norgestomet and Body-Weight

The effects on estrus and fertility of 3 estrus synchronization protocols were studied in Brahman beef heifers. In Treatment 1 (PGF protocol; n=234), heifers received 7.5 mg, i.m. prostianol on Day 0 and were inseminated after observed estrus until Day 5. Treatment 2 (10-d NOR protocol; n = 220) consisted of norgestomet (NOR; 3 mg, s.c. implant and 3 mg, i.m.) and estradiol valerate (5 mg, i.m.) treatment on Day -10, NOR implant removal and 400 IU, i.m. PMSG on Day 0, and AI after observed estrus through to Day 5. Treatment 3 (14-d NOR+PGF protocol; n = 168) constituted a NOR implant (3 mg, sc) on Day -14, NOR implant removal on Day 0, PGF on Day 16, and AI after observed estrus through to Day 21. All heifers were examined for return to estrus at the next cycle and inseminated after observed estrus. The heifers were then exposed to bulls for at least 21 d. During the period of estrus observation (5 d) after treatment, those heifers treated with the PGF protocol had a lower (P<0.01) rate of estrual response (58%) than heifers treated with the 10-d NOR (87%) or 14-d NOR+PGF (88%) protocol. Heifers treated with the 10-d NOR protocol displayed estrus earlier and had a closer synchrony of estrus than heifers treated with either the PGF or the 14-d NOR+PGF protocol. Heifers treated with the 14-d NOR+PGF protocol had higher (P<0.05) conception and calving rates (51 and 46%) to AI at the induced estrus than heifers treated with the PGF (45 and 27%) or the 10-d NOR (38 and 33%) protocol. Calving rate to 2 rounds of AI was greater (P<0.05) for heifers treated with the 14-d NOR-PGF (50%) protocol than heifers treated with the 10-d NOR (38%) but not the PGF (43%) protocol. Breeding season calving rates were similar among the 3 protocols. The results show that the 14-d NOR+PGF estrus synchronization protocol induced a high incidence of estrus with comparatively high fertility in Brahman heifers.

Topics: Animal Husbandry; Animals; Body Weight; Cattle; Dinoprost; Drug Interactions; Estrus Synchronization; Female; Fertility; Male; Ovary; Pregnenediones; Progesterone Congeners; Seasons; Ultrasonography

The effects of energy supplementation (flushing) on LH and estradiol secretion, follicular growth and the response to estrus synchronization treatment (Norgestomet + PMSG initiated 41.9 +/- 3.4 d after calving) were investigated in 16 suckled beef cows fed either 70% (Group C, n = 8) of energy requirements from calving to 3 wk after AI or fed the same restricted diet until 11 d before synchronization and then were supplemented with 2 kg concentrate until 3 wk after AI (Group S, n = 8). Concentrations of LH and estradiol 17 beta were measured from 3 sampling periods: 25 and 39 d after calving and between 29 and 49 h after implant removal. Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography 11 d before treatment to implant withdrawal (IR). The effects of energy level, day (or hour) of observation and corresponding interactions were tested on repeated measurements by split-plot ANOVA. No positive effect of flushing was observed on characteristics of LH secretion on Day 39. However, the size of the largest follicle and the number of large follicles were higher in Group S than in Group C cows, respectively, 7 and 9 d after the beginning of flushing to 2 d after the start of treatment. After IR, the estradiol secretion tended to be higher in Group S than in Group C cows (9.8 +/- 0.4 pg/mL vs 7.2 +/- 0.2 pg/mL; P = 0.06), but no effect on LH secretion was observed. After implant removal 12 cows ovulated (Group S: 7/8 vs Group C: 5/8; P > 0.05), 7 were pregnant at 21 d after AI (Group S: 6/8 vs Group C: 1/8; P < 0.05) and 4 at 45 d after AI (Group S: 4/8 vs Group C 0/8; P > 0.05). To conclude, flushing had a positive effect on follicular growth, which does not seem to be mediated by LH. In cows fed a restricted diet, flushing enhanced follicular growth, increased the fertilization rate and/or reduced early embryonic death.

Topics: Animals; Animals, Suckling; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cattle; Estradiol; Estrus Synchronization; Female; Gonadotropins, Equine; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Insemination, Artificial; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Nutritional Status; Ovarian Follicle; Postpartum Period; Pregnenediones; Radioimmunoassay

Crossbred heifers (n = 75) fed for rapid (R; .82 kg/d) or slow-then-rapid (SR; .41 kg/d for 90 d then .82 kg/d) postweaning gain were used to examine the effects of age or pattern of gain on induction of puberty by a progestin. At 9.5, 11.0, and 12.5 mo of age, 12 prepuberal heifers from each growth treatment received progestin (a 6-mg Norgestomet implant for 10 d) or control treatments. Induction of puberty, LH secretory profiles, and ovarian follicular characteristics were assessed in Norgestomet-treated and control heifers. Body weights of R heifers were greater (P < .01) than those of SR heifers at all ages. At 12.5 mo, more Norgestomet-treated heifers exhibited a puberal estrus within 5 d after implant removal compared with controls (82% vs 9%, respectively), but Norgestomet did not induce puberty at 9.5 or 11 mo of age (progestin x age, P < .05) in heifers of either gain pattern. Norgestomet increased (P < .01) LH pulse frequency at all ages, whereas Norgestomet increased only mean LH concentrations at 12.5 mo of age (progestin x age, P < .03). Norgestomet treatment altered (P < .01) ovarian follicular characteristics at all ages. Gain pattern did not affect (P > .1) LH secretory profiles, ovarian characteristics, or induction of puberty by Norgestomet. We conclude that progestins induce puberty by hastening the normal cascade of endocrine and ovarian events associated with spontaneous puberty. Furthermore, age, but not pattern of gain, seems to be the critical factor influencing the efficacy of progestins to induce puberty in heifers.

Topics: Aging; Animals; Body Weight; Cattle; Drug Implants; Female; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Follicle; Pregnenediones; Progesterone Congeners; Random Allocation; Sexual Maturation; Time Factors; Ultrasonography; Weight Gain

Effects of body weight, condition score, ovarian cyclic status and insemination regimen on pregnancy rates were investigated in 164 Bos indicus heifers synchronised with norgestomet-oestradiol and pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG). Oestrus detection techniques were also compared. Heifers were inseminated at either a fixed time (group 1, n = 83) of 48.0 +/- 0.2 h (mean +/- SEM) after implant removal or at 8.9 +/- 0.5 h after oestrus was detected (group 2, n = 81). Group 2 heifers that were not detected in oestrus by 72 h after implant removal were inseminated at that time. Oestrus was detected for the purpose of insemination using heatmount detectors. Tail-paint and oestrogen treated, chin-ball harnessed steers were used to compare the efficiency of oestrus detection. The probability of ovarian cyclicity increased with increasing body weight and condition score (P < 0.001). A higher proportion of heifers that were acyclic at the commencement of treatment, compared with cyclic heifers, were detected in oestrus at the time of insemination in the fixed-time inseminated group (P < 0.01). Analysis of covariance revealed that intervals from implant removal to oestrus were influenced by ovarian cyclic status (P < 0.01) and insemination group (P < 0.05). A higher pregnancy rate (% +/- SEM) was obtained in acyclic compared with cyclic heifers in the group 1 heifers (50.0 +/- 10 vs 28.1 +/- 6; P = 0.055) but not among the group 2 heifers (45.8 +/- 10 vs 49.1 +/- 7; P = 0.787). The probability of pregnancy was found to be associated negatively with body weight (P = 0.01) while a higher pregnancy rate was obtained in the group 2 compared with group 1 heifers (48.2% vs 34.9%; P = 0.093). The efficiency of oestrus detection was highest using heatmount detectors compared with tail-paint and chin-ball harnessed steers (90.7% vs 37.0% and 23.5%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We conclude that pregnancy rates can be increased in extensive environments when insemination follows oestrus detection using heatmount detectors compared with a fixed-time insemination. The fertility of heifers inseminated at a fixed time is influenced by ovarian cyclic status due to its influence on oestrus-to-insemination intervals.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Body Weight; Cattle; Estradiol; Estrus; Female; Fertility; Gonadotropins, Equine; Insemination, Artificial; Male; Ovary; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Pregnenediones; Progesterone; Progesterone Congeners; Random Allocation

As experiment was conducted with 15 Angus X Hereford heifers that were 16 mo of age at the time the experiment was initiated. The heifers were assigned randomly in equal numbers to be fed low (L), maintenance (M) or high (H) energy diets for 191 d. Overall average weight for heifers at the time the experiment was initiated was 294 +/- 6 kg. All heifers were exhibiting estrous cycles at regular intervals and estrus was synchronized using a progestogen implant (norgestomet) in combination with an injection of estradiol valerate and norgestomet before initiation of dietary treatments. Dietary treatments started at time of implant removal and this day was designated as d 0. Blood samples were collected every other day from d 150 to 160 and progesterone concentrations were quantified to evaluate estrous cycle activity. In order to resynchronize the reproductive state, all heifers were retreated with norgestomet implants and injected with the estradiol valerate and norgestomet combination on d 160. Implants were removed on d 170. Serial blood samples were collected for 4-h periods at 20-min intervals starting at 0, 10, 20 and 30 h after implant removal and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were quantified. Progesterone was quantified in samples collected at daily intervals (170 to 191 d) to evaluate whether a normal estrous cycle occurred subsequent to removal of the implant. Four of five heifers in each of the L and M treatment groups were not cycling, whereas all heifers in the H treatment were cycling at the time of progestogen implantation on d 160.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Cattle; Diet; Drug Combinations; Drug Implants; Energy Metabolism; Estradiol; Estrus; Female; Luteinizing Hormone; Pregnancy; Pregnenediones; Progesterone