olanzapine and Chronic-Disease

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent of the thiobenzodiazepine class. It blocks multiple neurotransmitter receptors including dopaminergic at D1, D2, D3, D4 brain receptors, serotonergic at 5-HT2a, 5-HT2c, 5-HT3, 5-HT6 receptors, catecholamines at alpha1 adrenergic receptors, acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors, and histamine at H1 receptors. Olanzapine has five times the affinity for 5-HT2 receptors than D2 receptors and has been used to treat schizophrenia and delirium. Olanzapine's activity at multiple receptors, particularly at the D2, 5-HT2c, and 5-HT3 receptors which appear to be involved in nausea and emesis, has prompted its use in the treatment of nausea and vomiting refractory to standard antiemetics. Case reports and formal clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of chronic nausea, the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis, and the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis. Phase II and phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that there is a significant improvement in nausea when olanzapine is added to guideline directed prophylactic antiemetic agents 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy Common side effects of olanzapine when used over a period of months include weight gain as well as an association with the onset of diabetes mellitus, but these effects have not been seen with short term use of daily doses of less than one week.

Topics: Animals; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Nausea; Olanzapine; Vomiting

Early-onset psychotic illnesses in children and adolescents are not as rare as is commonly believed. These disorders, which include schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, and major depression with psychotic features, often have a chronic and severe course and poor long-term outcome. Many patients with early-onset schizophrenia have greater functional impairments than most patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that patients with early-onset schizophrenia experience substantial gray matter loss during adolescence, which is not observed in studies of patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. The chronic course, severe functional impairments, and poor prognosis of early-onset psychosis create a great need to identify effective and safe treatments for youth with psychosis. Although atypical anti-psychotics have been considered superior to traditional antipsychotics, there has been little controlled information to inform clinical decisions until recently. Over the past 5 years, several studies have been initiated to address these questions. The results of the studies completed to date are reviewed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Brain Diseases; Child; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Failure

Since the previous publication of Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines in 1997, there has been a substantial increase in evidence-based treatment options for bipolar disorder. The present guidelines review the new evidence and use criteria to rate strength of evidence and incorporate effectiveness, safety, and tolerability data to determine global clinical recommendations for treatment of various phases of bipolar disorder. The guidelines suggest that although pharmacotherapy forms the cornerstone of management, utilization of adjunctive psychosocial treatments and incorporation of chronic disease management model involving a healthcare team are required in providing optimal management for patients with bipolar disorder. Lithium, valproate and several atypical antipsychotics are first-line treatments for acute mania. Bipolar depression and mixed states are frequently associated with suicidal acts; therefore assessment for suicide should always be an integral part of managing any bipolar patient. Lithium, lamotrigine or various combinations of antidepressant and mood-stabilizing agents are first-line treatments for bipolar depression. First-line options in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder are lithium, lamotrigine, valproate and olanzapine. Historical and symptom profiles help with treatment selection. With the growing recognition of bipolar II disorders, it is anticipated that a larger body of evidence will become available to guide treatment of this common and disabling condition. These guidelines also discuss issues related to bipolar disorder in women and those with comorbidity and include a section on safety and monitoring.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Canada; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Lamotrigine; Lithium Carbonate; Mass Screening; Mood Disorders; Olanzapine; Personality Disorders; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Substance-Related Disorders; Triazines; Valproic Acid

Topics: Acute Disease; Affect; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Lithium Compounds; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid

This study aimed to determine the effect of olanzapine and other antipsychotic drugs on cognitive functions after 6months of treatment. Baseline, 3month and 6month psychopathological and cognitive evaluations were made. Thirty-eight partially responsive outpatients with DSM-IV chronic schizophrenia diagnosis were included in the study. On the indication of their attending psychiatrists, 21 patients initiated treatment with olanzapine, and 17 remained on their previous treatment with other antipsychotic drugs. Cognitive assessments were blind to medication and psychopathological status. The olanzapine group presented a significantly greater improvement in negative symptomatology and verbal memory than the comparison group in repeated-measures of MANOVAs between baseline, 3month and 6month assessments. These differences remained statistically significant after covarying out gender, treatment with other atypical antipsychotics, biperidene doses and changes in positive and negative symptoms. In order to match previous differences between groups, cognitive baseline scores for each test were introduced as covariates, resulting in a significant improvement for the olanzapine group in negative symptomatology and the interference task of the Stroop test.We then re-analyzed the data, dividing the comparison group into two groups: risperidone-treated patients (n=9) and patients receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=8). Post-hoc analyses between groups were carried out with baseline cognitive assessment as covariate. The olanzapine group improved significantly more than the risperidone group in negative symptomatology and in the interference task of Stroop test. The improvement in the number of categories of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was higher in risperidone patients than in those receiving olanzapine or conventional antipsychotic treatment. Conventional antipsychotic drugs did not present a significant improvement over atypical antipsychotic drugs in any cognitive function. In summary, in patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotic agents were associated with slight differential improvements over time in attentional, verbal memory and executive functions compared with conventional neuroleptic drugs. No differential improvements were found in social functioning, verbal fluency, non-verbal domains of memory or visuo-motor abilities.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method

Rapid improvement of tardive dyskinesia was identified following initiation of olanzapine in an elderly male patient formally treated with chlorpromazine.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Chlorpromazine; Chronic Disease; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

The unprecedented level of activity in the development of new antipsychotic medications can be traced to the 1989 approval of clozapine by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of refractory schizophrenia. This has encouraged the development of other new agents that share some of clozapine's receptor binding characteristics. A wide range of clinical trial designs are being used during the development of new antipsychotic medications. This article describes both basic designs and more innovative ones: flexible-dose designs that include placebo and conventional neuroleptic agents as controls; fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of experimental medication; and fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of the experimental and comparator medication. The strengths and weaknesses of each are identified. The need for long-term maintenance studies of newer agents is emphasized because psychotic disorders in general, and schizophrenia in particular, are chronic relapsing illnesses. The current status of four newer antipsychotic medications is considered: clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and sertindole. The importance of direct comparison among the newer antipsychotic medications in both short- and long-term trials is highlighted.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Psychotic depression has a high rate of relapse. The study aims were to identify a prediction model of risk of relapse of psychotic depression and examine whether predictors moderated the effect of treatment on relapse. One hundred and twenty-six men and women aged 18-85 years, who experienced sustained remission or near-remission of psychotic depression with sertraline plus olanzapine, participated in a 36-week randomized controlled trial that compared sertraline plus olanzapine with sertraline plus placebo in preventing relapse (NCT01427608). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of relapse and to model the combined role of significant predictors. Concordance statistic was calculated to determine the accuracy of the best fit multivariable models in predicting relapse. Finally, interaction terms were tested for each significant predictor to examine whether they moderated the effect of treatment on risk of relapse. Lifetime number of depressive episodes, severity of residual depressive symptoms at the time of randomization, and psychomotor disturbance both at acute enrollment when participants were depressed and at the time of randomization predicted risk of relapse. Multivariable models had 69-70% accuracy in predicting relapse. Psychomotor disturbance was associated with increased risk of relapse in the sertraline plus olanzapine group compared with sertraline plus placebo, whereas the other predictors did not moderate the effect of treatment on relapse. Future research is needed to determine whether a combination of clinical and biological variables can further increase the accuracy of prediction of relapse of psychotic depression.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Sertraline; Treatment Outcome

The comparative antidepressant effects of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia remain elusive, leading us to examine this question using the data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness phase 2E.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone because of inadequate efficacy were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (n=49) or double-blind treatment with another atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [n=19], quetiapine [n=15], or risperidone [n=16]). The primary outcome was the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score. Antidepressant effects of clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics were compared in patients with chronic schizophrenia and those with a major depressive episode (MDE) at baseline (i.e. ≥6 on the CDSS), using mixed models.. No differences in the baseline CDSS total scores were found between the treatment groups regardless of presence of an MDE. Clozapine was more effective than quetiapine in antidepressant effects for chronic schizophrenia (p<.01 for the whole sample and p=.01 for those with an MDE), and comparable to olanzapine and risperidone.. The present findings suggest that clozapine demonstrates superior antidepressant effects to quetiapine and comparable effects to olanzapine and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia regardless of presence of MDE. Given the indication of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and the negative impacts of depressive symptoms on clinical outcomes in schizophrenia, further research is warranted to investigate antidepressant effects of clozapine in TRS with an MDE.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

No large-scale randomized trial has compared the effect of different second-generation antipsychotic drugs and any first-generation drug on alcohol, drug and nicotine use in patients with schizophrenia. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness study randomly assigned 1432 patients formally diagnosed with schizophrenia to four second-generation antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, risperidone quetiapine, and ziprasidone) and one first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) and followed them for up to 18 months. Secondary outcome data documented cigarettes smoked in the past week and alcohol and drug use severity ratings. At baseline, 61% of patients smoked, 35% used alcohol, and 23% used illicit drugs. Although there were significant effects of time showing reduction in substance use over the 18 months (all p < 0.0001), this study found no evidence that any antipsychotic was robustly superior to any other in a secondary analysis of data on substance use outcomes from a large 18-month randomized schizophrenia trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alcoholism; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Smoking; Smoking Prevention; Substance-Related Disorders; Thiazoles; Young Adult

Noninferiority analysis is a statistical method of growing importance in comparative effectiveness research that has rarely been used in psychopharmacology. This method is used here to evaluate whether first-generation antipsychotics are clinically not inferior to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) using data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). A conservative noninferiority margin (NIM) on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was derived from the smallest published value for the minimal clinically important difference, further reduced by 25%. This NIM was used to assess whether perphenazine is noninferior to olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine on the basis of the 95% confidence intervals of differences in mean PANSS outcomes (N = 1049). Perphenazine was noninferior to all three SGAs during 18 months of intention-to-treat analysis and in several subanalyses. Noninferiority can be evaluated from studies designed as superiority trials. Power was available in the CATIE to conduct noninferiority analysis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to determine what variables predict a 'combined treatment outcome' (COMBOUT) in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. This analysis (n=522) was based on a randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, 12-week study that enrolled chronically-ill patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related disorder. COMBOUT was assessed using the PANSS for symptoms, CGI-S for overall clinical status, MADRS for depressive symptoms, QLS for functioning/QOL, and SWN-K for subjective well-being. Possible predictors included demographics as well as baseline scores (Model I), and early change (week 2) scores (Model II).. Model I: significantly better outcome (higher COMBOUT score) was observed in patients with lower MADRS (T= - 6.36; p<0.001) or higher QLS (T=5.05; p<0.001) scores at baseline. Model II: significantly better COMBOUT was observed in patients with early improvement of QLS (T=4.93; p<0.001), SWN-K (T=3.88; p<0.001), PANSS (T= - 2.32; p=0.021) and CGI-S scores (T= - 2.22; p=0.027). Changes in EPS were not predictors of COMBOUT in the models tested.. COMBOUT at endpoint was predicted by lower depressive symptom score and higher QOL at baseline and by early improvement in psychopathology, quality of life and subjective well-being.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Demography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Although there have been important advances in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), many patients fail to respond to first-line pharmacotherapy. Limited evidence suggests that second generation antipsychotics may have a role to play as monotherapy in PTSD.. We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled study using flexible-dose olanzapine monotherapy for 8 weeks in 28 adult male and female participants (mean age: 40.75 ± 11.59 years) with non-combat related chronic PTSD. Data were analysed with repeated measures analysis of variance, using an intention to treat, last observation carried forward approach.. The olanzapine group (n = 14) demonstrated significantly greater improvement on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale from baseline to endpoint than the placebo group (n = 14) (F = 5.71, p = 0.018). Olanzapine was generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events recorded. Substantial weight gain (6-10 kg) was, however, reported in 6/14 participants in the olanzapine group.. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled evidence of the efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy in an exclusively non-combat related chronic PTSD group. Despite the small sample size, these data suggest that olanzapine may have a role in the treatment of PTSD. These findings warrant replication in a larger sample.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sertindole in comparison with olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond successfully to their previous treatments. Patients with schizophrenia who were at least moderately ill and had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment were randomized to double-blind sertindole or olanzapine treatment. A total of 389 patients were treated, 196 with sertindole (mean dose=17 mg/day) and 193 with olanzapine (mean dose=16 mg/day). Both drugs improved all the efficacy scale scores including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Although sertindole failed to prove noninferiority to olanzapine in terms of reduction in PANSS total score with the last-observation-carried-forward analysis, this can be attributed to the higher withdrawal rate in the sertindole group by day 16 by which sertindole was up-titrated to the effective dose. On excluding early withdrawals, the noninferiority criterion was fulfilled, as also in the observed-case analysis. They had similar safety profiles with respect to the total incidence of adverse events. The incidence of asymptomatic QT prolongation was higher in the sertindole group. Sertindole has an efficacy and safety profile that is comparable to that of olanzapine. The slow titration schedule and lack of sedating effect of sertindole should be considered when initiating treatment with this drug.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Head-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics have predominantly included patients with chronic conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia.. The study was an 8-week, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, controlled multicenter trial (NCT00145444). Seventy-six patients with schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (diagnosis < 5 y), and a maximum lifetime antipsychotic treatment < 16 weeks participated in the study. Efficacy of ziprasidone (80-160 mg/d) and olanzapine 10-20 mg was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and the Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (HQLS); tolerability assessments included laboratory assessments, body weight, and electroencephalogram.. Olanzapine (n = 34) and ziprasidone (n = 39) showed equal efficacy as measured by the PANSS, CDSS, CGI, and HQLS. However, mean weight gain was significantly higher in the olanzapine group (6.8 vs 0.1 kg, P < .001). Ziprasidone was associated with decreasing levels of triglycerides, cholesterol, and transaminases, while these parameters increased in the olanzapine group (all P values < .05). There were no significant differences in fasting glucose and prolactin levels or in cardiac or sexual side effects. Patients on ziprasidone used biperiden for extrapyramidal side effects more frequently (P < .05).. The results of this study indicate that ziprasidone and olanzapine have comparable therapeutic efficacy but differ in their side effect profile. However, there is a risk of a type II error with this sample size. Clinically significant weight gain and laboratory abnormalities appear early after initiating treatment and are more prominent with olanzapine, while more patients on ziprasidone received anticholinergic drugs to treat extrapyramidal symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Antipsychotic Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Biperiden; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Triglycerides; Young Adult

The objective of this study, the effect of aripiprazole on clinical symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia was compared to that of perospirone and olanzapine. The subjects were 31 patients, they were diagnosed with schizophrenia on the basis of the criteria of the DSM-IV. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and cognitive function was assessed using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Keio Version: KWCST) and the St. Marianna University School of Medicine's Computerized Memory Test (STM-COMET) as executive function and memory/attention function tests at baseline and 8 weeks after switching. As a result, comparison of the BPRS mean total score revealed no significant difference between aripiprazole and the other medications. Aripiprazole resulted in significant changes in the number of categories achieved (CA) and difficulty maintaining set (DMS) compared to olanzapine at the second level of the KWCST. Comparison thus revealed no difference in clinical effect between aripiprazole and the other medications, but might suggest possible differences between aripiprazole and olanzapine in the profiles of the improvement effects on executive function, memory, and attention function.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Attention; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Executive Function; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Single-Blind Method; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Verbal Learning

Metabolic syndrome and elevated lipids, related to cardiovascular risk factors, are more prevalent in schizophrenia and there has been much debate about the extent to which specific antipsychotics contribute more to the increased risk of developing hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Most studies have concentrated on fasting levels in patients recently started on medication. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects of 2nd generation antipsychotics using both fasting measures and provocative tests may provide results that are more informative. We present results of a randomized prospective study of lipid metabolism and metabolic syndrome in chronic schizophrenic patients using both fasting and post-prandial lipid measures.. Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia, most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting levels of lipids, free fatty acid (FFA) and leptin were assessed. At baseline and end of month 2 of treatment patients had a fatty meal test (FMT) in which postprandial lipids were measured at several time points before and after meal ingestion. Weight was assessed monthly and waist measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data was analyzed on 23 patients randomized to risperidone and 23 patients randomized to olanzapine.. Overall, there were no differential drug effects on any fasting lipid measure and fasting triglycerides did not increase in olanzapine treated patients after 5 months of treatment. However, at 2 months of drug treatment the FMT revealed a significantly greater increase in triglycerides, and very low density (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, in olanzapine compared to risperidone patients (Ps=.05-.01). There was no difference between treatments with olanzapine vs. risperidone on development of metabolic syndrome during the 5 month treatment period.. Chronic schizophrenic patients treated for years with first and second generation antipsychotics may have developed tolerance to the effects of olanzapine on increasing fasting triglycerides and other lipids, but some underlying metabolic abnormalities may be revealed in postprandial tests of lipid metabolism. These findings suggest that the development of standardized tests and criteria for measurement of postprandial triglycerides and related lipid levels, in addition to fasting levels, may be helpful in identifying metabolic effects of olanzapine and other second generation antipsychotics in chronically treated schizophrenics. In some reports postprandial increases in triglycerides have been identified as important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but the actual differential consequences of these lipid metabolic differences for development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in patients treated with different antipsychotics need more objective outcome measures to determine and quantify cardiovascular risk outcomes.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Lipid Metabolism Disorders; Male; Models, Statistical; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of ziprasidone versus the comparators olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine were investigated in adult patients with chronic schizophrenia, schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders, with lack of efficacy or intolerance to their previous antipsychotic treatment based on clinical judgement of the investigator. A total of 293 patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with either ziprasidone 80-160 mg/day (n=147) or with one of the comparator drugs (n=146). In the latter group the investigator could choose between olanzapine 10-20 mg/day (n=24), risperidone 4-8 mg/day (n=22) or quetiapine 300-750 mg/day (n=97). The study comprised four visits including a baseline examination prior to randomization and further examinations at the end of weeks 1, 4 and 12. Ziprasidone was non-inferior (defined as a difference of 7 units or less on the PANSS scale to the disadvantage of ziprasidone) to the composite group (olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine) on the total PANSS score as well as on all subscores (P<0.0001); there were no significant between-group differences in the CGI-S and I and UKU scores. Ziprasidone-treated patients lost an average of 2.1 kg in the 12 weeks of the study, the mean weight for risperidone and quetiapine remained unchanged, and patients receiving olanzapine gained 3.1 kg on average.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides; Young Adult

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study examined the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who had discontinued antipsychotic treatment in phases 1 and 2 were eligible for phase 3, in which they selected one of nine antipsychotic regimens with the help of their study doctor. We describe the characteristics of the patients who selected each treatment option and their outcomes.. Two hundred and seventy patients entered phase 3. The open-label treatment options were monotherapy with oral aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, long-acting injectable fluphenazine decanoate, or a combination of any two of these treatments.. Few patients selected fluphenazine decanoate (n=9) or perphenazine (n=4). Similar numbers selected each of the other options (range 33-41). Of the seven common choices, those who selected clozapine and combination antipsychotic treatment were the most symptomatic, and those who selected aripiprazole and ziprasidone had the highest body mass index. Symptoms improved for all groups, although the improvements were modest for the groups starting with relatively mild levels of symptoms. Side effect profiles of the medications varied considerably but medication discontinuations due to intolerability were rare (7% overall).. Patients and their doctors made treatment selections based on clinical factors, including severity of symptoms, response to prior treatments, and physical health status. Fluphenazine decanoate was rarely used among those with evidence of treatment non-adherence and clozapine was underutilized for those with poor previous response. Combination antipsychotic treatment warrants further study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study sought to examine the effect of ziprasidone on olanzapine or clozapine-associated medical morbidity such as insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose, obesity, and hyperlipidemia in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. This was a 6-week, open label trial of ziprasidone 160 mg/day added to a stable dose of olanzapine or clozapine in 21 schizophrenia or schizoaffective patients with DM, impaired fasting glucose, or insulin resistance.. Ten olanzapine-treated subjects and 11 clozapine-treated subjects were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline for age, gender, education, ethnicity, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. At week 6, there were no significant changes in weight, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. There was no significant difference in psychotic, negative, or depressive symptoms. QTc significantly increased at week 2 but not at week 6.. The addition of 160 mg/day of ziprasidone was well tolerated but did not produce significant improvement in fasting glucose, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia or lead to weight loss in olanzapine- or clozapine-treated subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors

Comparisons of diabetic potential, glucose related metabolic levels, and insulin resistance between olanzapine and risperidone have produced variable results in cross-sectional and epidemiologic studies. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects during treatment with these drugs may provide results that are more informative.. Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-IV), most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting glucose, insulin, insulin-related metabolic measures, and prolactin were assessed, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed during baseline and months 1, 2, and 5 of treatment. Weight was assessed monthly, and waist and hip measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data were analyzed on 23 patients randomly assigned to risperidone and 23 patients randomly assigned to olanzapine. The study was conducted from February 2003 to August 2007.. Most patients were overweight or obese at baseline (mean body mass index [BMI] = 29.4), but there were no differential drug effects on weight change and no differences between drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no overall drug treatment differences in fasting glucose or glycohemoglobin or 2-hour glucose levels in OGTT and no differences between the two drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no consistent drug treatment differences in the number of patients who developed borderline or diabetic glucose levels. Olanzapine-treated patients showed a significantly greater increase than risperidone-treated patients in a fasting measure of insulin resistance (P = .041), and olanzapine patients showed greater decreases in insulin sensitivity during OGTT (P = .023) compared to risperidone-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients had a significantly greater increase in 1-hour glucose and insulin levels during OGTT in subsequent months compared to baseline and greater increase in glucose and insulin area under the curve over time than the risperdone-treated patients. Prolactin levels decreased in olanzapine patients and increased in risperidone patients (P values approximately .02). There were no significant drug treatment differences in C-peptide levels or 2 indices proposed as measures of insulin secretion or beta-cell function (homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function [HOMA-B], BIGTT-acute insulin response surrogate measure [BIGTT-AIR]). Changes in insulin resistance over time were not strongly related to changes in BMI or waist circumference during study drug treatment.. The increase in insulin levels during olanzapine treatment may compensate for the increase in insulin resistance and serve to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose levels. This may contribute to the lack of differences between olanzapine and risperidone in indices of diabetic or prediabetic glucose levels or glycohemoglobin. How many years this compensatory mechanism will persist needs further investigation. Periodic OGTT tests measuring glucose and insulin levels would be helpful in assessing the status of beta-cell insulin reserve in patients treated with olanzapine and other second-generation antipsychotics and assessing an individual patient's risk for conversion to type 2 diabetes.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00287820.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prolactin; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

There is little information about weight gain induced by antipsychotics at long-term.. To quantify the weight gain induced by first (haloperidol) and second generation antipsychotics (olanzapine and risperidone) in a cohort of drug-naïve subjects after 1 year of treatment.. This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial, including a representative sample of first episode psychotic incident cases from a population area of 555.000 people. The main outcome measures were changes in body weight and body mass index at 3 months and at 12 months. Both a per protocol analysis and an intention to treat analysis were conducted.. A total of 164 drug-naïve patients were included. At 12 months 144 patients were evaluated. Of them, 66% completed the protocol and 34% needed treatment switch. We found statistically significant differences in weight gain at 3 months: 3.8 kg (+/-4.1) for haloperidol, 5.9 kg (+/-5.1) for risperidone and 8.4 kg (+/-5.0) for olanzapine (F=7.045; p=0.002). After 1 year the difference in weight gain had disappeared: 9.7 kg (+/-5.7) for haloperidol, 8.9 kg (+/-8.8) for risperidone and 10.9 kg (+/-7.2) for olanzapine (F=0.817; p=0.445).. Drug-naïve patients experience an extraordinary weight gain after 1 year of treatment with haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone. The main difference among these treatments is the pattern of weight gain but not the final amount of weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Risperidone; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

This double-blind study compared a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs compared to a representative older agent for patients with schizophrenia who use or avoid illicit substances.. Schizophrenic subjects were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. The primary aim of this analysis was to delineate differences between the overall effectiveness of these five treatments among patients who used or did not use illicit substances.. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation among patients who use illicit drugs (median 3.3 to 6.8 months). Among non-users time to treatment discontinuation was significantly longer for patients treated with olanzapine (median 13.0 months) than perphenazine ( 5.9 months), risperidone (5.6 months), or quetiapine (5.0 months); time to discontinuation for ziprasidone (4.3 months) was even shorter, although the latter difference was not significant. The difference between risperidone and quetiapine, although small, was significant. All remaining differences were non-significant. Similar results were found for discontinuation due to inefficacy. There were no differences between illicit users and non-users in symptom reduction and global improvement, after adjustment for differential duration of treatment. Differences in discontinuation results were attenuated by non-compliance, but the trends persisted after controlling for treatment compliance.. Among patients with chronic schizophrenia who avoid use of illicit drugs, olanzapine was more effective than other antipsychotics as reflected by longer time to all-cause discontinuation, but illicit substance abuse attenuated this advantage, reinforcing the need for concurrent substance abuse treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal

To investigate the long-term weight loss outcomes during usual clinical practice after switching from olanzapine standard oral tablet (SOT) to olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (ODT).. In this open-label prospective study, 26 patients with schizophrenia who were clinically stable on olanzapine SOT treatment were switched to olanzapine ODT. All other aspects of treatment remained constant. Weight was recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months.. Patients incurred an average weight loss of 2.7 +/- 0.7 kg (p = 0.001) after switching patients from olanzapine SOT to olanzapine ODT at 12 months. Peak weight loss was observed at 6 months; however, significant weight loss was achieved as early as 3 months. The majority (81.9%) of patients lost weight, while 18.1% had no weight change or weight gain. Body mass index (BMI) significantly decreased by 1.0 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2) (p = 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated with higher doses of olanzapine (> or = 20 mg) incurred a greater weight loss of their body weight (5.6%), compared to those treated with lower doses (< 20 mg), who lost 1.9% of their body weight (p = 0.04).. This study demonstrated that, in usual clinical practice, switching patients from olanzapine SOT to olanzapine ODT treatment resulted in significant weight loss that was maintained over 12 months.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Overweight; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Loss

Metformin (850-1700 mg) plus sibutramine (10-20 mg, n=13) or placebo (n=15) was administered for 12 weeks in olanzapine-treated chronic schizophrenia patients. Weight loss was similar in both groups: -2.8+/-3.2 kg vs. -1.4+/-2.6 kg. Except for preventing a triglyceride increase, the drug combination lacked efficacy for metabolic control in this clinical population.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite Depressants; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Cyclobutanes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pilot Projects; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Waist-Hip Ratio; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Appetite; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Chronic Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Fluphenazine; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Olanzapine; Reference Values; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

This study examined the relative effects of the second-generation antipsychotic drugs and an older representative agent on psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. Consenting patients were enrolled in the NIMH Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project. In phase 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. Clozapine was included for patients who chose this pathway after discontinuing phase 1 due to inefficacy; all other patients received another second-generation antipsychotic. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Quality of Life Scale.. Psychosocial functioning modestly improved for the one-third of phase 1 patients who reached the primary Quality of Life Scale analysis endpoint of 12 months (average effect size 0.19 SD units). Although for several of the drugs individually there were significant changes from baseline, overall there were no significant differences between the different agents. Results were similar at 6 and 18 months. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the amount of change in the Quality of Life Scale total score or subscale scores at 6, 12, or 18 months. Patients treated with clozapine in the efficacy pathway made comparable gains. Early treatment discontinuations, especially among patients most impaired at baseline, limited the ability to achieve more substantial functional gains.. All antipsychotic treatment groups in all phases made modest improvements in psychosocial functioning. There were no differences among them after 6, 12, or 18 months. More substantial improvements would likely require more intensive adjunctive psychosocial rehabilitation interventions.

Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States

The relative effectiveness of newly started antipsychotic drugs for individuals with schizophrenia may depend on multiple factors, including each patient's previous treatment response and the reason for a new medication trial. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=114) who had been randomly assigned to and then discontinued perphenazine in phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia study were reassigned randomly to double-blinded treatment with olanzapine, 7.5-30.0 mg/day (N=38); quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day (N=38); or risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day (N=38). The primary aim was to determine whether there were differences among these three treatments in effectiveness, as measured by time to treatment discontinuation for any reason. Secondary outcomes included reasons for treatment discontinuation and measures of drug tolerability.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with quetiapine (median, 9.9 months) and olanzapine (7.1 months) than with risperidone (3.6 months). There were no significant differences between treatments on discontinuation due to inefficacy, intolerability, or patient decision.. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine, quetiapine and olanzapine were more effective than risperidone, as reflected by longer time to discontinuation for any reason. In the context of other results from the CATIE study, the effectiveness and acceptability of antipsychotic drugs appears to vary considerably according to clinical circumstances.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this open-label study was to evaluate the use of olanzapine in the treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Sixteen children who were 8-17 years of age and met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were admitted into a 10-week, open-label, optimizing dose study of olanzapine. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity/Improvement scales were used to assess improvement during the study. Of the 16 subjects who completed the study, 12 demonstrated significant improvement on end of treatment BPRS, CGI, and PANSS scores compared with baseline. Male subjects showed greater improvement and also gained more weight. Weight gain occurred in all but 2 subjects. Weight gain was significant, with patients averaging a gain of about 6.2 kg during the 6-week course of the study. Two of the subjects experienced extrapyramidal symptoms. The average dose of olanzapine for all subjects was 0.17 mg/kg.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Child; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The goal of this study is to examine if Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) scores may improve on an 8-week olanzapine treatment in 10 patients with chronic schizophrenia. The patients were rated every 2 weeks on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Baseline and endpoint NSS scores were evaluated by the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES). The results demonstrated that baseline total PANSS and subscale scores of positive and general symptomatology, and baseline CGI scores were significantly reduced at the end of olanzapine treatment. There were no significant differences between baseline and endpoint subscale scores of negative symptomatology. We have also found no significant differences between baseline and endpoint total and subscale scores of NES. Baseline total scores of NES were significantly correlated only with negative schizophrenic symptoms at baseline. Our findings indicate that NSS may not improve in schizophrenic patients with olanzapine treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

When a schizophrenia patient has an inadequate response to treatment with an antipsychotic drug, it is unclear what other antipsychotic to switch to and when to use clozapine. In this study, the authors compared switching to clozapine with switching to another atypical antipsychotic in patients who had discontinued treatment with a newer atypical antipsychotic in the context of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Interventions Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone in phase 1 or 1B of the trials, primarily because of inadequate efficacy, were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (N=49) or blinded treatment with another newer atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [N=19], quetiapine [N=15], or risperidone [N=16]).. Time until treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly longer for clozapine (median=10.5 months) than for quetiapine (median=3.3), or risperidone (median=2.8), but not for olanzapine (median=2.7). Time to discontinuation because of inadequate therapeutic effect was significantly longer for clozapine than for olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. At 3-month assessments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores had decreased more in patients treated with clozapine than in patients treated with quetiapine or risperidone but not olanzapine. One patient treated with clozapine developed agranulocytosis, and another developed eosinophilia; both required treatment discontinuation.. For these patients with schizophrenia who prospectively failed to improve with an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine was more effective than switching to another newer atypical antipsychotic. Safety monitoring is necessary to detect and manage clozapine's serious side effects.

Topics: Adult; Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Eosinophilia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

In the treatment of schizophrenia, changing antipsychotics is common when one treatment is suboptimally effective, but the relative effectiveness of drugs used in this strategy is unknown. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients who had just discontinued a different atypical antipsychotic.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=444) who had discontinued the atypical antipsychotic randomly assigned during phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation were randomly reassigned to double-blind treatment with a different antipsychotic (olanzapine, 7.5-30 mg/day [N=66]; quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day [N=63]; risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day [N=69]; or ziprasidone, 40-160 mg/day [N=135]). The primary aim was to determine if there were differences between these four treatments in effectiveness measured by time until discontinuation for any reason.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with risperidone (median: 7.0 months) and olanzapine (6.3 months) than with quetiapine (4.0 months) and ziprasidone (2.8 months). Among patients who discontinued their previous antipsychotic because of inefficacy (N=184), olanzapine was more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone, and risperidone was more effective than quetiapine. There were no significant differences between antipsychotics among those who discontinued their previous treatment because of intolerability (N=168).. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued treatment with an atypical antipsychotic, risperidone and olanzapine were more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone as reflected by longer time until discontinuation for any reason.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The objective of the study was to examine whether patients with schizophrenia who were judged to be stable on long-term treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications would further benefit from a switch to an atypical antipsychotic drug. Thirty-six subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, on conventional antipsychotic medication therapy for at least 2 years, were randomized in double-blind fashion to risperidone versus olanzapine. Patients were titrated up to 6 mg risperidone or 15 mg olanzapine as tolerated, followed by tapering and discontinuation of conventional antipsychotic medication. Atypical antipsychotic agents were then administered alone (monotherapy) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Simpson Angus Scale. Body weight was measured at each visit. Both treatment groups exhibited marked and similar improvement in the total PANSS score from baseline to study endpoint (22 weeks) [risperidone: baseline=59.3 (SE 3.1), 22 weeks=44.3 (SE 2.3) (p<0.001); olanzapine: baseline=55.9 (SE 3.3), 22 weeks=46.9 (SE 3.2) (p<0.001). Both groups also exhibited significant reductions in PANSS factor scores for positive and negative symptoms and disorganized thoughts. Only risperidone-treated patients exhibited significant decreases in uncontrolled hostility/excitement and anxiety and depression. Of note, while positive factor scores exhibited the majority of change within the first 10 weeks, negative factor scores continued to decline significantly in both treatment groups throughout the study. Tolerability assessments did not differ between groups. The results indicate that both atypical antipsychotic medications provided significant additional improvement in symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia previously on conventional antipsychotic agents.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine (5 and 20 mg/day) over a 6-month period in chronic schizophrenic patients experiencing predominantly negative symptoms.. Two hundred and forty-four patients participated in a 6-month multicenter double-blind trial of placebo (n = 34), olanzapine 5 mg/day (n = 70), olanzapine 20 mg/day (n = 70), or amisulpride 150 mg/day (n = 70). Primary measure was the scale for the assessment of negative symptoms.. Olanzapine 5 mg/day showed significantly greater improvement than placebo in negative symptoms and in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Baseline positive symptoms were low at baseline and changed minimally. The neurological tolerance of olanzapine, amisulpride and placebo were comparable.. Olanzapine 5 mg/day was effective in treating negative symptoms in a group of schizophrenic with predominantly negative symptoms during the stabilization phase. Improvement in positive symptoms or extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was unlikely to explain this result while improvement in depression may have partially contributed.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Chronic Disease; Depression; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sulpiride; Surveys and Questionnaires

Obesity is common in persons with schizophrenia. Besides its adverse health effects, obesity reduces quality of life and contributes to the social stigma of schizophrenia.. This 14-week, multicenter, open-label, rater-blinded, randomized study evaluated the effects of a group-based behavioral treatment (BT) for weight loss in overweight and obese stable patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had been switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive BT or usual clinical care (UC). BT included 20 sessions during which patients were taught to reduce caloric intake. In UC, patients were encouraged to lose weight but received no special advice about weight reduction. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight.. Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The mean +/- SD weight loss at endpoint was significant in both groups (p < .05) and numerically greater in patients receiving BT than in those receiving UC (-2.0 +/- 3.79 and -1.1 +/- 3.11 kg, respectively). More patients in the BT group than in the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (26.5% [9/34] and 10.8% [4/37], respectively; p = .082). A post hoc analysis of patients attending at least 1 BT session showed that significantly more patients in the BT than the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (32.1% [9/28] vs. 10.8% [4/37], respectively, p = .038) and at week 14 (complete population; 40.9% [9/22] and 14.3% [4/28], respectively, p = .027).. BT may be an effective method for weight reduction in patients with chronic psychotic illness.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior Therapy; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Olanzapine; Prevalence; Psychotherapy, Group; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.. A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.. Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.. The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The purpose of this study was to examine whether elderly chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder patients would clinically improve if switched to olanzapine from previous neuroleptic treatment. Twenty-one hospitalized patients, aged 6088 yr, with a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were being treated with typical neuroleptic medication were switched to olanzapine. The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale were completed while patients were on their previous medication regimen and again 6 months after the last patient had been started on olanzapine. The mean duration of treatment was 289 d (S.D.=139). Three patients discontinued the medication. Mean end dose of olanzapine was 12.9 mg (S.D.=5.7). Paired sample t tests were used to test change on PANSS Positive, Negative and Total scales, CGI, GDS and body weight. PANSS (Positive, p=0.002; Negative, p=0.003; General, p=0.003; and Total, p=0.000) and CGI (p=0.000) but not the GDS (p=0.67) demonstrated statistically significant improvement. There was no significant change in body weight (p=0.61). Elderly patients with aggravation of chronic schizophrenia showed improvement after being switched to olanzapine with no weight gain. Clinically meaningful change was observed in positive and negative psychotic symptomatology but not in depressive symptoms.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Treatment Outcome

Several recent studies, albeit limited in sample number, design and generalizability, have suggested that augmentation of atypical antipsychotic medication (such as clozapine and olanzapine) with sulpiride, a substituted benzamide antipsychotic medication, may play a role in the management of treatment-resistant psychotic conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate any change in clinical symptomatology or side-effect profile in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients receiving sulpiride in addition to olanzapine. Seventeen patients with treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia, who were receiving olanzapine monotherapy for at least 6 months before study commencement, were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either adjunctive treatment with sulpiride (study group) or to continue their pre-study treatment with olanzapine with no medication augmentation (control group), each for a period of 8 weeks. Changes in measures of positive and negative symptoms, anxiety, depression and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks. Study observations indicated no significant differences in the changes in positive or negative symptomatology between patients receiving a combined regimen of olanzapine with sulpiride (600 mg/ day) augmentation and controls. However, a significantly greater improvement of depressive symptomatology (P < 0.05; as assessed by the Hamilton Scale for Depression) was noted in the sulpiride augmentation group. These data indicate improvement in depressive symptomatology with sulpiride augmentation of olanzapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride

Patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) often receive depot antipsychotic medications to assure longer administration and better compliance with their treatment regimen. This study evaluated whether patients stabilized on depot antipsychotic medication could be successfully transitioned to oral olanzapine.. In a 3-month open-label study, 26 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia taking depot antipsychotics for over 3 years were randomly assigned to continue on their current depot dose or to switch to oral olanzapine. Clinical ratings (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS], Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] scale, and Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] scale) and side effect parameters (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale [AIMS], Barnes Akathisia Scale, AMDP-5 scale, vital signs, and weight) were obtained monthly.. Oral olanzapine patients (N = 13) demonstrated significant clinical improvement over the depot control group (N = 13) from baseline to 3-month endpoint (PANSS total, p =.012; PANSS general, p =.068; PANSS negative, p =.098; CGI-Improvement, p =.007; CGI-Severity, p =.026; GAF, p =.015). Side effect rating scales showed no statistical differences between the 2 groups (AIMS, Barnes Akathisia Scale, AMDP-5, vital signs). The depot control group showed no statistical superiority in any measure except weight change (p =.0005). After 3 months, all olanzapine patients preferred olanzapine to their previous depot medications and chose to continue on olanzapine treatment.. Clinicians may expect clinical improvement when switching chronically psychotic patients from traditional depot antipsychotic drugs to oral olanzapine. Switching may be completed within a 4-week period with relative compliance being maintained and patients preferring oral olanzapine to their previous depot medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia patients are known to manifest widespread, multifaceted cognitive deficits. There is now an increasing emphasis on the critical importance of cognitive deficits for the functional outcome in schizophrenia. Typical antipsychotics, although effective in reducing positive symptoms of the illness, have not shown much effect on cognitive functions. Atypical antipsychotics have shown promise of improving some cognitive functions.. This naturalistic study aimed to determine whether olanzapine and clozapine improve cognitive functioning in a sample of 48 patients with chronic schizophrenia who had either failed to show sufficient clinical improvements or suffered from distressing side effects with conventional antipsychotics and were switched to either olanzapine or clozapine for clinical reasons and, if so, whether the two drugs produce similar or different cognitive effects.. All patients completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests designed to index executive functioning, verbal learning, verbal and visual and memory, attention, working memory, and psychomotor speed at: (i) baseline, (ii) after 6 weeks and (iii) after 6 months of treatment with olanzapine or clozapine.. From the initial 48 patients who remained on olanzapine ( n=16) or clozapine ( n=14) for the entire duration with continuous participation, 30 provided data for this study. There were improvements over time (i.e. from baseline through 6 weeks to 6 months) in both treatment groups on verbal fluency, verbal learning and verbal and visual memory measures.. The findings indicate similar beneficial effects of olanzapine and clozapine on verbal learning and memory measures in patients showing a favourable clinical response to these drugs.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cognition; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Problem Solving; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine is a substrate of the cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 1A2. In this study, pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects of adding the CYP1A2 inhibitor fluvoxamine to steady-state olanzapine was examined in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Eight patients had been treated for at least 3 months with 10 to 20 mg/day olanzapine. Fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) was added (week 0) to the olanzapine treatment and continued for 8 weeks. Concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolite N-desmethylolanzapine and of fluvoxamine were analyzed at weeks 0, 1, 4, and 8. Addition of fluvoxamine resulted in a 12% to 112% ( < 0.01) increase of olanzapine from 31 +/- SD 15 ng/mL (week 0) to 56 +/- 31 ng/mL (week 8) in all patients. N-desmethylolanzapine concentrations were not significantly changed ( > 0.05). Fluvoxamine concentrations were 48 +/- 26 ng/mL on week 1 and 83 +/- 47 ng/mL on week 8. It is concluded that fluvoxamine affects olanzapine degradation and thus increases olanzapine concentrations. Although the combination was well tolerated in this sample and the negative symptom response appeared to be favorable in at least five patients, the combination therapy of olanzapine and fluvoxamine should be used cautiously and should be controlled by therapeutic drug monitoring to avoid olanzapine-induced side effects or intoxications.

Topics: Adult; Benzodiazepines; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Chronic Disease; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluvoxamine; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Time Factors

The aim of this study is to provide long-term data on the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in a group of patients with severe refractory schizophrenia.. Twenty patients who had previously received treatment with typical antipsychotic agents and who met the DSM-IV criteria of schizophrenia and refractoriness to treatment were evaluated in a 1-year prospective study after switching to olanzapine. The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were used to measure effectiveness. The extrapyramidal symptoms were also recorded. Serial laboratory tests, electrocardiograms and body weight measurements were also performed. Longitudinal statistical analyses were performed on the global changes in the scores of the scales by means of a repeated measures analysis of variance.. Significant reductions in the global scores from baseline in the PANSS, as well as in the BPRS, were observed. Furthermore, these reductions were also significant when considered only from Week 12. Olanzapine was, in general, well tolerated; a weight gain was observed between baseline and Month 4.5, but, interestingly, it decreased again from this time point to Month 12.. Olanzapine was shown to be a suitable treatment for refractory schizophrenia in this series of seriously ill patients. Although most of the effects were observed before Week 12, improvement persisted after 1 year. Weight gain stopped or even regressed when the treatment was prolonged. Large controlled clinical trials to define the role of atypical antipsychotics for the management of treatment-refractory schizophrenia are necessary.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Drug Resistance; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

The authors compared the efficacy and safety of three atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) with one another and with haloperidol in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. In a double-blind trial, 157 inpatients with a history of suboptimal treatment response were randomly assigned to treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol for 14 weeks (an 8-week escalation and fixed-dose period followed by a 6-week variable-dose period).. Clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine (but not haloperidol) resulted in statistically significant improvements in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Improvements seen in total and negative symptom scores with clozapine and olanzapine were superior to haloperidol. The atypical drugs, particularly olanzapine and clozapine, were associated with weight gain.. The effects of atypical antipsychotics in this population were statistically significant but clinically modest. The overall pattern of results suggests that clozapine and olanzapine have similar general antipsychotic efficacy and that risperidone may be somewhat less effective. Clozapine was the most effective treatment for negative symptoms. However, the differences among treatments were small.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Admission; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to determine the effect of olanzapine and other antipsychotic drugs on cognitive functions after 6months of treatment. Baseline, 3month and 6month psychopathological and cognitive evaluations were made. Thirty-eight partially responsive outpatients with DSM-IV chronic schizophrenia diagnosis were included in the study. On the indication of their attending psychiatrists, 21 patients initiated treatment with olanzapine, and 17 remained on their previous treatment with other antipsychotic drugs. Cognitive assessments were blind to medication and psychopathological status. The olanzapine group presented a significantly greater improvement in negative symptomatology and verbal memory than the comparison group in repeated-measures of MANOVAs between baseline, 3month and 6month assessments. These differences remained statistically significant after covarying out gender, treatment with other atypical antipsychotics, biperidene doses and changes in positive and negative symptoms. In order to match previous differences between groups, cognitive baseline scores for each test were introduced as covariates, resulting in a significant improvement for the olanzapine group in negative symptomatology and the interference task of the Stroop test.We then re-analyzed the data, dividing the comparison group into two groups: risperidone-treated patients (n=9) and patients receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=8). Post-hoc analyses between groups were carried out with baseline cognitive assessment as covariate. The olanzapine group improved significantly more than the risperidone group in negative symptomatology and in the interference task of Stroop test. The improvement in the number of categories of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was higher in risperidone patients than in those receiving olanzapine or conventional antipsychotic treatment. Conventional antipsychotic drugs did not present a significant improvement over atypical antipsychotic drugs in any cognitive function. In summary, in patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotic agents were associated with slight differential improvements over time in attentional, verbal memory and executive functions compared with conventional neuroleptic drugs. No differential improvements were found in social functioning, verbal fluency, non-verbal domains of memory or visuo-motor abilities.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Single-Blind Method

This randomized double-blind trial was conducted to test the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Importantly, this study also represents the first large clinical trial of olanzapine conducted in an Asian population. Patients (n = 182) were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol over a period of 8 weeks. The primary analyses included: (i) a test of non-inferiority of olanzapine compared with haloperidol in efficacy using the Final Global Improvement Rating (FGIR); and (ii) comparison between the treatment groups in extrapyramidal symptom severity using the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS). Olanzapine was comparable to haloperidol in efficacy in treating positive symptoms and significantly superior in treating negative symptoms. Extrapyramidal symptom severity was significantly improved for olanzapine-treated patients versus haloperidol-treated patients. Olanzapine was shown to be more effective and better tolerated than haloperidol in the treatment of Japanese patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Neurocognitive deficits are an enduring characteristic of schizophrenia, and remain prominent in patients whose positive symptoms have decreased after treatment with typical neuroleptics. Recent research has reported that olanzapine improves cognitive functioning in relapsing schizophrenia followed in an outpatient setting. Whether olanzapine will have an effect on improving cognitive function in chronic schizophrenics who have been hospitalized for long periods of time, and have shown a poor response to other conventional and atypical neuroleptics, has not been established. This study investigated cognitive function in chronic medication refractory schizophrenics who were treated with olanzapine or haloperidol in a double-blind study for 8 wk, and followed in an open olanzapine study for several additional months. Patients were evaluated with psychopathology rating scales and a battery of neuropsychological tests at baseline, end of double-blind and end of open-label phases of the study. At the end of the double-blind phase there were no significant differences between olanzapine and haloperidol, except for a trend for improvement on the Wisconsin Card Sort Test on olanzapine, which was significant at traditional but not corrected significance levels. After an additional 3 months of treatment with olanzapine doses of 20-40 mg/d, our statistical analysis showed significant improvement on overall neuropsychological test performance and specific cognitive tasks assessing verbal memory. However, these open-label results are difficult to interpret definitively because of the lack of a comparison drug group and the olanzapine dose escalation over time. Neurocognitive changes were not correlated with changes in psychopathology as assessed by PANSS or SANS scores.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Hyperprolactinemia and metabolic disturbance are common side effects of antipsychotics that cause intolerance. Despite its potential influence on relapse, there are no established guidelines for antipsychotic switching. This naturalistic study explored the association between antipsychotic switching, baseline clinical status, metabolic changes, and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. In total, 177 patients with amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia and 274 with olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance were enrolled. Relapse was determined by assessing changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores from baseline to 6 months (increased over 20% or 10% reaching 70). Metabolic indices were measured at baseline and 3 months. Patients with baseline PANSS >60 were more likely to relapse. Further, patients switching to aripiprazole had a higher risk of relapse regardless of their original medication. Participants who originally used amisulpride had reduced prolactin levels following medication change, while switching to olanzapine caused increased weight and blood glucose levels. In patients originally using olanzapine, only switching to aripiprazole reduced insulin resistance. Adverse effects on weight and lipid metabolism were observed in patients who switched to risperidone, while amisulpride improved lipid profiles. Changing schizophrenia treatment requires careful consideration of multiple variables, particularly the choice of substituted drug and the patient's baseline symptoms.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Recurrence; Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic (AP) medications are the first line of treatment for schizophrenia. However, most conferr a risk of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). The objective of this investigation was to conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of AIWG, followed by comprehensive, post-GWAS approaches.. We investigated n = 201 schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder patients of European and African American ancestry who were treated primarily with clozapine or olanzapine. We conducted a genome-wide association analysis for AIWG, defined primarily as a percentage of weight change from baseline.. When examining Europeans (n = 147), we noticed an association between rs62097526 (β = 0.39, p = 3.59 × 10-6, CADD = 2.213) variant, located downstream of the CIDEA gene, which is considered a risk factor for AIWG. In the entire sample, we observed a significant association between rs1525085 (β = 0.411, p = 3.15 × 10-9) variant of the DGKB gene and AIWG. The association was nominally significant in Europeans (β = 0.271, p = 0.002) and African Americans (β = 0.579, p = 5.73 × 10-5) with the same risk allele. Our top genes (p < 5 × 10-5) were enriched in the GWAS catalog for the risk of obesity and interacted with the known risk factors for obesity (G6PD) and diabetes (IRS1). In addition, these genes are targeted by miRNAs related to schizophrenia (mir-34a) and obesity (mir-19b). However, our polygenic risk score analyses did not provide support for major genetic overlap between obesity and the risk of AIWG.. In summary, we propose that the CIDEA and DGKB genes are risk factors for AIWG in transethnic populations. Additionally, our evidence suggests that the G6PD and IRS1 gene-related pathways might be involved in AIWG.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Black or African American; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Diacylglycerol Kinase; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multifactorial Inheritance; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain; White People; Young Adult

We investigated whether negative symptoms, such as poor motivation or anhedonia, were associated with higher body mass index (BMI) in stable patients with schizophrenia chronically treated with antipsychotic medication.. 62 olanzapine- or clozapine-treated patients with illness duration of at least four years were selected from an international multicenter study on the characterization of negative symptoms. All participants completed the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Bivariate correlations between BMI and negative symptoms (BNSS) were explored, as well as multiple regression analyses. We further explored the association of two principal component factors of the BNSS and BMI. Subsidiary analyses re-modeled the above using the negative symptoms subscale of the PANSS and the EMSLEY factor for negative symptoms for convergent validity.. Lower negative symptoms (BNSS score) were associated with higher BMI (r=-0.31; p=0.015). A multiple regression analysis showed that negative symptoms (BNSS score) and age were significant predictors of BMI (p=0.037). This was mostly driven by the motivation/pleasure factor of the BNSS. Within this second factor, BMI was negatively associated with anhedonia (r=-0.254; p=0.046) and asociality (r=-0.253; p=0.048), but not avolition (r=-0.169; p=0.188). EMSLEY score was positively associated with BNSS (r=0.873, p<0.001), but negatively associated with BMI (r=-0.308; p=0.015). The association between PANSS and BMI did not reach significance (r=-224, p=0.080).. We conclude that lower negative symptoms were associated with higher BMI (assessed using both the BNSS and EMSLEY) in chronic stable schizophrenia patients, mostly due to lower anhedonia and asociality levels.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Principal Component Analysis; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Regression Analysis; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Recent studies have shown that antipsychotic drugs have epigenetic effects. However, the effects of antipsychotic drugs on histone modification remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effects of antipsychotic drugs on the epigenetic modification of the BDNF gene in the rat hippocampus. Rats were subjected to chronic restraint stress (6 h/d for 21 d) and then were administered with either olanzapine (2 mg/kg) or haloperidol (1 mg/kg). The levels of histone H3 acetylation and MeCP2 binding at BDNF promoter IV were assessed with chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. The mRNA levels of total BDNF with exon IV, HDAC5, DNMT1, and DNMT3a were assessed with a quantitative RT-PCR procedure. Chronic restraint stress resulted in the downregulation of total and exon IV BDNF mRNA levels and a decrease in histone H3 acetylation and an increase in MeCP2 binding at BDNF promoter IV. Furthermore, there were robust increases in the expression of HDAC5 and DNMTs. Olanzapine administration largely prevented these changes. The administration of haloperidol had no effect. These findings suggest that the antipsychotic drug olanzapine induced histone modification of BDNF gene expression in the hippocampus and that these epigenetic alterations may represent one of the mechanisms underlying the actions of antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Chronic Disease; Epigenesis, Genetic; Gene Expression; Hippocampus; Male; Olanzapine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Restraint, Physical; Stress, Psychological

A new depot formulation of paliperidone has been developed that provides effective treatment for schizophrenia for 3 months (PP3M). It has been tested in phase-3 trials, but no data on its cost-effectiveness have been published.. To determine the cost-effectiveness of PP3M compared with once-monthly paliperidone (PP1M), haloperidol long-acting therapy (HAL-LAT), risperidone microspheres (RIS-LAT), and oral olanzapine (oral-OLZ) for treating chronic schizophrenia in The Netherlands.. A previous 1-year decision tree was adapted, based on local inputs supplemented with data from published literature. The primary analysis used DRG costs in 2016 euros from the insurer perspective, as derived from official lists. A micro-costing analysis was also conducted. For the costing scenario, official list prices were used. Clinical outcomes included relapses (treated as outpatients, requiring hospitalization, total), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Rates and utility scores were derived from the literature. Economic outcomes were the incremental cost/QALY-gained or relapse-avoided. Model robustness was examined in scenario, 1-way, and probability sensitivity analyses.. The expected cost was lowest with PP3M (8,781€), followed by PP1M (10,325€), HAL-LAT (11,278€), RIS-LAT (11,307€), and oral-OLZ (13,556€). PP3M had the fewest total relapses/patient (0.36, 0.94, 1.39, 1.21, and 1.70, respectively), hospitalizations (0.11, 0.46, 0.40, 0.56, and 0.57, respectively), emergency room visits (0.25, 0.48. 0.99, 0.65, and 1.14, respectively) and the most QALYs (0.847, 0.735, 0.709, 0.719, and 0.656, respectively). In both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, PP3M dominated all other drugs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed base case findings. In the costing analysis, total costs were, on average, 31.9% higher than DRGs.. PP3M dominated all commonly used drugs. It is cost-effective for treating chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands. Results were robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. For patients requiring a depot medication, such as those with adherence problems, PP3M appears to be a good alternative anti-psychotic treatment.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Haloperidol; Humans; Netherlands; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Atypical long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are increasingly available for treating chronic schizophrenia in patients chronically non-adherent to prescribed regimens. Few economic studies have compared these products.. To determine the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole (ARI-LAI), paliperidone (PP-LAI), olanzapine (OLZ-LAI), and risperidone (RIS-LAI) in patients with chronic schizophrenia in Finland.. A 1-year decision tree model was adapted with guidance from an expert panel. Patients started hospitalized in relapse; those who responded continued treatment, others were switched to secondary drugs, then clozapine in the event of 2nd line failure. Rates of adherence, stable disease, relapse, and hospitalization were taken from pivotal trials, and utilities from published research. Included were direct costs paid by the Finnish Ministry of Health, in 2015 euros. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), hospitalization rates, and rates of relapse not requiring hospitalization. Model robustness was assessed using a series of 1-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses.. Expected costs were lowest for PP-LAI at 41,148€, followed by 41,543€ for ARI-LAI, 42,067€ for RIS-LAI and 45,406€ for OLZ-LAI. Respective QALYs were 0.683, 0.671, 0.666, and 0.672. Re-hospitalization rates and non-admitted relapses were 23.6% and 3.9% for PP-LAI, 28.5% and 4.1% for ARI-LAI, 28.8% and 5.0% for RIS-LAI, 28.3% and 5.2% for OLZ-LAI. PP-LAI treatment was associated with the most days with stable disease (132.0), followed by OLZ-LAI (125.5), ARI-LAI (122.6), and RIS-LAI (114.4). Sensitive inputs between PP-LAI and ARI-LAI included rates of adherence, dropouts, and relapses plus drug prices; dropout and relapse rates for RIS-LAI; OLZ-LAI results were insensitive. In probability sensitivity analyses, PP-LAI dominated ARI-LAI in 75.8% of the 10,000 iterations, RIS-LAI in 83.1% and OLZ-LAI in 95.7%.. PP-LAI dominated the other atypicals. It appears to be the preferred option for treating chronic relapsing schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Finland; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Monosymptomatic hypochondriac psychosis (MHP) patients present with a delusional ideation that revolves around one particular hypochondriac concern. Delusional infestation is the most common type of MHP seen by the dermatologist.. This study was designed to retrospectively investigate a group of patients with delusions of infestation seen in an academic medical center in São Paulo, Brazil.. A retrospective study of patients presenting with delusional infestation between 2007 and 2014 was conducted. Records were reviewed to study personal data, symptoms, and treatments.. Thirty patients were studied (22 female, eight male). Their mean age was 58 years in men and 60 years in women. Twenty-four patients spent most of their time at home (i.e. they were housewives, retired, or unemployed). The duration of disease varied from 3 months to 20 years. Fifteen patients brought in fragments of material that they believed to be parasites ("specimen sign"). Treatment consisted of the antipsychotic drugs pimozide (1-6 mg/d) or olanzapine (5-10 mg/d). Three patients did not return for follow-up. Follow-up varying from 2 months to 7 years was recorded in 24 patients. Two patients were treated with other psychoactive drugs prescribed by psychiatrists for additional psychiatric diagnoses. Control of symptoms was achieved in the majority of patients who underwent adequate follow-up.. Delusional infestation is an extremely chronic disease. Attempts to discontinue treatment in those patients in whom a lengthy follow-up was performed inevitably resulted in symptom relapses.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brazil; Chronic Disease; Cohort Studies; Delusional Parasitosis; Dermatology; Ectoparasitic Infestations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pimozide; Prevalence; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Distribution; Urban Population

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Peduncle; Chronic Disease; Female; Hallucinations; Humans; Olanzapine; Treatment Outcome

Patients with chronic schizophrenia suffer a huge burden, as do their families/caregivers. Treating schizophrenia is costly for health systems. The European Medicines Agency has approved paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI; Xeplion), an atypical antipsychotic depot; however, its pharmacoeconomic profile in Portugal is unknown. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the viewpoint of the Portuguese National Health Service.. PP-LAI was compared with long acting injectables risperidone (RIS-LAI) and haloperidol (HAL-LAI) and oral drugs (olanzapine; oral-OLZ) adapting a 1-year decision tree to Portugal, guided by local experts. Clinical information and costs were obtained from literature sources and published lists. Outcomes included relapses (both requiring and not requiring hospitalization) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were expressed in 2014 euros. Economic outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs); including cost-utility (outcome = QALYs) and cost-effectiveness analyses (outcomes = relapse/hospitalization/emergency room (ER) visit avoided).. The base-case cost of oral-OLZ was 4447€ (20% drugs/20% medical/60% hospital); HAL-LAI cost 4474€ (13% drugs/13% medical/74% hospital); PP-LAI cost 5326€ (49% drugs/12% medical/39% hospital); RIS-LAI cost 6223€ (44% drugs/12% medical/44% hospital). Respective QALYs/hospitalizations/ER visits were oral-OLZ: 0.761/0.615/0.242; HAL-LAI: 0.758/0.623/0.250; PP-LAI: 0.823/0.288/0.122; RIS-LAI: 0.799/0.394/0.168. HAL-LAI was dominated by oral-OLZ and RIS-LAI by PP-LAI for all outcomes. The ICER of PP-LAI over oral-OLZ was 14,247€/QALY, well below NICE/Portuguese thresholds (≈24,800€/30,000€/QALY). ICERs were 1973€/relapse avoided and 2697€/hospitalization avoided. Analyses were robust against most variations in input values, as PP-LAI was cost-effective over oral-OLZ in >99% of 10,000 simulations.. In Portugal, PP-LAI dominated HAL-LAI and RIS-LAI and was cost-effective over oral-OLZ with respect to QALYs gained, relapses avoided, and hospitalizations avoided.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Haloperidol; Hospitalization; Humans; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Portugal; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine cause metabolic side effects leading to obesity and insulin resistance. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this study we investigated the effects of chronic treatment of olanzapine on the fatty acid composition of plasma in mice.. Twenty 8-week female Balb/c mice were randomly assigned to two groups: the OLA group and the control group. After treatment with olanzapine (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle intraperitoneally for 8 weeks, fasting glucose, insulin levels and oral glucose tolerance test were determined. Effects on plasma fatty acid profile and plasma indices of D5 desaturase, D6 desaturase and SCD1 activity were also investigated.. Chronic administration of olanzapine significantly elevated fasting glucose and insulin levels, impaired glucose tolerance, but did not increase body weight. Total saturated fatty acids and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids were significantly increased and total monounsaturated fatty acids were significantly decreased, while total n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids showed no prominent changes. Chronic olanzapine treatment significantly up-regulated D6 desaturase activity while down-regulating D5 desaturase activity. Palmitic acid (C16:0), dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (C20:3n-6) and D6 desaturase were associated with an increase probability of insulin resistance, whereas nervonic acid (C24:1) and SCD1 were significantly associated with a lower insulin resistance probability.. All results indicated that such drug-induced effects on fatty acid profile in plasma were relevant for the metabolic adverse effects associated with olanzapine and possibly other antipsychotics. Further studies are needed to investigate geneticand other mechanisms to explain how plasma fatty acids regulate glucose metabolism and affect the risk of insulin resistance.

Topics: 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic Acid; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Area Under Curve; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Chronic Disease; Fatty Acid Desaturases; Fatty Acids; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Olanzapine; Palmitic Acid; Random Allocation

Schizophrenia is a severe and debilitating psychiatric disorder. Pharmacological interventions aim to ameliorate symptoms and reduce the risk of relapse and costly hospitalisation. Despite the established efficacy of antipsychotic medication, compliance to treatment is poor, particularly with oral formulation. The emergence of long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations in recent years has aimed to counteract the poor compliance rates observed and optimise long term patient outcomes.. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) vs. risperidone long acting injectable (RLAI), paliperidone long acting injectable (PLAI) and olanzapine long acting injectable (OLAI) in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia patients in the United Kingdom.. A Markov model was developed to emulate the treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort of patients initiating maintenance treatment with LAI antipsychotics. The economic analysis was conducted from a National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a 10 year time horizon. Efficacy and safety probabilities were derived from mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) where possible. Analyses were conducted assuming pooled dosing from randomised clinical trials included in the MTCs.. The model estimates that AOM 400 improves clinical outcomes by reducing relapses per patient comparative to other LAIs over the model time horizon (2.38, 2.53, 2.70, and 2.67 for AOM 400, RLAI, PLAI and OLAI respectively). In the deterministic analysis, AOM 400 dominated PLAI and OLAI; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 3,686 per QALY gained was observed against RLAI. Results from the univariate sensitivity analyses highlighted the probability and cost of relapse as main drivers for cost-effectiveness. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, AOM 400 demonstrated a marginally higher probability of being cost-effective (51%) than RLAI, PLAI and OLAI (48%, 1% and 0%, respectively) at a willingness to pay threshold of GBP 20,000.. The model was built to accommodate results of an adjusted MTC analysis. Furthermore the model effectively captures repercussions of deteriorating compliance to treatment by incorporating three levels of compliance with elevated risks of relapse for partial compliance and non-compliance. Limitations of the analysis include the limited number of studies incorporated in the MTC, the extrapolation of short term clinical data and the exclusion of the wider societal burden.. Comparative to other atypical antipsychotics, AOM 400 represents value for money in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia; however, in light of the PSA findings and comparable cost-effectiveness (i.e. against RLAI), the product profile and wider benefits of the respective treatments must be taken into account when prescribing antipsychotics.. Future research should assess the use of LAI antipsychotics earlier in the disease course of schizophrenia to see whether improved compliance and outcomes shortly following the onset of psychosis has the potential to alter the disease trajectory. Moreover it should be assessed whether changes in the disease trajectory can alleviate cost and resource pressures placed on national health services.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; State Medicine; United Kingdom

The Czech Republic is faced with making choices between pharmaceutical products, including depot injectable antipsychotics. A pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of atypical depots.. An existing 1-year decision-analytic framework was adapted to model drug use in this healthcare system. The average direct costs to the General Insurance Company of the Czech Republic of using paliperidone palmitate (Xeplion®), risperidone (Risperdal Consta®), and olanzapine pamoate (Zypadhera®) were determined. Literature-derived clinical rates populated the model, with costs adjusted to 2012 Euros using the consumer price index. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), days in remission, and proportions hospitalized or visiting emergency rooms. One-way sensitivity analyses were calculated for all important inputs. A multivariate probability analysis was used to examine the stability of results using 10,000 iterations of simulated input over reasonable ranges of all included variables.. Expected average costs/per patient treated were €5377 for PP-LAI, €6118 for RIS-LAI, and €6537 for OLZ-LAI. Respective QALYs were 0.817, 0.809, and 0.811; ER visits were 0.127, 0.134, and 0.141; hospitalizations were 0.252, 0.298, and 0.289. Results were generally robust in sensitivity analyses. PP-LAI dominated RIS-LAI and OLZ-LAI in 90.2% and 92.1% of simulations, respectively. Results were insensitive to drug prices but sensitive to adherence and hospitalization rates.. PP-LAI dominated the other two drugs, as it had a lower overall cost and superior clinical outcomes, making it the preferred choice. Using PP-LAI in place of RIS-LAI for chronic relapsing schizophrenia would reduce the overall costs of care for the healthcare system.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Czech Republic; Decision Support Techniques; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Costs; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Palmitates; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

In Finland, regional rates of schizophrenia exceed those in most countries, impacting the healthcare burden. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of long-acting antipsychotic (LAI) drugs paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI), olanzapine pamoate (OLZ-LAI), and risperidone (RIS-LAI) for chronic schizophrenia.. This study adapted a decision tree analysis from Norway for the Finnish National Health Service. Country-specific data were sought from the literature and public documents, guided by clinical experts. Costs of health services and products were retrieved from literature sources and current price lists. This simulation study estimated average 1-year costs for treating patients with each LAI, average remission days, rates of hospitalization and emergency room visits and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).. PP-LAI was dominant. Its estimated annual average cost was €10,380/patient and was associated with 0.817 QALY; OLZ-LAI cost €12,145 with 0.810 QALY; RIS-LAI cost €12,074 with 0.809 QALY. PP-LAI had the lowest rates of hospitalization, emergency room visits, and relapse days. This analysis was robust against most variations in input values except adherence rates. PP-LAI was dominant over OLZ-LAI and RIS-LAI in 77.8% and 85.9% of simulations, respectively. Limitations include the 1-year time horizon (as opposed to lifetime costs), omission of the costs of adverse events, and the assumption of universal accessibility.. In Finland, PP-LAI dominated the other LAIs as it was associated with a lower cost and better clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Costs; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Finland; Humans; Isoxazoles; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Palmitates; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

Chronic mild stress (CMS)-induced 'anhedonia' is a predictive model of antidepressant activity. We assessed the reversal of CMS-induced behavioral changes by asenapine, the antidepressant imipramine, and the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and risperidone. Secondarily, the ability of these agents to facilitate intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was assessed to ensure that any attenuation of CMS-induced anhedonia was not associated with an overt hedonic profile. After 2 weeks of CMS, male Wistar rats were administered asenapine (0.06-0.6 mg/kg), olanzapine (2 mg/kg), risperidone (0.5 mg/kg), or imipramine (10 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection over 5 weeks to examine their ability to reverse CMS-induced reductions in the intake of a sucrose solution. For the ICSS study, rats were trained to deliver an electrical stimulus to the ventral tegmental area. The effects of acute doses of subcutaneous asenapine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3 and 1 mg/kg), risperidone (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), and intraperitoneal imipramine (3-30 mg/kg), cocaine (5.0 mg/kg), or amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) on ICSS were then examined. CMS significantly reduced sucrose intake (P < 0.001). All active agents (0.6 mg/kg asenapine, 2 mg/kg olanzapine, 0.5 mg/kg risperidone, and 10 mg/kg imipramine) reversed the effect of CMS (all P < 0.001). In the ICSS protocol, asenapine (0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg), olanzapine (1 mg/kg), and risperidone (0.3 mg/kg) impaired ICSS performance, whereas positive controls (5 mg/kg cocaine, 1 mg/kg amphetamine) facilitated ICSS. Asenapine reversed CMS-induced anhedonia without facilitating ICSS, providing support for a role of asenapine in treating bipolar disorder and aspects of negative and/or affective symptoms in schizophrenia.

Topics: Anhedonia; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Chronic Disease; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Imipramine; Male; Olanzapine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Risperidone; Self Stimulation; Stress, Psychological

Measles virus is a highly prevalent neurotropic virus capable of causing persistent infections within the central nervous system.. We measured IgG class antibodies to measles in 820 individuals including 138 with recent onset psychosis, 378 with persistent schizophrenia, and 304 non-psychiatric controls. Levels of antibodies among the groups were compared by bivariate and by multivariate analyses and correlated with clinical and demographic variables.. The level of measles antibodies in individuals with a recent onset of psychosis was greater than the level of antibodies in individuals with persistent schizophrenia or individuals without a history of a psychiatric disorder (p<.00001). The level of measles antibodies in the individuals with persistent schizophrenia was greater than the level of measles antibodies in the controls (p<.001). Recent onset of psychosis was associated with having elevated levels of measles antibodies, defined as the 90th percentile of the levels of the controls, with an odds ratio of 8.0 (95% CI 4.6, 14.0); persistent schizophrenia was associated with having this level with an odds ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.4, 3.7). Within the psychiatric groups, measles antibody levels were associated with age, race, and current treatment with the antipsychotic medication, olanzapine.. The reasons for elevated levels of measles antibodies in the psychiatric groups are not known with certainty and should be studied in prospective investigations.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antibodies, Viral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Male; Measles virus; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Reference Values; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sex Factors; Young Adult

Patients' non-compliance in treatments, such as irregular taking of medication, represents an enormous problem with psychiatric patients in general. This difficulty occurs especially in patients suffering from chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. There are not any significant differences in the efficacy of reducing the positive symptoms in schizophrenia between the conventional and the atypical antipsychotics. However, the effects which are manifested in negative schizophrenia symptoms or in the patients' cognitive functioning, favour the atypical antipsychotics. When it comes to adding the subjective well-being of the patients and their improvement of the quality of life, then, the advantages of atypical antipsychotics are unquestionable. New trends in medicine are increasingly impinge on the pharmacoeconomy, which aims at reducing treatment cost. This trend is getting progressively stronger in the world and as such, it certainly will not bypass Croatia. Pharmacists and General Practice doctors (GP) are permitted, by the law, to replace the original medicament prescribed by a specialist doctor, with a cheaper one from the same generic group of medicaments, with a purpose of cutting down the treatment costs. Is there always a valid justification for such practice, and should it become a rule for all the patients out there? This is a case report of a patient who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. He has been on a treatment with atypical antipsychotics and has kept in a good and stable remission for the past seven years. His therapy consisted of olanzapine in a dose of 15 mg in the evening, throughout the whole period of his 7-year remission. A month ago, his GP doctor self- initially prescribed a generic olanzapine. The impact of this decision on to the mental state of the patient as well as his trust in the treatment itself is described in this report.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cognition Disorders; Cost Savings; Croatia; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Family Practice; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Patient Readmission; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Treatment Outcome

Adverse effects from medication vary with age. Weight gain with several psychotropics is well known in adults but less information is available related to extent and complications of psychotropic-induced weight gain in older psychiatric patients. We determined the relative incidence of 2 obesity-related conditions (diabetes and hypertension) in older psychiatric patients receiving antipsychotics, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers.. A population-based case-control study of all psychiatric patients aged 67 years or older in contact with either specialist services or primary care using administrative data from Nova Scotia.. We identified incident cases of diabetes (n = 608) and of hypertension (n = 1056), as well as an equal number of control subjects for each condition. Amitryptiline, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and olanzapine were associated with an increased risk of presenting with hypertension 6 months after initial prescription. By contrast, conventional antipsychotics were associated with a reduced incidence of hypertension. Olanzapine was also significantly associated with diabetes after 6 months (OR adj = 2.58, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.92). The findings for SSRIs and olanzapine remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders such as sociodemographic characteristics, schizophrenia, beta blockers, thiazide diuretics, and corticosteroids.. Our results suggest that the association of psychotropics and 2 obesity-related conditions, hypertension and diabetes, applies to older psychiatric patients as well as younger populations. Within drug classes, there are drugs that have a greater association than others, and this may be a factor when choosing a specific agent.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Mental Disorders; Obesity; Olanzapine; Psychotropic Drugs; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Toluene toxicity primarily affects central nervous system white matter, causing a characteristic brain MRI pattern.. A toluene addicted man, after an abstinence period and a treatment with neuroleptics, presented with severe worsening of preexisting generalized tremor, opsoclonus, dysarthria, gait inability, jerky tendon reflexes and behaviour disorders. Magnetic resonance imaging showed mild leukoencephalopathy and hypointensities in deep gray matter nuclei. The DaT-scan revealed a decrease in presynaptic dopamine reuptake.. Clinical and neuroradiological findings and the possible sensitivity to neuroleptics indicate dopaminergic impairment. Our case suggests that chronic toluene abuse causes presynaptic dopaminergic depletion.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Chronic Disease; Dopamine; Gait Disorders, Neurologic; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neural Pathways; Neuropsychological Tests; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Olanzapine; Solvents; Substance-Related Disorders; Toluene; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Tremor; Young Adult

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Remission Induction; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

To test association of dopamine receptor D3 (DRD-3) gene polymorphisms with olanzapine response in genetic samples from a registration phase clinical trial.. Eighty-eight acutely ill patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were genotyped for ser-9-gly (rs6280) and 23 other polymorphisms within the DRD-3 gene. Allelic association of clinical response (mean baseline- to-endpoint reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total and subscores) over 6 weeks of olanzapine treatment was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance.. Ser-9-gly genotypes were associated with differences in PANSS total score improvement from baseline to 6 weeks (p = 0.021). This association was most notable for improvement in positive symptoms (p = 0.0001), with patients with gly/gly genotype significantly more responsive. More patients with the gly/gly genotype had greater positive symptom remission (endpoint rating of minimal or none on all PANSS positive items, 39.1%) compared with patients with gly/ser and ser/ser genotypes (13.8%; p = 0.033). DRD-3 polymorphisms in disequilibrium with ser-9-gly were also significantly associated with greater positive symptom improvement (p = 0.0009-0.021), and one not in complete linkage disequilibrium, with lesser improvement (p = 0.027).. Gly/gly DRD-3 genotype predicted statistically and clinically significantly better acute positive symptom reduction compared with other ser-9-gly genotypes in patients treated with olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Polymorphism, Genetic; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; White People

In the present study we have investigated the effects of a chronic administration of olanzapine (Ola) on visual and spatial memory in normal and anhedonic rats. The effects of Ola have been compared to those of the typical antipsychotic Hal, the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline (Ami), and the mood stabilizer VPA. Anhedonia (assessed by reduction of sucrose preference) was induced by administration of a chronic mild stress (CMS) protocol, in which rats were exposed sequentially, over a period of 4 wk, to a variety of unpredictable mild stressors. The spatial memory was evaluated by testing the ability of the rats to discriminate a familiar vs. a novel environment, while the visual memory was assessed by testing the ability of the rats to discriminate familiar vs. novel objects. In CMS-free rats, VPA (5 or 30 mg/kg.d), Ola (0.02 or 0.1 mg/kg.d), Ami (2 mg/kg.d) and Hal (0.2 mg/kg.d) caused no detectable modifications of visual memory, whereas VPA (5 mg/kg.d), Ami (2 mg/kg.d) and Ola (0.02 mg/kg.d) did not modify spatial memory performance. In our experimental conditions, the administration of the CMS protocol caused an impairment of both visual and spatial memory. The chronic treatment of anhedonic rats with Ola (0.02 mg/kg.d) or Ami (2 mg/kg.d) prevented, at least in part, the stress-induced impairment of visuospatial performance. In conclusion, the results of the present preclinical study seem to indicate that the chronic administration of low doses of Ola or Ami has the potential to lead to substantial cognitive benefits in depressed patients.

Topics: Amitriptyline; Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Conditioning, Operant; Discrimination, Psychological; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Food Preferences; Haloperidol; Male; Maze Learning; Memory; Olanzapine; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Recognition, Psychology; Space Perception; Stress, Psychological; Taste; Valproic Acid

An orally disintegrating tablet formulation of olanzapine (ODT olanzapine) is designed to dissolve rapidly upon contact with saliva. We describe a manic patient who has an esophageal stricture and chronic pharyngitis, two conditions that impede the swallowing of medications. She was successfully treated for her mania with this orally disintegrating formulation. This case report shows that ODT olanzapine may be useful in the psychiatric management of manic and other patients for whom olanzapine is appropriate, and who have an underlying medical condition that impedes swallowing oral medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Esophageal Stenosis; Female; Humans; Olanzapine; Pharyngitis

The neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) plays important roles in neural migration, synaptogenesis and CNS development. Change of N-CAM fragments in CSF of schizophrenic patients was reported previously, and we aimed to detect difference in circulating N-CAM in the serum of schizophrenic patients and healthy controls.. Samples were from 14 chronic schizophrenic patients including 3 drug naïve patients and 11 healthy controls. After removal of albumin and globulin, N-CAM fragments were measured by Western blot technique with monoclonal antibody.. N-CAM immunoreactive bands were detected primarily at 180, 140, 120, 75, 68 and 52 kDa. Samples from patients and controls showed similar patterns of bands, but schizophrenic patients showed increases or decreases at some bands intensity compared to healthy controls. The 68 kDa/73-75 kDa bands intensity ratio was substantially elevated in schizophrenic patients (0.262+/-0.14 in patients, 0.065+/-0.04 in controls) especially, the three drug naïve patients had a higher value of this ratio compared to the medicated patients. One drug naïve patient showed a decrease in this ratio after one month of antipsychotic medication.. The results suggest elevated membrane turnover and/or abnormalities in the regulation of proteolysis of N-CAM in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blotting, Western; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Indoles; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Weight; Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules; Olanzapine; Protein Isoforms; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The glutamate-ergic hypothesis of schizophrenia pathogenesis has been substantially expanded due to recent data on changes in glutamate metabolizing enzymes (GME) in the brain of patients with schizophrenia. Significant changes in the amounts of glutamate synthetase (GS), glutamate synthetase-like protein (GSLP), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) have been found. Alterations in the cerebral metabolism of glutamate (together with disturbances in glutamate receptors and transporters) apparently play an important role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Glutamate dysmetabolism has been shown to be of systemic nature, i.e. the amounts of GME (GDH and GSLP) are elevated in platelets of patients with chronic schizophrenia, and these enzymes may be vital markers of glutamate system status. The amounts of GDH and GSLP were monitored in platelets of chronic patients during treatment with olanzapine, an atypical neuroleptic modulating glutamate concentration in the brain and blood of patients. GSLP amount can serve as a predictor of the duration of treatment to achieve a positive outcome. Further studies of GME in blood may result in elaboration of prognostically valuable biological tests not only for schizophrenia treatments, but also for other mental and nervous system diseases in which the glutamate system is substantially implicated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Platelets; Blotting, Western; Brain; Chronic Disease; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Female; Glutamate Dehydrogenase; Glutamate Synthase; Glutamates; Humans; Luminescence; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prefrontal Cortex; Prognosis; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Impaired ability to detect and correct errors may contribute to poor cognitive and social function in schizophrenia.. To test the hypothesis that impairment in error monitoring contributes to impaired executive function in schizophrenia.. 56 schizophrenia patients and 77 healthy individuals were tested with the Penn Conditional Exclusion test (PCET), a computerised test of executive function which allowed collection of accuracy and latency performance parameters. Error monitoring was assessed by analyzing reaction times for correct (RTC) and incorrect (RTI) responses. Tests of face recognition, working memory (WM) and processing speed were also administered.. Executive error-monitoring effort (EXER), calculated by dividing the difference between RTI and RTC by the sum of RTC and RTI, was significantly smaller in patients than controls. A regression model with the executive function (PCET total errors) as dependent variable showed independent contributions of EXER, verbal WM and spatial WM to test performance and explained 35% of the variance. EXER showed significant association with error-monitoring effort for face recognition in patients but not controls.. Impaired error-monitoring contributes to poor executive function in schizophrenia. Independent contributions of error-monitoring effort and verbal WM to executive functions may reflect distinct contributions of prefrontal and medial frontal cortical dysfunctions. Error-monitoring mechanisms in different cognitive domains may share more neural resources in schizophrenia than in healthy individuals, reflecting inefficient processing.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Reaction Time; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Self Efficacy; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles

Previous studies have reported that hippocampal volumes correlate with symptom severity in schizophrenia. This longitudinal study measured changes in symptoms and hippocampal volume in patients switched from typical antipsychotics to olanzapine.. MRI scans were acquired from patients with chronic schizophrenia (n=10) and healthy volunteers (n=20). At baseline, patients were treated with typical antipsychotics for at least one year, then switched to olanzapine, and rescanned approximately one year later.. Olanzapine treatment resulted in no significant change in right or left hippocampal volume. Individual changes in right hippocampal volume correlated significantly with changes in symptoms.. Hippocampal volume change may serve as a marker of symptom change in patients on olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hippocampus; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) has rarely been reported as an eating disorder-related personality trait. A 23-year-old woman was diagnosed as having anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging type. At the age of 53 years, she was admitted to Jikei University Hospital because of excessive bodyweight loss. She was diagnosed as having SPD based on bizarre behavior, ideation and a tendency to seek isolation. She was treated with low-dose antipsychotics, and her impulsive behavior improved. The patient's SPD was considered to have had a psychopathological contribution to her chronic episodes of anorexia nervosa.

Topics: Anorexia Nervosa; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Bulimia; Chronic Disease; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Paroxetine; Schizotypal Personality Disorder; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Atypical antipsychotics can affect cortical volume differently from traditional drugs. The study of the outcome of grey matter deficits in schizophrenia with olanzapine may be of particular interest in this context.. In this study, we evaluated the changes in the volume of gray matter in the cortex of 11 schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine and in 11 healthy controls after three years of follow-up. After MR imaging, acquisition data were processed with a volumetric quantification method based on the Talairach atlas. The longitudinal change of volumetric data was corrected for differences in overall brain size.. Patients showed greater reduction than controls in cortical volume in the frontal and parietal regions during follow-up. No relationship was observed between clinical and volumetric changes.. Our data suggest that the profile of action of olanzapine on the cortical volume of chronically ill patients may be similar to that of typical antipsychotics. Other explanations, however, cannot be completely discarded for that outcome with our data.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

We studied a sample of schizophrenia out-patients to test the hypotheses that serum homocysteine concentrations would correlate positively with measures of glucose metabolism.. Subjects underwent a nutritional assessment and fasting plasma, serum insulin and homocysteine tests.. Males had a significantly higher homocysteine levels than females (7.69 +/- 1.42 microM vs. 6.63 +/- 1.40 microM; P = 0.02). Comparing subjects with normal fasting glucose (NFG) (glucose < 100 mg/dl) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (> or = 100 mg/dl) subjects with IFG (mean 8.2 +/- 1.5 microM) had significantly higher homocysteine levels than those with NFG (mean 7.2 +/- 1.4 microM, P = 0.03). IFG was also associated with greater mean values for a Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (P = 0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.045).. The group with IFG had higher fasting serum homocysteine concentrations than those with NFG which supports a connection to an important cardiovascular risk factor.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Community Mental Health Centers; Female; Folic Acid; Homeostasis; Homocysteine; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Nutrition Assessment; Olanzapine; Prediabetic State; Psychotic Disorders; Reference Values; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Statistics as Topic; Waist-Hip Ratio

Many patients recovering from a first psychotic episode will discontinue medication against medical advice, even before a 1-year treatment course is completed. Factors associated with treatment adherence in patients with chronic schizophrenia include beliefs about severity of illness and need for treatment, treatment with typical versus atypical antipsychotic and medication side effects.. In this 2-year prospective study of 254 patients recovering from a first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder we examined the relationship between antipsychotic medication non-adherence and patient beliefs about: need for treatment, antipsychotic medication benefits, and negative aspects of antipsychotic medication treatment. We also examined the relationship between medication non-adherence and treatment with either haloperidol or olanzapine, and objective measures of symptom response and side effects.. The likelihood of becoming medication non-adherent for 1 week or longer was greater in subjects whose belief in need for treatment was less (HR=1.75, 95% CI 1.16, 2.65, p=0.0077) or who believed medications were of low benefit (HR=2.88, 95 CI 1.79-4.65, p<0.0001). Subjects randomized to haloperidol were more likely to become medication non-adherent for >or=1 week than subjects randomized to olanzapine (HR-1.51, 95% CI 1.01, 2.27, p=0.045).. Beliefs about need for treatment and the benefits of antipsychotic medication may be intervention targets to improve likelihood of long-term medication adherence in patients recovering from a first episode of schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or schizophreniform disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Models, Psychological; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Clozapine is a well-known antipsychotic to cause fatal agranulocytosis but there are only a few case reports about the risk of leukopenia and agranulocytosis associated with other atypical antipsychotics. Olanzapine has structural pharmacological similarities to those of clozapine and reports about haematological adverse effects of olanzapine include three groups: the first group includes cases of olanzapine-induced neutropenia, the second informing that olanzapine is safe after clozapine induced agranulocytosis and the third group forms prolongation of clozapine-induced leukopenia with olanzapine use. The aim of this paper is to report a case of prolongation of clozapine-induced leukopenia despite olanzapine treatment and discuss leukopenia caused by atypical antipsychotic use in the light of recent and limited literature.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia

Risperidone, olanzapine, and clozapine are three atypical antipsychotic medications commonly used in the management of chronic schizophrenia. While they offer advantages with regard to clinical efficacy and side-effect profile, few studies have compared them in a naturalistic prospective observational manner. This study therefore investigated their comparative efficacy over 12 weeks including illness characteristics and adverse effects. One hundred thirty-one patients (76 M, 55 F) with DSMI-V schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were treated with risperidone (n = 38), olanzapine (n = 38), or clozapine (n = 55). All patients showed a significant decrease of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-positive scores. Decreases in tardive dyskinesia and impulsivity scores were noted with clozapine and olanzapine, respectively. No differences between the medications were noted on depression, anxiety, EPS, or overt aggression scores. Olanzapine and clozapine appeared to be more effective in females. Males showed a decreased sexual performance irrespective of the medication and those treated with risperidone and clozapine showed greater proportional reduction of overt aggression. Clozapine-treated patients showed significant increased weight, increased glucose levels, and lowered sexual performance. Risperidone patients tended to exhibit reduced cholesterol levels. Higher creatine kinase (CK) levels were noted in risperidone-treated patients. While cautious given the nature of the study design, results suggest differences in the response to various atypical antipsychotic medications regarding efficacy and side-effect susceptibility.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Creatine Kinase; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Prospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sex Factors; Triglycerides

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon but sometimes fatal complication of neuroleptics and other medications that involve the central dopaminergic system. Many diagnostic criteria have been proposed for NMS but because of its variable presentation, universal criteria have not been established yet. Hyperthermia, disturbances of consciousness, extrapyramidal and autonomic symptoms are common features of NMS. We report the case of a 36 years old woman suffering from chronic schizophrenia and treated with flufenazine and olanzapine, who presented with series of generalised tonic-clonic seizures as the acute onset of recurrent malignant neuroleptic syndrome. Although atypical neuroleptics were previously thought to have less risk for MNS, combination of conventional and atypical neuroleptics in therapy increases the risk of NMS development and olanzapine might be responsible for the epileptic manifestations at the onset of fulminant NMS.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Early Diagnosis; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy, Generalized; Fluphenazine; Humans; Male; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Seizures

The authors performed a longitudinal study of the effects on thalamic volume of switching from typical to atypical antipsychotic medications.. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 10 subjects with chronic schizophrenia taking typical antipsychotics and 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects with schizophrenia were switched to olanzapine; both groups were rescanned.. At baseline, thalamic volumes in subjects with chronic schizophrenia were 5.8% greater than those of healthy volunteers. At follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups. Additional analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between baseline thalamic volume and dosage of typical antipsychotic medication. Higher dosages at baseline were correlated with larger reductions in volume after the switch to olanzapine.. Antipsychotic medication effects may be a factor in the wide range of thalamic volume differences reported between subjects with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Atrophy; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertrophy; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Olanzapine; Schizophrenia; Thalamus; Therapeutic Equivalency

Treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics is often associated with extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), a disorder involving involuntary muscle movement. Because EPS are often associated with the use of antipsychotics, anticholinergic agents are often indicated.. In this observational, retrospective study, we examined whether the initiation of olanzapine or risperidone, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotics, is related to the adjunctive use of anticholinergic agents.. We identified patients with schizophrenia from outpatient clinics in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and defined initiation of olanzapine or risperidone as patients who were not on any antipsychotics for 6 months and subsequently initiated on the target drug between 1/4/1999 and 31/3/2000. The data were analysed using tests of means or chi-square tests.. The study yielded two major findings. First, compared with risperidone initiators, there were significantly fewer olanzapine initiators who used at least one anticholinergic agent adjunctively. Secondly, among olanzapine or risperidone initiators, patients who used at least one anticholinergic agent adjunctively tended to stay on the target drug significantly longer than those who did not use any anticholinergic agent adjunctively with the target drug.. As the use of anticholinergics is a proxy for the presence of EPS, these findings suggest that risperidone may be more associated with EPS than olanzapine. However, to assess the benefits and side effects associated with olanzapine or risperidone, future research needs to examine various patient outcomes resulting from the initiation of each drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Cholinergic Antagonists; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hospitals, Veterans; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Patient Selection; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Anemia of chronic disease (ACD) is a condition of decreased red cell mass secondary to some other chronic inflammatory condition. In ACD total body iron stores are normal, though serum iron is typically low secondary to iron sequestration by macrophages, and often iron supplementation is not an effective treatment for ACD for the same reason. The pathogenesis of ACD had been poorly understood, but recently there has been important progress: upregulation of interleukin-6 (Il-6) secondary to the underlying chronic inflammatory disease upregulates expression of the protein hepcidin. Upregulation of hepcidin causes anemia by a number of mechanisms: decreased intestinal absorption of iron from the duodenum, increased sequestration of iron by macrophages. Thus, downregulation of Il-6 may represent a most important treatment avenue for ACD. Anti-Il-6 antibodies might be a way to lower Il-6 levels, but such antibodies besides being expensive would have to be given intravenously or intramuscularly, and such large immunogenic molecules may not be appropriate in patients already with a chronic inflammatory condition. Here, we note that an immediately available and potentially effective treatment for ACD is to decrease Il-6 levels by histamine (H1) receptor antagonism, given that histamine acting through the H1 receptor is known to be a potent positive regulator of Il-6. Among the classes of medications that are H1 antagonists we point out that atypical antipsychotic medications such as olanzapine and quetiapine are among the most potent H1 antagonists, and can have simple daily dosing schedules and thus may be particularly useful in ACD.

Topics: Anemia; Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Down-Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation; Hepcidins; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Interleukin-6; Iron; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Histamine H1; Up-Regulation

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Cystic Fibrosis; Female; Headache; Humans; Olanzapine; Referral and Consultation; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neurologic Examination; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Treatment Refusal

The effect of mirtazapine on steady-state plasma concentrations of the newer atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine was investigated in 24 patients with chronic schizophrenia. In order to treat residual negative symptoms, additional mirtazapine (30 mg per day) was administered for six consecutive weeks to nine patients stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-650 mg per day), eight on risperidone (3-8 mg per day) and seven on olanzapine (10-20mg per day). There were only minimal and statistically insignificant changes in mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite norclozapine, risperidone and its metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and olanzapine during the study period. Mirtazapine co-administration with either clozapine, risperidone or olanzapine was well tolerated. In the overall sample, a slight improvement in negative symptomatology, as assessed by the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, was observed at final evaluation (P<0.01) and six patients (two in each treatment group) were classified as responders. While double-blind, controlled studies are needed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of mirtazapine in chronic schizophrenia, our findings indicate that mirtazapine has a negligible effect on the metabolism of clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine and can be added safely to an existing treatment with these antipsychotics.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluoxetine; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine

Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has broad spectrum psychotropic effects, affecting dopamine receptors 1, 2, and 3, 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A, 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C, muscarinic, alpha-adrenergic, alpha-adrenergic, and histamine H-sites. This unique pharmacologic property allows clinicians to use the agent as an adjunct for pain control, particularly when the intensity of the pain is exacerbated by dysregulation of neurotransmitters. Three case studies are presented from a suburban family practice setting in which olanzapine has been successfully used to regulate pain perception in adults with chronic pain.

Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pain; Pirenzepine

This analysis compares the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine in controlling negative and positive symptoms of chronic psychosis in older patients.. Post hoc assessments were made in a subset of risperidone-treated (N = 19) and olanzapine-treated (N = 20) older patients (aged 50 to 65 years) from a large international, multicenter, parallel, double-blind, 28-week study of patients aged 18 to 65 years (N = 339) randomly assigned to receive risperidone (4-12 mg/day) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day). Assessments were made using repeated-measures analysis.. At both 8 weeks and 28 weeks, the magnitude of changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive symptom subscale scores did not differ between treatment groups (8 weeks: risperidone, -6.5; olanzapine, -6.8, p = .866; 28 weeks: risperidone, -6.5; olanzapine, -7.0; p = .804). However, by the 8-week timepoint, olanzapine had reduced PANSS negative subscale scores significantly more than risperidone (-8.8 vs. -4.9, p = .032). By the 28-week endpoint, olanzapine had continued to maintain significantly greater reduction in baseline-to-endpoint PANSS negative scores (-8.1 vs. -3.5, p = .032) and led to significantly greater reduction in scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) dimensions of affective flattening (-5.2 vs. -0.6, p = .033) and alogia (-3.8 vs. -0.3, p = .007). Patients in the olanzapine treatment group also demonstrated numerically greater reduction of both SANS summary (-3.7 vs. -1.0, p = .078) and SANS composite scores (-14.1 vs. -4.1, p = .075).. These data demonstrate that, in older patients with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, risperidone and olanzapine have approximately equal efficacy in controlling positive symptoms. However, olanzapine appears to be more efficacious in maintaining control over negative symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Olanzapine, a thienobenzodiazepine, is a new "atypical" antipsychotic drug. Olanzapine's pharmacologic properties suggest it would be effective for headaches, and its propensity for inducing acute extrapyramidal reactions or tardive dyskinesia is relatively low. We thus decided to assess the value of olanzapine in the treatment of chronic refractory headache.. We reviewed the records of 50 patients with refractory headache who were treated with olanzapine for at least 3 months. All previously had failed treatment with at least four preventative medications. The daily dose of olanzapine varied from 2.5 to 35 mg; most patients (n = 19) received 5 mg or 10 mg (n = 17) a day.. Treatment resulted in a statistically significant decrease in headache days relative to baseline, from 27.5 +/- 4.9 before treatment to 21.1+/-10.7 after treatment (P <.001, Student t test). The difference in headache severity (0 to 10 scale) before treatment (8.7+/-1.6) and after treatment (2.2 +/- 2.1) was also statistically significant (P <.001).. Olanzapine may be effective for patients with refractory headache, including those who have failed a number of other prophylactic agents. Olanzapine should receive particular consideration for patients with refractory headache who have mania, bipolar disorder, or psychotic depression or whose headaches previously responded to other neuroleptic medications.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Headache Disorders; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Olanzapine; Pain, Intractable; Pirenzepine; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Humans; Male; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly used for the treatment of elderly patients. However, there are only few studies on their efficacy and side effects in this patient group. The case of a 67-year old patient is presented, in whom under treatment with olanzapine in usual dosage, serum level increased into the toxic range. This olanzapine overdosage was accompanied by severe impairments in visual and verbal memory and by an increase of slow-frequency activity in the EEG. Both alterations may be attributed to the anticholinergic effects of olanzapine and reversed rapidly after dose reduction and normalization of the olanzapine serum level.

Topics: Aged; Amnesia; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Overdose; Electroencephalography; Humans; Male; Mental Recall; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia, Paranoid

Recent evidence suggests that effects upon glutamatergic transmission may contribute to the therapeutic action of certain atypical antipsychotic agents.. Glutamate concentrations were measured in serum and were estimated (Glx/Cr) in cingulate cortex by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in schizophrenia patients while they were being treated with conventional neuroleptics and then 8 weeks after switching to olanzapine. Serum glutamate concentrations were obtained from 11 subjects, and MRS estimates of Glx/Cr were available from 10 subjects at both time points.. Serum glutamate concentrations significantly increased after the switch from conventional agents to olanzapine; brain glutamate (Glx/Cr) did not change significantly; however, brain glutamate (Glx/Cr) concentrations increased significantly in patients who exhibited an improvement in negative symptoms with olanzapine compared with patients with no change or worsening of negative symptoms.. Comparisons performed following the switch from conventional agents to olanzapine are consistent with previous studies of clozapine and provide additional preliminary evidence supporting the hypothesis that effects on excitatory amino acid activity may contribute to olanzapine's efficacy for treating negative symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Creatine; Female; Glutamic Acid; Gyrus Cinguli; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Reference Values; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Atypical neuroleptics share a common feature, showing higher affinity for 5-HT2 receptors than for D2 dopamine receptors, but show considerable differences in their clinical and pharmacological properties. In clinical doses, they occupy serotonergic receptors near saturation, but show considerable differences regarding the D2 receptor occupancies, with clozapine showing the lowest degree of occupation. We assessed serotonergic and dopaminergic receptor responsiveness in two groups of male schizophrenic patients, one treated with the atypical neuroleptic clozapine (14 patients, doses 200-600 mg/d) and the other treated with olanzapine (11 patients, doses 10-30 mg/d). We measured the prolactin responses to the acute administration of a serotonergic drug, clomipramine, and a dopaminergic one, haloperidol. Tests were first performed in the drug-free state, and were repeated after the patients had been treated with stable doses of either drug for six weeks. Clomipramine administration induced significant increases of prolactin in the drug-free state. These responses were eliminated after treatment of the patients with either drug, thereby indicating a high 5-HT receptor occupancy by both clozapine and olanzapine. The prolactin responses to haloperidol were not altered after treatment with clozapine, but were significantly reduced after the olanzapine treatment. The baseline prolactin levels were not influenced by clozapine treatment, and were moderately but significantly increased after treatment with olanzapine. The results indicate that there is a difference between the two drugs in their capacity to block dopamine receptors at the hypothalamus-pituitary level, and match the results obtained by SPECT receptor binding studies for striatal dopamine receptors.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clomipramine; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Serotonin; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to compare the rehospitalization rates of patients discharged from the hospital while being treated with risperidone, olanzapine, or conventional antipsychotics.. By using Israel's National Psychiatric Hospitalization Case Registry, rehospitalization status was monitored for all patients with schizophrenia who were discharged from any inpatient psychiatric facility in Israel while taking risperidone (N=268) or olanzapine (N=313) between Jan. 1, 1998, and Dec. 31, 1998, and a group of patients discharged during that time who were treated with conventional antipsychotics (N=458). Time to readmission over the course of 2 years was measured by the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) formula.. The readmission rate for patients discharged while taking conventional antipsychotics was higher than the rates for patients treated with either risperidone or olanzapine. At 24 months, 67% of the risperidone-treated patients and 69% of the olanzapine-treated patients remained in the community, as compared to 52% of the patients treated with conventional antipsychotics.. This study suggests that the rehospitalization rates of patients taking the novel antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine are not different from each other and are considerably lower than the rate for patients treated with conventional antipsychotics. The results confirm findings of previous studies suggesting that the levels of overall effectiveness of risperidone and olanzapine are not very different and offers evidence that these drugs are more effective in preventing rehospitalization than conventional antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Israel; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Discharge; Patient Readmission; Pirenzepine; Registries; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Time Factors

The high acquisition cost of the atypical antipsychotics has prompted their closer clinical and economic evaluation. This study aims to examine the financial implications of using atypical antipsychotics in a defined catchment area sample of patients with schizophrenia.. Service costs over a 10-month period were compared between groups of patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia who were taking different atypical antipsychotic agents.. All patients studied were taking clozapine (N = 31). risperidone (N = 19), or olanzapine (N = 41). Clozapine was used in more chronic patients, while risperidone and olanzapine were prescribed in both chronic and recently diagnosed cases. After background group differences were controlled for, patients on risperidone treatment incurred the lowest costs. The monthly costs for the clozapine and olanzapine groups were higher than for risperidone by US $246 and US $566, respectively.. Clozapine was reserved for more severe forms of schizophrenia, but its cost impact was relatively low. Risperidone, as prescribed in ordinary practice, may be more cost-effective than olanzapine.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; England; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Readmission; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

We present a 46-year old lady suffering from chronic paranoid schizophrenia accompanied by a chronic Fregoli's syndrome. The patient feels persecuted by a male person and identifies this persecutor in different persons of different shape, different age and different sex. The symptoms are very refractory to treatment despite various neuroleptic therapies. Historical, psychodynamic and neuropsychological aspects of this delusional syndrome are discussed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Capgras Syndrome; Chronic Disease; Delusions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Treatment Failure

To date only five reports of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) related to olanzapine exist. The first case report was published in November 1998.. We report the case of a 78-year-old woman suffering from chronic schizophrenia who developed a NMS while being treated with olanzapine and levomepromazine. Before this her medication had been unchanged for more than 2 years.. When treated with olanzapine and levomepromazine, the patient had a fulminant NMS which was complicated with pneumonia. When the neuroleptic drug treatment was discontinued, the patient recovered. However, when this combination was restarted later due to severe agitation and hallucinations, the symptoms of NMS reappeared.. This case report shows that the neuroleptic malignant syndrome can occur during olanzapine treatment as well as during treatment with conventional neuroleptics. This syndrome may develop even after a long and stable neuroleptic treatment.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Methotrimeprazine; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Alcohol Drinking; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pancreatitis; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia

To report a case of marked elevation of serum creatine kinase (CK) associated with olanzapine therapy.. A 39-year-old white Jewish schizophrenic man treated with olanzapine developed an elevated serum CK concentration with a peak concentration of 4000 IU/L (normal < 230). No other diagnostic criteria for neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) were present. On discontinuation of the drug, serum CK concentrations returned to normal within eight days.. Olanzapine, like other atypical antipsychotic drugs, may cause muscle injury with concomitant elevations of serum CK of muscle origin. We suggest that in patients treated with olanzapine, CK concentrations should be checked on initiation of therapy, within the first 48 hours, and weekly thereafter for at least one month. In addition, patients with clinical signs suggestive of NMS should be monitored more carefully. For those patients with a history of NMS, or even of isolated serum CK elevation during antipsychotic therapy, follow-up should be stricter.. Marked elevation of serum CK may be a possible complication of olanzapine therapy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Creatine Kinase; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Rhabdomyolysis; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia, Paranoid

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Treatment Outcome