nuvaring and Menorrhagia

nuvaring has been researched along with Menorrhagia* in 2 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for nuvaring and Menorrhagia

ArticleYear
Comparison of combined hormonal vaginal ring with ultralow-dose combined oral contraceptive pills in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding: A pilot study.
    Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    The aim of this study was to compare combined hormonal vaginal ring with ultralow-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills in management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Fifty patients were randomised into Group I: vaginal ring (n = 25) and group II: COC pills (n = 25). Menstrual blood loss (MBL) was assessed at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months (while on treatment) and at 9 months (3 months after stopping therapy). There was significant reduction in baseline pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score from 440 ± 188 (Mean ± SD) to 178 ± 95, 139 ± 117, 112 ± 84 and 120 ± 108 in group I and from 452 ± 206 to 204 ± 152, 179 ± 125, 176 ± 164 and 202 ± 167 in group II at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Reduction in MBL was 72% and 62% at 6 months and up to 71% and 55% at 9 months in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.001). Reduction in MBL with ring was greater at higher baseline PBAC score but lesser in patients with fibroid > 2 cm. Combined vaginal hormonal treatment for HMB is as effective as oral hormonal therapy, with minor and transient side effects and persistence of response after cessation of therapy.

    Topics: Adult; Contraceptive Devices, Female; Contraceptives, Oral, Combined; Desogestrel; Drug Combinations; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; Humans; Menorrhagia; Pilot Projects

2016
Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial with norethisterone.
    Contraception, 2012, Volume: 85, Issue:3

    This study compared the efficacy of the contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR; NuvaRing; N.V. Organon, Oss, the Netherlands) and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during the fertile age.. Ninety-five women with idiopathic HMB were selected in this randomized controlled trial. They were treated with either the CVR (n=48) or norethisterone (n=47) for three cycles. Each cycle consisted of 3 weeks of CVR use and then a 1-week ring-free period or norethisterone tablets, 5 mg three times daily from Cycle Days 5 to 26. Outcome measures were as follows: menstrual blood loss assessed by pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin, quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, side effects and overall satisfaction with treatment.. Significant improvements in PBAC score, the duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin and QoL were observed at the end of the study in each group. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the mean PBAC score (90.2±24.4 vs. 92.3±26.7) and its percent reduction (68.6% vs. 69.5%), duration of menses (5.3±1.2 vs. 5.5±1.1 days), hemoglobin and serum ferritin at the end of the study between the CVR and the norethisterone groups, respectively. Significantly more ring users were satisfied and elected to continue with treatment.. Both the CVR and oral norethisterone are effective treatments for idiopathic HMB. The CVR may be an attractive option especially for those requesting contraception as well.

    Topics: Adult; Contraceptive Devices, Female; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Desogestrel; Drug Combinations; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; Humans; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Young Adult

2012