niacinamide and Hand-Foot Syndrome

niacinamide has been researched along with Hand-Foot Syndrome in 62 studies

nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.

Hand-Foot Syndrome: Chemotherapy-induced dermal side effects that are associated with the use of various CYTOSTATIC AGENTS. Symptoms range from mild ERYTHEMA and/or PARESTHESIA to severe ulcerative dermatitis with debilitating pain involving typically palmoplantar and intertriginous areas. These cutaneous manifestations are sometimes accompanied by nail anomalies.

Research

Studies (62)

Authors

Clinical Trials (11)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Central Review

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants whose best response was CR, PR, stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD. Per RECIST version 1.1, CR=all target lesions disappeared, any pathological lymph node, target/non-target, a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. PD=at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. SD=neither sufficient shrinkage qualified for PR nor sufficient increase qualified for PD, taking smallest sum of diameters as a reference. Non-CR/Non-PD=persistence of 1/more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits. DCR=CR+PR+SD or Non-CR/Non-PD. CR and PR confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. SD and Non-CR/Non-PD documented at least 6 weeks after randomization. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression

Duration of Response (DOR) by Central Reader

DOR was defined as the time from date of first response (CR or PR) to the date when PD is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. DOR defined for confirmed responders only (that is, CR or PR). 'NA' indicates that value could not be estimated due to censored data. Median and 95% CIs were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Central Review

ORR was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) observed during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study treatment, assessed according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR=CR+PR. CR and PR were confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last known alive date. Median and other 95% CIs computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later

Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Index Score

The EQ-5D was a generic Quality of life (QoL) based instrument validated in cancer populations. EQ-5D questionnaire contained a 5-item descriptive system of health states (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and visual analogue scale (VAS). A single HRQoL score ranging from -0.59 to 1 was generated from standard scoring algorithm developed by the EuroQoL was the EQ-5D index score, higher scores represent better health status. A change of at least 0.10 to 0.12 points was considered clinically meaningful. The results on the ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC for the EQ-5D - Index Score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug)

Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

The EQ-5D was a generic QoL preference based instrument and has been validated in the cancer populations. VAS was generated from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). This VAS score was referred to as the EQ-5D self-reported health status score. The results on ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug)

Patient Reported Outcomes: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (8 Item) (FBSI-8)

The FBSI-8 was an 8-item questionnaire. Participants responded to each item using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A total scale score was calculated (range from 0 to 32), with higher scores indicating low symptomatology and reflecting a better Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The results on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of time-adjusted area under curve (AUC) for the FBSI-8 score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and end of treatment (EOT, 21 days after last dose of study drug)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the Independent Review Panel According to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1

PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression, radiological or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years or until disease radiological progression

Time to Progression (TTP) by Central Review

TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease radiological progression by central review. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression

Area Under Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil

AUC(0-tlast) is defined as AUC from time 0 to the last data point, calculated up by linear trapezoidal rule, down by logarithmic trapezoidal rule. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14

Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil

Maximum observed drug concentration, directly taken from analytical data. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory Abnormalities

Hematological (anemia, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio [INR], lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell [WBC]), biochemical (ALT [alanine aminotransferase], AST [aspartate aminotransferase], GGT [gamma-glutamyl-transferase], lipase, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia) evaluations were done. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4-Grade 3: Severe or medically significant; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization and CTCAE version 4-Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention were indicated. (NCT01234337)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed, to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST version 1.0, a) CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks, b) PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions, c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR = percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 recorded from first dose of study treatment until PD or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (months) = (date of death minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression of disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. PD: >=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of a pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if demonstrated by cytological investigation and it was not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented were considered PD if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Health State Profile Utility Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Health state profile component assesses level of health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain was rated on a 3-point response scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= extreme problems). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score were transformed and resulted in a total score range of 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15) Score

FKSI was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 15 items (lack of energy, side effects, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria and sleep). Each of the 15 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score = sum of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Score

FKSI-DRS was used to assess quality of life for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 9 items (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria). Each of the 9 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI-DRS score = sum of the 9 item scores; total range: 0 - 36; 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Biochemistry

Biochemistry laboratory test included parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and lipase. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematology

Hematology laboratory test included hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cells count, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Urinalysis

Urinalysis included urine blood/ hemoglobin, glucose and protein. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of the AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death related to AE. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life -threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and non -serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

Response

"Clinical biologic activity of treatment, defined as the sum of complete response, partial response, and prolonged stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks, upon treatment with the combination of sorafenib and bevacizumab, in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma previously treated with immunotherapy or in previously untreated patients who are not appropriate candidates to receive IL-2-based treatment.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started of the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started." (NCT00387751)
Timeframe: 4 months

Reviews

4 reviews available for niacinamide and Hand-Foot Syndrome

Trials

26 trials available for niacinamide and Hand-Foot Syndrome

Other Studies

32 other studies available for niacinamide and Hand-Foot Syndrome