Page last updated: 2024-11-01

nitrendipine and Stroke

nitrendipine has been researched along with Stroke in 15 studies

Nitrendipine: A calcium channel blocker with marked vasodilator action. It is an effective antihypertensive agent and differs from other calcium channel blockers in that it does not reduce glomerular filtration rate and is mildly natriuretic, rather than sodium retentive.
nitrendipine : A dihydropyridine that is 1,4-dihydropyridine substituted by methyl groups at positions 2 and 6, a 3-nitrophenyl group at position 4, a ethoxycarbonyl group at position 3 and a methoxycarbonyl group at position 5. It is a calcium-channel blocker used in the treatment of hypertension.

Stroke: A group of pathological conditions characterized by sudden, non-convulsive loss of neurological function due to BRAIN ISCHEMIA or INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES. Stroke is classified by the type of tissue NECROSIS, such as the anatomic location, vasculature involved, etiology, age of the affected individual, and hemorrhagic vs. non-hemorrhagic nature. (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, pp777-810)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"In hypertensive stroke patients, for the same level of blood pressure control, eprosartan will be more effective than nitrendipine in reducing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality."9.11Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). ( Berger, J; Diener, HC; Dominiak, P; Hammersen, F; Kulschewski, A; Lüders, S; Plate, K; Schrader, J; Zidek, W, 2005)
"In hypertensive stroke patients, for the same level of blood pressure control, eprosartan will be more effective than nitrendipine in reducing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality."5.11Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). ( Berger, J; Diener, HC; Dominiak, P; Hammersen, F; Kulschewski, A; Lüders, S; Plate, K; Schrader, J; Zidek, W, 2005)
" In secondary prevention, an additional risk reduction is modeled for eprosartan according to the results of the MOSES study ("Morbidity and Mortality after Stroke--Eprosartan Compared to Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention")."3.75Cost-utility analysis of eprosartan compared to enalapril in primary prevention and nitrendipine in secondary prevention in Europe--the HEALTH model. ( Diener, HC; Gradl, B; Greiner, W; Jönsson, B; Lindgren, P; Lüders, S; Schrader, J; Schwander, B; Villar, FA; Zöllner, Y, 2009)
"Hypertension is the most important cardiovascular risk factor for stroke."2.43Effects of eprosartan on target organ protection. ( de la Sierra, A, 2006)

Research

Studies (15)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's14 (93.33)29.6817
2010's1 (6.67)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Trenkwalder, P1
Dowlatshahi, D1
Hill, MD2
Schwander, B1
Gradl, B1
Zöllner, Y1
Lindgren, P1
Diener, HC2
Lüders, S2
Schrader, J2
Villar, FA1
Greiner, W1
Jönsson, B1
Scholze, J1
Thijs, L1
Richart, T1
de Leeuw, PW2
Kuznetsova, T1
Grodzicki, T1
Kawecka-Jaszcz, K1
O'Brien, E2
Redón, J1
Birkenhäger, WH2
Fagard, R2
Staessen, JA2
Thijisq, L1
Celis, H1
Bulpitt, CJ1
Fletcher, AE1
Forette, F1
Leonetti, G1
McCormack, P1
Nachev, C1
Rodicio, JL1
Rosenfeld, J1
Sarti, C1
Tuomilehto, J1
Webster, J1
Yodfat, Y1
Zanchetti, A1
Kulschewski, A1
Hammersen, F1
Plate, K1
Berger, J1
Zidek, W1
Dominiak, P1
Bloch, MJ1
Basile, J1
Boulanger, JM1
Strauss, MH1
Verma, S1
Owen, A1
Larsen, K1
Hornnes, N1
Boysen, G1
Johnston, SC1
de la Sierra, A1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Stroke Prediction Study Using a Model Based on Internet Search Queries[NCT04755959]450 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-02-28Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Peripheral and Cerebral Arterial Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Fimasartan vs. Valsartan vs. Atenolol[NCT02403349]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Reviews

1 review available for nitrendipine and Stroke

ArticleYear
Effects of eprosartan on target organ protection.
    Vascular health and risk management, 2006, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure

2006

Trials

5 trials available for nitrendipine and Stroke

ArticleYear
Effects of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive therapy on outcome in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.
    Journal of hypertension, 2004, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus; Dihydrop

2004
Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).
    Stroke, 2005, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Acrylates; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; B

2005
Morbidity and mortality after stroke--eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).
    Stroke, 2006, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Data Interpretation, S

2006
MOSES raises questions.
    Stroke, 2006, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Topics: Acrylates; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Data Interpretation, Stati

2006
MOSES: superiority or noninferiority?
    Stroke, 2006, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clinica

2006

Other Studies

9 other studies available for nitrendipine and Stroke

ArticleYear
[Combined drug therapy is better: successfully protecting elderly hypertensive patients].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2008, Jul-31, Volume: 150, Issue:28-31

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combina

2008
Angiotensin receptor blockers and secondary stroke prevention: the MOSES study.
    Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 2009, Volume: 7, Issue:5

    Topics: Acrylates; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors;

2009
Cost-utility analysis of eprosartan compared to enalapril in primary prevention and nitrendipine in secondary prevention in Europe--the HEALTH model.
    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2009, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Acrylates; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Enalapril; Europ

2009
[Isolated systolic hypertension].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2009, Sep-10, Volume: 151, Issue:37

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Female; Human

2009
Morbidity and mortality on combination versus monotherapy: a posthoc analysis of the Systolic Hypertension in Europe trial.
    Journal of hypertension, 2010, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Double-Blind Method; Drug T

2010
Analysis of recent papers in hypertension. An angiotensin receptor blocker is more effective than a calcium channel blocker in secondary stroke prevention.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2005, Volume: 7, Issue:8

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Calcium Channel Blockers; Humans; Hypertension;

2005
Does the MOSES study provide sufficient evidence for Eprosartan against Nitrendipine?
    Stroke, 2006, Volume: 37, Issue:6

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blocker

2006
Preventing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events after stroke: eprosartan or nitrendipine?
    Nature clinical practice. Neurology, 2006, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blocker

2006
[Not all antihypertensive agents protect equally well].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2006, Aug-17, Volume: 148, Issue:33-34

    Topics: Acrylates; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Convert

2006