerbation. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to OLZ/SAM, olanzapine monotherapy, or placebo. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint assessed was the change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) score between baseline and week 4, respectively, for OLZ/SAM versus placebo. Safety monitoring occurred throughout.. 401 patients received ≥ 1 dose of study drug; 352 completed treatment. Treatment with OLZ/SAM resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in PANSS total and CGI-S scores from baseline to week 4 (least squares [LS] mean ± SE: -6.4 ± 1.8 [P < .001] and -0.38 ± 0.12 [P = .002], respectively). Olanzapine treatment resulted in similar improvements (PANSS and CGI-S LS mean ± SE of -5.3 ± 1.84 [P = .004] and -0.44 ± 0.12 [P < .001], respectively). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 54.5%, 54.9%, and 44.8% of patients on OLZ/SAM, olanzapine, and placebo, respectively. Weight gain, somnolence, dry mouth, anxiety, and headache were the most common AEs (ie, ≥ 5%) with active treatment.. OLZ/SAM treatment resulted in statistically and clinically significant efficacy improvements over 4 weeks versus placebo in adults with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia. Improvements were similar to those observed with olanzapine. OLZ/SAM was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of olanzapine.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634346; EudraCT number: 2015-003373-15​​.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Schizophrenia; Symptom Flare Up

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a common comorbidity of schizophrenia. No effective pharmacologic treatment is available for both disorders to date.. In a phase 2, double-blind study, patients with schizophrenia and AUD experiencing ≥ 10 drinking and ≥ 2 heavy-drinking days in the previous month and recent (≤ 6 mo) disease symptom exacerbation were recruited between June 2014 and March 2017. DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria were used to assign the diagnoses of schizophrenia and AUD, respectively. After a 6-week lead-in period, 234 eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to olanzapine + 10 mg samidorphan tablets (OLZ/SAM) or olanzapine + placebo tablets (olanzapine) for 36-60 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome of time to the first event of exacerbation of disease symptoms (EEDS) was evaluated using the log rank test for treatment comparison, and the Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratio. Safety was assessed as adverse events and laboratory measures.. No significant difference was observed between groups in the time to first EEDS (hazard ratio = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.53-1.56; P = .746). Patients treated with OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine had numerically lower rates in 6 of 8 criteria to evaluate EEDS. Change from baseline in percentage of heavy-drinking days during the double-blind treatment period was similar in OLZ/SAM- vs olanzapine-treated patients. OLZ/SAM was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to olanzapine.. OLZ/SAM was not superior to olanzapine in the time to EEDS and was well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia and AUD. Further research is needed to identify effective treatments for this difficult-to-treat population.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02161718; EudraCT number: 2014-001211-39 ​.

Topics: Adult; Alcoholism; Antipsychotic Agents; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia and comorbid alcohol use disorder remain understudied. This post hoc analysis evaluated data from Phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness in Schizophrenia study (January 2001-December 2004).. Patients without substance abuse (except marijuana use) in the month before study entry were categorized into those with a history of alcohol use disorder (SZ + AUD) within 5 years before study entry and those without alcohol use disorder (SZ-only) per DSM-IV criteria. Time to first and recurrent exacerbations and hospitalizations were compared between disease states and between olanzapine and perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone.. A total of 1,338 patients (SZ + AUD = 22.6%; SZ-only = 77.4%) were included. Time to first exacerbation of SZ was significantly shorter in the SZ + AUD versus SZ-only population (median = 5.4 vs 6.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.01-1.42]; P = .039). Similar findings were observed for first hospitalization (HR = 1.63 [95% CI, 1.20-2.22]; P = .002) and recurrent hospitalizations (HR = 1.60 [95% CI, 1.18-2.15]; P = .002). The most common reasons leading to exacerbation in both groups were an increase in symptom severity and lack of efficacy. In patients with SZ + AUD related or unrelated to marijuana, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone were associated with significantly shorter time to first exacerbation versus olanzapine.. This post hoc analysis confirmed that patients with SZ + AUD had a worse illness course than patients with SZ-only and suggests that olanzapine may be associated with a longer time to first and recurrent exacerbations versus other antipsychotics in this difficult-to-treat population. Further research is needed to identify effective treatments for this important yet understudied patient population.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00014001.

Topics: Adult; Alcoholism; Antipsychotic Agents; Comorbidity; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Symptom Flare Up; Thiazoles; Time Factors

To compare longitudinal metabolic effects of 7 antipsychotics, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), blood pressure (BP), glucose, triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); to investigate risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MetS); and to make recommendations on frequency and timing of monitoring metabolic measurements.. This randomized, open-label, pharmacologic trial was conducted among patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) in 32 hospitals across China. Patients were randomly assigned to 7 groups and assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess changes of metabolic measures over time. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the risk factors for MetS.. In total, 2,550 (718 drug-naïve) of 2,774 patients finished the study between July 6, 2010, and November 30, 2011. We found significant (P < .05) changes for BMI, WC, TG, and LDL-C, with TG and LDL-C reaching a plateau. Interactions between baseline metabolic condition and changes over time were observed for BMI (χ² = 43.11, P < .001), WC (χ² = 36.34, P < .001), systolic BP (χ² = 11.92, P = .002), glucose (χ² = 6.09, P = .01), and TG (χ² = 6.01, P = .01). Antipsychotics generally had greater adverse effects on patients who were initially screened as metabolically normal. After controlling for other associated factors, we found that antipsychotics resulted in differing risk for incident MetS, with a similar pattern to findings in other populations: olanzapine (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36, P < .001) > quetiapine (OR = 3.29, P < .001) > perphenazine (OR = 2.73, P = .007) > risperidone (OR = 2.21, P = .02) > aripiprazole (OR = 1.74, P = .15) ≈ haloperidol (OR = 1.75, P = .22) ≈ ziprasidone (OR = 1, reference).. Metabolic traits should be monitored frequently in early stages of antipsychotic treatment due to rapid and substantial changes. Clinicians should not assume low risk for patients with normal metabolic parameters at baseline.. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-10000934.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides

Symptomatic remission is an achievable goal in the treatment of schizophrenia. The type of antipsychotic medication and particular genetic variants of the dopaminergic system might be associated with remission. Potential pharmacogenetic markers of the treatment response to antipsychotic medication are missing. This study assessed the possible association between dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2 rs1800497) and dopamine transporter (DAT1 rs28363170) gene variants with symptomatic remission in schizophrenia.. Olanzapine (5-20 mg/d) monotherapy was administered for 6 months to 150 male Caucasian subjects with schizophrenia. Remission was evaluated according to "Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group" criteria. Genotyping was performed by PCR-RFLP.. Symptomatic remission was found in 31% of patients. DRD2 rs1800497 and DAT1 rs28363170 gene variants were not significantly associated with symptomatic remission. The limitations are a relatively small sample size of patients with schizophrenia (N=150), especially of group with symptomatic remission (N=45). However, the study had moderate but adequate sample sizes for most of the comparisons. Only two dopaminergic polymorphisms were analyzed, and plasma concentration of olanzapine was not determined.. These results revealed a lack of association between DRD2 rs1800497 and DAT1 rs28363170 genetic variants and symptomatic remission in male patients treated with olanzapine, suggesting that these genetic variants could not be used to predict symptomatic remission to olanzapine monotherapy. Negative results should be further confirmed or rejected in the larger samples, including haplotype analyses, to detect clinically useful and easy obtainable pharmacogenetic markers that might predict therapeutic response or remission in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Olanzapine; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; White People

Our previous study showed that metabolic abnormalities reduced the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and deteriorated cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia. Inflammation may play a key role in this process. Omega-3 fatty acids have been documented to ameliorate inflammation. Therefore, we hypothesized that omega-3 fatty acids may be of value in enhancing BDNF levels and improving cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia with metabolic syndrome (MetS). We recruited 80 patients with both schizophrenia and MetS who received long-term olanzapine monotherapy. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). The patients were randomly assigned to the OMG-3 group (n = 40) or the placebo group (n = 40). Of the 80 patients who consented to the study, 72 completed this 12-week RCT. The primary outcome was the changes from baseline to 12 weeks in clinical characteristics and the levels of BDNF, CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α. There was a significant correlation between omega-3 fatty acid treatment and enhanced delayed memory factor in the RBANS assessment (F

Topics: Cognitive Dysfunction; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than healthy individuals. This study was conducted to compare the effect of lurasidone and olanzapine on cardiometabolic parameters in unmedicated patients with schizophrenia.. The present study was a randomized open-label, parallel design, active-controlled clinical trial. After recruitment and randomization of 101 patients, a baseline assessment was done by PANSS, SOFAS, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, HbA. There was a significant increase in fasting blood glucose (p < 0.001), HbA. Lurasidone showed a favourable effect on lipid profile and cardiovascular risk indices over olanzapine. However, long-term studies are needed to establish and generalize the findings.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03304457.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lipids; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A combination of olanzapine and the opioid receptor antagonist samidorphan is under development for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. The single-tablet combination treatment is intended to provide the efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating olanzapine-associated weight gain. In this phase 3 double-blind trial, the authors evaluated the weight profile of combined olanzapine/samidorphan compared with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia.. Adults (ages 18‒55 years) with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive either combination treatment with olanzapine and samidorphan or olanzapine treatment for 24 weeks. Primary endpoints were percent change from baseline in body weight and proportion of patients with ≥10% weight gain at week 24. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥7% weight gain. Waist circumference and fasting metabolic laboratory parameters were also measured.. Of 561 patients who underwent randomization (olanzapine/samidorphan combination, N=280; olanzapine, N=281), 538 had at least one postbaseline weight assessment. At week 24, the least squares mean percent weight change from baseline was 4.21% (SE=0.68) in the olanzapine/samidorphan group and 6.59% (SE=0.67) in the olanzapine group (the difference of -2.38% [SE=0.76] was significant). Significantly fewer patients in the olanzapine/samidorphan combination group compared with the olanzapine group had weight gain ≥10% (17.8% and 29.8%, respectively; number needed to treat [NNT]=7.29; odds ratio=0.50) and weight gain ≥7% (27.5% and 42.7%, respectively; NNT=6.29; odds ratio=0.50). Increases in waist circumference were smaller in the olanzapine/samidorphan combination group compared with the olanzapine group. Schizophrenia symptom improvement was similar between treatment groups. Adverse events (in ≥10% of the groups) in the olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine groups included weight gain (24.8% and 36.2%), somnolence (21.2% and 18.1%), dry mouth (12.8% and 8.0%), and increased appetite (10.9% and 12.3%). Metabolic changes were small and similar between treatments.. Olanzapine/samidorphan combination treatment was associated with significantly less weight gain and smaller increases in waist circumference than olanzapine and was well tolerated. The antipsychotic efficacy of the combination treatment was similar to that of olanzapine monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP) is a key factor contributing to the development of antipsychotic treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We examined the efficacy and safety of blonanserin (BNS) and olanzapine (OLZ) as adjuncts to prior antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia and DSP in a 24-week, multicenter (17 sites), randomized, rater-blinded study with two parallel groups (BNS and OLZ add-on treatments) in patients with schizophrenia and DSP: the ROADS Study. The primary outcome was the change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes were changes in the PANSS subscale scores, Clinical Global Impressions, and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), and changes in antipsychotic doses. The 61 assessed patients were allocated into a BNS group (n = 26) and an OLZ group (n = 29). The PANSS total scores were reduced in both groups (mean ± SD: -14.8 ± 24.0, p = 0.0042; -10.5 ± 12.9, p = 0.0003; respectively) with no significant between-group difference (mean, -4.3, 95 %CI 15.1-6.4, p = 0.42). The BNS group showed significant reductions from week 4; the OLZ group showed significant reductions from week 8. The ESRS scores were reduced in the BNS group and the others were reduced in both groups. The antipsychotic monotherapy rates at the endpoint were 26.3 % (n = 6) for BNS and 23.8 % (n = 5) for OLZ. The concomitant antipsychotic doses were reduced in both groups with good tolerability. Our results suggest that augmentations with BNS and OLZ are antipsychotic treatment options for DSP patients, and BNS may be favorable for DSP based on the relatively quick responses to BNS observed herein.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dopamine; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Amisulpride, aripiprazole, and olanzapine are first-line atypical antipsychotics that have not previously been compared head-to-head in a pragmatic trial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these agents in a controlled trial.. This pragmatic, rater-blind, randomised controlled trial was done in three academic centres of psychiatry in Norway, and one in Austria. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (F20-29), and had symptoms of active psychosis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive oral amisulpride, aripiprazole, or olanzapine. Treatment allocation was open to patients and staff, and starting dose, treatment changes, and adjustments were left to the discretion of the treating physician. Computer-generated randomisation lists for each study centre were prepared by independent statisticians. Patients were followed up for 52 weeks after random assignment, during which assessments were done 8 times by researchers masked to treatment. The primary outcome was reduction of the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at 52 weeks, and primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01446328.. Between Oct 20, 2011, and Dec 30, 2016, we assessed 359 patients for eligibility. 215 patients were excluded (107 did not meet inclusion criteria, 82 declined to participate, 26 other reasons). 144 patients (mean baseline PANSS total estimated score 78·4 [SD 1·4]) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive amisulpride (44 patients), aripiprazole (48 patients) or olanzapine (52 patients). After 52 weeks, the patients allocated to amisulpride had a PANSS total score reduction of 32·7 points (SD 3·1) compared with 21·9 points reduction with aripiprazole (SD 3·9, p=0·027) and 23·3 points with olanzapine (2·9, p=0·025). We observed weight gain and increases of serum lipids and prolactin in all groups. 26 serious adverse events (SAEs) among 20 patients were registered (four [9%] of 44 patients allocated to amisulpride, ten [21%] of 48 patients allocated to aripiprazole, and six [12%] of 52 patients allocated to olanzapine), with no statistically significant differences between the study drugs. 17 (65%) of the 26 SAEs occurred during the use of the study drug, with readmission or protracted hospital admission accounting for 13 SAEs. One death by suicide, one unspecified death, and one life-threatening accident occurred during follow-up, after cessation of treatment.. Amisulpride was more efficacious than aripiprazole or olanzapine for reducing the PANSS total scores in adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Side-effect differences among the groups were generally small. This study supports the notion that clinically relevant efficacy differences exist between antipsychotic drugs. Future research should aim to compare first-line antipsychotics directly in pragmatic clinical trials that reflect everyday clinical practice.. The Research Council of Norway, the Western Norway Regional Health Trust, and participating hospitals and universities.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Norway; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone in first-episode schizophrenia (FES).. The eight-week, open, randomised study was conducted in six Chinese medical centres. Altogether, 498 FES subjects were randomised to aripiprazole (. All three antipsychotics significantly improved the baseline to end-point PANSS total and each of the sub-scale scores (. For FES, risperidone might be a better choice than aripiprazole due to improved efficacy and functional improvement, without inferior tolerability. Aripiprazole is a better choice to avoid relevant short-term weight gain. Olanzapine could be chosen to avoid neurological adverse effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

With the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) widely applied to treat patients with schizophrenia, adverse effects, especially the metabolic syndrome (MetS), were paid more attention following by the efficacy of SGAs. Several studies have suggested that acupuncture could be an effective and safe intervention for MetS. Here, we present a study protocol to investigate the effect of electroacupuncture on MetS due to olanzapine and risperidone.. This study is a prospective, randomized, single-centered, patient-assessor-blinded, parallel-controlled clinical pilot trial. In all, 36 patients will be randomized to an experimental group or control group by a 1:1 ratio. All patients will receive lifestyle interventions. The experimental group will receive electroacupuncture treatment. The control group will receive sham electroacupuncture treatment. The primary outcomes are body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). The secondary outcome measures include blood pressure (BP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), leptin, and adiponectin. We will assess at baseline, 8 weeks after intervention and at the end of 3 months' follow-up.. The results of this trial are expected to provide data on the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture on MetS due to olanzapine and risperidone, and potential biochemical mechanism.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clinical Protocols; Electroacupuncture; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Treatment with most antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of weight gain and metabolic disturbances. In a randomized trial, we previously demonstrated that 16 weeks of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide treatment vs. placebo significantly reduced glucometabolic disturbances and body weight in prediabetic, overweight/obese schizophrenia-spectrum disorder patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the beneficial effects of the 16-week intervention were sustained beyond the intervention period.. One year after completion of the intervention, we investigated changes in body weight, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, and lipids comparing 1-year follow-up levels to end of treatment (week 16) and baseline (week 0) levels.. From end of treatment to the 1-year follow-up, body weight had increased in the liraglutide-treated group. However, compared to baseline levels, the placebo-subtracted body weight loss remained significantly reduced (-3.8 kg, 95% CI: -7.3 to -0.2, P = 0.04). Fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, and lipids had each returned to baseline levels 1 year after stopping liraglutide.. The body weight reduction during 16 weeks of liraglutide treatment was partially sustained 1 year after the intervention was completed. However, the improvements in other metabolic parameters returned to baseline levels.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; C-Peptide; Clozapine; Denmark; Fasting; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lipid Metabolism; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Overweight; Placebos; Prediabetic State; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Individuals with schizophrenia are at increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) due to their lifestyle and antipsychotic treatment. Our previous study showed that patients with both schizophrenia and MetS present an increased expression and production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Omega-3 fatty acids have a documented role in suppressing TNF-alpha; therefore, we hypothesized that they may be of value in relieving inflammation and improving metabolic disturbance in patients with both schizophrenia and MetS.. This study employed a randomized placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on MetS in patients with schizophrenia.. We recruited 80 patients with both schizophrenia and MetS who received long-term olanzapine monotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned to the OMG-3 group (n = 40) or the placebo group (n = 40).. Our findings provide suggestive evidence that omega-3 fatty acids have beneficial effects on TG metabolism in patients with both schizophrenia and MetS that parallel decreased inflammation levels.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Biomarkers; Dietary Supplements; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Second-generation antipsychotics are associated with moderate benefits in terms of improved schizophrenia symptoms, but also with higher rates of side-effects such as excessive weight gain (WG); a consensus on their efficacy has not been reached. To date, no study has evaluated the interplay of treatments and side-effects in a single framework, which is a critical step to clarify the role of side-effects in explaining the efficacy of these antipsychotics. We used recent methods for mediation and interaction to clarify the role of WG in explaining the effects of second-generation drugs on schizophrenia symptoms. We used data from 1460 participants in the CATIE trial, assigned to either perphenazine (first-generation comparison drug), olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. The primary outcome was an individual's score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for symptoms of schizophrenia after 9 months, separately evaluated as positive (PANSS+), negative (PANSS-), and total PANSS score. WG after 6 months was investigated as a potential mediator and effect modifier. Results showed that, by limiting WG, patients would benefit of a considerably better improvement in terms of PANSS symptoms. In the scenario of weight change being controlled between -2% and 1% for all participants, patients assigned to olanzapine would experience the highest significant improvements in both PANSS+ (-2.66 points; 95% CI: -4.98, -0.35), PANSS- (-1.59; 95% CI: -4.31, 1.14), and total PANSS (-6.11; 95% CI: -13.13, 0.92). In conclusion, occurrence of excessive WG hampers the potentially beneficial effects of second-generation antipsychotics, thus suggesting future directions for treatment and interventions.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Body-Weight Trajectory; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

This post hoc analysis of an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of paliperidone extended release (ER) in Chinese patients with non-acute schizophrenia, after switching from olanzapine.. Patients with schizophrenia who were dissatisfied with prior olanzapine treatment switched to flexible paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day) based on clinical judgment. Change from baseline to week 12 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (primary endpoint), PANSS subscale scores, response rate, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score, personal and social performance (PSP) scores, patient satisfaction with treatment score, change in sleep quality, level of daytime sleepiness and safety were evaluated.. Out of 118 enrolled patients, 95 (81%) completed the study. Mean duration of study was 76.9 (23.85) days. The primary endpoint, mean (SD) PANSS total score changed significantly from baseline to endpoint (-19.6 [18.71], P <.0001). Secondary endpoints including PANSS subscale score, PSP, patient satisfaction and daytime drowsiness also significantly improved (P <.001). Most commonly reported (≥1%) treatment-emergent adverse events were akathisia (n = 14 [12%]) and insomnia (n = 9 [8%]).. Switching to flexible-dosed paliperidone ER in patients dissatisfied with prior olanzapine treatment achieved good efficacy and tolerability consistently over 12 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; China; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Patient Satisfaction; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome

This study examined the effect of adjunctive telmisartan on body metabolism in clozapine- or olanzapine-treated patients with schizophrenia.. Each subject had been on stable dose of olanzapine or clozapine for at least 1 month. In a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects received either telmisartan (80 mg once per day) or placebo. The homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated based on fasting blood levels of insulin and glucose. Fasting blood levels of triglycerides and cholesterols, as well as serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured. The whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess body composition. Lipid particles were assessed using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. All assessments were conducted at baseline and repeated at week 12.. Fifty-four subjects were randomized and 43 completed the study (22 in the telmisartan group, 21 in the placebo group). There were no significant differences between the two groups in week 12 changes for HOMA-IR or fasting triglycerides (- 0.18 ± 1.24 vs 0.39 ± 1.39, p = 0.181; - 26 ± 76 vs - 10 ± 81 mg/dL, p = 0.679, respectively) (telmisartan vs placebo). Further, there were no significant between group differences in week 12 changes for other fasting lipids, body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, as well as various measures of lipid particles (p's > 0.100). The DXA assessment showed no significant differences between the two groups in week 12 changes for fat mass, lean mass, or total mass (p's > 0.100).. In the present study, adjunctive treatment of telmisartan did not seem to improve body metabolism in schizophrenia patients receiving olanzapine or clozapine. The implications for future studies were discussed. CLINICALTRIALS.. NCT00981526.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose; Humans; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Telmisartan; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

Neurotrophic factors like Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Neurotrophin 3 (NT3) and Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), play a role in neuroplasticity and neurogenesis contributing to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The objective of the present study was to investigate and compare the effect of olanzapine and lurasidone on the change in serum neurotrophins in patients with schizophrenia. The present study was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel design clinical trial. After randomization baseline evaluations of serum BDNF, NGF, NT3, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scoring, Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) scoring of 101 unmedicated schizophrenia patients were done. Patients were reassessed after 6 weeks of monotherapy with olanzapine or lurasidone. Serum BDNF increased after treatment with both the drug groups but rise with olanzapine was found to be significantly higher (916.22; 95 %CI: 866.07 to 966.37; p < 0.001) in comparison to lurasidone. Increase in levels NGF and NT3 was also observed but there was no significant difference between the groups (NGF: 2.32; CI: 3.54 to -3.53; p = 0.57 and NT3: 0.99; CI: 2.11 to 0.14; p = 0.086). The difference in improvement in PANSS and SOFASS with both the drugs was not statistically significant. Both the drugs alleviate the symptoms of schizophrenia but olanzapine was better tolerated. Our findings suggest that increase in serum BDNF with olanzapine monotherapy is significantly higher than that with lurasidone but there is no significant difference in change in serum NGF and NT3. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT03304457).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Biomarkers; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Female; Humans; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Middle Aged; Nerve Growth Factor; Nerve Growth Factors; Neurotrophin 3; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Young Adult

Preclinical evidence and data from a proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers suggest that samidorphan, an opioid antagonist, mitigates weight gain associated with olanzapine. This study prospectively compared combination therapy of olanzapine plus either samidorphan or placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia.. This was an international, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study of olanzapine plus samidorphan in patients with schizophrenia. The study had a 1-week open-label olanzapine lead-in period followed by a 12-week double-blind treatment phase in which patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive olanzapine plus placebo (N=75) or olanzapine plus 5 mg (N=80), 10 mg (N=86), or 20 mg (N=68) of samidorphan. The primary aims were to confirm that the antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine plus samidorphan was comparable to olanzapine plus placebo, to assess the effect of combining olanzapine with samidorphan on olanzapine-induced weight gain, and to assess the overall safety and tolerability of olanzapine plus samidorphan.. Antipsychotic efficacy, as assessed by total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), was equivalent across all treatment groups. Treatment with olanzapine plus samidorphan resulted in a statistically significant lower weight gain (37% lower weight gain compared with olanzapine plus placebo). The least square mean percent change from baseline in body weight was 4.1% (2.9 kg) for the olanzapine plus placebo group and 2.6% (1.9 kg) for the olanzapine plus samidorphan group (2.8% [2.1 kg] for the 5 mg group, 2.1% [1.5 kg] for the 10 mg group, and 2.9% [2.2 kg] for the 20 mg group). Adverse events reported at a frequency ≥5% in any of the olanzapine plus samidorphan groups and occurring at a rate ≥2 times greater than in the olanzapine plus placebo group were somnolence, sedation, dizziness, and constipation. Other safety measures were comparable between the olanzapine plus samidorphan groups and the olanzapine plus placebo group.. The antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine plus samidorphan was equivalent to that of olanzapine plus placebo, and olanzapine plus samidorphan was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant mitigation of weight gain compared with olanzapine plus placebo. Olanzapine plus samidorphan was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to olanzapine plus placebo.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Constipation; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sleepiness; Weight Gain

In patients with schizophrenia, medication adherence is important for relapse prevention, and effective adherence monitoring is essential for treatment planning. A digital medicine system (DMS) has been developed to objectively monitor patient adherence and support clinical decision making regarding treatment choices. This study assesses the acceptance and performance of the DMS in adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis and in healthcare professionals (HCPs).. This is a multicentre, 8-week, single-arm, open-label pragmatic trial designed using coproduction methodology. The study will be conducted at five National Health Service Foundation Trusts in the UK. Patients 18-65 years old with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis will be eligible. HCPs (psychiatrists, care coordinators, nurses, pharmacists), researchers, information governance personnel, clinical commissioning groups and patients participated in the study design and coproduction. Intervention employed will be the DMS, an integrated system comprising an oral sensor tablet coencapsulated with an antipsychotic, non-medicated wearable patch, mobile application (app) and web-based dashboard. The coencapsulation product contains aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone, as prescribed by the HCP, with a miniature ingestible event marker (IEM) in tablet. On ingestion, the IEM transmits a signal to the patch, which collects ingestion and physical activity data for processing on the patient's smartphone or tablet before transmission to a cloud-based server for viewing by patients, caregivers and HCPs on secure web portals or mobile apps.. Approval was granted by London - City and East Research Ethics Committee (REC ref no 18/LO/0128), and clinical trial authorisation was provided by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant. The trial will be compliant with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.. NCT03568500; EudraCT2017-004602-17; Pre-results.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Biosensing Techniques; Cloud Computing; Humans; Medical Informatics Applications; Medication Adherence; Mobile Applications; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic; Psychiatry; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tablets; United Kingdom

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Deprescriptions; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medication Adherence; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and metabolic effects of paliperidone palmitate (PP) injections against oral olanzapine in first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients.. Eligible patients were randomized to receive PP or olanzapine. Efficacy assessments and weight-related parameters were assessed at baseline, weeks 1, 5, 9, and endpoint or at early withdrawal. Lipid, glucose, insulin and prolactin were evaluated at baseline and endpoint or at early withdrawal.. The Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores declined significantly after treatment in both groups. Significant increases in weight-related parameters from baseline to endpoint were shown in both groups. Although there was no significant difference in PANSS scores and weight-related parameters between the two groups through the whole 13-week study. The increased level of triglyceride and HOMA-IR at endpoint from baseline in the olanzapine group was higher than the PP group. There was a stronger elevation of prolactin level in the PP group.. In summary, PP and olanzapine showed similar improvement in the treatment of FES patients. This study also reinforced the necessity for regular monitoring of metabolic parameters in schizophrenia patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics. Clinical trial registration numbers: ChiCTR-IOR-14005304. Date of registration: 2014-10-11.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adipose Tissue; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Female; Humans; Injections; Lipids; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Waist Circumference; Young Adult

The long-term effects of dose reduction of atypical antipsychotics on cognitive function and symptomatology in stable patients with schizophrenia remain unclear. We sought to determine the change in cognitive function and symptomatology after reducing risperidone or olanzapine dosage in stable schizophrenic patients.. Seventy-five stabilized schizophrenic patients prescribed risperidone (≥4 mg/day) or olanzapine (≥10 mg/day) were randomly divided into a dose-reduction group ( n=37) and a maintenance group ( n=38). For the dose-reduction group, the dose of antipsychotics was reduced by 50%; for the maintenance group, the dose remained unchanged throughout the whole study. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Negative Symptom Assessment-16, Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects, and Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery were measured at baseline, 12, 28, and 52 weeks. Linear mixed models were performed to compare the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Negative Symptom Assessment-16, Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores between groups.. The linear mixed model showed significant time by group interactions on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptoms, Negative Symptom Assessment-16, Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory and total score of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (all p<0.05). Post hoc analyses showed significant improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative subscale, Negative Symptom Assessment-16, Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects, speed of processing, working memory and total score of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery for the dose reduction group compared with those for the maintenance group (all p<0.05).. This study indicated that a risperidone or olanzapine dose reduction of 50% may not lead to more severe symptomatology but can improve speed of processing, working memory and negative symptoms in patients with stabilized schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognition; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to determine whether weight changes at week 2 or other factors predicted weight gain at week 6 for schizophrenia patients receiving olanzapine. This study was the secondary analysis of a six-week trial for 94 patients receiving olanzapine (5 mg/d) plus trifluoperazine (5 mg/d), or olanzapine (10 mg/d) alone. Patients were included in analysis only if they had completed the 6-week trial (per protocol analysis). Weight gain was defined as a 7% or greater increase of the patient's baseline weight. The receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to determine the optimal cutoff points of statistically significant predictors. Eleven of the 67 patients completing the 6-week trial were classified as weight gainers. Weight change at week 2 was the statistically significant predictor for ultimate weight gain at week 6. A weight change of 1.0 kg at week 2 appeared to be the optimal cutoff point, with a sensitivity of 0.92, a specificity of 0.75, and an AUC of 0.85. Using weight change at week 2 to predict weight gain at week 6 is favorable in terms of both specificity and sensitivity. Weight change of 1.0 kg or more at 2 weeks is a reliable predictor.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may help identify patients at risk for treatment failure. Reference ranges (RR) for plasma concentrations of ABLs that account for between-patient variability were developed for risperidone and olanzapine based on population pharmacokinetic models. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) collected clinical outcomes and ABLs, allowing testing of the relationship of ABLs with outcomes.. ABLs from 694 patients who were randomized to olanzapine or risperidone were compared to the 80% RRs and were assessed as below or within/above the RR. Treatment failure was defined per any of these criteria: (1) emergency room visit for psychiatric reasons, (2) hospitalization for psychiatric reasons, (3) adverse event of completed suicide, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt, (4) assaultive behavior, (5) arrested or jailed, (6) 2-point increase from baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, (7) 25% increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients assessed with treatment failure within 100 days of drug concentration measurement were analyzed.. Treatment failure occurred in 126 of 323 patients. The proportion of patients with ABLs below RR was 18.3% (59/323) compared to 10% expected in a fully adherent population. Among the 59 with ABLs below RR, 50.8% had treatment failure (compared to 36.4% for the 264 with ABLs within/above RR). The difference between groups was significant (odds ratio = 1.810; 95% CI = 1.025, 3.197; p = 0.0408).. Analysis of CATIE data showed that ABLs within the context of RRs may identify patients with higher risk of relapse.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

No established treatment algorithm exists for patients with schizophrenia. Whether switching antipsychotics or early use of clozapine improves outcome in (first-episode) schizophrenia is unknown.. This three-phase study was done in 27 centres, consisting of general hospitals and psychiatric specialty clinics, in 14 European countries and Israel. Patients aged 18-40 years who met criteria of the DSM-IV for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder were treated for 4 weeks with up to 800 mg/day amisulpride orally in an open-label design (phase 1). Patients who did not meet symptomatic remission criteria at 4 weeks were randomly assigned to continue amisulpride or switch to olanzapine (≤20 mg/day) during a 6-week double-blind phase, with patients and staff masked to treatment allocation (phase 2). Randomisation was done online by a randomisation website; the application implemented stratification by site and sex, and applied the minimisation method for randomisation. Patients who were not in remission at 10 weeks were given clozapine (≤900 mg/day) for an additional 12 weeks in an open-label design (phase 3). The primary outcome was the number of patients who achieved symptomatic remission at the final visits of phases 1, 2, and 3, measured by intention-to-treat analysis. Data were analysed with a generalised linear mixed model, with a logistic link and binomial error distribution. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01248195, and closed to accrual.. Between May 26, 2011, and May 15, 2016, we recruited 481 participants who signed informed consent. Of the 446 patients in the intention-to-treat sample, 371 (83%) completed open-label amisulpride treatment, and 250 (56%) achieved remission after phase 1. 93 patients who were not in remission continued to the 6-week double-blind switching trial, with 72 (77%) patients completing the trial (39 on olanzapine and 33 on amisulpride); 15 (45%) patients on amisulpride versus 17 (44%) on olanzapine achieved remission (p=0·87). Of the 40 patients who were not in remission after 10 weeks of treatment, 28 (70%) started on clozapine; 18 (64%) patients completed the 12-week treatment, and five (28%) achieved remission. The number of serious adverse events did not differ between the treatment arms in phase 2: one patient on olanzapine was admitted to hospital because of an epileptic seizure, and one patient on amisulpride was admitted to hospital twice because of exacerbations of psychotic symptoms. Over the course of the trial, two serious suicide attempts were reported.. For most patients in the early stages of schizophrenia, symptomatic remission can be achieved using a simple treatment algorithm comprising the sequential administration of amisulpride and clozapine. Since switching to olanzapine did not improve outcome, clozapine should be used after patients fail a single antipsychotic trial-not until two antipsychotics have been tried, as is the current recommendation.. European Commission Seventh Framework Program.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To test the validity and sensitivity of the six-item version (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).. Using data from the clozapine phase (2E) of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study, we investigated the following: (i) The scalability of PANSS-6 and PANSS-30; (ii) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores; (iii) Whether PANSS-6 could identify cross-sectional symptom remission; and (iv) The efficacy of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine in TRS using the 'speed of change' on PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 (change in total score per week) as outcome measures.. We found that (i) only PANSS-6 and not PANSS-30 was scalable; (ii) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores was high (Spearman coefficient: 0.85), (iii) PANSS-6 accurately identified cross-sectional symptom remission as defined by the Andreasen et al. criteria; and (iv) The only antipsychotic that caused improvement (speed of change significantly lower than 0 during the first three months of treatment) was clozapine, both when using PANSS-6 (speed of change: -0.50 points/week; 95%CI: -0.84, -0.17) and PANSS-30 (speed of change: -1.41 points/week; 95%CI: -2.80, -0.02) as outcome measures.. PANSS-6 validly measures severity, remission and antipsychotic efficacy in TRS.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Reproducibility of Results; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity

ALKS 3831 is composed of a flexible dose of olanzapine and a fixed dose of 10-mg samidorphan (a novel opioid system modulator), designed to provide the established antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine and to mitigate olanzapine-induced weight gain. To support clinical development of ALKS 3831, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase I study to obtain steady-state exposure for olanzapine and samidorphan and short-term safety at the intended therapeutic dose range of ALKS 3831 10/10 (10-mg olanzapine/10-mg samidorphan) to ALKS 3831 20/10 (20-mg olanzapine/10-mg samidorphan) in subjects with schizophrenia.. After a 1-week olanzapine lead-in period, 42 subjects (14 women) with schizophrenia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ALKS 3831 10/10 or ALKS 3831 20/10 bilayer oral tablets once daily for 14 days. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine and samidorphan were quantified by using an LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated according to noncompartmental analysis. Safety was monitored throughout the study.. After a 1-week olanzapine lead-in phase with titration of olanzapine dose up to 15 mg/d, the steady-state concentration of olanzapine was reached in 3-4 days and that of samidorphan was reached in 5 days after initiation of once-daily oral administration of ALKS 3831 10/10 or ALKS 3831 20/10. At steady state, exposure to olanzapine increased dose proportionally from 10 mg (ALKS 3831 10/10) to 20 mg (ALKS 3831 20/10), and exposure to samidorphan was similar between the 2 ALKS 3831 dose groups, indicating that different dose levels of olanzapine in ALKS 3831 had no impact on the pharmacokinetic profile of samidorphan. ALKS 3831 was well tolerated, and no safety concerns unique to ALKS 3831 compared with olanzapine monotherapy were identified.. In the present study, samidorphan exposure was not affected by different dose levels of olanzapine in ALKS 3831. In addition, olanzapine exposure as a component of ALKS 3831 was comparable with previously published data for olanzapine monotherapy. The present data indicate that combining olanzapine with samidorphan does not affect the pharmacokinetic profile of either drug and support continued clinical evaluation of ALKS 3831. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02804568.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Weight Gain

Weight gain during treatment with antipsychotics is a prominent side-effect, especially with some second-generation antipsychotics, such as olanzapine and clozapine, and pharmacological treatments which ameliorate this side-effect are important to investigate. Decreases in histaminergic transmission in the brain induced by antipsychotics may be one of the mechanisms contributing to weight gain. Since betahistine is a histaminergic agonist, it may potentially counteract the weight gain effects of antipsychotics.. We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of treatment with betahistine (N = 29) or placebo (N = 22) in adolescents and adults on anthropomorphically measured weight-related parameters, appetite, and fasting glucose-lipid and leptin levels in 51 patients treated with first and/or second-generation antipsychotics who had gained weight during treatment or had high body-mass-index (BMI). Psychopathology and side-effects were also assessed with relevant scales.. In a sub-group of patients being treated with olanzapine or clozapine (n = 26), betahistine was significantly (P < .05) better than placebo in preventing increases in weight (3.1 kg less weight gain than placebo), BMI, and waist circumference. Betahistine did not decrease weight or BMI in patients treated with other antipsychotics. There was also no effect of betahistine on preventing weight or BMI gain in the total combined sample of all subjects. Betahistine did not significantly improve appetite or glucose-lipid measures in either subgroup. There were no significant differences in side-effects or psychopathology changes in the betahistine- vs. placebo-treated patients.. These results suggest that betahistine may potentially be a useful adjunctive drug for decreasing weight gain in patients treated with antipsychotics that are potent histamine antagonists, such as olanzapine or clozapine, but may not be useful for this purpose in patients on other antipsychotic medications. The results justify larger placebo-controlled studies to further confirm these effects before specific recommendations can be made for routine use.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Betahistine; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Child; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between early reduction in psychotic symptoms and the ultimate response in patients with schizophrenia treated by atypical antipsychotics, and to determine the best time to switch or maitain the regimen. We also explore the possible predictors for the clinical response.. One hundred eleven inpatients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia were randomized to give optimal therapy of olanzapine, risperidone, and paliperidone in one-week run-in period and 12 weeks' intervention. All participants were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Early Response, defined as reduction of 25% in PANSS score, was examined at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8, and these ratings were used to predict ultimate response (25% PANSS reduction) at week 12. We hypothesized that early treatment response at Week 1 or 2 could predict Week 12's treatment outcome.. The early treatment response at Week 2 had a greater negative prediction value (NPV, 93.6%) than did the response at Week 1 (NPV, 69.7%), Week 3 (NPV, 91.5%), Week 4 (NPV, 90.7%) and Week 8 (NPV, 87.2%). The positive predictive value became more acceptable (65%) until Week 4. There was no any other potential predictors, including types of antipsychotics medication and treatment dosage, were associated with ultimate response in this study.. The treatment non-response at Week 2 optimally predicted the ultimate (Week 12) non-response, in terms of negative predictive value (NPV). These finding suggests that the revision of treatment strategy should be considered t if patients with schizophrenia was not responsive to them after 2 weeks' treatment, and for those who are responders at Week 2, another two weeks are needed to further evaluate whether they will be continuously responsive.. NCT03730857 at ClinicalTrial.gov . Date of registration: 30/Oct/2018.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Acute akathisia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with a negative effect on illness outcome. Its incidence in patients treated with antipsychotics has shown to be highly variable across studies.. Our goals were to investigate prevalence, risk factors for the development of acute akathisia, and differences in incidence between antipsychotics in a sample of 493 first episode non-affective psychosis patients.. This is a pooled analysis of three prospective, randomized, flexible-dose, and open-label clinical trials. Patients were randomized assigned to different arms of treatment (haloperidol, quetiapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, or aripiprazole). Akathisia was determined using the Barnes Akathisia Scale at 6 weeks after antipsychotic initialization. Univariate analyses were performed to identify demographic, biochemical, substance use, clinical, and treatment-related predictors of acute akathisia. Considering these results, a predictive model based of a subsample of 132 patients was constructed with akathisia as the dependent variable.. The overall incidence of akathisia was 19.5%. No differences in demographic, biochemical, substance use, and clinical variables were found. Significant incidence differences between antipsychotics were observed (Χ. Among second generation antipsychotics, only olanzapine and quetiapine should be considered as akathisia-sparing drugs. The type of antipsychotic, having been hospitalized, and a more severe symptomatology at intake seem to predict the development of acute akathisia.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Incidence; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Young Adult

The Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS) compared the efficacy of risperidone, olanzapine, and molindone over 8 weeks in 119 youths age 8-19 years with early-onset schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. From this large dataset, we examined predictors of treatment response and drop out using stepwise regression and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis. Treatment response was defined as having both a ≥ 20% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score < 3. More severe baseline symptoms, having a history of being in an early education program, and previous prescription of a mood stabilizer increased the likelihood of responding to treatment. Anhedonia and poor community functioning predicted a reduction in symptom severity on the PANSS. Random assignment to different antipsychotic treatment was not predictive of outcome. Parental report of aggressive behaviors at baseline and being African American were associated with a greater likelihood of drop out. Our results suggest youth with more severe psychotic symptoms are most likely to benefit from treatment with antipsychotics and that aggressive youth may require additional support to improve treatment adherence. Further investigation is needed to understand potentially modifiable predictors of response like early education programs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Compared with the general population, patients with schizophrenia have a 2- to 3-fold higher mortality rate primarily caused by cardiovascular disease. Previous interventions designed to counteract antipsychotic-induced weight gain and cardiometabolic disturbances reported limited effects.. To determine the effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide added to clozapine or olanzapine treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.. This randomized clinical double-blind trial enrolled participants at 2 clinical sites in Denmark. Of 214 eligible participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 103 were randomized to liraglutide or placebo. Participants received stable treatment with clozapine or olanzapine, were overweight or obese, and had prediabetes. Data were collected from May 1, 2013, through February 25, 2016.. Treatment for 16 weeks with once-daily subcutaneous injection of liraglutide or placebo. Trial drug therapy was titrated during the first 2 weeks of the study.. The primary end point was change in glucose tolerance estimated by a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test result. Secondary end points included change in body weight and cardiometabolic parameters.. Of the 103 patients undergoing randomization (60 men [58.3%] and 43 women [41.7%]), 97 were included in the efficacy analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 42.5 (10.5) years and mean (SD) body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 33.8 (5.9). The liraglutide and placebo groups had comparable characteristics (mean [SD] age, 42.1 [10.7] vs 43.0 [10.5] years; 30 men in each group; mean [SD] body mass index, 33.7 [5.1] vs 33.9 [6.6]). A total of 96 randomized participants (93.2%) completed the trial. Glucose tolerance improved in the liraglutide group compared with the placebo group (P < .001). Altogether, 30 liraglutide-treated participants (63.8%) developed normal glucose tolerance compared with 8 placebo-treated participants (16.0%) (P < .001; number needed to treat, 2). Body weight decreased with liraglutide compared with placebo (-5.3 kg; 95% CI, -7.0 to -3.7 kg). Reductions in waist circumference (-4.1 cm; 95% CI, -6.0 to -2.3 cm), systolic blood pressure (-4.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3 mm Hg), visceral fat (-250.19 g; 95% CI, -459.9 to -40.5 g), and low-density lipoprotein levels (-15.4 mg/dL; 95% CI, -23.2 to -7.7 mg/dL) occurred with liraglutide compared with placebo. Adverse events with liraglutide affected mainly the gastrointestinal tract.. Liraglutide significantly improved glucose tolerance, body weight, and cardiometabolic disturbances in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with clozapine or olanzapine.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01845259.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Overweight; Prediabetic State; Schizophrenia

This study examined the effect of adjunctive telmisartan on psychopathology and cognition in olanzapine- or clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia.. In a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder received either telmisartan (80 mg once per day) or placebo. Psychopathology was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and a neuropsychological battery was used to assess cognitive performance. Assessments for psychopathology and cognition were conducted at baseline and week 12.. Fifty-four subjects were randomized, and 43 completed the study (22 in the telmisartan group, 21 in the placebo group). After 12-weeks of treatment, the telmisartan group had a significant decrease in PANSS total score compared withthe placebo group (mean ± SD: - 4.1 ± 8.1 vs. 0.4 ± 7.5, P = 0.038, SCohen's d = 0.57). There were no significant differences between the two groups in change from baseline to week 12 in PANSS subscale scores, SANS total score, or any cognitive measures (P > 0.100).. The present study suggests that adjunctive treatment with telmisartan may improve schizophrenia symptoms. Future trials with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Telmisartan

This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine versus risperidone among patients with schizophrenia who are established in outpatient psychiatric care and entering supported employment. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted among 107 outpatients with schizophrenia, who were cross-titrated to flexible dose risperidone or olanzapine over 2 weeks. Clinical endpoints included time to hospitalization and persistence on assigned medication. Weight, laboratory tests, psychopathology, neurologic side effects, social adjustment and role functioning were assessed at 3-6 month intervals. Data were analyzed first by randomized treatment, and then reassessed controlling for prior medication treatment. The proportion of patients on assigned medication at 18 months was 30.9% for risperidone and 37.3% for olanzapine. Mean doses were 6.4 ± 3.2 mg daily for risperidone, and 17.0 ± 5.0 mg daily for olanzapine. The groups did not differ significantly in time to medication discontinuation, first hospitalization or first employment. There were few differences in psychopathology, laboratory, or neurological assessments between groups at 18 months. Patients randomized to olanzapine gained modestly more weight. Controlling for pre-randomization medication suggested improvement in some aspects of psychopathology from switching medications; however, switching from olanzapine to risperidone was associated with more hospitalizations. Risperidone and olanzapine have similar efficacy and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia who are participating in supported employment. Randomization to olanzapine was associated with more weight gain, but randomization from olanzapine to risperidone appeared to be associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalization. Careful monitoring of metabolic effects and participation in supported employment may have contributed to minimal weight gain and metabolic effects.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Employment, Supported; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Although supported employment increases job acquisition for people with serious mental illness, data on participants' job tenure have been variable. This study evaluated the effects of a standardized work skills training program (the Workplace Fundamentals Module [WPFM]) on job tenure and other work outcomes among individuals receiving individual placement and support (IPS). The effects of two atypical antipsychotic medications on side effects were also tested. The primary hypothesis tested was that participants in IPS plus WPFM would have increased job tenure compared with those enrolled in IPS only, and the secondary hypothesis was that different antipsychotic medications would yield unique side effects.. A 2×2 randomized controlled trial compared work outcomes, including job tenure, of participants receiving IPS with or without WPFM for up to two years after obtaining a job. Participants were also randomly assigned to olanzapine or risperidone. Measures of work outcomes, clinical status, and medication side effects were collected.. Among 107 participants, 63% obtained at least one job. WPFM did not increase job tenure (51.53 and 41.37 total weeks worked for IPS only and IPS plus WPFM, respectively) or affect other work outcomes. Participants on olanzapine experienced increased body mass index, whereas those on risperidone lost weight, but medications did not differentially affect clinical or job outcomes.. Clinic-based skills training did not improve work outcomes accruing from IPS. Risperidone, compared with olanzapine, may reduce body mass but has no differential effect on other work or clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Employment, Supported; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Professional Competence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of asenapine 2.5 mg twice daily (bid; n=97) or 5 mg bid (n=113) versus placebo (n=101) in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.. Adults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) schizophrenia diagnosis were randomized to asenapine 2.5 mg bid, 5 mg bid, placebo, or olanzapine 15 mg once daily. The primary objective was to test superiority of asenapine versus placebo as measured by the change from baseline to day 42 in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The key safety objective was to evaluate weight change in asenapine versus olanzapine at day 42.. The primary efficacy endpoint was met; the difference in least squares mean change from baseline to day 42 in PANSS total score between asenapine 5 mg bid and placebo was -5.5 points (unadjusted 95% CI: -10.1, -1.0; multiplicity adjusted P=0.0356). Neither asenapine 2.5 mg bid nor olanzapine 15mg were superior to placebo. Both asenapine groups demonstrated significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42. Significantly higher incidences of oral hypoesthesia and dysgeusia (combined) for asenapine 2.5 mg bid (5.2% vs 0.0%; P=0.0217) and 5 mg bid (7.1% vs 0.0%; P=0.0033) were observed versus placebo. There were no significant differences between asenapine and placebo for insomnia, extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, dizziness, or combination of somnolence/sedation/hypersomnia.. This study supports previous efficacy and safety findings of asenapine; asenapine 5 mg bid is the lowest effective dose in adults with schizophrenia. Asenapine was associated with significantly less weight gain than olanzapine at day 42.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Disease Progression; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Dysgeusia; Europe; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Hypesthesia; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Mouth Diseases; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Ziprasidone (ZIP) is often used with olanzapine (OLZ) in 'switch' and combination therapy but empirical evidence to support these strategies is limited.. This study was therefore designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching from OLZ to ZIP, the combination of both medications, and OLZ and ZIP monotherapy, in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD).. In this 12 week open-label, assessor-blinded randomized trial, 148 patients with SSD who had not used antipsychotics for at least 3 months were assigned to ZIP (n = 49) or OLZ monotherapy (n = 31); OLZ for 4 weeks then a switch to ZIP (OLZ/ZIP, n = 35); or combination therapy (OLZ + ZIP, n = 33). The severity of psychosis and abnormal involuntary movements was evaluated at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks using standard instruments. Baseline-to-endpoint changes in weight gain and metabolic measures were compared.. The efficacy of both OLZ/ZIP and OLZ + ZIP was comparable OLZ monotherapy and better than ZIP monotherapy in reducing overall psychotic and negative symptoms at most 8 and 12 week measurement points. Changes in weight gain, glucose, and lipid measures did not differ between OLZ/ZIP and OLZ + ZIP, but were markedly higher following OLZ monotherapy. The OLZ + ZIP group had the lowest overall incidence of adverse events and extrapyramidal symptoms of all the treatment regimens.. We conclude that combining ZIP and OLZ at the outset of treatment is superior to switching from OLZ to ZIP in terms of improving psychotic symptoms and limiting movement side effects without increasing the risk of metabolic syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is common in clinical practice, but not recommended in guidelines for treating schizophrenia patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose olanzapine plus low-dose trifluoperazine (a first-generation antipsychotic [FGA]) to full-dose olanzapine (a second-generation antipsychotic [SGA]) in the treatment of acute schizophrenia.. In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients were randomized to receive 5mg/day of olanzapine plus 5mg/day of trifluoperazine or 10mg/day of olanzapine for 6weeks. Efficacy measures, including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and other scales, safety measures, side effect measures, and quality of life were assessed regularly. Response was defined as at least a 30% reduction in the PANSS total score.. Both groups were similar in: 1) baseline characteristics, 2) score changes in all efficacy measures, safety measures, side effect measures, and quality of life, and 3) response rates at each visit. The polypharmacy group with low-dose olanzapine did not have less weight gain and lower lipid levels than the monotherapy group with full-dose olanzapine.. Polypharmacy is as efficacious and safe as, but cheaper than, monotherapy in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Whether our findings can be generalized to other combinations of an appropriate ratio of one FGA to another SGA dosage, which can achieve favorable clinical responses and side effect profiles, needs further investigation.

Topics: Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Trifluoperazine

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction (SGD) in treating olanzapine induced hyperprolactinemia. Methods Totally 120 schizophrenia patients who took Olanzapine Tablet (OT) were assigned to the treatment group and the control group by random number table, 60 in each group. All patients took OT. Those in the treatment group additionally took SGD. The ther- apeutic course for all was 8 weeks. Serum levels of prolactin were measured before treatment and at the end of week 2, 4, and 8 after treatment. The spiritual symptoms of patients were assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) before treatment and at the end of week 8 after treatment. Adverse reactions were assessed using Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) before treatment and at the end of week 8 after treatment. Results Compared with before treatment in the same group, ser- um levels of prolactin were significantly reduced in the treatment group at the end of week 4 and 8 after treatment (P <0. 05). There was no statistical difference in serum levels of prolactin in the control group among each time points (P > 0. 05). Compared with the control group, serum levels of prolactin de- creased significantly in the treatment group at the end of week 4 and 8 after treatment (P <0. 01). There was no statistical difference in PANSS between the two groups at the end of week 8 after treatment (P> 0. 05). Adverse reactions occurred in 5 cases (943%) of the treatment group and 4 cases (7. 14%) in the control group. They were manifested as insomnia, headache, constipation, and incapability of sitting quietly. There was no statistical difference in adverse reaction between the two groups (P'>0. 05). Con- clusions SGD could effectively improve olanzapine-induced hyperprolactinemia, and had no obvious effect on psychotic symptoms. It showed no obvious adverse reactions.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Weight gain has long been recognized as a side-effect of atypical antipsychotic drugs. Numerous new approaches have been tried for prevention of weight gain, the H2 blockers being one of them. The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine in olanzapine-induced weight gain at two fixed doses of 150 and 300 mg day. Seventy-five inpatients with an ICD-10-DCR diagnosis of schizophrenia as their first episode were randomized into three groups of 25 patients each, receiving 150 mg day. All patients were comparable with respect to their weight and BMI at baseline. When a change in the weight and BMI was assessed at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline, no significant difference was observed between the three groups.. Ranitidine at doses of 150 and 300 mg day

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Ranitidine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To determine whether the prescription of aripiprazole, compared with olanzapine and haloperidol, was associated with a lower frequency of metabolic syndrome (MS) and treatment discontinuation at 1 year.. Patients were randomly assigned to be treated open-label and according to usual clinical practice with either aripiprazole, olanzapine, or haloperidol and followed up for 1 year.. Three hundred out-patients with persistent schizophrenia were recruited in 35 mental health services. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis found no significant differences in the rate of MS between aripiprazole (37%), olanzapine (47%), and haloperidol (42%). Treatment discontinuation for any cause was higher for aripiprazole (52%) than for olanzapine (33%; OR, 0.41; P = 0.004), or haloperidol (37%; OR, 0.51; P = 0.030). No significant difference was found between olanzapine and haloperidol. Time to discontinuation for any cause was longer for olanzapine than for aripiprazole (HR, 0.55; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between haloperidol and aripiprazole, or between olanzapine and haloperidol.. The prescription of aripiprazole did not significantly reduce the rates of MS, but its treatment retention was worse. Aripiprazole cannot be considered the safest and most effective drug for maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in routine care, although it may have a place in antipsychotic therapy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Increased body weight and hyperlipidemia caused by antipsychotics may be associated with improved antipsychotic efficacy in schizophrenia. If this association has a causal interrelationship via a genuine pathophysiological mechanism, then body weight loss in antipsychotic-treated patients would be accompanied by worsened psychopathology. This could have clinical implications.. To explore whether the decreased body weight in these patients is associated with a worsened psychopathology.. In our previously published study, a 16 week treatment period with add-on orlistat (but not placebo) resulted in body weight loss in male (but not female) clozapine- or olanzapine-treated overweight or obese patients. In the current study, we investigated whether body weight loss in those male patients could worsen psychosis. Changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores within groups and body weight changes and lipid profiles over the treatment period were analysed by the paired samples t-test. Between-group comparisons were analysed by the independent samples t-test.. Over the treatment period body weight decreased by 2.56 ± 3.25 kg from initial 106.02 ± 12.61 kg (p = 0.04) for the orlistat group, with no statistically significant changes for the placebo group. Lipid levels did not change in either group. The orlistat-induced weight decrease was not associated with worsening in the PANSS scores.. Weight loss was not associated with a worsening of psychosis. The interrelationship between the antipsychotic-induced weigh gain and improved schizophrenia psychopathology observed in earlier studies appears to be indirect. Orlistat treatment in our study did not worsen psychopathology in this population.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lactones; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Orlistat; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychopathology; Schizophrenia; Weight Loss

Patients with schizophrenia experience higher rates of obesity and related morbidity and mortality than the general population does. Given preclinical studies revealing the role of histamine H1 receptor in human eating behavior, and the potential of olanzapine to block with this system, we hypothesized that histamine H1 receptor agonists may be beneficial in reducing antipsychotic-associated weight gain. In the present study, 36 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and treated with olanzapine were randomized to betahistine (48 mg/d) or matching placebo for 16 weeks. Study outcomes were change in body weight from baseline and effect on antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine. The patients in the betahistine group had less weight gain (-1.95 kg) compared with placebo group (5.6 + 5.5 kg vs 6.9 + 5.6 kg, respectively). Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Questionnaire showed improvement within each group and that subjects treated with betahistine enjoyed an improvement (reduction) by a mean of 35.7 points, higher when compared with placebo subjects who had a reduction of 26.6 points (P = 0.233). An almost equal amount of subjects in both groups experienced adverse effects during the course of this study (87.5% of betahistine vs 85.0% of placebo-treated subjects). Overall, there were no clinically marked differences in safety signals between both groups. A larger study addressing the weaknesses of this pilot study is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Betahistine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Internationality; Male; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and IM aripiprazole for the treatment of agitated patients with schizophrenia in clinical practice.. A 24-hour randomized double-blind study carried out at a psychiatric hospital in Thailand enrolled adult patients (18-65years old) with schizophrenia experiencing agitation. Patients received one dose of IM olanzapine or IM aripiprazole followed by routine oral psychotropic medications. Efficacy was primarily measured using the Excited Component of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-EC).. A total of 80 patients with a PANSS-EC score range of 22-35 entered the study, of whom 13% had a medical comorbidity and 40% a history of active substance abuse. The 40 patients receiving IM olanzapine showed greater improvement than the 40 patients receiving IM aripiprazole in PANSS-EC scores at 2h after the injection (p=0.002) but not at 24h. The two treatments were well tolerated. Patients receiving IM olanzapine experienced greater somnolence than those receiving IM aripiprazole. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs in either group.. The results indicate that IM olanzapine and aripiprazole are similarly effective and well tolerated in the real-world treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia over the first 24h. However, in the early hours, IM olanzapine may produce more sedation and reductions in agitation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This analysis of the Paliperidone Palmitate Research in Demonstrating Effectiveness (PRIDE) study (NCT01157351) compared outcomes after administration of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs conventional oral antipsychotics (COAs) or atypical oral antipsychotics (AOAs).. PRIDE was a 15-month study of 444 individuals with schizophrenia and a history of incarceration. They were randomly assigned to PP or to 1 of 7 commonly prescribed OAs. Primary endpoint was time to first treatment failure (TF). Event-free probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; treatment group differences (PP vs COAs, PP vs AOAs, and PP vs oral paliperidone/risperidone) were assessed using a log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. No adjustment was made for multiplicity.. Compared with PP, risk for first TF was 34% higher with COAs (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.80-2.25), 41% higher with AOAs (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.06-1.88), and 39% higher with paliperidone/risperidone (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.97-1.99). Incidences of extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events (AEs) were 45.7%, 13.7%, and 10.6% in the COA, AOA, and oral paliperidone/risperidone groups vs 23.9% in the PP group. Incidences of prolactin-related AEs were 5.7%, 3.8%, and 3.5% vs 23.5%, and incidences of ≥7% weight increase were 11.4%, 14.9%, and 16.0% vs 32.4%.. Results suggest a lower risk of TF but a higher rate of some AEs after treatment with PP vs COAs, AOAs, and paliperidone/risperidone. Deselection of specific OAs and low patient-compliance rates with OAs likely biased the safety results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

While doctors often increase the dose of an antipsychotic when there is insufficient response, there is limited evidence that this intervention is any better than waiting longer on the lower dose. We put the proposition to test.. In this 4-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in psychiatric care from September 2012 to March 2015, 103 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10) who did not respond to olanzapine 10 mg/d or risperidone 3 mg/d were randomly allocated to a dose-increment or -continuation group. In the increment group, antipsychotic doses were doubled for 4 weeks, whereas in the continuation group, doses were not changed. Completion rate (primary outcome measure); changes in psychopathology, function, and extrapyramidal symptoms; and response rate were compared between the groups. The relationship between baseline plasma antipsychotic concentrations and changes in psychopathology was examined.. The completion rate was significantly lower in the increment group than in the continuation group (69.2% [36/52] vs 86.3% [44/51], P = .038). No significant superiority was observed in any of the outcome measures in the increment group compared to the continuation group, except the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive subscale score change in intention-to-treat analysis. Those with lower plasma concentrations of olanzapine on their initial treatment showed a greater improvement on the PANSS positive subscale when their dose was increased (P = .042).. As a general strategy, patients with schizophrenia failing to respond to moderate antipsychotic doses may not benefit from an increase in dose. The possibility of benefit in those whose plasma antipsychotic concentrations at baseline are still low cannot be ruled out.. UMIN.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm identifier: UMIN000008667.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Schizophrenic Psychology

Glutamate dysregulation may be involved in the neuropathology of schizophrenia. Memantine, a drug approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease, acts as a partial uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of memantine as an adjunctive treatment to olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, patients with schizophrenia according to DSM-IV clinical criteria were selected. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either memantine (week 1:10 mg/day; weeks 2-6:20 mg/day) plus olanzapine (15-20 mg/day) or olanzapine plus placebo. At baseline, no statistically significant difference regarding the mean total PANSS scores between treatment groups was found. Results showed that memantine significantly improved the positive and negative PANSS score in patients maintained on olanzapine after six weeks compared to olanzapine alone (P<0.001). Furthermore, female patients showed significantly better response than males, especially in positive PANSS score. No significant changes in extrapyramidal symptoms were observed.These findings indicate that olanzapine efficacy might be augmented with memantine. Furthermore, this effect is more remarkable in female patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Memantine; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Although hyperprolactinemia carries a long-term risk of morbidity, the threshold of dopamine D2/3 receptor (D2/3R) occupancy for hyperprolactinemia has not been investigated in older patients with schizophrenia. Data were taken from a positron emission tomography (PET) study conducted between August 2007 and August 2015. The present post hoc study included 42 clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) (mean ± SD age = 60.2 ± 6.7 years) taking olanzapine or risperidone. Subjects underwent [¹¹C]-raclopride PET scans to measure D2/3R occupancy before and after reducing their dose of antipsychotic by up to 40%. Blood samples were collected before each PET scan to measure prolactin levels.. The relationship between prolactin levels and D2/3R occupancy was examined using stepwise linear regression analyses. The D2/3R occupancy thresholds for hyperprolactinemia were explored using Fisher exact tests.. Prolactin levels decreased following dose reduction (mean ± SD = 24.1 ± 30.2 ng/mL to 17.2 ± 15.1 ng/mL; P < .001). Prolactin levels were associated with female gender (β = .32, P = .006, vs male), antipsychotics (β = .23, P = .02, risperidone vs olanzapine), and D2/3R occupancy (β = .23, P = .04). Those with D2/3R occupancy of 66% or higher were more likely to have hyperprolactinemia than those with D2/3R occupancy lower than 66% (P = .03). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this threshold were 0.44, 0.81, 0.78, and 0.48, respectively. We identified a D2/3R occupancy threshold for hyperprolactinemia of 66% in older patients with schizophrenia, which is lower than that reported in younger patients (73%) by other researchers.. Our results suggest a higher sensitivity to antipsychotics in older patients. Prolactin levels could assist in the determination of appropriate antipsychotic dosing to minimize adverse effects.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00716755.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine Antagonists; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prolactin; Raclopride; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Although depressive symptoms are a frequently occurring phenomenon in schizophrenia, effective treatments remain an area of clinical need.. To assess the benefit of short-term treatment with the atypical antipsychotic asenapine versus placebo on depressive symptoms in patients with acute schizophrenia in an exacerbated state.. Data were pooled from intent-to-treat (ITT) populations of three 6-week, randomized controlled studies with fixed doses of asenapine (ASE; n=427), olanzapine (OLA; n=82), risperidone (RIS; n=54), haloperidol (HAL; n=97), or placebo (PLA; n=254). Change from baseline Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score and individual item scores were assessed at Day 21 and Day 42 in the total patient population (n=914), and in patients presenting with a CDSS total score of .6 at baseline (n=248). Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analyses were performed on patient data.. The observed change from baseline in CDSS total score was significantly larger with ASE.compared to PLA.at both Day 21 (p<0.05) and Day 42 (p<0.01) for the total patient population group, and at Day 21 (p<0.05) in patients with baseline CDSS total score .6. For both populations, there was a significant change from baseline in the CDSS depression item score with ASE.compared to PLA.at Day 21 (p<0.01, all patient population; p<0.05, patients with baseline CDSS .6), and at Day 42 (p<0.01) in the all patient population. Statistically significant changes from baseline, in favor of ASE versus PLA, were also observed in other individual CDSS item scores including hopelessness (p<0.05, Day 21, patients with baseline CDSS .6), self-depreciation (p<0.05, Day 42, all patient population), guilty ideas of reference (p<0.01, Day 42, all patient population), pathological guilt (p<0.01, Day 21, all patient population; p<0.05, Day 21 and Day 42, patients with baseline CDSS score .6), and observed depression (p<0.05, Day 21, all patient population).. ASE significantly improved a range of depressive symptoms in people with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, as measured by the CDSS. ASE may represent a beneficial treatment option for the management of depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To describe secondary analyses from a 12-week, randomized, open-label trial where adult schizophrenia outpatients receiving risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole were switched to iloperidone.. Patients were randomized into two groups: one where the antecedent antipsychotic dose was titrated downwards to zero over 2 weeks (n=240), and the other group where the antecedent antipsychotic was abruptly stopped (n=260). Adaptations of the Clinical Global Impression scale were used to evaluate clinical changes. Other assessments included the reporting of adverse events (AEs), study discontinuation, body weight, and metabolic variables.. Improvement was steady throughout the study for both gradual- and immediate-switch groups starting at Week 1 and continuing through Week 12. Discontinuations due to AEs in the first 2 weeks of treatment were higher for the immediate-switch group compared with the gradual-switch group (10.8% vs. 5.4%, NNT 19, 95% CI 10-151). Fewer patients in the gradual-switch group experienced dizziness as an AE, whereas a higher percentage of patients in the immediate-switch group exhibited earlier onset of a therapeutic response within the first 2 weeks; both groups were comparable thereafter with low rates of dizziness and similar efficacy outcomes.. Switching to iloperidone can be accomplished either with a gradual crossover or immediate discontinuation of the prior antipsychotic; however, the immediate-switch method is associated with greater proportion of initial dizziness. The observed outcomes are consistent with what has been previously reported regarding iloperidone's favorable akathisia/EPS profile and modest impact on somnolence/sedation, body weight, and metabolic variables.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dizziness; Female; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The comparative antidepressant effects of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia remain elusive, leading us to examine this question using the data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness phase 2E.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone because of inadequate efficacy were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (n=49) or double-blind treatment with another atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [n=19], quetiapine [n=15], or risperidone [n=16]). The primary outcome was the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score. Antidepressant effects of clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics were compared in patients with chronic schizophrenia and those with a major depressive episode (MDE) at baseline (i.e. ≥6 on the CDSS), using mixed models.. No differences in the baseline CDSS total scores were found between the treatment groups regardless of presence of an MDE. Clozapine was more effective than quetiapine in antidepressant effects for chronic schizophrenia (p<.01 for the whole sample and p=.01 for those with an MDE), and comparable to olanzapine and risperidone.. The present findings suggest that clozapine demonstrates superior antidepressant effects to quetiapine and comparable effects to olanzapine and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia regardless of presence of MDE. Given the indication of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and the negative impacts of depressive symptoms on clinical outcomes in schizophrenia, further research is warranted to investigate antidepressant effects of clozapine in TRS with an MDE.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of once- versus twice-daily dosing of risperidone and olanzapine on clinical outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Data from phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia study were used. Patients with schizophrenia were randomly allocated to treatment with risperidone and olanzapine, and were also randomly assigned to once-daily (N=173 and 169, respectively) or twice-daily (N=168 and 167, respectively) dosing and followed for up to 18 months. Discontinuation rate and time to discontinuation were used as primary outcome measures to compare the two groups. The following outcome measures were also analyzed: efficacy, safety, medication adherence, adverse events, and concomitant psychotropic medications. No significant differences in discontinuation rates and time to discontinuation were observed between the once- and twice-daily dosing groups (P>0.05) in patients receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The once-daily dosing group demonstrated significantly lower mean daily doses of risperidone and olanzapine across phase 1, and lower rates of hospitalization for exacerbation of schizophrenia, sleepiness, and orthostatic faintness in patients receiving olanzapine (P<0.05) compared to the twice-daily dosing group. No significant differences were found in any other outcome measures between the two dosing groups. In conclusion, effectiveness and efficacy outcomes between once- and twice-daily dosing for risperidone and olanzapine were not significantly different. However, in view of the lower mean dose and better side effect profile, it is advisable to adhere to a once-daily dosing regimen, especially in the case of olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

To compare the efficacy and safety profile between intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and IM haloperidol plus IM lorazepam in acute schizophrenic patients with moderate to severe agitation.. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. Acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 67) were randomized to receive 10 mg IM olanzapine (n = 37) or 5 mg IM haloperidol plus 2 mg IM lorazepam (n = 30). Agitation was measured with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC) and Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES) during the first 2 hours and at 24 hours after the first injection. Safety was assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale and by recording adverse events at 24 hours following the first injection. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale was also rated.. The PANSS-EC scores decreased significantly at 2 hours after the first injection in both groups (olanzapine: -10.2, p < 0.001; haloperidol + lorazepam: -9.9, p < 0.001). Haloperidol plus lorazepam was not inferior to olanzapine in reducing agitation at 2 hours. There were no significant differences in PANSS-EC or ACES scores between the two groups within 2 hours following the first injection. The frequencies of adverse events and changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Simpson-Angus Scale, and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale scores from baseline to 24 hours showed no significant differences between the groups.. The findings suggest that IM haloperidol (5 mg) plus lorazepam (2 mg) is not inferior to IM olanzapine (10 mg) in the treatment of acute schizophrenic patients with moderate to severe agitation (ClinialTrials.gov identifier number NCT00797277).

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

We tested the hypothesis that a common functional variant in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Val66Met, which has been shown to be associated with increased body mass index (BMI) in schizophrenia (SCZ) and schizoaffective disorder (SAD), is also associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain in bipolar disorder (BPD). Association of Val66Met with other metabolic measures, including high- and low-density cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c, was also tested.. This was a 12-month, prospective, randomized trial of two atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) with moderate (risperidone) or high (olanzapine) risk to cause weight gain. Subjects were diagnosed as having BPD (n = 90) and SCZ or SAD (n = 76).. BMI was significantly greater in all diagnoses for Met66 allele carriers at six months (p = 0.01). Met66 carriers with BPD showed a greater increase in the triglycerides/high-density (HDL) cholesterol ratio (p = 0.01), a key marker for metabolic syndrome related to insulin resistance, and log-triglycerides (p = 0.04), after three or six months of treatment. Met66 carriers had the greatest increase in log-triglycerides (p = 0.03) and triglycerides/HDL cholesterol ratio after three months of treatment with risperidone (p = 0.003), and the highest BMI at six months (p = 0.01).. The positive association of BNDF Val66Met with high BMI values replicates previous findings in patients with SCZ and indicates the BDNF Val66Met genotype as a potential risk factor for obesity and insulin resistance measures in patients with BPD receiving antipsychotics as well.

Topics: Adult; Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Dyslipidemias; Female; Genotype; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides

The salience network (SN), a set of brain regions composed of the anterior fronto-insular cortex (aFI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), is usually involved in interoception, self-regulating, and action selection. Accumulating evidence indicates that dysfunctions in this network are associated with various pathophysiological deficits in both schizophrenia and eating disorders, stemming mainly from dysfunctional information processing of internal or external stimuli. In addition, the metabolic side effects of some antipsychotics (APs), as well as their pharmacological mechanisms of action, also suggest a link between the functional and neurophysiological changes in the brain in both schizophrenia and in eating disorders. Nevertheless, there is still a knowledge gap in explicitly and directly linking the metabolic side effects associated with AP treatment with the dysfunction in SN associated with processing of food-related information in schizophrenia. Here we provide neuroimaging evidence for such a link, by presenting data on a group of schizophrenia patients who followed 16 weeks of olanzapine treatment and undertook a passive viewing task while their brain activity was recorded. In response to food-related dynamic stimuli (video clips), we observed a decreased activity in SN (aFI and ACC) after the treatment, which also correlated with ghrelin plasma concentration and a measure of dietary restraint. Taken together with past findings regarding the role of SN in both schizophrenia and eating disorders, our results suggest that enhancing the reactivity in the SN has the potential to be a treatment strategy in people with anorexia nervosa.. NCT 00290121.

Topics: Adult; Anorexia Nervosa; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Brain Mapping; Cerebral Cortex; Female; Ghrelin; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Most cognitive domains show only minimal improvement following typical or atypical antipsychotic treatments in schizophrenia, and some may even worsen. One domain that may worsen is procedural learning, an implicit memory function relying mainly on the integrity of the fronto-striatal system.. We investigated whether switching to atypical antipsychotics would improve procedural learning and task-related neural activation in patients on typical antipsychotics. Furthermore, we explored the differential effects of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine.. Thirty schizophrenia patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a 5-min procedural (sequence) learning task on two occasions: at baseline and 7-8 weeks later. Of 30 patients, 10 remained on typical antipsychotics, and 20 were switched randomly in equal numbers to receive either olanzapine (10-20 mg) or risperidone (4-8 mg) for 7-8 weeks.. At baseline, patients (all on typical antipsychotics) showed no procedural learning. At follow-up, patients who remained on typical antipsychotics continued to show a lack of procedural learning, whereas those switched to atypical antipsychotics displayed significant procedural learning (p = 0.001) and increased activation in the superior-middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate and striatum (cluster-corrected p < 0.05). These neural effects were present as a linear increase over five successive 30-s blocks of sequenced trials. A switch to either risperidone or olanzapine resulted in comparable performance but with both overlapping and distinct task-related activations.. Atypical antipsychotics restore procedural learning deficits and associated neural activity in schizophrenia. Furthermore, different atypical antipsychotics produce idiosyncratic task-related neural activations, and this specificity may contribute to their differential long-term clinical profiles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Learning; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Performance; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

In adults with schizophrenia, early response/non-response (ER/ENR) to antipsychotics at 2 weeks robustly predicts ultimate response/non-response (UR/UNR). However, less data about the predictive value of ER/ENR exist in adolescents with schizophrenia. Post hoc analysis of a 6-week trial in adolescents aged 13-17 with schizophrenia were randomized 2:1 to olanzapine or placebo. ER was defined as ≥20 % reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-children (BPRS-C) total score at week 2 (ER2) or 3 (ER3); UR was defined with increasing stringency as total BPRS-C score reduction ≥20, ≥30, ≥40 or ≥50 %; remission was defined cross-sectionally using Andreasen et al. (2005) criteria. By week 2 (n = 69) and 3 (n = 66), olanzapine-treated youth achieved 73.3 and 85.5 % of their overall BPRS-C score reduction at 6 weeks last observation carried forward. ER and ENR patients did not differ significantly regarding baseline demographic, illness and treatment variables. ER 2 (frequency = 68.1 %) and ER 3 (frequency = 65.2 %) significantly predicted UR and remission (p = 0.0044-p < 0.0001), with ER3 having more predictive power. A ≥ 20 % BPRS-C reduction threshold for ER had best predictive validity (area under the curve = 0.88-0.92). At 6 weeks, patients with ER had significantly greater improvements in BPRS-C, Clinical Global Impressions Improvement and Severity scores, greater cross-sectional remission and less all-cause discontinuation (p = 0.047-p < 0.0001). Adverse event profiles were similar in the ER and ENR groups. Adolescents with schizophrenia experienced the majority of symptomatic improvement early during olanzapine treatment. ER predicted UR and remission, with ER3 having best predictive power. A ≥ 20 % improvement threshold for defining ER was confirmed as a robust outcome indicator.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Placebo Effect; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to develop a clinically acceptable method of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for olanzapine and risperidone and to evaluate the feasibility of its implementation.. A non-randomised study of inpatients from five Mental Health Trusts was conducted, with a clinical interview at the time of TDM and a subsequent 6-week follow-up review of clinical notes. The TDM intervention comprised: (a) a venous blood sample taken 12 hours post-dose, 7-10 days after drug initiation, and (b) rapid results feedback, with interpretation algorithm guidance.. Thirty-two participants provided samples (19 prescribed olanzapine, 13 risperidone). Twenty-six participants remained on the target drug at study end, with seven experiencing a dose change, for whom only four of the TDM results were confirmed as having been checked. Mean dose increased for olanzapine (0.9 mg/day, range 0-10) and decreased for risperidone (-0.3 mg/day, range -4-3).. TDM can be implemented as part of routine clinical practice for both drugs. However, the lack of robust supporting evidence for or against antipsychotic TDM has probably led to a lack of enthusiasm for and interest in the results. Nevertheless, the advent of less invasive measures and the targeting of patients who might be more likely to benefit may facilitate uptake.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

No large-scale randomized trial has compared the effect of different second-generation antipsychotic drugs and any first-generation drug on alcohol, drug and nicotine use in patients with schizophrenia. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness study randomly assigned 1432 patients formally diagnosed with schizophrenia to four second-generation antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, risperidone quetiapine, and ziprasidone) and one first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) and followed them for up to 18 months. Secondary outcome data documented cigarettes smoked in the past week and alcohol and drug use severity ratings. At baseline, 61% of patients smoked, 35% used alcohol, and 23% used illicit drugs. Although there were significant effects of time showing reduction in substance use over the 18 months (all p < 0.0001), this study found no evidence that any antipsychotic was robustly superior to any other in a secondary analysis of data on substance use outcomes from a large 18-month randomized schizophrenia trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alcoholism; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Smoking; Smoking Prevention; Substance-Related Disorders; Thiazoles; Young Adult

The purpose of this study was to assess differences in the outcomes of youth with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SCZ-S) and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PsyNOS) during early antipsychotic treatment.. The study was a prospective, naturalistic, inception cohort study of youth ≤19 years old with SCZ-S (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder) or PsyNOS (PsyNOS, brief psychotic disorder) and ≤24 months of lifetime antipsychotic treatment receiving clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. Baseline demographic, illness and treatment variables, and effectiveness outcomes were compared at 12 weeks last-observation-carried-forward across SCZ-S and PsyNOS patients, adjusting for significantly different baseline variables.. Altogether, 130 youth with SCZ-S (n=42) or PsyNOS (n=88), mostly antipsychotic naïve (76.9%), were prescribed risperidone (47.7%), olanzapine (19.2%), aripiprazole (14.6%), quetiapine (11.5%), or ziprasidone (6.9%). Compared with those with PsyNOS, SCZ-S youth were older (16.4±2.1 vs. 14.8±3.2, p=0.0040), and less likely to be Caucasian (19.1% vs. 42.5%, p=0.009). At baseline, SCZ-S patients had significantly higher Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores (6.0±0.9 vs. 5.5±0.8, p=0.0018) and lower Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores (29.6±9.2 vs. 36.1±8.9, p=0.0002) and were more likely to be in the severely ill CGAS group (i.e., CGAS≤40). SCZ-S and PsyNOS patients did not differ regarding all-cause discontinuation (40.5 vs. 40.3%. p=0.49), discontinuation because of adverse effects (12.2% vs. 12.4%, p=0.97), or nonadherence (29.3% vs. 30.9%, p=0.88), but somewhat more SCZ-S patients discontinued treatment for inefficacy (19.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.063). CGI-S and CGAS scores improved significantly in both diagnostic groups (p=0.0001, each). Adjusting for baseline differences, PsyNOS patients experienced significantly better CGI-I improvement (CGI-I) scores (p=0.012) and more frequently reached higher categorical CGAS group status (p=0.021) than SCZ-S patients.. Both youth with SCZ-S and those with PsyNOS experienced significant improvements with clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. However, treatment discontinuation was common within 12 weeks, with greater inefficacy-related discontinuation in the SCZ-S group, whereas CGI-I and CGAS score-based improvements were greater in the PsyNOS group.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Identify moderators of treatment outcome from antipsychotic pharmacotherapy in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trial. Specifically, we used logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to explore the association between baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes in the CATIE trial.. This is a secondary analysis of the CATIE trial in which 1,460 adults with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia were randomly assigned to olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone treatment for up to 18 months or until discontinuation between January 2001 and December 2004. Logistic regression was used to examine baseline characteristics associated with remission, response, and treatment continuation at 3 and 6 months of treatment. ROC analyses identified subgroups associated with similar likelihood of treatment outcome. Remission was defined by scores of selected items on psychoticism, disorganization, and negative symptoms. Response was defined as a 50% or greater improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.. The most consistent predictors of poor outcome on all variables were low scores on neurocognitive tests (in particular verbal memory) (OR = 1.13-1.49, P< .05); previous reported side effects (OR = 0.49-0.69, P < .05); negative attitude to medication (OR = 1.03-1.10, P < .05); comorbid depression (OR = 0.47-0.51, P < .05); psychosocial factors such as unemployment (OR = 0.74-0.75, P <.05), homelessness (OR = 0.54, P <.05), and living alone (OR = 1.58-1.94, P < .01); and random assignment to a medication other than olanzapine (OR = 1.54-2.04, P < .01). ROC analysis demonstrated prognostic subgroups with large differences in response likelihood.. Baseline characteristics in schizophrenia are informative regarding clinically important treatment outcomes with respect to antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. Further research should examine whether interventions that target improvement of patients' deficits in neuropsychological function and attitude toward medication as well as decreasing patients' social isolation can improve treatment outcomes with antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00014001.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Remission Induction; Schizophrenia; Socioeconomic Factors; Young Adult

Trajectory patterns of positive, disorganized and negative dimension symptoms during antipsychotic treatment in drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis have yet to be examined by using naturalistic data.. This pragmatic clinical trial randomized 161 drug-naive patients with a first episode of psychosis to olanzapine, risperidone or haloperidol. Patients were assessed with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Positive Symptoms (SAPS) at baseline and at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 of antipsychotic treatment. Censored normal models of response trajectories were developed with three dimensions of the SAPS-SANS scores (positive, disorganized and negative) in order to identify the different response trajectories. Diagnosis, cannabis use, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), smoking and antipsychotic class were examined as possible predictive variables.. Patients were classified in five groups according to the positive dimension, three groups according to the disorganized dimension and five groups according to the negative dimension. Longer DUPs and cannabis use were associated with higher scores and poorer responses in the positive dimension. Cannabis use was associated with higher scores and poorer responses in the disorganized dimension. Only schizophrenia diagnosis was associated with higher scores and poorer responses in the negative dimension.. Our results illustrate the heterogeneity of short-term response to antipsychotics in patients with a first episode of psychosis and highlight markedly different patterns of response in the positive, disorganized and negative dimensions. DUP, cannabis use and diagnosis appeared to have a prognostic value in predicting treatment response with different implications for each dimension.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Marijuana Smoking; Middle Aged; Models, Psychological; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Difficulties with affect regulation and impulse control have a strong influence on violence. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline depression and impulsivity predict aggression and whether they predict differential response to antiaggressive treatment. This is important, as we lack knowledge as to the selection of antipsychotics for the treatment of aggression.. Physically aggressive inpatients with schizophrenia who received an evaluation of depression and impulsivity at baseline were randomly assigned in a double-blind, parallel group, 12-week trial to clozapine, olanzapine, or haloperidol. Trait impulsivity was measured by the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; depression by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Depression factor. The number and severity of aggressive events, as measured by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS), were the outcome measures.. Baseline depression and impulsivity predicted higher levels of aggression, as measured by the MOAS total score, over the 12-week treatment period across all 3 medication groups. In addition, there was a strong interaction effect between baseline depression/impulsivity and medication grouping in predicting MOAS score. In particular, when higher depression and impulsivity were present at baseline, patients on haloperidol presented with more aggression than patients on the other 3 medications.. Depression and impulsivity are important predictors of aggression and of differential response to antiaggressive treatment. This is most likely due to the medications' dissimilar neurotransmitter profiles. By identifying patients who will respond better to a given medication, we will be able to develop individualized strategies for the treatment of violent behavior.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Violence; Young Adult

Olanzapine (OLZ), a commonly prescribed second generation antipsychotic drug, is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome and may contribute to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Opioidergic neurotransmission may be implicated in the development of these metabolic disturbances. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of opioid blockade on OLZ-treated patients' metabolic status. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n=30) on a stable dose of OLZ were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone (NTX), (n=14) or placebo (n=16). The primary outcome measure was the change in body mass index (BMI) at 12 weeks. Secondary measures included body fat and fat-free mass, along with homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), plasma lipids and liver function tests (LFTs). There was no significant change in BMI between the treatment arms. However, in comparison to the OLZ + placebo combination, the OLZ + NTX group displayed a significant decrease in the fat and increase in fat-free mass along with a trend towards improvement in HOMA-IR values. There were no significant differences in plasma lipids and LFTs. These findings suggest that addition of NTX to OLZ may attenuate OLZ-induced body fat mass gain. A larger study of longer duration will be needed to confirm these results.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Lipids; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Aggressive behavior can be a dangerous complication of schizophrenia. Hostility is related to aggression. This study aimed to compare the effects of olanzapine, perphenazine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone on hostility in schizophrenia.. We used the data that were acquired in the 18-month Phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study. We analyzed the scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) hostility item in a subset of 614 patients who showed at least minimal hostility (a score ≥ 2) at baseline.. The primary analysis of hostility indicated an effect of difference between treatments (F(4,1487) = 7.78, P < 0.0001). Olanzapine was significantly superior to perphenazine and quetiapine at months 1, 3, 6, and 9. It was also significantly superior to ziprasidone at months 1, 3, and 6, and to risperidone at months 3 and 6.. Our results are consistent with those of a similar post-hoc analysis of hostility in first-episode subjects with schizophrenia enrolled in the European First-Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) trial, where olanzapine demonstrated advantages compared with haloperidol, quetiapine, and amisulpride.. Olanzapine demonstrated advantages in terms of a specific antihostility effect over the other antipsychotics tested in Phase 1 of the CATIE trial.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Hostility; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

The study examined the rate of remission in individuals experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia (FES) in China and explored predictors of remission in the acute phase of the illness.. Fifty-five FES patients were randomly treated with risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole at therapeutic doses for 8 weeks, and their clinical profiles and cognition were assessed using standardized assessment instruments at entry and the end of the study.. Of the 55 patients, 30 (54.5%) remitted by the end of the 8-week study. In univariate analyses, shorter duration of untreated psychosis, higher scores on both the time-based prospective memory (TBPM) and event-based prospective memory tasks and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised, and less severe negative symptoms were significantly associated with remission. In stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, only higher scores on the TBPM significantly predicted remission. Individuals having higher scores reflecting better TBPM at baseline were more likely to achieve remission after 8 weeks of optimized antipsychotic treatment.. TPBM may be useful in helping clinicians identify those FES patients most likely to achieve a favorable treatment response.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; China; Female; Humans; Male; Memory, Episodic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prognosis; Quinolones; Remission Induction; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Schizophrenia is associated with impaired sleep continuity. The second generation antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine have been reported to improve sleep continuity but also to rarely induce restless legs syndrome (RLS). The aims of this randomized double-blind study were to compare the effects of clozapine and olanzapine on sleep and the occurrence of RLS. Therefore, polysomnographies were recorded and RLS symptoms were assessed in 30 patients with schizophrenia before and after 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment with either clozapine or olanzapine. Treatment with both antipsychotics increased total sleep time, sleep period time and sleep efficiency and decreased sleep onset latency. These changes were similar in both groups, occurred during the first 2 treatment weeks and were sustained. For example, sleep efficiency increased from 83% (olanzapine) and 82% (clozapine) at baseline to 95% at week 2 and 97% at week 6 in both treatment groups. Sleep architecture was differently affected: clozapine caused a significantly stronger increase of stage 2 sleep (44%) than olanzapine (11%) but olanzapine a significantly stronger increase of REM-sleep. Olanzapine caused an 80% increase of slow wave sleep whereas clozapine caused a 6% decrease. No patient reported any of 4 RLS defining symptoms at baseline. During treatment, 1 patient of each group reported at one visit all 4 symptoms, i.e. met the diagnosis of an RLS. In conclusion, sleep continuity similarly improved and sleep architecture changed more physiologically with olanzapine. Neither of the antipsychotics induced RLS symptoms that were clinically relevant.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Databases, Factual; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polysomnography; Schizophrenia; Sleep Wake Disorders; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Agitation is a major problem in acute schizophrenia. Only a few studies have tested antipsychotic agents in severely agitated patients, mainly because of legal issues. Furthermore, most studies were limited to the first 24 hours. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of oral haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine in reducing psychotic agitation in severely agitated patients with schizophrenia or schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder over 96 hours using a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded, controlled design within a naturalistic treatment regimen.. In total, 43 severely agitated patients at acute care psychiatric units were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either daily haloperidol 15 mg, olanzapine 20 mg, or risperidone 2 to 6 mg over 5 days. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale psychotic agitation subscale score was the primary outcome variable. A mixed-model analysis was applied.. All drugs were effective for rapid tranquilization within 2 hours. Over 5 days, the course differed between agents (P < 0.001), but none was superior. Dropouts occurred only in the risperidone and olanzapine groups. Men responded better to treatment than did women during the initial 2 hours (P = 0.046) as well as over the 5-day course (P < 0.001). No difference between drug groups was observed regarding diazepam or biperiden use.. Oral haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine seem to be suitable for treating acute severe psychotic agitation in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Response to oral antipsychotics demonstrated a gender effect with poorer outcome in women throughout the study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Switzerland; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Noninferiority analysis is a statistical method of growing importance in comparative effectiveness research that has rarely been used in psychopharmacology. This method is used here to evaluate whether first-generation antipsychotics are clinically not inferior to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) using data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). A conservative noninferiority margin (NIM) on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was derived from the smallest published value for the minimal clinically important difference, further reduced by 25%. This NIM was used to assess whether perphenazine is noninferior to olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine on the basis of the 95% confidence intervals of differences in mean PANSS outcomes (N = 1049). Perphenazine was noninferior to all three SGAs during 18 months of intention-to-treat analysis and in several subanalyses. Noninferiority can be evaluated from studies designed as superiority trials. Power was available in the CATIE to conduct noninferiority analysis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

We examined the difference between the effects of olanzapine (OLZ) and risperidone (RIS) on PR and QT intervals among patients with stable schizophrenia using a cohort analysis.. Twenty-one subjects treated with OLZ were enrolled in the study. Following baseline assessments, which included PR and QT intervals, OLZ was switched to RIS for each subject. The same parameters were evaluated following the switch to RIS.. All patients who had been treated with OLZ were successfully switched to RIS. In all patients, we observed a significant decrease in PR interval (t = 2.397, P = 0.029) and no change in either QTc or RR interval. In female patients, the QTc interval was significantly decreased (t = 3.495, P = 0.008) following the switch, while in male patients, the QTc interval did not change. No patients showed a PR interval of >200 ms or a QTc interval of >500 ms.. OLZ treatment has a greater prolonging effect on PR and QT intervals compared with RIS. Careful attention may need to be paid to the cardiac conduction system in addition to QT prolongation during OLZ treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cohort Studies; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Conduction System; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Characteristics; Young Adult

This study was a comparative investigation of the clinical efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine, IM haloperidol, and IM levomepromazine in acute agitated patients with schizophrenia.. The subjects were 122 inpatients. Their clinical symptoms were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC), PANSS, and Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale, and their safety were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS).. The mean changes from baseline on the PANSS-EC, Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, BARS, and DIEPSS scores were significantly better in both IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine than in IM haloperidol. Of these, the mean changes from baseline on the BARS and DIEPSS scores were significantly better in IM olanzapine than in IM levomepromazine. The mean change from baseline on the PANSS positive score was significantly better in both IM olanzapine and IM haloperidol than in IM levomepromazine.. The results of this study suggest the possibility that the anti-agitation effects of IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine are more rapid than those of IM haloperidol. No worsening of EPS was observed. Our results also suggest that compared with IM levomepromazine, IM olanzapine is safer and affords greater improvement in symptoms.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Methotrimeprazine; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Problems with the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics on negative symptoms and cognition have highlighted the need for further development of drugs targeting central nervous system neurotransmitter systems other than dopamine. One target in development is neurokinin 3 (NK(3)) tachykinin receptors, which are coreleased and interact with dopamine. This study investigates the efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects of AZD2624, a selective, orally active NK(3) receptor antagonist, in symptomatic patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: AZD2624 40 mg, placebo, or olanzapine 15 mg. Treatment lasted for 28 days, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale and Improvement Scales, and cognition as assessed by CogState were used as primary outcome measures. There were no significant differences in patients treated with AZD2624 versus placebo on change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score and Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale; in addition, no change in CogState measures was found. Results of the trial do not support a role for the NK(3) antagonist AZD2624 as a therapeutic treatment for acute schizophrenia when used as monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aminoquinolines; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Neurokinin-3; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

In a 12-week randomized open-label trial, adults diagnosed with schizophrenia experiencing inadequate efficacy and/or poor tolerability on risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole were randomized to switch to iloperidone either gradually (ie, down-titration of current therapy over the first 2weeks [to 50% on Day 1, 25% by Week 1, 0% by Week 2]) or immediately. All patients were titrated on iloperidone to 6mg BID by Day 4, then flexibly dosing between 6 and 12mg BID, as needed. The primary variable was the Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) and the primary analysis time point was Week 12. A total of 500 patients were randomized and received iloperidone (gradual switch, 240; immediate switch, 260), with 175, 155, and 170 patients switched from risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole, respectively. I-CGI-C Results confirmed improved outcomes at Week 12, with scores that were similar between the gradual- and immediate-switch groups, respectively, for risperidone, 2.82 and 2.67 (95% CI: -0.229, 0.511); olanzapine, 2.87 and 3.03 (95% CI: -0.548, 0.235); and aripiprazole, 2.79 and 2.81 (95% CI: -0.405, 0.368). Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both switch groups, with the most frequently reported (≥10%) being dizziness, dry mouth, somnolence, and weight increase. In conclusion, switching to iloperidone by either a gradual or an immediate method did not reveal any clinically significant differences in ratings of overall efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes, based on the I-CGI-C at 12weeks. Similar overall safety/AE profiles were observed regardless of the specific agent from which patients were switched.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Aortic Bodies; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Cohort Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Patients with schizophrenia frequently switch between antipsychotics, underscoring the need to achieve and maintain important treatment outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following the switch. This analysis evaluated HRQoL changes among patients with schizophrenia switched from their current antipsychotic to lurasidone.. Stable but symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia were switched from their current antipsychotic to lurasidone in a six-week, open-label trial. HRQoL was assessed using two validated patient-reported measures, the Personal Evaluation of Transitions in Treatment (PETiT) scale and the Short-Form 12 (SF-12). Total and domain scores (psychosocial function and adherence-related attitude) were assessed using the PETiT scale; patients' mental and physical component summary scores (MCS and PCS) were assessed using the SF-12. Changes in HRQoL from baseline to study endpoint were compared using ANCOVA, with baseline score, treatment, and pooled site as covariates. Changes were assessed among all patients and those switched from specific antipsychotics to lurasidone.. The analysis included 235 patients with data on the PETiT and SF-12 who had received ≥ 1 dose of lurasidone. Statistically significant improvements were observed from baseline to study endpoint on the PETiT total (mean change [SD]: 3.2 [8.5]) and psychosocial functioning (2.5 [6.9]) and adherence-related attitude (0.7 [2.6]) domain scores (all p ≤ 0.002). When examined by preswitch antipsychotic, significant improvements in PETiT total scores were observed in patients switched from quetiapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone (all p < 0.03) but not olanzapine (p = 0.893). Improvements on the SF-12 MCS score were observed for all patients (mean change [SD]: 3.7 [11.5], p < 0.001) and for those switched from quetiapine or aripiprazole (both p < 0.03). The SF-12 PCS scores remained comparable to those at baseline in all patient groups.. These findings indicate that patients switching from other antipsychotics to lurasidone experienced statistically significant improvement of HRQoL, based on PETiT scores, within six weeks of treatment. Patient health status remained stable with respect to the SF-12 physical component and showed improvement on the mental component. Changes in HRQoL varied based on the antipsychotic used before switching to lurasidone.. NCT01143077.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to determine the efficacy of melatonin 3 mg/day in prevention of olanzapine-induced metabolic side-effects. In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 48 patients with first-episode schizophrenia who were eligible for olanzapine treatment, were randomly assigned to olanzapine plus either melatonin 3 mg/day or matched placebo for eight weeks. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters as well as psychiatric symptoms using The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were assessed at baseline, week 4, and 8. Primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in weight at week 8. Data were analyzed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and mixed-effects model. Thirty-six patients had at least one post-baseline measurement. At week eight, melatonin was associated with significantly less weight gain [mean difference (MD) = 3.2 kg, P = 0.023], increase in waist circumference [MD = 2.83 cm, P = 0.041] and triglyceride concentration [MD = 62 mg/dl, P = 0.090 (nearly significant)] than the placebo. Changes in cholesterol, insulin, and blood sugar concentrations did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients in the melatonin group experienced significantly more reduction in their PANSS scores [MD = 12.9 points, P = 0.014] than the placebo group. No serious adverse events were reported. To summarize, in patients treated with olanzapine, short-term melatonin treatment attenuates weight gain, abdominal obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia. It might also provide additional benefit for treatment of psychosis. The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (. NCT01593774).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Melatonin; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

An aim of the study was to investigate the effect of olanzapine treatment on platelet ultrastructure and to search for its association with serotonin metabolism in patients with schizophrenia. Platelets of 59 patients with chronic (attack-like schizophrenia) treated with olanzapine and 31 health people were explored. Based on the data on the platelet ultrastructure, authors studied the content of functionally activated vacuolated platelets (VP) and less active granular platelets (GP) as well of platelet serotonin (PS). VP content was higher in patients compared to the control group (+57%, p<0.001). After treatment for 8 and 28 weeks with olanzapine, it decreased and reached the control level (52% and 57%, respectively). There were significant negative correlations between % VP and PS before treatment (r= -0.30, p=0.02) and 8 week after treatment (r= -0.29, p<0.04) and a positive correlation between the decrease in % VP and increase in the PS levels during 8-week treatment (r=0.34, p=0.008). The association between increased platelet vacuolization and decreased PS content in schizophrenia was demonstrated for the first time. This association disappeared after treatment that led to the normalization of % VP and PS levels.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Microscopy, Electron; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin

Metabolic disturbances, obesity and life-shortening cardiovascular morbidity are major clinical problems among patients with antipsychotic treatment. Especially two of the most efficacious antipsychotics, clozapine and olanzapine, cause weight gain and metabolic disturbances. Additionally, patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders not infrequently consume alcohol. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has shown to improve glycaemic control and reduce alcohol intake among patients with type 2 diabetes.. To investigate whether the beneficial effects of GLP-1 analogues on glycaemic control and alcohol intake, in patients with type 2 diabetes, can be extended to a population of pre-diabetic psychiatric patients receiving antipsychotic treatment.. Trial design, intervention and participants: The study is a 16-week, double-blinded, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial, designed to evaluate the effects of the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on glycaemic control and alcohol intake compared to placebo in patients who are prediabetic, overweight (body mass index ≥27 kg/m(2)), diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and on stable treatment with either clozapine or olanzapine.. The primary endpoint is the change in glucose tolerance from baseline (measured by area under the curve for the plasma glucose excursion following a 4 h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test) to follow-up at week 16. The secondary endpoints include changes of dysglycaemia, body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, secretion of incretin hormones, insulin sensitivity and β cell function, dual-energy X-ray absorption scan (body composition), lipid profile, liver function and measures of quality of life, daily functioning, severity of the psychiatric disease and alcohol consumption from baseline to follow-up at week 16. Status: Currently recruiting patients.. Ethical approval has been obtained. Before screening, all patients will be provided oral and written information about the trial. The study will be disseminated by peer-review publications and conference presentations.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01845259, EudraCT: 2013-000121-31.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose Intolerance; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prediabetic State; Research Design; Schizophrenia

To characterize subgroups of subjects with schizophrenia from the Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC) trial who either completed or attempted suicide and those who did not.. The ZODIAC, conducted between February 2002 and March 2007, was an open-label, randomized, large simple trial of patients with schizophrenia (N = 18,154) followed up for 1 year by unblinded investigators providing usual care in 18 countries; the primary outcome measure was nonsuicide mortality. Every report on a completed or attempted suicide was independently adjudicated using a predefined algorithm. Primary analysis for the current report examined the association between completed or attempted suicides and the baseline variables using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models. Usage of "hard" or "soft" methods for attempted or completed suicide and distribution of suicide-related events by geographical region were also summarized.. Overall incidences of subjects who either completed (35/18,154) or attempted (108/18,154) suicide were low, as were rates per person-time on assigned treatment analysis (0.24 for completed and 0.74 for attempted suicides per 100 person-years of exposure). The highest suicide-related mortality was seen among subjects recently diagnosed with schizophrenia. Among all potential baseline risk factors for completed suicide examined, the variables most associated with completed suicide were history of suicide attempts (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.33-5.12) and usage of antidepressant medication (OR = 3.5; 95% CI, 0.84-14.85). History of > 5 hospitalizations in the past (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.35-3.31) and history of suicide attempts (OR = 5.0; 95% CI, 3.21-7.76) were the variables most associated with attempted suicide among potential baseline risk factors for suicide attempts.. Our results, obtained in a large prospective randomized study, confirm current clinical understanding regarding completed or attempted suicide in schizophrenia and the associated risk factors.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00418171.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asia; Benzodiazepines; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Suicide; Suicide, Attempted; Thiazoles; Time Factors; United States

Bitopertin is a glycine reuptake inhibitor postulated to improve N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor hypofunction by increasing synaptic glycine concentrations. This randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase II/III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of bitopertin monotherapy over 4 weeks in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Of 301 patients randomised, 299 received placebo (n=80), bitopertin 10mg (n=80) or 30mg (n=77), or olanzapine 15mg (n=62). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, showed non-statistically significant improvements with bitopertin 30mg and olanzapine vs. placebo: bitopertin 10mg (-11.7; standard error [SE], 1.89; p=0.945), bitopertin 30mg (-15.3; SE, 1.87; p=0.211), olanzapine (-14.9; SE, 2.13; p=0.295) and placebo (-11.9; SE, 1.90). The PANSS positive subscale score, a secondary endpoint, also showed improvement with bitopertin 30mg (p=0.030) whereas a trend was observed with olanzapine (p=0.072) vs. placebo. Although not statistically significant, bitopertin 30mg and olanzapine reduced overall illness severity (Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale; p=0.098 and p=0.126, respectively). More patients receiving bitopertin 30mg (51.3%) or olanzapine (52.5%) than placebo (32.9%) were ready for hospital discharge at Week 4 (bitopertin, p=0.014; olanzapine, p=0.024). In summary, this study failed due to lack of statistical separation of either bitopertin or olanzapine (active control) from placebo on the primary endpoint. Of interest, improved positive symptoms and readiness for hospital discharge were associated with both bitopertin and olanzapine treatment. Bitopertin was safe and well tolerated in this study.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Sulfones; Treatment Outcome

Studies of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine in Asian and Taiwanese populations are limited. This study examined the efficacy and safety of IM olanzapine in Taiwanese patients with schizophrenia and acute agitated behavior.This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel study comparing the efficacy and safety of 10 mg/d IM olanzapine (n = 25) against 7.5 mg/d haloperidol (n = 24). The primary objective was to assess the change of agitation from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale-Excited Component Scale.The changes of Positive and Negative Symptom Scale-Excited Component Scale score from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection did not show statistically significant difference between study groups (olanzapine -9.0 ± 5.7, haloperidol -7.9 ± 4.0, P = 0.254). Both groups reported insomnia as the most common treatment-emergent adverse event, and no serious adverse event was reported.Intramuscular olanzapine and IM haloperidol are similarly effective antipsychotic agents in treating agitated symptoms in Taiwanese patients with schizophrenia. Both IM olanzapine and IM haloperidol were proven to be safe and well tolerated, which also provided alternative options in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia with agitation.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Sixty-one patients with schizophrenia stably treated with risperidone or olanzapine were randomly assigned to dose-reduction-by-half group or dose maintenance group. Subjective experiences were assessed at baseline and 28 weeks using three different self-rating scales. No significant differences in changes of subjective experiences were observed between the two groups.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Self Report; Treatment Outcome

We compared long-term treatment effectiveness of monthly olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) with that of oral olanzapine. Outpatients with 2 or more episodes of psychotic worsening in the past 24 months with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score of lower than 70 were randomized to 405 mg/4 weeks of olanzapine LAI (n = 264) or 10 mg/d of oral olanzapine (n = 260) for 2 years of open-label treatment. Dosing thereafter was flexible (150-405 mg/4 weeks of LAI vs 5-20 mg/d of oral). Primary outcome was time to all-cause discontinuation. At baseline, patients were clinically stable (mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score of 57). Seventeen percent of patients had been psychiatrically hospitalized in the previous 6 months, and 4.6% were rated nonadherent in the month before study entry. The groups did not differ significantly in median time to all-cause discontinuation (645 days for LAI, 678 days for oral; P = 0.61), discontinuation rate (53.8% for LAI, 51.2% for oral; P = 0.60), or relapse rate (20.1% for LAI, 18.5% for oral; P = 0.66). Postbaseline psychiatric hospitalization rate was low for both groups (7.6% for LAI, 9.2% for oral), but mean hospitalization duration was significantly longer for oral patients (1.80 days [20 for those hospitalized] vs 0.43 days [6 for those hospitalized], P = 0.02). There were no clinically significant group differences in adverse events or safety measures. No post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome events occurred. In conclusion, olanzapine LAI and oral olanzapine were similarly effective and well tolerated for up to 2 years of treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Treatment discontinuation for olanzapine LAI was similar to that of oral olanzapine, despite the 3-hour post-injection observation period and other precautionary procedures related to risk of post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Satisfaction; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI). A 6-year, single-arm, open-label extension study of olanzapine LAI was conducted at 127 sites in 25 countries. Patients were 18-76 years of age, were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N=931), and had been previously enrolled in one of three clinical trials of olanzapine LAI. Patients received flexibly dosed (45-405 mg) olanzapine LAI every 2-4 weeks. The mean duration of exposure was ∼3 years. A total of 393 (42.2%) patients completed the study. The mean weight change was +2.1 kg (P<0.001), with 40.6% of patients experiencing 7% or higher weight gain. Treatment-emergent categorical changes occurred in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed no systemic accumulation of olanzapine after long-term treatment. There were 36 occurrences of post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome, all resolving within 72 h. The mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and subscale scores did not change significantly over the course of the study, indicating clinical stability. Olanzapine LAI appeared effective as a long-term maintenance treatment, with a safety profile generally consistent with the known profile of oral olanzapine, except for injection-related events (including post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Delayed-Action Preparations; Delirium; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Young Adult

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to assess whether saffron aqueous extract (SAE) or its active constituent, crocin, prevents olanzapine-induced metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance in patients with schizophrenia.. 66 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were on olanzapine treatment (5-20 mg daily) were randomly allocated to receive a capsule of SAE (n=22; 30 mg daily), crocin (n=22; 30 mg daily) or placebo (n=22) in a 12-week triple-blind trial. Patients were screened not to have MetS at baseline and further assessment was done at weeks 6 and 12. Measurement of fasting blood glucose (FBS) and serum lipids were repeated at weeks 2, 6 and 12. Fasting blood levels of insulin and HbA1c were also measured at baseline and week 12. HOMA-IR and HOMA-β were determined to evaluate insulin resistance.. 61 patients completed the trial and no serious adverse effects were reported. Time-treatment interaction showed a significant difference in FBS in both SAE and crocin groups compared to placebo (p=0.004). In addition, SAE could effectively prevent reaching the criteria of metabolic syndrome (0 patients) compared to crocin (9.1%) and placebo (27.3%) as early as week 6.. SAE could prevent metabolic syndrome compared to crocin and placebo. Furthermore, both SAE and crocin prevented increases in blood glucose during the study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Carotenoids; Crocus; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Plant Extracts; Schizophrenia; Waist Circumference

In this study, we assessed the efficacy of 2 pharmacodynamically different antidepressants, citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) and reboxetine (a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), as adjunctive therapy to risperidone and olanzapine for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.. We performed a 6-month, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The recruitment period was from November 2008 to December 2011.The sample comprised 90 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) who exhibited negative symptoms. The patients were recruited from 10 centers in different cities of the Spanish State. The primary efficacy measure was change in score on the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) between baseline and 6-month assessment. Other efficacy measures were changes in the PANSS subscales and total score, as well as the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) subscales and total score.. For statistical analysis, we employed mixed-effects models. We did not find statistically significant differences between the placebo group and the 2 treatment groups at 6-month assessments for the PANSS total (P=.6511), any PANSS subscale (negative [P=.5533], positive [P=.1723], or general psychopathology [P=.2083]), or the SANS (P= .5884). Cohen d measure showed a small effect size below the 0.5 threshold for all comparisons.. In conclusion, our results do not support adjunctive use of citalopram or reboxetine with risperidone or olanzapine for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01300364.

Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Citalopram; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reboxetine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

We examined whether augmentation with olanzapine would be superior to switching to olanzapine among early non-responders (ENRs) to risperidone, and whether augmentation with risperidone would be superior to switching to risperidone among ENRs to olanzapine. We performed a rater-blinded, randomized clinical trial at psychiatric emergency sites. Eligible patients were newly admitted patients with acute schizophrenia. ENRs to the initial antipsychotic (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale: ≥ 4 at 2 weeks) were allocated to receive either augmentation with or switching to the other antipsychotic (RIS+OLZ vs. RIS-OLZ; OLZ+RIS vs.. Sixty patients who completed 2 weeks of risperidone treatment were divided into 33 early responders (RIS-ER) and 27 ENRs (RIS+OLZ, n=14; RIS-OLZ, n=13). Although time to treatment discontinuation for any cause was significantly shorter in RIS+OLZ group (54.1 days [95% confidence interval, 41.3-67.0]) than in RIS-ER group (68.7 [61.2-76.2]; P=0.050), it was not significantly shorter in RIS-OLZ group (58.5 [43.1-73.9]) than in RIS-ER group (P=0.19). Sixty patients who completed 2 weeks of olanzapine treatment were divided into 36 early responders (OLZ-ER) and 24 ENRs (OLZ+RIS, n=11; OLZ-RIS, n=13). Although time to treatment discontinuation for any cause was significantly shorter in OLZ-RIS group (56.1days [40.7-71.5]) than in OLZ-ER group (74.9 [68.5-81.3]; P=0.008), it was not significantly shorter in OLZ+RIS group (64.6 [49.6-79.6]) than in OLZ-ER group (P=0.20).. Despite the lack of pharmacokinetic investigation of dose adequacy in this study, it is possible that switching to olanzapine among ENRs to risperidone might have a small advantage over augmentation with olanzapine, while augmentation with risperidone might have a small advantage over switching to risperidone among ENRs to olanzapine. Further research is required before it would be appropriate to modify routine practice in the direction of these findings.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

While acute-phase antipsychotic response has been attributed to 65%-80% dopamine D₂ receptor blockade, the degree of occupancy for relapse prevention in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia remains unknown.. In this secondary study of an open-label, 28-week, randomized, controlled trial conducted between April 2009 and August 2011, clinically stable patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) treated with risperidone or olanzapine were randomly assigned to the reduction group (dose reduced by 50%) or maintenance group (dose kept constant). Plasma antipsychotic concentrations at peak and trough before and after dose reduction were estimated with population pharmacokinetic techniques, using 2 collected plasma samples. Corresponding dopamine D₂ occupancy levels were then estimated using the model we developed. Relapse was defined as worsening in 4 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Positive subscale items: delusion, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, and suspiciousness.. Plasma antipsychotic concentrations were available for 16 and 15 patients in the reduction and maintenance groups, respectively. Estimated dopamine D₂ occupancy (mean ± SD) decreased following dose reduction from 75.6% ± 4.9% to 66.8% ± 6.4% at peak and 72.3% ± 5.7% to 62.0% ± 6.8% at trough. In the reduction group, 10 patients (62.5%) did not demonstrate continuous D₂ receptor blockade above 65% (ie, < 65% at trough) after dose reduction; furthermore, 7 patients (43.8%) did not achieve a threshold of 65% occupancy even at peak. Nonetheless, only 1 patient met our relapse criteria after dose reduction during the 6 months of the study.. The results suggest that the therapeutic threshold regarding dopamine D₂ occupancy may be lower for those who are stable in antipsychotic maintenance versus acute-phase treatment. Positron emission tomography studies are warranted to further test our preliminary findings.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry identifier: UMIN000001834.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) signaling has been shown to have antipsychotic properties in animal models and to impact glucose-dependent insulin release, satiety, memory, and learning in man. Previous work has shown that two coding mutations (rs6923761 and rs1042044) are associated with altered insulin release and cortisol levels. We identified four frequently occurring haplotypes in Caucasians, haplotype 1 through haplotype 4, spanning exons 4-7 and containing the two coding variants. We analyzed response to antipsychotics, defined as predicted change in PANSS-Total (dPANSS) at 18 months, in Caucasian subjects from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness treated with olanzapine (n=139), perphenazine (n=78), quetiapine (n=14), risperidone (n=143), and ziprasidone (n=90). Haplotype trend regression analysis revealed significant associations with dPANSS for olanzapine (best p=0.002), perphenazine (best p=0.01), quetiapine (best p=0.008), risperidone (best p=0.02), and ziprasidone (best p=0.007). We also evaluated genetic models for the two most common haplotypes. Haplotype 1 (uniquely including the rs1042044 [Leu(260)] allele) was associated with better response to olanzapine (p=0.002), and risperidone (p=0.006), and worse response to perphenazine (p=.03), and ziprasidone (p=0.003), with a recessive genetic model providing the best fit. Haplotype 2 (uniquely including the rs6923761 [Ser(168)] allele) was associated with better response to perphenazine (p=0.001) and worse response to olanzapine (p=.02), with a dominant genetic model providing the best fit. However, GLP1R haplotypes were not associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain. These results link functional genetic variants in GLP1R to antipsychotic response.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Genotyping Techniques; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Haplotypes; Humans; Male; Models, Genetic; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Glucagon; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; White People

Schizophrenia is a complex illness with unknown aetiology and pathogenesis. Currently, a considerable number of patients with schizophrenia do not receive standardised and systematic treatment in China. In the past years, many controlled trials have been conducted in chronic schizophrenia. In contrast, research on first-episode schizophrenia is lacking. This paper describes the background and design of the Chinese First-Episode Schizophrenia Trial project--a multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial. A total of 600 first-episode schizophrenia patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and treated with risperidone, aripiprazole, and olanzapine for 1 year. During the study period, only 1 medication change of the 3 antipsychotic medications was allowed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; China; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Despite the widespread use of antipsychotics, little is known of the molecular bases behind the action of antipsychotic drugs. A genome-wide study is needed to characterize the genes that affect the clinical response and their adverse effects.. Here we show the analysis of the blood transcriptome of 22 schizophrenia patients before and after medication with atypical antipsychotics by next-generation sequencing.. We found that 17 genes, among the 21 495 genes analyzed, have significantly-altered expression after medication (p-value adjusted [Padj] <0.05). Six genes (ADAMTS2, CD177, CNTNAP3, ENTPD2, RFX2, and UNC45B) out of the 17 are among the 200 genes that we characterized with differential expression in a previous study between antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia patients and controls (Sainz et al., 2013). This number of schizophrenia-altered expression genes is significantly higher than expected by chance (Chi-test, Padj 1.19E-50), suggesting that at least part of the antipsychotic beneficial effects is exerted by modulating the expression of these genes. Interestingly, all six of these genes were overexpressed in patients and reverted to control levels of expression after treatment. We also found a significant enrichment of genes related to obesity and diabetes, known adverse affects of antipsychotics.. These results may facilitate understanding of unknown molecular mechanisms behind schizophrenia symptoms and the molecular mechanisms of antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Transcriptome; Treatment Outcome

This study was designed to investigate whether a preventive weight management program (WMP) reduces weight gain during olanzapine (OLZ) treatment. Moreover, we examined the effects of intervention on metabolic parameters.. Patients (N = 100) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV) who had commenced treatment with OLZ were recruited. Following a run-in period of 4 weeks, 74 patients who had gained at least 1.5 kg body weight were randomized to receive either 12 bi-weekly WMP sessions (prevention group (PG), n = 36), or usual care (control group (CG), n = 38). Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were assessed after the 24-week intervention phase and a 24-week follow-up.. Forty-two percent of 74 participants (PG: 36.1%, CG: 47.4%) finished the 24-week intervention phase while 34% of them (PG: 30.6%, CG: 36.8%) completed the 48-week study. There was no significant difference in weight gain between groups (PG: + 3.4 ± 4.2 kg vs. CG: + 4.5 ± 6.1 kg, P = 0.184) after 24 weeks. Nevertheless, PG showed a significantly smaller increase in waist circumference than CG (PG: + 4.6 ± 8.3 cm, CG: + 10.1 ± 7.3 cm, P = 0.019) after 48 weeks. Furthermore, PG showed a significantly smaller increase in fasting glucose (P = 0.031) and 2-h glucose after oral glucose load (P = 0.018) than CG.. These results suggest that preventive WMP may reduce the risk of abdominal obesity and deterioration of glucose metabolism in OLZ-treated patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dyslipidemias; Early Medical Intervention; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Reduction Programs

This study examined the effect of adjunctive intranasal insulin therapy on body metabolism in patients with schizophrenia.. Each subject had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and had been on stable dose of antipsychotic agent for at least one month. In an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects received either intranasal insulin (40 IU 4 times per day) or placebo. The whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess body composition. Lipid particles were assessed using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. All assessments were conducted at baseline, and repeated at week 8.. A total number of 39 subjects completed the study (18 in the insulin group, 21 in the placebo group). There were no significant differences between the two groups in week 8 changes for body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, as well as various measures of lipid particles (p's>0.100). The DXA assessment showed no significant differences between the two groups in week 8 changes for fat mass, lean mass or total mass (p's>0.100).. In the present study, adjunctive therapy of intranasal insulin did not seem to improve body metabolism in patients with schizophrenia. The implications for future studies were discussed.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Waist Circumference; Young Adult

The initially postulated superior neurocognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics is currently under debate.. A prospective, randomized, open-label study was carried out to compare the long-term neurocognitive effectiveness of haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone in the first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A final sample of 79 patients randomized to haloperidol (N = 28), olanzapine (N = 23), or risperidone (N = 28) who completed clinical and cognitive evaluations at baseline and 3-year follow-up was included in the final analysis. Forty-one healthy individuals were also included in the final analysis. The main outcome measure was cognitive changes at 3-year follow-up. Due to the fact that some of the patients had switched their initially prescribed antipsychotic medication during the course of the study (6 out of 28 in haloperidol group, 18 out of 23 in olanzapine group, and 24 out of 28 in risperidone group continued with the initial study drug at 3-year assessment), we have also conducted a per protocol analysis.. Overall, cognitive changes were similar in the three treatment groups and controls, although a greater improvement in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol, and Iowa Gambling Test was found in the treatment groups. The better performance observed on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Digit Symbol in olanzapine treatment group was likely explained by the lower prevalence of use of antimuscarinic drugs. These results were essentially similar to those found in the intention-to-treat analysis.. The major conclusion of this study is that haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone have not demonstrated substantial neurocognitive effectiveness, improving cognitive deficits present in the early phases of the illness. The study also underscores the importance of exploring new drugs for the treatment of cognitive impairments and associated functional disabilities in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To examine the effectiveness of switching patients to lurasidone using 3 different dosing strategies.. Adults with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a nonacute phase of illness were randomized to 1 of 3 lurasidone dosing regimens for the initial 2 weeks of the study: (1) 40 mg/d for 2 weeks; (2) 40 mg/d for 1 week, increased to 80 mg/d on day 8 for week 2 (up-titration group); and (3) 80 mg/d for 2 weeks. Lurasidone was then flexibly dosed (40-120 mg/d) for the subsequent 4 weeks of the study. The preswitch antipsychotic agent was tapered by day 7 to 50% of the original dose and discontinued by the end of week 2. Subjects were stratified on the basis of whether the primary preswitch antipsychotic medication was classified as "sedating" (olanzapine or quetiapine) or "nonsedating" (all other antipsychotics). The primary outcome measure was time to treatment failure, defined as any occurrence of insufficient clinical response, exacerbation of underlying disease, or discontinuation due to an adverse event. The study was conducted from June 2010 to May 2011.. Of 240 subjects treated in this study, 86 (35.8%) were treated with an antecedent sedating antipsychotic, and 154 (64.2%) were treated with an antecedent nonsedating antipsychotic. Nineteen (7.9%) of the 240 patients experienced treatment failure. No clinically relevant differences were observed when the 3 randomized switch groups were compared. Treatment failure rates were 10/86 (11.6%) versus 9/154 (5.8%) among subjects who had been receiving a preswitch sedating versus nonsedating antipsychotic medication, respectively. Consistent with prior studies of lurasidone, there was no signal for clinically relevant adverse changes in body weight, glucose, insulin, lipids, or prolactin; mean improvements in weight and lipids were observed. Movement disorder rating scales did not demonstrate meaningful changes. The incidence of akathisia as an adverse event was 12.5%; only 1 subject (0.4%) discontinued due to akathisia.. Switching patients to lurasidone can be successfully accomplished by starting at 40 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 80 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 40 mg/d for 1 week followed by 80 mg/d the second week.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01143077.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of lurasidone, a new atypical antipsychotic agent, in the longer-term treatment of schizophrenia (DSM-IV). Persistence of symptom improvement was assessed as a secondary outcome.. Patients who completed a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of fixed doses of once-daily lurasidone (40 or 120 mg) or olanzapine 15 mg (to confirm assay sensitivity) were eligible to receive flexibly dosed lurasidone 40 to 120 mg/d in this 6-month, open-label extension study (conducted from March 2008 to December 2009). Assessments of safety and tolerability were conducted at open-label baseline, at day 10, and monthly thereafter.. Of 254 enrolled patients, 113 (44.5%) completed 6 months of open-label treatment. During the open-label study (month 6 observed cases), small decreases were observed in mean weight (-0.1 kg) and median lipid levels (total cholesterol, -6.5 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein, 0.0 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein, 0.0 mg/dL; triglycerides, -8.5 mg/dL). Patients previously treated with olanzapine (n = 69) experienced decrease in weight and improvement in lipid levels, whereas patients previously treated with lurasidone (n = 115) or placebo (n = 62) experienced minimal changes. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in median prolactin levels. The 2 most commonly reported adverse events were akathisia (13.0%) and insomnia (11.0%). Persistent antipsychotic efficacy of lurasidone was shown for patients who had previously received lurasidone, olanzapine, or placebo; further reductions from open-label baseline to final visit were observed in mean PANSS total score (-8.7) for all patients.. Open-label treatment with flexibly dosed lurasidone (40-120 mg/d) was generally safe, well tolerated, and effective over a 6-month period in patients who had completed a preceding 6-week, double-blind study.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We examined sex differences in the effect of olanzapine (OLZ), risperidone (RIS), aripiprazole (ARP), or quetiapine (QTP) on mean corrected QT (QTc) intervals among 222 patients with schizophrenia.. Subjects were patients with schizophrenia who were treated with either OLZ (n = 69), RIS (n = 60), ARP (n = 62), or QTP (n = 31). Electrocardiographic measurements were conducted, and the QT interval was corrected using Bazett's correction formula.. The mean QTc interval of the QTP group was significantly longer than that of the RIS group (p = 0.002) or ARP group (p = 0.029). The mean QTc interval of the OLZ group was also significantly longer than that of the RIS group (p = 0.006). In female participants, the difference in the mean QTc interval among the four second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) groups was statistically significant (p = 0.002), whereas in male patients, there was no significant difference in the mean QTc interval among the four SGA groups. Post hoc analyses showed that sex differences in QTc interval were observed only in OLZ treatment group (p = 0.007).. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate sex differences in the effect of four SGAs on the QTc interval.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Young Adult

To compare matched paliperidone-ER- and olanzapine-treated schizophrenic patients on measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.. Eighty hospitalized patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to treatment with paliperidone ER or olanzapine for a period of 12 weeks. At baseline and every 4 weeks, we assessed weight, subcutaneous fat, waist and hip circumferences, fasting glucose, insulin, glycohemoglobin A1, cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and prolactin. We also assessed at every time point body mass index (BMI), homeostasis insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and homeostasis β-cell function (HOMA-B).. Thirty-three patients randomly assigned to paliperidone ER and 23 patients randomly assigned to olanzapine groups completed the entire 12-week treatment. Within-group analyses showed that fasting measures in both groups increased for weight, BMI, waist circumferences, hip circumference, subcutaneous fat, cholesterol, triglycerides, and prolactin. In contrast, fasting glucose, LDL, and HOMA-B increased during treatment only in the olanzapine group. We also detected significantly different serum prolactin levels at all time point between the paliperidone ER- and olanzapine-treated groups, as well as a statistical trend for HOMA-B to increase more in the olanzapine compared to paliperidone-ER group over the 12 weeks of the trial. We did not detect, however, differential drug effects over the 12 weeks of the trial on fasting measures of BMI, glucose, glycohemoglobin A1, insulin, HDL, LDL, cholesterol, triglyceride, or HOMA-IR.. This study reinforces the necessity of regularly monitoring metabolic parameters in patients with schizophrenia taking atypical antipsychotics, including paliperidone ER.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Isoxazoles; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidines; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Young Adult

Dropouts impact clinical trial outcome analyses. Ignoring missing data is not an acceptable option when planning, conducting or interpreting the analysis of a clinical trial. Treatment related efficacy and safety data observed in the trial may not always be sufficient in explaining the dropouts' mechanism. Nevertheless, these dropout data may carry important treatment-related information and present as an outcome by itself. Traditional analyses involve the use of the time-to-event approach assuming that the dropouts' hazard is solely related to the efficacy or safety profiles observed in a study. A latent variable approach was developed to generalize this approach and to implement a more flexible dropout hazard function in a schizophrenia trial. This unobserved latent variable was used to jointly model the longitudinal efficacy data and dropout profiles across treatments. The analysis provides a framework to model informative dropouts simultaneously with primary efficacy outcomes and make intelligent decisions in drug development.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Proportional Hazards Models; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the effect of ziprasidone and olanzapine on glucose and lipid metabolism in first-episode schizophrenia.. A total of 260 schizophrenics were assigned randomly to receive ziprasidone or olanzapine for 6 weeks. The weight was measured at baseline, week 2, 4 and 6. Fasting blood glucose (FBS), fasting insulin, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total-cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) were measured at baseline and the end of 6-week treatment. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was measured in some patients at baseline and the end of 6-week treatment. Body mass index (BMI) and insulin resistance index (IRI) were counted.. A total of 245 patients completed the trial, including 121 ziprasidone patients and 124 olanzapine patients. The average dose was 137.5 mg/d for ziprasidone and 19.5 mg/d for olanzapine. Patients treated with olanzapine had higher weight gain than those treated with ziprasidone [(4.55±3.37) kg vs (-0.83±2.05) kg, P<0.001]. After the treatment, FBS, fasting insulin, HDL, TC, TG, LDL and IRI levels were significantly increased in the olanzapine group (all P values<0.001 ). However, in the ziprasidone group, FBS decreased significantly and HDL and TG levels increased significantly after the 6-week treatment (all P values<0.05). The mean changes of FBS, fasting insulin, TC, TG, LDL and IRI were significantly different in the two groups (all P values<0.001).. Ziprasidone has less glucose and lipid metabolic effect for first-episode schizophrenia patients in short-term treatment. However, olanzapine induces weight gain and dysfunction of glucose and lipid metabolism significantly, which is associated with increased risk of complications. When the doctors choose antipsychotics in the clinic, they should consider the side effects of the medication.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Female; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Young Adult

We compared the time to discontinuation due to lack of tolerability over 24 weeks in patients suffering from schizophrenia treated with pomaglumetad methionil (LY2140023 monohydrate, the prodrug of metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist, LY404039) or standard of care (SOC: olanzapine, risperidone, or aripiprazole).. Study HBBR was a multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the long-term safety and tolerability of LY2140023 with SOC for schizophrenia. Patients had moderate symptomatology with prominent negative symptoms and evidence of functional impairment. Those who met entry criteria were randomized to open-label treatment with either LY2140023 (target dose: 40 mg twice daily [BID]; n = 130) or SOC (n = 131).. There was no statistically significant difference between LY2140023 and SOC for time to discontinuation due to lack of tolerability (primary objective; P = .184). The Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed comparable time to event profiles. Only 27% of LY2140023 and 45% of SOC patients completed the 24-week open-label, active treatment phase. Twenty-seven patients (20.8%) in the LY2140023 group and 15 patients (11.5%) in the SOC group discontinued due to lack of efficacy (P = .044). Twenty-three patients (17.7%) in the LY2140023 group and 19 patients (14.5%) in the SOC group discontinued due to adverse events (physician and subject decision combined, P = .505). The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable between groups. LY2140023-treated patients reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events of vomiting, agitation, and dyspepsia, while SOC-treated patients reported significantly more akathisia and weight gain. The incidence of treatment-emergent parkinsonism (P = .011) and akathisia (P = .029) was significantly greater in SOC group. Improvement in PANSS total score over the initial 6 to 8 weeks of treatment was similar between groups, but improvement was significantly greater in the SOC group at 24-week endpoint (P = .004). LY2140023 and SOC groups had comparable negative symptom improvement at 24-week endpoint (P = .444).. These data provide further evidence that the potential antipsychotic LY2140023 monohydrate, with a glutamatergic mechanism of action, may have a unique tolerability profile characterized by a low association with some adverse events such as extrapyramidal symptoms and weight gain that may characterize currently available dopaminergic antipsychotics.. A Long-term, Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Safety Study of LY2140023 Versus Atypical Antipsychotic Standard of Care in Patients with DSM-IV-TR Schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amino Acids; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Standard of Care; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Clinicians treating schizophrenia routinely employ high doses and/or antipsychotic switching to achieve response. However, little is actually known regarding the value of these interventions in early schizophrenia. Data were gathered from a treatment algorithm implemented in patients with first-episode schizophrenia that employs two antipsychotic trials at increasing doses before clozapine. Patients were initially treated with either olanzapine or risperidone across three dose ranges, (low, full, high), and in the case of suboptimal response were switched to the alternate antipsychotic. We were interested in the value of (a) high dose treatment and (b) antipsychotic switching. A total of 244 patients were evaluated, with 74.5% (184/244) responsive to Trial 1, and only 16.7% (10/60) responsive to Trial 2. Percentage of response for subjects switched from olanzapine to risperidone was 4.0% (1/25) vs. 25.7% (9/35) for those switched from risperidone to olanzapine. High doses yielded a 15.5% response (14.6% for risperidone vs. 16.7% for olanzapine).The present findings concur with other research indicating that response rate to the initial antipsychotic trial in first-episode schizophrenia is robust; thereafter it declines notably. In general, the proportion of responders to antipsychotic switching and high dose interventions was low. For both strategies olanzapine proved superior to risperidone, particularly in the case of antipsychotic switching (i.e. risperidone to olanzapine vs. vice versa). It remains to be established whether further antipsychotic trials are associated with even greater decrements in rate of response. Findings underscore the importance of moving to clozapine when treatment resistance has been established.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Large-scale data are still lacking on the relationship between serum prolactin concentration and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics.. The dataset from 481 subjects (risperidone, N = 172, olanzapine, N = 211, and ziprasidone, N = 98) who participated in Phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials in Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) was used in the present analysis. Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels on the day of the measurement of serum prolactin level were estimated from plasma antipsychotic concentrations. A multivariate general linear model was used to examine effects of clinical and demographic characteristics, including estimated D2 occupancy levels, on serum prolactin concentrations. Individual subjects were divided into two groups, stratified by the presence of hyperprolactinemia. To evaluate the performance of this binary classification, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of consecutive cut-off points in the D2 occupancy were calculated.. The multivariate general linear model revealed that estimated D2 occupancy levels had significant effects on serum prolactin concentrations while any other variables failed to show significant effects. The cut-off point associated with 0.5 or greater, in both sensitivity and specificity with the greatest accuracy, was 73% (sensitivity, 0.58; specificity, 0.68; accuracy = 0.64) (68-70% for risperidone, 77% for olanzapine, and 55% for ziprasidone.).. The threshold for hyperprolactinemia in D2 occupancy may lie somewhat on a lower side of the established therapeutic window with antipsychotics (i.e. 65-80%). This finding highlights the need for the use of the lowest possible dose to avoid this hormonal side effect in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Predictive Value of Tests; Prolactin; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Thiazoles

Impact of dose reduction of atypical antipsychotics on cognitive function has not been investigated in stable patients with schizophrenia. In this open-label, 28-week, randomized controlled trial, stable patients with schizophrenia treated with risperidone or olanzapine were randomly assigned to the reduction group (dose reduced by 50% in 4 weeks and then maintained) or maintenance group (dose kept constant). Assessments at baseline and week 28 included the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS). Sixty-one patients were enrolled; 2 of 31 (6.5%) and 5 of 30 (16.7%) patients prematurely withdrew from the study in the reduction and maintenance groups, respectively. While no significant differences in change in the PANSS total score were observed between the 2 groups, the reduction group showed significantly greater improvements in the RBANS and DIEPSS total scores compared with the maintenance group (mean ± SD, +7.0±7.1 vs -0.1±8.0, P < .001; -0.9±1.7 vs +0.1±1.2, P = .010, respectively). This 6-month pilot study suggests that risperidone or olanzapine dose reduction of 50% can improve cognitive function for stable patients with schizophrenia. Due to the open-label design, small sample size, and short study duration, however, there is a need to confirm the finding through double-blind, larger scale trials with longer follow-up periods. Moreover, potential risks of relapse following antipsychotic dose reduction should be thoroughly investigated in longer term studies.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

We previously demonstrated that the addition of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine attenuates olanzapine-induced weight gain. Using the same study sample, we also sought to determine whether reboxetine's weight-attenuating effect was accompanied by a beneficial effect on metabolic and endocrine parameters relevant to antipsychotic-induced weight gain and obesity.. Blood samples at baseline and at the end of the 6-week trial were available for 54 participants who participated in previous double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of reboxetine (4 mg BID) addition to olanzapine-treated schizophrenia patients. Fasting glucose, lipid profile, insulin, leptin, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), prolactin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were analyzed.. In contrast to the olanzapine/placebo group, the olanzapine/reboxetine group exhibited a reduction in blood triglyceride (p < 0.05) and leptin (p < 0.05) levels, and elevation in cortisol (p < 0.05) and DHEA (p < 0.008) levels. No significant between-group differences were detected in the changes in cholesterol, glucose, insulin, TSH, and prolactin.. Reboxetine addition resulted in meaningful improvement of some metabolic and endocrine measures associated with olanzapine-induced weight gain. The potential role of reboxetine in the prevention of olanzapine-induced weight gain and cardio-metabolic morbidity merits further large-scale, long-term investigation.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Olanzapine; Reboxetine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) receptor 2a (5-HT2AR) signaling is important for modulation of corticostriatal pathways and prefrontal activity during cognition. Furthermore, newer antipsychotic drugs target 5-HT2AR. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the 5-HT2AR gene (HTR2A rs6314, C>T; OMIM 182135) has been weakly associated with differential 5-HT2AR signaling and with physiologic as well as behavioral effects.. To use a hierarchical approach to determine the functional effects of this single-nucleotide polymorphism on 5-HT2AR messenger RNA and protein expression, on prefrontal phenotypes linked with genetic risk for schizophrenia, and on treatment with olanzapine.. In silico predictions, in vitro, and case-control investigations.. Academic and clinical facilities.. The postmortem study included 112 brains from healthy individuals; the in vivo investigation included a total sample of 371 healthy individuals and patients with schizophrenia. EXPOSURES Patients received olanzapine monotherapy for 8 weeks.. In silico predictions, messenger RNA, and protein expression in postmortem human prefrontal cortex and HeLa cells, functional magnetic resonance imaging prefrontal activity and behavior during working memory and attention in healthy individuals, and response to an 8-week trial of olanzapine treatment in patients with schizophrenia.. Bioinformatic analysis predicted that rs6314 alters patterns of splicing, with possible effects on HTR2A expression. Moreover, the T allele was associated with reduced prefrontal messenger RNA expression in postmortem prefrontal cortex, with reduced protein expression in vitro, inefficient prefrontal blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging response during working memory and attentional control processing, and impaired working memory and attention behavior, as well as with attenuated improvement in negative symptoms after olanzapine treatment.. Our results suggest that HTR2A rs6314 affects 5-HT2AR expression and functionally contributes to genetic modulation of known endophenotypes of schizophrenia-like higher-level cognitive behaviors and related prefrontal activity, as well as response to treatment with olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Endophenotypes; Female; Genetic Variation; HeLa Cells; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Prefrontal Cortex; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Young Adult

In contrast to olanzapine, ziprasidone has been reported to cause minimal or no weight gain. This study aimed to compare the effects of ziprasidone and olanzapine on weight, body composition, appetite, resting energy expenditure, substrate oxidation, and metabolic parameters in adults with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders.. Twenty adults with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders were randomized 1:1 to ziprasidone 20-160 mg/day or olanzapine 5-20 mg/day for 12 weeks. The mean doses during the 12-week study period were 109(range: 65-140) mg/day for ziprasidone and 11.6(range: 8.2-15.5) mg/day for olanzapine. Body weight, appetite, body composition, resting energy expenditure, and metabolic parameters were measured before and after drug treatment. Outcome measurements before and after medication were compared, and ziprasidone- and olanzapine-treated patients were compared.. After 12 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients showed significant weight gain, particularly fat gain, with increased low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and decreased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations. In contrast, ziprasidone-treated patients showed no significant weight gain with increased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentration.. Ziprasidone was associated with a lower propensity for weight gain and central fat deposition than olanzapine. Studies in larger patient samples are required to confirm these results.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Body Composition; Body Weight; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Energy Metabolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain; Young Adult

In treating schizophrenia, 65% to 80% occupancy of dopamine D₂ receptors optimizes therapeutic efficacy while minimizing risks of extrapyramidal symptoms and cognitive impairments. However, it is unclear as to whether it is necessary to keep D₂ receptor occupancy within this therapeutic window to maintain clinical response. The data set from phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials in Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trial was reappraised. Thirty patients receiving risperidone (12 patients), olanzapine (12 patients), or ziprasidone (6 patients) fulfilled the following definition of remission and were included: a score of 3 or less on the 8 specific items in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (ie, P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5, and G9; adopted from Andreasen et al, 2005) at the initial assessment and months 1, 2, and 6. Peak and trough D₂ receptor occupancy levels at month 6 were estimated from plasma antipsychotic concentrations using population pharmacokinetic analysis and our D₂ prediction model. Estimated mean ± SD peak and trough D₂ receptor occupancy levels at month 6 were 70.3% ± 9.8% and 60.5% ± 20.2%, respectively; among these individuals, 46.7% (14 patients) did not achieve continuous blockade of 65% or greater (ie, trough D₂ occupancy of <65%). In conclusion, approximately half of patients with remission did not achieve continuous blockade of estimated D₂ receptor occupancy 5% or greater. These results extend our previous findings and suggest that sustained D₂ receptor occupancy greater than 65% may not always be necessary for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nonlinear Dynamics; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Protein Binding; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Remission Induction; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

We examined clinical characteristics including serum olanzapine concentrations for acute schizophrenia patients who required above conventional doses. We performed a rater-blinded, randomized clinical trial in 12 psychiatric emergency sites. Eligible patients were 18-64 years old and met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, acute schizophrenia-like psychotic disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. A total of 42 patients were randomly assigned by means of sealed envelopes to receive risperidone (3-12 mg/day; n=20) and olanzapine (10-40 mg/day; n=22), with follow-up at 8 weeks. The Negative score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was significantly higher in patients who required high doses than in patients who responded to conventional doses. Serum olanzapine concentrations at the time of oral 20mg/day could be obtained from 5 out of 7 patients who subsequently required high-dose olanzapine. All values were more than 30 ng/mL after 11-16 h from dosing to sample collection, and the mean value was 47.876 (S.D. 21.546) ng/mL. Such concentrations are appropriate with respect to a therapeutic range of 20-50 ng/mL. The present study has shown evidence that the reason for requiring high-dose olanzapine cannot be explained by pharmacokinetics in the treatment of acute-phase schizophrenia.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

The highly selective and fast dissociating D2 receptor antagonist JNJ-37822681 may be associated with lower risk for weight gain and undesirable metabolic effects compared with available antipsychotics.. In this double-blind, randomized study, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to 12 weeks of JNJ-37822681 (10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg, twice daily) or olanzapine (10 mg/d during week 1; 15 mg/d after week 1), or 6 weeks of placebo (followed by 6 weeks of olanzapine, 15 mg/d). Metabolic and body mass parameters were assessed at weeks 6 and 12.. For metabolic parameters, at week 6 none of the JNJ-37822681 groups demonstrated significant change vs placebo; however, significant changes (P < .05) were observed in the olanzapine vs placebo group in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-LDL cholesterol, and free fatty acids. For all JNJ-37822681 groups, mean weight changes at week 12 (-0.3 [10 mg], + 0.3 [20 mg], + 0.8 kg [30 mg]) were significantly less (P < .001) than for the olanzapine group (+ 2.7 kg). A higher percentage of overweight or obese patients (baseline body mass index: ≥25 kg/m2) receiving olanzapine had ≥7% increase in weight than those receiving JNJ-37822681 (9.8% vs 2.3%, respectively).. JNJ-37822681 treatment was associated with a more favorable outcome on weight and metabolic adverse effects vs olanzapine for treating schizophrenia; the 10 mg twice-daily dose demonstrated minimal to no weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperidines; Pyridazines; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides; Waist Circumference

Hospitalization is a costly and distressing event associated with relapse during schizophrenia treatment. No information is available on the predictors of psychiatric hospitalization during maintenance treatment with olanzapine long-acting injection (olanzapine-LAI) or how the risk of hospitalization differs between olanzapine-LAI and oral olanzapine. This study aimed to identify the predictors of psychiatric hospitalization during maintenance treatment with olanzapine-LAI and assessed four parameters: hospitalization prevalence, incidence rate, duration, and the time to first hospitalization. Olanzapine-LAI was also compared with a sub-therapeutic dose of olanzapine-LAI and with oral olanzapine.. This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of data from a randomized, double-blind study comparing the safety and efficacy of olanzapine-LAI (pooled active depot groups: 405 mg/4 weeks, 300 mg/2 weeks, and 150 mg/2 weeks) with oral olanzapine and sub-therapeutic olanzapine-LAI (45 mg/4 weeks) during 6 months' maintenance treatment of clinically stable schizophrenia outpatients (n=1064). The four psychiatric hospitalization parameters were analyzed for each treatment group. Within the olanzapine-LAI group, patients with and without hospitalization were compared on baseline characteristics. Logistic regression and Cox's proportional hazards models were used to identify the best predictors of hospitalization. Comparisons between the treatment groups employed descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox's proportional hazards models.. Psychiatric hospitalization was best predicted by suicide threats in the 12 months before baseline and by prior hospitalization. Compared with sub-therapeutic olanzapine-LAI, olanzapine-LAI was associated with a significantly lower hospitalization rate (5.2% versus 11.1%, p < 0.01), a lower mean number of hospitalizations (0.1 versus 0.2, p = 0.01), a shorter mean duration of hospitalization (1.5 days versus 2.9 days, p < 0.01), and a similar median time to first hospitalization (35 versus 60 days, p = 0.48). Olanzapine-LAI did not differ significantly from oral olanzapine on the studied hospitalization parameters.. In clinically stable schizophrenia outpatients receiving olanzapine-LAI maintenance treatment, psychiatric hospitalization was best predicted by a history of suicide threats and prior psychiatric hospitalization. Olanzapine-LAI was associated with a significantly lower incidence of psychiatric hospitalization and shorter duration of hospitalization compared with sub-therapeutic olanzapine-LAI. Olanzapine-LAI did not differ significantly from oral olanzapine on hospitalization parameters.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00088491.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

A Phase 2 efficacy study suggested that asenapine (ASE) was superior to risperidone in decreasing negative symptoms in schizophrenia at 6 weeks, prompting design of two negative symptom studies. Two 26-week core studies with 26-week extensions compared asenapine (ASE: 5-10mg twice-daily] and olanzapine (OLA: 5-20mg once-daily) as monotherapies in reducing persistent negative symptoms (PNS). While neither study met the primary endpoint of superiority of ASE over OLA, ASE was statistically superior to OLA in one extension study. This prompted a pooled analysis of the treatment effects of both drugs.. Data were pooled from two 26-week core studies and extensions. Efficacy endpoints: change in Negative Symptom Assessment scale-16 (NSA-16) total score at Week 26 (prespecified primary endpoint) and Week 52. Additional measures: change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total, Marder factors, negative subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness score (CGI-S) assessments, NSA-16 factor domains, NSA global score, and individual items.. Pooled data from the extension studies (n=502) showed no differences between ASE and OLA at Week 26. At Week 52, ASE showed superiority over OLA in NSA-16 total score, NSA global, PANSS Marder negative and PANSS negative subscales, some NSA-16 items, and four of five factor domains. In addition, pooled data for patients who entered the core trials (n=949) were analyzed over 52weeks (whether or not patients entered the extension). No significant differences between groups were observed in change in NSA-16 total score at 26-weeks. At Week 52, ASE was significantly superior over OLA in this measure, NSA global score and PANSS Marder negative factor. There were more early dropouts due to AEs, including worsening of the disease, in the ASE group.. In this pooled analysis, ASE and OLA did not differ significantly over 26 weeks, but indicated a signal of superiority for ASE with continued treatment up to 52 weeks.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Databases, Factual; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Hallucinations are prevalent in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders and may have severe consequences for the affected patients. Antipsychotic drug trials that specifically address the anti-hallucinatory effectiveness of the respective drugs in representative samples are rare. The aims of the present study were to investigate the rate and severity of hallucinations in acutely admitted psychotic patients at hospital admission and discharge or after 6 weeks at the latest, if not discharged earlier (discharge/6 weeks); and to compare the anti-hallucinatory effectiveness of risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone with up to 2 years' follow-up.. Adult patients acutely admitted to an emergency ward for psychosis were consecutively randomized to risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or ziprasidone and followed for up to 2 years in a pragmatic design. Participants were assessed repeatedly using the hallucinatory behavior item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).. A total of 226 patients, 30.5% of those assessed for eligibility, were randomized and 68% were hallucinating at baseline. This proportion was reduced to 33% at discharge/6 weeks. In the primary analyses based on intention to treat groups of patients experiencing frequent hallucinations, the quetiapine and ziprasidone groups both had faster decreases of the mean hallucination scores than the risperidone group.. Hallucinations are fairly responsive to antipsychotic drug treatment and differential anti-hallucinatory effectiveness may be found among existing antipsychotic drugs. If replicated, this could pave the way for a more targeted pharmacotherapy based on individual symptom profiles, rather than on the diagnostic category.. ClinicalTrials.gov ID; NCT00932529.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Hallucinations; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

It is desirable to establish evidence for the selection of antipsychotics from the viewpoint of recovery of social activity in individual patient with schizophrenia receiving medication. From this perspective, awareness of the importance of studies about drug effectiveness on treatment discontinuation rate, remission rate, and improvement in QOL has grown recently. In Western countries, numerous reports are available in effectiveness studies, which are related to olanzapine and risperidone primarily, whereas evidence for other second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is poor. In Japan, no effectiveness study has been reported: thus, it is desirable to collect data that will serve as evidence for selection of the 3 SGAs approved after olanzapine.. The present study was a long-term effectiveness study under healthcare setting in Japan. It was designed as an open-label, multicenter, randomized, comparative study involving 104-week oral treatment with 1 of the 3 drugs (aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone) in patients with schizophrenia aged 20 years or over who required antipsychotic medication or switching of the current medication to others for reasons such as lack of efficacy and intolerability. The primary endpoint is treatment discontinuation rate for any causes. The secondary endpoints include remission rate, improvement of social activity, alleviation, aggravation or recurrence of psychiatric symptoms, and safety. The target number of subjects was set at 300.. Because this study is expected to yield evidence regarding the selection of antipsychotics for facilitating the recovery of social activity in patients with schizophrenia, it is considered highly valuable to perform this effectiveness study under ordinary healthcare setting in Japan.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000007942.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Protocols; Female; Humans; Japan; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Remission Induction; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Schizophrenia; Serine; Time Factors

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between body weight and illness characteristics, including weight gain and therapeutic efficacy, in adolescents with schizophrenia.. Adolescents ages 13-17 years (n = 107) with American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) schizophrenia enrolled in a 6 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing olanzapine and placebo. Therapeutic response was assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C). Secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Obesity was defined as sex-/age-adjusted body mass index (BMI) ≥ 95th percentile. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between weight gain and psychiatric symptom improvement; logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of baseline obesity.. Weight gain was significantly correlated with greater BPRS-C reduction among olanzapine-treated subjects (r = -0.31, p<0.01), whereas a trend was observed among placebo-treated subjects (r = -0.31, p = 0.08). However, this relationship became nonsignificant when analyses were controlled for duration of olanzapine treatment (p=0.12), and a treatment by weight gain interaction did not emerge in a repeated-measures mixed model analysis that included time in the study (t = 1.27, p = 0.21). Additionally, weight gain ≥ 7% was not significantly associated with response or remission. Among 17 adolescents (16%) with obesity at study entry, obesity was not significantly associated with endpoint BPRS-C illness severity. However, girls (p = 0.03), individuals hospitalized within the past year (p = 0.02), and those with less severe overall (p = 0.03) and negative symptoms (p = 0.003) according to the CGI-S and PANSS negative subscale, respectively, were more likely to be obese at baseline.. Baseline obesity was associated with lower illness severity, which could be mediated by greater treatment adherence, leading to more weight gain. Olanzapine-related weight gain was not independently associated with symptomatic outcome when controlling for treatment duration. Additional studies are needed to extend these findings to other disorders and medications.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Models, Statistical; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Sex Characteristics; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This was the first study, to our knowledge, in patients with schizophrenia in which olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) was used to attempt delivery of depot formulation in multiple therapeutic doses.. This study assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of olanzapine after single and multiple administrations of olanzapine LAI and evaluated maintenance of symptom control.. This was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized study of olanzapine LAI in patients with schizophrenia stabilized with oral olanzapine. Key inclusion criteria included well-tolerated and efficacious treatment with daily olanzapine. Patients were required to be receiving a stable oral dose for 4 weeks before study entry with no requirement for as-needed additional antipsychotic medication within 2 weeks before entry. Exclusion criteria included serious unstable illnesses, unresolved seizures, pregnancy or breastfeeding, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, narrow-angle glaucoma, or serious suicidal risk. Initially, 34 patients received olanzapine LAI as a single injection of 50 to 450 mg, and as the study progressed, 247 patients received consecutive injections of 100 to 405 mg olanzapine LAI administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 3 to 6 months. Spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded at each visit. Analyses of efficacy and safety profile parameters were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. All hypotheses were tested at a 2-sided significance level of P < 0.05.. Study participants had a mean age of 39 years and were primarily white men. The PK properties suggested prolonged release providing sustained olanzapine plasma concentrations and supporting a dosing interval ≤4 weeks. Olanzapine LAI doses of 150 or 300 mg every 2 weeks and 210 or 405 mg every 4 weeks provide mean steady-state olanzapine concentrations similar to those after oral administration of 5 to 20 mg/d. The mean baseline Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score of 17.27 decreased by 2.68 points, and the mean baseline Clinical Global Impression-Severity score of 3.39 decreased by 0.23 points, indicating that patients' psychiatric health was maintained or slightly improved. Significant mean weight gain (P < 0.001) and treatment-emergent changes in nonfasting glucose were observed. Incidence of weight gain ≥7% of baseline was observed in 17.8% of patients. The common adverse events were injection site pain, anxiety, sedation, insomnia, somnolence, and headache, and the safety profile for olanzapine LAI was comparable to that of oral olanzapine, except for injection site-related adverse events.. The safety profile and PK data from this study support continued clinical development of olanzapine LAI in controlled efficacy studies at doses ≤300 mg every 2 weeks or 405 mg every 4 weeks. Clinical trial registry ID: 4535 http://www.lillytrials.com/results/ZyprexaLAI.pdf.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Antipsychotic drugs exert antipsychotic effects by blocking dopamine D2 receptors in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, effects of D2 receptor blockade on neurocognitive function still remain to be elucidated. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate impacts of estimated dopamine D2 receptor occupancy with antipsychotic drugs on several domains of neurocognitive function in patients with schizophrenia in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials in Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trial.. The dataset from the CATIE trial was used in the present analysis. Data were extracted from 410 subjects who were treated with risperidone, olanzapine, or ziprasidone, received assessments for neurocognitive functions (verbal memory, vigilance, processing speed, reasoning, and working memory) and psychopathology, and provided plasma samples for the measurement of plasma antipsychotic concentrations. D2 receptor occupancy levels on the day of neurocognitive assessment were estimated from plasma antipsychotic concentrations, using population pharmacokinetic analysis and our recently developed model. A multivariate general linear model was used to examine effects of clinical and demographic characteristics, including estimated D2 occupancy levels, on neurocognitive functions.. D2 occupancy levels showed significant associations with the vigilance and the summary scores. Neurocognitive functions, including vigilance, were especially impaired in subjects who showed D2 receptor occupancy level of >77%.. These findings suggest a nonlinear relationship between prescribed antipsychotic doses and overall neurocognitive function and vigilance. This study shows that D2 occupancy above approximately 80% not only increases the risk for extrapyramidal side effects as consistently reported in the literature but also increases the risk for cognitive impairment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Young Adult

The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole with olanzapine in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia in an Indian population.. This was a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing aripiprazole and olanzapine in the treatment of individuals with schizophrenia in an inpatient clinical setting. Sixty subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, who fulfilled the ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, were enrolled. Patients' detailed demographic and clinical evaluation was conducted and they were administered efficacy assessment scales (BPRS, PANSS) and safety assessments scale (Simpson Angus Scale, UKU side effect rating scale) at regular intervals of 1 week each throughout the study. The laboratory tests (complete haemogram, electrocardiogram (ECG), lipid profile, liver and renal function tests) were conducted at baseline and after 1-week intervals until 6 weeks of treatment. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either aripiprazole or olanzapine.. Both aripiprazole and olanzapine led to significant reductions on BPRS and PANSS total score over a period of 6 weeks. Weight gain was observed more frequently in the olanzapine-treated group (22.20%) as compared to aripiprazole (7.70%). More patients in the aripiprazole treatment group required comedications (trihexiphenidyl and lorazepam) than olanzapine recipients.. This study demonstrates that aripiprazole is equally efficacious as olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Aripiprazole has a more benign side effect profile (weight gain, blood sugar level, lipid profile) as compared to olanzapine in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia. This study is the first in an Indian population to have compared aripiprazole and olanzapine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; India; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Negative symptoms that do not improve following antipsychotic treatment represent a challenge for development of effective treatments. Few studies have been carried out so far, especially in first-episode schizophrenia patients, to clarify prevalence, correlates and impact of persistent negative symptoms (PNS) on short- and long-term outcome of the disease. All patients from EUFEST study for whom both baseline and 12-month assessments were available were included (N=345). PNS were defined as the presence of at least one negative symptom of moderate or higher severity, not confounded by depression or parkinsonism, at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. Patients with PNS were compared to those with at least one negative symptom of moderate or higher severity at the baseline, not persisting after 1 year, on demographic, clinical, neurocognitive, global functioning and quality of life measures. PNS not confounded by depression or parkinsonism were present in 6.7% of the sample. The symptom that more often persisted was blunted affect. Patients with PNS differed from those without PNS for a longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and a more frequent discontinuation of study treatment; they also had a poorer psychopathological outcome and a worse global functioning after 1 year of treatment. The presence of PNS was associated to poorer improvement of all psychopathological dimensions and worse global functioning after 1 year of treatment. The longer DUP in subjects with PNS suggests that programs aimed at shortening DUP might reduce the prevalence of PNS and improve prognosis of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychomotor Disorders; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objective of the study was to compare metabolic effects of ziprasidone versus olanzapine treatment in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.. In this 6-week, multicenter, open-label trial, 260 patients were randomly assigned to receive ziprasidone or olanzapine treatment (130 per group). Primary metabolic measures were changes in weight and body mass index (BMI). Secondary metabolic measures were changes in glucose, insulin, lipids, and blood pressure. Efficacy and safety were also measured additionally.. A total number of 230 patients completed the study. The mean daily dosages were 138.2(28.6) mg for ziprasidone and 19.0(2.3) mg for olanzapine. After 6-week treatment, there were significant between-group differences in change scores on weight [4.22(3.49) kg versus -0.84(2.04) kg, p < 0.001] and BMI [1.59(1.37) versus -0.30(0.74), p < 0.001]. In addition, there were significant between-group differences in change scores on fasting plasma glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment 2-insulin resistance, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.001); all the changes were clinically in favor of ziprasidone treatment. Both medications were effective in improving schizophrenia symptoms, but the decreases in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores of the olanzapine group were significantly greater than that of the ziprasidone group (p < 0.05). Compared with olanzapine, ziprasidone also induced more prolonging of corrected QT interval and extrapyramidal side effects (p < 0.05). Both medications were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed in either group.. Compared with olanzapine, ziprasidone treatment was associated with less adverse effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Female; Glucose; Humans; Insulin; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Young Adult

Early predictability of sustained response to atypical antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia has important implications for clinical decision making. In order to investigate whether early onset of efficacy correlates with week-6 response for the selective fast-dissociating D2 receptor antagonist JNJ-37822681, we analysed data from a 12-week placebo- and active-controlled (olanzapine) study designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of JNJ-37822681. Factors, including baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, waist circumference, weight, body mass index group, number of previous hospitalisations, age at diagnosis, race, sex and age at study entry, and relative (%) change from baseline on day 3 (early improvement) in PANSS total score, were analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, to predict the week-6 efficacy response (≥ 30% improvement in PANSS total score). Results showed that week-6 response with JNJ-37822681 30 mg bid treatment could be reliably predicted by improvement in PANSS total score on day 3, the number of previous hospitalisations, and race (80% accuracy [ROC area under curve]). Early improvement (day 3) in PANSS score had the highest predictive value as a single factor across all JNJ-37822681 doses. At a specificity of 70%, sensitivity for predicting week-6 response was: 0.60, 0.64, and 0.74 in the 10-, 20-, and 30 mg bid JNJ-37822681 groups, respectively; 0.40 in olanzapine group. Early improvement in PANSS may be a simple and reliable way to predict sustained response with JNJ-37822681 in patients with acute schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperidines; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridazines; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this paper was to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of a small panel of independent and clinically important factors based on symptom improvement, baseline cognitive impairment, and weight change during the early treatment phase.. The study sample was based on a double-blind, 6-month continuation study of ziprasidone and olanzapine (N=94). We developed a parsimonious 6-month GAF prediction function using a logistic regression model, and evaluated its predictive accuracy and performance using bootstrap estimates of c-statistics and error in predicted probability.. At up to 6 months of follow-up, 52 (55%) of all subjects treated with ziprasidone or olanzapine met the responder criterion of ≥50% improvement in GAF. At Week 2 (acute phase), the majority of ziprasidone (75%) and olanzapine (70%) patients showed greater than 25% improvement in the BPRS psychotic symptom subscale score. These early psychotic symptom responders (Week 2) showed significantly greater improvement in global functioning than early non-responders at all time points (Week 6 and Month 6) (all p's<0.05), confirming early response as an indicator of continued responsiveness to treatment over at least 6 months. A multivariate prediction function based on baseline neurocognitive scores and GAF, early reduction of psychotic symptoms at 2 weeks, and percentage of weight change observed at 6 weeks (All p's <0.05), showed statistically acceptable predictive performance (boostrap c-statistics=0.8598).. Our findings suggest that a parsimonious model incorporating a psychotic symptom assessment score, baseline neurocognitive performance, and risk of weight gain can be developed for predicting patients' likelihood of achieving favorable, long-term treatment outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Prognosis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Caudate and hippocampal volume differences in patients with schizophrenia are associated with disease and antipsychotic treatment, but local shape alterations have not been thoroughly examined. Schizophrenia patients randomly assigned to haloperidol and olanzapine treatment underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The caudate and hippocampus were represented as medial representations (M-reps); mesh structures derived from automatic segmentations of high resolution MRIs. Two quantitative shape measures were examined: local width and local deformation. A novel nonparametric statistical method, adjusted exponentially tilted (ET) likelihood, was used to compare the shape measures across the three groups while controlling for covariates. Longitudinal shape change was not observed in the hippocampus or caudate when the treatment groups and controls were examined in a global analysis, nor when the three groups were examined individually. Both baseline and repeated measures analysis showed differences in local caudate and hippocampal size between patients and controls, while no consistent differences were shown between treatment groups. Regionally specific differences in local hippocampal and caudate shape are present in schizophrenic patients. Treatment-related related longitudinal shape change was not observed within the studied timeframe. Our results provide additional evidence for disrupted cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits in schizophrenia.. This longitudinal study was conducted from March 1, 1997 to July 31, 2001 at 14 academic medical centers (11 in the United States, one in Canada, one in the Netherlands, and one in England). This study was performed prior to the establishment of centralized registries of federally and privately supported clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Caudate Nucleus; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Hippocampus; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Organ Size; Schizophrenia

The aim of the study was to identify predictors associated with a lower likelihood of achieving a clinical remission 1 year after the first break of the illness. Participants were 174 consecutive subjects included in a first episode programme with no prior treatment with antipsychotic medication. Patients were assigned to haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone in a randomized, open-label, prospective clinical trial. The main outcome variable was the remission criteria developed by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group. Clinical variables were included in a logistic regression analysis in order to predict the remission state at 1 year. At 1 year, 31% of patients met criteria for remission. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of achieving clinical remission 1 year away from a first episode of non-affective psychosis were the length of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), the severity of negative symptomatology and the educational level attained at baseline. The results suggest that: (1) patients with a lengthy DUP, a greater severity of negative symptomatology at baseline and with a lower education level are in a higher risk of not achieving a clinical remission during the first year of treatment; and (2) early intervention clinical programs should aim to reduce the length of DUP in order to provide a better outcome for patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Educational Status; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Logistic Models; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Remission Induction; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Time-to-Treatment; Young Adult

Constipation is a common and potentially fatal side effect of clozapine treatment. Another important side effect of clozapine may also be significant weight gain. Orlistat is a weight-control medication that is known to induce loose stools as a common side effect. This study aimed to explore whether orlistat used to control clozapine-induced weight gain can simultaneously tackle clozapine-related constipation. In this 16-week randomized-controlled study, clozapine-treated patients received add-on orlistat (n=30) or add-on placebo (n=24). Colonic function was measured using the Bristol Stool Form Scale. There was a significant (P=0.039) difference in the prevalence of constipation in favor of orlistat over placebo in completers (n=40) at the endpoint. A decrease in the prevalence of constipation within the orlistat group (P=0.035) was observed (vs. no statistically significant changes in the placebo group). In clozapine-treated patients, orlistat may be beneficial not only for weight control but also as a laxative. As no established treatments for clozapine-induced constipation exist, orlistat can be considered for this population, although more studies are required.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Colon; Constipation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Finland; Humans; Incidence; Lactones; Laxatives; Obesity; Olanzapine; Orlistat; Overweight; Patient Dropouts; Prevalence; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Weight Loss

To compare longer-term safety and effectiveness of the 4 most commonly used atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) in 332 patients, aged > 40 years, having psychosis associated with schizophrenia, mood disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, or dementia, diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria.. We used equipoise-stratified randomization (a hybrid of complete randomization and clinician's choice methods) that allowed patients or their treating psychiatrists to exclude 1 or 2 of the study atypical antipsychotics due to past experience or anticipated risk. Patients were followed for up to 2 years, with assessments at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Medications were administered employing open-label design and flexible dosages, but with blind raters. The study was conducted from October 2005 to October 2010.. Primary metabolic markers (body mass index, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides), percentage of patients who stay on the randomly assigned atypical antipsychotic for at least 6 months, psychopathology, percentage of patients who develop metabolic syndrome, and percentage of patients who develop serious and nonserious adverse events.. Because of a high incidence of serious adverse events, quetiapine was discontinued midway through the trial. There were significant differences among patients willing to be randomized to different atypical antipsychotics (P < .01), suggesting that treating clinicians tended to exclude olanzapine and prefer aripiprazole as one of the possible choices in patients with metabolic problems. Yet, the atypical antipsychotic groups did not differ in longitudinal changes in metabolic parameters or on most other outcome measures. Overall results suggested a high discontinuation rate (median duration 26 weeks prior to discontinuation), lack of significant improvement in psychopathology, and high cumulative incidence of metabolic syndrome (36.5% in 1 year) and of serious (23.7%) and nonserious (50.8%) adverse events for all atypical antipsychotics in the study.. Employing a study design that closely mimicked clinical practice, we found a lack of effectiveness and a high incidence of side effects with 4 commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics across diagnostic groups in patients over age 40, with relatively few differences among the drugs. Caution in the use of these drugs is warranted in middle-aged and older patients.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00245206.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Therapeutic Equipoise; Triglycerides; United States

Combination treatment with reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and betahistine, a histamine H1 receptor agonist/H3 antagonist, was developed to produce complementary action in CNS pathways regulating appetite and body weight. In the present placebo-controlled study, we evaluated whether a reboxetine-betahistine combination attenuates olanzapine-induced weight gain in schizophrenia patients.. Forty-three inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenic disorder participated in a randomized double-blind study. Reboxetine (4 mg/day) with betahistine (48 mg/day) (N = 29) or placebo (N = 14) was co-administered with olanzapine (10 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Mental status was assessed at baseline and endpoint with relevant rating scales. Intention-to-treat method was used for statistical analysis.. Seven patients in the study group and four in the placebo group discontinued the trial. At the end of the trial, patients in the olanzapine/reboxetine + betahistine group gained significantly less weight than those in the olanzapine/placebo group [2.02 ± 2.37 and 4.77 ± 3.16 kg, respectively; t = 2. 89, degrees of freedom (df) = 41, p = 0.006]. The weight-attenuating effect of this combination was twofold larger than the weight-attenuating effect previously demonstrated with reboxetine alone. Significantly fewer patients in the study group than in the comparison group increased their initial weight by >7 %, the cutoff for clinically significant weight gain [3/29 (10.3 %) and 6/14 (42.9 %), respectively; χ (2) = 6.03, df = 1, p = 0.014]. The reboxetine-betahistine combination was safe and well tolerated.. Reboxetine-betahistine combination produces a clinically meaningful attenuation of olanzapine-induced weight gain. These results justify direct comparison between the reboxetine-betahistine combination and reboxetine alone.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Betahistine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Olanzapine; Reboxetine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Large, "practical" or streamlined trials (LSTs) are used to study the effectiveness and/or safety of medicines in real world settings with minimal study imposed interventions. While LSTs have benefits over traditional randomized clinical trials and observational studies, there are inherent challenges to their conduct. Enrollment and follow-up of a large study sample of patients with mental illness pose a particular difficulty. To assist in overcoming operational barriers in future LSTs in psychiatry, this paper describes the recruitment and observational follow-up strategies used for the ZODIAC study, an international, open-label LST, which followed 18,239 persons randomly assigned to one of two treatments indicated for schizophrenia for 1 year. ZODIAC enrolled patients in 18 countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia using broad study entry criteria and required minimal clinical care intervention. Recruitment of adequate numbers and continued engagement of both study centers and subjects were significant challenges. Strategies implemented to mitigate these in ZODIAC include global study expansion, study branding, field coordinator and site relations programs, monthly site newsletters, collection of alternate contact information, conduct of national death index (NDI) searches, and frequent sponsor, contract research organization (CRO) and site interaction to share best practices and address recruitment challenges quickly. We conclude that conduct of large LSTs in psychiatric patient populations is feasible, but importantly, realistic site recruitment goals and maintaining site engagement are key factors that need to be considered in early study planning and conduct.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cause of Death; Humans; International Cooperation; Longitudinal Studies; Lost to Follow-Up; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The aim of this study was to determine what variables predict a 'combined treatment outcome' (COMBOUT) in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. This analysis (n=522) was based on a randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, 12-week study that enrolled chronically-ill patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related disorder. COMBOUT was assessed using the PANSS for symptoms, CGI-S for overall clinical status, MADRS for depressive symptoms, QLS for functioning/QOL, and SWN-K for subjective well-being. Possible predictors included demographics as well as baseline scores (Model I), and early change (week 2) scores (Model II).. Model I: significantly better outcome (higher COMBOUT score) was observed in patients with lower MADRS (T= - 6.36; p<0.001) or higher QLS (T=5.05; p<0.001) scores at baseline. Model II: significantly better COMBOUT was observed in patients with early improvement of QLS (T=4.93; p<0.001), SWN-K (T=3.88; p<0.001), PANSS (T= - 2.32; p=0.021) and CGI-S scores (T= - 2.22; p=0.027). Changes in EPS were not predictors of COMBOUT in the models tested.. COMBOUT at endpoint was predicted by lower depressive symptom score and higher QOL at baseline and by early improvement in psychopathology, quality of life and subjective well-being.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Demography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine rapid-acting intramuscular (IM) injection is an atypical antipsychotic drug already used overseas and recently approved in Japan. The objective of this study was to confirm the efficacy of rapid-acting IM olanzapine 10 mg was greater than IM placebo in patients with exacerbation of schizophrenia with acute psychotic agitation by comparing changes from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) total score.. We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in Japanese patients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the diagnostic criteria specified in the DSM-IV-TR. Patients were randomized to 2 treatment groups: IM olanzapine (10 mg) or IM placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in PANSS-EC from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection. Treatment groups were compared with an analysis of variance model which included treatment and site as factors. During the 24-hour treatment period, safety was assessed by clinical examination and laboratory investigations, electrocardiograms, extrapyramidal symptoms scales, and recording spontaneously reported adverse events.. Of the 91 randomized patients, 90 patients (45 IM olanzapine-group; 45 IM placebo-group) were in the full analysis set. The mean change of PANSS-EC total score from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection (mean±standard deviation) was -9.2±4.5 for the IM olanzapine group and -2.8±5.6 for the IM placebo group. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p<.001). There were no deaths, serious adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation, severe TEAEs, or instances of oversedation in this study. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in the proportion of patients with potentially clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate), electrocardiograms, and treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms.. The efficacy of IM olanzapine 10 mg in patients with exacerbation of schizophrenia with acute psychotic agitation was greater than IM placebo in the primary efficacy measure, PANSS-EC. Intramuscular olanzapine 10 mg was shown to be generally safe and tolerable, and could be a new option for treatment of schizophrenia in Japan.. NCT00970281.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) pentagonal (PM) and Van der Gaag (VDG) 5-factor models were compared on a range of change-over-time statistical indicators. PANSS data from a randomized, controlled trial for 108 adults diagnosed with schizophrenia were re-analyzed to calculate five factor scores for each model. Random effects regression was used to determine their relative performance in modeling change-over-time, determining covariance structure, and achieving goodness of fit. Performance of the 10 factors in estimating change-over-time was similar, as were significant covariates for the factor dyads: age, gender, chronicity/acuity, and anticholinergic medication. The PM model factors demonstrated the best "goodness of model fit" to the data on all five of the factor dyads. Correlation analyses indicated significantly high, positive correlations between the five factor dyads: Positive and Negative factors for the PM and VDG models, the PM Activation and VDG Excited factors, the PM Dysphoric Mood and the VDG emotional distress factors, and the PM Autistic Preoccupation and the VDG Disorganized factors, although the PANSS items on each factor differed somewhat. These results extend previous findings and indicate several important performance differences between the PM and VDG models in their parsimonious representation of the syndromes of schizophrenia and estimating change-over-time.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Regression Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Young Adult

Clozapine, the most widely used option in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, has been shown to be superior to other antipsychotic medications in improving cognitive function in patients. However, the results have not been consistent and the mechanisms underlying this effect have not been elucidated. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate verbal and nonverbal cognition (using visuospatial processing tests) in patients treated with clozapine (initially treatment resistant) and those treated with other second-generation antipsychotics, relative healthy control subjects. Furthermore, we examined neural correlates of visuospatial processing in the three groups.. Twenty schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine (TR-C group), 23 patients stabilised with atypical antipsychotics other than clozapine (NTR group), and 21 healthy control participants completed a battery of verbal and visuospatial cognitive tests. In addition, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing one of the visuospatial tests (the mental rotation task). The fMRI data were analysed separately in each group using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM5).. Overall, schizophrenia patients exhibited deficit on verbal and nonverbal processing relative to the healthy controls, but we observed some interesting differences between the two groups of patients. Specifically, the NTR group performed better than the TR-C group on the Block Design and the Raven's Progressive Matrices. With respect to brain function during mental rotation, the NTR group showed significant activations in regions of the temporal and occipital cortex, whereas the TR-C patients did not. The relative deactivations associated with the task were also more robust in NTR compared to the other group of patients, despite a similar performance.. Present results suggest better visuospatial processing in the NTR relative to the TR-C group. This difference could be attributed to the treatment resistance itself or a lack of beneficial effect of clozapine relative to other atypical antipsychotics in ameliorating nonverbal abilities. Future studies of the relationship between clozapine and cognition, as well as between treatment resistance and cognition, are warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Space Perception; Young Adult

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, in which memory impairment is a core deficit. The methods of positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), Wechsler memory scale-4th edition (WMS-IV) and event-related potential (ERP) were used to study the effects of olanzapine on the cognitive function in the first-episode schizophrenic patients. We performed multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial to study the cognitive functioning in Han Chinese first-episode schizophrenic patients in a 12-week treatment regime with olanzapine (129 cases) or placebo (132 cases). The results showed that (1) the patients with first-episode schizophrenia showed significant deficits in the long-term memory, short-term memory, immediate memory and memory quotient by WMS-IV assessment, and decreases the total scores, positive symptoms, negative symptoms and general psychopathology by PANSS assessment; (2) olanzapine could significantly improve the PANSS scores including total scores, positive symptoms, negative symptoms and general psychopathology in the first-episode schizophrenic patients; (3) olanzapine could significantly improve the short-term memory, immediate memory and memory quotient in the first-episode schizophrenic patients; and (3) although the latencies of P(2), N(2) and P(3) were significantly prolonged, P(2) and P(3) amplitudes were decreased and the latencies of N(1) did not change, olanzapine did not influence any P(300) items in the first-episode schizophrenic patients. The data suggested that that olanzapine could improve cognitive process, such as memorizing and extraction of the information although there were many changes of cognitive functions in Han Chinese first-episode schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; China; Double-Blind Method; Evoked Potentials; Female; Humans; Male; Memory Disorders; Memory, Short-Term; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

The goal of this study was to identify genetic markers associated with LY2140023 monohydrate response in patients with schizophrenia. Variants in eight candidate genes related to the mechanism of action of LY2140023 or olanzapine were investigated in a genetic cohort collected from two clinical trials. Results from this genetic analysis indicate that 23 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were associated with a change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score in response to LY2140023 at 28 days (P<0.01; false discovery rate <0.2). Sixteen of these SNPs were located in the serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A). Bioinformatic analyses identified a putative antisense nested gene in intron 2 of HTR2A in the region of the genetic markers associated with LY2140023 response. These data suggest a genetic association exists between SNPs in several genes, such as HTR2A, and response to LY2140023 treatment. Additional clinical trials are needed to establish replication of these results.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acids; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; Female; Haplotypes; Humans; Introns; Male; Neuregulin-1; Olanzapine; Pharmacogenetics; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate; Russia; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; United States

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), especially clozapine and olanzapine, are associated with an increased metabolic risk. Recent research showed that plasma adiponectin levels, an adipocyte-derived hormone that increases insulin sensitivity, vary in the same way in schizophrenic patients as in the general population according to gender, adiposity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether different SGAs differentially affect plasma adiponectin levels independent of body mass index (BMI) and MetS status. 113 patients with schizophrenia (65.5% males, 32.3years old) who were free of antipsychotic medication were enrolled in this open-label prospective single-center study and received either risperidone (n=54) or olanzapine (n=59). They were followed prospectively for 12weeks. Average daily dose was 4.4mg/day for risperidone and 17.4mg/day for olanzapine. Plasma adiponectin levels as well as fasting metabolic parameters were measured at baseline, 6weeks and 12weeks. The two groups had similar baseline demographic and metabolic characteristics. A significant increase in body weight was observed over time. This increase was significantly larger in the olanzapine group than in the risperidone group (+7.0kg versus +3.1kg, p<0.0002). Changes in fasting glucose and insulin levels and in HOMA-IR, an index of insulin resistance, were not significantly different in both treatment groups. MetS prevalence increased significantly more in the olanzapine group as compared to the risperidone groups where the prevalence did not change over time. We observed a significant (p=0.0015) treatment by time interaction showing an adiponectin increase in the risperidone-treated patients (from 10,154 to 11,124ng/ml) whereas adiponectin levels decreased in olanzapine treated patients (from 11,280 to 8988ng/ml). This effect was independent of BMI and the presence/absence of MetS. The differential effect of antipsychotic treatment (risperidone versus olanzapine) on plasma adiponectin levels over time, independent of changes in waist circumference and antipsychotic dosing, suggests a specific effect on adipose tissues, similar to what has been observed in animal models. The observed olanzapine-associated reduction in plasma adiponectin levels may at least partially contribute to the increased metabolic risk of olanzapine compared to risperidone.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Waist Circumference

Second-generation antipsychotics yield only a modest improvement in cognitive benefit compared to first-generation antipsychotics. Aripiprazole, which is a partial dopamine D2 receptor agonist, may have an impact on cognitive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia. This study administered aripiprazole or placebo to 36 outpatients with schizophrenia also receiving risperidone or olanzapine for 12 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) just prior to drug administration as well as 12 weeks after. The PANSS and UKU side effect rating scales were used to evaluate the clinical response to additional treatment with aripiprazole. In a primary analyses, ANCOVA showed that there was an interaction between the treatment group and time for verbal fluency (p < 0.05), but not for any domain in BACS, PANSS or UKU side effect rating scales. Upon secondary analysis, however, the ameliorative change in motor speed as assessed by the BACS (p < 0.05) for those receiving aripiprazole was greater than that for the placebo group, whereas deterioration in verbal fluency (p < 0.01) and executive function (p < 0.01) in those receiving aripiprazole was significantly greater than in the placebo group. These results suggest that adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole improves motor speed but worsens some cognitive functions. It is likely that these effects are due to the dopamine D2 antagonistic effect of aripiprazole.

Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

This 22-week, open-label study, conducted between November 2006 and September 2008 in a community setting, was designed to determine if weight gain during olanzapine treatment can be prevented or mitigated with adjunctive treatment algorithms that include amantadine, metformin, and zonisamide.. Outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV-TR criteria) were randomly assigned to olanzapine alone (n = 50), olanzapine plus algorithm A (olanzapine + A [amantadine 200 mg/d with possible switches to metformin 1,000-1,500 mg/d and then to zonisamide 100-400 mg/d; n = 76]), or olanzapine plus algorithm B (olanzapine + B [metformin 1,000-1,500 mg/d with possible switches to amantadine 200 mg/d and then to zonisamide 100-400 mg/d; n = 73]). Brief weight management education was provided at baseline. The primary outcome measure was comparison of mean weight gain between olanzapine and pooled olanzapine + A and olanzapine + B results.. Least squares mean ± SE weight gain was 2.76 ± 0.75 kg for olanzapine, 2.40 ± 0.65 kg for olanzapine + A, and 0.65 ± 0.63 kg for olanzapine + B. Mean weight gain during olanzapine treatment did not differ significantly from pooled results for olanzapine + A and olanzapine + B (P = .065). Participants treated with olanzapine + B experienced significantly less mean weight gain than olanzapine-treated participants (P = .036).. Pooled treatment algorithm results were not significantly different from olanzapine monotherapy in mitigating weight gain. However, participants who received treatment with metformin with possible progression to amantadine and then zonisamide had significantly less mean weight gain than participants treated with olanzapine alone. Progression of some participants through the algorithm indicated that a single therapy solution may not be adequate for every patient. Patients treated with olanzapine should receive regular weight monitoring.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00401973.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Amantadine; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Protocols; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Zonisamide

We examined 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported to be associated with response to iloperidone therapy for association with response to risperidone therapy.. Patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were assessed during 2006 and 2007 for response/nonresponse (defined as ≥ 20%/<20% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total score) after 2 weeks of risperidone treatment (2 to 6 mg/d). Responders continued risperidone treatment; nonresponders were randomly assigned to either risperidone or olanzapine treatment (10 to 20 mg/d) for an additional 10 weeks. Associations between change in PANSS total (primary outcome measure), positive, and negative scores and the 6 SNPs were examined in risperidone-treated patients (N = 145). Genotype frequencies and improvement in PANSS total scores were analyzed for those SNPs significantly associated with change in PANSS total score.. The SNPs XKR4 rs9643483 and GRIA4 rs2513265 were significantly associated with change in PANSS total response (adjusted P < .05 for both), with the same direction of effect as reported for iloperidone. For patients with nonresponsive genotypes for these SNPs, mean improvement in PANSS total score for African Americans was two-thirds that seen for whites (XKR4: -13.9 versus -21.4; GRIA4: -12.5 versus -20.9).. In this retrospective pharmacogenomic analysis, we found that 2 SNPs previously linked to iloperidone response were also associated with response to risperidone.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00337662.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Black or African American; Drug Resistance; Genotype; Humans; Isoxazoles; Membrane Proteins; Membrane Transport Proteins; Olanzapine; Piperidines; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, AMPA; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; White People

This study compares the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine to that of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) in patients with schizophrenia, who failed to show a response to initial trials of FGAs.. This study was an 8-week treatment, randomized, rater-blind, active-control study with 3 treatment arms. 48 patients, who showed inadequate response to 1 FGA, were enrolled and randomized into risperidone, olanzapine, or FGA (haloperidol or trifluoperazine) groups. They were blindly assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) at baseline and biweekly.. All 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the PANSS total, positive, and general scores from baseline to endpoint (p-values range from 0.003 to 0.021). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in score changes. The olanzapine group had significant score reductions than the risperidone and FGAs groups in terms of the ESRS subjective total score and did not experience a significant increase in the dose of anticholinergics. The FGA group demonstrated that extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) worsened under an increased dosage of anti-EPS drugs. Olanzapine was associated with significant body weight gain (2.69 ± 4.0 kg, p=0.026), but there were no significant group differences on weight gain.. Haloperidol or trifluoperazine demonstrated similar efficacy as risperidone or olanzapine for patients with schizophrenia who had failed their first trial with a FGA. Related double-blind, fixed dose studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results of our study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Resistance; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Trifluoperazine

Olanzapine has frequently been reported to induce substantial weight gain, which is associated with an increased prevalence of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes. Several reports have described that olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) induce less weight gain than oral standard tablets (OST) do, although both forms have equal bioavailability. We tried to clarify whether or not body weight change differed between olanzapine ODT and OST treatments in olanzapine-naïve schizophrenia patients. An open-label, 12-month, multicenter, randomized, flexible-dose study was conducted for direct comparison of the effects of OST (mean dosage, 15.7 mg; N=57) and ODT (mean dosage, 15.2 mg; N=61) on body weight and metabolic measures such as blood glucose, hemoglobin(A1c), total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides in olanzapine-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Outcome measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), The World Health Organization Quality of Life 26 (WHO-QOL26), Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI)-10, and tolerability assessed by the UKU side-effect rating scale. This study was conducted between June 2007 and April 2010. No significant difference was found in the weight gain between the two forms of olanzapine. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any metabolic measure, efficacy, tolerability, WHO-QOL26, or DAI-10 score. Previous reports describing that olanzapine ODT induced less weight gain than OST were not supported by results of this randomized study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Tablets; Triglycerides

Despite extensive experience with antipsychotic medications, we have limited capacity to predict which patients will benefit from which medications and for what symptoms. Such prediction is of particular importance for the proper treatment of violence. Our goal was to determine whether executive function predicts outcome of treatment for aggressive behavior and whether such prediction varies across medication groups.. Ninety-nine physically aggressive inpatients (aged 18-60 years) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (diagnosed according to DSM-IV) who completed tests of executive function were randomly assigned in a double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week trial to clozapine (n = 32), olanzapine (n = 32), or haloperidol (n = 35). The number and severity of aggressive events as measured by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) were the outcome measures. Psychopathology and medication side effects were also assessed. The study was conducted from 1999 to 2004.. Poor executive function predicted higher levels of aggression, as measured by MOAS scores over the 12-week period, in all 3 medication groups (F(1,98) = 222.2, P < .0001). There was, however, a significant interaction effect between medication grouping and executive function (F(1,98) = 15.32, P < .001): clozapine exerted an antiaggression effect even in the presence of executive dysfunction.. Executive function was a strong predictor of response to antiaggression treatment in all medication groups, but clozapine still retained clinical efficacy in the presence of poor executive functioning. Olanzapine was particularly efficacious in the absence of executive dysfunction. These findings have important implications for a targeted approach to the treatment of aggression in patients with schizophrenia.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01123408.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Executive Function; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychological Tests; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Patients with an acute psychotic episode underwent HOMA testing for insulin sensitivity (IS) prior to and after 3 weeks of treatment with olanzapine (n = 7) or risperidone (n = 7).. The HOMA-IS index was reduced in the olanzapine group, but significantly increased in patients treated with risperidone. There was a significant "time × medication" interaction (p = 0.03). The BMI significantly increased as a result of both treatments. IS can be acutely ameliorated by antipsychotic treatment with risperidone despite weight increase.. Compared to risperidone, the IS is impaired after a 3-week treatment with olanzapine. Already short-term antipsychotic treatment may have eff ects on insulin sensitivity.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Homeostasis; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Most antipsychotic agents can cause QT prolongation, which causes torsades de pointes. The QT interval in healthy subjects is longer during nighttime than during daytime. The QT interval of patients treated with antipsychotics may be prolonged during nighttime, and the effects of antipsychotics on the QT interval may differ between antipsychotics. This study investigated the circadian dynamics of the QT interval in patients treated with antipsychotics and healthy controls, using a 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram in a clinical setting. Sixty-six patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia that were treated with risperidone or olanzapine and 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The QT intervals were corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF = QT / RR). Mean ± SD nighttime QTcFs were 411.6 ± 29.0, 395.9 ± 21.2, and 387.8 ± 19.0 milliseconds (ms) in the risperidone, olanzapine, and control groups, respectively. The mean daytime QTcFs were 397.7 ± 23.4, 392.4 ± 18.9, and 382.6 ± 17.3 ms, respectively. The mean nighttime QTcF of the risperidone group was significantly longer than that of the olanzapine and control groups, although there was no significant difference in the mean daytime QTcF between the risperidone and olanzapine groups. The current study used 24-hour Holter electrocardiograms to reveal significantly longer QT intervals in the risperidone group especially during nighttime. In clinical practices, evaluations of the QT interval have been conducted over short periods in the daytime, but it is believed that such methods may not be able to fully elucidate the effects of antipsychotics on the QT interval.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Circadian Rhythm; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Torsades de Pointes

Two randomized, double-blind, 26-week core studies (Eastern [EH] and Western Hemisphere [WH]) tested the hypothesis that asenapine is superior to olanzapine for persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia; 26-week extension studies assessed the comparative long-term efficacy and safety of these agents. In the core studies, 949 people were randomized to asenapine (n = 241 and 244) or olanzapine (n = 240 and 224); 26-week completion rates with asenapine were 64.7% and 49.6% (olanzapine, 80.4% and 63.8%) in the EH and WH, respectively. In the EH and WH extensions, respectively (asenapine, n = 134 and 86; olanzapine, n = 172 and 110), 52-week completion rates were 84.3% and 66.3% with asenapine (olanzapine, 89.0% and 80.9%). Asenapine was not superior to olanzapine in change in the 16-item Negative Symptom Assessment Scale total score in either core study, but asenapine was superior to olanzapine at week 52 in the WH extension study. Olanzapine was associated with modest, but significantly greater, changes in PANSS positive subscale score at various assessment times in both core studies and the WH extension study. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between treatments across studies. Weight gain was consistently lower with asenapine. Extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse event incidence was higher with asenapine (EH: 8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-12.5%; WH: 16.4%; 95% CI, 11.9%-21.6%) than olanzapine (EH: 3.3%; 95% CI, 1.4%-6.4%; WH: 12.1%; 95% CI, 8.1%-17.0%), but Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale-Abbreviated total score changes did not significantly differ between treatments. In conclusion, asenapine superiority over olanzapine was not observed in the core studies. Both treatments improved persistent negative symptoms, but discontinuation rates were higher with asenapine.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychomotor Performance; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Behavior; Young Adult

In treating schizophrenia, it has been established that 65-80% occupancy of dopamine D2 receptors optimizes therapeutic efficacy while minimizing risks of extrapyramidal symptoms. However, it is unclear as to whether it is necessary to keep D2 receptor occupancy within this therapeutic window to maintain response. In this study, daily peak and trough D2 receptor occupancy levels were estimated in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) who were receiving risperidone or olanzapine. Using two collected plasma samples, plasma antipsychotic concentrations at peak and trough were estimated with population pharmacokinetic techniques. Corresponding dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels were then estimated, using a recently developed model. 35 subjects with stable schizophrenia completed the study (mean±SD age, 48.8±13.8years; male [N=14]; Asians [N=23], Caucasians [N=12]; risperidone [N=20] at 3.2±2.3mg/day, and olanzapine [N=15] at 9.2±4.9mg/day) between September and December 2010. 48.6% (N=17) did not achieve a continuous blockade of ≥65%. Moreover, 11.4% (N=4) did not achieve the 65% threshold at estimated peak concentrations. In conclusion, approximately half the subjects with stable schizophrenia did not achieve estimated continuous blockade of D2 receptor occupancy of ≥65%. The results suggest that sustained D2 receptor occupancy levels of ≥65% may not always be necessary for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Protein Binding; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effects of olanzapine long-acting injection (olanzapine-LAI) on levels of functioning in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia.. During this 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 404 inpatients were randomized to four treatment arms (olanzapine-LAI 210 mg/2 weeks = 106; olanzapine-LAI 300 mg/2 weeks = 100; olanzapine-LAI 405 mg/4 weeks = 100; placebo = 98). Also, data from the three active dosing arms were combined and compared to placebo data.. NCT00088478.. The treatment group comparison of mean change from baseline to endpoint in the total score and four subdomains of the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale (QLS) and in the 2 summary scores and 8 subscale scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were assessed using an ANOVA model.. All three olanzapine-LAI treatment groups and the combined olanzapine-LAI group were superior to placebo on the QLS total score (all p-values < 0.01) and the Intrapsychic Foundations subdomain (all p-values < 0.02). Olanzapine-LAI 210 mg/2 weeks (p < 0.001), 300 mg/2 weeks (p = 0.006), and the combined olanzapine-LAI group (p = 0.003) were superior to placebo on the Interpersonal Relations subdomain. The 300 mg/2 weeks group (p = 0.027) and the combined olanzapine-LAI group (p = 0.014) were also superior to placebo on the Instrumental Role subdomain. For the SF-36, the 300 mg/2 weeks and 405 mg/4 weeks olanzapine-LAI groups and the combined olanzapine-LAI group were superior to placebo on the Mental component score (all p-values < 0.05). Each olanzapine-LAI group and the combined group were superior on the Mental Health scale (all p-values < 0.05). Significant negative correlations between PANSS scores and measures of functioning indicate that as symptoms decreased, functioning increased.. These results suggest that olanzapine-LAI may improve level of functioning in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia within 8 weeks of initiating treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We have previously shown that patients with schizophrenia treated with typical antipsychotics were impaired on the weather prediction probabilistic classification learning (PCL) task that relies on striatal function, and that similar patients treated with atypical antipsychotics were impaired on the Iowa gambling task (IGT) that depends on medial prefrontocortical function.. We tested the hypothesis that test performance of patients treated with risperidone will be more similar to those treated with typical rather than atypical antipsychotics.. Groups of schizophrenia patients treated with risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine or typical antipsychotics did not differ on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) but scored lower than controls on the MMSE. For the PCL task, patients treated with clozapine improved over trials while those treated with typical antipsychotics, olanzapine, or risperidone did not. For the IGT, patients treated with typical antipsychotics or risperidone improved over trials while those treated with clozapine or olanzapine did not.. Results generally supported the hypothesis that patients treated with risperidone perform more like those treated with typical antipsychotics than those treated with other atypical antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Decision Making; Female; Gambling; Humans; Learning; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Sleep propensity at daytime has not been investigated in untreated patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, while the antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine are considered to frequently cause 'sleepiness' or 'sedation', this has not been objectified yet. Therefore, 30 patients with schizophrenia were included in this randomized, double-blind study. Sleep propensity was assessed before and after 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment with either clozapine or olanzapine using a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT); in the MSLT, sleep latencies of 5 nap opportunities of 20 min during daytime are averaged. In addition, the number of sleep onsets was recorded. Mean sleep latency in untreated schizophrenic patients was 16.2 ± 0.8 min at baseline. Both antipsychotics induced an increase of sleep propensity as indicated by a shortened sleep latency and more sleep onsets during the treatment period as compared to baseline. These effects were strongest in the morning. Four patients receiving clozapine and 3 patients receiving olanzapine reported subjective sleepiness, in all but one commencing in the first treatment week and persisting until study end. While the mean sleep latency during treatment was significantly shorter in these patients (12.3 ± 0.8 min) than in those without subjective sleepiness (14.9 ± 0.7 min), a short sleep latency was not necessarily associated with subjective sleepiness. In conclusion, mean sleep latency was >36% longer (i.e. sleep propensity was lower) in untreated patients with schizophrenia than in healthy subjects previously consistently reported. Furthermore, clozapine and olanzapine increased sleep propensity in schizophrenic patients. A minority of patients reported subjective sleepiness.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polysomnography; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reaction Time; Schizophrenia; Sleep Stages; Statistics as Topic; Time Factors; Young Adult

Although some previous studies have compared the 2 medicines, ziprasidone and olanzapine most selected chronic patients as subjects. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone vs. olanzapine in naive first-episode schizophrenia.. 80 patients were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment either with 80-160 mg/day of ziprasidone or 10-20 mg/day of olanzapine. The primary efficacy measurements were the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression-severity scale scores. The second efficacy measurement was the response rate of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed.. 79 patients completed the trial. The average dose was 127.5 mg/day with ziprasidone and 19.1 mg/day with olanzapine. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in primary or secondary efficacy measurements at each visit point (all p>0.05). Body weight significantly increased with olanzapine, and more extrapyramidal symptoms were observed with ziprasidone (all p<0.05). Both medicines were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed.. Ziprasidone was as effective as olanzapine in short-term treatment for first-episode schizophrenia, and both medicines were well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Episode of Care; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Patients with schizophrenia or related disorders often switch antipsychotic therapy, most commonly due to lack of efficacy and side effects. The differences in anticipated efficacy and tolerability among atypical antipsychotics may drive switching behaviours. Switching to long-acting antipsychotics may improve adherence. Improving adherence is essential as relatively short medication gaps significantly increase the risk of schizophrenia hospitalizations. Long-term treatment with risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI), the first available long-acting atypical antipsychotic, versus oral atypical antipsychotics showed better adherence with RLAI. Stable patients with schizophrenia or related disorders treated with a stable dose of antipsychotic showed improved efficacy when switched to flexible doses of RLAI. The most common reason for patients to switch from olanzapine to another antipsychotic is excessive weight gain. Metabolic dysfunction also occurs more commonly with olanzapine than with risperidone. Patients switching from olanzapine to risperidone experienced significant decreases in body weight, body mass index and triglyceride levels, whereas patients switching from risperidone to olanzapine experienced significant increases in body weight and triglyceride levels. The efficacy, tolerability and safety of RLAI in non-acute patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder previously treated with oral olanzapine needs to be explored.. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of switching from oral olanzapine to RLAI.. This was a six-month, prospective, multicentre, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label trial. The trial evaluated non-acute adult patients with psychotic disorders treated with a stable olanzapine dose who required a treatment change. Three weeks after RLAI initiation, olanzapine was tapered off over 1 week or 3 weeks. Efficacy and safety measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Among 96 patients analysed, significant endpoint efficacy changes versus baseline were observed for PANSS, CGI-S and GAF (all p<0.0001). PANSS total score improvement was ≥20% for 65.6% of patients and ≥50% for 31.3%. TEAEs were similar in the 1- and 3-week taper groups (40.0% and 46.5%, respectively). TEAEs were generally mild (34.5%) or moderate (49.0%) in intensity.. Switching non-acute patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requiring a treatment change from a stable dose of oral olanzapine to RLAI improved psychiatric symptom control, functioning and patient treatment satisfaction. RLAI was generally well tolerated.. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00216632.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Satisfaction; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Weight gain is commonly observed with olanzapine treatment. Zonisamide is an antiepileptic drug associated with weight loss. This study examined the effectiveness of zonisamide in preventing weight gain in 42 patients beginning olanzapine for bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Each patient had a body mass index of 22 mg/kg or greater and was randomized to taking olanzapine with either zonisamide (n = 20) or placebo (n = 22) for 16 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight in kilograms from baseline. In the primary analysis using longitudinal regression, patients who received zonisamide had a significantly slower rate of weight gain and increase in body mass index than those who received placebo. The patients treated with zonisamide gained a mean (SD) of 0.9 (3.3) kg, whereas those treated with placebo gained a mean (SD) of 5.0 (5.5) kg; P = 0.01. None of the patients in the zonisamide group, compared with 7 patients (33%) in the placebo group, gained 7% of body weight or greater from baseline (Fisher exact test, P = 0.009). The zonisamide group, however, reported significantly more cognitive impairment as an adverse event than the placebo group (25% vs 0, respectively; P = 0.02). Zonisamide was effective for mitigating weight gain in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia initiating treatment with olanzapine but was associated with cognitive impairment as an adverse event.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Regression Analysis; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult; Zonisamide

We examined whether augmentation with olanzapine would be superior to increased risperidone dose among acute schizophrenia patients showing early non-response to risperidone. We performed a rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial at psychiatric emergency sites. Eligible patients were newly admitted patients with acute schizophrenia. Early response was defined as Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale score ≤3 following 2 weeks of treatment. Early non-responders were allocated to receive either augmentation with olanzapine (RIS+OLZ group) or increased risperidone dose (RIS+RIS group). The 78 patients who completed 2 weeks of treatment were divided into 52 early responders to risperidone and 26 early non-responders to risperidone (RIS+OLZ group, n=13; RIS+RIS group, n=13). No difference in the achievement of ≥50% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was observed between RIS+OLZ and RIS+RIS groups. Although time to treatment discontinuation for any cause was significantly shorter in the RIS+RIS group (6.8 weeks [95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.4]) than in early responders to risperidone (8.6 weeks [7.9-9.3]; P=0.018), there was no significant difference between the RIS+OLZ group (7.9 weeks [6.3-9.5]) and early responders to risperidone. Secondary outcomes justify the inclusion of augmentation arms in additional, larger studies comparing strategies for early non-responders.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method

Social cognition captures affect recognition, social cue perception, "theory of mind," empathy, and attributional style. The aim of our study was to assess social cognition in schizophrenia inpatients being treated with first-generation antipsychotic drugs (FGAs), n=28 (perphenazine and haloperidol, FGAs) or with second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs), n=56 (olanzapine and clozapine, SGAs).. Eighty-four patients completed the Facial Expression Recognition Test, the Voice Emotion Recognition Test, the Short Recognition Memory Test for Faces, and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Patients also completed the Visual Object and Space Perception Test (VOSP) as a control task, which would not engage social cognition. The patients were compared with fifty healthy controls matched for age and gender.. There were no significant differences on social cognitive performance between the FGA- and SGA-treatment groups. Nor was olanzapine superior to clozapine, FGAs or both. However, patients treated with FGAs performed significantly worse on VOSP compared to both groups treated with SGAs, a 10% difference.. We cannot conclude that SGAs were associated with better social cognition than FGAs. However, there were small but significant advantages for SGAs in non-social visual processing function, as evaluated with the VOSP.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Awareness; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Clozapine; Cues; Discrimination, Psychological; Emotions; Facial Expression; Female; Haloperidol; Hospitalization; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Psychotic Disorders; Retina; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Behavior; Social Perception; Speech Perception; Theory of Mind; Visual Perception; Young Adult

Safety and efficacy results, collected in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients treated for up to nearly 3 years, are presented for asenapine and olanzapine.. Patients completing a 52-week randomized double-blind core study on flexible-dose asenapine (5 or 10 mg BID) or olanzapine (10 or 20 mg QD) could continue treatment until study blind was broken.290 patients on asenapine and 150 on olanzapine continued treatment for variable lengths of time [mean ± SD (range) 311.0 ± 146.1 (10 - 653) d and 327.4 ± 139.6 (15 - 631) d, respectively]. Adverse event (AE) incidence was lower during the extension (asenapine, 62%; olanzapine, 55%) than during the core study (78%, 80%). In both groups, body weight increase and incidence of extrapyramidal AEs were negligible during the extension. Mean PANSS total score changes during first year of treatment were - 37.0 for asenapine and - 35.3 for olanzapine, with further changes of 1.6 for asenapine and - 0.8 for olanzapine at the extension study endpoint.. Clinical stability on asenapine as well as olanzapine was maintained, with few recurrent or newly emerging AEs beyond 1 year of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pharmacovigilance; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Time; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

JNJ-37822681 is a novel, highly selective dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist characterized by a rapid dissociation rate from the dopamine D₂ receptor. This profile was hypothesized to confer antipsychotic efficacy and improved tolerability. In this 12-week study, the efficacy and safety of JNJ-37822681 were evaluated in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to JNJ-37822681 (10-, 20- or 30-mg bid), olanzapine (15 mg once-daily), or placebo (for 6 weeks followed by olanzapine for 6 weeks). Of 498 randomized patients, 298 (60%) completed the study. All JNJ-37822681 dose groups and the olanzapine group showed significantly greater reduction in PANSS total score from baseline to week 6 versus placebo (all p-values < 0.001). Least-squares adjusted mean changes from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score were: -6.4 (placebo); -18.4 (10 mg JNJ-37822681), -17.7 (20 mg JNJ-37822681), -20.0 (30 mg JNJ-37822681) and -22.9 (olanzapine). All JNJ-37822681 groups showed significant improvement versus placebo from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS subscales, Marder factors, Clinical Global Impression of Severity, and in the Subjective Well-Being on Neuroleptics scale (all p-values < 0.05). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with JNJ-37822681 were insomnia (17%) and akathisia (13%). Incidences of extrapyramidal symptoms were dose-related and were comparable for JNJ-37822681 10 mg bid and olanzapine groups. All JNJ-37822681 dose groups showed lesser weight gain compared with olanzapine. The efficacy and tolerability profile of the JNJ-37822681 10 mg bid was consistent with the study hypothesis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Incidence; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyridazines; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Olanzapine and other second generation antipsychotics have been associated with weight gain, which may be related to changes in appetite and food intake. However, it is unclear whether changes in appetite in response to treatment with second generation antipsychotics are persistent in patients treated chronically with these medications and the extent to which changes in appetite are related to any continuing weight gain associated with long-term treatment with these drugs. In a randomized 5-month study of the effects of olanzapine and risperidone on metabolic changes in chronic schizophrenic patients, we assessed appetite changes using two scales and correlated appetite changes with weight gain and metabolic changes. There is evidence that the hormone ghrelin is related to appetite stimulation and falls during satiation after meals, and therefore, may be a physiological concomitant indicating appetite changes. We therefore, also measured ghrelin before and after a fatty meal at baseline and after 2 months of drug treatment. Neither olanzapine nor risperidone increased appetite during the 5 months of study drug treatment, and there was a trend for a decrease in appetite over time. Weight only increased slightly during treatment and changes in appetite scores were not correlated with changes in weight or changes in glucose or lipids. Fasting ghrelin did not increase in olanzapine- or risperidone-treated patients, and there were no significant changes in ghrelin responses to a fatty meal between baseline and 2 months of drug treatment, and no differences in response in olanzapine- vs. risperidone-treated patients. Our findings suggest that in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, olanzapine or risperidone do not induce increases in appetite and appetite changes are not related to any further small drug-induced weight gain in these chronically treated patients. However, it is possible that different relationships may exist between appetite and weight changes induced by the medications in drug naive patients newly started on olanzapine or risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Female; Ghrelin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

There is evidence to suggest that clozapine is underutilized in treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE), a multi-phase, randomized comparative effectiveness trial for schizophrenia, were used to identify factors associated with choosing randomization to clozapine. Two pathways were available in phase 2 of CATIE: randomization to clozapine or an untried atypical antipsychotic (2E), or randomization to an untried atypical antipsychotic (2T). We examined the proportion of entrants who chose to enter phase 2E due to the lack of efficacy of the phase 1 treatment, along with their demographic and clinical characteristics. Only 31.2% who discontinued phase 1 for lack of efficacy entered phase 2E. In multivariable analysis, males showed significantly increased odds of choosing phase 2E (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.38; confidence interval (CI) = 1.20, 4.70) as did patients with higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores (AOR = 1.01; CI = 1.00, 1.03), more inpatient days (AOR = 1.06; CI = 1.02, 1.10) and more outpatient visits, (AOR = 1.06; CI = 1.02, 1.11). More effort examining the decision-making process of patients and providers is needed in order to increase the utilization of this effective treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Dropouts; Patient Participation; Perphenazine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Characteristics

To assess neurocognitive outcomes following antipsychotic intervention in youth enrolled in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS).. Neurocognitive functioning of youth (ages 8 to 19 years) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was evaluated in a four-site, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing molindone, olanzapine, and risperidone. The primary outcomes were overall group change from baseline in neurocognitive composite and six domain scores after 8 weeks and continued treatment up to 52 weeks. Age and sex were included as covariates in all analyses.. Of 116 TEOSS participants, 77 (66%) had post-baseline neurocognitive data. No significant differences emerged in the neurocognitive outcomes of the three medication groups. Therefore, the three treatment groups were combined into one group to assess overall neurocognitive outcomes. Significant modest improvements were observed in the composite score and in three of six domain scores in the acute phase, and in four of six domain scores in the combined acute and maintenance phases. Partial correlation analyses revealed very few relationships among Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) baseline or change scores and neurocognition change scores.. Antipsychotic intervention in youth with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders (EOSS) led to modest improvement in measures of neurocognitive function. The changes in cognition were largely unrelated to baseline symptoms or symptom change. Small treatment effect sizes, easily accounted for by practice effects, highlight the critical need for the development of more efficacious interventions for the enduring neurocognitive deficits seen in EOSS. Clinical trial registry information-Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00053703.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Molindone; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Apoptosis has been considered to be involved in schizophrenia. Water channels are modulated just before apoptosis. In the aquaporin family, aquaporin 4 (AQP-4) is most highly expressed in the brain and is supposed to play an important role in a neuronal environment. In this clinical study, we investigated the relationship between the AQP-4 polymorphism and drug response in schizophrenia under the control of the MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) promoter gene. We recruited 91 patients with schizophrenia, and they were randomized to receive olanzapine (n = 44), risperidone (n = 23), or paliperidone (n = 24). Genotyping of AQP-4 and MAOA polymorphisms was done in all patients. Patients with the AQP-4 non-C polymorphism needed a higher dosage of olanzapine for treatment (z = 4.163, P = 0.041), and patients with a short form of the MAOA polymorphism needed a higher dosage of risperidone for treatment (z = 5.124, P = 0.024). Patients who smoked cigarettes needed a higher dosage of olanzapine for treatment (z = 4.905, P = 0.027), but cigarette smoking did not affect the dosage of paliperidone. The AQP-4 polymorphism may have an effect in influencing the dosage of olanzapine. However, the roles of AQP-4 polymorphisms in the blood-brain barrier and different neuroprotective effects need further exploration in future studies.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aquaporin 4; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Drug Monitoring; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Monoamine Oxidase; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Polymorphism, Genetic; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrimidines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Smoking; Young Adult

To treat acute schizophrenia, a long-acting injectable antipsychotic needs a rapid onset of action and therapeutic profile similar to that of oral agents. The present post-hoc analyses compared results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) for acute schizophrenia with those observed in similarly designed trials of oral olanzapine.. Six-week results from the olanzapine LAI study (N = 404) were compared with those of 3 oral studies (study 1: olanzapine vs. haloperidol vs. placebo [N = 335]; study 2: olanzapine vs. haloperidol vs. low-dose olanzapine [N = 431]; study 3: olanzapine vs. placebo vs. low-dose olanzapine [N = 152]). All patients had baseline Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores ≥24 (0-6 scale). Six-week effect sizes were calculated. Efficacy onset, pharmacokinetics, discontinuations, weight gain, and extrapyramidal symptoms were also assessed.. At 6 weeks, mean BPRS scores decreased by 14 to 15 points for olanzapine LAI (405 mg/4 weeks, 210 or 300 mg/2 weeks), by 8 to 16 for oral olanzapine (10 ± 2.5 or 15 ± 2.5 mg/day), and by 12 to 13 for haloperidol (15 ± 5 mg/day). For those same dose groups, effect sizes vs. placebo for the BPRS were 0.7 to 0.8 for olanzapine LAI, 0.5 to 0.7 for oral olanzapine, and 0.6 for haloperidol. The first statistically significant separation from placebo on the BPRS occurred at 3 days for the olanzapine LAI groups and at 1 week for oral olanzapine and haloperidol (15 ± 5 mg/day) in oral study 1 although as late as week 6 for the 10-mg/day olanzapine dose in oral study 3. Olanzapine concentrations were similar across studies. Weight gain ≥7% of baseline occurred in up to 35% of olanzapine LAI and oral patients versus up to 12% of haloperidol and placebo patients. Extrapyramidal symptoms were lowest in the olanzapine LAI groups and significantly greater in the haloperidol groups. No post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome events occurred in the olanzapine LAI study.. Patients treated acutely with olanzapine LAI showed a similar pattern of improvement to that seen historically with oral olanzapine. With the exception of injection-related adverse events, the efficacy and tolerability profile of olanzapine LAI is similar to oral olanzapine.. ClinicalTrials.gov ID; URL: http://http//www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00088478; ClinicalStudyResults.org ID; URL: http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org/: 917, 978, 982, and 5984.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Metabolic effects are generally more pronounced with second-generation than first-generation antipsychotics. This study was designed to compare long-term metabolic effects and efficacy of paliperidone extended release (ER) with those of oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In this 6-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study, adults with schizophrenia were treated with paliperidone ER (6-9 mg/d; n = 239) or oral olanzapine (10-15 mg/d; n = 220). The primary outcome was mean change in the ratio of serum triglyceride level to high-density lipoprotein level (TG/HDL), a marker of insulin resistance. Other outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, measures of lipid and glucose metabolism, and body weight. Significant improvements in psychotic symptoms were observed with both treatments (P < 0.0001). The TG/HDL ratio was significantly higher at end point versus baseline with olanzapine compared with that of paliperidone ER. Mean end point change in TG/HDL ratio was 0.97 ± 2.72 [corrected] for olanzapine (P < 0.0001, reflecting worsening), with no significant change for paliperidone ER (-0.17 ± 2.51). Newly diagnosed impairment in TG and metabolic syndrome was more common with olanzapine (P < 0.05). Insulin resistance, as measured by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, worsened significantly with olanzapine (P = 0.0003), but not with paliperidone ER. Glucose sensitivity for insulin worsened significantly with olanzapine (P < 0.03), with no significant changes for paliperidone ER. End point increase in body weight was significantly higher with olanzapine than paliperidone ER (3.8 vs 1.2 kg; P = 0.0013). In summary, both paliperidone ER and olanzapine effectively treated schizophrenia; however, undesirable metabolic effects were significantly greater with olanzapine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Isoxazoles; Lipoproteins, HDL; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrimidines; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides; Waist Circumference

To describe the efficacy, safety and tolerability of lurasidone for the acute treatment of schizophrenia using the metrics number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH).. Study data were pooled from six Phase II and III, 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that were conducted to test the efficacy and safety of lurasidone for the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Included were the following interventions: fixed doses of lurasidone 20, 40, 80, 120 and 160 mg/d; haloperidol 10 mg/d; olanzapine 15 mg/d; quetiapine extended-release 600 mg/d; placebo. The following outcomes were assessed: responder rates as defined by a reduction of ≥20, 30, 40 or 50% from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; study completion; discontinuation due to an adverse event (AE); weight gain ≥7% from baseline; incidence of spontaneously reported AEs; incidence of total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL, fasting triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL and glucose ≥126 mg/dL at endpoint. NNT for the efficacy outcomes were calculated after excluding one failed study. NNH for the safety/tolerability outcomes were calculated using all six studies. Likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) was also calculated to illustrate trade-offs between outcomes of improvement ≥30% on the PANSS vs. incidence of akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism.. NNT vs. placebo for PANSS reductions ≥30% were 6, 6, 7 and 4 for lurasidone doses of 40, 80, 120 and 160 mg/d, respectively, and 4 and 3 for olanzapine 15 mg/d and quetiapine extended-release 600 mg/d, respectively. Lurasidone was not associated with any statistically significant disadvantages over placebo for weight gain or metabolic abnormalities; NNH vs. placebo for weight gain ≥7% from baseline was 4 for olanzapine and 9 for quetiapine extended-release in contrast to a NNH for this outcome ranging from 43 to 150 for lurasidone 40-160 mg/d. The 5 most consistently encountered adverse events attributable to lurasidone were akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism, with NNH vs. placebo for lurasidone 40-120 mg/d ranging from 6 (akathisia with 120 mg/d) to 30 (parkinsonism with 80 mg/d). Lurasidone 160 mg/d appeared better tolerated than doses of 40, 80 or 120 mg/d for akathisia, nausea, sedation or somnolence, with no NNH values for these adverse events for 160 mg/d vs. placebo being statistically significant. LHH was favorable for lurasidone when contrasting PANSS reductions vs. adverse events.. NNT and NNH can help quantify efficacy, safety and tolerability outcomes and place lurasidone into clinical perspective. Advantages for lurasidone include a low propensity for weight gain and metabolic abnormalities. More commonly encountered adverse events include akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism, but NNH values are generally in the double digits, reflecting an overall tolerable profile. Individual patient characteristics, values and preferences will need to be considered when selecting lurasidone over other antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Isoindoles; Likelihood Functions; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Medication Adherence; Nausea; Numbers Needed To Treat; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Weight Gain

This study aimed to compare the effects of the two most commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics, olanzapine and risperidone, on fasting blood sugar and serum lipid profile of the recipients.. A randomised, comparative, open clinical study was conducted on 60 schizophrenic patients. The patients were divided into two groups, one receiving olanzapine and the other receiving risperidone. The patients were assessed for changes in fasting blood sugar and serum lipid profile (triglycerides [TG], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL] and total cholesterol) eight weeks after starting treatment. The number of patients positive for fasting blood sugar and lipid profile criteria of metabolic syndrome was calculated by applying the modified National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (NCEP ATP III) criteria at eight weeks.. Patients treated with olanzapine showed a highly significant increase in the observed parameters, whereas those treated with risperidone showed a significant increase in fasting blood sugar, HDL and LDL levels, and a highly significant increase in other parameters. Intergroup comparison was insignificant except for TG, VLDL and total cholesterol levels. More men as compared to women fulfilled the NCEP ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome in both groups.. Olanzapine has a higher propensity to cause derangement of some parameters of lipid profile than risperidone. These parameters include TG, VLDL and total cholesterol levels.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Female; Humans; Lipids; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lipoproteins, VLDL; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Reproducibility of Results; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sertindole in comparison with olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond successfully to their previous treatments. Patients with schizophrenia who were at least moderately ill and had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment were randomized to double-blind sertindole or olanzapine treatment. A total of 389 patients were treated, 196 with sertindole (mean dose=17 mg/day) and 193 with olanzapine (mean dose=16 mg/day). Both drugs improved all the efficacy scale scores including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Although sertindole failed to prove noninferiority to olanzapine in terms of reduction in PANSS total score with the last-observation-carried-forward analysis, this can be attributed to the higher withdrawal rate in the sertindole group by day 16 by which sertindole was up-titrated to the effective dose. On excluding early withdrawals, the noninferiority criterion was fulfilled, as also in the observed-case analysis. They had similar safety profiles with respect to the total incidence of adverse events. The incidence of asymptomatic QT prolongation was higher in the sertindole group. Sertindole has an efficacy and safety profile that is comparable to that of olanzapine. The slow titration schedule and lack of sedating effect of sertindole should be considered when initiating treatment with this drug.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Imaging evidence indicates that brain alterations are primary to the full-blown onset of schizophrenia and seem to progress across time. The potential effects of antipsychotic medication on brain structure represent a key factor in understanding brain changes in psychosis. We aimed to investigate the effects of low doses of haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine on cortical thickness.. We investigated the effects of risperidone (N=16), olanzapine (N=18) and low doses of haloperidol (N=18) in cortical thickness changes during 1-year follow-up period in a large and heterogeneous sample of schizophrenia spectrum patients. The relationship between cortical thickness changes and clinical and cognitive outcome was also assessed. A group of 45 healthy volunteers was also longitudinally evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging brain scans (1.5T) were obtained and images were analyzed by using BRAINS2.. There were no significant effects of time (F(1,47)<1.66; P>0.204), treatment group (F(2,47)<1.47; P>0.242) or group-by-time interaction (F(2,47)<1.82; P>0.174) for any of the cortical thickness variables. When the group of healthy controls was included in the analyses, it is of note that group-by-time interaction showed a significant result for the frontal lobe at trend level (F(3,81)=2.686; P=0.052). After the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, there were no significant associations between changes in cortical thickness and clinical and cognitive outcome.. Low doses of haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine seem to equally affect gray matter cortical thickness, overall and lobes, at the medium-term (1 year). The clinical effectiveness of treatments was not significantly related to changes in cortical thickness.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare the 12-month effectiveness of several second-generation antipsychotic drugs, with that of haloperidol in never-treated patients with first-episode psychosis. In total, 114 patients without life time exposure to any psychotropic medication were randomized to haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine or ziprasidone. Primary outcome was time to all-cause discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included discontinuation rates and symptom change as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The overall discontinuation rate 64%. At 12 months, the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was 40.0% for olanzapine, 56.5% for quetiapine, 64.0% for risperidone, 80.0% for ziprasidone and 85.7% for haloperidol. Mean time to antipsychotic discontinuation was higher in patients randomized to second-generation antipsychotics than in those taking haloperidol. Significantly lower discontinuation was noted in patients on olanzapine than on haloperidol, or ziprasidone. Our results suggest that olanzapine might lead to longer treatment continuation in treatment naïve FEP patients than haloperidol and, possibly ziprasidone. Global psychopathology was significantly less reduced by haloperidol than with each individual SGA in this earliest phase of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacogenomic analyses of weight gain during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics have resulted in a number of associations with variants in ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1 (ANKK1)/dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and serotonin 2C receptor (HTR2C) genes. These studies primarily assessed subjects with schizophrenia who had prior antipsychotic exposure that may have influenced the amount of weight gained from subsequent therapies. We assessed the relationships between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes with weight gain during treatment with olanzapine in a predominantly antipsychotic-naive population.. The association between 5 ANKK1, 54 DRD2, and 11 HTR2C SNPs and weight change during 8 weeks of olanzapine treatment was assessed in 4 pooled studies of 205 white patients with diagnoses other than schizophrenia who were generally likely to have had limited previous antipsychotic exposure.. The A allele of DRD2 rs2440390(A/G) was associated with greater weight gain in the entire study sample (P = .0473). Three HTR2C SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium, rs6318, rs2497538, and rs1414334, were associated with greater weight gain in women but not in men (P = .0032, .0012, and .0031, respectively). A significant association with weight gain for 2 HTR2C SNPs previously reported associated with weight gain, -759C/T (rs3813929) and -697G/C (rs518147), was not found.. Associations between weight gain and HTR2C and DRD2 variants in whites newly exposed to olanzapine may present opportunities for the individualization of medication selection and development based on differences in adverse events observed across genotype groups.

Topics: Adult; Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Borderline Personality Disorder; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Linkage Disequilibrium; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

This study was undertaken to examine if patients exhibit more pronounced metabolic abnormalities after 8-year treatment with clozapine or olanzapine than before, and also to investigate whether there exist any differences between long-term clozapine and olanzapine therapies regarding metabolic side- effects.. Fifty psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and on treatment with clozapine or olanzapine were studied during 8 years. Fasting blood or serum samples for glucose, lipids, prolactin and antipsychotic drug concentrations were analyzed. In addition, body mass index was calculated.. More patients treated with olanzapine compared with those treated with clozapine ended with their medication, in most cases because of diabetes mellitus and/or hyperlipidemia, during the 8-year follow-up. Also more patients treated with olanzapine compared with those treated with clozapine developed manifest diabetes mellitus during the 8-year period. Prolactin levels were higher in the patients treated with olanzapine compared with in those treated with clozapine at study start, but there were no differences in the other parameters between the treatment groups at study start. In the patients remaining on their medication all 8 years, the glucose level increased over time in the clozapine group, but not in the olanzapine group, whereas body mass index and lipids were unchanged over time in both treatment groups.. Our findings point to that both olanzapine and clozapine long-term treatments cause development of hyperglycemia and/or hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, olanzapine long-term treatment seems to more often lead to development of manifest diabetes mellitus than long-term treatment with clozapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperlipidemias; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

Head-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics have predominantly included patients with chronic conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia.. The study was an 8-week, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, controlled multicenter trial (NCT00145444). Seventy-six patients with schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (diagnosis < 5 y), and a maximum lifetime antipsychotic treatment < 16 weeks participated in the study. Efficacy of ziprasidone (80-160 mg/d) and olanzapine 10-20 mg was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and the Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (HQLS); tolerability assessments included laboratory assessments, body weight, and electroencephalogram.. Olanzapine (n = 34) and ziprasidone (n = 39) showed equal efficacy as measured by the PANSS, CDSS, CGI, and HQLS. However, mean weight gain was significantly higher in the olanzapine group (6.8 vs 0.1 kg, P < .001). Ziprasidone was associated with decreasing levels of triglycerides, cholesterol, and transaminases, while these parameters increased in the olanzapine group (all P values < .05). There were no significant differences in fasting glucose and prolactin levels or in cardiac or sexual side effects. Patients on ziprasidone used biperiden for extrapyramidal side effects more frequently (P < .05).. The results of this study indicate that ziprasidone and olanzapine have comparable therapeutic efficacy but differ in their side effect profile. However, there is a risk of a type II error with this sample size. Clinically significant weight gain and laboratory abnormalities appear early after initiating treatment and are more prominent with olanzapine, while more patients on ziprasidone received anticholinergic drugs to treat extrapyramidal symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Antipsychotic Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Biperiden; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Triglycerides; Young Adult

The primary purpose of this study was to compare changes in cognition in early-onset psychosis after 6-months treatment with quetiapine or olanzapine. This is a randomized, single-blind, 6-month study in 50 adolescents with a diagnosis of early-onset psychosis. Patients were randomized to quetiapine (n = 24) or olanzapine (n =26). A thorough neuropsychological battery was administered at baseline and after 6-month treatment. Out of the total sample included in the study, 32 patients completed at least 6-months treatment with the assigned medication (quetiapine, n =16; olanzapine, n = 16). No changes were observed in cognitive performance after 6-month treatment with quetiapine or olanzapine. Although some trends toward cognitive improvement were observed for the olanzapine group after 6-month treatment, neither group showed statistically significant gains. Furthermore, there was no evidence of any differential efficacy of olanzapine or quetiapine on cognitive improvement in this sample of adolescents with psychosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Spain; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is an often devastating neuropsychiatric illness. Understanding the genetic variation affecting response to antipsychotics is important to develop novel diagnostic tests to match individual schizophrenia patients to the most effective and safe medication. In this study, we use a genome-wide approach to detect genetic variation underlying individual differences in response to treatment with the antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and perphenazine. Our sample consisted of 738 subjects with DSM-IV schizophrenia who took part in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness. Subjects were genotyped using the Affymetrix 500 K genotyping platform plus a custom 164 K chip to improve genome-wide coverage. Treatment outcome was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Our criterion for genome-wide significance was a prespecified threshold that ensures that, on an average, only 10% of the significant findings are false discoveries. The top statistical result reached significance at our prespecified threshold and involved a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in an intergenic region on chromosome 4p15. In addition, SNPs in Ankyrin Repeat and Sterile Alpha Motif Domain-Containing Protein 1B (ANKS1B) and in the Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 5 gene (CNTNAP5), which mediated the effects of olanzapine and risperidone on Negative symptoms, were very close to our threshold for declaring significance. The most significant SNP in CNTNAP5 is nonsynonymous, giving rise to an amino-acid substitution. In addition to highlighting our top results, we provide all P-values for download as a resource for investigators with the requisite samples to carry out replication. This study demonstrates the potential of genome-wide association studies to discover novel genes that mediate the effects of antipsychotics, which could eventually help to tailor drug treatment to schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Follow-Up Studies; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Pharmacogenetics; Piperazines; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

We compared the response to antipsychotic treatment between patients with and without tardive dyskinesia (TD) and examined the course of TD.. This analysis compared 200 patients with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia and TD and 997 patients without TD, all of whom were randomly assigned to receive one of 4 second-generation antipsychotics. The primary clinical outcome measure was time to all-cause treatment discontinuation, and the primary measure for evaluating the course of TD was change from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare treatment discontinuation between groups. Changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and neurocognitive scores were compared using mixed models and analysis of variance. Treatment differences between drugs in AIMS scores and all-cause discontinuation were examined for those with TD at baseline. Percentages of patients meeting criteria for TD postbaseline or showing changes in AIMS scores were evaluated with χ(2) tests. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2004.. Time to treatment discontinuation for any cause was not significantly different between the TD and non-TD groups (χ(2)(1) = 0.11, P = .743). Changes in PANSS scores were not significantly different (F(1,974) = 0.82, P = .366), but patients with TD showed less improvement in neurocognitive scores (F(1,359) = 6.53, P = .011). Among patients with TD, there were no significant differences between drugs in the decline in AIMS scores (F(3,151) = 0.32, P = .811); 55% met criteria for TD at 2 consecutive visits postbaseline, 76% met criteria for TD at some or all postbaseline visits, 24% did not meet criteria for TD at any subsequent visit, 32% showed a ≥ 50% decrease in AIMS score, and 7% showed a ≥ 50% increase in AIMS score.. Schizophrenia patients with and without TD were similar in time to discontinuation of treatment for any cause and improvement in psychopathology, but differed in neurocognitive response. There were no significant differences between treatments in the course of TD, with most patients showing either persistence of or fluctuation in observable symptoms.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00014001.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chi-Square Distribution; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To explore long-term effects of orlistat in adult clozapine- or olanzapine-treated patients with DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia and overweight or obesity who tolerate orlistat.. Orlistat or placebo was added to clozapine or olanzapine in stable doses in a 16-week randomized controlled trial. Open-label orlistat was added to the antipsychotics during a 16-week extension phase for those completing the double-blind phase. No low-calorie diet or participation in behavioral programs was required. Body weight (primary outcome) and some metabolic parameters were measured prospectively. Analyses were performed for those completing both phases (ie, population differing from that reported earlier). The study was conducted from 2004 through 2005.. During the open-label phase, the 44 patients experienced mean ± SD body weight loss of -1.29 ± 3.04 kg, P = .007. During both phases, men (but not women) showed a weight loss of -2.39 ± 5.45 kg, P = .023. Some subgroups showed desirable changes in several metabolic parameters. Prolonged (32 weeks) orlistat treatment yielded no additional benefits as compared to short (16 weeks) treatment.. In clozapine- or olanzapine-treated overweight or obese patients able to take orlistat on a long-term basis, the drug, with no concomitant hypocaloric diet or behavioral interventions, caused moderate weight loss only in men. However, some metabolic benefits may be achieved independently of weight changes. In patients who do not respond to orlistat within the first 16 weeks, continuation treatment may provide no additional benefits.. controlled-trials.com Identifier: ISRCTN65731856.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Antipyretics; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Orlistat; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

In the treatment of schizophrenia, all currently available oral antipsychotics are administered at least once daily, with strict adherence strongly encouraged to minimize risk of relapse. Based on a better understanding of the brain kinetics of antipsychotics, we have proposed a variation of this approach, "extended" dosing, which allows for intermittent but regular dosing.. We carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating 35 individuals with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia who had been stabilized on antipsychotic therapy. Over a 6-month interval, 18 subjects received their medication as usual (daily), while 17 received their antipsychotic therapy every second day (extended). Outcome measures included clinical scales to assess symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [the primary outcome measure], Calgary Depression Scale), illness severity (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale), and relapse (ie, rehospitalization) rates. Side effects were also assessed, including movement disorders (Barnes Akathisia Scale, Simpson-Angus Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) and weight. The study was conducted from February 2003 to July 2007.. Individuals in the extended dosing group were not at greater risk of symptom exacerbation, relapse, or rehospitalization; indeed, more rehospitalizations occurred in those receiving regular dosing. At the same time, though, there was no indication that side effects were significantly reduced in the extended dosing group.. These results challenge the long-standing dogma that oral antipsychotics must be administered daily in stabilized patients with schizophrenia. Further studies with larger samples are needed to replicate these findings, as well as to elucidate whether postulated clinical advantages can be established and determined to outweigh potential risks.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00431574.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Loxapine; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Ontario; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Secondary Prevention

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder in terms of patient response to antipsychotic treatment. Understanding the heterogeneity of treatment response may help to guide treatment decisions. This study was undertaken to capture inherent patterns of response to antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia, characterize the subgroups of patients with similar courses of response, and examine illness characteristics at baseline as possible predictors of response.. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was applied to data from a randomized, double-blind, 12-week study of 628 patients with schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder treated with risperidone or olanzapine.. Four distinct response trajectories based on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score over 12 weeks were identified: Class 1 (420 patients, 80.6%) with moderate average baseline PANSS total score showing gradual symptom improvement; Class 2 (65 patients, 12.5%) showing rapid symptom improvement; Class 3 (24 patients, 4.6%) with high average baseline PANSS total score showing gradual symptom improvement; and Class 4 (12 patients, 2.3%) showing unsustained symptom improvement. Latent class membership of early responders (ER) and early non-responders (ENR) was determined based on 20% symptom improvement criteria at 2 weeks and ultimate responders (UR) and ultimate non-responders (UNR) based on 40% symptom improvement criteria at 12 weeks. Baseline factors with potential influence on latent class membership were identified.. This study identified four distinct treatment response patterns with predominant representation of responders or non-responders to treatment in these classes. This heterogeneity may represent discrete endophenotypes of response to treatment with different etiologic underpinnings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

Oral-to-depot dose correspondence was explored in a 24-week study of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI). Patients with schizophrenia stabilized on oral olanzapine of 10, 15, or 20 mg/day (n=1065) were randomized to continue their oral treatment or switch directly to a fixed dose of olanzapine LAI [(mg/weeks) 45/4, 150/2, 405/4, or 300/2] without oral supplementation. Six-month relapse rates for each LAI-dose group stratified by earlier oral dose were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model assessing risk of relapse relative to each oral dose. Relapse rates for the therapeutic LAI doses (≥ 150 mg) varied depending on earlier oral dose, ranging from 1.5% (patients switched from 10 mg/day to 300 mg/2 weeks) to 18.8% (patients switched from 20 mg/day to 150 mg/2 weeks). Switching from 10 mg/day to 405 mg/4 weeks produced a comparable risk of relapse as remaining on that oral dose [Hazard ratio (HR)=1.03]. Switching from 15 or 20 mg/day to 300 mg/2 weeks produced comparable risk of relapse as remaining on those oral doses (HR=0.68 and 1.13, respectively). Pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted to evaluate the resulting dosing recommendations. Findings suggest that patients can be switched directly from oral to olanzapine LAI without the need for oral supplementation and with a low risk of relapse when initiated on an appropriate LAI dose.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Recurrence; Schizophrenia

It is generally accepted that antipsychotics are more effective than placebo. However, it remains unclear whether antipsychotics induce a pattern or trajectory of response that is distinct from placebo. We used a data-driven technique, called growth mixture modelling (GMM), to identify the different patterns of response observed in antipsychotic trials and to determine whether drug-treated and placebo-treated subjects show similar or distinct patterns of response.. We examined data on 420 patients with schizophrenia treated for 6 weeks in two double-blind placebo-controlled trials using haloperidol and olanzapine. We used GMM to identify the optimal number of response trajectories; to compare the trajectories in drug-treated versus placebo-treated patients; and to determine whether the trajectories for the different dimensions (positive versus negative symptoms) were identical or different.. Positive symptoms were found to respond along four distinct trajectories, with the two most common trajectories ('Partial responder' and 'Responder') accounting for 70% of the patients and seen proportionally in both drug- and placebo-treated. The most striking drug-placebo difference was in the 'Dramatic responders', seen only among the drug-treated. The response of negative symptoms was more modest and did not show such distinct trajectories.. Trajectory models of response, rather than the simple responder/non-responder dichotomy, provide a better statistical account of how antipsychotics work. The 'Dramatic responders' (those showing >70% response) were seen only among the drug-treated and make a significant contribution to the overall drug-placebo difference. Identifying and studying this subset may provide specific insight into antipsychotic action.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The authors compared 1-year mortality rates associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine in real-world use.. The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC) was an open-label, randomized, postmarketing large simple trial that enrolled patients with schizophrenia (N=18,154) in naturalistic practice in 18 countries. The primary outcome measure was nonsuicide mortality in the year after initiation of assigned treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either ziprasidone or olanzapine and followed for 1 year by unblinded investigators providing usual care. A physician-administered questionnaire was used to collect baseline demographic information, medical and psychiatric history, and concomitant medication use. Follow-up information on hospitalizations and emergency department visits, patients' vital status, and current antipsychotic drug status was collected and reported by treating psychiatrists. Post hoc analyses of sudden death, a secondary endpoint, were also conducted.. The incidence of nonsuicide mortality within 1 year of initiating pharmacotherapy was 0.91 for ziprasidone (N=9,077) and 0.90 for olanzapine (N=9,077). The relative risk was 1.02 (95% CI=0.76-1.39). This finding was confirmed in numerous secondary and sensitivity analyses.. Despite the known risk of QTc prolongation with ziprasidone treatment, the findings of this study failed to show that ziprasidone is associated with an elevated risk of nonsuicidal mortality relative to olanzapine in real-world use; the study excludes a relative risk larger than 1.39 with a high probability. However, the study was neither powered nor designed to examine the risk of rare events like torsade de pointes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cause of Death; Cross-Sectional Studies; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk; Schizophrenia; Suicide; Thiazoles

The objective of this study, the effect of aripiprazole on clinical symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia was compared to that of perospirone and olanzapine. The subjects were 31 patients, they were diagnosed with schizophrenia on the basis of the criteria of the DSM-IV. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and cognitive function was assessed using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Keio Version: KWCST) and the St. Marianna University School of Medicine's Computerized Memory Test (STM-COMET) as executive function and memory/attention function tests at baseline and 8 weeks after switching. As a result, comparison of the BPRS mean total score revealed no significant difference between aripiprazole and the other medications. Aripiprazole resulted in significant changes in the number of categories achieved (CA) and difficulty maintaining set (DMS) compared to olanzapine at the second level of the KWCST. Comparison thus revealed no difference in clinical effect between aripiprazole and the other medications, but might suggest possible differences between aripiprazole and olanzapine in the profiles of the improvement effects on executive function, memory, and attention function.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Executive Function; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Verbal Learning

In a recently published 24-week maintenance study of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) in schizophrenia (Kane et al., 2010), apparent dose-associated changes were noted in both efficacy and safety parameters. To help clinicians balance safety and efficacy when choosing a dose of olanzapine LAI, we further studied these changes.. Outpatients with schizophrenia who had maintained stability on open-label oral olanzapine for 4 to 8 weeks were randomly assigned to "low" (150 mg/2 weeks; N = 140), "medium" (405 mg/4 weeks; N = 318), or "high" (300 mg/2 weeks; N = 141) dosages of olanzapine LAI for 24 weeks. Potential relationships between dose and several safety or efficacy measures were examined via regression analysis, the Jonckheere-Terpstra test (continuous data), or the Cochran-Armitage test (categorical data).. Safety parameters statistically significantly related to dose were mean weight change (low: +0.67 [SD = 4.38], medium: +0.89 [SD = 3.87], high: +1.70 [SD = 4.14] kg, p = .024; effect size [ES] = 0.264 high vs. low dose), mean change in prolactin (low: -5.61 [SD = 12.49], medium: -2.76 [SD = 19.02]), high: +3.58 [SD = 33.78] μg/L, p = .001; ES = 0.410 high vs. low dose), fasting triglycerides change from normal at baseline to high (low: 3.2%, medium: 6.0%, high: 18.9%, p = .001; NNT = 7 high vs. low dose) and fasting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol change from normal at baseline to low (low: 13.8%, medium: 19.6%, high: 30.7%, p = .019; NNT = 6 high vs. low dose). Efficacy measures significantly related to dose included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score mean change (low: +2.66 [SD = 14.95], medium: -0.09 [SD = 13.47], high: -2.19 [SD = 13.11], p <.01; ES = 0.356 high vs. low dose), relapse rate (low: 16%, medium: 10%, high: 5%, p = .003; NNT = 9 high vs. low dose), all-cause discontinuation rate (low: 36%, medium: 30%, high: 24%, p = .037; NNT = 9 high vs. low dose), and rate of discontinuation due to efficacy-related reasons (low: 20%, medium: 14%, high: 6%, p <.001). Time to all-cause discontinuation (p = .035) and time to relapse (p = .005) were also significantly related to dose.. Analyses of several safety and efficacy parameters revealed significant associations with dose of olanzapine LAI, with the highest dose generally showing greater efficacy as well as greater adverse changes in metabolic safety measures. When considering olanzapine LAI, as with all antipsychotics, it is important to carefully consider the potential benefits and risks for an individual patient.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00088491.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Olanzapine; Regression Analysis; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

We examined whether early response/non-response to risperidone according to the Clinical Global Impressions-improvement scale (CGI-I) at 2 weeks could predict subsequent response. This prediction was also applied to olanzapine. We then investigated whether early non-responders (ENRs) to risperidone or olanzapine who switched to the other showed significantly greater improvement, compared with those staying on the initial antipsychotic. We performed a rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 18 psychiatric emergency sites. Eligible patients were newly admitted patients with acute schizophrenia. Early response was defined as CGI-I ≤ 3 following 2 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome measure was achievement of remission and ≥ 50% improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at 4 weeks.. At 4 weeks, 53% of risperidone early responders (ERs) went into remission, whereas only 9% of ENRs staying on risperidone (n=11) did (P=0.016). Similarly, at 4 weeks, 81% of risperidone ERs achieved ≥ 50% response, whereas only 9% of ENRs staying on risperidone achieved ≥ 50% response (P < 0.0001). In contrast, 58% of olanzapine ERs (n=33) went into remission, whereas 38% of ENRs staying on olanzapine (n=8) did at 4 weeks (P=0.44). Similarly, 61% of olanzapine ERs achieved ≥ 50% response, whereas 25% of ENRs staying on olanzapine achieved ≥ 50% response (P=0.12). The negative likelihood ratio for the prediction of ≥ 50% response at 4 weeks by early response status to risperidone at 2 weeks was 0.057.. In newly admitted patients with acute schizophrenia, non-response to risperidone using CGI-I at 2 weeks can predict subsequent response. It looks like there is significant response to olanzapine that doesn't occur until 4 weeks. Thus, clinicians may want to switch to another drug earlier when risperidone is the first drug, and later when olanzapine is the first drug.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity

To assess changes in insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated with olanzapine or risperidone.. One hundred and thirty patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks double-blind treatment with olanzapine or risperidone. Insulin sensitivity was measured using a two-step euglycaemic, hyperinsulinaemic clamp procedure. Whole-body adiposity was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The primary endpoint was the within-group change from baseline in insulin sensitivity normalized to fat-free mass (M(ffm) /I) during the clamp procedure's low-insulin phase, using an analysis of covariance model including the covariate weight change.. Forty-one olanzapine-treated and 33 risperidone-treated patients completed baseline and endpoint clamp measurements. Mean M(ffm) /I during the low-insulin phase declined 9.0% (p = 0.226) in olanzapine-treated patients and 13.2% (p = 0.047) in risperidone-treated patients (between-group difference p = 0.354). During the high-insulin phase, M(ffm) /I declined 10.4% (p = 0.036) in olanzapine-treated patients and 2.1% (p = 0.698) in risperidone-treated patients (between-group difference p = 0.664). Changes in M(ffm) /I correlated inversely with changes in body weight and adiposity, which were generally higher in olanzapine-treated patients. Significant within-group increases in fasting glucose, but not haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were observed during olanzapine treatment. The fasting glucose change was not correlated with M(ffm) /I changes.. Small, but statistically significant, decrements in insulin sensitivity were observed in olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients at 1 of 2 insulin doses tested. Significant increases in fasting glucose and insulin and total fat mass were observed only in olanzapine-treated patients. Changes in insulin sensitivity correlated significantly with changes in weight or adiposity, but not with changes in glucose.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Early, effective treatment in first-episode schizophrenia is advocated, although evidence based on a systematic approach over multiple antipsychotic trials is lacking. Employing a naturalistic design, we examined response rates over 3 circumscribed antipsychotic trials.. Between June 2003 and December 2008, 244 individuals with first-episode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-IV criteria were treated at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, following an algorithm that moved them through 2 antipsychotic trials, followed by a trial with clozapine. For the first 2 trials, treatment consisted of risperidone followed by olanzapine, or vice versa; each trial consisted of 3 stages (low-, full-, or high-dose) lasting up to 4 weeks at each level and adjusted according to response/tolerability. Clinical response was defined as a Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score of 2 (much improved) or 1 (very much improved) and/or a Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Thought Disorder subscale score ≤ 6. Data were analyzed retrospectively, and publication of anonymized clinical data was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in May 2003.. In trial 1, 74.5% of individuals responded, with rates significantly higher for olanzapine (82.1%, 115/140) versus risperidone (66.3%, 69/104; P = .005). With trial 2, response rate dropped dramatically to 16.6% but again was significantly higher for olanzapine (25.7%, 9/35) compared to risperidone (4.0%, 1/25; P = .04). Response rate climbed above 70% once more, specifically 75.0% (21/28), in those individuals who agreed to a third trial with clozapine.. Results confirm a high response rate (75%) to initial antipsychotic treatment in first-episode schizophrenia. A considerably lower response rate (< 20%) occurs with a second antipsychotic trial. Results here were specific to olanzapine and risperidone, suggesting clinical differences (ie, olanzapine more effective than risperidone). A subsequent trial with clozapine is clearly warranted, although it remains unclear whether outcome would be further enhanced if it were used earlier in the treatment algorithm.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

In recent years, several pharmacological and psychosocial interventions have examined ways to prevent or treat weight gain in people receiving second-generation antipsychotics. While there has been some success, in general, results have not been compelling. Atomoxetine is a selective norepinepherine reuptake inhibitor found to be associated with appetite suppression. Therefore, we examined whether atomoxetine may be of benefit for those who have gained weight on either clozapine or olanzapine.. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All participants received the same psychosocial platform: a structured support and exercise group. People with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, on olanzapine or clozapine, who had gained at least 7% of their pre-clozapine or pre-olanzapine weight were eligible for a 24-week, randomized, parallel group, double-blind comparison of adjunctive atomoxetine or placebo.. Thirty-seven participants (20 atomoxetine, 17 placebo) were randomized and 26 participants (14 atomoxetine, 12 placebo; 70.2%) completed the study. There were no significant group differences in baseline BMI (atomoxetine: 34.5±4.9; placebo: 35.7±7.0) or weight (atomoxetine: 102.2±15.7 kg; placebo: 104.3±17.5 kg). Both treatment groups showed modest, not significant, trends in weight loss, averaging about 2 kg. Gender or baseline antipsychotic treatment did not modify treatment effects on weight. Secondary outcomes included neuropsychological assessments, symptom assessments (BPRS, SANS) and safety assessments. Of these, only the group difference in Gordon distractibility test scores was statistically significant and favored treatment with atomoxetine.. Atomoxetine is not effective for weight loss in this population, but both olanzapine and clozapine participants can lose weight with structured group support and exercise.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite Depressants; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Clozapine; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet, Reducing; Double-Blind Method; Exercise; Female; Humans; Life Style; Male; Maryland; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Obesity; Olanzapine; Propylamines; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that 1 or more dose levels of LY2140023 monohydrate, an oral prodrug of the potent metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 2/3 receptor agonist LY404039, given to patients with schizophrenia for 4 weeks would demonstrate significantly greater efficacy than placebo. The HBBI study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo- and active-controlled trial. Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia were randomized in a 2:2:2:2:2:1 ratio to receive 5-, 20-, 40-, or 80-mg LY2140023 monohydrate twice daily, placebo twice daily, or placebo (am) and 15 mg of olanzapine (pm) daily. Efficacy was defined as the change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score assessed at 4 weeks. The primary analysis did not show that any of the 4 LY2140023 monohydrate doses were more efficacious than placebo as measured by the PANSS total score. Similarly, olanzapine did not significantly separate from placebo. A higher-than-anticipated treatment effect (14.6-point improvement) in the placebo group was observed on PANSS total score. LY2140023 monohydrate was generally well tolerated, although 4 patients reported the serious adverse event of convulsion. LY2140023 monohydrate-treated patients showed little change in dopamine-related adverse events and weight. The results of the HBBI study are considered to be inconclusive because LY2140023 monohydrate and the active control olanzapine did not separate from placebo in the treatment of patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia. Additional efficacy, safety, and tolerability testing are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amino Acids; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prodrugs; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate; Schizophrenia

The antipsychotic drug, olanzapine, one of the most widely used drugs in clinical medicine, has a high rate of discontinuation due to inefficacy and/or adverse effects. We identified a single nucleotide polymorphism in the drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 3A43 (CYP3A43; rs472660), that highly significantly predicted olanzapine clearance in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness trial (P=5.9e(-7)). Moreover, at standard antipsychotic doses, 50% of individuals with the high clearance genotype (AA) have trough blood levels below the therapeutic range. Interestingly, a much higher proportion of African Americans carry the A allele compared with Caucasians (allele frequency 67 vs 14%). After accounting for CYP3A43 genotype, race is no longer a significant predictor of olanzapine clearance. Olanzapine clearance was associated with measures of clinical response. Patients with greater clearance had higher symptom ratings and were more likely to discontinue treatment due to an inadequate response. Our data identify a genetic mechanism for variation in olanzapine response and demonstrate that blood level monitoring of olanzapine treatment is advisable.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Black or African American; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Female; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Glucose; Humans; Linear Models; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Models, Chemical; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Smoking; Weight Gain; White People

Emerging data indicate the neuromodulator adenosine may play a role in the therapeutics of schizophrenia. Adenosine A(2A) receptor stimulation exerts a functional antagonism at postsynaptic D(2) receptors. Data from animal models relevant to schizophrenia support a therapeutic effect of modulating adenosinergic transmission in the ventral striatum. One previous clinical trial showed superiority of adjunctive dipyridamole, an adenosine reuptake inhibitor, compared to placebo in ameliorating positive symptoms in schizophrenia patients.. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of dipyridamole monotherapy of 200 mg/day on positive and negative symptoms, with the goal of determining dosing for future adjunctive studies in schizophrenia.. Twenty symptomatic schizophrenia participants were randomized to a 6-week double-blind trial comparing olanzapine (20 mg/day) to dipyridamole monotherapy (200 mg/day). Thirteen participants completed the treatment phase (eight on dipyridamole; five on olanzapine).. The olanzapine group showed a trend (p = 0.08) for superiority on BPRS total scores (mean ± SD: total BPRS score decreasing from 36.8 ± 2.3 at week 1, to 33.2 ± 5.5 at the end of the study). The mean total BPRS scores decreased from 36.4 ± 5.3 to 34.0 ± 7.7 in the dipyridamole group.. Although these pilot data do not support a significant antipsychotic effect of dipyridamole monotherapy, the results provide some evidence for examining dipyridamole (200 mg/day) as adjunct to symptomatic antipsychotic-treated schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dipyridamole; Double-Blind Method; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Pilot Projects; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A positive relationship between cholesterol levels and cognition has been reported in various human and animal studies, but has never been investigated in schizophrenia. The goal of this study was to examine this relationship in schizophrenic patients randomized to clozapine, olanzapine or haloperidol.. This was a double-blind randomized prospective 12-week study. Participants received a baseline evaluation including a cognitive battery consisting of an evaluation of psychomotor function, general executive function, visual and verbal memory, and visuospatial ability. Their fasting serum cholesterol level was also assessed. The participants were then randomized to clozapine, olanzapine, or haloperidol. They were evaluated at the end of 12 weeks. A general cognitive index (GCI) derived from the cognitive battery was the primary variable.. 82 patients had both baseline and endpoint neurocognitive assessments and cholesterol levels. There was a statistically and clinically significant positive association between change in cholesterol levels and change in GCI. This association was especially pronounced for verbal memory. There was no interaction between medication grouping and cholesterol level; the positive association was observable separately in each medication group. It was very robust and remained significant after we controlled for glucose and triglyceride levels, anticholinergic side effects, medication serum levels, cholesterol lowering medications, and pre-study antipsychotic medications.. Cholesterol levels show a strong association with cognition in schizophrenia in all medication groups. Further research on the role of lipid metabolism in cognition may suggest new treatments for this core deficit of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Triglycerides; Young Adult

Given the controversy about the comparative efficacy of first- compared with second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia, more large-scale evidence is needed to guide clinicians in their prescriptions. Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in centers of excellence on highly selected samples, poorly representative of real-world patients, and often suffered conflicts of interest as they were sponsored by drug companies. The primary aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of haloperidol, olanzapine and aripiprazole in a representative sample of schizophrenia patients. The GiSAS trial is an open-label, independent, pragmatic RCT in Italian community-based public psychiatric services. At least 260 patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia will be randomly allocated to one of the study drugs and followed up for one year. A two-year observational phase will follow. The primary outcome for tolerability will be the onset of metabolic syndrome. The primary endpoint for effectiveness will be discontinuation of antipsychotic monotherapy. Secondary measures include global functioning, time to discontinuation due to side-effects, change of lipid profile, extrapyramidal symptoms and other adverse effects. In the last four years, the GiSAS study group has been working to implement this multicenter RCT. The trial mechanism is now fully functional and working. As of end of February 2011, 260 subjects were randomized by 54 study investigators in 33 out of 43 participating centers.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Italy; Logistic Models; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quinolones; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for the acute treatment of first-episode schizophrenia patients with cannabis use disorders. This secondary analysis of a previously published study included 49 first-episode patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder and a co-occurring lifetime diagnosis of cannabis use disorders randomly assigned to treatment with either olanzapine (n=28) or risperidone (n=21) for 16weeks. The olanzapine group did not differ significantly from the risperidone group for initial response rates of positive symptoms, and rates of cannabis use or alcohol use during the study. Positive symptoms and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) global asociality-anhedonia scores improved over time but did not differ between study medications. In both groups, cannabis use during the study was higher in patients who used cannabis within three months of the admission. Thus, our results suggest that olanzapine and risperidone had a similar initial efficacy on psychotic symptoms and substance use in first-episode patients with co-occurring cannabis use disorders. If clinicians are choosing between olanzapine versus risperidone treatment for this population, their decision should be based upon factors other than symptom response and short-term substance misuse.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Statistics, Nonparametric; Substance-Related Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

The study was designed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of lurasidone in the treatment of acute schizophrenia.. Participants, who were recently admitted inpatients with schizophrenia with an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms, were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with 40 mg of lurasidone, 120 mg of lurasidone, 15 mg of olanzapine (included to test for assay sensitivity), or placebo, dosed once daily. Efficacy was evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (as the primary efficacy measure) and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score (as the key secondary efficacy measure).. Treatment with both doses of lurasidone or with olanzapine was associated with significantly greater improvement at week 6 on PANSS total score, PANSS positive and negative subscale scores, and CGI-S score compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in mean PANSS total or CGI-S change scores for the lurasidone groups compared with the olanzapine group. With responders defined as those with an improvement of at least 20% on the PANSS, endpoint responder rates were significant compared with placebo for olanzapine only. The incidence of akathisia was higher with 120 mg of lurasidone (22.9%) than with 40 mg of lurasidone (11.8%), olanzapine (7.4%), or placebo (0.9%). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 7% weight gain was 5.9% for the lurasidone groups combined, 34.4% for the olanzapine group, and 7.0% for the placebo group.. Lurasidone was an effective treatment for patients with acute schizophrenia. Safety assessments indicated a higher frequency of adverse events associated with 120 mg/day of lurasidone compared with 40 mg/day.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Admission; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Body mass index (BMI) increase is an undesired effect associated with antipsychotics, and crucial for patients' global health and treatment compliance. We aimed to investigate the relation between BMI during olanzapine or haloperidol treatments and leptin, neuropeptide Y (NPY), adiponectin and lipid serum levels.. In this 9-month, randomized and naturalist study, 34 male patients, 18 on olanzapine and 16 on haloperidol group were enrolled, all were under monotherapy. Patient outcome was evaluated with positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) at every 3-month period. In each visit, BMI, leptin, NPY, lipid, olanzapine or haloperidol levels were also monitored.. Leptin levels positively correlated with BMI in olanzapine (r=0.64, p<0.001) and haloperidol (r=0.73, p<0.001) groups; only in olanzapine patients, the former also correlated with PANSS score (r=0.54, p<0.05). NPY levels negatively correlated with olanzapine levels (r=− 0.65, p<0.01). Adiponectin levels had not significantly varied.. Antipsychotics probably interfere on leptin and NPY signalling ways and disturb these hormones in eating behaviour control.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers; Body Mass Index; Haloperidol; Humans; Leptin; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropeptide Y; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

The authors conducted a multisite randomized controlled trial examining the strategy of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole to ameliorate metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease.. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with a body mass index ≥ 27 and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dl who were on a stable treatment dosage of olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone were randomly assigned to switch to ari-piprazole (N=109) for 24 weeks or stay on their current medication (N=106). All participants were enrolled in a behaviorally oriented diet and exercise program. Clinical raters were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary and key secondary outcomes were change in non-HDL cholesterol and efficacy failure, respectively.. The prespecified primary analysis included 89 switchers and 98 stayers who had at least one postbaseline non-HDL cholesterol measurement. The least squares mean estimates of non-HDL cholesterol decreased more for the switch group than for the stay group (-20.2 mg/dl and -10.8 mg/dl, respectively). Switching was associated with larger weight reductions (least squares mean=2.9 kg) and a net reduction of serum triglycerides of 32.7 mg/dl. Twenty-two switchers (20.6%) and 18 stayers (17.0%) experienced protocol-defined efficacy failure. Forty-seven switchers (43.9%) and 26 stayers (24.5%) discontinued the assigned antipsychotic medication before 24 weeks.. Switching to aripiprazole led to improvement of non-HDL cholesterol levels and other metabolic parameters. Rates of efficacy failure were similar between groups, but switching to aripiprazole was associated with a higher rate of treatment discontinuation. In the context of close clinical monitoring, switching from an antipsychotic with high metabolic risk to one with lower risk to improve metabolic parameters is an effective strategy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Combined Modality Therapy; Dibenzothiazepines; Diet, Reducing; Drug Substitution; Exercise; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risk; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

The Ziprasidone Observational study of car DIAC Outcomes (ZODIAC), a large simple trial comparing ziprasidone versus olanzapine in real-world use, showed no difference in risk of sudden death. Upon the request of the US Food and Drug Administration, 205 fatal events were readjudicated applying ICD-10 coding rules for sudden death.. A readjudication committee coded three domains (witness to death, time of symptom onset to death, and most likely cause of death) for use within algorithms consistent with ICD-10 rules. Relative risks (RR) and corresponding 95%CI were calculated for persons randomized to ziprasidone versus olanzapine, comparing 1-year incidence of sudden death, using multiple definitions.. Data on symptom onset to death and diagnosis of specific cardiac arrhythmias required by the ICD-10 rules were often lacking. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of cases suggestive of cardiac origin but missing data required by ICD-10 sudden death codes. Overall, the readjudicated data matched the study's initial findings, with no significant difference in 1-year mortality between ziprasidone and olanzapine for sudden death not otherwise specified and sudden cardiac death (R96.0 or R96.1 or I46.1; RR = 1.11, 95%CI 0.45- 2.77).. After outcome readjudication, ZODIAC found no difference in the risk of sudden death among those randomized to ziprasidone versus olanzapine. However, unlike hospital-based studies, fatal events in general population studies often occur outside hospital and often lack the clinical detail needed for the exact determination of symptom onset and event. Epidemiological evaluations of sudden death need to consider the limitations of the available data.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cause of Death; Clinical Coding; Death, Sudden; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Endpoint Determination; Follow-Up Studies; Heart; Humans; Incidence; International Classification of Diseases; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Research Design; Risk; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Time Factors; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Longitudinal data comparing the metabolic effects of olanzapine and risperidone with or without valproic acid supplementation in schizophrenic and bipolar patients are lacking.. This study compares the metabolic effects of olanzapine and risperidone in a prospective, randomized, open-label trial in 160 patients with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months' treatment. The study was conducted between 2000 and 2006. The primary analysis compared all patients randomized to olanzapine or risperidone; the primary outcome measure was changes in triglycerides (TG), and TG/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, a risk factor for ischemic cardiovascular disease. Secondary analyses included the effect of concomitant valproic acid.. Significantly greater increases in weight (F(4,434) = 4.7), body mass index (BMI) (F(4,424) = 5.1), glycosylated hemoglobin (HgbA1c) (F(4,427) = 4.3), total cholesterol (F(4,429) = 4.4), TG (F(4,426) = 5.9), and TG/HDL-C ratio (F(4,426) = 4.3) (P < .005 for all drug × time interaction effects) were observed at all but the initial time points in the olanzapine- compared to the risperidone patients. Olanzapine/+valproic acid produced significantly greater increases in HgbA1c, BMI, weight, TG, and TG/HDL-C than olanzapine/-valproic acid at 3 and 6 months, while risperidone/+valproic acid produced significantly smaller increases in HgbA1c, BMI, and weight at 1, 3, and 6 months than risperidone/-valproic acid. The olanzapine/+valproic acid group had significantly greater BMI, and weight at 1, 3, and 6 months, and greater HgbA1c at 3 and 6 months, compared with the risperidone/+valproic acid group. There were too few patients treated with mood stabilizers other than valproic acid to analyze effects of any other mood stabilizer separately. Metabolic effects did not differ significantly by diagnostic category (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder vs bipolar disorder).. Further study of the metabolic effects of adjunctive valproic acid is indicated, as valproic acid may produce markedly different metabolic effects when combined with various antipsychotic drugs.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00179062.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Female; GABA Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

There have been few reports regarding olanzapine (OLZ)-related QT prolongation and hyperprolactinemia. This study evaluated the dose-dependent effect of OLZ on QT interval and plasma prolactin (PRL) level in a single sample of patients with schizophrenia.. Twenty-six subjects treated with varying starting doses of OLZ were enrolled in the study. Following baseline assessments, which included completion of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), measurements of Body Mass Index (BMI), QT interval, electrolytes, fasting plasma glucose, PRL, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and low density lipoprotein (LDL), the dose of OLZ was increased for each subject. The same parameters were evaluated following the increased dose treatment.. A significant decrease was observed in BPRS score (p = 0.01) following treatment with an increased dose of OLZ. Significant increases were observed in BMI (p = 0.032), QTc (p = 0.031), and plasma PRL level (p = 0.028). The mean values of electrolytes, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL and LDL treatment were unchanged by the switch to increased-dose OLZ treatment.. We have demonstrated the dose-dependent effect of OLZ on the QT interval and the plasma PRL level of patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Japan; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Metabolic changes were examined in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with either oral olanzapine or olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI). Data were collected from patients who had been stabilized on oral olanzapine (10, 15, or 20 mg/day) for ≥4 weeks and then randomized to either continued olanzapine oral treatment (n = 322) or LAI (n = 599; 150 mg/2 weeks, 405 mg/4 weeks, or 300 mg/2 weeks) for up to 24 weeks. Mean and categorical changes in metabolic parameters were analyzed. Mean changes in weight, glucose, and most lipids were generally not significantly different between treatment groups. Weight changes over time followed similar patterns and were not significantly different at endpoint between the two treatment-formulation groups. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly less among olanzapine LAI-treated patients. Percentages of patients with potentially clinically significant changes in blood glucose and lipid concentrations were similar for the two treatments. Percentages of patients experiencing adverse events related to weight, diabetes, or dyslipidemia were also not significantly different between treatments. Metabolic changes in patients with schizophrenia appeared generally similar during treatment with oral olanzapine or olanzapine LAI.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol, LDL; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

To compare the effects of haloperidol, amisulpride, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone on hostility in first-episode schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder.. We used the data acquired in the European First-Episode Schizophrenia Trial, an open, randomized trial (conducted in 14 countries) comparing 5 antipsychotic drugs in 498 patients aged 18-40 years with first-episode schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder. DSM-IV diagnostic criteria were used. Patients were assessed between December 23, 2002 and January 14, 2006. Most subjects joined the study as inpatients and then continued with follow-ups in outpatient clinic visits. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was administered at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization. We analyzed the scores on the PANSS hostility item in a subset of 302 patients showing at least minimal hostility (a score > 1) at baseline. We hypothesized (1) that the treatments would differ in their efficacy for hostility and (2) that olanzapine would be superior to haloperidol. Our primary statistical analysis tested the null hypothesis of no difference among the treatment groups in change in hostility over time. Secondary analysis addressed the question of whether the effects on hostility found in the primary analysis were specific to this item. All our analyses were post hoc.. The primary analysis of hostility indicated an effect of differences between treatments (F(4,889) = 4.02, P = .0031). Post hoc treatment-group contrasts for hostility change showed that, at months 1 and 3, olanzapine was significantly superior (P < .05) to haloperidol, quetiapine, and amisulpride in reducing hostility. Secondary analyses demonstrated that these results were at least partly specific to hostility.. Both hypotheses were supported. Olanzapine appears to be a superior treatment for hostility in early phases of therapy for first-episode schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. This efficacy advantage of olanzapine must be weighed against its adverse metabolic effects and propensity to cause weight gain.. ISRCTN Register Identifier: ISRCTN68736636.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Haloperidol; Hostility; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Response patterns may differ between patients with first-episode and multiepisode schizophrenia. This analysis explored trial duration with first-episode patients and asked whether early limited improvement predicts ultimate lack of treatment response with first-episode patients as it does with multiepisode patients.. One hundred twelve subjects (mean age = 23.3 years, SD = 5.1 years) who presented between November 1998 and October 2004 with a first episode of psychosis and had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine or risperidone for 16 weeks. Treatment response, the primary outcome measure, was defined as a rating of mild or better on all of the positive symptom items on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Change Version With Psychosis and Disorganization Items. Response rates were calculated for each study week. A logistic regression analysis examined the association between percentage reduction in symptom severity scores from baseline values at weeks 2, 4, or 8 and response by week 16. The study was conducted at The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York and the Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Bronx, New York.. The estimated cumulative response rate was 39.59% (95% CI, 29.77%-49.41%) by week 8 and 65.19% (95% CI, 55.11%-75.27%) by week 16. The confidence intervals for estimated response at weeks 10, 12, 14, and 16 were not distinct. Response rates increased approximately 5 to 6 percentage points each 2-week interval between week 10 and 16. Percentage reduction in symptom severity score at week 4 (but not 2 or 8) was associated (χ²₁ = 3.96; P < .05) with responder status at week 16 (odds ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05). However, receiver operating characteristic curves did not suggest any level of percentage symptom reduction that would be clinically useful as a predictor of response by week 16.. Many first-episode patients respond between weeks 8 and 16 of treatment with a single antipsychotic medication. Limited early symptom improvement does not identify those first-episode patients who will not improve with a full 16-week trial with enough accuracy to be clinically useful.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000374.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

In patients with schizophrenia, early non-response to oral antipsychotic therapy robustly predicts subsequent non-response to continued treatment with the same medication. This study assessed whether early response predicted later response when using a long-acting injection (LAI) antipsychotic.. Data were taken from an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine LAI in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia (n = 233). Early response was defined as ≥ 30% improvement from baseline to Week 4 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS0-6) Total score. Subsequent response was defined as ≥ 40% baseline-to-endpoint improvement in PANSS0-6 Total score. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and predictive accuracy were calculated. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared between Early Responders and Early Non-responders.. Early response/non-response to olanzapine LAI predicted later response/non-response with high sensitivity (85%), specificity (72%), PPV (78%), NPV (80%), and overall accuracy (79%). Compared to Early Non-responders, Early Responders had significantly greater improvement in PANSS0-6 Total scores at all time points and greater baseline-to-endpoint improvement in PANSS subscale scores, Quality of Life Scale scores, and Short Form-36 Health Survey scores (all p ≤ .01). Among Early Non-responders, 20% demonstrated response by Week 8. Patients who lacked early improvement (at Week 4) in Negative Symptoms and Disorganized Thoughts were more likely to continue being non-responders at Week 8.. Among acutely ill patients with schizophrenia, early response predicted subsequent response to olanzapine LAI. Early Responders experienced significantly better clinical and functional outcomes than Early Non-responders. Findings are consistent with previous research on oral antipsychotics.. F1D-MC-HGJZ: Comparison of Intramuscular Olanzapine Depot With Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00088478?term=olanzapine+depot&rank=3Registry identifier - NCT00088478.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Time Factors

Atypical or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are associated with excessive body weight gain (BWG) and other components of metabolic syndrome. Among all SGAs, clozapine and olanzapine are known to cause the most significant weight gain, followed by risperidone and quetiapine. The genetic variant of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), -308 G>A polymorphism (rs1800629), has been implicated in clozapine-induced BWG in several studies. We hypothesized that TNF-α -308 G>A polymorphism has a general effect on SGA-induced BWG. The present study was conducted to examine the association between TNF-α -308 G>A polymorphism and BWG during treatment for schizophrenia using a variety of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). A total of 500 patients with schizophrenia treated with clozapine (n=275), olanzapine (n=79) or risperidone (n=146) for an average of 49.9 months were recruited. Subjects with an increase in weight of more than 7% from the baseline before the current SGA treatment to the weight at the survey point were defined as having BWG. The association between TNF-α -308 G>A polymorphism and BWG was studied, and the effect of non-genetic factors such as baseline BMI, SGA treatment duration and SGA type on the association was controlled by logistic regression. The results revealed that there was no significant association between BWG and TNF-α -308 G>A polymorphism (GG/GA/AA or GG/GA+AA) in each separate SGA group or collectively. These findings suggest that TNF-α -308 G>A polymorphism does not play a major role in SGA-induced weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Weight Gain

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ("atypical") antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of olanzapine compared to other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. 2. Reference searching We inspected the reference of all identified studies for more trials. 3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information. 4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised trials that used at least single-blind (rater-blind) design, comparing oral olanzapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random effects model.. The review currently includes 50 studies and 9476 participants which provided data for six comparisons (olanzapine compared to amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone). The overall attrition from the included studies was considerable (49.2%) leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Olanzapine improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) more than aripiprazole (2 RCTs, n = 794, WMD -4.96 CI -8.06 to -1.85), quetiapine (10 RCTs, n = 1449, WMD -3.66 CI -5.39 to -1.93), risperidone (15 RCTs, n = 2390, WMD -1.94 CI -3.31 to -0.58) and ziprasidone (4 RCTs, n = 1291, WMD -8.32 CI -10.99 to -5.64), but not more than amisulpride or clozapine. This somewhat better efficacy was confirmed by fewer participants in the olanzapine groups leaving the studies early due to inefficacy of treatment compared to quetiapine (8 RCTs, n = 1563, RR 0.56 CI 0.44 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 6 to 50), risperidone (14 RCTs, n = 2744, RR 0.78 CI 0.62 to 0.98, NNT 50 CI 17 to 100) and ziprasidone (5 RCTs, n = 1937, RR 0.64 CI 0.51 to 0.79, NNT 17, CI 11 to 33).Fewer participants in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (2 RCTs, n = 876, RR 0.56 CI 0.41 to 0.77, NNT 11 CI 7 to 25) and ziprasidone (2 RCTs, n = 766, RR 0.65 CI 0.45 to 0.93, NNT 17 CI 9 to 100) treatment groups, but not in the clozapine group (1 RCT, n = 980, RR 1.28 CI 1.02 to 1.61, NNH not estimable), had to be re-hospitalised in the trials.Except for clozapine, all comparators induced less weight gain than olanzapine (olanzapine compared to amisulpride: 3 RCTs, n = 671, WMD 2.11 kg CI 1.29 kg to 2.94 kg; aripiprazole: 1 RCT, n = 90, WMD 5.60 kg CI 2.15 kg to 9.05 kg; quetiapine: 7 RCTs, n = 1173, WMD 2.68 kg CI 1.10 kg to 4.26 kg; risperidone: 13 RCTs, n = 2116, WMD 2.61 kg CI 1.48 kg to 3.74 kg; ziprasidone: 5 RCTs, n = 1659, WMD 3.82 kg CI 2.96 kg to 4.69 kg). Associated problems such as glucose and cholesterol increase were usually also more frequent in the olanzapine group. Other differences in adverse effects were less well documented. Nevertheless, olanzapine may be associated with slightly more extrapyramidal side effects than quetiapine (use of antiparkinson medication (6 RCTs, n = 1090, RR 2.05 CI 1.26 to 3.32, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100), but less than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication 13 RCTs, n = 2599, RR 0.78 CI 0.65 to 0.95, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100) and ziprasidone (use of antiparkinson medication 4 RCTs, n = 1732, RR 0.70 CI 0.50 to 0.97, NNH not estimabl. Olanzapine may be a somewhat more efficacious drug than some other second generation antipsychotic drugs. This small superiority in efficacy needs to be weighed against a larger weight gain and associated metabolic problems than most other second generation antipsychotic drugs, except clozapine. These conclusions are tentative due to the large number of people leaving the studies early which possibly limits the validity of the findings. Further large, well-designed trials are necessary to establish the relative effects of different second generation antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of risperidone and olanzapine in schizophrenic patients with intolerant extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) on first generation antipsychotics. We conducted an 8-week, rater-blinded, flexible dose study. Seventy patients with schizophrenia, who met the DSM-IV research criteria of having neuroleptic-induced acute dystonia or parkinsonism, were randomly assigned to risperidone or olanzapine group. The primary outcome was a comparison of the incidence of concomitant anticholinergic drugs usage between the groups to manage their acute dystonia and parkinsonism. The average doses of risperidone and olanzapine from baseline to study end point were 1.8-3.5 mg/day and 7.7-11.7 mg/day, respectively. There were no significant differences in demographic data, severity of EPS or psychotic symptoms between the groups at baseline assessment. Patients taking risperidone had significantly higher incidence of using anticholinergic drugs to manage acute dystonia or parkinsonism overall during the study (OR = 5.17, 95%CI = 1.49-17.88, P = 0.013). There was no significant between-group difference in the changing of rating scales of EPS and psychotic symptoms. The results of our study favour olanzapine as a better choice in schizophrenic patients with intolerant EPS. Double-blinded, fixed dose and different ethnical study for EPS-intolerant schizophrenic patients is needed to confirm the results of our study.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dystonia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Parkinsonian Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method

Schizophrenia patients have a potential increased risk of metabolic dysregulation during antipsychotic treatments. Our objective was to compare changes in prolactin and metabolic variables (glucose, lipids and weight) as a post-hoc analysis from a six-month, randomised, controlled study of olanzapine (OLZ, n = 171; 10-20 mg/day) or quetiapine (QUE, n = 175; 300-700 mg/day). No statistically significant treatment group differences for baseline to endpoint mean changes in body mass index (P = 0.209) or weight (P = 0.250) were observed. There was a greater incidence of clinically significant weight gain (defined as > or =7% increase from baseline) in OLZ (19.2%) compared to QUE (13.2%)-treated patients (P = 0.181). No statistically significant treatment group differences for lipids and glucose variables, either as mean change from baseline to endpoint or treatment-emergent (TE) categorical changes were found (P > or = 0.05). Incidence rates for TE diabetes were similar between treatment groups 2.5% (n = 4) in the OLZ-treatment group and 1.3% (n = 2) in the QUE-treatment group (P = 0.685). Hyperprolactinaemia was present at baseline in many patients (OLZ 32.9%; QUE 31.4%), but after 2 weeks of treatment prolactin values had reverted to normal for nearly all patients (OLZ 100%; QUE 99.4%). There were no significant treatment differences in any variable between cohorts.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain

Our objective was to prospectively assess whether early (ie, 2 weeks) response to an antipsychotic predicts later (12-week) response and whether 'switching' early non-responders to another antipsychotic is a better strategy than 'staying'. This randomized, double-blind, flexible-dosed, 12-week study enrolled 628 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. All initiated treatment with risperidone. Early response was defined as > or =20% improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score following 2 weeks of treatment. Early responders (ERs) continued on risperidone, whereas early non-responders (ENRs) were randomized (1 : 1) to continue on risperidone 2-6 mg/day or switch to olanzapine 10-20 mg/day for 10 additional weeks. Compared with ENRs, risperidone ERs showed significantly greater reduction in PANSS total score (end point; p<001). Early response/non-response was highly predictive of subsequent clinical outcomes. Switching risperidone ENRs to olanzapine at week 2 resulted in a small but significantly greater reduction in PANSS total score (end point; p=0.020) and in depressive symptoms (end point; p=0.004); the reduction in PANSS was greater among those who were still moderately ill at 2 weeks. Switching risperidone ENRs to olanzapine also resulted in significantly greater increases in triglycerides, a significantly greater decrease in prolactin, and significantly less treatment-emergent dyskinesia. This is the first study to prospectively show that early response/non-response to an antipsychotic (risperidone) is a reliable clinical marker of subsequent clinical outcomes and that a 'switching' strategy based on this information may lead to greater clinical improvement than staying on a drug for a longer period in some patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Statistics, Nonparametric; Triglycerides

Although the evidence base for the use of antipsychotics in older people with schizophrenia is generally of low quality, it tends to support the use of atypical antipsychotics. Only limited information regarding longer term adherence to these apparently more effective drugs is available. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of adherence to risperidone or olanzapine in patients over 60.. Patients receiving care from old age psychiatrists for their schizophrenia were randomised to treatment with olanzapine or risperidone and were followed for up to 3(1/2) years. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess the univariate effect of randomisation drug on long-term adherence and Cox regression adjusted for baseline variables which may have affected adherence.. In total, 60.6% of the 66 patients in the study were still taking their randomised drug by the end of the interval in which they remained under observation (64.7% olanzapine and 56.3% risperidone). This difference was non-significant. No baseline variable was associated with an increased risk of non-adherence, though the delivery form of pre-randomisation drug (oral or depot) was weakly (p = 0.054) associated with patients originally on depot being less likely to be adherent to an atypical drug.. Overall adherence with atypical medication was good with almost two-thirds of the patients remaining on their randomisation drug for the interval in which they were under observation. Patients taken off depot were less likely to be adherent but there was no significant difference in adherence between olanzapine and risperidone. Scrutiny of the survival curves suggested that non-adherence is an early event in treatment and patients adherent at 6 months were likely to remain adherent over a longer time period.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Proportional Hazards Models; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Earlier studies have shown widespread alterations of functional connectivity of various brain networks in schizophrenia, including the default mode network (DMN). The DMN has also an important role in the performance of cognitive tasks. Furthermore, treatment with second-generation antipsychotic drugs may ameliorate to some degree working memory (WM) deficits and related brain activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with olanzapine monotherapy on functional connectivity among brain regions of the DMN during WM. Seventeen patients underwent an 8-week prospective study and completed two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment during the performance of the N-back WM task. To control for potential repetition effects, 19 healthy controls also underwent two fMRI scans at a similar time interval. We used spatial group-independent component analysis (ICA) to analyze fMRI data. Relative to controls, patients with schizophrenia had reduced connectivity strength within the DMN in posterior cingulate, whereas it was greater in precuneus and inferior parietal lobule. Treatment with olanzapine was associated with increases in DMN connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex, but not in posterior regions of DMN. These results suggest that treatment with olanzapine is associated with the modulation of DMN connectivity in schizophrenia. In addition, our findings suggest critical functional differences in the regions of DMN.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Brain Mapping; Case-Control Studies; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory Disorders; Memory, Short-Term; Nerve Net; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Oxygen; Principal Component Analysis; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Young Adult

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine long-acting injection for maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.. Outpatients with schizophrenia who had maintained stability on an oral regimen of olanzapine (10, 15, or 20 mg/day) for 4 to 8 weeks were randomly assigned to 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with "low" (150 mg every 2 weeks; N=140), "medium" (405 mg every 4 weeks; N=318), or "high" (300 mg every 2 weeks; N=141) doses of olanzapine long-acting injection; a very low reference dose of olanzapine long-acting injection (45 mg every 4 weeks; N=144); or their stabilized dose of oral olanzapine (N=322). Rates of and time to psychotic exacerbation were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.. At 24 weeks, the majority of oral olanzapine-treated patients (93%), as well as most olanzapine long-acting injection-treated patients receiving high (95%), medium (90%), low (84%), and very low doses (69%), remained exacerbation free, with the therapeutic 4-week regimen (medium dose) and pooled 2-week regimen (low and high doses) demonstrating efficacy similar to that of oral olanzapine as well as to each other. The three standard long-acting doses were superior to the very low reference dose based on time to exacerbation. Incidence of weight gain > or = 7% of baseline was 21% for oral olanza-pine compared with 21%, 15%, 16%, and 8% for the high, medium, low, and very low olanzapine long-acting treatment groups, respectively. No clinically significant differences were observed between the long-acting injection and oral olanzapine groups in general safety parameters. Few injection-site reactions occurred (3%). Two patients experienced sedation and delirium consistent with olanzapine overdose following possible accidental intravascular injection.. Olanzapine long-acting injection was efficacious in maintenance treatment of schizophrenia for up to 24 weeks, with a safety profile similar to oral olanzapine except for injection-related adverse events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly drugs of first choice in schizophrenia. Amisulpride, a new atypical antipsychotic, is reported to be effective for both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in Western countries but Indian experience is limited. The aim of the present study was therefore to conduct a trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in Indian schizophrenia patients.. Eighty adult patients of either sex were randomized to receive standard doses of the two drugs orally, in a single blind manner, for 12 weeks, with follow up at 4 and 8 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and physician-administered Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions (ADRs).. Evaluable were 39 patients on amisulpride and 38 on olanzapine. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to demographics, illness duration and rating scores. Final BPRS score was lower for olanzapine (33.2 +/- 9.44) than for amisulpride (37.7 +/- 9.67). SAPS and SANS scores and CGI rating improved individually in both arms but remained comparable between groups throughout the study period, but olanzapine reduced SAPS score to a greater extent. ADRs were encountered in 67.5% and 47.5% of patients (p = 0.113) on amisulpride and olanzapine, respectively. Tremor and insomnia were more frequent with amisulpride, while olanzapine caused more weight gain and sedation. No serious ADRs occurred.. Amisulpride, although comparable to olanzapine on some measures, did not match the improvement seen with the latter drug in BPRS and SAPS scores. Despite differences in ADR profiles, overall tolerability was satisfactory for both drugs. In Indian patients, amisulpride should therefore be an alternative to olanzapine to a limited extent, such as when weight gain and sedation are undesirable.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; India; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Single-Blind Method; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Sulpiride; Treatment Outcome; Tremor; Weight Gain

Effectiveness has become more and more important as a comprehensive outcome measure for (long-term) treatment in schizophrenia. Early predictors to identify patients at a high risk for not succeeding the initiated treatment would be very useful. Discontinuation of the initiated treatment was used as criterion for effectiveness and patients' drug attitude was shown to be predictive for non-adherence or discontinuation of long-term treatment in schizophrenia. Accordingly, the predictive validity of the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) for effectiveness should be evaluated. Based on a sub-sample of patients from the EUFEST study for whom DAI assessments were available significant predictors for effectiveness as measured by discontinuation of initiated treatment were identified based on a logistic and a Cox-regression analysis. A Receiver-Operating Characteristic- (ROC-) analysis was conducted for the DAI, prognostic / diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity) were calculated and a cut-off value suggested. In a sample of 228 first-episode patients, the DAI score was the most powerful predictor for effectiveness (p<0.001) besides two other significant predictors (PANSS-positive score and sexual side effects). The ROC-analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.64 (p<0.001). The suggested cut-off point of about 20 yielded a sensitivity of 70-75% and a specificity of 40-45%. Study results indicate that the Drug Attitude Inventory, filled in by patients early in treatment seems to be a valid predictor for effectiveness as measured by discontinuation of the initiated treatment. DAI scores could also serve as an (differential) indicator for the need of enhanced treatment monitoring. These findings have to be validated in other (first-episode) samples.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; ROC Curve; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

We conducted a double-blind 1-year trial of asenapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. Patients were randomized to asenapine (5 or 10 mg BID; n=913) or olanzapine (10-20 mg QD; n=312), and monitored regularly.. Trial completion rates were 38% with asenapine, 57% with olanzapine; main reasons for discontinuation were withdrawal of consent (22%, 16%) and insufficient response (25%, 14%); fewer discontinuations were due to adverse events (6%, 7%). Mean weight gain was 0.9 kg with asenapine, 4.2 kg with olanzapine. Extrapyramidal symptoms reported as adverse events were more common with asenapine. Mean reductions in PANSS total score with asenapine and olanzapine were -21.0 and -27.5 ( P<0.0001); the exclusion of patients who had previous poor experience with olanzapine may have biased the results in favor of olanzapine. Scores on the subjective well-being on neuroleptics scale and functionality measures were similar between groups.. Asenapine was well tolerated over 1 year of treatment, causing less weight gain than olanzapine but more frequent extrapyramidal symptoms. PANSS total score improved with both agents; the improvement was greater with olanzapine than with asenapine using last observations carried forward but not in an observed-case analysis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Olanzapine associated weight gain (WG) is a major concern in patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of topiramate to prevent olanzapine induced WG in these cases. We also studied various metabolic parameters.. In this 12-week, double-blind, parallel group study, seventy-two drug-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia patients were randomized to receive olanzapine+placebo (olanzapine group) or olanzapine+topiramate (100mg/day) (topiramate group). Weight, body mass index, fasting glucose, insulin, insulin resistance (IR), leptin, lipids and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks. The patients were clinically evaluated using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and were monitored for adverse effects.. Topiramate resulted in a weight loss of 1.27+/-2.28 kg (p<0.01), decrease in leptin (p<0.001), glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride levels and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In the olanzapine group, there was a significant WG, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, increased IR, hyperleptinemia, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001).There was a greater clinical improvement (PANSS scores) (p<0.001) in the topiramate group. The adverse effects were well tolerated.. Topiramate could prevent olanzapine induced weight gain and adverse metabolic effects. It also results in a greater clinical improvement when used with olanzapine in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Humans; Insulin; Lipids; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Neuroprotective Agents; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Topiramate; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To compare the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine in schizophrenic patients with tardive dyskinesia on treatment with first-generation antipsychotics.. We conducted a 24-week, rater-blinded, flexible-dose study. Sixty patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (n = 58) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 2) met the DSM-IV research criteria for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia and were randomly assigned to a risperidone or olanzapine group. The primary outcome was a comparison of the change in the total scores on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) from baseline to study end point between the groups. The study was conducted from July 2000 to June 2004.. The mean ± SD doses of risperidone and olanzapine from baseline to study end point were 1.9 ± 0.7 to 4.1 ± 1.4 mg/d and 8.1 ± 2.0 to 12.6 ± 5.4 mg/d, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data, severity of tardive dyskinesia, or psychotic symptoms between risperidone and olanzapine groups at baseline assessment. Both groups showed significant improvement in mean ± SD AIMS total scores (risperidone: −7.4 ± 6.9, P < .0001; olanzapine: −6.2 ± 8.0, P = .0002). However, there was a more statistically significant change in the slope of AIMS total scores in the risperidone group than in the olanzapine group (P = .0001).. Our findings demonstrated that olanzapine may not have better potential for tardive dyskinesia improvement than risperidone did. Double-blinded, fixed dose studies with a larger sample size on schizophrenic patients with tardive dyskinesia from different ethnic groups are needed to confirm the results of our study.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00621998

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Taiwan

Metabolic syndrome and elevated lipids, related to cardiovascular risk factors, are more prevalent in schizophrenia and there has been much debate about the extent to which specific antipsychotics contribute more to the increased risk of developing hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Most studies have concentrated on fasting levels in patients recently started on medication. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects of 2nd generation antipsychotics using both fasting measures and provocative tests may provide results that are more informative. We present results of a randomized prospective study of lipid metabolism and metabolic syndrome in chronic schizophrenic patients using both fasting and post-prandial lipid measures.. Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia, most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting levels of lipids, free fatty acid (FFA) and leptin were assessed. At baseline and end of month 2 of treatment patients had a fatty meal test (FMT) in which postprandial lipids were measured at several time points before and after meal ingestion. Weight was assessed monthly and waist measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data was analyzed on 23 patients randomized to risperidone and 23 patients randomized to olanzapine.. Overall, there were no differential drug effects on any fasting lipid measure and fasting triglycerides did not increase in olanzapine treated patients after 5 months of treatment. However, at 2 months of drug treatment the FMT revealed a significantly greater increase in triglycerides, and very low density (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, in olanzapine compared to risperidone patients (Ps=.05-.01). There was no difference between treatments with olanzapine vs. risperidone on development of metabolic syndrome during the 5 month treatment period.. Chronic schizophrenic patients treated for years with first and second generation antipsychotics may have developed tolerance to the effects of olanzapine on increasing fasting triglycerides and other lipids, but some underlying metabolic abnormalities may be revealed in postprandial tests of lipid metabolism. These findings suggest that the development of standardized tests and criteria for measurement of postprandial triglycerides and related lipid levels, in addition to fasting levels, may be helpful in identifying metabolic effects of olanzapine and other second generation antipsychotics in chronically treated schizophrenics. In some reports postprandial increases in triglycerides have been identified as important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but the actual differential consequences of these lipid metabolic differences for development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in patients treated with different antipsychotics need more objective outcome measures to determine and quantify cardiovascular risk outcomes.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Lipid Metabolism Disorders; Male; Models, Statistical; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The purpose of this study is to determine if an earlier age at onset of positive symptoms in schizophrenia is associated with cannabis use disorders (CUD).. 49 first-episode schizophrenia subjects with CUD were compared to 51 first-episode schizophrenia subjects with no substance use disorders for demographic and clinical variables. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the joint relationship between variables significantly associated with CUD on univariate testing and ascertain if these variables independently predict CUD. Significance level was set at p<0.05.. 74% of CUD subjects had the onset of CUD before the onset of positive symptoms. Compared to non-substance abusing subjects, CUD subjects were predominantly male, younger at study entry, had an earlier age at onset of positive symptoms, less educational attainment, a lower self-socioeconomic status, better premorbid childhood social adjustment, a trend for poorer premorbid childhood academic adjustment, less motor abnormalities but more severe hallucinations and delusions. In the multivariate analysis, only male gender, worse socio-economic status, better premorbid childhood social adjustment, and more severe positive symptoms at study entry were associated with a lifetime history of CUD.. Although cannabis use precedes the onset of illness in most patients, there was no significant association between onset of illness and CUD that was not accounted for by demographic and clinical variables. Previous studies implicating CUD in the onset of schizophrenia may need to more comprehensively assess the relationship between CUD and schizophrenia, and take into account additional variables that we found associated with CUD.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Executive Function; Female; Humans; Male; Marijuana Abuse; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

The study attempted to identify clinical variables which could predict the response to a second-generation antipsychotic treatment during acute episodes among schizophrenic patients. Socio-demographic, premorbid and clinical variables were studied in a population of 95 diagnosed with schizophrenia, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSMIV), during an acute treated phase, in a multicentre prospective study. Patients were assigned to olanzapine or risperidone treatment in an open design. Clinical evaluations were performed at D0, D42 and D180. Good response to treatment was defined as a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) reduction greater than 20% and a Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score lower than 35. Univariate analysis revealed earlier age at onset of schizophrenia and earlier age at first prescription of antipsychotic among non-responders compared with good responders at D42. Non-responders also had a clinical profile at the onset of antipsychotic treatment characterised by more severe forms of the acute episode as shown by higher scores at the positive, general and overall PANSS scale and on CGI-S and BPRS scores. With a multivariate logistic regression model, age at onset and overall duration of illness remained the only clinical criteria identified as predictors of response to antipsychotic treatment at D42. Clinical variables do not clearly appear to be good predictors of treatment efficacy.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Sex Characteristics; Treatment Outcome

Cognitive deficits are a core feature in schizophrenia. Cognitive deficits appear to be present at the onset of schizophrenia and persist after remission of psychotic symptoms. As cognitive deficits are associated with poor functional outcome, they form an important focus of treatment. There are relatively few head-to-head comparisons of the effects of second generation antipsychotics on cognition in recent onset schizophrenia. This is the first study to compare the effects of a short term treatment of olanzapine versus ziprasidone on cognitive functioning in recent onset schizophrenia. An earlier study conducted in chronic patients revealed an enhancement of cognition after treatment for both agents, but the extent of improvement was not significantly different between ziprasidone and olanzapine.. Patients with recent onset schizophrenia with limited previous exposure to medical treatment underwent a double blind randomized controlled treatment trial. Fifty-six patients completed the neuropsychological testing procedure prior to randomization and after eight weeks of treatment and were included in the analysis. We tested cognitive functioning in general and verbal memory in particular. We calculated a single unweighted composite score based on nine cognitive tests to determine general cognitive functioning.. Cognition appeared enhanced after treatment, but was not significantly different between treatment groups, neither for the verbal memory measures, nor for the neurocognitive composite score. Furthermore, cognitive enhancement did not correlate to clinical improvement.. Cognitive deficits are not a reason for preferentially prescribing one of the two second generation antipsychotics tested over the other.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Statistics as Topic; Thiazoles; Verbal Learning; Young Adult

To examine the long-term safety and efficacy of three antipsychotics in early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders.. Patients (8 to 19 years old) who had improved during an 8-week, randomized, double-blind acute trial of olanzapine, risperidone, or molindone (plus benztropine) were eligible to continue on the same medication for up to 44 additional weeks under double-blind conditions. Adjunctive medications were allowed according to defined algorithms. Standardized symptom, safety, and functional assessments were conducted every 4 weeks.. Of the 116 youths randomized in the acute trial, 54 entered maintenance treatment (molindone, n = 20; olanzapine, n = 13; risperidone, n = 21). Fourteen (26%) completed 44 weeks of treatment. Adverse effects (n = 15), inadequate efficacy (n = 14), or study nonadherence (n = 8) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The three treatment arms did not significantly differ in symptom decrease or time to discontinuation. Akathisia was more common with molindone and elevated prolactin concentrations more common with risperidone. Although weight gain and metabolic adverse events had occurred more often with olanzapine and risperidone during the acute trial, no significant between-drug differences emerged in most of these parameters during maintenance treatment.. Only 12% of youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders continued on their originally randomized treatment at 52 weeks. No agent demonstrated superior efficacy, and all were associated with side effects, including weight gain. Improved treatments are needed for early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Clinical trial registry information-Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders in Children and Adolescents; URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT00053703.

Topics: Adolescent; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Benzodiazepines; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Molindone; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Psychotropic Drugs; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare patients' preference for olanzapine orodispersible tablet (ODT) with oral conventional tablet (OCT).. A 12-week randomized, crossover, multinational, open-label study was conducted to estimate the proportion of patients preferring ODT or OCT. Outpatients with stable schizophrenia on OCT monotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to ODT or OCT. Compliance and drug attitude were measured using the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10) and Medication Adherence Form (MAF) scales; tolerability and safety by Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP-5) questionnaire and adverse event summary.. A total of 175 patients answered a preference question: 106 (61%) preferred ODT and 48 (27%) preferred OCT (P<0.001 adjusted for treatment sequence); 21 (12%) expressed no preference. There was no significant change in DAI-10 with either formulation. MAF was above 75% in 94% vs. 93% of patients on ODC and OCT, respectively. Compliance as measured by tablet count was above 98% on both formulations. The adverse event profiles did not differ between formulations. Mean weight increase over 6 weeks on ODT was 0.8 kg and on OCT was 0.6 kg.. Given the importance of patients' preference for treatment planning and success, the ODT formulation should be routinely considered as a treatment option.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Choice Behavior; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Participation; Patient Satisfaction; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Many antipsychotic medications carry a substantial liability for weight gain, and one mechanism common to all antipsychotics is binding to the dopamine D2 receptor. We therefore examined the relationship between -141C Ins/Del (rs1799732), a functional promoter region polymorphism in DRD2, and antipsychotic-induced weight gain in 58 first episode schizophrenia patients enrolled in a randomized trial of risperidone versus olanzapine. Carriers of the deletion allele (n=29) were compared with Ins/Ins homozygotes (noncarriers, n=29) in a mixed model encompassing 10 weight measurements over 16 weeks. Deletion allele carriers showed significantly more weight gain after 6 weeks of treatment regardless of assigned medication. Although deletion carriers were prescribed higher doses of olanzapine (but not risperidone), dose did not seem to account for the genotype effects on weight gain. Given earlier evidence that deletion carriers show reduced symptom response to medication, additional study of appropriate treatment options for these patients seems warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of armodafinil, the longer-lasting isomer of modafinil, as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia.. This 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study was conducted between July and December 2007. Patients had a history of stable schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria) for ≥ 8 weeks and were treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or paliperidone for ≥ 6 weeks at stable doses for ≥ 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily placebo or armodafinil 50, 100, or 200 mg. The primary efficacy measure was the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery. Secondary outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).. Sixty patients were randomly assigned (15 in each group). No apparent differences between groups in the MATRICS composite score were observed (mean ± SD change from baseline to final visit: armodafinil 50 mg, 1.9 ± 6.22; 100 mg, 2.8 ± 7.98; 200 mg, 2.9 ± 4.72; placebo, 2.2 ± 5.06). The mean ± SD changes in PANSS total scores were -6.3 ± 7.25 for armodafinil 200 mg and -1.7 ± 4.89 for placebo at final visit (effect size=0.73; 95% CI, -0.08 to 1.54) and PANSS negative symptoms scores were -3.4 ± 2.07 and 0.1 ± 1.93 (effect size=1.69; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.60), respectively. Although reductions in SANS total score were observed with both armodafinil and placebo at final visit, no between-group difference was shown. Armodafinil was generally well tolerated, with diarrhea and headache the most commonly reported adverse events. There was no evidence of worsening of psychosis with adjunctive armodafinil.. In this 4-week study, adjunctive armodafinil was not associated with an improvement in cognitive measures, but armodafinil 200 mg/d appeared to mitigate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Treatment was generally well tolerated.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00487942.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Benzodiazepines; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrimidines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To enhance functional outcome in schizophrenia improvement of cognitive symptoms is crucial.. Using a comprehensive test battery, this follow-up examines cognitive effects in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia after a change of medication following insufficient clinical response and intolerance.. After eight weeks cognitive outcomes had not improved in the patients having switched from olanzapine to ziprasidone (n=11; mean dose 136 mg) nor in those having switched from ziprasidone to olanzapine (n=10; mean 16 mg), while the symptoms of patients maintaining olanzapine (n=18; mean 10.9 mg) or ziprasidone (n=18; mean 88.9 mg) treatment had not improved further.. The findings suggest that also in early-stage schizophrenia the antipsychotics tested affect cognitive symptoms similarly.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objective of this study was to determine if early changes in triglycerides and weight may be useful in predicting longer-term changes in weight and other metabolic parameters. Data were from three 24- to 28-week randomized, controlled studies comparing olanzapine to ziprasidone or aripiprazole for treatment of schizophrenia. Analyses were restricted to completers with fasting laboratory data at all protocol specified time points. Analyses were primarily descriptive and included mean changes and categorical outcomes. In all treatment groups, participants who did not experience a 20 mg/dL or greater increase in triglycerides at early time points were unlikely to experience a change of 50 mg/dL or more in triglycerides after 6 months. Negative predictive values were 83% to 95%. However, early change in triglycerides was not useful for predicting later change in glucose, cholesterol, or weight. Similarly, early weight change gave robust negative predictive values for longer-term weight change (≥10 kg), but not for change in glucose or cholesterol. Lack of early elevation in triglyceride concentrations was predictive of later lack of substantial increase in triglycerides in olanzapine-, ziprasidone-, and aripiprazole-treated participants. Lack of early elevation in weight was predictive of later lack of substantial increase in weight in all 3 treatment groups. Early monitoring of triglyceride concentrations and weight may help clinicians assess risk that individuals will experience significant increase in triglycerides or weight gain, allowing assessments of potential risks and benefits earlier in treatment. Clinical monitoring is advised throughout treatment for all patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Triglycerides; Weight Gain

The concepts of partial recovery and remission have become increasingly important for the evaluation of the effectiveness of schizophrenia therapeutics. The relationship of baseline symptoms and changes in symptoms to remission of psychosis was evaluated. Fifty-six outpatients with residual schizophrenia completed a double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol and were then enrolled into a one-year open-label trial of olanzapine. Out of these 56 subjects, 13 (23%) met remission criteria at the beginning of the open-label treatment and were excluded. During the one-year study, 7/43 (16%) subjects met remission criteria. These subjects had significantly lower baseline ratings for tardive dyskinesia (TD) than subjects who did not achieve remission (1.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 4.2 +/- 4.6, P = 0.03). As expected, remitted subjects had significantly greater improvements in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores, positive subscale scores and scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total scores. Remitted subjects also experienced a significantly greater improvement in depressive symptoms (P = 0.001), activation (P = 0.005), and Clinical Global Impressions scores (P < 0.001), as well as greater improvements in extrapyramidal symptoms (P = 0.007) and TD (P < 0.001). These results suggest that the relationship of depressive symptoms and improved side effects to the construct of remission in schizophrenia may deserve special attention. Future studies should aim to relate remission criteria to functional outcomes, cognition, and other important symptom domains.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Depression; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Remission Induction; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index

Data from the 3-year, prospective, observational SOHO study were used to compare the effectiveness (in terms of treatment discontinuation) and the tolerability of olanzapine, risperidone, other atypicals and typical antipsychotics in 1009 previously untreated outpatients with schizophrenia who started monotherapy at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the time to treatment discontinuation by the treatment group, Cox proportional hazards regression models identified the variables associated with treatment discontinuation (adjusted for baseline differences between treatment groups), and logistic regression models compared the tolerability profiles of the different treatment groups. Of the 931 patients analyzed, 31.9% discontinued the medication initiated at baseline during the 3-year follow-up. Olanzapine had the lowest rate of discontinuation (28.9%), followed by other atypical (34.0%), risperidone (36.2%) and typical antipsychotics (44.5%). Compared to olanzapine, risk of treatment discontinuation was higher with typical antipsychotics (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 2.78) or risperidone (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.82). A higher baseline Clinical Global Impression (CGI) positive score was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Olanzapine was associated with a lower frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms than other antipsychotics, fewer prolactin-related adverse events than risperidone and other atypical antipsychotics, but greater weight gain than typicals and risperidone. For all analyses, comparison with the other atypical group is limited due to its small sample size (n=50). In conclusion, treatment effectiveness and tolerability varied among antipsychotic medications in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia. The results should be interpreted conservatively given the observational study design.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Confidence Intervals; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Patient Compliance; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of ziprasidone versus the comparators olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine were investigated in adult patients with chronic schizophrenia, schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders, with lack of efficacy or intolerance to their previous antipsychotic treatment based on clinical judgement of the investigator. A total of 293 patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with either ziprasidone 80-160 mg/day (n=147) or with one of the comparator drugs (n=146). In the latter group the investigator could choose between olanzapine 10-20 mg/day (n=24), risperidone 4-8 mg/day (n=22) or quetiapine 300-750 mg/day (n=97). The study comprised four visits including a baseline examination prior to randomization and further examinations at the end of weeks 1, 4 and 12. Ziprasidone was non-inferior (defined as a difference of 7 units or less on the PANSS scale to the disadvantage of ziprasidone) to the composite group (olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine) on the total PANSS score as well as on all subscores (P<0.0001); there were no significant between-group differences in the CGI-S and I and UKU scores. Ziprasidone-treated patients lost an average of 2.1 kg in the 12 weeks of the study, the mean weight for risperidone and quetiapine remained unchanged, and patients receiving olanzapine gained 3.1 kg on average.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides; Young Adult

Adaptive trial design applied to randomized clinical trials of psychiatric medicines offers the potential to make clinical trials more efficient. In the current analysis, we retrospectively applied Bayesian adaptive allocation methods to a case study in agitated patients with schizophrenia and related diseases. The original study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel design. The objective of this analysis was to demonstrate the potential benefits of Bayesian adaptive designs by shortening the study duration and therefore limiting patient exposure to ineffective placebo or an active comparator with a known side effect. Bayesian methods allowed us to fully leverage historical data along with data observed as the study was ongoing to calculate predictive probabilities of patient response to treatment without experiencing a specified side effect. Using the Bayesian adaptive approach would have required less than half the number of patients as the original study to draw the same conclusion. Sample size was reduced from 311 to 156 patients, thereby decreasing the number of patients exposed to placebo from 54 to 30 and the number exposed to the active control with a known side effect from 126 to 60.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Dystonia; Haloperidol; Humans; Monte Carlo Method; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Research Design; Retrospective Studies; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The second generation antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine are known to cause weight gain. However, only clozapine is associated with drug-induced fever. Cytokines have been linked to the induction of both weight gain and drug-induced fever. We investigated these potential side effects of clozapine and olanzapine and studied their differential effects on cytokine secretion. Thirty patients suffering from schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder or schizoaffective disorder were treated with either clozapine (mean modal dose: 266.7+/-77.9mg) or olanzapine (21.2+/-2.5mg) in a randomized, double-blind, 6-week study. Body mass index (BMI), tympanic temperature, and plasma levels of leptin and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), soluble TNF receptor 1 and 2 (sTNFR-1/2), soluble interleukin-2 receptors (sIL-2R), interleukin-6) were determined weekly. BMI, leptin and cytokines significantly increased over time, except interleukin-6 and sTNFR-1 in the olanzapine group. All cytokines numerically increased compared to baseline already during the first week of treatment in both groups. Leptin, TNF-alpha, sTNFR-1, sTNFR-2 and sIL-2R levels correlated with the BMI. Five patients who received clozapine (33%) developed drug-induced fever (>/=38 degrees C). In these, interleukin-6 peak levels were significantly (p<0.01) higher than in those patients treated with clozapine who did not develop fever. In conclusion, increase of BMI appears to be related to clozapine's and olanzapine's similar effects on cytokine systems, whilst drug-induced fever appears to be related to clozapine's differential effects on interleukin-6.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Clozapine; Cytokines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fever; Humans; Leptin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Using time-lapse maps, we visualized the dynamics of schizophrenia progression, revealing spreading cortical changes that depend on the type of antipsychotic treatment. Dynamic, 4-dimensional models of disease progression were created from 4 repeated high-resolution brain magnetic resonance imaging scans of 36 first-episode schizophrenia patients (30 men/6 women; mean age: 24.2 +/- 5.1 SD years) randomized to haloperidol (HAL) (n = 15) or olanzapine (OLZ) treatment (n = 21), imaged at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months (144 scans). Based on surface-based cortical models and point-by-point measures of gray matter volume, we generated time-lapse maps for each treatment. Disease trajectories differed for atypical versus typical neuroleptic drugs. A rapidly advancing parietal-to-frontal deficit trajectory, in HAL-treated patients, mirrored normal cortical maturation but greatly intensified. The disease trajectory advanced even after symptom normalization, involving the frontal cortex within 12 months with typical drug treatment. Areas with fastest tissue loss shifted anteriorly in the first year of psychosis. This trajectory was not seen with OLZ. Whether this association reflects either reduced neurotoxicity or neuroprotection cannot be addressed with neuroimaging; changes may relate to glial rather than neural components. These maps revise current models of schizophrenia progression; due to power limitations, the findings require confirmation in a sample large enough to model group x time interactions.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Brain Mapping; Disease Progression; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Few studies have directly compared the efficacy and tolerability of atypical agents.. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole (n = 355) with olanzapine (n = 348) in patients with schizophrenia experiencing acute relapse. After a 6-week acute treatment phase, patients with Clinical Global Impression-Improvement = 1-3 or > or = 20% reduction in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) Total score could progress to the 46-week outpatient extension phase. Co-primary study objectives were to compare efficacy at Week 6 and weight gain liability from baseline to Week 26.. The mean olanzapine dose was 15.4 mg/day compared with a mean aripiprazole dose of 23.0 mg/day. More patients treated with olanzapine (47%) completed the 52-week study than those treated with aripiprazole (39%); time to discontinuation was significantly in favor of olanzapine (p < .05). At Week 6, mean change in PANSS Total score (olanzapine, -29.5; aripiprazole, -24.6 [random regression model]) showed a treatment difference of 4.9 points. As the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (6 points) was within the 95% confidence interval (2.2-7.6) for treatment difference, olanzapine proved to be superior to aripiprazole on this measure. More patients experienced significant weight gain at Week 26 with olanzapine (40%) than with aripiprazole (21%; p < .05 [weighted generalized estimating equation analysis]), with significant differences observed from Week 3. Mean weight gain at Week 26 was significantly greater with olanzapine than with aripiprazole (+4.30 kg vs. +.13 kg, respectively).. Olanzapine had a statistically significant efficacy advantage over aripiprazole, whereas aripiprazole was associated with significantly less weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Glucose; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quinolones; Schizophrenia

Previous analysis of data from CATIE showed that patients randomly assigned to switch to a new medication were more likely to discontinue study drug than those who stayed on the medication they had been taking prior to randomization. This study addresses additional outcomes measures evaluating symptoms, neurocognition, quality of life, neurological side effects, weight, and health costs. First, considering patients randomized to olanzapine or risperidone, outcomes among patients who had been on the drug to which they were randomized prior to CATIE (N=129 "stayers") were compared to outcomes of those who switched to either of these two drugs (N=269 "switchers"). A second set of analyses considered patients on baseline monotherapy with olanzapine (N=297); risperidone (N=252) or quetiapine (n=87) and compared those randomly assigned to stay on each of these medications with those assigned to switch to any of the other five phase 1 medications in CATIE. In mixed models of each outcome the independent variable of primary interest represented stay vs. switch, with multivariate adjustment for potential confounding factors.. With one exception, there were no significant differences between stayers and switchers on any outcome measure in either set of analyses. The exception was that, in the second set of analyses, patients who stayed on olanzapine showed greater weight gain than those who switched from olanzapine to other drugs.. Switching to a new medication yielded no advantage over staying on the previous medication. Staying on olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

This study examined the main metabolic side effects induced by antipsychotic treatment in a cohort of first episode drug-naïve subjects after the first year of treatment.. A randomized, open-label, prospective clinical trial was conducted. Participants were 164 consecutive subjects included in a first episode program and never treated with antipsychotic medication. Patients were assigned to haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone. The main outcome measures were changes at 1 year in fasting glucose parameters (glucose, insulin levels and insulin resistance index) and changes in fasting lipid parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol).. 144 of the total sample were evaluated at 1 year. There was a statistically significant increase in the mean values of insulin levels, insulin resistance index, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. No pathological values in fasting glucose plasma levels were found at baseline and there were no changes after 1 year. Weight gain was positively correlated with changes in insulin levels, insulin resistance index and triglyceride levels. We did not detect statistically significant differences between treatments in any of the parameters evaluated.. Fasting glycaemia and insulin concentrations at baseline do not support the hypothesis that schizophrenia is associated with an underlying abnormality in glucose metabolism. The changes in insulin and lipid parameters at 1 year seem to be related to the magnitude of weight gain. There were no significant differences between haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone concerning metabolic adverse effects after the first year of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Spain; Triglycerides; Weight Gain; Young Adult

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study examined the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who had discontinued antipsychotic treatment in phases 1 and 2 were eligible for phase 3, in which they selected one of nine antipsychotic regimens with the help of their study doctor. We describe the characteristics of the patients who selected each treatment option and their outcomes.. Two hundred and seventy patients entered phase 3. The open-label treatment options were monotherapy with oral aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, long-acting injectable fluphenazine decanoate, or a combination of any two of these treatments.. Few patients selected fluphenazine decanoate (n=9) or perphenazine (n=4). Similar numbers selected each of the other options (range 33-41). Of the seven common choices, those who selected clozapine and combination antipsychotic treatment were the most symptomatic, and those who selected aripiprazole and ziprasidone had the highest body mass index. Symptoms improved for all groups, although the improvements were modest for the groups starting with relatively mild levels of symptoms. Side effect profiles of the medications varied considerably but medication discontinuations due to intolerability were rare (7% overall).. Patients and their doctors made treatment selections based on clinical factors, including severity of symptoms, response to prior treatments, and physical health status. Fluphenazine decanoate was rarely used among those with evidence of treatment non-adherence and clozapine was underutilized for those with poor previous response. Combination antipsychotic treatment warrants further study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Hyperprolactinemia, an adverse effect associated with the use of typical antipsychotics and the atypical antipsychotic risperidone, has both acute and chronic clinical consequences. One option for clinical management is switching to an agent with a lower liability for inducing hyperprolactinemia. This post-hoc sub-analysis of an 8-week, open-label study in outpatients with schizophrenia (CN138-215) examined short-term effects on prolactin levels during a switch from risperidone or olanzapine to aripiprazole 30 mg/day. Three switch strategies were used: (I) immediate aripiprazole initiation with simultaneous immediate discontinuation of olanzapine/risperidone; (II) immediate aripiprazole initiation while tapering off olanzapine/risperidone over 14 days; (III) titrating aripiprazole upwards while tapering off olanzapine/risperidone over 14 days. Changes in prolactin levels from baseline to each last observation carried forward time point were compared with t-tests using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. This sub-analysis included 269 subjects: 105 previously treated with risperidone; 164 previously treated with olanzapine. Mean baseline prolactin levels (ng/mL) were within normal range for the three olanzapine groups (Group-I, 11.7; Group-II, 13.2; Group-III, 11.2), but above normal for the risperidone groups (Group-I, 39.7; Group-II, 48.5; Group-III, 33.5). Following aripiprazole initiation, mean prolactin levels decreased significantly (p<0.001) at week-1 and were maintained to week-8 in all groups irrespective of prior treatment. Previously elevated prolactin levels in the risperidone groups were reduced to within normal range within 1 week, irrespective of switching strategy. Tolerability was good regardless of prior medication or switching strategy. Overall, rapid decreases of prolactin levels were achieved safely with all three aripiprazole switching strategies. Reversal of hyperprolactinemia during the crossover period indicates the safety and potential utility of aripiprazole addition in patients with elevated prolactin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Young Adult

This study assessed the relationship between duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and cognitive measures in order to assess if longer DUP was associated with worse performance. One hundred two patients with first episode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assessed on cognitive measures of speed of processing, episodic memory, executive function, and visual spatial processing at baseline (when patients were drug naive and after 16 weeks of olanzapine or risperidone treatment), so that a change score could be derived. DUP was defined by the emergence of psychiatric symptoms and the emergence of psychotic symptoms. Data were analyzed correlationally, parametrically (after the group was divided into long and short DUP by median split), and by regression. We found that DUP for psychotic symptoms in this group of patients was long, with a median of 46 weeks. Neither correlational, parametric analyses in which DUP served as a class variable, nor multiple regression indicated that longer DUP was associated with worse cognition at baseline or smaller magnitude of improvement in cognition. Our results suggest that while early intervention may be critical for symptom amelioration by shortening DUP, early intervention for treatment of psychiatric symptoms may have little or no impact on cognitive function. Furthermore, assuming that cognition is a core symptom of schizophrenia, the notion that ongoing psychosis is somehow toxic for a variety of information processing domains appears questionable.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Young Adult

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of divalproex sodium extended release (divalproex ER) vs placebo in combination with olanzapine or risperidone for the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center trial, a total of 402 patients were randomized and treated; 103 received olanzapine/placebo, 99 received olanzapine/divalproex ER, 101 received risperidone/placebo, and 99 received risperidone/divalproex ER. Divalproex ER was initiated on day 1 at 20 mg/kg per day q AM and was titrated to clinical effect on days 3, 7, and 10, not to exceed a maximum dosage of 35 mg/kg per day. Olanzapine and risperidone were initiated at 5 and 2 mg/day q PM, respectively, increased to 10 and 4 mg/day on day 3, and increased to fixed target doses of 15 and 6 mg/day on day 6. No significant treatment difference was demonstrated between the combination therapy and antipsychotic monotherapy groups on the primary efficacy variable of the mean change from baseline to day 14 last observation carried forward on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, although antipsychotic monotherapy did demonstrate superiority to combination therapy on the PANSS Negative subscale at several time points. Combination therapy also failed to show an advantage over antipsychotic monotherapy at day 84 on the PANSS total score. Most adverse events observed in the study were mild to moderate in severity, and the overall number of adverse events did not differ significantly between the combination therapy groups and their corresponding antipsychotic monotherapy group.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

To assess olanzapine's efficacy and tolerability in adolescents with schizophrenia.. One hundred seven inpatient and outpatient adolescents (olanzapine, n = 72, mean age 16.1 years; placebo, n = 35, mean age 16.3 years) with schizophrenia participated in this randomized (2:1), international, multisite, industry-sponsored trial. All patients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia, and they were treated for up to 6 weeks with flexible doses of olanzapine (2.5-20.0 mg/day) or placebo. Last-observation-carried-forward mean changes from baseline to endpoint on the anchored version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were assessed.. More olanzapine-treated versus placebo-treated patients completed the trial (68.1% versus 42.9%, p =.020). Compared with placebo-treated patients, olanzapine-treated adolescents had significantly greater improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children total (p =.003), Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (p =.004), PANSS total (p =.005), and PANSS positive scores (p =.002). Olanzapine-treated patients gained significantly more baseline-to-endpoint weight (4.3 kg versus 0.1 kg, p <.001). Significantly more olanzapine-treated versus placebo-treated patients gained 7% or greater of their body weight at any time during treatment (45.8% versus 14.7%, p =.002). Prolactin and triglyceride mean baseline-to-endpoint changes were significantly higher in olanzapine-treated versus placebo-treated adolescents. The incidence of treatment-emergent significant changes in fasting glucose, cholesterol, or triglycerides did not differ between the groups at endpoint, but significantly more olanzapine-treated patients had high triglycerides at any time during treatment.. Olanzapine-treated adolescents with schizophrenia experienced significant symptom improvement. Significant increases in weight, triglycerides, uric acid, most liver function tests, and prolactin were observed during olanzapine treatment.Clinical trial registration information-Olanzapine Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Adolescents With Schizophrenia. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00051298.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Child; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Male; Olanzapine; Psychometrics; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Excessive body weight gain (BWG), hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia are important side effects of olanzapine. We assessed the effects of rosiglitazone on BWG, the insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), lipids, glycated hemoglobin and fibrinogen in olanzapine-treated schizophrenia patients.. Thirty patients taking olanzapine (10-20 mg daily for 8 months) were randomly allocated to rosiglitazone (n=15; 4 to 8 mg daily) or placebo (n=15) in a 12-week double-blind protocol. Anthropometric and biochemical variables were evaluated at baseline, weeks 6 and 12.. The rosiglitazone and placebo groups gained 3.2+/-4.5 and 2.2+/-2.3 kg, respectively (p=0.65). Insulin and the HOMA-IR significantly decreased after rosiglitazone (p<0.05). Rosiglitazone did not improve the lipid profile, fibrinogen and Hb1c levels.. The positive impact of rosiglitazone was limited to improved glycemic control. It cannot be recommended for metabolic control during olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinogen; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Rosiglitazone; Schizophrenia; Statistics as Topic; Thiazolidinediones

Studies describing long-term continuous care of outpatients with schizophrenia are relatively scarce. The prospective European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study (SOHO) provides data on a cohort of schizophrenic patients over a period of three years.. Prospective, long-term, observational study including outpatients who initiate therapy or change to a new antipsychotic. The study was designed to provide two patient groups of approximately equal size: treated either with olanzapine or a non-olanzapine antipsychotic. Sociodemographic, clinical and disease characteristics at baseline were described. Clinical severity of symptoms was assessed at each visit using the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). Treatment outcomes were analyzed as treatment discontinuation, remission and relapse rates.. French results are presented in this report. Nine hundred and thirty-three patients (62% males) were recruited between March and December 2001. The mean age was 37.1+/-11.5 years. The mean time since first consultation for schizophrenia was 8.0+/-9.3 years. At study baseline, one quarter had paid employment, less than one third had a spouse or partner and more than half of them had an independent housing. Thirty percent of patients reported a previous suicide attempt. The mean CGI was 4.5+/-1.0 at admission. Overall, medication discontinuation for any cause occurred for 42% of patients. A remission (defined by a CGI

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cohort Studies; European Union; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Remission Induction; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Suicide, Attempted; Treatment Outcome

The electronic Schizophrenia Treatment Adherence Registry (e-STAR) is a prospective, observational study of patients with schizophrenia designed to evaluate long-term treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice.. Parameters were assessed at baseline and at 3 month intervals for 2 years in patients initiated on risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) (n=1345) or a new oral antipsychotic (AP) (n=277; 35.7% and 36.5% on risperidone and olanzapine, respectively) in Spain. Hospitalization prior to therapy was assessed by a retrospective chart review.. At 24 months, treatment retention (81.8% for RLAI versus 63.4% for oral APs, p<0.0001) and reduction in Clinical Global Impression Severity scores (-1.14 for RLAI versus -0.94 for APs, p=0.0165) were significantly higher with RLAI. Compared to the pre-switch period, RLAI patients had greater reductions in the number (reduction of 0.37 stays per patient versus 0.2, p<0.05) and days (18.74 versus 13.02, p<0.01) of hospitalizations at 24 months than oral AP patients.. This 2 year, prospective, observational study showed that, compared to oral antipsychotics, RLAI was associated with better treatment retention, greater improvement in clinical symptoms and functioning, and greater reduction in hospital stays and days in hospital in patients with schizophrenia. Improved treatment adherence, increased efficacy and reduced hospitalization with RLAI offer the opportunity of substantial therapeutic improvement in schizophrenia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Long-Term Care; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Readmission; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Registries; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Signal detection methods were used to identify values of metabolic variables that predict development of prediabetes or diabetes before (moderators) or associated with treatment (mediators), utilizing data from two multi-center clinical trials of patients with schizophrenia, treated for 6 months with olanzapine (OLZ) or ziprasidone (ZIP). At baseline, participants were often overweight/obese (63% with a body mass index >or=25.0kg/m(2)), dyslipidemic [more than one-third had elevated triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations], and prediabetic (20%). Weight gain was significantly greater in OLZ-treated patients, as was accentuation of dyslipidemia. However, there were no significant correlations between weight gain and lipid changes from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8 or to last observation. Type 2 diabetes developed in 4% and prediabetes in 18% of the population. Significant baseline predictors of diabetes were a HDL-C concentration <28mg/dL, or being >or=58-years-old if HDL-C concentration was >or=28mg/dL. Baseline plasma glucose concentration >or=92mg/dL was the only significant predictor of developing prediabetes, accounting for 60% of cases. Post-treatment increments in plasma TG concentrations >or=145mg/dL or >or=59mg/dL were significant predictors of diabetes (23%) or prediabetes (27%), respectively. If the increase in TG was <145mg/dL, rapid weight gain >or=6.1kg in 2 weeks predicted development of diabetes (18%). These findings provide a quantitative approach to identify those at greatest treatment-associated risk to develop glucose intolerance, and emphasize the need to address co-morbid medical disorders in these patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Lipid Metabolism; Lipoproteins, HDL; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prediabetic State; Predictive Value of Tests; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The second-generation antipsychotic agents clozapine and olanzapine have been associated with weight gain and increased lipid and glucose blood levels. Since some of the neurotransmitters that are impaired in aggressive patients are involved in lipid/glucose metabolism, aggressive patients may represent a subgroup with a differential profile of adverse metabolic reactions to these medications. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of clozapine and olanzapine in comparison to the first-generation agent haloperidol on these metabolic parameters in aggressive patients with schizophrenia.. 110 inpatients with schizophrenia and a history of physical assaults were included in a randomized double-blind 12-week study. Fasting glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides were collected at baseline and at the end of the study. Ninety-three patients provided blood samples at baseline and at least at one point after randomization to clozapine (N=34), olanzapine (N=31) or haloperidol (N=28).. There were significant differences among the three medication groups in weight gain and in increases in blood lipids and glucose. Patients on haloperidol showed no increase on any of these parameters. Patients on olanzapine gained the most weight, but patients on clozapine had the greatest increases in cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose. An effect of ethnicity was observed, as African-American patients were more likely to develop metabolic abnormalities than other ethnic groups, especially on clozapine.. In this prospective randomized trial, clozapine and olanzapine were associated with weight gain. Clozapine was associated with increases in both lipids and glucose. This effect was most prominent in the African-American patients.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Ethnicity; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Inpatients; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; Young Adult

This study sought to examine the effect of ziprasidone on olanzapine or clozapine-associated medical morbidity such as insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose, obesity, and hyperlipidemia in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. This was a 6-week, open label trial of ziprasidone 160 mg/day added to a stable dose of olanzapine or clozapine in 21 schizophrenia or schizoaffective patients with DM, impaired fasting glucose, or insulin resistance.. Ten olanzapine-treated subjects and 11 clozapine-treated subjects were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline for age, gender, education, ethnicity, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. At week 6, there were no significant changes in weight, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. There was no significant difference in psychotic, negative, or depressive symptoms. QTc significantly increased at week 2 but not at week 6.. The addition of 160 mg/day of ziprasidone was well tolerated but did not produce significant improvement in fasting glucose, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia or lead to weight loss in olanzapine- or clozapine-treated subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors

To evaluate the effectiveness of olanzapine versus aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia.. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with schizophrenia (diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR criteria) were randomly assigned to either olanzapine (n = 281) or aripiprazole (n = 285) for 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. The primary outcome was time to all-cause discontinuation. Efficacy was measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total change from baseline. Time-to-event data were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was conducted from October 2003 to July 2007.. Treatment groups did not differ significantly in time to all-cause discontinuation (p = .067) or all-cause discontinuation rate (olanzapine, 42.7% vs. aripiprazole, 50.2%; p = .053). Olanzapine-treated patients had significantly longer time to efficacy-related discontinuation (p < .001) and a significantly lower efficacy-related discontinuation rate (olanzapine, 8.9% vs. aripiprazole, 16.8%; p = .006). Olanzapine-treated patients had a significantly greater mean decrease (last observation carried forward) in PANSS total score (-30.2) than did aripiprazole-treated patients (-25.9, p = .014). Olanzapine-treated patients had a mean weight change of +3.4 kg (vs. +0.3 kg for aripiprazole-treated patients; p < .001) and a significantly greater incidence of >or= 7% body weight gain at any time (40.3% vs. 16.4%; p < .001). Fasting mean glucose change was +4.87 mg/dL for olanzapine and +0.90 mg/dL for aripiprazole (p = .045). Incidence of baseline glucose < 100 mg/dL and >or= 126 mg/dL at any time was 1.7% for olanzapine and 0.6% for aripiprazole (p = .623). Fasting mean total cholesterol change was +4.09 mg/dL for olanzapine and -9.85 mg/dL for aripiprazole (p < .001). Incidence of baseline total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL and >or= 240 mg/dL at any time was 9.2% for olanzapine and 1.5% for aripiprazole (p = .008). Fasting mean triglycerides change was +25.66 mg/dL for olanzapine and -17.52 mg/dL for aripiprazole (p < .001). Treatment groups did not significantly differ on measures of extrapyramidal symptoms.. Treatment groups did not differ significantly on the primary outcome. Olanzapine-treated patients had significantly greater improvement in symptom efficacy at 28 weeks as well as significantly greater mean increases in weight and glucose and significantly greater worsening on lipids parameters.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00088049.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires

This randomized, 24-week, flexible-dose study compared changes in glucose metabolism in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia receiving initial exposure to olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone.. The hypothesized primary endpoint was change (baseline to week 24) in area under the curve (AUC) 0- to 2-hour plasma glucose values during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); primary analysis: olanzapine versus quetiapine. Secondary endpoints included mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour plasma insulin values, insulin sensitivity index, and fasting lipids. The first patient enrolled on April 29, 2004, and the last patient completed the study on October 24, 2005.. Mean weight change (kg) over 24 weeks was +3.7 (quetiapine), +4.6 (olanzapine), and +3.6 (risperidone). Based on data from 395 patients (quetiapine, N = 115 [mean dose = 607.0 mg/day], olanzapine, N = 146 [mean dose = 15.2 mg/day], and risperidone, N = 134 [mean dose = 5.2 mg/day]), mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose value (mg/dL x h) at week 24 was significantly lower for quetiapine versus olanzapine (t = 1.98, df = 377, p = .048). Increases in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose values were statistically significant with olanzapine (+21.9 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 11.5 to 32.4 mg/dL x h) and risperidone (+18.8 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 8.1 to 29.4 mg/dL x h), but not quetiapine (+9.1 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = -2.3 to 20.5 mg/dL x h). AUC 0- to 2-hour insulin values increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+24.5%, 95% CI = 11.5% to 39.0%), but not with quetiapine or risperidone. Reductions in insulin sensitivity index were statistically significant with olanzapine (-19.1%, 95% CI = -27.9% to -9.3%) and risperidone (-15.8%, 95% CI = -25.1% to -5.4%), but not quetiapine. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+21.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.0 to 29.2 mg/dL, and +20.5 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.8 to 27.1 mg/dL, respectively) and quetiapine (+13.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 4.3 to 21.9 mg/dL, and +13.3 mg/dL, 95% CI = 6.1 to 20.5 mg/dL, respectively), but not risperidone. Statistically significant increases in triglycerides (+30.9 mg/dL, 95% CI = 10.9 to 51.0 mg/dL), total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (0.5, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8), and triglyceride/HDL ratio (0.3, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.6) were observed with olanzapine only.. The results indicate a significant difference in the change in glucose tolerance during 6 months' treatment with olanzapine versus quetiapine, with significant reductions on olanzapine and risperidone, but not quetiapine; these differential changes were largely explained by changes in insulin sensitivity.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00214578.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Glucose; Humans; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides; Young Adult

Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders is highly prevalent and notably influences functional outcomes.. To characterise the cognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotic drugs.. One hundred consecutive and previously unmedicated patients with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders were admitted. Seventy-seven completed baseline, 1-month and 6-month psychopathological and neuropsychological assessments. Patients were randomised to risperidone or olanzapine treatment. Four final treatment allocation groups were defined since patients continued treatment in their normal setting: risperidone, olanzapine, mixed and no-antipsychotic groups.. There were no differences in cognitive effectiveness between the four treatment groups. Reliable change index methods demonstrated that nearly a half of patients showed an improvement in Global Cognitive Score at the 6-month assessment. Improvement on the neuropsychological tests ranged from 17 to 54%. A strong predictor of cognitive response was poor performance on baseline neuropsychological tests; response was moderately influenced by a low premorbid scholastic performance and IQ.. Cognitive improvement related to second-generation antipsychotic drugs appeared within the first 4 weeks of treatment and persisted at 6 months irrespective of treatment group. Greater cognitive dysfunction at baseline and lower premorbid cognitive background predicted cognitive improvement in our sample.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Educational Status; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Statistics as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Most antipsychotics are thought to have an effect on D(2) and D(3) receptors. The development of carbon 11-labeled (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine ([(11)C]-(+)-PHNO), the first agonist radioligand with higher affinity for D(3) than D(2) receptors, allows one to differentiate the effects of antipsychotics on high-affinity vs low-affinity sites of the D(2) receptor and on D(3) vs D(2) receptor subtypes.. To examine the effects of antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, or olanzapine) on the high- vs high- + low-affinity sites of the D(2) and D(3) receptors by comparing the [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and [(11)C]raclopride binding in the D(3) receptor-rich (globus pallidus and ventral striatum) and D(2) receptor-rich (caudate and putamen) regions.. Two sequential studies with different participants and appropriate controls were performed. The first compared the occupancy produced by 3 antipsychotics as measured with [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and [(11)C]raclopride. The second was a double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment to compare the effect of pramipexole (a D(3) receptor-preferring agonist) vs placebo on the increased [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO signal observed in the globus pallidus of patients.. Positron Emission Tomography Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.. Twenty-three patients with schizophrenia and 23 healthy controls.. Antipsychotic occupancies as measured with [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and [(11)C]raclopride.. The antipsychotic-treated patients showed high occupancies with both [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and [(11)C]raclopride in the dorsal striatum, with [(11)C]raclopride occupancies about 20% higher. Most strikingly, patients did not show any occupancy with [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO in the globus pallidus as compared with normal controls or with their own scans using [(11)C]raclopride. This unblocked [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO signal was displaced by a single dose of pramipexole.. Antipsychotics block both the high- and low-affinity states of the D(2) receptors across the brain, but antipsychotic treatment does not block the [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO signal in the D(3) receptor-rich regions, despite the ongoing D(2) receptor blockade. This [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO signal in regions such as the globus pallidus seems increased despite antipsychotic treatment and is displaceable by a D(3) receptor-preferring agonist. The radiotracer [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and the data open up new avenues for exploring the potential therapeutic significance of the D(3) receptor in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia; Benzodiazepines; Benzothiazoles; Binding, Competitive; Carbon Radioisotopes; Caudate Nucleus; Clozapine; Dopamine Agonists; Dopamine Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Globus Pallidus; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Oxazines; Positron-Emission Tomography; Pramipexole; Putamen; Raclopride; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

To examine the impact of medication nonadherence on treatment outcome in schizophrenia and potential risk factors for nonadherence.. A post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, 8-week, fixed-dose study comparing olanzapine 10, 20, and 40 mg/day for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria) with suboptimal response to current treatment (N = 599) was conducted between September 12, 2003, and November 3, 2005, at 55 study centers in the United States. Nonadherence was defined as not taking medication as prescribed based on daily pill counts. Because there was no significant difference in nonadherence between dose groups, effects of nonadherence on efficacy and safety outcomes were examined using all 3 groups combined. Baseline demographics and symptom severity were investigated as potential risk factors for nonadherence.. During the 8-week study, 34.5% of patients were nonadherent at least once. Nonadherent patients had significantly less improvement compared to adherent patients as measured by change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (-22.57 vs. -26.84, p = .002). Longer duration of nonadherence was associated with reduced likelihood of treatment response (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.99, p = .008). The early treatment discontinuation rate was higher in nonadherent compared to adherent patients (40.8% vs. 24.5%, p < .001). Adherent and nonadherent patients had comparable outcomes in most safety measures, except for weight change, for which adherent patients had greater weight gain than nonadherent patients (2.63 kg vs. 1.96 kg, p = .02). Greater depression severity at baseline (p = .01) and greater hostility level during the study were significant risk factors for nonadherence (p = .02).. Medication nonadherence had a significantly negative impact on treatment response, highlighting the importance of adherence to achieve satisfactory treatment outcome. Findings may also help clinicians identify patients at risk for nonadherence and utilize interventions to improve adherence.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00100776.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine treatment has been associated with clinically meaningful weight increases, hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus. There are few options for olanzapine responders who fail other antipsychotic agents. Aripiprazole is a potent (high-affinity) partial agonist at D2 and 5-HT1A receptors and a potent antagonist at 5-HT2A receptor and is associated with less weight gain than olanzapine. We report the results of a 10-week placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study that examined 15 mg/d aripiprazole's effects on weight, lipids, glucose metabolism, and psychopathology in overweight and obese schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder subjects treated with a stable dose of olanzapine. During the 4 weeks of aripiprazole treatment, there were significant decreases in weight (P = 0.003) and body mass index (P = 0.004) compared with placebo. Total serum cholesterol (P = 0.208), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; P = 0.99), HDL-2 (P = 0.08), HDL-3 (P = 0.495), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.665) did not change significantly comparing aripiprazole treatment to placebo treatment. However, total serum triglycerides (P = 0.001), total very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C; P = 0.01), and VLDL-1C and VLDL-2C (P = 0.012) decreased significantly during the aripiprazole treatment phase. The VLDL-3C tended lower during aripiprazole, but the decrease was not significant (P = 0.062). There was a decrease in C-reactive protein comparing aripiprazole treatment to placebo, although it did not reach significance (P = 0.087). The addition of aripiprazole to a stable dose of olanzapine was well tolerated and resulted in significant improvements on several outcome measures that predict risk for medical morbidity.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Overweight; Piperazines; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Triglycerides

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; alpha-Tocopherol; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Double-Blind Method; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Oxidative Stress; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

To compare the effectiveness of a switch from haloperidol (N=99), olanzapine (N=82), or risperidone (N=104) to 12 weeks of treatment with 80-160 mg/day ziprasidone in patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Stable outpatients with persistent symptoms or troublesome side effects were switched using one of three 1-week taper/switch strategies as determined by the investigator. Efficacy was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score, Clinical Global Impression, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and tolerability by using standard measures of weight change, extrapyramidal symptoms, and laboratory findings. Suboptimal efficacy was the primary reason for switching. The preferred switch strategy was immediate discontinuation, and the preferred dosing regimen was 120 mg/day. Completer rates were 68, 60, and 86% in the haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine pre-switch groups, respectively. At week 12, a switch to ziprasidone resulted in statistically significant improvement from baseline on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning scales, reduction in extrapyramidal symptoms and a neutral impact on metabolic parameters. Switch from olanzapine and risperidone resulted in weight reduction and from haloperidol in some weight increase. In conclusion, oral ziprasidone of 80-160 mg/day with food was a clinically valuable treatment option for stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder experiencing suboptimal efficacy or poor tolerability with haloperidol, olanzapine, or risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles

In treatment-resistant schizophrenia a combination of ECT with antipsychotics has been reported to have superior outcomes compared to other strategies, however the results were inconsistent. We investigated the long-term effects of the combination of unilateral, non-dominant hemisphere ECT with three antipsychotics.. The clinical study was a naturalistic, prospective, open-labeled, active-controlled study in adult outpatients of both genders suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia with a follow up of 2 years. The patients received sulpiride (n=17, 100-400mg/day, PO), risperidone (n=26, 2-8 mg/day, PO) or olanzapine (n=27, 5-10mg/day, PO). Unilateral ECT was applied in 1 unit (0.5A, 0.8 mS) in six single applications, once a week and further according to the clinical need, in fortnight steps. Clinical efficacy was established using the PANSS and CGI psychometric scales.. According to the results, the most effective treatment mode was olanzapine plus ECT, then risperidone plus ECT, while sulpiride plus ECT had lower clinical efficacy. Olanzapine plus ECT was significantly superior in all scale scores vs sulpiride plus ECT, as well as risperidone plus ECT except for PANSS-P (t=1.85, p>0.05). During the study, 38 of 70 patients were withdrawn due to treatment failure (n=21), side effects (n=6) and non-compliance (n=11).. The combination of novel antipsychotics and ECT can be used safely and effectively in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Combined Modality Therapy; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Young Adult

Neurocognitive impairment and psychiatric symptoms have been associated with deficits in psychosocial and occupational functioning in patients with schizophrenia. This post-hoc analysis evaluates the relationships among cognition, psychopathology, and psychosocial functioning in patients with schizophrenia at baseline and following sustained treatment with antipsychotic drugs.. Data were obtained from a clinical trial assessing the cognitive effects of selected antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomly assigned to 24 weeks of treatment with olanzapine (n = 159), risperidone (n = 158), or haloperidol (n = 97). Psychosocial functioning was assessed with the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale [QLS], cognition with a standard battery of neurocognitive tests; and psychiatric symptoms with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]. A path-analytic approach was used to evaluate the effects of changes in cognitive functioning on subdomains of quality of life, and to determine whether such effects were direct or mediated via changes in psychiatric symptoms.. At baseline, processing speed affected functioning mainly indirectly via negative symptoms. Positive symptoms also affected functioning at baseline although independent of cognition. At 24 weeks, changes in processing speed affected changes in functioning both directly and indirectly via PANSS negative subscale scores. Positive symptoms no longer contributed to the path-analytic models. Although a consistent relationship was observed between processing speed and the 3 functional domains, variation existed as to whether the paths were direct and/or indirect. Working memory and verbal memory did not significantly contribute to any of the path-analytic models studied.. Processing speed demonstrated direct and indirect effects via negative symptoms on three domains of functioning as measured by the QLS at baseline and following 24 weeks of antipsychotic treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this 6-month observational study was to examine which clinical, eating- and lifestyle-related factors were associated with weight gain in patients initiating or switching to oral olanzapine for the treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar mania. A total of 622 outpatients in four countries (China, Mexico, Romania, Taiwan) were assessed at monthly intervals for up to 6 months. Mixed model repeated-measures analysis, adjusted for baseline weight, was used to identify which factors were associated with weight gain during olanzapine therapy. After 6 months of therapy, the LS mean weight change was +4.1 kg and 43.9% of the patients had significant (> or = 7%) weight gain. Early significant weight gain after 2 months of therapy occurred in 23.4% of the patients and these patients gained significantly more weight overall. Ten factors were associated with weight gain during 6 months of olanzapine therapy in an exploratory multivariate analysis: country, housing conditions, stronger appetite, excessive amount of food needed to feel full, eating until uncomfortably full, thoughts preoccupied with food, meal location, increased meal frequency, evening snack consumption, and a lower amount of vigorous exercise. These results indicate that the influence of environmental, eating- and lifestyle-related factors should be considered when assessing weight gain during olanzapine therapy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Demography; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Feeding Behavior; Female; Health Status; Humans; International Cooperation; Life Style; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Weight Gain

The regional neuronal changes taking place in the early and late stages of antipsychotic treatment are still not well characterized in humans. In addition, it is not known whether these regional changes are predictive of or are correlated with treatment response. Using PET with 15O, we evaluated the time course of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) patterns generated by a first (haloperidol) and a second (olanzapine) generation antipsychotic drug in patients with schizophrenia during a 6-week treatment trial. Patients were initially scanned after withdrawal of all psychotropic medication (2 weeks), and then blindly randomized to treatment with haloperidol (n=12) or olanzapine (n=17) for a period of 6 weeks. Patients were scanned again after 1 and 6 weeks of treatment. All assessments, including scanning sessions, were obtained in a double-blind manner. As hypothesized, we observed rCBF changes that were common to both the drugs, implicating cortico-subcortical and limbic neuronal networks in antipsychotic action. In addition, in these regions, some patterns seen at weeks 1 and 6 were distinctive, indexing neuronal changes related to an early (ventral striatum, hippocampus) and consolidated (anterior cingulate/medial frontal cortex) stage of drug response. Finally, both after 1 and 6 weeks of treatment, we observed differential patterns of rCBF activation between good and poor responders. After 1 week of treatment, greater rCBF increase in the ventral striatum and greater decrease in the hippocampus were associated with good response.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Limbic System; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Radionuclide Imaging; Regional Blood Flow; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

An open-label study was performed to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (Zyprexa Zydis) in ameliorating excitement symptoms in the acute phase of schizophrenia. Fifty-three patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for first-episode schizophrenia and treated with olanzapine monotherapy were evaluated with regard to their clinical improvement, behavioural response to medication, and extrapyramidal side effects using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC), Nursing Assessment of Medication Acceptance (NAMA), and Drug-Induced Extra-Pyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS), respectively. Scores of PANSS-EC were significantly reduced after 3 days of olanzapine administration. A reduction in NAMA scores was also observed 7 days after administration of olanzapine. The DIEPSS score was unaffected by olanzapine administration. These results suggest that olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets are effective and well-tolerated for treatment excitement in the acute phase of schizophrenic patients. In addition, it is possible that adherence to medications is improved by using olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Solubility; Young Adult

Comparisons of diabetic potential, glucose related metabolic levels, and insulin resistance between olanzapine and risperidone have produced variable results in cross-sectional and epidemiologic studies. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects during treatment with these drugs may provide results that are more informative.. Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-IV), most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting glucose, insulin, insulin-related metabolic measures, and prolactin were assessed, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed during baseline and months 1, 2, and 5 of treatment. Weight was assessed monthly, and waist and hip measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data were analyzed on 23 patients randomly assigned to risperidone and 23 patients randomly assigned to olanzapine. The study was conducted from February 2003 to August 2007.. Most patients were overweight or obese at baseline (mean body mass index [BMI] = 29.4), but there were no differential drug effects on weight change and no differences between drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no overall drug treatment differences in fasting glucose or glycohemoglobin or 2-hour glucose levels in OGTT and no differences between the two drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no consistent drug treatment differences in the number of patients who developed borderline or diabetic glucose levels. Olanzapine-treated patients showed a significantly greater increase than risperidone-treated patients in a fasting measure of insulin resistance (P = .041), and olanzapine patients showed greater decreases in insulin sensitivity during OGTT (P = .023) compared to risperidone-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients had a significantly greater increase in 1-hour glucose and insulin levels during OGTT in subsequent months compared to baseline and greater increase in glucose and insulin area under the curve over time than the risperdone-treated patients. Prolactin levels decreased in olanzapine patients and increased in risperidone patients (P values approximately .02). There were no significant drug treatment differences in C-peptide levels or 2 indices proposed as measures of insulin secretion or beta-cell function (homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function [HOMA-B], BIGTT-acute insulin response surrogate measure [BIGTT-AIR]). Changes in insulin resistance over time were not strongly related to changes in BMI or waist circumference during study drug treatment.. The increase in insulin levels during olanzapine treatment may compensate for the increase in insulin resistance and serve to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose levels. This may contribute to the lack of differences between olanzapine and risperidone in indices of diabetic or prediabetic glucose levels or glycohemoglobin. How many years this compensatory mechanism will persist needs further investigation. Periodic OGTT tests measuring glucose and insulin levels would be helpful in assessing the status of beta-cell insulin reserve in patients treated with olanzapine and other second-generation antipsychotics and assessing an individual patient's risk for conversion to type 2 diabetes.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00287820.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The present study explores sweet stimuli effects on hunger and negative alliesthesia in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs and controls. Those phenomena were examined in relation to previous weight gain, eating and weight-related cognitions and type of sweet stimuli: aspartame or sucrose. Alliesthesia is delayed in participants who gained weight regardless of cross group differences. A similar reduction of hunger was observed after the intake of two kinds of sweet stimuli (aspartame or sucrose) whereas alliesthesia measures were not affected. Whereas atypical antipsychotic drug-induced weight gain is linked to delayed satiety, the phenomenon is similar in magnitude in non-psychiatric controls who gained weight.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aspartame; Benzodiazepines; Carbonated Beverages; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Food Preferences; Humans; Hunger; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pleasure; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sucrose; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sweetening Agents; Taste; Time Factors; Young Adult

Recent literature documents a stronger association between nonfasting triglycerides (TG) and cardiovascular risk compared to fasting TG. Given concerns over antipsychotic effects on serum TG, this analysis explored changes in nonfasting TG in phase 1 of the CATIE Schizophrenia Trial.. Change in nonfasting TG, adjusted for baseline value, was compared between antipsychotic treatment groups using subjects with nonfasting laboratory assessments at baseline and 3 months.. Among the 246 subjects there were significant treatment differences in 3-month change from baseline (p=0.009). The greatest increases in median and adjusted mean nonfasting TG levels were seen among those randomized to quetiapine (mean+54.7 mg/dl, median+26 mg/dl) and olanzapine (mean+23.4 mg/dl, median+26.5 mg/dl), while ziprasidone was neutral (mean+0.0 mg/dl, median+8 mg/dl), and decreases were seen with risperidone (mean -18.4 mg/dl, median -6.5 mg/dl) and perphenazine (mean -1.3 mg/dl, median -22 mg/dl). Pairwise comparisons indicated a significant between-group difference for perphenazine vs. olanzapine (p=0.002) and a trend for perphenazine vs. quetiapine (p=0.006).. This analysis provides further evidence for differential antipsychotic metabolic liabilities, and confirms signals for the effects of olanzapine and quetiapine on serum TG seen in earlier CATIE analyses. Future consensus recommendations will clarify the role of nonfasting TG monitoring in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides

To evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic polypharmacy in a methodologically sound manner.. In this open-label study, 17 patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, who failed to respond to a sequential monotherapy with olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, were subsequently treated with a combination therapy with olanzapine plus risperidone for at least 8 weeks.. Seven responded according to the primary endpoint defined as the post-treatment Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale being less than 70% of the pretreatment values, and they were classified as such an average of 10 weeks after the initiation of polypharmacy. Two of them were successful in a later conversion to monotherapy. None dropped out prematurely. Four (out of 13 inpatients) got better enough to be discharged from the hospital, while six patients did not show any response. The Global Assessment of Functioning score improved from 37.1 to 53.0 in responders (mean maximum dose: olanzapine 12.9 mg; risperidone 3.14 mg), while it showed non-significant changes among others (mean maximum dose: olanzapine 14.5 mg; risperidone 5.50 mg). Body weight, prolactin, and total cholesterol increased significantly.. Antipsychotic polypharmacy might be sometimes helpful for difficult populations but at the cost of adverse effects. More studies of antipsychotic combination therapy versus clozapine, augmentation strategies or tenacious longer- term monotherapy are warranted for refractory schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polypharmacy; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

There is an ongoing debate regarding doses of antipsychotic in stable schizophrenia patients. This French pilot study was undertaken to estimate two strategies of treatment with olanzapine in stable phase - maintenance of the acute dose or dose reduction.. 6 months open, randomized trial comparing two strategies of treatment with olanzapine in 97 schizophrenia stabilized outpatients.. Mean daily doses at 6 months in the olanzapine full dose (OFD) and reduction dose (ORD) groups were respectively 18.1 mg and 13.3 mg. 4 patients (8%) relapsed in the ORD group versus 3 (6%) in the OFD group. A secondary analysis reflecting more real life setting showed a numerically higher rate of relapse in the dose reduction group (20% versus 10%).. These results suggest that maintenance treatment with olanzapine, beyond 4 months, with the same dose that was effective acutely could be useful to prevent new psychiatric hospitalization.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Evaluation; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention

Dysfunctional activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during working memory (WM) in schizophrenia patients has repeatedly been observed, however little is known about specific medication effects on the modulation of DLPFC activation. We measured activation of DLPFC during a WM task in a longitudinal fMRI study in ten schizophrenia patients first when they received conventional antipsychotics (T1) and a second time after they had been switched to olanzapine (T2). A healthy control group matched for age, handedness and gender was investigated at two corresponding time points. We analyzed the fMRI data with SPM5 in a 2 x 2 x 2 design (group x session x task). Schizophrenia patients showed fewer correct responses compared to healthy controls at both time points. The fMRI data revealed a significant group by task interaction in the bilateral DLPFC and the right parietal cortex, indicating a reduced BOLD response in the patient group. After switching to olanzapine, schizophrenia patients displayed a significant increase in the BOLD response during the 0-back condition in the DLPFC. This study showed that switching patients from conventional neuroleptics to olanzapine did not significantly alter the frontal or parietal BOLD response during working memory task. However, medication status had influences on the activation during attentional task (0-back), emphasizing the importance of baseline selection in pharmacological fMRI studies.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Female; Functional Laterality; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Oxygen; Prefrontal Cortex; Schizophrenia

The aim of this study was to evaluate metabolic and hormonal side effects in children and adolescents after 6 months of treatment with 3 different second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs).. 66 children and adolescents (44 male [66.7%], mean +/- SD age = 15.2 +/- 2.9 years) treated for 6 months with risperidone (N = 22), olanzapine (N = 20), or quetiapine (N = 24) composed the study sample. 34 patients (51.5%) suffered from schizophrenia or other psychosis (according to DSM-IV criteria). Patients were consecutively attending different programs from March 2005 to October 2006. Prior to enrollment in the study, patients were either antipsychotic-naive (37.9%, N = 25) or had been taking an antipsychotic drug for fewer than 30 days. Significant weight gain was defined as a > or = 0.5 increase in body mass index (BMI) z score (adjusted for age and gender) at 6 months. Based on recent criteria for pediatric populations, patients were considered "at risk for adverse health outcome" if they met at least 1 of the following criteria: (1) > or = 85th BMI percentile plus presence of 1 or more negative weight-related clinical outcomes, or (2) > or = 95th BMI percentile.. After the 6 months, BMI z scores increased significantly in patients receiving olanzapine and risperidone. At the 6-month follow-up, 33 patients (50.0%) showed significant weight gain. The number of patients at risk for adverse health outcome increased from 11 (16.7%) to 25 (37.9%) (p = .018). The latter increase was significant only in the olanzapine group (p = .012). Total cholesterol levels increased significantly in patients receiving olanzapine (p = .047) and quetiapine (p = .016). Treatment with quetiapine was associated with a significant decrease in free thyroxin (p = .011).. Metabolic and hormonal side effects of SGAs in children and adolescents should be carefully monitored when prescribing these drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Child; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders; Thyroxine; Triglycerides

In clinical practice, physicians often need to change the antipsychotic medications they give to patients because of an inadequate response or the presence of unacceptable or unsafe side effects. However, there is a lack of consensus in the field as to the optimal switching strategy for antipsychotics, especially with regards to the speed at which the dose of the previous antipsychotic should be reduced. This paper assesses the short-term results of strategies for the discontinuation of olanzapine when initiating risperidone.. In a 6-week, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded study, patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, on a stable drug dose for more than 30 days at entry, who were intolerant of or exhibiting a suboptimal symptom response to more than 30 days of olanzapine treatment, were randomly assigned to the following switch strategies (common risperidone initiation scheme; varying olanzapine discontinuation): (i) abrupt strategy, where olanzapine was discontinued at risperidone initiation; (ii) gradual 1 strategy, where olanzapine was given at 50% entry dose for 1 week after risperidone initiation and then discontinued; or (iii) gradual 2 strategy, where olanzapine was given at 100% entry dose for 1 week, then at 50% in the second week, and then discontinued.. The study enrolled 123 patients on stable doses of olanzapine. Their mean age was 40.3 years and mean (+/- standard deviation (SD)) baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 75.6 +/- 11.5. All-cause treatment discontinuation was lowest (12%) in the group with the slowest olanzapine dose reduction (gradual 2) and occurred at half the discontinuation rate in the other two groups (25% in abrupt and 28% in gradual 1). The relative risk of early discontinuation was 0.77 (confidence interval 0.61-0.99) for the slowest dose reduction compared with the other two strategies. After the medication was changed, improvements at endpoint were seen in PANSS total score (-7.3; p < 0.0001) and in PANSS positive (-3.0; p < 0.0001), negative (-0.9; p = 0.171) and anxiety/depression (-1.4; p = 0.0005) subscale scores. Severity of movement disorders and weight changes were minimal.. When switching patients from olanzapine to risperidone, a gradual reduction in the dose of olanzapine over 2 weeks was associated with higher rates of retention compared with abrupt or less gradual discontinuation. Switching via any strategy was associated with significant improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms and was generally well tolerated.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378183.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Withholding Treatment

Major mental disorders are associated with an increased risk for obesity-related cardiovascular mortality, leading to interest in risk-reduction approaches that target weight and risk-related plasma lipids, including use of antipsychotic agents with low metabolic risk. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the metabolic effects of aripiprazole versus olanzapine in overweight persons with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were previously on olanzapine treatment.. In total, 173 subjects with DSM-IV-TR-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to receive aripiprazole (N = 88) or olanzapine (N = 85) for 16 weeks in a study conducted from March 30, 2004, to August 8, 2006. Primary and secondary endpoints were mean weight change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in fasting triglyceride levels, respectively.. At week 16, weight decreased significantly with aripiprazole versus olanzapine (-1.8 vs. +1.41 kg; p < .001). Significant differences in percentage change in triglyceride levels were observed with aripiprazole (decreases) versus olanzapine (increases) at all time-points. In addition, significantly more subjects receiving aripiprazole had clinically relevant (> or = 7%) weight loss versus olanzapine (11.1% vs. 2.6%; p = .038), and a lower percentage of subjects receiving aripiprazole had clinically relevant weight gain (2.5% vs. 9.1%; p = .082). Mean percentage changes in fasting total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at week 16 were significantly different with aripiprazole versus olanzapine, with no significant effects on glycemic laboratory measures. Mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores for both groups were in the range of "no change" to "minimal improvement." CGI-I endpoint scores were statistically significantly better with olanzapine (mean +/- SE = 3.09 +/- 0.16) versus aripiprazole (mean +/- SE = 3.74 +/- 0.15; p < .001), and more subjects discontinued aripiprazole (N = 32/88; 36%) than olanzapine (N = 22/85; 26%).. Significant improvements in weight and lipids observed during discontinuation of olanzapine and switch to aripiprazole treatment occurred with limited evidence of negative psychiatric effects, relative to uninterrupted continuation of olanzapine treatment. The results suggest that the potential value of therapeutic substitutions involving specific antipsychotic medications should be considered in overall efforts to reduce cardiovascular risk in this population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Overweight; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Triglycerides

To examine whether subjective well-being and craving for cannabis were different in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders treated with either olanzapine or risperidone.. A 6-week, double-blind, randomized trial of olanzapine and risperidone was carried out in 128 young adults with recent onset schizophrenia or related disorders. Primary efficacy measures were the mean baseline-to-endpoint change in total scores on the Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptics scale, the Obsessive-Compulsive Drug Use Scale, the Drug Desire Questionnaire, and the cannabis use self-report. An analysis of covariance was used to test between-group differences.. Estimated D(2) receptor occupancy did not differ between olanzapine (n = 63) and risperidone (n = 65). Similar improvements in subjective well-being were found in both groups. In the comorbid cannabis-using group (n = 41, 32%), a similar decrease in craving for cannabis was found in both treatment conditions.. Both olanzapine and risperidone were associated with improved subjective well-being. No evidence was found for a differential effect of olanzapine or risperidone on subjective experience or on craving for cannabis in dosages leading to comparable dopamine D(2) occupancy.. ISRCTN46365995.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Marijuana Abuse; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires

The objective of this study was to assess the dose-response relationship of standard and higher doses of olanzapine in a randomized, double-blind, 8-week, fixed-dose study comparing olanzapine 10 (n = 199), 20 (n = 200), and 40 mg/d (n = 200) for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and suboptimal response to current treatment. Patients meeting criteria for antipsychotic treatment resistance were excluded. Dose-response relationship was assessed by linear regression analysis with log-transformed dose (independent variable) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (dependent variable). There were no significant dose group differences in patients completing the study (overall, 67.8%). All dose groups showed statistically significant improvement in PANSS total scores from baseline to end point without significant dose-response relationship (P = 0.295). Post hoc analysis of response showed significant interaction between baseline PANSS and dose (P = 0.023), indicating better response at higher doses for patients with higher baseline PANSS. There was a significant dose response for mean change in weight (P = 0.003) with significant difference between the 10- and 40-mg-dose groups (P = 0.002; 1.9 [10 mg/d], 2.3 [20 mg/d], and 3.0 kg [40 mg/d]). There was a significant dose response for change in prolactin (P < 0.001) with a significant difference between each group (-10.5 [10 mg/d], -1.7 [20 mg/d], and 4.9 ng/mL [40 mg/d]; P < or = 0.018). Over 8 weeks, non-treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder responded to all 3 doses of olanzapine, without a statistically significant dose-response relationship, suggesting that for many patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, particularly those who are mildly or moderately ill, 10 mg/d should be the initial dose of choice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To compare changes in neuropsychological functioning over time among adults with schizophrenia treated with atypical and conventional antipsychotics, controlling for phenomenological changes, medication dosage, concomitant use of anticholinergic medications, and practice effects.. In a larger clinical trial, 108 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to medication groups (risperidone, olanzapine, or conventional medications), treated in an open-label design, and monitored prospectively for 12 months using standard neuropsychological and symptomatology instruments.. Significant differential effects were evident on the ability to maintain and rapidly shift mental set within a psychomotor task, with patients in the conventional medication group consistently making more errors over time until the 12-month follow-up, when the olanzapine group made significantly more errors. Significant differential effects were also evident on delayed memory, with patients receiving olanzapine improving more steadily over time until the 12-month follow-up, when patients in the conventional group were able to recall significantly more. Positive and negative symptomatology was a significant, inversely related covariate on most of the cognitive measures examined.. The atypical and conventional medications examined were not consistently differential enhancers of cognitive functioning on disparate cognitive functioning measures over time.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mental Processes; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Performance; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Olanzapine is an efficacious drug often used as a first-line medication in the treatment for schizophrenia. However, weight gain is a notable adverse drug reaction of this medication in a proportion of patients and a major cause of noncompliance. Several hypotheses, including a contribution from hormonal, physiological and environmental factors, have been postulated. In this study, we aimed to analyze a possible association of genetic polymorphisms at four important candidate genes involved in appetite regulation and antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome with olanzapine-induced weight gain.. A total of 154 schizophrenia subjects were recruited in a systematic, 6-week, open-label trial of olanzapine. We investigated the contribution of 14 polymorphisms from four genes, namely, leptin, lipoprotein lipase, tri-acyl-glycerol lipase and citrate lyase using a binary logistic regression analysis towards olanzapine-induced weight gain.. rs 4731426 C/G SNP, a variant in the leptin gene, was moderately associated with median weight gain (Delta weight(m); [p = 0.05; OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 0.99-4.90]) and significantly associated with extreme weight gain (Delta weight(e) [p = 0.019; OR: 11.43; 95% CI: 1.49-87.55]) when average drug dose was included in a regression model. Using in silico analysis, we found that this associated intronic SNP in the leptin gene alters the binding of zinc finger 5, a transcription factor.. The leptin gene may be a promising candidate for olanzapine-induced weight gain. As the associations are modest, replicate studies are warranted. This approach may facilitate rationalized drug regimens.

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Female; Genetic Linkage; Humans; India; Leptin; Male; Metabolic Networks and Pathways; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

A recent 12-week controlled comparison demonstrated the superiority of clozapine to "high-dose" olanzapine in adolescents with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. In the present study, the authors conducted a 12-week, open-label, follow-up study to examine changes in lipid and glucose metabolism in youths maintained on clozapine and to determine whether patients who were previously randomized to high-dose olanzapine (up to 30 mg/day) responded to clozapine.. Thirty three (14 clozapine, 19 olanzapine) (85%) of 39 patients were available for the present 12-week, open-label extension study. Extended safety data using an intention-to-treat analysis from the 14 subjects treated with clozapine for a total of 24 weeks are presented. In addition, we report the clinical outcomes for 10 of 19 olanzapine-treated patients who were switched after 12 weeks to clozapine due to treatment nonresponse. Clinical response was defined as a decrease of 30% or more in total Brief Psychiatric Rating score from week 12 and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).. The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (defined as fasting triglycerides >125 mg/dL) (10/14 = 71%) and the incidence of "prediabetes" (defined as fasting blood glucose > or =100) (4/14 = 29%) at week 24 in the clozapine-treated subjects were notable. Seven (70%) of 10 of young patients with schizophrenia who failed treatment with "high-dose" olanzapine were found to respond to a 12-week, open-label clozapine trial.. Clinicians and caregivers need to be aware of potential metabolic adverse events of long-term clozapine treatment. Adolescents with a poor response to olanzapine may do better on clozapine.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertriglyceridemia; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

There is a limited evidence base to guide treatment of children and adolescents with nonaffective psychoses because few comparative studies of first-line second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have been undertaken. To plan the design of a subsequent randomized controlled trial (RCT), the authors conducted this pilot study to demonstrate the feasibility of the treatment and measurement protocols.. Thirty children and adolescents (20 males, 10 females), ages 10-18 years, who met unmodified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria for a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (schizophrenia, schizoaffective, schizophreniform, psychotic disorder not otherwise specified) were randomized to receive 12 weeks of open-label, flexibly dosed treatment with either risperidone (mean [standard deviation, SD] dose = 3.4 mg [1.5]), olanzapine (mean [SD] dose = 14.0 mg [4.6]) or quetiapine (mean [SD] dose = 611 mg [253.4]).. Twenty one (70%) of 30 subjects completed the study. There was no overall statistically significant difference with regard to reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores in treatment efficacy observed (F((2,24)) = 3.13, p = 0.06). However, the possibility of a large differential treatment effect with regard to change in PANSS total scores favoring risperidone relative to quetiapine (risperidone vs. quetiapine, d = 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.09-2.01]) was suggested by the point estimate.. These preliminary data, viewed together with the extant literature, suggest that a future larger RCT with only two treatment arms may be warranted to establish whether there is a clinically significant differential treatment effect between risperidone and quetiapine for children and adolescents with nonaffective psychoses. Additional challenges and considerations for mounting a larger RCT are explored.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Agitation is a common phenomenon in schizophrenia or acute mania. Because of the inability of patients to give informed consent in such situations, data from consenting studies are limited.. This observational prospective 5-day study evaluated the effectiveness of olanzapine in a sample of highly agitated patients with aggression. Primary endpoint was mean change of the PANSS-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) score.. Mean PANSS-EC score at baseline was 25.5 points, 60.2% were severely agitated and 41.6% severely aggressive. A significant decrease in PANSS-EC total score (-13.3 points) was observed with rapid dose escalation and an average daily dose of 21.2 mg/day of olanzapine. 40 patients (24.1%) required treatment with another antipsychotic and 21 patients (12.7%) were not treated with olanzapine at day 5. At endpoint, 64.2% of patients were in remission of agitation. PANSS-EC reduction was not significantly different in patients with or without concurrent benzodiazepine use.. Severe agitation with aggression may be well controlled with olanzapine in many cases, possibly by higher initial and overall doses of olanzapine. Controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There is uncertainty regarding the onset timing of the cognitive deficiencies of schizophrenia. We investigated whether conversion to psychosis and/or olanzapine altered the neuropsychological course of subjects within the first-ever double blind medication study of the putative schizophrenia first episode prodrome.. Sixty participants in a double blind trial of olanzapine as a treatment for putative prodromal states were assessed at entry (pre-randomization), and again at 6 and 12 months (if they remained non-psychotic), or at any of these points prior to psychosis followed by post-psychosis and 6 months post-psychosis assessments.. Participants who converted to psychosis did not differ from placebo non-converters in pre-randomization global neuropsychological status. Early converters did not differ from later converters in entry neuropsychological status. Subjects who converted after 6 months did not show neuropsychological declines during the initial, pre-psychosis, 6 months. Neuropsychological course did not differ between converters to psychosis and non-converters, or between olanzapine and placebo-assigned subjects.. Neither the onset of frank psychosis nor olanzapine treatment of the prodrome significantly alters neuropsychological course in persons considered to be at high risk at their initial (pre-psychosis) assessment. These findings suggest that the neuropsychological deficiencies associated with psychotic conditions largely pre-exist the first frank psychotic episode.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; North America; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The present study examined the ability of the International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) and the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) to predict suicide attempts or hospitalizations to prevent attempts (referred to as Type 1 events) during the InterSePT trial [Meltzer, H.Y., Alphs, L., Green, A.I., Altamura, A.C., Anand, R., Bertoldi, A., Bourgeois, M., Chouinard, G., Islam, M.Z., Kane, J., Krishman, R., Lindenmayer, J.P., Potkin, S., 2003. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia. Archive of General Psychiatry 60, 82-91]. The primary goal of this analysis was to determine if the ISST and CDS ratings indicated that the raters, an unblinded (UP) and a blinded psychiatrist (BP) using the ISST, and a blinded rater using the CDS, were able to identify those patients who had a Type 1 event. The ratings of patients adjudged to have experienced a Type 1 event (Group 1) were compared with patients who did not (Group 2). The ISST and the CDS ratings obtained 2-8 weeks prior to a Type 1 event (Pre-1) and Pre-2, the rating immediately prior to Pre-1, obtained 2-12 weeks before Pre-1, were analyzed to test the hypothesis that the difference between Pre-2 and Pre-1 ratings for the Group 1 patients was significantly greater than the difference in the comparable ratings for Group 2 patients. The prediction that patients with Type 1 events would show greater worsening in ISST and CDS ratings between Pre-2 and Pre-1 than the Group 2 patients was confirmed. However, the sensitivity and specificity of a worsening in ratings was not sufficient to provide definitive warning of an impending Type 1 event. Other characteristics of the patients with Type 1 events provide additional warning: e.g. overall higher ratings on these scales, slower improvement in suicidality during treatment, and previous number of suicide attempts. These results indicate that the ISST and CDS may provide some additional information that can assist clinical decision making regarding suicidal risk in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Olanzapine; Personality Inventory; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Suicide; Suicide Prevention; Suicide, Attempted; Thinking

Atypical (second-generation) antipsychotics are considered standard treatment for children and adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. However, the superiority of second-generation antipsychotics over first-generation antipsychotics has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two second-generation antipsychotics (olanzapine and risperidone) with a first-generation antipsychotic (molindone) in the treatment of early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.. This double-blind multisite trial randomly assigned pediatric patients with early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder to treatment with either olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), risperidone (0.5-6 mg/day), or molindone (10-140 mg/day, plus 1 mg/day of benztropine) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was response to treatment, defined as a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement score of 1 or 2 and >or=20% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score after 8 weeks of treatment.. In total, 119 youth were randomly assigned to treatment. Of these subjects, 116 received at least one dose of treatment and thus were available for analysis. No significant differences were found among treatment groups in response rates (molindone: 50%; olanzapine: 34%; risperidone: 46%) or magnitude of symptom reduction. Olanzapine and risperidone were associated with significantly greater weight gain. Olanzapine showed the greatest risk of weight gain and significant increases in fasting cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, insulin, and liver transaminase levels. Molindone led to more self-reports of akathisia.. Risperidone and olanzapine did not demonstrate superior efficacy over molindone for treating early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Adverse effects were frequent but differed among medications. The results question the nearly exclusive use of second-generation antipsychotics to treat early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The safety findings related to weight gain and metabolic problems raise important public health concerns, given the widespread use of second-generation antipsychotics in youth for nonpsychotic disorders.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Molindone; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of olanzapine, clozapine, and haloperidol on neurocognitive function in schizophrenic patients who present with documented episodes of physical aggression and to determine whether change in cognitive function is related to aggression. One hundred physically aggressive schizophrenic inpatients were assigned to a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week treatment, and received cognitive evaluations at baseline. There were 33, 34, and 33 subjects in the clozapine, olanzapine, and haloperidol groups, respectively. They were administered a battery of tests assessing psychomotor function, general executive function, visual and verbal memory, and visuospatial ability. A general cognitive index was derived from the above battery. The overall score on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale was used to measure the number and severity of the aggressive events. Psychiatric symptoms and side effects were also assessed. The improvement in the general cognitive index differed significantly among the 3 treatment groups, with olanzapine being superior to both haloperidol and clozapine. Further analyses revealed significantly greater improvement with olanzapine in several cognitive domains. Furthermore, improvement in the general cognitive index was significantly associated with a decrease in aggression in the olanzapine group but not in the other 2 medication groups. In violent schizophrenic patients, olanzapine treatment is associated with better cognitive functioning relative to haloperidol and clozapine. This improvement in neurocognitive function is associated with a decrease in aggressive behavior. As clozapine markedly reduced aggression, there may be different pathways for the antiaggressive effect of olanzapine and that of clozapine.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Violence

Tobacco consumption has been recognized as a factor mediating the interindividual variations in olanzapine's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The primary objective of this study was to describe the dose effect of smoking on the dose-plasma concentration relationship and the pharmacokinetics of oral olanzapine in male schizophrenic patients using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrochemical detector. Twenty-seven male schizophrenic inpatients were recruited and were stratified into the following groups according to smoking behaviors: non-smokers (n=9), light-smokers (1-4 cigarettes per day; n=9), and heavy-smokers (>or=5 cigarettes per day; n=9). Plasma olanzapine concentrations were determined up to 120 h following a single oral dose of 10 mg olanzapine. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by the non-compartment method using WinNonlin software. Results show that there was a significant correlation among non-smokers (n=9; 0.79; p=0.01) or combined with light-smokers (n=18; 0.62; p<0.01) between peak plasma olanzapine concentrations (Cmax) and their individual dose-corrected by body weight, but this correlation did not appear in heavy-smokers. There were no significant differences between non-smokers and light-smokers except for significant decreased AUC0-->120 by 45.1% in light-smokers. The mean C(max) and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 120 h (AUC0-->120) of the heavy-smoking patients was 9.3+/-4.3 ng/ml (65.2% reduction compared to the non-smokers) and 302.4+/-167.8 h ng/ml (67.6% reduction compared to the non-smokers), respectively. In summary, a daily consumption of 5 cigarettes is probably sufficient for induction of olanzapine metabolism. Smoking cessation is recommended for olanzapine therapy to have better prediction for therapeutic dosages particularly in heavy-smokers. Compared to non-smokers, heavy-smokers therefore require a 50-100% increase in olanzapine doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring will need to be considered when schizophrenic patients change their smoking behaviors.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Smoking; Taiwan; Time Factors; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to elucidate, whether shift from first generation antipsychotics (FGA) to olanzapine can affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of residually symptomatic schizophrenic outpatients.. Patients were randomized to either olanzapine or to continuation on their FGA. The 15D-measured HRQoL at baseline and end-point (after 12 weeks) was compared.. Patients (n = 21) randomized to olanzapine achieved better HRQoL than those (n = 21) who continued on their FGA. This difference on the 15D (0.048 on a 0-1 scale; p = .037) was clinically important and comparable to that resulting from common surgical interventions, for example, hip or knee replacement.. HRQoL of stable outpatients with residual symptoms or adverse effects may improve substantially after shift from FGAs to olanzapine.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia

Rapid control of agitation is of critical importance in the treatment of acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. Both olanzapine and aripiprazole have been shown to be safe and effective in this setting, with each having somewhat different receptor binding affinity profiles. This 5-day, randomized, double-blind trial evaluated relative improvements in agitation in hospitalized patients who received orally dosed olanzapine (n = 306, 20 mg/d) or aripiprazole (n = 298, 15 mg/d, increasing to 30 mg/d as needed). Lorazepam was also given as needed (total dose, < or =4 mg/d) but not in place of a study drug dose increase. The primary efficacy measure was daily mean change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) score. Secondary measures of positive symptoms and safety were also assessed. Significant improvements from baseline in PANSS-EC and secondary efficacy measures were seen for both olanzapine and aripiprazole (P < 0.001),with no between-group differences. A greater proportion of aripiprazole-treated patients received lorazepam at each visit compared with olanzapine-treated patients, but this difference was significant only at visit 5 (41.2% vs 31.0%, P = 0.033). Fasting glucose and triglycerides increased more significantly in olanzapine-treated patients (P = 0.030 and P < 0.001, respectively). Prolactin increased in the olanzapine group and decreased in the aripiprazole group with a significant between-group difference (P < 0.001). During the first 5 days of randomized treatment, olanzapine and aripiprazole displayed similar efficacy profiles for treating agitation associated with schizophrenia. Aripiprazole-treated patients had smaller increases in glucose and lipids, but no difference was observed between treatments in the proportion of patients experiencing categorical shifts in these measures.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Dopamine Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; United States; Young Adult

Factors associated with clinician assessment may play a role in the increasing rate of failed trials. The use of centralized raters, a small group of highly skilled, tightly calibrated, and continuously monitored raters linked to the study sites through videoconferencing can address these issues by reducing the sheer number of raters involved, using rigorous calibration procedures not logistically feasible with a larger dispersed group of raters, and by blinding raters to visit and protocol. This phase 2 study was the first randomized controlled trial to use centralized raters in a study of treatments for schizophrenia. Subjects (N = 313) from 32 sites were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with 1 of 2 doses of an investigational antipsychotic, olanzapine 15 mg, or placebo. Subjects were evaluated weekly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Data from the olanzapine (n = 68) and placebo (n = 68) arms were provided by the sponsor. The mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale change was significantly greater with olanzapine (-15.2) than placebo (-4.43), P = 0.002. The significant difference was apparent at week 1. The effect size was 0.48. Internal consistency was high throughout the study. Scores at screening were normally distributed and not skewed toward the cutoff score. Results found that hospitalized patients with schizophrenia were willing and able to participate in clinical trials using remote interviews conducted via videoconference. This methodology shows enormous promise for use in clinical trials, even with acutely psychotic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Telemedicine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Videoconferencing; Young Adult

Previous studies have shown that untreated patients with acute schizophrenia present with reduced heart rate variability and complexity as well as increased QT variability. This autonomic dysregulation might contribute to increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in these patients. However, the additional effects of newer antipsychotics on autonomic dysfunction have not been investigated, applying these new cardiac parameters to gain information about the regulation at sinus node level as well as the susceptibility to arrhythmias. We have investigated 15 patients with acute schizophrenia before and after established olanzapine treatment and compared them with matched controls. New nonlinear parameters (approximate entropy, compression entropy, fractal dimension) of heart rate variability and also the QT-variability index were calculated. In accordance with previous results, we have observed reduced complexity of heart rate regulation in untreated patients. Furthermore, the QT-variability index was significantly increased in unmedicated patients, indicating increased repolarization lability. Reduction of the heart rate regulation complexity after olanzapine treatment was seen, as measured by compression entropy of heart rate. No change in QT variability was observed after treatment. This study shows that unmedicated patients with acute schizophrenia experience autonomic dysfunction. Olanzapine treatment seems to have very little additional impact in regard to the QT variability. However, the decrease in heart rate complexity after olanzapine treatment suggests decreased cardiac vagal function, which may increase the risk for cardiac mortality. Further studies are warranted to gain more insight into cardiac regulation in schizophrenia and the effect of novel antipsychotics.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Autonomic Nervous System; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Female; Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To investigate potential changes and associations in clinical dimensions and cognitive functioning after the first 6 weeks of pharmacological treatment as the relation between cognitive and clinical change may have an impact in determining the importance of cognition as a treatment target.. Patients (n = 42) completed a brief battery of 5 neurocognitive tests within 72 hours of commencing, and 6 weeks after, standard pharmacological treatment. The cognitive testing comprised 5 domains: attention, visuomotor speed, declarative memory, working memory, and executive function. Volunteers (n = 43) were recruited to control for practice effects.. Patients and control subjects improved over time in the raw scores in cognitive tests. Patients' performance, at baseline and end point assessments, was below that of the control subjects in all cognitive variables, except the Stroop interference score. No interaction effect between time and group was found. Further, after controlling for practice effects and adjusting for multiple comparisons, patients' cognitive performance showed no significant improvement. Accordingly, there was no association between clinical improvement and cognitive change. This lack of association was also observed in the subgroup of people who showed decreased scores in negative symptoms.. Cognitive response is not clearly enhanced by antipsychotic drugs and it is not a by-product of clinical recovery during the acute phase (first 6 weeks) of a first-episode nonaffective psychosis.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Statistics as Topic; Young Adult

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in a community based study on sexual function and prolactin levels comparing the use of aripiprazole and standard of care (SOC), which was a limited choice of three widely used and available antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) (The Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole [STAR] study [NCT00237913]).. This open-label, 26-week, multi-centre, randomised study compared aripiprazole to SOC (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) in patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria). The primary effectiveness variable was the mean total score of the Investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) at Week 26. The outcome research variables included the Arizona Sexual Experience scale (ASEX). This along with the data collected on serum prolactin levels at week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 26 will be the focus of this paper.. A total of 555 patients were randomised to receive aripiprazole (n = 284) or SOC (n = 271). Both treatment groups experienced improvements in sexual function from baseline ASEX assessments. However at 8 weeks the aripiprazole treatment group reported significantly greater improvement compared with the SOC group (p = 0.007; OC). Although baseline mean serum prolactin levels were similar in the two treatment groups (43.4 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group and 42.3 mg/dL in the SOC group, p = NS) at Week 26 OC, mean decreases in serum prolactin were 34.2 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group, compared with 13.3 mg/dL in the SOC group (p < 0.001).. The study findings suggest that aripiprazole has the potential to reduce sexual dysfunction, which in turn might improve patient compliance.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Satisfaction; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sexual Behavior; Treatment Outcome

A long-acting depot formulation of olanzapine that sustains plasma olanzapine concentrations for over a month after a single injection is currently under development. This multicenter, open-label study explored D(2) receptor occupancy of a fixed dose of olanzapine pamoate (OP) depot given every 4 weeks. Patients (nine male, five female) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder previously stabilized on oral olanzapine were switched to OP depot 300 mg by intramuscular injection every 4 weeks for 6 months. No visitwise within-group significant changes were found in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total or Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scores, although seven patients received oral olanzapine supplementation during the first four injection cycles. To minimize impact on D(2) occupancy, positron emission tomography (PET) scans were not completed during injection cycles that required supplemental oral olanzapine. Two patients reported transient injection site adverse events, which did not result in discontinuation. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were insomnia, aggravated psychosis, and anxiety. Mean striatal D(2) receptor occupancy, as measured by [(11)C]-raclopride PET, was 69% on oral olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) and 50% (trough) on OP depot at steady state. Following an initial decline, occupancy returned to 84% of baseline oral olanzapine occupancy after six injections. Over the study period, D(2) receptor occupancy and plasma olanzapine concentrations were significantly correlated (r=0.76, P

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

AMPA-receptor-positive modulators (Ampakines) facilitate learning and memory in animal models and in preliminary trials in human subjects. CX516 is the first Ampakine to be studied for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Stable schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine (n=52), olanzapine (n=40), or risperidone (n=13) were randomly assigned to add-on treatment with CX516 900 mg three times daily or placebo for 4 weeks. Subjects were assessed with a cognitive battery at baseline, week 4, and at 4-week follow-up. Clinical scales and safety monitoring were also performed. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in a composite cognitive score at week 4 for the intent-to-treat sample. Additional analyses examined change in symptom rating scores and examined drug effects on patients treated with clozapine separately from patients treated with either olanzapine or risperidone. A total of 105 patients were randomized and 95 (90%) completed the 4-week trial. Patients treated with CX516 did not differ from placebo in change from baseline on the composite cognitive score, or on any cognitive test at weeks 4 or 8. The between groups effect size at week 4 for the cognitive composite score was -0.19 for clozapine-treated patients and 0.24 for patients treated with olanzapine or risperidone. The placebo group improved more on the PANSS total score than the CX516 group; no other clinical rating differed between treatment groups. CX516 was associated with fatigue, insomnia and epigastric discomfort compared to placebo, but was generally well tolerated. CX516 was not effective for cognition or for symptoms of schizophrenia when added to clozapine, olanzapine, or risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Dioxoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Performance; Risperidone; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of clozapine versus "high-dose" olanzapine in treatment-refractory adolescents with schizophrenia.. Children, ages 10-18 years, who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and who were resistant or intolerant to at least two antipsychotic drugs were randomized to receive 12 weeks of double-blind flexibly dosed treatment with clozapine (n = 18) or "high-dose" olanzapine (up to 30 mg/day) (n = 21). The primary efficacy measure was response (improvement), defined as a decrease of 30% or more in total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score from baseline and a Clinical Global Impression Scale improvement rating of "1" (very much improved) or "2" (much improved).. Significantly more clozapine-treated adolescents met response criteria (66%) compared with olanzapine-treated subjects (33%). Clozapine was superior to olanzapine in terms of reduction of the psychosis cluster scores and negative symptoms from baseline to end point. However, both treatments were associated with significant weight-gain and related metabolic abnormalities.. This double-blind randomized comparison of two second-generation antipsychotic drugs for treatment-refractory adolescents with schizophrenia supports clozapine as the agent of choice. The development of interventions to limit weight gain and metabolic side effects are needed to enhance the risk-benefit profile for both study treatments.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

This study aimed to evaluate the association of positive and negative symptoms, as well as of neurocognition to functional status in patients with schizophrenia. Participants were 309 veterans with DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were enrolled in a 12-month double-blind clinical trial and randomized to receive either 5 to 20 mg/d of oral olanzapine or haloperidol. Patients were assessed at study entry and at 3, 6 and 12-months on the PANSS and measures of verbal memory, verbal fluency, fine motor coordination, visual sequencing/set shifting, and conceptual reasoning. Functional status was evaluated by the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale (QLS) and by days of employment in the past 30. Hierarchical regression models examined the association of functional status with symptomatology and three neurocognitive factors (motor skills, memory and card sorting), controlling for demographics and visit number. A mixed effects model was used to adjust for repeated observations from the same subjects.. The PANSS explained 16% additional variance in QLS total score after accounting for demographics and visit number (p<.001), while the neurocognitive factors explained only 4% additional variance beyond the effect of symptoms. When neurocognition was entered before symptoms, it explained an additional 8% of the variance on the QLS total score, while the PANSS explained an additional 12% over and above neurocognition.. These findings suggest that symptoms may pose an equal or greater impediment to functional capacity independent of neurocognition, at least in younger non-institutionalized people with schizophrenia.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Employment; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Veterans

Acute agitation is a common presentation in emergency departments and is often secondary to an underlying psychotic condition. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three second generation antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine) versus haloperidol in the treatment of psychotic agitation for up to 72 h.. We recruited 101 patients with acute psychosis who were admitted at the Mental Health Department 1 South of Turin, Psychiatric Emergency Service of San Giovanni Battista Hospital, from June 2004 to June 2005.. Aggressive behavior, as measured by Modified Overt Aggression Scale and Hostility-suspiciousness factor derived from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, significantly improved in all groups, with no significant between-group differences. Extrapyramidal symptoms were more common in haloperidol treated patients compared with patients receiving risperidone, olanzapine or quetiapine.. Our results show that in the clinical practice setting of emergency psychiatry olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine are as effective as haloperidol and better tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dibenzothiazepines; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Female; Haloperidol; Hostility; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Cognitive adaptation training (CAT) is a psychosocial treatment that uses environmental supports such as signs, checklists, alarms, and the organization of belongings to cue and sequence adaptive behaviors in the home. Ninety-five outpatients with schizophrenia (structured clinical interview for diagnosis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) were randomly assigned to (1) Full-CAT (CAT focused on many aspects of community adaptation including grooming, care of living quarters, leisure skills, social and role performance, and medication adherence), (2) Pharm-CAT (CAT focused only on medication and appointment adherence), or (3) treatment as usual (TAU). Treatment lasted for 9 months, and patients were followed for 6 months after the withdrawal of home visits. Medication adherence (assessed during unannounced, in-home pill counts) and functional outcomes were assessed at 3-month intervals. Results of mixed-effects regression models indicated that both CAT and Pharm-CAT treatments were superior to TAU for improving adherence to prescribed medication (P < .0001). Effects on medication adherence remained significant when home visits were withdrawn. Full-CAT treatment improved functional outcome relative to Pharm-CAT and TAU (P < .0001). However, differences for functional outcome across groups decreased following the withdrawal of home visits and were no longer statistically significant at the 6-month follow-up. Survival time to relapse or significant exacerbation was significantly longer in both CAT and Pharm-CAT in comparison to TAU (.004). Findings indicate that supports targeting medication adherence can improve and maintain this behavior. Comprehensive supports targeting multiple domains of functioning are necessary to improve functional outcomes. Maintenance of gains in functional outcome may require some form of continued intervention.

Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Patient-Centered Care; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Social Environment; Social Support; Treatment Outcome

This was a randomized, flexible-dose, rater-blind, parallel-group, quasi-naturalistic trial comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia hospitalized for severe psychotic symptoms. Seventy-five patients were randomized to quetiapine (n=25), risperidone (n=25), or olanzapine (n=25). Mean doses at Week 8 were: 590.0 mg/day quetiapine; 5.1 mg/day risperidone; 15.1 mg/day olanzapine. Four quetiapine, five risperidone, and five olanzapine patients discontinued prior to Week 8. There were no significant differences between groups in the primary efficacy measures of improvement from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at Week 8 in the per protocol (PP) population and the number of completers who experienced >or=40% improvement on the same scale. PP and intent-to-treat analyses showed significant improvement from baseline in each component of a PANSS-derived battery, without significant differences between treatments. No quetiapine patients, one risperidone, and four olanzapine patients reported an adverse event (AE) of moderate intensity; no severe AEs were reported. A linear mixed model for repeated measures showed an effect of treatment on body weight, with significant differences favoring quetiapine over risperidone and olanzapine. Simpson-Angus Scale scores were significantly worse with risperidone compared with both olanzapine and quetiapine at Week 3 and compared with quetiapine thereafter. Use of concomitant medications for anxiety or tension was significantly less frequent with quetiapine. In conclusion, quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine have similar efficacy in schizophrenia, but there are drug-specific differences for some AEs and in the use of concomitant medication that differentiate these agents.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The second generation antipsychotic drugs, such as risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine, are effective in treating patients with schizophrenia and have been considered as the first line therapy. Recently, increasing attention has been drawn to the potential diabetogenic effect of these novel antipsychotics. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of metformin treatment on the olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance in schizophrenic patients. Twenty-four schizophrenic subjects who had received olanzapine treatment at least 3 months were assigned to the therapy with metformin 1500 mg/day for 8 weeks. The metabolic parameters were quantitatively assessed at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8 by using the intravenous glucose tolerance test. After an 8-week treatment with metformin, the body weight, fasting levels of glucose, triglyceride, and insulin, insulin secretion, and insulin resistance significantly decreased. Half of study subjects with metabolic syndrome obtained improvement after the metformin trial. Subjects' psychopathological condition remained unchanged during the study period. The olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance could be reversed after 8-week metformin treatment. Based on the results of this study, we hypothesize that metformin could modulate the effect of olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Female; Glucose; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lipids; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Sex Characteristics

Early nonresponse to antipsychotics appears to predict subsequent nonresponse to treatment when assessed in randomized controlled trials of predominately acute inpatients treated for schizophrenia. This study assessed the predictive accuracy of early nonresponse to treatment and its clinical, functional, and economic ramifications in the naturalistic treatment of predominately chronic outpatients treated for schizophrenia.. This post hoc analysis used data from a 1-year, randomized, open-label study of olanzapine, risperidone, and typical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. If clinically warranted, patients could switch antipsychotics following 8 weeks of treatment. Patients completing 8 weeks of treatment (n = 443 of 664 enrollees) were included. Patients with early response (> or = 20% improvement from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at 2 weeks) were compared with early nonresponders on symptom remission, functionality, perceptions of medication influence, and total health care costs at 8 weeks.. Early response/nonresponse at 2 weeks predicted subsequent response/nonresponse at 8 weeks with a high level of accuracy (72%) and specificity (89%). After 8 weeks, early nonresponders were less likely to achieve symptom remission (P < .001), improved less on functional domains (P < .05), perceived medication as less beneficial (P = .004), and incurred total heath care costs over twice that of early responders ($4349 vs $2102, P = .010).. In the usual care of schizophrenia patients, early nonresponse appears to reliably predict subsequent nonresponse to continued treatment with the same medication to be associated with poorer outcomes and higher health care costs. Identifying early nonresponders may minimize prolonging exposure to suboptimal or ineffective treatment strategies.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Costs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Treatment Failure; United States

This double-blind study compared a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs compared to a representative older agent for patients with schizophrenia who use or avoid illicit substances.. Schizophrenic subjects were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. The primary aim of this analysis was to delineate differences between the overall effectiveness of these five treatments among patients who used or did not use illicit substances.. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation among patients who use illicit drugs (median 3.3 to 6.8 months). Among non-users time to treatment discontinuation was significantly longer for patients treated with olanzapine (median 13.0 months) than perphenazine ( 5.9 months), risperidone (5.6 months), or quetiapine (5.0 months); time to discontinuation for ziprasidone (4.3 months) was even shorter, although the latter difference was not significant. The difference between risperidone and quetiapine, although small, was significant. All remaining differences were non-significant. Similar results were found for discontinuation due to inefficacy. There were no differences between illicit users and non-users in symptom reduction and global improvement, after adjustment for differential duration of treatment. Differences in discontinuation results were attenuated by non-compliance, but the trends persisted after controlling for treatment compliance.. Among patients with chronic schizophrenia who avoid use of illicit drugs, olanzapine was more effective than other antipsychotics as reflected by longer time to all-cause discontinuation, but illicit substance abuse attenuated this advantage, reinforcing the need for concurrent substance abuse treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal

Response to antipsychotics is highly variable, which may be due in part to differences in drug exposure. The goal of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of concentration exposure of olanzapine. Patients with Alzheimer's disease (n = 117) and schizophrenia (n = 406) were treated with olanzapine as part of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). Combined, these patients (n = 523) provided 1527 plasma samples for determination of olanzapine concentrations. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to determine the population pharmacokinetics of olanzapine, and patient-specific covariates were evaluated as potential contributors to variability in drug exposure. The population mean olanzapine clearance and volume of distribution were 16.1 L/h and 2150 L, respectively. Elimination of olanzapine varied nearly 10-fold (range, 6.66-67.96 L/h). Smoking status, sex, and race accounted for 26%, 12%, and 7% of the variability, respectively (P < .0001). Smokers cleared olanzapine 55% faster than non/past smokers (P < .0001). Men cleared olanzapine 38% faster than women (P < .0001). Patients who identified themselves as black or African American cleared olanzapine 26% faster than other races (P < .0001). Differences in olanzapine exposure due to sex, race, and smoking may account for some of the variability in response to olanzapine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Alzheimer Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Black or African American; Chromatography, Liquid; Female; Humans; Indians, North American; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Smoking; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; White People

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain is one of the most distressing adverse effects being observed in recent times. Most studies have been limited by several confounders.. To evaluate the predictors of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis treated with olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol and compare them with a healthy matched control group.. Newly diagnosed patients with first-episode schizophrenia treated with antipsychotic medication-olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol-and matched healthy controls were followed for 6 weeks. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and weight changes and proportions of subjects with more than 7% weight gain were calculated. The predictors of weight gain were explored.. Ninety-nine patients with first-episode schizophrenia and 51 healthy controls were examined. Waist circumference (r = -0.25; P < 0.01) and weight (r = -0.24; P < 0.01) at baseline in addition to the disease process (P < 0.001) as well as antipsychotic use (P < 0.001) were associated with greater increases in weight and BMI. Olanzapine (77%) had greater clinically significant weight gain as compared with risperidone (63%) and haloperidol (22%). Lower BMI at baseline and a diagnosis of undifferentiated schizophrenia were associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain.. The results confirm clinically significant and substantial weight gain induced by antipsychotic treatment in drug-naive patients with first-episode schizophrenia and identify several risk factors for weight gain such as lower BMI scores, use of olanzapine, and a diagnosis of undifferentiated schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

To investigate the long-term weight loss outcomes during usual clinical practice after switching from olanzapine standard oral tablet (SOT) to olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (ODT).. In this open-label prospective study, 26 patients with schizophrenia who were clinically stable on olanzapine SOT treatment were switched to olanzapine ODT. All other aspects of treatment remained constant. Weight was recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months.. Patients incurred an average weight loss of 2.7 +/- 0.7 kg (p = 0.001) after switching patients from olanzapine SOT to olanzapine ODT at 12 months. Peak weight loss was observed at 6 months; however, significant weight loss was achieved as early as 3 months. The majority (81.9%) of patients lost weight, while 18.1% had no weight change or weight gain. Body mass index (BMI) significantly decreased by 1.0 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2) (p = 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated with higher doses of olanzapine (> or = 20 mg) incurred a greater weight loss of their body weight (5.6%), compared to those treated with lower doses (< 20 mg), who lost 1.9% of their body weight (p = 0.04).. This study demonstrated that, in usual clinical practice, switching patients from olanzapine SOT to olanzapine ODT treatment resulted in significant weight loss that was maintained over 12 months.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Overweight; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Loss

Clozapine, despite its side-effect burden, has been considered to be the drug of choice for patients with schizophrenia whose psychotic symptoms fail to respond adequately to other anti-psychotic drugs. There are conflicting data concerning the potential utility of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia at doses beyond the 10- to 20-mg/day range that has proven to be effective for most nonrefractory patients with schizophrenia.. The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (target dose, 25-45 mg/day) and clozapine (300-900 mg/day) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had failed to respond adequately to prior treatment with other antipsychotic drugs.. This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (mean dose, 34 mg/day; N = 19) or clozapine (mean dose, 564 mg/day; N = 21) in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Outcome measures included psychopathology, cognitive performance (as assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery), and tolerability. The study was conducted between May 2000 and December 2003.. Robust and significant (mostly p < .001) improvement in multiple measures of psychopathology, mainly between 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment, was found in both treatment groups, with no significant difference between the 2 treatments except for the Global Assessment of Functioning score, which favored clozapine (p = .01). Improvement in some domains of cognition was significant-and equivalent for both drugs, as well. Nonsignificantly different improvement in Verbal List Learning-Immediate Recall (p < .05), Controlled Word Association Test (p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (p < .001) was found. There were no significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms. Weight gain was significantly (p = .01) greater with olanzapine.. Olanzapine, at higher than customary doses, demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in this study. However, the small sample size precludes definitively concluding that the 2 treatments are equivalent, at these doses, in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are a limitation in its use.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00179231.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Antagonists; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Recent in-vitro studies show that antipsychotic drugs increase lipid biosynthesis through changes in gene expression. Based on these finding we compared the expression of two central lipid biosynthesis genes, fatty acid synthase (FASN) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), in whole blood of olanzapine-treated and unmedicated patients. Patients with psychotic disorders were consecutively selected from an ongoing, naturalistic study, and divided into two groups according to the following criteria: (1) strict monotherapy with olanzapine (n=19) or (2) no current medication (n=19). The groups were matched on gender, race and body mass index. Blood lipid levels were examined, and gene expression in whole blood was assessed with quantitative real-time PCR. Expression of FASN (p=0.003) and SCD (p=0.002) was significantly up-regulated in olanzapine-treated compared to unmedicated patients. Transcriptional activation of lipid biosynthesis genes in peripheral blood cells of olanzapine-treated patients suggests a direct lipogenic action of antipsychotic drugs, which may be related to metabolic adverse effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Cells; Case-Control Studies; Fatty Acid Synthases; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase; Up-Regulation

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of metformin in preventing olanzapine-induced weight gain.. Forty patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to treatment for 12 weeks with olanzapine, 15 mg/day, plus metformin, 750 mg/day (N=20), or olanzapine, 15 mg/day, plus placebo (N=20). This investigation was conducted in a double-blind fashion. Planned assessments included body weight, body mass index, proportion of patients who gained more than 7% of their baseline weight at the end of the 12-week treatment, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose and insulin, insulin resistance index, and scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).. Of the 40 patients who were randomly assigned, 37 (92.5%) completed treatments. The weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio levels increased less in the olanzapine plus metformin group relative to the olanzapine plus placebo group during the 12-week follow-up period. The insulin and insulin resistance index values of the olanzapine plus placebo group increased significantly at weeks 8 and 12. In contrast, the insulin and insulin resistance index levels of the olanzapine plus metformin group remained unchanged. Significantly fewer patients in the olanzapine plus metformin group relative to patients in the olanzapine plus placebo group increased their baseline weight by more than 7%, which was the cutoff for clinically meaningful weight gain. There was a significant decrease in SAPS and SANS scores within each group from baseline to week 12, with no between-group differences. Metformin was tolerated well by all patients.. Metformin was effective and safe in attenuating olanzapine-induced weight gain and insulin resistance in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenia patients. Patients displayed good adherence to this type of preventive intervention.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Waist-Hip Ratio; Weight Gain

N-Methyl D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor hypofunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and D-serine and glycine add-on therapy to antipsychotics has shown beneficial effects in schizophrenic patients. Nevertheless, previous studies have not shown consistently altered D-serine concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of schizophrenic patients. To confirm and extend these results, CSF concentrations of both endogenous NMDA-receptor co-agonists d-serine and glycine and their common precursor L-serine were analyzed simultaneously in 17 healthy controls and 19 schizophrenic patients before and 6 weeks after daily olanzapine (10 mg) treatment. CSF D-serine, L-serine and glycine concentrations and their relative ratios were similar between schizophrenic patients and controls and no differences were observed before and after olanzapine therapy. Thus, the NMDA-receptor hypofunction hypothesis in schizophrenia is not explained by olanzapine therapy-dependent absolute or relative decreases in CSF D-serine and glycine concentrations in this series of male patients, thereby not providing convenient markers for the disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Glycine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Serine

Atypical antipsychotics induce weight gain and are linked to increased diabetes risk, but their relative impact on factors that elevate disease risk are unknown.. We performed a 6-month, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of risperidone and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. At baseline and weeks 6 and 24, we quantified: (1) total adiposity by DEXA, (2) visceral adiposity by abdominal CT, and (3) insulin sensitivity (SI) and (4) pancreatic function ("disposition index", DI) by intravenous glucose tolerance test.. At baseline, groups (risperidone: n=28; olanzapine: n=31) were overweight or obese by body mass index (risperidone: 28.4+/-5.4, olanzapine: 30.6+/-7.0kg/m2). Both drugs induced weight gain (p<0.004). Total adiposity was increased by olanzapine at 6 weeks (p=0.0006) and by both treatments at 24 weeks (p<0.003). Visceral adiposity was increased by olanzapine and risperidone by 24 weeks (p<0.003). S(I) did not deteriorate appreciably, although a downward trend was observed with risperidone. Given known ethnic differences in adiposity and S(I), we performed secondary analysis in African American and Hispanic subjects. In this subset, olanzapine expanded both total and visceral adiposity (p<0.02); no increase was observed with risperidone. There were modest downward trends for SI with both treatments. By week 24, olanzapine-treated subjects exhibited diminished DI (p=0.033), indicating inadequate pancreatic compensation for insulin resistance.. This is the first prospective study in psychiatric patients that quantified antipsychotic effects on the multiple metabolic processes that increase diabetes risk. Results indicate that ethnic minorities may have greater susceptibility to antipsychotic-induced glucoregulatory complications.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Double-Blind Method; Ethnicity; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

There have been innumerable advances in the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia, but problems have emerged hand-in-glove, such as the presence of treatment-emergent glucose intolerance and frank diabetes mellitus (DM).. Medication-naïve patients with schizophrenia (n = 99) underwent baseline fasting and 2 h post-prandial plasma glucose measurements repeated after 6 weeks after randomization to receive olanzapine, risperidone or haloperidol. The results were compared with a matched healthy control group.. A significant difference (P = 0.002) in baseline 2 h post-prandial blood sugar (PPBS) was noted between the control group and the treatment group along with a significant increase in weight (P < 0.001), fasting blood sugar (P = 0.01) and 2 h PPBS (P < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint between the groups. A statistical significance in the incidence of DM at endpoint by the WHO criteria (10.1%) was also noted.. Male patients with schizophrenia are liable to develop DM. Antipsychotic treatment leads to the development of DM in a significant 10.1% within 6 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia

To use the degree of response after 2 weeks of treatment to predict non-response at 4 to 6 weeks.. Post-hoc re-analysis of a large multi-centered double-blind trial including 1996 patients with schizophrenia using receiver-operator curves and logistic regression analyses to predict non-response at 4 weeks and at 4-6 weeks from the percentage BPRS change at weeks 1 and 2. The primary non-response criterion was a less than 25% BPRS reduction from baseline.. A 0% BPRS reduction at 2 weeks predicted non-response at 4 weeks with a positive predictive value of 77.1%; and sustained non-response at weeks 4, 5 and 6 with a positive predictive value of 75.8%. In a secondary last-observation-carried forward-analysis a less stringent cutoff of < or =15% BPRS reduction was associated with an acceptable positive predictive value (75%), with even higher sensitivity (76%).. Those patients who showed little to no reduction of symptoms at week 2 were unlikely to show even minimal response at weeks 4 to 6. There is increasing evidence that such patients may benefit from a change in treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; International Cooperation; Logistic Models; Olanzapine; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; ROC Curve; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate predictors of treatment discontinuation against medical advice and poor medication adherence among first-episode patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone.. First-episode patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), quetiapine (100-800 mg/day), or risperidone (0.5-4 mg/day) as part of a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, multicenter study. Patients were enrolled from 2002 to 2004 at one of 26 sites in the United States and Canada. Survival analysis tested for predictors of treatment discontinuation against medical advice, while mixed models tested for predictors of poor medication adherence. Significant findings from the final models were replicated in sensitivity analyses.. Of the 400 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 115 patients who discontinued treatment against medical advice and 119 study completers were compared in this analysis. Poor treatment response (p < .001) and low medication adherence (p = .02) were independent predictors of discontinuation against medical advice. Ongoing substance abuse, ongoing depression, and treatment response failure significantly predicted poor medication adherence (p < .01). Higher cognitive performance at baseline and ethnicity (black) were also associated with lower medication adherence (p < .05). An association between poor medication adherence and illness insight at study entry was found at trend level (p = .059).. This study highlights the importance of treatment response in predicting discontinuation against medical advice and poor adherence to medication in first-episode patients. These results also support interventions to improve adherence behavior, particularly by targeting substance use disorders and depressive symptoms.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00034892 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Culture; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Refusal

Abnormality of P300 waveforms of event-related potentials (ERPs) has been suggested to represent an aspect of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Previous work points to the contribution of altered neural function in discrete brain regions in the left hemisphere to psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. In this study, we sought to determine: 1) if patients with schizophrenia elicit a decreased P300 current source density in brain areas, such as the superior temporal gyrus (STG); 2) if decreased P300 generator density in the left STG is recovered by treatment with the most widely-used antipsychotic drug olanzapine; and 3) if the recovery of P300 source density is associated with improvements of cognitive and functional status. P300 in response to an auditory oddball task, as well as verbal learning memory, psychopathology, and quality of life were evaluated in 16 right-handed patients with schizophrenia before and after treatment with olanzapine for 6 months. ERP data were also obtained from 16 right-handed age and gender-matched normal volunteers. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) analysis was used to obtain current density images of P300. Patients with schizophrenia showed significantly smaller LORETA values in several brain regions in the left side, particularly STG, middle frontal gyrus, and precentral gyrus, compared with control subjects. Six-month treatment with olanzapine significantly increased P300 source density only in the left STG. Positive symptoms, negative symptoms, verbal learning memory, and quality of life were also improved during treatment. Significant correlations were found between the increase in LORETA values of left STG vs. improvements of negative symptoms, as measured by Scale for the Assessment of the Negative Symptoms, and verbal learning memory, as measured by the Japanese Verbal Learning Test. Improvement of quality of life, as evaluated by the Quality of Life Scale, were significantly associated with an increase in LORETA values of middle frontal gyrus, and tended to correlate with that of precentral gyrus. The results of this study suggest that changes in cortical activity, as measured by ERPs, are responsible for the ability of some antipsychotic drugs to improve cognition and functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain Mapping; Electroencephalography; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Female; Functional Laterality; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory Disorders; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Regression Analysis; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Verbal Learning

The prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in patients with schizophrenia is relatively high. Antipsychotics have been found to influence OCS.. To determine whether induction or severity of OCS differs during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone in young patients with early psychosis.. One hundred twenty-two patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder were randomized in a double-blind design to groups of 6 weeks' treatment with olanzapine (n = 59) or risperidone (n = 63), with a mean dose of 11.3 mg olanzapine and 3.0 mg risperidone at 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the mean baseline-to-endpoint change in total score on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).. Treatment with olanzapine was associated with greater decreases in Y-BOCS total score than treatment with risperidone in total group (N = 122: -2.2 vs -0.3, z = -2.651, P < 0.01), in patients with baseline Y-BOCS total score greater than 0 (n = 58: -5.1 vs -0.4, z = -2.717, P < 0.01), and in patients with baseline Y-BOCS total score greater than 10 (n = 29: -7.1 vs -0.6, z = -2.138, P = 0.032).. In this randomized, 6-week, double-blind trial, we found a significant and clinically relevant difference in decrease in Y-BOCS scores favoring olanzapine compared with risperidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Capsules; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Metformin (850-1700 mg) plus sibutramine (10-20 mg, n=13) or placebo (n=15) was administered for 12 weeks in olanzapine-treated chronic schizophrenia patients. Weight loss was similar in both groups: -2.8+/-3.2 kg vs. -1.4+/-2.6 kg. Except for preventing a triglyceride increase, the drug combination lacked efficacy for metabolic control in this clinical population.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite Depressants; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Cyclobutanes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Waist-Hip Ratio; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

This is a secondary analysis of clinical trial data collected in 12 European countries. We examined changes in weight and weight-related quality of life among community patients with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole (ARI) versus standard of care (SOC), consisting of other marketed atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone).. Five-hundred and fifty-five patients whose clinical symptoms were not optimally controlled and/or experienced tolerability problems with current medication were randomized to ARI (10-30 mg/day) or SOC. Weight and weight-related quality of life (using the IWQOL-Lite) were assessed at baseline, and weeks 8, 18 and 26. Random regression analysis across all time points using all available data was used to compare groups on changes in weight and IWQOL-Lite. Meaningful change from baseline was also assessed.. Participants were 59.7% male, with a mean age of 38.5 years (SD 10.9) and mean baseline body mass index of 27.2 (SD 5.1). ARI participants lost an average of 1.7% of baseline weight in comparison to a gain of 2.1% by SOC participants (p<0.0001) at 26 weeks. ARI participants experienced significantly greater increases in physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, and IWQOL-Lite total score. At 26 weeks, 20.7% of ARI participants experienced meaningful improvements in IWQOL-Lite score, versus 13.5% of SOC participants. A clinically meaningful change in weight was also associated with a meaningful change in quality of life (p<0.001). A potential limitation of this study was its funding by a pharmaceutical company.. Compared to standard of care, patients with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole experienced decreased weight and improved weight-related quality of life over 26 weeks. These changes were both statistically and clinically significant.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Self Concept; Social Adjustment

Second-generation antipsychotic drugs were introduced over a decade ago for the treatment of schizophrenia; however, their purported clinical effectiveness compared with first-generation antipsychotic drugs is still debated. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotic drugs with that of a low dose of haloperidol, in first-episode schizophrenia.. We did an open randomised controlled trial of haloperidol versus second-generation antipsychotic drugs in 50 sites, in 14 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18-40 years, and met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. 498 patients were randomly assigned by a web-based online system to haloperidol (1-4 mg per day; n=103), amisulpride (200-800 mg per day; n=104), olanzapine (5-20 mg per day; n=105), quetiapine (200-750 mg per day; n=104), or ziprasidone (40-160 mg per day; n=82); follow-up was at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. Patients and their treating physicians were not blinded to the assigned treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN68736636.. The number of patients who discontinued treatment for any cause within 12 months was 63 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 72%) for haloperidol, 32 (40%) for amisulpride, 30 (33%) for olanzapine, 51 (53%) for quetiapine, and 31 (45%) for ziprasidone. Comparisons with haloperidol showed lower risks for any-cause discontinuation with amisulpride (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, [95% CI 0.24-0.57]), olanzapine (HR 0.28 [0.18-0.43]), quetiapine (HR 0.52 [0.35-0.76]), and ziprasidone (HR 0.51 [0.32-0.81]). However, symptom reductions were virtually the same in all the groups, at around 60%.. This pragmatic trial suggests that clinically meaningful antipsychotic treatment of first-episode of schizophrenia is achievable, for at least 1 year. However, we cannot conclude that second-generation drugs are more efficacious than is haloperidol, since discontinuation rates are not necessarily consistent with symptomatic improvement.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Switching medications is common in the treatment of schizophrenia. This study examines the effectiveness of olanzapine therapy following a clinically warranted switch from risperidone during treatment of patients with schizophrenia.. This post-hoc analysis used data from the risperidone arm of a randomized, open-label, 1-year study of patients with schizophrenia. Study protocol permitted antipsychotic switching when clinically warranted, and outcomes were assessed with standard psychiatric measures. Statistical analyses assessed changes from pre- to post-medication switch and endpoint comparisons between patients switched from risperidone to olanzapine and patients continued on risperidone.. Most patients who switched from risperidone switched to olanzapine (43/60; 71.7%). Average duration of risperidone treatment prior to switching was 86 days (mean modal dose 4.0 mg/day). Most switchers (86%) completed the 1-year study on olanzapine (average duration 241 days; mean modal dose 12.0 mg/day). Following switch to olanzapine, patients experienced significant improvements on clinical (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) and social (Quality of Life Inventory) parameters, with similar proportions of patients achieving remission status at endpoint compared with risperidone patients not requiring medication switch (41.9 vs. 35.5%). Mean weight gain for switchers was approximately 0.4 kg while on risperidone (average treatment duration < 3 months) and 2.4 kg on olanzapine (average treatment duration approximately 8 months).. This study suggests that olanzapine is an effective treatment option for schizophrenia patients requiring a switch from risperidone. Given the small sample size and lack of a comparative group, one cannot determine if other medication options would have been as effective as the switch to olanzapine. Thus, further research is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Probability; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

The authors provide an overview of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health. CATIE was designed to compare a proxy first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, to several newer drugs. In phase 1 of the trial, consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone for up to 18 months on a double-blind basis. Patients with tardive dyskinesia were excluded from being randomly assigned to perphenazine and were assigned to one of the four second-generation antipsychotics in phase 1A. Clozapine was included in phase 2 of the study. Overall, olanzapine had the longest time to discontinuation in phase 1, but it was associated with significant weight and metabolic concerns. Perphenazine was not significantly different in overall effectiveness, compared with quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Also, perphenazine was found to be the most cost-effective drug. Clozapine was confirmed as the most effective drug for individuals with a poor symptom response to previous antipsychotic drug trials, although clozapine was also associated with troublesome adverse effects. There were no differences in neurocognitive or psychosocial functioning in response to medications. Subsequent randomizations suggest that a poor response to an initial medication may mean that a different medication will be more effective or better tolerated. Although the CATIE results are controversial, they are broadly consistent with most previous antipsychotic drug trials and meta-analyses; however, the results may not generalize well to patients at high risk of tardive dyskinesia. Patient characteristics and clinical circumstances affected drug effectiveness; these patient factors are important in making treatment choices.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychology; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

To examine the efficacy and tolerability of a new injectable formulation of olanzapine, olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI), relative to placebo for treatment of acutely ill patients with schizophrenia.. Patients with DSM-IV or DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia in this 8-week, double-blind study were randomly assigned to receive 210 mg/2 weeks, 300 mg/2 weeks, or 405 mg/4 weeks of olanzapine LAI or placebo/2 weeks. No oral antipsychotic supplementation was permitted. The primary efficacy measure was mean baseline-to-end point change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The study was conducted from June 2004 to April 2005.. Mean baseline-to-end point decreases in PANSS total scores were significantly greater for all olanzapine LAI regimens relative to placebo (all p values < .001). The 300 mg/2 weeks and 405 mg/4 weeks olanzapine LAI groups separated from placebo on the PANSS total at 3 days after starting treatment, and all olanzapine LAI groups separated from placebo by 7 days. Rates of clinical improvement (end point Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale score or= 7% of baseline (23.6-35.4% vs. 12.4%, p

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Weight gain has become one of the most common and concerning side effects of antipsychotic treatment. The mechanisms whereby antipsychotics induce weight gain are not known. It has been suggested that peptides related to food intake and energy balance could play a role in weight gain secondary to antipsychotic therapy. To better understand the pathophysiology of antipsychotic-induced weight gain, we studied the effects of 3 antipsychotic drugs (haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone) on peptides involved in energy balance (insulin, ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, visfatin, and resistin) in a population of drug-naive patients with first episode of psychosis.A significant increase in weight (10.16 kg [SD, 8.30 kg]; P < 0.001), body mass index (3.56 kg/m [SD, 2.89 kg/m]; P < 0.001), and fasting insulin (3.93 muU/mL [SD, 3.93 muU/mL]; P = 0.028), leptin (6.76 ng/mL [SD, 7.21 ng/mL]; P < 0.001), and ghrelin (15.47 fmol/mL [SD, 47.90 fmol/mL]; P = 0.009) plasma levels were observed. The increments in insulin and leptin concentrations were highly correlated with the increment in weight and body mass index and seem to be a consequence of the higher fat stores. The unexpected increase in ghrelin levels might be related with the causal mechanism of weight gain induced by antipsychotics. Finally, the 3 antipsychotics had similar effects in all parameters evaluated.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Energy Metabolism; Female; Ghrelin; Haloperidol; Humans; Insulin; Leptin; Male; Middle Aged; Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Resistin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Memory deficits and sleep disturbances are common clinical features of schizophrenia. Sleep is supposed to promote memory consolidation and the antipsychotic olanzapine is suggested to improve both sleep and memory functions. Therefore we performed a study to analyse the acute effects of olanzapine on distinct sleep parameters and sleep-related memory consolidation in parallel.. We studied 26 patients with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic medication with amisulpride (age range 19-44 years). Immediately before polysomnography and the morning after we performed neuropsychological tasks. Before the third night in the sleep laboratory, patients received either olanzapine or a placebo.. We found a significant positive association for slow wave sleep and declarative memory performance in schizophrenia at baseline. Additionally, Stage 2 sleep spindle density was positively related to overnight memory consolidation. Olanzapine caused a significant increase in the amount of slow wave sleep in accordance with recent studies, but led also to a significant decrease in sleep spindle density, which had not been described before. Memory performance the next morning was not different between the two groups.. Since not only slow wave sleep but also sleep spindles are supposed to promote sleep-related memory consolidation, we suggest that a putative positive effect on memory performance by slow wave sleep augmentation is neutralised by the decrease in sleep spindles due to olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Memory Disorders; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Polysomnography; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Sleep Stages; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires

Approximately 60% of patients with a first episode of psychosis will significantly reduce the severity of their positive symptomatology with antipsychotic drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of response to antipsychotic treatment during the first episode of non-affective psychosis. 172 patients (107 male) with a diagnosis of schizophreniform, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, brief reactive psychosis, schizotypal personality disorder or psychosis non-otherwise specified entered the study. Sociodemographic, premorbid and clinical data at baseline were evaluated. Unpaired t-test for continuous and chi2 for categorical data, respectively, were used to compare responders and non-responders selected variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish a prediction model. 57.6% of study subjects (99 of 172) responded to antipsychotic treatment. The following variables were significantly associated with less likelihood of response: 1.--lower severity of general psychopathology, positive symptoms and disorganized symptoms at baseline; 2.--earlier age of onset; 3.--diagnosis of schizophrenia; 4.--longer DUP; 5.--poorer premorbid adjustment during adolescence, and 6.--hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that differences between responders and non-responders were largely accounted for by BPRS total score, age of onset, premorbid adjustment at early adolescence, and diagnosis. Patients with an early age of onset of schizophrenia, a poor premorbid adolescent functioning, and with a lower severity of psychopathology at intake seem to have a decrease likelihood of responding to antipsychotic treatment. Helping clinicians to identify non-responders is meant as a first step to optimise therapeutic effort to benefit individuals in this vulnerable group.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Schizotypal Personality Disorder; Socioeconomic Factors; Spain; Treatment Outcome

The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate, in a clinical practice setting, the effectiveness of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among partially-responding, symptomatic Asian patients who switch from conventional antipsychotic treatment, (2) to assess the safety of olanzapine and (3) to assess the change in quality of life in Asian patients with schizophrenia who switch to olanzapine.. Effectiveness, safety and quality of life were assessed in outpatients with schizophrenia (n=1267) who lacked symptomatic control with conventional antipsychotics and were switched to olanzapine therapy. Data for this prospective, observational study were collected for 12 months from Asian patients in China, Hong Kong, the Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan.. Significant clinical improvements (P<0.05) were observed following 12 months of olanzapine treatment and 87.3% of the subjects responded to treatment at endpoint (i.e. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total score reduced by > or =30% relative to baseline; last observation carried forward). Abnormal involuntary movements (mean change in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale: -3.20, P<0.001) and quality of life were significantly improved in patients treated with olanzapine. However, some patients experienced significant weight gain (3.60+/-4.50 kg, P<0.001) with olanzapine treatment, relative to baseline.. This study shows that switching to olanzapine may be effective in improving symptoms, may be well-tolerated and may improve the quality of life in Asian patients who are only partially responsive to treatment with conventional antipsychotics. The pragmatic design and naturalistic setting of this large study make the findings relevant for treating patients from some Asian countries in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

A key feature of schizophrenia is the inability to screen out irrelevant sensory input. Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, a cross-species measure of sensorimotor gating, provides a valuable opportunity to study this feature. PPI is reliably impaired in schizophrenia. Animal models of disrupted PPI have proved valuable for the evaluation of antipsychotic substances. The cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic circuitry is primarily responsible for modulation of PPI in animals. We examined PPI and its brain correlates, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), in men with schizophrenia treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics. Thirty men with schizophrenia on stable doses of typical antipsychotics (n=10), risperidone (n=10) or olanzapine (n=10; 9 with usable fMRI data) and 12 healthy men underwent psychophysiological testing and fMRI during a tactile PPI paradigm. The results showed reduced PPI of the eye-blink startle response in patients compared with healthy controls. Within the patient group, those on typical antipsychotics showed significantly impaired PPI but risperidone- or olanzapine-treated patients showed a milder (non-significant) deficit. Increased activity in the striatum, thalamus, insula, hippocampal, temporal, inferior frontal and inferior parietal regions occurred in association with PPI in controls. Patients treated with risperidone or olanzapine, but not with typical antipsychotics, showed significant activation in PPI-relevant regions. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that atypical antipsychotics positively influence PPI and partially restore associated brain functions in schizophrenia. Imaging data buttress the validity of PPI as a useful animal model of schizophrenia.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Blinking; Brain; Brain Mapping; Habituation, Psychophysiologic; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Reaction Time; Reflex, Startle; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Touch; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Chronic Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Fluphenazine; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Olanzapine; Reference Values; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

We investigated the relationships between L/S promoter (SERTPR) and l/s intron2 (SERTin2) genetic variants of serotonin transporter (SERT) polymorphisms with olanzapine-induced weight gain and treatment response in 94 female schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine for up to 3 months. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each patient prior to olanzapine administration and 3 months afterwards. To assess and evaluate improvement of clinical psychotic symptoms and therapeutic response to the antipsychotic, all patients were rated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome ScaLe (PANSS). Overall, the presence of S SERTPR allelic variant and SS genotype was associated with significantly higher weight gain in subjects who were non-obese at the time of admission. The presence of L SERTPR variant was associated with significantly better treatment response measured with total PANSS and general PANSS subscale, while the presence of l SERTin2 variant determined better treatment response only in several items. No evidence of linkage disequilibrium between the two loci was found in the sample. These findings identify genetic factors associated with oLanzapine-induced weight gain and treatment response in femaLe schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Croatia; Female; Genotype; Humans; Linkage Disequilibrium; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia is associated with the stressful side effects. Muscle rigidity causes distress, discomfort and poor compliance. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between plasma hormones (cortisol and prolactin/PRL) and muscle rigidity in female schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine or fluphenazine. In a randomized, double-blind 22-weeks study, 12 patients were treated with olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) and 10 patients received fluphenazine (6-21 mg/day). Treatment with olanzapine moderately decreased, while treatment with fluphenazine significantly increased plasma cortisol levels and muscle rigidity. The marked and moderate increase in plasma PRL levels were found in patients treated with fluphenazine and olanzapine, respectively. The results suggested that olanzapine induced moderate neuroendocrine effects and a reduction in rigidity as compared to fluphenazine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluphenazine; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Muscle Rigidity; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Schizophrenia

In the present study, we examined the effects of olanzapine on plasma levels of catecholamine metabolites, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and cytokines (interleukin-2, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) using 32 olanzapine-treated schizophrenic patients and age and sex-matched 55 healthy individuals. Treatment with olanzapine for 8 weeks improved both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It also increased the plasma 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol levels, which were associated with the changes in the total scores of negative symptoms measured on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, and decreased the plasma homovanillic acid levels. In addition, treatment with olanzapine for 8 weeks reduced the plasma interleukin-2 levels. In contrast, olanzapine did not alter the plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, interleukin-6, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha. These results suggest that olanzapine influences the dynamics of catecholamine and interleukin-2, which might be associated with its clinical efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Catecholamines; Cytokines; Female; Homovanillic Acid; Humans; Interleukin-2; Interleukin-6; Male; Methoxyhydroxyphenylglycol; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Several studies have demonstrated the effective use of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the management of mood, however studies of its use in psychosis remain limited. The aim of this study was to investigate for the first time efficacy of DHEA augmentation with standardized antipsychotic medication (olanzapine) and to explore effects of DHEA augmentation on side-effect profiles including weight gain, glucose tolerance, aggression, quality of life and neurocognitive function. Finally, we aimed to analyze any relationship between plasma levels and clinical response to DHEA administration. Forty patients with chronic schizophrenia stabilized on olanzapine were randomized in double-blind fashion to receive either DHEA (titrated up to 150mg) or placebo augmentation for a period of 12-weeks. Blood samples were collected at baseline, mid-study and study completion. Results indicated improvement of negative symptoms (SANS scale) even when baseline scores were controlled as a covariate. Some improvement in Parkinsonism and akathisia compared to baseline was seen in patients receiving DHEA. No change in psychosis as reflected by the PANSS was noted. Patients receiving DHEA appeared to demonstrate relatively stable glucose levels compared to controls at the end of the study. An improvement in cognitive performance (most notably memory), which did not reach significance due to low sample number, was observed following DHEA administration. Results further suggest preliminary evidence of involvement of the neurosteroid system in schizophrenia pathophysiology, and confirm initial "cautious" findings identifying an agent capable of improving negative symptoms and certain features of extrapyramidal side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cognition; Dehydroepiandrosterone; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Hormones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain

During a schizophrenia treatment episode, persistence with the initial antipsychotic may indicate optimal pharmacotherapy and be a precursor to longer-term effectiveness and other positive outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the ability of selected variables to predict antipsychotic persistence among patients receiving olanzapine or risperidone as initial treatment.. Data for this analysis, which was not defined in the original study protocol, came from a naturalistic, randomized, open-label trial comparing costs and effectiveness of first-line antipsychotic treatment options in schizophrenia. Predictor variables were as follows: (1) patients' initial antipsychotic (olanzapine [n = 222] or risperidone [n = 218]); (2) current (within 30 days) comorbid diagnosis of substance abuse; and (3) nine self-report items from the Rating of Medication Influence (ROMI) scale, including an item assessing patients' perceptions of the role of their therapeutic alliance in their adherence.. For the primary analysis, a stepwise logistic regression was used in predicting antipsychotic persistence of at least 180 days. Variables found to be significantly predictive were included in a second analysis that assessed persistence at additional thresholds (> 90 days, > 270 days, and completion of the 1-year study).. Four variables predicted longer antipsychotic persistence; olanzapine as initial antipsychotic (p = 0.004), absence of comorbid substance abuse (p = 0.025), and two of the ROMI items representing patients' subjective response to treatment--positive relationship with clinical staff (p = 0.048) and fulfillment of life goals (p = 0.050).. Within a randomized trial design, this study corroborated the influence of several factors on antipsychotic persistence in schizophrenia. Results support the importance of the initial antipsychotic treatment option, presence of a comorbid substance abuse diagnosis, and the role of patients' subjective responses. Additional research is needed to further explore these and other factors as predictors of antipsychotic persistence, and of subsequent treatment outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome

In this study, the Authors assessed some insulin counter-regulatory factors, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein after olanzapine administration, and the effect of metformin on these variables, 37 patients with chronic schizophrenia were given olanzapine (10 mg/day for 14 weeks). Nineteen patients received metformin (850-2550 mg/day) and 18 received placebo in a randomized, double-blind protocol. The following variables were quantified before and after olanzapine: cortisol, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, glucagon, growth hormone, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein. Results were correlated with the changes in body weight and the insulin resistance index. We have reported elsewhere that metformin did not prevent olanzapine-induced weight gain, and the insulin resistance index significantly decreased after metformin and placebo; Baptista T, et al. Can J Psychiatry 2006; 51: 192-196. Cortisol, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and fibrinogen levels significantly decreased in both groups. Glucagon significantly increased after metformin (P=0.03). Leptin tended to increase after placebo (P=0.1) and displayed a small nonsignificant reduction after metformin. The C-reactive protein did not change significantly in any group. Contrarily to most published studies, olanzapine was associated with decreased insulin resistance. Decrements in cortisol, fibrinogen and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels point to an improvement in the metabolic profile. The trend for leptin to increase after placebo, but not after metformin in spite of similar weight gain suggests a beneficial effect of this antidiabetic agent.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; C-Reactive Protein; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinogen; Glucagon; Human Growth Hormone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Leptin; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Search for safe and effective strategies to diminish weight gain associated with second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is imperative. In the present study, we sought to replicate our preliminary findings, which indicated that coadministration of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine attenuates olanzapine-induced weight gain.. Fifty-nine patients hospitalized for first-episode DSM-IV schizophrenic disorder participated in this randomized double-blind study. Reboxetine (4 mg/day; 31 patients) or placebo (29 patients) was coadministered with olanzapine (10 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.. Nine patients in each group prematurely discontinued the trial. Olanzapine/reboxetine-treated patients showed a significantly lower increase in body weight (mean = 3.31 kg, SD = 2.73) than their olanzapine/placebo-treated counterparts (mean = 4.91 kg, SD = 2.45). Significantly fewer olanzapine/reboxetine-treated patients gained at least 7% of their initial weight, the cutoff for clinically significant weight gain (6 [19.4%] of 31 patients vs 13 [46.4%] of 28 patients). Seven (22.6%) olanzapine/reboxetine-treated patients compared to only one patient (3.6%) in the olanzapine/placebo group revealed no weight change or even modest weight loss. Appetite increase was significantly lower in the olanzapine/reboxetine than olanzapine/placebo group and was correlated with attenuation of weight gain. Reboxetine addition was safe and well tolerated.. The results confirm that coadministration of reboxetine promotes a clinically meaningful attenuation of olanzapine-induced weight gain in schizophrenia patients. If substantiated in long-term studies, along with behavioral management and diet counseling, reboxetine may have a clinical utility in controlling SGA-induced weight gain.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Olanzapine; Reboxetine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Second generation antipsychotics have less influence on prolactin levels than conventional antipsychotics (CA), which are commonly associated with sexual dysfunction and hyperprolactinaemia. However, only a few studies have been conducted assessing these newer antipsychotics and sexual function/dysfunction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sexual function and hormonal profile of male schizophrenic patients taking olanzapine or CA. Sixty-three inpatients with acute episodes of schizophrenia were randomly assigned to take either olanzapine, or go on conventional antipsychotic treatment. The Dickson-Glazer sexual functioning questionnaire was used to assess sexual functioning where serum prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, total testosterone, free testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations were measured. All measurements were taken on discharge from the inpatient unit (baseline), and again at 3 and 9 months after discharge. Prolactin levels in the olanzapine group decreased more rapidly and were significantly lower than in the CA group after 3 months (12.1+/-6.3 microg/l, p=0.01; 18.1+/-11.2 microg/l, p=0.564, respectively). After nine months, there was a tendency toward normal levels in both groups, and the frequency of sexual complaints did not differ between the groups. This study showed no difference between olanzapine and conventional antipsychotics regarding sexual complaints in the treatment of schizophrenia, but did show a difference in the hormone level normalization rate.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Follow-Up Studies; Hormones; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Schizophrenia; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Surveys and Questionnaires

This study examined the relative effects of the second-generation antipsychotic drugs and an older representative agent on psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. Consenting patients were enrolled in the NIMH Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project. In phase 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. Clozapine was included for patients who chose this pathway after discontinuing phase 1 due to inefficacy; all other patients received another second-generation antipsychotic. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Quality of Life Scale.. Psychosocial functioning modestly improved for the one-third of phase 1 patients who reached the primary Quality of Life Scale analysis endpoint of 12 months (average effect size 0.19 SD units). Although for several of the drugs individually there were significant changes from baseline, overall there were no significant differences between the different agents. Results were similar at 6 and 18 months. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the amount of change in the Quality of Life Scale total score or subscale scores at 6, 12, or 18 months. Patients treated with clozapine in the efficacy pathway made comparable gains. Early treatment discontinuations, especially among patients most impaired at baseline, limited the ability to achieve more substantial functional gains.. All antipsychotic treatment groups in all phases made modest improvements in psychosocial functioning. There were no differences among them after 6, 12, or 18 months. More substantial improvements would likely require more intensive adjunctive psychosocial rehabilitation interventions.

Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States

The relative effectiveness of newly started antipsychotic drugs for individuals with schizophrenia may depend on multiple factors, including each patient's previous treatment response and the reason for a new medication trial. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=114) who had been randomly assigned to and then discontinued perphenazine in phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia study were reassigned randomly to double-blinded treatment with olanzapine, 7.5-30.0 mg/day (N=38); quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day (N=38); or risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day (N=38). The primary aim was to determine whether there were differences among these three treatments in effectiveness, as measured by time to treatment discontinuation for any reason. Secondary outcomes included reasons for treatment discontinuation and measures of drug tolerability.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with quetiapine (median, 9.9 months) and olanzapine (7.1 months) than with risperidone (3.6 months). There were no significant differences between treatments on discontinuation due to inefficacy, intolerability, or patient decision.. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine, quetiapine and olanzapine were more effective than risperidone, as reflected by longer time to discontinuation for any reason. In the context of other results from the CATIE study, the effectiveness and acceptability of antipsychotic drugs appears to vary considerably according to clinical circumstances.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Primary negative symptoms are intrinsic to the pathology of schizophrenia and are associated with significant deficits in motivation, verbal and nonverbal communication, affect, and cognitive and social functioning. Overall, atypical antipsychotic medications have been found to be more efficacious than conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms, based on studies with acute patients. Results have been confounded by concomitant improvements in positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms. This 12-week, double-blind, controlled study aimed to examine the effects of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine versus haloperidol on persistent, primary negative symptoms and neurocognitive functions in stable schizophrenic patients with the deficit syndrome and low levels of concomitant positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms.. Thirty-five patients with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms were randomly assigned in a 12-week double-blind study to either olanzapine (15-20 mg/day) or haloperidol (15-20 mg/day). Patients taking haloperidol received additional blinded benztropine. Inclusion criteria were Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative score of >or=20, PANSS positive score < 20, and fulfilling the criteria for the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome. The PANSS, Clinical Global Impressions, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Simpson-Angus Scale, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale were assessed at regular subsequent intervals. A neuropsychological battery examining declarative verbal learning memory, attention and processing speed, executive functioning, and simple motor functioning domains of cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint. The study ran from September 1998 through May 2005.. There was a statistically significant difference for PANSS negative symptoms (F = 5.44, df = 1,15; p

Topics: Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Communication; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motivation; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Social Behavior; Treatment Outcome

Thirteen outpatients with chronic but stable schizophrenia received donepezil and placebo augmentation of their maintenance antipsychotic medication regimen. Each subject received in a randomized, counterbalanced order 1) donepezil 5 mg for 6 weeks then donepezil 10 mg for six weeks and 2) placebo donepezil for 12 weeks. Serial ratings of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) [Kay, S.R., Fiszbein, A., Opler, L.A., 1987. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 13(2): 261-276] were performed by a trained rater blind to the donepezil order and condition: at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. On donepezil as compared to baseline or placebo, there was a significant improvement in PANSS negative scores (p=.018, n=13). These results are discussed with respect to other studies using cholinesterase inhibitors as an augmentation strategy in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Donepezil; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nootropic Agents; Olanzapine; Piperidines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Antipsychotic medications improve psychosis but often induce a state of dysphoria in patients. Blockade of the dopamine D(2) receptors, which is thought to mediate their efficacy, has also been implicated in producing this adverse subjective experience. The authors present the first double-blind controlled study to examine the relationship between striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D(2) receptor binding potential and occupancy values and adverse subjective experience.. Patients with recent-onset psychosis (N=12) were randomly assigned to low or high doses of olanzapine or risperidone. Subjective experiences, motor side effects, and striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D(2) receptors (determined with [(11)C]raclopride and [(11)C]FLB 457 PET scans, respectively) were evaluated after 2 weeks of continuous antipsychotic treatment.. Higher dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy and binding potentials in the striatal (dorsal and ventral), temporal, and insular regions were associated with subjective experience. The finding was confirmed with two convergent methods of analysis (region-of-interest and voxel-based statistics), and the same relationship was observed using two different dopamine receptor measures (observed binding potential values and age- and sex-corrected occupancy values).. Higher D(2) receptor occupancy is associated with negative subjective experience in patients taking risperidone or olanzapine. These negative subjective effects may be related to the high discontinuation rates seen in usual practice. Understanding the neurobiological mechanism of these negative subjective experiences and developing antipsychotics with novel (i.e., non D(2)) mechanisms may be critical in improving the treatment of psychosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Carbon Radioisotopes; Corpus Striatum; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Raclopride; Radionuclide Imaging; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The purpose of this open-label study was to evaluate the use of olanzapine in the treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Sixteen children who were 8-17 years of age and met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were admitted into a 10-week, open-label, optimizing dose study of olanzapine. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity/Improvement scales were used to assess improvement during the study. Of the 16 subjects who completed the study, 12 demonstrated significant improvement on end of treatment BPRS, CGI, and PANSS scores compared with baseline. Male subjects showed greater improvement and also gained more weight. Weight gain occurred in all but 2 subjects. Weight gain was significant, with patients averaging a gain of about 6.2 kg during the 6-week course of the study. Two of the subjects experienced extrapyramidal symptoms. The average dose of olanzapine for all subjects was 0.17 mg/kg.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The use of certain atypical antipsychotics has been associated with metabolic disturbances. We have assessed the evolution of body weight and glycaemia during a 6-month randomized comparative trial of amisulpride and olanzapine. Three hundred and seventy-seven adult patients with schizophrenia were randomized to either amisulpride (200-800 mg/day) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) for 6 months. Body weight and fasting blood glucose were measured. Both treatments showed comparable antipsychotic activity. Weight gain over the study was significantly greater (P=0.0004) in the olanzapine group (3.9+/-5.3 kg) than in the amisulpride group (1.6+/-4.9 kg). Mean fasting blood glucose increased in the olanzapine group by 4.42 mg/dl to a mean maximum value (118+/-38 mg/dl). In the amisulpride group, mean glucose levels fell by 2.82 mg/dl. The difference between groups was significant at 2 (P=0.0066) and 6 months (P=0.017). One olanzapine-treated patient was diagnosed with diabetes. Metabolic changes in the amisulpride group were restricted to patients with high body mass index at inclusion. At doses that provide comparable control of psychosis, treatment with olanzapine was associated with greater increase in weight and blood glucose compared with amisulpride. This should be taken into account in assessing risk-benefit of treatment options in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

Excessive body weight gain (BWG) is a clinically relevant side effect of olanzapine administration. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether metformin prevents or reverses BWG in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder under olanzapine administration. Secondarily we evaluated diverse metabolic variables.. Eighty patients taking olanzapine (5-20 mg daily for more than 4 consecutive months) were randomly allocated to metformin (n=40; 850 to 2550 mg daily) or placebo (n=40) group in a 12-week double-blind protocol. Waist circumference (WC) body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI) fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (Hb1c), insulin, an insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) lipids, leptin, c-reactive protein, fibrinogen, cortisol and the growth hormone (GH) were evaluated at baseline and at week 12 of treatment.. The metformin group lost 1.4+/-3.2 kg (p=0.01) and tended to decrease its leptin levels, whereas the placebo group maintained a stable weight: -0.18+/-2.8 kg (p=0.7). The HOMA-IR significantly increased after placebo (p=0.006) and did not change after metformin (p=0.8). No ostensible differences were observed in the other variables, even though metformin did not improve the lipid profile and the Hb1c levels.. Metformin may safely assist olanzapine-treated patients in body weight and carbohydrate metabolism control.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Energy Metabolism; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Leptin; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Statistics as Topic

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Melkersson proposed leptin dysregulation as a factor in the olanzapine-induced metabolic dysfunction. Their suggestion was based on the absence of the expected positive correlation between serum leptin levels and the BMI, and the loss of the sex-dependent difference in leptin levels, which are higher in women. Although subsequent studies did not confirm that proposal, few of them assessed basal leptin levels and corrected for body fat percentage. Along with these variables, we added a precise definition of participants out of the expected positive correlation in a large sample of schizophrenia patients. Sixty patients (26 women and 34 men) with severe schizophrenia undergoing chronic hospitalization and conventional antipsychotic treatment were switched to olanzapine (10-20 mg/day). We assessed at baseline, and at weeks 8 and 16 of treatment, the percentage of participants with abnormal correlation (out of the 95% confidence interval in the regression line) between leptin levels and the BMI, and the correlation between leptin and insulin, glucose, the insulin resistance index, c-reactive protein (CRP) and treatment response. Leptin levels were higher in women than in men (P<0.01). The positive correlation between leptin levels, BMI and percentage of fat were preserved. After olanzapine, 3.8% of women and 2.9-5.8% of men were out the 95% confidence interval, and the proportion was similar at baseline. Glucose, insulin, the insulin resistance index and the CRP levels significantly increased after olanzapine. The impact of olanzapine on leptin regulation appears discrete and limited to a small number of participants. Additional studies must clarify the features that render them to metabolic dysregulation.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Reactive Protein; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Leptin; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Weight Gain

To compare olanzapine and risperidone outcome on some neurocognitive dimensions in chronic schizophrenia patients with prominent negative symptoms.. We randomised and followed for 1 year 235 chronic schizophrenia outpatients with a SANS global score > or =10 to open-label flexible-dose treatment with olanzapine or risperidone. Clinical, functional and cognitive assessments [including the COGLAB battery reaction time, vigilance-span of apprehension (VSA) and a card-sorting task] were done periodically.. There were no significant differences between olanzapine (n=120) and risperidone (n=115) treatments in the neurocognitive dimensions tested. Mean+/-SD doses were 12.2+/-5.8 mg/day of olanzapine and 4.9+/-2.0 mg/day of risperidone. Patients in the olanzapine group showed a significant improvement in the VSA total score, but the within-group change was modest (effect size of 0.26); the difference with the risperidone group was not significant (p=0.207). Patients in both groups showed a significant improvement in a composite measure of executive efficiency based on the card-sorting task, with within-group effect size of 0.21 (risperidone) and 0.35 (olanzapine); the between-group difference was not significant (p=0.164). At baseline, better functional status correlated with VSA. Patients scoring lower on VSA or executive efficiency at baseline improved more on these respective measures.. Modest pro-cognitive effects can also be found in chronic schizophrenia outpatients with prominent negative symptoms when treated with olanzapine or risperidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Pain Measurement; Reaction Time; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Social Behavior; Spain

Neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia is severe and is an important predictor of functional outcome. The relative effect of the second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs and older agents on neurocognition has not been comprehensively determined.. To compare the neurocognitive effects of several second-generation antipsychotics and a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine.. Randomized, double-blind study of patients with schizophrenia assigned to receive treatment with olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine fumarate, or risperidone for up to 18 months as reported previously by Lieberman et al. Ziprasidone hydrochloride was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration.. Fifty-seven sites participated, including academic sites and treatment mental health facilities representative of the community.. From a cohort of 1460 patients in the treatment study, 817 completed neurocognitive testing immediately prior to randomization and then after 2 months of treatment.. The primary outcome was change in a neurocognitive composite score after 2 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive composite score change at 6 months and 18 months after continued treatment and changes in neurocognitive domains.. At 2 months, treatment resulted in small neurocognitive improvements of z = 0.13 for olanzapine (P<.002), 0.25 for perphenazine (P<.001), 0.18 for quetiapine (P<.001), 0.26 for risperidone (P<.001), and 0.12 for ziprasidone (P<.06), with no significant differences between groups. Results at 6 months were similar. After 18 months of treatment, neurocognitive improvement was greater in the perphenazine group than in the olanzapine and risperidone groups. Neurocognitive improvement predicted longer time to treatment discontinuation, independently from symptom improvement, in patients treated with quetiapine or ziprasidone.. After 2 months of antipsychotic treatment, all groups had a small but significant improvement in neurocognition. There were no differences between any pair of agents, including the typical drug perphenazine. These results differ from the majority of previous studies, and the possible reasons are discussed.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Cohort Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

There are inconsistent reports regarding the caudate nucleus volume in patients with schizophrenia compared with healthy subjects. The reason for this is that neuroleptic medication may affect the volume of the caudate nucleus in schizophrenic patients. To clarify which antipsychotic medication changes the volume of the caudate nucleus in patients with schizophrenia, we measured the volumes of grey and white matter in the caudate nucleus of schizophrenic patients. Ten patients with schizophrenia were examined twice by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the grey and white matter volumes in the caudate nucleus. After the first MRI examination, all the patients were treated with olanzapine. The clinical responses were evaluated by the positive and negative rating scale. When the symptoms improved, the patients were examined by a second MRI scan. Ten healthy control subjects also underwent MRI. The schizophrenic patients had reduced volumes of grey and white matter in the caudate nucleus compared to the healthy control subjects. The volumes of grey and white matter in the caudate nucleus of the schizophrenic patients increased after treatment with olanzapine. These findings suggest that treatment with olanzapine may increase the grey and white matter volumes in the caudate nucleus in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Caudate Nucleus; Female; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

To contrast the effect of a typical antipsychotic (haloperidol) and an atypical antipsychotic (olanzapine) on neurocognitive functioning in schizophrenia when learning and practice (LP) effects are controlled.. Two groups of participants were recruited, 27 schizophrenia patients in their first 5 years of illness and 13 normal controls. Prior to double-blind randomisation, all subjects were assessed on four occasions within 5 days (prerandomisation period) on the same neurocognitive battery. Repeated assessment prior to randomisation was chosen as a method to control for LP effects. Patients were then randomised to 56 days of treatment with haloperidol or olanzapine (postrandomisation). All subjects were assessed on neurocognitive measures at Days 28 and 56.. LP effects were present during the prerandomisation period on motor tasks, verbal and visual short-term memory, attention, and on a measure of verbal working memory. There were no changes in performance for patients randomised to treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol or the normal control group during the postrandomisation period.. Once LP effects are controlled, olanzapine and haloperidol do not affect performance on measures of motor functioning, verbal short-term memory, attention, verbal working memory, reaction time, visuospatial short-term memory, and visual working memory beyond that observed from LP effects.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Mental Processes; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

This 52-week randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, multicenter study evaluated the overall effectiveness (as measured by treatment discontinuation rates) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients early in the course of psychotic illness.. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), quetiapine (100-800 mg/day), or risperidone (0.5-4 mg/day) administered in twice-daily doses. Statistical analyses tested for noninferiority in all-cause treatment discontinuation rates up to 52 weeks (primary outcome measure) based on a prespecified noninferiority margin of 20%.. A total of 400 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (N=133), quetiapine (N=134), or risperidone (N=133). The mean modal prescribed daily doses were 11.7 mg for olanzapine, 506 mg for quetiapine, and 2.4 mg for risperidone. At week 52, all-cause treatment discontinuation rates were 68.4%, 70.9%, and 71.4% for olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, respectively. Reductions in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were similar for the three treatment groups, but reductions in PANSS positive subscale scores were greater in the olanzapine group (at 12 weeks and at 52 weeks or withdrawal from study) and the risperidone group (at 12 weeks). The most common elicited adverse events for olanzapine were drowsiness (53%), weight gain (51%), and insomnia (38%); for quetiapine, drowsiness (58%), increased sleep hours (42%), and weight gain (40%); and for risperidone, drowsiness (50%), menstrual irregularities in women (47%), and weight gain (41%).. Olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone demonstrated comparable effectiveness in early-psychosis patients, as indicated by similar rates of all-cause treatment discontinuation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sleep Stages; Sleep Wake Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The authors sought to compare the effects of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone on neurocognitive function in patients with early psychosis.. In a 52-week double-blind, multicenter study, 400 patients early in the course of psychotic illness (<5 years) were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), quetiapine (100-800 mg/day), or risperidone (0.5-4 mg/day). The mean modal daily dose was 11.7 mg (SD=5.3) for olanzapine, 506 mg (SD=215) for quetiapine, and 2.4 mg (SD=1.0) for risperidone. A total of 224 patients completed neurocognitive assessments at baseline and at 12 weeks, and 81 patients also completed them at 52 weeks. Neurocognitive composite scores were calculated from the neurocognitive battery used in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) and from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia.. At week 12, there was significant improvement in neurocognition for each treatment (p<0.01), but no significant overall difference between treatments. Composite z score improvements on the CATIE neurocognitive battery were 0.17 for olanzapine, 0.33 for quetiapine, and 0.32 for risperidone. Composite z score improvements on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia were 0.19 for olanzapine, 0.34 for quetiapine, and 0.22 for risperidone. Statistically significant relationships between improvements in neurocognition and functional outcome were observed at weeks 12 and 52.. Olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone all produced significant improvements in neurocognition in early-psychosis patients. Although cognitive improvements were modest, their clinical importance was suggested by relationships with improvements in functional outcome.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Health Status; Humans; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Treatment Outcome

Neurocognitive impairment is a core feature in the pathology of schizophrenia and considered to be relatively persistent towards psychopharmacological interventions. There are hints that atypical antipsychotics can influence neurocognitive dysfunctions more favorable than conventional compounds. But little is known about differences in efficacy on neurocognitive dysfunctions linked to the variety of receptor profiles of different atypical antipsychotics. This study compared the effects of the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine and olanzapine on cognitive function in patients with an acute episode of schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to receive quetiapine or olanzapine for 8 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 8. Efficacy was assessed weekly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Improvement Scale (CGI). Tolerability was assessed each week using the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU). In total, 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Data from the 33 patients who completed cognitive assessments at two or more time points out of three (baseline, Week 4 and Week 8) are analyzed here. Both quetiapine and olanzapine improved global cognitive index z-scores, however, this was more marked with quetiapine. Between-group comparisons showed significantly greater improvements in reaction quality/attention with quetiapine than olanzapine. Quetiapine and olanzapine produced significant improvements from baseline to week 8 in PANSS total and subscale scores. Both treatments were well tolerated, especially no EPS occurred during 8 weeks of treatment. Both quetiapine and olanzapine improved cognition; however, the improvement in cognitive index scores was more marked in patients receiving quetiapine. Furthermore, quetiapine produced a significantly greater improvement in reaction quality/attention than olanzapine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Statistics, Nonparametric

Resolution was defined as achieving the severity component of the remission criteria (simultaneous ratings of mild or less on 8 of the PANSS items evaluating the core symptoms of schizophrenia). Analysis of a 6-week open label study with olanzapine 5-20 mg in 306 patients with acute exacerbation, shows resolution to be a clinically meaningful measure and an achievable outcome for treatment of acute psychosis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Terminology as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This pooled analysis of four 6-week, randomized, open-label, parallel trials of patients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (5-20 mg/d) with those of chlorpromazine (200-800 mg/d). Of the 123 patients randomly allocated to olanzapine (n = 83) or chlorpromazine (n = 40), 109 completed the study (olanzapine, n = 77; chlorpromazine, n = 32). Olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater baseline-to-end point mean improvements in the primary efficacy measure, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total, compared with chlorpromazine-treated patients (least-squares means: olanzapine, -21.1; chlorpromazine, -10.4; P < 0.001). Response rate was significantly higher in the olanzapine group (66.3% vs. 32.4%; P = 0.001). Baseline-to-maximum changes in the UKU scores for akathisia were significantly different between the groups (P = 0.018). A decrease (improvement) in these scores was observed in 6/74 (8.1%) of olanzapine- and 1/36 (2.8%) chlorpromazine-treated patients. Weight gain was the only common (> or =10%) adverse event that occurred more frequently, although not significantly differently, in the olanzapine group (27.7%) than the chlorpromazine group (12.5%), whereas postural hypotension was the only common adverse event whose occurrence was significantly different between the groups (olanzapine, 0.0%; chlorpromazine, 10.0%; P = 0.010). Both the incidence of > or =7% weight gain from baseline (olanzapine, 26.3%; chlorpromazine, 24.3%) and baseline-to-end point changes in weight (mean +/- SD, kg: olanzapine, 3.41 +/- 3.14; chlorpromazine, 2.81 +/- 2.65) were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Baseline-to- end point changes in nonfasting glucose differed significantly between the groups (mean +/- SD, mmol/L: olanzapine, 0.09 +/- 1.11; chlorpromazine, 0.72 +/- 2.04; P = 0.042). This analysis suggests that, compared with chlorpromazine, olanzapine may be more efficacious and have a more favorable tolerability profile in treating patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Africa, Northern; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Electrocardiography; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Middle East; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Principal Component Analysis; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance-Related Disorders; Treatment Refusal

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Incidence; India; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome

Prepulse inhibition (PPI), whereby the startle eyeblink response is inhibited by a relatively weak non-startling stimulus preceding the powerful startle eliciting stimulus, is a measure of sensorimotor gating and has been shown to be deficient in schizophrenia patients. There is considerable interest in whether conventional and/or atypical antipsychotic medications can "normalize" PPI deficits in schizophrenia patients. 51 schizophrenia patients participated in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on the effects of three commonly-prescribed antipsychotic medications (risperidone, olanzapine, or haloperidol) on PPI, startle habituation, and startle reactivity. Patients were tested at baseline, Week 4 and Week 8. Mixed model regression analyses revealed that olanzapine significantly improved PPI from Week 4 to Week 8, and that at Week 8 patients receiving olanzapine produced significantly greater PPI than those receiving risperidone, but not haloperidol. There were no effects of medication on startle habituation or startle reactivity. These results support the conclusion that olanzapine effectively increased PPI in schizophrenia patients, but that risperidone and haloperidol had no such effects. The results are discussed in terms of animal models, neural substrates, and treatment implications.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Electromyography; Female; Habituation, Psychophysiologic; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Reflex, Startle; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable risperidone have not been compared with those of an oral atypical antipsychotic.. To compare long-acting risperidone and oral olanzapine in 377 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. Patients were randomised to receive long-acting risperidone (25 mg or 50 mg every 14 days) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/day).. In the 13-week phase, long-acting risperidone was at least as effective as (not inferior to) oral olanzapine. In the 12-month phase, significant improvements in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and factor scores from baseline to month 12 and end-point were seen in both groups of patients. Few patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event.. Both treatments were efficacious and well tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

The Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Study is a publicly funded clinical trial designed to compare the therapeutic benefits, safety, and tolerability of risperidone, olanzapine, and molindone in youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The rationale, design, and methods of the Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Study are described.. Using a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design at four sites, youths with EOSS (ages 8-19 years) were assigned to an 8-week acute trial of risperidone (0.5-6.0 mg/day), olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), or molindone (10-140 mg/day). Responders continued double-blind treatment for 44 weeks. The primary outcome measure was responder status at 8 weeks, defined by a 20% reduction in baseline Positive and Negative Symptom Scale scores plus ratings of significant improvement on the Clinical Global Impressions. Secondary outcome measures included assessments of psychopathology, functional impairment, quality of life, and medication safety. An intent-to-treat analytic plan was used.. From February 2002 to May 2006, 476 youths were screened, 173 were further evaluated, and 119 were randomized. Several significant study modifications were required to address safety, the use of adjunctive medications, and the termination of the olanzapine treatment arm due to weight gain.. The Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Study will inform clinical practice regarding the use of antipsychotic medications for youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Important safety concerns emerged during the study, including higher than anticipated rates of suicidality and problems tapering thymoleptic agents before randomization.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Molindone; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

Although antipsychotic drugs control acute psychotic manifestations of schizophrenia, improving cognitive symptoms is also important for long-term prognosis.. Three hundred and seventy-seven adult patients with acute psychosis were randomised to either amisulpride (200-800 mg/d) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/d) for 6 months. Neuropsychological performance was assessed at inclusion and after 6 months in a subgroup of 26 subjects (11 treated with amisulpride and 15 with olanzapine) using the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), the Trail Making Test (TMT) and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT).. The improvement in BPRS score was similar in both treatment groups. No significant differences in test performance between groups were observed at inclusion. After 6 months, AVLT scores increased by 8.7 points in the amisulpride group and by 2.3 points in the olanzapine group (p = 0.049). Completion speed in the TMT increased by 17.4 s (amisulpride) and 15.4 s (olanzapine) for Part A and by 39.8 and 48.8 s, respectively for Part B. Performance in the COWAT improved little in both groups.. Both amisulpride and olanzapine produce sustained improvement in certain measures of neuropsychological performance in patients with schizophrenia; a significant improvement in score on the AVLT was observed only with amisulpride.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride

Evidence on sequential trial with atypical antipsychotics has been scarce.. We conducted an algorithm-based antipsychotic pharmacotherapy.. In this open-label study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were treated with antipsychotic monotherapy, step-by-step, with each trial lasting up to 8 weeks. At baseline, they were highly symptomatic to score more than 54 in the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS(1-7)) score. When the posttreatment BPRS score was above 70% of the baseline, they were subsequently treated with another and up to three atypicals. Basically, anticholinergics were prohibited, and only adjunctive allowed was lorazepam. The secondary endpoint was a clinical status good enough to be discharged for 66 inpatients and a successful continuation therapy with the same antipsychotic agent for more than 6 months for 12 outpatients.. Three groups of 26 patients each were randomized to Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone. Thirty-nine (50%) responded to the first agent (Olanzapine16, Quetiapine9, Risperidone14), and 14 responded to the second. Only two showed response to the third, and 16 failed to respond to all three antipsychotics, with only 7 dropouts. Overall, there were 22 Olanzapine, 14 Quetiapine, and 19 Risperidone responders. Based on the secondary outcome, 20 Olanzapine-treated (average maximum dose, 15.4 mg), 10 Quetiapine-treated (418 mg), and 20 Risperidone-treated (4.10 mg) patients responded. The difference in response as the first choice was significant (p < 0.05). Relative doses of those failing to respond were comparable (Olanzapine 18.3 mg, Quetiapine 564 mg, Risperidone5.47 mg). Extrapyramidal symptoms did not change significantly.. When the first atypical antipsychotic is inadequate, switching to the second is worth trying, although some remain treatment-refractory. Quetiapine may be inferior to Olanzapine and Risperidone in symptomatic patients.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

To determine the effect of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine in severely agitated patients.. This was an open-label multicenter 1-week observational study of IM olanzapine treatment in severely agitated inpatients and psychiatric emergency services with bipolar mania (n = 22) or schizophrenia (n = 52). Mean change from baseline to 2 h post-first injection (LOCF) in agitation was assessed by PANSS-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) (score range: 5-35 points) mean change from baseline to 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min post-first injection, and visit-wise mean changes from mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses estimated time to categorical response (rating of

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Cognitive deficits are recognized as a critical determinant of functional outcomes in schizophrenia; and second generation antipsychotic drugs have been touted for their potential to enhance cognitive functioning and community tenure.. The study examined the relative merits of olanzapine and quetiapine in improving cognitive deficits and enhancing psychosocial functioning in a sample of community dwelling adults previously treated with first generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.. In a prospective, rater-blinded study, 86 participants were randomized to receive either olanzapine or quetiapine, and assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Outcome measures included, besides symptoms and side effects rating scales, the subjective scale to investigate cognition in schizophrenia (SSTICS), a computer-assisted cognitive test battery (COGLAB), the sickness impact profile (SIP), the global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale, and the drug attitude inventory (DAI).. Both olanzapine and quetiapine were equally effective in improving symptom severity and decreasing the neurological side effects. Quetiapine was significantly better tolerated (p=0.002), improved self-rated cognitive dysfunction (p=0.002) and subjects' performance on selected neurocognitive tasks (p=0.01). Olanzapine use was associated with greater symptom stability, fewer drop outs (p=0.01) and frequent metabolic aberrations (p=0.001). The accrued benefits of drug therapy, however, were not reflected as significant gains in daily functioning and quality of life.. Quetiapine is noted to have specific cognition enhancing properties in schizophrenia that warrants further exploration. The observed clinical and cognitive benefits associated with quetiapine may likely be attributable to its loose binding to, and fast dissociation from the dopamine receptors. Olanzapine has proved to be a reliable antipsychotic drug with a greater liability to cause metabolic abnormalities.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Awareness; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Space Perception; Treatment Outcome; Visual Perception

Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex and heterogeneous mental disorder, with pathological features of disrupted neuronal excitability and plasticity within limbic structures of the brain. These pathological features manifest behaviorally as positive symptoms (including hallucinations, delusions and thought disorder), negative symptoms (such as social withdrawal, apathy and emotional blunting) and other psychopathological symptoms (such as psychomotor retardation, lack of insight, poor attention and impulse control). Altered glutamate neurotransmission has for decades been linked to schizophrenia, but all commonly prescribed antipsychotics act on dopamine receptors. LY404039 is a selective agonist for metabotropic glutamate 2/3 (mGlu2/3) receptors and has shown antipsychotic potential in animal studies. With data from rodents, we provide new evidence that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists work by a distinct mechanism different from that of olanzapine. To clinically test this mechanism, an oral prodrug of LY404039 (LY2140023) was evaluated in schizophrenic patients with olanzapine as an active control in a randomized, three-armed, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment with LY2140023, like treatment with olanzapine, was safe and well-tolerated; treated patients showed statistically significant improvements in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo (P < 0.001 at week 4). Notably, patients treated with LY2140023 did not differ from placebo-treated patients with respect to prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal symptoms or weight gain. These data suggest that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists have antipsychotic properties and may provide a new alternative for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cyclic S-Oxides; Disease Models, Animal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Olanzapine; Placebos; Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Depressive Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Psychometrics; Receptors, Adrenergic; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Remission Induction; Schizophrenia

Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is frequent, involves multiple domains, and is enduring. Numerous recent clinical trials have suggested that second-generation antipsychotic medications significantly enhance cognition in schizophrenia. However, none of these studies included healthy controls undergoing repeated testing to assess the possibility that improvements might reflect simple practice effects.. To report the results on cognition of a randomized comparison of 2 widely prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications, olanzapine and risperidone, in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and a healthy control group.. Randomized clinical trial.. Hospital-based research units. Patients A total of 104 participants with first-episode schizophrenia and 84 healthy controls.. Cognitive assessment of all study participants occurred at baseline, 6 weeks later, and 16 weeks later. Neurocognitive tests included measures of working memory and attention, speed, motor function, episodic memory, and executive function.. No differential drug effects were observed. Of 16 cognitive measures, 9 demonstrated improvement over time and only 2 demonstrated greater rates of change than those observed in the healthy control group undergoing repeated assessment. The composite effect size for cognitive change was 0.33 in the healthy control group (attributed to practice) and 0.36 in the patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Improvements in cognition in the first-episode schizophrenia group could not be accounted for by medication dose, demographic variables, or intellectual level.. The cognitive improvements observed in the trial were consistent in magnitude with practice effects observed in healthy controls, suggesting that some of the improvements in cognition in the first-episode schizophrenia group may have been due to practice effects (ie, exposure, familiarity, and/or procedural learning). Our results also indicated that differential medication effects on cognition were small. We believe that these findings have important implications for drug discovery and the design of registration trials that attempt to demonstrate cognitive enhancement.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Control Groups; Female; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Practice, Psychological; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this paper was to review whether the $50m spent by the US National Institute of Mental Health in doing the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trials found any useful evidence to change the clinical management of schizophrenia by psychiatrists.. The CATIE trials were conducted in the US on 1460 enrolled patients in an effort to track how the drugs used to treat schizophrenia actually work in clinical practice (rather than in 6-week clinical trials). In a complex 3-phase design, patients were randomized to various types of (mostly) atypical antipsychotic drugs. Some 69-74% of patients switched antipsychotics for one reason or another during the 18 months of treatment. Some of the results were expensive confirmations of known prior results; of the commonly prescribed drugs, clozapine was the most effective, and olanzapine and ziprasidone caused the most and fewest metabolic side effects, respectively. The most stunning finding was that psychiatrists tend to ignore life-threatening, treatable medical conditions in patients presenting for treatment with schizophrenia. Of patients entering the study, 45% had untreated diabetes, 89% had untreated hyperlipidemias and 62% had untreated hypertension. This study failed to reveal anything of significant importance in the psychopharmacological treatment of schizophrenia, but did expose a woeful standard in the medical management of schizophrenia offered by psychiatrists. Psychiatrists should learn to properly treat diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension when detected.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Australia; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychiatry; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Time Factors

The second generation antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine frequently induce weight gain. Randomized studies investigating abnormal eating behavior (food craving, binge eating) possibly associated with weight gain are lacking. Thirty patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder were included in this randomized, double-blind, parallel study comparing abnormal eating behavior using a standardized scale, clinical efficacy using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 0-6 and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, and tolerability of clozapine and olanzapine. In both treatment groups, the number of patients reporting food craving, binge eating, or both increased over time. The likelihood to experience food craving at any time during drug treatment showed a trend (P = 0.068) to be higher in the olanzapine group (48.9%) compared with the clozapine group (23.3%). The likelihood to experience binge eating at any time during drug treatment was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in the olanzapine group (16.7%) than in the clozapine group (8.9%). In both groups, significant baseline-to-end point improvements of clinical symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 0-6: clozapine, 36.6 +/- 8.8 to 15.9 +/- 13.7; olanzapine, 36.7 +/- 9.9 to 19.1 +/- 13.8) and severity of illness (Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale: clozapine, 4.7 +/- 0.6 to 2.5 +/- 1.5; olanzapine, 4.5 +/- 0.6 to 2.3 +/- 1.2) were observed. These improvements did not differ significantly between groups. Olanzapine was more tolerable than clozapine; adverse events occurred significantly (P < 0.01) less frequently than in the clozapine group. These results suggest that both clozapine and olanzapine can induce food craving and binge eating, however, olanzapine possibly to a greater extent. Findings on clinical efficacy and safety are in accordance with previous reports.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Bulimia; Clozapine; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Sialorrhea; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The presence of obesity and increases in body mass are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. This study examined the effects of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on weight, body mass index (BMI), and development of obesity in a drug-naive population compared with a matched healthy control group.. Consecutive patients during the period from June through October 2006 with DSM-IV schizophrenia at our referral psychiatric hospital were recruited for an extensive prospective study that included anthropometric measures of weight, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and BMI. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive haloperidol, olanzapine, or risperidone and compared with a matched healthy control group. The prevalence of obesity, which was the main outcome measure, was assessed on the basis of 2 criteria: revised World Health Organization (WHO) definition for Asians and criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Inclusions started in June 2006, and patients were followed for a period of 6 weeks.. The analysis of 66 patients showed a prevalence of overweight (WHO criteria) at 22.7% and obesity at 31.8% (IDF criteria). The prevalence of obesity (IDF criteria) in our patients is over 30 times as high as that of the matched healthy control group (p < .001). Subjects in the olanzapine group had the greatest weight gain at 5.1 kg, followed by risperidone at 4.1 kg and haloperidol at 2.8 kg.. Obesity is highly prevalent among patients treated with atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Assessment and monitoring of obesity along with preventive and curative measures should be part of the clinical management of patients treated with antipsychotics.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00534183, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Adult; Anthropometry; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; India; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

The main objective was to evaluate the effect of five second-generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and zotepine) on prolactinaemia during 6 week therapy in 433 female in-patients with mainly schizophrenic disorders. Secondary objectives included identification of dynamics of change in serum prolactin levels and correlations of changes of prolactinaemia with some demographic and clinical parameters.. The trial was a prospective, open-label, single-center one with a flexible dosing of SGAs. The therapeutic effect of SGAs was assessed by a change of scores of CGI-S and CGI-I scales from a baseline to the endpoint. Blood samples were taken in the morning under fasting condition.. Amisulpride and risperidone increased prolactinaemia significantly in 100% of patients, as early as after week 1 of the therapy. Quetiapine and zotepine relatively reduced prolactinaemia significantly, as early as from week 1 of the quetiapine treatment. Olanzapine led to a transient mild prolactin elevation. The much lower prevalence of hyperprolactinaemia over 2 000 mIU/l differentiates olanzapine from amisulpride and risperidone. Prolactin elevation did not correlate with age, menopausal condition, therapeutic efficacy, antipsychotic daily dose, serum levels of lipids and glucose. There was significant correlation with first vs. subsequent psychotic episodes, weight, EPS and serum levels of thyroid hormones.. Amisulpride and risperidone had marked and early prolactin elevating effects, requiring, therefore, more frequent monitoring of prolactinaemia and associated undesirable effects and risks than olanzapine, quetiapine and zotepine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Statistics, Nonparametric; Sulpiride

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among Asian patients in an outpatient setting.. This was an open-label, prospective, observational study involving 339 patients from Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI-S), and safety parameters were assessed.. 62% of patients responded to olanzapine treatment, defined a priori as a reduction in BPRS of > 40% from baseline. Following the 8-week treatment period, the BPRS total, BPRS positive, BPRS negative, and CGI-S scores decreased by 18.7 (95% CI: 17.4, 20.2), 6.1 (5.6, 6.6), 2.9 (2.6, 3.2), and 1.5 points (median 1.0), respectively (p < 0.0001). In total, 31 of the 339 patients (9.1%) failed to complete the study according to the study description. Loss to follow-up and personal conflict were the most common reasons for discontinuation. There were 30 treatment-emergent adverse events with six serious cases, assessed as unrelated to study drug, reported.. This study further demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in actual clinical practice settings, in reducing the severity of psychopathological symptoms in Asian patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Schizophrenia

The goal of this study is to examine if Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) scores may improve on an 8-week olanzapine treatment in 10 patients with chronic schizophrenia. The patients were rated every 2 weeks on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Baseline and endpoint NSS scores were evaluated by the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES). The results demonstrated that baseline total PANSS and subscale scores of positive and general symptomatology, and baseline CGI scores were significantly reduced at the end of olanzapine treatment. There were no significant differences between baseline and endpoint subscale scores of negative symptomatology. We have also found no significant differences between baseline and endpoint total and subscale scores of NES. Baseline total scores of NES were significantly correlated only with negative schizophrenic symptoms at baseline. Our findings indicate that NSS may not improve in schizophrenic patients with olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Celecoxib augmentation therapy has been reported to enhance the rate of clinical response for patients with schizophrenia. This may be due in part to an effect of celecoxib in the immune dysfunction associated with schizophrenia. Given concerns about the safety of COX-2 inhibitors, studies investigating cytokine levels in medicated patients with schizophrenia are of public health importance. Twenty-eight schizophrenia subjects stabilized on olanzapine or risperidone were randomized to receive 8 wk of celecoxib (400 mg/d) or placebo. Serum soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2r) and in-vitro PHA-stimulated whole-blood cytokine production levels were measured at baseline, 1 wk, and 8 wk. Celecoxib augmentation did not alter any of the cytokine parameters measured for the overall study group. However, 1 wk of celecoxib augmentation increased TNF-alpha and IL-2 production levels in olanzapine-treated subjects. These elevations did not persist by week 8. Overall, celecoxib does not significantly modify cytokine levels in medicated schizophrenia subjects.

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Celecoxib; Cytokines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulfonamides

Schizophrenic patients exhibit impairments in prepulse inhibition (PPI) and habituation of the acoustic startle response (ASR). Recent studies suggested that PPI deficits and habituation deficits are normalized after antipsychotic treatment. Despite clear evidence of gating and habituation mechanisms in animal models, it is still unknown which neurotransmitter systems are involved in schizophrenic patients. Thus, we compared the effects of a combined 5-HT2A/D2 and a pure D2/D3 antagonist on PPI and habituation of ASR in patients with schizophrenia.. The ASR was measured in 37 acute schizophrenic patients who were randomized and double-blinded as to treatment with amisulpride or olanzapine. Patients were assessed during the first week and after four and eight weeks of treatment. Twenty healthy matched control subjects were examined likewise.. Schizophrenic patients showed a significant PPI deficit and significantly decreased startle amplitude at baseline. The gating deficit disappeared after antipsychotic treatment in both treatment groups. Amisulpride sensitized the startle amplitude, whereas startle amplitude was not changed by olanzapine. After correcting for startle amplitude, patients did not show a habituation deficit; however, amisulpride accelerated habituation, whereas olanzapine had no effect.. Our findings suggest that the PPI-restoring effect of antipsychotics is probably attributed to a dopamine D2 receptor blockade.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Follow-Up Studies; Habituation, Psychophysiologic; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Reference Values; Reflex, Startle; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists; Sulpiride

Accepted clinical evidence suggests superior efficacy of novel antipsychotics in the treatment of cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia. Whether this constitutes a primary drug effect or a secondary effect due to easing extrapyramidal side-effects or improving positive symptoms when converting from a first- to a second-generation neuroleptic is still open to debate. Long-term efficacy as well as differential drug effects on cognitive performance are also poorly documented. We therefore compared cognitive performance of olanzapine vs. clozapine treatment in a controlled, randomized, double-blind trial. Fifty-four patients were assessed following a 2- to 9-day washout and again after 4 and 26 wk of neuroleptic treatment. Patients were rated on the PANSS for psychopathological changes, extrapyramidal side-effects were assessed on the Simpson-Angus Scale, and cognitive performance was assessed with the Stroop, Wisconsin Card Sorting and the Tower of London tests. Schizophrenia symptoms, extrapyramidal side-effects and cognitive performance improved significantly in the course of either drug treatment. Stroop test performance and Tower of London planning time improved significantly over 26 wk compared to baseline and 4-wk follow-up assessment while Wisconsin Card Sorting and Tower of London execution time improved significantly after 4 wk with no further improvement after 26 wk. Improved executive function was not related to improving positive symptoms and easing extrapyramidal side-effects, thus indicative of a primary treatment effect of either antipsychotic. However, Stroop reaction time improved with olanzapine while clozapine had a stronger effect on improving negative symptoms, thus suggestive of a differential drug effect.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Clopamide; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Problem Solving; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reaction Time; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

Nocturnal hormone profiles were measured in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms both under drug-free baseline conditions and after subchronic administration of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine, with the aim of characterizing its pharmacological properties on the neuroendocrine level. The following hormones were studied in the sleep laboratory under polysomnographic control: adrenocorticotrophic hormone, cortisol, growth hormone (GH), prolactin, testosterone, and melatonin. Blood samples were taken at regular time intervals over the night, and serum concentrations of the hormones were determined. Ten patients completed the study, two of them were excluded from analysis due to incomplete hormone profiles. The dynamics of baseline nocturnal hormone secretion were similar to the patterns known from healthy subjects. After the treatment period of about 4 weeks, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity was reduced with decreased cortisol plasma levels compared to baseline conditions. Olanzapine induced a moderate prolactin elevation. The characteristic GH peak around sleep onset, clearly present under baseline conditions, was markedly reduced after treatment. Testosterone and melatonin secretion were not significantly altered. In conclusion, although interpretation is difficult in some cases due to interference with indirect effects of olanzapine administration and the consequences of the clinical course of the underlying schizophrenic disorder, the neuroendocrine findings are consistent with the receptor-binding profile of olanzapine where, beside the D(2) antagonism, the antiserotonergic properties are most important.

Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Circadian Rhythm; Growth Hormone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Inpatients; Male; Melatonin; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Schizophrenia; Sleep; Testosterone

Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia can reach 1 to 2 standard deviations below healthy controls. The comparative effect of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications on neurocognition is controversial, and based primarily on studies with small samples and large doses of typical comparator medications. The present study assessed neurocognitive efficacy. It was hypothesized that olanzapine treatment would improve neurocognitive deficits to a greater degree than either risperidone or haloperidol treatment. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel study with neurocognition assessed at baseline, and 8, 24, and 52 weeks. Per protocol, the haloperidol arm was discontinued. Four hundred and fourteen inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral olanzapine (n = 159), risperidone (n = 158), or haloperidol (n = 97). Individual domains (executive function, learning and memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, verbal fluency, motor function, and visuospatial ability) were transformed into composite scores and compared between treatment groups. At the 52-week endpoint, neurocognition significantly improved in each group (p < 0.01 for olanzapine and risperidone, p = 0.04 for haloperidol), with no significant differences between groups. Olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients significantly (p < 0.05) improved on domains of executive function, learning/memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, and motor functions. Additionally, risperidone-treated patients improved on domains of visuospatial memory. Haloperidol-treated patients improved only on domains of learning/memory. However, patients able to remain in treatment for the entire 52 weeks benefited more from olanzapine or risperidone treatment than haloperidol treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Reaction Time; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Although treatment with antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine and clozapine, has been implicated in weight gain and higher incidence of diabetes, the mechanism of these adverse reactions remains unclear. The purposes of this study were to explore the early effects of olanzapine on serum levels of ghrelin, adiponectin and leptin, three recently identified hormones that play crucial roles in the regulation of energy balance and glucose metabolism. Thirteen patients with schizophrenia who had not received any medication in the 4 weeks prior to this study were included. The patients received olanzapine at an average dose of 14.5mg/day. Serum levels of ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin and insulin, as well as weight and fasting glucose, were investigated at the baseline and at 4 weeks. Serum ghrelin levels had decreased (p 0.03) and leptin had increased (p 0.02), while adiponectin and insulin levels had not significantly changed at Week 4 (p 0.29 and p 0.25, respectively). Weight had increased (p 0.01), while fasting glucose had not significantly changed (p 0.46). These findings suggest that ghrelin levels decrease and leptin levels increase after initiation of olanzapine therapy. Weight gain is also considered to be an early change, while change in insulin sensitivity is not an early change of treatment with olanzapine. Further large-scale and longitudinal studies are warranted to elucidate metabolic changes involving ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin and insulin and their impact on weight and glucose metabolism during treatment with olanzapine and other antipsychotics.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Female; Ghrelin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Leptin; Male; Olanzapine; Peptide Hormones; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Fructose; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Topiramate; Weight Gain

Although a growing body of research suggests that atypical neuroleptic medications are efficacious in the treatment of cocaine addiction among individuals with schizophrenia, more rigorously controlled trials are needed. To extend this research, we performed a 6-week double-blind study comparing olanzapine to haloperidol with the primary objective of reducing cue-elicited cocaine craving and the secondary aims of decreasing substance use, improving psychiatric symptoms, and determining an effect size for future studies.. Thirty-one subjects with cocaine dependence and schizophrenia were randomized to olanzapine or haloperidol, underwent a cue-exposure procedure, and completed psychiatric and substance abuse ratings.. Individuals in the olanzapine group who completed the study had a significant reduction on the energy subscale of the Voris Cocaine Craving Scale at study completion compared with individuals in the haloperidol group. The olanzapine-treated group also had lower, but not statistically significant, PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale scores and fewer positive urine toxicology screens compared with those in the haloperidol group.. This small, but rigorously controlled, pilot trial provides additional evidence for the use of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of individuals with co-occurring schizophrenia and cocaine dependence. Reductions in craving were associated with medium to large effect sizes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Addictive; Benzodiazepines; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cues; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

This secondary report from our 52-week, double-blind, relapse prevention trial tested whether stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment would experience greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment. On average, Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale total scores improved by 4.3 +/- 10.6 points during treatment with olanzapine (10-20 mg/d; n = 212), but decreased by 7.1 +/- 14.6 points during treatment with placebo (n = 92; P < 0.001). Mean Quality-of-Life Scale total scores worsened in both treatment groups for the relapsing patient subgroup, whereas for nonrelapsing patients, those treated with olanzapine had significantly improved mean Quality-of-Life Scale total scores compared with those given placebo. For a subset of nonrelapsing patients who were considered "nonexacerbating" on the basis of minimal non-clinically relevant increases in psychopathology, Quality-of-Life Scale total mean change was no better (P = 0.066) for those given placebo (2.7 +/- 11.0; n = 40) than those treated with olanzapine (5.7 +/- 8.9; n = 174). Path analysis indicated a direct effect of treatment (approximately 29%) on quality of life that was not accounted for by differential changes in psychopathology. In conclusion, stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment experienced no greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment, even in the absence of psychotic symptoms.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention

Following an earlier study in which elderly patients with schizophrenia had their typical antipsychotic medication changed to olanzapine or risperidone, the 61 patients were followed for up to a further six months to see if either treatment was superior in terms of efficacy or side effects.. To determine whether either olanzapine or risperidone was superior in terms of efficacy or side effects when treating schizophrenia in late life.. Psychiatric symptoms, side effects and quality of life were rated every six weeks for 24 weeks of open label comparative treatment using standard measures. Group differences were examined using analysis of covariance and within-group changes over time were assessed using paired t-tests.. There were 34 olanzapine and 32 risperidone patients who entered the study, but intention to treat data was only available for 61 of the 66 patients. There were no clinical or demographic differences between the groups. Parkinsonism, positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia improved in both groups both from baseline switch to olanzapine or risperidone and during the six month follow-up after completion of crossover. No significant differences were seen between groups on most measures. However, patients treated with olanzapine showed a significantly greater improvement in quality of life from baseline compared to risperidone patients.. Both drugs were well tolerated and their use was associated with fewer symptoms of schizophrenia and less adverse effects than were seen when the patients were taking a typical antipsychotic at baseline. Olanzapine appears to have particular benefit with regard to quality of life.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Parkinsonian Disorders; Patient Dropouts; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This open-label, prospective, 4-month study in hyperprolactinemic patients with schizophrenia explored whether prolactin levels decrease after switching antipsychotic therapy to olanzapine. A secondary objective was to determine if reproductive morbidities and sexual dysfunction occurring with hyperprolactinemia improved with prolactin normalization. Clinically stable patients with schizophrenia, who had hyperprolactinemia defined as >18.8 ng/ml for males and >24.2 ng/ml for females, were randomized to: remain on current therapy (n=27) or switch to olanzapine, 5-20 mg/day, (n=27). Baseline prolactin levels in female patients randomized to receive olanzapine (n=14) were 66.3+/-38.7 ng/ml and were 82.0+/-37.6 (p=.32) in those remaining on their pre-study antipsychotic medication (n=14). In male patients, baseline prolactin levels were 33.7+/-12.1 and 33.5+/-13.8 ng/ml (p=.97), respectively, for those randomized to olanzapine (n=13) or remaining on pre-study treatment (n=13). At study end, patients switched to olanzapine experienced significant reductions in mean serum prolactin levels of 19.8+/-18.1 ng/ml in males (p=.02), and 32.3+/-47.5 ng/ml in females (p=.01), but prolactin continued to be elevated in patients who remained on pre-study antipsychotic treatment. After switching to olanzapine treatment, male patients experienced significantly (p=.03) increased free testosterone levels but there were no significant improvements in total testosterone levels; some female patients experienced improved menstrual cycling, as well as resolution of galactorrhea and gynecomastia, and sexual functioning was significantly improved in both genders. Patients switched to olanzapine, as well as those remaining on their pre-study medication, maintained clinical stability, their symptoms continued to improve, although there were no significant between-treatment differences in improvement. Treatment-emergent adverse events did occur in both treatment groups; however, they were not significantly different between groups. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly lower eosinophil counts and higher elevations in low-density lipoproteins and standing blood pressure than non-switched patients. Olanzapine treatment may offer sustained reduction in serum prolactin and improvement in sexual and reproductive comorbid symptoms in patients with schizophrenia who have treatment-emergent hyperprolactinemia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Estradiol; Female; Galactorrhea; Gynecomastia; Humans; Male; Menstrual Cycle; Olanzapine; Premenopause; Prolactin; Reproduction; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Characteristics; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Testosterone

There is an ongoing debate over whether atypical antipsychotics are more effective than typical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. This naturalistic study compares atypical and typical antipsychotics on time to all-cause medication discontinuation, a recognized index of medication effectiveness in the treatment of schizophrenia.. We used data from a large, 3-year, observational, non-randomized, multisite study of schizophrenia, conducted in the U.S. between 7/1997 and 9/2003. Patients who were initiated on oral atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or ziprasidone) or oral typical antipsychotics (low, medium, or high potency) were compared on time to all-cause medication discontinuation for 1 year following initiation. Treatment group comparisons were based on treatment episodes using 3 statistical approaches (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox Proportional Hazards regression model, and propensity score-adjusted bootstrap resampling methods). To further assess the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were performed, including the use of (a) only 1 medication episode for each patient, the one with which the patient was treated first, and (b) all medication episodes, including those simultaneously initiated on more than 1 antipsychotic.. Mean time to all-cause medication discontinuation was longer on atypical (N = 1132, 256.3 days) compared to typical antipsychotics (N = 534, 197.2 days; p < .01), and longer on atypicals compared to typicals of high potency (N = 320, 187.5 days; p < .01), medium potency (N = 140, 213.5 days; p < .01), and low potency (N = 74, 208.7 days; p < .01). Among the atypicals, only clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone had significantly longer time to all-cause medication discontinuation compared to typicals, regardless of potency level, and compared to haloperidol with prophylactic anticholinergic treatment. When compared to perphenazine, a medium-potency typical antipsychotic, only clozapine and olanzapine had a consistently and significantly longer time to all-cause medication discontinuation. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses.. In the usual care of schizophrenia patients, time to medication discontinuation for any cause appears significantly longer for atypical than typical antipsychotics regardless of the typical antipsychotic potency level. Findings were primarily driven by clozapine and olanzapine, and to a lesser extent by risperidone. Furthermore, only clozapine and olanzapine therapy showed consistently and significantly longer treatment duration compared to perphenazine, a medium-potency typical antipsychotic.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bias; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Episode of Care; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

All antipsychotics act on the dopamine D(2) receptor. The present study extends prior pharmacogenetic investigations of the D(2) receptor gene (DRD2) by examining, in first-episode schizophrenia patients, promoter region variation as a predictor of response time to two first-line atypical antipsychotics.. Patients experiencing their first episode of schizophrenia (N=61) were genotyped for two DRD2 promoter region polymorphisms (A-241G and -141C Ins/Del) and were randomly assigned to receive 16 weeks of treatment with either risperidone or olanzapine. Time until sustained response (two consecutive ratings without significant positive symptoms) for rare allele carriers versus wild types was examined by using Kaplan-Meier curves.. Relative to wild type homozygotes, G carriers (A-241G) exhibited a significantly faster time until response, whereas -141C Del carriers took a significantly longer time to respond. Diplotype analysis revealed similar results.. These findings suggest that variation in the D(2) receptor gene can, in part, explain variation in the timing of clinical response to antipsychotics in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Genetic; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The authors examined cognitive changes associated with treatment with ziprasidone and olanzapine over a 6-month double-blind clinical trial, using normative standards for the cognitive measures. Sixty-two schizophrenia patients entered the study on ziprasidone treatment (39 completers), and 71 patients entered while receiving treatment with olanzapine (33 completers). From a larger set of cognitive domains assessed in the acute treatment study, we selected verbal learning, executive functioning, and verbal fluency for further analysis due to their functional relevance and extensive normative data. Standard scores were developed based on previously published age- and education-corrected norms. Baseline performance was impaired across all tests on average. The proportion of patients impaired on each of the tests at baseline ranged from 36% (letter fluency) to 89%. Performance was significantly improved by ziprasidone and olanzapine treatment for all cognitive variables and for the composite measure. A number of subjects met the a priori criteria for normalization in performance, ranging from 10% for Trail Making Test Part B to 37% for Word List Total Learning. There were no significant differences across medications in extent of change or likelihood of inducing normalization. Statistically significant improvements in cognitive performance over 6 months of treatment with atypical antipsychotic medications are associated with performance increasing into the normal range of cognitive functioning in a proportion of previously impaired patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Patient Admission; Piperazines; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia can reduce quality of life and treatment compliance. This report will compare the effects of selected atypical and typical antipsychotics on sexual function in a large, international population of outpatients with schizophrenia who were treated over 1 year.. Outpatients with schizophrenia, who initiated or changed antipsychotic treatment, and entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to the monotherapy prescribed at baseline: olanzapine (N=2638), risperidone (N=860), quetiapine (N=142) or haloperidol (N=188).. Based on patient perception, the odds of experiencing sexual dysfunction during 1 year of therapy was significantly lower for patients treated with olanzapine and quetiapine when compared to patients who received risperidone or haloperidol (all P< or =0.001). Females on olanzapine (14%) or quetiapine (8%) experienced a lower rate of menstrual irregularities, compared to females on risperidone (23%) or haloperidol (29%). Significant discordance was evident between patient reports and psychiatrist perception of sexual dysfunction, with psychiatrists underestimating sexual dysfunction (P< or =0.001).. These findings indicate clinically relevant differences exist in the sexual side effect profiles of these selected antipsychotics. These factors should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for outpatients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Health Surveys; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Time; Treatment Outcome

To determine how the use of the newer, so called atypical antipsychotic medications, effects the pharmacoeconomic treatment burden of schizophrenia and related conditions and to provide a clear comparison of the costs and risks associated with these atypical drugs.. In this 2-year, open-label, prospective study, resource utilization (RU) data were collected on 160 patients with these conditions. A comparison between risks and costs was performed by combining the generalized CNOMSS data on both economic factors and risk assessments.. The main findings of the study were that the total adjusted 1- and 2-year costs were lowest for quetiapine. Drug acquisition costs were lowest for risperidone for both the 1- and 2-year cohorts. Clozapine use was predictably associated with the highest overall and medication costs at both 1 and 2 years.. Treatment with risperidone or quetiapine was associated with the lowest overall costs when compared with olanzapine or clozapine.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Canada; Clozapine; Cohort Studies; Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Costs; Female; Health Care Surveys; Health Resources; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Weight gain can be an adverse effect of antipsychotics and is an important factor for long-term health and treatment compliance. Many reports have shown that the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor may be related to eating behaviors or lipolytic activities, both associated with body weight change. We hypothesized that there might be a relationship between the alpha(2a)-adrenergic receptor -1,291 C/G polymorphism and olanzapine-induced weight gain. A group of 62 Korean schizophrenic patients participated in a study; weight and height measurements were obtained prior to starting olanzapine and measured again after long-term treatment. Genotyping for the -1291 C/G polymorphism was performed on all participants. Body weight changes from baseline to endpoint were significantly associated with genotypes (P = 0.028). The frequency of the G allele was significantly higher in subjects who had severe weight gain (defined as a more than 10% weight gain from baseline) compared to subjects who did not have extreme weight gain (less than 10% weight gain from baseline) (X(2) = 6.120, P = 0.013; OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.21-5.51). Therefore, the findings from this study support a relationship between the -1291 C/G polymorphism of the alpha(2a)-adrenergic receptor and weight gain in Korean schizophrenic patients receiving olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Alleles; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Humans; Korea; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

When a schizophrenia patient has an inadequate response to treatment with an antipsychotic drug, it is unclear what other antipsychotic to switch to and when to use clozapine. In this study, the authors compared switching to clozapine with switching to another atypical antipsychotic in patients who had discontinued treatment with a newer atypical antipsychotic in the context of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Interventions Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone in phase 1 or 1B of the trials, primarily because of inadequate efficacy, were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (N=49) or blinded treatment with another newer atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [N=19], quetiapine [N=15], or risperidone [N=16]).. Time until treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly longer for clozapine (median=10.5 months) than for quetiapine (median=3.3), or risperidone (median=2.8), but not for olanzapine (median=2.7). Time to discontinuation because of inadequate therapeutic effect was significantly longer for clozapine than for olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. At 3-month assessments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores had decreased more in patients treated with clozapine than in patients treated with quetiapine or risperidone but not olanzapine. One patient treated with clozapine developed agranulocytosis, and another developed eosinophilia; both required treatment discontinuation.. For these patients with schizophrenia who prospectively failed to improve with an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine was more effective than switching to another newer atypical antipsychotic. Safety monitoring is necessary to detect and manage clozapine's serious side effects.

Topics: Adult; Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Eosinophilia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

In the treatment of schizophrenia, changing antipsychotics is common when one treatment is suboptimally effective, but the relative effectiveness of drugs used in this strategy is unknown. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients who had just discontinued a different atypical antipsychotic.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=444) who had discontinued the atypical antipsychotic randomly assigned during phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation were randomly reassigned to double-blind treatment with a different antipsychotic (olanzapine, 7.5-30 mg/day [N=66]; quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day [N=63]; risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day [N=69]; or ziprasidone, 40-160 mg/day [N=135]). The primary aim was to determine if there were differences between these four treatments in effectiveness measured by time until discontinuation for any reason.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with risperidone (median: 7.0 months) and olanzapine (6.3 months) than with quetiapine (4.0 months) and ziprasidone (2.8 months). Among patients who discontinued their previous antipsychotic because of inefficacy (N=184), olanzapine was more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone, and risperidone was more effective than quetiapine. There were no significant differences between antipsychotics among those who discontinued their previous treatment because of intolerability (N=168).. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued treatment with an atypical antipsychotic, risperidone and olanzapine were more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone as reflected by longer time until discontinuation for any reason.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Glucose and lipid metabolism dysfunction is a significant side effect associated with antipsychotics. Although there are many studies about the linkages between drugs and metabolic dysfunction, most of these studies have compared the effects of two antipsychotics on only one metabolic measure: either glucose or lipid metabolism.. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and sulpiride on glucose and lipid metabolism in first-episode schizophrenia.. One hundred twelve schizophrenics were assigned randomly to receive clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or sulpiride for 8 weeks. Planned assessments included body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, insulin resistance index (IRI), cholesterol, and triglyceride. All measures were collected at baseline and at the end of the 8-week treatment.. After treatment, insulin, C-peptide, and IRI were significantly increased in the four groups, but not fasting glucose levels. Cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly increased in the clozapine and olanzapine groups. Patients treated with clozapine and olanzapine had higher fasting insulin, C-peptide, and IRI levels than those treated with risperidone and sulpiride. Among the four antipsychotics, the increases of mean BMI from high to low were as follows: clozapine, olanzapine, sulpiride, and risperidone.. This study confirmed that the four antipsychotic drugs were associated with an increase of insulin, C-peptide, and IRI. It was found that clozapine and olanzapine were associated with an increase in cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The effects of clozapine and olanzapine on the glucose and lipid metabolism outweighed those of risperidone and sulpiride.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Female; Homeostasis; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Triglycerides; Waist-Hip Ratio

To assess whether metformin prevents body weight gain (BWG) and metabolic dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia who are treated with olanzapine.. Forty patients taking olanzapine (10 mg daily) were randomly allocated to a metformin (n = 20; 850 to 1700 mg daily) or placebo (n = 20) group in a 14-week double-blind study. Waist circumference (WC), BWG, body mass index (BMI) fasting glucose, insulin, and lipids were evaluated at baseline and at Weeks 7 and 14 of treatment.. At Week 14, BWG (kg) was similar in the metformin group (5.5 kg) and the placebo group (6.3 kg), P = 0.4. There were no differences between the changes in BMI, WC, glucose, insulin, insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and plasma lipid levels observed in the treatment group and the placebo group; however, glucose levels decreased significantly after metformin administration (P = 0.02). The HOMA-IR decreased significantly in both groups, but 3 subjects from the placebo group developed fasting glucose levels greater than 5 mmol/L. After taking metformin, triglyceride levels increased, but the cholesterol profile improved significantly.. Metformin did not prevent olanzapine-induced BWG. While some lipid parameters worsened during placebo, the HOMA-IR improved in both the placebo and the metformin groups. Carbohydrate metabolism impairment was not systematically observed during short-term olanzapine administration.

Topics: Adult; Anthropometry; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The objective of this study is to compare olanzapine with ziprasidone therapy in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and experiencing depressive symptoms.. This randomized, double-blind, 24-week, fixed-dose study compared olanzapine (n = 202) and ziprasidone (n = 192) for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and experiencing prominent depressive symptoms. Outcome measures included change in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) score from baseline to 8 weeks (primary outcome) and changes in CDSS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores for 24 weeks. Statistical analyses included mixed-effects model repeated measures (primary analysis) and change from baseline to last observation carried forward (LOCF).. At baseline, patients had moderate depressive symptoms (mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales total score, 27.3). For 8 weeks, patients treated with olanzapine or ziprasidone had significant improvements on CDSS. Treatment group differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.493, mixed-effects model repeated measures; P = 0.497, LOCF). For 24 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvements in depressive symptoms (results varied by depression measure and statistical approach) and GAF (P < 0.017, LOCF). A significantly higher proportion of olanzapine-treated patients completed the study (44.6% vs 29.7%; P = 0.003) and remained longer on medication (median, 163 vs 73 days, P < 0.001), compared with ziprasidone-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly (P < 0.05) greater increases in triglycerides, HgbA1c, and weight.. For 24 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients had greater and more sustained participation in treatment, during which time significantly greater improvements were observed in depressive symptoms and GAF scores, along with increases in weight and certain metabolic parameters as compared with ziprasidone-treated patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Depression; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; United States; Weight Gain

This study assessed the efficacy of olanzapine in delaying or preventing conversion to psychosis and reducing symptoms in people with prodromal symptoms of schizophrenia.. This randomized trial occurred at four North American clinics in the Prevention Through Risk Identification, Management, and Education project. Outpatients received olanzapine (5-15 mg/day, N=31) or placebo (N=29) during a 1-year double-blind treatment period and no treatment during a 1-year follow-up period. Efficacy measures included the conversion-to-psychosis rate and Scale of Prodromal Symptoms scores.. During the treatment year, 16.1% of olanzapine patients and 37.9% of placebo patients experienced a conversion to psychosis, a nearly significant difference. The hazard of conversion among placebo patients was about 2.5 times that among olanzapine-treated patients, which also approached significance. In the follow-up year, the conversion rate did not differ significantly between groups. During treatment, the mean score for prodromal positive symptoms improved more in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group, and the mixed-model repeated-measures least-squares mean score showed significantly greater improvement between weeks 8 and 28 with olanzapine. The olanzapine patients gained significantly more weight (mean=8.79 kg, SD=9.05, versus mean=0.30 kg, SD=4.24).. A significant treatment difference in the conversion-to-psychosis rate was not demonstrated. However, these results may be influenced by low power. The nearly significant differences suggest that olanzapine might reduce the conversion rate and delay onset of psychosis. Olanzapine was efficacious for positive prodromal symptoms but induced weight gain. Further treatment research in this phase of illness is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The main objective was to assess the efficacy of a weight management program designed for outpatients taking olanzapine for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and to compare these patients with a randomized control group. The effects of the weight management program were also assessed with regard to safety and quality of life.. Forty-eight patients were enrolled in a 12-week, randomized, multicenter weight management study. Thirty-three patients were randomly allocated to an intervention group in which they received olanzapine within a weight management program. Fifteen patients were allocated to a control group in which they were given olanzapine treatment as usual outpatients. Weight, body mass index (BMI), and measurements of safety and quality of life were evaluated. The study was conducted from January 7, 2003, to September 16, 2003.. Thirty-six patients (75%) completed this study. We found significant differences in weight (-3.94 +/- 3.63 kg vs. -1.48 +/- 1.88 kg, p = .006) and BMI (-1.50 +/- 1.34 vs. -0.59 +/- 0.73, p = .007) change from baseline to endpoint between the intervention and control groups, respectively. Significant differences in weight reduction were initially observed at week 8 (p = .040). No significant differences were found with regard to the safety outcomes. When the ratio of low-density lipoproteins to high-density lipoproteins was calculated, change from baseline was greater in the intervention group than the control group (-0.19 vs. -0.04), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .556). After the completion of the weight management program, there was a trend toward statistical difference in the physical health score changes between the weight management and control groups (1.12 in the intervention group vs. -0.93 in the control group, p = .067).. The weight management program was effective in terms of weight reduction in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder taking olanzapine and was also found to be safe in terms of psychiatric symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory data. In addition, such a weight management program might improve quality of life in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with respect to their physical well-being.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Diet, Reducing; Exercise Therapy; Female; Health Status; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

We conducted a naturalistic, multicenter, 24-hour, nonrandomized, observational study describing for the first time the effectiveness and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine to control agitation and aggression in "real world" patients with psychosis. The data thus obtained was compared with that reported from randomized double-blind clinical trials.. 92 patients attending psychiatric emergency settings were enrolled. The study subjects were 44 male and 48 female patients with a mean age of 36.5+/-12 years and DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of schizophrenia (48.9%), psychotic disorder not specified (23.9%) or bipolar disorder (27.2%). 10 mg IM olanzapine was administered to all patients. An optional second injection was permitted> or =2 hours later in line with hospital policy. Evaluations (PANSS-EC and CGI-S) were performed at baseline and 2 and 24 hours following the IM injection.. Two hours after IM olanzapine was administered, a mean decrease of -9.6 in the PANSS-EC from a baseline score of 26.5 was recorded. At the 24-hour endpoint a statistically and clinically significant reduction in the PANSS-EC scores (11.6+/-5.3) was observed as compared with values at study entry (26.5+/-5.9) and at 2 hours endpoint (16.9+/-9.3), which represent a mean decrease of -14.9 and -5.3, respectively.. The present naturalistic study provides naturalistic data on the effectiveness of IM olanzapine in the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania that is in line the data obtained in randomized double-blind clinical trials.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aggression; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine compared with risperidone in negative symptoms, after 1 year of treatment, in schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms.. This was a multicenter, randomized, monitored, open-label, parallel, dose-flexible, 1-year study of outpatients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria) with prominent negative symptoms (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms [SANS] summary score > or =10) previously treated with conventional antipsychotics. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an initial dose of olanzapine 10 mg/d or more (n = 120) or risperidone 3 mg/d or more (n = 115). The primary efficacy measure was the SANS summary score. Secondary efficacy measures included Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale, Calgary Depression Scale, and Social Functioning Scale. The response rate was defined as 30% or more of improvement in the SANS summary score.. The mean dose throughout the study was 12.2 mg/d (+/-5.8 mg/d) for olanzapine and 4.9 mg/d (+/-2.0 mg/d) for risperidone. At 1 year, olanzapine patients showed significantly higher improvement than risperidone patients on the SANS summary (P = 0.015) and on the affective flattening (P = 0.007) and avolition/apathy (P = 0.028) SANS subscales. There were also significant improvements in favor of olanzapine in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms summary (P = 0.021), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (P = 0.008), and Social Functioning Scale total (P < 0.001) scores. The response rate was greater (P = 0.001) in the olanzapine cohort (69.2%) than in the risperidone cohort (48.7%). Olanzapine patients reported less extrapyramidal side effects but a higher incidence of clinically important body weight increase than risperidone patients.. Long-term treatment with olanzapine was associated with significantly better improvement in negative symptoms as compared with risperidone-treated schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Risk; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Weight Gain

Violent behavior of patients with schizophrenia prolongs hospital stay and interferes with their integration into the community. Finding appropriate treatment of violent behaviors is of primary importance.. To compare the efficacy of 2 atypical antipsychotic agents, clozapine and olanzapine, with one another and with haloperidol in the treatment of physical assaults and other aggressive behaviors in physically assaultive patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week trial. Physically assaultive subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were inpatients in state psychiatric facilities were randomly assigned to treatment with clozapine (n = 37), olanzapine (n = 37), or haloperidol (n = 36).. Number and severity of physical assaults as measured by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) physical aggression score and the number and severity of all aggressive events as measured by the MOAS overall score. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed through the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).. Clozapine was superior to both olanzapine and haloperidol in reducing the number and severity of physical assaults as assessed by the MOAS physical aggression score and in reducing overall aggression as measured by the MOAS total score. Olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in reducing the number and severity of aggressive incidents on these 2 MOAS measures. There were no significant differences among the 3 medication groups in improvement of psychiatric symptoms as measured by the PANSS total score and the 3 PANSS subscales.. Clozapine shows greater efficacy than olanzapine and olanzapine greater efficacy than haloperidol in reducing aggressive behavior. This antiaggressive effect appears to be separate from the antipsychotic and sedative action of these medications.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Violence

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of switching to risperidone in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia who had failed to respond to an initial-prescribed antipsychotic, olanzapine. Fifty-one patients with first-episode schizophrenia after unsuccessful treatment of olanzapine (the mean (S.D.) dosage: 16.4 (4.4) mg/day) were included in this switching study. Of the 51 patients, 43 (84.3%) completed the full 12-week trial and 8 (15.7%) dropped out. The mean dosage of risperidone at the endpoint (last observation) was 3.1 (2.0) mg/day. The total scores of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales (BPRS) were significantly reduced from baseline to endpoint, especially in the positive and excitement factors (p<0.001). Responder rate (at least 20% decrease in BPRS total score plus final Clinical Global Impression score of 3 or less) was 35.3%. These findings indicate that the switching to risperidone could be one of the useful treatment options in this population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The objective of the study was to examine whether patients with schizophrenia who were judged to be stable on long-term treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications would further benefit from a switch to an atypical antipsychotic drug. Thirty-six subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, on conventional antipsychotic medication therapy for at least 2 years, were randomized in double-blind fashion to risperidone versus olanzapine. Patients were titrated up to 6 mg risperidone or 15 mg olanzapine as tolerated, followed by tapering and discontinuation of conventional antipsychotic medication. Atypical antipsychotic agents were then administered alone (monotherapy) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Simpson Angus Scale. Body weight was measured at each visit. Both treatment groups exhibited marked and similar improvement in the total PANSS score from baseline to study endpoint (22 weeks) [risperidone: baseline=59.3 (SE 3.1), 22 weeks=44.3 (SE 2.3) (p<0.001); olanzapine: baseline=55.9 (SE 3.3), 22 weeks=46.9 (SE 3.2) (p<0.001). Both groups also exhibited significant reductions in PANSS factor scores for positive and negative symptoms and disorganized thoughts. Only risperidone-treated patients exhibited significant decreases in uncontrolled hostility/excitement and anxiety and depression. Of note, while positive factor scores exhibited the majority of change within the first 10 weeks, negative factor scores continued to decline significantly in both treatment groups throughout the study. Tolerability assessments did not differ between groups. The results indicate that both atypical antipsychotic medications provided significant additional improvement in symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia previously on conventional antipsychotic agents.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the distribution for the P300 generator, as demonstrated by Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) images, in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with olanzapine. Data were obtained from five right-handed patients treated with olanzapine for 6 months. Five right-handed normal volunteers also participated in the study. LORETA images of P300 in response to the odd-ball auditory discrimination task revealed a left dominant lateralized high current source density in the temporal lobes in all control subjects. Although this pattern of brain activation was not evident in patients at baseline, 6-month treatment with olanzapine recovered the left dominant pattern of the electrical density in the temporal regions, such as the Heschl gyrus, and improved performance on a test of verbal learning and memory. Scores of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale also improved during treatment. These results provide the first suggestion that enhancement of verbal memory and the functional status by treatment with some antipsychotic drugs may be associated with modulations of the anatomical configuration of electrical brain activity in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Brain Mapping; Case-Control Studies; Electroencephalography; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Statistics, Nonparametric

Negative symptoms are considered the most debilitating and refractory aspect of schizophrenia, being associated with poor social, occupational and global outcomes. Conventional antipsychotics have limited efficacy against these symptoms and poor tolerability profiles. Atypical antipsychotics are an alternative treatment, and this 12-week, randomised, flexibly dosed study compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of quetiapine and olanzapine in this regard. Of the 40 patients who entered the study (32 male; 8 female), 19 were randomised to quetiapine (mean dose 637 mg/day, mean treatment duration 80 days) and 21 to olanzapine (mean dose 16 mg/day, mean treatment duration 78 days). Quetiapine and olanzapine were similarly effective: in each treatment group significant improvements at Week 12 were observed for negative symptom scores on the SANS and the PANSS, and for subscale scores of affective flattening and alogia on the SANS. Both treatments were well tolerated in this patient population, with no worsening of extrapyramidal symptoms in either case. Anxiety and insomnia were the most common adverse events (> or =7% of patients in each group), but were not drug-related. Although this is a small study with limited power, the results support the effectiveness of quetiapine and olanzapine in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

Childhood-onset schizophrenia is a rare but severe form of the disorder that is frequently treatment resistant. The psychiatrist has a limited evidence base to guide treatment, particularly as there are no trials in children comparing atypical antipsychotics, the mainstay of current treatment.. To compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and clozapine, hypothesizing that clozapine would be more efficacious.. Double-blind randomized 8-week controlled trial, with a 2-year open-label follow-up.. National Institute of Mental Health study, January 1998 to June 2005. Patients underwent reassessment 2 years after discharge.. Children and adolescents recruited nationally, aged 7 to 16 years, meeting unmodified DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, and resistant to treatment with at least 2 antipsychotics.. After drug washout and a 1- to 3-week antipsychotic-free period, patients were randomized to treatment with clozapine (n = 12) or olanzapine (n = 13).. The Clinical Global Impression Severity of Symptoms Scale and Schedule for the Assessment of Negative/Positive Symptoms.. Clozapine was associated with a significant reduction in all outcome measures, whereas olanzapine showed a less consistent profile of clinical improvement. While there were moderate to large differential treatment effects in favor of clozapine, these reached significance only in the alleviation of negative symptoms from an antipsychotic-free baseline (P = .04; effect size, 0.89). Clozapine was associated with more overall adverse events. At 2-year follow-up, 15 patients were receiving clozapine with evidence of sustained clinical improvement, but additional adverse events emerged, including lipid anomalies (n = 6) and seizures (n = 1).. While not demonstrating definitively the superiority of clozapine compared with olanzapine in treatment-refractory childhood-onset schizophrenia, the study suggests that clozapine has a more favorable profile of clinical response, which is balanced against more associated adverse events.

Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

GENERAL PURPOSE: To evaluate the social functioning of schizophrenic outpatients after switching to second-generation antipsychotics.. Multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel, flexible-dose, 1-year study of schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms (defined as a SANS Global score > or =10), previously treated with conventional antipsychotics. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to treatment with an initial dose of at least 10 mg/day olanzapine (N = 120) or at least 3 mg/day risperidone (N = 115). Dosage could be modified during the study according to clinical criteria. Social functioning was evaluated using the total and subscales scores of the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) (validated Spanish version). Other efficacy measures included the SANS, SAPS, and CGI-S scales. Response was defined in advance as a 30% improvement in the SANS Global score.. The mean doses during the trial were 12.2 mg/day (S.D. = 5.8) of olanzapine and 4.9 mg/day (S.D. = 2) of risperidone. There were no significant baseline differences in SFS total scores or other relevant clinical variables. At 1 year, olanzapine-treated patients presented a mean improvement in SFS total scores (7.75) that were significantly higher (p = 0.0028) than for risperidone-treated patients (-0.92). Treatment with olanzapine resulted in a greater numerical improvement than risperidone in all SFS domains and reached statistical significance in such categories as social engagement or withdrawal (p = 0.01), independence (performance) (p = 0.0098), independence (competence) (p = 0.04), recreational activities (p = 0.0391), and occupation/employment (p = 0.0024) in which the greatest difference between the olanzapine and risperidone groups was found (0.86 vs. -3.06). Significantly more patients treated with olanzapine reached or surpassed the SFS typified total scores corresponding to a functional level that is representative of a sample of stabilized Spanish outpatients with schizophrenia without prominent negative symptoms (p = 0.0009). Associated factors were treatment with olanzapine and a 30% improvement or more in SANS global score or SAPS global score.. Long-term treatment with olanzapine was associated with overall greater improvement in social functioning (as measured by SFS) compared to risperidone-treated patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Patient Selection; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Behavior; Time Factors

We investigated the effect of gender on plasma prolactin levels in 20 Japanese drug-naïve schizophrenic patients [10 male, 10 female, aged 25.4+/-10.3 (mean+/-S.D.), range = 12-46 years] treated with olanzapine. Plasma prolactin levels were measured at baseline, and weeks 3 and 8 after starting titration of olanzapine. Comparisons of plasma prolactin levels between baseline and week 3, and between baseline and week 8 were made by repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in olanzapine-induced prolactin changes between male and female patients (P = 0.037). In male patients (n = 10), the plasma concentration of prolactin at week 3 was significantly higher than at baseline (P = 0.016), but there was no significant difference between the plasma concentration of prolactin at week 8 and at baseline or week 3 (P = 0.191). In female patients (n = 10), there was a significant change of prolactin between baseline and week 3 (P = 0.005), and between baseline and week 8 (P = 0.047). Our results indicate the possibility of gender differences in prolactin elevation induced by olanzapine in Japanese drug-naïve schizophrenic patients. These gender-based findings may be helpful for clinicians when deciding the frequency of follow-up visits once a patient starts olanzapine therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sex Characteristics

This study examined specific predictors of the efficacy of risperidone (RP), olanzapine (OL) and first-generation antipsychotic agents (FGAs), the role of confounding factors, and concomitant agents such as antidepressants, anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers in the treatment of health related quality of life (HRQL) impairment of schizophrenia patients.. This was a community-based, open label, parallel group naturalistic study of 124 schizophrenia outpatients who received either RP, OL, FGA, or combined agents (CA). Evaluations were performed at baseline and 12 months later. They included the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Distress Scale for Adverse Symptoms, and inventories for the assessment of distress severity, subjective tolerability, and self-efficacy.. OL was found to be superior to RP, FGAs and CA in terms of quality of life. FGAs revealed greater therapeutic benefit than RP, which was more beneficial than combined therapy. Improvement in Q-LES-Q was revealed in patients who received antidepressants and anxiolytics, but not mood stabilizers, or anti-Parkinson drugs. This effect was independent of treatment groups and gender. Regression models revealed that changes in emotional distress and side effects were common predictors for HRQL changes across treatment groups. Specific predictors of HRQL efficacy included self-efficacy for OL, negative and positive symptoms for RP, dysphoric mood and positive symptoms, daily doses and self-efficacy for FGA treated patients.. These findings suggest that OL is beneficial in the treatment of HRQL impairment in schizophrenia compared with RP, FGAs and CA. Special attention should be paid to specific predictors of HRQL efficacy for each antipsychotic agent, and to concomitant treatment with antidepressants and anxiolytics.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Patient Selection; Predictive Value of Tests; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is structurally similar to clozapine but has not been shown at routine doses to share the superiority of clozapine to traditional antipsychotics in treatment-resistant patients. Olanzapine, however, has been increasingly used in higher doses as clinicians attempt to find a more tolerable therapy for those refractory to conventional agents. This study examined the relationship of high-dose olanzapine plasma concentrations to symptoms, adverse effects, smoking, and gender. Thirteen patients participated in a double blind 16-week crossover study (8 weeks each arm) of olanzapine (50 mg/day) compared to clozapine (450 mg/day). Women had significantly higher plasma olanzapine levels than men at each time point in each arm (weeks 4, 6, and 8). At 8 weeks women had a steady-state olanzapine level of 278 +/- 62 ng/ml while men had a steady-state level of 127 +/- 47 ng/ml (p = 0.005). At week 4, olanzapine levels tended to be higher in those who had been on clozapine previously (205 ng/ml) compared to those who received olanzapine in the first arm (105 ng/ml). Cigarette intake was negatively correlated to olanzapine plasma concentrations (week 8: r = -0.86, p < 0.05). Plasma levels were significantly higher in those experiencing constipation (176 vs. 82 ng/ml; p = 0.022). Plasma levels of olanzapine were not associated with symptom response and anticholinergic effects were seen at greater frequency with higher olanzapine concentrations. In conclusion, this study reports plasma olanzapine levels at high fixed doses of olanzapine (50 mg/day) in relation to side effects, symptoms, smoking, and gender.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Constipation; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Characteristics; Sex Factors; Smoking; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vision Disorders; Xerostomia

Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) is a clinically severe form of schizophrenia, which causes severe impairment to cognitive, linguistic, and social development. There are few prospective and retrospective open clinical trials of risperidone and olanzapine in COS. In this open-label, randomized, prospective study, we compared the tolerability and effectiveness of risperidone versus olanzapine in the treatment of COS patients.. The study population consisted of 25 children with COS (mean age 11.09 +/- 1.55 years). After an evaluation, patients received risperidone (0.25-4.5 mg/day, mean dose 1.62 +/- 1.02 mg/day) or olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day, mean dose 8.18 +/- 4.41 mg/day) for 12 weeks, with weekly evaluations.. Both groups showed comparable significant (p < 0.001) within-group improvement from baseline to endpoint (LOCF) in Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores. Of the olanzapine-treated children, 11 (91.7%) completed the 12 weeks of the study, whereas in the risperidone-treated children only 9 (69.2%) did. No significant differences between risperidone-treated children and olanzapine-treated children were observed on Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) and Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) rating scales. Both treatment groups showed significant (p < 0.001) increase in weight from baseline to endpoint.. Our open-label, small-scale comparative study suggests that both risperidone and olanzapine appear to be efficacious antipsychotic medications in COS, with a slight nonsignificant advantage of olanzapine in the dropout rate.

Topics: Adolescent; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Israel; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This study compared the effects of olanzapine (OLZ) with those of quetiapine (QUE) for improving negative symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had prominent negative symptoms and marked deficits in social or occupational functioning. In this 6-month, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial, patients were randomized to treatment with OLZ (n = 171, 10-20 mg/d) or QUE (n = 175, 300-700 mg/d). Patients were treated at community mental health centers and assigned case managers who developed individualized psychosocial treatment plans. The primary efficacy measure was the reduction in negative symptoms using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Secondary measures assessed changes in functioning, psychopathology, and treatment tolerability. Treatment with OLZ or QUE led to a significant reduction in negative symptoms, with no between-group difference (P = 0.09). Both treatment groups also showed significant improvement on most efficacy measures. Olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement on positive symptoms and on several measures of functioning including Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, Quality of Life Instrumental Role domain, and level of effort in psychosocial or occupational rehabilitation programs. Significantly more OLZ-treated patients completed the study (52.6% OLZ, 37.7% QUE, P = 0.007). Treatment differences in safety were relatively small and not thought to be clinically relevant. Patients with schizophrenia who manifest prominent negative symptoms and marked functional deficits demonstrated significant improvement in negative symptoms after treatment with OLZ or QUE. Greater improvement in positive symptoms and a greater study completion rate may hold relevance to enhanced functional outcomes observed after OLZ therapy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Social Adjustment; Treatment Outcome

Recently, increasing attention has been drawn to the potential diabetogenic effect of atypical antipsychotics. The goal of this prospective study is to evaluate the early effect of olanzapine and risperidone treatment on pancreatic beta-cell function in atypical-naive schizophrenic patients. Twenty-six subjects were assigned randomly to therapy with olanzapine or risperidone for 14 days. The metabolic parameters were quantitatively assessed by using the intravenous glucose tolerance test. The levels of fasting glucose, fasting insulin, lipid profiles, and leptin were also assessed. There were no significant within-group changes in weight or body mass index for both groups after 2 weeks of treatment. The levels of fasting glucose, fasting insulin, cholesterol, or leptin did not change in both groups. The triglyceride level significantly increased in olanzapine group. Glucose disappearance rate and insulin sensitivity did not change in both groups. Insulin secretion significantly decreased in olanzapine group. After 2 weeks of olanzapine treatment, schizophrenic patients decreased insulin secretory response to a hyperglycemic challenge. The results of this study support the hypothesis that olanzapine might directly impair pancreatic beta-cell function.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Metabolic side effects have been found earlier during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Among those disturbances serum lipids are less investigated. We conducted a prospective, open study in schizophrenia patients in order to compare body weight and serum lipids during treatment with amisulpride, ziprasidone, clozapine or olanzapine over a period of 4 weeks. Body mass index, total cholesterol and triglycerides increased in patients treated with clozapine and olanzapine whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in those patients. In patients treated with amisulpride or ziprasidone, we found a decrease in body mass index and total cholesterol whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased. Our results indicate that treatment with ziprasidone and amisulpride is more favourable than treatment with clozapine and olanzapine with respect to the risk to induce weight gain and hyperlipidaemia. These results are important with regard to the increased risk for cardiovascular complications in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Humans; Lipids; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Triglycerides

To examine treatment-specific changes in health-related quality of life (QOL) among patients with schizophrenia and to assess the association between clinical and QOL improvement.. This post hoc analysis used the findings of a 28-week, randomized, multicenter trial of patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) treated with olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) or ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day). Data were collected from August 2001 to December 2002. Efficacy was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Quality of life was assessed with the generic health self-administered Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) and the disease-specific expert-administered Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Mixed-effects-repeated-measures and last-observation-carried-forward approaches were used to assess the effects of treatment on QOL and the association of clinical outcomes to QOL outcomes.. Olanzapine- and ziprasidone-treated patients demonstrated similar improvement from baseline to endpoint on the SF-36 and QLS. All correlations between changes in PANSS scores and the SF-36 were significant (p < .001), ranging from -0.159 to -0.400. All correlations between changes in PANSS scores and the QLS were significant (p < .0001), ranging from -0.286 to -0.603. The correlations between the 2 QOL measures were generally significant but small to moderate in magnitude.. The results of this study indicate that, in patients with schizophrenia, olanzapine and ziprasidone treatment are associated with significant QOL and clinical improvements. Further, the significant correlation between change scores on the PANSS and QOL measures suggests that treatment-related clinical improvements are associated with improved health-related and disease-specific QOL.. ClinicalStudyResults.org identifier 2347.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Health Status; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Distribution; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine (5 and 20 mg/day) over a 6-month period in chronic schizophrenic patients experiencing predominantly negative symptoms.. Two hundred and forty-four patients participated in a 6-month multicenter double-blind trial of placebo (n = 34), olanzapine 5 mg/day (n = 70), olanzapine 20 mg/day (n = 70), or amisulpride 150 mg/day (n = 70). Primary measure was the scale for the assessment of negative symptoms.. Olanzapine 5 mg/day showed significantly greater improvement than placebo in negative symptoms and in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Baseline positive symptoms were low at baseline and changed minimally. The neurological tolerance of olanzapine, amisulpride and placebo were comparable.. Olanzapine 5 mg/day was effective in treating negative symptoms in a group of schizophrenic with predominantly negative symptoms during the stabilization phase. Improvement in positive symptoms or extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was unlikely to explain this result while improvement in depression may have partially contributed.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Chronic Disease; Depression; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sulpiride; Surveys and Questionnaires

The effect of lamotrigine on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone was investigated in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder stabilized on chronic treatment with clozapine (200-500 mg/day; n = 11), risperidone (3-6 mg/day; n = 10) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day; n = 14)). Lamotrigine was titrated up to a final dosage of 200 mg/day over 8 weeks, and pharmacokinetic assessments were made at baseline and during treatment weeks 6 and 10, at lamotrigine dosages of 100 and 200 mg/day respectively. The plasma concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine, risperidone, and 9-hydroxy-risperidone did not change significantly during treatment with lamotrigine. The mean plasma concentrations of olanzapine were 31 +/- 7 ng/mL at baseline, 32 +/- 7 ng/mL at week 6, and 36 +/- 9 ng/mL at week 10, the difference between week 10 and baseline being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy was well tolerated in all groups. These findings indicate that lamotrigine, at the dosages recommended for use as a mood stabilizer, does not affect the plasma levels of clozapine, risperidone, and their active metabolites. The modest elevation in plasma olanzapine concentration, possibly due to inhibition of UGT1A4-mediated olanzapine glucuronidation, is unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Lamotrigine; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Triazines

To examine the quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes for Asian schizophrenic outpatients treated with olanzapine or haloperidol. Patients were randomized to 24-weeks' treatment with either olanzapine (n = 144) or haloperidol (n = 132) in a double-blind, prospective, multi-country study. The QLS and WHO-BREF were assessed for QoL; the PANSS, BPRS and CGI scales for clinical status; the BAS, AIMS and SAS scales for physical dysfunction. Regardless of antipsychotic, QoL improved significantly at 8 weeks and maintained this improvement at 24 weeks. Compared with haloperidol, olanzapine treatment was associated with significantly better QoL in the WHO-BREF physical and social relationship domains, better improvements in extrapyramidal symptoms in BAS and SAS scores, as well as lower incidence of adverse events. Patients taking haloperidol were more likely to be co-prescribed anticholinergics. The comparatively superior side-effect profile and tolerability of olanzapine may have contributed to enhance domain-specific QoL for these Asian outpatients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of aripiprazole with olanzapine in patients with either acute relapsing or chronic, stable schizophrenia.. A 52-week, open-label extension to a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who completed the initial treatment or who met the protocol definition of relapse after > or =2 weeks of double-blind treatment were randomized to aripiprazole (15-30 mg/day, n = 104) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day, n = 110) for 52 weeks.. Sixty-nine percent of patients completed the study. Efficacy improvements were similar between groups at endpoint, mean reductions in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total scores from baseline for patients completing the study (observed cases) were similar in chronic stable patients (aripiprazole, -7.94; olanzapine, -7.36) and in patients with acute relapse (aripiprazole, -31.19; olanzapine, -29.55). Olanzapine-treated patients reported more extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)-related adverse events (18%) than aripiprazole-treated patients (10%). No significant differences in EPS were seen between treatments at endpoint. Olanzapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain than aripiprazole at all time points (week 52 [LOCF]: +2.54 vs +0.04 kg; p < 0.001). Changes in fasting glucose and lipid levels at endpoint favored aripiprazole over olanzapine, with significant differences observed for total cholesterol, low- and high-density lipoprotein. While differences observed for changes in fasting glucose and triglycerides favored aripiprazole, they were not statistically significant.. Aripiprazole showed similar efficacy to olanzapine for long-term treatment of acutely psychotic and chronic, stable schizophrenia patients, with a lower liability for weight gain or increased lipid levels.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quinolones; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

This article compares the efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for positive and negative symptoms using an 18-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover design. The hypotheses were that olanzapine would be more efficacious for treating negative symptoms, and that risperidone would be superior in treating positive symptoms. Positive and negative symptoms scores improved throughout treatment, regardless of medication type. Differences between the medications were found for negative and general psychopathology rating scales. Overall, olanzapine led to greater improvements in negative symptoms than did risperidone. When each scale was analyzed individually, greater improvements were found for olanzapine on Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) General,PANSS total, and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)attention. A nearly significant trend favoring olanzapine was found for the Calgary Depression Scale. Several negative symptom subscales followed a nonsignificant trend toward olanzapine being more efficacious than risperidone.Thus, there was a very consistent pattern of greater efficacy for olanzapine, particularly for negative symptoms. Despite the small number of subjects, this study shows the potential of a within-subject design to elucidate differences in efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Cigarette smoking has been shown in several studies to induce the metabolism of the cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) substrates clozapine and olanzapine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-dependent effect of cigarette smoking on serum concentrations of these drugs in a naturalistic setting.. In 73 schizophrenic patients recruited from psychiatric nursing homes, patient characteristics, smoking habits, drug dosing and serum concentrations of clozapine (n=33) and olanzapine (n=40) were registered. Concentration to dose (C/D) ratios of clozapine and olanzapine in non-smokers and subgroups of smokers were compared.. Fifty-nine patients (80%) were smokers and these were stratified into the following groups according to smoking habits: 1-6 (n=0), 7-12 (n=13), 13-19 (n=18) and >or=20 (n=28) cigarettes daily. While the mean ratio was twice as high in non-smokers compared to smokers for both drugs (p<0.01), the C/D ratios of clozapine and olanzapine were not significantly different between the subgroups of smokers (p >0.15). Absolute serum concentrations were also higher in non-smokers compared to smokers: 50% for clozapine (p=0.058) and 67% for olanzapine (p<0.01).. A daily consumption of 7-12 cigarettes is probably sufficient for maximum induction of clozapine and olanzapine metabolism. A 50% lower starting dose of both drugs in non-smokers seems rational to avoid side effects.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Clozapine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nursing Homes; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Smoking

Randomized controlled drug trials have demonstrated that antipsychotic medication is effective to rapidly improve psychotic symptomatology in first-episode psychosis. However, these results may not be generalizable to routine clinical practice. We evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of olanza-pine, risperidone, and haloperidol in individuals with first-episode nonaffective psychosis who are representative of clinical practice and who are treated in routine clinical settings.. 172 patients participated in a practical clinical trial and were randomly assigned to haloperidol (N = 56), risperidone (N = 61), and olanzapine (N = 55). The mean modal daily doses were 5.4 mg/day for halo-peridol, 4 mg/day for risperidone, and 15.3 mg/day for olanzapine; 98.3% of subjects were drug naive at baseline. Data from clinical measures of treatment response and tolerability and safety data from the 6-week acute phase of a large epidemiologic and longitudinal (February 2001 to February 2005) intervention program of first-episode psychosis (schizophrenia spectrum disorders, DSM-IV criteria) are reported.. All 3 treatments showed similar effectiveness in reducing the severity of general, negative, and positive symptomatology after 6 weeks of treatment, as reported by mean change in total Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms scores between baseline and 6 weeks. The proportion of study subjects responding, defined as 40% or greater BPRS total score improvement from baseline, was 57.1% (N = 32 of 56) haloperidol, 52.5% (N = 32 of 61) risperidone, and 63.6% (N = 35 of 55) olanzapine, with no statistical differences among groups. The frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms (chi(2) = 24.519; p < .001) and concomitant anticholinergic medication use (chi(2) = 57.842; p < .0001) was greater with haloperidol than olanzapine or risperidone. Olanzapine-treated patients had significantly more weight gain compared with the haloperidol and risperidone groups (p < .001).. Relatively low doses of haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine are equally effective for the acute treatment of first-episode nonaffective psychosis under usual conditions of real clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of switching to olanzapine were investigated in patients with first-episode schizophrenia who failed to attain an adequate clinical response to an initial therapeutic trial of risperidone (2-6 mg/day for 12 weeks).. A total of 58 first-episode patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who had residual symptoms following treatment with risperidone were enrolled in an open-label, 12-week study of olanzapine. Dosing was determined by clinical judgment. The main efficacy measure was the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Patients with a 20% or greater decrease in BPRS total score plus a final Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score of or= 7%) from baseline.. Although we cannot draw any conclusion from a study without a control group, favorable outcomes and good tolerance were observed after switching to olanzapine from risperidone in our population. In addition, factors that predicted a good overall response included a relative absence of positive symptoms at baseline and the percentage reduction in total BPRS score at 4 weeks of treatment. Double-blind, crossover trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Cross-Over Studies; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal

To compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and olanzapine in subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression in a randomised double-blind trial.. Eighty-five adult patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and presenting a depressive episode were randomised to amisulpride (200-600 mg/day) or olanzapine (5-15 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were change in Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) score and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Change. Safety was monitored by adverse event reporting and determination of extrapyramidal function and metabolic variables.. The mean change from baseline of CDS score was -6.84 in the amisulpride group and -7.36 in the olanzapine group. 65.9% and 61.5% of subjects, respectively, were considered "much" or "very much" improved. No significant inter-group difference in effect size was observed. The frequency of adverse events was low and emergence of extrapyramidal symptoms was not seen. Four patients in the olanzapine group developed abnormal triglyceride levels. Mean weight gain was 1.45 and 0.5 kg, respectively, in the olanzapine and amisulpride groups.. Amisulpride and olanzapine are effective in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid depression. Tolerance of both drugs was acceptable, although use of olanzapine was associated with a trend toward greater metabolic side-effects .

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Female; France; Humans; Italy; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Tunisia; Weight Gain

To assess whether pharmacokinetic drug interactions occur when sertraline is added to antipsychotic medications.. Forty-eight patients with remitted DSM-IV schizophrenia and comorbid major depression were randomized to placebo for 6 weeks or sertraline 50 mg for 4 weeks followed by sertraline 50 mg to 100 mg for 2 weeks for nonresponders. Treatment with the patients' usual antipsychotic continued. Weekly clinical outcome assessments occurred for 6 weeks, and serum samples for drug monitoring were collected at Weeks 1, 5, and 6. Serum concentrations of sertraline and antipsychotics were measured with standard assays.. In both placebo- and sertraline-treated groups, most patients displayed minor fluctuations in antipsychotic serum levels over 6 weeks. There was no clinical evidence of drug interactions in the sertraline-treated group.. Clinically significant adverse effects did not occur despite variable antipsychotic serum levels with or without sertraline. Concern about pharmacokinetic interactions should not deter the use of sertraline for depression in individuals with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder, Major; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline

Changing antipsychotics is common despite the dearth of information on risks and benefits associated with medication changes. The authors examined phase 1 findings from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study to explore whether it was more advantageous to continue taking the medication being received at baseline or to switch to a different antipsychotic.. First, for patients randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (N=314) or risperidone (N=321), the authors assessed the impact of being assigned to stay with the medication they were receiving at entry into the study versus being assigned to switch to these medications from a different antipsychotic. Second, for patients whose baseline antipsychotic was olanzapine (N=319), risperidone (N=271), or quetiapine (N=94), the authors examined the impact of being randomly assigned to stay with the same antipsychotic versus switch. Finally, the authors assessed the impact of removing the data of 209 patients whose random assignment was to stay with their baseline antipsychotic. The authors followed analysis strategies for CATIE; primary outcome was time until all-cause treatment discontinuation.. Individuals randomly assigned to olanzapine and risperidone who were continuing with their baseline medication had significantly longer times until discontinuation than did those assigned to switch antipsychotics. When these "stayers" were removed, differences seen in the original CATIE phase 1 analyses were attenuated, although the original pattern of results remained.. Comparisons of medication effectiveness should take into account whether medications being compared were each newly initiated. Further, unless the clinical situation requires a medication change, prescribers may want to take steps to optimize current medication regimens (e.g., dosage adjustments, behavioral or psychosocial interventions) before switching medications.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Psychotherapy; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Selection Bias; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

The authors compared 4-month treatment outcomes for olanzapine versus risperidone in patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders.. One hundred twelve subjects (70% male; mean age=23.3 years [SD = 5.1]) with first-episode schizophrenia (75%), schizophreniform disorder (17%), or schizoaffective disorder (8%) were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day) or risperidone (1-6 mg/day).. Response rates did not significantly differ between olanzapine (43.7%, 95% CI=28.8%-58.6%) and risperidone (54.3%, 95% CI=39.9%-68.7%). Among those responding to treatment, more subjects in the olanzapine group (40.9%, 95% CI=16.8%-65.0%) than in the risperidone group (18.9%, 95% CI=0%-39.2%) had subsequent ratings not meeting response criteria. Negative symptom outcomes and measures of parkinsonism and akathisia did not differ between medications. Extrapyramidal symptom severity scores were 1.4 (95% CI=1.2-1.6) with risperidone and 1.2 (95% CI=1.0-1.4) with olanzapine. Significantly more weight gain occurred with olanzapine than with risperidone: the increase in weight at 4 months relative to baseline weight was 17.3% (95% CI=14.2%-20.5%) with olanzapine and 11.3% (95% CI=8.4%-14.3%) with risperidone. Body mass index at baseline and at 4 months was 24.3 (95% CI=22.8-25.7) versus 28.2 (95% CI=26.7-29.7) with olanzapine and 23.9 (95% CI=22.5-25.3) versus 26.7 (95% CI=25.2-28.2) with risperidone.. Clinical outcomes with risperidone were equal to those with olanzapine, and response may be more stable. Olanzapine may have an advantage for motor side effects. Both medications caused substantial rapid weight gain, but weight gain was greater with olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Weight gain is associated with treatment with many psychotropic agents. Nizatidine, H2 receptor antagonist, has been proposed to have weight-reducing effects. This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of nizatidine in reducing/limiting weight gain in patients with schizophrenia who have been under treatment with olanzapine.. Patients receiving olanzapine (2 to 6 months) and weight gain >or= 5% of their body weight during olanzapine treatment were randomly assigned to receive nizatidine 600 mg or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Change in psychopathology was assessed using Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores from baseline to endpoint. Safety was assessed using the Safety Assessed Software, assessment of glucose and lipid blood levels, and treatment-emergent adverse events.. Out of 54 patients enrolled in this analysis, 45 completed the protocol. The mean weight change prior randomization was 7.6 kg and 7.3 kg for those randomized to placebo and nizatidine, respectively (p = 0.828). Patients receiving placebo and nizatidine had a mean weight gain of 12.3% (0.7 kg) and 12% (1.1 kg) from baseline to endpoint, respectively (p = 0.9). Patients from both groups experienced a statistically significant decrease on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale mean score from baseline to endpoint. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 18.5% and 25.9% on the placebo and nizatidine group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in glucose and lipid blood levels from baseline to endpoint and between groups.. The concomitant use of olanzapine with nizatidine was not effective in controlling weight gain in patients who had previously gained weight during treatment with olanzapine when compared to placebo.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Double-Blind Method; Education, Nursing, Associate; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nizatidine; Obesity; Olanzapine; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Weight gain is a common adverse effect associated with olanzapine treatment. Another side effect of olanzapine treatment is a significant increase in circulating leptin levels. This preliminary study monitored the changes in leptin levels for 2 weeks after olanzapine treatment had been initiated. The relationship between the changes in circulating leptin levels and alterations in body weight in 9 patients with schizophrenia who received olanzapine was examined. The results showed that olanzapine may cause a surge in circulating leptin levels before weight gain is manifested. Moreover, higher pretreatment circulating leptin levels predicted lower weight gains after olanzapine treatments (r = -0.93; p < 0.05) after controlling for the effect of sex.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Leptin; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Weight Gain

Increased appetite and weight gain are frequently reported in treatment with olanzapine. However, the mechanism behind this appetite gain remains unclear. Ghrelin is a newly discovered appetite-stimulating peptide that has a role in the regulation of feeding behavior. Ghrelin is synthesized principally in the stomach, and the concentration of circulating ghrelin is negatively correlated with leptin and body fat mass. To elucidate the mechanism of appetite and weight gain during olanzapine treatment, we investigated the circulating ghrelin levels.. Seven patients with schizophrenia were examined before and after 6-month administration of olanzapine. The concentrations of circulating ghrelin, leptin, glucose and lipid metabolic parameters were measured.. Body fat percentage (P=0.0121) and serum leptin (P=0.0284) were significantly increased after 6-month administration of olanzapine. Both plasma total ghrelin (P=0.0188) and active ghrelin levels (P=0.0057) were significantly increased. Six of the seven patients reported increased appetite during olanzapine treatment. Other glucose and lipid parameters were not altered significantly.. Although, the leptin level and body fat percentage were significantly increased, the concentration of circulating ghrelin was also significantly increased. Olanzapine may directly act on the secretion of ghrelin and induce appetite, resulting in weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Female; Ghrelin; Humans; Leptin; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Peptide Hormones; Radioimmunoassay; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Combined serotonin-2A (5-HT(2A)) and dopamine-2 (D2) receptor blockade has been proposed as a candidate mechanism by which second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) improve both cognition and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients, in contrast to antipsychotics of the first generation. The SGA amisulpride, however, only binds to D2/D3 receptors, which makes it an interesting tool to test this assumption. In a randomized controlled trial, 52 schizophrenic patients were allocated to treatment with either olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) or amisulpride (400-800 mg/day). A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and clinical ratings were used to assess participants at inclusion and after 4 and 8 weeks. Cognitive improvements of moderate size were observed, with effect sizes similar to those obtained in previous studies on the cognitive effects of SGAs. Importantly, amisulpride was not inferior to olanzapine for any cognitive domain. Combined 5-HT(2A)/D2 receptor blockade is probably not necessary for cognitive improvement by SGAs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Memory; Memory, Short-Term; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Performance; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin; Sulpiride; Verbal Learning

The pattern of brain metabolic changes produced by olanzapine has yet to be described, despite the theoretical and clinical interest of this new antipsychotic. We studied a group of 17 schizophrenic patients who underwent two fluoro-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) studies under two different conditions: a baseline scan during treatment with either conventional antipsychotics (n=15) or risperidone (n=2) and a second scan performed 17-24 weeks after switching to olanzapine. PET scans were obtained while performing a standard cognitive paradigm (Continuous Performance Test) and analysed by means of Statistical Parametric Mapping. No significant metabolic changes were found in the comparison between pre- and post-olanzapine conditions. A brain map of the statistical power of our design showed that changes up to 3% in the frontal and up to 8% in the occipital region were not likely to exist (1-beta=0.8). The degree of improvement in positive symptoms was related to the amount of activity decrease in the right orbital region and to the amount of activity increase in the primary visual area. Improvement in negative symptoms was associated with an activity increase in the dorsal prefrontal cortex, and a higher baseline activity in both temporal poles. These correlation patterns suggest that the functional mechanism of action of olanzapine may share traits from both typical and atypical neuroleptics.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Cognition; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Radiopharmaceuticals; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The present study examined sexual functioning among first-time treated schizophrenia patients at the time that they initiated antipsychotic treatment, and again 3 and 6 months later. These first-time treated patients comprise a subgroup of 570 schizophrenia patients who were part of a cohort of 7,655 patients enrolled in the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient-Health Outcomes observational study (IC-SOHO). As part of a brief clinical assessment conducted at entry to the study, and after 3 and 6 months of antipsychotic medication, patients were asked to rate their sexual functioning, and the investigator was asked to rate the extent to which the patient had neuroleptic-related loss of libido and sexual dysfunction. After being treated, patients treated with olanzapine showed the lowest prevalence of neuroleptic-induced sexual difficulties. At 3 months, there were significant differences between the treatment groups on neuroleptic-related loss of libido, neuroleptic-related sexual dysfunction and change in patient-rated sexual dysfunction. At 6 months, the difference between the groups on neuroleptic-related loss of libido was statistically significant. There were no significant differences between males and females. Many recent onset patients appear to suffer from problems of sexual functioning. Olanzapine may offer an advantage in this area.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Libido; Male; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Schizophrenia; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Time Factors

In an open-label study, 13 patients taking depot antipsychotic medication for greater than 3 years were switched to oral olanzapine. The first 3-month experience has been previously reported. We now describe a second 3-month experience and integrate our observations into a cumulative 6-month report. Monthly, we assessed patients using clinical ratings [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Clinical Global Improvement Scale (CGI)] and side effect parameters [Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry psychotropic side effect rating scale (AMDP-5), and weights]. Olanzapine patients showed statistically significant improvement (baseline to endpoint sixth month) in GAF (p=0.015), MMSE (p=0.022), CGI improvement, and AIMS (p=0.038). There was no statistically significant change in PANSS, CGI severity, or AMDP-5 overall side effects. Weight gain over 6 months averaged 8.9 lb. All patients completed the study. Compliance was estimated at 90%, and 81% of patients chose to continue on the oral olanzapine. One patient was hospitalized at the conclusion of the study. Our findings suggest that clinicians may consider oral olanzapine as a viable alternative to depot antipsychotic medications, balancing clinical improvement in some clinical measures with lack of improvement in other clinical measures; and balancing improvement in abnormal involuntary movements with weight gain and its sequelae.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Olanzapine has been hypothesized to have superior efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The authors examined the comparative efficacy and safety of olanzapine and haloperidol in outpatients with partially responsive schizophrenia.. Sixty-three outpatients with schizophrenia who met retrospective and prospective criteria for either residual positive or residual negative symptoms entered a 16-week double-blind, parallel-groups comparison of olanzapine and haloperidol.. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effect on positive or negative symptoms. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups on measures of social and functional outcome. Olanzapine-treated patients had a significant reduction in extrapyramidal symptoms and subjective measures of stiffness and dry mouth, but the increases in systolic blood pressure and weight in olanzapine-treated patients were significantly greater than they were in haloperidol-treated patients.. Olanzapine has limited differential benefit for either positive or negative symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Although olanzapine is associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms, other side effects may offset this benefit.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

This open label study was performed to evaluate the relationship between the plasma concentration of olanzapine and the response in acute schizophrenic inpatients.. A total of 54 inpatients, 38 males and 16 females, age ranging from 18 to 75 years, affected by Schizophrenia (DSM IV criteria) during an exacerbation phase were included in the study. Olanzapine (OLZ) was started at a dose of 5-20 mg/day and was increased to a mean dose of 15.27 mg +/-5.53 S.D. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and after 2 weeks, by using BPRS, PANNS, HRS-D, EPSE, and ACS.. BPRS and total PANSS showed a statistically significant improvement at the end of the study. Olanzapine plasma levels (PL) ranged from 5 to 120 ng/ml (mean 33.15 ng/ml +/- 28.28 S.D.) and showed a positive correlation with OLZ dosage. A significant curvilinear correlation between OLZ PL and clinical improvement (BPRS, PANSS and HRS-D percent of amelioration) was observed.. Olanzapine plasma level determination seems to be a useful tool in optimizing acute treatment particularly for more problematic cases.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Previous research indicated that women are more vulnerable than men to adverse psychological consequences of weight gain. Other research has suggested that weight gain experienced during antipsychotic therapy may also psychologically impact women more negatively. This study assessed the impact of acute treatment-emergent weight gain on clinical and functional outcomes of patients with schizophrenia by patient gender and antipsychotic treatment (olanzapine or haloperidol).. Data were drawn from the acute phase (first 6-weeks) of a double-blind randomized clinical trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of 1296 men and 700 women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The associations between weight change and change in core schizophrenia symptoms, depressive symptoms, and functional status were examined post-hoc for men and women and for each medication group. Core schizophrenia symptoms (positive and negative) were measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), depressive symptoms with the BPRS Anxiety/Depression Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and functional status with the mental and physical component scores on the Medical Outcome Survey-Short Form 36. Statistical analysis included methods that controlled for treatment duration.. Weight gain during 6-week treatment with olanzapine and haloperidol was significantly associated with improvements in core schizophrenia symptoms, depressive symptoms, mental functioning, and physical functioning for men and women alike. The conditional probability of clinical response (20% reduction in core schizophrenia symptom), given a clinically significant weight gain (at least 7% of baseline weight), showed that about half of the patients who lost weight responded to treatment, whereas three-quarters of the patients who had a clinically significant weight gain responded to treatment. The positive associations between therapeutic response and weight gain were similar for the olanzapine and haloperidol treatment groups. Improved outcomes were, however, more pronounced for the olanzapine-treated patients, and more olanzapine-treated patients gained weight.. The findings of significant relationships between treatment-emergent weight gain and improvements in clinical and functional status at 6-weeks suggest that patients who have greater treatment-emergent weight gain are more likely to benefit from treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol regardless of gender.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

This randomized double-blind multicenter trial evaluated the effects of olanzapine vs. clozapine on subjective well-being, quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome.. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of olanzapine, mean dosage 16.2 +/- 4.8 (5-25 mg/day) vs. clozapine, mean dosage 209 +/- 91 (100-400 mg/day) regarding improvement on the 'Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment' (SWN) Scale after 26 treatment weeks in 114 patients with schizophrenia. Secondary outcome parameters included: Munich QOL Dimension List (MLDL), Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI).. SWN scores improved significantly in both groups, olanzapine was non-inferior to clozapine (group difference 3.2 points in favor of olanzapine; 95% CI: 4.2;10.5). MLDL-satisfaction, PANSS and CGI-S improved similarly, olanzapine yielded a higher CGI Therapeutic Index. Individual SWN and PANSS changes correlated only moderately (r = -0.45).. Olanzapine was non-inferior to clozapine. The lack of a marked correlation between PANSS and SWN improvements indicates that patients and psychiatrists perceive treatment differently.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Clozapine; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Obesity is common in persons with schizophrenia. Besides its adverse health effects, obesity reduces quality of life and contributes to the social stigma of schizophrenia.. This 14-week, multicenter, open-label, rater-blinded, randomized study evaluated the effects of a group-based behavioral treatment (BT) for weight loss in overweight and obese stable patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had been switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive BT or usual clinical care (UC). BT included 20 sessions during which patients were taught to reduce caloric intake. In UC, patients were encouraged to lose weight but received no special advice about weight reduction. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight.. Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The mean +/- SD weight loss at endpoint was significant in both groups (p < .05) and numerically greater in patients receiving BT than in those receiving UC (-2.0 +/- 3.79 and -1.1 +/- 3.11 kg, respectively). More patients in the BT group than in the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (26.5% [9/34] and 10.8% [4/37], respectively; p = .082). A post hoc analysis of patients attending at least 1 BT session showed that significantly more patients in the BT than the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (32.1% [9/28] vs. 10.8% [4/37], respectively, p = .038) and at week 14 (complete population; 40.9% [9/22] and 14.3% [4/28], respectively, p = .027).. BT may be an effective method for weight reduction in patients with chronic psychotic illness.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Psychotherapy, Group; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of abruptly switching inadequately treated psychotic outpatients from another oral antipsychotic to olanzapine and to evaluate subjective well-being under olanzapine.. Previous medication was switched to olanzapine 10 mg/day and continued for 4 weeks (5-20 mg/day). Successful switch was predefined as no change or any improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale after one week. A successful switch rate of > or = 70 % was considered a positive study outcome. Well-being was evaluated using the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics (SWN) scale.. 198 patients (100 %) were switched to olanzapine. In 177 patients (89 %), CGI-I was unchanged (29 %) or improved (60 %) after one week of olanzapine treatment, indicating a positive study outcome (p < 0.001). SWN total score significantly improved from 127.9 (+/- 32.5) at baseline to 139.2 (+/- 31.5) at week 1, continuing to 149.3 (+/- 30.3) at week 4 (LOCF).. The findings suggest that an abrupt switch from another antipsychotic to olanzapine 10 mg/day can be performed successfully in psychotic patients, while rapidly improving subjective well-being.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Histamine antagonism has been implicated in antipsychotic drug-induced weight gain. Betahistine, a histamine enhancer with H1 agonistic/H3 antagonistic properties (48 mg t.i.d.), was coadministered with olanzapine (10 mg/day) in three first-episode schizophrenia patients for 6 weeks. Body weight was measured at baseline and weekly thereafter. Clinical rating scales were completed at baseline and at week 6. All participants gained weight (mean weight gain 3.1+/-0.9 kg) and a similar pattern of weight gain was observed: an increase during the first 2 weeks and no additional weight gain (two patients) or minor weight loss (one patient) from weeks 3 to 6. None gained 7% of baseline weight, which is the cut-off for clinically significant weight gain. Betahistine was safe and well tolerated and did not interfere with the antipsychotic effect of olanzapine. Our findings justify a placebo-controlled evaluation of the putative weight-attenuating effect of betahistine in olanzapine-induced weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Betahistine; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Histamine Agonists; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Olanzapine; Receptors, Histamine H3; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

D-serine, a selective full agonist at the glycine site of N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor, might presently be the compound of choice for counteracting the hypothesized dysfunction of this receptor class in schizophrenia. Studies performed with Taiwanese patients indicate that D-serine significantly improves schizophrenia symptoms when used as adjuvant to conventional neuroleptics but not to clozapine. We assessed the efficacy and safety of D-serine adjuvant treatment for Occidental schizophrenia patients treated with newer atypical antipsychotics.. Thirty-nine risperidone- or olanzapine-treated schizophrenia patients participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week crossover trial with 30 mg/kg/day D-serine added to their antipsychotic medication. Measures of clinical efficacy and side effects were determined biweekly throughout the study. Clinical laboratory parameters and amino acid serum levels were monitored.. D-serine administration induced increased serine serum levels (p < .001) and resulted in significant (p < .001) improvements in negative, positive, cognitive, and depression symptoms, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. For approximately one third of the sample, D-serine treatment resulted in significant (>20%) reductions in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores. D-serine was well tolerated, and no detrimental changes in clinical laboratory parameters were noted.. These findings 1) indicate that risperidone and olanzapine efficacy might be augmented with D-serine adjuvant treatment; 2) confirm D-serine efficacy against main schizophrenia symptom domains; and 3) warrant the assessment of D-serine antipsychotic monotherapy for this illness.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Pathomorphologic brain changes occurring as early as first-episode schizophrenia have been extensively described. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that these changes may be progressive and associated with clinical outcome. This raises the possibility that antipsychotics might alter such pathomorphologic progression in early-stage schizophrenia.. To test a priori hypotheses that olanzapine-treated patients have less change over time in whole brain gray matter volumes and lateral ventricle volumes than haloperidol-treated patients and that gray matter and lateral ventricle volume changes are associated with changes in psychopathology and neurocognition.. Longitudinal, randomized, controlled, multisite, double-blind study. Patients treated and followed up for up to 104 weeks. Neurocognitive and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments performed at weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 24, 52, and 104. Mixed-models analyses with time-dependent covariates evaluated treatment effects on MRI end points and explored relationships between MRI, psychopathologic, and neurocognitive outcomes.. Fourteen academic medical centers (United States, 11; Canada, 1; Netherlands, 1; England, 1).. Patients with first-episode psychosis (DSM-IV) and healthy volunteers.. Random allocation to a conventional antipsychotic, haloperidol (2-20 mg/d), or an atypical antipsychotic, olanzapine (5-20 mg/d).. Brain volume changes assessed by MRI.. Of 263 randomized patients, 161 had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline MRI evaluation. Haloperidol-treated patients exhibited significant decreases in gray matter volume, whereas olanzapine-treated patients did not. A matched sample of healthy volunteers (n = 58) examined contemporaneously showed no change in gray matter volume.. Patients with first-episode psychosis exhibited a significant between-treatment difference in MRI volume changes. Haloperidol was associated with significant reductions in gray matter volume, whereas olanzapine was not. Post hoc analyses suggested that treatment effects on brain volume and psychopathology of schizophrenia may be associated. The differential treatment effects on brain morphology could be due to haloperidol-associated toxicity or greater therapeutic effects of olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Cognition Disorders; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

It is widely held that there is a delayed onset of antipsychotic action and that any early effects represent nonspecific behavioral effects. Recent research has shown that antipsychotic action begins within the first week. The authors tested the hypothesis that psychosis improves within the first 24 hours of antipsychotic treatment.. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 311 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder and an acute exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg i.m. of olanzapine, 7.5 mg i.m. of haloperidol, or intramuscular placebo. Subjects were rated with structured rating scales (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression) at baseline, 2 hours, and 24 hours.. The olanzapine and haloperidol groups showed greater resolution of overall symptoms than the placebo group; for the olanzapine group, this effect was evident at 2 hours. A factor analysis showed that an independent change in psychosis (which included conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, unusual thought content) was evident within the first 24 hours for both drugs. This improvement in core psychosis was not mediated unidirectionally by changes in nonspecific behavioral effects or other psychopathology.. These data suggest that the onset of antipsychotic action is early and that the magnitude of this action grows with time. This clinical reality calls into question some prevailing hypotheses regarding the mechanism of action of antipsychotics and suggests that antipsychotic action may be more proximally related to the blockade of dopamine transmission than was originally thought.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dopamine Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Weight gain is commonly observed with olanzapine treatment and can increase the risk for obesity, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. This study examined the effectiveness of sibutramine, an approved weight loss agent, in overweight and obese subjects taking olanzapine for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. Each subject had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, had been taking a stable dose of olanzapine for at least 4 months, and had a body mass index of >/=30 kg/m(2) or >/=27 kg/m(2) plus at least one cardiovascular risk factor. In a 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 37 subjects received placebo or sibutramine (up to 15 mg/day). For the first 8 weeks all subjects participated in weekly group sessions focused on nutrition and behavioral modification.. The sibutramine and placebo groups had no significant baseline differences on age, gender, education, ethnicity, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and blood pressure. At week 12 the sibutramine group had significantly greater losses than the placebo group in weight (mean=8.3 lb, SD=2.4, versus mean=1.8 lb, SD=1.6), waist circumference, body mass index, and hemoglobin A(1c). There were no significant differences on most side effects, although the sibutramine group exhibited a mean increase in systolic blood pressure of 2.1 mm Hg (SD=8.5), and anticholinergic side effects and sleep disturbances were at least twice as common in the sibutramine group.. Sibutramine was an effective and well-tolerated adjunct to behavior modification for weight loss in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder being treated with olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite Depressants; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclobutanes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Sleep Wake Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Chi-Square Distribution; Electromyography; Emotions; Facial Expression; Facial Muscles; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The authors investigated the influence of aging on the improvement of subjective sleep quality by atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia.. Subjects were 86 inpatients (mean age: 61.4 years) who had been receiving treatment with conventional antipsychotic drugs and who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia. Their antipsychotic medication was changed from conventional antipsychotics to one of four atypical antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, or risperidone). Patients were grouped by age (older or younger than 65 years). Subjective sleep quality and psychopathology were assessed twice: 1) at baseline, and 2) 8 weeks after switching to the atypical antipsychotic drugs. Subjective sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to measure psychopathology.. The proportion of the patients who experienced improved subjective sleep quality was significantly higher in the elderly than in the middle-aged group. Logistic-regression analysis revealed that the improvement in subjective sleep quality through administration of atypical antipsychotic drugs was predicted by increased age, daytime dysfunction, and longer sleep latency at baseline.. These results demonstrate that atypical antipsychotic drugs are beneficial to the quality of sleep in elderly patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Indoles; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polysomnography; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Sleep Stages; Thiazoles

Comorbid cocaine abuse adversely affects clinical outcomes in schizophrenia. Using a prospective, randomized, parallel group design (N = 24), we tested the hypothesis that patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine have reduced cocaine craving and abuse compared with those treated with haloperidol. In addition, we examined whether this differential effect correlated with reductions in extrapyramidal symptoms, positive and negative symptoms, and/or depression. There were no significant differences overall in proportions of positive drug screens between treatment groups; no differences in positive, negative, or depressive symptoms; and few differences between treatment conditions in extrapyramidal symptoms. However, craving for cocaine was rated significantly lower by patients treated with haloperidol compared with patients treated with olanzapine. Important study limitations include a small sample size and high attrition rates. Larger controlled studies are necessary to determine optimal antipsychotic therapy for patients with schizophrenia and comorbid cocaine abuse.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Behavior, Addictive; Benzodiazepines; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder; Female; Haloperidol; Hospitals, Veterans; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Philadelphia; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance Abuse Detection

Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Simultaneous treatment with multiple antipsychotics (polypharmacy) is suggested by some expert consensus guidelines as the last resort after exhausting monotherapy alternatives. This study assessed the annual rate and duration of antipsychotic monotherapy and its inverse, antipsychotic polypharmacy, among schizophrenia patients initiated on commonly used atypical antipsychotic medications.. Data were drawn from a large prospective naturalistic study of patients treated for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, conducted 7/1997-9/2003. Analyses focused on patients (N = 796) who were initiated during the study on olanzapine (N = 405), quetiapine (N = 115), or risperidone (N = 276). The percentage of patients with monotherapy on the index antipsychotic over the 1-year post initiation, and the cumulative number of days on monotherapy were calculated for all patients and for each of the 3 atypical antipsychotic treatment groups. Analyses employed repeated measures generalized linear models and non-parametric bootstrap re-sampling, controlling for patient characteristics.. During the 1-year period, only a third (35.7%) of the patients were treated predominately with monotherapy (> 300 days). Most patients (57.7%) had at least one prolonged period of antipsychotic polypharmacy (> 60 consecutive days). Patients averaged 195.5 days on monotherapy, 155.7 days on polypharmacy, and 13.9 days without antipsychotic therapy. Olanzapine-initiated patients were significantly more likely to be on monotherapy with the initiating antipsychotic during the 1-year post initiation compared to risperidone (p = .043) or quetiapine (p = .002). The number of monotherapy days was significantly greater for olanzapine than quetiapine (p < .001), but not for olanzapine versus risperidone, or for risperidone versus quetiapine-initiated patients.. Despite guidelines recommending the use of polypharmacy only as a last resort, the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy for prolonged periods is very common during the treatment of schizophrenia patients in usual care settings. In addition, in this non-randomized naturalistic observational study, the most commonly used atypical antipsychotics significantly differed on the rate and duration of antipsychotic monotherapy. Reasons for and the impact of the predominant use of polypharmacy will require further study.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Polypharmacy; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Nursing Assessment; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is the most commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotic medication in Australia. Research reports an average weight gain of between 4.5 and 7 kg in the 3 months following its commencement. Trying to minimize this weight gain in a population with an already high prevalence of obesity, mortality and morbidity is of clinical and social importance. This randomized controlled trial investigated the impact of individual nutrition education provided by a dietitian on weight gain in the 3 and 6 months following the commencement of olanzapine.. Fifty-one individuals (29 females, 22 males) who had started on olanzapine in the previous 3 months (mean length of 27 days +/- 20) were recruited through Peninsula Health Psychiatric Services and were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n = 29) or the control group (n = 22). Individuals in the intervention group received six 1 hour nutrition education sessions over a 3-month period. Weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI) and qualitative measures of exercise levels, quality of life, health and body image were collected at baseline at 3 and 6 months.. After 3 months, the control group had gained significantly more weight than the treatment group (6.0 kg vs 2.0 kg, p < or = 0.002). Weight gain of more than 7% of initial weight occurred in 64% of the control group compared to 13% of the treatment group. The control group's BMI increased significantly more than the treatment group's (2 kg/m(2)vs 0.7 kg/m(2), p < or = 0.03). The treatment group reported significantly greater improvements in moderate exercise levels, quality of life, health and body image compared to the controls. At 6 months, the control group continued to show significantly more weight gain since baseline than the treatment group (9.9 kg vs 2.0 kg, p < or = 0.013) and consequently had significantly greater increases in BMI (3.2 kg/m(2)vs 0.8 kg/m(2), p < or = 0.017).. Individual nutritional intervention provided by a dietitian is highly successful at preventing olanzapine-induced weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Body Image; Body Mass Index; Depressive Disorder, Major; Exercise; Female; Health Status; Humans; Male; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Obesity; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

This study investigated safety and effectiveness of olanzapine in monotherapy compared with conventional antipsychotics in treatment of acute inpatients with schizophrenia.. This was a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized, open-label, multisite, observational study of Spanish inpatients with an acute episode of schizophrenia. Data included safety assessments with an extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) questionnaire and the report of spontaneous adverse events, plus clinical assessments with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S). A multivariate methodology was used to more adequately determine which factors can influence safety and effectiveness of olanzapine in monotherapy.. 339 patients treated with olanzapine in monotherapy (OGm) and 385 patients treated with conventional antipsychotics (CG) were included in the analysis. Treatment-emergent EPS were significantly higher in the CG (p<0.0001). Response rate was significantly higher in the OGm (p=0.005). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the only variable significantly correlated with treatment-emergent EPS and clinical response was treatment strategy, with patients in OGm having 1.5 times the probability of obtaining a clinical response and patients in CG having 5 times the risk of developing EPS.. In this naturalistic study olanzapine in monotherapy was better-tolerated and at least as effective as conventional antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Demography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risk; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effectiveness of olanzapine for treating schizophrenia and to assess if olanzapine promotes a better quality of life than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs).. Multicenter, naturalistic, randomized controlled study, comparing olanzapine with FGAs, at hospitalization and during a 9-month follow-up. Outcome assessors were blind to the allocated drug. The dose of antipsychotic was determined by doctors according to their clinical practice routines. Data collection was performed from April 1999 to August 2001.. 197 patients with DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia were allocated to olanzapine (N = 104) and FGA (N = 93). Patients taking olanzapine showed greater improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative symptoms (mean difference = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) and general psychopathology (mean difference = 4.0, 95% CI = 0.8 to 7.2) sub-scales and fewer incidences of tardive dyskinesia (RR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4 to 4.2, p < .0001). Olanzapine was also associated with greater improvement in a number of health-related quality-of-life outcomes on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, including physical functioning (mean difference = 6.6, 95% CI = 1.2 to 11.9), physical role limitations (mean difference = 13.7, 95% CI = 3.0 to 24.3), and emotional role limitations (mean difference = 12.1, 95% CI = 0.7 to 23.5). Patients taking olanzapine gained significantly more weight during the trial than patients taking FGAs, with a correspondent endpoint increase in the body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 versus 25.3 (p < .001).. Compared with FGAs, olanzapine has advantages in terms of improvements of negative symptoms and quality of life. It is also associated with fewer incidences of tardive dyskinesia and greater increases in weight and BMI. These findings are highlighted by the naturalistic approach adopted in this trial.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brazil; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Available studies suggest comparable efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia over the short term.. This retrospective analysis of data from a 28-week, double-blind, schizophrenia trial compared the cumulative amount of time that patients met severity criteria for remission during olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) or risperidone (4-12 mg/day) treatment.. The percentage cumulative time spent in remission was 40% for olanzapine- and 31% for risperidone-treated patients (P = 0.03) using Definition 1 (PANSS items P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5, G9 < or = 3), and 18% and 11% (P = 0.01), respectively, using Definition 2 (BPRS Total reduced 50%, BPRS psychosis items < or = 3, CGI-severity < or = 3).. During 28 weeks of treatment, olanzapine-treated patients spent more cumulative time in remission than risperidone-treated patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The authors' goal was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 6 months' treatment with flexible-dose ziprasidone and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scores were obtained for 126 responders to a 6-week acute study of olanzapine and ziprasidone during a blinded 6-month continuation study and optional extension study.. Comparable improvements in BPRS and CGI severity scores were seen with both drugs. Olanzapine produced significant increases from acute-study baseline values in weight and body mass index and within-group increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting insulin. Between-group differences were not significant for lipids and insulin. Mean QTc values at endpoint were 407.1 msec (baseline mean=406.0 msec) and 394.4 msec (baseline mean=399.7 msec) for ziprasidone and olanzapine, respectively. No patient had a QTc interval > or =500 msec.. Ziprasidone and olanzapine had comparable long-term efficacy; olanzapine was associated with significant weight gain and metabolic alterations.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Antipsychotic medications may reduce hostile and aggressive behavior in schizophrenia. This study compared the effectiveness of antipsychotics in the treatment of aggression.. The Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study compares the effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in practice setting. Schizophrenia outpatients who initiated or changed to a new antipsychotic are followed in this non-interventional, prospective observational study for up to 3 years, with 6-months data now available on the entire cohort (N=7655). The presence or absence of verbal or physical hostility/aggression was assessed retrospectively for the period of 6 months before enrollment, and prospectively in the period of 6 months after enrollment (the study treatment period). At baseline, patients in five monotherapy treatment groups (combined N=3135) were prescribed one of the treatments: clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or haloperidol, and had complete data.. Hostile/aggressive behavior was reduced during the treatment period. Olanzapine and risperidone were significantly superior to haloperidol and to clozapine in this respect. These results remained essentially unchanged when adjusting for baseline imbalances in age, gender, age of onset, and substance abuse.. As monotherapy, both olanzapine and risperidone were superior to haloperidol and clozapine in reducing aggression. The relative lack of effectiveness of clozapine may be specific to this study population.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cohort Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Hostility; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 12 months' treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol in preventing relapse of schizophrenia. The study also examined other measures of clinical effectiveness and tolerability.. Outpatients with schizophrenia (ICD-10 or DSM-IV), who initiated or changed antipsychotic treatment, entered this 3-year, naturalistic, prospective, observational study between November 2000 and December 2001. At baseline, subsets of patients were prescribed monotherapy with olanzapine (N = 3222), risperidone (N = 1116), quetiapine (N = 189), or haloperidol (N = 256). Patients remaining on monotherapy were assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale. Relapse rate was determined from the responder subset. Treatment patterns, patient perception of treatment compliance, substance and alcohol intake patterns, and treatment tolerability were recorded. Results are based on 12-month treatment data.. Compared to haloperidol-treated patients, olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients had approximately 3 to 4 times higher odds of response at 12 months (p

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; International Classification of Diseases; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy of two atypical antipsychotic drugs, olanzapine and risperidone, in schizophrenic patients with post-psychotic depression.. A clinically significant decrease of MADRS scores occurred in patients treated with both drugs for 8 weeks.. Atypical antipsychotic drugs may be particularly appropriate when treating schizophrenic patients with depression.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index

There have been conflicting reports as to whether olanzapine produces lower occupancy of striatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor than typical antipsychotic drugs and preferential occupancy of extrastriatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors. We performed [(18)F] fallypride PET studies in six schizophrenic subjects treated with olanzapine and six schizophrenic subjects treated with haloperidol to examine the occupancy of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine receptors by these antipsychotic drugs. [(18)F] setoperone PET studies were performed in seven olanzapine-treated subjects to determine 5-HT(2A) receptor occupancy. Occupancy of dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors by olanzapine was not significantly different from that seen with haloperidol in the putamen, ventral striatum, medial thalamus, amygdala, or temporal cortex, that is, 67.5-78.2% occupancy; olanzapine produced no preferential occupancy of dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors in the ventral striatum, medial thalamus, amygdala, or temporal cortex. There was, however, significantly lower occupancy of substantia nigra/VTA dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors in olanzapine-treated compared to haloperidol-treated subjects, that is, 40.2 vs 59.3% (p=0.0014, corrected for multiple comparisons); in olanzapine-treated subjects, the substantia nigra/VTA was the only region with significantly lower dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy than the putamen, that is, 40.2 vs 69.2% (p<0.001, corrected for multiple comparison). Occupancy of 5-HT(2A) receptors was 85-93% in the olanzapine- treated subjects. The results of this study demonstrated that olanzapine does not produce preferential occupancy of extrastriatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors but does spare substantia nigra/VTA receptors. Sparing of substantia nigra/VTA dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy may contribute to the low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in olanzapine-treated patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzamides; Benzodiazepines; Brain Chemistry; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine Antagonists; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Pyrimidinones; Pyrrolidines; Radiopharmaceuticals; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists

Response to typical antipsychotic medication has been associated with achieving a level of striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the range of 65% to 70%. We undertook this study to determine whether response to the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine occurs at lower levels of D2 receptor occupancy.. Eighteen patients who presented with a first episode of psychosis were randomized to receive olanzapine 5 mg daily or haloperidol 2 mg daily in a double-blind design. We acquired positron emission tomography (PET) scans using the D2 ligand [11C]raclopride within the first 15 days of treatment to determine the percentage of D2 receptors occupied by the medication. According to response, dosage was then adjusted to a maximum dosage of 20 mg daily of either drug. PET scans were repeated after 10 to 12 weeks of treatment.. At the first PET scan, the 8 olanzapine-treated patients had significantly lower D2 receptor occupancies (mean 63.4%, SD 7.3) than those observed in the 10 patients treated with haloperidol (mean 73.0%, SD 6.1). When patients were rescanned following dosage adjustment, mean D2 receptor occupancies were greater than 70% in both groups. D2 receptor occupancies did not differ significantly between the olanzapine-treated group (mean 72.0%, SD 5.7) and the haloperidol-treated group (mean 78.7%, SD 7.6).. These results suggest that, in patients being treated for a first episode of psychosis, olanzapine has its antipsychotic effect at approximately the same levels of D2 receptor occupancy as are achieved with low dosages of haloperidol.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Corpus Striatum; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Psychotic Disorders; Raclopride; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to determine if amantadine affects weight gain in psychiatric patients taking olanzapine.. Twenty-one adults who had gained at least 5 lb with olanzapine were randomly assigned to receive amantadine (N=12) or placebo (N=9) in addition to olanzapine. The length of time taking olanzapine ranged from 1 to 44 months. Body mass index, psychiatric status, and fasting blood levels were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks.. Significantly fewer subjects taking amantadine gained weight, with a mean change in body mass index of -0.07 kg/m2 for the amantadine group and 1.24 kg/m2 for the placebo group. This effect remained significant when the authors controlled for baseline body mass index and length of olanzapine treatment. No changes in fasting glucose, insulin, leptin, prolactin, and lipid levels were seen. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores remained stable.. Amantadine induced weight stabilization in subjects taking olanzapine and was well tolerated.

Topics: Amantadine; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Dopamine Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.. A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.. Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.. The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

A post hoc analysis of the SPECTRUM trial was carried out to evaluate whether the improvements in efficacy and tolerability gained on switching to quetiapine occurred consistently for patients previously treated with either: haloperidol (n = 43); olanzapine (n = 66); or risperidone (n = 55) monotherapy. Patients were initiated with quetiapine to 400 mg/day over 7 days, and then flexibly dosed (300-750 mg/day) for 11 weeks. The mean (SD) modal dose of quetiapine was 501 (138) mg/day in the haloperidol subgroup, 472 (147) mg/day in the olanzapine subgroup and 485 (141) mg/day in the risperidone subgroup at the study endpoint. Switching to quetiapine induced significant improvements from baseline in PANSS scores, with least square mean changes in total scores of -32.5, -15.4, and -18.5 for patients previously treated with haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). Significant improvements were also noted in CDSS scores, particularly for patients clinically depressed at baseline (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). There were significant reductions in EPS on the SAS and BAS for all subgroups (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). Switching to quetiapine produced efficacy and tolerability benefits regardless of whether their previous antipsychotic was haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The introduction of second generation antipsychotics (SGA) represents a major advance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Concerns about the metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects of the SGA have been widely disseminated. The benefits and risks of these drugs have been studied with a focus on particular organ systems. A basic principle of prevention is that the intensity of risk-reduction therapy should be adjusted to a individual's absolute risk. Hence, the first step is to assess an individual's risk status. The present study was designed to evaluate whether there is an added cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in switching schizophrenia patients from typical antipsychotics to the SGA olanzapine. Risk status was determined by a 10-year risk assessment as recommended by the USA National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. This was carried out with Framingham scoring to identify individuals whose short-term (10-year) risk warrants consideration of intensive treatment. This risk was calculated for schizophrenia patients who were treated by haloperidol for a minimum period of 6 months and again following 6 months of exposure to olanzapine. Forty-three patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. There were 25 male and 18 female patients (mean age 40.7+/-2.4 years). The mean 10-year percentage risk of CVD for the group while on haloperidol treatment was 4.58+/-0.9 and, after 6 months of exposure to olanzapine, this was reduced to 4.12+/-0.9. Changes in the total risk and each evaluated risk variable were not statistically significant, except for a decrease in resting systolic blood pressure. Switching schizophrenia patients from typical antipsychotic treatment to olanzapine is safe and does not increase the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Olanzapine; Risk Assessment; Schizophrenia

In this pilot study, we have investigated the effects of switching from olanzapine or risperidone treatment to low-dose perphenazine combined with buspirone in six schizophrenic patients who had experienced weight gain. We found no relapse as to psychotic symptoms measured by the CGI-S scale and no exacerbation of extrapyramidal side-effects as measured by the Simpson-Angus Scale. In addition, we observed a medium weight reduction of 10.5 kg (range 1-20 kg).

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Buspirone; Denmark; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Pilot Projects; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Weight Loss

The efficacy and safety of olanzapine were compared with those of ziprasidone.. This was a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 28-week study of patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 10-20 mg/day of olanzapine or 80-160 mg/day of ziprasidone. The primary efficacy measure was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Secondary efficacy and safety measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale subscales as well as mood, quality of life, and extrapyramidal symptom scales. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events and measuring vital signs and weight.. The study was completed by significantly more olanzapine-treated patients (165 of 277, 59.6%) than ziprasidone-treated patients (115 of 271, 42.4%). At 28 weeks, the olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly more improvement than the ziprasidone-treated patients on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale overall scale and all subscales and on the Clinical Global Impression ratings of severity of illness and improvement. The responder rate was higher for olanzapine than for ziprasidone. Extrapyramidal symptoms were not significantly different between groups in change-to-endpoint analyses, but results favored olanzapine on baseline-to-maximum changes. Weight change was significantly greater with olanzapine (mean=3.06 kg, SD=6.87) than with ziprasidone (mean=-1.12 kg, SD=4.70). Fasting lipid profiles were significantly superior in the ziprasidone group; there was no significant difference in fasting glucose level.. Olanzapine treatment resulted in significantly greater psychopathology improvement and higher response and completion rates than ziprasidone treatment, while ziprasidone was superior for weight change and lipid profile.

Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Fasting; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Substantial weight gain is common with many atypical antipsychotics.. To evaluate the extent, time course and predictors of weight gain and its effect on study retention among people with first-episode psychosis treated with olanzapine or haloperidol.. Survival analysis assessed time to potentially clinically significant weight gain (> or =7%) and the effect of weight gain on study retention. Weight gain during the 2-year study was summarised using last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF), observed cases and study completion approaches.. After 2 years of treatment, LOCF mean weight gain was 10.2 kg (s.d.=10.1) for olanzapine (n=131) and 4.0 kg (s.d.=7.3) for haloperidol (n=132); observed cases mean weight gain was 15.4 kg (s.d.=10.0) for olanzapine and 7.5 kg (s.d.=9.2) for haloperidol. Change in body mass index was significantly predicted only by treatment group (P < 0.0001).. Olanzapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain than haloperidol, with both leading to greater weight gain than previously described.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Altered regional cerebral blood flow (r-CBF) is mentioned as one of possible etiological factors or as a consequence of schizophrenia. Perfusion scintigraphic brain studies with SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) can detect areas of the brain with altered perfusion during the disease. Conflicting data exist on follow-up after treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate r-CBF in acute first-episode schizophrenia and early effect of antipsychotic drugs on r-CBF.. Clinical criteria for schizophrenia were met according to International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition (ICD-10). Psychic status and severity of the disease in each patient were evaluated with psychiatric interview, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on the same day as the scintigraphic study. Brain perfusion SPECT was performed 20 minutes after 99mTc-ECD application. R-CBF was measured in 9 first-episode schizophrenic male patients 2-7 (median 6) days after the beginning of antipsychotic treatment and 8-15 (median 9) weeks later. Semiquantitative analysis of r-CBF was performed with cerebellum as the reference region. R-CBF was evaluated for 12 regions in each study.. Decrease in perfusion in comparison to cerebellum was detected in left (90%) and right (93%) frontal lobes. Increase in perfusion between the first (t1) and the second (t2) investigation was significant (p<0.05) for both frontal regions (left 94%, right 97%). Significant decrease in PANSS (p<0.05) and CGI (p<0.001) scores was noted and correlated well with the increase of r-CBF.. Our findings implicate that patients with first-episode schizophrenia have significant left hypoperfusion relative to the right in dorsolateral frontal lobes. Increased blood flow was observed bilaterally in dorsolateral frontal lobes after 10 weeks of antipsychotic medication. Significant amelioration of r-CBF correlated with clinical improvement.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain Mapping; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Cysteine; Frontal Lobe; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Organotechnetium Compounds; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Radiopharmaceuticals; Regional Blood Flow; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Risperidone and olanzapine are the 2 most widely prescribed second-generation anti-psychotics. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine using duration of hospitalization as the primary outcome measure. This outcome was selected as it is an indirect measure of how well patients are responding to the medication and represents a "real world" endpoint relevant to practicing hospital psychiatrists.. The study was done at a large state psychiatric hospital in North Carolina from 2001 to 2003. Subjects were eligible for inclusion if they required treatment with an antipsychotic (e.g., positive symptoms) and were able to provide informed consent. Eighty-five patients entered the study and were randomly assigned to risperidone (N = 40) or olanzapine (N = 45) as their initial antipsychotic. Treatment was naturalistic, and dosing was based on the discretion of the treating physician.. There was no significant difference in the mean durations of hospitalization for the risperidone group (7.9 days) as compared to the olanzapine group (8.1 days). There were no significant differences in the demographics of either treatment group, but, during the study, risperidone-treated patients used more antihistamines (chi(2) = 4.0, p = .05). Eighty percent of each group (N = 36, olanzapine; N = 32, risperidone) remained on the study medication at discharge.. Risperidone and olanzapine were equally efficacious, suggesting that measures other than "efficacy" (e.g., side effects, cost) should be considered when determining overall "effectiveness" of treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Hospitalization; Hospitals, Psychiatric; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

It has been suggested that the extract of gingko biloba (EGb) may enhance the efficiency of the classic antipsychotic haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia, especially on positive symptoms, and reduce serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the therapeutic effect of EGb and to examine the effect of it on the levels of antioxidant enzymes in schizophrenic patients on olanzapine treatment. We hypothesized that EGb would have the beneficial effects on schizophrenic symptoms and might cause reductions in antioxidant enzymes. The subjects were randomly assigned to the two groups: olanzapine plus EGb (group I) (n=15) and olanzapine alone (group II) (n=14). The patients were evaluated at baseline and at week 8 with respect to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), serum SOD, catalase (CAT), and glutathion peroxidase (GPX) levels. At baseline, no statistically significant difference regarding the mean total PANSS scores between treatment groups was found. At the evaluation of week 8, a significant difference in mean Scale for the Assessment of Postive Symptoms (SAPS) scores but not in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms scores between groups was found. Total patients had statistically significant higher serum SOD, CAT and GPX levels compared to control groups at baseline. At 8 weeks, there were significant differences in the mean decrease in SOD and CAT levels but not in GPX levels between treatment groups. The changes in SOD and CAT levels were correlated with the change in SAPS in group I, but not in the group II. The present study supported the findings of the previous study demonstrating that EGb might enhance the efficiency of antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia, particularly on positive symptoms of the disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Catalase; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erythrocytes; Female; Ginkgo biloba; Glutathione Peroxidase; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Plant Extracts; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Superoxide Dismutase

Our objective was to describe and compare neuroleptic drug utilization patterns among French schizophrenic outpatients in public and private care settings.. A cross sectional survey was carried out by a random sample of 61 public and 112 private psychiatrists who registered for one month all schizophrenic adult outpatients treated with a neuroleptic drug. Among registered patients, each psychiatrist was to include a maximum of 18 patients (public setting) or 9 patients (private setting). Statistical analysis was weighted to take into account for psychiatrist activity level, assessed by patient registration.. Psychiatrists included 934 patients in the public care setting and 927 patients in the private care setting. Patients were (mean+/-sd) 40.1+/-12.1 years old, 60.9% men. The patients' social and clinical characteristics were less favorable in the public setting than in the private setting: no professional activity (78.9% vs 65.1%), living in institution (7.2% vs 3.7%), under legal protection (35.1% vs 14.5%), drug abuse (9.6% vs 5.6%). An atypical neuroleptic was prescribed for 63.0% of patients and a classic neuroleptic for 49.7%, an association of neuroleptics for 22.0%. In both settings, the most prescribed neuroleptics were olanzapine (28.0%) and risperidone (18.6%) with a higher mean daily dosage in the public care setting. At least one neuroleptic treatment change (drug and/or dosage) occurred during the previous year for 44.9% and 39.2% patients, in public and private settings, respectively. In both settings, reasons for changes were mainly lack of efficacy (55.1%) and side effects (49.8%).. Public and private care populations were different but not as much as expected. In both settings, atypical neuroleptics were the predominant drugs used in the treatment of schizophrenia outpatients. The high frequency of drug change for lack of efficacy or side effects demonstrates the difficulties with the use of the present neuroleptic armamentarium.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Utilization; Female; France; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

To assess treatment discontinuation and concomitant use of other antipsychotics among individuals initiated on olanzapine or risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia.. Using data from the Quebec health insurance plan and the Quebec database for hospitalization, we conducted a population-based cohort study of patients for whom a first claim for olanzapine or risperidone was submitted between 1 January 1997 and 31 August 1999. Included were 6405 patients with schizophrenia whom we followed from the date of the first claim for olanzapine or risperidone either to discontinuation date, end of eligibility for the drug plan, 365 days, date of moving out of the province, or date of death. We used Cox regression models to compute hazards ratios (HRs) of having the treatment discontinued and logistic regression models to compute odds ratios (ORs) among persisting patients of having any concomitant antipsychotic prescription. All models were adjusted for age, sex, schizophrenia disorder, comorbidity, region, beneficiary type, substance use disorder, and prior hospitalization for mental illness.. Compared with risperidone users (n = 2718), discontinuation rates were lower for olanzapine users (n = 3687; HR = 0.79; 95%CI, 0.74 to 0.84). The odds of receiving any concomitant antipsychotic prescription did not differ statistically between olanzapine and risperidone users (OR 0.85; 95%CI, 0.71 to 1.01).. The study results suggest that new users of olanzapine were less likely to discontinue their initial treatment than were new users of risperidone, although discontinuation was high in both groups. Among those who persisted, concomitant use of other antipsychotics did not differ between olanzapine users and risperidone users.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cohort Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Population Surveillance; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

A major contributor to mortality inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder is cardiovascular disease, an important risk factor for which is the cluster of clinical abnormalities that define the metabolic syndrome (eg, abdominal/visceral obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, impaired glucose tolerance).. The aim of this article was to examine the effects of switching from the antipsychotic olanzapine to risperidone on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in high-risk overweight or obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. This post hoc analysis was based on data from a previous 2-phase, 20-week, multicenter (19 US sites), rater-blinded, open-label study. High-risk overweight or obese (body mass index [BMI], >26 kg/m(2)) patients aged 18 to 65 years with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder whose treatment was switched from olanzapine to risperidone were enrolled. Patients who entered the phase 1 switch from olanzapine to risperidone (6 weeks) and the phase 2 extension (14 weeks) were included in the assessment. The primary end point was the difference from baseline in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome at week 20, determined using measurements of weight, BMI, waist circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP).. Baseline assessments for the metabolic syndrome were available from 121 of 123 patients recruited for phase 1 of the study (61 men, 60 women; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [10.2] years; mean [SD] BMI, 33.9 [6.9] kg/m(2)); 71 patients entered phase 2 (29 men, 42 women; mean [SD] age, 40.2 [10.3] years; mean [SD] BMI, 35.1 [7.3] kg/m(2)), of whom 39 (54.9%) ere diagnosed with schizophrenia, and 32 (45.1%) with schizoaffective disorder. The metabolic syndrome was identified in 63 (52.1%) patients at study entry. In the 71 patients with data available from baseline and week 20 (using the last observation carried forward method), the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was reduced from 38 (53.5%) patients at baseline to 26 (36.6%) at study end (McNemar chi(2) = 8.0, P < 0.005). Significant improvements at study end were seen in mean weight (P = 0.031), BMI (P = 0.002), waist circumference (P = 0.003), SBP (P = 0.006), and DBP (P = 0.010). There was no significant difference in the reduction in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome between patients who did or did not receive the behavioral therapy for weight loss.. In this post hoc analysis of switching from the antipsychotic olanzapine to risperidone on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in high-risk overweight or obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, the metabolic syndrome was highly prevalent at baseline. Switching from olanza- pine to risperidone was associated with a significant reduction in this prevalence.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Systole; United States; Waist-Hip Ratio

The association of hyperglycaemia and weight gain with the use of atypical antipsychotics has been documented. However, there is still not enough data from India. The fact that Indian patients usually have a lower body weight compared to European and American counterparts makes it difficult to extrapolate available data to the Indian context. The purpose of this study is: (a) To compare the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in schizophrenic patients taking olanzapine with those taking typical antipsychotics, and (b) to follow-up non-diabetic, non-obese schizophrenics on a stable regimen of antipsychotic monotherapy and determine the proportion of patients who develop weight gain, diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance; comparing the effects of olanzapine versus typical antipsychotics. Fifty-five schizophrenic patients attending psychiatry outpatients' department and on stable antipsychotic monotherapy for at least 6 weeks were included in the study. Those with a family or personal history of diabetes were excluded. There were 28 cases on olanzapine and 27 on either haloperidol or trifluoperazine. Fasting blood glucose estimation and body-mass Index (BMI) were recorded at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks. The two groups were comparable with respect to age, genderwise composition, and duration of illness. There was no significant difference in baseline glycaemic status or BMI. At the end of 12 weeks, olanzapine was not associated with any significant change in body weight, BMI or plasma fasting glucose. Duration of use of antipsychotic emerged as the only statistically significant risk factor for developing hyperglycaemia across both groups.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Hyperglycemia; India; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Time Factors; Trifluoperazine

Newer antipsychotic medications have been reported to enhance cognitive functioning in schizophrenia. Head to head studies with double-blind methods are still relatively few in number.. To compare the relative cognitive enhancing effects of ziprasidone and olanzapine in the treatment of acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. In this 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-designed trial, patients were randomized to ziprasidone or olanzapine. No patient who had ever received a complete treatment trial with either of these medications previously was entered into the study. Cognitive testing measuring attention, motor speed, memory, executive functioning, and verbal skills were performed on all patients at baseline and endpoint.. Treatment with either ziprasidone or olanzapine was associated with statistically significant improvements from baseline in attention, memory, working memory, motor speed, and executive functions. Treatment with olanzapine was also associated with a statistically significant improvement in verbal fluency. No statistically significant differences between these medications were found in the magnitude of improvement from baseline on any of the cognitive measures (other than verbal fluency in an exploratory analysis). Observed changes were not associated with changes in clinical symptoms measured using the PANSS or changes in movement disorders.. During 6 weeks of treatment, ziprasidone and olanzapine demonstrated substantial and comparable cognitive-enhancing effects relative to previous treatment. These effects were noted in all aspects of cognitive functioning previously proven to predict functional outcome in schizophrenia. No overall differences were detected between the medications in terms of the extent of cognitive enhancement.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Clozapine has been the gold standard for treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia but is associated with serious safety liabilities. This has prompted the search for therapeutic alternatives for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus clozapine in schizophrenic patients who failed to respond adequately to antipsychotic medication or who experienced intolerable adverse effects associated with the medication. This 18-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study compared treatment with either olanzapine (5-25 mg/day, n=75) or clozapine (100-500 mg/day, n=72) in patients with schizophrenia who were nonresponsive to, or intolerant of, standard acceptable antipsychotic therapy. At the 18-week endpoint, no statistically significant differences were found between olanzapine and clozapine in any efficacy measure used: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, positive, negative, or general psychopathology or Clinical Global Impression severity (CGI-S). Response rates based on the criteria of Kane et al. [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 45 (1988) 789] were also not significantly different between olanzapine-treated (57.9%) and clozapine-treated patients (60.8%). There were no significant differences in measurements of extrapyramidal symptoms or electrocardiography, and no clinically and statistically significant changes were seen in vital signs or laboratory measures in either group. Both treatments were well tolerated. Olanzapine demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in patients who had failed previous treatment because of lack of efficacy (treatment resistance) or intolerable side effects (treatment intolerance). Olanzapine therefore presents a safe alternative in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia

Clinical trials indicate that glycine site agonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may reduce negative and cognitive symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia when used as adjuvants to conventional antipsychotics but possibly not to clozapine. In this study, we assessed whether high-dose glycine may also be therapeutically beneficial when added to olanzapine and risperidone treatment.. Seventeen olanzapine- or risperidone-treated schizophrenia patients participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week crossover treatment trial with.8 g/kg/day glycine added to their ongoing antipsychotic medication. Clinical assessments were performed biweekly throughout the study. Clinical laboratory parameters and amino acid serum levels were monitored.. Glycine treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a significant (p <.0001) 23% +/- 8% reduction in negative symptoms. Significant improvements were also registered in cognitive and positive symptoms. The negative symptoms improvement remained significant even following covariation for changes in other symptom clusters and extrapyramidal side effects. High posttreatment glycine serum levels significantly predicted (r =.60) clinical response.. These findings indicate that the efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone may be augmented using high-dose adjuvant glycine treatment and suggest that these atypical antipsychotics may affect NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission differently than clozapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavioral Symptoms; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Prolactin levels are elevated to varying degrees by antipsychotics. Prolactin elevations may result in sexual and other adverse effects, and they may be related to antipsychotic effects. We used the data collected in a trial of antipsychotics to study the differential effect of these drugs on prolactin level, to explore the relation between clinical effects and prolactin level, and to determine the relationship between plasma levels of antipsychotics and prolactin level.. Treatment-resistant patients (133 men, 24 women) diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated in a double-blind, randomized, 14-week trial comparing clozapine (N = 40), olanzapine (N = 39), risperidone (N = 41), and haloperidol (N = 37). Plasma levels of prolactin and antipsychotics were determined at baseline and at weeks 5, 8, 10, 12, and 14 during the trial. Clinical effects were measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Statistical analyses were limited to the 75 men for whom repeated prolactin levels were available. Data were gathered from June 1996 to December 1999.. Risperidone caused significant elevation of prolactin levels (p <.05) that appeared to be dose-dependent. Clozapine and olanzapine were associated with decreases of prolactin, whereas haloperidol led to a minor, nonsignificant increase. Plasma olanzapine and prolactin levels were correlated. Prolactin levels were not related to clinical improvement or extrapyramidal side effects.. Antipsychotics show major differences in their effects on prolactin, and risperidone has clearly the most robust effect.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine compared with fluphenazine in the treatment of patients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. This was a long-term (22-week), randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial. Sixty patients (mean age, 35.4 years) were randomly assigned to either olanzapine (n=30) or fluphenazine (n=30). They received treatment at three centers in Croatia during a 22-week study period and were assessed weekly for the first 6 weeks and monthly thereafter. Efficacy was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Rating Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Improvement scores. The Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS), Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), vital signs, laboratory tests, and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed to evaluate safety. The olanzapine group showed significantly greater mean decreases from baseline to endpoint for BPRS total (-25.8 vs. -16.5, P=.035), PANSS total (-45.7 vs. -29.5, P=.037), PANSS positive (-13.0 vs. -7.9, P=.034), and CGI Severity (-2.2 vs. -1.3, P=.031) scores. The olanzapine group showed greater mean decreases on all measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, significantly so for the SAS (-2.1 vs. 1.9, P=.004) and HAS (-3.4 vs. 2.6, P=.028). Patients in the fluphenazine group experienced a higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (76.7% vs. 50.0%, P=.032). Weight gain was the most frequently reported adverse event in the olanzapine group (16.7% vs. 0.0%, P=.020). Akathisia (30.0% vs. 10.0%, P=.053) and insomnia (20.0% vs. 0.0%, P=.010) appeared most frequent in the fluphenazine group. Daily use of anticholinergics and benzodiazepines were both significantly greater for the fluphenazine group (P=.003 and.04, respectively). No significant changes were observed in vital signs, ECG, or clinical chemistry. The study indicates that olanzapine has advantages in both efficacy and safety compared to fluphenazine; however, the small sample size limits our ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluphenazine; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to determine the location of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in drug naïve, first episode patients with schizophrenia. Various fatness and fat distribution parameters (by Computerized Tomography scanning and anthropometry) and 1600 hr plasma cortisol were measured in 19 (15 men and 4 women) subjects with schizophrenia (mean age = 31.0 years; mean body mass index [BMI] = 24.6 kg/m2) and an equal number of age- and sex- matched controls (mean age = 32.6 yr; mean BMI = 23.0 kg/m2). Patients were then given either olanzapine or risperidone. Sixteen patients were re-tested following a treatment period lasting approximately 6 months. Patients with schizophrenia, had significantly more intra-abdominal fat [IAF] (116.8 +/- 20.2 cm2 vs. 38.0 +/- 4.8 cm2, respectively; t = 3.80, df = 18, p < 0.0001) and had higher levels of plasma cortisol (360.2 +/- 49.6 nmol/L vs. 192.7 +/- 19.7 nmol/L, respectively; t = 3.13, df = 18, p < 0.003) than appropriately matched control subjects. Treatment with atypical antipsychotics did not result in a significant increase in IAF (116.8 +/- 20.2 cm2 vs. 131.7 +/- 20.9 cm2; p = NS) though visceral fat stores still remained significantly higher than those seen in controls (38.0 +/- 4.8 cm2) (F = 9.34; df = 2, 51; p < 0.0003). However, plasma levels of cortisol did significantly decrease (360.2 +/- 49.6 nmol/L +/- vs. 316.2 +/- 48.4 nmol/L; p < 0.05). Pre-treatment levels of IAF did not differ between those who received risperidone and those who were given olanzapine (123.0 +/- 35.9 cm2 vs. 113.1 +/- 15.7 cm2, respectively; t = 0.20, df = 16, p < 0.84). The increase in IAF did not differ between those given risperidone and those who received olanzapine (26.9 +/- 12.1 cm2 vs. 18.24 +/- 11.44 cm2, respectively; t = 0.50, df = 16, p < 0.63). Patients with drug naïve, first episode, schizophrenia have higher levels of visceral fats stores as compared to matched control subjects. Treatment with atypical antipsychotics does not result in a significant increase in IAF distribution.

Topics: Abdomen; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Composition; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; White People

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Female; Hostility; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Valproic Acid

The striatum is known to play a primary role in procedural learning. In this study, the authors simultaneously assessed the effects of two antipsychotic drugs on procedural learning and on striatal dopamine (D2) receptor occupancy. Twenty-seven patients receiving either olanzapine or haloperidol as antipsychotic medication were assessed with the Computed Visual Tracking Task (CVTT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) following the administration of Iodine 123-IBZM (123I-IBZM), a radioligand with a high affinity and specificity for the D2 receptors. The results showed poorer procedural learning in the haloperidol-treated patients than in normal control subjects, while no difference could be found between olanzapine-treated patients and normal control subjects. In the haloperidol but not the olanzapine group, significant correlations were found between procedural learning deficits and striatal D2 receptor occupancy. However, there was no significant difference in D2 receptor occupancy between olanzapine- and haloperidol-treated patients, and this may be related to the high doses of olanzapine and low doses of haloperidol administered. The authors concluded that: 1) striatal D2 receptor blockade may alter procedural learning in humans; and 2) olanzapine may have a protective effect on procedural learning, even at doses that produce striatal D2 receptor occupancy as high as that found with haloperidol. This protective effect of olanzapine may be related to its atypical pharmacological properties.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzamides; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Corpus Striatum; Female; Functional Laterality; Haloperidol; Humans; Learning; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrrolidines; Radiopharmaceuticals; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

This study compared the specific antihostility effects of atypical antipsychotic monotherapy (olanzapine or risperidone) with that of combination treatment with divalproex sodium among patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode.. A total of 249 inpatients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine plus placebo, olanzapine plus divalproex, risperidone plus placebo, or risperidone plus divalproex in a double-blind, 28-day multicenter trial. The target daily dose was 15 milligrams for olanzapine, 6 milligrams for risperidone, and up to 30 milligrams per kilogram (minimum, 15 milligrams per kilogram) for divalproex. The hostility item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was the principal outcome measure. Covariates included the PANSS items reflecting positive symptoms of schizophrenia (delusions, suspiciousness/persecution, grandiosity, unusual thought content, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinatory behavior).. Combination treatment with risperidone or olanzapine plus divalproex was associated with different scores on the hostility item of the PANSS compared with antipsychotic monotherapy. Combination therapy had a significantly greater antihostility effect at days 3 and 7 than monotherapy. This result was not seen beyond the first week of treatment, but there was a trend toward a difference in effect for the entire treatment period. The effect on hostility appears to be statistically independent of antipsychotic effect on other PANSS items reflecting delusional thinking, a formal thought disorder, or hallucinations.. Divalproex sodium may be useful as an adjunctive agent in specifically reducing hostility in the first week of treatment with risperidone or olanzapine among patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Health Services Research; Humans; Olanzapine; Placebos; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; United States; Valproic Acid

The purpose of the present paper was to investigate the effects of the dopamine agonist amantadine in those patients with weight gain induced by olanzapine. An open trial was conducted in those patients who gained >3 kg in weight induced by olanzapine use. All subjects were evaluated by weight, body mass index (BMI), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) before and after the use of amantadine in addition to olanzapine. Twenty-five of 30 enrolled patients completed the present study. Mean bodyweight and BMI was increased by 6.44 +/- 4.42 kg and 5.04 +/- 3.47 kg/m2 significantly with olanzapine alone (P < 0.001). When amantadine and olanzapine were used together, the average weight and BMI decreased by 1.07 +/- 3.19 kg and 0.84 +/- 2.5 kg/m2, but did not have statistical significance. The average values of BPRS showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001). No significant changes were present in ESRS. Amantadine did not have an effect on weight gain induced by olanzapine. Randomized placebo-controlled prospective studies are needed.

Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Selective localization of dopamine D(4) receptors in the prefrontal cortex and preferential affinity of clozapine for the dopamine D(4) receptor over the D(2) receptor led to the hypothesis that the superior efficacy of clozapine may be mediated via blockade of the D(4) receptor. This hypothesis was tested by evaluating sonepiprazole, a selective D(4) dopamine antagonist, in schizophrenia patients.. We treated 467 hospitalized schizophrenia patients with scores of > or = 60 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) with sonepiprazole, olanzapine, or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in the PANSS total score at 6 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points were the mean change from baseline in the PANSS factor scores, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score, the Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness score, and the Calgary Depression Scale score.. No statistically significant differences were observed between placebo and any sonepiprazole dose on the primary or any secondary end point after 6 weeks of treatment. Statistically significant differences, favoring olanzapine over placebo, were observed on all efficacy end points but the Calgary Depression Scale.. Sonepiprazole was ineffective for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affective Symptoms; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Placebos; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Schizophrenia; Sulfonamides

Olanzapine, a thienobenzodiazepine, is one of the relatively new atypical antipsychotic drugs. The lowest threshold of effective olanzapine plasma levels in inpatient treatment is assumed to be 9 ng/ml. Very little is known about the plasma concentration in patients at various oral doses of olanzapine or about the clinically relevant interactions with co-medications.. In 71 schizophrenic patients (age 32.6 +/- 12.1, range 18-63 years; 31 women, 40 men), plasma olanzapine levels were assessed in 377 tests by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. Fifty-six of these plasma levels were assessed while patients were receiving olanzapine as monotherapy; otherwise, the plasma levels were assessed with the patients receiving various co-medications.. The mean daily oral dose of olanzapine was 17.5 mg (SD = 7.0, range 5-40 mg), and the mean olanzapine plasma concentration was 54.2 ng/ml (SD 37.8 ng/ml, range 1.2-208 ng/ml). The plasma concentration of olanzapine increased linearly with the daily oral dose (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). A multiple variance analysis considering age and sex as covariables showed a significant difference in the dose-corrected plasma levels of olanzapine among 40 smokers and 31 non-smokers; age and sex did not affect the dose-corrected plasma levels. However, women received a significantly lower daily dose of olanzapine under routine clinical study conditions. No differences could be detected among the dose-corrected plasma concentration of those patients who were taken off olanzapine because they did not respond (n = 14) or because of side effects (n = 5) and those who were discharged while still on olanzapine. Under the co-medication with fluvoxamine, significantly higher dose-corrected olanzapine plasma concentrations were found than with olanzapine monotherapy, whereas significantly lower dose-corrected olanzapine plasma concentrations were detected under lithium and trimipramine co-medication. Under co-medication with amitriptyline, benperidol, carbamazepine, flupentixol, and lorazepam, the dose-corrected olanzapine plasma concentrations were no different than the plasma levels under olanzapine monotherapy.. The relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring is emphasized with respect to the data presented and to the literature. Future studies should examine, in particular, the effects of a wider range of co-medications in a larger patient sample.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biometry; Chi-Square Distribution; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Smoking; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet

Attentional deficits have been implicated in the pathophysiology of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. Since the latency of the P300 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) is considered to be a sensitive measure of stimulus classification speed, while its amplitude-a measure of attentional resource allocation when memory updating is engaged, the present study focuses on the comparison of P300 between healthy subjects and schizophrenic patients experiencing auditory hallucinations and treated with clozapine and olanzapine.. The auditory P300 was assessed during the anticipatory period of a short memory test, in 16 male hallucinated schizophrenic patients and 13 male normal subjects matched for age and educational level. The patients were reexamined under identical conditions when their hallucinations had resolved following treatment with clozapine (8 patients) and olanzapine (8 patients).. The patients with hallucinations exhibited significantly reduced P300 amplitude at leads Fp1, F3, (C3-T5)/2, F4, Cz and Fz, when compared to the normal controls and at leads Fp1, F3, F4, (C4-T6)/2, C4, P4, Cz and Fz when compared to themselves during the remission phase. However logistic regression models revealed that the most important leads, differentiating the patient group before treatment either with the healthy controls, or with itself after treatment, were that at the left temporoparietal and at the left prefrontal area. Memory performance of the patient group, even after treatment and in spite of its significant improvement, remained significantly less than that of healthy controls. both antipsychotic agents had similar effects on the p300 amplitude and memory performance.. These findings indicate that auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia manifest abnormal aspects of attention, mediated by a distributed network involving or affecting the left temporoparietal and left prefrontal area. Additionally, the present study points to an improvement of attentional function in schizophrenic patients experiencing auditory hallucinations, both in the clozapine group but also in the olanzapine group.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Case-Control Studies; Clozapine; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Hallucinations; Humans; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reaction Time; Schizophrenia

To assess changes in cognitive function in stable outpatients with schizophrenia switched to ziprasidone from conventional antipsychotics (n = 108), olanzapine (n = 104), or risperidone (n = 58) because of suboptimal efficacy or poor tolerability.. In three separate 6-week trials, patients received ziprasidone 40 mg b.i.d. for 2 days, followed by 20-80 mg b.i.d. for the next 40 days. Before switching, and at endpoint, patients were evaluated with tests of working and secondary verbal memory, vigilance, visuomotor speed, verbal fluency, and executive functioning. Principal components factor analysis was performed to test for clustering of cognitive variables.. Significant improvements were seen at endpoint in secondary verbal memory (in all three groups), vigilance (in patients switched from conventional antipsychotics or risperidone), executive function (in patients switched from conventional antipsychotics or risperidone), and verbal fluency. Factor analysis on baseline scores suggested reduction of the cognitive variables to three factors: verbal skills, attention and short-term memory, and executive functioning. Analysis of z-transformed mean change in factor scores showed significant improvement in verbal skills and global score following the switch from conventional antipsychotics, olanzapine, or risperidone.. Patients requiring a change in antipsychotic therapy may exhibit cognitive improvement following a switch to ziprasidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Arousal; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Verbal Behavior

Co-occurring substance use disorders, mostly involving alcohol, cannabis or cocaine, occur commonly in patients with schizophrenia and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Available but limited data suggest that substance use disorders (especially cannabis use disorders) may also be common in first-episode patients and appear linked to a poor outcome in these patients. Strategies to curtail substance use form an important dimension of the treatment program for both first-episode and chronic patients. We report on rates of co-occurring substance use disorders in patients within their first episode of schizophrenia-related psychosis from a multicenter, international treatment trial of olanzapine vs. haloperidol.. The study involved 262 patients (of 263 who were randomized and who returned for a post-randomization evaluation) within their first episode of psychosis (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder) recruited from 14 academic medical centers in North America and Western Europe. Patients with a history of substance dependence within 1 month prior to entry were excluded.. Of this sample, 97 (37%) had a lifetime diagnosis of substance use disorder (SUD); of these 74 (28% of the total) had a lifetime cannabis use disorder (CUD) and 54 (21%) had a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Patients with SUD were more likely to be men. Those with CUD had a lower age of onset than those without. Patients with SUD had more positive symptoms and fewer negative symptoms than those without SUD, and they had a longer duration of untreated psychosis. The 12-week response data indicated that 27% of patients with SUD were responders compared to 35% of those without SUD. Patients with AUD were less likely to respond to olanzapine than those without AUD.. These data suggest that first-episode patients are quite likely to have comorbid substance use disorders, and that the presence of these disorders may negatively influence response to antipsychotic medications, both typical and atypical antipsychotics, over the first 12 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance-Related Disorders

To examine the impact of smoking status on antipsychotic-associated weight gain.. In two double-blind studies, 552 adult and elderly patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to risperidone or olanzapine treatment for 8 weeks. Smoking status at baseline was recorded together with other background characteristics.. In both adult and elderly patients, olanzapine-treated smokers and nonsmokers gained weight at a similar rate, whereas risperidone-treated smokers gained less weight than did nonsmokers. Olanzapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain than was risperidone across all measures in both adult and elderly patients.. These findings support a quantitatively or qualitatively different effect of risperidone and olanzapine on the metabolic changes underlying antipsychotic-associated weight gain. Mechanisms responsible for olanzapine's effect on weight appear to counteract smokers' physiologic bias toward weight loss, an effect not seen among risperidone-treated patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Smoking; Weight Gain

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Social Perception

Atypical antipsychotics offer advantages over earlier drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia, although few data exist on the relative merits of different atypical antipsychotics. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to compare amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Adult schizophrenic patients with dominant positive symptomatology received amisulpride (200-800 mg/day) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score, assessed with a non-inferiority analysis. The evolution of positive and negative symptomatology, depression, social functioning and quality of life were assessed. Safety evaluation included adverse event reporting, neurological status and body weight. The improvement of BPRS score was 32.7% in the amisulpride group and 33.0% in the olanzapine group; thus, the efficacy of amisulpride was not inferior to that of olanzapine. All other secondary efficacy outcome variables evolved to a similar extent in both groups. Adverse event frequency was similar in both groups. Amenorrhoea was encountered only in the amisulpride group (6.2% of patients), whereas elevations of liver transaminases were more frequent in the olanzapine group (17% versus 3.7% of patients). The incidence and mean extent of clinically relevant weight gain were higher in the olanzapine group (35.1% and 3.9 kg) than in the amisulpride group (20.6% and 1.6 kg). The efficacy of amisulpride is not inferior to that of olanzapine in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. The side-effect profile of the two drugs differed.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Treatment Outcome

To examine the D2 occupancy of two commonly used antipsychotic medications and relate this to the D2 occupancy by endogenous dopamine in schizophrenia.. The aim of this study is to compare the occupancy of striatal D2 receptors by the atypical antipsychotic medications risperidone and olanzapine at fixed dosages and to estimate the effect on D2 occupancy by dopamine as a result of these treatments.. Seven patients with schizophrenia taking risperidone 6 mg/day and nine patients with schizophrenia taking olanzapine 10 mg/day underwent an [123I]IBZM SPECT scan after 3 weeks of treatment. The specific to non-specific equilibrium partition coefficient (V3") after bolus plus constant infusion of the tracer was calculated as [(striatal activity)/(cerebellar activity)]-1. D2 receptor occupancy was calculated by comparing V3" measured in treated patients to an age-corrected V3" value derived from a group of untreated patients with schizophrenia, previously published, according to the following formula: OCC=1-(V3" treated/V3" drug free).. V3" was significantly lower in risperidone treated patients compared with olanzapine treated patients (0.23+/-0.06 versus 0.34+/-0.08, P=-0.01), which translated to a significantly larger occupancy in schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone compared to olanzapine (69+/-8% versus 55 +/-11%, P=0.01). Data from our previous study were used to calculate the occupancy of striatal D2 receptors by antipsychotic medications required to reduce the occupancy of these receptors by endogenous dopamine to control values. In medication-free patients with schizophrenia, the occupancy of striatal D2 receptors by endogenous dopamine is estimated at 15.8%. In healthy controls, the occupancy of striatal D2 receptors by dopamine is estimated at 8.8%. In order to reduce the dopamine occupancy of striatal D2 receptors in patients with schizophrenia to control values, 48% receptor occupancy by antipsychotic medications is required.. These data indicate that the dosage of these medications, found to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia, reduces DA stimulation of D2 receptors to levels slightly lower than those found in unmedicated healthy subjects.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzamides; Benzodiazepines; Dopamine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrrolidines; Radiopharmaceuticals; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

This prospective study measured adherence to conventional and atypical antipsychotics after hospital discharge in patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. We examined the interaction of several predictors such as gender, severity of illness, attitudes toward medications, side effects, and dose frequency.. The sample consisted of consecutive randomized and nonrandomized patients who were discharged from an inpatient unit with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder between December 1995 and July 1999. All patients were taking oral antipsychotics and consented to the use of an electronic adherence monitor at discharge. Medications were prescribed by usual care providers, and medication adherence was followed weekly for 3 months. The outcome measure was the medication adherence rate registered in the electronic monitors.. We found no significant difference in adherence between the combined groups of atypical and conventional antipsychotics. Individual medication analysis found better medication adherence with olanzapine in comparison with risperidone and conventional antipsychotics, but the difference disappeared in the final model controlling for dose frequency. Dose frequency, gender, and akathisia predicted adherence.. Olanzapine initially appeared to be associated with an adherence advantage over risperidone and conventional antipsychotics, but the apparent advantage may have been due to a usual care dose frequency practice that associated olanzapine more often with once-daily dosing. This study suggests that dose frequency is an important predictor of medication adherence. An important caveat is that these results apply only to short-term adherence.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Feasibility Studies; Female; Hospitalization; Hospitals, Psychiatric; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Patient Discharge; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Several recent studies, albeit limited in sample number, design and generalizability, have suggested that augmentation of atypical antipsychotic medication (such as clozapine and olanzapine) with sulpiride, a substituted benzamide antipsychotic medication, may play a role in the management of treatment-resistant psychotic conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate any change in clinical symptomatology or side-effect profile in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients receiving sulpiride in addition to olanzapine. Seventeen patients with treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia, who were receiving olanzapine monotherapy for at least 6 months before study commencement, were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either adjunctive treatment with sulpiride (study group) or to continue their pre-study treatment with olanzapine with no medication augmentation (control group), each for a period of 8 weeks. Changes in measures of positive and negative symptoms, anxiety, depression and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks. Study observations indicated no significant differences in the changes in positive or negative symptomatology between patients receiving a combined regimen of olanzapine with sulpiride (600 mg/ day) augmentation and controls. However, a significantly greater improvement of depressive symptomatology (P < 0.05; as assessed by the Hamilton Scale for Depression) was noted in the sulpiride augmentation group. These data indicate improvement in depressive symptomatology with sulpiride augmentation of olanzapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride

Adiponectin is a recently identified adipocyte-derived protein, which is associated with glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity and adiposity. The aim of this study was to explore the alterations in serum adiponectin concentration during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone. Serum concentrations of adiponectin were investigated in body mass index (BMI, kg/m2)- and age-matched groups of non-diabetic, non-obese schizophrenic patients receiving a stable dose of olanzapine (n = 18) or risperidone (n = 15) for 4 weeks or more, and of mentally and physically healthy volunteers (n = 17). Patients undergoing treatment with olanzapine or risperidone had significantly higher adiponectin concentrations than the healthy volunteers, even after controlling for BMI. Adiponectin concentrations decreased with increasing BMI in patients taking olanzapine, while elevated levels were observed in patients taking risperidone, regardless of adiposity. This preliminary cross-sectional study indicates that adiponectin is involved in the regulation of glucose metabolism and weight in schizophrenic patients during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone, presumably showing a normalizing effect on metabolic abnormality.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Proteins; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serum

There has been considerable support for the observation that atypical antipsychotics have a broader range of therapeutic effects than traditional antipsychotics. We are exploring whether this expanded clinical efficacy can also be seen in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.. The subjects were 157 treatment-resistant inpatients diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. They were randomly assigned to treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol in a 14-week double-blind trial and rated with a standard measure of clinical antipsychotic efficacy (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]). Factor analysis at baseline and endpoint together with changes in 5 PANSS-derived factors were examined. Data were gathered from June 1996 to December 1999.. The underlying PANSS factor structure, as indicated by the factor loadings, was essentially identical at baseline and endpoint. At baseline, the excitement factor was followed by the positive, negative, cognitive, and depression/anxiety factors, explaining 49.4% of the total variance. At endpoint, the positive factor was followed by the negative, excitement, cognitive, and depression/anxiety factors, explaining 55.5% of the total variance. The endpoint data indicated statistically significant (p <.05) improvements over time on the positive factor for all 3 atypicals, but not for haloperidol. The negative factor showed significant improvement for clozapine and olanzapine, with significant worsening for haloperidol. Clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone were superior to haloperidol on the negative factor, while clozapine was also superior to risperidone. The cognitive factor showed significant improvement for all atypicals, as did the depression/anxiety factor. Only clozapine showed improvement on the excitement factor and was superior to both haloperidol and risperidone.. Treatment with atypical antipsychotics did not substantially change the underlying PANSS 5-factor structure. However, antipsychotic treatment with all 3 atypical medications was associated with significant improvements on 3 of 5 syndromal domains (positive, cognitive, and depression/anxiety) of schizophrenia. Clozapine and olanzapine also showed improvement on the negative factor. Only clozapine was associated with improvement on the excitement domain. This finding confirms that atypicals are associated with improvement of an expanded spectrum of symptoms in treatment-resistant patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

We conducted a prospective double-blind study of accelerated dose titration of olanzapine in the treatment of newly admitted acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to either oral olanzapine (10 mg per day) or oral haloperidol (10 mg per day), plus lorazepam as needed (up to 12 mg per day). Antipsychotic dosage was increased to 20 mg per day as early as day 3. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Agitation subscale during the first 24 hours of treatment, daily for the first week, then weekly until study completion. Significant within-group improvement was demonstrated in PANSS Agitation scores for both groups as early as 1 hour after initiating therapy (-5.79 +/- 6.30 for olanzapine and -4.89 +/- 6.05 for haloperidol, P <.001). This study demonstrated that accelerated dose titration of oral olanzapine is as efficacious as oral haloperidol in reducing acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Emergency Treatment; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Results from the International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) indicate that clozapine is more effective than olanzapine in reducing suicidal behavior in schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients. However, because InterSePT allowed the uncontrolled use of concomitant psychotropic medications (CPMs), it is possible that the antisuicidal effect of clozapine may have been influenced by greater use of such agents. This article describes the use patterns of CPMs during InterSePT and examines whether CPM use may have affected study outcome.. In this study, 479 patients received clozapine and 477 patients received olanzapine. Concomitant psychotropic medications were grouped into 4 classes: antipsychotics, antidepressants, sedatives/anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers. The doses of each CPM were converted into dosage equivalents of standard reference drugs. An analysis of covariance was performed to compare mean daily doses of CPMs between the 2 groups over the 2-year treatment period. The duration of treatment for each patient was 2 years, with the first patient entering the study in March 1998 and the last patient completing treatment in February 2001.. Approximately 90% of patients in both treatment groups received at least 1 CPM. The mean +/- SD number of CPMs per patient was 3.8 +/- 2.90 in the clozapine group and 4.2 +/- 3.16 in the olanzapine group. For each CPM class, the mean daily dose was statistically significantly lower in the clozapine group (antipsychotics, p <.001; antidepressants, p <.01; sedatives/anxiolytics, p <.001; mood stabilizers, p <.05). Analyses of CPM use by study intervals, suicide attempters versus nonattempters, study completers versus noncompleters, and geographic region resulted in similar findings.. The results support the conclusion that the effects of clozapine in reducing the risk of suicidal behavior derive from its intrinsic pharmacology and not from the influence of concomitant psychotropic medications.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Psychotropic Drugs; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide; Suicide Prevention; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine treatment is associated with substantial weight gain. In this double-blind placebo-controlled study we evaluated whether the H2 antagonist famotidine may prevent/attenuate olanzapine-induced weight gain. Fourteen first-episode DSM-IV schizophrenia patients were randomly allocated to receive either famotidine (40 mg/day, n=7) or placebo (n=7) in addition to olanzapine (10 mg/day) for 6 weeks. All patients completed the trial. Patients in both groups showed a similar increase in body weight (olanzapine/famotidine: 4.8 (3.2) kg and olanzapine/placebo: 4.9 (1.6) kg, respectively; a between-group difference of 0.14 (1.3) kg). Four of seven (57.1%) patients in the olanzapine/famotidine group and three of seven (42.9%) in the olanzapine/placebo group gained at least 7% of their initial body weight, a cut-off for clinically significant weight gain. Famotidine addition was safe and well tolerated and did not interfere with olanzapine's therapeutic effect. In conclusion, famotidine (40 mg/day for 6 weeks) is not effective in preventing/attenuating weight gain in olanzapine-treated first-episode schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Famotidine; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Weight Gain

The effect of antipsychotic medication on neurocognitive function remains controversial, especially since most previous work has compared the effects of novel antipsychotic medications with those of high doses of conventional medications. This study compares the neurocognitive effects of olanzapine and low doses of haloperidol in patients with first-episode psychosis.. Patients with a first episode of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder (N=167) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with olanzapine (mean modal dose= 9.63 mg/day) or haloperidol (mean modal dose=4.60 mg/day) for the 12-week acute phase of a 2-year study. The patients were assessed with a battery of neurocognitive tests at baseline and 12 weeks after beginning treatment.. An unweighted neurocognitive composite score, composed of measures of verbal fluency, motor functions, working memory, verbal memory, and vigilance, improved significantly with both haloperidol and olanzapine treatment (effect sizes of 0.20 and 0.36, respectively, no significant difference between groups). A weighted composite score developed from a principal-component analysis of the same measures improved to a significantly greater degree with olanzapine, compared with haloperidol. Anticholinergic use, extrapyramidal symptoms, and estimated IQ had little effect on the statistical differentiation of the medications, although duration of illness had a modest effect. The correlations of cognitive improvement with changes in clinical characteristics and with side effects of treatment were significant for patients who received haloperidol but not for patients who received olanzapine.. Olanzapine has a beneficial effect on neurocognitive function in patients with a first episode of psychosis. However, in a comparison of the effects of olanzapine and low doses of haloperidol, the difference in benefit is small.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Principal Component Analysis; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of olanzapine and risperidone on cognitive functions in patients with schizophrenia. The subjects were schizophrenic outpatients, all meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and already treated with risperidone. In the experimental group (15), risperidone was changed to olanzapine to be administered for 8 weeks. Risperidone was maintained without a change in the daily dose in the control group (13). The assessment of clinical symptoms and cognitive functions in both groups was made at baseline and at 8 weeks. The experimental group relative to the control group showed significant improvement in five items such as immediate and delayed recall of verbal memory, verbal fluency, visual memory and total error of executive function. Although these data are preliminary, they could suggest the possibility of cognitive benefits from treatment with olanzapine relative to risperidone. These findings did not appear to be mediated by changes in clinical symptoms and side effects.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Mental Recall; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Verbal Behavior; Visual Perception

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of weight gain during long-term treatment with olanzapine under routine conditions. Weight changes in a sample of 27 outpatients with schizophrenic or schizoaffective disorder were assessed over a mean duration of treatment of 22 months (6-42 months). Treatment with olanzapine was started anew or switched from a conventional antipsychotic drug. Eighteen (66.7%) patients gained more than 7% of their initial body weight. Mean weight gain was 9.2 kg over the study period for the first year 7.7 kg, and only 1.7 kg in the second year. Due to some patients losing weight in the second year, the latter finding obscures the fact that more than 50% of patients gained considerable weight also during the second year (4.8 kg). Weight gain per month was significantly higher in patients with lower body mass index, yet the highest weight gain was found in the most obese patient. Weight gain under olanzapine is a serious concern, and should be monitored closely and countered by active measures.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The subjects were 157 treatment-resistant inpatients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. They were randomly assigned to treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol in a 14-week, double-blind trial. Incidents of overt aggression were recorded and their severity was scored. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was administered. Atypical antipsychotics showed an overall superiority over haloperidol, particularly after the first 24 days of the study when the dose escalation of clozapine was completed. Once an adequate therapeutic dose of clozapine was reached, it was superior to haloperidol in reducing the number and severity of aggressive incidents. Patients exhibiting persistent aggressive behavior showed less improvement of psychotic symptoms than the other patients. There was an interaction between aggressiveness, medication type, and antipsychotic response: risperidone and olanzapine showed better antipsychotic efficacy in patients exhibiting less aggressive behavior; the opposite was true for clozapine. Clozapine appears to have superior antiaggresive effects in treatment-resistant patients; this superiority develops after the patient has been exposed to an adequate dose regimen.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

To investigate which cognitive and affective features contribute most to responder/non-responder group separation during a switching trial with atypical antipsychotic.. A prospective open trial with an atypical antipsychotic (olanzapine).. One hundred and thirty-four patients meeting diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder began an 8-week open-label olanzapine treatment at a dose of 5 mg/day which was increased to 10 mg/day after one week.. Olanzapine during 8 weeks. Patients were considered as responders if their BPRS score decreased of at least 20% (n = 96) and non-responders if it did not (n = 38). Neuropsychological assessments were carried out at baseline, at four and at eight weeks.. Neurocognitive measures were analyzed for discriminate factors between responder and non-responder groups. A regression analysis was applied to explain the effects of depression on each cognitive variable. Depression was found to be a weak discriminant factor, however this finding could not firmly establish that depression is a potential factor in explaining deficits and improvements in cognition.

Topics: Affective Symptoms; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Depressive Disorder; Discriminant Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Verbal Behavior

Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) may contribute to the observed heterogeneity of the treatment response in first-episode schizophrenia.. To examine the relationship of DUP and premorbid function with clinical outcomes following up to 2 years of antipsychotic treatment.. For a subsample (n=191) of subjects participating in a clinical trial, DUP and premorbid function were prospectively compared with clinical response to olanzapine or haloperidol.. Shorter DUP and good premorbid function each independently are associated with better clinical response, including improvement in overall psychopathology and negative symptoms. Premorbid function also is associated with positive symptom, social and vocational outcomes.. Earlier antipsychotic treatment is associated with better outcomes in first-episode schizophrenia. Poor premorbid function could indicate an illness subtype less likely to respond to antipsychotic treatment regardless of when it is instituted.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Prognosis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Remission Induction; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is characterized by high suicide risk and low awareness of disorder. Although awareness has benefits for medication compliance and clinical outcome, it is unclear how it may relate to suicide risk in this population.. This multicenter investigation assessed awareness and suicide-related behavior in 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients were followed over 2 years and assessed by blinded raters for suicide-related events.. Awareness of psychiatric condition at baseline was associated with increased risk of suicide events over the follow-up. This effect was mediated by depression and hopelessness levels. By contrast, changes in awareness associated with treatment decreased the risk of suicide.. Although some patients may become depressed after acknowledging the clinical handicaps of their disorder, treatment-related changes in awareness are generally associated with a positive outcome relative to suicide risk. The complex interactions and mediation effects of these clinical variables require careful monitoring.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Awareness; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder; Female; Health Status; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide; Suicide Prevention; Treatment Outcome

The well-known amplitude reduction of the P300 appears to be unaffected by the treatment with classical antipsychotics in schizophrenia, whereas the effects of atypical neuroleptics on this event-related potential are less understood. The study of these changes could help in deciding whether the P300 amplitude reduction in schizophrenia is a trait or state marker of that illness and in better describing the effect of atypical antipsychotics on altered cognitive functions. We present a prospective longitudinal study of P300 amplitude and latency before and after 6 months' treatment with olanzapine in 11 patients with schizophrenia. A healthy control group (n = 30) was also studied. Overall, no significant changes, either in amplitude or in latency as measured at Pz and Fz electrodes, were found when comparing the pre- and postolanzapine conditions, despite the overall improvement in positive and negative symptoms. Nevertheless a direct specific association was observed between a P300 amplitude increase with olanzapine and the improvement in negative symptoms. These data would suggest that P300 amplitude reduction in schizophrenia may be relatively independent from clinical state and treatment, thus constituting a trait marker of schizophrenia. Our data also suggest that, in addition to this, some further changes in P300 amplitude might depend on the clinical state of the patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Auditory Perception; Benzodiazepines; Electroencephalography; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of olanzapine plus fluvoxamine and those of olanzapine alone, in schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-week trial was carried out at a University Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. The efficacy and adverse effects were assessed biweekly by using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side-effect scale, respectively. Twenty schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine plus fluvoxamine or olanzapine alone. The study found that the means of BPRS total and BPRS general psychopathology score changes were significantly larger in olanzapine plus fluvoxamine group (P = 0.037 and P = 0.045, respectively). The incidence of treatment adverse effects is comparable. In conclusion, the study findings suggest that fluvoxamine augmentation to olanzapine is well tolerated and more effective than olanzapine alone for short-term (6-week) treatment of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Due to a number of limitations, further studies are warranted to confirm.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluvoxamine; Hospitals, Psychiatric; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Tablets; Weight Loss

We report the results of a double-blind, randomized prospective trial on D2 and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy and the clinical effects of olanzapine versus clozapine in a sample of neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenic patients. Receptor occupancy was evaluated in different cortical areas and in basal ganglia using [18F] fluoro-ethyl-spiperone ([18F] FESP) and positron emission tomography (PET). A total of 15 neuroleptic-free patients completed the study undergoing a baseline and a post-treatment PET scan (olanzapine, nine patients, one female; clozapine, six patients, three female) 8 weeks after starting treatment. PET data were analysed both by regions of interest and on a voxel-by-voxel basis using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM96). Olanzapine and clozapine induced a similar and significant inhibition of [18F] FESP binding index in the cortex. In the basal ganglia, receptor occupancy was significantly higher with olanzapine than with clozapine (p=0.0018). By contrast, no differences in receptor occupancy were detected at the level of the pituitary gland. Clinical outcomes, in particular a full extra pyramidal tolerability, were similar. In this sample of neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenic patients, olanzapine and clozapine showed a different pattern of occupancy of D2-like receptor despite a common lack of extrapyramidal side-effects.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT2; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Spiperone

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially persistent and disabling abnormal involuntary movement disorder. The aim of this 8-month study was to determine if olanzapine treatment could lead to a significant and persistent reduction in preexisting TD.. Eligible schizophrenia patients met restricted Research Diagnosis criteria of TD requiring, in part, a rating of at least moderate severity (score > or = 3) in one or more of seven body regions on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Patients received olanzapine, 5-20 mg/day, for 8 months. During this period, they underwent one to two dose reduction periods under blinded conditions. Concurrent changes in TD, psychopathology, parkinsonism and akathisia were assessed with the AIMS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Simpson-Angus and Barnes Akathisia Scales, respectively.. A significant reduction in mean AIMS total score was demonstrated at endpoint (n = 92; p < 0.001) as well as at each visit (p < 0.001) and as early as Week 1 on olanzapine. Approximately 70% of patients no longer met the restricted Research Diagnostic criteria for persistent TD (RD-TD) after 8 months of treatment. No statistically significant rebound worsening of TD was found during either blinded drug reduction period. Significant improvement in psychopathology (p = 0.001) and parkinsonism (p < 0.001) was observed.. Improvement in the severity of preexisting TD was achieved with olanzapine and persisted throughout the 8-month study and during each dose reduction period. Overall improvement in clinical status suggests that olanzapine may be effective for the long-term management of schizophrenia patients with preexisting TD.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesias; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Olanzapine; Probability; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Deficits in working memory and in prefrontal cortical physiology are important outcome measures in schizophrenia, and both have been associated with dopamine dysregulation and with a functional polymorphism (Val(108/158)Met) in the catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene that affects dopamine inactivation in the prefrontal cortex. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in patients with schizophrenia the effect of COMT genotype on symptom variation, working memory performance, and prefrontal cortical physiology in response to treatment with an atypical antipsychotic drug.. Thirty patients with acute untreated schizophrenia were clinically evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, underwent COMT Val/Met genotyping, and entered an 8-week prospective study of olanzapine treatment. Twenty patients completed two 3-T functional magnetic resonance imaging scans at 4 and 8 weeks during performance of N-back working memory tasks.. There was a significant interaction of COMT genotype and the effects of olanzapine on prefrontal cortical function. Met allele load predicted improvement in working memory performance and prefrontal physiology after 8 weeks of treatment. A similar effect was found also for negative symptoms assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.. These results suggest that a genetically determined variation in prefrontal dopamine catabolism impacts the therapeutic profile of olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Dopamine; Female; Genotype; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory Disorders; Methionine; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prefrontal Cortex; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; Valine

A follow-up study of patients with schizophrenia was conducted to examine change in striatal volumes and extrapyramidal symptoms after a change in medication.. Thirty-seven patients with schizophrenia and 23 healthy volunteers were examined. Patients at baseline receiving typical antipsychotics (N=10) or risperidone but exhibiting limited response (N=13) were switched to treatment with olanzapine. Patients receiving risperidone and exhibiting a good response (N=14) continued treatment with risperidone. Caudate, putamen, and pallidal volumes were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. The Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale was used to assess clinical signs and symptoms.. At baseline, basal ganglia volumes in patients treated with typical antipsychotics were greater than in healthy subjects (putamen: 7.0% larger; globus pallidus: 20.7% larger). After the switch to olanzapine, putamen and globus pallidus volumes decreased (9.8% and 10.7%, respectively) and did not differ from those of healthy subjects at the follow-up evaluation. Akathisia was also reduced. In the patients receiving risperidone at baseline, basal ganglia volumes did not differ between those exhibiting good and poor response, and no significant volume changes were observed in subjects with poor risperidone response after the switch to olanzapine treatment.. Olanzapine reversed putamen and globus pallidus enlargement induced by typical antipsychotics but did not alter volumes in patients previously treated with risperidone. Changes in striatal volumes related to typical and atypical antipsychotics may represent an interactive effect between individual medications and unique patient characteristics.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Caudate Nucleus; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Globus Pallidus; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Putamen; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Limited randomized, controlled trial data exist on possible differences between atypical antipsychotics in efficacy, overall tolerability, and important indices of health status. The authors compared the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in the treatment of acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. In this 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-design, flexible-dose trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive ziprasidone (N=136) or olanzapine (N=133). Primary efficacy measures were improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale scores; secondary measures were scores on the CGI improvement scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. Tolerability assessments included fasting lipid profiles, fasting glucose and insulin measurements, electrocardiography, and monitoring of vital signs and body weight.. The overall mean daily doses were 129.9 mg (SD=27.3) for ziprasidone and 11.3 mg (SD=2.8) for olanzapine. Both antipsychotics were efficacious in improving symptoms and global illness severity. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in primary or secondary efficacy measures at endpoint or in by-visit analysis. Both agents were well tolerated. Body weight, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increased with olanzapine but not with ziprasidone; all between-group comparisons of these variables were significant and favored ziprasidone. Olanzapine, but not ziprasidone, was associated with significant increases in fasting insulin level. No patient in either group exhibited a corrected QT interval >/=500 msec.. During 6 weeks' treatment, ziprasidone and olanzapine demonstrated comparable antipsychotic efficacy. Differences favoring ziprasidone were observed in metabolic parameters.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

It is well known that sleep disturbance is an integral symptom of schizophrenia. In recent studies, a deficit of delta sleep has been observed in schizophrenic patients. Antipsychotic drugs with serotonin (5-HT2) receptor-antagonistic properties are considered to have delta sleep promoting effects. We have investigated the effects of subchronic olanzapine treatment on sleep EEG in schizophrenic patients.. The effects of administration of olanzapine (15 to 20 mg) on sleep were studied for four weeks in 10 male, drug-free patients suffering from schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. Conventional sleep EEG parameters were investigated at baseline and after treatment with olanzapine for four weeks. Additionally, spectral power analysis of the EEG signal in distinct frequency bands was computed for different sleep stages. Psychopathology (PANSS, HAMD-17, HAMA) and side effects were assessed weekly.. All patients improved, as measured by PANSS global scores. Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement of parameters of sleep efficiency and an increase of delta sleep as well as REM sleep. Regarding spectral power values, no significant differences between baseline and treatment conditions were found.. Sleep improvement was due to parameters of sleep efficiency and delta sleep, which may be related to serotonin antagonistic properties of olanzapine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Delta Rhythm; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Electroencephalography; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polysomnography; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Stages; Surveys and Questionnaires

Cardiac adverse events in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics have gained increasing interest in recent years. In the present study, heart rate variability (HRV), which is a sensitive parameter reflecting central autonomic cardiac control, was investigated during treatment with olanzapine. Ten physically healthy male patients with schizophrenia, who displayed predominantly negative symptoms, were studied in the sleep laboratory under drug-free baseline conditions and after 4 weeks of olanzapine medication. HRV was assessed during different sleep stages both in the time and frequency domains. Only slight changes in HRV were shown during treatment, and appeared to be independent of sleep stages. Spectral analysis indicated a slight shift of the sympathovagal balance in favour of the sympathetic tone, which was consistent with an elevation of heart rate in the time domain; total HRV was not altered. These changes are in accordance with olanzapine's receptor profile exerting anticholinergic and anti-adrenergic properties. In conclusion, taken together with findings from previous studies demonstrating that olanzapine does not cause clinically significant changes of the QTc interval, the present results are consistent with the known cardiac safety profile of olanzapine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electroencephalography; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Sleep Stages

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Polyuria; Schizophrenia; Water Intoxication

To assess the impact of olanzapine versus conventional neuroleptic therapy among subjects with schizophrenia on ratings of tardive dyskinesia (TD).. The naturalistic study was conducted in three psychiatric hospitals in Brazil. Patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and related disorders (DSMIV) and with a BPRS score>24. Patients were evaluated by means of the PANSS scale for symptomatology (Kay et al. 1986), the Clinical Global Impression, The UKU side effect rating scale (Lingjaerde et al. 1987), and the Tardive Dyskinesia AIMS scale (Guy et al. 1976). Patients were seen by the treating physician routinely while hospitalized and then monthly on an out-patient basis. All scale assessments were repeated after 9 months of discharge.. The sample was comprised of 190 patients (99 in the olanzapine and 91 in the standard treatment), with a completion rate of 88.2% for olanzapine and 84.9% for the conventional treatment (p=0.385, n. s.). The mean change from baseline in the PANSS total score favored olanzapine regarding negative symptoms (2.3, 95% C. I. 0.6-4.1, p<0.001); and general psychopathology (4.0, 95% C.I. 0.8-7.2, p<0.02) factors. TD was defined by applying Morgenstern & Glazer (1993) and Schooler & Kane (1982) criteria, on the basis of the AIMS scale. Both results favored olanzapine at the end of the follow-up (Morgenstern & Glazer: 25.6% versus 56.3%; Schooler & Kane: 16.3% versus 45.2%). At the end of the follow-up, by using the overall rating of the AIMS scale, the presence of TD was 2.3% for olanzapine (2/87), and 16.7% (12/72) for the conventional treatment.. The results of this open label naturalistic trial showed that olanzapine had an impact on negative symptoms, decreased general psychopathology and reduced the risk of tardive dyskinesia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Demography; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, is a substrate of the cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme. Administration of a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor (eg, fluvoxamine) may alter the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic interactions between olanzapine and fluvoxamine in patients with schizophrenia. Ten male smokers were administrated a single dose of olanzapine 10 mg at baseline, followed by 2 weeks of fluvoxamine 50 mg/day and another 2 weeks of fluvoxamine 100 mg/day. Olanzapine 10 mg was given at day 10 during each fluvoxamine treatment. After pretreatment with fluvoxamine, the area under the curve, maximal plasma concentration, and half-time of olanzapine were significantly increased by 30% to 55%, 12% to 64%, and 25% to 32%, respectively. Volume of distribution and apparent clearance were significantly reduced by 4% to 26% and 26% t O 38%, respectively, after administration of fluvoxamine. Increases in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity appear to be dose dependent. Presumably, altered olanzapine pharmacokinetics are attributed to the inhibition of CYP1A2. Patients treated with the combination of olanzapine and fluvoxamine should be monitored carefully.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Antagonism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluvoxamine; Half-Life; Humans; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Smoking; Taiwan

The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine has extensively been compared with haloperidol, whereas studies vs. other (conventional) neuroleptics are scarce. This exploratory double-blind 4-week study was designed to compare the efficacy and the safety of olanzapine (OLA) and flupenthixol (FLU) which have recently been considered as a "partially atypical" antipsychotics.. Twenty-eight inpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned for treatment with OLA (N = 15, 5-20 mg/d) or FLU (N = 13, 5-20 mg/d). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Negative Symptoms Rating Scale (NSRS), plus the Patient Global Impression (PGI) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales, were used to assess the efficacy of both compounds; safety was determined by using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and by assessing treatment-emergent adverse events. Non-parametric statistics were applied.. BPRS and NSRS scores improved in both groups (exploratory tests; all p < or = 0.02). Similar results were observed for CGI-Severity, CGI- and PGI-Improvement. There were no significant group differences. Responder rates (at least 40 % decrease in BPRS total) were 9/13 OLA patients (69 %) and 9/12 FLU patients (75 %). EPS events were reported only in the FLU group (p < 0.01); FLU patients needed significantly more anticholinergic medication. Weight gain was higher in OLA patients (p < 0.01). Overall, fewer patients with adverse events were observed in the OLA group (p = 0.04). No significant changes were noted on SAS and AIMS scores.. Findings from this study suggest that overall and negative symptomatology improved in both treatment groups, while the safety and tolerability profiles differed for both substances.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Case-Control Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Flupenthixol; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the effects of the atypical antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and perospirone on the subjective quality of sleep in patients with schizophrenia.. Subjects were 92 inpatients (mean age = 59.9 years) who had been receiving treatment with conventional antipsychotic drugs and who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 atypical antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone). Subjective sleep quality and psychopathology were assessed twice: at baseline and 8 weeks after switching. Data were collected from June 2001 to December 2001. Subjective sleep quality was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and psychopathology was measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).. Subjective sleep quality as assessed by the PSQI was significantly improved with administration of olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine, but not with perospirone, in comparison with conventional antipsychotic drugs. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the improvement of sleep quality with administration of atypical antipsychotic drugs was predicted by poor sleep quality at baseline. In addition, improvement of sleep quality was significantly correlated with improvement of negative symptoms as assessed by the PANSS.. These results demonstrated that atypical antipsychotic drugs improved subjective quality of sleep in patients with schizophrenia compared with conventional antipsychotic drugs, suggesting that the marked potency of serotonin-2 receptor blockade in atypical antipsychotic drugs may be involved in the mechanism of this improvement. These improvements were correlated with improvement of negative symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Health Status; Hospitalization; Humans; Indoles; Isoindoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep; Thiazoles

Schizophrenic disorders as well as neuroleptic treatment can affect locomotion. The study assessed the influence of neuroleptic treatment on externally triggered gait on a treadmill at three different velocities via ultrasonic topometric gait analysis. Spatial and temporal gait parameters were assessed in two groups of schizophrenic patients either under treatment with conventional neuroleptics (n = 12) or without neuroleptic treatment (n = 10) and re-assessed after treatment change to the atypical neuroleptic olanzapine in a repeated measures design. After switch from conventional neuroleptics to olanzapine patients showed an increase of step length and decrease of cadence at the low (p

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exercise Test; Female; Flupenthixol; Fluphenazine; Gait; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Rigidity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Fifty clinically stable, schizophrenic outpatients, suffering from residual schizophrenic symptoms and/or neurological side effects, were randomised to either continue their conventional neuroleptic(s) or change it to olanzapine. After 12 weeks patients on olanzapine exhibited significant improvement in neurological side effects and psychotic symptomatology as compared to patients on conventional antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia

Weight gain is a side effect of therapy with many atypical antipsychotics and may have important clinical repercussions with respect to long-term health and treatment compliance. The primary objective of this double-blind study was to compare the safety and tolerability of aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia as evidenced by the percentage of patients exhibiting significant weight gain.. This was a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who were in acute relapse and required hospitalization. Significant weight gain was defined as a > or = 7% increase in body weight from baseline. Body weight, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) assessments were performed at baseline and at regular intervals during the study. The study period was from April 2000 through June 2001.. 317 patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (N = 156) or olanzapine (N = 161). Compared with those treated with aripiprazole, a greater proportion of patients treated with olanzapine exhibited clinically significant weight gain during the trial. By week 26, 37% of olanzapine-treated patients had experienced significant weight gain compared with 14% of aripiprazole-treated patients (p < .001). Statistically significant differences in mean weight change were observed between treatments beginning at week 1 and sustained throughout the study. At week 26, there was a mean weight loss of 1.37 kg (3.04 lb) with aripiprazole compared with a mean increase of 4.23 kg (9.40 lb) with olanzapine among patients who remained on therapy (p < .001). Changes in fasting plasma levels of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly different in the 2 treatment groups, with worsening of the lipid profile among patients treated with olanzapine. There was a consistent and sustained improvement in symptoms in patients who remained on therapy with either olanzapine or aripiprazole as assessed by CGI-I scores and responder rates throughout the study.. Olanzapine had a greater impact on patients' weight than aripiprazole. Significant differences in favor of aripiprazole were also observed in the effects of therapy on plasma lipid profile. Both treatment groups achieved comparable clinically meaningful improvements on efficacy measures. The observed effects on weight and lipids indicate a potentially lower metabolic and cardiovascular risk in patients treated with aripiprazole compared with those treated with olanzapine.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Incidence; Lipids; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Suicidal behavior in patients with psychotic disorders represents a seriously undertreated life-threatening condition. The International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) is the first large-scale, prospective study designed to evaluate the potential of antipsychotic medications to reduce suicidal behaviors in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are known to be at high risk for suicide. The unique challenges to study design and the solutions identified for the InterSePT study are described. These challenges included defining suicidal behavior in patients with psychosis, endpoint selection, determination of analytic strategy, and development of scales to assess suicidal behavior. Given the life-threatening nature of suicidal behavior, ethical considerations required that the design minimize suicide attempts and deaths. While the study focused primarily on treatment of suicide, opportunities were used to collect data in related areas of interest, including suicide risk factors, other efficacy measures (e.g., Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Covi Anxiety Scale, Calgary Depression Scale), adverse events, pharmacoeconomics, and pharmacogenetics. Because of the complexity of the design issues, a steering committee, suicide monitoring board, and publication committee were established to assist with their management.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Research Design; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Suicide Prevention; Treatment Outcome

A Suicide Monitoring Board (SMB) evaluated putative events of suicidal behavior to determine whether they should be counted as outcome data (endpoints) in the International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) study. The InterSePT study compared clozapine and olanzapine prospectively, on reduction of suicidality in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. SMB members, blinded to patient identification, evaluated packages of clinical information and the forms used to summarize the putative events and their context. The SMB members met regularly by international teleconference to discuss ratings they found problematic and to achieve consensus. Exactly 243 of the 980 patients enrolled (24.8%) were considered to have experienced 577 suicidal events. Of these events, 483 (83.7%) were confirmed by the SMB as real or valid endpoints. Before the consensus discussions, acceptable levels of agreement (K = 0.52) were reached among the SMB members regarding ratings considered as valid suicidal events; agreement increased (K = 0.64) when consensus ratings and those of on-site psychiatrists also blinded to treatment were also included. This article discusses our experience of evaluating schizophrenia patients for suicidality in general and in particular from reviewing chart information. The process of making clinical judgments regarding the seriousness of suicidal behavior in schizophrenia patients and their suicidal risk warrants further study.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Olanzapine; Reproducibility of Results; Schizophrenia; Suicide Prevention; Treatment Outcome

This study prospectively examined the effectiveness of treatment with olanzapine versus risperidone in reducing violent behavior among patients with schizophrenia under "usual care" conditions in the community.. Participants were 124 adults with DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia-spectrum disorders receiving services in public-sector mental health systems in North Carolina. After enrollment (1997-1999), subjects were followed for 3 years in an observational study with interviews at 6-month intervals to assess treatment, clinical outcomes, and violent behavior. Rates of violence were compared over time between periods of first switch to olanzapine or risperidone and periods following at least 1 year of treatment with each of these medications.. The study found that remaining on olanzapine for 1 year or more significantly lowered violence risk compared to first switch period, but no significant change in violence risk was found for subjects remaining on risperidone for 1 year or more. These results were obtained using multivariable time-series analysis controlling for salient demographic and clinical covariates.. This study found that, in the complex "real world" settings where persons with schizophrenia reside, long-term treatment with olanzapine confers some advantage over risperidone in reducing violence risk. This advantage appears to be at least in part an indirect effect, via improvement in adherence with treatment. Specifically, adherence with prescribed medication was found to mediate the association between olanzapine treatment and reduced violent behavior.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Community Mental Health Centers; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; North Carolina; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Violence

Our objective was to compare lipid profiles of schizophrenic patients treated with conventional antipsychotics or risperidone to those of patients switched to olanzapine. Our results indicate that in patients switched to olanzapine, fasting serum lipids initially increased then returned to pretreatment levels, and endpoint lipid levels were not significantly different from those in patients remaining on conventional antipsychotics or risperidone.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Lipids; Longitudinal Studies; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

A pilot study was conducted to examine if donepezil could enhance cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Fifteen subjects who were on stable olanzapine treatment were entered into a 6-week open-labeled trial of donepezil. Subjects received baseline and end-of-study P50 and neuropsychological assessments. Donepezil treatment resulted in significant improvement in manual dexterity. There were moderate improvements in verbal recall memory and visual memory and processing speed, with smaller changes in P50 and verbal recognition memory. There was no effect on an attention measure. There were no changes in either positive or negative symptoms. These results suggest that cholinergic tone modulation may enhance selective behavioral functions in patients with schizophrenia, but further study is required to delineate the full extent of the potential benefit of this approach.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Donepezil; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evoked Potentials; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Memory; Nootropic Agents; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Conventional antipsychotics although effective in treating acute psychotic and behavioural symptoms are subject to certain limitations due to the high incidence of side effects associated, mainly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and insufficient response shown in some cases. EPS are a major factor in neuroleptic non compliance and high relapse rates among patients. This study was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of olanzapine compared to typical antipsychotics drugs in the treatment of schizophrenic inpatients at acute psychiatric in-patient units.. Data from 904 patients schizophrenic patients (F20 of ICD10, WHO) were collected in this prospective, comparative, non-randomized, open and observational study. Patients were followed during their entire hospital stay. Safety was assessed through the collection of spontaneous adverse events and a specific extrapyramidal symptoms questionnaire (EPS). Clinical status was measured through the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI) and the Nursing Observational Scale for In-patient Evaluation (NOSIE).. A total of 483 patients received olanzapine (olanzapine group, OG), and 421 received typical antipsychotics (control group, CG). Treatment emergent EPS, or worsening of previous EPS were statistically significantly higher in the CG (P=0.001). Responder rate was statistically greater in the OG (P<0.001). Mean change in BPRS-total, BPRS-negative, BPRS-agitation subscales and PGI was significantly higher in the OG (P<0.001). Mean decrease in CGI, BPRS positive and BPRS depression sub-scales was also significantly lower (P< or =0.05). Mean change in the NOSIE scale was similar between both groups.. Olanzapine has been shown to be better tolerated in comparison with conventional antipsychotics in a large unselected sample of acutely psychotic schizophrenic in-patients. Its effectiveness may be greater than that of conventional antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Safety; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The superiority of olanzapine to haloperidol with respect to a decreased incidence of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS) in patients with schizophrenia was demonstrated in studies conducted in both Japan and Western countries. EPS measurements used in Western countries included the Simpson-Angus, Barnes akathisia and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, while the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptom Scale (DIEPSS) was used in Japan. The aim of this study was to clarify how the DIEPSS captures EPS profiles. The baseline prevalence and treatment-emergent incidence of EPS in Japanese schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine or haloperidol were retrospectively compared as assessed by the DIEPSS to the prevalence and incidence of EPS in primarily Caucasian schizophrenic patients who were treated with olanzapine or haloperidol. Specifically, the prevalence and incidence of dyskinesia, akathisia and parkinsonism were compared between the Japanese trial and an international trial to examine if appropriate definitions using the DIEPSS can be derived assuming that a comparable prevalence and incidence of the syndromes would be observed when any differences in residual antipsychotic exposure at the initiation of study treatment were accounted for. For the incidence of all EPS syndromes, odds ratios were observed to be similar between the two studies, indicating that appropriate criteria for the clinical diagnosis of the EPS syndromes could be established based on the DIEPSS. This preliminary and retrospective work suggests that the DIEPSS can be used to operationally define the presence or absence, and make the clinical diagnosis, of specific EPS syndromes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prevalence; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia

This double-blind, randomized, multicenter study investigated the use of divalproex with an antipsychotic agent in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Patients (n = 249) who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine monotherapy, risperidone monotherapy, divalproex plus olanzapine, or divalproex plus risperidone for 28 days. Divalproex was initiated at 15 mg/kg/day and titrated over 12 days to a maximum dosage of 30 mg/kg/day. Olanzapine and risperidone, were, respectively, initiated at 5 and 2 mg/day and were titrated over the first 6 days to respective target fixed daily dosages of 15 and 6 mg/day. Improvements from baseline were observed at all evaluation points throughout the 28-day treatment period in the two combination therapy and the two antipsychotic monotherapy groups, with statistically significant treatment differences favoring combination therapy as soon as day 3 for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) total score, as well as PANSS and BPRSd subscales. These findings were confirmed in post hoc repeated-measures analyses of variance in which treatment differences favoring combination therapy were observed for PANSS total (p = 0.020) and PANSS positive scale scores (p = 0.002). Both combination therapy and antipsychotic monotherapy were well tolerated. Treatment with divalproex in combination with an atypical antipsychotic agent resulted in earlier improvements in a range of psychotic symptoms among acutely hospitalized patients with schizophrenia. Further evaluation is warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Valproic Acid

Approximately 50% of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder attempt suicide, and approximately 10% die of suicide. Study results suggest that clozapine therapy significantly reduces suicidal behavior in these patients.. A multicenter, randomized, international, 2-year study comparing the risk for suicidal behavior in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine was conducted in 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 26.8% of whom were refractory to previous treatment, who were considered at high risk for suicide because of previous suicide attempts or current suicidal ideation. To equalize clinical contact across treatments, all patients were seen weekly for 6 months and then biweekly for 18 months. Subsequent to randomization, unmasked clinicians at each site could make any interventions necessary to prevent the occurrence of suicide attempts. Suicidal behavior was assessed at each visit. Primary end points included suicide attempts (including those that led to death), hospitalizations to prevent suicide, and a rating of "much worsening of suicidality" from baseline. Masked raters, including an independent suicide monitoring board, determined when end point criteria were achieved.. Suicidal behavior was significantly less in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; P =.03). Fewer clozapine-treated patients attempted suicide (34 vs 55; P =.03), required hospitalizations (82 vs 107; P =.05) or rescue interventions (118 vs 155; P =.01) to prevent suicide, or required concomitant treatment with antidepressants (221 vs 258; P =.01) or anxiolytics or soporifics (301 vs 331; P =.03). Overall, few of these high-risk patients died of suicide during the study (5 clozapine vs 3 olanzapine-treated patients; P =.73).. Clozapine therapy demonstrated superiority to olanzapine therapy in preventing suicide attempts in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder at high risk for suicide. Use of clozapine in this population should lead to a significant reduction in suicidal behavior.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Dropouts; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Suicide; Suicide Prevention; Suicide, Attempted; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that has efficacy in adults with psychotic disorders. This preliminary study examined the effectiveness of olanzapine in adolescents with schizophrenia or its related conditions.. Adolescents aged 12-17 years (inclusive) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or schizophreniform disorder were enrolled in this 8-week, open-label, outpatient study. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were administered as outcome measures. Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed at each visit. Olanzapine was initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg/day and could be increased to a maximum total daily dose of 20 mg.. Sixteen participants with a mean age of 13.8 (SD = 1.5) years were treated. Significant improvements were found in the PANSS, CGI severity, and CGAS scores. Reductions in both positive and negative symptoms were found. Increased appetite and sedation were the most frequently reported side effects. Two subjects required treatment for extrapyramidal side effects.. Psychotic symptoms significantly improved during study. Overall, olanzapine was well tolerated. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings, to assess long-term treatment outcomes, and to compare the effectiveness of olanzapine with that of other antipsychotics.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia

Reduced auditory P300 amplitude generally has been considered to be a trait marker of schizophrenia, independent of antipsychotic treatment and clinical symptoms. However, several seemingly well-conducted studies have found P300 amplitude to be a state marker correlated with clinical symptoms. Recent research on atypical antipsychotics indicate that these medications may alter P300 amplitude as well as having beneficial clinical effects. The objective of the present study was to further elucidate the effects of schizophrenia, symptom severity, and medication status on the P300. The baseline auditory P300 was assessed in unmedicated schizophrenic patients who then were treated with olanzapine for 6 weeks and reassessed. Healthy control subjects were assessed at baseline and again at 6 weeks. Compared to healthy controls, the unmedicated patients' P300s were attenuated and delayed prior to treatment. Subsequent antipsychotic treatment increased the patients' P300 amplitudes without affecting latency. Frontal P300 amplitude was normalized, but parietal P300 amplitude remained below that of healthy controls. Although olanzapine was effective in reducing the patients' symptoms, there were no correlations between symptoms and P300 amplitude or latency either before or after treatment. The results of the present study lend support to the view that P300 amplitude behaves as a trait marker. No evidence is found of a P300 clinical state marker.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Reaction Time; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index

The association of hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia with use of atypical antipsychotics has been documented in case reports and uncontrolled studies. The authors' goal was to assess the effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on glucose and cholesterol levels in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder during a randomized double-blind 14-week trial.. One hundred fifty-seven patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were inpatients at four hospitals were originally included in the study. The 14-week trial consisted of an 8-week fixed-dose period and a 6-week variable-dose period. Planned assessments included fasting glucose and cholesterol, which were collected at baseline and at the end of the 8-week period and the following 6-week period.. One hundred eight of the 157 patients provided blood samples at baseline and at least at one point after random assignment to clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol during the treatment trial. Seven of these patients had diabetes; their glucose levels were >125 mg/dl at baseline. Data from 101 patients were used for statistical analyses. During the initial 8-week period there was an overall significant increase in mean glucose levels. There were significant increases in glucose levels at the end of the 8-week fixed-dose period for patients given clozapine (N=27) and those given haloperidol (N=25). The olanzapine group showed a significant increase of glucose levels at the end of the 6-week variable-dose period (N=22). Fourteen of the 101 patients developed abnormal glucose levels (>125 mg/dl) during the trial (six with clozapine, four with olanzapine, three with risperidone, and one with haloperidol). Cholesterol levels were increased at the end of the 8-week fixed-dose period for the patients given clozapine (N=27) and those given olanzapine (N=26); cholesterol levels were also increased at the end of the 6-week variable-dose period for patients given olanzapine (N=22).. In this prospective randomized trial, clozapine, olanzapine, and haloperidol were associated with an increase of plasma glucose level, and clozapine and olanzapine were associated with an increase in cholesterol levels. The mean changes in glucose and cholesterol levels remained within clinically normal ranges, but approximately 14% of the patients developed abnormally high glucose levels during the course of their participation in the study.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haloperidol; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperglycemia; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Since increased norepinephrine availability may account for the weight-reducing effect of appetite suppressants, the authors hypothesized that the addition of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine may prevent or attenuate olanzapine-induced weight gain.. Twenty-six patients hospitalized for first-episode DSM-IV schizophrenic disorder participated in the study. In addition to 6 weeks of treatment with olanzapine, 10 mg/day, patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind design to receive either reboxetine, 4 mg/day, (N=13) or placebo (N=13).. Ten patients in each group completed the 6-week trial. Patients given olanzapine and reboxetine demonstrated a significantly lower increase in body weight (mean=2.5 kg, SD=2.7) than those given olanzapine and placebo (mean=5.5 kg, SD=3.1). Significantly fewer patients in the olanzapine/reboxetine group (N=2 of 10) than in the olanzapine/placebo group (N=7 of 10) gained at least 7% of their initial weight, the cutoff for clinically significant weight gain. The addition of reboxetine to olanzapine treatment was safe and well tolerated by the patients. A between-group difference in the reduction of Hamilton depression scale scores was seen that favored the olanzapine/reboxetine group (mean difference=-3.1, SD=1.25).. The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine may reduce olanzapine-induced weight gain in schizophrenia patients, and activation of the adrenergic system may attenuate weight gain induced by atypical antipsychotic agents.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reboxetine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The authors tested the hypothesis that a dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy level between 60% and 70% in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia would result in optimal subjective experience. In addition, they sought preliminary evidence on whether subjective experience is better with low-dose olanzapine than with low-dose haloperidol.. Subjects (N=24) who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, or haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Subjective experience, psychopathology, and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at endpoint. After 6 weeks, D(2) receptor occupancy was assessed with [(123)I]iodobenzamide single photon emission computed tomography.. The two study groups were similar at baseline. After 6 weeks, patients receiving olanzapine had a significantly lower mean dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy (51.0%, range=36%-67%) than those given haloperidol (65.5%, range=45%-75%). Receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% was associated with optimal subjective experience, and subjective experience improved significantly in the haloperidol group.. A level of D(2) receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for subjective experience of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. Substantial interindividual variation in D(2) receptor occupancy was seen at fixed low-dose levels of olanzapine and haloperidol. Olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, showed no superior subjective response over haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Olanzapine may need to be dosed higher than 7.5 mg/day for most patients with recent-onset schizophrenia, and haloperidol needs to be individually titrated in the very low dose range to reach optimal occupancy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Corpus Striatum; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Iodobenzenes; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Treatment Outcome

The effects of risperidone and olanzapine on cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia were compared in a randomized, double-blind trial.. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive 2-6 mg/day of risperidone or 5-20 mg/day of olanzapine for 8 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed with a focused cognitive assessment battery; in addition, extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed using the extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS), and the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) was rated for all patients.. Treatment with these two atypical antipsychotic medications was associated with improved performance on the Wisconsin card sorting test, the trail-making test, the California verbal learning test, the continuous performance test, and some aspects of verbal fluency and spatial working memory. No differences in the effects of the drugs on any of the cognitive tests were noted. Correcting for the effects of anticholinergic treatment did not alter the magnitude of cognitive effects.. Atypical antipsychotic treatment is associated with wide-ranging benefits on cognitive functioning. Previous reports of greater benefits of olanzapine over risperidone in a small-sample pilot study were not substantiated. These results are not due in general to changes in clinical symptoms or movement disorders, suggesting a direct effect of atypical antipsychotic medications on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arousal; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Performance; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Verbal Learning

Significant weight gain is a side effect associated with olanzapine treatment in some patients. We investigated the efficacy of high-dose fluoxetine as a weight-reducing agent for patients who develop early weight gain with olanzapine treatment. Patients that gained >/=3% of their baseline weight in the initial 8 weeks of olanzapine treatment (n=31) were randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo or fluoxetine (60 mg/day). Clinical, weight, and weight-related measures were assessed. Fluoxetine failed to demonstrate weight-reducing effects (fluoxetine group: baseline mean 80.5 kg, SD=19.1, last mean=83.5 kg, SD=19.8; placebo group: baseline mean=77.1 kg, SD=12.1, last mean=78.8 kg, SD=10.6; F=1.3; df=1, 18; p=0.3). There were no differential effects in psychopathology, extrapyramidal side effects or weight-related measures between the placebo and fluoxetine groups. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors are probably not a practical option to counteract weight gain induced by atypical antipsychotics. Atypical-induced weight gain may result from mechanisms other than 5HT reuptake blockade.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoxetine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) often receive depot antipsychotic medications to assure longer administration and better compliance with their treatment regimen. This study evaluated whether patients stabilized on depot antipsychotic medication could be successfully transitioned to oral olanzapine.. In a 3-month open-label study, 26 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia taking depot antipsychotics for over 3 years were randomly assigned to continue on their current depot dose or to switch to oral olanzapine. Clinical ratings (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS], Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] scale, and Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] scale) and side effect parameters (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale [AIMS], Barnes Akathisia Scale, AMDP-5 scale, vital signs, and weight) were obtained monthly.. Oral olanzapine patients (N = 13) demonstrated significant clinical improvement over the depot control group (N = 13) from baseline to 3-month endpoint (PANSS total, p =.012; PANSS general, p =.068; PANSS negative, p =.098; CGI-Improvement, p =.007; CGI-Severity, p =.026; GAF, p =.015). Side effect rating scales showed no statistical differences between the 2 groups (AIMS, Barnes Akathisia Scale, AMDP-5, vital signs). The depot control group showed no statistical superiority in any measure except weight change (p =.0005). After 3 months, all olanzapine patients preferred olanzapine to their previous depot medications and chose to continue on olanzapine treatment.. Clinicians may expect clinical improvement when switching chronically psychotic patients from traditional depot antipsychotic drugs to oral olanzapine. Switching may be completed within a 4-week period with relative compliance being maintained and patients preferring oral olanzapine to their previous depot medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to investigate patterns of the P600 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited during a working memory test in 16 male schizophrenic patients experiencing auditory hallucinations before and after treatment with clozapine and olanzapine, and 13 male normal subjects matched for age and educational level. Before treatment, patients showed significantly reduced P600 amplitudes on the right parietal region compared with controls, and when in remission also showed significantly reduced P600 amplitudes located on the right parietal and temporofrontal areas, compared both to themselves before treatment and to normal controls. The patient's memory performance before and after treatment remained significantly lower than that of healthy controls. These findings may indicate that auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia are associated with impaired synchronization of the processes related to target detection, as reflected by the P600. The present study also casts doubts regarding the cognitive sparing effect of atypical antipsychotics, despite the fact that they mediate symptom improvement.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Hallucinations; Humans; Male; Memory; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reference Values; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

This study investigated whether the smokinginducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and the polymorphic CYP2D6 play significant roles in the metabolism of olanzapine and its clinical effects at steady-state treatment. Caffeine and debrisoquine were used as measures of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, respectively. After drug therapy for 15 days, the effect of olanzapine on the activities of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 was also examined. Seventeen psychiatric patients (9 men and 8 women) were orally administered olanzapine, at a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) dosage of 10 mg/d for all smokers (n = 8) and 7.5 +/- 2.5 mg/d (range, 5-10 mg) for nonsmokers (n = 9;p <0.01). The plasma concentration-to-dose (C:D) ratio was closely correlated to the CYP1A2 activity ( s = -0.89;p <0.0001). The mean urinary caffeine indexes of nonsmokers and smokers were 17 +/- 8 and 101 +/- 44, respectively, indicating that smoking had induced a sixfold higher CYP1A2 activity (p <0.0001). Likewise, the olanzapine plasma C:D ratio (ng.mL.mg) was about fivefold lower in smokers (7.9 +/- 2.6) than in nonsmokers (1.56 +/- 1.1;p <0.0001). On day 15 of the antipsychotic therapy, the percentage decrease in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score relative to the predosing score (in the drug-free period) was higher for nonsmokers than for smokers (30.4 +/- 10% vs. 12.5 +/- 14%;p <0.01). Six nonsmokers and three smokers experienced side effects with olanzapine. After 15 days of drug treatment, olanzapine had caused significant (p <0.0001) and substantial CYP1A2 inhibition (by 50%) in comparison with predosing values, and such inhibition can contribute to adverse drug interactions. In conclusion, smoking-induced increased CYP1A2 activity significantly diminished plasma olanzapine concentrations and the antipsychotic effect of the drug. The performance of a simple caffeine test may assist in individualization of the olanzapine dosage.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Caffeine; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Smoking; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

The first double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of an atypical neuroleptic medication is being conducted in symptomatic treatment-seeking patients meeting new diagnostic criteria for a putative prodromal syndrome. This identifies them as being at high risk for developing psychosis in the near future. The study aims include prevention of psychosis onset and disability, as well as palliation of ongoing symptomatology. The purpose of this report is to describe the study's "prodromally symptomatic" sample at baseline, i.e., at intake immediately prior to randomization and prior to receiving study medication. Sixty treatment-seeking patients meeting prodromal inclusion criteria were recruited across four sites: New Haven, CT (n=39), Toronto, Ontario (n=9), Calgary, Alberta (n=6), and Chapel Hill, NC (n=6). The sample was young (median age 16), largely male (65%), and came from families with high titers of serious mental illness (44%). Most patients (93%) met criteria for the Attenuated Positive Symptom (APS) prodromal syndrome and presented with significant but nonpsychotic suspiciousness, perceptual aberrations, unusual thought content, and conceptual disorganization. They presented with minimal to mild affective symptoms and substance use/abuse, but they were quite functionally compromised (mean Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score=42). The prodromal sample was compared with other clinical-trial samples of adolescent depression, adolescent mania, and first episode schizophrenia. Prodromal patients proved not to be depressed or manic. They were less severely ill than untreated first episode schizophrenia but more severely ill than treated first episode schizophrenia. While not psychotically disabled, these patients nevertheless present with a clinical syndrome. Subsequent reports will detail the effects of drug versus placebo on prodromal symptoms, neuropsychological profile, and the rate of conversion to psychosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Comorbidity; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Disorders; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sleep Wake Disorders; Speech Disorders

The first double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of an atypical neuroleptic medication is being conducted in symptomatic treatment-seeking patients meeting new diagnostic criteria for a putative prodromal syndrome. This identifies them as being at high risk for developing psychosis in the near future. The study aims include prevention of psychosis onset and disability, as well as palliation of ongoing symptomatology. This report presents the study rationale and design. Recent studies will be reviewed that have advanced our knowledge about the early course of schizophrenia and our ability to predict onset prospectively, advances that have rendered prodromal intervention research feasible and ethical. The study design has many novel features. It tests for prevention versus delay in psychosis onset, as well as for efficacy and safety in a newly defined clinical population. This has required the development of innovative clinical research assessment instruments and a new operational definition of psychosis onset. The integration of these novel elements into an otherwise typical clinical trial design is detailed. The companion report will address sample recruitment and the clinical phenomenology at baseline of this putative "prodromal" entity.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Preventive Health Services; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia

Weight gain is associated with treatment with olanzapine and other psychotropic agents. Nizatidine, a histamine H-2 receptor antagonist, has been proposed to have weight-reducing effects. This double-blind trial evaluated the efficacy of nizatidine in limiting weight gain in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders who were treated with olanzapine for up to 16 weeks. After an initial screening period, 175 patients were randomized to receive olanzapine (5-20 mg) with either placebo or nizatidine (150 mg b.i.d. or 300 mg b.i.d.). Significantly less weight gain was observed on average at weeks 3 and 4 with olanzapine+nizatidine 300 mg b.i.d. (P<0.05) compared to olanzapine+placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant at 16 weeks. Nizatidine was well-tolerated and did not adversely affect clinical outcomes. Nizatidine 300 mg b.i.d. may have an early transient effect in limiting the weight gain, but this potential early effect appeared to be diminished or eliminated by 16 weeks.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nizatidine; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

The role of simple reaction time in schizophrenia has been extensively reported to date in professional literature. However, most studies have examined basic reaction time under static conditions using a single measurement. The aim of the present study was to establish whether any changes occur in simple reaction time during treatment with risperidone or olanzapine in in-patients suffering a relapse of schizophrenia.. Seventeen in-patients suffering acute relapse of schizophrenia (DSM IV criteria) and twenty matched, healthy controls participated in an eight-week, double-blind pilot study. The patients were treated with conventional antipsychotics for seven days after admission and were then randomised to the treatment arms with risperidone (4 mg/day) or with olanzapine (10 mg/day) at a fixed dosage in the first week and thereafter in flexible dosages for the remaining seven weeks. Since no differences were found between reaction times of patients treated with risperidone or olanzapine, the two treatment groups were merged in the statistical analysis before being compared with the normal controls. Psychopathological symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and extrapyramidal symptoms with the Simpson Angus Scale and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. Reaction time was measured with the Alpha apparatus, connected to a personal computer. All assessments and measurements were conducted four times during the treatment phase of the study.. The reaction time of patients was significantly longer than that of the healthy controls (t1 = 17.11; p1 < 0.05). After eight weeks of treatment the reaction time of patients significantly improved but did not reach that of the healthy controls (t4 = 28.18, p4 < 0.05). Furthermore, the improved reaction time in the patients did not correlate with improvement of psychopathological symptoms or with improved extrapyramidal symptoms.. The results of the study suggest that simple reaction time can improve during treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Neurologic Examination; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reaction Time; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Slovenia

Dopamine D(2) blocking typical antipsychotic drugs are known to change the cerebral perfusion patterns of schizophrenic patients, especially in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. In recent years atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine, which have high serotonin 5-HT(2A)/dopamine D(2) occupation ratios, have been shown to be more effective in the treatment of schizophrenia symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine in a within-subject design. Twenty-four patients with schizophrenia participated as subjects in the study. Each subject was scanned in a medication-free state and after 6 weeks of 10 mg/day fixed dose olanzapine treatment. Despite the clinical improvement seen in the patients, repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that olanzapine produced no significant changes in cortical rCBF after the six-week treatment. This finding indicates that unlike typical antipsychotics olanzapine has no negative effect on cortical cerebral perfusion patterns of schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Radiopharmaceuticals; Regional Blood Flow; Schizophrenia; Technetium Tc 99m Exametazime; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Treatment Outcome

To assess the safety and effectiveness of olanzapine compared to typical antipsychotics in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenics in acute psychiatric inpatient wards.. Data were collected from a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized, open, observational study of 904 inpatients with schizophrenia. One hundred and fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for first-episode schizophrenia, defined as (1) the International Classification of Diseases: Mental and Behavioral Disorders, 10th ed. (ICD-10) diagnosis of schizophrenia, (2) antipsychotic nai;ve, and (3) a course of illness of less than 5 years. Eighty-nine (56.3%) of these patients were assigned to the olanzapine treatment group (OLZ) and 69 (43.7%) to the control group that received treatment with conventional antipsychotics (CON). Safety was evaluated in terms of the spontaneous adverse events reported and a specific questionnaire for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Clinical status was measured by means of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Clinical response was defined as the baseline-endpoint decrease in BPRS>40% plus an endpoint BPRS<18 or an endpoint CGI

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia

To evaluate and compare the drug response and side effects of adolescents with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol.. Forty-three patients were treated with olanzapine (n = 19), risperidone (n = 17) and haloperidol (n = 7) for 8 weeks in an open clinical trial. Clinical improvement was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and side effects with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale.. Significant clinical improvement was observed by week 4 for all medications. Olanzapine and haloperidol induced fatigability more frequently than risperidone. Haloperidol was associated with a higher frequency of depression and more severe extrapyramidal symptoms.. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study in adolescents to compare the efficacy and side effects of three most commonly prescribed antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol appear to be equally effective for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescent inpatients but have different side effect profiles.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Depression; Dopamine Antagonists; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Fatigue; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Treatment Outcome

Improved drug therapy for schizophrenia may represent the best strategy for reducing the costs of schizophrenia and the recurrent chronic course of the disease. Olanzapine and risperidone are atypical antipsychotic agents developed to meet this need. We report a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, 30-week study designed to compare the efficacy, safety, and associated resource use for olanzapine and risperidone in Australia and New Zealand. The study sample consisted of 65 patients who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder. Olanzapine-treated patients showed a significantly greater reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, and PANSS General Psychopathology scores at endpoint compared to the risperidone-treated patients. Response rates through 30 weeks showed a significantly greater proportion of olanzapine-treated patients had achieved a 20% or greater improvement in their PANSS total score compared to risperidone-treated patients. Olanzapine and risperidone were equivalent in their improvement of PANSS positive and negative scores and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) at endpoint. Using generic and disease-specific measures of quality of life, olanzapine-treated patients showed significant within-group improvement in most measures, and significant differences were observed in favor of olanzapine over risperidone in Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Intrapsychic Foundation and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item instrument (SF-36) Role Functioning Limitations-Emotional subscale scores. Despite the relatively small sample size, our study suggests that olanzapine has a superior risk:benefit profile compared to risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Australia; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; National Health Programs; New Zealand; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Many outpatients with schizophrenia experience persistent symptoms or side effects on their current antipsychotic regimen. Few studies have prospectively examined the effects of the prior medication or switching method on the safety and efficacy of a newly available antipsychotic. Efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone were evaluated in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were switched from conventional or atypical antipsychotics in three 6-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trials.. Stable outpatients with persistent symptoms or troublesome side effects on (1) conventional antipsychotic (N = 108), (2) olanzapine (N = 104), or (3) risperidone (N = 58) therapy were switched to an open-label, 6-week, flexible-dose trial of ziprasidone (40-160 mg/day). Patients were randomly assigned at baseline to 1 of 3 switching schedules during the first week of ziprasidone therapy. Baseline and outcome assessments included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) ratings.. All 3 switching strategies were well tolerated for all 3 patient groups. After 6 weeks on ziprasidone therapy, significant (p <.05) improvements were observed on all major symptom measures and almost all subscales for all switched subgroups.. Switching stable but symptomatic outpatients from their previous antipsychotic to ziprasidone was generally well tolerated and was associated with symptom improvements 6 weeks later. Improvements occurred in patients recently on other first-line atypical antipsychotic, as well as in those on conventional antipsychotic, treatment. While limitations of switching study designs do not permit interpretation of comparative efficacy, these studies suggest that outpatients who partially respond to conventional antipsychotics, risperidone, or olanzapine may experience improved control of psychotic symptoms following a switch to ziprasidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Atypical antipsychotics are commonly used in the management of schizophrenia in late life with evidence suggesting they induce lower rates of motor disturbance, but have similar efficacy to conventional antipsychotics. Trials in the elderly have been either retrospective, small, of short duration or of a single-arm design.. To demonstrate the effects upon motor side-effects, efficacy, safety and quality of life (QOL) of switching elderly patients with schizophrenia from conventional antipsychotics to olanzapine or risperidone.. Elderly patients with schizophrenia were randomly allocated to olanzapine or risperidone and followed through an open-label crossover period. Between and within group intention to treat analyses were conducted.. 66 patients were randomised (mean age 69.6 [SD +/- 6.2]). Four (11.8%) patients on olanzapine and 8 (26.7%) patients on risperidone failed to complete the crossover because of treatment failure [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.73[0.73-10.2] p = 0.14]. The mean doses upon completion of switching in each arm were 9.9 mg (SD = 4.2) and 1.7 mg (SD = 1.2) for olanzapine and risperidone respectively. In both arms there was improvement in Parkinsonism, though only olanzapine was associated with a reduction in dyskinetic symptoms. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Scale for the assessment of Negative Symptoms and Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores all improved through the crossover period in both arms with no between group differences. Treatment with olanzapine was associated with a better response over risperidone on the psychological domain of the World Health Organisation-Quality Of Life [Brief] (WHO-QOL-BREF) scale ( p = 0.02). Patients in the olanzapine arm also demonstrated improvement from baseline in the WHO-QOL-BREF physical, psychological and health satisfaction domains, but risperidone had no effect on any Quality of Life (QOL) measure.. After switching from a conventional antipsychotic, olanzapine and risperidone were associated with improvement in core symptoms of schizophrenia and motor side effects. Subjects switched to olanzapine were more likely to complete the switching process and show an improvement in psychological QOL.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Disorders; Quality of Life; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

This study evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and quality of life (Qol) offered by olanzapine in first-episode schizophrenia.. One hundred and eighty-two patients with first-episode schizophrenia (ICD-10) drawn from a larger, naturalistic, study were evaluated after 6 months of treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, or conventional antipsychotics (CA). Clinical status was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Global Assessment of Function (GAF). AWAD and EuroQol scales were used to evaluate patients' attitude towards medication and Qol, respectively.. Subjects treated with olanzapine, risperidone, and CA showed similar improvements on CGI-S and GAF. Treatment-emergent, extrapyramidal symptoms were significantly lower in olanzapine-treated patients (17.8%) than in the risperidone (46.4%) and CA (62.2%) groups. Compared to CA, olanzapine and risperidone showed significantly greater improvement on the visual analog scale of EuroQol. Olanzapine-treated patients also showed significantly improved AWAD scores.. In first-episode schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotics were effective, and improved Qol. Olanzapine had a lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and better subjective acceptance of medication.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Distinct calming rather than nonspecific sedation is desirable for the treatment of acute agitation. In 3 double-blind studies, acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia (N = 311), bipolar mania (N = 201), or dementia (N = 206) were treated with intramuscular (1-3 injections/24 hrs) olanzapine (2.5-10.0 mg), haloperidol (7.5 mg), lorazepam (2.0 mg), or placebo. The Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES; Eli Lilly and Co.) and treatment-emergent adverse events assessed sedation. Across all studies, 1 patient (lorazepam-treated, bipolar) became unarousable. There were no significant between-group differences in ACES scores of deep sleep or unarousable at any time across. Excluding asleep patients, agitation remained significantly more reduced with olanzapine than placebo (P <.05). The incidences of adverse events indicative of sedation were not significantly different with olanzapine versus comparators. For the treatment of acute agitation associated with schizophrenia, bipolar mania, or dementia, intramuscular olanzapine-treated patients experienced no more sedation than haloperidol- or lorazepam-treated patients and experienced distinct calming rather than nonspecific sedation.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Dementia; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Injections, Intramuscular; Lorazepam; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychomotor Agitation; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

First generation antipsychotics induce extrapyramidal motor symptoms (EPS), presumably through dopamine D(2) receptor blockade at the dorsal striatum. This may also produce impairment of cognitive processes, such as procedural learning, that are dependent on this region. Haloperidol and, to a lesser extent, risperidone, are active in the dorsal striatum and may induce EPS and impairment of procedural learning. In contrast, the prototypical second-generation antipsychotic, clozapine, is less active in the dorsal striatum and does not induce EPS or impair procedural learning. Olanzapine is pharmacologically similar to clozapine and has a low incidence of EPS induction.. To assess the hypothesis that olanzapine would not have a deleterious effect on procedural learning.. Thirty-nine subjects with early phase schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double blind treatment with haloperidol, risperidone, or olanzapine. They were administered the Tower of Toronto test at an unmedicated baseline and again following 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment.. Procedural learning, defined as the improvement observed between two blocks of five trials of the Tower of Toronto, was preserved after 6 weeks of all three treatments but showed a substantial decline after 6 months of treatment with haloperidol or risperidone.. These data are consistent with the differential activity of the three medications in dorsal striatum structures and suggest that the advantages of olanzapine over haloperidol and risperidone in relation to extrapyramidal syndromes may also generalize to procedural learning. The results also suggest that the procedural learning disadvantages of haloperidol and risperidone accrue slowly but are apparent after 6 months of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Learning; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

Schizophrenia patients are known to manifest widespread, multifaceted cognitive deficits. There is now an increasing emphasis on the critical importance of cognitive deficits for the functional outcome in schizophrenia. Typical antipsychotics, although effective in reducing positive symptoms of the illness, have not shown much effect on cognitive functions. Atypical antipsychotics have shown promise of improving some cognitive functions.. This naturalistic study aimed to determine whether olanzapine and clozapine improve cognitive functioning in a sample of 48 patients with chronic schizophrenia who had either failed to show sufficient clinical improvements or suffered from distressing side effects with conventional antipsychotics and were switched to either olanzapine or clozapine for clinical reasons and, if so, whether the two drugs produce similar or different cognitive effects.. All patients completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests designed to index executive functioning, verbal learning, verbal and visual and memory, attention, working memory, and psychomotor speed at: (i) baseline, (ii) after 6 weeks and (iii) after 6 months of treatment with olanzapine or clozapine.. From the initial 48 patients who remained on olanzapine ( n=16) or clozapine ( n=14) for the entire duration with continuous participation, 30 provided data for this study. There were improvements over time (i.e. from baseline through 6 weeks to 6 months) in both treatment groups on verbal fluency, verbal learning and verbal and visual memory measures.. The findings indicate similar beneficial effects of olanzapine and clozapine on verbal learning and memory measures in patients showing a favourable clinical response to these drugs.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cognition; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Problem Solving; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Prolongation of the QTc interval has been reported during treatment with oral antipsychotic agents and may be more pronounced during parenteral administration. Pooled QTc interval data from acutely agitated patients across four double-blind trials were compared. Databases included: placebo-controlled [two schizophrenia, one bipolar mania trials (n=565)]; haloperidol-controlled [two schizophrenia trials (n=482)]; geriatric placebo-controlled [1 dementia trial (n=204)]. Patients received 1-3 injections of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/injection), IM haloperidol (7.5 mg/injection), or IM placebo. At 2 and 24 h after IM olanzapine treatment, the mean QTc interval decreased approximately 3 ms from baseline in the placebo- and haloperidol-controlled databases. When there was a statistically significant difference between IM olanzapine and IM placebo, QTc intervals decreased during treatment with IM olanzapine and increased with IM placebo. The incidences of prolonged (endpoint >/=99th percentile of healthy adults or >/=500 ms) or lengthened (increase >/=60 ms) QTc intervals during treatment with IM olanzapine (<3% placebo- and haloperidol-controlled databases, <12% geriatric placebo-controlled database) were never significantly greater than with comparators. These data suggest that IM olanzapine has a favorable QTc interval profile in acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia, bipolar mania, or dementia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Dementia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Long QT Syndrome; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Agitation; Schizophrenia

Acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia who receive intramuscular (IM) medications typically are switched to oral (PO) antipsychotic maintenance therapy.. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus those of haloperidol during transition from IM to PO therapy. We used additional data from a previously reported trial to test the hypothesis that the reduction in agitation achieved by IM olanzapine 10 mg or IM haloperidol 7.5 mg would be maintained following transition to 4 days of PO olanzapine or PO haloperidol (5-20 mg/d for both). We also hypothesized that olanzapine would maintain its more favorable extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) safety profile.. This was a multinational (hospitals in 13 countries), double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Acutely agitated inpatients with schizophrenia were treated with 1 to 3 IM injections to olanzapine 10 mg or haloperidol 7.5 mg over 24 hours and were entered into a 4-day PO treatment period with the same medication (5-20 mg/d for both). The primary efficacy measurement was reduction in agitation, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) score. Adverse events and scores on EPS rating scales were assessed.. A total of 311 patients (204 men, 107 women; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [11.6] years) were enrolled (131, 126, and 54 patients in the olanzapine, haloperidol, and placebo groups, respectively). In all, 93.1% (122/131) of olanzapine-treated patients and 92.1% (116/126) of haloperidol-treated patients completed the IM period and entered the PO period; 85.5% (112/131) of olanzapine-treated patients and 84.1% (106/126) of haloperidol-treated patients completed the PO period. IM olanzapine and IM haloperidol effectively reduced agitation over 24 hours (mean [SD] PANSS-EC change, -7.1 [4.81 vs -6.7 [4.3], respectively). Reductions in agitation were sustained throughout the PO period with both study drugs (mean [SD] change from PO period baseline, -0.6 [4.8] vs -1.3 [4.4], respectively). During PO treatment, haloperidol-treated patients spontaneously reported significantly more acute dystonia than olanzapine-treated patients (4.3%[5/116] vs 0% [0/122], respectively; P = 0.026) and akathisia (5.2% [6/116] vs 0% [0/122], respectively; P = 0.013). Significantly more haloperidol-treated patients than olanzapine-treated patients met categorical criteria for treatment-emergent akathisia (18.5% [17/92] vs 6.5% [7/107], respectively; P = 0.015).. In the acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia in this study, both IM olanzapine 10 mg and IM haloperidol 7.5 mg effectively reduced agitation over 24 hours. This alleviation of agitation was sustained following transition from IM therapy to 4 days of PO treatment (5-20 mg/d for both). During the 4 days of PO treatment, olanzapine-treated patients did not spontaneously report any incidences of acute dystonia, and olanzapine had a superior EPS safety profile to that of haloperidol. The combination of IM and PO olanzapine may help improve the treatment of acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Few long-term studies have compared the efficacy and safety of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications directly in patients with a first episode of psychosis who met the criteria for schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder. This study compared the acute and long-term effectiveness of haloperidol with that of olanzapine in patients with first-episode psychosis in a large, controlled clinical trial.. Patients with first-episode psychosis (N=263) were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive haloperidol or olanzapine and were followed for up to 104 weeks. Domains measured included psychopathology, psychosocial variables, neurocognitive functioning, and brain morphology and metabolism. This report presents data from clinical measures of treatment response and safety data from the 12-week acute treatment phase.. Haloperidol and olanzapine were associated with substantial and comparable baseline-to-endpoint reductions in symptom severity, which did not differ significantly in last-observation-carried-forward analyses. However, in a mixed-model analysis, olanzapine-treated subjects had significantly greater decreases in symptom severity as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score and negative and general scales and by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale but not as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive scale and by the Clinical Global Impression severity rating. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced a lower rate of treatment-emergent parkinsonism and akathisia but had significantly more weight gain, compared with the haloperidol-treated patients. Overall, significantly more olanzapine-treated subjects than haloperidol-treated subjects completed the 12-week acute phase of the study (67% versus 54%).. As expected on the basis of previous studies, both olanzapine and haloperidol were effective in the acute reduction of psychopathological symptoms in this group of patients with first-episode psychosis. However, olanzapine had several relative advantages in therapeutic response. Although the nature of adverse events differed between the two agents, retention in the study was greater with olanzapine. Retention in treatment is important in this patient population, given their risk of relapse. Longer-term results are needed to determine whether treatment with atypical antipsychotics results in superior outcomes for a first episode of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The prodromal phase of schizophrenic disorders has been described prospectively. The present study aimed to determine the short-term efficacy and safety of olanzapine treatment of prodromal symptoms compared with placebo.. This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled trial with fixed-flexible dosing conducted at four sites. Sixty patients met prodromal diagnostic criteria, including attenuated psychotic symptoms, as determined by structured interviews. Olanzapine 5-15 mg daily or placebo was prescribed for 8 weeks.. In the mixed-effects, repeated-measures analysis, the treatment x time interaction for the change from baseline on the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms total score was statistically significant, and post hoc analyses revealed that the olanzapine-placebo difference reached p<.10 by week 6 and p<.05 at week 8. Ratings of extrapyramidal symptoms remained low in each group and were not significantly different. Olanzapine patients gained 9.9 lb versus.7 lb for placebo patients (p<.001).. This short-term analysis suggests olanzapine is associated with significantly greater symptomatic improvement but significantly greater weight gain than is placebo in prodromal patients. Extrapyramidal symptoms with olanzapine were minimal and similar to those with placebo. Future research over the longer term with more patients will be needed before recommendations can be made regarding routine treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Enhanced ability to reliably identify risk factors for suicidal behavior permits more focused decisions concerning treatment interventions and support services, with potential reduction in lives lost to suicide.. This study followed 980 patients at high risk for suicide in a multicenter prospective study for 2 years after randomization to clozapine or olanzapine. A priori predictors related to diagnosis, treatment resistance, and clinical constructs of disease symptoms were evaluated as possible predictors of subsequent suicide-related events.. Ten baseline univariate predictors were identified. Historical predictors were diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, history or current use at baseline of alcohol or substance abuse, cigarette smoking, number of lifetime suicide attempts, and the number of hospitalizations in the previous 36 months to prevent suicide. Predictive clinical features included greater baseline scores on the InterSePT scale for suicidal thinking, the Covi Anxiety Scale, the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS), and severity of Parkinsonism. Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed the number of hospitalizations in the previous 36 months, baseline CDS, severity of Parkinson's, history of substance abuse, and lifetime suicide attempts. Clozapine, in general, was more effective than olanzapine in decreasing the risk of suicidality, regardless of risk factors present.. This is the first prospective analysis of predictors of suicide risk in a large schizophrenic and schizoaffective population judged to be at high risk for suicide. Assessment of these risk factors may aid clinicians in evaluating risk for suicidal behaviors so that appropriate interventions can be made.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the objective and subjective efficacy as well as tolerability of olanzapine in acute treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders under naturalistic non-selective conditions. Inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, consecutively admitted over an 18-month period, treated with olanzapine, were included. Diagnoses were made according to ICD-10 criteria based on repeated clinical assessments. Efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine were assessed at baseline and at the end of inpatient acute treatment including Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression, subjective assessments, UKU and biological investigations. One hundred and twenty non-selected patients who met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia (73%), schizophreniform disorder (14%) or schizoaffective disorder (13%) were treated with olanzapine 15.3+/-5.2 mg/day. Baseline severity (PANSS total mean score 102.2) was higher compared to various admittance studies (PANSS total mean score 86-90). In 32% of patients (n=38), olanzapine treatment was discontinued, mainly because of inefficacy for positive (89%, n=34) and/or negative (95%, n=36) symptoms and/or because of adverse events (37%, n=14). Response rates as improvement in PANSS total score (after > or =3 weeks of treatment) of > or =20%, 30% or 40% were 68%, 55% and 35%, respectively. Response rates in post-hoc defined treatment resistant patients were not significantly different from non-refractory patients. Sedation (26%) was the most common side-effect, followed by weight gain (22%). With regards to subjective efficacy, 30% of the patients were not satisfied with the efficacy of olanzapine, while only 6% of the patients reported a not satisfying subjective tolerability. According to duration of olanzapine treatment, the results for patients, who remained in hospital, revealed a faster increase of weight compared to admittance studies (7 kg in 14 weeks versus 7 kg in 38 weeks). Olanzapine has been found to be effective and tolerable, also under naturalistic acute treatment conditions. Compared to previous double-blind admittance studies, patients had a higher severity of illness at entry and a lower > or =40% PANSS total score response rate. By contrast to previous results, mean dose of olanzapine was similar for multiple- and first-episode patients, and weight gain was more severe. The results underline the need of Phase IV studies for the assessment of clinical antipsy

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Satisfaction; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Serial verbal learning task (explicit long-term memory) and verbal fluency (generation of a response) are tests that are usually severely impaired in schizophrenia. Despite the growing literature supporting the clinical efficacy of olanzapine, psychiatrists still question its cognitive consequences. This study assessed the efficacy of olanzapine on neurocognitive functioning. Patients (N = 134) meeting diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorders began an 8-week, open-label olanzapine treatment at a dose of 5 mg/d, which was increased to 10 mg/d after 1 week. Daily dosage was subsequently adjusted between 5 and 20 mg/d based on individual clinical status. All previous antipsychotics were tapered and discontinued during the first 2 weeks of the study. Neuropsychologic assessments were carried out at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. Explicit long-term memory was assessed with the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test: the average immediate recall score significantly improved (P < 0.001), as did the delayed recall score (P < 0.001). The average total score on category fluency improved from 34.6 words at baseline to 37.6 words at end point (P < 0.0001). Time on both Trail A and B making tasks significantly decreased (P < 0.0001). Lack of a control arm makes it impossible to exclude a practice effect as an explanation for the enhanced cognitive performance, although the Word List Recall test represents one of the better resources to avoid a practice effect. After switching to olanzapine, there was a statistically significant improvement of cognitive function in the 3 main domains tested and no significant worsening of any memory or executive function measure.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Canada; Cognition; Female; Humans; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Performance; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Verbal Learning; Word Association Tests

A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effect of nizatidine on olanzapine-associated weight gain (OAWG) in ten patients with schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder in Korea. Psychometric ratings with positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) were measured at baseline, week 4 and week 8; as were weight and body mass index (BMI). A combination of nizatidine for 8 weeks resulted in significant reversal of weight gain without worsening the psychopathology (weight: 3.5% and BMI: 3.7%). In line with studies of Western populations, an add-on therapy of nizatidine could be an effective option for the control of weight gain in olanzapine-treated patients in Korea. Our findings call for further evaluation of the effect of this drug on OAWG, with randomized placebo-controlled studies, in Asian populations.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Nizatidine; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

It has been reported that nizatidine may reduce the weight gain in schizophrenic patients receiving olanzapine treatment. Previous studies have demonstrated a relation between olanzapine-induced weight gain and serum leptin levels. Therefore, in the present study, it was planned to investigate the efficacy of nizatidine on the treatment of olanzapine-induced weight gain, and if available, whether leptin levels were associated with reductions in weight gain. Of the patients with schizophrenia on olanzapine treatment, 59 who gave informed consent entered a 3 month open-label screening period. Of them, 35 patients (59%) showed weight gain in excess of 2.5 kg. These patients were randomly divided into two groups; olanzapine plus nizatidine (group I) and olanzapine plus placebo (group II) for an 8-week double-blind phase. The patients were evaluated at the baseline and at week 8 with respect to the positive and negative syndrome scale, body mass index, weight and serum leptin levels. In the open-label period, olanzapine led to a considerable marked increase in weight and in serum leptin levels. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to weight at the beginning of the 8-week double-blind treatment period. Throughout the 8 week double-blind period, in group I, the weight decreased by 4.5 +/- 2.2 kg ( p<0.05). In contrast, weight increased in group II by a mean of 2.3 +/- 0.9 kg ( p>0.05). The leptin levels decreased by 4.4 +/- 2.3 ng/ml in group I ( p<0.01), and increased by 1.8 +/- 0.6 ng/ml in group II ( p>0.05). These changes were accompanied by changes in the leptin levels in both groups I and II. It is concluded that leptin seems to be strongly associated with olanzapine-induced weight gain and that nizatidine treatment may reduce the weight gain and the correlated leptin levels in patients with schizophrenia on olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Leptin; Male; Nizatidine; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To examine the effects of risperidone and olanzapine on cognitive functioning in elderly patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. One hundred seventy-six elderly inpatients and outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were enrolled in this multicenter, double-blind trial. After their antipsychotic medications were tapered for 1 week, patients were randomly assigned to receive either risperidone 1 to 3 mg/day or olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. Performance on the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Serial Verbal Learning Test (SVLT), TMT (Trail Making Test) Parts A and B, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Verbal Fluency Examinations (VFE) was assessed at baseline and at end point.. Patients in the risperidone group had improved scores on at least one test of attention, memory, executive function, and verbal fluency, and those in the olanzapine group had improved scores on at least one test of attention and memory function. Scores on the TMT Part B, WCST total errors (executive function domain), and the VFE improved significantly from baseline in the risperidone group but not in the olanzapine group. No significant differences in change scores between the two groups were found. Higher baseline scores on each test predicted more improvement at endpoint.. Low doses of risperidone and olanzapine improve cognitive function in elderly patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Consistent with research in younger populations, these improvements occur in aspects of cognitive functioning related to functional outcome.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia has still not been clearly resolved. In addressing this issue, the current report presents an open-label, prospective, 13 week trial with olanzapine use in Chinese schizophrenic patients who were resistant to more than two different classes of antipsychotics during a minimal 4 week treatment period for each antipsychotic drug at adequate dosage. Fifty-one inpatients were recruited after a cross-titration period and given 10-25 mg of olanzapine daily, without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Brief Psychotic Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, the Simpson-Angus scale, and the Barnes Akathisia Scale. The olanzapine-treated patients showed significant improvement in both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia by the end of the study. Overall, 20 of 51 (39.2%) responded to 10-25 mg of olanzapine per day as measured by the BPRS and CGI scores. Five patients dropped out due to the worsening of their psychotic symptoms, two patients discontinued owing to poor drug compliance, and the remaining patient complained of a lack of efficacy. Extrapyramidal side-effects were mild, and anticholinergic medications required has decreased. The present open study suggests that olanzapine may be effective and well-tolerated in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Further double-blinded trials are needed to confirm this result.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Asian People; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Anxiety; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Weight gain is an important side effect of antipsychotic (AP) treatment. Weight is regulated by multiple systems, including leptin, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and gonadal steroids. The aim was to investigate whether AP-induced weight gain was related to leptin and NPY abnormalities and whether these were associated with a disruption of gonadal steroid production.. Twenty two female patients with schizophrenia receiving standard AP treatment were studied over a 3-month period. Plasma leptin, NPY, gonadal steroids and their regulators were measured along with weight and BMI.. Weight, leptin and testosterone levels increased over time. There were significant relationships between a change in oestrogen levels and both a change in NPY levels and a change in BMI. Change in BMI, weight and leptin all correlated strongly with a change in the testosterone/luteinizing hormone ratio.. AP treatment results in increase in weight over time and this increase is accompanied by increased leptin levels. AP-induced weight gain is also associated with disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Altered regulation of NPY, either through abnormal leptin control or serotonin blockade, is a possible explanation for the effects of AP medication on both weight and gonadal steroid levels.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Humans; Leptin; Middle Aged; Neuropeptide Y; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Radioimmunoassay; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Weight Gain

To assess the effect of an educational intervention on antipsychotic-induced weight gain among patients with schizophrenia.. Quasi-experimental. Seventy patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered this 6-month study condicted in the United States. All participants began receiving olanzapine treatment when they entered the study. The patients were then randomly assigned to an intervention group or a standard care group. Over the next 4-months, the intervention group participated in weekly psychoeducation classes focused on nutrition, exercise, and living a healthy lifestyle. Patients were followed for an additional 2 months to assess weight change.. A statistically significant difference in weight change between the two groups was observed post-treatment and at endpoint. At endpoint, the mean weight change of the intervention group was -.06 pounds, while the mean weight change in the standard care group was 9.57 pounds. In both groups, men gained significantly more weight than did women.. The results indicate that a structured educational intervention might have a positive effect on antipsychotic-induced weight gain among patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Nurse's Role; Nursing Evaluation Research; Nutritional Sciences; Obesity; Olanzapine; Patient Education as Topic; Pirenzepine; Program Evaluation; Schizophrenia; Self-Help Groups; Weight Gain

The 5-HT2A receptor promoter -1438G/A polymorphism, which is in complete linkage disequilibrium with the 5-HT2A 102T/C polymorphism, may be related to antipsychotic response. The aim of this paper is to determine relationships between the -1438G/A polymorphism and olanzapine negative symptom response. DNA from 41 subjects with schizophrenia (as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) was analyzed for the -1438G/A polymorphism. Olanzapine (7.5-20 mg/day) was given for 6 weeks and response was assessed using the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). A linear regression used a dependent variable of percent change in SANS. Independent variables included 5-HT2A polymorphisms and interactions. The -1438G/A polymorphism and percent change in SANS showed a significant trend (P=.0542). The A/A genotype group had a 45% reduction in SANS compared with 19% in the other groups. We conclude that the A/A genotype may be associated with olanzapine negative symptom response, seen as a 2-fold greater percent reduction in SANS, and may be clinically relevant.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Genotype; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

The symptom response and side-effects of olanzapine and risperidone were compared in patients with recent onset schizophrenia. Actively symptomatic patients (n=44) randomly received olanzapine 15 mg (median dose) or risperidone 4 mg (median dose). Symptom response and side-effects were measured during a 6-10-week treatment study. No major differences were observed between the two treatment groups. Symptoms improved significantly on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, positive subscale and general psychopathology subscale for both treatment groups. Using five symptom dimensions, both drugs were effective in treating positive symptoms and agitation/excitement symptoms, and neither olanzapine or risperidone influenced disorganization and depression symptoms. Results on the negative symptoms subscale and symptom dimension were inconclusive. No major differences were found in the frequency of the reported side-effects akathisia, parkinsonism and weight gain. These data indicate that the differences between olanzapine and risperidone in symptom response are small. In spite of the relatively low power of the study, we could exclude the presence of substantially different treatment effects between olanzapine and risperidone.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder would respond when switched to olanzapine and whether they could maintain their response on this atypical antipsychotic.. In this single-center, observational, 1-year open-label study, a cohort of patients was switched to olanzapine due to failure on previous treatment. The patients were followed up (retrospectively) for an additional 5 years. Patients had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and all but one were treatment-resistant. The starting dose was 10 mg/day, with dosage adjustments based on physician judgment.. The CGI-S and CGI-I scales were the primary outcome measures. During the observation period, positive and negative symptoms, hospital readmission rates and duration of hospitalization were measured, and treatment-emergent adverse events recorded.. Mean age of patients (n = 25) was 39.7 years; 19 were male, and all were Caucasian. The mean number of antipsychotics used prior to olanzapine was 4.6 with risperidone (76%) being the most common. The mean duration of olanzapine therapy was 8.6 months. The average number of hospital admissions per patient dropped from 1.32 during the year prior to olanzapine therapy to 0.39 after starting olanzapine. Total number of hospital days was 1042 the year before and 258 the year after olanzapine treatment. The mean CGI-S score improved from markedly ill at baseline to borderline/mildly ill at study end. The mean CGI-I score was rated much improved at study end. Few adverse events occurred during the study. Twelve patients remained on olanzapine monotherapy after 5 years of treatment (mean duration of 62 months).. Olanzapine may be a treatment option for patients who fail to respond to treatment with other antipsychotics. Importantly, this is one of the first reports showing that patients with schizophrenia can be maintained on atypical antipsychotic monotherapy for at least 5 years.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

New-generation antipsychotics have been proposed to normalize the P50 sensory gating index in patients with schizophrenia. In the context of a double-blind comparison of olanzapine and haloperidol, the authors examined the effect of olanzapine on P50 suppression.. P50 measurements were obtained at baseline while patients were being treated with fluphenazine and after 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with either olanzapine (N=12) or haloperidol (N=12).. There were no treatment group differences in P50 amplitude, latency, or sensory gating ratio.. These results suggest that there is not a significant differential effect of olanzapine and haloperidol on the P50 sensory gating index in schizophrenia.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Auditory Perception; Benzodiazepines; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Reflex, Startle; Schizophrenia

Minimum doses of haloperidol might show similar efficacy and side-effects compared to atypical antipsychotics. The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of minimum doses of haloperidol with standard doses of risperidone and olanzapine on a 6-month open trial in first psychotic episode patients and to examine the effect of compliance on their outcome. Forty-two patients were recruited and started on flexible doses of these drugs. Olanzapine was given with no cost to the patients. Efficacy and side-effects were monitored every 3 months using standardized assessments. Thirty patients completed the study. All treatment groups showed improvement in positive, negative and depressive symptoms. There were no differences in side-effects among them. The haloperidol group required higher doses of anticholinergics. The rate of treatment discontinuation was higher in the risperidone group due to the direct cost. Minimum doses of haloperidol might prove to be a good choice of treatment for patients with a first episode of psychosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Mexico; Neurologic Examination; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Increased serotonergic activity is discussed as an important pathogenetic factor in schizophrenia. Further support for this hypothesis is difficult to obtain due to the lack of valid indicators of the brain's serotonin system. A great deal of evidence discovered through human and animal studies suggests that a weak loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) indicates high serotonergic activity and vice versa. The LDAEP is a measure of auditory cortex activity, reflecting increase or decrease of auditory evoked potential amplitudes with increasing tone loudness, which is probably modulated by the serotonergic innervation there. This is true only for the LDAEP of the primary auditory cortex, since this region is more highly innervated by serotonergic fibers than the secondary auditory cortex. The LDAEP (N1/P2 component) of 25 inpatients with schizophrenia free of medication and 25 healthy controls matched by age and gender, were recorded. Using dipole source analysis, the LDAEP of primary (tangential dipole) and this of secondary auditory cortex (radial dipole) was separately analyzed. Following a 4-week treatment with the 5-HT(2) antagonists clozapine or olanzapine, patients were once again studied. The LDAEP of the primary, but not of the secondary auditory cortex, was significantly weaker in the patients with schizophrenia than in healthy volunteers, indicating enhanced serotonergic neurotransmission. After treatment with the 5-HT(2) antagonists, the LDAEP (of the right hemisphere) tended to be increased, indicating normalization of serotonergic function in the patients with schizophrenia. These results suggest that the loudness dependence of primary auditory cortex evoked activity is well suitable to assess serotonergic dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Auditory Cortex; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Female; Humans; Loudness Perception; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reference Values; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Antagonists; Synaptic Transmission

To compare the six-week clinical response and safety profile of schizophrenia patients, age > or =60 years, receiving olanzapine (OLZ) vs haloperidol (HAL) in a double blind, randomized trial.. Double-blind data on patients age > or =60 randomized to 5 mg/d OLZ (n=83) or 5 mg/d HAL (n=34) (Week 1) then flexibly dosed to 5-20 mg/d over six weeks, with a 48-week extension for responders, were analyzed post-hoc. Efficacy indices included the PANSS Total and PANSS Psychosis Core Total (PPCT). Safety measures included the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), treatment-emergent adverse events, and laboratory values. Mixed model, repeated measures (MMRM) analyses were applied to all continuous data measured at each visit. Continuous data recorded only at phase completion or termination were analyzed with a fixed effect last observation carried forward (LOCF) model. Frequencies of categorical response data were analyzed using Fisher's exact methods. Differences were tested for significance at Week 6 using a two-sided alpha value of 0.05.. HAL group (n=34; age range 60-80) received a mean modal dose 9.4 mg/d while OLZ group (n=83; age range 60-86) received a mean modal dose 11.9 mg/d. At Week 6, OLZ was superior to HAL on both the PANSS Total (p=0.015) and PPCT (p=0.043). Considering safety, OLZ was superior to HAL for the SAS and BAS (p<0.001; p<0.001). No spontaneous adverse event occurred more frequently with OLZ than with HAL. In patients never receiving adjunct anticholinergic therapy, no significant differences were present for anticholinergic-like side effects including blurred vision, dry mouth, constipation, or urinary difficulties.. In elderly schizophrenia patients, olanzapine was more efficacious and better tolerated for extrapyramidal signs than was haloperidol. Olanzapine was equivalent to haloperidol for anticholinergic-like side effects when corrected for anticholingergic agents.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Sustained response to antipsychotic therapy is an important outcome measure for patients with psychotic disorders. Placebo control in studies of relapse prevention contributes valuable information yet provokes much debate. This study, using placebo as a control, evaluated olanzapine's efficacy in preventing a psychotic relapse. Participants were stable minimally symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study included 4 phases: (1) 4-day to 9-day screening/evaluation (N = 583), (2) 6-week conversion to open-label olanzapine (N = 493; 10-20 mg/d), (3) 8-week stabilization on olanzapine (N = 458; 10-20 mg/d), and (4) 52-week randomized (2:1), double-blind maintenance with olanzapine (N = 224; 10-20 mg/d) or placebo (N = 102). Primary relapse criteria were clinically significant changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive item cluster or rehospitalization due to positive symptoms. Statistical methodology allowed sequential real-time estimation of efficacy across blinded treatment groups and multiple interim analyses, which permitted study termination when efficacy was significantly different between treatments. A significant between-treatment difference emerged 210 days after first patient randomization to double-blind treatment. Thus, 151 (46.3%) of the randomized patients were discontinued early and 34 (10.4%) of the planned patient enrollment were not required. The olanzapine group had a significantly longer time to relapse (P < 0.0001) than the placebo group. The 6-month cumulative estimated relapse rate (Kaplan-Meier) was 5.5% for olanzapine-treated patients versus 55.2% for placebo-treated patients. The design of this study enabled appropriate statistical testing of the primary hypothesis while minimizing exposure of patients to a less effective treatment than olanzapine. In remitted stabilized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, olanzapine demonstrated a positive benefit-to-risk profile in relapse prevention.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Side effect and health status changes were measured in 3 studies in which outpatients experiencing suboptimal efficacy or tolerability with their current antipsychotic were switched to 6 weeks of open-label ziprasidone. The studies differed only in the patient's prior antipsychotic; 1 study group was on olanzapine (n = 104), a second on risperidone (n = 58), and third on a conventional antipsychotic (n = 108). Baseline and end point health status measures included weight and height, nonfasting cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, prolactin levels, and extrapyramidal side effects. Improvements in health indices and side effects were seen among all 3 groups, but the specific benefits depended on the preswitch antipsychotic. For example, patients switched from olanzapine experienced a mean weight loss of 1.76 kg (P < 0.0001), those switched from risperidone had a lesser reduction in weight (-0.86 kg; P = 0.015), and those switched from conventionals had a nonsignificant increase (+0.27 kg; P = 0.3). Prolactin levels decreased among those switched from risperidone (P < 0.0001) or conventionals (P = 0.05), but not for patients switched from olanzapine. EPS improved among those switched from conventionals (P < 0.0001) and to a lesser extent among those switched from risperidone (P < 0.01), but not in those changed from olanzapine (NS). Thus, in these studies, switching to ziprasidone in patients with continuing symptoms or side effects on their current medication was often associated with improved health status indices, lowered prolactin levels, or less EPS, with the magnitude benefit consistent with the known side-effect profile of the preswitch antipsychotic.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Withholding Treatment

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

In schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease, cortical and subcortical motor organization is influenced by primary disease conditions and neuroleptic treatment. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging patients with schizophrenia were compared, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn), under stable treatment with olanzapine (n = 7; OL) or haloperidol (n = 7; HA) to healthy controls (n = 7; HC), patients with schizophrenia without any neuroleptic treatment (n = 7; UN) and to patients with left (n = 7; LHP)- and right (n = 7; RHP)-sided hemiparkinsonism. All subjects performed a unilateral left-handed fingertapping task. All groups had significant activation in the contralateral motor cortex and the putamen (P < 0.001). Different activation patterns between groups within cortical and subcortical regions of interest were revealed. In particular, different subcortical activation patterns were found between OL- and HA-treated patients with schizophrenia. Activation of the contralateral putamen was increased in right-sided hemiparkinsonism. Significant thalamus activation was found in patients under neuroleptic treatment as well as in hemiparkinsonism, whereas the thalamus was not activated in untreated patients with schizophrenia and in healthy controls. Comparing dopaminergic depletion in hemiparkinsonism and dopaminergic blockade in HA-treated patients, an increase in activation was found within the contralateral primary motorcortex, in the ipsilateral putamen and the contralateral thalamus in hemiparkinsonism. In contrast, activation of the contralateral putamen differed between OL and HA, LHP and RHP. These findings confirm that cortical and subcortical motor-related brain loop functions are influenced by both primary neuropsychiatric conditions as well as by treatment effects. It is hypothesized that dopaminergic depletion in hemiparkinsonism and dopaminergic blockade under neuroleptic agents influence basal ganglia activity in a different way; in particular regarding functional connectivity. Basal ganglia and thalamic interaction seems to have a key role in cortical-subcortical interaction.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Dopamine; Female; Fingers; Functional Laterality; Haloperidol; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Movement; Olanzapine; Parkinson Disease; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychomotor Performance; Putamen; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thalamus