Page last updated: 2024-11-07

norethindrone acetate and Fibroid

norethindrone acetate has been researched along with Fibroid in 16 studies

norethisterone acetate : A 3-oxo Delta(4)-steroid that is norethisterone in which the hydroxy group has been converted to its acetate ester.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To evaluate elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, alone or with add-back therapy, in premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding (greater than 80 mL per month) associated with uterine leiomyomas."9.27Elagolix Alone or With Add-Back Therapy in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Al-Hendy, A; Archer, DF; Bradley, L; Carr, BR; Chwalisz, K; Diamond, MP; Duan, WR; Dufek, MB; Gao, J; Owens, CD; Simon, JA; Soliman, AM; Stewart, EA; Watts, NB, 2018)
"Elagolix appeared to be effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroid and combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate was able to alleviate the hypoestrogenism side effects in premenopausal women."9.22Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Ahmad, I; Muhammad, J; Norhayati, MN; Yusof, Y, 2022)
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for long-term treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids."9.19Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆. ( Barlow, DH; Bestel, E; Bouchard, P; Donnez, J; Donnez, O; Fauser, BC; Loumaye, E; Nouri, K; Osterloh, I; Palacios, S; Tomaszewski, J; Vázquez, F, 2014)
"Elagolix is an orally active, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist approved for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids."8.12Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. ( Beck, D; Degner, J; Liu, M; Mostafa, NM; Noertersheuser, P; Shebley, M; Winzenborg, I, 2022)
"This drug evaluation features the clinical results from previous and ongoing studies of relugolix, in combination with the add back therapy of estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA), as a novel, orally administered, nonpeptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with UFs."8.12An evaluation of relugolix/estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women. ( Al-Hendy, A; Ali, M; Badary, OA; Chen, HY; Chiang, YF; Hsia, SM, 2022)
"To evaluate elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, alone or with add-back therapy, in premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding (greater than 80 mL per month) associated with uterine leiomyomas."5.27Elagolix Alone or With Add-Back Therapy in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Al-Hendy, A; Archer, DF; Bradley, L; Carr, BR; Chwalisz, K; Diamond, MP; Duan, WR; Dufek, MB; Gao, J; Owens, CD; Simon, JA; Soliman, AM; Stewart, EA; Watts, NB, 2018)
"Elagolix appeared to be effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroid and combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate was able to alleviate the hypoestrogenism side effects in premenopausal women."5.22Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Ahmad, I; Muhammad, J; Norhayati, MN; Yusof, Y, 2022)
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for long-term treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids."5.19Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆. ( Barlow, DH; Bestel, E; Bouchard, P; Donnez, J; Donnez, O; Fauser, BC; Loumaye, E; Nouri, K; Osterloh, I; Palacios, S; Tomaszewski, J; Vázquez, F, 2014)
"Elagolix is an orally active, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist approved for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids."4.12Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. ( Beck, D; Degner, J; Liu, M; Mostafa, NM; Noertersheuser, P; Shebley, M; Winzenborg, I, 2022)
"This drug evaluation features the clinical results from previous and ongoing studies of relugolix, in combination with the add back therapy of estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA), as a novel, orally administered, nonpeptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with UFs."4.12An evaluation of relugolix/estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women. ( Al-Hendy, A; Ali, M; Badary, OA; Chen, HY; Chiang, YF; Hsia, SM, 2022)
"Uterine fibroids are common non-cancerous neoplasm that cause heavy menstrual bleeding and other signs."3.11Linzagolix with and without hormonal add-back therapy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. ( Al-Hendy, A; Archer, D; Bestel, E; Bradley, L; Donnez, J; Garner, E; Gotteland, JP; Humberstone, A; Loumaye, E; Marsh, E; Petraglia, F; Stewart, EA; Taylor, HS; Terrill, P; Watts, N, 2022)
"Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain."3.01Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy. ( Al-Hendy, A; Arjona Ferreira, JC; Critchley, HOD; Langenberg, AGM; Li, Y; Lukes, AS; McKain, L; Poindexter, AN; Stewart, EA; Venturella, R; Villarroel, C; Wagman, RB, 2021)
"The quality of the myometrial scar, defined by ultrasound evaluation, was similar in the two study groups both at one-week (p=0."2.79Preoperative treatment with letrozole in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy of large uterine myomas: a prospective non-randomized study. ( Ferrero, S; Leone Roberti Maggiore, U; Scala, C; Venturini, PL, 2014)
"Uterine fibroids can cause heavy menstrual bleeding."2.66Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical therapy). ( Lumbiganon, P; Pattanittum, P; Sangkomkamhang, US, 2020)

Research

Studies (16)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19902 (12.50)18.7374
1990's1 (6.25)18.2507
2000's1 (6.25)29.6817
2010's3 (18.75)24.3611
2020's9 (56.25)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Beck, D1
Winzenborg, I1
Liu, M1
Degner, J1
Mostafa, NM1
Noertersheuser, P1
Shebley, M1
Muhammad, J1
Yusof, Y1
Ahmad, I1
Norhayati, MN1
Ali, M1
Chen, HY1
Chiang, YF1
Badary, OA1
Hsia, SM1
Al-Hendy, A4
Donnez, J3
Taylor, HS1
Stewart, EA3
Bradley, L2
Marsh, E1
Archer, D1
Petraglia, F1
Watts, N1
Gotteland, JP1
Bestel, E2
Terrill, P1
Loumaye, E2
Humberstone, A1
Garner, E1
Syed, YY1
Sangkomkamhang, US1
Lumbiganon, P1
Pattanittum, P1
Lukes, AS1
Poindexter, AN1
Venturella, R1
Villarroel, C1
Critchley, HOD1
Li, Y1
McKain, L1
Arjona Ferreira, JC1
Langenberg, AGM1
Wagman, RB1
Carr, BR1
Archer, DF1
Watts, NB1
Diamond, MP1
Gao, J1
Owens, CD1
Chwalisz, K1
Duan, WR1
Soliman, AM1
Dufek, MB1
Simon, JA1
Vázquez, F1
Tomaszewski, J1
Nouri, K1
Bouchard, P1
Fauser, BC1
Barlow, DH1
Palacios, S1
Donnez, O1
Osterloh, I1
Leone Roberti Maggiore, U1
Scala, C1
Venturini, PL1
Ferrero, S1
Simsek, T1
Karakus, C1
Trak, B1
BRISCOE, CC1
Lai, FM1
Wong, FW1
Allen, PW1
Casanas-Roux, F1
Caprasse, J1
Ferin, J1
Thomas, K1

Clinical Trials (14)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women[NCT02654054]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-22Completed
Extension Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids[NCT02925494]Phase 3433 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-14Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain[NCT01620528]Phase 3872 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-22Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain[NCT01931670]Phase 3815 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-09Completed
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women[NCT02691494]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-03Completed
Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain[NCT02143713]Phase 3496 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-27Completed
Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain[NCT01760954]Phase 3506 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-28Completed
A Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Oral Administration of OBE2109 Alone and in Combination With Add-back Therapy for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associat[NCT03070951]Phase 3511 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-23Completed
A Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Oral Administration of OBE2109 Alone and in Combination With Add-back Therapy for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associat[NCT03070899]Phase 3526 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-20Completed
LIBERTY 2: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate[NCT03103087]Phase 3382 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-14Completed
LIBERTY 1: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Co-Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associate[NCT03049735]Phase 3388 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-26Completed
A Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids[NCT01817530]Phase 2571 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-08Completed
A Phase III, Multicentre, Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of 3-months Open-label Treatment With PGL4001, Followed by a Randomised, Double-blind Placebo Controlled Period of 10 Days Treatment With Progestin, in Subjects With Myomas and[NCT01156857]Phase 3209 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Phase III, Multicentre, Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Successive Periods of 3-month Open-label PGL4001 Treatment, Each Followed by Ten Days of Double-blind Treatment With Progestin or Placebo and a Drug-free Period Until [NCT01252069]Phase 3132 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-19.0
Elagolix-209.0
Elagolix + Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate-135.2

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.1
Elagolix-234.7
Elagolix + E2/NETA-192.2

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.3
Elagolix-236.2
Elagolix + E2/NETA-194.7

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month

"Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.8
Elagolix-221.5
Elagolix + E2/NETA-176.7

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder

"Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions:~Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume < 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day, which is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period [last treatment visit date] or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date), and~≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month.~Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids, or adverse events were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.7
Elagolix84.1
Elagolix + E2/NETA68.5

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6

(NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.1
Elagolix65.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA61.5

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month

"Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02654054)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.4
Elagolix84.0
Elagolix + E2/NETA56.8

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder

"Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions:~Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume < 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the last dose date), and~≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month.~Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids, or adverse events were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not." (NCT02925494)
Timeframe: From Month 0 (Baseline in Pivotal Study) to Final Month of Treatment Period (up through Month 6 in Extension Study)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo->Elagolix85.7
Placebo->Elagolix + E2/NETA66.7
Elagolix->Elagolix89.4
Elagolix + E2/NETA->Elagolix + E2/NETA87.9

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin Concentration ≤ 10.5 g/dL and an Increase From Baseline > 2 g/dL at Month 6 During the Treatment Period

(NCT02925494)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo->Elagolix70.6
Placebo->Elagolix + E2/NETA36.4
Elagolix->Elagolix71.4
Elagolix + E2/NETA->Elagolix + E2/NETA72.5

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month

Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11. (NCT02925494)
Timeframe: Final Month of Treatment Period (up through Month 6)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo->Elagolix88.7
Placebo->Elagolix + E2/NETA56.0
Elagolix->Elagolix89.2
Elagolix->Elagolix + E2/NETA74.8

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume For Each 28-Day Interval and Final Month of the Treatment Period

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period of the pivotal study, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02925494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline in Pivotal Study), Extension Study: Day 1 to 28, Day 29 to 56, Day 57 to 84, Day 85 to 112, Day 113 to 140, Day 141 to 168, Final Month of Treatment Period (up through Month 6)

,,,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Study Day 1 to 28Study Day 29 to 56Study Day 57 to 84Study Day 85 to 112Study Day 113 to 140Study Day 141 to 168Final Month
Elagolix + E2/NETA->Elagolix + E2/NETA-186.5-191.9-200.6-200.5-192.9-211.4-205.6
Elagolix->Elagolix-253.4-249.7-255.9-252.0-253.9-279.1-250.3
Placebo->Elagolix-151.7-210.9-236.9-235.1-237.3-263.8-256.6
Placebo->Elagolix + E2/NETA-61.7-203.1-209.0-204.5-194.5-175.4-186.4

Percent Change From Baseline in MBL Volume For Each 28-Day Interval and Final Month of the Treatment Period

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period of the pivotal study, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02925494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline in Pivotal Study), Extension Study: Day 1 to 28, Day 29 to 56, Day 57 to 84, Day 85 to 112, Day 113 to 140, Day 141 to 168, Final Month of Treatment Period (up through Month 6)

,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Study Day 1 to 28Study Day 29 to 56Study Day 57 to 84Study Day 85 to 112Study Day 113 to 140Study Day 141 to 168Final Month
Elagolix + E2/NETA->Elagolix + E2/NETA-87.7-87.8-90.6-91.2-87.5-89.7-90.8
Elagolix->Elagolix-94.0-93.3-96.9-95.2-97.7-99.2-96.6
Placebo->Elagolix-46.5-87.2-89.9-90.3-90.0-91.8-91.0
Placebo->Elagolix + E2/NETA-28.2-79.4-82.9-82.7-75.0-79.3-78.5

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.20
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.25
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.32

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.32
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.20
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.49

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.27
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.19
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.89

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.46
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.64
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.51

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.07
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.93
Elagolix 200 mg BID-6.00

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.76
Elagolix 150 mg QD-3.88
Elagolix 200 mg BID-4.36

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.46
Elagolix 150 mg QD-6.17
Elagolix 200 mg BID-8.69

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.33
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.83
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.98

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.16
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.22
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.26

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.29
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.22

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.72
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.00
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.12

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in the Pain Domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.47
Elagolix 150 mg QD-20.76
Elagolix 200 mg BID-24.23

Change From Baseline to Month 1 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.47
Elagolix 150 mg QD-11.26
Elagolix 200 mg BID-15.52

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.27
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.46

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.43
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.75
Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.06

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.17
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.93
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.23

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.29
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.77
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.56

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.42
Elagolix 150 mg QD-6.83
Elagolix 200 mg BID-8.94

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.60
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.69
Elagolix 200 mg BID-5.25

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.70
Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.72
Elagolix 200 mg BID-11.56

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.96
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.68

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.33
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.44

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.33
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.38

Change From Baseline to Month 2 in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.91
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.38
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.87

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.29
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.29
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.55

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)

The DYSP pain scale ranges from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.29
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.39
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.49

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.37
Elagolix 150 mg QD-3.00
Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.47

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.35
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.89
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.33

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.87
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.92
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.65

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.23
Elagolix 150 mg QD-7.24
Elagolix 200 mg BID-9.16

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.73
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.90
Elagolix 200 mg BID-5.73

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-7.00
Elagolix 150 mg QD-9.20
Elagolix 200 mg BID-11.90

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.35
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.03
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.73

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.44
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.61

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.09
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.74
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.39

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Pain Domain of the EHP-30

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-17.71
Elagolix 150 mg QD-26.99
Elagolix 200 mg BID-36.46

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-12.57
Elagolix 150 mg QD-17.32
Elagolix 200 mg BID-26.44

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)

Permitted rescue narcotic analgesics included 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.10
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.07
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.22

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.28
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.39
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.57

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.38
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.59
Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.61

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.51
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.81
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.55

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.08
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.85
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.44

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.81
Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.41
Elagolix 200 mg BID-10.70

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.89
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.43
Elagolix 200 mg BID-6.13

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-7.84
Elagolix 150 mg QD-10.26
Elagolix 200 mg BID-13.09

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.40
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.05
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.72

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.33
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.51
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.72

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.45
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.61

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.15
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.95
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.76

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.29
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.36
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.60

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.13
Elagolix 150 mg QD-3.10
Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.94

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.67
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.86
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.71

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.10
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.75
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.94

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-7.80
Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.31
Elagolix 200 mg BID-10.93

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.80
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.94
Elagolix 200 mg BID-6.62

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-8.87
Elagolix 150 mg QD-10.04
Elagolix 200 mg BID-14.00

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.43
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.02
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.84

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.34
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.49
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.74

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.30
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.44
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.57

Change From Baseline to Month 5 in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.24
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.92
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.85

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionpills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.35
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.56

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.44
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.89
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.75

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.45
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.73
Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.94

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.48
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.07
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.78

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.02
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.48

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.75
Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.11
Elagolix 200 mg BID-11.21

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.94
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.78
Elagolix 200 mg BID-6.69

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.88
Elagolix 150 mg QD-9.14
Elagolix 200 mg BID-13.67

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.29
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.41
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.60

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.31
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.48
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.72

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.15
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.80
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.75

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Pain Domain of the EHP-30

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-15.42
Elagolix 150 mg QD-27.99
Elagolix 200 mg BID-40.52

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-11.56
Elagolix 150 mg QD-16.27
Elagolix 200 mg BID-29.07

Number of Days of Hospitalization

(NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventiondays (Mean)
Placebo2.9
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.0
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.0

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.35
Elagolix 150 mg QD-38.42
Elagolix 200 mg BID-45.35

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-7.51
Elagolix 150 mg QD-13.74
Elagolix 200 mg BID-15.23

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-13.44
Elagolix 150 mg QD-44.23
Elagolix 200 mg BID-77.22

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-13.81
Elagolix 150 mg QD-19.50
Elagolix 200 mg BID-27.53

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.80
Elagolix 150 mg QD-47.01
Elagolix 200 mg BID-79.74

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-17.64
Elagolix 150 mg QD-26.10
Elagolix 200 mg BID-40.13

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-18.08
Elagolix 150 mg QD-48.02
Elagolix 200 mg BID-79.98

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-17.94
Elagolix 150 mg QD-32.05
Elagolix 200 mg BID-48.35

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-18.09
Elagolix 150 mg QD-46.72
Elagolix 200 mg BID-84.58

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-19.60
Elagolix 150 mg QD-31.15
Elagolix 200 mg BID-49.28

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-19.21
Elagolix 150 mg QD-40.60
Elagolix 200 mg BID-79.99

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-18.17
Elagolix 150 mg QD-30.55
Elagolix 200 mg BID-48.14

Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo14.5
Elagolix 150 mg QD35.1
Elagolix 200 mg BID44.1

Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo25.8
Elagolix 150 mg QD32.3
Elagolix 200 mg BID33.9

Percentage of Responders at Month 1 for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo26.3
Elagolix 150 mg QD30.4
Elagolix 200 mg BID31.8

Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo17.2
Elagolix 150 mg QD44.8
Elagolix 200 mg BID71.3

Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo32.2
Elagolix 150 mg QD41.1
Elagolix 200 mg BID46.3

Percentage of Responders at Month 2 for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.1
Elagolix 150 mg QD33.7
Elagolix 200 mg BID44.7

Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo19.6
Elagolix 150 mg QD46.4
Elagolix 200 mg BID75.8

Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo36.5
Elagolix 150 mg QD50.4
Elagolix 200 mg BID54.5

Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo21.7
Elagolix 150 mg QD47.6
Elagolix 200 mg BID75.3

Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo35.4
Elagolix 150 mg QD53.2
Elagolix 200 mg BID63.8

Percentage of Responders at Month 4 for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.1
Elagolix 150 mg QD44.3
Elagolix 200 mg BID54.2

Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo24.3
Elagolix 150 mg QD45.7
Elagolix 200 mg BID79.0

Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo38.3
Elagolix 150 mg QD49.8
Elagolix 200 mg BID62.1

Percentage of Responders at Month 5 for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo35.3
Elagolix 150 mg QD43.7
Elagolix 200 mg BID54.8

Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo23.1
Elagolix 150 mg QD42.1
Elagolix 200 mg BID75.3

Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo34.9
Elagolix 150 mg QD45.7
Elagolix 200 mg BID62.1

Percentage of Responders at Month 6 for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
Elagolix 150 mg QD39.6
Elagolix 200 mg BID50.3

Response to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 1

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 1 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.50
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.97
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.76

Response to PGIC at Month 2

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 2 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.13
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.74
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.11

Response to PGIC at Month 3

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.14
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.53
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.01

Response to PGIC at Month 4

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 4 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.16
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.54
Elagolix 200 mg BID1.91

Response to PGIC at Month 5

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 5 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.19
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.50
Elagolix 200 mg BID1.87

Response to PGIC at Month 6

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.27
Elagolix 150 mg QD2.56
Elagolix 200 mg BID1.92

Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type

(NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All CategoriesAbdominal HysterectomyAngiographyArthroscopyBiopsyBlood DrawConsultationCT ScanDiagnostic LaparoscopyElectrocardiogramEndometrial AblationHistological ExamIntrauterine InseminationIn Vitro FertilizationLaparoscopic HysterectomyLaparotomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingOophorectomyPelvic ExamPhysical ExaminationSurgery for AdhesionsTherapeutic LaparoscopyTransfusionUltrasoundUrine TestVaginal HysterectomyX-RayOther (Not Specified)
Elagolix 150 mg QD2100007331100000000110000380210
Elagolix 200 mg BID320011163603000000002150106110510
Placebo620001276210300000000532000142601416

Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period

(NCT01620528)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6Overall
Elagolix 150 mg QD54503837353226126
Elagolix 200 mg BID51473348422221113
Placebo69705966544338189

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionnumber of pills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.31
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.36
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.49

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)

The DYSP pain scale ranges from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.30
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.39
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.60

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.33
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.90
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.55

Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)

Permitted country-specific rescue narcotic analgesics included 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionnumber of pills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.12
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.12
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.21

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionnumber of pills (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.40
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.52

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.52
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.06
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.65

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.48
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.63
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.80

Number of Days of Hospitalization

This is assessed using HRUQ. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

Interventiondays (Mean)
Placebo3.2
Elagolix 150 mg QD3.3
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.2

Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo22.7
Elagolix 150 mg QD43.4
Elagolix 200 mg BID72.4

Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: At Month 3 of Treatment Period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo36.5
Elagolix 150 mg QD49.8
Elagolix 200 mg BID57.8

Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.62-1.80-1.43-1.81-1.58-1.34
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.56-2.25-2.17-2.03-1.96-1.67
Placebo-0.61-0.82-0.76-0.55-0.85-0.76

Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.08-2.75-2.95-2.55-2.99-2.61
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.30-3.06-2.94-3.54-3.51-3.34
Placebo-1.45-1.63-2.03-2.21-1.87-1.89

Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.69-1.28-0.88-1.19-1.68-2.27
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.72-1.46-1.46-2.19-1.69-2.29
Placebo-0.71-1.06-1.31-1.26-0.78-1.44

Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.94-4.74-6.10-6.21-6.66-7.08
Elagolix 200 mg BID-4.69-7.08-7.27-9.35-9.51-9.13
Placebo-1.60-3.43-4.07-4.58-4.37-6.11

Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.78-4.04-3.84-3.77-4.67-4.89
Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.89-4.48-4.34-5.64-5.16-5.58
Placebo-2.18-2.71-3.37-3.46-2.62-3.30

Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-4.02-6.27-7.31-7.58-7.81-8.01
Elagolix 200 mg BID-5.91-9.36-9.30-11.14-11.15-10.70
Placebo-2.19-4.25-4.66-4.87-5.32-6.73

Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.06-1.62-2.06-2.19-2.28
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.23-2.04-2.84-2.95-2.87
Placebo-0.78-1.08-1.49-1.58-1.60

Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.19-0.32-0.40-0.41-0.42
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.26-0.49-0.63-0.70-0.69
Placebo-0.21-0.25-0.35-0.39-0.36

Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to administering study drug), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.86-0.84-0.97-1.05-0.99
Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.11-1.67-1.70-1.74-1.76
Placebo-0.33-0.39-0.45-0.47-0.50

Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.24-0.41-0.50-0.54-0.58
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.31-0.54-0.69-0.78-0.81
Placebo-0.22-0.34-0.39-0.45-0.48

Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5

,,
Interventionnumber of pills (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 4Month 5
Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.29-0.32-0.38-0.37
Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.32-0.44-0.51-0.54
Placebo-0.20-0.25-0.29-0.32

Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-19.40-26.62-28.23
Elagolix 200 mg BID-22.75-34.72-36.44
Placebo-15.20-19.29-19.53

Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-10.46-17.26-17.07
Elagolix 200 mg BID-14.29-25.20-28.24
Placebo-9.89-14.51-14.14

Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type

This is assessed using HRUQ. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All CategoriesAbdominal HysterectomyAngiographyArthroscopyBiopsyBlood DrawColposcopyConsultationCT ScanDiagnostic LaparoscopyElectrocardiogramEndometrial AblationHistological ExamIntrauterine InseminationIn Vitro FertilizationLaparoscopic HysterectomyLaparotomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingOophorectomyPelvic ExamPhysical ExaminationSurgery for AdhesionsTherapeutic LaparoscopyTransfusionUltrasoundUrine TestVaginal HysterectomyX-RayOther (Not Specified)
Elagolix 150 mg QD2801011305100200000020016000370114
Elagolix 200 mg BID2200114015000000000021400026074
Placebo3700001201704000000003180009801213

Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period

This is assessed using Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6Overall
Elagolix 150 mg QD53474246393127124
Elagolix 200 mg BID57544340433025131
Placebo99937254625639201

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD3.122.622.532.562.432.50
Elagolix 200 mg BID2.842.152.021.971.981.95
Placebo3.493.243.163.193.233.22

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-39.67-39.26-45.73-48.52-45.99-49.70
Elagolix 200 mg BID-53.68-80.68-82.52-83.92-85.53-80.43
Placebo-14.36-17.36-20.58-21.55-22.63-23.81

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionpercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD-15.47-26.30-32.63-36.19-38.17-42.09
Elagolix 200 mg BID-18.86-34.32-44.83-51.52-53.61-52.42
Placebo-12.43-21.13-25.78-29.94-31.96-31.25

Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.29 or greater from Baseline in DYSP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD33.839.944.041.342.839.9
Elagolix 200 mg BID35.147.453.759.858.155.8
Placebo33.333.239.538.537.439.4

Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment Period

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD33.039.445.944.146.2
Elagolix 200 mg BID46.269.879.880.776.9
Placebo17.319.021.223.725.4

Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain. (NCT01931670)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment Period

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix 150 mg QD27.639.851.450.551.6
Elagolix 200 mg BID29.350.763.263.262.2
Placebo23.532.138.739.840.6

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.1
Elagolix-196.6
Elagolix + E2/NETA-127.0

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.2
Elagolix-211.1
Elagolix + E2/NETA-200.3

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6

Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo28.5
Elagolix-223.7
Elagolix + E2/NETA-198.1

Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final Month

"Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.3
Elagolix-198.8
Elagolix + E2/NETA-168.8

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for Responder

"Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions:~Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume < 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day, which is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date), and~≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month.~Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids, or adverse events were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo10.5
Elagolix76.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA76.5

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6

(NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.8
Elagolix40.0
Elagolix + E2/NETA50.0

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final Month

"Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11.~The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date." (NCT02691494)
Timeframe: Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.7
Elagolix88.9
Elagolix + E2/NETA61.0

Number of Days in Hospital During the Treatment Period

The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study, including physician visits, hospitalizations and types of procedures received. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD2.0
Placebo Elagolix 200 mg BID4.0
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD3.0
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID3.0

Number of Participants With Non-study Health Visits During the Treatment Period

The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD48
Placebo Elagolix 200 mg BID65
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD76
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID76

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.85 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD37.0
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID57.1
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD50.8
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID75.9

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.43 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD27.2
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID32.7
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD66.4
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID67.2

Change From Baseline in Any Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Any rescue analgesic use (NSAID and/or opioid) was calculated as the total number of pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.44-0.49-0.46-0.48-0.46-0.45
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.47-0.52-0.53-0.54-0.57-0.59
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.07-0.16-0.14-0.13-0.16-0.16
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.16-0.24-0.24-0.28-0.29-0.28

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Dimension

"The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and includes pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image, and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis.~Each question in the core questionnaire is scored on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always.~The pain dimension consists of 11 questions. The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-32.25-32.00-32.95
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-36.45-37.42-38.48
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.02-11.12-10.60
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-12.18-15.25-15.61

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Sexual Intercourse Dimension

"The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis; only 1 modular questionnaire (sexual intercourse [5 items]) was used in this study.~The Sexual Intercourse dimension consists of 5 questions, each answered on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always, or Not Applicable (not scored). The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-24.17-24.61-23.21
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-28.37-28.66-33.21
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-3.29-9.26-9.36
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-10.35-12.50-7.30

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Hours of Work Lost in Workplace and Household

"The HRPQ consists of 9 questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity and daily activities in the home.~Absenteeism: Number of hours of intended work lost due to illness or treatment. Presenteeism: Number of hours of work where output was impacted by illness or treatments.~Total hours lost is the sum of hours missed due to absenteeism plus presenteeism." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Absenteeism from workplacePresenteeism from workplaceTotal hours of work lost from workplaceAbsenteeism from householdPresenteeism from householdTotal hours of work lost from household
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.25-8.38-9.36-3.56-2.33-5.84
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.73-10.63-12.02-3.50-2.74-6.17
Placebo Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.33-8.37-9.70-2.68-2.19-4.86
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.82-10.31-13.22-3.17-2.47-5.64

Change From Baseline in NSAID Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. NSAID rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of NSAID pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.25-0.29-0.27-0.28-0.27-0.26
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.28-0.29-0.30-0.30-0.31-0.32
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.05-0.10-0.11-0.09-0.11-0.10
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.12-0.18-0.18-0.20-0.21-0.20

Change From Baseline in Opioid Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Opioid rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of opioid pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.19-0.19-0.19-0.20-0.19-0.20
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.20-0.23-0.23-0.24-0.26-0.27
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.02-0.06-0.04-0.05-0.05-0.06
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.04-0.06-0.06-0.08-0.08-0.07

Percent Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-54.6-50.7-49.0-50.5-51.8-52.9
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-81.3-84.0-84.8-83.0-82.7-81.8
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-18.4-47.6-40.2-40.3-38.0-44.6
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-27.0-70.2-76.7-77.5-75.6-80.7

Percent Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse~1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse~2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain~3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain~Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of Not Applicable were excluded." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-43.7-38.0-43.4-49.1-57.0-51.3
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-48.7-51.1-49.1-48.5-42.7-49.7
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-10.4-12.0-22.1-22.3-25.7-18.8
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-16.9-19.2-26.4-12.6-9.5-28.3

Percent Change From Baseline in Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Assessed With Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

The NRS measured endometriosis-associated pain with and without menstruation on an 11-point scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain ever. Participants were asked to assess their endometriosis pain over the past 24 hours at it's worst at approximately the same time every day in the e-Diary. Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-50.8-50.7-52.7-54.7-56.1-53.9
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-58.7-58.7-59.5-60.4-62.3-61.1
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-12.0-20.7-27.7-31.2-29.2-30.7
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-18.2-25.8-35.0-38.8-45.6-41.7

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-47.9-48.6-50.7-53.2-54.9-53.6
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-54.0-53.1-54.5-54.4-57.4-55.9
Placebo Elagolix 200 mg BID-11.3-12.8-17.8-23.1-31.2-27.2
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-7.3-7.8-24.5-25.0-30.4-24.0

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

"The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:~Very Much Improved~Much Improved~Minimally Improved~Not Changed~Minimally Worse~Much Worse~Very Much Worse" (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD65.769.167.971.171.875.4
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID78.378.977.282.182.184.0
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD50.058.763.661.467.165.8
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID56.874.570.975.281.076.3

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.85 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD56.752.248.147.753.2
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID74.379.177.180.082.9
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD11.836.530.033.030.9
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID24.562.364.164.759.0

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dyspareunia at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.29 or more from baseline in dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesics).~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary. Dyspareunia was assessed according to the following:~0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse~1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse~2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain~3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain~Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of Not Applicable were excluded." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD50.547.055.754.152.345.9
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID63.465.361.260.263.558.1
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD23.130.637.334.830.028.8
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID27.335.133.332.340.031.3

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.43 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT02143713)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD61.761.866.264.867.5
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID62.163.465.666.472.6
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD12.720.818.927.328.4
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID18.227.429.134.333.0

Number of Days in Hospital During the Treatment Period

The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study, including physician visits, hospitalizations and types of procedures received. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD2.0
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID1.5
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD3.0
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID1.0

Number of Participants With Non-study Health Visits During the Treatment Period

The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD81
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID68
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD59
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID48

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.81 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-665.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD52.1
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID78.2
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD32.6
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID64.4

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.36 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-665.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD67.5
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID69.1
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD39.5
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID57.5

Change From Baseline in Any Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, and/or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Any rescue analgesic use (NSAID and/or opioid) was calculated as the total number of pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.35-0.35-0.37-0.40-0.41-0.40
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.58-0.59-0.61-0.62-0.59-0.56
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.15-0.24-0.25-0.26-0.27-0.22
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.16-0.28-0.32-0.35-0.34-0.38

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Dimension

"The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and includes pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image, and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis.~Each question in the core questionnaire is scored on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always.~The pain dimension consists of 11 questions. The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-29.50-30.10-31.18
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-40.28-43.16-41.62
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-12.98-17.87-15.63
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-13.27-21.87-25.17

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Sexual Intercourse Dimension

"The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis; only 1 modular questionnaire (sexual intercourse [5 items]) was used in this study.~The Sexual Intercourse dimension consists of 5 questions, each answered on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always, or Not Applicable (not scored). The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-19.81-20.88-24.23
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-29.42-27.27-30.55
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-8.15-15.00-12.45
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-9.86-18.24-23.17

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Hours of Work Lost in Workplace and Household

"The HRPQ consists of 9 questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity and daily activities in the home.~Absenteeism: Number of hours of intended work lost due to illness or treatment. Presenteeism: Number of hours of work where output was impacted by illness or treatments.~Total hours lost is the sum of hours missed due to absenteeism plus presenteeism." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and month 6

,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Absenteeism from workplacePresenteeism from workplaceTotal hours of work lost from workplaceAbsenteeism from householdPresenteeism from householdTotal hours of work lost from household
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-1.84-11.14-12.98-3.10-2.72-5.82
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-3.01-12.45-15.15-3.69-2.49-6.15
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-2.15-8.29-10.44-3.76-2.95-6.90
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-2.78-10.15-13.03-2.80-2.72-5.52

Change From Baseline in NSAID Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, and/or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. NSAID rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of NSAID pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.24-0.24-0.24-0.25-0.27-0.27
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.34-0.34-0.34-0.35-0.32-0.31
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.07-0.12-0.12-0.13-0.13-0.12
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.09-0.14-0.14-0.17-0.17-0.23

Change From Baseline in Opioid Rescue Analgesic Use

Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, and/or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Opioid rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of opioid pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpills/day (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.11-0.11-0.13-0.15-0.15-0.13
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.24-0.25-0.28-0.27-0.27-0.25
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-0.09-0.12-0.13-0.13-0.14-0.10
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-0.07-0.14-0.17-0.19-0.17-0.16

Percent Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-46.7-46.7-47.9-51.4-52.4-49.2
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-82.7-84.8-84.5-85.1-83.4-82.0
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-19.0-46.6-36.3-38.2-33.4-37.9
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-19.3-67.3-65.9-67.4-77.2-71.6

Percent Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse~1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse~2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain~3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain~Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of Not Applicable were excluded." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-32.8-36.2-36.1-35.0-34.9-30.7
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-39.5-40.4-38.6-48.6-44.8-41.7
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-12.9-16.2-14.1-24.3-20.2-28.0
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-1.1-27.1-23.5-20.7-27.5-12.6

Percent Change From Baseline in Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Assessed With Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

The NRS measured endometriosis-associated pain with and without menstruation on an 11-point scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain ever. Participants were asked to assess their endometriosis pain over the past 24 hours at it's worst at approximately the same time every day in the e-Diary. Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-41.0-44.4-45.5-47.7-46.4-48.2
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-60.0-62.1-62.2-63.5-62.1-60.7
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-9.2-31.2-28.0-32.8-29.0-27.8
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-22.3-34.6-39.9-40.0-46.4-45.5

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Based on Daily Assessment

"Participants assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD-37.4-41.4-44.0-47.2-45.3-48.9
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID-54.5-56.4-56.8-59.6-58.0-56.5
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD-9.6-22.6-19.7-32.0-17.7-10.2
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID-20.7-18.0-30.2-33.9-42.5-43.9

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

"The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:~Very Much Improved~Much Improved~Minimally Improved~Not Changed~Minimally Worse~Much Worse~Very Much Worse" (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD63.364.764.370.775.269.4
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID86.487.387.491.587.591.2
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD47.165.773.773.966.370.4
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID45.570.071.370.878.779.3

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.81 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-665.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities each day of their period in an e-Diary. Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD48.051.149.253.954.0
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID80.978.980.579.883.3
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD21.040.236.839.632.6
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID20.660.054.358.264.0

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dyspareunia at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.36 or more from baseline in dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesics).~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary. Dyspareunia was assessed according to the following:~0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse~1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse~2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain~3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain~Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of Not Applicable were excluded." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD50.051.950.048.946.645.2
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID61.358.363.865.365.360.0
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD33.335.836.446.938.139.0
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID15.630.032.841.939.743.1

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

"Response was defined as a reduction of -0.36 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-665.~Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0: No discomfort~1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do~2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do~3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.~Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit." (NCT01760954)
Timeframe: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-665 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-667 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
Elagolix/Elagolix 150 mg QD55.462.661.464.161.3
Elagolix/Elagolix 200 mg BID74.369.570.775.671.9
Placebo/Elagolix 150 mg QD23.838.133.739.640.4
Placebo/Elagolix 200 mg BID29.041.045.747.351.7

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.4
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire

"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.7
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group

"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.30

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire

"PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-0.6

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-0.9

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.8
Placebo (Group C)-1.0

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)43.6
Placebo (Group C)17.1

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high score = good). LS means and p-value for test of difference was relugolix plus E2/NETA minus placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)44.4
Placebo (Group C)16.5

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of time, most of the time and all of the time.) Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-36.1
Placebo (Group C)-13.7

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)

"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5), raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)]*100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-51.7
Placebo (Group C)-18.3

Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.30
Placebo (Group C)39.85

Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-5.47
Placebo (Group C)-0.67

Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-3.10
Placebo (Group C)3.04

Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)0.12
Placebo (Group C)3.48

Change From Baseline in UFS-QoL Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most participants (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-51.7
Placebo (Group C)-18.3

Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Score by Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score

"The UFS-QoL total score was the sum of 6 subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function). The raw scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)37.8
Placebo (Group C)13.8

Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)34
Placebo (Group C)17

Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)48
Placebo (Group C)34

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)19
Placebo (Group C)2

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)35
Placebo (Group C)18

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease in UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)79
Placebo (Group C)37

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)78
Placebo (Group C)42

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4) As Assessed By DXA

"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.819
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)-1.919

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Hemoglobin For Women With A Hemoglobin Concentration ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)24.3
Placebo (Group C)4.3

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume

"MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. Least square (LS) means for test of difference is Relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-84.3
Placebo (Group C)-15.1

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume

"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-17.4
Placebo (Group C)-7.4

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume

"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-13.8
Placebo (Group C)-1.5

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12

An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term. Reported confidence interval (CI) based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson). As per the objective of the study, the secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below. (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)5.56
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)35.71

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)6.3
Placebo (Group C)3.9

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA

"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)71.2
Placebo (Group C)14.73

Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24

"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)61.29
Placebo (Group C)5.41

Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)47.06
Placebo (Group C)17.07

Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (e-Diary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with e-Diary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)50.40
Placebo (Group C)3.10

Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)45.34

Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)63
Placebo (Group C)4

Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.9
Placebo (Group C)NA

Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)16.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

Time To MBL Response

"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.4
Placebo (Group C)27.1

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Function From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at Baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)2 Category improvement (-2)3 Category improvement (-3)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)1913102
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1330184

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)3 Category improvement (-3)2 Category improvement (-2)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)218182
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)7222910

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck As Assessed By DXA

"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck (same leg across participants) at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD. The LS means were based on a mixed-effect model with visit, region, Baseline MBL volume, age at Baseline, body mass index at Baseline, BMD at Baseline, race, and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects. For Relugolix plus E2/NETA Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4), number (n)=95.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only rel" (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)Total HipFemoral Neck
Placebo (Group C)0.315-0.0440.019
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.126-0.173-0.684

Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And NET In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03103087)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
RelugolixNET
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1.960.28

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Embarrassment Caused By Uterine Fibroids Based On UFS-QoL Question 29

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.5
Placebo (Group C)-0.4

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Function Assessed Using The PGA Questionnaire

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.6
Placebo (Group C)-0.5

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Predose Concentrations Of Estradiol In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group

"Blood samples for determination of serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.95

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Symptoms Assessed Using The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Questionnaire

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.1
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Physical Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 11

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.1
Placebo (Group C)-0.6

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Interference Of Uterine Fibroids With Social Activities Based On UFS-QoL Question 20

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.7
Placebo (Group C)-0.7

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Physical Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-2.0
Placebo (Group C)-0.9

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire Score For Social Activities

"The Menorrhagia Impact was evaluated using a 5-point response scale to assess level of improvement from Baseline to Week 24. Response scale: Not at all, 2. Slightly, 3.Moderately, 4. Quite a bit and 5. Extremely.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.9
Placebo (Group C)-0.8

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)44.4
Placebo (Group C)14.6

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)45.8
Placebo (Group C)15.1

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale Score

"Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-30.9
Placebo (Group C)-10.5

Change From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score As Measured By The UFS-QoL (Q1, Q2, Q5)

"The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL Symptoms Scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids: Heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question [Q] 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Q2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Q5). raw scores were transformed to a normalized score: Transformed Score = [(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/(Possible raw score range)] * 100 Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity.~As per the study objective, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only these two arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-45.0
Placebo (Group C)-16.1

Change From Baseline In E2 Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-22.95
Placebo (Group C)51.72

Change From Baseline In Follicle Stimulating Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-6.25
Placebo (Group C)0.10

Change From Baseline In Luteinizing Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-1.90
Placebo (Group C)3.62

Change From Baseline In Progesterone Serum Concentration At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.05
Placebo (Group C)3.00

Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"The Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale consists of 3 items proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most patients (heavy bleeding during the menstrual period [Question 1], passing blood clots during the menstrual period [Question 2], and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area [Question 5]).Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (None of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time and all of the time). Lower score indicates minimal symptom severity and higher score indicates maximum symptom severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-45.0
Placebo (Group C)-16.1

Change From Baseline In UFS-QoL Score By Health-Related Quality Of Life Total Score

"The UFS-QoL total score was the sum of 6 subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function). The raw scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)38.0
Placebo (Group C)12.8

Number Of Participants Who Achieved A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 During The 35 Days Prior To Randomization

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the last 35 days of treatment (up to 24 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)33
Placebo (Group C)11

Number Of Participants With A ≥ 30% Reduction in NRS Score From Baseline to Last 35 Days of Treatment Who Had Maximum Pain Scores ≥ 4 At Baseline

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain NRS. The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)42
Placebo (Group C)27

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline And Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL At Week 24

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)15
Placebo (Group C)5

Number Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥ 1 g/dL From Baseline To Week 24 Among Those With Below Lower Limit Of Normal

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)34
Placebo (Group C)17

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Decrease In UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale Score

"A Responder was defined as meeting a meaningful change threshold, set as a 20-point change from Baseline, in the Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Scale at Week 24 on the transformed score.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)79
Placebo (Group C)35

Number Of Responders With At Least 20 Points Increase From Baseline At Week 24 In UFS-QoL Revised Activities Scale Score

As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)78
Placebo (Group C)45

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 12 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), As Assessed By DXA

"Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4) at Baseline and at Week 12. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.470
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)-1.995

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In MBL Volume

MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method. As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented. (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-84.3
Placebo (Group C)-23.2

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Primary Uterine Fibroid Volume

"The volume of the primary uterine fibroid was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-12.4
Placebo (Group C)-0.3

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Uterine Volume

"The volume of the uterus was measured by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-12.9
Placebo (Group C)2.2

Percent Change From Baseline In Hemoglobin For Women With a Hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline

"LS means and p-value for test of difference is relugolix plus E2/NETA minus Placebo based on mixed-effect model with treatment, visit, region, Baseline MBL and treatment by visit interaction included as fixed effects.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)20.8
Placebo (Group C)10.0

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 12

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported CI based on exact binomial 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson).~As per the objective of the study, this secondary analysis compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with relugolix plus delayed E2/NETA at Week 12 and are presented below." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)10.94
Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)36.36

Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Through Week 24

"An adverse event was defined as an unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The preferred terms of hyperhidrosis, feeling hot, hot flush, night sweats, and flushing were combined to describe vasomotor symptoms. Participants with multiple events for a given preferred term were counted only once for each preferred term.~Reported percentages based on the total number of participants in each treatment group.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)14.8
Placebo (Group C)9.4

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved A Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume Of < 80 mL And A ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume With Relugolix Plus E2/NETA

"A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of < 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 24/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified primary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)73.4
Placebo (Group C)18.9

Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤ 10.5 g/dL At Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of > 2 g/dL From Baseline At Week 24

"Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤ 10.5 gram (g)/deciliter (dL) at Baseline and reported at Week 24.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)50.0
Placebo (Group C)21.74

Percentage Of Participants With A Maximum NRS Score ≤ 1 For Uterine Fibroid-Associated Pain Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Uterine fibroid-associated pain was assessed by a pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is a validated, single-item, self-reported measure, which asks respondents to rank their pain on an 11-point scale as follows: 0 (no pain), 1 to 3 (mild pain), 4 to 6 (moderate pain), and 7 to 10 (severe pain).~Participants were asked to document, in an e-Diary, the worst pain associated with their uterine fibroids that they experienced during the last 24 hours, every day until the end of study drug administration. Pain evaluable participants, defined as those who had maximum NRS score ≥ 4 at Baseline and had at least 28 days (80% of the last 35 days of treatment) of pain scores recorded in the e-Diary, were analyzed.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)43.10
Placebo (Group C)10.14

Percentage Of Participants With Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of Treatment

"Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits:~No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea;~No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with electronic diary (eDiary) data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting;~Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with eDiary data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 24)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)52.34
Placebo (Group C)5.51

Predose Trough Concentrations Of E2 In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of E2 serum concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics. As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)48.34

Sustained Amenorrhea Rate (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea is defined as participants time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea until the date of last study drug.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)67
Placebo (Group C)7

Time To Achieving Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Time to amenorrhea was defined as the weeks from date of first dose of study drug to the start of amenorrhea.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)5.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

Time To Achieving Sustained Amenorrhea (No Or Negligible Bleeding)

"Sustained amenorrhea status as determined based on time to achieve and maintain amenorrhea status.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)11.3
Placebo (Group C)NA

Time To MBL Response

"Defined as the time to achieve an MBL volume of < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline MBL volume as measured by the alkaline hematin method. MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

Interventionweeks (Median)
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)8.3
Placebo (Group C)25.1

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In The PGA Questionnaire For Symptoms From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)2 Category improvement (-2)3 Category improvement (-3)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)281415
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1429228

Participants Achieving Improvement From Baseline In The PGA Questionnaire For Uterine Fibroid-related Function From Baseline At Week 24

"The PGAs assessed participants' limitation in activities and the severity of symptoms due to uterine fibroids over the previous 4 weeks, as perceived by the participant. The PGA for function and symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point response scale (no limitation at all [1], mild limitation [2], moderate limitation [3], quite a bit of limitation [4], and extreme limitation [5]). Category improvements for symptoms are presented. A 1-category improvement would be severe at baseline to moderate.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Category improvement (-1)2 Category improvement (-2)3 Category improvement (-3)4 Category improvement (-4)
Placebo (Group C)16944
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)2118232

Percent Change From Baseline At Week 24 In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1 To L4), Total Hip, And Femoral Neck

"BMD was assessed by DXA at the lumbar spine (L1, L2, L3, and L4), total hip, and femoral neck at Baseline and at Week 24. The scans were read by the central radiology laboratory in accordance with the imaging charter. The same DXA machine was used at the local imaging center at each site and operated in the same scan mode for all images procured for an individual participant. All images were submitted for central reading. The central radiology laboratory collected and evaluated all DXA scans for acceptability and measured BMD.~As per the objective of the study, the pre-specified secondary efficacy analyses compared relugolix plus E2/NETA with placebo. Therefore, only relugolix plus E2/NETA and placebo arms are presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Lumbar Spine (L1 to L4)Total HipFemoral Neck
Placebo (Group C)0.0520.5490.307
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-0.3560.023-0.262

Predose Trough Concentrations Of Relugolix And Norethindrone (NET) In The Relugolix Plus E2/NETA Group At Week 24

"Blood samples for determination of relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were collected predose at Week 24. Relugolix and NET plasma concentrations were determined using validated bioanalytical methodology.~Concentrations below the quantification limit (BQL) were set to 0 for analysis of summary statistics.~As per the objective of the study, only relugolix plus E2/NETA concentration is presented." (NCT03049735)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
RelugolixNET
Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)2.130.33

Change in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month

The average bleeding score was calculated for each 28-day interval starting on Day 29 using data collected on daily bleeding diary using the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson (MVJ) Menstrual Bleeding Scale (1=spotting, 2 = very light bleeding, 3 = light bleeding, 4 = moderate bleeding, 5 = heavy bleeding, 6 = very heavy/gushing bleeding). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-0.3
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-0.7
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-0.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-0.1
Cohort 2: Placebo-0.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-0.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-0.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-0.1

Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit

Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Interventiong/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo0.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD1.4
Cohort 2: Placebo0.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD1.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD1.2

Mean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with any bleeding including spotting was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Interventiondays (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-1.2
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-4.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-2.7
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.1
Cohort 2: Placebo-1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-3.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.8

Mean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with heavy bleeding (either heavy or very heavy/gushing bleeding) was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Interventiondays (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Placebo-1.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-2.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.7
Cohort 2: Placebo-0.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-1.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-1.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Amenorrhea is defined as having 0 days of bleeding or spotting based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding or spotting, based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. Participants needed to have at least 66 days on treatment. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo1.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID56.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD33.3
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD28.3
Cohort 2: Placebo1.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD50.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD17.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.7

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month

Percentage of participants who achieved an MBL volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo32.81
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID91.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD88.52
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.03
Cohort 2: Placebo36.84
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD91.55
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD72.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.53

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo1.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID75.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD52.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD43.3
Cohort 2: Placebo2.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD67.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD31.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD34.8

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

Percentage of participants with a >= 50% reduction from baseline in MBL to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo31.25
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID93.55
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD86.89
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD82.26
Cohort 2: Placebo35.53
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD90.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD79.45
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.53

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 56 to 29 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, second last 28 days of treatment (last 56 to 29 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo11.29
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID94.83
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD88.14
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD85.00
Cohort 2: Placebo18.42
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD85.29
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD67.19
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD77.14

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 84 to 57 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, third last 28 days of treatment (last 84 to 57 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo19.67
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID96.43
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD89.47
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.31
Cohort 2: Placebo21.62
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD86.36
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD74.19
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD72.31

Percentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥50% Reduction in MBL Volume from Baseline to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Placebo26.56
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID91.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD85.25
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD79.03
Cohort 2: Placebo31.58
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD90.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD72.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD81.58

Change From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) Questionnaire

The NBUFSQ (8 items) is a brief patient-reported daily diary that assesses non-bleeding symptoms experienced by women with uterine fibroids. It includes 6 items, asking women to rate their symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, pressure, and cramping, back pain, bloating, and urinary problems) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric response scale that ranges from 0 (i.e., no symptom) to 10 (i.e., worst possible symptom) and 2 items to address urinary frequency during the daytime and at night. Data presented in the sum of scores to the 6 symptom questions, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (worst possible symptoms). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. Final Month is defined as the last 28 days prior to and including the last dose date of study drug. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1-28, Days 29-56, Days 57-84, Days 85-112, Days 113-140, Days 141-168, Final Month of treatment, Post-treatment (PT) Days 1-28, PT Days 29-56, PT Days 57-84, PT Days 85-112, PT Days 113-140, PT Days 141-168

,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Days 1-28Days 29-56Days 57-84Days 85-112Days 113-140Days 141-168Final MonthPT Days 1-28PT Days 29-56PT Days 57-84PT Days 85-112PT Days 113-140PT Days 141-168
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-3.4-5.8-7.2-7.8-7.6-8.0-6.7-5.2-4.1-4.0-6.4-3.1-8.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-3.1-4.4-4.1-5.2-5.3-5.1-4.1-3.8-1.0-2.1-4.81.34.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.4-2.9-3.2-3.7-3.4-3.3-3.5-3.00.0-1.10.71.4-3.3
Cohort 1: Placebo-3.3-4.5-5.6-7.0-4.1-6.8-5.3-5.6-5.7-5.4-4.43.47.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-2.7-4.2-4.5-5.1-5.5-5.9-4.0-3.8-2.8-2.0-2.4-17.3-3.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-2.1-2.2-2.2-3.6-4.0-4.4-3.3-2.0-2.7-1.6-3.0-5.6-3.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD0.0-2.3-3.8-4.1-5.3-4.8-2.3-2.3-2.5-3.9-5.0-7.0-6.4
Cohort 2: Placebo0.4-0.30.1-0.20.1-0.4-0.8-0.8-0.2-0.5-2.7-6.2-10.5

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-35.5-36.1-35.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-20.3-19.620.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-3.70.0-2.7
Cohort 1: Placebo6.913.29.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-33.6-33.5-34.8
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-17.2-12.2-12.8
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-1.9-0.70.0
Cohort 2: Placebo6.71.43.0

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-41.9-40.2-39.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-24.6-23.3-24.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-9.8-8.8-12.9
Cohort 1: Placebo1.78.34.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-34.4-34.2-36.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-17.5-17.8-16.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-4.6-1.1-1.6
Cohort 2: Placebo5.4-1.80.1

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume, as measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID-30.9-35.6-31.5
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD-19.4-21.9-22.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD-7.3-13.2-11.8
Cohort 1: Placebo7.317.515.9
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD-24.7-26.00-26.6
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD-15.7-13.5-11.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD-6.1-9.0-6.7
Cohort 2: Placebo8.410.711.6

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID67.370.569.8
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD46.247.950.0
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD23.426.227.5
Cohort 1: Placebo13.224.424.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD63.264.066.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD37.738.640.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.434.830.0
Cohort 2: Placebo10.914.513.6

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID79.675.073.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD50.054.257.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD31.940.541.2
Cohort 1: Placebo13.224.424.5
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD66.762.064.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD34.040.940.0
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD22.434.830.0
Cohort 2: Placebo9.418.216.7

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound. (NCT01817530)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Final Visit
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID73.178.773.2
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD42.958.058.9
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD18.531.926.8
Cohort 1: Placebo5.22.03.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD57.162.563.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD36.832.729.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD17.526.023.4
Cohort 2: Placebo1.41.61.4

Reviews

3 reviews available for norethindrone acetate and Fibroid

ArticleYear
Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMC women's health, 2022, 01-15, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Leiomyoma; Men

2022
Relugolix/Estradiol/Norethisterone (Norethindrone) Acetate: A Review in Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.
    Drugs, 2022, Volume: 82, Issue:15

    Topics: Acetates; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone; Norethindrone Acetate; U

2022
Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical therapy).
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020, 11-23, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bias; Contraceptives, Oral; Desogestrel; Female; Goserelin;

2020

Trials

6 trials available for norethindrone acetate and Fibroid

ArticleYear
Linzagolix with and without hormonal add-back therapy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.
    Lancet (London, England), 2022, 09-17, Volume: 400, Issue:10356

    Topics: Carboxylic Acids; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone Acetate; Pyrimidi

2022
Linzagolix with and without hormonal add-back therapy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.
    Lancet (London, England), 2022, 09-17, Volume: 400, Issue:10356

    Topics: Carboxylic Acids; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone Acetate; Pyrimidi

2022
Linzagolix with and without hormonal add-back therapy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.
    Lancet (London, England), 2022, 09-17, Volume: 400, Issue:10356

    Topics: Carboxylic Acids; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone Acetate; Pyrimidi

2022
Linzagolix with and without hormonal add-back therapy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.
    Lancet (London, England), 2022, 09-17, Volume: 400, Issue:10356

    Topics: Carboxylic Acids; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone Acetate; Pyrimidi

2022
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 02-18, Volume: 384, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema

2021
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 02-18, Volume: 384, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema

2021
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 02-18, Volume: 384, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema

2021
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 02-18, Volume: 384, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estrogens; Fema

2021
Elagolix Alone or With Add-Back Therapy in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018, Volume: 132, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estr

2018
Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆.
    Fertility and sterility, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amenorrhea; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

2014
Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆.
    Fertility and sterility, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amenorrhea; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

2014
Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆.
    Fertility and sterility, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amenorrhea; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

2014
Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ☆.
    Fertility and sterility, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amenorrhea; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

2014
Preoperative treatment with letrozole in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy of large uterine myomas: a prospective non-randomized study.
    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2014, Volume: 181

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Loss, Surgical; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cicatrix; Contraceptives

2014
Impact of different hormone replacement therapy regimens on the size of myoma uteri in postmenopausal period: tibolone versus transdermal hormonal replacement system.
    Maturitas, 2002, Jul-25, Volume: 42, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Endometrial Neoplasms; Estradiol;

2002

Other Studies

7 other studies available for norethindrone acetate and Fibroid

ArticleYear
Myfembree for fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2021, Aug-09, Volume: 63, Issue:1630

    Topics: Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Estradiol; Female; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Gonadotropin-Releasin

2021
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydr

2022
An evaluation of relugolix/estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2022, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Norethindrone Ace

2022
Oriahnn for fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2021, Apr-05, Volume: 63, Issue:1621

    Topics: Drug Combinations; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Men

2021
ACUTE HEMORRHAGIC DEGENERATION OF A LEIOMYOMA FOLLOWING NORETHINDRONE ACETATE: REPORT OF A CASE.
    Obstetrics and gynecology, 1964, Volume: 23

    Topics: Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Neoplasms; Norethindrone; Norethindrone Acetate; Pathology; Surgical Proc

1964
Diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis with hemorrhage.
    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 1991, Volume: 115, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Clomiphene; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Infertility, Female; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia

1991
Cyclic changes in ciliation, cell height, and mitotic activity in human tubal epithelium during reproductive life.
    Fertility and sterility, 1985, Volume: 43, Issue:4

    Topics: Cell Cycle; Epithelial Cells; Estrogens; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Follicular Phase; Humans; Leiomyom

1985