norethindrone acetate has been researched along with Hot Flashes in 23 studies
norethisterone acetate : A 3-oxo Delta(4)-steroid that is norethisterone in which the hydroxy group has been converted to its acetate ester.
Hot Flashes: A sudden, temporary sensation of heat predominantly experienced by some women during MENOPAUSE. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination estradiol plus norethindrone acetate transdermal delivery system given in a continuous sequential regimen with transdermal estradiol versus placebo in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause." | 9.09 | Efficacy of continuous sequential transdermal estradiol and norethindrone acetate in relieving vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. ( Cassel, D; Dain, MP; Furst, KW; Hille, D; Notelovitz, M; Skarinsky, D; VandePol, C, 2000) |
"Norethindrone acetate (NETA) is a unique progestin that has both estrogenic and androgenic properties and is effective as an add-back regimen without estrogen supplementation." | 6.48 | The hormonal profile of norethindrone acetate: rationale for add-back therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in women with endometriosis. ( Chwalisz, K; Stanczyk, FZ; Surrey, E, 2012) |
"Among women in the modified intent-to-treat population, transdermal 17beta-estradiol plus norethindrone acetate significantly reduced the mean daily number of moderate-to-severe hot flashes experienced by women from 4." | 5.11 | A multicenter, open-label study to evaluate satisfaction and menopausal quality of life in women using transdermal estradiol/norethindrone acetate therapy for the management of menopausal signs and symptoms. ( Adler, G; Galant, R; Maki, KC; Quinn, L; Witchger, MS; Young, D, 2005) |
"This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination estradiol plus norethindrone acetate transdermal delivery system given in a continuous sequential regimen with transdermal estradiol versus placebo in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause." | 5.09 | Efficacy of continuous sequential transdermal estradiol and norethindrone acetate in relieving vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. ( Cassel, D; Dain, MP; Furst, KW; Hille, D; Notelovitz, M; Skarinsky, D; VandePol, C, 2000) |
"Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain." | 3.01 | Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy. ( Al-Hendy, A; Arjona Ferreira, JC; Critchley, HOD; Langenberg, AGM; Li, Y; Lukes, AS; McKain, L; Poindexter, AN; Stewart, EA; Venturella, R; Villarroel, C; Wagman, RB, 2021) |
"To compare the effects of the abrupt discontinuation of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and reduction of the daily dosage of the hormone on climacteric symptoms." | 2.75 | Effect of abrupt discontinuation versus gradual dose reduction of postmenopausal hormone therapy on hot flushes. ( Azevedo, LH; Cunha, EP; Fernandes, CE; Ferreira, JA; Peixoto, S; Pompei, LM; Steiner, ML; Strufaldi, R, 2010) |
"Depression is not negatively affected by the tested progestins and it may be ameliorated by MPA." | 2.71 | A comparison of the central effects of different progestins used in hormone replacement therapy. ( Alessandrini, C; Arangino, S; Baldassari, F; Cagnacci, A; Landi, S; Volpe, A, 2004) |
"Norethindrone acetate (NETA) is a unique progestin that has both estrogenic and androgenic properties and is effective as an add-back regimen without estrogen supplementation." | 2.48 | The hormonal profile of norethindrone acetate: rationale for add-back therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in women with endometriosis. ( Chwalisz, K; Stanczyk, FZ; Surrey, E, 2012) |
"Endometrial hyperplasia was not observed in the group receiving NA/EE 0." | 2.43 | Effects of low-dose norethindrone acetate plus ethinyl estradiol (0.5 mg/2.5 microg) in women with postmenopausal symptoms: updated analysis of three randomized, controlled trials. ( Ellman, H; Rowan, JP; Simon, JA; Speroff, L, 2006) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 2 (8.70) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 16 (69.57) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (17.39) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (4.35) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Al-Hendy, A | 1 |
Lukes, AS | 1 |
Poindexter, AN | 1 |
Venturella, R | 1 |
Villarroel, C | 1 |
Critchley, HOD | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
McKain, L | 1 |
Arjona Ferreira, JC | 1 |
Langenberg, AGM | 1 |
Wagman, RB | 1 |
Stewart, EA | 1 |
Cheng, G | 1 |
Butler, R | 1 |
Warner, M | 1 |
Gustafsson, JÅ | 1 |
Wilczek, B | 1 |
Landgren, BM | 1 |
Mattsson, LÅ | 2 |
Ipsen, HE | 1 |
Granqvist, CJ | 1 |
Kokot-Kierepa, M | 1 |
Cunha, EP | 1 |
Azevedo, LH | 1 |
Pompei, LM | 1 |
Strufaldi, R | 1 |
Steiner, ML | 1 |
Ferreira, JA | 1 |
Peixoto, S | 1 |
Fernandes, CE | 1 |
Chwalisz, K | 1 |
Surrey, E | 1 |
Stanczyk, FZ | 1 |
von Holst, T | 1 |
Lang, E | 2 |
Winkler, U | 1 |
Keil, D | 1 |
Skouby, SO | 1 |
Heikkinen, J | 1 |
Vaheri, R | 2 |
Mäenpää, J | 1 |
Timonen, U | 2 |
Cagnacci, A | 1 |
Arangino, S | 1 |
Baldassari, F | 1 |
Alessandrini, C | 1 |
Landi, S | 1 |
Volpe, A | 1 |
Bassol, S | 1 |
Carranza-Lira, S | 1 |
Celis-Gonzalez, C | 1 |
Santoyo, S | 1 |
Murillo, A | 1 |
Martinez, N | 1 |
Santos, J | 1 |
Llaca, V | 1 |
de la Loza, FR | 1 |
Zarain, J | 1 |
da Fonseca, AM | 1 |
Camargos, AF | 1 |
Baracat, EC | 1 |
da Sá, MF | 1 |
Bayo, J | 1 |
Adaro, L | 1 |
Gurucharri, C | 1 |
Murga, M | 1 |
Siseles, N | 1 |
Sayegh, F | 1 |
Tempone, A | 1 |
Tempone, LM | 1 |
Tozzini, RI | 1 |
Boccanera, R | 1 |
Naranjo, C | 1 |
Sanchez, F | 1 |
Gomez, G | 1 |
Blanco, S | 1 |
Reyes-Marquez, R | 1 |
Albrecht, G | 1 |
Rios, PC | 1 |
Adler, G | 1 |
Young, D | 1 |
Galant, R | 1 |
Quinn, L | 1 |
Witchger, MS | 1 |
Maki, KC | 1 |
Rozmus-Warcholińska, W | 1 |
Skrzypulec, V | 1 |
Drosdzol, A | 1 |
Kowalczyk, R | 1 |
Nowosielski, K | 1 |
Piela, B | 1 |
Walaszek, A | 1 |
Gambacciani, M | 1 |
Spielmann, D | 2 |
Genazzani, AR | 1 |
Pornel, B | 3 |
Rowan, JP | 1 |
Simon, JA | 1 |
Speroff, L | 1 |
Ellman, H | 1 |
Fonseca, AM | 1 |
Bagnoli, VR | 1 |
Penteado, SR | 1 |
Paixão, JS | 1 |
Cavalcanti, AL | 1 |
Pinotti, JA | 1 |
Panay, N | 1 |
Ylikorkala, O | 3 |
Archer, DF | 1 |
Gut, R | 1 |
Hammar, ML | 1 |
van de Weijer, P | 1 |
Franke, HR | 1 |
von Mauw, EM | 1 |
Nijland, EA | 1 |
Rozenberg, S | 1 |
Arrenbrecht, S | 1 |
Notelovitz, M | 1 |
Cassel, D | 1 |
Hille, D | 1 |
Furst, KW | 1 |
Dain, MP | 1 |
VandePol, C | 1 |
Skarinsky, D | 1 |
Bruhat, M | 1 |
Rudolf, K | 1 |
Kainulainen, P | 1 |
Viitanen, A | 1 |
al-Azzawi, F | 1 |
Wahab, M | 1 |
Thompson, J | 1 |
Hirvonen, E | 1 |
van der Mooren, MJ | 1 |
Dillon, J | 1 |
Magaril, C | 1 |
Loh, FH | 1 |
Chen, LH | 1 |
Yu, SL | 1 |
Jorgensen, LN | 1 |
Baerug, U | 1 |
Winge, T | 1 |
Nordland, G | 1 |
Faber-Swensson, E | 1 |
Heldaas, K | 1 |
Norling, B | 1 |
Larsen, S | 1 |
Arce, JC | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIBERTY 2: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate[NCT03103087] | Phase 3 | 382 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-06-14 | Completed | ||
LIBERTY 1: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate[NCT03049735] | Phase 3 | 388 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-04-26 | Completed | ||
A Six Month Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Ultra-low Dose Combinations With 0.5 mg Estradiol and 0.1 mg or 0.25 mg Norethisterone Acetate (Activelle Low Dose 0[NCT00184795] | Phase 3 | 576 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-05-28 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Group-Comparative Trial to Compare the Effects of Livial® and Activelle ® on the Vaginal Bleeding Pattern, Vasomotor Complaints, Vaginal Atrophy, QoL and Sexual Function[NCT00431093] | Phase 4 | 570 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-11-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.7 |
"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.7 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.8 |
"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -22.30 |
"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -2.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.8 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -2.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.7 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.6 |
"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.9 |
"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | -1.0 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 43.6 |
Placebo (Group C) | 17.1 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good). LS means and p-value for test of difference was relugolix plus E2/NETA minus placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 44.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | 16.5 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of time, most of the time and all of the time.) Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -36.1 |
Placebo (Group C) | -13.7 |
"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5), raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)]*100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -51.7 |
Placebo (Group C) | -18.3 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -22.30 |
Placebo (Group C) | 39.85 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | IU/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -5.47 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.67 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | IU/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -3.10 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.04 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 0.12 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.48 |
"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most participants (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -51.7 |
Placebo (Group C) | -18.3 |
"The UFS-QoL total score was the sum of 6 subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function). The raw scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 37.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | 13.8 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 34 |
Placebo (Group C) | 17 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 48 |
Placebo (Group C) | 34 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 19 |
Placebo (Group C) | 2 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 35 |
Placebo (Group C) | 18 |
"Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 79 |
Placebo (Group C) | 37 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 78 |
Placebo (Group C) | 42 |
"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -0.819 |
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B) | -1.919 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 24.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | 4.3 |
"MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. Least square (LS) means for test of difference is Relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -84.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | -15.1 |
"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -17.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | -7.4 |
"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -13.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | -1.5 |
An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term. Reported confidence interval (CI) based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson). As per the objective of the study, the secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 5.56 |
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B) | 35.71 |
"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 6.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.9 |
"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 71.2 |
Placebo (Group C) | 14.73 |
"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 61.29 |
Placebo (Group C) | 5.41 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 47.06 |
Placebo (Group C) | 17.07 |
"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (e-Diary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with e-Diary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 50.40 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.10 |
"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 45.34 |
"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 63 |
Placebo (Group C) | 4 |
"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 8.9 |
Placebo (Group C) | NA |
"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 16.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | NA |
"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 8.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | 27.1 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at Baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Category improvement (-1) | 2 Category improvement (-2) | 3 Category improvement (-3) | 4 Category improvement (-4) | |
Placebo (Group C) | 19 | 13 | 10 | 2 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 13 | 30 | 18 | 4 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Category improvement (-1) | 3 Category improvement (-3) | 2 Category improvement (-2) | 4 Category improvement (-4) | |
Placebo (Group C) | 21 | 8 | 18 | 2 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 7 | 22 | 29 | 10 |
"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck (same leg across participants) at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects. For Relugolix plus E2/NETA Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4), number (n)=95.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only rel" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) | Total Hip | Femoral Neck | |
Placebo (Group C) | 0.315 | -0.044 | 0.019 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -0.126 | -0.173 | -0.684 |
"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Relugolix | NET | |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 1.96 | 0.28 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.5 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.4 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.6 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.5 |
"Blood samples for determination of serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -22.95 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -2.1 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.8 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -2.1 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.6 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.7 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.7 |
"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -2.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.9 |
"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.9 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.8 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 44.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | 14.6 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 45.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | 15.1 |
"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -30.9 |
Placebo (Group C) | -10.5 |
"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5). raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)] * 100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the study objective, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only these two arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -45.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | -16.1 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -22.95 |
Placebo (Group C) | 51.72 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | IU/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -6.25 |
Placebo (Group C) | 0.10 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | IU/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -1.90 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.62 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -0.05 |
Placebo (Group C) | 3.00 |
"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most patients (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -45.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | -16.1 |
"The UFS-QoL total score was the sum of 6 subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function). The raw scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 38.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | 12.8 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 33 |
Placebo (Group C) | 11 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 42 |
Placebo (Group C) | 27 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 15 |
Placebo (Group C) | 5 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 34 |
Placebo (Group C) | 17 |
"A Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 79 |
Placebo (Group C) | 35 |
As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 78 |
Placebo (Group C) | 45 |
"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -0.470 |
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B) | -1.995 |
MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -84.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | -23.2 |
"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -12.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | -0.3 |
"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -12.9 |
Placebo (Group C) | 2.2 |
"LS means and p-value for test of difference is relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 20.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | 10.0 |
"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported CI based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson).~As per the objective of the study, this secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 10.94 |
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B) | 36.36 |
"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 14.8 |
Placebo (Group C) | 9.4 |
"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 73.4 |
Placebo (Group C) | 18.9 |
"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 50.0 |
Placebo (Group C) | 21.74 |
"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at Baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 43.10 |
Placebo (Group C) | 10.14 |
"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (eDiary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with eDiary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 52.34 |
Placebo (Group C) | 5.51 |
"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 48.34 |
"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 67 |
Placebo (Group C) | 7 |
"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 5.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | NA |
"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 11.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | NA |
"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method. MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 8.3 |
Placebo (Group C) | 25.1 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Category improvement (-1) | 2 Category improvement (-2) | 3 Category improvement (-3) | 4 Category improvement (-4) | |
Placebo (Group C) | 28 | 14 | 1 | 5 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 14 | 29 | 22 | 8 |
"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Category improvement (-1) | 2 Category improvement (-2) | 3 Category improvement (-3) | 4 Category improvement (-4) | |
Placebo (Group C) | 16 | 9 | 4 | 4 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 21 | 18 | 23 | 2 |
"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4) | Total Hip | Femoral Neck | |
Placebo (Group C) | 0.052 | 0.549 | 0.307 |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | -0.356 | 0.023 | -0.262 |
"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics.~As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Relugolix | NET | |
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A) | 2.13 | 0.33 |
2 reviews available for norethindrone acetate and Hot Flashes
Article | Year |
---|---|
The hormonal profile of norethindrone acetate: rationale for add-back therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in women with endometriosis.
Topics: Bone Density; Endometriosis; Estrogens; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hot Flashes; Humans; | 2012 |
Effects of low-dose norethindrone acetate plus ethinyl estradiol (0.5 mg/2.5 microg) in women with postmenopausal symptoms: updated analysis of three randomized, controlled trials.
Topics: Bone Density; Endometrial Hyperplasia; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; Hot | 2006 |
19 trials available for norethindrone acetate and Hot Flashes
Article | Year |
---|---|
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema | 2021 |
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema | 2021 |
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema | 2021 |
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema | 2021 |
Effect of abrupt discontinuation versus gradual dose reduction of postmenopausal hormone therapy on hot flushes.
Topics: Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Norethindrone; No | 2010 |
Bleeding patterns in peri and postmenopausal women taking a continuous combined regimen of estradiol with norethisterone acetate or a conventional sequential regimen of conjugated equine estrogens with medrogestone.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Austria; Cohort Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estra | 2002 |
A low-dose start in hormone replacement therapy provides a beneficial bleeding profile and few side-effects: randomized comparison with a conventional-dose regimen.
Topics: Aged; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; | 2004 |
A comparison of the central effects of different progestins used in hormone replacement therapy.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anxiety; Body Temperature; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Estradiol; Fe | 2004 |
The impact of a monophasic continuous estro-progestogenic treatment on Latin American menopausal women.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anxiety; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Depression; Dizziness; Estrad | 2005 |
A multicenter, open-label study to evaluate satisfaction and menopausal quality of life in women using transdermal estradiol/norethindrone acetate therapy for the management of menopausal signs and symptoms.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aged; Drug Combinations; Estradiol; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Hyperhid | 2005 |
[The effect of transdermal hormone replacement therapy on vasomotor symptoms in perimenopausal women].
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Estradiol; Estrogen Repl | 2004 |
Efficacy on climacteric symptoms of a continuous combined regimen of 1 mg 17beta-estradiol and trimegestone versus two regimens combining 1 or 2 mg 17beta-estradiol and norethisterone acetate.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Affect; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combina | 2005 |
A study of the control of climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women following sequential regimens of 1 mg 17beta-estradiol and trimegestone compared with a regimen containing 1 mg estradiol valerate and norethisterone over a two-year period.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; E | 2005 |
Monophasic estrogen-progestogen therapy and sexuality in postmenopausal women.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Estradiol; Female; Hormone Replac | 2007 |
Ultra-low-dose estradiol and norethisterone acetate: effective menopausal symptom relief.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; | 2007 |
Tibolone and low-dose continuous combined hormone treatment: vaginal bleeding pattern, efficacy and tolerability.
Topics: Aged; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Es | 2007 |
Comparison of continuous and sequential transdermal progestogen with sequential oral progestogen in postmenopausal women using continuous transdermal estrogen: vasomotor symptoms, bleeding patterns, and serum lipids.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Cohort Studies; Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement The | 1997 |
Efficacy of continuous sequential transdermal estradiol and norethindrone acetate in relieving vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Double-Blind Method; Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Hot | 2000 |
Effective bleeding control and symptom relief by lower dose regimens of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: a randomized comparative dose-ranging study.
Topics: Aged; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therap | 2001 |
Acceptability and patterns of endometrial bleeding in estradiol-based HRT regimens: a comparative study of cyclical sequential combinations of trimegestone or norethisterone acetate.
Topics: Argentina; Double-Blind Method; Endometrium; Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Europe; Female | 2001 |
The efficacy of two dosages of a continuous combined hormone replacement regimen.
Topics: Aged; Alkaline Phosphatase; Amino Acids; Asian People; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, L | 2002 |
Do combinations of 1 mg estradiol and low doses of NETA effectively control menopausal symptoms?
Topics: Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Menopause; Middle Aged; Noreth | 1998 |
2 other studies available for norethindrone acetate and Hot Flashes
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effects of short-term estradiol and norethindrone acetate treatment on the breasts of normal postmenopausal women.
Topics: Aged; Breast; Cell Proliferation; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Collagen; Contraceptives, Oral | 2013 |
Ultra-low-dose estradiol and norethisterone acetate: bleeding patterns and other outcomes over 52 weeks of therapy.
Topics: Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Estradiol; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Hot Flashes; Human | 2015 |