npi-2358 and Neoplasms

Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDA) are a potential new class of oncology drugs that have garnered attention recently as a number of these agents have entered into Phase 2-3 studies. Currently available data suggest how the subsequent evolution of these agents into clinical practice may proceed, with new therapeutic paradigms based on similarities, differences and interactions with current standard of care agents. In particular, the broadly successful group of agents targeting angiogenesis through the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) pathway, can be contrasted to the VDAs that principally disrupt established tumor vasculature through a different set of molecular targets. Although the angiogenesis inhibitors may benchmark where other vascularly targeted agents such as VDAs may be successful, the differences in terms of efficacy and safety profiles lead to important differentiation in how VDAs are likely to be used. Although the majority of VDAs bind tubulin, significant differences also exist between VDAs and cytotoxic agents, including tubulin targeted agents such as taxanes and vinca alkyloids. Clinical trial data is now available for several VDAs allowing such assessment. Data of yet has been the strongest in NSCLC, with indications of how these drugs may be developed beneficially in subsets of patients such as those with squamous cell histology or at risk of bleeding events. Other indications being aggressively pursued include prostate carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, sarcomas and astrocytomas. The field also continues to advance with investigation into how to optimally schedule administration of VDAs and what effects might be class effects and/or markers of efficacy.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Blood Vessels; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diketopiperazines; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Serine; Tubulin

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested.. To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel.. The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021.. Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo.. The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety.. Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim.. Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin's same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim's next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diketopiperazines; Docetaxel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Filgrastim; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Polyethylene Glycols; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Plinabulin (NPI-2358) is a vascular disrupting agent that elicits tumor vascular endothelial architectural destabilization leading to selective collapse of established tumor vasculature. Preclinical data indicated plinabulin has favorable safety and antitumor activity profiles, leading to initiation of this clinical trial to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of plinabulin in patients with advanced malignancies.. Patients received a weekly infusion of plinabulin for 3 of every 4 weeks. A dynamic accelerated dose titration method was used to escalate the dose from 2 mg/m² to the RP2D, followed by enrollment of an RP2D cohort. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and cardiovascular assessments were conducted, and Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) scans were performed to estimate changes in tumor blood flow.. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. A dose of 30 mg/m² was selected as the RP2D based on the adverse events of nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, tumor pain, and transient blood pressure elevations, with DCE-MRI indicating decreases in tumor blood flow (Ktrans) from 13.5 mg/m² (defining a biologically effective dose) with a 16% to 82% decrease in patients evaluated at 30 mg/m². Half-life was 6.06 ± 3.03 hours, clearance was 30.50 ± 22.88 L/h, and distributive volume was 211 ± 67.9 L.. At the RP2D of 30 mg/m², plinabulin showed a favorable safety profile, while eliciting biological effects as evidenced by decreases in tumor blood flow, tumor pain, and other mechanistically relevant adverse events. On the basis of these results additional clinical trials were initiated with plinabulin in combination with standard chemotherapy agents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Diketopiperazines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Imidazoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Lymphoma; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Piperazines

MBRI-001, a deuterium-substituted plinabulin derivative, has been reported to have better pharmacokinetic and similar antitumor effects in comparison with plinabulin. In this approach, we further carried out its polymorphs, co-crystal structure of MBRI-001-tubulin and tubulin inhibition study. Among the different polymorphs, Form F (MBRI-001/H

Topics: Animals; Binding Sites; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Crystallography, X-Ray; Deuterium; Diketopiperazines; Humans; Mice; Mice, Nude; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Neoplasms; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Tubulin; Tubulin Modulators

MBRI-001 was demonstrated preliminary better pharmacokinetics and antitumor effects than that of plinabulin in vivo. In this approach, we further carried out systematic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of MBRI-001 in vitro and in vivo. MBRI-001 was tested stable in rat plasma and more stable in liver microsomes than plinabulin in vitro. In vivo, MBRI-001 could be distributed rapidly and widely in various tissues, especially the concentration of MBRI-001 in lung was remarkably higher than other tissues. Excretion study indicated that MBRI-001 might been decomposed and excreted as metabolites. Additionally, the combination treatment of MBRI-001 and gefitinib revealed better antitumor inhibition rate than monotherapy in vivo. Therefore, we suggest that MBRI-001 could be developed as a promising anti-cancer agent in near future.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Deuterium; Diketopiperazines; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Microsomes, Liver; Neoplasms; Protein Binding; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Tissue Distribution

The diketopiperazine NPI-2358 is a synthetic analog of NPI-2350, a natural product isolated from Aspergillus sp., which depolymerizes microtubules in A549 human lung carcinoma cells. Although structurally different from the colchicine-binding site agents reported to date, NPI-2358 binds to the colchicine-binding site of tubulin. NPI-2358 has potent in-vitro anti-tumor activity against various human tumor cell lines and maintains activity against tumor cell lines with various multidrug-resistant (MDR) profiles. In addition, when evaluated in proliferating human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), concentrations as low as 10 nmol/l NPI-2358 induced tubulin depolymerization within 30 min. Furthermore, NPI-2358 dose dependently increases HUVEC monolayer permeability--an in-vitro model of tumor vascular collapse. NPI-2358 was compared with three tubulin-depolymerizing agents with vascular-disrupting activity: colchicine, vincristine and combretastatin A-4 (CA4). Results showed that the activity of NPI-2358 in HUVECs was more potent than either colchicine or vincristine; the profile of CA4 approached that of NPI-2358. Altogether, our data show that NPI-2358 is a potent anti-tumor agent which is active in MDR tumor cell lines, and is able to rapidly induce tubulin depolymerization and monolayer permeability in HUVECs. These data warrant further evaluation of NPI-2358 as a vascular-disrupting agent in vivo. Currently, NPI-2358 is in preclinical development for the treatment of cancer.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Membrane Permeability; Cell Survival; Colchicine; Dextrans; Diketopiperazines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate; HL-60 Cells; HT29 Cells; Humans; Imidazoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Jurkat Cells; Microtubules; Neoplasms; Piperazines; Stilbenes; Time Factors; Tubulin; Vincristine