Page last updated: 2024-11-01

nicardipine and Hematoma

nicardipine has been researched along with Hematoma in 14 studies

Nicardipine: A potent calcium channel blockader with marked vasodilator action. It has antihypertensive properties and is effective in the treatment of angina and coronary spasms without showing cardiodepressant effects. It has also been used in the treatment of asthma and enhances the action of specific antineoplastic agents.
nicardipine : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)- and (S)-nicardipine. It is a calcium channel blocker which is used to treat hypertension.
2-[benzyl(methyl)amino]ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate : A dihydropyridine that is 1,4-dihydropyridine substituted by a methyl, {2-[benzyl(methyl)amino]ethoxy}carbonyl, 3-nitrophenyl, methoxycarbonyl and methyl groups at positions 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively.

Hematoma: A collection of blood outside the BLOOD VESSELS. Hematoma can be localized in an organ, space, or tissue.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The effects of acute systolic blood pressure levels achieved with continuous intravenous administration of nicardipine for Japanese patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage on clinical outcomes were determined."9.41Intravenous nicardipine for Japanese patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage: an individual participant data analysis. ( Fukuda-Doi, M; Inoue, M; Koga, M; Miwa, K; Qureshi, AI; Toyoda, K; Yoshimura, S, 2023)
" Prospective studies involving hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage adults treated with intravenous nicardipine whose outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale were eligible."9.22Intensive blood pressure lowering with nicardipine and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage: An individual participant data systematic review. ( Fukuda-Doi, M; Hsu, CY; Ihara, M; Inoue, M; Itabashi, R; Koga, M; Martin, RH; Minematsu, K; Okada, Y; Palesch, YY; Qureshi, AI; Sakai, N; Steiner, T; Suarez, JI; Toyoda, K; Wang, Y; Yamagami, H; Yamamoto, H; Yoon, BW; Yoshimura, S, 2022)
"The authors performed a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride for acute hypertension in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)."9.16Antihypertensive treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage by intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride: prospective multi-center study. ( Hong, CK; Hwang, SK; Kim, JH; Kim, JS; Yang, KH, 2012)
"In patients with hemorrhagic stroke, nicardipine appeared to have similar efficacy as clevidipine in SBP reduction, with a more likely reduction of rebound hypertension and drug cost."8.12Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine for Acute Blood Pressure Reduction in Hemorrhagic Stroke. ( Breslin, J; Hanify, J; Heierman, T; Larizadeh, K; Phipps, W; Saldana, S; Sanchez, M, 2022)
"The effects of acute systolic blood pressure levels achieved with continuous intravenous administration of nicardipine for Japanese patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage on clinical outcomes were determined."5.41Intravenous nicardipine for Japanese patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage: an individual participant data analysis. ( Fukuda-Doi, M; Inoue, M; Koga, M; Miwa, K; Qureshi, AI; Toyoda, K; Yoshimura, S, 2023)
" Prospective studies involving hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage adults treated with intravenous nicardipine whose outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale were eligible."5.22Intensive blood pressure lowering with nicardipine and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage: An individual participant data systematic review. ( Fukuda-Doi, M; Hsu, CY; Ihara, M; Inoue, M; Itabashi, R; Koga, M; Martin, RH; Minematsu, K; Okada, Y; Palesch, YY; Qureshi, AI; Sakai, N; Steiner, T; Suarez, JI; Toyoda, K; Wang, Y; Yamagami, H; Yamamoto, H; Yoon, BW; Yoshimura, S, 2022)
"The authors performed a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride for acute hypertension in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)."5.16Antihypertensive treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage by intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride: prospective multi-center study. ( Hong, CK; Hwang, SK; Kim, JH; Kim, JS; Yang, KH, 2012)
"In patients with hemorrhagic stroke, nicardipine appeared to have similar efficacy as clevidipine in SBP reduction, with a more likely reduction of rebound hypertension and drug cost."4.12Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine for Acute Blood Pressure Reduction in Hemorrhagic Stroke. ( Breslin, J; Hanify, J; Heierman, T; Larizadeh, K; Phipps, W; Saldana, S; Sanchez, M, 2022)
"The Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement (SAMURAI)-ICH Study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study investigating the safety and feasibility of early (within 3 h from onset) reduction of systolic BP (SBP) to < 160 mm Hg with intravenous nicardipine for acute hypertension in cases of spontaneous ICH."3.88Early Achievement of Blood Pressure Lowering and Hematoma Growth in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-Factor Assessment and Improvement-Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study. ( Ando, D; Fujita, K; Hasegawa, Y; Ide, T; Itabashi, R; Kamimura, T; Kamiyama, K; Kario, K; Kimura, K; Koga, M; Kumamoto, M; Matsubara, S; Nagatsuka, K; Okada, Y; Okuda, S; Sato, S; Shiokawa, Y; Shiozawa, M; Todo, K; Toyoda, K; Yamagami, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshimoto, T; Yoshimura, S, 2018)
"In order to reduce the total amount of intravenous nicardipine and to maintain the BP below 80% of the initial BP, oral administration of a long-acting N-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, is useful and important, independent of whether the hematomas are surgically removed."3.75Oral administration of cilnidipine to patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the acute stage: significance and role of an N-type calcium channel blocker. ( Asano, S; Fuke, N; Ide, F; Matsuno, A; Miyawaki, S; Murakami, M; Nakaguchi, H; Sasaki, M; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, J; Uno, T, 2009)
"Using data from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-2) trial, we performed HE shift analysis in response to intensive blood pressure lowering by generating polychotomous strata based on previously established HE definitions, percentile/absolute quartiles of hematoma volume change, and quartiles of 24-hour follow-up hematoma volumes."3.01Hematoma Expansion Shift Analysis to Assess Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatments. ( Dowlatshahi, D; Menon, BK; Qureshi, AI; Ramsay, T; Saver, JL; Yogendrakumar, V, 2021)
"We present an unusual case of spinal cord ischemia from an acute type B intramural hematoma that was successfully treated with blood pressure elevation and drainage of cerebral spinal fluid."1.39Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta complicated by spinal cord ischemia. ( Cassiere, HA; Liang, D; Yu, PJ, 2013)
"Immediately after diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage on computed tomographic scan, 156 patients who were admitted within 24 hours of onset were treated with either a combination of PAF and BPC (PAF group) or a combination of RAF and BPC (RAF group)."1.33Rapid administration of antifibrinolytics and strict blood pressure control for intracerebral hemorrhage. ( Fujii, Y; Morita, K; Sorimachi, T; Tanaka, R, 2005)

Research

Studies (14)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's3 (21.43)29.6817
2010's5 (35.71)24.3611
2020's6 (42.86)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Toyoda, K4
Yoshimura, S4
Fukuda-Doi, M3
Qureshi, AI6
Martin, RH2
Palesch, YY3
Ihara, M2
Suarez, JI1
Okada, Y2
Hsu, CY2
Itabashi, R2
Wang, Y2
Yamagami, H2
Steiner, T2
Sakai, N1
Yoon, BW2
Inoue, M2
Minematsu, K1
Yamamoto, H2
Koga, M4
Saldana, S1
Breslin, J1
Hanify, J1
Heierman, T1
Larizadeh, K1
Sanchez, M1
Phipps, W1
Miwa, K2
Foster, L1
Okazaki, S1
Tanaka, K1
Hasegawa, Y2
Shiokawa, Y2
Iwama, T1
Kamiyama, K2
Hoshino, H1
Yogendrakumar, V1
Ramsay, T1
Menon, BK1
Saver, JL1
Dowlatshahi, D1
Yamaguchi, Y1
Sato, S1
Todo, K1
Okuda, S1
Kimura, K1
Kario, K1
Fujita, K1
Kumamoto, M1
Kamimura, T1
Ando, D1
Ide, T1
Yoshimoto, T1
Shiozawa, M1
Matsubara, S1
Nagatsuka, K1
Morotti, A1
Shoamanesh, A1
Oliveira-Filho, J1
Schlunk, F1
Romero, JM1
Jessel, M1
Ayres, A1
Vashkevich, A1
Schwab, K1
Cassarly, C1
Greenberg, SM1
Rosand, J1
Goldstein, JN2
Yu, PJ1
Cassiere, HA1
Liang, D1
Matsuno, A1
Ide, F1
Tanaka, H1
Asano, S1
Miyawaki, S1
Uno, T1
Tanaka, J1
Nakaguchi, H1
Sasaki, M1
Murakami, M1
Fuke, N1
Nishikawa, T1
Ueba, T1
Kajiwara, M1
Iwata, R1
Miyamatsu, N1
Yamashita, K1
Martin, R1
Novitzke, J1
Cruz-Flores, S1
Ehtisham, A1
Ezzeddine, MA1
Kirmani, JF1
Hussein, HM1
Suri, MF1
Tariq, N1
Liu, Y1
Hwang, SK1
Kim, JS1
Kim, JH1
Hong, CK1
Yang, KH1
Suzuki, M1
Hayashi, A1
Sasamata, M1
Sorimachi, T1
Fujii, Y1
Morita, K1
Tanaka, R1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH)-II: A Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Blood Pressure Reduction for Hypertension in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage[NCT01176565]Phase 31,000 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-15Terminated (stopped due to Planned interim analysis: no significant outcome differences between groups)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Any Serious Adverse Event Within the 90-day Study Period

The complete count of all subjects who experienced any serious adverse events throughout their participation in the trial was included in this tabulation. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed by the site investigators for all patients. Potential relatedness to the study treatment was a required reporting element for all adverse events but was not considered in this count. Terminology from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and severity criteria from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.03) were used as a basis for reporting adverse events. Serious adverse events are defined as being fatal, life-threatening, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, resulting in disability or congenital anomaly, or requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage and were required to be reported promptly. An Independent Oversight Committee (IOC) reviewed and adjudicated adverse event data. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through the 90 day visit (90 ± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) or until known death, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard SBP Reduction Arm100
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm128

Hematoma Expansion (Number of Patients With Hematoma Expansion of 33% or Greater Between the Baseline and 24 +/- 6 Hours Head CTs, as Measured by the Central Reader for Patients With Readable Scans for Both Time Points Submitted by Data Lock.)

Hematoma expansion as determined by serial CT scans: Hematoma expansion was defined as an increase in the volume of intraparenchymal hemorrhage of 33% or greater as measured by a central imaging analyst who was was unaware of the treatment assignments, clinical findings, and time points of image acquisition. The area of the hematoma was delineated by image analysis software with the use of density thresholds on each slice, followed by manual correction. To ensure accuracy and consistency of the readings, images were coded randomly and independently of subject numbers and manual correction was also done without awareness of treatment assignments, clinical findings, or time points of image acquisition. This data point is defined as being present (hematoma expansion of 33% or more was calculated between the baseline scan hematoma volume and the 24 +/- 6 hours hematoma volume measures at data analysis), meaning that hematoma expansion as defined must have occurred or it was not counted. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From the baseline head CT to the 24 +/- 6 hours from randomization head CT

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard SBP Reduction Arm104
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm85

Hypotension Within 72 Hours

Hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure) was the most likely adverse event that could be associated with the study treatment, and is the primary basis (risk) on which neurological deterioration or other untoward effects of the study treatment could occur. It is therefore examined as a numerically-measured occurrence in addition to monitoring patients closely for neurological deterioration or other symptoms. Hypotension, when named as an adverse event, was defined as the syndrome of low blood pressure with SBP < 85 mmHg. Instances of hypotension were to be avoided through close monitoring, and administration of fluid bolus for SBP < 110 mmHg. If hypotension did occur, it was to be reversed as quickly as possible through discontinuation of intravenous nicardipine and intravenous fluid administration, which can be accomplished readily in a variety of settings where patients with intracerebral hemorrhage are routinely housed during early hospitalization. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through 72 hours from randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard SBP Reduction Arm3
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm6

Neurological Deterioration Within 24 Hours, Defined by a Decrease of 2 or More Points on the GCS Score or an Increase of 4 or More Points on the NIHSS Score From Baseline, Not Related to Sedation or Hypnotic-agent Use and Sustained for at Least 8 Hours.

Neurologic deterioration was measured using two scales. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score measures of level of consciousness in eye, motor, and verbal components. At least one point is given in each category. The scale ranges from 3 to 15, with 3 indicating deep unconsciousness and 15 indicating consciousness is not impaired. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) quantifies neurologic deficits in 11 categories. Level of consciousness, horizontal eye movement, visual fields, facial palsy, movement in each limb, sensation, language & speech, and extinction or inattention on one side of the body are tested. Scores range from 0 to 42, with 0 indicating normal function and higher scores indicating greater deficit severity. Neurological status was checked per ICU standards through 24 hours, recommended as hourly GCS and full assessment every 2 hours. NIHSS assessment at baseline and 24 +/- 3 hours was pre-specified. Assessments were added for suspected neurological change. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through the 24-hour treatment period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard SBP Reduction Arm40
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm55

Treatment-related Serious Adverse Event Within 72 Hours of Randomization

Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed by the site investigators for all patients, including for their potential relatedness to the study treatment. An Independent Oversight Committee (IOC) reviewed and adjudicated all adverse event data. The 72-hours-from-randomization time window was considered the most likely time frame during which treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events would be observed. Terminology from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and severity criteria from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.03) were used as a basis for reporting adverse events. Serious adverse events are defined as being fatal, life-threatening, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, resulting in disability or congenital anomaly, or requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage and were required to be reported promptly. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through 72 hours (3 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard SBP Reduction Arm6
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm8

Death or Disability According to Modified Rankin Scale Score at 90 Days (3 Months) From Randomization

The primary outcome was death or disability, defined by modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 4-6 at 90 days following treatment. The modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0, indicating no symptoms, to 6, indicating death. A score of 4 indicates moderately severe disability including the inability to walk or attend to one's own bodily needs. A score of 5 indicates severe disability; bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care. To score a 3 or lower on the mRS, a person must at least be able to walk without the assistance of another person. We chose the mRS because of its high inter-observer reliability, superiority to other indices, and consistency with previous trials in patients with ICH. Reliability was further increased by use of a structured interview template and by requiring mRS assessors to pass a certification test. Persons conducting the 90-day mRS assessment were to be unaware of the treatment arm or clinical course of the patients they assessed. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: 90 days (± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) from randomization

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Death or disability at 90 days (mRS = 4 - 6)Known death at or before 90 days
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm18633
Standard SBP Reduction Arm18134

Quality of Life at 90 Days Using EuroQol (EQ) Measures: EQ-5D (EuroQol Five Dimension), Consisting of Standardized EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol Five Dimension, Three-Level) Questionnaire and EQ VAS (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) Scores

Standardized scales developed by the EuroQol Research Foundation were used as a secondary outcome measure in addition to the mRS scale score. The EQ-5D is a simple, standardized non-disease-specific instrument for describing and valuating health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire consists of 5 questions in 5 different domains and allows for responses from 1 (the best outcome) to 3 (the worst outcome) in each of five categories (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Total scores range from 5 to 15, with lower scores indicating better quality of life and a higher score indicating a worse quality of life. A second component of EuroQol outcome measurements is a printed 20 cm visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) that appears somewhat like a thermometer, on which a score from 0 (worst imaginable health state or death) to 100 (best imaginable health state) is marked by the patient (or, when necessary, their proxy) with the scale in view. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: 90 days (± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) from randomization

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
EQ-5D utility scale questionnaireEQ VAS (visual analog scale)
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm0.762.5
Standard SBP Reduction Arm0.770

Reviews

2 reviews available for nicardipine and Hematoma

ArticleYear
Intensive blood pressure lowering with nicardipine and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage: An individual participant data systematic review.
    International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2022, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Hematoma; Humans; Male;

2022
Intravenous nicardipine for Japanese patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage: an individual participant data analysis.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2023, Volume: 46, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cerebral Hemorrha

2023

Trials

4 trials available for nicardipine and Hematoma

ArticleYear
Regional Differences in the Response to Acute Blood Pressure Lowering After Cerebral Hemorrhage.
    Neurology, 2021, 02-02, Volume: 96, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Black or African American; Cerebral Hemorrhage; China;

2021
Hematoma Expansion Shift Analysis to Assess Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatments.
    Neurology, 2021, 08-24, Volume: 97, Issue:8

    Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrh

2021
White Matter Hyperintensities and Blood Pressure Lowering in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of the ATACH-2 Trial.
    Neurocritical care, 2020, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Case-Control Studies; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Disease Progression

2020
Antihypertensive treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage by intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride: prospective multi-center study.
    Journal of Korean medical science, 2012, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cerebral Hem

2012

Other Studies

8 other studies available for nicardipine and Hematoma

ArticleYear
Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine for Acute Blood Pressure Reduction in Hemorrhagic Stroke.
    Neurocritical care, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:3

    Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Bradycardia; Hematoma; Hemorrha

2022
Early Achievement of Blood Pressure Lowering and Hematoma Growth in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-Factor Assessment and Improvement-Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study.
    Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, Volume: 46, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Feasibility Studies; Female; Hematoma; Humans; Hypert

2018
Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta complicated by spinal cord ischemia.
    Journal of cardiac surgery, 2013, Volume: 28, Issue:6

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Aortic Diseases; Blood Pressure

2013
Oral administration of cilnidipine to patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the acute stage: significance and role of an N-type calcium channel blocker.
    Irish journal of medical science, 2009, Volume: 178, Issue:4

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Calcium Channels, N-Type; Dihy

2009
Preventive effect of aggressive blood pressure lowering on hematoma enlargement in patients with ultra-acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2010, Volume: 50, Issue:11

    Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Cerebral Arteries; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Hemato

2010
Association of serum glucose concentrations during acute hospitalization with hematoma expansion, perihematomal edema, and three month outcome among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Neurocritical care, 2011, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Brain Edema; Cerebral Hemorrhage; D

2011
Nicardipine, a calcium antagonist, does not aggravate intracerebral haemorrhage in an intracerebral haemorrhage model in rats.
    The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, 2005, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Col

2005
Rapid administration of antifibrinolytics and strict blood pressure control for intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Neurosurgery, 2005, Volume: 57, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Blood Pressure; Case-Control Studies; Cerebral Hemo

2005