nicardipine has been researched along with Disease Exacerbation in 6 studies
Nicardipine: A potent calcium channel blockader with marked vasodilator action. It has antihypertensive properties and is effective in the treatment of angina and coronary spasms without showing cardiodepressant effects. It has also been used in the treatment of asthma and enhances the action of specific antineoplastic agents.
nicardipine : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)- and (S)-nicardipine. It is a calcium channel blocker which is used to treat hypertension.
2-[benzyl(methyl)amino]ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate : A dihydropyridine that is 1,4-dihydropyridine substituted by a methyl, {2-[benzyl(methyl)amino]ethoxy}carbonyl, 3-nitrophenyl, methoxycarbonyl and methyl groups at positions 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"It has been proposed that worsening of heart failure with dihydropyridines, such as nicardipine, is related to the activation of the neuroendocrine system." | 9.08 | Clinical and neurohormonal effects of nicardipine hydrochloride in patients with severe chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. ( Benatar, D; Gheorghiade, M; Hall, V; Reddy, S, 1998) |
"It has been proposed that worsening of heart failure with dihydropyridines, such as nicardipine, is related to the activation of the neuroendocrine system." | 5.08 | Clinical and neurohormonal effects of nicardipine hydrochloride in patients with severe chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. ( Benatar, D; Gheorghiade, M; Hall, V; Reddy, S, 1998) |
"Using data from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-2) trial, we performed HE shift analysis in response to intensive blood pressure lowering by generating polychotomous strata based on previously established HE definitions, percentile/absolute quartiles of hematoma volume change, and quartiles of 24-hour follow-up hematoma volumes." | 3.01 | Hematoma Expansion Shift Analysis to Assess Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatments. ( Dowlatshahi, D; Menon, BK; Qureshi, AI; Ramsay, T; Saver, JL; Yogendrakumar, V, 2021) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (16.67) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 2 (33.33) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (50.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Toyoda, K | 1 |
Palesch, YY | 2 |
Koga, M | 1 |
Foster, L | 1 |
Yamamoto, H | 1 |
Yoshimura, S | 1 |
Ihara, M | 1 |
Fukuda-Doi, M | 1 |
Okazaki, S | 1 |
Tanaka, K | 1 |
Miwa, K | 1 |
Hasegawa, Y | 1 |
Shiokawa, Y | 1 |
Iwama, T | 1 |
Kamiyama, K | 1 |
Hoshino, H | 1 |
Steiner, T | 1 |
Yoon, BW | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Hsu, CY | 1 |
Qureshi, AI | 4 |
Yogendrakumar, V | 1 |
Ramsay, T | 1 |
Menon, BK | 1 |
Saver, JL | 1 |
Dowlatshahi, D | 1 |
Morotti, A | 1 |
Shoamanesh, A | 1 |
Oliveira-Filho, J | 1 |
Schlunk, F | 1 |
Romero, JM | 1 |
Jessel, M | 1 |
Ayres, A | 1 |
Vashkevich, A | 1 |
Schwab, K | 1 |
Cassarly, C | 1 |
Martin, RH | 1 |
Greenberg, SM | 1 |
Rosand, J | 1 |
Goldstein, JN | 2 |
Yamamura, A | 1 |
Martin, R | 1 |
Novitzke, J | 1 |
Cruz-Flores, S | 1 |
Ehtisham, A | 1 |
Ezzeddine, MA | 1 |
Kirmani, JF | 1 |
Hussein, HM | 1 |
Suri, MF | 1 |
Tariq, N | 1 |
Liu, Y | 1 |
Benatar, D | 1 |
Hall, V | 1 |
Reddy, S | 1 |
Gheorghiade, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH)-II: A Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Blood Pressure Reduction for Hypertension in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage[NCT01176565] | Phase 3 | 1,000 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-05-15 | Terminated (stopped due to Planned interim analysis: no significant outcome differences between groups) | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The complete count of all subjects who experienced any serious adverse events throughout their participation in the trial was included in this tabulation. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed by the site investigators for all patients. Potential relatedness to the study treatment was a required reporting element for all adverse events but was not considered in this count. Terminology from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and severity criteria from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.03) were used as a basis for reporting adverse events. Serious adverse events are defined as being fatal, life-threatening, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, resulting in disability or congenital anomaly, or requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage and were required to be reported promptly. An Independent Oversight Committee (IOC) reviewed and adjudicated adverse event data. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through the 90 day visit (90 ± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) or until known death, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 100 |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 128 |
Hematoma expansion as determined by serial CT scans: Hematoma expansion was defined as an increase in the volume of intraparenchymal hemorrhage of 33% or greater as measured by a central imaging analyst who was was unaware of the treatment assignments, clinical findings, and time points of image acquisition. The area of the hematoma was delineated by image analysis software with the use of density thresholds on each slice, followed by manual correction. To ensure accuracy and consistency of the readings, images were coded randomly and independently of subject numbers and manual correction was also done without awareness of treatment assignments, clinical findings, or time points of image acquisition. This data point is defined as being present (hematoma expansion of 33% or more was calculated between the baseline scan hematoma volume and the 24 +/- 6 hours hematoma volume measures at data analysis), meaning that hematoma expansion as defined must have occurred or it was not counted. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From the baseline head CT to the 24 +/- 6 hours from randomization head CT
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 104 |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 85 |
Hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure) was the most likely adverse event that could be associated with the study treatment, and is the primary basis (risk) on which neurological deterioration or other untoward effects of the study treatment could occur. It is therefore examined as a numerically-measured occurrence in addition to monitoring patients closely for neurological deterioration or other symptoms. Hypotension, when named as an adverse event, was defined as the syndrome of low blood pressure with SBP < 85 mmHg. Instances of hypotension were to be avoided through close monitoring, and administration of fluid bolus for SBP < 110 mmHg. If hypotension did occur, it was to be reversed as quickly as possible through discontinuation of intravenous nicardipine and intravenous fluid administration, which can be accomplished readily in a variety of settings where patients with intracerebral hemorrhage are routinely housed during early hospitalization. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through 72 hours from randomization
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 3 |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 6 |
Neurologic deterioration was measured using two scales. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score measures of level of consciousness in eye, motor, and verbal components. At least one point is given in each category. The scale ranges from 3 to 15, with 3 indicating deep unconsciousness and 15 indicating consciousness is not impaired. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) quantifies neurologic deficits in 11 categories. Level of consciousness, horizontal eye movement, visual fields, facial palsy, movement in each limb, sensation, language & speech, and extinction or inattention on one side of the body are tested. Scores range from 0 to 42, with 0 indicating normal function and higher scores indicating greater deficit severity. Neurological status was checked per ICU standards through 24 hours, recommended as hourly GCS and full assessment every 2 hours. NIHSS assessment at baseline and 24 +/- 3 hours was pre-specified. Assessments were added for suspected neurological change. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through the 24-hour treatment period
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 40 |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 55 |
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed by the site investigators for all patients, including for their potential relatedness to the study treatment. An Independent Oversight Committee (IOC) reviewed and adjudicated all adverse event data. The 72-hours-from-randomization time window was considered the most likely time frame during which treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events would be observed. Terminology from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and severity criteria from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.03) were used as a basis for reporting adverse events. Serious adverse events are defined as being fatal, life-threatening, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, resulting in disability or congenital anomaly, or requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage and were required to be reported promptly. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: From randomization through 72 hours (3 days)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 6 |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 8 |
The primary outcome was death or disability, defined by modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 4-6 at 90 days following treatment. The modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0, indicating no symptoms, to 6, indicating death. A score of 4 indicates moderately severe disability including the inability to walk or attend to one's own bodily needs. A score of 5 indicates severe disability; bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care. To score a 3 or lower on the mRS, a person must at least be able to walk without the assistance of another person. We chose the mRS because of its high inter-observer reliability, superiority to other indices, and consistency with previous trials in patients with ICH. Reliability was further increased by use of a structured interview template and by requiring mRS assessors to pass a certification test. Persons conducting the 90-day mRS assessment were to be unaware of the treatment arm or clinical course of the patients they assessed. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: 90 days (± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) from randomization
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Death or disability at 90 days (mRS = 4 - 6) | Known death at or before 90 days | |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 186 | 33 |
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 181 | 34 |
Standardized scales developed by the EuroQol Research Foundation were used as a secondary outcome measure in addition to the mRS scale score. The EQ-5D is a simple, standardized non-disease-specific instrument for describing and valuating health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire consists of 5 questions in 5 different domains and allows for responses from 1 (the best outcome) to 3 (the worst outcome) in each of five categories (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Total scores range from 5 to 15, with lower scores indicating better quality of life and a higher score indicating a worse quality of life. A second component of EuroQol outcome measurements is a printed 20 cm visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) that appears somewhat like a thermometer, on which a score from 0 (worst imaginable health state or death) to 100 (best imaginable health state) is marked by the patient (or, when necessary, their proxy) with the scale in view. (NCT01176565)
Timeframe: 90 days (± 14 days per protocol window; up to ± 30 days data is used) from randomization
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
EQ-5D utility scale questionnaire | EQ VAS (visual analog scale) | |
Intensive SBP Reduction Arm | 0.7 | 62.5 |
Standard SBP Reduction Arm | 0.7 | 70 |
1 review available for nicardipine and Disease Exacerbation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Molecular Mechanism of Dihydropyridine Ca
Topics: Animals; Calcium; Calcium Channel Blockers; Calcium Signaling; Dihydropyridines; Disease Models, Ani | 2016 |
4 trials available for nicardipine and Disease Exacerbation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Regional Differences in the Response to Acute Blood Pressure Lowering After Cerebral Hemorrhage.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Black or African American; Cerebral Hemorrhage; China; | 2021 |
Hematoma Expansion Shift Analysis to Assess Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatments.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrh | 2021 |
White Matter Hyperintensities and Blood Pressure Lowering in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of the ATACH-2 Trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Case-Control Studies; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Disease Progression | 2020 |
Clinical and neurohormonal effects of nicardipine hydrochloride in patients with severe chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.
Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Captopril; Ca | 1998 |
1 other study available for nicardipine and Disease Exacerbation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Association of serum glucose concentrations during acute hospitalization with hematoma expansion, perihematomal edema, and three month outcome among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Brain Edema; Cerebral Hemorrhage; D | 2011 |