niraparib and Ovarian-Neoplasms

Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival irrespective of biomarker status in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. This review focuses on the adverse events associated with niraparib and their management to maintain efficacy of niraparib treatment and improve quality of life for patients. In five trials assessing efficacy of niraparib in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (PRIMA, NOVA, NORA, QUADRA, and PRIME), treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were reported in nearly all patients (≥99%) receiving niraparib; the events were grade ≥3 in 51-74% of patients. Across all lines of therapy, treatment-emergent adverse events led to dose interruptions in 62-80% of patients receiving niraparib and dose reductions in 47-71%. Hematologic events were most frequently reported, including thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Common non-hematologic events included gastrointestinal events, which were generally low grade (<5% were grade ≥3). Clinical strategies to manage these and other events, such as fatigue and insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacologic agents, are summarized. Once-daily niraparib dosing may be advantageous for some patients for many reasons, including night-time dosing which may help alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms. An individualized starting dose (determined by baseline body weight and platelet count) of niraparib demonstrated an improved safety profile while maintaining efficacy. Patients receiving the niraparib individualized starting dose had fewer grade ≥3 adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions than patients receiving a fixed starting dose. The safety profile of niraparib across five pivotal studies in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was consistent across multiple lines of treatment, including as maintenance therapy in first-line and recurrent settings and as treatment in heavily pre-treated patients. Long-term safety data from the NOVA trial confirmed that, with appropriate and early dose modifications, niraparib is well tolerated.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Ovarian cancer affects the cells of the ovaries, and epithelial cancer is the most common type of malignant ovarian cancer. The homologous recombination repair pathway enables error-free repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Damage of key genes associated with this pathway leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which results in unrepaired DNA and can lead to cancer. Tumours with HRD are believed to be sensitive to treatment with poly-adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as niraparib. We conducted a health technology assessment to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of HRD testing to inform patient decisions about the use of niraparib maintenance therapy for patients with high-grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer. We also evaluated the efficacy and safety of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with HRD or homologous recombination proficiency (HRP), the cost-effectiveness of HRD testing, the budget impact of publicly funding HRD testing, and patient preferences and values.. We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2, and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted a cost-utility analysis with a 5-year time horizon from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding HRD testing in people with ovarian cancer in Ontario. We performed a literature search for quantitative evidence of patient and provider preferences with respect to HRD testing and maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors. To contextualize the potential value of HRD testing, we spoke with people with ovarian cancer.. The clinical evidence review included two studies in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (one in patients with newly diagnosed advanced cases and one in patients with recurrent cancer). The studies evaluated niraparib maintenance therapy compared with no maintenance therapy and used HRD testing to group patients according to HRD status. Compared to placebo, niraparib maintenance therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer, and in tumours with HRD or HRP (GRADE: High), but the studies did not compare the results between the HRD and HRP groups. The frequency of adverse events was higher in the niraparib group. We identified no studies that evaluated the clinical utility of HRD testing.We conducted a primary economic evaluation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HRD testing for people with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer in an Ontario setting. Our analysis used a 5-year time horizon. HRD testing (for all eligible people or only for people with. In patients with newly diagnosed (advanced) or recurrent high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, niraparib maintenance therapy improved progression-free survival compared with no maintenance therapy in tumours with HRD or HRP (GRADE: High). Because we identified no studies on the clinical utility of HRD testing, we cannot comment on how it would affect patient decisions and clinical outcomes.Over a 5-year time horizon, HRD testing for people with

Topics: Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Technology Assessment, Biomedical

In many patients with ovarian cancer who are treated with platinum-based chemotherapy after surgery, the tumor comes back several months later. In order to minimize this risk, one treatment approach that has shown promising results is PARP inhibitors. This treatment works by inhibiting cancer cells' ability to repair themselves after DNA damage. One of the PARP inhibitors approved by medical authorities is niraparib, used as a solo therapy after surgery and chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the most effective maintenance strategy for patients in this setting is still debated. In a worldwide clinical trial called NIRVANA-1, researchers are investigating how niraparib would work if combined with another treatment called bevacizumab, which stops the growth of new blood vessels in tumors. Patients who participate in this trial will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: the combination of niraparib + bevacizumab or niraparib by itself. The main purpose of NIRVANA-1 is to understand whether the combination of niraparib and bevacizumab prevents the cancer from returning in patients with completely resected stage III ovarian cancer. The trial will also assess the safety of this combination compared with niraparib alone. At the time of this writing, NIRVANA-1 is open for new patients to join. Sponsored by ARCAGY-GINECO, the NIRVANA-1 trial is currently recruiting patients from France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Japan and Korea. The duration of the inclusion period is estimated to be around 36 months. The study is registered on ClinicalTrial.gov with registration number NCT05183984.

Topics: Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Humans; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Pregnancy

The standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer is surgical cytoreduction plus platinum-based chemotherapy; however, recurrent disease frequently occurs after treatment. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as first-line maintenance therapy have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib is the only PARP inhibitor that offers a significant progression-free survival benefit compared with placebo in this patient population regardless of the homologous recombination status. However, predictive factors for treatment responses and approaches to dose optimization remain to be investigated. In this study, two Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer exhibited long-term responses to niraparib treatment, and hematological toxicity was successfully managed by dose adjustment. The literature on clinical trials and real-world experience on the efficacy, tolerability, and dose individualization of niraparib treatment in Western and Chinese patients was also reviewed. Future research is warranted to identify the characteristics of 'long responders' to niraparib treatment.

Topics: Asian People; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

PARP inhibitors are effective in different types of tumors such as ovarian, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer. Many studies are in progress and may lead to prescription evolution. PARP inhibitors prescription is almost reserved to patients with a constitutional BRCA mutation or a somatic BRCA alteration or a tumor with a deficiency in homologous recombination. Nowadays, the diagnosis of homologous recombination deficit, HRD, is possible with the prescription of a myChoice CDx (Myriad) test. PARP inhibitors are studied in association with chemotherapy and targeted therapies but also with radiotherapy and with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Access to PARP inhibitors is challenged with the emergence of resistance mechanism. Various trials are now studying the possibility of reversing these resistance mechanisms.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prostatic Neoplasms; Recombinational DNA Repair

New molecular therapeutic approaches have emerged in recent years for advanced gynaecological cancers, including targeted therapies such as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). These have demonstrated efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancers in patients carrying a mutation in the BRCA gene, which predisposes them to breast and ovarian cancers. Clinical and pre-clinical data suggest that the activity of PARPi inhibitors may not be limited to BRCA mutated tumours and may involve the homologous recombination pathway. These data raise the question of the potential efficacy of PARPi in advanced endometrial and cervical cancers where treatment options are currently limited. At present, there are few data available on the activity of PARPi in endometrial and cervical cancers, but some results seem promising. In this review, we present a synthesis of the available studies concerning PARPi in endometrial and cervical cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; DNA Damage; DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Infections; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), treated with niraparib maintenance, present with haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities. Limited data exist on niraparib safety assessment.. To evaluate niraparib safety profile, as maintenance therapy, in women with platinum-sensitive EOC.. PubMed and Cochrane searches were carried out up to April 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating niraparib versus placebo in EOC patients with a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Regarding the meta-analysis, for dichotomous data, the pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated.. A total of 1539 patients from three RCTs revealed that niraparib-treated patients are associated with a significantly higher risk of any grade of nausea (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.48), fatigue (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.52,. Niraparib is considered an effective and well-tolerated choice, with an improved safety profile, for the maintenance treatment of EOC patients.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Poly (adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), including pathogenic mutations in. JGOG2052 is a single-arm, open-label, multi-center, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib monotherapy for a recurrent or persistent rare fraction of gynecologic malignancies with. Japan Primary Registries Network (JPRN) Identifier: jRCT2031210264.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

We reviewed clinical data for niraparib monotherapy in

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Niraparib (Zejula™) is a PARP inhibitor which is approved for maintenance therapy in adults with advanced ovarian cancer in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In a placebo-controlled phase III trial in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, niraparib significantly extended progression free survival in two predefined populations, namely a patient population with altered homologous-recombination DNA repair pathways [i.e. homologous-recombination deficiency positive (HRd)] and the overall trial population. A prespecified exploratory subgroup analysis indicated that niraparib was also efficacious in patients who were homologous recombination deficiency negative or homologous recombination proficient (HRp). Niraparib has a manageable tolerability profile with myelosuppression as the main safety concern. Haematological reactions were managed with monitoring and dose reduction or interruption. A weight- and platelet count-based individualised dosage regimen introduced during the trial (and subsequently approved) appeared to improve haematological tolerability. Niraparib is a useful option for first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer in adults who responded to platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous-recombination deficiency status and is a promising option for HRp patients, for whom maintenance treatment options are limited.. In 2021, ovarian cancer is predicted to be responsible for ≈ 43,770 deaths in Europe and the USA combined. Niraparib (Zejula™) is a once-daily oral treatment for first-line maintenance therapy in adults with advanced ovarian cancer that is responsive to chemotherapy. Although other agents of the same drug class (e.g. olaparib) are only approved for use against tumours with compromised DNA repair mechanisms, niraparib is approved without this restriction. Niraparib reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, irrespective of whether the patients had compromised or functional DNA repair mechanisms. Abnormal blood counts are the main safety concern with niraparib, though adverse drug reactions may be managed through monitoring and interrupting or decreasing the dosage. Starting treatment at a personalised lower dosage may also reduce the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. Niraparib is a useful option for first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, regardless of the patient's DNA repair mechanisms, and is a promising option for patients with functional DNA repair mechanisms, a group for which maintenance treatment options are limited.

Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

In early stages, standard treatment is adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of platinum-based combination for 6 cycles, especially in serous and endometrioid high grade carcinomas. In advanced stages, indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed on a case-by-case basis in multidisciplinary meetings (MDM). Bevacizumab can also be considered in the neoadjuvant setting in some circumstances, always after discussion in MDM. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 21 days, with or without bevacizumab remains the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy. Inhibitors of poly-(ADP-riboses) polymerases (PARPi) have been approved and are reimbursed as maintenance monotherapy in tumors carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation after complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Two recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of PARPi on progression free survival, one for niraparib single-agent in patients with high-grade ovarian carcinoma regardless of BRCA status, the other one for the combination of bevacizumab and olaparib in patients with high grade carcinoma, with positive test for homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency (regardless of BRCA status). These two new modalities of maintenance therapy are now available in compassionate use programs or post compassionate use programs. Depending on pending decisions upon reimbursement, these indications might be somewhat modified.

Topics: Algorithms; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, it has high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. Poly(ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors selectively target DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in tumor cells that cannot be repaired and induce the synthetic lethality of BRCA1/2 mutation cancers. PARP inhibitors are clinically used to treat recurrent ovarian cancer and show significant efficacy in ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects. PARP inhibitors also have significant clinical benefits in patients without HR defects. With the increasingly extensive clinical application of PARP inhibitors, the possibility of acquiring drug resistance is high. Therefore, clinical strategies should be adopted to manage drug resistance of PARP inhibitors. This study aims to summarize the indications and toxicity of PARP inhibitors, the mechanism of action, targeted treatment of drug resistance, and potential methods to manage drug-resistant diseases. We used the term "ovarian cancer" and the names of each PARP inhibitor as keywords to search articles published in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) on Pubmed, along with the keywords "clinicaltrials.gov" and "google.com/patents" as well as "uspto.gov." The FDA has approved olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Talazoparib and veliparib are currently in early trials and show promising clinical results. The mechanism underlying resistance to PARP inhibitors and the clinical strategies to overcome them remain unclear. Understanding the mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors and their relationship with platinum resistance may help with the development of antiresistance therapies and optimization of the sequence of drug application in the future clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; DNA Repair; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

To summarize the data supporting the use of maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer treatment.. Since December 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved four drugs for six different ovarian cancer maintenance indications based on the results of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and tolerability. These include antiangiogenesis and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) inhibitors (PARP inhibitors). Four drugs are approved for use in maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer, including bevacizumab (GOG-0213 and OCEANS), niraparib (NOVA), olaparib (Study 19 and SOLO2) and rucaparib (ARIEL3). Two drugs are approved for use in maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, including bevacizumab (GOG-0218) and olaparib (SOLO1). New data were reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress in October 2019 that may lead to the approval of additional strategies in front-line maintenance, including the use of niraparib (PRIMA), veliparib (VELIA) and bevacizumab + olaparib (PAOLA).. The landscape of maintenance treatment options for ovarian cancer has been rapidly expanding and continues to evolve as new data emerge. Currently approved strategies include antiangiogenesis and PARP inhibitor treatments.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To review the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (OC, FTC, and PPC).. A literature search via MEDLINE through PubMed from August 2013 to January 2020 was performed using the key terms. Completed and ongoing trials were identified through a review of the website trial registry https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.. In a phase III, double-blind clinical trial, progression-free survival improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent OC: 21 versus 5.5 months in the germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have gained a place in the therapeutic management of OC, FTC, and PPC because of their ability to suppress growth of homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with. PARP inhibitors can be used as a single agent for maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in patients with partial or complete response following 2 or more rounds of platinum-based therapy.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the front-line management of advanced ovarian cancer has recently emerged as an exciting strategy with the potential to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this article, we review the results of four recently published Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of PARP inhibitors in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer (SOLO1, PRIMA, PAOLA-1, and VELIA). Collectively, the studies suggest that PARP maintenance in the upfront setting is most beneficial among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers (hazard ratios range from 0.31 to 0.44), followed by patients with tumours that harbour homologous recombination deficiencies (hazard ratios range from 0.33 to 0.57). All three studies that included an all-comer population were able to demonstrate benefit of PARP inhibitors, regardless of biomarker status. The FDA has approved olaparib for front-line maintenance therapy among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers, and niraparib for all patients, regardless of biomarker status. In determining which patients should be offered front-line maintenance PARP inhibitors, and which agent to use, there are multiple factors to consider, including FDA indication, dosing preference, toxicity, risks versus benefits for each patient population, and cost. There are ongoing studies further exploring the front-line use of PARP inhibitors, including the potential downstream effects of PARP-inhibitor resistance in the recurrent setting, combining PARP-inhibitors with other anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and inhibitors of pathways implicated in PARP inhibitor resistance.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Approval; Drug Costs; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinational DNA Repair; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Breast and ovarian cancer are common malignancies among older adults, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Although most cases of breast and ovarian cancer are sporadic, a significant proportion is caused by mutations in cancer susceptibility genes, most often breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) 1 and 2. Furthermore, some breast and ovarian tumors are phenotypically similar to those with BRCA mutations, a phenomenon known as "BRCAness". BRCA mutations and "BRCAness" lead to defects in DNA repair, which may be a target for therapeutic agents such as Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. PARP inhibitors are novel medications which lead to double-strand breaks resulting in cell death due to synthetic lethality, and which have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancers with or without BRCA mutations. Three different PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib) have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer and one (olaparib) for breast cancer harboring BRCA mutations. Here, we review the currently available evidence regarding the use of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of patients with breast and ovarian cancer, with a particular focus on the inclusion of older adults in clinical trials of these therapies. Additionally, we provide an overview of currently ongoing studies of PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancer, and include recommendations for increasing the evidence-base for using these medications among older patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; DNA Repair; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Synthetic Lethal Mutations

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have provided great clinical benefits to ovarian cancer patients. To date, three PARP inhibitors, namely, olaparib, rucaparib and niraparib have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in the United States. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and platinum sensitivity are prospective biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers. Preclinical data have focused on identifying the gene aberrations that might generate HRD and induce sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in vitro in cancer cell lines or in vivo in patient-derived xenografts. Clinical trials have focused on genomic scar analysis to identify biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors. Additionally, researchers have aimed to investigate mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and strategies to overcome this resistance. Combining PARP inhibitors with HR pathway inhibitors to extend the utility of PARP inhibitors to BRCA-proficient tumours is increasingly foreseeable. Identifying the population of patients with the greatest potential benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy and the circumstances under which patients are no longer suited for PARP inhibitor therapy are important. Further studies are required in order to propose better strategies for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancers.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer, and often is the result of altered DNA repair capacities in tumour cells. DNA damage repair defects are common in different cancer types; these alterations can also induce tumour-specific vulnerabilities that can be exploited therapeutically. In 2009, a first-in-man clinical trial of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib clinically validated the synthetic lethal interaction between inhibition of PARP1, a key sensor of DNA damage, and BRCA1/BRCA2 deficiency. In this review, we summarize a decade of PARP inhibitor clinical development, a work that has resulted in the registration of several PARP inhibitors in breast (olaparib and talazoparib) and ovarian cancer (olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib, either alone or following platinum chemotherapy as maintenance therapy). Over the past 10 years, our knowledge on the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitor as well as how tumours become resistant has been extended, and we summarise this work here. We also discuss opportunities for expanding the precision medicine approach with PARP inhibitors, identifying a wider population who could benefit from this drug class. This includes developing and validating better predictive biomarkers for patient stratification, mainly based on homologous recombination defects beyond BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, identifying DNA repair deficient tumours in other cancer types such as prostate or pancreatic cancer, or by designing combination therapies with PARP inhibitors.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Genomic Instability; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Niraparib is an oral poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as well as recently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the maintenance treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The mechanisms of action of niraparib include inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity as well as increased formation of PARP-DNA complexes through "trapping" the PARP enzyme on damaged DNA. Phase I and III studies have demonstrated activity and benefit of niraparib in both BRCA mutated (BRCAm) and BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) cancers. Phase I testing of niraparib established the maximally tolerated dose of 300mg by mouth (PO) daily, and the phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study demonstrated the benefit of niraparib maintenance therapy compared to placebo after completion of and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in both BRCAm and BRCAwt ovarian cancer patient populations. Toxicities seen with niraparib include hematologic, gastrointestinal, fatigue, and cardiovascular. Hematologic toxicities include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia and leukopenia; upfront dose modification to 200mg niraparib for patients with baseline weight of ≤77kg and/or baseline platelets of ≤150,000K/uL should be considered to avoid significant hematologic toxicity, especially thrombocytopenia, based on recent analyses of the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study. Cardiovascular toxicities include hypertension, tachycardia, as well as palpitations, and patients should be monitored for hypertension. PARP inhibitors have been associated with low risks of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and the overall risk of AML and MDS is 0.9% of all patients treated with niraparib. Niraparib testing is ongoing in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients as maintenance therapy following completion of platinum-based chemotherapy, in BRCAwt cancers as treatment, as well as in combinations with other biologic drugs such as immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Ovarian cancer is a disease with a propensity to recur despite dramatic responses to initial treatment, which typically consists of a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. A maintenance therapy, which may prevent or delay relapse while not negatively impacting quality of life, is critical to improving outcomes. Areas covered: This review discusses the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Expert opinion: Following presentation of ENGOT-OV16/NOVA at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress, niraparib became the first PARP inhibitor to receive full approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the maintenance treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of a patient's germline or somatic mutational status. This approval has had a sweeping impact on treatment strategies, moving the indication for a PARP inhibitor earlier in the treatment course and greatly expanding the population of patients who may benefit from this class of drugs. Active clinical trials suggest that new indications and novel treatment combinations are eagerly sought.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Niraparib, an orally available selective inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP), is the first PARP inhibitor approved for use in patients with ovarian cancer who do not harbor a germ-line or somatic mutation in the breast cancer gene (BRCA). Overall, niraparib is well tolerated and its toxicities, primarily hematologic, are manageable especially with recently released initial dose modification guidelines based on weight and baseline platelet count. The role of niraparib as maintenance following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy as well as in the treatment of recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer is an active area of investigation. Areas covered: This review focuses on niraparib, its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects as evidenced by prospective clinical trials, and licensed indications. Expert commentary: Niraparib introduced the use of PARP inhibitors regardless of biomarker status. Recent studies highlight the critical need for more accurate biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors. In the next 5 years, we anticipate further expansion of and elucidation regarding the optimal indication for use of niraparib in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has greatly increased over the past 5 years. With several new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals, three PARP inhibitors have entered into standard of care treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (including ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer). Olaparib and rucaparib currently have indications for treatment of recurrent BRCA mutant ovarian cancer. Olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib all have indications for maintenance therapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after response to platinum-based therapy. In our practice, we use both olaparib and rucaparib in the recurrent setting, and all three PARP inhibitors in the maintenance setting. Choice of which PARP inhibitor to use in either setting is largely based upon baseline laboratory values, number of prior therapies, and presence of a BRCA mutation and/or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). As (HRD) and other biomarker assessments continue to improve, we anticipate being able to better identify which patients might most benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy in the future. The clinically available PARP inhibitors are currently undergoing extensive investigations in clinical trials. Other newer agents such as talazoparib, veliparib, 2X-121, and CEP-9722 are in earlier stages of development. As more FDA-approved indications for PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer become available, we anticipate the decision of which PARP inhibitor to use will become increasingly complex.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovary; Phthalazines; Phthalimides; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Clinical investigation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment has rapidly evolved from observations of single-agent in vitro activity of these agents in BRCA-deficient cancer cells in 2005 to the initiation of multiple phase III studies in 2013. With clinical trial design and treatment of ovarian cancer increasingly based on histological and molecular characteristics, PARP inhibitors are on the horizon of becoming the first biologic agents to be used to treat ovarian cancer based upon pre-selection characteristics of the patient's cancer. PARP inhibitors are most active in ovarian cancers that have defects or aberrations in DNA repair; use of these agents has been of particular interest in high grade serous cancers (HGSC), where studies have shown that ~50% of HGSC have abnormalities of DNA repair through BRCA germline and somatic mutation, post-translational changes of BRCA, and abnormalities of other DNA repair molecules. In addition, as aberrant DNA pathways in other histological subtypes of ovarian cancer are identified, and through the combination of PARP inhibitors with other biologic agents, the pool of eligible patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitors will likely expand. Pending review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the outcome of confirmatory phase III studies, PARP inhibitors could become the first FDA-approved biologic agent for ovarian cancer and also the first new FDA-approval in ovarian cancer since carboplatin and gemcitabine were approved for platinum sensitive ovarian cancer in 2006. This review discusses the PARP inhibitors that are currently in testing for ovarian cancer treatment and the future of this class of anti-cancer agents.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA Repair; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) trial was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen of niraparib for first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.. In the phase 3 PRIMA trial, patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N = 733) were initially treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) regimen of 300 mg once daily. Subsequently, the protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD: 200 mg once daily in patients with baseline body weight < 77 kg or baseline platelet count < 150,000/µL, and 300 mg once daily in all other patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by starting dose.. Overall, 475 (64.8%) patients were assigned to an FSD (niraparib, n = 317; placebo, n = 158) and 258 (35.2%) were assigned to an ISD (niraparib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88). Efficacy in patients who received FSD or ISD was similar for the overall (FSD hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46-0.76] vs. ISD HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.98]) and the homologous recombination-deficient (FSD HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64] vs. ISD HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.72]) populations. In patients with low body weight/platelet count, rates of grades ≥3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions were lower for those who received ISD than for those who received FSD.. In PRIMA, similar dose intensity, similar efficacy, and improved safety were observed with the ISD compared with the FSD regimen.

Topics: Body Weight; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prospective Studies

To report updated long-term efficacy and safety from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016).. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with complete or partial response (CR or PR) to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received niraparib or placebo once daily (2:1 ratio). Stratification factors were best response to first-line chemotherapy regimen (CR/PR), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status (deficient [HRd]/proficient [HRp] or not determined). Updated (ad hoc) progression-free survival (PFS) data (as of November 17, 2021) by investigator assessment (INV) are reported.. In 733 randomised patients (niraparib, 487; placebo, 246), median PFS follow-up was 3.5years. Median INV-PFS was 24.5 versus 11.2months (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.68) in the HRd population and 13.8 versus 8.2months (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79) in the overall population for niraparib and placebo, respectively. In the HRp population, median INV-PFS was 8.4 versus 5.4months (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87), respectively. Results were concordant with the primary analysis. Niraparib-treated patients were more likely to be free of progression or death at 4years than placebo-treated patients (HRd, 38% versus 17%; overall, 24% versus 14%). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in niraparib patients were thrombocytopenia (39.7%), anaemia (31.6%), and neutropenia (21.3%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia incidence rate (1.2%) was the same for niraparib- and placebo-treated patients. Overall survival remained immature.. Niraparib maintained clinically significant improvements in PFS with 3.5years of follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of progression irrespective of HRD status. No new safety signals were identified.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival

The efficacy of niraparib maintenance therapy with an individualized starting dose (ISD) warrants further investigation in a broad population with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), including patients without postoperative residual disease.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib with an ISD in a broad population with newly diagnosed aOC (R0 resection permitted).. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was conducted in China and enrolled 384 patients with newly diagnosed aOC who received primary or interval debulking surgery and responded to treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. By data cutoff (September 30, 2021), median follow-up for progression-free survival (PFS) was 27.5 (IQR, 24.7-30.4) months.. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo with ISD (200 mg/d for those with a body weight of <77 kg and/or platelet count of <150 ×103/μL [to convert to ×109/μL, multiply by 1] at baseline; 300 mg/d otherwise) stratified by germline BRCA variant status, tumor homologous recombination deficiency status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.. The primary end point was blinded, independent central review-assessed PFS in the intention-to-treat population.. A total of 384 patients were randomized (255 niraparib [66.4%]; median [range] age, 53 [32-77] years; 129 placebo [33.6%]; median [range] age, 54 [33-77] years), and 375 (247 niraparib [65.9%], 128 placebo [34.1%]) received treatment at a dose of 200 mg per day. Median PFS with niraparib vs placebo was 24.8 vs 8.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.60; P < .001) in the intention-to-treat population; not reached vs 10.8 months (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.68) and 19.3 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67) in patients with and without germline BRCA variants, respectively; not reached vs 11.0 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.68) and 16.6 vs 5.5 months (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.75) in homologous recombination deficient and proficient patients, respectively; and 24.8 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61) and 16.5 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.72) in those with optimal and suboptimal debulking, respectively. Similar proportions of niraparib-treated and placebo-treated patients (6.7% vs 5.4%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-emergent adverse events.. This randomized clinical trial found that niraparib maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with newly diagnosed aOC regardless of postoperative residual disease or biomarker status. The ISD was effective and safe in the first-line maintenance setting.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03709316.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival

This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treatment regimen of dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, combined with niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) who had previously received bevacizumab treatment.. This Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, conducted in the USA, enrolled patients with recurrent PROC to receive niraparib and dostarlimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (up to 3 years). A preplanned interim futility analysis was performed after the first 41 patients had undergone ≥1 radiographic evaluation (approximately 9 weeks from the first treatment).. The prespecified interim futility criterion was met and the study was therefore terminated. For the 41 patients assessed, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-19.9); no patients achieved a complete response, 3 patients (7.3%) achieved a partial response (duration of response; 3.0, 3.8, and 9.2 months, respectively), and 9 patients (22.0%) had stable disease. In total, 39 patients (95.1%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event, but no new safety issues were observed. HRQoL, assessed using FOSI, or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Symptom Index scores, worsened over time compared with baseline scores.. The study was terminated due to the observed ORR at the interim futility analysis. This highlights a need for effective therapies in treating patients with recurrent BRCAwt PROC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Phase III trial data have shown a significant benefit by the addition of a maintenance treatment with niraparib, irrespective of BRCA or HRD status, in patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancers; and, a significant benefit of the combination of olaparib and bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab monotherapy in HRD positive patients. However, it is unclear whether a PARP inhibitor monotherapy is sufficient, or if the addition of bevacizumab is needed.. This trial will investigate if the treatment strategy of carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab/niraparib is superior to the treatment of carboplatin/paclitaxel/niraparib in an all-comer population.. Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance improves progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.. AGO-OVAR 28/ENGOT-ov57 is an international, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial within the the European Network for Gynecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT), led by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) study group. All patients should have completed the first cycle of chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) as part of the Study Run-In-Period. Prior to day 1 of cycle 2, patients with a valid central tumor BRCA (tBRCA) test result were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either: Arm 1, to receive five additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel q21d, followed by niraparib for up to 3 years; or Arm 2, to receive five additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab q21d, followed by bevacizumab q21d (for up to 1 year), and niraparib for up to 3 years.. The trial population is composed of adult patients with newly diagnosed, advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer FIGO III/IV (except FIGO IIIA2 without nodal involvement). Patients who are scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery are also eligible for the trial.. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival.. The study plans to recruit 970 patients (485 patients in each arm).. The Last-Patient-In is expected to be enrolled in September 2024, with presentation of the primary endpoint in 2028.. NCT05009082; EudraCT Number: 2021-001271-16.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies

Given the expanding clinical use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), there is a significant need for optimal strategies with which to treat patients whose cancer progresses while using a PARPi. However, the treatment consensus after PARPi has not been established. The aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3056/NIRVANA-R trial is to investigate the efficacy of niraparib in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients who were previously treated with a PARPi.. The KGOG 3056/NIRVANA-R is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer recruited from seven KGOG sites. This study included patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy and had been treated with a PARPi. Mucinous histology type was excluded. Patients who had responded to the last platinum regimen (either complete or partial response) were eligible to participate in this study. Forty-four patients will be recruited. All enrolled patients are treated with niraparib and bevacizumab for maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The primary endpoint of the study is 6-month progression-free survival rate. Accrual is expected to be completed in 2022, followed by presentation of results in 2023.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734665.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Republic of Korea

To evaluate the association between surgical timing and postoperative residual disease status on the efficacy of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence.. Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) study of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed primary advanced ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed by surgical status (primary debulking surgery [PDS] vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy/interval debulking surgery [NACT/IDS]) and postoperative residual disease status (no visible residual disease [NVRD] vs visible residual disease [VRD]) in the intent-to-treat population.. In PRIMA (N = 733), 236 (32.2%) patients underwent PDS, and 481 (65.6%) received NACT/IDS before enrollment. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) for progression were similar in PDS (13.7 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.67 [0.47-0.96]) and NACT/IDS (14.2 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.57 [0.44-0.73]) subgroups. In patients who received NACT/IDS and had NVRD (n = 304), the hazard ratio (95% CI) for progression was 0.65 (0.46-0.91). In patients with VRD following PDS (n = 183) or NACT/IDS (n = 149), the hazard ratios (95% CI) for progression were 0.58 (0.39-0.86) and 0.41 (0.27-0.62), respectively. PFS was not evaluable for patients with PDS and NVRD because of sample size (n = 37).. In this post hoc analysis, niraparib efficacy was similar across PDS and NACT/IDS subgroups. Patients who had NACT/IDS and VRD had the highest reduction in the risk of progression with niraparib maintenance.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm, Residual; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

To assess safety and efficacy of niraparib + bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.. This multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB to IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (NCT03326193). Patients were required to have an attempt at debulking surgery and have a complete response, partial response, or no evidence of disease following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with ≥3 cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival, and safety.. Among the 105 evaluable patients, the PFS rate at 18 months was 62% (95% CI 52-71%) in the overall population and 76% (95% CI 61-87) in the homologous recombination deficient (HRd), 47% (95% CI 31-64%) in the HR proficient (HRp), and 56% (95% CI 31-79%) in the HR not determined (HRnd) subgroups (December 24, 2020, cutoff). After a median follow-up time of 28.7 months (IQR, 23.9-32.5 months), median PFS was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.5-25.1) in the overall population (N = 105) and 28.3 months (95% CI 19.9-NE), 14.2 months (95% CI 8.6-16.8), and 12.1 months (95% CI 8.0-NE) in the HRd, HRp, and HRnd subgroups, respectively (June 16, 2021, cutoff). The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (related to niraparib and/or bevacizumab) were thrombocytopenia (74/105), fatigue (60/105), and anemia (55/105; December 24, 2020, cutoff).. Niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy displayed promising PFS results. Safety was consistent with the known safety profiles of niraparib and bevacizumab as monotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. Preclinical and clinical data demonstrated that the combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a synergistic antitumor activity in this setting of patients.. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of niraparib plus dostarlimab compared with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients not suitable for platinum treatment.. This trial will assess the hypothesis that niraparib plus dostarlimab therapy is effective to increase overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to first subsequent therapy respect to chemotherapy alone, with an acceptable toxicity profile.. This is a phase III, multicenter trial, where recurrent ovarian cancer patients not eligible for platinum re-treatment will be randomized 1:1 to receive niraparib plus dostarlimab vs physician's choice chemotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The study will be performed according to European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups (ENGOT) model B and patients will be recruited from 40 sites across MITO, CEEGOG, GINECO, HeCOG, MANGO, and NOGGO groups.. Eligible patients must have recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer not eligible for platinum retreatment. Patients who received previous treatment with poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors will be eligible. No more than two prior lines of treatment are allowed.. The primary endpoint is overall survival defined as the time from the randomization to the date of death by any cause.. 427 patients will be randomized.. June 2024 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04679064.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.. This Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs.. Twenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%.. Efficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Topics: Female; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

This study evaluated maintenance treatment with niraparib, a potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2, in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. Between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019, 265 patients were randomized to receive niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88); 249 patients received an ISD (300 mg, n = 14; 200 mg, n = 235) as per protocol. In the intention-to-treat population, median PFS was significantly longer for patients receiving niraparib versus placebo: 18.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.9-not evaluable] versus 5.4 (95% CI, 3.7-5.7) months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45; P < 0.0001], and a similar PFS benefit was observed in patients receiving an ISD, regardless of BRCA mutation status. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% and 19.3% of patients who received niraparib and placebo, respectively; the most common events were neutrophil count decreased (20.3% versus 8.0%) and anemia (14.7% versus 2.3%).. Niraparib maintenance treatment reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 68% and prolonged PFS compared to placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Individualized niraparib dosing is effective and safe and should be considered standard practice in this setting.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of niraparib 300 mg/day in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer in a maintenance setting.. Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer who had received ≥2 platinum-based regimens. The primary endpoint (incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days after initial niraparib administration) was justified by the incidences of a global pivotal phase 3 study and its post-hoc safety analysis on thrombocytopenia, the major hematological adverse event of niraparib. The overall safety analysis examined other treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Enrolled patients (n=19) had a median (min, max) body weight of 53.9 (40.8-79.1) kg; all but one patient weighed <77 kg. Most (94.7%) patients initially received niraparib 300 mg/day but this decreased in subsequent cycles (mean±standard deviation dose intensity, 191.6±65.7 mg/day). In total, 6/19 (31.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days of initial niraparib administration. Other common TEAEs included nausea, and decreased platelet or neutrophil counts. No progression-free or overall survival events occurred; only 1 of 4 response-evaluable patients had a post-baseline tumor assessment (stable disease).. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events in Japanese ovarian cancer patients was similar to that in the corresponding non-Japanese study. Overall, the safety profile was acceptable and consistent with the known safety profile and previous experience with niraparib.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

ZL-2306-005 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, as first-line maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with platinum-responsive, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to standardized, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo (300 mg [baseline body weight ≥ 77 kg, platelet count ≥ 150,000/μL] or 200 mg) once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review) and overall survival (sample size planned: 591 patients). Secondary end points included investigator-evaluated PFS and safety.. ZL-2306-005 was terminated early owing to ES-SCLC treatment landscape changes (data cutoff: March 20, 2020). During July 2018-February 2020, a total of 185 of 272 patients screened were randomized (niraparib: n = 125 [CR = 1, PR = 124]; placebo: n = 60 [CR = 1, PR = 59]). Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (blinded independent central review) was 1.54 months (1.41-2.69, niraparib) and 1.36 months (1.31-1.48, placebo); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46-0.95, p = 0.0242). Median overall survival was 9.92 months (9.33-13.54, niraparib) and 11.43 months (9.53-not estimable, placebo); HR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.62-1.73, p = 0.9052). Median investigator-evaluated PFS was 1.48 months (1.41-2.56, niraparib) and 1.41 months (1.31-2.00, placebo); HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.61-1.26; p = 0.4653). Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events occurred in 34.4% (niraparib) and 25.0% (placebo) of patients.. ZL-2306-005 did not reach primary end points. Nevertheless, niraparib as maintenance therapy modestly improved PFS in patients with platinum-responsive ES-SCLC, with acceptable tolerability profile and no new safety signal.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Pharmacokinetics characteristics of niraparib in Chinese patients were similar to those in white patients. Niraparib could be well tolerated by Chinese patients, and adverse events were manageable in this study. Population pharmacokinetics analysis indicated that baseline body weight had a modest impact on pharmacokinetics parameters of niraparib; however, it was not considered clinically important.. This randomized, open-label, single-arm, phase I study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of niraparib in Chinese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 100, 200, or 300 mg of niraparib once daily. PK parameters were analyzed after single and multiple dose administrations.. The PK profile of niraparib in Chinese patients is consistent with that in white patients. Niraparib is safe and well tolerated in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Combined PARP and immune checkpoint inhibition has yielded encouraging results in ovarian cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed immunogenomic profiling and highly multiplexed single-cell imaging on tumor samples from patients enrolled in a Phase I/II trial of niraparib and pembrolizumab in ovarian cancer (NCT02657889). We identify two determinants of response; mutational signature 3 reflecting defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and positive immune score as a surrogate of interferon-primed exhausted CD8 + T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. Presence of one or both features associates with an improved outcome while concurrent absence yields no responses. Single-cell spatial analysis reveals prominent interactions of exhausted CD8 + T-cells and PD-L1 + macrophages and PD-L1 + tumor cells as mechanistic determinants of response. Furthermore, spatial analysis of two extreme responders shows differential clustering of exhausted CD8 + T-cells with PD-L1 + macrophages in the first, and exhausted CD8 + T-cells with cancer cells harboring genomic PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplification in the second.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Monitoring; Female; Gene Amplification; Humans; Indazoles; Interferons; Macrophages; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovary; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Recombinational DNA Repair; Single-Cell Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Microenvironment

In China, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) has been widely used in ovarian cancer (OC) over the past two decades. Although Gynecologic Oncology Group-0213 trial did not show its overall survival benefit in first relapsed patients, the questions on patient selection and effect of subsequent targeting therapy are still open. The preliminary data from our pre-SOC1 phase II study showed that selected patients with second relapse who never received SCR at recurrence may still benefit from surgery. Moreover, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) maintenance now has been a standard care for platinum sensitive relapsed OC. To our knowledge, no published or ongoing trial is trying to answer the question if patient can benefit from a potentially complete resection combined with PARPi maintenance in OC patients with secondary recurrence.. SOC-3 is a multi-center, open, randomized, controlled, phase II trial of SCR followed by chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance vs chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance in patients with platinum-sensitive second relapsed OC who never received SCR at recurrence. To guarantee surgical quality, if the sites had no experience of participating in any OC-related surgical trials, the number of recurrent lesions evaluated by central-reviewed positron emission tomography-computed tomography image shouldn't be more than 3. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SCR followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance or 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance alone. Patients who undergo at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and must be, in the opinion of the investigator, without disease progression, will be assigned niraparib maintenance. Major inclusion criteria are secondary relapsed OC with a platinum-free interval of no less than 6 months and a possibly complete resection. Major exclusion criteria are borderline tumors and non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, received debulking surgery at recurrence and impossible to complete resection. The sample size is 96 patients. Primary endpoint is 12-month non-progression rate.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03983226.

Topics: Adolescent; China; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Quality of Life

Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved for use in heavily pretreated patients and as maintenance treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. We present long-term safety data for niraparib from the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either once-daily niraparib 300 mg or placebo. Two independent cohorts were enrolled based on germline BRCA mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, reported previously. Long-term safety data were from the most recent data cutoff (September 2017).. Overall, 367 patients received niraparib 300 mg once daily. Dose reductions due to TEAEs were highest in month 1 (34%) and declined every month thereafter. Incidence of any-grade and grade ≥ 3 hematologic and symptomatic TEAEs was also highest in month 1 and subsequently declined. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia decreased from 28% (month 1) to 9% and 5% (months 2 and 3, respectively), with protocol-directed dose interruptions and/or reductions. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were reported in 2 and 6 niraparib-treated patients, respectively, and in 1 placebo patient each. Treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs were <5% in each month and time interval measured.. These data demonstrate the importance of appropriate dose reduction according to toxicity criteria and support the safe long-term use of niraparib for maintenance treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the foundation of treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, but has substantial toxicity. Bevacizumab and maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors both significantly improve efficacy versus standard therapy, primarily in terms of progression-free survival, and offer the potential for chemotherapy-free treatment. AVANOVA2 compared niraparib and bevacizumab versus niraparib alone as definitive treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. This open-label, randomised, phase 2, superiority trial in 15 university hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and the USA enrolled women aged 18 years or older with measurable or evaluable high-grade serous or endometrioid platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had to have previously received platinum-containing therapy for primary disease but ≤1 prior non-platinum-containing regimen for recurrent disease. Previous treatment with bevacizumab or first-line maintenance PARP inhibitors was permitted. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (by random permuted blocks with block sizes of two and four, no masking), stratified by homologous recombination deficiency status and chemotherapy-free interval, to receive once-daily oral niraparib 300 mg alone or with intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by the investigators in the intention-to-treat population after events in at least 62 patients. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02354131.. Between May 23, 2016, and March 6, 2017, 97 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned: 48 to niraparib plus bevacizumab and 49 to single-agent niraparib. Median follow-up was 16·9 months (IQR 15·4-20·9). Niraparib plus bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival compared with niraparib alone (median progression-free survival 11·9 months [95% CI 8·5-16·7] vs 5·5 months [3·8-6·3], respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·35 [95% CI 0·21-0·57], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 31 (65%) of 48 patients who received niraparib plus bevacizumab and 22 (45%) of 49 who received single-agent niraparib. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both groups were anaemia (7 [15%] of 48 vs 9 [18%] of 49) and thrombocytopenia (5 [10%] vs 6 [12%]), and hypertension in the combination group (10 [21%] vs 0). Niraparib plus bevacizumab was associated with increased incidences of any-grade proteinuria (10 [21%] of 48 patients vs 0) and hypertension (27 [56%] of 48 vs 11 [22%] of 49) compared with niraparib alone. No treatment-related deaths occurred.. The efficacy observed with this chemotherapy-free combination of approved agents in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer warrants further evaluation. A randomised phase 3 trial investigating niraparib plus bevacizumab versus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is planned.. Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology and Tesaro.

Topics: Aged; Anemia, Aplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Proteinuria; Thrombocytopenia

Niraparib, an inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has been associated with significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the presence or absence of. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival.. Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.. Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality of Life; Survival Analysis

To analyze the safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients aged ≥70 years with recurrent ovarian cancer in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.. The trial enrolled 2 independent cohorts with histologically diagnosed recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who responded to platinum rechallenge, on the basis of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation (gBRCAmut) status. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Adverse events (AEs) of special interest were based on the known safety profile of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.. Patients aged ≥70 years in the gBRCAmut cohort receiving niraparib (n = 14) had not yet reached a median PFS compared with a median PFS of 3.7 months for the same age group in the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01 to 0.73]). Non-gBRCAmut patients aged ≥70 years receiving niraparib (n = 47) had a median PFS of 11.3 months compared with 3.8 months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.71]). Median duration of follow-up in the niraparib arm was 17.3 months in patients ≥70 years and 17.2 months in patients <70 years. Frequency, severity of AEs, and dose reductions in the niraparib arm were similar in patients aged <70 and ≥ 70 years population. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs in patients ≥70 years were hematologic: thrombocytopenia event (34.4%), anemia event (13.1%), and neutropenia event (16.4%).. For patients ≥70 years of age receiving niraparib as maintenance treatment in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, PFS benefits and incidence of any grade or serious treatment-emergent AEs were comparable to results in the younger population. Use of niraparib should be considered in this population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Late-line treatment options for patients with ovarian cancer are few, with the proportion of patients achieving an overall response typically less than 10%, and median overall survival after third-line therapy of 5-9 months. In this study (QUADRA), we investigated the activity of niraparib monotherapy as the fourth or later line of therapy.. QUADRA was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study that evaluated the safety and activity of niraparib in adult patients (≥18 years) with relapsed, high-grade serous (grade 2 or 3) epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had been treated with three or more previous chemotherapy regimens. The study was done in the USA and Canada, and 56 sites screened patients (50 sites treated at least one patient). Patients received oral niraparib 300 mg once daily continuously, beginning on day 1 and every cycle (28 days) thereafter until disease progression. The primary objective was the proportion of patients achieving an investigator-assessed confirmed overall response in patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumours (including patients with BRCA and without BRCA mutations) sensitive to their last platinum-based therapy who had received three or four previous anticancer therapy regimens (primary efficacy population). Efficacy analyses were additionally done in all dosed patients with measurable disease at baseline.. Between April 1, 2015 and Nov 1, 2017, we screened 729 patients for eligibility and enrolled 463 patients, who were initiated on niraparib therapy. At the time of database lock (April 11, 2018), enrolment had closed and the study was ongoing, with 21 patients still on treatment. Patients had received a median of four (IQR 3-5) previous lines of therapy, and the median follow-up for overall survival was 12·2 months (IQR 3·7-22·1). 151 (33%) of 463 patients were resistant and 161 (35%) of 463 patients were refractory to the last administered platinum therapy. 13 (28%) of 47 patients in the primary efficacy population achieved an overall response according to RECIST (95% CI 15·6-42·6; one-sided p=0·00053). The most common drug-related grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (113 [24%] of 463 patients) and thrombocytopenia (95 [21%] of 463 patients). The most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events were small intestinal obstruction (34 [7%] of 463 patients), thrombocytopenia (34 [7%] of 463 patients), and vomiting (27 [6%] of 463 patients). One death due to gastric haemorrhage was considered treatment related.. We observed clinically relevant activity of niraparib among women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer, especially in patients with HRD-positive platinum-sensitive disease, which includes not only patients with a BRCA mutation but also a population with BRCA wild-type disease. We identified no new safety signals. Our data support expansion of the treatment indication for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors to include patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer beyond those with BRCA mutations.. Tesaro.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Canada; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Time Factors; United States; Young Adult

In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274), maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer who had a response to their last platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical benefit and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) to their last platinum-based therapy.. A total of 553 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of 203 patients with a germline. Progression-free survival was improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo in both the g. Patients achieved clinical benefit from maintenance treatment with niraparib regardless of response to the last platinum-based therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organoplatinum Compounds; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Combining poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with antiangiogenic agents appeared to enhance activity vs PARP inhibitors alone in a randomized phase II trial.. In AVANOVA (NCT02354131) part 1, patients with measurable/evaluable high-grade serous/endometrioid platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days with escalating doses of niraparib capsules (100, 200, or 300 mg daily) in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D).. Three of 12 enrolled patients had germline BRCA2 mutations. In cycle 1, nine patients experienced grade 3 toxicities: five with hypertension, three with anemia, and one with thrombocytopenia. There was one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 thrombocytopenia with niraparib 300 mg), thus the RP2D was bevacizumab 15 mg/kg with niraparib 300 mg. The response rate was 50%; disease was stabilized in a further 42%. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 (95% confidence interval 8.4-20.1) months. Niraparib pharmacokinetics were consistent with historical single-agent data. Overlapping exposure was observed across the dose ranges tested on days 1 and 21.. There was one dose-limiting toxicity; other adverse events were typical PARP inhibitor and antiangiogenic class effects. Niraparib-bevacizumab showed promising activity; Part 2 (vs bevacizumab) was recently reported and phase III comparison with standard-of-care therapy is planned.

Topics: Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Niraparib (Zejula™) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The pivotal phase III clinical trial has shown improved progression-free survival in patients receiving niraparib compared with those receiving placebo.. Since niraparib is administered orally, it is of interest to investigate the oral bioavailability (F. Six patients received an oral therapeutic dose of 300 mg niraparib, followed by a 15-min intravenous infusion of 100 µg. The F

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Breast Neoplasms; Carbon Radioisotopes; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Radioactive Tracers; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved in the USA and Europe for maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the pivotal ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, the dose reduction rate due to treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 68.9%, and the discontinuation rate due to TEAE was 14.7%, including 3.3% due to thrombocytopenia. A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify clinical parameters that predict dose reductions.. All analyses were carried out on the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients were analyzed according to the study drug consumed (i.e., as treated). A predictive modeling method (decision trees) was used to identify important variables for predicting the likelihood of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia within 30 days after the first dose of niraparib and determine cut-off points for chosen variables.. Following dose modification, 200 mg was the most commonly administered dose in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Baseline platelet count and baseline body weight were identified as risk factors for increased incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. Patients with a baseline body weight <77 kg or a baseline platelet count <150 000/µl in effect received an average daily dose ∼200 mg (median = 207 mg) due to dose interruption and reduction. Progression-free survival in patients who were dose reduced to either 200 or 100 mg was consistent with that of patients who remained at the 300 mg starting dose.. The analysis presented suggests that patients with baseline body weight of <77 kg or baseline platelets of <150 000/µl may benefit from a starting dose of 200 mg/day.. NCT01847274.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Body Weight; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Incidence; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platelet Count; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia

Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival.. Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications.. Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Germ-Line Mutation; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum Compounds; Young Adult

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is implicated in DNA repair and transcription regulation. Niraparib (MK4827) is an oral potent, selective PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in preclinical tumour models with loss of BRCA and PTEN function. We investigated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and preliminary antitumour activity of niraparib.. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, we enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours at one site in the UK and two sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years; had a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less; had assessable disease; were not suitable to receive any established treatments; had adequate organ function; and had discontinued any previous anticancer treatments at least 4 weeks previously. In part A, cohorts of three to six patients, enriched for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, received niraparib daily at ten escalating doses from 30 mg to 400 mg in a 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Dose expansion at the maximum tolerated dose was pursued in 15 patients to confirm tolerability. In part B, we further investigated the maximum tolerated dose in patients with sporadic platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer and sporadic prostate cancer. We obtained blood, circulating tumour cells, and optional paired tumour biopsies for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Toxic effects were assessed by common toxicity criteria and tumour responses ascribed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Circulating tumour cells and archival tumour tissue in prostate patients were analysed for exploratory putative predictive biomarkers, such as loss of PTEN expression and ETS rearrangements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00749502.. Between Sept 15, 2008, and Jan 14, 2011, we enrolled 100 patients: 60 in part A and 40 in part B. 300 mg/day was established as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxic effects reported in the first cycle were grade 3 fatigue (one patient given 30 mg/day), grade 3 pneumonitis (one given 60 mg/day), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two given 400 mg/day). Common treatment-related toxic effects were anaemia (48 patients [48%]), nausea (42 [42%]), fatigue (42 [42%]), thrombocytopenia (35 [35%]), anorexia (26 [26%]), neutropenia (24 [24%]), constipation (23 [23%]), and vomiting (20 [20%]), and were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and the mean terminal elimination half-life was 36·4 h (range 32·8-46·0). Pharmacodynamic analyses confirmed PARP inhibition exceeded 50% at doses greater than 80 mg/day and antitumour activity was documented beyond doses of 60 mg/day. Eight (40% [95% CI 19-64]) of 20 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses, as did two (50% [7-93]) of four mutation carriers with breast cancer. Antitumour activity was also reported in sporadic high-grade serous ovarian cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and prostate cancer. We recorded no correlation between loss of PTEN expression or ETS rearrangements and measures of antitumour activity in patients with prostate cancer.. A recommended phase 2 dose of 300 mg/day niraparib is well tolerated. Niraparib should be further assessed in inherited and sporadic cancers with homologous recombination DNA repair defects and to target PARP-mediated transcription in cancer.. Merck Sharp and Dohme.

Topics: Adult; Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heterozygote; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tissue Distribution

To describe patient characteristics, effectiveness and safety in a real-world population treated with niraparib in the Spanish expanded-access programme.. This retrospective observational study included women with platinum-sensitive recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received maintenance niraparib within the Spanish niraparib expanded-access programme. Eligible patients had received ≥2 previous lines of platinum-containing therapy, remained platinum-sensitive after the penultimate line of platinum and had responded to the most recent platinum-containing therapy. Niraparib dosing was at the treating physician's discretion (300 mg/day fixed starting dose or individualised starting dose [ISD] according to baseline body weight and platelet count). Safety, impact of dose adjustments, patient characteristics and effectiveness were analysed using data extracted from medical records.. Among 316 eligible patients, 80% had BRCA wild-type tumours and 66% received an ISD. Median niraparib duration was 7.8 months. The most common adverse events typically occurred within 3 months of starting niraparib. Median progression-free survival was 8.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-10.0) months. One- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86% (95% CI 81-89%) and 65% (95% CI 59-70%), respectively. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, haematological toxicities and asthenia/fatigue were less common with ISD than fixed starting dose niraparib, but progression-free survival was similar irrespective of dosing strategy. Subsequent therapy included platinum in 71% of patients who received further treatment.. Outcomes in this large real-world dataset of niraparib-treated patients are consistent with phase III trials, providing reassuring evidence of the tolerability and activity of niraparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. NCT04546373.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Combination chemotherapy is an established approach used to manage toxicities while eliciting an enhanced therapeutic response. Delivery of drug combinations at specific molar ratios has been considered a means to achieve synergistic effects resulting in improvements in efficacy while minimizing dose related adverse drug reactions. The benefits of this approach have been realized with the FDA approval of Vyxeos®, the first liposome formulation to deliver a synergistic drug combination leading to improved overall survival against standard of care. In the current study, we demonstrate the synergistic potential of the PARP inhibitor niraparib and doxorubicin for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Through in vitro screening in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines, we find that niraparib and doxorubicin demonstrate consistent synergy/additivity at the majority of evaluated molar ratio combinations. Further to these findings, we report formulation of a nanoparticle encapsulating our identified synergistic combination. We describe a rational design process to achieve highly stable liposomes that are targeted with folate to folate-receptor-alpha, which is known to be overexpressed on the surface of ovarian cancer cells. With this approach, we aim to achieve targeted delivery of niraparib and doxorubicin at a pre-determined synergistic molar ratio via increased receptor-mediated endocytosis.

Topics: Doxorubicin; Drug Combinations; Female; Folic Acid; Humans; Liposomes; Nanoparticles; Ovarian Neoplasms

Topics: China; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

This study analyzed a 63-year-old woman with hereditary BRCA1 mutation. She underwent interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). After 2 years of postoperative chemotherapy, she developed headache and dizziness, and a suspected metastatic cerebellar mass in left ovary was detected. Pathological analysis of the mass revealed HGSOC, which was removed surgically. Eight months and another 6 months after the surgery, local recurrence was noted; hence, she underwent CyberKnife treatment. After 3 months, cervical spinal cord metastasis was found, evidenced by left shoulder pain. Moreover, meningeal dissemination was present around the cauda equina. Chemotherapy treatment, including bevacizumab, was ineffective and increased lesions were observed. After CyberKnife treatment for the cervical spinal cord metastasis, niraparib was initiated for the meningeal dissemination. The cerebellar lesions and meningeal dissemination improved within 8 months of niraparib treatment. Although meningeal dissemination is challenging to treat, niraparib may be useful in BRCA-mutated HGSOC.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of niraparib versus routine surveillance as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in China.. A three-state partitioned survival model that adopted a lifetime horizon with a 4-week cycle length was developed. Efficacy data were derived from the NORA study. Cost and utility data were obtained from published studies and online databases. The cost and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. In this analysis, the primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at 1 to 3 times the gross domestic product per capita of China in 2022 ($12,741 to $38,233/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the model results.. In the base-case analysis, niraparib was not found to be cost-effective, with an ICER of $42,888/QALY compared with routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated that the ICER value was most sensitive to the cost of subsequent treatment in placebo group. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the WTP thresholds, the probability of niraparib being cost-effective was 2.9% to 50.1%.. Niraparib improves the survival benefit of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. However, it seems to be less cost-effective, as it has higher costs than routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. Reasonable dose reduction according to the patient's actual situation or lowering the price of niraparib can improve its cost-effectiveness.

Topics: China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; East Asian People; Female; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum Compounds; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Cisplatin (CDDP) is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug with proven efficacy for treating tumors. However, its use has been associated with severe side effects and eventually leads to drug resistance, thus limiting its clinical application in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the success rate of reversing cisplatin resistance using a synthetic, multitargeted nanodrug delivery system comprising a Mn-based metal-organic framework (Mn-MOF) containing niraparib (Nira) and CDDP alongside transferrin (Tf) conjugated to the surface (Tf-Mn-MOF@Nira@CDDP; MNCT). Our results revealed that MNCT can target the tumor site, consume glutathione (GSH), which is highly expressed in drug-resistant cells, and then decompose to release the encapsulated Nira and CDDP. Nira and CDDP play a synergistic role in increasing DNA damage and apoptosis, exhibiting excellent antiproliferation, migration, and invasion activities. In addition, MNCT significantly inhibited tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice and exhibited excellent biocompatibility without side effects. Furthermore, it depleted GSH, downregulated multidrug-resistant transporter protein (

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Mice; Nanoparticles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Transferrin

Inhibitors of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerases (PARP) provide clinical benefit to patients with breast and ovarian cancers, by compromising the DNA repair activity of cancer cells. Although these agents extend progression-free survival in many patients, responses can be short lived with many patients ultimately progressing. Identification of combination partners that increase dependence of cancer cells to the DNA repair activity of PARPs may represent a strategy to increase the utility of PARP inhibitors. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) regulates DNA damage response pathways through splicing and protein modification, and inhibitors of PRMT5 have recently entered clinical trials.. The effect of PRMT5 inhibition on the levels of DNA damage and repair markers including γH2AX, RAD51, and 53BP1 was determined using high content immunofluorescent imaging. The anti-proliferative activity of the combination of PRMT5 and PARP inhibitors was evaluated using in vitro models of breast and ovarian cancers using both cell lines and ex vivo patient derived xenografts. Finally, the combinations of PRMT5 and PARP inhibitors were evaluated in cell line xenograft models in vivo.. Inhibition of PRMT5 by GSK3326595 led to increased levels of markers of DNA damage. The addition of GSK3326595 to the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, resulted in increased growth inhibition of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines and patient derived spheroids. In vivo, the combination improved the partial effects on tumor growth inhibition achieved by either single agent, producing complete tumor stasis and regression.. These data demonstrate that inhibition of PRMT5 induced signatures of DNA damage in models of breast and ovarian cancer. Furthermore, combination with the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib, resulted in increased anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Overall, these data suggest inhibition of PRMT5 as a mechanism to broaden and enhance the clinical application of PARP inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; DNA Damage; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases

Niraparib dosages can be individualized to reduce the starting dose based on body weight and baseline platelet count. However, even with individualized dosing, scattered cases of ≥Grade 3 hematologic toxicity occur. This study explored markers predictive of serious hematologic toxicity in niraparib therapy.. This retrospective observational study investigated patients who started niraparib therapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research between December 2020 and March 2022. Associations between hematologic toxicities and serum creatinine ratio (percentage increase in serum creatinine between baseline and after niraparib initiation) were investigated.. Out of 50 ovarian cancer patients who initiated niraparib, 45 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty-three patients (51.1%) developed ≥Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, with neutropenia in 17 (37.8%), anemia in 9 (20.0%), and thrombocytopenia in 4 (8.9%). Patients with Grade 4 hematologic toxicity showed higher serum creatinine ratios than those with ≤Grade 2. Thrombocytopenia ≥Grade 3 occurred only within 2 months of niraparib initiation and was preceded by an increase in serum creatinine in all affected patients.. Serum creatinine ratio offers a potential marker for predicting severe hematologic toxicity following niraparib therapy.

Topics: Anemia; Creatinine; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neutropenia; Ovarian Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a new maintenance therapy option for patients with ovarian cancer (OC).. To evaluate the efficacy and influencing factors of the novel PARP inhibitor niraparib for maintenance treatment of Chinese patients with advanced OC.. In this retrospective multicenter real-world study patients with advanced OC from 15 hospitals throughout China were enrolled. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included the time to treatment discontinuation and safety. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify possible risk factors for PFS, after which a prediction model was established to evaluate the likelihood of achieving an 18-month PFS. The relationship between the dose of niraparib and PFS was also evaluated.. The PFS rates of 199 patients at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months were 87.4%, 75.9%, 63.6%, 56.1%, and 51.8%, respectively. LASSO regression model revealed that only age < 65 years (P = 0.011), BRCA mutations (P < 0.001), and R0 status after cytoreductive surgery (P = 0.01) were significant factors associated with prolonged PFS times. Based on the LASSO logistic regression analysis, a clinical prediction formula was developed: - 2.412 + 1.396Age. For Chinese OC patients, niraparib, particularly at a 200 mg individual starting dose, was an effective therapy with easily manageable safety.. Maintenance therapy with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors is a new option for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) after they have received platinum-based chemotherapy to reduce the recurrence or relapse rates, but it remains unclear whether there are any changes in efficacy and safety when different starting doses of niraparib are administrated to Chinese patients, who typically have a bodyweight < 77 kg. We found that niraparib exhibited satisfactory efficacy with tolerable safety during maintenance therapy for advanced OC whether administered at 100 mg or 200 mg doses. We believe these regimens can serve as a valuable addition to the previous results of randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

The aim of this study was to provide real-world efficacy and safety data on niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with non-germline (gBRCA)1/2 mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. This retrospective multi-center cohort study included 94 platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients without known gBRCA1/2 mutation treated in an individual patient access program in Norway. The primary outcome was time from start of niraparib treatment to first subsequent treatment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, safety, and tolerability.. After median follow-up of 13.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0 to 16.8), 68.1% had progressed and 22.3% had died. Of the entire cohort, 61.7% had commenced a new line of treatment, and 24.5% were still receiving niraparib. The median duration of niraparib treatment was 5.0 months (range 0.4 to 27.3), and the median time to first subsequent treatment was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.4 to 13.0). Patients with elevated CA125 prior to start of niraparib had shorter time to first subsequent treatment (7.3 months, 95% CI 4.2 to 10.3) than patients with normalized CA125 (12.2 months, 95% CI 10.9 to 13.7 (p=0.002). Patients who started on individual dose based on weight and platelet counts had fewer dose reductions (p<0.001) and interruptions (p=0.02).. In a real-world setting, niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with non-gBRCA1/2 mutated recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer showed effectiveness comparable with published phase III studies and acceptable safety. Individualized dosing is essential to minimize adverse events. CA125 levels at start of niraparib treatment may help to estimate the individual prognosis.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Resistance to platinum and PARP inhibitors represents a major barrier to the long-term survival of ovarian cancer patients. We aim to explore the potential role of chronic stress in drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Leveraging four ovarian cancer with chronic stress (OCCS) mouse models, we explore the therapeutic efficacy of platinum, Niraparib, and Docetaxel treatment in vivo, and compare the efficacy of these anti-tumor drugs in vitro using cell viability assays. Comparing the transcriptional characteristics in RNA-Seq of OCCS mice with public databases, we analyze the molecular mechanism of chronic stress promoting drug resistance in ovarian cancer. We find that chronic stress is positively correlated with platinum-resistant recurrence in ovarian cancer patients. Chronic stress can induce platinum and Niraparib resistance of ovarian cancer, but it does not affect the therapeutic efficacy of Docetaxel treatment in vivo. And the platinum-resistant cell lines are not sensitive to these anti-tumor drugs, which is different from the result in vivo. Then, we identify several gene networks and their constituent genes that are most significantly associated with chronic stress and drug resistance in ovarian cancer, including the glycolysis pathway and DNA damage. This study develops Niraparib and platinum-resistant in vivo models, reflecting the ability of OCCS mice to reproduce different aspects of human ovarian cancer molecular mechanism, and provides a new theoretical basis for overcoming the double drug resistance of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; Indazoles; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Stress, Psychological

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common form of ovarian cancer diagnosed in patients worldwide. Patients with

Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Mass Spectrometry; Mitochondria; Neoplasm Grading; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Proteomics; Signal Transduction

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Niraparib was approved for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. The authors retrospectively investigated niraparib-related adverse events (AEs) through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Four algorithms were employed to quantify the signals of niraparib associated AEs, using data from the FAERS between 2017 and 2021. MYSQL 8.0, Navicat Premium 15, Microsoft EXCEL 2019 and the GraphPad Prism 8 were used to conduct statistical analysis. There are 7,238,157 reports collected from the FAERS database, of which 11,701 reports listed niraparib as the 'primary suspected (PS)' drug. A total of 97 significant disproportionality PTs conforming to the four algorithms were simultaneously retained. Unexpected significant AEs such as neuropathy peripheral, photosensitivity reaction, gastrooesophageal reflux disease might also occur. The median onset time of niraparib-associated AEs was 18 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4-66 days), and most of the cases occurred within the first months after niraparib initiation. The study found niraparib-associated AEs and might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of niraparib.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pharmacovigilance; Retrospective Studies; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

In the base case, olaparib was the more cost-effective treatment regimen. The ICERs for olaparib and niraparib compared to placebo were NT$1,804,785 and NT$2,340,265 per PFS-LY, respectively. Tornado analysis showed that PFS and the total resource use cost of niraparib regimen for patients without. Olaparib was estimated to be less cost and more effective compared to niraparib as maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines

Niraparib is effective against epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but with adverse effects. In this study, we retrospectively investigated niraparib maintenance treatment feasibility in Korean patients newly diagnosed with EOC.. The medical records of 35 patients were reviewed. Data on the baseline clinical characteristics were collected, and adverse effects were described.. Sixteen patients underwent treatment suspension or dose reduction. There was no significant difference in adverse effects (A/E) due to the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy conclusion and niraparib initiation. The two groups had similar International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. The number of patients with a history of bevacizumab use was higher in the dose modification group than in the standard dose group.. Niraparib use must be considered in those previously treated with bevacizumab. There is a need for prospective research on lower dose (<200 mg) treatments in patients with risk factors.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Tapering; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to evaluate medical adherence for patients with ovarian cancer who initiated treatment with a PARP inhibitor therapy, and to identify factors associated with nonadherence.. We used the MarketScan Database to identify ovarian cancer patients who initiated PARP inhibitor therapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was adherence defined as ≥ 80% proportion of days covered (PDC). A secondary outcome included adherence assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess relation between PDC and explanatory variables. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate impact of dose-adjustments and toxicity-related delays on adherence.. Among 170,976 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 151 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time from diagnosis to initiating therapy was 33 months. Overall, 40 (26.5%) were non-adherent based on a PDC less than 80%. Non-adherent patients were more likely to receive niraparib and have a longer duration of therapy (p < 0.05). We found no significant impact of age, comorbidities, insurance plan, or year of PARP inhibitor initiation on non-adherence. In a sensitivity analysis to assess different definition of adherence, non-adherence ranged from 11.3% to 41.1%. When accounting for possible dose-adjustments, 21.2% of patients were non-adherent.. This population based study of ovarian cancer patients found that a quarter of patients may be sub-optimally adherent to PARP inhibitor therapy. Future research should focus on identification of patients at risk for nonadherence and interventions to lower nonadherence among these patients.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Adult; Aged; Budgets; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; United States

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) therapy showed limited efficacy in ovarian cancer management. Increasing evidence indicated that conventional and targeted therapies could affect tumor-associated immune responses and increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy. However, the effects of Niraparib, one of the poly (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, on the immune response remains unclear. Delineating the crosstalk between cytotoxic anticancer agents and cancer-associated immunity may lead to more efficient combinatorial strategies.. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in human ovarian cancer cells after PARP inhibitors treatment was examined by western blotting (WB) and flow cytometry. The expression of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP1), PD-L1, and CD8 in human ovarian cancer tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry(IHC). The effect of Niraparib and PD-L1 blockade in ovarian cancer progression was investigated in vivo. The changes of immune cells and cytokines in vitro and in vivo were detected by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Changes of cGAS/STING signal pathway after Niraparib treatment were determined by WB, ELISA.. Niraparib upregulated membrane PD-L1 and total PD-L1 expression in ovarian cancer cells and had a synergistic effect with PD-L1 blockade in vivo. In clinical patient samples, Niraparib augmented cytotoxic CD8. Niraparib could modulate the immune response via the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, and combination with PD-L1 blockade could further enhance the effect. These results provide a sound theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Female; Humans; Immunity; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitors (PARPi) are used to treat recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) patients due to greater survival benefits and minimal side effects, especially in those patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, acquired resistance of platinum-based chemotherapy leads to the limited efficacy of PARPi monotherapy in most patients. Twist is recognized as a possible oncogene and contributes to acquired cisplatin resistance in OC cells. In this study, we show how Twist knockdown cisplatin-resistant (CisR) OC cells blocked DNA damage response (DDR) to sensitize these cells to a concurrent treatment of cisplatin as a platinum-based chemotherapy agent and niraparib as a PARPi on in vitro two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell culture. To investigate the lethality of PARPi and cisplatin on Twist knockdown CisR OC cells, two CisR cell lines (OV90 and SKOV3) were established using step-wise dose escalation method. In addition, in vitro 3D spheroidal cell model was generated using modified hanging drop and hydrogel scaffolds techniques on poly-2-hydroxylethly methacrylate (poly-HEMA) coated plates. Twist expression was strongly correlated with the expression of DDR proteins, PARP1 and XRCC1 and overexpression of both proteins was associated with cisplatin resistance in OC cells. Moreover, combination of cisplatin (Cis) and niraparib (Nira) produced lethality on Twist-knockdown CisR OC cells, according to combination index (CI). We found that Cis alone, Nira alone, or a combination of Cis+Nira therapy increased cell death by suppressing DDR proteins in 2D monolayer cell culture. Notably, the combination of Nira and Cis was considerably effective against 3D-cultures of Twist knockdown CisR OC cells in which Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is upregulated, leading to initiation of mitochondrial-mediated cell death. In addition, immunohistochemically, Cis alone, Nira alone or Cis+Nira showed lower ki-67 (cell proliferative marker) expression and higher cleaved caspase-3 (apoptotic marker) immuno-reactivity. Hence, lethality of PARPi with the combination of Cis on Twist knockdown CisR OC cells may provide an effective way to expand the therapeutic potential to overcome platinum-based chemotherapy resistance and PARPi cross resistance in OC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mitochondria; Nuclear Proteins; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction; Synthetic Lethal Mutations; Twist-Related Protein 1

Niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, is approved for first/second-line maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and multi-line monotherapy in BRCAmt patients or platinum-sensitive recurrence patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). We present real-world experience from a single center of China.. Patients treated with niraparib in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between June 2019 to July 2020 were recruited. The initial dose was given according to individualization. Response and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, respectively. HRD testing (AmoyDx®) was detected in most patients. Treatment was given until unequivocal progression or intolerable toxicity.. Twenty-two patients all received niraparib at a bolus of 200 mg/d. Fifty percent of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer are HRD-positive. Six patients underwent first-line maintenance therapy. Sixteen patients received exploratory therapy. Ultimately image evaluation revealed that two patients achieved partial response (PR) and one patient achieved stable disease (SD), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 33.3% (95%CI = 0.060-0.759) and disease control rate (DCR) of 50% (95%CI = 0.140-0.861) in the exploratory multi-line monotherapy group. The most common AEs were nausea, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were managed by dose reduction and interruption. Leg swelling was observed as a new adverse event.. It is feasible that patients receiving a bolus of 200 mg/d in patients from Chinese population can acquire promising efficacy and tolerance. This is the first real-world data about niraparib in ovarian cancer patients with available HRD status from China.

Topics: Adult; Aged; China; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exhibit promising activity against ovarian cancers, but their efficacy can be limited by acquired drug resistance. This study explores the role of autophagy in regulating the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors.. Induction of autophagy was detected by punctate LC3 fluorescence staining, LC3I to LC3II conversion on Western blot analysis, and electron microscopy. Enhanced growth inhibition and apoptosis were observed when PARP inhibitors were used with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine (CQ), or LYS05 to block the hydrolysis of proteins and lipids in autophagosomes or with small interfering RNA against ATG5 or ATG7 to prevent the formation of autophagosomes. The preclinical efficacy of the combination of CQ and olaparib was evaluated with a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and the OVCAR8 human ovarian cancer cell line.. Four PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) induced autophagy in a panel of ovarian cancer cells. Inhibition of autophagy with CQ enhanced the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. In vivo, olaparib and CQ produced additive growth inhibition in OVCAR8 xenografts and a PDX. Olaparib inhibited PARP activity, and this led to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an accumulation of γ-H2AX. Inhibition of autophagy also increased ROS and γ-H2AX and enhanced the effect of olaparib on both entities. Treatment with olaparib increased phosphorylation of ATM and PTEN while decreasing the phosphorylation of AKT and mTOR and inducing autophagy.. PARP inhibitor-induced autophagy provides an adaptive mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer cells with wild-type BRCA, and a combination of PARP inhibitors with CQ or other autophagy inhibitors could improve outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Cell Line, Tumor; Chloroquine; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Recombinational DNA Repair

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phenotype; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Olaparib was approved on December 19, 2014 by the US FDA as 4th-line therapy (and beyond) for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations; rucaparib was approved on December 19, 2016 as 3rd-line therapy (and beyond) for germline or somatic BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent disease. On October 23, 2019, niraparib was approved for treatment of women with damaging mutations in BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair genes who had been treated with three or more prior regimens. We compared the cost-effectiveness of PARPi(s) with intravenous regimens for platinum-resistant disease.. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity data from regulatory trials were incorporated in a model which transitioned patients through response, hematologic complications, non-hematologic complications, progression, and death. Using TreeAge Pro 2017, each PARPi(s) was compared separately to non‑platinum-based and bevacizumab-containing regimens. Costs of IV drugs, managing toxicities, infusions, and supportive care were estimated using 2017 Medicare data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and PFS was reported in quality adjusted life months for platinum-resistant populations.. Non‑platinum-based intravenous chemotherapy was most cost effective ($6,412/PFS-month) compared with bevacizumab-containing regimens ($12,187/PFS-month), niraparib ($18,970/PFS-month), olaparib ($16,327/PFS-month), and rucaparib ($16,637/PFS-month). ICERs for PARPi(s) were 3-3.5× times greater than intravenous non‑platinum-based regimens.. High costs of orally administered PARPi(s) were not mitigated or balanced by costs of infusion and managing toxicities of intravenous regimens typically associated with lower response and shorter median PFS. Balancing modest clinical benefit with costs of novel therapies remains problematic and could widen disparities among those with limited access to care.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Markov Chains; Models, Statistical; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life; United States

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Diseases; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Risk Factors

Niraparib maintenance after frontline chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer extends progression free survival. The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.. Decision analysis models compared the cost of observation versus niraparib maintenance following chemotherapy for five groups: all newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients (overall), those with homologous recombination deficiency, those harboring. For the overall group, the cost of observation was US$5.8 billion versus $20.5 billion for niraparib maintenance, with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $72 829. For the homologous recombination deficiency group, the observation cost was $3.0 billion versus $14.8 billion for niraparib maintenance (incremental cost effectiveness ratio $56 329). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios for the. For patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, maintenance therapy with niraparib was cost effective. Cost effectiveness was improved when analyzing those patients with homologous recombination deficiency and

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

This study aims to describe the real-world experience, including the clinical and financial burden, associated with PARP inhibitors in a large community oncology practice.. Retrospective chart review identified patients prescribed olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib for maintenance therapy or treatment of recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer across twelve gynecologic oncologists between December 2016 and November 2018. Demographic, financial and clinical data were extracted. One PARP cycle was defined as a single 28-day period. For patients treated with more than one PARPi, each course was described separately.. A total of 47 patients and 506 PARP cycles were identified (122 olaparib, 24%; 89 rucaparib, 18%; 294 niraparib, 58%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were similar to previously reported. Toxicity resulted in dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation in 69%, 63% and 29% respectively. Dose interruptions were most frequent for niraparib but resulted in fewer discontinuations (p-value 0.01). Mean duration of use was 7.46 cycles (olaparib 10.52, rucaparib 4.68, niraparib 7.34). Average cost of PARPi therapy was $8018 per cycle. A total of 711 phone calls were documented (call rate 1.4 calls/cycle) with the highest call volume required for care coordination, lab results and toxicity management.. Although the toxicity profile was similar to randomized clinical trials, this real-world experience demonstrated more dose modifications and discontinuations for toxicity management than previously reported. Furthermore, the clinical and financial burden of PARP inhibitors may be significant and future studies should assess the impact on patient outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Community Health Centers; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Costs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gynecology; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Medical Oncology; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Workload

Homologous recombination deficiency is a critical biologic feature of ovarian cancer. This weakness in DNA damage repair relies on functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, orally available and initially approved for maintenance therapy in women with ovarian cancer by the US FDA in 2017 and by the EMA in 2017 for the same indication. Ovarian cancer represents the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The efficacy of niraparib has changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, but overall survival data is still to come. This review summarizes the data regarding niraparib mechanism of action, toxicities, single agent efficacy and novel combinations in ovarian cancer.

Topics: Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND Thrombocytopenia is a potentially treatment-limiting adverse event of particular interest with the PARP inhibitor niraparib. This adverse event may necessitate niraparib dose reduction or treatment discontinuation, resulting in suboptimal treatment outcomes. Here, we report on niraparib dose optimization in 2 patients with breast cancer and 4 patients with ovarian cancer through concurrent administration of the thrombopoietin receptor stimulating agent avatrombopag to mitigate thrombocytopenia, enabling niraparib reescalation and improved clinical response. CASE REPORT Three of 6 patients received niraparib 300 mg daily, the highest recommended dose, for a sustained period. Avatrombopag therapy enabled niraparib dose escalation that led to reductions in biomarkers associated with disease progression. Before initiation of avatrombopag, increases in CA-125 levels, a marker for ovarian cancer, were observed in association with niraparib dose interruption, and in 2 patients with ovarian cancer CA-125 levels fell in response to niraparib dose escalation enabled by concurrent avatrombopag therapy. Further, in 2 patients with metastatic breast cancer, intracranial response was observed in association with avatrombopag-enabled niraparib therapy. In 1 patient with metastatic breast cancer, niraparib induced an intracranial response, while previous use of talazoparib had not, confirming preclinical findings of superior blood-brain-barrier penetrance with niraparib. CONCLUSIONS Avatrombopag is currently approved for use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease in patients undergoing a surgical procedure. A clinical trial of avatrombopag for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is ongoing. Preliminary results in these 6 patient cases demonstrate the need for a confirmatory trial of avatrombopag for optimizing the dose of niraparib.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombocytopenia

There are large randomized clinical trials-SOLO-1 (Olaparib Maintenance Monotherapy in Patients With BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer Following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy [December 2018]), PRIMA (A Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy [September 2019]), and PAOLA-1 (Platine, Avastin and Olaparib in 1st Line [December 2019])-reporting positive efficacy results for maintenance regimens for women with primary, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The findings resulted in approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of the treatments studied as of May 2020. However, there are pressing economic considerations given the many eligible patients and substantial associated costs.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance strategies for patients with (1) a BRCA variant, (2) homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant, or (3) homologous recombination proficiency.. In this economic evaluation of the US health care sector using simulated patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, 3 decision trees were developed, one for each molecular signature. The maintenance strategies evaluated were olaparib (SOLO-1), olaparib-bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), and niraparib (PRIMA). Base case 1 assessed olaparib, olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation of a patient with a BRCA variant. Base case 2 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant. Base case 3 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination proficiency. The time horizon was 24 months. Costs were estimated from Medicare claims, wholesale acquisition prices, and published sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses with microsimulation were then conducted to account for uncertainty and assess model stability. One-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. The study was performed from January through June 2020.. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US dollars per progression-free life-year saved (PF-LYS).. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/PF-LYS, none of the drugs could be considered cost-effective compared with observation. In the case of a patient with a BRCA variant, olaparib was the most cost-effective (ICER, $186 777/PF-LYS). The third-party payer price per month of olaparib would need to be reduced from approximately $17 000 to $9000 to be considered cost-effective. Olaparib-bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant (ICER, $629 347/PF-LYS), and bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of patient with homologous recombination proficiency (ICER, $557 865/PF-LYS). Even at a price of $0 per month, niraparib could not be considered cost-effective as a maintenance strategy for patients with homologous recombination proficiency.. The findings of this study suggest that, at current costs, maintenance therapy for primary ovarian cancer is not cost-effective, regardless of molecular signature. For certain therapies, lowering the drug price alone may not make them cost-effective.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Computing Methodologies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Medicare; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Ovarian cancer is the second the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. 70% of patients relapse in the first 3 years following debulking surgery and first-line chemotherapy. Niraparib is a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor which uses the concept of synthetic lethality in the presence of a mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (

Topics: Aged; Brain Neoplasms; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Grading; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

This study estimated time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) with niraparib compared with routine surveillance (RS) in the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated for niraparib and RS by fitting parametric survival distributions to Kaplan-Meier data for 553 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were enrolled in the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline. In the g. Patients who were treated with niraparib compared with RS experienced increased mean TWiST. Thus, patients who were treated with niraparib in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial experienced more time without symptoms or symptomatic toxicities compared with control.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

Topics: Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Precision Medicine

Ovarian cancer is the second most common and the most lethal gynecological malignancy in the western world. Unfortunately, there are lack of methods for early screening and diagnosis of the disease. Because of this, most of the cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage and have poor prognosis. The standard treatment of ovarian cancer is maximal cytoreductive surgical debulking followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. There are new molecular agents available for maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer including anti-angiogenic therapies, poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. Niraparib is a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor that has shown to be clinically effective as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. Studies have shown the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of presence or absence of BRCA gene mutations or homologous recombination deficiency status. Studies have shown that treatment-emergent Grade 3 or Grade 4 hematological events were observed in patients receiving niraparib including thrombocytopenia (33.8%), anemia (25.3%) and neutropenia (19.6%). Most of the hematological laboratory abnormalities occurred within the first three treatment cycles. After dose adjustment, the incidence of hematological abnormalities was infrequent beyond cycle 3. We are reporting two cases of Grade III/IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients treated with niraparib in our institution. Unfortunately, one of the patients succumbed to septic shock secondary to right lower lobe pneumonia while severely neutropenic. The second patient's blood counts improved after discontinuing the medication and with supportive transfusions during the hospitalization.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of niraparib compared with routine surveillance (RS), olaparib and rucaparib for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).. A decision-analytic model estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for niraparib versus RS, olaparib, and rucaparib from a US payer perspective. The model considered recurrent OC patients with or without germline BRCA mutations (gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut), who were responsive to their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Model health states were: progression-free disease, progressed disease and dead. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using parametric survival distributions based on ENGOT-OV16/NOVA (niraparib phase III trial), ARIEL3 (rucaparib phase III trial) and Study 19 (olaparib phase II trial). Mean overall survival (OS) benefit was estimated as double the mean PFS benefit based on the relationship between PFS and OS observed in Study 19. Costs included: drug, chemotherapy, monitoring, adverse events, and terminal care. EQ-5D utilities were estimated from trial data.. Compared to RS, niraparib was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$68,287/QALY and US$108,287/QALY for gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut, respectively. Compared to olaparib and rucaparib, niraparib decreased costs and increased QALYs, with a cost saving of US$8799 and US$22,236 versus olaparib and US$198,708 and US$73,561 versus rucaparib for gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut, respectively.. Niraparib was estimated to be less costly and more effective compared to olaparib and rucaparib, and the ICER fell within an acceptable range compared to RS. Therefore, niraparib may be considered a cost-effective maintenance treatment for patients with recurrent OC.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Survival Rate; United States

This study aimed to evaluate the budget impact of niraparib and olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer from a US third party payer perspective.. A budget impact model was constructed to assess the additional per member per month (PMPM) costs associated with the introduction of niraparib and olaparib, two poly ADP-ribose polymerase ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors recently approved to be used in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer patients with and without a gBRCA mutation. The model assessed both pharmacy costs and medical costs. Pharmacy costs included adjusted drug costs, coinsurance, and dispensing fees. Medical costs included costs associated with disease monitoring and management of adverse events from the treatment. Epidemiological data from the literature were used to estimate the target population size. The analysis used 1-year time frame, and patients were assumed on treatment until disease progression or death. All costs were computed in 2017 USD. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the model robustness.. In a hypothetical plan of 1,000,000 members, 206 patients were estimated to be potential candidates for niraparib or olaparib maintenance treatment after applying all epidemiological parameters. At listed 30-day supply WAC prices of $14,750 for niraparib and $13,482 for olaparib, budget impacts of these two drugs were $0.169 PMPM and $0.156 PMPM, respectively, most of which were contributed by pharmacy costs. Sensitivity analyses suggested that assumptions around market share, platinum-sensitive rate after first treatment, and WAC prices affected results the most.. In this model, it was assumed that adopting niraparib and olaparib would not affect utilization of existing medications. Also, the estimated clinical parameters from clinical trials could differ from real-world data.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Budgets; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Econometric; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Survival Analysis; United States

PARP inhibitors have been proven clinically efficacious in platinum-responsive ovarian cancer regardless of BRCA1/2 status and in breast cancers with germline BRCA1/2 mutation. However, resistance to PARP inhibitors may preexist or evolve during treatment in many cancer types and may be overcome by combining PARP inhibitors with other therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which confer durable responses and are rapidly becoming the standard of care for multiple tumor types. This study investigated the therapeutic potential of combining niraparib, a highly selective PARP1/2 inhibitor, with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical tumor models. Our results indicate that niraparib treatment increases the activity of the type I (alpha) and type II (gamma) interferon pathways and enhances the infiltration of CD8

Topics: Animals; Antibodies; Base Sequence; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Line, Tumor; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Interferons; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mutation; Neoplasm Transplantation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

FDA-approved treatments for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) include bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors (PARPi); clinical decisions regarding therapy must be made prior to initiating chemotherapy. Using the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) value frameworks, we assessed relative values of concurrent/maintenance biologic therapies in PSROC.. Value scores were calculated for key maintenance therapies based on randomized controlled trials: bevacizumab (OCEANS, GOG 213); olaparib (Study 19, SOLO2); niraparib (NOVA); rucaparib (ARIEL3). Personalized value scorecards were constructed for patients with germline/somatic-BRCA mutations, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and wild-type BRCA (wBRCA). ASCO value scores assess clinical benefit, toxicity, long-term survival, symptom palliation, treatment-free interval, and quality of life (QOL). ESMO value scores assess clinical benefit, toxicity, and QOL.. ASCO scores were highest for maintenance PARPi in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts: olaparib (SOLO2) = 47, (Study 19) = 62; niraparib = 50; rucaparib = 54. HRD cohorts had slightly lower scores: niraparib = 46; rucaparib = 37. wBRCA cohorts had the lowest scores: niraparib = 26; rucaparib = 26; and olaparib (Study 19) = 32, as did patients receiving bevacizumab (OCEANS) = 35, (GOG 213) = 26. ESMO scores demonstrated high-value for maintenance PARPi in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts and low-value for bevacizumab and PARPi in wBRCA cohorts.. The value of maintenance PARPi therapy depends heavily on BRCA status, with the highest value scores in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts. Personalized value scorecards provide a visual aid to assess the harm-benefit balance of maintenance PARPi for PSROC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organoplatinum Compounds; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Precision Medicine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has one of the highest death to incidence ratios among all cancers. High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common and deadliest EOC histotype due to the lack of therapeutic options following debulking surgery and platinum/taxane-based chemotherapies. For recurrent chemosensitive HGSOC, poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi; olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib) represent an emerging treatment strategy. While PARPi are most effective in homologous recombination DNA repair-deficient (HRD) HGSOCs, recent studies have observed a significant benefit in non-HRD HGSOCs. However, all HGSOC patients are likely to acquire resistance. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need to understand PARPi resistance and to introduce novel combinatorial therapies to manage PARPi resistance and extend HGSOC disease-free intervals. In a panel of HGSOC cell lines, we established matched olaparib sensitive and resistant cells. Transcriptome analysis of the matched olaparib-sensitive vs -resistant cells revealed activation of the Wnt signaling pathway and consequently increased TCF transcriptional activity in PARPi-resistant cells. Forced activation of canonical Wnt signaling in several PARPi-sensitive cells via WNT3A reduced olaparib and rucaparib sensitivity. PARPi resistant cells were sensitive to inhibition of Wnt signaling using the FDA-approved compound, pyrvinium pamoate, which has been shown to promote downregulation of β-catenin. In both an HGSOC cell line and a patient-derived xenograft model, we observed that combining pyrvinium pamoate with olaparib resulted in a significant decrease in tumor burden. This study demonstrates that Wnt signaling can mediate PARPi resistance in HGSOC and provides a clinical rationale for combining PARP and Wnt inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Heterografts; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Mice; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Wnt Signaling Pathway

Niraparib is a highly selective inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2 approved in the United States for maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In this open-label crossover study, we evaluated the effects of food on niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety.. Patients received a single 300-mg dose of niraparib either after a high-fat meal or under fasting conditions. After a 7-day PK assessment, all patients received a second 300-mg dose of niraparib under the opposite condition, followed by 7-day PK assessment. Blood samples for PK analyses were collected at baseline (on days 1 and 8) and up to 168 h post-dose. Bioequivalence between conditions was defined by the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC. The high-fat meal/fasting ratios of geometric least-squares means for AUC. A high-fat meal did not impact the PK profile of niraparib, indicating that niraparib can be taken with or without food. Niraparib was safe and well-tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Dietary Fats; Drug Monitoring; Fasting; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Therapeutic Equivalency

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib has been shown to rapidly down-regulate the expression of ERBB1/2/4 as well as the levels of c-MET, PDGFRα and mutant RAS proteins via autophagic degradation. Neratinib interacted in an additive to synergistic fashion with the approved PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells. Neratinib and niraparib caused the ATM-dependent activation of AMPK which in turn was required to cause mTOR inactivation, ULK-1 activation and ATG13 phosphorylation. The drug combination initially increased autophagosome levels followed later by autolysosome levels. Preventing autophagosome formation by expressing activated mTOR or knocking down of Beclin1, or knock down of the autolysosome protein cathepsin B, reduced drug combination lethality. The drug combination caused an endoplasmic reticulum stress response as judged by enhanced eIF2α phosphorylation that was responsible for reducing MCL-1 and BCL-XL levels and increasing ATG5 and Beclin1 expression. Knock down of BIM, but not of BAX or BAK, reduced cell killing. Expression of activated MEK1 prevented the drug combination increasing BIM expression and reduced cell killing. Downstream of the mitochondrion, drug lethality was partially reduced by knock down of AIF, but expression of dominant negative caspase 9 was not protective. Our data demonstrate that neratinib and niraparib interact to kill ovarian cancer cells through convergent DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Cell killing required the induction of autophagy and was cathepsin B and AIF -dependent, and effector caspase independent.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quinolines

The FDA approved niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, on March 27, 2017, for maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Approval was based on data from the NOVA trial comparing niraparib with placebo in two independent cohorts, based on germline

Topics: Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Progression-Free Survival; Risk Assessment

PARP inhibitors have transformed treatment for ovarian cancer, a cancer notable for homologous recombination (HR) deficiencies and aberrant DNA repair, especially in the high-grade serous subtype. PARP inhibitors are now approved for recurrent ovarian cancer as maintenance following response to platinum chemotherapy and

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins are used by cells in several DNA repair processes. PARP inhibition can result in preferential death of cancer cells when another mechanism for repairing DNA is defective. Two PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of recurrent, BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. More recently, these two and a third PARP inhibitor, niraparib, were approved by the FDA as maintenance therapy following platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. This has caused a paradigm shift in disease management and a challenge for clinicians, who must decide how best to use these agents in individualized treatment. The oral formulation is attractive to patients, but adverse effects such as nausea and fatigue can impact quality of life. As clinicians become comfortable selecting PARP inhibitors and managing associated toxicities, future steps will be to investigate how to safely administer them in combination with other therapies.

Topics: Anemia; Creatinine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Exanthema; Fatigue; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Leukopenia; Mutation; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Nasopharyngitis; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Thrombocytopenia; Transaminases; Vomiting

The recent approval of olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapy can significantly affect the management of ovarian cancer. Clinical benefits, however, come with trade-offs in adverse events and costs.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of new ovarian cancer poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapies, olaparib and niraparib, as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. A decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib compared with placebo from a U.S. health care sector perspective. Costs included drug costs and costs of disease monitoring and management of adverse events throughout the treatment course. Costs were estimated from RED BOOK, Medicare reimbursement rates, and the literature and reported in 2017 U.S. dollars. Clinical effectiveness was measured in progression-free survival (PFS) life-years based on clinical trial results (NCT00753545, NCT01874353, and NCT01847274). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was computed by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental effectiveness.. At base case, niraparib was the more effective treatment option with slightly higher PFS, followed by olaparib. The ICERs for niraparib and olaparib compared with common baseline placebo were $235K and $287K per PFS life-year, respectively, with olaparib extended-dominated by niraparib. Both drugs were associated with lower ICERs in patients with a gBRCA mutation than in patients without a gBRCA mutation. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that drug prices and PFS could affect ICERs significantly, but the ICERs remained above $100K per PFS life-year within the plausible ranges of all parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that niraparib was associated with higher net benefits compared with placebo only when willingness-to-pay (WTP) values were above $210K per PFS life-year thresholds.. PARP inhibitors niraparib and olaparib will extend PFS in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients but are also associated with high drug acquisition costs. The base case ICERs were around or above $250K per PFS life-year in this model. No formal cost-effectiveness WTP threshold for health technology assessment exists in the United States. At a reference WTP of $100K per PFS life-year, the PARP inhibitors may not be cost-effective options.. This study was unfunded. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Topics: Clinical Decision-Making; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Economic; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; United States

Oral niraparib, a highly-selective, potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor, is approved in the USA for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. It is also under regulatory review in the EU for use in maintenance treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the multinational, phase 3 NOVA trial in adult patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, niraparib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival, irrespective of the presence or absence of a germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation and irrespective of the presence or absence of homologous recombinant deficiency. Niraparib is also in development for use in other solid tumours, including breast and prostate cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of niraparib leading to its first global approval for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Drug Approval; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Riassunto. I PARP inibitori interferiscono con la riparazione del danno nella singola elica del DNA determinando una progressione del difetto nella doppia elica. In circa il 50% delle pazienti con carcinoma dell'ovaio sieroso di alto grado sono presenti difetti nei meccanismi di ricombinazione omologa, deputati alla riparazione del danno della doppia elica del DNA. L'incapacità di riparare il danno si traduce nella morte cellulare, un processo definito "letalità sintetica". Nella famiglia dei PARP inibitori il niraparib è stato il primo a essere approvato dalla FDA nel trattamento delle pazienti con carcinoma ovarico ricorrente indipendentemente dalla presenza o assenza di mutazioni BRCA. Questo risultato è stato raggiunto grazie ai dati emersi dal trial di fase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA, favorevoli in termini di prolungamento della sopravvivenza libera da progressione e associati a un buon profilo di tossicità. Ulteriori trial clinici sono in corso per valutare ulteriori indicazioni all'impiego di niraparib nel trattamento del carcinoma ovarico.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Repair; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), but the optimal treatment setting remains unknown. We assessed the effect of niraparib on HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as well as the relationship between certain markers of homologous recombination (HR) status, including BRCA1/2 mutations and formation of RAD51 foci after DNA damage, and response of these PDXs to niraparib in vivo.. Massively parallel sequencing was performed on HGSOCs to identify mutations contributing to HR deficiency. HR pathway integrity was assessed using fluorescence microscopy-based RAD51 focus formation assays. Effects of niraparib (MK-4827) on treatment-naïve PDX tumor growth as monotherapy, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel, and as maintenance therapy were assessed by transabdominal ultrasound. Niraparib responses were correlated with changes in levels of poly(ADP-ribose), PARP1, and repair proteins by western blotting.. Five PDX models were evaluated in vivo. Tumor regressions were induced by single-agent niraparib in one of two PDX models with deleterious BRCA2 mutations and in a PDX with RAD51C promoter methylation. Diminished formation of RAD51 foci failed to predict response, but Artemis loss was associated with resistance. Niraparib generally failed to enhance responses to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, but maintenance niraparib therapy delayed progression in a BRCA2-deficient PDX.. Mutations in HR genes are neither necessary nor sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Assessment of repair status through multiple complementary assays is needed to guide PARP inhibitor therapy, design future clinical trials and identify ovarian cancer patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition.

Topics: DNA-Binding Proteins; Female; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Promoter Regions, Genetic

Results from a phase III trial indicate that maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor niraparib is more effective than placebo in slowing the progression of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Improved progression-free survival was seen regardless of the presence or absence of germline BRCA mutations, or of homologous recombination deficiency; however, patients who had these mutations or defective DNA repair did better.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Progression; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome